SVHS Website Header

My Cart

D2.His.11.9-12C3 FrameworkSocial StudiesHistoryGrades 9-12

D2.His.11.9-12: Critiquing the Usefulness of Sources for an Inquiry

In plain English: D2.His.11.9-12 is the C3 Framework history indicator for grades 9-12 that asks students to critique how useful historical sources are for a specific inquiry, based on each source's maker, date, place of origin, intended audience and purpose. A source can be very useful for one question and weak for another, so students judge usefulness against the question being asked.

Critique the usefulness of historical sources for a specific historical inquiry based on their maker, date, place of origin, intended audience, and purpose.

C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 2: Applying Disciplinary Concepts and Tools · Discipline: History · Historical Sources and Evidence · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

70 min

Overview

Students critique the usefulness of five sources for one specific inquiry: How did the 1893 World's Columbian Exposition represent African Americans, and how did African American writers and speakers respond? The sources are the Exposition's official guide, the preface and closing note of the 1893 pamphlet The Reason Why, Frederick Douglass's introduction to that pamphlet, and two excerpts from Fannie Barrier Williams's address to the World's Congress of Representative Women.

For each source, students weigh maker, date, place of origin, intended audience and purpose, and explain what the source can and cannot show for each part of the inquiry. The lesson stresses that usefulness depends on the question, that a source made to promote or to protest can be strong evidence of that view, and that sources made at the same time and place can still give very different pictures.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Identify the maker, date, place of origin, intended audience and purpose of a historical source
  • Explain how each of those five features raises or limits a source's usefulness for a specific inquiry
  • Judge that the same source can be strong evidence for one sub-question and weak evidence for another
  • Write a critique that compares two sources' usefulness and supports the judgment with quotations

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Inferring a plausible maker, date, place of origin and audience for a source D2.His.11.6-8
  • Citing textual evidence that attends to a source's date and origin RH.9-10.1
  • Basic knowledge of emancipation and Reconstruction

Lesson Procedure

70-70 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "A historian asks: how did a city's summer festival treat the small food vendors who worked at it? She has three sources: the festival's official program, a letter one vendor wrote to the local paper, and a tourism advertisement. Rank them from most to least useful for HER question, and give a reason for each. Would your ranking change if her question were 'What did the festival offer visitors?'"

    Collect two or three rankings. Draw out the key idea: usefulness is not a fixed quality of a source; it depends on the question. The official program is strong evidence of what organizers wanted visitors to see and weak evidence of vendors' experience. The vendor's letter is the reverse. Name the five features the indicator asks students to weigh: maker, date, place of origin, intended audience and purpose. A critique states what a source can and cannot show for a specific inquiry, and why.

  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    The inquiry. Post the question for the whole lesson: How did the 1893 World's Columbian Exposition represent African Americans, and how did African American writers and speakers respond? The sources are from Chicago in 1893-1894. The World's Columbian Exposition, held at Jackson Park, celebrated "the four-hundredth anniversary of the discovery of America" (Source B, paragraph 2); its official guide gives its dates as May 1 to October 26, 1893, though the fair in fact stayed open until October 30.

    Source A comes from the official guidebook, compiled by John J. Flinn and "issued under authority of the World's Columbian Exposition." Source B comes from a pamphlet, The Reason Why the Colored American Is Not in the World's Columbian Exposition, distributed by Ida B. Wells; its preface is unsigned, and its closing note is signed by Wells. Model the critique on these two before students try the others.

