D2.His.11.6-8: Inferring Who Made a Source, When, Where and for Whom
In plain English: D2.His.11.6-8 is the C3 Framework history indicator for grades 6-8 that asks students to use other historical sources to infer a plausible maker, date, place of origin and intended audience for a source that does not state them. Students match clues inside an unsigned source with outside records, then explain how sure they can be.
Use other historical sources to infer a plausible maker, date, place of origin, and intended audience for historical sources where this information is not easily identified.
C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 2: Applying Disciplinary Concepts and Tools · Discipline: History · Historical Sources and Evidence · Official standard
Students learn to infer a plausible maker, date, place of origin and intended audience for a source that does not state them. The mystery source is a set of stanzas from a camp song printed in 1824 by an anonymous contributor. Students match clues in the song, such as "captain Washington" giving orders in a camp, with outside records: the Continental Congress journal for June 1775 and a National Park Service account of Washington's arrival in Cambridge.
They then compare their inferences with those of Oscar Sonneck, a Library of Congress specialist who studied the song in 1909, and test how strong each kind of evidence is: a dated record, a family tradition, a printer's imprint, a city directory. The lesson ends with students writing their own plausible answers to the four questions and saying how sure they are.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Define maker, date, place of origin and intended audience, and explain what it means to infer them
Use dated records from other sources to infer a plausible date range for an undated source
Use other sources to infer a plausible place of origin and maker, telling the speaker of a text apart from its maker
Infer a plausible intended audience from what readers would need to know to understand a source
Explain how sure an inference is by naming the kind of evidence behind it
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Citing specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources RH.6-8.1
Telling primary sources apart from secondary sources
Basic events of 1775 near Boston: the fighting at Lexington and Concord and the start of the war for independence
"You find an old note tucked inside a used library book. It has no name, no date and no address. It says: 'Meet us after the big game by the snack stand. Bring the poster!' Write down every clue in the note. Then list two other things you could check, outside the note, to figure out who wrote it, when, where, and for whom."
Pairs share. Students usually list a school sports schedule, a yearbook, the library's checkout record or a friend who might recognize the handwriting. Name the four questions historians ask about every source, and write them on the board:
Maker: the person or group who created the source.
Date: when the source was created.
Place of origin: where the source was created.
Intended audience: the people the maker meant to read, hear or see it.
When a source does not tell us these things, historians infer them: they reach a reasoned conclusion from clues in the source and from other historical sources, such as records, letters and later studies. The goal is a plausible answer, one that is believable and backed by evidence even though it is not proven.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Today's mystery source is a song. Source 1 is the first seven stanzas (groups of lines, like verses) of a song about a visit to an army camp. It was printed in 1824 in a book series called Farmer and Moore's Collections, sent in by an anonymous writer (one who gave no name), and nobody wrote down who made up the words, when or where. Many students will know the tune: it is one version of "Yankee Doodle." Knowing the tune does not answer our four questions, because many people wrote new words for it.
The song uses the everyday speech of rural New England, called dialect. An old dictionary helps with three words. John Russell Bartlett's Dictionary of Americanisms (1859) calls "tarnal" "A New England corruption of eternal" and says "nation" can mean "very, extremely," as in "Only a nation louder" (line 20). It describes hasty pudding as "Indian meal stirred into boiling water until it becomes a thick batter or pudding," and Indian meal as "Meal made from Indian corn": cornmeal. Let students guess the rest from context: if the "swampin gun" is "As large as log of maple" (line 14), what must "swampin" mean?
Four questions, and where the clues come from
Question
Clues inside the source
Other sources that can help
Maker
Words, spelling, what the maker knows well
Letters, notes, later studies that name a writer
Date
People and events the source mentions
Records with dates, such as a journal of meetings
Place of origin
Places, landscape, local names
Records or histories that say where those people and events were
Intended audience
Who would understand the jokes, names and words
Evidence of who bought, sang or read it
Read Source 1 aloud once for fun, then a second time looking for clues. Source 2 is from the official journal of the Continental Congress, the meeting of leaders from the thirteen colonies, in June 1775. In it, Resolved marks a formal decision, and "Esq." (Esquire) is a polite title for a gentleman. Source 3 opens with Washington's General Orders, instructions to the whole army; the page says he used them to introduce himself to his new army. Source 3 is from a National Park Service page about the house in Cambridge, Massachusetts, that Washington used as his headquarters. A siege is when an army surrounds a place to cut it off; Source 3 says Washington would "direct a siege" from Cambridge.
11. Father and I went down to camp, Along with Captain Goodwin, Where we see the men and boys As thick as Hasty-puddin.
52. There was captain Washington Upon a slapping stallion, A giving orders to his men— I guess there was a million.
3. And then the feathers on his hat, 10They look'd so tarnal fina, I wanted pockily to get To give to my Jemima.
4. And there they had a swampin gun As large as log of maple, 15On a deuced little cart— A load for father's cattle;
5. And every time they fired it off, It took a horn of powder; It made a noise like father's gun, 20Only a nation louder.
