D2.Psy.19.9-12: Applying Psychology's Major Approaches to Real Issues
In plain English: D2.Psy.19.9-12 is the C3 Framework psychology indicator for grades 9-12 that asks students to apply the major theoretical approaches in psychology to educational, emotional, political, ethical, motivational, organizational, personal and social issues. Students explain one issue through several approaches, compare what each one shows and misses, and weigh the evidence behind each.
Apply the major theoretical approaches in psychology to educational, emotional, political, ethical, motivational, organizational, personal, and social issues.
C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 2: Applying Disciplinary Concepts and Tools · Discipline: Psychology · Applications of Psychological Knowledge · Official standard
D2.Psy.19.9-12 asks students to apply the major theoretical approaches in psychology to educational, emotional, political, ethical, motivational, organizational, personal and social issues. An approach is a way of explaining behavior that decides which questions get asked first: the biological approach looks at the brain and body, the behavioral approach at learning from associations and consequences, the cognitive approach at how people interpret and think, the psychodynamic approach at unconscious conflict, the humanistic approach at growth and choice, and the sociocultural approach at groups, roles and culture. Applying them well means using more than one on the same issue and saying what each shows and what it misses.
Students read four historical sources, each written from a different starting point: Pavlov's conditioned reflexes (1927), Freud's account of repression (1910), Münsterberg's interviews about monotony at work (1913) and Lippmann's "pictures in our heads" (1922). They then apply all six approaches to invented cases covering all eight kinds of issue, compute from Pavlov's and Münsterberg's own numbers, and judge how strong the evidence behind each approach's explanation is.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Describe six major theoretical approaches in psychology and the first question each one asks
Apply at least two approaches to each of the eight kinds of issue named in the indicator: educational, emotional, political, ethical, motivational, organizational, personal and social
Use a historical source to show how one approach explains an issue, quoting it with a paragraph number
Compare what two approaches reveal and miss about the same issue, and judge the evidence behind each
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
The biological, cognitive, behavioral and sociocultural perspectives D2.Psy.2.9-12
How areas of psychology connect D2.Psy.17.9-12
Applying a psychological principle to daily life D2.Psy.18.9-12
Multiplying and dividing with large numbers and converting seconds to hours
"A student who used to love basketball suddenly quits the team. Write three different explanations for why, each starting from a different kind of cause."
Collect explanations and sort them on the board without labels: something in the body (an injury, exhaustion), something learned (practices became punishing), a way of thinking ("I'll never start"), a hidden feeling (anger at a parent who pushed), a need for growth (wanting to try something new), the group (teammates or culture). Tell students these are six major approaches in psychology, and that today they will apply them to eight kinds of issues.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Six major theoretical approaches (descriptions and questions written for this page)
Approach
Key idea
First question about an issue
Source on this page
Biological
Behavior and mental life depend on the brain, nervous system, hormones and genes
What is happening in the body?
None directly; see the teacher notes
Behavioral
Behavior is learned through associations and consequences
What has this behavior been paired with or rewarded by?
Source 1 (Pavlov)
Cognitive
Behavior follows from how people perceive, interpret and remember
What picture of the situation is the person acting on?
Source 4 (Lippmann); Source 3 (Münsterberg) in part
Psychodynamic
Unconscious wishes and conflicts shape behavior
What might the person be keeping out of awareness?
Source 2 (Freud)
Humanistic
People seek growth, choice and a sense of worth
What does this mean to the person and their goals?
None; described in this table
Sociocultural
Groups, roles and culture shape behavior
Which group, role or setting is involved?
None; described in this table
Eight kinds of issue. The indicator names educational (learning and school), emotional (feelings and their causes), political (government, voting and public opinion), ethical (choices about right and wrong), motivational (why people start and keep going), organizational (workplaces and teams), personal (one's own decisions and identity) and social (relationships and groups) issues. Any approach can be applied to any of them, but some fit some issues more closely than others.
Read Source 1 and Source 2, written from two very different starting points.
1Demonstration. -- The dog used in the following experiment has been operated upon as described previously. It can be seen that so long as no special stimulus is applied the salivary glands remain quite inactive. But when the sounds from a beating metronome are allowed to fall upon the ear, a salivary secretion begins after 9 seconds, and in the course of 45 seconds eleven drops have been secreted. The activity of the salivary gland has thus been called into play by impulses of sound -- a stimulus quite alien to food. This activity of the salivary gland cannot be regarded as anything else than a component of the alimentary reflex. Besides the secretory, the motor component of the food reflex is also very apparent in experiments of this kind. In this very experiment the dog turns in the direction from which it has been customary to present the food and begins to lick its lips vigorously.