    Five features, and the critique question each one raises for this inquiry
    FeatureCritique questionWhat it can change about usefulness
    MakerWho made it, and what did they know or want?Insider knowledge, authority, a stake in the outcome
    DateWhen was it made, compared with the events?Made during the fair, or later and revised
    Place of originWhere was it made?Made at the fair by people who could see it, or elsewhere
    Intended audienceWho was meant to read or hear it?What the maker explained, stressed or left out
    PurposeWhy was it made?To guide, to promote, to protest, to persuade

    The first duty of the visitor who is desirous of obtaining the best possible results from a visit to the World's Columbian Exposition, be his time brief or unlimited, is carefully to study the accompanying map. This is an absolute necessity to one who would not travel aimlessly over the grounds and who has a purpose beyond that of a mere curiosity hunter. It is presumed at the outset that the great majority of visitors are those who seek to enlighten themselves regarding the progress which the world has made in the arts, sciences and industries. To him who enters upon an examination of the external and internal exhibit of this the greatest of World's Fairs a liberal education is assured. It is the aim of this volume to aid in such endeavor—to clear the way of obstacles—to make the pathway broad and pleasant.

    [...]

    The World's Congress Auxiliary.—The organization is an authorized adjunct of the Exposition, and aims to supplement the exhibit of material progress by the Exposition by a portrayal of the "wonderful achievements of the new age in science, literature, education, government, jurisprudence, morals, charity, religion, and other departments of human activity, as the most effective means of increasing the fraternity, progress, prosperity and peace of mankind." [...]

    [...]

    Hayti has a beautiful little pavilion in the foreign section, and has exhibits in nearly every department of the Exposition, which serve to illustrate the wonderful progress made by this little republic during recent years. The Haytian building cost $20,000, and the exhibits made by the country $100,000.

    John J. Flinn, compiler; "issued under authority of the World's Columbian Exposition", Source A: Official Guide to the World's Columbian Exposition (three excerpts) (1893). Public domain (published 1893). Source text.

    To the Seeker After Truth:

    Columbia has bidden the civilized world to join with her in celebrating the four-hundredth anniversary of the discovery of America, and the invitation has been accepted. At Jackson Park are displayed exhibits of her natural resources, and her progress in the arts and sciences, but that which would best illustrate her moral grandeur has been ignored.

    The exhibit of the progress made by a race in 25 years of freedom as against 250 years of slavery, would have been the greatest tribute to the greatness and progressiveness of American institutions which could have been shown the world. The colored people of this great Republic number eight millions—more than one-tenth the whole population of the United States. They were among the earliest settlers of this continent, landing at Jamestown, Virginia in 1619 in a slave ship, before the Puritans, who landed at Plymouth in 1620. They have contributed a large share to American prosperity and civilization. [...]

    Those visitors to the World's Columbian Exposition who know these facts, especially foreigners will naturally ask: Why are not the colored people, who constitute so large an element of the American population, and who have contributed so large a share to American greatness,—more visibly present and better represented in this World's Exposition? Why are they not taking part in this glorious celebration of the four-hundredth anniversary of the discovery of their country? Are they so dull and stupid as to feel no interest in this great event? It is to answer these questions and supply as far as possible our lack of representation at the Exposition that the Afro-American has published this volume.

    [...]

    TO THE PUBLIC.

    This pamphlet is published by contribution from colored people of the United States. The haste necessary for the press, prevents the incorporation of interesting data showing the progress of the colored people in commercial lines.

    Besides the cuts of a school and hospital it was desired to have a cut of the Capital Savings Bank, a flourishing institution conducted by the colored people of Washington, D. C. The cut, however, did not arrive in time for the press.

    Twenty thousand copies of The Reason Why are now ready for gratuitous distribution. Applications by mail will enclose three cents for postage. All orders addressed to the undersigned will be promptly acknowledged. Ida B. Wells,
    Room 9, 128 Clark St.,
    Chicago, Ill.

    August 30, 1893.

    Unsigned preface; closing note signed by Ida B. Wells, Source B: The Reason Why (1893): the preface and the closing note "To the Public" (1893). Public domain (published 1893). Source text.
    • Purpose and audience: what the official guide is good evidence for (Source A, paragraph 1)

      How useful is Source A for the first half of the inquiry, how the Exposition represented itself?