6. I went as near to it myself As Jacob's underpinnin, And father went as near again— I thought the deuce was in him.
257. And there I see a little keg, Its heads were made of leather— They knock'd upon 't with little sticks To call the folks together.
Unknown (an anonymous contributor to Farmer and Moore's Collections, 1824), Source 1: The mystery song, stanzas 1-7 (no title page, no author, no date) (1824; this edition 1909). Public domain (published 1909). Source text.
1The report of the committee being read and debated,
2Resolved, That a General be appointed to command all the continental forces, raised, or to be raised, for the defence of American liberty.
3That five hundred dollars, per month, be allowed for his pay and expences.
4The Congress then proceeded to the choice of a general, [...] when George Washington, Esq. was unanimously elected.
[...]
5FRIDAY, JUNE 16, 1775
6The congress met according to adjournment.
7The president from the chair informed Geo: Washington Esqʳ that he had the order of the Congress to acq[ain]t him, that the Congress had by a unanimous vote made choice of him to be general and com[mander] in chief to take the supreme command of the forces raised and to be raised, in defence of American Liberty, and desired his acceptance of it. Whereupon Colonel Washington, standing in his place, spoke as follows:
8"Mr. President,
9"Tho' I am truly sensible of the high Honour done me, in this Appointment, yet I feel great distress, from a consciousness that my abilities and military experience may not be equal to the extensive and important Trust: However, as the Congress desire it, I will enter upon the momentous duty, and exert every power I possess in their service, and for support of the glorious cause. I beg they will accept my most cordial thanks for this distinguished testimony of their approbation."
[...]
Continental Congress (journal kept by its secretary, Charles Thomson), edited by Worthington Chauncey Ford for the Library of Congress, Source 2: Journals of the Continental Congress, June 1775 (excerpt) (1775; this edition 1905). Public domain (published 1905). Source text.
1"The Continental Congress having now taken all the Troops of the several Colonies, which have been raised, or which may be hereafter raised, for the support and defence of the Liberties of America; into their Pay and Service: They are now the Troops of the United Provinces of North America; and it is hoped that all Distinctions of Colonies will be laid aside; so that one and the same spirit may animate the whole, and the only Contest be, who shall render, on this great and trying occasion, the most essential service to the great and common cause in which we are all engaged." - General Orders, July 4, 1775
2With these words, General George Washington introduced himself to his new army. Washington had arrived in Cambridge on July 2. That evening, he formally took command from Massachusetts General Artemas Ward, met with some of the army's high-ranking officers, and went to work—joining his temporary housemate and third in command Charles Lee, a professional soldier with a career of military service far exceeding that of any American-born commander, for a ride to examine some of the siege lines around Cambridge. Within two weeks, Washington moved west along the Road to Watertown to the grand Georgian mansion of the evacuated John Vassall. From there he would direct a siege and begin working to shape an army to match his vision.
National Park Service, Longfellow House-Washington's Headquarters National Historic Site, Source 3: "George Washington," National Park Service (excerpt) (2025). US government work (17 U.S.C. 105). Source text.
Date: the earliest the song could be (Source 1, lines 5-7, with Source 2)
The song's "captain Washington" is "giving orders to his men" in a camp. If that is George Washington, when is the earliest he could be giving orders to this army?
Result: Source 2 says Congress resolved "That a General be appointed to command all the continental forces" and that "George Washington, Esq. was unanimously elected" (paragraphs 2 and 4). The next entry is dated "FRIDAY, JUNE 16, 1775" (paragraph 5), so the vote came the day before, June 15, 1775. Inference: the stanza was probably written after mid-June 1775. It depends on one assumption: that the song's captain really is George Washington.
Place of origin: which camp? (Source 1, line 1, with Source 3)
The song says only "Father and I went down to camp." Which camp could it be?
Result: Source 3 says "Washington had arrived in Cambridge on July 2" and rode "to examine some of the siege lines around Cambridge" (paragraph 2). An army camp where Washington gave orders in 1775 points to the camp around Cambridge, near Boston, in Massachusetts. Inference: the song was plausibly made in or near that camp. The local dialect in Source 1 fits New England too.
Maker: the speaker is not always the maker (Source 1, lines 1 and 13-16)
The song is told by "I," a young person who went with "Father" and is amazed by everything in camp, from the crowd to a gun "As large as log of maple" (line 14). Was the maker a farm boy?
Result: Not necessarily. A writer can invent a speaker, the way an author invents a narrator. What the song does show is a maker who knew camp life and New England speech well enough to joke about them. So the safest inference is "a New Englander who knew the camp," not "a farm boy."
Intended audience: who would get the jokes? (Source 1, lines 2 and 9-12, with Source 3)
The song names "Captain Goodwin" and jokes about the feathers on Washington's hat. Who would enjoy this?
