RH.9-10.10Common CoreELALiteracy in History/Social StudiesGrades 9-10
RH.9-10.10: Reading Grades 9-10 History Texts Without Support: The Lowell Mill Girls, 1834-1842
In plain English: RH.9-10.10 is the Common Core literacy standard for history/social studies in grades 9-10 that names the goal of the whole strand: by the end of grade 10, students read and comprehend history and social studies texts of grades 9-10 complexity independently and proficiently, including memoirs, travel accounts, letters and translated primary sources.
By the end of grade 10, read and comprehend history/social studies texts in the grades 9—10 text complexity band independently and proficiently.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies 6-12 · Cluster: Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity · Official standard
RH.9-10.10 does not add a new skill; it sets the level at which students use all the others. By the end of grade 10 they read and comprehend history and social studies texts in the grades 9-10 text complexity bandindependently and proficiently: without a teacher's glossary or a partner, and with understanding they can show. This lesson gives students four questions to ask of a hard history text, Origin, Core, Terms and Claim (Diagram 1), and then takes the supports away one reading at a time (Diagram 2).
All four sources are about the young women who ran the cotton mills of Lowell, Massachusetts, in the 1830s and 1840s. The teacher models the questions on Harriet H. Robinson's 1898 memory of the strike of 1836, which she joined as a child. Pairs use them on Charles Dickens's 1842 account of the mill girls' pianos, libraries and magazine. Each student reads a letter by the French engineer Michel Chevalier, written in 1834, alone. For homework, students read, with no support at all, a dialogue by a mill worker printed in the workers' own magazine, The Lowell Offering.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Establish a source's origin, including its date, writer, audience, translation and distance from the events, before reading it closely
Reduce a long sentence from a history text to its main clause and explain what the other parts add
Determine the period meaning of historical and economic terms from context, word parts and background knowledge
State a source's claim and the angle it is written from, and support both with quotations
Read a grades 9-10 history text without support and describe which question they still needed
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Reading history texts in the grades 6-8 band independently RH.6-8.10
Citing evidence from primary and secondary sources RH.6-8.1
Basic background: the United States in the 1830s, and the idea of a factory in which machines driven by water power spin and weave cloth
"In 1842 the English novelist Charles Dickens spent a day in the cotton mills of Lowell, Massachusetts, and wrote these words about the young women who worked there: 'But I solemnly declare, that from all the crowd I saw in the different factories that day, I cannot recall or separate one young face that gave me a painful impression [...].' Rewrite his words in 15 words or fewer. Then write one question you would want answered before you trusted it."
Take two or three rewrites. Most keep the core, "I cannot recall or separate one young face that gave me a painful impression," and drop "from all the crowd I saw." Then collect the questions: Who showed him around? Was he there on an ordinary day? What had he seen in English mills? Tell students that both moves, shrinking a sentence to its core and questioning where a source comes from, are part of reading history well. RH.9-10.10 asks that by the end of grade 10 they do this independently and proficiently with texts in the grades 9-10 text complexity band, the range of difficulty the Common Core sets for those grades. Today they practice on four sources about the young women, most from New England farms, who ran the Lowell cotton mills in the 1830s and 1840s: first with the teacher, then with a partner, then alone.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Part 1: The four questions. Show Diagram 1 and hand out the four-question card. Origin: who wrote this, when, for whom, and how long after the events? Core: what is the main clause of a long sentence? Terms: what did this word mean then, in this text? Claim: what is the writer saying, and from what angle, insider or visitor, at the time or years later? Explain that grades 9-10 history texts are hard for all four reasons at once, and that a strong reader notices which question a sentence needs.
Part 2: The modeled passage. Read the context note aloud: In the 1820s Boston investors built cotton mills at Lowell, on the Merrimack River, and hired young women from New England farms to run the machines. Most lived in boarding-houses owned by the mill companies. Harriet Hanson started work in a Lowell mill as a child in 1835; as Harriet H. Robinson she later wrote for newspapers and worked for woman suffrage, and in 1898 she published a book about her years in the mills. Glossary: "operatives" (factory workers), "corporations" (the companies that owned the mills), "board" (meals and lodging), "en masse" (French, all together), "vehemently" (with strong feeling), "bravado" (a show of boldness), "functionary" (an official). Then think aloud through the passage, one question at a time.
1One of the first strikes of cotton-factory operatives that ever took place in this country was that in Lowell, in October, 1836. When it was announced that the wages were to be cut down, great indignation was felt, and it was decided to strike, en masse. This was done. The mills were shut down, and the girls went in procession from their several corporations to the “grove” on Chapel Hill, and listened to “incendiary” speeches from early labor reformers.
2One of the girls stood on a pump, and gave vent to the feelings of her companions in a neat speech, declaring that it was their duty to resist all attempts at cutting down the wages. This was the first time a woman had spoken in public in Lowell, and the event caused surprise and consternation among her audience.
3Cutting down the wages was not their only grievance, nor the only cause of this strike. Hitherto the corporations had paid twenty-five cents a week towards the board of each operative, and now it was their purpose to have the girls pay the sum; and this, in addition to the cut in the wages, would make a difference of at least one dollar a week. It was estimated that as many as twelve or fifteen hundred girls turned out, and walked in procession through the streets. They had neither flags nor music, but sang songs, a favorite (but rather inappropriate) one being a parody on “I won’t be a nun.”
[...]