      Result: Very useful for the organizers' framing. Its maker worked "under authority of" the Exposition, and its stated purpose is to help visitors "who seek to enlighten themselves regarding the progress which the world has made in the arts, sciences and industries" (paragraph 1). Because it was written to guide and attract visitors, it shows what organizers wanted them to see. The same purpose makes it weak evidence of what was missing: a guidebook has no reason to point out who was left out.

    • Intended audience: who Source B was written for (Source B, paragraphs 4 and 8)

      Source B names its readers. How does that affect its usefulness for the second half of the inquiry?

      Result: The preface addresses "visitors to the World's Columbian Exposition," "especially foreigners" (paragraph 4), and the closing note offers copies by mail for "three cents for postage" (paragraph 8). Writing for outsiders, the makers explain basic facts about Black Americans, such as their number and long history (paragraph 3). That makes Source B strong evidence of how African American writers wanted the world to see the fair; it is an argument made for a purpose, so its claims need checking against other records.

    • Date and maker: when and how Source B was made (Source B, paragraphs 6 and 9)

      The closing note is dated and signed. What do the date and the conditions of publication add to the critique?

      Result: It is dated "August 30, 1893" (paragraph 9), during the fair, and signed by Ida B. Wells. It says the pamphlet "is published by contribution from colored people of the United States" and that "The haste necessary for the press" kept out "interesting data showing the progress of the colored people in commercial lines" (paragraph 6). So it is a source made during the events, by people directly affected, and by its makers' own account an incomplete one.

    • Place of origin and a second look at Source A (Source A, paragraph 3)

      Both sources were made in Chicago during the fair. Does Source A say anything about people of African descent at all?

      Result: Yes, indirectly. The Hayti entry praises "the wonderful progress made by this little republic" and gives the cost of its pavilion and exhibits (paragraph 3). A student could use this to ask why the guide praises one nation's progress while Source B says the progress of Black Americans was "ignored" (paragraph 2). Being made on the spot gives both sources detail; it does not make either one complete.

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Pairs read Source C, the opening chapter of the same pamphlet, by Frederick Douglass, and Source D, an address by Fannie Barrier Williams of Illinois to the World's Congress of Representative Women in May 1893. Source A, paragraph 2, explains that the World's Congress Auxiliary was "an authorized adjunct of the Exposition" that held congresses alongside the exhibits; the volume that printed Williams's address calls it a congress held "under the auspices of the Woman's branch" of that Auxiliary.

    For each source, pairs fill in the five features, then write one sentence beginning "For this inquiry, the source is most useful for showing ___ because its maker/date/place/audience/purpose ___." Prompt them to notice two things. Douglass describes his own authority in paragraph 4, so his maker is part of his argument. Williams spoke inside one of the Exposition's official programs, which complicates any claim that African Americans had no part in the fair at all.

    The colored people of America are not indifferent to the good opinion of the world, and we have made every effort to improve our first years of freedom and citizenship. We earnestly desired to show some results of our first thirty years of acknowledged manhood and womanhood. Wherein we have failed, it has been not our fault but our misfortune, and it is sincerely hoped that this brief story, not only of our successes, but of trials and failures, our hopes and disappointments will relieve us of the charge of indifference and indolence. We have deemed it only a duty to ourselves, to make plain what might otherwise be misunderstood and misconstrued concerning us. To do this we must begin with slavery. The duty undertaken is far from a welcome one.

    It involves the necessity of plain speaking of wrongs and outrages endured, and of rights withheld, and withheld in flagrant contradiction to boasted American Republican liberty and civilization. It is always more agreeable to speak well of one's country and its institutions than to speak otherwise; to tell of their good qualities rather than of their evil ones.

    [...]

