SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

RH.6-8.1Common CoreELALiteracy in History/Social StudiesGrades 6-8

RH.6-8.1: Citing Evidence from Primary and Secondary Sources

In plain English: RH.6-8.1 is the Common Core literacy standard for history/social studies in grades 6-8 that asks students to cite specific textual evidence to support their analysis of primary and secondary sources. Students back each claim with the source's exact words and say where those words are, keeping in mind whether the source comes from the time or was written later.

Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies 6-12 · Cluster: Key Ideas and Details · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

60-75 min

Overview

Students practice the core habit of RH.6-8.1: every claim about a history source is backed by the source's own words, with the source and paragraph named. They read two accounts of how ancient Egyptians made mummies and built the Great Pyramid. The first is by Herodotus, a Greek writer who traveled in Egypt about 450 BC. The second is by Hendrik Willem van Loon, a historian who wrote a history of the ancient world for young readers in 1920. Students learn what makes a source primary (made at the time, by someone who was there) or secondary (made later, by someone who studied other sources), and they see that the answer can depend on the question: Herodotus is a primary source for the embalming of his own day but a secondary source for a pyramid built about 2,100 years before he arrived.

The lesson uses a claim, evidence and explanation pattern (Diagram 2). Students find the exact words that support a claim, choose specific quotations over general ones, check a secondary source against a primary one, and notice when a source gives no evidence at all. In the homework, they test Herodotus's description of the crocodile against a modern secondary source written for this page.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Tell a primary source from a secondary source and explain the choice with the source's date and how the author got the information
  • Support a claim about a primary or secondary source with a specific quotation, named by source and paragraph
  • Choose the quotation that proves a claim over one that is only on the same topic
  • Check a claim in a secondary source against a primary source and cite both
  • Recognize when a source gives no evidence for a claim, and say so in their analysis

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Quoting accurately from a text when explaining what it says RI.5.1
  • Citing textual evidence for what a text says and what can be inferred from it RI.6.1
  • Basic background: ancient Egyptians preserved the bodies of the dead as mummies, and the pyramids at Giza were built as royal tombs

Lesson Procedure

60-75 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5-10 minutes

    Start with a school event students know, then name the two kinds of source.

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "Two sources describe last spring's field day. One is a text message a classmate sent from the field that afternoon: 'Blue team won the relay, Maya fell but got up.' The other is a paragraph in this year's yearbook, written by a student who was not at school that day. Which one comes from the time of the event? If the two disagree about who won, which would you trust more, and what exact words would you point to?"

    Take a few answers. Then define the terms on the board. A primary source is made at the time of an event by someone who took part in it or saw it, or it is an object from that time: a letter, a diary, a photograph, a tool. A secondary source is made later by someone who was not there and who studied primary sources or other accounts: a textbook, an encyclopedia, a history book. The text message is primary; the yearbook paragraph is secondary. Textual evidence is the exact words of a source, and to cite evidence is to quote those words (or restate them closely, which is called paraphrasing) and say where they are.

  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Part 1: Two writers, two kinds of source. Herodotus was a Greek writer who traveled in Egypt in the fifth century BC, about 450 BC, and wrote a long history of the peoples he met. People in his time still made mummies, so when he describes embalming, the preparing of a dead body to keep it from decaying, he is writing about the Egypt of his own day. Van Loon was a historian born in the Netherlands who lived in the United States. He wrote Ancient Man in 1920 for his two young sons, using earlier writers and the discoveries of archaeologists, the scientists who study the objects and buildings people left behind. Show Diagram 1.

    Is it a primary or a secondary source?
    Question to askPrimary sourceSecondary source
    When was it made?At the time of the eventLater, often much later
    How did the author know?Took part, saw it, or was told by people of that timeStudied other sources
    Example on this pageHerodotus on embalming in his own day (Source 1)Van Loon on embalming, written in 1920 (Source 2)

    Part 2: A cited point has three parts. Show Diagram 2. A claim is a sentence that says what you think the source shows. The evidence is the source's exact words, in quotation marks, with the source and paragraph in parentheses. The explanation says how those words prove the claim. Evidence is specific when it is the exact words that prove this claim, not just words on the same topic. An analysis is a set of claims like these that together explain what a source shows. Before reading, tell students that Source 1 describes the treatment of a dead body and that Herodotus's description of the costliest method is detailed and a little gruesome. Then read Source 1 aloud, pausing to gloss "natron" (a natural salt that dries out the body), "myrrh" and "cassia" (sweet-smelling plant spices), and "sepulchral chamber" (a burial room).

