D2.His.13.6-8: Judging Whether a Source Fits Your Question: Gettysburg, 1863
In plain English: D2.His.13.6-8 is the C3 Framework history indicator for grades 6-8 that asks students to judge how relevant and how useful a historical source is for a question. Students use clues about its maker, date, place of origin, intended audience and purpose, and learn that a source can be very useful for one question and of little use for another.
Evaluate the relevancy and utility of a historical source based on information such as maker, date, place of origin, intended audience, and purpose.
C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 2: Applying Disciplinary Concepts and Tools · Discipline: History · Historical Sources and Evidence · Official standard
Students who research the past soon find more sources than they can use. D2.His.13.6-8 asks them to choose well: to judge a source's relevancy (does it give information about the people, place, time and topic of my question?) and its utility (how well can it help me answer that question?). They base the judgment on five clues: who made the source, when, where, for whom, and why. This lesson gives students one SVHS teaching tool for that work, the Source Fit Check, and four research questions (questions to investigate) about the Battle of Gettysburg (July 1-3, 1863).
The sources come from very different makers: a girl who lived in Gettysburg and published her memories in 1889 (Sources 1 and 5), a Union officer's long letter to his brother written weeks after the battle (Source 3) and the editor's preface (introduction) that explains how it was printed (Source 4), a National Park Service web page (Source 2), an 1891 popular history (Source 6) and a preface by a veteran, or former soldier (Source 7). Students learn that the same source can fit one question well and another hardly at all, and they explain their judgments with clues and quotations. Graphic descriptions of wounds are cut from the excerpts, and every cut is marked.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Explain the difference between a source's relevancy and its utility for a research question
Find the maker, date, place of origin, intended audience and purpose of a source, using the source, its caption and the notes the lesson gives
Decide whether a source is relevant to a research question and copy the words that show it
Rate how useful a relevant source is for a question, giving at least two clues as reasons
Explain why one source can fit one research question well and another poorly
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Telling primary sources (made by people who took part in or saw the events) from secondary sources (made later by people who studied them) D2.His.9.6-8
Citing specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources RH.6-8.1
Basic background: the Civil War (1861-1865) was fought between the United States (the Union) and the Confederate States, eleven Southern states that had seceded (broken away)
"Your class wants to know two things about last week's science fair (an invented example): Who won first prize? How nervous were the students who presented? You have three sources: the judges' score sheet, a diary one presenter wrote that night, and a story on the school website written a week later by a parent volunteer. Which source would you use for each question, and why?"
Give students two minutes to write, then take answers. Most students pick the score sheet for the first question and the diary for the second. Ask why the score sheet is a poor choice for the second question: it is about the right event, but it was made by judges to record points, so it says nothing about feelings. Write two words on the board: relevant (it is about my question) and useful (it can really help me answer my question). Tell students that historians make the same choices with sources from the past.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Define the two judgments. A research question is the question you are trying to answer. A source is relevant to a research question (the noun is relevancy) when it gives information about the people, place, time and topic the question asks about. A source's utility is how useful it is: how well it can help you answer the question. Relevancy comes first, because a source that says nothing about your question cannot help with it. But a relevant source can still be weak: its maker may have heard the story from someone else, or written it long afterward, or made it to honor someone rather than to report.
Historians judge utility with clues about how a source was made. One clue is whether the maker was an eyewitness, someone who saw the events himself or herself. Hand out the Source Fit Check and read each row. Explain the harder words: the place of origin is where the source was made; the intended audience is the person or group the maker expected to read or see it; the purpose is the reason it was made.
The Source Fit Check (an SVHS teaching tool): five clues, then two judgments
Step
Ask
Where to look
Clue 1: Maker
Who made it? Was the maker there, and what could he or she see or know?
The author's name, the words "I" and "we," the caption under the source
Clue 2: Date
When was it made? How long after the events?
Dates in the text, the year of printing
Clue 3: Place of origin
Where was it made, or where was the maker standing?
Place names, "here," notes the lesson gives about the source
Clue 4: Intended audience
Who was it made for: one person, a family, soldiers, the public?
Words like "my readers" or "dear brother"
Clue 5: Purpose
Why was it made: to remember, to inform, to honor, to persuade, to sell?
What the maker says about the reason; the kind of source
Judgment 1: Relevant?
Does it give information about the people, place, time and topic of my question? Yes, Partly or No
Copy the words that show it
Judgment 2: Useful?
How well can it help me answer my question? Very, Somewhat or Not very
Give at least two clues as reasons
Give the background. The Battle of Gettysburg was fought on July 1-3, 1863, in and around Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, between the Union Army of the Potomac and the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia, led by General Robert E. Lee. On July 3, Lee's artillery (large cannons) fired on the Union line for about two hours, a cannonade or bombardment (heavy, steady cannon fire), before about 12,000 Confederate soldiers attacked it (National Park Service, Source 2). Then show the four research questions the class will use all lesson.
Four research questions used in this lesson
Question
What it asks
A
What was the battle like for the people who lived near Gettysburg?
B
What was it like for Union soldiers on the ridge they held when the Confederate cannons opened fire on July 3?
C
How many soldiers were killed, wounded or missing in the battle?
D
How did Americans remember the battle about twenty-five years later?
