D2.Psy.12.9-12: Social, Cultural, Gender and Economic Influences on Behavior Around the World
In plain English: D2.Psy.12.9-12 is the C3 Framework psychology indicator for grades 9-12 that asks students to explain how social, cultural, gender and economic factors influence behavior and human interactions in societies around the world. Students learn to name each kind of factor, trace its effect on what people do and how they treat one another, and judge the evidence behind cross-cultural claims.
Explain how social, cultural, gender, and economic factors influence behavior and human interactions in societies around the world.
C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 2: Applying Disciplinary Concepts and Tools · Discipline: Psychology · Influences on Thought and Behavior · Official standard
D2.Psy.12.9-12 asks students to explain how social, cultural, gender and economic factors influence behavior and human interactions in societies around the world. Social factors come from the people around us: groups, roles and norms. Cultural factors are the shared values, customs and beliefs a community passes on. Gender factors are the roles and expectations a society attaches to being a girl or a boy, a woman or a man. Economic factors include income, work and how a society produces and trades goods. The indicator asks about two outcomes: what individuals do (behavior) and how people treat one another (human interactions).
The lesson uses three historical sources and one current federal data release: William Graham Sumner's 1906 account of in-groups and ethnocentrism, Margaret Mead's 1928 explanation of her study in Samoa, Leta Stetter Hollingworth's 1914 critique of a biological explanation of sex differences in achievement, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics' American Time Use Survey for 2025. An invented case and an invented study with invented data let students apply all four factors. Students plan studies on paper only.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Define social, cultural, gender and economic factors and tell behavior apart from human interactions
Explain, with evidence, how each kind of factor can influence behavior and interactions in societies around the world
Read historical claims about culture and gender critically, separating their lasting insights from outdated parts
Compute and interpret simple differences and percentages from time-use and invented survey data
Plan, on paper only, a study of how an economic or gender factor relates to how people spend time with others
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Biological, psychological and sociocultural factors in behavior D2.Psy.9.9-12
Multicultural and global perspectives in psychology D2.Psy.7.9-12
Computing a difference, a mean and a percent change
"Think of a family meal, a holiday or a greeting in your home. Name one thing people do that a visitor from far away might find unusual. Who taught you to do it, and what would happen if you stopped?"
Collect two or three answers without judging them. Point out that each answer already involves a cultural custom, a social response from others, often a gender role (who cooks, who serves, who speaks first) and sometimes an economic condition (what a family can afford, who is at work). Today's question: how do these four kinds of factors shape what people do and how they treat each other?
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Four kinds of factors (definitions and everyday examples written for this page)
Factor
What it includes
Everyday example
Social
Groups a person belongs to, roles, norms, the presence and reactions of others
A student speaks more freely with friends than in front of a whole class
Cultural
Shared values, customs, language and beliefs passed from one generation to the next
Whether people greet with a handshake, a bow or a kiss on the cheek
Gender
Roles and expectations a society attaches to girls and boys, women and men
Which family members are expected to cook, care for children or earn money
Economic
Income, work, cost of living and how a society produces and trades goods
A teen with a job has less free time for clubs and friends
Behavior and interactions. A behavior is what one person does; a human interaction is what happens between people, such as cooperation, conflict, sharing, courtesy or exclusion. A norm is a shared expectation about how people should act. Ethnocentrism is judging other groups by the standards of one's own group.
Evidence from around the world. Three findings show these factors at work. (1) In 2001, a team led by the anthropologist Joseph Henrich reported results of the same sharing game played in 15 small-scale societies in South America, Africa, Asia and the Pacific (American Economic Review). Average offers differed widely from one society to another, and groups whose daily life involved more market trade and more cooperation in producing food tended to make fairer offers. (2) In 2005, the psychologist Janet Shibley Hyde reviewed 46 meta-analyses (each a statistical summary of many studies) of psychological differences between males and females (American Psychologist) and concluded that males and females are similar on most, but not all, psychological variables. (3) In 2008, Luigi Guiso and colleagues compared international test scores across many countries (Science) and reported that the gap between boys' and girls' math scores was smaller in countries with greater gender equality. Each finding is about groups and averages, not about any one person.
Read Source 1. William Graham Sumner (1840-1910) taught at Yale and wrote Folkways to describe how customs form and hold groups together. His definition in Source 1 helped make ethnocentrism a standard term in American social science.