Result: Jokes about real officers only work for people who know them or have seen them. Source 3 says the soldiers were "the Troops of the several Colonies" (paragraph 1), and they held siege lines around Cambridge (paragraph 2). A plausible intended audience is soldiers and their families in New England, people who knew the camp and spoke the same dialect.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Sources 4 and 5 are by Oscar Sonneck, who worked at the Library of Congress. In 1909 he wrote a report for the Librarian of Congress about the history of four American songs. His report is a secondary source: a later study that uses older sources. A broadside is a song or notice printed on one side of a single sheet. Sonneck had found three early broadsides of this song, with fifteen stanzas each. Gloss a few of his words before reading: provincialisms (words used in one region), allusion (a mention), derisively satirical (mocking), greenhorn (a newcomer with no experience) and conjecture (a guess based on evidence).
Pairs read Source 4 and underline every clue Sonneck uses. Then they compare his inferences with the class's inferences from Direct Instruction: where does he agree, and what does he add? Next, read Source 5. Ask: what kind of evidence is the claim that Edward Bangs wrote the words? (A note from a classmate, passed along by Hale, which Sonneck had not seen in full.) What other facts make it more plausible? (Bangs was in the Harvard class of 1777, so he was a student in 1775, and he "joined the Middlesex farmers in the pursuit of April 19, 1775," paragraph 3.) In paragraph 3, ask what the playful phrase "mount Pegasus" might mean, given that it marks the start of the years when Bangs "might have written the lines."
1If we turn to the text itself, it clearly reveals an American origin. It is so full of American provincialisms, slang expressions of the time, allusions to American habits, customs, that no Englishman could have penned these verses. Even if he could have done so, he would not have done so, because his poetic efforts in this form would largely have been a puzzle to his comrades. Had this text been a British production, it would have found its way to England, which apparently is not the case. To be a British satire on the unmilitary appearance of provincial American troops, as has been said, the verses would have to be derisively satirical, which they are not. They breathe good-natured humor and they deal not at all with the uncouth appearance of American soldiery, but with the experience of a Yankee greenhorn in matters military who went down to a military camp and upon his return narrates in his own naive style the impressions made on him by all the wonderful sights of military pomp and circumstance.
2But the text helps us beyond proving a mere American origin. Our Yankee clearly describes not an imaginary camp, but a particular camp, and part of the desired effect was calculated by the author from personal allusions: Captain Gooding, Squire David, Captain Davis, Captain Washington. These names were unmistakably borrowed from life. [...] the allusion to and description of a "Captain Washington and gentlefolks about him" who is "grown so tarnal proud, he will not ride without 'em," etc., as a bit of humorously twisted characterization, fits none so well as George Washington, commander in chief. Without this allusion to George Washington, the date of the text would be indefinite within certain limits. With this allusion the conjecture becomes fairly safe that the text of "Father and I went down to camp" originated at or in the vicinity of the "Provincial Camp," Cambridge, Mass., in 1775 or 1776.
Oscar G. T. Sonneck, Library of Congress, Source 4: A historian reads the song for clues (Sonneck, 1909) (1909). Public domain (published 1909). Source text.
1[...] Dr. Edward Everett Hale when printing the "Yankey's Return" in his "New England History in Ballads," 1903, remarked:
2An autograph note of Judge Dawes, of the Harvard class of 1777, addressed to my father, says that the author of the well-known lines was Edward Bangs, who graduated with him.
3The historian would have preferred to see the autograph note of Judge Dawes printed in full, as in this form it merely assigns the poem to a member of the Harvard class of 1777 without defining the date or place of Edward Bangs's poetic effusion. According to Doctor Hale's meager information, Edward Bangs might have written the lines any year between the time he was able to mount Pegasus and 1787, when part of the text was quoted in "The Contrast" written as Mr. Matthews suggestively pointed out in his monograph on "Uncle Sam" by a member of the Harvard class of 1776. In this connection it is also suggestive that Bangs had, as a college boy, joined the Middlesex farmers in the pursuit of April 19, 1775, that Harvard College was transferred from Cambridge to Concord in September, 1775, and returned to Cambridge in 1776. On the other hand there appears to exist no evidence, positive, circumstantial, or even traditional, that the words of the "Yankey's Return from Camp" were written or known before the war for independence, that is, before 1775.
4[...] Thus, to sum up, it would appear that the "Yankee Doodle" text "Father and I went down to camp" originated in 1775 or 1776, and that we have in this particular broadside its first and original edition printed presumably shortly after it had been written. Since the fifteen stanzas are identical in the three earliest known editions, they clearly represent an accepted form of the text not only, but a form attributable to a single author, and it would really seem as if the authorship of Edward Bangs in 1775 rather than in 1776, rests on something more than tradition.
Oscar G. T. Sonneck, Library of Congress, quoting Edward Everett Hale, Source 5: Who wrote the words? (Sonneck, 1909) (1909). Public domain (published 1909). Source text.
Check for understanding: In Source 4, paragraph 1, Sonneck rejects one idea about the maker. Which idea, and what is his evidence? (That a British writer made the song to mock American troops; the verses are full of American slang and "breathe good-natured humor" instead of mocking.) Have students add one line to their notes: Sonneck's inference about the maker is plausible because...