4My own recollection of this first strike (or “turn out” as it was called) is very vivid. I worked in a lower room, where I had heard the proposed strike fully, if not vehemently, discussed; I had been an ardent listener to what was said against this attempt at “oppression” on the part of the corporation, and naturally I took sides with the strikers. When the day came on which the girls were to turn out, those in the upper rooms started first, and so many of them left that our mill was at once shut down. Then, when the girls in my room stood irresolute, uncertain what to do, asking each other, “Would you?” or “Shall we turn out?” and not one of them having the courage to lead off, I, who began to think they would not go out, after all their talk, became impatient, and started on ahead, saying, with childish bravado, “I don’t care what you do, I am going to turn out, whether any one else does or not;” and I marched out, and was followed by the others.
5As I looked back at the long line that followed me, I was more proud than I have ever been since at any success I may have achieved, and more proud than I shall ever be again until my own beloved State gives to its women citizens the right of suffrage.
6The agent of the corporation where I then worked took some small revenges on the supposed ringleaders; on the principle of sending the weaker to the wall, my mother was turned away from her boarding-house, that functionary saying, “Mrs. Hanson, you could not prevent the older girls from turning out, but your daughter is a child, and her you could control.”
Harriet H. Robinson, Loom and Spindle, or Life Among the Early Mill Girls, chapter V, "Characteristics (Continued)" (Source 1: the turn-out of October 1836; one cut marked [...]) (1898). Public domain (published 1898). Source text.
Origin: before reading closely
What do the source line and the passage tell a reader about where this account comes from?
Result: It is a memoir, a primary source by a participant, but written 62 years after the October 1836 strike (1898 - 1836 = 62), when Robinson was an adult who had worked for woman suffrage. Two phrases show the gap: "My own recollection of this first strike" and "more proud than I shall ever be again until my own beloved State gives to its women citizens the right of suffrage." Expect vivid memory, some pride, and a purpose that belongs to 1898 as much as to 1836.
Core: the longest sentence
"Then, when the girls in my room stood irresolute, [...] I, who began to think they would not go out, after all their talk, became impatient, and started on ahead, saying, with childish bravado, [...] and I marched out, and was followed by the others." Who did what?
Result: The subject is "I"; the verbs are "became impatient," "started on ahead" and "marched out." Everything before "I" is a "when" part that sets the scene, and "who began to think they would not go out" explains why. Plain version: while the older girls in her room hesitated, the child lost patience, walked out first, and the others followed her.
Terms: words the passage explains itself
What do "turn out" and "operative" mean here, and how can a reader tell without a dictionary?
Result: Robinson defines the first in a parenthesis: "this first strike (or 'turn out' as it was called)," so to turn out is to walk off the job in protest. "Operative" is the period word for a factory worker: paragraph 1 speaks of "cotton-factory operatives," and paragraph 3 of "the board of each operative," which the glossary explains. Reading "operative" as a modern "agent" would make no sense in either sentence.
Claim and angle: the point of the passage
State the claim in one sentence and the angle in one phrase.
Result: Claim: in 1836 the young women of Lowell struck together against a wage cut and a new charge for their board, and the protest was bold enough that one girl's public speech caused "surprise and consternation" and a mill agent took revenge afterward. Angle: a participant, remembering proudly as an adult, who ties the protest to women's rights. A claim such as "The girls sang a parody of a song" is too narrow: it is one detail, not the point.
Background and numbers: why the board charge mattered
Paragraph 3 says the new charge, "in addition to the cut in the wages, would make a difference of at least one dollar a week." What does the reader need to know, and what does the arithmetic show?
Result: The companies had paid twenty-five cents a week toward each worker's board and now wanted the workers to pay it. If the total loss was at least one dollar a week, then the wage cut itself was at least 75 cents a week, since 1.00 - 0.25 = 0.75, three times the board charge. Knowing that workers paid for company housing out of their wages explains why a charge of a quarter could help start a strike.
Teacher tip. Model one wrong turn on purpose. Read "incendiary" as "set on fire," then go back and notice that Robinson puts the word in quotation marks: she is repeating what critics called the speeches, not calling them that herself. Quotation marks around a single word are a small clue that the writer is keeping her distance from it, and students will meet them again in all four sources.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Give pairs this context note and the card with prompts, but no glossary: Charles Dickens, already a famous English novelist, toured the United States in 1842 and spent a winter day at Lowell. His travel book American Notes came out later that year, for readers in Britain. Just before this passage he describes the mill girls' clean clothes, the workrooms, the boarding-houses and the company hospital. Pairs answer each prompt in writing before they ask for help. Circulate and hear from every pair at least once.
1I am now going to state three facts, which will startle a large class of readers on this side of the Atlantic, very much.
2Firstly, there is a joint-stock piano in a great many of the boarding-houses. Secondly, nearly all these young ladies subscribe to circulating libraries. Thirdly, they have got up among themselves a periodical called THE LOWELL OFFERING, ‘A repository of original articles, written exclusively by females actively employed in the mills,’—which is duly printed, published, and sold; and whereof I brought away from Lowell four hundred good solid pages, which I have read from beginning to end.
3The large class of readers, startled by these facts, will exclaim, with one voice, ‘How very preposterous!’ On my deferentially inquiring why, they will answer, ‘These things are above their station.’ In reply to that objection, I would beg to ask what their station is.