114. Sentiments in the in-group and towards the out-group. The relation of comradeship and peace in the we-group and that of hostility and war towards others-groups are correlative to each other. The exigencies of war with outsiders are what make peace inside, lest internal discord should weaken the we-group for war. [...] Loyalty to the group, sacrifice for it, hatred and contempt for outsiders, brotherhood within, warlikeness without,--all grow together, common products of the same situation. [...]
215. Ethnocentrism is the technical name for this view of things in which one's own group is the center of everything, and all others are scaled and rated with reference to it. Folkways correspond to it to cover both the inner and the outer relation. Each group nourishes its own pride and vanity, boasts itself superior, exalts its own divinities, and looks with contempt on outsiders. Each group thinks its own folkways the only right ones, and if it observes that other groups have other folkways, these excite its scorn. Opprobrious epithets are derived from these differences. [...] For our present purpose the most important fact is that ethnocentrism leads a people to exaggerate and intensify everything in their own folkways which is peculiar and which differentiates them from others. It therefore strengthens the folkways.
William Graham Sumner, Source 1: Sumner on the in-group, the out-group and ethnocentrism (1906) (1906). Public domain (published 1906). Source text.
Then read Source 2. Margaret Mead (1901-1978) was a 23-year-old graduate student of Franz Boas when she went to Samoa in 1925. Sample warning: by her own account in paragraph 3, she studied only fifty girls in three neighbouring villages on one island, a small sample of one part of Samoa.
1[...] So, in order to investigate the particular problem, I chose to go not to Germany or to Russia, but to Samoa, a South Sea island about thirteen degrees from the Equator [...]. Because I was a woman and could hope for greater intimacy in working with girls rather than with boys, and because owing to a paucity of women ethnologists our knowledge of primitive girls is far slighter than our knowledge of boys, I chose to concentrate upon the adolescent girl in Samoa.
[...]
2I concentrated upon the girls of the community. I spent the greater part of my time with them. I studied most closely the households in which adolescent girls lived. I spent more time in the games of children than in the councils of their elders. Speaking their language, eating their food, sitting barefoot and cross-legged upon the pebbly floor, I did my best to minimise the differences between us and to learn to know and understand all the girls of three little villages on the coast of the little island of Taū, in the Manu’a Archipelago.
3[...] And because these less measurable parts of their lives were so similar, because one girl’s life was so much like another’s, in an uncomplex, uniform culture like Samoa, I feel justified in generalising although I studied only fifty girls in three small neighbouring villages.
4In the following chapters I have described the lives of these girls, the lives of their younger sisters who will soon be adolescent, of their brothers with whom a strict taboo forbids them to speak, of their older sisters who have left puberty behind them, of their elders, the mothers and fathers whose attitudes towards life determine the attitudes of their children. And through this description I have tried to answer the question which sent me to Samoa: Are the disturbances which vex our adolescents due to the nature of adolescence itself or to the civilisation? Under different conditions does adolescence present a different picture?
Margaret Mead, Source 2: Mead explains why she went to Samoa and whom she studied (1928) (1928). Public domain (published 1928). Source text.
A cultural and social factor in interactions: Source 1, paragraph 2
Use Sumner's definition to explain how ethnocentrism shapes the way two groups treat each other.
Result: Each group "thinks its own folkways the only right ones," so other groups' customs "excite its scorn." The cultural factor is the group's own folkways; the interaction it produces is contempt or distance toward outsiders, even when the other group has done nothing to them.
A gender factor in behavior: Source 4, paragraph 2
On days they did household activities, women averaged 2.8 hours and men 2.1 hours. What is the difference, and what can and can't these numbers show?
Result: 2.8 - 2.1 = 0.7 hours, or 42 minutes. The numbers describe behavior in the United States in 2025. They fit the idea that gender roles shape who does housework, but by themselves they cannot show why: work hours, family makeup and habits all differ, too.
An economic factor around the world
In Henrich's 15 societies, what pattern linked the way people make a living to how they shared in the game?
Result: Groups more involved in market trade, and groups that relied more on cooperation to produce food, tended to make higher offers. An economic way of life seems to shape norms of fairness toward strangers, an interaction, although the researchers compared societies, not individuals.
Gender in the research itself: Source 2, paragraph 1
Why did Mead study girls rather than boys, and what does this show about research?
Result: She writes that as "a woman" she "could hope for greater intimacy in working with girls," and that few women ethnologists had studied girls. Gender shaped which people a researcher could reach and which questions had been asked at all.