2This experiment is an example of a central nervous activity depending on the integrity of the hemispheres. A decerebrate dog would never have responded by salivary secretion to any stimulus of the kind. It is obvious also that the underlying principle of this activity is signalization. The sound of the metronome is the signal for food, and the animal reacts to the signal in the same way as if it were food; no distinction can be observed between the effects produced on the animal by the sounds of the beating metronome and showing it real food.
[...]
3[...] Hence a first and most essential requisite for the formation of a new conditioned reflex lies in a coincidence in time of the action of any previously neutral stimulus with some definite unconditioned stimulus. Further, it is not enough that there should be overlapping between the two stimuli; it is also and equally necessary that the conditioned stimulus should begin to operate before the unconditioned stimulus comes into action.
4If this order is reversed, the unconditioned stimulus being applied first and the neutral stimulus second, the conditioned reflex cannot be established at all. Dr. Krestovnikov performed these experiments with many different modifications and controls, but the effect was always the same. The following are some of his results: In one case 427 applications were made in succession of the odour of vanillin together with the introduction of acid into the dog's mouth, but the acid was always made to precede the vanillin by some 5 to 10 seconds. Vanillin failed to acquire the properties of a conditioned stimulus. However, in the succeeding experiment, in which the order of stimuli was reversed, the odour, this time of amyl acetate, became an effective conditioned stimulus after only 20 combinations. With another dog the loud buzzing of an electric bell set going 5 to 10 seconds after administration of food failed to establish a conditioned alimentary reflex even after 374 combinations, whereas the regular rotation of an object in front of the eyes of the animal, the rotation beginning before the administration of food, acquired the properties of a conditioned stimulus after only 5 combinations. The electric buzzer set going before the administration of food established a conditioned alimentary reflex after only a single combination.
Ivan P. Pavlov, translated by G. V. Anrep, Source 1: Ivan Pavlov on conditioned reflexes (1927) (1927). Public domain (published 1927). Source text.
1It is on this idea of resistance that I based my theory of the psychic processes of hystericals. It had been found that in order to cure the patient it was necessary that this force should be overcome. Now with the mechanism of the cure as a starting point, quite a definite theory could be constructed. These same forces, which in the present situation as resistances opposed the emergence of the forgotten ideas into consciousness, must themselves have caused the forgetting, and repressed from consciousness the pathogenic experiences. I called this hypothetical process "repression" (Verdrängung), and considered that it was proved by the undeniable existence of resistance.
[...]
2Perhaps I can make the process of repression and its necessary relation to the resistance of the patient, more concrete by a rough illustration, which I will derive from our present situation.
3Suppose that here in this hall and in this audience, whose exemplary stillness and attention I cannot sufficiently commend, there is an individual who is creating a disturbance, and, by his ill-bred laughing, talking, by scraping his feet, distracts my attention from my task. I explain that I cannot go on with my lecture under these conditions, and thereupon several strong men among you get up, and, after a short struggle, eject the disturber of the peace from the hall. He is now "repressed," and I can continue my lecture. But in order that the disturbance may not be repeated, in case the man who has just been thrown out attempts to force his way back into the room, the gentlemen who have executed my suggestion take their chairs to the door and establish themselves there as a "resistance," to keep up the repression. Now, if you transfer both locations to the psyche, calling this "consciousness," and the outside the "unconscious," you have a tolerably good illustration of the process of repression.
[...]
4New questions at once arise in great number from our theory. The situation of psychic conflict is a very frequent one; an attempt of the ego to defend itself from painful memories can be observed everywhere, and yet the result is not a mental fission. We cannot avoid the assumption that still other conditions are necessary, if the conflict is to result in dissociation. I willingly concede that with the assumption of "repression" we stand, not at the end, but at the very beginning of a psychological theory. But we can advance only one step at a time, and the completion of our knowledge must await further and more thorough work.
Sigmund Freud, translated by Harry W. Chase, Source 2: Sigmund Freud on repression (1910) (1910). Public domain (published 1910). Source text.
Behavioral approach, emotional issue: Source 1
Mina, 15, feels her heart race at the whine of a dentist's drill before anything has touched her. How would a behavioral psychologist use Source 1 to explain it?
Result: The sound has come just before an unpleasant experience many times, so, like the metronome in paragraph 1, it now sets off the reaction on its own: "the animal reacts to the signal in the same way as if it were food." The behavioral question is what the sound has been paired with, not what Mina believes about it.
Psychodynamic approach, personal issue: Source 2
Ben, 17, keeps "forgetting" to call an uncle he argued with last month. How would the psychodynamic approach explain the forgetting, and how sure can it be?
Result: It would say a painful feeling about the argument is being kept out of awareness, a small case of what Freud calls "repression." Freud himself calls repression a "hypothetical process," and the explanation is hard to test: a cognitive psychologist might simply point to a busy month.