4It is their station to work. And they do work. They labour in these mills, upon an average, twelve hours a day, which is unquestionably work, and pretty tight work too. Perhaps it is above their station to indulge in such amusements, on any terms. Are we quite sure that we in England have not formed our ideas of the ‘station’ of working people, from accustoming ourselves to the contemplation of that class as they are, and not as they might be? I think that if we examine our own feelings, we shall find that the pianos, and the circulating libraries, and even the Lowell Offering, startle us by their novelty, and not by their bearing upon any abstract question of right or wrong.
5For myself, I know no station in which, the occupation of to-day cheerfully done and the occupation of to-morrow cheerfully looked to, any one of these pursuits is not most humanising and laudable. I know no station which is rendered more endurable to the person in it, or more safe to the person out of it, by having ignorance for its associate. I know no station which has a right to monopolise the means of mutual instruction, improvement, and rational entertainment; or which has ever continued to be a station very long, after seeking to do so.
Charles Dickens, American Notes for General Circulation, chapter IV, "An American Railroad. Lowell and Its Factory System" (Source 2: three facts that will startle English readers) (1842; this edition 1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.
Origin. Prompt: find two phrases that show who Dickens expects to read this. Teacher note: "a large class of readers on this side of the Atlantic" (paragraph 1) and "we in England" (paragraph 4). He writes as a visitor, for English readers, in the year of his visit.
Core. Prompt: shrink the question in paragraph 4 that begins "Are we quite sure." Teacher note: the core is "Are we quite sure that we in England have not formed our ideas of the 'station' of working people"; the rest, "from accustoming ourselves to the contemplation of that class as they are, and not as they might be," says how those ideas were formed. Plain version: maybe the English think workers belong low only because that is where they are used to seeing them.
Terms. Prompt: work out "station," "joint-stock piano" and "circulating libraries." Teacher note: "station" is a person's rank or place in society, the meaning the whole argument turns on; a joint-stock piano is owned in shares by the boarders, the way a joint-stock company is owned by its shareholders; circulating libraries lend books to members who pay a fee.
Claim. Prompt: state Dickens's claim and the angle in two sentences. Teacher note: claim, the English are startled by the mill girls' pianos, libraries and magazine only because these things are new to them, and no class of people has a right to keep learning to itself; angle, an English visitor who uses Lowell to criticize English attitudes toward working people.
Close by asking pairs which question took longest. Many choose Core, because of paragraph 5's long "I know no station" sentences, or Terms, because "station" shifts from a word the readers use to a word Dickens questions. Tell students that for Source 3 they will get a one-sentence context note and the card with question names only.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Each student reads alone, with the card that shows only the four question names. Context note: Michel Chevalier, a French engineer sent by his government to study American railroads and canals, wrote this letter from Boston in June 1834 for readers in France, and it was printed in English in 1839. Students mark each place they got stuck, write the question they used there, and finish with a two-sentence claim and angle. Collect the claims before the quiz, which uses this passage.
1The introduction of the manufacturing system into a new country, under the empire of very different circumstances, is an event worthy of the closest attention. No sooner was I recovered from the sort of giddiness with which I was seized at the sight of this extemporaneous town, hardly had I taken time to touch it, to make sure that it was not a pasteboard town, like those which Potemkin erected for Catherine along the road to Byzantium, when I set myself to inquire, how far the creation of manufactures in this country, had given rise to the same dangers in regard to the welfare and morals of the working class, and in regard to the security of the rich and of public order, as in Europe; and through the polite attention of the agents of the two principal companies (the Merrimack and the Lawrence), I was able to satisfy my curiosity. The cotton manufacture alone employs six thousand persons in Lowell; of this number nearly five thousand are young women from 17 to 24 years of age, the daughters of farmers from the different New England States, and particularly from Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont; they are here remote from their families, and under their own control. On seeing them pass through the streets in the morning and evening and at their meal-hours, neatly dressed; on finding their scarfs, and shawls, and green silk hoods which they wear as a shelter from the sun and dust (for Lowell is not yet paved), hanging up in the factories amidst the flowers and shrubs, which they cultivate, I said to myself, this, then, is not like Manchester; and when I was informed of the rate of their wages, I understood that it was not at all like Manchester. The following are the average weekly wages paid by the Merrimack corporation last May.
[...]
2These numbers are averages; the wages of the more skilful hands amounting to five, and sometimes nearly six dollars. Note that last March, in consequence of the crisis occasioned by the President's quarrel with the Bank, there was a general reduction of from 30 to 40 cents a week. You know how much smaller are the wages of women than of men; there are few women in Europe, out of a few great cities, who can earn more than 20 cents a day or one dollar a week. It must also be remembered, that, in the United States the necessaries of life are not only much cheaper than in England, but even than in France, so that a great many of these girls can save a dollar or a dollar and a half a week. After spending four years in the factories, they may have a little fortune of 250 or 300 dollars, when they often quit work and marry.
Michel Chevalier, translated by T. G. Bradford, Society, Manners and Politics in the United States, Letter XII, "The Factory Girls of Lowell," Boston, June 22, 1834 (Source 3: is Lowell like Manchester?; one cut marked [...]) (1836; this edition 1839). Public domain (published 1839). Source text.
Closure10 minutes
Exit ticket (sticky note): (1) Copy the sentence in Source 3 that took you longest and write its core. (2) Rate your reading of Source 3 as "needed help," "used the card" or "read it on my own," with one reason.
