RH.6-8.1Common CoreELALiteracy in History/Social StudiesGrades 6-8
RH.6-8.1: Citing Evidence from Primary and Secondary Sources
In plain English: RH.6-8.1 is the Common Core literacy standard for history/social studies in grades 6-8 that asks students to cite specific textual evidence to support their analysis of primary and secondary sources. Students back each claim with the source's exact words and say where those words are, keeping in mind whether the source comes from the time or was written later.
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies 6-12 · Cluster: Key Ideas and Details · Official standard
Students practice the core habit of RH.6-8.1: every claim about a history source is backed by the source's own words, with the source and paragraph named. They read two accounts of how ancient Egyptians made mummies and built the Great Pyramid. The first is by Herodotus, a Greek writer who traveled in Egypt about 450 BC. The second is by Hendrik Willem van Loon, a historian who wrote a history of the ancient world for young readers in 1920. Students learn what makes a source primary (made at the time, by someone who was there) or secondary (made later, by someone who studied other sources), and they see that the answer can depend on the question: Herodotus is a primary source for the embalming of his own day but a secondary source for a pyramid built about 2,100 years before he arrived.
The lesson uses a claim, evidence and explanation pattern (Diagram 2). Students find the exact words that support a claim, choose specific quotations over general ones, check a secondary source against a primary one, and notice when a source gives no evidence at all. In the homework, they test Herodotus's description of the crocodile against a modern secondary source written for this page.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Tell a primary source from a secondary source and explain the choice with the source's date and how the author got the information
Support a claim about a primary or secondary source with a specific quotation, named by source and paragraph
Choose the quotation that proves a claim over one that is only on the same topic
Check a claim in a secondary source against a primary source and cite both
Recognize when a source gives no evidence for a claim, and say so in their analysis
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Quoting accurately from a text when explaining what it says RI.5.1
Citing textual evidence for what a text says and what can be inferred from it RI.6.1
Basic background: ancient Egyptians preserved the bodies of the dead as mummies, and the pyramids at Giza were built as royal tombs
Start with a school event students know, then name the two kinds of source.
Warm-Up Prompt
"Two sources describe last spring's field day. One is a text message a classmate sent from the field that afternoon: 'Blue team won the relay, Maya fell but got up.' The other is a paragraph in this year's yearbook, written by a student who was not at school that day. Which one comes from the time of the event? If the two disagree about who won, which would you trust more, and what exact words would you point to?"
Take a few answers. Then define the terms on the board. A primary source is made at the time of an event by someone who took part in it or saw it, or it is an object from that time: a letter, a diary, a photograph, a tool. A secondary source is made later by someone who was not there and who studied primary sources or other accounts: a textbook, an encyclopedia, a history book. The text message is primary; the yearbook paragraph is secondary. Textual evidence is the exact words of a source, and to cite evidence is to quote those words (or restate them closely, which is called paraphrasing) and say where they are.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Part 1: Two writers, two kinds of source. Herodotus was a Greek writer who traveled in Egypt in the fifth century BC, about 450 BC, and wrote a long history of the peoples he met. People in his time still made mummies, so when he describes embalming, the preparing of a dead body to keep it from decaying, he is writing about the Egypt of his own day. Van Loon was a historian born in the Netherlands who lived in the United States. He wrote Ancient Man in 1920 for his two young sons, using earlier writers and the discoveries of archaeologists, the scientists who study the objects and buildings people left behind. Show Diagram 1.
Is it a primary or a secondary source?
Question to ask
Primary source
Secondary source
When was it made?
At the time of the event
Later, often much later
How did the author know?
Took part, saw it, or was told by people of that time
Studied other sources
Example on this page
Herodotus on embalming in his own day (Source 1)
Van Loon on embalming, written in 1920 (Source 2)
Part 2: A cited point has three parts. Show Diagram 2. A claim is a sentence that says what you think the source shows. The evidence is the source's exact words, in quotation marks, with the source and paragraph in parentheses. The explanation says how those words prove the claim. Evidence is specific when it is the exact words that prove this claim, not just words on the same topic. An analysis is a set of claims like these that together explain what a source shows. Before reading, tell students that Source 1 describes the treatment of a dead body and that Herodotus's description of the costliest method is detailed and a little gruesome. Then read Source 1 aloud, pausing to gloss "natron" (a natural salt that dries out the body), "myrrh" and "cassia" (sweet-smelling plant spices), and "sepulchral chamber" (a burial room).
1In this occupation certain persons employ themselves regularly and inherit this as a craft. These, whenever a corpse is conveyed to them, show to those who brought it wooden models of corpses made like reality by painting, and the best of the ways of embalming they say is that of him whose name I think it impiety to mention when speaking of a matter of such a kind; the second which they show is less good than this and also less expensive; and the third is the least expensive of all. Having told them about this, they inquire of them in which way they desire the corpse of their friend to be prepared.
2Then they after they have agreed for a certain price depart out of the way, and the others being left behind in the buildings embalm according to the best of these ways thus:—First with a crooked iron tool they draw out the brain through the nostrils, extracting it partly thus and partly by pouring in drugs; and after this with a sharp stone of Ethiopia they make a cut along the side and take out the whole contents of the belly, and when they have cleared out the cavity and cleansed it with palm-wine they cleanse it again with spices pounded up: then they fill the belly with pure myrrh pounded up and with cassia and other spices except frankincense, and sew it together again.