Invented case: Dana, 16, keeps working on her drawings after a contest rejects them. What would a humanistic psychologist ask first?
Result: What drawing means to Dana and to the person she wants to become. The approach looks for growth and choice rather than rewards: she may keep going because the work expresses who she is, not because of prizes. A behavioral psychologist would instead ask what she still gains from drawing.
Invented case: at one school, students who find a lost phone almost always hand it in at the front office. What would a sociocultural psychologist look at?
Result: The group's norms and the school's habits: whether handing in lost things is expected, praised and easy there. The same student might act differently in a setting where nobody does it. The approach explains the ethical choice through the setting, not through one person's character alone.
Close the segment: In which example would two approaches give the most different answers? Ask students to name the two approaches and the evidence each would want.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Read Source 3 together. Münsterberg, a psychologist who taught at Harvard, visited factories to ask workers about repetitive jobs, an organizational issue. Then compute from his own numbers.
1For a long while I have tried to discover in every large factory which I have visited the particular job which from the standpoint of the outsider presents itself as the most tiresome possible, As soon as I found it, I had a full frank talk with the man or woman who performed it and earnestly tried to get self-observational comment. My chief aim was to bring out how far the mere repetition, especially when it is continued through years, is felt as a source of discomfort. I may again point to a few chance illustrations. In an electrical factory with many thousands of employees I gained the impression that the prize for monotonous work belonged to a woman who packs incandescent lamps in tissue paper. She wraps them from morning until night, from the first day of the year to the last, and has been doing that for the last 12 years. She performs this packing process at an average rate of 13,000 lamps a day. The woman has reached about 50,000,000 times for the next lamp with one hand and with the other to the little pile of tissue sheets and then performed the packing. Each lamp demands about 20 finger movements. As long as I watched her, she was able to pack 25 lamps in 42 seconds, and only a few times did she need as many as 44 seconds. Every 25 lamps filled a box, and the closing of the box required a short time for itself. She evidently took pleasure in expressing herself fully about her occupation. She assured me that she found the work really interesting, and that she constantly felt an inner tension, thinking how many boxes she would be able to fill before the next pause. Above all, she told me that there is continuous variation. Sometimes she grasps the lamp or paper in a different way, sometimes the packing itself does not run smoothly, sometimes she feels fresher, sometimes less in the mood for the work, and there is always something to observe and something to think about.
[...]
2On the other hand, I not seldom found wage-earners, both men and women, who seemed to have really interesting and varied activities and who nevertheless complained bitterly over the monotonous, tiresome factory labor. I became more and more convinced that the feeling of monotony depends much less upon the particular kind of work than upon the special disposition of the individual. It cannot be denied that the same contrast exists in the higher classes of work. We find school-teachers who constantly complain that it is intolerably monotonous to go on teaching immature children the rudiments of knowledge, while other teachers with exactly the same task before them are daily inspired anew by the manifoldness of life in the classroom. We find physicians who complain that one case in their practice is like another, and judges who despair because they always have to deal with the same petty cases, while other judges and physicians feel clearly that every case offers something new and that the repetition as such is neither conspicuous nor disagreeable. [...]
Hugo Münsterberg, Source 3: Hugo Münsterberg on monotony at work (1913) (1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.
Numbers reported in Source 3, paragraph 1
Quantity
Value in the source
Lamps packed per day (average)
13,000
Pace while Münsterberg watched
25 lamps in 42 seconds
Years in the job
12
Reaches for the next lamp so far
about 50,000,000
How long is a day of packing? At 25 lamps in 42 seconds, each lamp takes 42 / 25 = 1.68 seconds, so 13,000 lamps take 13,000 x 1.68 = 21,840 seconds. Divided by 3,600, that is about 6.1 hours of packing, not counting the time to close the boxes.
Is "about 50,000,000" reasonable? If she worked about 300 days a year, 13,000 x 300 x 12 = 46,800,000, which rounds to about 50 million. The figure fits, if the 300-day year is right; the source does not say how many days she worked.
Which approach is Münsterberg using? Ask students to find, in paragraph 2, the sentence where he says what the feeling of monotony depends on, and to match it to a row of the approach table. Then ask: what would a behavioral or a sociocultural psychologist ask about the same factory?
Now read Source 4. Lippmann's book is about public opinion, a political issue. Paragraph 1 is set in 1914.