Read Source 1 aloud. It is the start of a book by Tillie Pierce Alleman, who was a schoolgirl in Gettysburg in 1863 (her book's title calls it "what a girl saw") and published her memories in 1889. Model the Source Fit Check on it, thinking aloud, before showing the two worked examples.
1Impressed with the fact that incidents connected with the Battle of Gettysburg, are daily becoming more appreciated, and believing that the recital of those occurrences will awaken new interest as time rolls on, I am constrained to transmit in some tangible form, my knowledge of the place now so historic, as well as my experience during those thrilling days of July, 1863.
2Nor is it with any desire to be classed among the heroines of that period, that these lines are written; but simply to show what many a patriotic and loyal girl would have done if surrounded by similar circumstances.
3In truth, the history of those days contains numerous instances, in which America's daughters, loyal to their country and flag, have experienced, suffered and sacrificed far more than did the present writer.
4In their behalf, and as a legacy to my own offspring, I therefore pen these lines, and deem it unnecessary to make any further apology.
5Gettysburg is my native place.
6As is doubtless known to many of my readers, it is most pleasantly located in a healthful region of country, near the southern border of Pennsylvania.
7Prior to the battle it was comparatively unknown to the outside world, save to those interested in the Lutheran College and Theological Seminary here located.
Tillie Pierce Alleman, At Gettysburg, or What a Girl Saw and Heard of the Battle, chapter I, Introduction (Source 1: the opening of the chapter) (1889). Public domain (published 1889). Source text.
Next read Source 3 together. Its maker, Frank Haskell, was an aide (an assistant officer) to the Union general John Gibbon. Before reading, explain these words: a staff is the group of officers who help a general; the crest is the top of the ridge where his men stood; a shell is an exploding cannon ball; a corps (said "core") is a large part of an army; "Rebel" was the Union soldiers' word for the Confederates; and to estimate is to make a careful guess. Then read Source 4, the 1908 editor's preface, which tells how Haskell's letter came to be printed. For Source 4, explain that a pamphlet is a thin paper booklet, an edition is one printing of a book, to reprint is to print again, and omissions are parts left out.
1We dozed in the heat, and lolled upon the ground, with half open eyes. Our horses were hitched to the trees munching some oats. A great lull rests upon all the field. Time was heavy, and for want of something better to do, I yawned, and looked at my watch. It was five minutes before one o'clock. I returned my watch to its pocket, and thought possibly that I might go to sleep, and stretched myself upon the ground accordingly. Ex uno disce omnes. My attitude and purpose were those of the General and the rest of the staff.
2What sound was that? There was no mistaking it. The distinct sharp sound of one of the enemy's guns, square over to the front, caused us to open our eyes and turn them in that direction, when we saw directly above the crest the smoke of the bursting shell, and heard its noise. In an instant, before a word was spoken, as if that was the signal gun for general work, loud, startling, booming, the report of gun after gun in rapid succession smote our ears and their shells plunged down and exploded all around us. We sprang to our feet. In briefest time the whole Rebel line to the West was pouring out its thunder and its iron upon our devoted crest. The wildest confusion for a few moments obtained sway among us. The shells came bursting all about. The servants ran terror-stricken for dear life and disappeared. The horses, hitched to the trees or held by the slack hands of orderlies, neighed out in fright, and broke away and plunged riderless through the fields. The General at the first had snatched his sword, and started on foot for the front. I called for my horse; nobody responded. I found him tied to a tree, near by, eating oats, with an air of the greatest composure, which under the circumstances, even then struck me as exceedingly ridiculous. He alone, of all beasts or men near was cool. I am not sure but that I learned a lesson then from a horse. [...] A hundred and twenty-five rebel guns, we estimate, are now active, firing twenty-four pound, twenty, twelve and ten-pound projectiles, solid shot and shells, spherical, conical, spiral. The enemy's fire is chiefly concentrated upon the position of the Second Corps. [...]
Franklin Aretas Haskell, The Battle of Gettysburg, the third day: the cannonade begins (Source 3: excerpt from a letter written in July 1863) (1908). Public domain (published 1908). Source text.
1This story of the Battle of Gettysburg was written by Lieutenant Haskell to his brother, H. M. Haskell of Portage, not long after the contest. It was not intended for publication; but its great merit was at once recognized, and it was offered to Mr. Turner for insertion in his weekly paper. It was, however, too long a document for such purpose. About fifteen years later, it was published in a pamphlet of 72 pages, without even a title-page, for private circulation only. The account was widely read by military experts, and received much praise for both its literary and its professional merit. The pamphlet having become rare, for the edition was small, was reprinted in 1898 as part of the history of Dartmouth's Class of 1854. Certain omissions and changes were, however, made therein by its editor, Captain Daniel Hall, who was an aide on General Howard's staff; the reason assigned being, that the account was written so soon after the battle that "although surprisingly accurate in minute details," the author was not fully informed relative to one or two facts which to him seemed to reflect on General Sickles. Captain Hall assumed that were Colonel Haskell now living, he would have justified these omissions. In March, 1908, the Dartmouth College version was reprinted by the Commandery of Massachusetts, Military Order of the Loyal Legion, under the editorship of Captain Charles Hunt.
2In deciding to inaugurate its own series of Reprints with Colonel Haskell's brilliant paper, the Wisconsin History Commission has, in accordance with its fixed policy, reverted to the original edition, which is here presented entire, exactly as first printed. [...]