Independent Practice15 minutes
Source 6 shows Sonneck dating two of the printed copies. An imprint is the line on a printed item that names the printer and the city. A city directory is a yearly book that lists a city's residents and businesses with their addresses.
Students work alone and answer in full sentences:
Where was the Coverly broadside printed, and how do you know? (Quote paragraph 1.)
Name the two outside sources Sonneck uses to date it, and say what each one shows.
Isaiah Thomas had the songs "Bound up for preservation." In his own words, why did he want to keep them?
Does the 1810-1813 date tell us when the words were first written? Explain.
1[...] The question now is whether or not the broadsides themselves help to trace the date of origin of this text. The "Yankee's Return from Camp" has the imprint, "N. Coverly, jr., Printer, Milk-Street, Boston." Reference to the Boston City Directories proves that this printer flourished between 1810 and 1823, the "jr." disappearing from the directory of 1818. However, the broadside can not have been printed after 1813, since it forms part of the curious collection of songs, ballads, etc., in three volumes, presented to the American Antiquarian Society by Isaiah Thomas in 1814, with the statement that it was "purchased from a ballad printer and seller in Boston, 1813. Bound up for preservation—to shew that the articles of this kind are in vogue with the vulgar at this time, 1814." Consequently the date of this particular broadside is fixed as between 1810 and 1813.
2No such definite clew is given in the broadside of "The Yankey's Return from Camp. Together with the favorite Song of the Black Bird." The spelling of Yankey instead of Yankee suggests the second half of the eighteenth century rather than the first half of the nineteenth, but the argument is not a safe one, since the spelling with y is easily traced in early nineteenth-century literature. Indeed, it appears in the very chorus of Coverly's broadside, 1810–1813. [...]
Oscar G. T. Sonneck, Library of Congress, Source 6: Dating two printed copies (Sonneck, 1909) (1909). Public domain (published 1909). Source text.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket (index card): Write one sentence for each of the four questions about Source 1: "A plausible maker is ___ because ___ (Source __)." Do the same for date, place of origin and intended audience. Circle the one you are least sure of, and say why.
Teacher notes. The song uses dialect, including "tarnal" and "nation," which Bartlett's 1859 dictionary describes as corruptions of "eternal" and "damnation" used for emphasis; in the song they are part of the joke and are not aimed at anyone. Students may read Isaiah Thomas's word "vulgar" (Source 6) as "rude"; ask what the rest of his sentence, about "a ballad printer and seller," suggests it means here. Sonneck's conclusions are inferences: he says the conjecture "becomes fairly safe" (Source 4), and that Bangs's authorship rests "on something more than tradition" (Source 5), not that it is proven. Keep that language when students write. The words and the tune have separate histories; this lesson is about the words of one version only. Source 7, for homework, is printed below.
1In "The Contrast" we find in Act III, scene 1, this amusing bit of dialogue. Jonathan, the first stage Yankee, when asked to sing a song, says:
[...]
2Marblehead's a rocky place, And Cape-Cod is sandy; Charlestown is burned down, Boston is the dandy. Yankee doodle, doodle do, etc.
[...]
3Enough of the dialogue has been quoted to make it self-evident that Royall Tyler did not write these verses himself, but merely borrowed them for his purposes from what the Germans so happily call the "Volksmund." Discounting some of the hundred and ninety-nine verses as part of Tyler's humorous poetic license, it is clear that many folk poets must have been at work to form such an endless chain of verses for Yankee Doodle, the single links of which would be left out or inserted according to local preferences, as is so often the case with folk songs. It is, furthermore, clear that the text, whole or in part, could not have become so well known and popular in one or two or three years in a country like America to make a reference to more than 199 ballad verses an effective bit of humorous exaggeration and comedy writing. Thus we seem to drift back toward Revolutionary times, but it is also significant that at least the verse "Marblehead's a rocky place" can not have been written before June 17, 1775, the day on which Charlestown was burned down by General Gage. Nor would there have been any sense in writing them after 1785, when the town was rapidly rising from the ashes.
4Curiously enough, this verse, which seems to have been written between middle of June, 1775 and 1785, appears in none of the historically important sources of the publications of the "Yankee Doodle" text. No safe inference is to be drawn from this fact, but one is naturally inclined to believe that it was a local interpolation not belonging to the original text.
Oscar G. T. Sonneck, Library of Congress, quoting Royall Tyler's play The Contrast (1787), Source 7: A verse in a 1787 play (Sonneck, 1909) (1909). Public domain (published 1909). Source text.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a four-box organizer (maker, date, place, audience) with a sentence starter in each box: "The clue is ___. Source __ tells me ___. So a plausible ___ is ___."