Factors combine
Invented example: in a village where families sell vegetables at a weekly market, girls usually help at the stall and boys usually help in the fields. Which factors are at work?
Result: Economic (the family's income depends on the market), gender (a division of tasks by sex), cultural (the custom is passed down) and social (others expect it and react if it changes). The behavior is the work each child does; the interactions include whom each child spends the day with and learns from.
Close the segment: Which of the four factors is easiest to see from outside a society, and which is hardest? Students usually say customs are easiest and economic pressures hardest, which is a reason to collect data rather than rely on impressions.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Read Source 6 together. It is an invented study with invented data, modeled on the sharing game described above.
1Invented study summary, written for this page. Researchers ran a sharing game with adult volunteers in two invented towns. In Town A, most people work for wages and buy their food at markets. In Town B, most families farm and fish for their own use and trade little with outsiders.
2In the game, one volunteer receives 10 tokens, which can later be traded for food, and offers some of them to an unknown second volunteer from the same town. If the second volunteer accepts, both keep their shares; if the second volunteer refuses, neither gets anything. Everyone took part by choice and could stop at any time, and names were not recorded.
3Offers by the 12 first volunteers in Town A: 5, 4, 5, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 5, 4, 5, 4. Offers by the 12 first volunteers in Town B: 3, 2, 4, 3, 3, 5, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 2.
4The researchers' note: "Twelve offers per town is a very small sample, and the two towns differ in many ways besides how people earn a living. We report this as a pattern to study further, not as proof that work and trade cause the difference."
SVHS (invented scenario), Source 6: A sharing game in two towns (invented study with invented data) (2026). Original passage written for this page.
Find the factor. Which difference between the towns is the economic factor the study is about? What other differences might matter?
Look at the data. Diagram 2 shows every offer. Without computing, which town's offers look higher?
Compute. Find the mean offer in each town and the difference between the means (students do this in the homework).
Interpret. The game measures behavior (the offer) and an interaction (whether the second player accepts). What norm about strangers might each town's offers reflect?
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students read Sources 3, 4 and 5 on their own and use all six sources for the quiz and homework. Source 3 is a 1914 critique by a psychologist; Source 4 is a current federal data release; Source 5 is an invented case.
1But even if it were determined that men actually do vary more in mental traits than women do, still nothing would be proved regarding their inherent variability. In order to establish the greater native variability of either sex it is necessary to show (1) that in the trait being distributed the opportunity and training of the sexes have been exactly equal, and (2) that in neither group has variability had more or less survival value than in the other group.
[...]
2Briefly our thesis may be summed up thus:
31. The greater variability of males in anatomical traits is not established, but is debated by authorities of perhaps equal competence.
42. But even if it were established, it would only suggest, not prove, that men are more variable in mental traits also. The empirical data at present available on this point are inadequate and contradictory, and if they point either way, actually indicate greater female variability.
53. But even if it were established that there actually is greater male variability in mental traits, it would only suggest, not prove, that there is greater inherent variability. For (a) the opportunity and exercise of the sexes have been dissimilar and unequal; (b) intellectual variability has had survival value for men, but for women it has had little or none — this by virtue of the different parts played by the sexes in the perpetuation of the species.
64. It must be remembered that variability in and of itself does not have social significance, unless it is known in what the variability consists — whether in greater range, greater frequency at the extremes, or in flattening at the top of the curve of distribution.
75. It is undesirable to seek for the cause of sex differences in eminence in ultimate and obscure affective and intellectual differences until we have exhausted as a cause the known, obvious, and inescapable fact that women bear and rear the children, and that this has had as an inevitable sequel the occupation of housekeeping, a field where eminence is not possible.
Leta Stetter Hollingworth, Source 3: Hollingworth's critique of the "greater male variability" doctrine (1914) (1914). Public domain (published 1914). Source text.
1These and other results from the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) were released today. They include the average amount of time per day in 2025 that individuals worked, did household activities, and engaged in leisure and sports activities. Additionally, measures of the average time per day spent providing childcare--both as a primary (or main) activity and while doing other things are provided. For a detailed description of ATUS data and methodology, see the Technical Note.
[...]
2--Eighty-seven percent of women and 75 percent of men spent some time doing household activities on an average day. On the days they did household activities, women spent an average of 2.8 hours on these activities, while men spent 2.1 hours doing so. (See table 1.)