R. G. T. (Reuben G. Thwaites), editor, Wisconsin History Commission, The Battle of Gettysburg, Preface by the editor (Source 4: how Haskell's letter was printed) (1908). Public domain (published 1908). Source text.
Source Fit Check: Source 1 and question D
Question D asks how Americans remembered the battle about twenty-five years later. Use the five clues on Source 1, then make both judgments.
Result: Maker: Alleman, who was there; Gettysburg is her "native place" (paragraph 5). Date: published in 1889, when, she says, the battle's incidents were "daily becoming more appreciated" (paragraph 1). Place of origin: the excerpt does not say where she wrote it, only that Gettysburg is where she was born. Audience: "my readers" (paragraph 6) and "my own offspring" (paragraph 4). Purpose: "to show what many a patriotic and loyal girl would have done" (paragraph 2). Relevant: yes. Useful: very, because in her own words she shows how one person who lived through the battle chose to tell it about a generation later, and for whom.
Relevancy first: Source 1 and question C
Question C asks how many soldiers were killed, wounded or missing. Is Source 1 relevant?
Result: No. The introduction gives no numbers and no account of the fighting. The clues explain why: it is the opening of a memory book for her readers and her family, not a count made by people who kept records. A source that is not relevant cannot be useful for the question, so set it aside here, even though it was very useful for question D.
Source Fit Check: Source 3 and question B
Question B asks what it was like for Union soldiers on their ridge when the Confederate cannons opened fire on July 3. Use Sources 3 and 4.
Result: Maker: Haskell, an officer on General Gibbon's staff, on the ridge himself: shells fell on "our devoted crest" (Source 3, paragraph 2). Date: written "not long after the contest" (Source 4, paragraph 1). Audience: "his brother, H. M. Haskell of Portage" (Source 4, paragraph 1). Purpose: a private letter; "It was not intended for publication" (Source 4, paragraph 1). Relevant: yes, it tells the first minutes of the July 3 cannonade. Useful: very, because he saw and heard it himself and wrote it down within weeks for someone he did not need to impress.
Relevancy first: Source 3 and question A
Question A asks what the battle was like for the people who lived near Gettysburg. Is Source 3 relevant?
Result: No. Source 3 stays with the soldiers and officers on the ridge. It mentions horses, guns and shells, and nothing about the town or the families who lived there. Even an excellent eyewitness source is not relevant to a question about people it never saw.
Point out the pattern: Source 1 was very useful for one question and not relevant to another, and so was Source 3. The judgment always belongs to a source and a question together.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs read Source 2 and complete a Source Fit Check for it on questions C and B. Circulate and ask, "Which words show it is relevant? What clue makes it stronger or weaker?" Then share the key.
1On July 3 Lee’s artillery opened a two-hour bombardment of the Federal lines on Cemetery Ridge and Cemetery Hill. This for a time engaged the massed guns of both sides in a thundering duel for supremacy but did little to soften up the Federal defensive position. Then some 12,000 Confederates advanced across open fields toward the Federal center in an attack known as “Pickett’s Charge.” The attack failed and cost Lee over 5,000 soldiers in one hour. The Battle of Gettysburg was over. The next day, July 4, Lee began his retreat to Virginia.
[...]
2The battle brought devastation to the residents of Gettysburg. When the armies marched away from Gettysburg they left behind a community in shambles and over 51,000 soldiers dead, wounded, or missing. Wounded and dying were crowded into nearly every building. Every farm field or garden was a graveyard. Most of the dead lay in hastily dug and inadequate graves; some had not been buried at all. Churches, public buildings and even private homes were hospitals, filled with wounded soldiers. The Union medical staff that remained were strained to treat so many wounded scattered about the county. To meet the demand, Camp Letterman General Hospital was established east of Gettysburg where all of the wounded were eventually taken to before transport to permanent hospitals in Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington. [...]
National Park Service, Gettysburg National Military Park, Gettysburg Overview, "Three Days in July 1863" and "The Aftermath" (Source 2: two paragraphs) (2022). US government work (17 U.S.C. 105). Source text.
Key for the teacher.
Clues. Maker: the National Park Service, the federal agency that runs Gettysburg National Military Park. Date: the page was last updated in 2022. Place of origin: the park's website. Audience: visitors and web readers who want to learn about the battle. Purpose: to explain the battle and what followed it.
Question C. Relevant: yes, "over 51,000 soldiers dead, wounded, or missing" (paragraph 2). Useful: very, as a starting point, because it gives one total for both armies. Its limit: the page does not say which records the total comes from, so a careful researcher would look for those records next.
Question B. Relevant: partly. One sentence names the "two-hour bombardment" of the Union lines (paragraph 1). Useful: not very. It is a short summary and names no one who heard the guns, so it cannot show what the soldiers lived through.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students read Source 5 on their own, another part of Alleman's 1889 book, and answer in writing:
Find two clues about Source 5: its date and where Alleman was. Use Source 1, Source 5 and the note just above Source 5.
Is Source 5 relevant to question A? Copy the words that show it, with the paragraph number.
Rate Source 5's utility for question A (Very, Somewhat or Not very). Give one clue that makes it stronger and one that makes it weaker.