Teacher note on the sources: The passages are quoted exactly as printed in 1839, 1845, 1898 and 1913, with the writers' spellings and punctuation. None contains a slur. Period words such as "females" and "operatives" were ordinary then. In Source 4, Ellen says she will not "be a white slave." Keep the phrase and name it for students. In the 1830s and 1840s, Northern mill workers and labor reformers often compared long hours, factory bells and wage cuts to slavery, with phrases such as "white slave" and "wage slavery"; the verse cut from Source 1, the strikers' song of 1836, has the line "I cannot be a slave." The workers used the comparison to protest their loss of independence. It was disputed at the time: many abolitionists objected that it played down the evil of slavery, and defenders of slavery turned it around to claim that enslaved people in the South were better off than Northern workers. Help students test the comparison against chattel slavery in the same years, which held about two and a half million people in the United States (1840 census) as property for life: enslaved people could be bought and sold, separated from their families and held by violence, received no wages, and passed their status to their children. The mill women were paid, and, like Ellen, could give notice and leave. The phrase shows how the workers understood their own freedom; it does not describe what slavery was.
For homework: students read the passage below on their own, with no card and no context note beyond its source line.
1"I will not stay in Lowell any longer; I am determined to give my notice this very day," said Ellen Collins, as the earliest bell was tolling to remind us of the hour for labor.
2"Why, what is the matter, Ellen? It seems to me you have dreamed out a new idea! Where do you think of going? and what for?"
3"I am going home, where I shall not be obliged to rise so early in the morning, nor be dragged about by the ringing of a bell, nor confined in a close noisy room from morning till night. I will not stay here; I am determined to go home in a fortnight."
[...]
4"And so, Ellen," said I, "you think it unpleasant to rise so early in the morning, and be confined in the noisy mill so many hours during the day. And I think so, too. All this, and much more, is very annoying, no doubt. But we must not forget that there are advantages, as well as disadvantages, in this employment, as in every other. If we expect to find all sunshine and flowers in any station in life, we shall most surely be disappointed. We are very busily engaged during the day; but then we have the evening to ourselves, with no one to dictate to or control us. I have frequently heard you say, that you would not be confined to household duties, and that you dislike the millinery business altogether, because you could not have your evenings for leisure. You know that in Lowell we have schools, lectures, and meetings of every description, for moral and intellectual improvement."
5"All that is very true," replied Ellen, "but if we were to attend every public institution, and every evening school which offers itself for our improvement, we might spend every farthing of our earnings, and even more. Then if sickness should overtake us, what are the probable consequences? Here we are, far from kindred and home; and if we have an empty purse, we shall be destitute of friends also."
6"I do not think so, Ellen. I believe there is no place where there are so many advantages within the reach of the laboring class of people, as exist here; where there is so much equality, so few aristocratic distinctions, and such good fellowship, as may be found in this community. A person has only to be honest, industrious, and moral, to secure the respect of the virtuous and good, though he may not be worth a dollar; while on the other hand, an immoral person, though he should possess wealth, is not respected."
7"As to the morality of the place," returned Ellen, "I have no fault to find. I object to the constant hurry of everything. We cannot have time to eat, drink, or sleep; we have only thirty minutes, or at most three-quarters of an hour, allowed us, to go from our work, partake of our food, and return to the noisy chatter of machinery. Up before day, at the clang of the bell--and out of the mill by the clang of the bell--into the mill, and at work, in obedience to that ding-dong of a bell--just as though we were so many living machines. I will give my notice to-morrow: go, I will--I won't stay here and be a white slave."
"Almira" (pen name of a Lowell mill worker), Mind Amongst the Spindles: A Miscellany, Wholly Composed by the Factory Girls, "The Spirit of Discontent," signed "Almira" (Source 4: two mill workers argue about leaving Lowell; one cut marked [...]) (1845). Public domain (published 1845). Source text.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Keep the card with prompts for Source 3 and have students answer Origin in writing before reading the first sentence
Pre-mark the two longest sentences in Source 3 and have students bracket everything except the subject and verb before writing a claim
Read paragraph 1 of Source 3 aloud once, then have students reread it alone, so the difficulty is in the language and not in decoding
For Advanced Students
Read the rest of Chevalier's Letter XII and decide whether his answer to his own question about Manchester is convincing
Find what Dickens says earlier in the chapter about the person who guided his visit, and explain how it affects your reading of Source 2
Compare how Robinson in 1898 and "Almira" in the 1840s describe the mill bell, and explain what the difference in time does to each account
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong work establishes each source's origin before reading, reduces long sentences to a core that keeps their meaning, gives period meanings for terms with a named clue, and writes a claim with an angle that fits the whole passage. The Source 3 claims and the homework reading record together show whether a student reads grade-level history alone. Watch for four problems: treating a translated or remembered source as if it were written on the spot; keeping a modifier and losing the main clause; giving a modern meaning to a period term such as "station" or "operative"; and stating a claim with no angle, or an angle with no claim.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Core Sentence Relay
15 minPairs
Pairs get 6 sentence cards from parts of the Robinson, Dickens and Chevalier books that the lesson does not print. One partner brackets every part that is not the main clause; the other writes the core and a plain restatement of 20 words or fewer; then they swap roles for the next card. Cuts inside a card are marked [...].
The 6 Sentence Cards
Robinson: "I had been to school constantly until I was about ten years of age, when my mother, feeling obliged to have help in her work besides what I could give, and also needing the money which I could earn, allowed me, at my urgent request (for I wanted to earn money like the other little girls), to go to work in the mill."
