CCRA.W.7: Conducting Short and Sustained Research Projects
In plain English: CCRA.W.7 is the Common Core College and Career Readiness anchor standard for writing that asks students to conduct both short and more sustained research projects built on focused questions, and to show that they understand the subject they investigated, not just that they collected facts. In grades 6-12 it is carried by W.6.7 through W.11-12.7 and WHST.6-8.7 through WHST.11-12.7.
Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects based on focused questions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Writing · Cluster: Research to Build and Present Knowledge Also written as CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.7 · Official standard
CCRA.W.7 is the research anchor. It asks students to conduct research projects built on focused questions, in two lengths: short projects that answer a question in a class period or two, and more sustained projects that run over weeks. In both, the goal is to demonstrate understanding of the subject: a writer who understands can explain how the facts fit together and what they still cannot show, instead of listing what each source says.
The lesson runs one short project from start to finish with a packet of three invented sources about a school pond that turns green, then studies an invented four-week research log as a model of a sustained project. All sources, names and data on this page are invented for teaching. The companion anchor CCRA.W.8 covers judging sources and avoiding plagiarism in depth; this page focuses on the questions, the process and the understanding.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Tell apart research questions that are too broad, too narrow and focused, and revise a question to focus it
Carry out a short research project on a focused question, drawing on several sources
Plan a more sustained project and explain when to refocus, narrow or broaden the inquiry
Show understanding of a subject by synthesizing sources, naming limits and generating new focused questions
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Taking notes from a text in their own words
Drawing evidence from informational texts to support analysis CCRA.W.9
Reading a simple data table with dates and measurements
Determining the central ideas of a text and summarizing them CCRA.R.2
"Here are three research questions: 'What is weather?' 'Did it rain in our town last Tuesday?' 'Why does the north soccer field stay muddy for days after rain when the south field dries in one?' Which one could you research well in two class periods? Why are the other two harder?"
Take three answers. The first question is too broad (whole books exist on it), the second is too narrow (one lookup ends it), and the third is focused: it names a specific puzzle that a few sources and some observation could explain.
Direct Instruction15 minutes
Use Diagram 1 to show the research cycle: a focused question, sources, notes, a synthesized answer and new questions, with an arrow back to the question because a source can change what the writer needs to ask. Then compare the two project lengths the standard names.
Short and more sustained research projects
Feature
Short project
More sustained project
Time
One to three class periods
Several weeks, with checkpoints
Question
Usually given, and answerable with a few sources
Often self-generated; may ask how to solve a problem; refined along the way
Sources
A small set, often supplied
Many, found and judged by the student; may include data the student collects
Process
Refocus once if a source changes the picture
Narrow or broaden more than once; keep a research log; confer with the teacher
Product
A paragraph or a short report
A longer paper or presentation that synthesizes the sources
Progression of CCRA.W.7 in grades 6-12 (short paraphrases of the grade-level standards)
Grade-level standard
Band
What this band adds
W.6.7
Grade 6
Short research projects that answer a question, drawing on several sources and refocusing the inquiry when appropriate
W.7.7
Grade 7
Adds generating additional related, focused questions for further research
W.8.7
Grade 8
Includes self-generated questions; the new questions open multiple avenues of exploration
W.9-10.7
Grades 9-10
Short and more sustained projects that answer a question or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry; synthesize multiple sources to show understanding of the subject
W.11-12.7
Grades 11-12
The same expectations as grades 9-10 (the wording is identical), carried out with the more complex questions and sources of these grades
WHST.6-8.7
Grades 6-8 (history, science, technical)
The grade 8 expectations, applied to research in history, science and technical subjects
WHST.9-10.7
Grades 9-10 (history, science, technical)
The grades 9-10 expectations, applied to research in history, science and technical subjects
WHST.11-12.7
Grades 11-12 (history, science, technical)
The grades 11-12 expectations, applied to research in history, science and technical subjects
Work through the five examples. They follow one invented question about two school soccer fields, so that the pond packet stays fresh for practice.
Focusing a broad question
Too broad: "How do sports fields work?"
Result: Focused: "Why does the north soccer field stay muddy for days after rain when the south field dries in one?" It names one place, one puzzle and a comparison that sources and observation can answer.
Opening up a question that is too narrow
Too narrow: "Is the north field muddy today?" One look answers it, and nothing is left to understand.
Result: Opened up: "What makes the north field drain more slowly than the south field?" The answer needs several sources: a map of the slope, notes from the groundskeeper, a reading on soil.
Refocusing when a source changes the picture (grade 6 and up)
A student assumes the cause is shade, then the groundskeeper says the north field was built over packed clay.