1There is an island in the ocean where in 1914 a few Englishmen, Frenchmen, and Germans lived. No cable reaches that island, and the British mail steamer comes but once in sixty days. In September it had not yet come, and the islanders were still talking about the latest newspaper which told about the approaching trial of Madame Caillaux for the shooting of Gaston Calmette. It was, therefore, with more than usual eagerness that the whole colony assembled at the quay on a day in mid-September to hear from the captain what the verdict had been. They learned that for over six weeks now those of them who were English and those of them who were French had been fighting in behalf of the sanctity of treaties against those of them who were Germans. For six strange weeks they had acted as if they were friends, when in fact they were enemies.
[...]
2In all these instances we must note particularly one common factor. It is the insertion between man and his environment of a pseudo-environment. To that pseudo-environment his behavior is a response. But because it is behavior, the consequences, if they are acts, operate not in the pseudo-environment where the behavior is stimulated, but in the real environment where action eventuates. If the behavior is not a practical act, but what we call roughly thought and emotion, it may be a long time before there is any noticeable break in the texture of the fictitious world. But when the stimulus of the pseudo-fact results in action on things or other people, contradiction soon develops. Then comes the sensation of butting one's head against a stone wall, of learning by experience, and witnessing Herbert Spencer's tragedy of the murder of a Beautiful Theory by a Gang of Brutal Facts, the discomfort in short of a maladjustment. For certainly, at the level of social life, what is called the adjustment of man to his environment takes place through the medium of fictions.
[...]
3The analyst of public opinion must begin then, by recognizing the triangular relationship between the scene of action, the human picture of that scene, and the human response to that picture working itself out upon the scene of action. It is like a play suggested to the actors by their own experience, in which the plot is transacted in the real lives of the actors, and not merely in their stage parts. [...]
Walter Lippmann, Source 4: Walter Lippmann on the pictures in our heads (1922) (1922). Public domain (published 1922). Source text.
Discuss: (1) Which approach from the table fits paragraph 2 best, and which phrase shows it? (2) Paragraph 3 describes a triangle. Draw it with its three corners labeled. (3) Why might this approach be especially useful for political issues, where most people never see the events they vote or argue about?
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students read Source 5 on their own and use all five sources for the quiz and homework. Source 5 gives eight invented cases, one for each kind of issue in the indicator.
1Invented cases, written for this page. The people are not real.
2Case 1 (educational). After one low grade on a chemistry quiz, Aiden, 15, stops turning in his chemistry homework. He tells a friend, "I'm just not a science person."
3Case 2 (emotional). Zoe's coach sends practice changes to the team with a special ringtone, and the news is usually extra laps. Now, whenever Zoe, 16, hears that ringtone, her stomach tightens, even on days when there is no practice.
4Case 3 (political). In a student council election, many students say they will vote for the candidate whose poster shows her at a food drive. Few of them have read either candidate's plan for the council.
5Case 4 (ethical). The night before a history test, a photo of the answer key is shared in a large group chat. Some students look at it; most of the group does not.
6Case 5 (motivational). Luis, 17, runs before school almost every morning. He has never entered a race. "I just like who I am on the days I run," he says.
7Case 6 (organizational). At the café where Jamal, 17, works part time, the closing checklist is done carefully when the manager stays late and skipped on most nights when she leaves early.
8Case 7 (personal). Rosa, 16, has put off writing a scholarship essay for three weeks. The topic is her family's move to a new country, and she says she cannot explain why she keeps avoiding it.
9Case 8 (social). Kenji moved to a new school two weeks ago and has eaten lunch alone every day. Most lunch tables are filled by sports teams and clubs that formed last year.
SVHS (invented scenario), Source 5: Eight issues from one school year (invented cases) (2026). Original passage written for this page.
Task: choose two cases from Source 5 that are different kinds of issue. For each, write how two approaches from the table would explain it, one sentence each, and then one sentence on which explanation you would test first and what evidence you would need.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: "Pick one of the eight kinds of issue. Name the approach you think fits it best and the approach you think fits it worst, and give a reason for each."
Teacher notes. (1) Sources 1-4 are historical, and each shows only one way of thinking. Pavlov's dogs underwent surgery so that their saliva could be measured; the ethics of animal research is the subject of D2.Psy.4.9-12. (2) Freud's account rests on his own cases and his reading of them, not on controlled tests; he calls repression a "hypothetical process," and "hystericals" is a label from his time that the lesson does not use. Present the psychodynamic approach as one historical approach whose ideas are hard to test. (3) Münsterberg spoke with a few workers he chose himself, during factory visits, and his examples are open to other readings. Lippmann's example comes from 1914; the lesson takes no position on any current election or party. (4) No source on this page speaks for the biological, humanistic or sociocultural approach; their descriptions in the table are written for this page. (5) Source 5 is invented. If a case touches a student's own situation, such as worry, loneliness or a family move, point them to a trusted adult, such as a parent or school counselor.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give the approach table as a card with the first question of each approach in bold
Let students work Source 5 cases 2 and 5 first, where one approach fits clearly
Offer frames: "A ___ psychologist would explain this by ___. They would want evidence such as ___."