Robinson: "And after a time, as the wages became more and more reduced, the best portion of the girls left and went to their homes, or to the other employments that were fast opening to women, until there were very few of the old guard left [...]."
Dickens: "At some distance from the factories, and on the highest and pleasantest ground in the neighbourhood, stands their hospital, or boarding-house for the sick: it is the best house in those parts, and was built by an eminent merchant for his own residence."
Dickens: "Many of the circumstances whose strong influence has been at work for years in our manufacturing towns have not arisen here [...]."
Chevalier: "By the side of these larger structures rise numerous little wooden houses, painted white, with green blinds, very neat, very snug, very nicely carpeted, and with a few small trees around them [...]."
Chevalier: "The same spirit of enterprise, which a year ago suggested the idea of sending a cargo of ice from Boston to Calcutta round Cape Horn [...], has led them to build up a town here, wholly at their own expense [...]."
Answer Key for the Teacher
Card 1: core "my mother [...] allowed me [...] to go to work in the mill." Plain: at about ten, her mother let her leave school and work in the mill, because the family needed help and money and she begged to go.
Card 2: core "the best portion of the girls left and went to their homes." Plain: as wages kept falling, the best workers left for home or other jobs.
Card 3: core "stands their hospital." The subject comes after the verb; everything before it tells where. Plain: the mill hospital stands on the best ground in town, in a merchant's former house.
Card 4: core "Many of the circumstances [...] have not arisen here." Plain: the conditions that shaped English factory towns have not appeared at Lowell.
Card 5: core "rise numerous little wooden houses." Again the verb comes first. Plain: next to the big mills stand many small, neat, white wooden houses.
Card 6: core "The same spirit of enterprise [...] has led them to build up a town here." Plain: the Boston merchants who shipped ice to India built Lowell for the same reason, to make money.
Procedure
Find every verb in the sentence and ask which one has a subject that is not inside a "who," "which," "when" or "as" part
Check for an inverted order, where the verb comes before its subject
Bracket the rest, write the core, then add back only what the plain version needs
Swap roles and repeat
Discussion Questions
Cards 3 and 5 put the verb before the subject. Why might a writer describing a place do that?
On card 1, which bracketed part would you keep in a plain version, and why?
Variation for a Shorter Class
Use cards 2, 3 and 5 only, and have each pair write one core together.
2
Period Terms Sort
10 minGroups of 3
Groups get 8 term cards from Sources 1 and 2. They sort each term by the clue that unlocks it, the sentence around it, its word parts or outside knowledge, write a meaning, and test it by reading the sentence aloud with the meaning in place of the word.
The 8 Term Cards
"listened to 'incendiary' speeches from early labor reformers" (Source 1)
"caused surprise and consternation among her audience" (Source 1)
"Cutting down the wages was not their only grievance, nor the only cause of this strike" (Source 1)
"Hitherto the corporations had paid twenty-five cents a week" (Source 1)
"when the girls in my room stood irresolute, uncertain what to do" (Source 1)
"took some small revenges on the supposed ringleaders" (Source 1)
"On my deferentially inquiring why" (Source 2)
"has a right to monopolise the means of mutual instruction" (Source 2)
Answer Key for the Teacher
The sentence around it (3): consternation (alarm; paired with "surprise"), grievance (a complaint; paired with "cause of this strike"), deferentially (politely, as if showing respect; he asks the readers "why" after they call the girls' pursuits preposterous, so the politeness is ironic).
Word parts (3): hitherto (hither, "to here," + to: until now, set against "now it was their purpose"), irresolute (ir- "not" + resolute: undecided, as "uncertain what to do" confirms), ringleaders (ring, a group or gang, + leaders: the leaders of a group doing something the speaker disapproves of; "supposed" shows the agent was guessing).
Outside knowledge (2): incendiary (literally fire-starting; used of speech, stirring people to anger; the quotation marks show Robinson is repeating critics' word), monopolise (to keep something entirely for oneself, from "monopoly," one seller controlling a market).
Discussion Questions
Which term changes the most between its everyday modern meaning and its meaning in the source?
Robinson puts "incendiary" and "oppression" in quotation marks. What does that tell you about her angle in 1898?
Modification for English Learners
Give each group a two-column chart with the Spanish cognates where they exist (incendiario, consternación, irresoluto, monopolizar) and let students match before writing meanings.
3
Complexity Profile
15 minGroups of 3, then whole class
Groups build a complexity profile of Sources 1 and 2 using four qualitative features that the Common Core uses to judge text difficulty: structure, language, knowledge demands and purpose. For each feature they decide which source is harder and copy the words that prove it. Each student then writes one reading goal for Source 3.
Procedure
Make a four-row chart, one row per feature, with a column for each source
Mark the harder source in each row and copy one quotation as proof
Report one row to the class; hear from a group that decided the other way
Write a goal: "In Source 3, I will ask ___ whenever ___."
Answer Key for the Teacher
Structure: usually Source 2. Dickens sets up an imagined objection ("'These things are above their station.'") and then answers it, so the reader must track two voices; Source 1 tells events in order.
Language: usually Source 2, for the three sentences that begin "I know no station," each with a negative inside a negative.
Knowledge demands: either source. Source 1 assumes knowledge of company boarding-houses and wage cuts; Source 2 assumes knowledge of the English class system that "station" names.
Purpose: Source 2. Dickens writes about Lowell to criticize England, a purpose he never states outright, while Robinson says plainly that she is proud.