Result: Refocus: the question shifts from "How does shade slow drying?" to "How does the soil under each field affect drainage?" Refocusing is not failure; the standard expects it.
The short project ends with an answer about clay soil.
Result: New questions that open different avenues: "What do schools do to drain clay fields?" (solutions), "How much rain does the field get in a wet month?" (data), "Was the field built differently from the south one?" (history).
Narrowing a sustained project to solve a problem (grades 9-12)
After three weeks, the student has sources on drainage, grass types, costs and field history.
Result: Narrow for the final paper: "Which drainage fix could the school afford before next season?" The student keeps the sources that answer it, synthesizes them and names what is still unknown.
Guided Practice20 minutes
Run a short project together. The focused question is "Why does the Hillcrest pond turn green in August?" Students read the three invented sources below and fill a three-column note chart: what the source says (in their own words), which part of the question it helps answer, and what it cannot tell us. Groups then compare notes and decide which facts connect to each other.
1Source A: Pond log (invented data). Kept by the science club at Hillcrest Middle School, an invented school. Each reading was taken at 10 a.m. at the north end of the pond.
2June 15: water 19 °C; algae cover 0% of the surface; water level at the marker post.
3July 1: water 22 °C; algae cover 5%; water level 6 cm below the marker.
4July 15: water 25 °C; algae cover 15%; water level 12 cm below the marker.
5August 1: water 27 °C; algae cover 40%; water level 20 cm below the marker.
6August 15: water 28 °C; algae cover 70%; water level 26 cm below the marker.
7Club notes: no rain fell between July 20 and August 15. Algae cover was estimated by eye from the footbridge, so the percentages are rough.
SVHS (original invented source), Short research packet, Source A: Hillcrest pond log (invented data). Original passage written for this page.
1Source B: "Green Ponds: What Feeds Algae" (an invented fact sheet from the Marlow County Garden Office, a county office invented for this lesson).
2Algae are simple living things that make their own food from sunlight, as plants do. A small pond always holds some algae. The pond turns green when conditions let them multiply quickly. Three conditions help them multiply: light, warmth and nutrients.
3Light: more direct sun on the water means more growth. A pond that loses its shade, for example when a tree is removed, often grows more algae.
4Warmth: algae multiply faster in warm water. Shallow water warms faster than deep water, so a pond that loses depth in a dry summer can heat up quickly.
5Nutrients: nitrogen and phosphorus feed algae. Lawn fertilizer that washes into a pond with rain or sprinkler water adds both.
6Moving water: a fountain or bubbler that keeps the water moving and mixed can slow the growth of some algae, but it does not remove nutrients.
7Safety: some kinds of algae can make toxins. Do not touch water that has a thick green or blue-green scum, and keep pets away from it.
SVHS (original invented source), Short research packet, Source B: Green Ponds fact sheet (invented source). Original passage written for this page.
1Source C: Interview notes (invented). A student interviewed Mr. Burke, the Hillcrest groundskeeper, on July 28. The notes are the student's summary, except for the words in quotation marks.
2The pond was dug about 12 years ago. "It goes a little green most Augusts, but I've never seen it this bad."
3The big maple on the south bank, which shaded about half the pond, was taken down last October because it was diseased.
4The lawn around the pond got its summer fertilizer on July 2. The sprinklers run every evening.
5The fountain pump in the middle of the pond broke on July 10. A new part is on order and should arrive in September.
6He has not added any chemicals to the pond.
SVHS (original invented source), Short research packet, Source C: Interview notes with the groundskeeper (invented source). Original passage written for this page.
Sort the notes. Ask: "Which notes describe what changed in the pond, and which explain why algae grow?" Teacher note: the log and the interview describe changes; the fact sheet explains them.
Connect the sources. Ask groups to link one note from the fact sheet to one note from the log or the interview. A link sounds like "The fact sheet says ..., and the interview shows ...."
Draft an answer. Each group writes a two- or three-sentence answer to the question that uses at least two sources.
Compare with a model. Read the model short report below and mark where it connects sources, where it names a limit and where it asks a new question.
1Why Does the Hillcrest Pond Turn Green in August? (a short research report written in one class period)
2The Hillcrest pond turns green in August because the three things algae need all increased this summer. The fact sheet explains that algae multiply with light, warmth and nutrients, and our sources show a rise in each one. The pond log shows the water warming from 19 °C in mid-June to 28 °C by mid-August. The groundskeeper reported that the maple that shaded about half the pond was removed last October, so more sun reaches the water, and that the lawn was fertilized on July 2 while sprinklers ran every evening, which can wash fertilizer into the pond. The fountain pump also broke on July 10 and left the water still, which the fact sheet says can let some algae grow faster. The algae cover rose sharply in the weeks after these July changes.
