RH.6-8.6Common CoreELALiteracy in History/Social StudiesGrades 6-8
RH.6-8.6: Point of View and Purpose in History Sources: Loaded Language and Left-Out Facts
In plain English: RH.6-8.6 is the Common Core literacy standard for history/social studies in grades 6-8 that asks students to identify aspects of a text that reveal an author's point of view or purpose, such as loaded language or the inclusion or avoidance of particular facts. Students look at who wrote a source, the words chosen and the facts told or left out.
Identify aspects of a text that reveal an author's point of view or purpose (e.g., loaded language, inclusion or avoidance of particular facts).
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies 6-12 · Cluster: Craft and Structure · Official standard
Students learn to identify aspects of a text that reveal an author's point of view or purpose, the skill named in RH.6-8.6. They practice with the two examples the standard names: loaded language (words with strong positive or negative feelings) and the inclusion or avoidance of particular facts (what the author chooses to tell or leave out). They also ask who wrote a source, when and for whom.
Students start with Wilbur F. Gordy's 1901 textbook account of King George and the new taxes of 1767, full of loaded words against the King (Source 1). They then compare two primary sources by Christopher Columbus about the loss of his flagship on December 25, 1492: his journal, which tells the wreck in detail (Source 2), and his printed letter to a supporter, which never mentions it (Source 3). The quiz uses two accounts of the Boston Massacre of 1770: the diary of John Tudor, a Boston merchant who saw the events (Source 4), and H. A. Guerber's 1898 history for young readers (Source 5). The homework returns to Gordy's account of the Boston Tea Party (Source 6).
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Identify loaded language in a history source and replace it with neutral words
Identify facts an author includes or avoids, using a second source to find what is left out
Explain how an author's position, audience and word choice reveal a point of view
State an author's purpose and support it with evidence from the text
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Analyzing multiple accounts of the same event and noting the points of view they represent RI.5.6
Determining an author's point of view or purpose and explaining how it is conveyed RI.6.6
Basic background: in the 1760s and 1770s the thirteen colonies quarreled with Great Britain over taxes passed by Parliament
Start with two reports of the same basketball game.
Warm-Up Prompt
"Report A: 'Our heroic Tigers stormed back in the last minute and snatched a thrilling 52-50 win.' Report B: 'The Tigers won 52-50 after a late basket; the Hawks missed two free throws in the final seconds.' Who do you think wrote each report? Which words gave it away? What does each report tell that the other leaves out?"
Take answers, then name the ideas. An author's point of view is how the author sees the topic, shaped by who the author is and which side the author is on. An author's purpose is the reason for writing: to inform, to persuade, to praise, to defend or to keep a record. Two kinds of clues reveal them. Loaded language is a word or phrase with strong positive or negative feelings attached ("heroic," "stormed," "snatched"), used where a neutral word ("won") would do. The inclusion or avoidance of particular facts is the choice of what to tell and what to leave out: Report A never mentions the missed free throws. Today students look for both clues in history sources about Columbus's first voyage and about Boston before the American Revolution.
Direct Instruction15-20 minutes
Part 1: The source. Wilbur F. Gordy wrote American Leaders and Heroes (1901), a first history textbook for young pupils, told through the lives of famous Americans. Source 1 comes from his chapter on Samuel Adams, a Boston leader in the quarrel with Britain. It is a secondary source, written about 130 years after the events. Gloss before reading: the Stamp Act (a 1765 British tax on printed papers in the colonies, canceled in 1766), "Parliament" (Great Britain's lawmaking body), "port duties" (taxes on goods brought into the colonies by ship), "coerce" (force) and "Townshend" (Charles Townshend, the British official who proposed the new duties in 1767).
1As we have already seen, King George, much against his will, had to submit to the repeal of the Stamp Act by Parliament. But he was not satisfied. He could never carry out his selfish scheme of personal government in England and in America if he allowed the stubborn colonists to have their way in this matter.
2In 1767, therefore, through his tool, Townshend, Parliament levied new port duties on a few articles, including glass, lead, paper, and tea. These new taxes were hateful to the colonists because they were levied by Parliament, and because the money thus raised was to be used to their disadvantage in various ways: For example, some of it was to pay for maintaining in America a small English army. This army, the colonists believed, the King would use to compel them to do as he willed.
[...]
3Of course these merchants suffered heavy losses, and again begged for a repeal. But the dull-witted King could not understand the Americans. Thus far he had not been able to coerce them; he now made a shrewd attempt to outwit them.
4Influenced by him, Parliament took off all the new taxes except the one on tea. "There must be one tax to keep the right to tax," he said. If he could only succeed in getting the Americans to submit to paying any tax--no matter how small--that Parliament might levy, he would carry his point. He therefore urged not only the removal of all taxes except the one on tea, but also made arrangements whereby Americans could buy their taxed tea cheaper than it could be bought in England and cheaper even than they could smuggle it from Holland, as they had been doing. No doubt the King had great faith in this foolish scheme. "Of course," he argued, "the Americans will buy their tea where they can buy it cheapest, and then we will have them in a trap." But this was a huge blunder, as we shall now see.
Wilbur F. Gordy, American Leaders and Heroes, chapter XIII, "Samuel Adams and the Boston Tea Party" (Source 1: King George and the new taxes; one cut marked [...]) (1901). Public domain (published 1901). Source text.
Part 2: Four questions that reveal point of view and purpose. Put these on the board and keep them up all period.