Discussion Questions
Source 1 was published 56 years after Source 2. Is the newer text easier on every feature?
Which of the four questions on the card helps most with purpose, and which helps least?
Modification for Advanced Students
After the independent reading, add Source 3 as a third column and decide whether a translated letter is harder than the other two on each feature.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: Four Questions for Reading a Hard History Text
The four-question card used on every source in the lesson. Origin comes first, before close reading; Core is for long sentences; Terms is for words whose meaning has changed or that belong to history and economics; Claim comes at the end of each paragraph or passage and always includes the writer's angle.
Diagram 2: Taking the Supports Away, Source by Source
The five supports are a teacher think-aloud, a glossary, a context note, a partner and the four-question card. Source 1 gets four of them (all but a partner), Source 2 three (a context note, a partner and the card with prompts), Source 3 two (a one-sentence context note and the card with question names only) and Source 4 none.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RH.9-10.10 Homework: Reading a Mill Worker's Dialogue on Your Own
Directions: Read Source 4, "The Spirit of Discontent," printed at the end of the Closure phase of the lesson plan, on your own and without the card. Its paragraphs are numbered; give a paragraph number for every quotation. Answer in complete sentences.
Part 1: Origin and Core (Problems 1-3)
Using only the source line and the passage, explain who wrote Source 4, for what kind of publication, and about how many years after Chevalier's letter in Source 3 this book was printed. Then explain how the piece being a dialogue, with an "I" who argues with Ellen, changes the way you should read its claims.
Reduce this sentence from paragraph 6 to its core and restate it in plain words: "I believe there is no place where there are so many advantages within the reach of the laboring class of people, as exist here; where there is so much equality, so few aristocratic distinctions, and such good fellowship, as may be found in this community."
In paragraph 7, Ellen says: "Up before day, at the clang of the bell--and out of the mill by the clang of the bell--into the mill, and at work, in obedience to that ding-dong of a bell--just as though we were so many living machines." This is not a complete sentence. Explain what is missing, and why the writer might have Ellen speak this way.
Part 2: Terms and Claim (Problems 4-6)
Work out the meaning of "fortnight" (paragraph 3), "farthing" and "destitute" (paragraph 5) from context, and name the clue you used for each.
State the narrator's claim about life in Lowell and Ellen's claim, each with a quotation. Then decide which side the writer seems to favor in paragraphs 1-7, and explain which words show it.
Reading record: rate your reading of each of the four sources (Robinson, Dickens, Chevalier and "Almira") as "needed help," "used the card" or "read it on my own." Explain your rating for Source 4 in 3-4 sentences, naming the question you used most and one place where you still got stuck.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Accurate Reading
Cores, meanings and claims keep the passage's meaning
One answer changes the meaning
Two or more answers change the meaning
Origin and Angle
Uses date, writer and publication to explain how to read the source
Names the origin without using it
No attention to origin
Evidence
Exact quotations with paragraph numbers
Loose quotations or missing numbers
No quotations
Reflection
Reading record explains each rating with a specific place in the text
Ratings with general reasons
No reading record
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-12 and 15-17 use Source 3 (Chevalier, 1834), printed in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan. Question 13 also uses Source 1 (Robinson) in Direct Instruction, Question 18 uses Source 2 (Dickens) in Guided Practice, and Question 19 uses Sources 1 and 3. Question 14 asks about the standard itself, and Question 20 asks about your own reading. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 3 is a letter dated June 22, 1834, read here in an English translation printed in 1839. What does that origin mean for a careful reader?
Answer: D
Two facts about origin matter: the words are T. G. Bradford's English for Chevalier's French, so a single word may not be Chevalier's own choice, and the letter records what a foreign visitor saw and was told in 1834, when he writes of "this country" and compares it with "Europe." Choice A takes the date of the translation for the date of writing. Choice B dismisses the writer for being foreign, although he gives specific figures. Choice C judges by the type of source: a letter written at the time can be the better evidence.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which words from Source 3 show most directly that Chevalier is writing for readers in Europe?
Answer: B
"You know" speaks to readers who already know European wages, and the rest of the sentence compares them with women's pay "in Europe." Choice A is a fact about Lowell with no sign of the audience. Choice C introduces the table the lesson leaves out. Choice D describes the workers, not the readers.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Reduce this sentence from Source 3 to its core: "No sooner was I recovered from the sort of giddiness with which I was seized at the sight of this extemporaneous town, [...] when I set myself to inquire, how far the creation of manufactures in this country, had given rise to the same dangers [...] as in Europe." What is the main statement?
Answer: C
The "No sooner [...] when" frame means "as soon as I had recovered, I started asking." The main action is "I set myself to inquire," and what he asks is whether American factories had brought Europe's dangers. Choice A keeps only the time part. Choice B turns the question he asks into a claim he makes, the opposite of what he says. Choice D keeps a descriptive part and drops the main verb.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Chevalier calls Lowell "this extemporaneous town." Using context, what does "extemporaneous" mean here?
Answer: A
The sight of the town makes him giddy, and he has to "touch it" to be sure it is real, so the town is so new and sudden that it seems made up on the spot. Choice B confuses the town with the comparison: he checks that it is "not a pasteboard town," so it is real. Choice C is the opposite of new. Choice D adds a claim about distance that the sentence does not make.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Chevalier says he wanted "to make sure that it was not a pasteboard town, like those which Potemkin erected for Catherine along the road to Byzantium." What does this comparison suggest?