3Having so done they keep it for embalming covered up in natron for seventy days, but for a longer time than this it is not permitted to embalm it; and when the seventy days are past, they wash the corpse and roll its whole body up in fine linen cut into bands, smearing these beneath with gum, which the Egyptians use generally instead of glue. Then the kinsfolk receive it from them and have a wooden figure made in the shape of a man, and when they have had this made they enclose the corpse, and having shut it up within, they store it then in a sepulchral chamber, setting it to stand upright against the wall.
Herodotus, translated by G. C. Macaulay, The History of Herodotus, Book II, section 86 (Source 1: how the costliest embalming was done; printed in three paragraphs, footnote numbers left out) (1890). Public domain (published 1890). Source text.
Now read Source 2, van Loon's account of the same practice, written about 2,370 years after Herodotus.
1In the first place, the Egyptians came to believe that no soul could enter into the realm of Osiris without the possession of the body which had been its place of residence in this world.
2Whatever happened, the body must be preserved after death, and it must be given a permanent and suitable home. Therefore as soon as a man had died, his corpse was embalmed. This was a difficult and complicated operation which was performed by an official who was half doctor and half priest, with the help of an assistant whose duty it was to make the incision through which the chest could be filled with cedar-tree pitch and myrrh and cassia. This assistant belonged to a special class of people who were counted among the most despised of men. The Egyptians thought it a terrible thing to commit acts of violence upon a human being, whether dead or living, and only the lowest of the low could be hired to perform this unpopular task.
3Afterwards the priest took the body again and for a period of ten weeks he allowed it to be soaked in a solution of natron which was brought for this purpose from the distant desert of Libya. Then the body had become a "mummy" because it was filled with "Mumiai" or pitch. It was wrapped in yards and yards of specially prepared linen and it was placed in a beautifully decorated wooden coffin, ready to be removed to its final home in the western desert.
4The grave itself was a little stone room in the sand of the desert or a cave in a hill-side.
5After the coffin had been placed in the center the little room was well supplied with cooking utensils and weapons and statues (of clay or wood) representing bakers and butchers who were expected to wait upon their dead master in case he needed anything. Flutes and fiddles were added to give the occupant of the grave a chance to while away the long hours which he must spend in this "house of eternity."
Hendrik Willem van Loon, Ancient Man: The Beginning of Civilizations, chapter VI, "The Land of the Living and the Land of the Dead" (Source 2: embalming and the grave; illustration captions left out) (1920; this edition 1922). Public domain (published 1922). Source text.
One claim, one specific quotation (Source 1, paragraph 1)
Claim: In Herodotus's time, embalming was a trade passed down in families.
Result: Evidence: Herodotus writes that "certain persons employ themselves regularly and inherit this as a craft" (Source 1, paragraph 1). Explanation: to "inherit" is to receive something from your parents, and "regularly" shows that this was their steady work. The quotation is specific: it is the exact sentence that proves the claim, and the citation says where to find it.
General evidence against specific evidence (Source 1, paragraph 1)
Claim: Families could choose how much to spend. Weak support: "Herodotus talks about different kinds of embalming." Why is it weak, and what is stronger?
Result: The weak version names no words and no paragraph, so a reader cannot check it. Stronger: the embalmers show the family "wooden models," describe a second way that is "less good than this and also less expensive" and a third that is "the least expensive of all," and then ask "in which way they desire the corpse of their friend to be prepared" (Source 1, paragraph 1). Each quotation matches one part of the claim: choices, prices and the family's decision.
Checking a secondary source against a primary source (Sources 1 and 2, paragraph 3)
Claim: Van Loon's time for soaking the body in natron agrees with Herodotus.
Result: Herodotus: the body is "covered up in natron for seventy days" (Source 1, paragraph 3). Van Loon: "for a period of ten weeks" (Source 2, paragraph 3). A week has 7 days, and 70 ÷ 7 = 10, so the two sources agree. Citing both sources, each with its paragraph, is what makes the comparison checkable.
A model analysis of Sources 1 and 2 (80 words)
Task: in 80 words or fewer, analyze how far van Loon's secondary account of embalming can be checked against Herodotus.
Result: Van Loon's account of embalming, a secondary source, can be checked against Herodotus in some places but not in others. His "ten weeks" in natron (Source 2, paragraph 3) matches Herodotus's "seventy days" (Source 1, paragraph 3), and both name myrrh and cassia. But van Loon's reason for embalming, that no soul could reach "the realm of Osiris" without its body (Source 2, paragraph 1), is not in Herodotus's excerpt, and van Loon does not say where he learned it.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs make a two-column chart, Herodotus (Source 1) on the left and van Loon (Source 2) on the right. For each of three questions they copy the exact words from each source, with the paragraph number, or write "not in this source": Who does the work? Where is the cut made? What happens to the body after it is wrapped?
Teacher model for the chart: On who does the work, Herodotus names "certain persons" who "inherit this as a craft" (Source 1, paragraph 1), while van Loon names "an official who was half doctor and half priest" and an "assistant" (Source 2, paragraph 2). On the cut, Herodotus says "they make a cut along the side" and fill "the belly" (Source 1, paragraph 2), while van Loon says "the chest could be filled" (Source 2, paragraph 2), so the two sources do not agree on this detail. On the wrapped body, Herodotus's family puts it in "a wooden figure made in the shape of a man" and stands it "upright against the wall" of a burial room (Source 1, paragraph 3); van Loon puts it in "a beautifully decorated wooden coffin" (Source 2, paragraph 3) and a stone room or cave (paragraph 4). Ask: when the sources disagree, which one comes from the time? Which one tells us where its information came from?