Four questions for any history source
Question
What to look for
Example from Source 1
1. Who wrote it, when and for whom?
The author's place in the events and the audience
A textbook author in 1901, writing for young American pupils
2. Which words are loaded?
Words with strong feelings where a neutral word would do
"selfish scheme," "dull-witted King" (paragraphs 1 and 3)
3. Which facts are included?
Details that make one side look good or bad
The colonists' fear that an army would "compel them" (paragraph 2)
4. Which facts are avoided?
Details the other side would tell; check another source
Why Britain said it needed the money (paragraphs 1-4 never say)
Loaded language (Source 1)
Which words in Source 1 are loaded, and what do they show about Gordy's point of view?
Result: Gordy calls the King's plan a "selfish scheme" (paragraph 1) and a "foolish scheme" (paragraph 4), calls Townshend the King's "tool" (paragraph 2), calls the King "dull-witted" (paragraph 3) and calls the tea plan "a huge blunder" (paragraph 4). A neutral writer could say "plan," "the official who proposed the duties" and "a mistake." All the loaded words are negative and all point at the King, so Gordy's point of view is on the colonists' side: he presents King George as the villain of the story.
Inclusion and avoidance of facts (Source 1)
Which facts does Gordy include about the new taxes, and which does he leave out?
Result: He includes the colonists' side: the taxes were "hateful to the colonists because they were levied by Parliament," and the money would keep an army that the King "would use to compel them to do as he willed" (paragraph 2). He gives only one reason for the King's actions, that he wanted to "carry his point" (paragraph 4). He leaves out the reasons the British government gave: Britain had borrowed heavily to fight the French and Indian War (1754-1763) and wanted the colonies to share the cost of defending them. Including only one side's reasons makes that side look right.
Purpose (Source 1)
What was Gordy's purpose in writing this chapter?
Result: His purpose was to teach young pupils the story of the Revolution through its heroes and to make them admire the patriots. The clues are the audience (a first textbook for children), the loaded words that make the King a villain, and the story's shape: the King makes a "shrewd attempt to outwit" the Americans (paragraph 3), and the chapter promises that "this was a huge blunder, as we shall now see" (paragraph 4). Each chapter of the book ends with questions such as "What do you admire in his character?" A textbook can inform and still have a point of view.
Sentence frame: "The author's point of view is ___. One clue is the loaded language ___ (paragraph ___). Another clue is that the author includes / leaves out ___. The author's purpose seems to be ___." Show Diagram 1, which puts the clues together.
Guided Practice20 minutes
Two primary sources about the same event. On the night of December 24-25, 1492, during his first voyage, Columbus's flagship, the Santa María, ran aground off the island he called Española (Hispaniola, today Haiti and the Dominican Republic). Source 2 is his journal for that day. The journal itself is lost; it survives in a shortened copy made by Bartolomé de las Casas, who calls Columbus "the Admiral." Source 3 is the letter Columbus wrote on his way home to Luis de Santangel, a Spanish official who had helped pay for the voyage; it was printed in 1493 so that others could read it. Gloss: "tiller" and "helm" (the handle that steers a ship), "caravel" (a smaller ship of the fleet, here the Niña), "Highnesses" (King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain), "gainsaid" (opposed) and "Navidad" (Christmas, in Spanish).
1Navigating yesterday, with little wind, from Santo Tomé to Punta Santa, and being a league from it, at about eleven o'clock at night the Admiral went down to get some sleep, for he had not had any rest for two days and a night. As it was calm, the sailor who steered the ship thought he would go to sleep, leaving the tiller in charge of a boy. The Admiral had forbidden this throughout the voyage, whether it was blowing or whether it was calm. The boys were never to be entrusted with the helm.
[...]
2It pleased our Lord that, at twelve o'clock at night, when the Admiral had retired to rest, and when all had fallen asleep, seeing that it was a dead calm and the sea like glass, the tiller being in the hands of a boy, the current carried the ship on one of the sand-banks. If it had not been night the bank could have been seen, and the surf on it could be heard for a good league. But the ship ran upon it so gently that it could scarcely be felt. The boy, who felt the helm and heard the rush of the sea, cried out.
3The Admiral at once came up, and so quickly that no one had felt that the ship was aground. Presently the master of the ship, whose watch it was, came on deck. The Admiral ordered him and others to launch the boat, which was on the poop, and lay out an anchor astern. The master, with several others, got into the boat, and the Admiral thought that they did so with the object of obeying his orders. But they did so in order to take refuge with the caravel, which was half a league to leeward. The caravel would not allow them to come on board acting judiciously, and they therefore returned to the ship; but the caravel's boat arrived first.
4When the Admiral saw that his own people fled in this way, the water rising and the ship being across the sea, seeing no other course, he ordered the masts to be cut away and the ship to be lightened as much as possible, to see if she would come off. But, as the water continued to rise, nothing more could be done. Her side fell over across the sea, but it was nearly calm. Then the timbers opened, and the ship was lost.
Christopher Columbus, as abstracted by Bartolomé de las Casas, translated by Clements R. Markham, Journal of the First Voyage of Columbus, December 25, 1492 (Source 2: the loss of the Admiral's ship; one cut marked [...]) (1825; this edition 1906). Public domain (published 1906). Source text.
1SIR: As I know that you will have pleasure from the great victory which our Lord hath given me in my voyage, I write you this, by which you shall know that in thirty-three days I passed over to the Indies with the fleet which the most illustrious King and Queen, our Lords, gave me; where I found very many islands peopled with inhabitants beyond number. And, of them all, I have taken possession for their Highnesses, with proclamation and the royal standard displayed; and I was not gainsaid.
[...]