Read Source 1 aloud with tarnal, nation and Hasty-puddin glossed in the margin (see Direct Instruction), and do Example 1 together before students try the others
Pre-teach eight words: infer, plausible, stanza, dialect, broadside, imprint, siege, anonymous (with no name given)
For Advanced Students
Read the 1824 printing's extra stanzas in Sonneck's report (archive.org) and decide whether they support or weaken the 1775 date
Write a one-paragraph reply to Sonneck explaining which of his inferences is the weakest and what source would make it stronger
Find a second song in Sonneck's 1909 report and list the clues he uses to date it
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong work gives a plausible maker, date, place of origin and intended audience, names the clue in the source and the outside source for each one, and says how sure the inference is. Watch for answers that treat the speaker "I" as the maker, that confuse the date a copy was printed with the date the words were written, or that state an inference as a proven fact.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Clue Cards
15 minPairs
Each pair gets 8 clue cards. Each card has a clue from Sources 1-3 or from the caption under Source 1. Pairs sort each card under the question it helps answer (maker, date, place of origin or intended audience), then write the other source that supports it. A card can go under two questions.
The 8 Cards
"captain Washington" is "giving orders to his men" (Source 1, lines 5-7)
"Father and I went down to camp" (Source 1, line 1)
"Along with Captain Goodwin" (Source 1, line 2)
"tarnal fina" and "Only a nation louder" (Source 1, lines 10 and 20)
"a little keg" knocked "with little sticks / To call the folks together" (Source 1, lines 25-28)
"George Washington, Esq. was unanimously elected" (Source 2, paragraph 4)
"Washington had arrived in Cambridge on July 2" (Source 3, paragraph 2)
Source 1 was printed in 1824 (the caption under Source 1)
Answer Key for the Teacher
Date: cards 1, 6 and 7 (the words probably come after mid-June 1775), and card 8 (the words are no later than 1824).
Place of origin: cards 2 and 7 (the army camp around Cambridge), with card 4 (New England speech).
Maker: card 4 (someone who spoke rural New England dialect) and card 5 (someone who knew camp life well enough to joke about it).
Intended audience: cards 3 and 4 (people who knew the officers and spoke the dialect).
Variation
For a shorter version, give each pair only cards 1, 4, 6 and 7, one card for each question.
2
How Sure Are We?
15 minGroups of 3
Each group gets a strip with four levels: almost certain, likely, possible and not supported. The group places each of the five statements below on the strip and writes the evidence and its type (a dated record, a clue in the song, a historian's reasoning, or a family story) next to it.
The Statements
The words were written in 1775 or 1776.
The words were made up at or near the army camp around Cambridge.
Edward Bangs, a Harvard student, wrote the words.
A British officer wrote the words to make fun of American soldiers.
The words existed before 1787.
Possible Placements
Statement 5, almost certain: a dated record, the 1787 play quoting the verses (Source 5, paragraph 3).
Statements 1 and 2, likely: a clue in the song ("captain Washington") matched with dated records (Sources 2 and 3) and Sonneck's reasoning (Source 4, paragraph 2).
Statement 3, possible to likely: a family story from a classmate's note (Source 5, paragraph 2), made stronger by Bangs being near Cambridge in 1775 (paragraph 3).
Statement 4, not supported: Sonneck's reasoning that the verses are full of American slang and are not "derisively satirical" (Source 4, paragraph 1).
Accept other placements when the group's evidence supports them.
3
Written or Printed?
10-15 minGroups of 3-4
Groups place 6 event cards on a paper copy of Diagram 1, then mark each card W (it helps date when the words were written) or P (it tells when a copy was printed). Then they finish this sentence: "The words must be older than ___, because ___."
The 6 Event Cards
Congress chooses Washington as general (June 1775, Source 2)
Washington arrives in Cambridge (July 2, 1775, Source 3)
Harvard College moves from Cambridge to Concord (September 1775, Source 5)
The play The Contrast quotes some of the verses (1787, Source 5)
Coverly prints the broadside "Yankee's Return from Camp" (1810-1813, Source 6)
Source 1 is printed in Farmer and Moore's Collections (1824)
Answer Key for the Teacher
Cards 1-3 help date the writing (W): they place the camp, Washington and Bangs near Cambridge in 1775. Cards 5 and 6 are printed copies (P). Card 4 is a quotation, so it shows the words already existed: it sets the latest possible date. A good sentence: "The words must be older than 1787, because The Contrast quoted them that year."
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
1 diagrams
Diagram 1: Clues for Dating the Song, 1770-1830
A timeline drawn to scale. The dark shaded box is Sonneck's inferred date for the words, 1775 or 1776 (Sources 4 and 5). Dots mark dated events from the other sources: Congress chooses Washington and he reaches Cambridge in June-July 1775 (Sources 2 and 3); the play The Contrast quotes the verses in 1787 (Source 5); the Coverly broadside is printed between 1810 and 1813 (Source 6, light box); Source 1 is printed in 1824. The words cannot be later than the earliest copy that quotes them.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
D2.His.11.6-8 Homework: Dating One Extra Verse
Directions: Use Source 7 (printed in the Closure phase) for Part 1 and Sources 1-6 for Part 2. Source 7 starts with a verse that a character sings in the play The Contrast (1787), and then Sonneck explains what the verse tells him. Two of his words: Volksmund is German for "the mouth of the people," songs passed along by ordinary people, and an interpolation is a part added to a text later by someone else. Answer in complete sentences and cite each source and paragraph you use.