    In this occupation certain persons employ themselves regularly and inherit this as a craft. These, whenever a corpse is conveyed to them, show to those who brought it wooden models of corpses made like reality by painting, and the best of the ways of embalming they say is that of him whose name I think it impiety to mention when speaking of a matter of such a kind; the second which they show is less good than this and also less expensive; and the third is the least expensive of all. Having told them about this, they inquire of them in which way they desire the corpse of their friend to be prepared.

    Then they after they have agreed for a certain price depart out of the way, and the others being left behind in the buildings embalm according to the best of these ways thus:—First with a crooked iron tool they draw out the brain through the nostrils, extracting it partly thus and partly by pouring in drugs; and after this with a sharp stone of Ethiopia they make a cut along the side and take out the whole contents of the belly, and when they have cleared out the cavity and cleansed it with palm-wine they cleanse it again with spices pounded up: then they fill the belly with pure myrrh pounded up and with cassia and other spices except frankincense, and sew it together again.

    Having so done they keep it for embalming covered up in natron for seventy days, but for a longer time than this it is not permitted to embalm it; and when the seventy days are past, they wash the corpse and roll its whole body up in fine linen cut into bands, smearing these beneath with gum, which the Egyptians use generally instead of glue. Then the kinsfolk receive it from them and have a wooden figure made in the shape of a man, and when they have had this made they enclose the corpse, and having shut it up within, they store it then in a sepulchral chamber, setting it to stand upright against the wall.

    Herodotus, translated by G. C. Macaulay, The History of Herodotus, Book II, section 86 (Source 1: how the costliest embalming was done; printed in three paragraphs, footnote numbers left out) (1890). Public domain (published 1890). Source text.

    Now read Source 2, van Loon's account of the same practice, written about 2,370 years after Herodotus.

    In the first place, the Egyptians came to believe that no soul could enter into the realm of Osiris without the possession of the body which had been its place of residence in this world.

    Whatever happened, the body must be preserved after death, and it must be given a permanent and suitable home. Therefore as soon as a man had died, his corpse was embalmed. This was a difficult and complicated operation which was performed by an official who was half doctor and half priest, with the help of an assistant whose duty it was to make the incision through which the chest could be filled with cedar-tree pitch and myrrh and cassia. This assistant belonged to a special class of people who were counted among the most despised of men. The Egyptians thought it a terrible thing to commit acts of violence upon a human being, whether dead or living, and only the lowest of the low could be hired to perform this unpopular task.

    Afterwards the priest took the body again and for a period of ten weeks he allowed it to be soaked in a solution of natron which was brought for this purpose from the distant desert of Libya. Then the body had become a "mummy" because it was filled with "Mumiai" or pitch. It was wrapped in yards and yards of specially prepared linen and it was placed in a beautifully decorated wooden coffin, ready to be removed to its final home in the western desert.

    The grave itself was a little stone room in the sand of the desert or a cave in a hill-side.

    After the coffin had been placed in the center the little room was well supplied with cooking utensils and weapons and statues (of clay or wood) representing bakers and butchers who were expected to wait upon their dead master in case he needed anything. Flutes and fiddles were added to give the occupant of the grave a chance to while away the long hours which he must spend in this "house of eternity."

    Hendrik Willem van Loon, Ancient Man: The Beginning of Civilizations, chapter VI, "The Land of the Living and the Land of the Dead" (Source 2: embalming and the grave; illustration captions left out) (1920; this edition 1922). Public domain (published 1922). Source text.
    • One claim, one specific quotation (Source 1, paragraph 1)

      Claim: In Herodotus's time, embalming was a trade passed down in families.

      Result: Evidence: Herodotus writes that "certain persons employ themselves regularly and inherit this as a craft" (Source 1, paragraph 1). Explanation: to "inherit" is to receive something from your parents, and "regularly" shows that this was their steady work. The quotation is specific: it is the exact sentence that proves the claim, and the citation says where to find it.

    • General evidence against specific evidence (Source 1, paragraph 1)

      Claim: Families could choose how much to spend. Weak support: "Herodotus talks about different kinds of embalming." Why is it weak, and what is stronger?

      Result: The weak version names no words and no paragraph, so a reader cannot check it. Stronger: the embalmers show the family "wooden models," describe a second way that is "less good than this and also less expensive" and a third that is "the least expensive of all," and then ask "in which way they desire the corpse of their friend to be prepared" (Source 1, paragraph 1). Each quotation matches one part of the claim: choices, prices and the family's decision.

    • Checking a secondary source against a primary source (Sources 1 and 2, paragraph 3)

      Claim: Van Loon's time for soaking the body in natron agrees with Herodotus.

      Result: Herodotus: the body is "covered up in natron for seventy days" (Source 1, paragraph 3). Van Loon: "for a period of ten weeks" (Source 2, paragraph 3). A week has 7 days, and 70 ÷ 7 = 10, so the two sources agree. Citing both sources, each with its paragraph, is what makes the comparison checkable.