For Advanced Students
Choose one Source 5 case and write how all six approaches would explain it, then rank them by how testable each explanation is
Compare Pavlov's evidence (counted drops and pairings) with Freud's (case histories): which kind of evidence does each approach usually rely on?
Find a sentence in Source 3 that a sociocultural psychologist would read differently from Münsterberg
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong answers name the approach, use its first question on the specific issue, support the explanation with a quotation and paragraph number where a source applies, and compare at least two approaches by what each shows and misses. Watch for students who match each issue to only one approach, who treat Freud's hypotheses as established findings, or who confuse the cognitive approach (interpretation) with the behavioral approach (associations and consequences).
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Eight Issues, Six Lenses
15 minGroups of 3
Each group gets 8 issue cards, one for each kind of issue in the indicator, all invented for this page, and an approach chart with the six approaches from Direct Instruction. For each card the group names the issue type, the approach that fits best and a second approach that would explain it differently, and writes the first question each approach would ask.
The 8 Issue Cards (invented)
In one class, students talk more whenever the teacher turns to write on the board.
A 16-year-old has been afraid of dogs since a dog bit him when he was six.
After a town election, many voters can repeat a candidate's slogan but cannot name any of her plans.
A cashier gives a customer $10 too much in change, and the customer hands it back.
A student practices piano only in the weeks when her parents pay her for practicing.
Workers at a grocery store hide mistakes from a manager who yells about them.
A senior cannot decide whether to leave the drama club she has belonged to for three years.
After a school trip, a group of friends starts dressing alike.
Answer Key (one defensible pairing per card)
1: educational; behavioral (talking is followed by no consequence while the teacher's back is turned) and sociocultural (class norms). 2: emotional; behavioral (the dog was paired with pain) and biological (the body's fear response). 3: political; cognitive (voters act on a simple picture of the candidate) and sociocultural (what their circle repeats). 4: ethical; sociocultural (norms of honesty learned in a community) and humanistic (acting in line with one's own values). 5: motivational; behavioral (practice follows the pay) and humanistic (whether she wants to play for its own sake). 6: organizational; behavioral (mistakes are punished, so hiding them is rewarded) and sociocultural (the workplace culture). 7: personal; humanistic (which choice fits who she wants to become) and psychodynamic (feelings about leaving that she may not fully see). 8: social; sociocultural (group belonging) and cognitive (how each friend sees the group). Accept other pairings with a specific reason.
Debrief
Which approach did your group use most often? Which one did you never use, and can you find a card where it would add something?
2
Source Lens: A Four-Source Jigsaw
20 min4 expert groups, then mixed groups of 4
Each expert group takes one of Sources 1-4 and completes the Source Lens organizer. Then students regroup so that each new group has one expert for every source, and each expert teaches the others in 2 minutes.
Source Lens Organizer
Which approach does the writer start from? Quote the sentence that shows it, with its paragraph number.
Which of the eight kinds of issue does the source deal with directly?
What kind of evidence does the writer use: counted measurements, interviews, case histories, or examples and stories?
Name one other kind of issue from the eight that this approach could be applied to, and how.
What does this approach leave out? Name a second approach that would ask a different first question.
Variation
For a shorter class, pair Source 1 with Source 2 only. Each pair writes two sentences comparing the evidence the two writers rely on: counted drops and trials against case histories.
3
Plan a Test of Two Approaches on Paper
15 minPairs
Pairs plan, on paper only, a study that could tell two approaches apart on one everyday issue. They may not run it. Suggested question: why do most students sit in the same seat in a class even when seats are not assigned? A behavioral answer points to habit built from repetition; a sociocultural answer points to an unwritten class rule.
Study Plan Template
The issue, and which of the eight kinds it is
The two approaches and the explanation each gives
A result that the first approach predicts and the second does not
What is observed or measured, without names
Who takes part, how many, and for how long
Ethics: consent, privacy, no one singled out, and who approves the plan
One result that would support neither approach
Variation
Pairs swap plans and add a third approach's explanation that the plan could not test, then say what extra evidence it would need.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
1 diagrams
Diagram 1: One Issue Seen Through Six Approaches
The Warm-Up case, a student who quits the basketball team, with the first question each of the six major approaches would ask about it. The questions are examples written for this page; each approach points to different evidence, and more than one can be true at once.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
Homework: Six Approaches, Eight Kinds of Issue
Directions: Part 1 uses Sources 1, 3 and 4. Quote every source you use with its paragraph number. Part 2 gives new invented cases; for each one, name the kind of issue and use at least two approaches.