[...]
3--Among adults living with children under age 18, those who were not employed spent over an hour more than those who were employed doing household activities on an average day--3.1 hours compared to 1.7 hours. (See tables 8B and 8C.)
[...]
4--People were less likely to engage in socializing and communicating on an average day in 2025 than in 2015--30 percent compared with 38 percent. They also spent less time in these activities in 2025 than in 2015--35 minutes compared with 41 minutes. (See tables 1 and 11A.)
[...]
5--On an average day, among adults living in households with children under age 6, women spent an hour more than men providing primary childcare to household children--2.8 hours compared to 1.7 hours. This includes providing physical care, such as bathing or feeding a child (1.3 hours compared to 38 minutes) and travel related to care of household children (16 minutes compared to 10 minutes), among other activities. (See table 9.)
6--On average, among adults living with children under age 6, those who were not employed spent over an hour more per day caring for and helping household children than did employed adults--3.3 hours versus 1.7 hours. (See tables 8B and 8C.)
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Source 4: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, American Time Use Survey, 2025 Results (2026). US government work (17 U.S.C. 105). Source text.
1Invented case, written for this page. Four students in an online summer course, Rosa, Sam, Mina and Dev, are assigned a group presentation. They live in four different countries and meet by video in the evening.
2In Rosa's family, children are expected to wait until an adult asks for their opinion, so in the group calls she rarely interrupts and waits to be asked. Sam's school rewards students who speak first and argue hard, and he fills most of the first meeting. Mina is the oldest daughter in her family and is expected to look after two younger brothers in the evenings, so she often joins the calls late. Dev works twenty hours a week in his family's shop, which is his family's main income, and can meet only on weekends.
3After two meetings, Sam tells the teacher that Rosa "has no ideas" and that Mina and Dev "don't care." The teacher asks each student to send their ideas in writing. Rosa's written plan turns out to be the most detailed in the group, and the four agree to work on a shared document at times that suit each of them.
SVHS (invented scenario), Source 5: A group project across four households (invented case) (2026). Original passage written for this page.
Task: make a four-row chart for Source 5 with the headings Factor, Student, Evidence from the case, and Effect on the group's interactions. Fill one row each for a social, a cultural, a gender and an economic factor.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: "Pick one of the four factors. Give one example of how it shapes how people treat each other, and one piece of evidence from today's sources."
Teacher notes. (1) Sources 1-3 are historical and use the language of their time, such as Mead's "primitive" and her subtitle's contrast with "Western Civilisation"; these terms are outdated and treat other societies as lower stages of development, which anthropologists no longer accept. Mead's description of the Samoans' appearance is left out. Sumner wrote about groups at war and listed insulting nicknames, which are left out. (2) Mead's conclusions about Samoa were sharply challenged by the anthropologist Derek Freeman in 1983, and other scholars, such as Paul Shankman, have in turn challenged Freeman; the debate continues. Teach the excerpt as a historical example of method, not as a current account of Samoa. (3) Hollingworth wrote in 1914, when her view of housework was common; her method of separating opportunity from biology is what lasts. (4) Keep discussion of gender and culture to evidence about groups and roles, never claims about what any individual student or family is like. Sources 5 and 6 are invented.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give the four-factor table with one source example already placed in each row
Pre-highlight the sentence in each source that shows a factor, and have students label it S, C, G or E
Provide sentence frames: "A ___ factor in Source ___ is ___; it affects ___ because ___."
For Advanced Students
Find a sentence in Source 1 where Sumner describes how a group sees its own customs, and rewrite it in neutral, present-day language without losing its meaning
Explain why Henrich's comparison of 15 societies cannot by itself show that market trade causes fairer offers, and what further evidence would help
Read Hollingworth's five points as an argument map: which point does the most work, and why?
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong answers name a specific factor and its kind, say whether the outcome is a behavior or an interaction, support the claim with a quoted source or a number, and keep group patterns separate from claims about individuals. Watch for students who treat a cultural difference as a ranking, who read a gender gap in data as proof of a biological cause, or who take historical sources as current descriptions of real societies.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Four-Factor Stations: Six Invented Scenarios
15 minGroups of 4, rotating
Six stations each hold one invented scenario. At each one, groups write which social, cultural, gender and economic factors are present (not every scenario has all four), one behavior and one human interaction the factors shape, and one question a researcher would need to answer before claiming a cause.