    • A model analysis of Sources 1 and 2 (80 words)

      Task: in 80 words or fewer, analyze how far van Loon's secondary account of embalming can be checked against Herodotus.

      Result: Van Loon's account of embalming, a secondary source, can be checked against Herodotus in some places but not in others. His "ten weeks" in natron (Source 2, paragraph 3) matches Herodotus's "seventy days" (Source 1, paragraph 3), and both name myrrh and cassia. But van Loon's reason for embalming, that no soul could reach "the realm of Osiris" without its body (Source 2, paragraph 1), is not in Herodotus's excerpt, and van Loon does not say where he learned it.

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Pairs make a two-column chart, Herodotus (Source 1) on the left and van Loon (Source 2) on the right. For each of three questions they copy the exact words from each source, with the paragraph number, or write "not in this source": Who does the work? Where is the cut made? What happens to the body after it is wrapped?

    Teacher model for the chart: On who does the work, Herodotus names "certain persons" who "inherit this as a craft" (Source 1, paragraph 1), while van Loon names "an official who was half doctor and half priest" and an "assistant" (Source 2, paragraph 2). On the cut, Herodotus says "they make a cut along the side" and fill "the belly" (Source 1, paragraph 2), while van Loon says "the chest could be filled" (Source 2, paragraph 2), so the two sources do not agree on this detail. On the wrapped body, Herodotus's family puts it in "a wooden figure made in the shape of a man" and stands it "upright against the wall" of a burial room (Source 1, paragraph 3); van Loon puts it in "a beautifully decorated wooden coffin" (Source 2, paragraph 3) and a stone room or cave (paragraph 4). Ask: when the sources disagree, which one comes from the time? Which one tells us where its information came from?

    Practice analysis for Activity 2. The paragraph below was written for this page. It contains five deliberate citation errors. Pairs will test it against Sources 1 and 2.

    Herodotus shows that the best kind of embalming was done carefully, step by step. He says that the embalmers "draw out the brain through the nostrils" with "a sharp stone of Ethiopia" (Source 1, paragraph 2). He also explains why the Egyptians preserved bodies: the soul needed its body to enter the realm of Osiris (Source 1, paragraph 3).

    Van Loon agrees with Herodotus about how long the body was kept in natron, because the text says so. Van Loon writes that the cut was made by an assistant who was "counted among the most despised of men" (Source 2, paragraph 2), which proves that everyone in Egypt hated embalmers. Both writers say the wrapped body was placed "in a beautifully decorated wooden coffin" (Source 1, paragraph 3).

    Written for this page (an invented student analysis), Practice Analysis: What Two Sources Say About Embalming (written for this page; contains five deliberate citation errors for Activity 2). Original passage written for this page.
  4. Independent Practice15-20 minutes

    Students read how each writer describes the building of the Great Pyramid at Giza, the tomb of the king the Greeks called Cheops (the Egyptians called him Khufu). Herodotus wrote about 2,100 years after it was built. As they read, students mark each sentence of Source 3 with T where Herodotus reports what he was told and M where he gives his own measurement, opinion or guess, and they circle every number in Sources 3 and 4. Then they answer the quiz, which uses these two passages. Gloss "causeway" (a raised road), "talents" (a large unit of silver used as money), "serfs" (workers bound to a landowner) and "edifice" (a large building).

    Down to the time when Rhampsinitos was king, they told me there was in Egypt nothing but orderly rule, and Egypt prospered greatly; but after him Cheops became king over them and brought them to every kind of evil: for he shut up all the temples, and having first kept them from sacrificing there, he then bade all the Egyptians work for him. So some were appointed to draw stones from the stone-quarries in the Arabian mountains to the Nile, and others he ordered to receive the stones after they had been carried over the river in boats, and to draw them to those which are called the Libyan mountains; and they worked by a hundred thousand men at a time, for each three months continually.

    Of this oppression there passed ten years while the causeway was made by which they drew the stones, which causeway they built, and it is a work not much less, as it appears to me, than the pyramid; [...] For the making of the pyramid itself there passed a period of twenty years; and the pyramid is square, each side measuring eight hundred feet, and the height of it is the same. It is built of stone smoothed and fitted together in the most perfect manner, not one of the stones being less than thirty feet in length.

    [...]

    On the pyramid it is declared in Egyptian writing how much was spent on radishes and onions and leeks for the workmen, and if I rightly remember that which the interpreter said in reading to me this inscription, a sum of one thousand six hundred talents of silver was spent; and if this is so, how much besides is likely to have been expended upon the iron with which they worked, and upon bread and clothing for the workmen, seeing that they were building the works for the time which has been mentioned and were occupied for no small time besides, as I suppose, in the cutting and bringing of the stones and in working at the excavation under the ground?