Explain two words first: infantry are soldiers who fight on foot, and a column is a long line of marching soldiers.
Note on Source 5. Earlier in the same chapter, Alleman tells that on the afternoon of July 1 she left town on foot with a neighbor, Mrs. Schriver, whose father, Jacob Weikert, "lived on the Taneytown road at the eastern slope of the Round Top," "about three miles to the south" of town.
1At last we reached Mr. Weikert's and were gladly welcomed to their home.
2It was not long after our arrival, until Union artillery came hurrying by. It was indeed a thrilling sight. How the men impelled their horses! How the officers urged the men as they all flew past toward the sound of the battle! Now the road is getting all cut up; they take to the fields, and all is an anxious, eager hurry! Shouting, lashing the horses, cheering the men, they all rush madly on.
[...]
3After the artillery had passed, infantry began coming. I soon saw that these men were very thirsty and would go to the spring which is on the north side of the house.
4I was not long in learning what I could do. Obtaining a bucket, I hastened to the spring, and there, with others, carried water to the moving column until the spring was empty. We then went to the pump standing on the south side of the house, and supplied water from it. Thus we continued giving water to our tired soldiers until night came on, when we sought rest indoors.
5It was toward the close of the afternoon of this day that some of the wounded from the field of battle began to arrive where I was staying. They reported hard fighting, many wounded and killed, and were afraid our troops would be defeated and perhaps routed.
6The first wounded soldier whom I met had his thumb tied up. This I thought was dreadful, and told him so.
7“Oh,” said he, “this is nothing; you'll see worse than this before long.”
8“Oh! I hope not,” I innocently replied.
Tillie Pierce Alleman, At Gettysburg, or What a Girl Saw and Heard of the Battle, chapter III, "During the First Day of the Battle" (Source 5: excerpt) (1889). Public domain (published 1889). Source text.
What to look for. Strong answers quote a paragraph number, use the note above Source 5 to say where the Weikert farm was, and connect the 1889 date to how much she could remember. A strong rating gives one strength and one limit; "Very" and "Somewhat" can both earn full credit when the reasons come from the clues.
Closure5-10 minutes
Read Source 6 aloud: one paragraph from a history of the battle published in Boston in 1891. Explain three words first: a battery is a group of cannons placed together, a salvo is many guns fired at once, and signal guns are shots fired to tell everyone to begin. Students will use it in the quiz. Source 7, a preface written by an unnamed veteran for Alleman's book, is for homework.
1Be that as it may, the order was given for his artillery to open. Longstreet had massed seventy-five guns in one battery, Hill sixty-three, and Ewell enough more to bring the number up to one hundred and fifty in all. At precisely one o'clock the signal guns were fired. Before their echoes died away the whole line of Confederate batteries was blazing like a volcano. There seemed to be but one flash and one report, and their simultaneous discharges, pealing out deafening salvos, went rolling and rolling on through the valleys, and echoing among the hills, in one mighty volume of sound, vying with the loudest thunder. It was sublimely grand, sublimely terrifying. Without a moment's warning, as if the heavens above had opened and the earth below yawned beneath their feet, the Union soldiers found themselves in the midst of the pitiless storm. A tornado of shot and shell burst upon Cemetery Hill, tearing the air, rending the rocks, plowing up the ground, and dealing death on all sides at once.
Samuel Adams Drake, The Battle of Gettysburg, 1863, chapter IX, "The Third of July" (Source 6: the paragraph on the cannonade) (1891; this edition 1892). Public domain (published 1892). Source text.
1The experience of a little girl, during three days of a hard fought battle, as portrayed in this volume is certainly of rare occurrence, and very likely has never been realized before.
2Such a narrative as the following, is worthy of preservation among the pages of our nations literature.
3The story is told with such marked faithfulness, such honesty of expression, such vividness of portrayal, that those who lived in, and passed through those scenes, or similar ones, will at once recognize the situations, and surroundings, as natural and real.
4While perusing its pages, the veteran will again live in the days gone by; when he tramped the dusty march, joined in the terrible charge, or suffered in the army hospital.
[...]
5We have been asked to write a preface to her narrative; but we cannot slight this opportunity of thanking her in the name of the “Boys in Blue,” and all patriots, for what she did.
6We are truly glad to have this touching and thrilling story of her experience at the battle of Gettysburg, even though after many years; and our only regret is, that many of our comrades have answered to the last roll-call, before its publication.
7We will rejoice in its publication, and wide circulation; for it is deserving a welcome, not only in public libraries, but in the family circle of every American.
8It cannot fail to interest and instruct both old and young.
9The book will speak for itself.
10A VETERAN.
"A Veteran" (the preface is unsigned except for these words), At Gettysburg, or What a Girl Saw and Heard of the Battle, Preface (Source 7, for homework: a veteran's preface) (1889). Public domain (published 1889). Source text.
Exit ticket: "Write one sentence about any source from today that uses the words relevant and useful, and give one clue as your reason."