The 6 Station Scenarios
Invented: in a coastal town, fishing crews share each day's catch equally among all crew members, and people who keep extra fish for themselves are not invited back.
Invented: in a city where most young adults rent small apartments, many share homes with roommates they found online, and friends gather in cafes instead of at home.
Invented: in a farming region, families gather for a week every harvest, and teenagers who skip the harvest week are teased by their cousins.
Invented: at one school, students are expected to call teachers by first names, and a new student who says "Sir" and "Ma'am" is laughed at by classmates.
Invented: in a town where the main factory closes, many parents take jobs far away, and grandparents take over daily care of grandchildren.
Invented: in a sports league, boys' and girls' teams practice at different times, and the girls' practices are given the late-evening slots.
Debrief Questions
Which scenario had the most factors at once?
Which scenario shows a norm being enforced by other people, and how?
Did any group's first reading of a scenario rank one group's custom above another's? How did you rewrite it neutrally?
Teacher Note
The scenarios are invented and describe no real place or group. Accept any well-argued factor. Push groups to separate a description ("people share the catch") from a judgment ("they are generous"), and to name the interaction, not only the behavior.
2
Then and Now: Reading Gender Research Across a Century
20 minPairs
Pairs compare Hollingworth's 1914 argument (Source 3) with the two later findings on gender in Direct Instruction (Hyde, 2005; Guiso and colleagues, 2008). For each, they record the question, the kind of evidence and the factor it points to.
Then and Now Organizer
The question each researcher asked
The evidence: what kind, from whom, how many
The factor it points to: social, cultural, gender, economic or biological
One idea that has lasted
One idea, word or assumption that now reads as dated
Teacher Note
Keep the discussion on evidence about groups and roles. Students should notice that the later studies, like Hollingworth, compare settings with different opportunities, and that none of the three describes any individual.
3
Plan a Time-Use Study on Paper
15 minPairs
Pairs plan, on paper only, a time-use diary study of teenagers modeled on the American Time Use Survey (Source 4). They choose one economic or gender factor, such as having an after-school job or caring for younger siblings, and plan how they would measure its link with time spent with friends.
Time-Use Study Template
The factor, and how you will know which group each teen is in
The outcome: which activity, measured in minutes per day from a one-day diary
Who takes part, how many, and from how many places
Two other differences between your groups that could explain a result
Ethics: consent from parents, assent from teens, privacy of diaries, and who approves the plan
One result that would support a link and one that would not
Variation
Plan the same study in two countries, and add one question you would need to change so that it means the same thing in both places.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: Childcare Time by Sex and by Employment, 2025
American Time Use Survey, 2025 results (Source 4), for adults living with children under age 6. The top pair is "primary childcare" for women and men; the bottom pair is time "caring for and helping household children" for adults who were not employed and who were employed, as the release reports them.
Diagram 2: Offers in the Sharing Game in Two Invented Towns
Each dot is one offer from Source 6, stacked when offers are equal. Invented data, written for this page.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
Homework: Four Factors, Many Societies
Directions: Part 1 uses Sources 1, 4 and 6. Quote every source you use with its paragraph number. Part 2 asks you to explain and to plan on paper only: do not survey anyone.
Part 1: Reading and Computing (Problems 1-3)
Describe an example of ethnocentrism from sports, school rivalries or fan communities (not from politics). Explain it with Sumner's definition in Source 1, paragraph 2, and suggest one way a school or club could reduce its effects on how the groups treat each other.
Source 4, paragraph 3 compares adults living with children who were not employed and those who were employed. Find the difference in hours and in minutes, and how many times as much time the first group spent, to one decimal place. Then explain which kind of factor this shows and one reason the numbers cannot show the cause.
Compute the mean offer in each town in Source 6 and the difference between the two means. Show your work, then explain why the researchers' note matters for how you report the result.
Part 2: Explaining and Planning (Problems 4-6)
Plan, on paper only, a one-day time-diary study comparing teenagers who have after-school jobs with teenagers who do not. Name the outcome you will measure in minutes, two other differences between the groups that could matter, and how you will protect privacy.
Choose a behavior that differs around the world, such as greetings, meals or how people address teachers. In one paragraph, explain how at least three of the four factors could shape it, using neutral language that does not rank any group's custom.