2Española is a marvel; the mountains and hills, and plains, and fields, and the soil, so beautiful and rich for planting and sowing, for breeding cattle of all sorts, for building of towns and villages. There could be no believing, without seeing, such harbors as are here, as well as the many and great rivers, and excellent waters, most of which contain gold. In the trees and fruits and plants, there are great diversities from those of Juana. In this, there are many spiceries, and great mines of gold and other metals.
[...]
3This is [a land] to be desired,--and once seen, never to be relinquished--in which (although, indeed, I have taken possession of them all for their Highnesses, and all are more richly endowed than I have skill and power to say, and I hold them all in the name of their Highnesses who can dispose thereof as much and as completely as of the kingdoms of Castile) in this Española, in the place most suitable and best for its proximity to the gold mines, and for traffic with the mainland both on this side and with that over there belonging to the Great Can, where there will be great commerce and profit, I took possession of a large town which I named the city of Navidad. And I have made fortification there, and a fort (which by this time will have been completely finished) and I have left therein men enough for such a purpose, with arms and artillery, and provisions for more than a year, and a boat, and a [man who is] master of all seacraft for making others; and great friendship with the king of that land, to such a degree that he prided himself on calling and holding me as his brother.
4[...] as I made no delay at any point, so long as the wind gave me an opportunity of sailing, except only in the town of Navidad till I had left things safely arranged and well established. And in truth I should have done much more if the ships had served me as well as might reasonably have been expected.
Christopher Columbus, translated in Bernard Quaritch's edition, Letter from Columbus to Luis de Santangel, February 15, 1493 (Source 3: the report of the voyage; three cuts marked [...]) (1493; this edition 1906). Public domain (published 1906). Source text.
Purpose and loaded language in a primary source (Source 3)
What was Columbus's purpose in the letter, and which words show it?
Result: His purpose was to announce success and win more support for his voyages. He opens with "the great victory which our Lord hath given me" (paragraph 1), calls the island "a marvel" with rivers "most of which contain gold" and "great mines of gold" (paragraph 2), and calls it a land "once seen, never to be relinquished" where "there will be great commerce and profit" (paragraph 3). This loaded, glowing language is aimed at readers who could pay for more ships.
Pair task: Make a two-column chart. In the left column, list four facts about the night of December 25 that Source 2 includes. In the right column, write what Source 3 says about the same events, or "not mentioned." Then answer: Which facts did Columbus avoid in the letter, and why?
Teacher model for the pair work: Source 2 includes that the Admiral went to sleep, that the sailor at the helm left "the tiller in charge of a boy," which "The Admiral had forbidden" (paragraph 1), that the current carried the ship onto a sand-bank (paragraph 2), that the master and others fled to the caravel instead of obeying orders (paragraph 3), and that "the timbers opened, and the ship was lost" (paragraph 4). Source 3 never says that the ship was lost. It says Columbus "took possession of a large town" he named Navidad and "made fortification there, and a fort," leaving men with "a boat" (paragraph 3); in the journal entry for the next day, Columbus says that if he had not lost the ship, he would not have left people there. The only hint of trouble is "I should have done much more if the ships had served me as well as might reasonably have been expected" (paragraph 4), which blames the ships. Avoiding the wreck fits his purpose: a report of a "great victory" to the people who paid for it. Note that the journal has a point of view too: it stresses that the Admiral's orders were broken and his crew "fled," which places the blame on others.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students read two accounts of the Boston Massacre, then answer the quiz, which uses both. As they read, they highlight loaded language in one color and facts that make one side look better or worse in another. On the evening of March 5, 1770, British soldiers guarding the Customhouse in Boston fired into a crowd, and five men died. Source 4 is from the diary of John Tudor, a Boston merchant, written at the time. Source 5 is from H. A. Guerber's The Story of the Thirteen Colonies (1898), a history for young readers. Gloss for Source 4: Tudor spells as he spoke, so read it aloud: "Solders" (soldiers), "Goal" (jail, then spelled gaol), "mite" (might), "terable" (terrible), "committ" (send to jail to wait for trial), "Concourse" (crowd). Gloss for Source 5: "dissolve the colonial assemblies" (send the colonies' lawmakers home) and "regiments" (army units of several hundred soldiers).
1ON Monday Evening the 5th current, a few Minutes after 9 O'Clock a most horrid murder was committed in King Street before the Customhouse Door by 8 or 9 Soldiers under the Command of Capt Thos Preston drawn of from the Main Guard on the South side of the Town house.
2This unhappy affair began by Some Boys & young fellows throwing Snow Balls at the sentry placed at the Customhouse Door. On which 8 or 9 Solders Came to his assistance. Soon after a Number of people colected, when the Capt commanded the Soldiers to fire, which they did and 3 Men were Kil'd on the Spot & several Mortaly Wounded, one of which died next morning. The Capt soon drew off his Soldiers up to the Main Guard, or the Consequencis mite have been terable, for on the Guns fiering the people were alarmd & set the Bells a Ringing as if for Fire, which drew Multitudes to the place of action. [...] Capt Preston was taken up by a warrent given to the high Sherif by Justice Dania & Tudor and came under Examination about 2 O'clock & we sent him to Goal soon after 3, having Evidence sufficient, to committ him, on his ordering the soldiers to fire : So aboute 4 O'clock the Town became quiet.