Teacher notes. (1) Every cut is marked [...]. Source 3 leaves out the deaths of a groom and of animals hit by shells; Source 5 leaves out an artillery explosion and a badly hurt soldier; Source 7 leaves out a page about soldiers drinking her water and a dying general; Sources 2 and 4 leave out paragraphs on other topics. The full books contain these descriptions; preview before sharing full texts. (2) "Rebel" was the Union soldiers' everyday word for the Confederates in 1863; Source 3 keeps the author's words. (3) The National Park Service page that Source 2 comes from also has paragraphs on the causes of the war and on how the war is remembered today; this lesson uses only its account of July 3 and the aftermath. (4) Sources 3 and 6 give different numbers of Confederate guns. Let students notice and explain the difference themselves rather than settling it for them. (5) Alleman was Tillie Pierce as a girl; she wrote under her married name.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a Source Fit Check with sentence starters: "The maker was ___, who was / was not there because ___." and "It is relevant because it says '___' (paragraph ___)."
Read Sources 3 and 5 aloud and stop after each paragraph to ask one question: "Who is speaking, and where are they standing?"
Pre-teach eight words with a picture or gesture: artillery, shell, infantry, column, staff, crest, preface and edition (one printing of a book)
For Advanced Students
Ask students to write a fifth research question for which Source 7 would be very useful, and defend it
Have students compare what Source 3 and Source 6 say about the first minutes of July 3 and list which details only an eyewitness could give
Ask what kind of source, not on this page, would be most useful for question C, and who would have made it
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong work keeps the two judgments separate: first relevancy (with quoted words and a paragraph number), then utility (with at least two of the five clues as reasons). Students should rate a source for a stated question, never "good" or "bad" in general, and should recognize that a source can be relevant but only somewhat useful. Watch for students who judge a source by the kind of person who made it ("a girl," "a government") instead of by what that maker could know, when and why.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Source Card Sort: Two Questions
15 minPairs
Each pair gets 8 source cards and a mat with two columns, one for question A (what the battle was like for people who lived near Gettysburg) and one for question C (how many soldiers were killed, wounded or missing). The cards are invented for practice and describe sources only in words. For each card and each question, pairs decide Relevant (Yes, Partly, No) and, if relevant, Useful (Very, Somewhat, Not very), writing one clue as the reason.
The 8 Cards (invented for practice)
A list of the wounded soldiers treated at one field hospital, kept by a Union surgeon in July 1863
A letter a Gettysburg farm woman wrote to her sister on July 6, 1863, about soldiers sleeping in her barn
A large painting of the July 3 attack, made twenty years later for a public exhibit
A New York newspaper story printed on July 4, 1863, based on telegraph messages from the army
A diary a Gettysburg schoolteacher kept from June 26 to July 10, 1863
A speech a veteran gave at a reunion on the battlefield many years later, about old enemies becoming friends
A table of each army's losses, made by army officers from their units' reports in the weeks after the battle
A modern poster advertising a battle reenactment (a show in which people act out the battle)
Answer Key for the Teacher
Question A: Cards 2 and 5 are relevant and very useful: residents wrote them during or just after the battle. Card 4 is partly relevant and not very useful: it was made far away, from army messages, to give quick news. Card 6 is partly relevant at most: it is about soldiers' memories, made long after. Cards 1, 3, 7 and 8 are not relevant: they are about soldiers, the attack or a modern show.
Question C: Card 7 is relevant and very useful: officers made it from unit reports for the army. Card 1 is relevant but only somewhat useful: it counts one hospital, not the whole battle. Card 4 is relevant but not very useful: it was printed before anyone could finish counting. Cards 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 are not relevant.
Discussion
Ask: Which card changed the most between the two questions? (Card 7 or card 5.) Why is card 4 relevant to both questions but very useful for neither? Which clue did you use most often today?
2
One Letter, Four Questions
15 minGroups of 3-4
Each group gets the card below: an invented letter written by SVHS for practice, in the style of a Gettysburg resident in 1863. Groups rate it for all four research questions (A-D) on one Source Fit Check, then compare with another group.
The Letter Card (invented scenario)
"Gettysburg, July 8, 1863. Dear Cousin, We are alive. On the first day we hid in the cellar while the soldiers ran through our street. On the third day the cannon fire shook our windows for two hours, but I could see nothing from the cellar. Our church is now a hospital, and Mother and I carry soup there every morning. People say fifty thousand men were hurt, but no one knows. Your loving cousin, Mary." (Invented by SVHS. No real person is quoted.)
Answer Key for the Teacher
Clues: maker, a resident in town; date, five days after the battle; place, Gettysburg; audience, one cousin; purpose, to tell family she is safe. A: relevant and very useful, since she lived through it in town and wrote within days. B: partly relevant (she heard the guns) but not very useful: she "could see nothing" of the ridge. C: partly relevant but not very useful: "People say" marks a rumor (a story passed along without proof), and she says "no one knows." D: not relevant: it was written days after the battle, not about twenty-five years later.
Discussion
Ask: Which single words in the letter changed your ratings most? ("I could see nothing," "People say.") What would make this source more useful for question C?
3
Exhibit Panel: Remembering Gettysburg
20 minSmall groups
The class is building a museum panel for question D, "How did Americans remember the battle about twenty-five years later?" Each group may display only two of the seven sources on this page. Groups choose two and write a label for each (60-90 words) on chart paper.
What Each Label Must Do
Name the source and give its five clues in one or two sentences.
Quote the words that make it relevant to question D, with the paragraph number.
Rate its utility for question D and give two clues as reasons.
Name one thing a visitor should keep in mind about it (one limit).