Answer: B
The story, told of Grigory Potemkin, is that he put up painted fronts of villages to impress Empress Catherine II on her journey south, so "a pasteboard town" is a fake built to impress a visitor. Chevalier is joking that Lowell looked too good to be real. Choice A takes the comparison literally. Choice C ignores "to make sure that it was not." Choice D invents a trip the passage does not mention.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does Chevalier keep comparing Lowell with Manchester?
Answer: C
His question is whether manufactures in America had "given rise to the same dangers" to workers and public order "as in Europe," and Manchester, the center of English cotton spinning, is his example of those dangers. So "this, then, is not like Manchester" is his first answer. Choice A invents a biography (Manchester is in England). Choice B invents a business link. Choice D reverses the passage, which suggests Lowell paid better.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to paragraph 1, about what share of the six thousand people in Lowell's cotton mills were young women?
Answer: A
"Nearly five thousand" out of "six thousand" is 5,000/6,000 = 5/6, about 83 percent. Choice B computes the share of the other workers, 1,000/6,000. Choice C is a guess with no support in the numbers. Choice D divides the wrong way, 6,000/5,000, which gives more than all the workers.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Chevalier writes that "last March, in consequence of the crisis occasioned by the President's quarrel with the Bank, there was a general reduction." What happened, according to the passage?
Answer: D
The sentence gives a cause, "the crisis occasioned by the President's quarrel with the Bank," and an effect, "a general reduction of from 30 to 40 cents a week." (The President was Andrew Jackson, and the Bank was the Second Bank of the United States.) Choice A invents a bank failure. Choice B reverses "reduction." Choice C mixes in a separate sentence about women's wages.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Chevalier says that many of the girls "can save a dollar or a dollar and a half a week" and that after four years "they may have a little fortune of 250 or 300 dollars." Do his numbers fit together?
Answer: A
Four years is 4 x 52 = 208 weeks; 208 x 1 = 208 dollars and 208 x 1.50 = 312 dollars, so 250 or 300 dollars sits inside the range. Choice B multiplies the weekly amount by 4 without turning years into weeks. Choice C treats the savings as daily: 365 x 4 = 1,460 days. Choice D counts only one year, 52 weeks.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence best states the claim of Source 3?
Answer: C
The passage answers his question with the girls' neat dress and their wages: "this, then, is not like Manchester," and many "can save a dollar or a dollar and a half a week." Choice A reverses his conclusion. Choice B takes a detail about dress and adds a claim the text does not make. Choice D contradicts "I was able to satisfy my curiosity."
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Chevalier asks whether factories had brought Europe's dangers "in regard to the security of the rich and of public order." What danger does this phrase point to?
Answer: A
The phrase sits beside "the welfare and morals of the working class," so the danger comes from the workers themselves: in the 1830s many Europeans feared that poor, crowded factory workers would turn to riot and revolt, a threat to "the security of the rich and of public order." Choice B narrows "security" to theft. Choice C reads it as safety from fire. Choice D turns a social danger into a market risk that the sentence does not mention.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which detail in Source 3 should make a careful reader ask whether Chevalier saw the whole picture of mill life?
Answer: B
The companies' own agents arranged what he saw and told him about wages, so he may have been shown what they wanted him to see. Asking who guided a visitor is part of the Origin question. Choice A is his general point about a new country. Choice C is a detail of the streets. Choice D describes who the workers were, not how he learned about them.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 1 describes a strike over a wage cut in October 1836, and Source 3 mentions a wage reduction in March 1834. What should a careful reader conclude?
Answer: C
Chevalier's letter is dated June 1834, so "last March" is March 1834, two years before the cut Robinson describes; nothing requires them to be the same event. Choice A assumes they are the same cut. Choice B is impossible: a letter of 1834 cannot describe 1836. Choice D invents a borrowing the sources do not show. (Historians also record an earlier Lowell turn-out, in February 1834, against the cut Chevalier mentions.)
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Near the end of grade 10, a student reads Source 3 well with the four-question card but loses the thread without it. According to RH.9-10.10, what is the best next step?
Answer: D
The standard sets the goal of reading texts in the grades 9-10 band "independently and proficiently" by the end of grade 10, so the support should come off in steps on texts at that level. Choice A makes the support permanent. Choice B lowers the level of the texts instead of building independence within the band. Choice C removes the kind of text the standard is about.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Reduce this sentence from Source 3 to its core and restate it as a cause and an effect: "It must also be remembered, that, in the United States the necessaries of life are not only much cheaper than in England, but even than in France, so that a great many of these girls can save a dollar or a dollar and a half a week."
Model answer: Core: "the necessaries of life are [...] much cheaper [...] so that a great many of these girls can save." Cause: food, lodging and other basic needs cost less in the United States than in England or France. Effect: many of the Lowell girls can put aside a dollar or a dollar and a half each week. "It must also be remembered" only tells the reader to keep this in mind. Rubric: full credit for the core and a correct cause and effect; partial credit for one of the two.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Use context to explain what "manufactures" means in "how far the creation of manufactures in this country" and what "the more skilful hands" means in paragraph 2. Name the clue you used for each.
Model answer: "Manufactures" means factories and factory production, not the goods alone; the clue is that the next sentence turns to "the cotton manufacture," which "employs six thousand persons." "The more skilful hands" means the more skilled workers; the clue is that their wages are compared with the "averages" of the others, and "hands" was a period word for workers, as in "factory hands." Rubric: full credit for both meanings, each with a clue; partial credit for one.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Paragraph 2 is full of numbers. Explain how Chevalier uses them to argue that Lowell is "not at all like Manchester," and name one thing a historian would still want to know before accepting his conclusion.