An invented headline reads: "Study proves girls are naturally better at reading." Using Hollingworth's reasoning in Source 3 and the cross-national finding in Direct Instruction, explain what the study would need to show before the word "naturally" could be justified.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Factors
Each factor is specific, correctly labeled, and linked to a behavior or an interaction
Factors labeled but one vague or mislabeled
Factors missing or confused
Evidence
Quotations with source and paragraph numbers, or correct figures from the data, support each claim
One claim unsupported
No evidence
Computation
Problems 2 and 3 correct with work shown
One error
Several errors
Fairness and limits
Neutral language; group patterns kept apart from claims about individuals; plans ethical and on paper only
Mostly neutral, with one overgeneralization
Ranks groups or stereotypes individuals
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Sources 1 and 2 are printed in Direct Instruction, Source 6 in Guided Practice, and Sources 3, 4 and 5 in Independent Practice. Source 1 is used in Questions 1, 2 and 15; Source 2 in Questions 3-6 and 16; Source 3 in Questions 7-9 and 17; Source 4 in Questions 10-12 and 18; Source 5 in Question 19; and Source 6 in Questions 13 and 20. Question 14 needs no printed source. Questions 1-14 are multiple choice; 15-20 are short answer.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 1, paragraph 2, what does ethnocentrism lead a people to do with their own folkways?
Answer: B
Sumner writes that "ethnocentrism leads a people to exaggerate and intensify everything in their own folkways which is peculiar and which differentiates them from others." A reverses this: other groups' folkways "excite its scorn." C and D are not in the source.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 1, paragraph 1, what does Sumner say makes peace inside the we-group?
Answer: D
"The exigencies of war with outsiders are what make peace inside, lest internal discord should weaken the we-group for war." Sumner does mention religion later, but as something that sanctifies the whole social philosophy, not as the cause of peace (A). B and C are not in the excerpt.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 2, paragraph 1, why did Mead choose to study girls rather than boys?
Answer: C
She writes that "Because I was a woman and could hope for greater intimacy in working with girls," and that "our knowledge of primitive girls is far slighter than our knowledge of boys." The researcher's gender shaped her access. A, B and D are not in the source.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What reason does Mead give in Source 2, paragraph 3 for generalizing from the girls she studied?
Answer: D
"Because one girl's life was so much like another's, in an uncomplex, uniform culture like Samoa, I feel justified in generalising although I studied only fifty girls in three small neighbouring villages." A, B and C are not in the source. Whether her reason is a good one is a separate question.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What question does Mead say in Source 2, paragraph 4 sent her to Samoa?
Answer: B
"Are the disturbances which vex our adolescents due to the nature of adolescence itself or to the civilisation?" In this lesson's terms, she asked whether a cultural factor, not biology alone, shapes adolescent behavior. D changes the question to a comparison of sexes, which is not what she asked.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 2, paragraph 4 mentions girls' "brothers with whom a strict taboo forbids them to speak." What kind of influence does this show?
Answer: D
A taboo is a strong cultural rule; this one applies by gender and governs an interaction between brothers and sisters. B wrongly makes a learned rule biological. A and C are not in the source.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 3, paragraph 1, what must be shown before claiming that one sex is more variable by nature?
Answer: A
She writes that "it is necessary to show (1) that in the trait being distributed the opportunity and training of the sexes have been exactly equal." Her second condition concerns survival value. B, C and D are not her conditions.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 3, paragraph 7, which cause of sex differences in eminence should be exhausted first?
Answer: C
Point 5: look first at "the known, obvious, and inescapable fact that women bear and rear the children," and the housekeeping that followed, before "ultimate and obscure affective and intellectual differences." A is the explanation she says should come last. B and D are not in the excerpt.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What does Hollingworth say in Source 3, paragraph 4 about the data then available on mental variability?
Answer: B
"The empirical data at present available on this point are inadequate and contradictory, and if they point either way, actually indicate greater female variability." A reverses this. C overstates: she calls the data inadequate, not complete.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 4, paragraph 5, how much more time per day did women than men spend on primary childcare, in minutes?
Answer: B
2.8 hours - 1.7 hours = 1.1 hours, and 1.1 x 60 = 66 minutes. A treats 1.1 hours as 11 minutes. C multiplies 1.1 by 100 instead of 60. D adds the two times (4.5 hours) and converts the sum.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 4, paragraph 4 says average time spent socializing and communicating fell from 41 minutes in 2015 to 35 minutes in 2025. By about what percent did it fall?