Practice analysis for Activity 2. The paragraph below was written for this page. It contains five deliberate citation errors. Pairs will test it against Sources 1 and 2.
Herodotus shows that the best kind of embalming was done carefully, step by step. He says that the embalmers "draw out the brain through the nostrils" with "a sharp stone of Ethiopia" (Source 1, paragraph 2). He also explains why the Egyptians preserved bodies: the soul needed its body to enter the realm of Osiris (Source 1, paragraph 3).
Van Loon agrees with Herodotus about how long the body was kept in natron, because the text says so. Van Loon writes that the cut was made by an assistant who was "counted among the most despised of men" (Source 2, paragraph 2), which proves that everyone in Egypt hated embalmers. Both writers say the wrapped body was placed "in a beautifully decorated wooden coffin" (Source 1, paragraph 3).
Written for this page (an invented student analysis), Practice Analysis: What Two Sources Say About Embalming (written for this page; contains five deliberate citation errors for Activity 2). Original passage written for this page.
Independent Practice15-20 minutes
Students read how each writer describes the building of the Great Pyramid at Giza, the tomb of the king the Greeks called Cheops (the Egyptians called him Khufu). Herodotus wrote about 2,100 years after it was built. As they read, students mark each sentence of Source 3 with T where Herodotus reports what he was told and M where he gives his own measurement, opinion or guess, and they circle every number in Sources 3 and 4. Then they answer the quiz, which uses these two passages. Gloss "causeway" (a raised road), "talents" (a large unit of silver used as money), "serfs" (workers bound to a landowner) and "edifice" (a large building).
1Down to the time when Rhampsinitos was king, they told me there was in Egypt nothing but orderly rule, and Egypt prospered greatly; but after him Cheops became king over them and brought them to every kind of evil: for he shut up all the temples, and having first kept them from sacrificing there, he then bade all the Egyptians work for him. So some were appointed to draw stones from the stone-quarries in the Arabian mountains to the Nile, and others he ordered to receive the stones after they had been carried over the river in boats, and to draw them to those which are called the Libyan mountains; and they worked by a hundred thousand men at a time, for each three months continually.
2Of this oppression there passed ten years while the causeway was made by which they drew the stones, which causeway they built, and it is a work not much less, as it appears to me, than the pyramid; [...] For the making of the pyramid itself there passed a period of twenty years; and the pyramid is square, each side measuring eight hundred feet, and the height of it is the same. It is built of stone smoothed and fitted together in the most perfect manner, not one of the stones being less than thirty feet in length.
[...]
3On the pyramid it is declared in Egyptian writing how much was spent on radishes and onions and leeks for the workmen, and if I rightly remember that which the interpreter said in reading to me this inscription, a sum of one thousand six hundred talents of silver was spent; and if this is so, how much besides is likely to have been expended upon the iron with which they worked, and upon bread and clothing for the workmen, seeing that they were building the works for the time which has been mentioned and were occupied for no small time besides, as I suppose, in the cutting and bringing of the stones and in working at the excavation under the ground?
Herodotus, translated by G. C. Macaulay, The History of Herodotus, Book II, sections 124-125 (Source 3: how the Great Pyramid was built; two cuts marked [...]) (1890). Public domain (published 1890). Source text.
1Then one day, an Egyptian who had just buried his Mother, of whom he had been particularly fond, decided to give her a monument that should surpass anything that had ever been built in the valley of the Nile.
2He gathered his serfs and made them build an artificial mountain that could be seen for miles around. The sides of this hill he covered with a layer of bricks that the sand might not be blown away.
3People liked the novelty of the idea.
4Soon they were trying to outdo each other and the graves rose twenty and thirty and forty feet above the ground.
5At last a rich nobleman ordered a burial chamber made of solid stone.
6On top of the actual grave where the mummy rested, he constructed a pile of bricks which rose several hundred feet into the air. A small passage-way gave entrance to the vault and when this passage was closed with a heavy slab of granite the mummy was safe from all intrusion.
7The King of course could not allow one of his subjects to outdo him in such a matter. He was the most powerful man of all Egypt who lived in the biggest house and therefore he was entitled to the best grave.
8What others had done in brick he could do with the help of more costly materials.
9Pharaoh sent his officers far and wide to gather workmen. He constructed roads. He built barracks in which the workmen could live and sleep (you may see those barracks this very day). Then he set to work and made himself a grave which was to endure for all time.
10We call this great pile of masonry a "pyramid."
[...]
11The biggest of these many pyramids, which was built fifty centuries ago, was five hundred feet high.
12At the base it was seven hundred and fifty-five feet wide.
13It covered more than thirteen acres of desert, which is three times as much space as that occupied by the church of Saint Peter, the largest edifice of the Christian world.
14During twenty years, over a hundred thousand men were used to carry the stones from the distant peninsula of Sinai--to ferry them across the Nile (how they ever managed to do this we do not understand)--to drag them halfway across the desert and finally hoist them into their correct position.
Hendrik Willem van Loon, Ancient Man: The Beginning of Civilizations, chapter VI (Source 4: how the pyramids began and the Great Pyramid; one cut marked [...]) (1920; this edition 1922). Public domain (published 1922). Source text.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: On an index card, write one claim about Source 1 or Source 2 and support it with a quotation, the source and the paragraph number. Then write one sentence saying whether that source is primary or secondary for your claim, and why.