3[...] the unhappy Victims who fell in the Bloody Massacre. On this sorrowfull Occasion most of the shops & stores in Town were shut, all the Bells were order'd to toll a solom peal in Boston, Charleston, Cambridge & Roxbery. The several Hearses forming a junction in King Street, the Theatre of that inhuman Tradgedy, proceeded from thence thro' the main street, lengthened by an immence Concourse of people, So numerous as to be obliged to follow in Ranks of 4 & 6 abreast and brought up by a long Train of Carriages. [...] Note Capt Preston was tried for his Life on the affare of the above Octobr 24 1770. The Trial lasted 5 Days, but the Jury brought him in not Guilty.
John Tudor, in Albert Bushnell Hart's compilation, An Eye-Witness of the Boston Massacre, from the diary of John Tudor, March 1770 (Source 4: one Bostonian's account; three cuts marked [...]) (1896; this edition 1898). Public domain (published 1898). Source text.
1Urged on by the Massachusetts people, all the colonies wrote to Great Britain that they would not buy any British goods until the taxes were removed. The king, offended by the letters sent him, ordered the governors to dissolve the colonial assemblies again and again; but he could not prevent the Americans from talking and thinking as they pleased. When his troops began to come, men, women, and children scowled at them, openly calling them "lobsters" and "bloody-backs" because they wore red coats.
2As the Massachusetts people talked loudest, and urged the other colonies to resist, King George sent General Gage to Boston with two regiments. They came into the city on Sunday morning, with flags flying and drums beating, a thing which greatly shocked the good Puritans.
3The presence of British soldiers in America greatly annoyed the people. They daily grew more and more angry about it, and before long a small fight took place between soldiers and citizens, at Golden Hill, in the city of New York. Two months later, in the midst of the excitement caused by a false alarm of fire in Boston, a British soldier, annoyed by the taunts and snowballs of a mob, shot a man. This became the signal for more firing, which killed five men and wounded a few others (1770).
4The excitement caused in the city by the "Boston Massacre," or the "Bloody Massacre," as it is known, in history, proved very great. Although the principal men in Boston knew the soldiers had not been greatly to blame for what had happened, they saw that there would be more trouble unless the troops left the town. Samuel Ad´ams, therefore, explained this to the governor, who asked him if the people would be satisfied if he sent one regiment away. Adams answered that he would find out, but, going to the Old South Meetinghouse, where the patriots were assembled, he passed up the aisle, whispering to his friends right and left: "Both regiments or none."
5When Adams reached the platform, and told the people what the governor had said, his friends loudly cried: "Both regiments or none!" The rest of the people shouted the same thing. So the governor, much against his will, was forced to place the soldiers on an island in the bay. But after that, when mentioning those troops, King George spitefully called them "Sam Adams's regiments."
H. A. Guerber, The Story of the Thirteen Colonies, chapter LX, "The Boston Tea Party" (Source 5: British troops in Boston and the "Boston Massacre") (1898). Public domain (published 1898). Source text.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: On an index card, write one loaded word or phrase from Source 1 or Source 3, a neutral word that could replace it, and one sentence on what the loaded word reveals about the author's point of view or purpose.
Teacher note on the sources and their language: The passages are quoted exactly, with Tudor's spelling and Guerber's accent mark in "Ad´ams." Some statements in them are opinions or errors: Gordy's "his tool, Townshend" and "dull-witted King" are his judgments (Charles Townshend proposed the duties himself as the head of Britain's treasury), and his quotations of the King are given without a source. The regiments reached Boston on Saturday, October 1, 1768, not a Sunday as Guerber writes, sent on the orders of General Thomas Gage, the British commander in America. The five men who died after the shooting were Crispus Attucks, Samuel Gray and James Caldwell, killed that night, Samuel Maverick, who died the next morning, and Patrick Carr, who died nine days later. Captain Preston was acquitted in October 1770; at the soldiers' trial later that year, John Adams and Josiah Quincy defended them, six were acquitted, and two were found guilty of manslaughter. The Santa María's wreck is well documented; about 39 men stayed at Navidad, and when Columbus returned in November 1493, all of them were dead and the fort was destroyed. In Source 6, the men who destroyed the tea disguised themselves in a stereotyped costume of American Indians; the Mohawk people had no part in it. Source 3 leaves out the letter's descriptions of the island people, which use terms now considered offensive, his statement that he seized some of them by force, and his offer to ship enslaved people to Spain; the source note lists every cut. None of the passages contains a slur.
Homework passage. Source 6 is the end of Gordy's chapter on Samuel Adams: the town meeting of December 16, 1773, and the Boston Tea Party. Benjamin Rotch owned one of the tea ships, which could not leave the harbor without a pass from the governor. Gloss: "concerted" (planned ahead) and "prime mover" (the person who starts something).
1At three o'clock a great throng of eager men again crowded into the Old South Church and the streets outside to wait for the return of Rotch. It was a critical moment. "If the Governor refuses to give the pass, shall the revenue officer be allowed to seize the tea and land it to-morrow morning?" Many anxious faces showed that men were asking themselves this momentous question.
2But while, in deep suspense, the meeting waited and deliberated, John Rowe said, "Who knows how tea will mingle with salt water?" A whirlwind of applause swept through the assembly and the masses outside the church. As daylight deepened into darkness, candles were lighted. Shortly after six Benjamin Rotch entered the church and, with pale face, said, "The Governor refuses to give a pass." An angry murmur arose, but the crowd soon became silent, when Samuel Adams arose and said, "This meeting can do nothing more to save the country."
3This was plainly a concerted signal. In an instant a war-whoop sounded, and forty or fifty "Mohawks," or men dressed as Indians, who were waiting outside, dashed past the door and down Milk Street toward Griffin's Wharf, where the tea-ships were lying at anchor. It was bright moonlight, and everything could be plainly seen. Many men stood on shore and watched the "Mohawks" as they broke open 342 chests, and poured the tea into the harbor. There was no confusion. All was done in perfect order.