    All this, and more, we would gladly say of American laws, manners, customs and Christianity. But unhappily, nothing of all this can be said, without qualification and without flagrant disregard of the truth. The explanation is this: We have long had in this country, a system of iniquity which possessed the power of blinding the moral perception, stifling the voice of conscience, blunting all human sensibilities and perverting the plainest teaching of the religion we have here professed, a system which John Wesley truly characterized as the sum of all villanies, and one in view of which Thomas Jefferson, himself a slaveholder, said he "trembled for his country" when he reflected "that God is just and that His justice cannot sleep forever." That system was American slavery. Though it is now gone, its asserted spirit remains.

    The writer of the initial chapter of this pamphlet, having himself been a slave, knows the slave system both on the inside and outside. Having studied its effects not only upon the slave and upon the master, but also upon the people and institutions by which it has been surrounded, he may therefore, without presumption, assume to bear witness to its baneful influence upon all concerned, and especially to its malign agency in explaining the present condition of the colored people of the United States, who were its victims; and to the sentiment held toward them both by the people who held them in slavery, and the people of the country who tolerated and permitted their enslavement, and the bearing it has upon the relation which we the colored people sustain to the World's Fair. [...]

    [...] So when it is asked why we are excluded from the World's Columbian Exposition, the answer is Slavery.

    Frederick Douglass, Source C: Frederick Douglass, Introduction to The Reason Why (1893) (1893). Public domain (published 1893). Source text.

    Less than thirty years ago the term progress as applied to colored women of African descent in the United States would have been an anomaly. The recognition of that term to-day as appropriate is a fact full of interesting significance. That the discussion of progressive womanhood in this great assemblage of the representative women of the world is considered incomplete without some account of the colored women's status is a most noteworthy evidence that we have not failed to impress ourselves on the higher side of American life.

    Less is known of our women than of any other class of Americans.

    No organization of far-reaching influence for their special advancement, no conventions of women to take note of their progress, and no special literature reciting the incidents, the events, and all things interesting and instructive concerning them are to be found among the agencies directing their career. There has been no special interest in their peculiar condition as native-born American women. Their power to affect the social life of America, either for good or for ill, has excited not even a speculative interest.

    [...]

    But a better view of what our women are doing and what their present status is may be had by noticing some lines of progress that are easily verifiable.

    First it should be noticed that separate facts and figures relative to colored women are not easily obtainable. Among the white women of the country independence, progressive intelligence, and definite interests have done so much that nearly every fact and item illustrative of their progress and status is classified and easily accessible. Our women, on the contrary, have had no advantage of interests peculiar and distinct and separable from those of men that have yet excited public attention and kindly recognition.

    Fannie Barrier Williams of Illinois, Source D: Fannie Barrier Williams, address to the World's Congress of Representative Women, May 1893 (excerpts) (1893; this edition 1894). Public domain (published 1894). Source text.

    Check for understanding: Which source would you use to show that African American leaders disagreed with the Exposition's picture of American progress, and which would you use to show that an African American woman spoke within the Exposition's programs? Ask students to name the feature (maker, date, place, audience or purpose) that best supports each choice.

  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Students write a one-paragraph critique of the usefulness of two sources for one sub-question of their choice:

    • How did the Exposition's official publications describe its purpose?
    • Did African Americans take part in any official program of the Exposition?
    • What reasons did African American writers give for their absence from the exhibits?

    The paragraph must name at least three of the five features, quote each source once, and end with a sentence that says which source is more useful for that sub-question and why. Remind students that usefulness is not the same as agreement: a source can be very useful as evidence of a view the historian does not share.

  5. Closure10 minutes

    Exit ticket: "The most useful source for the inquiry is ___ for the part of the question about ___, because its ___ (feature) ___. Its biggest limitation for this inquiry is ___." Collect and sort by source chosen; share one strong example of each.