Gallery Walk and Vote
Groups post their panels. Each student gets two sticky notes and places them on the labels with the strongest reasons, not the favorite source. Several pairs of sources can work well; reward labels whose reasons come from the clues and the quoted words.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: The Source Fit Check
The Source Fit Check is an SVHS teaching tool. Start with a research question, gather the five clues, and judge relevancy first. Only a source that is relevant, at least in part, goes on to the second judgment, and every rating needs two clues as reasons.
Diagram 2: When the Sources on This Page Were Made
A timeline drawn to scale (4 pixels per year, tick marks every 20 years from 1860 to 2020). The dates come from the captions under the sources and from Source 4, which says the first pamphlet appeared "about fifteen years" after the battle. A source's date is only one clue: a later source can still be very useful for some questions.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
D2.His.13.6-8 Homework: A Veteran's Preface and Two New Questions
Directions: Use Source 7 (printed in Closure) for Part 1 and Sources 2, 3 and 5 for Part 2. For every rating, write Relevant (Yes, Partly or No) and Useful (Very, Somewhat or Not very), and give clues as reasons. Quote words with their paragraph numbers.
Part 1: A Veteran's Preface (Problems 1-3)
Make a Source Fit Check clue card for Source 7: its maker, date, place of origin, intended audience and purpose. Quote the words that show the audience and the purpose. Write "not stated" for any clue the source does not give, and explain what that missing clue makes harder to judge.
Is Source 7 relevant to research question A (what the battle was like for people who lived near Gettysburg)? Is it relevant to research question D (how Americans remembered the battle about twenty-five years later)? For each question, quote the words that decide it and rate Source 7's utility.
Source 7 says Alleman's story "is told with such marked faithfulness" (paragraph 3). Does this praise make Source 5 more trustworthy? Explain your answer using two clues about Source 7: its maker and its purpose.
Part 2: Two New Research Questions (Problems 4-6)
Research question E: "How were wounded soldiers cared for after the battle?" Rank Sources 2, 3 and 5 from most useful to least useful for this question. For each source, quote one phrase (or say that it has none) and give one clue as your reason.
Research question F: "What did Confederate soldiers experience during the July 3 cannonade?" Which source on this page comes closest to being relevant, and why is none of them very useful? Describe one source you would look for instead: its maker, date and intended audience.
Choose any source from this lesson and write your own research question about Gettysburg. In a paragraph of 5-7 sentences, judge the source's relevancy and utility for your question. Use at least three of the five clues and one quotation with its paragraph number, and end with one limit of the source.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Clues
All five clues found or marked "not stated," with quoted words for audience and purpose
Three or four clues, or clues without quotations
Fewer than three clues
Relevancy
Each relevancy judgment names the question and quotes the deciding words with a paragraph number
Judgments given with weak or missing quotations
Relevancy missing or confused with utility
Utility
Each rating gives at least two clues as reasons and fits the question asked
One clue, or a rating that ignores the question
No reasons, or a source called "good" or "bad" in general
Own paragraph (Problem 6)
Clear question; three clues; a quotation; a limit; both judgments
Missing one of these parts
Missing several parts or no judgment
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Question 4 uses Source 4 and Question 6 uses Source 3 (both printed in Direct Instruction). Question 5 uses Source 2 (Guided Practice). Questions 7, 12, 15 and 19 use Sources 1 and 5 (Direct Instruction and Independent Practice). Questions 8-10 and 17 use Source 6 (Closure), and Questions 16 and 20 use Sources 3 and 6. Questions 1-3, 11, 13, 14 and 18 need no printed source. Questions 1-14 are multiple choice; 15-20 are short answer.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student's research question is "What did Gettysburg families cook and eat during the battle?" Which source (imagined for this question) is relevant to it?
Answer: B
Only B gives information about the people (a Gettysburg family), the time (the battle) and the topic (food) of the question. A and D are about the armies' weapons and fighting, and C is about the armies' routes: each is about the battle but not about what families ate, so none is relevant to this question.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which two clues together tell you whether a source's maker was in a position to see the events?
Answer: A
A is right: who made the source and where that person was decide what he or she could see or know. B tells you who the source was for and why it was made, which shapes it, but not whether the maker saw the events. C and D are not among the five clues at all.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student wants to know what the weather was like in Gettysburg on July 3, 1863. Which of these imagined sources would be most useful?
Answer: C
C was written by someone in Gettysburg (place) on that very day (date), and a diary records what the writer noticed. A, B and D were all made many years later, and their purposes (to entertain, to impress viewers, to honor) make weather details unreliable. Choosing B because a painting shows the sky mixes up what a source shows with what its maker knew.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A researcher wants Haskell's own words exactly as he wrote them in 1863. According to Source 4, why should she use the 1908 printing rather than the 1898 printing?
Answer: D
Source 4, paragraph 1, says that in the 1898 reprint "Certain omissions and changes were, however, made therein by its editor," while paragraph 2 says the 1908 edition "reverted to the original edition" and presents it "exactly as first printed." A mixes up the 1898 reprint with the newspaper that first turned the letter down. B is impossible from the text: the preface speaks of what Haskell would have done "were Colonel Haskell now living." C confuses the first reader of the letter with the later printing.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which words make Source 2 relevant to research question A (what the battle was like for the people who lived near Gettysburg)?