    Herodotus, translated by G. C. Macaulay, The History of Herodotus, Book II, sections 124-125 (Source 3: how the Great Pyramid was built; two cuts marked [...]) (1890). Public domain (published 1890). Source text.

    Then one day, an Egyptian who had just buried his Mother, of whom he had been particularly fond, decided to give her a monument that should surpass anything that had ever been built in the valley of the Nile.

    He gathered his serfs and made them build an artificial mountain that could be seen for miles around. The sides of this hill he covered with a layer of bricks that the sand might not be blown away.

    People liked the novelty of the idea.

    Soon they were trying to outdo each other and the graves rose twenty and thirty and forty feet above the ground.

    At last a rich nobleman ordered a burial chamber made of solid stone.

    On top of the actual grave where the mummy rested, he constructed a pile of bricks which rose several hundred feet into the air. A small passage-way gave entrance to the vault and when this passage was closed with a heavy slab of granite the mummy was safe from all intrusion.

    The King of course could not allow one of his subjects to outdo him in such a matter. He was the most powerful man of all Egypt who lived in the biggest house and therefore he was entitled to the best grave.

    What others had done in brick he could do with the help of more costly materials.

    Pharaoh sent his officers far and wide to gather workmen. He constructed roads. He built barracks in which the workmen could live and sleep (you may see those barracks this very day). Then he set to work and made himself a grave which was to endure for all time.

    We call this great pile of masonry a "pyramid."

    [...]

    The biggest of these many pyramids, which was built fifty centuries ago, was five hundred feet high.

    At the base it was seven hundred and fifty-five feet wide.

    It covered more than thirteen acres of desert, which is three times as much space as that occupied by the church of Saint Peter, the largest edifice of the Christian world.

    During twenty years, over a hundred thousand men were used to carry the stones from the distant peninsula of Sinai--to ferry them across the Nile (how they ever managed to do this we do not understand)--to drag them halfway across the desert and finally hoist them into their correct position.

    Hendrik Willem van Loon, Ancient Man: The Beginning of Civilizations, chapter VI (Source 4: how the pyramids began and the Great Pyramid; one cut marked [...]) (1920; this edition 1922). Public domain (published 1922). Source text.
  5. Closure5-10 minutes

    Exit ticket: On an index card, write one claim about Source 1 or Source 2 and support it with a quotation, the source and the paragraph number. Then write one sentence saying whether that source is primary or secondary for your claim, and why.

    Teacher note on the sources and their language: The passages are quoted exactly as published in translation or in the 1922 printing, including older words such as "kinsfolk" (relatives) and "sepulchral." In Source 1, "him whose name I think it impiety to mention" is Herodotus's respectful way of referring to a god, usually understood to be Osiris; "Ethiopia" is the Greek name for the lands south of Egypt. In Source 3, the "Arabian mountains" and the "Libyan mountains" are the desert hills east and west of the Nile. Van Loon writes in the manner of 1920: he calls the workers "serfs," calls the embalmer's assistants "the lowest of the low," and imagines the first pyramid as one man's gift to his mother. Some details in both writers are out of date: modern estimates put the workforce at about 20,000 to 30,000 people rather than a hundred thousand, and most of the pyramid's blocks are far shorter than thirty feet. Questions 8, 9, 18 and 19 give students the modern facts they need, and their answer explanations give the corrections. None of the passages contains a slur. Source 1 describes the treatment of a dead body in some detail; this is standard content in grade 6 studies of ancient Egypt, but warn students before reading it (see Direct Instruction).

    Homework passages. Herodotus's description of the crocodile (Source 5) and a short modern text about the same animal, written for this page (Source 6).

    Of the crocodile the nature is as follows:—during the four most wintry months this creature eats nothing: she has four feet and is an animal belonging to the land and the water both; for she produces and hatches eggs on the land, and the most part of the day she remains upon dry land, but the whole of the night in the river, for the water in truth is warmer than the unclouded open air and the dew. Of all the mortal creatures of which we have knowledge this grows to the greatest bulk from the smallest beginning; for the eggs which she produces are not much larger than those of geese and the newly-hatched young one is in proportion to the egg, but as he grows he becomes as much as seventeen cubits long and sometimes yet larger.

    He has eyes like those of a pig and teeth large and tusky, in proportion to the size of his body; but unlike all other beasts he grows no tongue, neither does he move his lower jaw, but brings the upper jaw towards the lower, being in this too unlike all other beasts. He has moreover strong claws and a scaly hide upon his back which cannot be pierced; and he is blind in the water, but in the air he is of very keen sight. [...]