    Background for a fair picture of the Exposition. Keep the pamphlet's argument and the documented record apart, and present both the fair's self-presentation and its exclusions. The official guide presents the fair as a display of "the progress which the world has made" (Source A). Ferdinand L. Barnett's chapter of The Reason Why reports that President Benjamin Harrison named no African American to the National Commission, that Hale G. Parker of Missouri was later named only as an alternate commissioner, that no Black woman sat on the Board of Lady Managers proper, and that the Exposition set aside August 25, 1893, as "Colored People's Day," which Barnett calls "the refinement of irony." He also notes that Haiti chose Frederick Douglass as its commissioner at the fair, so the Haitian pavilion in Source A, paragraph 3, was the one place Douglass held an official role. African American women also spoke at the official congresses: the volume that prints Williams's address includes remarks by Anna J. Cooper, Fannie Jackson Coppin, Hallie Q. Brown and Sarah J. Early. Two facts to correct if students repeat them: the guide's title page lists the closing date as October 26, but the fair stayed open until October 30, 1893; and the preface's history is its own, since the first recorded Africans in English Virginia arrived at Point Comfort in 1619, and the 1620 Plymouth settlers are usually called Pilgrims.

    Teacher notes. The sources use the terms of their time: "colored people" appears in Sources B-E, and the full pamphlet also uses "Negro." These were the usual respectful terms of the 1890s, and the African American makers of these sources used them themselves. Students should quote them exactly and use "African American" or "Black American" in their own writing. Source C refers to slavery and its lasting effects. Later pages of Douglass's chapter, not printed here, discuss lynching, and Ida B. Wells's chapter "Lynch Law" in the same pamphlet describes mob killings of Black Americans in direct and painful detail. Preview the full pamphlet before assigning any more of it, present this history plainly and with care, and use document analysis only, never role-play. Source E, for homework, quotes the words of prejudiced bank directors in order to criticize them. Keep the critique on usefulness: students do not need to agree or disagree with any maker, and the rubrics score reasoning about the sources, not a position. Source E is printed below.

    This general failure of the American people to know the new generation of colored people, and to recognize this important change in them, is the cause of more injustice to our women than can well be estimated. Further progress is everywhere seriously hindered by this ignoring of their improvement.

    Our exclusion from the benefits of the fair play sentiment of the country is little less than a crime against the ambitions and aspirations of a whole race of women. The American people are but repeating the common folly of history in thus attempting to repress the yearnings of progressive humanity.

    In the item of employment colored women bear a distressing burden of mean and unreasonable discrimination. [...]

    Not long ago I presented the case of a bright young woman to a well-known bank president of Chicago, who was in need of a thoroughly competent stenographer and typewriter. The president was fully satisfied with the young woman as exceptionally qualified for the position, and manifested much pleasure in commending her to the directors for appointment, and at the same time disclaimed that there could be any opposition on account of the slight tinge of African blood that identified her as a colored woman. Yet, when the matter was brought before the directors for action, these mighty men of money and business, these men whose prominence in all the great interests of the city would seem to lift them above all narrowness and foolishness, scented the African taint, and at once bravely came to the rescue of the bank and of society by dashing the hopes of this capable yet helpless young woman. No other question but that of color determined the action of these men, many of whom are probably foremost members of the humane society and heavy contributors to foreign missions and church extension work.

    Fannie Barrier Williams of Illinois, Source E: Fannie Barrier Williams, the same address, on employment (excerpt) (1893; this edition 1894). Public domain (published 1894). Source text.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a five-row organizer (maker, date, place, audience, purpose) with one starter per row, such as "Because the audience was ___, the source explains ___"
  • Assign only Sources A, B and D for the critique, and read Source C aloud with a short gloss of its long sentences
  • Pre-teach: adjunct (an added part), auspices (sponsorship), anomaly (something out of place), malign (harmful), cut (a printed picture)

For Advanced Students

  • Read Ferdinand L. Barnett's chapter in the full pamphlet (archive.org) and critique its usefulness for the question of how the Exposition's boards made decisions
  • Compare the 1894 printed version of Williams's address with the congress's printed program of May 1893, if available, and discuss what an edited volume can change
  • Write a critique of a source's usefulness for a different inquiry, such as how the Exposition presented other nations