Part 1: Reading the Evidence (Problems 1-3)
A teacher plays a short chime just before every pop quiz, and after a few weeks some students tense up as soon as they hear it. Using Source 1, paragraph 3, explain why the order of chime and quiz matters, and say what kind of issue this is. Then explain how a cognitive psychologist would explain the same tension differently.
Using Source 4, paragraphs 1 and 2, explain how a student newspaper that printed a false report the day before a student council vote could change the result, even after a correction. Which approach are you using, and what kind of issue is this?
In Source 3, paragraph 1, every box held 25 lamps. How many boxes did the packer fill on an average day? She said she kept "thinking how many boxes she would be able to fill before the next pause." Explain how a behavioral and a humanistic psychologist would each read that remark about her motivation.
Part 2: Applying the Approaches (Problems 4-6)
Invented case: Marco, 16, finds a wallet with $40 and a student ID in the gym and returns it to the office. His friend says he would have kept the cash. Explain both choices with two approaches, and say what kind of issue this is.
Invented case: Hana, 17, must choose between a paid summer job and an unpaid internship in the field she wants to study. Apply the humanistic and the cognitive approaches to her decision, and name one thing each one would want to know about her.
Invented case: a new rule says phones must stay in lockers during lunch, and students who used to sit alone with their phones start sitting in groups. Explain the change with a sociocultural and a behavioral approach, and plan on paper one observation, without names, that could tell the two explanations apart.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Approaches
Each approach is named correctly and its first question is applied to the case
Approaches named, but one is confused with another
Approaches missing or wrong
Kind of issue
The kind of issue is named correctly for every case
One case misnamed
Issue types missing
Evidence and calculation
Quotations with paragraph numbers support the source-based answers, and the box count is correct
Some evidence or the calculation missing
No evidence from the sources
Comparison
Says what each approach shows and misses, and how to tell them apart
Comparison stated but not explained
No comparison
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Sources 1 and 2 are printed in Direct Instruction, Sources 3 and 4 in Guided Practice, and Source 5 in Independent Practice. Source 1 is used in Questions 1-3 and 19; Source 2 in Questions 5-7 and 17; Source 3 in Questions 11, 12 and 20; Source 4 in Questions 8-10; and Source 5 in Questions 4, 10, 13-20. Questions 1-14 are multiple choice; 15-20 are short answer.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 1, paragraph 1, how long after the metronome started did the dog's salivary secretion begin?
Answer: D
"A salivary secretion begins after 9 seconds, and in the course of 45 seconds eleven drops have been secreted." A is the length of the whole collection period, and C confuses the eleven drops with seconds. B is the delay when food was shown, a different demonstration in the same lecture.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 1, paragraph 2, which dog would never respond to the metronome with saliva?
Answer: D
Pavlov writes that "A decerebrate dog would never have responded by salivary secretion to any stimulus of the kind," because the response depends on "the integrity of the hemispheres." A mixes in a different experiment with puppies. B and C are not in the paragraph.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What does Source 1, paragraph 3 say is necessary for a new conditioned reflex, besides the two stimuli overlapping in time?
Answer: A
"It is also and equally necessary that the conditioned stimulus should begin to operate before the unconditioned stimulus comes into action." B is the order that failed in paragraph 4. C is wrong: paragraph 4 also uses smells and a rotating object. D is not in the source.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which approach best explains Case 2 in Source 5, Zoe's reaction to the coach's ringtone?
Answer: B
The ringtone has come right before news of extra laps many times, so, like Pavlov's metronome, it now sets off the reaction by itself, even on days with no practice. That is a learned association, the behavioral approach. A and C add causes the case gives no sign of. D is wrong: the reaction is tied to one particular ringtone, which points to learning, though a biological psychologist could still study the body's part in it.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 2, paragraph 1, what does Freud take as proof that repression happens?
Answer: A
He writes that he "considered that it was proved by the undeniable existence of resistance." He reasons from the patients' resistance in treatment back to a hypothetical cause. B and D describe kinds of evidence he does not give. C is wrong: the same lecture describes working with patients without hypnosis.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Freud's illustration in Source 2, paragraph 3, what do the men who sit by the door stand for?
Answer: C
The men who "take their chairs to the door and establish themselves there as a 'resistance'" keep the ejected man out. B is the man who was "repressed"; D is consciousness in his comparison, and the outside of the hall is the unconscious, so A is the place, not the guards.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What does Freud concede about his theory in Source 2, paragraph 4?
Answer: A
"I willingly concede that with the assumption of 'repression' we stand, not at the end, but at the very beginning of a psychological theory." B and C claim more than he does: he says "still other conditions are necessary" and that the theory must await "further and more thorough work." D reverses his position.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 4, paragraph 1, why did the islanders go on acting as friends for six weeks?