Model answer: He sets Lowell pay against European pay: skilled hands earn "five, and sometimes nearly six dollars" a week, while "there are few women in Europe, out of a few great cities, who can earn more than 20 cents a day or one dollar a week." Even after the March reduction many girls save, and after four years they can "quit work and marry." A historian would still want to know how many hours the women worked, what their board cost, and what the workers themselves thought of their pay. Rubric: full credit for explaining how the numbers support the comparison and naming a sensible missing piece of evidence; partial credit for one of the two.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Sources 2 and 3 were both written by European visitors. Name one thing the two writers do alike and one way their angles differ. Quote each source once.
Model answer: Both measure Lowell against their own countries: Dickens asks whether "we in England" judge workers fairly, and Chevalier concludes "this, then, is not like Manchester." Their angles differ. Dickens uses Lowell to criticize English readers' idea of what workers deserve, a moral argument about "station." Chevalier is an engineer testing whether factories bring social danger, and he builds his answer from wages and savings. Rubric: full credit for a likeness and a difference, each supported by a quotation from both sources; partial credit for one of the two.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Compare Source 1 (Robinson) with Source 3 (Chevalier). What does the insider see that the visitor does not? Support your answer with a quotation from each.
Model answer: Chevalier, a visitor, sees neat dress and good wages and concludes "this, then, is not like Manchester." Robinson, who worked in the mills, shows the workers' grievances and their anger at the companies: a cut in pay plus the new board charge "would make a difference of at least one dollar a week," and the girls struck. The insider sees conflict with the companies that a visitor on a guided tour does not. Robinson also writes 62 years later, so her memory has a purpose of its own. Rubric: full credit for a supported contrast with a quotation from each source; partial credit for one source only.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Reading record: which of the four questions did you need most for Source 3? Copy the words where you used it, explain what you did, and say what you understood afterward.
Model answer: I needed Terms most. At "they are here remote from their families, and under their own control" I first read "control" as the companies' control over the workers. Rereading, I saw that "their own control" means the young women ran their own lives, far from their parents, and that is why Chevalier goes on to worry about their "welfare and morals." Rubric: full credit for naming a question, quoting the place, describing what the student did and what became clear; partial credit for a question and a quotation without the rest. Answers will vary; any question used accurately earns credit.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RH.9-10.10 mean?
RH.9-10.10 means that by the end of grade 10 students can read and understand history and social studies texts of grades 9-10 difficulty on their own. It is the last of the ten reading standards for history, and it asks students to use the other nine, such as citing evidence and analyzing point of view, without a teacher's support.
What is the grades 9-10 text complexity band?
It is the range of difficulty the Common Core expects students to read in grades 9 and 10. Complexity is judged three ways: quantitative measures of sentence length and word frequency (the Common Core's supplement to Appendix A gives about 1050L to 1335L on the Lexile scale for this band), qualitative features such as structure, language, knowledge demands and purpose, and the match between the reader and the task.
How is RH.9-10.10 different from RI.9-10.10?
RI.9-10.10 is the English standard for literary nonfiction, and it splits the goal: by the end of grade 9 students read in the band with scaffolding as needed at the high end, and by the end of grade 10 they read at the high end independently. RH.9-10.10 names only the end of grade 10, and it is about history texts such as documents, letters, speeches, memoirs and histories.
Is RH.9-10.10 taught in history class or English class?
Both. The literacy standards for history belong to the history and social studies classroom, but English teachers often teach the same reading moves with history texts. The standard works best when a U.S. or world history course gives students regular practice with primary and secondary sources.
What does "independently and proficiently" look like in grades 9-10?
A student reads a new grade-level source alone and can say where it comes from and how that shapes it, untangle its long sentences, explain its historical terms, and state its claim and angle with evidence. The student notices when understanding breaks down and chooses a strategy before asking for help.
Why use texts from the 1830s and 1840s in a grades 9-10 lesson?
Primary sources from the period are what historians read, and they demand everything a hard text can demand: long sentences, words whose meaning has shifted, background knowledge and an unstated purpose. Short passages, a clear routine and supports that are removed step by step keep them within reach.
Is a translated source like Chevalier's letter still a primary source?
Yes. A translation of a letter written at the time is still a primary source, but the reader should know that the English words are the translator's. When a single word matters to an argument, a historian checks the original language.
How can teachers assess RH.9-10.10?
Give students a passage they have not seen, in the grades 9-10 band, and ask them to establish its origin, reduce a hard sentence to its core, explain two terms from context and state the claim and angle with quotations. Comparing that work with work on a supported passage shows how much of the reading is independent.
How can parents help with RH.9-10.10?
When your teenager reads a historical document, a news article about the past or an old family letter, ask: Who wrote this, and when? What is this long sentence really saying? What did that word mean then? What is the writer trying to convince us of? Asking the questions matters more than knowing the answers.
What comes after RH.9-10.10?
RH.11-12.10 sets the same goal for the grades 11-CCR band, the level of college and career readiness, by the end of grade 12. The texts grow longer and more abstract, arguments build across many paragraphs, and students weigh sources against one another more often.
07
Related Standards
6 standards
These standards connect to RH.9-10.10: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RH.6-8.10Prerequisite
Read history/social studies texts in the grades 6-8 band independently