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Strong work ties each judgment of usefulness to the specific inquiry, names the feature (maker, date, place, audience or purpose) behind it, quotes the source, and states both what the source can show and what it cannot. Watch for answers that call a source useless because it is one-sided, that treat any source made at the time as complete, or that confuse agreeing with a source with finding it useful.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Usefulness Matrix

20 minPairs

Each pair completes a matrix with one row for each of Sources A-E and seven columns: maker, date, place of origin, intended audience, purpose, most useful for, and least useful for. Every cell in the last two columns must name a part of the inquiry and cite a feature.

Sample Rows for the Teacher

  • Source A: compiled by Flinn under the Exposition's authority; 1893; Chicago; visitors; to guide them. Most useful for the organizers' framing of the fair as a display of progress. Least useful for who was left out, since a guide has no reason to say.
  • Source D: Williams, an African American woman from Illinois; spoken May 1893, printed 1894; a Chicago congress held under the World's Congress Auxiliary; congress delegates and, later, readers of the printed volume; to describe the progress of Black women and the little attention paid to it. Most useful for how one Black woman described her group's progress inside an Exposition program. Least useful for what the exhibit halls showed.
  • Source E: Williams; spoken May 1893, printed 1894; Chicago congress; women delegates and later readers; to argue against job discrimination. Most useful for the conditions Black women faced in Chicago. Least useful for the exhibits themselves.

Variation

For a shorter version, assign each pair two sources and have pairs with different sources combine their rows on the board.

2

Sub-question Sort

15 minGroups of 3-4

Each group gets four sub-question cards and ranks Sources A-E from most to least useful for each one. Groups then compare rankings: the source at the top should change from card to card.

The 4 Cards

  1. How did the Exposition's official publications describe what visitors would see?
  2. Did any African Americans speak within an official program of the Exposition?
  3. How did the makers of The Reason Why fund and spread their pamphlet?
  4. What kinds of discrimination did Black women in Chicago face in 1893?

Likely Top Choices

  • Card 1: Source A, made under the Exposition's authority for visitors.
  • Card 2: Source D, together with Source A, paragraph 2, which describes the World's Congress Auxiliary.
  • Card 3: Source B, paragraphs 6 and 8, the closing note signed by Wells.
  • Card 4: Source E, an eyewitness account by a speaker from Illinois who presented the job candidate herself.

Accept other rankings that are tied to a feature of the source.

3

Two Cases for Usefulness

10-15 minTwo teams, then whole class

One team argues that Source B is the more useful source for the whole inquiry; the other argues for Source D. Each team gets two minutes to open, one minute to answer the other team, and must cite at least three of the five features. The class then votes on which case was better reasoned, not on which source they prefer.

Points Each Side Might Make

  • For Source B: made during the fair (August 30, 1893) by people who said they were left out; its makers included leading Black writers of the day; it directly answers the inquiry's question of how African Americans responded.
  • For Source D: spoken at an official congress of the Exposition in May 1893, so it shows participation as well as criticism; its maker spoke as a member of the group the inquiry is about; it adds the experience of Black women, which the other sources say little about.

Modification for Online Classes

Teams post their opening statements in a shared document, then reply in writing to the other team's strongest point.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