Part 1: Reading Source 7 (Problems 1-3)
Quote the line in the verse (paragraph 2) that Sonneck uses to date it. What event does it refer to, and on what date did that event happen, according to paragraph 3?
Sonneck gives a latest date for the verse too. What is it, and what is his reason? Write the full date range he infers in paragraph 4.
In paragraph 3, Sonneck says the words could not have become popular "in one or two or three years." Explain how this reasoning helps him infer that the song was older than 1787.
Part 2: Putting the Sources Together (Problems 4-6)
Write a museum label (4-5 sentences) for Source 1 that gives a plausible maker, date, place of origin and intended audience. Use words like "probably" or "likely," and name the source behind each claim.
Sonneck thinks the Marblehead verse in Source 7 was added later by other people and was not part of the original song. How does that change what the verse can tell us about the date of Source 1?
Choose the weakest of your four inferences in Problem 4. Explain why it is weak and describe what kind of evidence would make it stronger.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Inference
Gives a plausible maker, date, place or audience that fits all the evidence used
Gives an inference that fits only part of the evidence
No inference, or one the sources contradict
Other sources
Names the outside source and the clue it connects to, with paragraph or line numbers
Names a source without a clue or citation
No outside source
How sure
Says how sure the inference is and why (dated record, clue, tradition)
Uses "probably" without a reason
States the inference as a proven fact
Written vs. printed
Keeps the date the words were written apart from the date a copy was printed
Mixes them up once
Treats a printing date as the writing date
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 2, 5, 14 and 19 use Sources 1-3 (Direct Instruction). Questions 3-4, 6, 8-9, 11 and 18 use Sources 4 and 5 (Guided Practice), and Questions 7, 10 and 13 use Source 6 (Independent Practice). Question 12 uses Diagram 1. Questions 1, 15-17 and 20 ask you to connect the sources. Choose the best answer, or write a short answer with quotations.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A historian writes that the intended audience of a camp song was "soldiers and their families." What part of the source is the historian describing?
Answer: A
The intended audience is the group the maker had in mind when creating the source. Choice B confuses the audience with later printers, who made copies for their own buyers; choice C confuses the people a source mentions with the people it was made for.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 1, lines 25-28, the speaker sees "a little keg" with heads "made of leather" that soldiers knock "with little sticks / To call the folks together." What is the object, and what does the description suggest about the speaker?
Answer: C
Leather heads struck with sticks to call people together describe a drum. The speaker calls it a keg, which suggests a newcomer to camp who does not know the word, the "Yankee greenhorn" Sonneck describes in Source 4, paragraph 1. Choice A takes "keg" literally and ignores the sticks; choice D mixes in "Hasty-puddin" from line 4, which is a comparison for how crowded the camp was.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 5, paragraph 3, says there is "no evidence, positive, circumstantial, or even traditional" that the words were "written or known" before 1775. How does this help a historian date the song?
Answer: B
Sonneck is saying that nothing points to an earlier date, so 1775 is a reasonable earliest limit. Choice A turns a lack of earlier evidence into proof of an exact year, which the sentence does not claim; choice C confuses being written or known with being printed; choice D reverses his point.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 4, paragraph 2, Sonneck says the names "Captain Gooding, Squire David, Captain Davis, Captain Washington" were "unmistakably borrowed from life." What does he infer from this?
Answer: D
He writes that "Our Yankee clearly describes not an imaginary camp, but a particular camp," and the real names are his evidence. Choice B is the opposite of "borrowed from life"; choice C goes beyond the text, since names of real officers would amuse anyone who knew the camp, not only officers.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 2, paragraph 7, the journal calls him "Colonel Washington" and then names him general. The song calls him "captain Washington" (Source 1, line 5). Which explanation fits Source 4 best?
Answer: A
Sonneck calls the song's picture of Washington "a bit of humorously twisted characterization" that "fits none so well as George Washington, commander in chief" (Source 4, paragraph 2), the top commander of the army. The wrong rank is part of the joke. Choice C has no support in any source, since Source 2 shows him being made general; choice D contradicts the inference that the song mentions him as the army's leader.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 4, paragraph 1, Sonneck notes that if the song had been British, "it would have found its way to England, which apparently is not the case." What does this point suggest?
Answer: C
If the song had been made by and for the British, copies would be expected in England; since there are none, it most likely stayed with the American audience it was made for. Choice A and choice D contradict "which apparently is not the case"; choice B invents a ban the source never mentions.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 6, paragraph 1, which of these is Sonneck's inference rather than a fact he read on the broadside or in a record?