4The "Boston Tea Party," of which Samuel Adams was the prime mover, was a long step toward the Revolution. Samuel Adams was at this time almost or quite alone in his desire for Independence, and he has well been called the "Father of the Revolution." But his influence for the good of America continued far beyond the time of the "Boston Tea Party." Up to the last his patriotism was earnest and sincere. He died in 1803, at the age of eighty-one years. Not as an orator, like Patrick Henry, but as a man of action, like Lincoln and Washington, had he a powerful influence over men. His was truly a life of distinguished service to his country.
Wilbur F. Gordy, American Leaders and Heroes, chapter XIII, "Samuel Adams and the Boston Tea Party" (Source 6: December 16, 1773) (1901). Public domain (published 1901). Source text.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a list of the loaded words in Source 1 with a blank beside each for a neutral replacement
Give the two-column chart for Sources 2 and 3 with the first row filled in
Use the sentence frame from Direct Instruction for every answer
For Advanced Students
Rewrite Source 1, paragraph 3 as a British official of 1768 might have written it, and list the facts you added
Find the loaded language in Source 2, the journal, and explain whose point of view it serves
Compare the account of the Boston Massacre in your history textbook with Sources 4 and 5: which facts does each include?
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong work names a specific clue (a quoted loaded word, a fact that is included, or a fact that is left out), says what it reveals (which side the author favors, or the reason for writing), and ties it to who wrote the source and for whom. For avoided facts, strong work names the second source that shows the fact exists. Watch for four errors: calling any strong word "loaded" without saying what feeling it carries or whom it favors; treating a fact as "avoided" without evidence that it happened; confusing the topic with the point of view; and assuming a primary source has no point of view because its author was there.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Loaded or Neutral?
15 minGroups of 3
Groups get 12 phrase cards quoted from Sources 1-3. They sort them into three piles, loaded and negative, loaded and positive, and neutral, then rewrite every loaded phrase in neutral words and say whom the loaded version favors.
The 12 Cards
"selfish scheme" (Source 1, paragraph 1)
"his tool, Townshend" (Source 1, paragraph 2)
"the dull-witted King" (Source 1, paragraph 3)
"this foolish scheme" (Source 1, paragraph 4)
"a huge blunder" (Source 1, paragraph 4)
"the great victory which our Lord hath given me" (Source 3, paragraph 1)
"Española is a marvel" (Source 3, paragraph 2)
"once seen, never to be relinquished" (Source 3, paragraph 3)
"Parliament levied new port duties on a few articles" (Source 1, paragraph 2)
"in thirty-three days I passed over to the Indies" (Source 3, paragraph 1)
"the current carried the ship on one of the sand-banks" (Source 2, paragraph 2)
"the master of the ship, whose watch it was, came on deck" (Source 2, paragraph 3)
Answer Key for the Teacher
Loaded, negative: cards 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Loaded, positive: cards 6, 7, 8
Neutral: cards 9, 10, 11, 12
Sample neutral rewrites: "selfish scheme" becomes "plan"; "his tool, Townshend" becomes "Townshend, the official who proposed the duties"; "a huge blunder" becomes "a mistake"; "Española is a marvel" becomes "Española is a large island."
The negative cards all come from Gordy and all point at the King; the positive cards all come from Columbus and all describe his own voyage.
Procedure
Read each card aloud in its sentence in the source
Ask: does this phrase carry a strong feeling, or could any writer on either side use it?
Sort the card, then write a neutral version of each loaded phrase on the back
Compare piles with another group and settle any disagreement by rereading the source
Discussion Questions
Which card was hardest to sort? What made it hard?
Is a neutral phrase always better in a history text? When might an author choose a loaded word honestly?
Variation for a Shorter Class
Use cards 1, 3, 6, 7, 9 and 11 only, two for each pile.
2
Included or Left Out?
15 minPairs
Pairs get 6 fact cards about the new taxes of 1767 and the tea plan. They find which facts Gordy includes in Source 1 and which he leaves out, then discuss how the left-out facts would change a reader's view of the King.
The 6 Fact Cards
The new taxes were levied by Parliament, not by the colonists' own assemblies.
Some of the tax money was to pay for a small English army in America.
Americans had been smuggling tea from Holland.
Under the new plan, taxed tea would cost Americans less than tea in England.
Britain had borrowed heavily to fight the French and Indian War (1754-1763) and wanted the colonies to share the cost of defending them.
The Tea Act of 1773 was passed partly to help the British East India Company, which had a large supply of unsold tea.
Answer Key for the Teacher
Card 1: Included (Source 1, paragraph 2)
Card 2: Included (Source 1, paragraph 2)
Card 3: Included (Source 1, paragraph 4)
Card 4: Included (Source 1, paragraph 4)
Card 5: Left out
Card 6: Left out
Cards 5 and 6 give reasons the British government had; including them would make the King look less "selfish" and "foolish." Cards 3 and 4 show that Gordy did include facts that do not flatter the colonists (they were smuggling) when they helped his story.
Procedure
Read each fact card and search Source 1 for it
Mark it Included (with the paragraph) or Left out
For each left-out fact, write one sentence on how it would change the reader's view
Discussion Questions
Why might a 1901 textbook for young American pupils leave out cards 5 and 6?
How can a reader find facts an author avoided? (Read another source, especially one from the other side.)
Modification for English Learners
Give the fact cards with key words underlined (Parliament, army, smuggling, cheaper, war, company) so pairs can scan Source 1 for the same words.