Teacher note on the sources and their language: The passages are quoted exactly as published in translation or in the 1922 printing, including older words such as "kinsfolk" (relatives) and "sepulchral." In Source 1, "him whose name I think it impiety to mention" is Herodotus's respectful way of referring to a god, usually understood to be Osiris; "Ethiopia" is the Greek name for the lands south of Egypt. In Source 3, the "Arabian mountains" and the "Libyan mountains" are the desert hills east and west of the Nile. Van Loon writes in the manner of 1920: he calls the workers "serfs," calls the embalmer's assistants "the lowest of the low," and imagines the first pyramid as one man's gift to his mother. Some details in both writers are out of date: modern estimates put the workforce at about 20,000 to 30,000 people rather than a hundred thousand, and most of the pyramid's blocks are far shorter than thirty feet. Questions 8, 9, 18 and 19 give students the modern facts they need, and their answer explanations give the corrections. None of the passages contains a slur. Source 1 describes the treatment of a dead body in some detail; this is standard content in grade 6 studies of ancient Egypt, but warn students before reading it (see Direct Instruction).
Homework passages. Herodotus's description of the crocodile (Source 5) and a short modern text about the same animal, written for this page (Source 6).
1Of the crocodile the nature is as follows:—during the four most wintry months this creature eats nothing: she has four feet and is an animal belonging to the land and the water both; for she produces and hatches eggs on the land, and the most part of the day she remains upon dry land, but the whole of the night in the river, for the water in truth is warmer than the unclouded open air and the dew. Of all the mortal creatures of which we have knowledge this grows to the greatest bulk from the smallest beginning; for the eggs which she produces are not much larger than those of geese and the newly-hatched young one is in proportion to the egg, but as he grows he becomes as much as seventeen cubits long and sometimes yet larger.
2He has eyes like those of a pig and teeth large and tusky, in proportion to the size of his body; but unlike all other beasts he grows no tongue, neither does he move his lower jaw, but brings the upper jaw towards the lower, being in this too unlike all other beasts. He has moreover strong claws and a scaly hide upon his back which cannot be pierced; and he is blind in the water, but in the air he is of very keen sight. [...]
3Now for some of the Egyptians the crocodiles are sacred animals, and for others not so, but they treat them on the contrary as enemies: those however who dwell about Thebes and about the lake of Moiris hold them to be most sacred, and each of these two peoples keeps one crocodile selected from the whole number, which has been trained to tameness, and they put hanging ornaments of molten stone and of gold into the ears of these and anklets round the front feet, and they give them food appointed and victims of sacrifices and treat them as well as possible while they live, and after they are dead they bury them in sacred tombs, embalming them: but those who dwell about the city of Elephantine even eat them, not holding them to be sacred. [...]
Herodotus, translated by G. C. Macaulay, The History of Herodotus, Book II, sections 68-69 (Source 5: the crocodile; two cuts marked [...]) (1890). Public domain (published 1890). Source text.
1The Nile crocodile lives in rivers, lakes and marshes across much of Africa, and in ancient times it was common along the Egyptian Nile. It is a reptile, so its body temperature rises and falls with its surroundings. On many days crocodiles bask on sandbanks in the sun, and at night they often move into the water, which cools more slowly than the air.
2A female lays her eggs in a nest she digs in a sandy bank, and she guards the nest until the young hatch. Each egg is about the size of a goose egg, and a newly hatched crocodile is about 30 centimeters (1 foot) long. Large males usually grow to 4 or 5 meters (13 to 16 feet), and very few reliable measurements are longer than about 6 meters (20 feet).
3A crocodile does have a tongue. It is held down to the floor of the mouth, so the animal cannot stick it out, and a person looking into the open mouth may not notice it. A crocodile opens its mouth by dropping its lower jaw; the upper jaw is joined firmly to the skull.
4Archaeologists have found thousands of crocodile mummies in Egypt, at places such as Kom Ombo and the Faiyum, the region around the lake that Herodotus calls Moiris. Many were buried near temples of Sobek, a god shown with a crocodile's head.
Written for this page (a model secondary source), What Scientists Know About the Nile Crocodile (Source 6: a secondary source written for this page in 2026). Original passage written for this page.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a claim-evidence-explanation frame with the claim already written, so students only find and copy the evidence and add one explanation sentence
Number the sentences of Source 1 in the margin and give sentence starters: "Herodotus writes that ...", "Van Loon states ...", "This shows ..."
Gloss older words before reading: corpse, natron, myrrh, cassia, kinsfolk, sepulchral, causeway, talents, serfs, edifice
For Advanced Students
Find every number in Sources 3 and 4 and sort them into three groups: numbers both writers give, numbers only Herodotus gives, and numbers only van Loon gives. Explain what the overlap suggests about van Loon's sources
Read the dedication at the start of van Loon's Ancient Man, where he tells his sons he is not "an infallible guide." Explain how that sentence should affect the way a reader cites him
Choose one claim in Source 4 that van Loon gives no evidence for, and write two questions an archaeologist could ask to test it
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong work states a claim, gives the exact words in quotation marks, names the source and paragraph, and explains how the words prove the claim. Watch for four errors: citing "the text" without a source or paragraph; quoting words from one source but naming the other; choosing a quotation on the same topic that does not prove the claim; and treating a secondary source's claim as proven when it gives no evidence. Students should also say whether a source is primary or secondary for the question they are asking, using its date and how the author knew.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Claim Cards: Find the Words
15-20 minGroups of 3
Each group gets eight claim cards about Sources 1 and 2. For each card, the group finds the exact words that support it and writes the source and paragraph, or marks the card Contradicted (the source says the opposite) or No evidence (neither source says it).