    Now for some of the Egyptians the crocodiles are sacred animals, and for others not so, but they treat them on the contrary as enemies: those however who dwell about Thebes and about the lake of Moiris hold them to be most sacred, and each of these two peoples keeps one crocodile selected from the whole number, which has been trained to tameness, and they put hanging ornaments of molten stone and of gold into the ears of these and anklets round the front feet, and they give them food appointed and victims of sacrifices and treat them as well as possible while they live, and after they are dead they bury them in sacred tombs, embalming them: but those who dwell about the city of Elephantine even eat them, not holding them to be sacred. [...]

    Herodotus, translated by G. C. Macaulay, The History of Herodotus, Book II, sections 68-69 (Source 5: the crocodile; two cuts marked [...]) (1890). Public domain (published 1890). Source text.

    The Nile crocodile lives in rivers, lakes and marshes across much of Africa, and in ancient times it was common along the Egyptian Nile. It is a reptile, so its body temperature rises and falls with its surroundings. On many days crocodiles bask on sandbanks in the sun, and at night they often move into the water, which cools more slowly than the air.

    A female lays her eggs in a nest she digs in a sandy bank, and she guards the nest until the young hatch. Each egg is about the size of a goose egg, and a newly hatched crocodile is about 30 centimeters (1 foot) long. Large males usually grow to 4 or 5 meters (13 to 16 feet), and very few reliable measurements are longer than about 6 meters (20 feet).

    A crocodile does have a tongue. It is held down to the floor of the mouth, so the animal cannot stick it out, and a person looking into the open mouth may not notice it. A crocodile opens its mouth by dropping its lower jaw; the upper jaw is joined firmly to the skull.

    Archaeologists have found thousands of crocodile mummies in Egypt, at places such as Kom Ombo and the Faiyum, the region around the lake that Herodotus calls Moiris. Many were buried near temples of Sobek, a god shown with a crocodile's head.

    Written for this page (a model secondary source), What Scientists Know About the Nile Crocodile (Source 6: a secondary source written for this page in 2026). Original passage written for this page.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a claim-evidence-explanation frame with the claim already written, so students only find and copy the evidence and add one explanation sentence
  • Number the sentences of Source 1 in the margin and give sentence starters: "Herodotus writes that ...", "Van Loon states ...", "This shows ..."
  • Gloss older words before reading: corpse, natron, myrrh, cassia, kinsfolk, sepulchral, causeway, talents, serfs, edifice

For Advanced Students

  • Find every number in Sources 3 and 4 and sort them into three groups: numbers both writers give, numbers only Herodotus gives, and numbers only van Loon gives. Explain what the overlap suggests about van Loon's sources
  • Read the dedication at the start of van Loon's Ancient Man, where he tells his sons he is not "an infallible guide." Explain how that sentence should affect the way a reader cites him
  • Choose one claim in Source 4 that van Loon gives no evidence for, and write two questions an archaeologist could ask to test it

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Strong work states a claim, gives the exact words in quotation marks, names the source and paragraph, and explains how the words prove the claim. Watch for four errors: citing "the text" without a source or paragraph; quoting words from one source but naming the other; choosing a quotation on the same topic that does not prove the claim; and treating a secondary source's claim as proven when it gives no evidence. Students should also say whether a source is primary or secondary for the question they are asking, using its date and how the author knew.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Claim Cards: Find the Words

15-20 minGroups of 3

Each group gets eight claim cards about Sources 1 and 2. For each card, the group finds the exact words that support it and writes the source and paragraph, or marks the card Contradicted (the source says the opposite) or No evidence (neither source says it).

The Eight Claim Cards

  1. The embalmers showed the family painted wooden models.
  2. The family and the embalmers agreed on a price before the work began.
  3. The brain was removed through the nose.
  4. Frankincense was put inside the body.
  5. After the wrapping, the body was stored standing up.
  6. The natron came from the desert of Libya.
  7. Statues of servants were placed in the grave to serve the dead.
  8. The embalmers were paid in gold.

Answer Key for the Teacher

  1. Supported: "show to those who brought it wooden models of corpses made like reality by painting" (Source 1, paragraph 1).
  2. Supported: "after they have agreed for a certain price" (Source 1, paragraph 2).
  3. Supported: "draw out the brain through the nostrils" (Source 1, paragraph 2).
  4. Contradicted: the belly is filled with "other spices except frankincense" (Source 1, paragraph 2).
  5. Supported: "setting it to stand upright against the wall" (Source 1, paragraph 3).
  6. Supported by the secondary source only: "brought for this purpose from the distant desert of Libya" (Source 2, paragraph 3).
  7. Supported by the secondary source only: "statues (of clay or wood) representing bakers and butchers who were expected to wait upon their dead master" (Source 2, paragraph 5).
  8. No evidence: Source 1 mentions a price, but neither source says what the embalmers were paid with.