Answer: B
Sonneck reaches the 1810-1813 range by combining two records: the city directories show Coverly working from 1810, and Thomas's note shows the copy was bought by 1813 ("Consequently the date of this particular broadside is fixed as between 1810 and 1813"). The other choices are read directly: the imprint is printed on the sheet, and the purchase and the gift come from Thomas's own statement. Choosing C mistakes Thomas's dated note, a record, for Sonneck's reasoning.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Sonneck calls Hale's information about Edward Bangs "meager" (Source 5, paragraph 3). What is missing from it?
Answer: D
He writes that the note "merely assigns the poem to a member of the Harvard class of 1777 without defining the date or place." Choice A is wrong because the note does name Bangs; choices B and C are wrong because the note does say Dawes and Bangs were in the Harvard class of 1777.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 5, paragraph 4, Sonneck says the fifteen stanzas "are identical in the three earliest known editions." What does he infer about the maker from this?
Answer: A
He concludes that the stanzas form "a form attributable to a single author." Choice D is the opposite: identical copies show the text was not changed; choice C confuses the collector who bought printed songs (Source 6) with the maker.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does Sonneck say the spelling "Yankey" is "not a safe" clue to the date of a broadside (Source 6, paragraph 2)?
Answer: C
He says the spelling "is easily traced in early nineteenth-century literature" and even appears in Coverly's 1810-1813 broadside. A clue that fits two centuries cannot narrow the date. Choice D is the overconfident reading he warns against; choices A and B have no support in the source.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 5, paragraph 2, who received the note from Judge Dawes saying that Edward Bangs wrote the lines?
Answer: B
Hale writes that the note was "addressed to my father." So the evidence passed from Dawes to Hale's father to Hale, and Sonneck only read Hale's summary. Choice C is wrong because Sonneck says he "would have preferred to see" the note in full; choice D names the playwright of The Contrast, which Source 5 mentions only as the 1787 play that quoted the verses.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Diagram 1 and Sources 1 and 3, about how many years passed between Washington's arrival in Cambridge and the 1824 printing of Source 1?
Answer: D
Washington arrived in 1775 and Source 1 was printed in 1824: 1824 - 1775 = 49 years. Choice A uses 1787, the year of The Contrast (1787 - 1775 = 12); choice C uses 1813, the last year of the Coverly broadside (1813 - 1775 = 38). A long gap is one reason a printing date cannot be used as the date the words were made.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The Coverly broadside's imprint reads "N. Coverly, jr." Why does it matter that the "jr." disappears from the Boston directory of 1818 (Source 6, paragraph 1)?
Answer: A
The printer still signed himself "jr." on this copy, and the directories stop using "jr." in 1818, so the copy was most likely printed before then; Thomas's note then narrows it to 1813 or earlier. Choice B is wrong because Sonneck says Coverly "flourished between 1810 and 1823"; choice C confuses the date of a printed copy with the date the words were made.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 3, paragraph 2, what did Washington do on the evening of July 2, 1775?
Answer: C
The page says "That evening, he formally took command from Massachusetts General Artemas Ward." Choice A happened in June, in Congress (Source 2); choice B happened "Within two weeks," not that evening; choice D has no support in any source.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Give the narrowest plausible date range you can for when stanzas 1-7 of Source 1 were first made up. Use at least two sources other than Source 1, and explain each end of your range.
Model answer: The words were probably made up between mid-June 1775 and 1776. The earliest end comes from the song's "captain Washington" (line 5): Congress elected George Washington general in June 1775 (Source 2, paragraph 4), and Sonneck found "no evidence" of the words before 1775 (Source 5, paragraph 3). The latest possible end is 1787, when the play The Contrast quoted part of the text (Source 5, paragraph 3). Sonneck narrows it to "1775 or 1776" because the camp and Washington fit the Cambridge camp (Source 4, paragraph 2). Rubric: 1 point for a range, 1 point for each end explained with a source (2), 1 point for saying it is an inference, not proof.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Sonneck writes that the words originated "at or in the vicinity of the 'Provincial Camp,' Cambridge, Mass." (Source 4, paragraph 2). Name two clues or sources, other than that sentence, that support this place of origin, and explain each.
Model answer: First, Source 3 says "Washington had arrived in Cambridge on July 2" and rode to the "siege lines around Cambridge" (paragraph 2), so a camp where Washington gave orders in 1775 fits Cambridge. Second, Source 5 says Bangs was in the Harvard class of 1777 and that Harvard was in Cambridge until it moved to Concord in September 1775 (paragraph 3), so the man named as maker was there. The New England dialect of Source 1, such as "tarnal" (line 10), also fits. Rubric: 2 points per clue with a citation and an explanation (4).
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Compare the intended audience of the song when it was first made up with the audience of the Coverly broadside printed in Boston in 1810-1813. Use at least one quotation for each.