The Eight Claim Cards
The embalmers showed the family painted wooden models.
The family and the embalmers agreed on a price before the work began.
The brain was removed through the nose.
Frankincense was put inside the body.
After the wrapping, the body was stored standing up.
The natron came from the desert of Libya.
Statues of servants were placed in the grave to serve the dead.
The embalmers were paid in gold.
Answer Key for the Teacher
Supported: "show to those who brought it wooden models of corpses made like reality by painting" (Source 1, paragraph 1).
Supported: "after they have agreed for a certain price" (Source 1, paragraph 2).
Supported: "draw out the brain through the nostrils" (Source 1, paragraph 2).
Contradicted: the belly is filled with "other spices except frankincense" (Source 1, paragraph 2).
Supported: "setting it to stand upright against the wall" (Source 1, paragraph 3).
Supported by the secondary source only: "brought for this purpose from the distant desert of Libya" (Source 2, paragraph 3).
Supported by the secondary source only: "statues (of clay or wood) representing bakers and butchers who were expected to wait upon their dead master" (Source 2, paragraph 5).
No evidence: Source 1 mentions a price, but neither source says what the embalmers were paid with.
Procedure
Deal the eight cards face down; each student takes a turn reading one aloud
The group searches both sources and agrees on one of four labels: Supported by Source 1, Supported by Source 2, Contradicted or No evidence
For every label except No evidence, write the exact words and the paragraph on the back of the card
Check two cards with another group before the class discussion
Discussion Questions
What is the difference between card 4 and card 8? Why does it matter which label you choose?
Cards 6 and 7 are supported only by van Loon. How sure can we be of them, and what would make us surer?
Which card was hardest to find evidence for, and why?
Variation for a Shorter Class
Use cards 1, 4, 6 and 8 only: one supported by Source 1, one contradicted, one supported only by Source 2 and one with no evidence.
2
Fix the Citations
15 minPairs
Pairs test the Practice Analysis (in the Guided Practice phase) against Sources 1 and 2. It contains five deliberate citation errors. Pairs find each one, name the kind of error, and rewrite the sentence so that its evidence is exact and correctly cited.
Procedure
Number the sentences of the Practice Analysis (there are six)
For each sentence, check every quotation and citation against Sources 1 and 2
Label each error: wrong words, wrong source, no evidence, claim goes beyond the evidence, or wrong paragraph
Rewrite each faulty sentence with the right evidence and citation
Answer Key for the Teacher
Wrong words (sentence 2): the brain is drawn out "with a crooked iron tool"; the "sharp stone of Ethiopia" is used afterward to make the cut (Source 1, paragraph 2).
Wrong source (sentence 3): the reason about Osiris comes from van Loon, "no soul could enter into the realm of Osiris without the possession of the body" (Source 2, paragraph 1). Herodotus's excerpt gives no reason.
No evidence (sentence 4): "the text says so" names no words and no paragraph. The evidence is "seventy days" (Source 1, paragraph 3) and "ten weeks" (Source 2, paragraph 3).
Claim goes beyond the evidence (sentence 5): the quotation is accurate, but a sentence about one group of assistants does not prove that "everyone in Egypt" hated embalmers, and van Loon gives no source for it.
Wrong source and paragraph (sentence 6): "in a beautifully decorated wooden coffin" is from Source 2, paragraph 3. Herodotus describes "a wooden figure made in the shape of a man" (Source 1, paragraph 3), so "both writers" is also wrong.
Discussion Questions
Sentence 1 has no error. What makes it acceptable even though it has no quotation of its own, and which words in Source 1, paragraph 2, would you add to support it?
Which error would a reader be least likely to catch without opening the sources? Why?
Modification for English Learners
Give pairs the five error labels on cards and the sentence numbers of the five faulty sentences, so they match a label to each sentence before rewriting it.
3
Source Sort: Primary or Secondary?
15 minPairs, then whole class
Pairs sort eight source cards about ancient Egypt into primary and secondary, and for each card write the question it could answer as a primary source, if any. The last card shows that the same text can be both, depending on the question.
The Eight Source Cards
A mummified cat from ancient Egypt, now in a museum
Herodotus's description of embalming, written in the fifth century BC (Source 1)
Van Loon's Ancient Man, written in 1920 (Sources 2 and 4)
A painting on the wall of an ancient Egyptian tomb that shows workers harvesting grain
An online encyclopedia article about the pyramids, written in 2026
Howard Carter's account of opening the tomb of King Tutankhamun, which he found in 1922, published in 1923
A documentary film about how the pyramids were built, made in 2015
Herodotus's description of how the Great Pyramid was built (Source 3)
Answer Key for the Teacher
Primary: cards 1 and 4 (objects and images made in ancient Egypt), card 2 (Herodotus describing a practice of his own time) and card 6 (Carter describing a discovery he led).
Secondary: cards 3, 5 and 7, all made long afterward by people who studied other sources.
Both, depending on the question: card 8 is a secondary source about the building of the pyramid, which happened about 2,100 years before Herodotus's visit, but a primary source for what Egyptians of the fifth century BC told visitors about it. Card 6 works the same way: it is primary for the discovery of the tomb and secondary for the life of Tutankhamun, who died more than 3,000 years earlier.