Procedure

  • Deal the eight cards face down; each student takes a turn reading one aloud
  • The group searches both sources and agrees on one of four labels: Supported by Source 1, Supported by Source 2, Contradicted or No evidence
  • For every label except No evidence, write the exact words and the paragraph on the back of the card
  • Check two cards with another group before the class discussion

Discussion Questions

  • What is the difference between card 4 and card 8? Why does it matter which label you choose?
  • Cards 6 and 7 are supported only by van Loon. How sure can we be of them, and what would make us surer?
  • Which card was hardest to find evidence for, and why?

Variation for a Shorter Class

Use cards 1, 4, 6 and 8 only: one supported by Source 1, one contradicted, one supported only by Source 2 and one with no evidence.

2

Fix the Citations

15 minPairs

Pairs test the Practice Analysis (in the Guided Practice phase) against Sources 1 and 2. It contains five deliberate citation errors. Pairs find each one, name the kind of error, and rewrite the sentence so that its evidence is exact and correctly cited.

Procedure

  • Number the sentences of the Practice Analysis (there are six)
  • For each sentence, check every quotation and citation against Sources 1 and 2
  • Label each error: wrong words, wrong source, no evidence, claim goes beyond the evidence, or wrong paragraph
  • Rewrite each faulty sentence with the right evidence and citation

Answer Key for the Teacher

  1. Wrong words (sentence 2): the brain is drawn out "with a crooked iron tool"; the "sharp stone of Ethiopia" is used afterward to make the cut (Source 1, paragraph 2).
  2. Wrong source (sentence 3): the reason about Osiris comes from van Loon, "no soul could enter into the realm of Osiris without the possession of the body" (Source 2, paragraph 1). Herodotus's excerpt gives no reason.
  3. No evidence (sentence 4): "the text says so" names no words and no paragraph. The evidence is "seventy days" (Source 1, paragraph 3) and "ten weeks" (Source 2, paragraph 3).
  4. Claim goes beyond the evidence (sentence 5): the quotation is accurate, but a sentence about one group of assistants does not prove that "everyone in Egypt" hated embalmers, and van Loon gives no source for it.
  5. Wrong source and paragraph (sentence 6): "in a beautifully decorated wooden coffin" is from Source 2, paragraph 3. Herodotus describes "a wooden figure made in the shape of a man" (Source 1, paragraph 3), so "both writers" is also wrong.

Discussion Questions

  • Sentence 1 has no error. What makes it acceptable even though it has no quotation of its own, and which words in Source 1, paragraph 2, would you add to support it?
  • Which error would a reader be least likely to catch without opening the sources? Why?

Modification for English Learners

Give pairs the five error labels on cards and the sentence numbers of the five faulty sentences, so they match a label to each sentence before rewriting it.

3

Source Sort: Primary or Secondary?

15 minPairs, then whole class

Pairs sort eight source cards about ancient Egypt into primary and secondary, and for each card write the question it could answer as a primary source, if any. The last card shows that the same text can be both, depending on the question.

The Eight Source Cards

  1. A mummified cat from ancient Egypt, now in a museum
  2. Herodotus's description of embalming, written in the fifth century BC (Source 1)
  3. Van Loon's Ancient Man, written in 1920 (Sources 2 and 4)
  4. A painting on the wall of an ancient Egyptian tomb that shows workers harvesting grain
  5. An online encyclopedia article about the pyramids, written in 2026
  6. Howard Carter's account of opening the tomb of King Tutankhamun, which he found in 1922, published in 1923
  7. A documentary film about how the pyramids were built, made in 2015
  8. Herodotus's description of how the Great Pyramid was built (Source 3)

Answer Key for the Teacher

  • Primary: cards 1 and 4 (objects and images made in ancient Egypt), card 2 (Herodotus describing a practice of his own time) and card 6 (Carter describing a discovery he led).
  • Secondary: cards 3, 5 and 7, all made long afterward by people who studied other sources.
  • Both, depending on the question: card 8 is a secondary source about the building of the pyramid, which happened about 2,100 years before Herodotus's visit, but a primary source for what Egyptians of the fifth century BC told visitors about it. Card 6 works the same way: it is primary for the discovery of the tomb and secondary for the life of Tutankhamun, who died more than 3,000 years earlier.

Discussion Questions

  • Card 3 was written more than a hundred years ago. Why is it still a secondary source?
  • What words in Source 3 show that Herodotus was told about the building rather than watching it?
  • Is a primary source always more accurate than a secondary one? Use a detail from Sources 3 and 4 in your answer.