Answer: B
No cable reached the island and the mail steamer came every sixty days, so they "had acted as if they were friends, when in fact they were enemies." They acted on an old picture of the world. A, C and D are not in the paragraph; the passage says nothing about agreements, orders or indifference.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What does Lippmann mean by a "pseudo-environment" in Source 4, paragraph 2?
Answer: D
It is "the insertion between man and his environment" of a picture to which "his behavior is a response." In paragraph 2 he adds that the consequences of acting on it land "in the real environment." A is too narrow: the picture need not be a lie. C is the opposite: the real scene is what the picture stands between.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which approach, with which source, best explains Case 3 in Source 5, the student council election?
Answer: A
Students who have not read either plan are voting on a picture formed from one poster, which is Lippmann's point that behavior responds to the picture in our heads. B would need a repeated pairing, which the case does not describe. C has no sign of a hidden conflict. D names the right approach but the wrong source: Münsterberg writes about work, not elections.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 3, paragraph 1, each lamp needs about 20 finger movements. About how many finger movements does the packer make on an average day?
Answer: C
She packs 13,000 lamps a day, and 13,000 x 20 = 260,000 movements. A counts lamps, not movements. B divides instead of multiplying (13,000 / 20 = 650). D adds a zero, as if each lamp took 200 movements.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What does Münsterberg conclude in Source 3, paragraph 2 about the feeling of monotony?
Answer: C
He writes that "the feeling of monotony depends much less upon the particular kind of work than upon the special disposition of the individual." A reverses this. B is contradicted by the workers who love repetitive jobs and those who complain about varied ones. D is wrong: he also gives school-teachers, physicians and judges as examples.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How would a behavioral psychologist most likely explain Case 6 in Source 5, the skipped closing checklist?
Answer: B
The checklist is done when the manager stays and skipped when she leaves, so the behavior follows its consequences: when nobody checks, nothing happens after a skip. A is humanistic, C is cognitive and D is psychodynamic; none of them fits the pattern of the manager staying or leaving as well.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which approach starts from the kind of reason Luis gives in Case 5 of Source 5?
Answer: D
Luis says "I just like who I am on the days I run" and has never raced, so the reason he gives is about his sense of self and growth, the humanistic approach's first question. A assumes a reward the case does not mention. B is wrong: he has no team. C makes a claim about the body that the case does not give, though a biological psychologist could still study it.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Case 1 in Source 5 is an educational issue. Explain Aiden's choice with the cognitive approach and with the behavioral approach. Which explanation would you test first, and how?
Model answer: Cognitive: Aiden interprets one low grade as proof that he is "just not a science person," so he sees no point in trying; the belief drives the behavior. Behavioral: homework was followed by a painful result, and not doing it removes that discomfort, so skipping is rewarded. I would test the cognitive explanation first by asking him what he thinks the grade says about him and whether he would try again if he believed effort mattered. Rubric: 1 point for each approach applied correctly to the case, 1 point for a reasoned choice with a way to test it.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Case 4 in Source 5 is an ethical issue. Use the sociocultural approach and one other approach to explain why some students looked at the answer key and most did not.
Model answer: Sociocultural: a large group chat creates a setting with its own norms; seeing others look may make looking seem normal, while friends who refuse may set the opposite norm, so the choice depends on which group a student feels part of. Humanistic: students who see honesty as part of who they want to be choose not to look even when others do. That most did not look shows that the group setting alone does not decide the choice. Rubric: 1 point for a sociocultural explanation, 1 point for a second approach applied correctly, 1 point for using the detail that most did not look.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Case 7 in Source 5 is a personal issue. Apply the psychodynamic approach to Rosa's avoidance using Source 2, and then explain why a careful psychologist would also try another approach.
Model answer: Psychodynamic: writing about the move may stir painful feelings that Rosa keeps out of awareness, so she avoids the task without being able to explain why, a mild version of what Freud calls "repression." But Freud calls it a "hypothetical process" and admits the theory stands "at the very beginning," and such explanations are hard to test. A cognitive approach could check something simpler, for example whether she believes the essay must be perfect, by asking her and seeing whether a short first draft breaks the delay. Rubric: 1 point for the psychodynamic explanation with a quotation, 1 point for the limit of the evidence, 1 point for a second approach with a way to check it.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Case 8 in Source 5 is a social issue. Explain Kenji's situation with the sociocultural approach and with the humanistic approach, and suggest one response that either approach would support.