3
Three Reports of One Shipwreck
15 minGroups of 3
Using only the facts in Source 2, each group writes three short reports of the night of December 25, 1492: one by Columbus for the King and Queen, one by the master of the ship defending himself, and one neutral report. They then read their reports aloud, and the class names the loaded words and the facts each report includes or leaves out.
Procedure
List the facts from Source 2: the Admiral asleep, the boy at the tiller, the calm sea and current, the sand-bank, the master's flight to the caravel, the masts cut away, the ship lost
Write each report in 3-4 sentences, using only facts from the list
Mark each report's loaded words and circle the facts it leaves out
Answer Key for the Teacher
Columbus's report: stresses that the boy steered against his orders and that the master fled; leaves out that the Admiral himself was asleep.
The master's report: stresses the dead calm, the current and the gentle grounding; leaves out that he went to the caravel instead of laying out the anchor as ordered.
Neutral report: gives the time, the calm, the boy at the tiller and the loss of the ship without words such as "fled."
Discussion Questions
All three reports use true facts. How can a report be true and still one-sided?
Which report is closest to Source 2, and whose point of view does Source 2 favor?
Modification for Advanced Students
Groups write a fourth report as Columbus's letter to Santangel might have told the night, then compare it with Source 3.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: Clues to Point of View and Purpose
The two clues named in RH.6-8.6, loaded language and the inclusion or avoidance of particular facts, each with an example from today's sources. Together with who wrote the source and for whom, they point to the author's point of view or purpose.
Diagram 2: What Columbus's Journal Tells and His Letter Avoids
Sources 2 and 3 describe the same days of Columbus's first voyage. The journal tells how the ship was lost; the printed letter describes a town and a fort and never mentions the wreck.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RH.6-8.6 Homework: Gordy's Account of the Boston Tea Party
Directions: Use Source 6, the end of Gordy's chapter on Samuel Adams, printed in the Closure phase of the lesson plan. Answer each problem in 2-5 sentences, quoting the words you use with their paragraph numbers.
Part 1: Loaded Language (Problems 1-3)
Find three loaded words or phrases in paragraphs 1-2 that describe the crowd or the moment. For each, say whether it makes the reader feel positively or negatively, and give a neutral replacement.
Paragraph 3 says, "There was no confusion. All was done in perfect order." How do these sentences shape the reader's view of the destruction of the tea? What might a neutral writer say instead?
Paragraph 4 calls Samuel Adams the "Father of the Revolution" and says, "His was truly a life of distinguished service to his country." What do these phrases reveal about Gordy's point of view of Adams?
Part 2: Facts Included and Left Out (Problems 4-6)
Gordy includes that "It was bright moonlight, and everything could be plainly seen" and that "Many men stood on shore and watched" (paragraph 3). Why might he include these details? Whose side do they help?
Source 6 does not say who owned the tea or what it was worth. The tea belonged to the British East India Company and was worth more than 9,000 British pounds, a large sum at the time. How might including this fact change a reader's view of the event?
Write a paragraph that states Gordy's point of view and purpose in Source 6. Support it with at least one loaded phrase and one fact that he includes or leaves out, and explain how the book's audience, young American pupils in 1901, fits your answer.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Loaded Language
Quotes loaded words and explains the feeling and whom it favors
Quotes loaded words without explaining them
No loaded words identified
Facts Included or Left Out
Names specific facts and explains how they shape the reader's view
Names facts without explaining their effect
No facts discussed
Point of View and Purpose
States both clearly and ties them to the author and audience
States one of the two, or states both vaguely
Gives the topic instead of a point of view
Evidence
Paragraph numbers and accurate quotations throughout
Some paragraph numbers missing
No reference to the source
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-7 and 9 use John Tudor's diary (Source 4), and Questions 10-14, 17 and 18 use Guerber's history (Source 5); Questions 8, 15, 16, 19 and 20 use both. Both passages are printed in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which phrase from Source 4, paragraph 1, is loaded language?
Answer: C
"A most horrid murder" carries strong negative feeling and a judgment: "murder" means a crime, and "horrid" adds horror. A neutral writer might say "a shooting." Choices A, B and D give the time and the place, facts any writer on either side would state.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
By calling the shooting a "murder" in the first sentence (Source 4, paragraph 1), what does Tudor reveal about his point of view?
Answer: A
A murder is a crime, so the word shows that Tudor judged the soldiers guilty before any trial. Choice B ignores the word "murder." Choice C reverses his view. Choice D fits the time and place in the sentence but not the word "murder."
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Tudor writes that "This unhappy affair began by Some Boys & young fellows throwing Snow Balls at the sentry" (Source 4, paragraph 2). Why is this detail important when you judge his account?
Answer: D
Tudor blames the soldiers, yet he records that the trouble began when boys threw snowballs at the sentry. Including a fact that does not help one's own side makes the account more trustworthy on that point. Choice A is the opposite of what he did. Choice B reverses the order in the sentence. Choice C has no support; the entry is dated to the events.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"Capt Preston was taken up by a warrent given to the high Sherif by Justice Dania & Tudor ... & we sent him to Goal" (Source 4, paragraph 2). What does this sentence reveal about Tudor?
Answer: B
The warrant came from "Justice Dania & Tudor," and Tudor writes "we sent him to Goal": he was one of the two justices who jailed Preston. So he was not a neutral observer. Choices A and C have no support. Choice D confuses Tudor with the "high Sherif," who received the warrant.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which phrase in Source 4, paragraph 3, is loaded language?