Answer: C
(41 - 35) / 41 = 6 / 41, about 0.146, or about 15 percent. A reports the 6-minute drop as if it were a percent. B is the drop in the share of people socializing (38 percent to 30 percent), a different measure. D divides by the 2025 value (6 / 35, about 17 percent) instead of the starting value.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which economic factor does Source 4 link to more time on household activities and on caring for children?
Answer: A
Paragraphs 3 and 6 compare adults who "were not employed" with employed adults: 3.1 versus 1.7 hours of household activities, and 3.3 versus 1.7 hours caring for children. Employment is an economic factor. B, C and D are not among the comparisons printed in Source 4.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 6, how many of Town A's 12 first volunteers offered 5 tokens, an even split?
Answer: C
Town A's offers are 5, 4, 5, 5, 3, 5, 4, 5, 5, 4, 5, 4: seven are 5. A is Town B's count, where only one volunteer offered 5. B assumes that half the volunteers made an even split. D also counts the offers of 4.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Invented case: in a country where most families earn their living from a family farm, teenagers spend more after-school time working beside relatives than with friends their own age. Which pair names the main factor and the outcome?
Answer: A
How families earn a living is an economic factor, and whom teenagers spend time with is a human interaction. B names a factor the case does not mention. C and D name an outcome, physical ability, that the case does not describe.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Sumner claims in Source 1, paragraph 1 that loyalty to the group and "hatred and contempt for outsiders" "all grow together." Explain his reasoning, then evaluate the claim with an example from school, sports or fan communities.
Model answer: Sumner argues that war with outsiders makes peace inside, so in-group loyalty and out-group hostility are "correlative" and grow from the same situation. His point that groups often favor their own members still holds, but the claim that loyalty requires hostility is too strong: a student can be loyal to her school team and still respect and befriend players from the other team. The psychologist Marilynn Brewer argued in 1999 (Journal of Social Issues) that favoring one's own group and hostility toward others are different things and often occur apart. Rubric: 1 point for his reasoning with a quotation; 1 point for a fitting example; 1 point for a reasoned judgment.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Mead says she feels justified in generalizing from the girls she studied (Source 2, paragraph 3). Besides the size of her sample, give two weaknesses in her justification, and name one thing she did, according to paragraph 2, that strengthens her evidence.
Model answer: (1) Calling the culture "uncomplex" and "uniform" assumes the very similarity she needs to show, and it is a dated way to describe any society. (2) She arrived with a question already in mind (paragraph 4), and her conclusions rest mainly on her own observations and interpretations as an outsider, which other observers might read differently. Strength: she lived among the girls for months, "Speaking their language, eating their food," and spent time in their households and games, so her observations came from close, long contact rather than a single visit. Rubric: 1 point for each weakness; 1 point for the strength with a quotation.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Explain how Hollingworth (Source 3) uses social and economic factors to challenge a biological explanation of sex differences in achievement. Then name one part of her own argument that reads as dated today.
Model answer: She argues that before blaming inborn differences, we must rule out unequal "opportunity and training" (paragraph 1) and the social and economic fact that women "bear and rear the children" and were tied to housekeeping (paragraph 7). Those are social and economic roles, not biology, and they limit which careers and achievements are open to women. Dated: she calls housekeeping "a field where eminence is not possible," a judgment many would reject now, and her argument assumes women will be the ones who keep house. Rubric: 1 point for the opportunity argument; 1 point for the child-rearing and housekeeping argument; 1 point for a dated part with a quotation.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Use two bullets from Source 4 to explain how gender and employment each relate to how adults spend time with children. Then explain why survey numbers like these cannot by themselves show what causes the differences.
Model answer: Paragraph 5: women in households with children under 6 spent 2.8 hours on primary childcare and men 1.7 hours, a gender difference in behavior and in interactions with children. Paragraph 6: adults who were not employed spent 3.3 hours caring for children and employed adults 1.7 hours, an economic difference. The survey measures time use but does not assign anyone to a gender role or a job, and the groups differ in other ways (ages of children, work hours, who else lives in the home), so the numbers show patterns, not causes. Rubric: 1 point for each bullet used correctly with its numbers; 1 point for the limit.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Analyze Source 5. For each of the four kinds of factors, name the student and the detail that shows it, and explain how the factor affected the group's interactions. Then say what the teacher's request for written ideas did.