Model answer: Sociocultural: the lunchroom is organized by groups that formed last year, so a newcomer has no group role yet; the setting, not Kenji's personality, keeps him alone. Humanistic: being alone threatens his need to feel accepted, and he may doubt his worth at the new school. A response both would support: a club or team adult inviting him to a group with a shared activity, which gives him a role and a sense of belonging. Rubric: 1 point for each approach applied correctly, 1 point for a response that follows from both.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Use Source 1, paragraphs 3 and 4 to explain why the order of events in Case 2 of Source 5 mattered for Zoe's reaction. Then name one question about her reaction that the behavioral approach does not answer.
Model answer: The ringtone comes first and the news of extra laps follows, which is the order Pavlov says is necessary: "the conditioned stimulus should begin to operate before the unconditioned stimulus comes into action." In paragraph 4, signals that came after the food or acid failed even after hundreds of pairings (427 and 374). If Zoe only heard the ringtone after already reading the news, the reaction would be less likely to form. The approach does not answer what Zoe thinks about the extra laps or whether she feels she can cope, which a cognitive psychologist would ask. Rubric: 1 point for the order principle with a quotation, 1 point for applying it to the case, 1 point for a question from another approach.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Case 6 in Source 5 is an organizational issue. Apply Münsterberg's conclusion in Source 3 to Jamal's café, and say what his explanation leaves out that a sociocultural psychologist would add.
Model answer: Münsterberg would look at each worker: "the feeling of monotony depends much less upon the particular kind of work than upon the special disposition of the individual," so some workers may find the checklist dull and skip it while others do not. But the case shows the whole staff changing with the manager's presence, which points to the setting. A sociocultural psychologist would add the workplace's unwritten rules: what the group treats as normal when the boss is away. Rubric: 1 point for applying Münsterberg's conclusion with a quotation, 1 point for a limit drawn from the case, 1 point for a sociocultural addition.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does D2.Psy.19.9-12 mean?
D2.Psy.19.9-12 asks high school students to apply the major theoretical approaches in psychology to eight kinds of issues: educational, emotional, political, ethical, motivational, organizational, personal and social. It is part of the C3 Framework's psychology companion (Appendix B), in the group on applications of psychological knowledge. Students should be able to explain one issue through more than one approach and compare what each shows.
What are the major theoretical approaches in psychology?
This lesson uses six that appear in many high school psychology courses: biological, behavioral, cognitive, psychodynamic, humanistic and sociocultural. Some courses add others, such as the evolutionary approach. Each one starts from a different question, so the same behavior can have several explanations at once.
How is D2.Psy.19.9-12 different from D2.Psy.2.9-12?
D2.Psy.2.9-12 asks students to investigate behavior from several perspectives. D2.Psy.19.9-12 takes the next step: applying those approaches to named kinds of real issues, from school and work to elections and ethics, and judging which explanation fits and how strong its evidence is.
Do students need to cover all eight kinds of issue?
Yes. The indicator lists all eight, so this page gives at least one case for each: the issue cards in Activity 1 and the eight cases in Source 5 cover every kind, and the quiz and homework assess each kind at least twice.
Is Freud's theory still taught as fact?
Not on this page. Freud's lectures are taught as the historical source of the psychodynamic approach. His evidence came from his own patients and his reading of them, and he called repression a "hypothetical process." Students practice the approach and then judge how testable its explanations are.
Why are there no sources for some of the approaches?
The page uses only public-domain texts from before 1930, federal works and original passages. None of the four historical sources chosen here speaks for the humanistic, biological or sociocultural approach, so their descriptions are written for this page. Students can still apply both to every case.
Can a political issue be taught without taking sides?
Yes. The political material on this page is historical (Lippmann's 1914 example) or an invented student council election. Students apply approaches to how people form opinions and vote, not to which side is right, and the lesson takes no position on any current election, party or policy.
Which approach is the right one?
There is rarely just one. Approaches answer different questions, and more than one can be true of the same behavior. A good answer says which approach fits a case best, which one adds something the first misses, and what evidence would help decide between them.
How is D2.Psy.19.9-12 assessed?
By giving students a case and asking them to name the kind of issue, apply at least two approaches, use a source where one applies, and compare the explanations. The short-answer quiz items and the homework rubric on this page score those steps, not memorized definitions.
What should a teacher do if a case feels personal to a student?
Some cases touch on worry, being left out or a family move. If a student connects a case to their own life and seems troubled, point them to a trusted adult, such as a parent or school counselor. The lesson never asks students to share personal experiences or to apply an approach to themselves or a classmate.
07
Related Standards
6 standards
These standards connect to D2.Psy.19.9-12: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
D2.Psy.2.9-12Prerequisite
Study behavior from biological, cognitive, behavioral and sociocultural views
Standard text: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History (Silver Spring, MD: NCSS, 2013). NCSS was not involved in the production of this lesson and does not endorse it.