Discussion Questions
Card 3 was written more than a hundred years ago. Why is it still a secondary source?
What words in Source 3 show that Herodotus was told about the building rather than watching it?
Is a primary source always more accurate than a secondary one? Use a detail from Sources 3 and 4 in your answer.
Modification for Advanced Students
Pairs write a ninth card for a source about their own school (for example, this year's yearbook) and trade it with another pair to sort.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: Timeline of the Sources, Drawn to Scale
The Great Pyramid was built about 2560 BC. Herodotus (Sources 1, 3 and 5) traveled in Egypt about 450 BC, some 2,100 years later, so for the building of the pyramid he is a secondary source; for the embalming he could see in his own time, he is a primary source. Van Loon (Sources 2 and 4) wrote in 1920, about 2,370 years after Herodotus, so he is a secondary source for both. Dates BC count down toward AD 1; there is no year 0.
Diagram 2: Claim, Evidence, Explanation
A cited point has three parts. The claim says what you think; the evidence is the source's exact words, with the source and paragraph; the explanation shows how those words prove the claim. The example uses Source 1, paragraph 1.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RH.6-8.1 Homework: Herodotus and the Crocodile
Directions: Use Source 5 (Herodotus on the crocodile) and Source 6 (a modern secondary source written for this page), both printed in the Closure phase of the lesson plan. For every answer, give the exact words in quotation marks with the source and paragraph number, for example (Source 5, paragraph 1). Answer Problems 1-5 in 2-4 sentences each; Problem 6 is a paragraph.
Part 1: Evidence from the Primary Source (Problems 1-3)
Herodotus calls the crocodile "an animal belonging to the land and the water both" (Source 5, paragraph 1). Quote two details from the same paragraph that support this description.
Did all Egyptians in Herodotus's time think the same way about crocodiles? Make a claim and support it with two quotations from Source 5, paragraph 3.
Is Source 5 a primary or a secondary source for how people near Thebes treated their sacred crocodile in the fifth century BC? Explain, using the date of the source and one quotation that describes what those people did.
Part 2: Checking with a Secondary Source (Problems 4-6)
Herodotus writes that the crocodile "grows no tongue" (Source 5, paragraph 2). Quote the words in Source 6 that answer this claim, and use Source 6 to explain how Herodotus might have made the mistake.
Herodotus says a crocodile can grow "as much as seventeen cubits long." A Greek cubit was about 46 centimeters. Change 17 cubits into meters, then quote the sentence in Source 6 that shows whether a crocodile that long is likely.
Write a paragraph of 120-150 words that answers this question: How accurate is Herodotus's description of the crocodile? Make a claim, support it with at least one detail that Source 6 confirms and one that it corrects, and cite both sources with paragraph numbers.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Claim
A clear claim that answers the question asked
A claim that is vague or answers part of the question
No claim
Evidence
Exact words in quotation marks that prove the claim, with source and paragraph
Evidence on the topic but not the exact proof, or a missing citation
No evidence from the sources
Explanation
Explains how each quotation supports the claim
Repeats the quotation without explaining it
No explanation
Source Type
Correctly says whether each source is primary or secondary for the question, using its date and how the author knew
Names the type without a reason
Source type missing or wrong
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-5, 11, 13, 15 and 18 use Herodotus's account of the Great Pyramid (Source 3), and Questions 6, 10, 12, 17 and 19 use van Loon's (Source 4); Questions 7-9, 14, 16 and 20 use both. Both passages are printed in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Near the start of Source 3, Herodotus writes "they told me." What do these words show about his account of Cheops?
Answer: A
"They told me" (Source 3, paragraph 1) shows that Herodotus is reporting what Egyptians said to him. The pyramid was built about 2,100 years before his visit, so choice B is impossible. Choice C invents records that the passage never mentions. Choice D misreads the phrase: reporting a story is not the same as rejecting it.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which quotation from Source 3 best supports the claim that Herodotus was not sure his information was exact?
Answer: C
In paragraph 3, "if I rightly remember" admits that his memory may be wrong, and "the interpreter said" shows that he could not read the inscription himself. Choices A, B and D are on the same topic but state their facts without any doubt, so they do not prove the claim.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 3, paragraph 1, how did the stones get from the Arabian mountains to the Libyan mountains?
Answer: B
Herodotus says the workers received "the stones after they had been carried over the river in boats" and drew them "to those which are called the Libyan mountains" (paragraph 1). Choice A leaves out the boats. Choice C invents rafts and a trip down the river. Choice D adds logs and soldiers that the passage never mentions.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 3, paragraph 2, what took ten years?
Answer: D
"Of this oppression there passed ten years while the causeway was made by which they drew the stones" (paragraph 2). Choice B confuses the causeway with the pyramid, which took "a period of twenty years." Choices A and C are not given as ten-year tasks in the passage.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 3, paragraph 2, Herodotus compares the causeway with the pyramid. Which words show that this comparison is his own opinion?
Answer: B
"It is a work not much less, as it appears to me, than the pyramid": "as it appears to me" marks the judgment as his own. Choice A is a report of what others told him, and it comes from paragraph 1. Choices C and D state facts without saying whose view they are.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which claim in Source 4 does van Loon support with evidence that a reader could check?