Answer: C
C (paragraph 2) tells what happened to residents' own houses, so it speaks to the people of question A; the same paragraph says the battle "brought devastation to the residents of Gettysburg." A, B and D all come from paragraph 1 and describe the armies, not the people who lived there.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 3, paragraph 2, says "A hundred and twenty-five rebel guns, we estimate, are now active." What do the words "we estimate" tell a researcher?
Answer: A
To estimate is to make a careful guess, so A is right: Haskell and the officers with him judged the number while the shells fell. Nothing in the source supports B or C. D misreads the sentence: "rebel guns" are Confederate guns, and they fire at the Union position, "the position of the Second Corps."
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How useful is Source 5 for research question B (what it was like for Union soldiers on their ridge when the cannons opened fire on July 3)?
Answer: D
D is right. Source 5 is not relevant to question B: it describes the afternoon of the first day ("this day," paragraph 5) at the Weikert house, about three miles south of town, and not the ridge on July 3. A treats an eyewitness to one event as an eyewitness to every event. B is also about the first day, so it cannot describe July 3 either. C judges the maker by the group she belongs to instead of by what she could see, when and why.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which words in Source 6 show Drake writing to stir his readers' feelings rather than to state a fact?
Answer: B
B gives Drake's feelings about the scene and invites readers to share them; it cannot be checked like a fact. A, D and C each state something that could be checked against army records (numbers of guns and a time), whether or not Drake has them right.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What clue inside Source 6 suggests that Drake did not watch the cannonade himself?
Answer: D
D: an eyewitness such as Haskell writes "we sprang to our feet" and "I called for my horse," while Drake describes the soldiers from outside, in the third person (writing about others as "they"). A and B are details a later writer can collect from reports, so they do not show that he was there. C is a figure of speech (a comparison made for effect) that anyone can use.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Is Source 6 relevant to research question C (how many soldiers were killed, wounded or missing)?
Answer: B
B is right: the only counts in Source 6 are of guns ("one hundred and fifty in all"). A claims a count the paragraph never gives. C treats a dramatic phrase as a number. D judges by date alone: an 1891 book could be relevant to question C if it gave losses; this paragraph simply does not.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student asks, "What were Gettysburg schoolchildren taught about the battle in the 1890s?" Which imagined source is most relevant?
Answer: A
The question is about the 1890s and about what children were taught, so A matches its time, people and topic. B and C were made during the battle and say nothing about later schooling. D is about the fighting itself, not about what children learned in the 1890s.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 1 says Alleman wrote "to show what many a patriotic and loyal girl would have done." How should that purpose affect the way you use Source 5?
Answer: C
C: a purpose shapes what a maker chooses to tell, so a careful reader notices how often Source 5 shows her helping and checks details against other sources. A goes too far: every source has a purpose, and Source 5 is still relevant to some questions. B confuses honesty about a purpose with accuracy. D is wrong because Alleman was there; her book is a primary source, though written many years later.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does a source's purpose matter when you judge its utility?
Answer: D
D: people who make a source to honor, to persuade or to inform pick different details, so purpose helps you see what a source may leave out or stress. A confuses purpose with date. B is wrong because letters, diaries and books have purposes too. C mixes up the two judgments: purpose affects utility, and every source has one.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Two imagined diaries describe July 1, 1863. Diary X was kept in a house on the town's main square; Diary Y was kept on a farm three miles away. For the question "What happened in the town that day?", which clue matters most?
Answer: B
B: the two diaries share the same audience, date and purpose (A, C, D), so those clues cannot tell them apart. Only the place clue differs, and it decides who could see the town.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Look at Source 5, paragraphs 4 and 5. Which paragraph tells something Alleman saw and did herself, and which tells only what others told her? Explain how this difference affects Source 5's utility for a question about the fighting itself.
Model answer: Paragraph 4 is firsthand (something she did herself): "I hastened to the spring, and there, with others, carried water to the moving column." Paragraph 5 is secondhand (what others told her): the wounded "reported hard fighting, many wounded and killed." For a question about the fighting itself, Source 5 is only somewhat useful at best, because she repeats what soldiers said and was at a farm about three miles south of town. For what happened at the farm, it is far more useful. Rubric: 2 points for correctly labeling both paragraphs with a quotation; 1 point for explaining the effect on utility.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Source 3 says "A hundred and twenty-five rebel guns, we estimate" were firing. Source 6 says the Confederate guns came to "one hundred and fifty in all." Use the clues to give one reason the numbers might differ, and say what a careful researcher should do next.
Model answer: Haskell made a quick estimate from where he stood, in the first minutes of the cannonade, and he may not have seen the whole Confederate line. Drake wrote in 1891, adding up numbers for each general (75 and 63 plus Ewell's guns), but his paragraph does not say where those numbers came from. The two sentences also count different things: Haskell, the guns "now active" at one moment; Drake, all the guns massed, "in all." Neither number should be used alone: a researcher should look for the armies' own records of their artillery. Rubric: 1 point for a reason tied to a clue (date, place or maker); 1 point for a sensible next step.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Rate Source 6's utility for research question B (what it was like for Union soldiers on their ridge when the cannons opened fire). Name its relevancy first, then give two clues as reasons.