Answer: D
"That inhuman Tradgedy" judges the event as cruel and terrible, and "Theatre" makes King Street the stage of a drama. Choices A, B and C describe the funeral in plain words that any observer could use.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Tudor writes that "the Capt commanded the Soldiers to fire" (Source 4, paragraph 2). Which later fact in Source 4 shows that a jury did not accept that Preston was guilty?
Answer: A
Paragraph 3 ends: "The Trial lasted 5 Days, but the Jury brought him in not Guilty." Tudor includes the verdict even though it goes against his own account. Choice B gives only the length of the trial. Choice C is Tudor's own action before the trial. Choice D describes the night of the shooting.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What was Tudor's most likely purpose in writing this diary entry?
Answer: B
A diary is a private record, and Tudor records times, places and actions in order, while his words ("horrid murder," "Bloody Massacre") show which side he is on. Choice A confuses his diary with the town's message to the lieutenant governor, which is not in Source 4. Choice C is the opposite of his view. Choice D is wrong because he writes about real events he saw and took part in.
Question 8 of 20 · Short Answer
Compare how Source 4 and Source 5 describe the people in the street before the shooting. Quote the words each author uses, and explain what the difference shows about each author's point of view.
Model answer: Tudor calls them "Some Boys & young fellows throwing Snow Balls at the sentry" (Source 4, paragraph 2), which makes them sound young and harmless. Guerber calls them "a mob" and says the soldier was "annoyed by the taunts and snowballs" (Source 5, paragraph 3), which makes them sound dangerous and rude. Tudor's words fit his view that the soldiers were to blame; Guerber's fit her view that "the soldiers had not been greatly to blame" (paragraph 4). Rubric: full credit for a quotation from each source and an explanation of each author's view; partial credit for both quotations without the explanation, or one quotation with it.
Question 9 of 20 · Short Answer
Name two loaded words or phrases Tudor uses in Source 4 for the event or its victims. For each, give a neutral replacement and explain what the loaded version reveals.
Model answer: "a most horrid murder" (paragraph 1) could be "a shooting"; the loaded version shows that Tudor judged the soldiers guilty of a crime. "the Bloody Massacre" (paragraph 3) could be "the shooting on King Street"; "massacre" means the killing of helpless people, so it presents the victims as innocent. Other acceptable answers: "the unhappy Victims," "that inhuman Tradgedy." Rubric: full credit for two quoted loaded phrases, a neutral replacement for each and an explanation; partial credit for two phrases without explanation, or one phrase fully explained.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Guerber writes that people called the soldiers "lobsters" and "bloody-backs" because they wore red coats (Source 5, paragraph 1). Why might this fact matter to a reader judging who was to blame for the later trouble?
Answer: C
By including the names people called the soldiers, men, women and children who "scowled at them," Guerber shows that colonists taunted the troops, a fact that makes the colonists look less innocent. Choice A reverses who insulted whom. Choice B is true but is not what makes the detail matter. Choice D has no support.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Guerber writes that the troops' arrival was "a thing which greatly shocked the good Puritans" (Source 5, paragraph 2). What does the phrase "the good Puritans" reveal?
Answer: A
"Good" is a positive loaded word: it presents the Puritans of Boston as decent people shocked by the soldiers' parade on a Sunday. Choice B reverses the feeling of the word. Choice C is wrong because there are no quotation marks and Gage says nothing in the passage. Choice D has no support.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which word in Source 5, paragraph 3, is loaded against the people who faced the soldier?
Answer: D
A mob is a disorderly, dangerous crowd; the word blames the people in the street. A neutral word would be "crowd." Choices A, B and C describe the scene or the people without a judgment.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"Although the principal men in Boston knew the soldiers had not been greatly to blame for what had happened, they saw that there would be more trouble unless the troops left the town" (Source 5, paragraph 4). What point of view does this sentence reveal?
Answer: B
Guerber states as a fact that Boston's leaders "knew the soldiers had not been greatly to blame," so her view is that the soldiers were not mostly at fault, the opposite of Tudor's "horrid murder." Choice A reverses her view. Choice C is not in the sentence; the leaders are the ones who judge. Choice D ignores the words "not been greatly to blame."
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"But after that, when mentioning those troops, King George spitefully called them 'Sam Adams's regiments'" (Source 5, paragraph 5). Which word reveals Guerber's view of the King?
Answer: C
"Spitefully" means with a wish to hurt or annoy; it presents the King as petty. A neutral writer might say "called them." Choices A, B and D are neutral words any writer could use.
Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 4 tells that Captain Preston was jailed, tried for his life and found not guilty. What does Source 5 say about this?
Answer: D
Source 5 never names Captain Preston and says nothing about an arrest or a trial; it moves from the shooting to the removal of the troops. This is a fact Guerber avoids, or at least leaves out, in this account. Choices A, B and C state things Source 5 does not say.
Question 16 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which statement best compares the points of view of Source 4 and Source 5?
Answer: A
Tudor calls the shooting "a most horrid murder" (Source 4, paragraph 1). Guerber says the soldiers "had not been greatly to blame" (Source 5, paragraph 4) but calls the King's words spiteful (paragraph 5). Choice B ignores Guerber's view of the soldiers. Choice C swaps the two authors. Choice D ignores the loaded language in both.
Question 17 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Guerber uses the names "Boston Massacre" and "Bloody Massacre" inside quotation marks (Source 5, paragraph 4). What do the quotation marks suggest?