Answer: C
Only the barracks come with a way to check them: "(you may see those barracks this very day)" (Source 4, paragraph 9). Choices A, B and D are told as a story with no source, no name and no place a reader could visit, so they cannot be checked from the text.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which pair of numbers appears in both Source 3 and Source 4?
Answer: A
Herodotus gives a hundred thousand men (Source 3, paragraph 1) and twenty years for the pyramid (paragraph 2); van Loon writes "During twenty years, over a hundred thousand men" (Source 4, paragraph 14). Choices B, C and D are numbers that only van Loon gives. The match suggests that van Loon may have used Herodotus, though he never says so.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Herodotus says the stones came "from the stone-quarries in the Arabian mountains" (Source 3, paragraph 1), the hills east of the Nile. Which words in Source 4 disagree with him about where the stones came from?
Answer: D
Van Loon writes that the men carried the stones "from the distant peninsula of Sinai" (paragraph 14). Choices A and B describe how stones were moved, not where they came from, and choice C describes the nobleman's chamber (paragraph 5). Outside the texts: most of the stone came from quarries at Giza itself, the fine white limestone for the outer layer came from Tura, across the Nile on the east bank, and granite came from Aswan, far up the river. So van Loon's Sinai is wrong, and Herodotus's "Arabian mountains" fits the Tura limestone.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Modern surveys measure each side of the Great Pyramid's base at about 756 feet (230 meters). Herodotus gives "eight hundred feet" (Source 3) and van Loon "seven hundred and fifty-five feet" (Source 4). Whose number is closer, and by how much?
Answer: B
756 - 755 = 1 foot for van Loon, and 800 - 756 = 44 feet for Herodotus. Choice A gives Herodotus's error but names the wrong source as closer. Choice C applies Herodotus's error to both. Choice D attaches Herodotus's 44-foot error to van Loon. A secondary source can be more accurate than a primary one when its author used later measurements.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In the last paragraph of Source 4, van Loon writes "(how they ever managed to do this we do not understand)." What does this show?
Answer: C
The words in parentheses follow "to ferry them across the Nile" (paragraph 14), so van Loon is admitting that he cannot explain how the stones were ferried. Choice A is the opposite. Choice B has no support: van Loon never mentions Herodotus. Choice D contradicts the sentence, which says the stones were ferried across.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Herodotus reports how much was spent on "radishes and onions and leeks for the workmen" (Source 3, paragraph 3). What evidence does he say this figure came from?
Answer: D
"On the pyramid it is declared in Egyptian writing" and "that which the interpreter said in reading to me this inscription" (paragraph 3). Choices A and B invent sources the passage never names. Choice C confuses the figure he reports with the other costs he adds afterward. No such inscription is known today; almost all of the pyramid's outer stones were later taken away.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Van Loon says the first great grave was built by an Egyptian "who had just buried his Mother" (Source 4, paragraph 1). Which statement best describes his evidence for this story?
Answer: A
Paragraph 1 names no person, no date, no place and no source, so the story cannot be checked from the text. Choices B and D invent evidence that is not there. Choice C is wrong because Herodotus's excerpt says nothing about a mother's grave, and van Loon never names Herodotus.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which quotation from Source 3 best supports the claim that Herodotus's account presents the building work as hard on the Egyptian people?
Answer: B
Paragraph 1 says Cheops "brought them to every kind of evil" and then explains it: he closed the temples and "bade all the Egyptians work for him." Choice A describes Egypt before Cheops, under Rhampsinitos, so it points the other way. Choices C and D describe the pyramid and its stones and do not say how the people were treated.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
For which question would Source 4 be a primary source?
Answer: A
Van Loon wrote in 1920, so his book is first-hand evidence of what a writer of that time believed and taught young readers. For choices B and C he is a secondary source, writing thousands of years after the building. Choice D is a question that Source 3, not Source 4, can answer.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
In Source 3, paragraph 3, find one place where Herodotus is reasoning for himself instead of reporting what he was told. Quote it and explain how you know.
Model answer: "how much besides is likely to have been expended upon the iron with which they worked, and upon bread and clothing for the workmen" (Source 3, paragraph 3). The word "likely" and the question mark show that he is working it out for himself from the figure he was told, and "as I suppose" later in the sentence says so directly. Rubric: full credit for an accurate quotation from paragraph 3 and an explanation that names the words showing his own reasoning; partial credit for a quotation without the explanation.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Van Loon writes that the Great Pyramid "was five hundred feet high" (Source 4, paragraph 11). What height does Herodotus give in Source 3? Quote his words, explain how you worked out the number, and say how far apart the two writers are.
Model answer: Herodotus says the pyramid is square, "each side measuring eight hundred feet, and the height of it is the same" (Source 3, paragraph 2), so his height is also 800 feet. That is 800 - 500 = 300 feet more than van Loon's figure. The two writers disagree, so a careful reader cites both and does not treat either number as settled. (Outside the texts: the pyramid was first about 481 feet, or 146.6 meters, tall, so van Loon is much closer.) Rubric: full credit for the quotation, the reasoning from "the same" to 800 feet and the 300-foot difference; partial credit for the quotation without the reasoning.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
According to van Loon, why did the king build the biggest grave of all? Write a claim and support it with a quotation from Source 4, with the paragraph number. Then say whether van Loon gives any evidence for this reason.