1 diagrams

Diagram 1: When the Sources Were Made, 1893

When the Sources Were Made, 1893 May 1 June 1 July 1 Aug. 1 Sept. 1 Oct. 1 Nov. 1 May 1: Exposition opens Source A lists May 1-Oct. 26 May 15-22: Congress of Women; Williams speaks (Sources D, E) Aug. 30: note in The Reason Why (Source B) Oct. 30: Exposition closes Later, in 1894: Sources D and E printed Light band: the Exposition was open. Dark band: the Congress of Representative Women. Scale: 1 day = 3.2 units. Source C has no date of its own; it was printed in Source B's pamphlet.
A timeline drawn to scale (1 day = 3.2 units). The light band is the period the Exposition was open, May 1 to October 30, 1893. The title page of the Official Guide (Source A) lists May 1 to October 26, but the fair stayed open four more days. The dark band is the World's Congress of Representative Women, May 15-22, 1893, where Fannie Barrier Williams spoke (Sources D and E); the volume printing her address appeared in 1894. The closing note of The Reason Why (Source B) is dated August 30, 1893, and Douglass's introduction (Source C) was printed in the same pamphlet.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

D2.His.11.9-12 Homework: How Useful Is One Story?

Directions: Use Source E (printed in the Closure phase) for Part 1 and Sources A-E for Part 2. Source E is a later part of the same address as Source D. Answer in complete sentences, cite paragraphs, and keep each judgment tied to the inquiry: How did the 1893 World's Columbian Exposition represent African Americans, and how did African American writers and speakers respond?

Part 1: Critiquing Source E (Problems 1-3)

  1. In paragraph 4, Williams tells a story from her own experience. What does her role in the story (her maker's position) add to its usefulness, and what does it limit?
  2. Williams spoke to the World's Congress of Representative Women in May 1893, and her words were printed in 1894. Explain how the intended audience of the spoken address may have shaped paragraphs 1-2.
  3. Is Source E more useful for the first half of the inquiry (how the Exposition represented African Americans) or the second half (how African American speakers responded)? Defend your answer with one quotation.

Part 2: Comparing Sources (Problems 4-6)

  1. Source D and Source E come from the same address. Explain why a historian might rate them differently for the sub-question "Did African Americans take part in the Exposition's official programs?"
  2. Choose the source you think has the greatest limitation for the whole inquiry. Name the feature that causes the limitation and propose one other kind of source that could make up for it.
  3. Write a five-sentence critique comparing the usefulness of Source A and Source C for the inquiry. Use at least three of the five features and end with a judgment.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Tied to the inquiryJudges usefulness for a named part of the inquiryJudges usefulness in generalNo judgment of usefulness
FeaturesUses maker, date, place, audience or purpose to explain each judgmentNames features without explaining their effectNo features named
EvidenceAccurate quotations with paragraph citationsParaphrase or uncited quotationNo evidence
BalanceStates what a source can and cannot showGives only strengths or only limitsCalls a source simply useful or useless

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 2-6 use Sources A and B (Direct Instruction), Questions 7-11 use Sources C and D (Guided Practice), and Question 14 uses Source E (Closure). Question 13 uses Diagram 1. Questions 1, 12 and 15-20 ask you to judge and compare the sources. Choose the best answer, or write a short answer with quotations.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A historian writes that a source is "very useful for this inquiry." Under D2.His.11.9-12, what else must a good critique state?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to Source A, paragraph 1, what is "an absolute necessity" for a visitor who has a real purpose at the Exposition?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to Source A, paragraph 2, what did the World's Congress Auxiliary aim to portray, beyond the exhibits of material progress?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why does the preface (Source B, paragraph 3) say Black Americans landed "at Jamestown, Virginia in 1619 in a slave ship, before the Puritans, who landed at Plymouth in 1620"?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Source B, paragraph 4, the makers ask whether Black Americans are "so dull and stupid as to feel no interest in this great event?" What is the best explanation of this question?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The closing note of Source B regrets that a picture of "the Capital Savings Bank, a flourishing institution conducted by the colored people of Washington, D. C." was left out (paragraph 7). What does this suggest about the makers' purpose?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Source C, paragraph 1, what does Douglass hope "this brief story" of successes and failures will do?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Douglass writes that "It is always more agreeable to speak well of one's country and its institutions than to speak otherwise" (Source C, paragraph 2). What does this sentence suggest about his audience?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to Source C, paragraph 5, what is Douglass's answer to the question of why Black Americans are excluded from the Exposition?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Williams says that "separate facts and figures relative to colored women are not easily obtainable" (Source D, paragraph 5). How does this statement matter for the inquiry?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Source D, paragraph 1, what does Williams treat as "a most noteworthy evidence" that Black women had made an impression on American life?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Fannie Barrier Williams spoke in May 1893, but Source D was printed in 1894 in a volume "for popular circulation." Which question does this raise about its usefulness?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The Exposition opened on May 1, 1893. How many days later was the closing note of Source B dated (August 30, 1893)?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Source E, paragraph 4, what is the main purpose of Williams's story about the bank?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer

    Critique the usefulness of Source C for the inquiry, using its maker and its purpose. Give one strength and one limitation.

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    Sources B and C were made during the fair. Explain one way that being made during the event makes them more useful for the inquiry, and one way it may limit them.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    All five sources were made in Chicago. Explain why place of origin alone does not settle their usefulness for the inquiry. Use two sources.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    Compare the intended audiences of Source B and Source D, and explain how each audience shaped what the maker said.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    A student wants to know how many African Americans visited the Exposition. Which source is most useful for this new sub-question, and why might none of the five be very useful?

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Choose the two sources you would use together to answer the whole inquiry, and defend your choice by explaining what each adds that the other lacks.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does D2.His.11.9-12 mean?

D2.His.11.9-12 asks high school students to critique how useful historical sources are for a specific inquiry, based on each source's maker, date, place of origin, intended audience and purpose. It is a history indicator in Dimension 2 of the C3 Framework, in the group on historical sources and evidence.

What is the difference between a source being useful and a source being reliable?

Reliability asks whether a source's claims can be trusted; usefulness asks what a source can tell us about a particular question. A one-sided pamphlet may be unreliable as a neutral account and still be very useful as evidence of what its makers believed.

How is D2.His.11.9-12 different from D2.His.11.6-8?

The 6-8 indicator asks students to infer a maker, date, place and audience when a source does not state them. The 9-12 indicator adds purpose and asks students to use all five features to judge a source's usefulness for a specific inquiry.

Why do the sources on this page come from the 1893 World's Fair?

The Exposition produced sources made at the same time and place for very different purposes: an official guide for visitors, a protest pamphlet for foreign readers, and an address to an international congress of women. That makes the five features easy to see and compare.

Does the lesson take a side on the World's Fair?

No. It presents the organizers' guide and the critics' pamphlet in their own words, plus a speaker who took part in one of the Exposition's congresses. Students judge what each source can show for the inquiry, and the rubrics score reasoning, not a position.

Who wrote The Reason Why?

The pamphlet has chapters signed by Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, I. Garland Penn and F. L. Barnett. Its preface is unsigned, and its closing note, dated August 30, 1893, is signed by Wells and says the pamphlet was "published by contribution from colored people of the United States."

How should students handle the period terms in these sources?

Quote them exactly when citing, and point out that the African American makers of these sources used "colored" and "Negro" themselves. In their own sentences, students should use current terms such as African American or Black American.

What does a strong D2.His.11.9-12 answer look like?

It names the part of the inquiry, gives a judgment, ties the judgment to one or more of the five features, quotes the source, and says what the source cannot show. A one-sentence verdict such as "biased, so useless" does not meet the indicator.

Can D2.His.11.9-12 be taught in any history course?

Yes. It fits U.S. History, World History and government courses whenever students build an argument from sources. The same five features work for any period; only the inquiry and the source set change.

Which literacy standards pair with D2.His.11.9-12?

RH.9-10.1 and RH.11-12.1 (citing evidence with attention to date and origin) and RH.11-12.6 (evaluating authors' differing points of view) pair naturally, because a usefulness critique depends on reading each maker's claims closely.