Model answer: Relevant: yes, it describes the cannonade and says "A tornado of shot and shell burst upon Cemetery Hill." Useful: somewhat. Drake published it in 1891, twenty-eight years after the battle (date), and nothing in the paragraph shows that he was there or how he learned these details (maker). It gives the big picture of the cannonade but not the feelings of one man on the ridge. Source 3 is more useful for this question. Rubric: 1 point for relevancy with a quotation; 1 point for a rating with two clues.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Describe one source that is not on this page but would be very useful for research question B and could tell something Source 3 cannot. Give its maker, date and intended audience, and explain why each clue makes it useful.
Model answer (one example): A letter written a few days after July 3 by an ordinary infantry soldier who lay behind the Union line during the cannonade, sent to his parents. Maker: a soldier who stayed in one spot under the shells, while Haskell, an officer, rode from place to place. Date: days afterward, while memories were fresh. Audience: his family, so he had little reason to impress the public. Other good answers: an artillery gunner's diary, or a regiment's report written that week. Rubric: 1 point for a fitting source with three clues; 1 point for explaining how the clues make it useful.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Is Source 1 relevant to research question A? Judge its relevancy and its utility for that question, with a quotation and two clues.
Model answer: Partly relevant. Paragraphs 5-7 describe the town before the battle ("comparatively unknown to the outside world"), but this excerpt does not describe the battle days. Useful: somewhat, as background, because its maker was born there ("my native place"), but it was published in 1889 for readers and her family, with the purpose of honoring loyal girls, so it does not report the battle itself. Rubric: 1 point for a relevancy judgment with a quotation; 1 point for a utility rating with two clues.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Source 3 was written for one reader, and Source 6 was written for many. Name one research question for which Source 6 could be more useful than Source 3, and explain why.
Model answer (one example): "How did popular books tell the story of Gettysburg about twenty-five years after the battle?" Source 6 was printed in 1891 in a series called "Decisive Events in American History" for general readers, so its dramatic style ("like a volcano") is itself evidence of how the story was told to the public. Source 3 is a private letter from 1863 that was not printed for the public until years later, so it cannot show this. Another good answer: a question about the whole Confederate artillery line, which Haskell could see only in part. Rubric: 1 point for a fitting question; 1 point for reasons drawn from date, audience or purpose.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does D2.His.13.6-8 mean?
D2.His.13.6-8 asks middle school students to judge how relevant and how useful a historical source is. It is part of Dimension 2 of the C3 Framework (history), in the group of indicators on historical sources and evidence. Students base the judgment on information about the source: who made it, when, where, for whom and why.
What is the difference between relevancy and utility?
Relevancy asks whether a source gives information about your question; utility asks how well it can help you answer it. A source must be relevant before it can be useful, but relevant sources differ a great deal in utility. A rumor in a letter can be about the right event and still be weak evidence.
Is D2.His.13.6-8 taught in U.S. history or world history?
Either. The indicator names a skill, not a topic, so it fits any grades 6-8 history course. This page uses the Battle of Gettysburg because its sources come from very different makers, written at different times for different readers, which makes the five clues easy to see.
Are primary sources always more useful than secondary sources?
No. A primary source, made by someone who took part in or saw the events, is often the best evidence of what one person saw and felt. A secondary source, written later by someone who studied many records, can be better for questions that no single eyewitness could answer, such as totals, causes or the shape of a whole event. Utility always depends on the question.
What are the five clues in D2.His.13.6-8?
The indicator lists information "such as maker, date, place of origin, intended audience, and purpose." The words "such as" mean the list is not complete: the kind of source and the maker's own words about how he or she learned something are useful clues too. This page practices the five named clues on every source.
How do I teach "intended audience" to middle schoolers?
Start with their own writing: a text to a best friend, a school essay and a post for the public tell the same story in different ways. Then look for audience words in a source, such as "my readers" or a letter's greeting. Ask how the source would change if it were written for a different reader.
What if a source does not say who made it or when?
Mark the missing clue "not stated" and say what it makes harder to judge. Students can sometimes infer a likely maker, date or audience from other sources; that is the companion indicator D2.His.11.6-8. An unsigned preface, such as the one signed only "A Veteran" on this page, is a good example to discuss.
How does D2.His.13.6-8 connect to D2.His.13.9-12?
In grades 9-12, D2.His.13.9-12 asks students to critique whether the sources a secondary interpretation uses are appropriate for its claims. The middle school work of judging one source against one question is the base for that: older students judge many sources at once, as a historian's argument uses them.
How can I assess D2.His.13.6-8 beyond a quiz?
Ask students to rate one source for two different research questions, with clues as reasons, or to choose two sources for a museum label and defend the choice. Score the reasoning with a rubric: relevancy with a quotation, utility with at least two clues, and one limit. A student who calls a source "good" without naming a question has not yet met the indicator.
Do the Gettysburg sources contain upsetting material?
The full books describe wounds and deaths in detail. The excerpts on this page leave those passages out, each cut is marked [...], and the Closure teacher notes list what was cut. Preview any longer reading before sharing it with students.
07
Related Standards
6 standards
These standards connect to D2.His.13.6-8: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
D2.His.9.6-8Prerequisite
Classify the kinds of historical sources used in a secondary interpretation
Standard text: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History (Silver Spring, MD: NCSS, 2013). NCSS was not involved in the production of this lesson and does not endorse it.