Model answer: Van Loon claims the king built the pyramid so that no one could have a finer grave than his: "The King of course could not allow one of his subjects to outdo him in such a matter" and "he was entitled to the best grave" (Source 4, paragraph 7). Van Loon gives no evidence for this reason; he states it as if it were obvious ("of course"), so it is his interpretation, not a fact the text proves. Rubric: full credit for a claim, a quotation with paragraph 7, and a correct statement that no evidence is given; partial credit for two of the three.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Historians today know that the pyramid builders cut stone with copper and stone tools; iron tools came into use in Egypt much later. Herodotus writes about "the iron with which they worked" (Source 3, paragraph 3). What does this show about using Source 3 as evidence for how the pyramid was built?
Model answer: It shows that Herodotus is a secondary source for the building and could be wrong about it. He was not there; he wrote about 2,100 years later and assumed the workers used iron, the tool metal of his own day. So his detail about tools reflects his own time, not the builders' time. A careful analysis cites Herodotus for what he was told and checks his details against other evidence. Rubric: full credit for naming Source 3 as a secondary source for the building, with a quotation and a reason; partial credit for one of these.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Van Loon writes that the Great Pyramid "covered more than thirteen acres of desert" (Source 4, paragraph 13). Each side of the square base is about 230 meters long, and one acre is about 4,047 square meters. Does the math support van Loon? Show your work.
Model answer: The base is a square, so its area is 230 × 230 = 52,900 square meters. 52,900 ÷ 4,047 is about 13.1 acres, which is more than thirteen acres. The math supports van Loon's claim in paragraph 13. Rubric: full credit for the correct area, the conversion and a conclusion tied to the quotation; partial credit for a correct area without the conclusion.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Which source is more useful for learning how the Great Pyramid was built, Source 3 or Source 4? Write a paragraph of 60-100 words with a claim and at least one cited quotation from each source.
Model answer: Source 3 is more useful, but only when it is read carefully. Herodotus at least tells the reader where his account came from: "they told me" (Source 3, paragraph 1), so we know he is passing on what Egyptians said. Van Loon repeats some of the same numbers, "During twenty years, over a hundred thousand men" (Source 4, paragraph 14), but names no sources at all, so a reader cannot check where his account came from. Rubric: full credit for a clear claim, one accurate quotation from each source with paragraph numbers, and an explanation that uses what kind of source each one is; partial credit for a claim with only one cited source. Either choice can earn full credit if the evidence supports it.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RH.6-8.1 mean?
RH.6-8.1 asks students in grades 6-8 to cite specific textual evidence to support their analysis of primary and secondary sources in history and social studies. In practice, every claim a student makes about a source is backed by the source's exact words (or a close paraphrase), with the source and its location named, so that a reader can check it. "RH" stands for Reading in History/Social Studies, the literacy standards that apply in history classes.
What is the difference between a primary source and a secondary source?
A primary source was made at the time of an event by someone who took part in it or saw it, or it is an object from that time; a secondary source was made later by someone who studied other sources. Letters, diaries, photographs, speeches and tools are usually primary. Textbooks, encyclopedias and history books written long afterward are usually secondary.
Can the same source be primary and secondary?
Yes: it depends on the question you ask. Herodotus is a primary source for the embalming he could see in Egypt in his own day, but a secondary source for the Great Pyramid, which was built about 2,100 years before he arrived. Asking "primary for what?" is a good habit for middle school students.
Is an old source always a primary source?
No: age alone does not decide it. Van Loon's Ancient Man is more than a hundred years old, but it is a secondary source about ancient Egypt, because he wrote it thousands of years after the events from other people's accounts. What matters is how close the author was to the events and how he or she knew.
What counts as specific textual evidence for RH.6-8.1?
Specific evidence is the exact words that prove the claim, with the source and paragraph (or page) named. A sentence such as "the text talks about mummies" is not specific: it names no words and cannot be checked. A short quotation that matches the claim is usually stronger than a long one that is only on the same topic.
Should students quote or paraphrase?
Both count as citing, as long as the source and location are named. Quoting is better when the exact wording matters, as with Herodotus's "seventy days" and van Loon's "ten weeks," where the exact numbers are what make the comparison. Paraphrasing, restating the idea in your own words, works for longer ideas, but it must stay faithful to what the source says.
How is RH.6-8.1 different from RI.7.1?
RI.7.1 asks for several pieces of evidence from informational texts in English class, while RH.6-8.1 applies the same citing skill to history sources and names the kind of source: primary or secondary. In a history class, students also have to think about when and how each source was made before they decide what its evidence can prove.
How is RH.6-8.1 usually assessed?
It is usually assessed with questions that ask students to choose the quotation that best supports a claim, and with short written answers that must include cited evidence. Teachers can also check it in document-based tasks, where students write an answer to a history question using several sources and cite each one.
Why use Herodotus and van Loon to teach RH.6-8.1?
They describe the same topics from very different distances. Herodotus traveled in Egypt about 450 BC and saw some of the customs he describes; van Loon wrote for young readers in 1920, thousands of years after the events. Both texts are in the public domain, both interest students aged 11-14, and both contain details that can be checked, including some that turn out to be wrong.
How can parents help a child practice RH.6-8.1 at home?
Ask "How do you know?" and "Where does it say that?" when your child tells you something from a history book, a museum sign or a news story. Old family photos, letters or a grandparent's story make good primary sources to compare with a book about the same time.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to RH.6-8.1: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RI.5.1Prerequisite
Quote accurately from a text when explaining what it says and what it implies
Lesson coming soon
Alongside
RI.7.1Parallel
Cite several pieces of evidence for what an informational text says and implies