Modification for Advanced Students

Pairs write a ninth card for a source about their own school (for example, this year's yearbook) and trade it with another pair to sort.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: Timeline of the Sources, Drawn to Scale

How far each source stands from the Great Pyramid Drawn to scale: each tick is 500 years 2000 BC 1000 BC AD 1 AD 1000 Great Pyramid built about 2560 BC The events Herodotus in Egypt about 450 BC Sources 1, 3, 5 van Loon writes AD 1920 Sources 2, 4 Source 6 written AD 2026 (this page) about 2,100 years about 2,370 years
The Great Pyramid was built about 2560 BC. Herodotus (Sources 1, 3 and 5) traveled in Egypt about 450 BC, some 2,100 years later, so for the building of the pyramid he is a secondary source; for the embalming he could see in his own time, he is a primary source. Van Loon (Sources 2 and 4) wrote in 1920, about 2,370 years after Herodotus, so he is a secondary source for both. Dates BC count down toward AD 1; there is no year 0.

Diagram 2: Claim, Evidence, Explanation

Claim, evidence, explanation: one cited point 1. Claim What you think the source shows: Embalming was a trade passed down in families. 2. Evidence The exact words, in quotation marks: "inherit this as a craft" (Source 1, paragraph 1) 3. Explanation How the words prove the claim: To "inherit" is to receive something from your parents. Name the source and the paragraph every time, and say whether the source comes from the time (primary) or was written later (secondary).
A cited point has three parts. The claim says what you think; the evidence is the source's exact words, with the source and paragraph; the explanation shows how those words prove the claim. The example uses Source 1, paragraph 1.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

RH.6-8.1 Homework: Herodotus and the Crocodile

Directions: Use Source 5 (Herodotus on the crocodile) and Source 6 (a modern secondary source written for this page), both printed in the Closure phase of the lesson plan. For every answer, give the exact words in quotation marks with the source and paragraph number, for example (Source 5, paragraph 1). Answer Problems 1-5 in 2-4 sentences each; Problem 6 is a paragraph.

Part 1: Evidence from the Primary Source (Problems 1-3)

  1. Herodotus calls the crocodile "an animal belonging to the land and the water both" (Source 5, paragraph 1). Quote two details from the same paragraph that support this description.
  2. Did all Egyptians in Herodotus's time think the same way about crocodiles? Make a claim and support it with two quotations from Source 5, paragraph 3.
  3. Is Source 5 a primary or a secondary source for how people near Thebes treated their sacred crocodile in the fifth century BC? Explain, using the date of the source and one quotation that describes what those people did.

Part 2: Checking with a Secondary Source (Problems 4-6)

  1. Herodotus writes that the crocodile "grows no tongue" (Source 5, paragraph 2). Quote the words in Source 6 that answer this claim, and use Source 6 to explain how Herodotus might have made the mistake.
  2. Herodotus says a crocodile can grow "as much as seventeen cubits long." A Greek cubit was about 46 centimeters. Change 17 cubits into meters, then quote the sentence in Source 6 that shows whether a crocodile that long is likely.
  3. Write a paragraph of 120-150 words that answers this question: How accurate is Herodotus's description of the crocodile? Make a claim, support it with at least one detail that Source 6 confirms and one that it corrects, and cite both sources with paragraph numbers.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
ClaimA clear claim that answers the question askedA claim that is vague or answers part of the questionNo claim
EvidenceExact words in quotation marks that prove the claim, with source and paragraphEvidence on the topic but not the exact proof, or a missing citationNo evidence from the sources
ExplanationExplains how each quotation supports the claimRepeats the quotation without explaining itNo explanation
Source TypeCorrectly says whether each source is primary or secondary for the question, using its date and how the author knewNames the type without a reasonSource type missing or wrong

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 1-5, 11, 13, 15 and 18 use Herodotus's account of the Great Pyramid (Source 3), and Questions 6, 10, 12, 17 and 19 use van Loon's (Source 4); Questions 7-9, 14, 16 and 20 use both. Both passages are printed in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Near the start of Source 3, Herodotus writes "they told me." What do these words show about his account of Cheops?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which quotation from Source 3 best supports the claim that Herodotus was not sure his information was exact?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to Source 3, paragraph 1, how did the stones get from the Arabian mountains to the Libyan mountains?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to Source 3, paragraph 2, what took ten years?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Source 3, paragraph 2, Herodotus compares the causeway with the pyramid. Which words show that this comparison is his own opinion?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which claim in Source 4 does van Loon support with evidence that a reader could check?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which pair of numbers appears in both Source 3 and Source 4?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Herodotus says the stones came "from the stone-quarries in the Arabian mountains" (Source 3, paragraph 1), the hills east of the Nile. Which words in Source 4 disagree with him about where the stones came from?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Modern surveys measure each side of the Great Pyramid's base at about 756 feet (230 meters). Herodotus gives "eight hundred feet" (Source 3) and van Loon "seven hundred and fifty-five feet" (Source 4). Whose number is closer, and by how much?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In the last paragraph of Source 4, van Loon writes "(how they ever managed to do this we do not understand)." What does this show?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Herodotus reports how much was spent on "radishes and onions and leeks for the workmen" (Source 3, paragraph 3). What evidence does he say this figure came from?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Van Loon says the first great grave was built by an Egyptian "who had just buried his Mother" (Source 4, paragraph 1). Which statement best describes his evidence for this story?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which quotation from Source 3 best supports the claim that Herodotus's account presents the building work as hard on the Egyptian people?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    For which question would Source 4 be a primary source?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer

    In Source 3, paragraph 3, find one place where Herodotus is reasoning for himself instead of reporting what he was told. Quote it and explain how you know.

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    Van Loon writes that the Great Pyramid "was five hundred feet high" (Source 4, paragraph 11). What height does Herodotus give in Source 3? Quote his words, explain how you worked out the number, and say how far apart the two writers are.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    According to van Loon, why did the king build the biggest grave of all? Write a claim and support it with a quotation from Source 4, with the paragraph number. Then say whether van Loon gives any evidence for this reason.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    Historians today know that the pyramid builders cut stone with copper and stone tools; iron tools came into use in Egypt much later. Herodotus writes about "the iron with which they worked" (Source 3, paragraph 3). What does this show about using Source 3 as evidence for how the pyramid was built?

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Van Loon writes that the Great Pyramid "covered more than thirteen acres of desert" (Source 4, paragraph 13). Each side of the square base is about 230 meters long, and one acre is about 4,047 square meters. Does the math support van Loon? Show your work.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Which source is more useful for learning how the Great Pyramid was built, Source 3 or Source 4? Write a paragraph of 60-100 words with a claim and at least one cited quotation from each source.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does RH.6-8.1 mean?

RH.6-8.1 asks students in grades 6-8 to cite specific textual evidence to support their analysis of primary and secondary sources in history and social studies. In practice, every claim a student makes about a source is backed by the source's exact words (or a close paraphrase), with the source and its location named, so that a reader can check it. "RH" stands for Reading in History/Social Studies, the literacy standards that apply in history classes.

What is the difference between a primary source and a secondary source?

A primary source was made at the time of an event by someone who took part in it or saw it, or it is an object from that time; a secondary source was made later by someone who studied other sources. Letters, diaries, photographs, speeches and tools are usually primary. Textbooks, encyclopedias and history books written long afterward are usually secondary.

Can the same source be primary and secondary?

Yes: it depends on the question you ask. Herodotus is a primary source for the embalming he could see in Egypt in his own day, but a secondary source for the Great Pyramid, which was built about 2,100 years before he arrived. Asking "primary for what?" is a good habit for middle school students.

Is an old source always a primary source?

No: age alone does not decide it. Van Loon's Ancient Man is more than a hundred years old, but it is a secondary source about ancient Egypt, because he wrote it thousands of years after the events from other people's accounts. What matters is how close the author was to the events and how he or she knew.

What counts as specific textual evidence for RH.6-8.1?

Specific evidence is the exact words that prove the claim, with the source and paragraph (or page) named. A sentence such as "the text talks about mummies" is not specific: it names no words and cannot be checked. A short quotation that matches the claim is usually stronger than a long one that is only on the same topic.

Should students quote or paraphrase?

Both count as citing, as long as the source and location are named. Quoting is better when the exact wording matters, as with Herodotus's "seventy days" and van Loon's "ten weeks," where the exact numbers are what make the comparison. Paraphrasing, restating the idea in your own words, works for longer ideas, but it must stay faithful to what the source says.

How is RH.6-8.1 different from RI.7.1?

RI.7.1 asks for several pieces of evidence from informational texts in English class, while RH.6-8.1 applies the same citing skill to history sources and names the kind of source: primary or secondary. In a history class, students also have to think about when and how each source was made before they decide what its evidence can prove.

How is RH.6-8.1 usually assessed?

It is usually assessed with questions that ask students to choose the quotation that best supports a claim, and with short written answers that must include cited evidence. Teachers can also check it in document-based tasks, where students write an answer to a history question using several sources and cite each one.

Why use Herodotus and van Loon to teach RH.6-8.1?

They describe the same topics from very different distances. Herodotus traveled in Egypt about 450 BC and saw some of the customs he describes; van Loon wrote for young readers in 1920, thousands of years after the events. Both texts are in the public domain, both interest students aged 11-14, and both contain details that can be checked, including some that turn out to be wrong.

How can parents help a child practice RH.6-8.1 at home?

Ask "How do you know?" and "Where does it say that?" when your child tells you something from a history book, a museum sign or a news story. Old family photos, letters or a grandparent's story make good primary sources to compare with a book about the same time.