Model answer: Cultural: Rosa's family expects children to wait until adults ask, so she waits in calls and Sam misreads her as having "no ideas." Social: Sam's school rewards speaking first, so he dominates the first meeting. Gender: Mina, the oldest daughter, cares for her brothers in the evenings, so she arrives late and is misread as not caring. Economic: Dev works twenty hours a week in the family shop, so he can meet only on weekends. Asking for written ideas removed the advantage of speaking first and showed Rosa's detailed plan, which changed how the group treated one another. Rubric: 1 point for each factor correctly identified with its effect; 1 point for the teacher's move.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Compare Source 6's invented result with Henrich's 2001 finding described in Direct Instruction. Explain how an economic way of life could shape fairness toward strangers, and why Source 6 alone cannot show that it does.
Model answer: In Source 6, Town A (wages and markets) made higher offers than Town B (farming and fishing for their own use), the same direction as Henrich's finding that groups more involved in market trade tended to make fairer offers. People who often deal with strangers in markets may learn a norm of splitting fairly with people they do not know. But Source 6 has only 12 offers per town, and the towns differ in many ways besides how people earn a living, so the difference could have other causes, as the researchers' note says. Rubric: 1 point for the comparison; 1 point for a plausible mechanism; 1 point for the limits.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does D2.Psy.12.9-12 mean?
D2.Psy.12.9-12 asks high school students to explain how social, cultural, gender and economic factors influence behavior and human interactions in societies around the world. It is the last indicator in the C3 psychology companion's group on influences on thought and behavior (Appendix B).
What is the difference between behavior and human interactions?
Behavior is what one person does, such as working, studying or greeting someone. Human interactions are what happens between people, such as cooperation, sharing, conflict or exclusion. The indicator asks about both.
What is the difference between a social and a cultural factor?
A social factor comes from the people and groups around a person right now: their roles, norms and reactions. A cultural factor is the set of values, customs and beliefs a community passes down over generations. The two overlap, since culture is learned through social life.
How is D2.Psy.12.9-12 different from D2.Psy.9.9-12?
D2.Psy.9.9-12 groups influences into three levels: biological, psychological and sociocultural. D2.Psy.12.9-12 looks inside the sociocultural level and separates social, cultural, gender and economic factors, with an emphasis on societies around the world.
Why does the lesson use sources from 1906, 1914 and 1928?
They are early, influential attempts to explain behavior by culture, social roles and opportunity, and they are public domain. Each is paired with later research or current data, and the page flags their dated language and the debates they started.
How should a teacher handle discussions of gender and culture?
Keep the discussion on evidence about roles, settings and groups, use neutral descriptions instead of rankings, and never make claims about any student's family or identity. Invented scenarios, like the ones on this page, let students practice without pointing at real people.
What is the American Time Use Survey?
It is a federal survey, run by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in which people report how they spent the previous day. Its yearly results show how time spent on work, housework, childcare and leisure differs by sex, age, employment and other characteristics.
Can students run a survey or a sharing game in class?
This lesson keeps all studies on paper. Surveys about families, jobs or money collect private information and need consent and review, which D2.Psy.4.9-12 covers. Source 6 is invented.
What mistakes do students often make with D2.Psy.12.9-12?
Many students treat a cultural difference as a ranking, read a gap in group averages as a fact about every member, or name a factor without saying whether it affects behavior or an interaction. Asking "which factor, what outcome, and what evidence?" helps.
How does this indicator connect to sociology and economics?
It overlaps with sociology indicators on social context and on in-groups and out-groups, such as D2.Soc.14.9-12, and with economics, where incentives and markets shape behavior. Psychology's focus is on how these forces show up in individual behavior and everyday interactions.
07
Related Standards
6 standards
These standards connect to D2.Psy.12.9-12: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
D2.Psy.9.9-12Prerequisite
Describe biological, psychological and sociocultural factors in thought and behavior
Explain how in-group and out-group membership shapes life chances and norms
Lesson coming soon
D2.Soc.7.9-12Parallel
Cite examples of how culture influences the individuals in it
Lesson coming soon
After this lesson
D2.Psy.13.9-12Next step
Explain common themes in psychology, including ethics, diversity and development
Lesson coming soon
D2.Psy.21.9-12Extends to
Discuss how psychological science can address domestic and global issues
Lesson coming soon
Standard text: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History (Silver Spring, MD: NCSS, 2013). NCSS was not involved in the production of this lesson and does not endorse it.