Model answer: At first the audience was most likely people who knew the camp: Sonneck says a British style "would largely have been a puzzle to his comrades" (Source 4, paragraph 1), and the song jokes about real officers like "Captain Goodwin" (Source 1, line 2). By 1810-1813 the song was a printed sheet sold by "a ballad printer and seller in Boston" to anyone who would buy it; Isaiah Thomas said such songs were "in vogue with the vulgar" (Source 6, paragraph 1). The audience grew from soldiers and their neighbors to the general public. Rubric: 2 points for each audience with a quotation (4), 1 point for the comparison.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Sonneck uses three kinds of evidence about the maker: clues in the words, a classmate's note reported by Hale, and facts about Bangs's life. Rank them from strongest to weakest and explain your ranking.
Model answer: Strongest: the clues in the words, because anyone can check them; the American slang and real names show an American maker who knew the camp (Source 4, paragraphs 1-2). Next: the facts about Bangs's life, such as his joining "the pursuit of April 19, 1775" (Source 5, paragraph 3), because they show he could have written it, though not that he did. Weakest: the note, because it reached Sonneck secondhand and was not "printed in full" (Source 5, paragraph 3). Other rankings earn credit when they are explained. Rubric: 1 point for a ranking, 1 point per explained kind of evidence (3), 1 point for citations.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
In Source 2, paragraph 9, Washington says he fears his "abilities and military experience may not be equal" to the job. Infer the intended audience of these words, and explain how that audience may have shaped what he said.
Model answer: The audience was the members of the Continental Congress, the people who had just chosen him; he spoke "standing in his place" after the president told him of their vote (paragraph 7). Speaking to the leaders who had trusted him, he thanks them for their "approbation" (approval) and speaks modestly, perhaps so that no one would think he wanted the command for himself. Other reasonable explanations earn credit when they are tied to the audience. Rubric: 2 points for the audience with evidence, 2 points for a reasoned link between audience and words, 1 point for a citation.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
A classmate writes: "Source 1 was made in 1824 by an anonymous writer in Farmer and Moore's Collections." Explain the two mistakes in this sentence.
Model answer: First, 1824 is when Source 1 was printed, not when the words were made up; the words were already quoted in a play in 1787 (Source 5, paragraph 3). Second, the anonymous writer only sent the stanzas to the collection; nothing shows that person made them up, and other sources point to a maker at the 1775 camp, possibly Edward Bangs (Source 5). Rubric: 2 points for each mistake explained with a source (4).
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does D2.His.11.6-8 mean?
D2.His.11.6-8 asks middle school students to use other historical sources to infer a plausible maker, date, place of origin and intended audience for a source that does not state them. It is a history indicator in Dimension 2 of the C3 Framework, in the group on historical sources and evidence. In practice, students find clues inside a source and check them against outside records.
What does "plausible" mean in D2.His.11.6-8?
It means believable and supported by evidence, though not proven. Students are not expected to discover the one true answer; they are expected to give an answer that fits the clues and the other sources, and to say how sure they are.
Why use "Yankee Doodle" to teach inference?
The words of one popular version were printed without a maker's name, and no early copy gives a date. A Library of Congress specialist, Oscar Sonneck, worked out a plausible maker, date and place in a 1909 report, so students can make their own inferences and then compare them with his. The song is short, funny and easy to read aloud.
Is this lesson about the tune or the words?
The words. The tune has its own history, which Sonneck treats separately in his report. This lesson studies only the stanzas that begin "Father and I went down to camp."
What is the difference between the speaker and the maker of a source?
The speaker is the voice inside the text, such as the "I" in a song; the maker is the person who created it. A writer can invent a speaker, so students should not assume they are the same person.
How is D2.His.11.6-8 different from D2.His.11.9-12?
The 6-8 indicator asks students to infer missing information about a source. The 9-12 indicator assumes students can do that and asks them to critique how useful a source is for a specific question, based on its maker, date, place of origin, intended audience and purpose.
What other sources help students infer a date?
Records with dates are the most useful: journals of meetings, letters, city directories and printed copies that quote the source. A later copy sets a latest possible date, and a person or event the source mentions can set an earliest possible date.
Are the dialect words in the song offensive?
No. Bartlett's Dictionary of Americanisms (1859) describes "tarnal" as "A New England corruption of eternal" and "nation" as "A corruption of damnation," meaning "very, extremely": words used for emphasis. The song uses them for humor, not to insult anyone. Gloss them before reading so students can focus on the clues.
How can I assess D2.His.11.6-8 without a test?
Give students a short source with its maker, date and place removed, plus one or two outside records, and ask for a labeled inference for each of the four questions. Score whether each answer is plausible, cites a clue and an outside source, and says how sure it is.
Does D2.His.11.6-8 connect to the Common Core literacy standards?
Yes. Citing evidence from the sources practices RH.6-8.1, and comparing Sonneck's study with the song practices RH.6-8.9, the relationship between a primary and a secondary source on the same topic.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to D2.His.11.6-8: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RH.6-8.1Prerequisite
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources
Standard text: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History (Silver Spring, MD: NCSS, 2013). NCSS was not involved in the production of this lesson and does not endorse it.