Answer: D
The words "as it is known, in history" and the quotation marks show that these are the names the event is known by, not words Guerber chose herself. Writers of her time often put the popular names of events in quotation marks (Gordy writes the "Boston Tea Party" in Source 6, and Guerber the "Cradle of Liberty" later in the same chapter), so the marks alone do not prove she rejects the word "massacre"; read with her view that the soldiers "had not been greatly to blame," they do suggest some distance from it. Choice A is wrong because she names no source. Choice B contradicts her account of the firing. Choice C is the opposite of what the quotation marks show.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Guerber includes facts that favor both sides. Quote one fact in Source 5 that makes the colonists look bad and one that makes the soldiers or the King look bad, and explain what this mix suggests about her purpose.
Model answer: Against the colonists: people openly called the soldiers "lobsters" and "bloody-backs" (paragraph 1), and a soldier was "annoyed by the taunts and snowballs of a mob" (paragraph 3). Against the soldiers or the King: the firing "killed five men" (paragraph 3), and "King George spitefully called them 'Sam Adams's regiments'" (paragraph 5). The mix suggests that Guerber's purpose was to explain to young readers how the quarrel grew, from the colonists' side overall but with some fairness to the soldiers. Rubric: full credit for one quotation on each side and a stated purpose; partial credit for two quotations without the purpose, or one quotation with it.
Question 19 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Tudor wrote Source 4 in 1770 as a Boston justice; Guerber wrote Source 5 in 1898 for young readers. How does this difference help explain their points of view?
Answer: C
Tudor was there and helped send Preston to jail, so he writes as one of the townspeople (Source 4, paragraph 2). Guerber, writing more than a century later, could know that Preston was acquitted and write with more distance about the soldiers. Choice A reverses where they were. Choice B swaps their audiences. Choice D is wrong on the dates: 1770 and 1898.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Choose one sentence from Source 4 or Source 5 that contains loaded language. Rewrite it in neutral words, keeping the facts, and explain what changed.
Model answer: Original: "a most horrid murder was committed in King Street before the Customhouse Door by 8 or 9 Soldiers" (Source 4, paragraph 1). Neutral: "eight or nine soldiers shot several people in King Street in front of the Customhouse." The facts (the place, the number of soldiers, the shooting) stay; "horrid" and "murder" go, so the sentence no longer judges the soldiers guilty. Rubric: full credit for a quoted loaded sentence, a neutral rewrite that keeps the facts and an explanation of what changed; partial credit for a rewrite that drops facts or keeps a loaded word.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RH.6-8.6 mean?
RH.6-8.6 asks students in grades 6-8 to identify the parts of a history or social studies text that reveal the author's point of view or purpose, for example loaded language or the facts the author includes or avoids. Students explain how they know which side an author is on or why the author wrote.
What is loaded language in history?
Loaded language is a word or phrase with strong positive or negative feelings, used where a neutral word would do: "the dull-witted King" instead of "the King," "a huge blunder" instead of "a mistake," "a marvel" instead of "a large island." It pushes the reader toward the author's view, often without the reader noticing.
How can students tell which facts an author avoided?
By reading a second source on the same event, especially one from another side or another time. A fact is avoided only if there is evidence it exists: Columbus's journal shows the ship was lost, so the letter's silence about it is an avoidance, not just a missing detail.
What is the difference between point of view and purpose?
Point of view is how the author sees the topic, for example on the colonists' side or the King's. Purpose is why the author wrote, for example to inform, persuade, praise, defend or keep a record. One text can have both: Columbus's letter reports his voyage (purpose) from the point of view of a leader proud of his success.
How is RH.6-8.6 different from RI.7.6?
RI.7.6 asks students to determine an author's point of view or purpose and analyze how the author distinguishes his or her position from that of others. RH.6-8.6 applies the skill to history sources and names two clues to look for: loaded language and the inclusion or avoidance of particular facts.
Do primary sources have a point of view?
Yes. A person who was there saw the event from one place and one side, and wrote for a reason. Columbus was on board when his flagship was lost, yet his printed letter to a supporter never mentions the wreck. Being present makes a source valuable, not neutral.
Is a source with a point of view unreliable?
Not necessarily. Every author has a point of view; the question is how it shapes the account. A one-sided source can still report accurate facts, and some authors include facts that do not help their own side, as Gordy does when he notes that Americans had been smuggling tea. Students should compare sources and check facts.
Why use Columbus's letter and journal to teach RH.6-8.6?
Because the two primary sources describe the same days and differ in one clear way: the journal tells how the flagship ran aground and was lost, and the printed letter to a supporter never mentions it. Students can see the avoidance of a fact and connect it to the letter's purpose of reporting success.
How is RH.6-8.6 usually assessed?
It is usually assessed with questions that quote a phrase and ask whether it is loaded and what it reveals, or ask which fact one source includes that another leaves out. Short written answers ask students to state an author's point of view or purpose and support it with two clues from the text.
How can parents help a child practice RH.6-8.6 at home?
Compare two reports of the same news story, game or product. Ask, "Which words show how the writer feels? What does one report tell that the other leaves out? Why might the writer have done that?" Ads and team websites are quick examples of loaded language.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to RH.6-8.6: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RI.5.6Prerequisite
Analyze multiple accounts of the same event and the points of view they represent
Lesson coming soon
Alongside
RI.7.6Parallel
Determine an author's point of view or purpose and how the author sets it apart from others
Lesson coming soon
RH.6-8.8Parallel
Distinguish among fact, opinion and reasoned judgment in a text
Lesson coming soon
RH.6-8.9Parallel
Analyze the relationship between a primary and a secondary source on the same topic
Lesson coming soon
After this lesson
RH.9-10.6Next step
Compare the points of view of two or more authors and the details each includes