3Our sources cannot show which cause mattered most, because the club measured temperature but not nutrients or sunlight. That raises a further question: would testing the water for phosphorus before and after the lawn is fertilized show a jump?
SVHS (original model report), Model short research report: Why Does the Hillcrest Pond Turn Green in August? (written for this page). Original passage written for this page.
Independent Practice15 minutes
The report below was written for this page with weaknesses on purpose. It is not a model. Students list what it does instead of demonstrating understanding, then explain in two or three sentences how to fix it.
Ponds and Algae
Algae are simple living things that make their own food from sunlight, as plants do. Hillcrest Middle School was built in 1998 and has about 600 students. The pond log says the water was 28 °C on August 15. Nitrogen and phosphorus feed algae. The groundskeeper said, "It goes a little green most Augusts." Some kinds of algae can make toxins. In conclusion, algae is very interesting and ponds should be kept clean.
SVHS (original weak report), Weak research report for analysis: Ponds and Algae (written for this page, with weaknesses on purpose). Original passage written for this page.
Grades 9-12 (and grade 8 students ready for it): read the invented research log below, a model of a more sustained project. Mark each place where the student narrows or broadens the question, and the reason given. The quiz and homework use this log.
1Research log: The Two Bike Racks (a four-week project by a student at Fairview High School, an invented school; all counts and answers are invented)
2Week 1. Starting question: Why don't more students ride bikes? My teacher said this was too broad, because it covers every student everywhere and every possible reason. I narrowed it to something I can study at my school: Why do so few students use the Maple Street bike rack when the Oak Street rack is nearly full?
3Week 2. I counted bikes at 8:30 a.m. on five school days. Maple Street rack (20 spaces): 4, 3, 5, 2, 4. Oak Street rack (20 spaces): 17, 18, 15, 19, 16. I asked 30 riders one question, "Why do you park where you park?" 21 said the Oak Street rack is under the roof overhang, so their bikes stay dry. 6 said it is closer to their first class. 3 gave other reasons.
4Week 3. Two of the "other reasons" riders said the Maple Street crossing has no crossing guard. I broadened the project to add a second question: does the route to each rack affect the choice? The assistant principal told me the Maple Street guard leaves at 8:15, before many riders arrive.
5Week 4. For the final paper, I narrowed again to a problem I could propose a solution for: What change would make the Maple Street rack worth using? Shelter was the reason most riders gave, and the crossing matters to some. My paper proposes a roof over the Maple Street rack and asks whether the guard could stay until 8:35.
6What I now understand. Riders choose a rack mainly to keep their bikes dry, not for distance, and the crossing is a second, smaller factor. New questions: Would a roof alone change where people park? Could a two-week trial with a temporary canopy test it?
SVHS (original model log), Model sustained research log, grades 9-12: The Two Bike Racks (written for this page). Original passage written for this page.
Closure5 minutes
Exit ticket: Write one new focused question that the pond project raises, and say whether it would suit a short or a more sustained project, with one reason. Look for questions that are specific and that the three sources cannot already answer.
Teacher note: every source, person, school and number on this page is invented, so the facts about the pond and the bike racks are practice material, not real findings. The fact sheet's general statements about algae (light, warmth, nutrients, moving water) are standard background, and its safety line is real advice: students should not touch scummy pond water. Topics for students' own projects should be about places, things or events, not about their personal lives.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give the note chart with the first row filled in from Source A
Provide question frames: "Why does ___ happen at ___?" and "What would make ___ better for ___?"
Let students research only two of the three sources, the log and the interview, and use the fact sheet as a word bank
For Advanced Students
Ask students to design a two-week investigation that could test which cause of the green pond matters most, including what they would measure
Have students rewrite the bike-rack log's Week 4 question as two different problem-solving questions and judge which is better focused
Ask students to find one place where the model short report could overstate what the sources show, and revise the sentence
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Check that research questions are focused: specific enough to answer, open enough to need several sources. In the short project, look for answers that connect sources to each other rather than reporting them one at a time. Strong work shows understanding by explaining how the facts fit together, naming what the sources cannot show and asking a new focused question. In plans for sustained projects, look for checkpoints where the writer expects to refocus, narrow or broaden.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Question Lab: Too Broad, Too Narrow or Focused?
10 minPairs
Pairs sort eight research questions into three piles, then repair every question that is not focused.
The Eight Question Cards
What is pollution?
What year did our school open its library?
Why does the line at the salad bar back up after 12:10 but not before?
How do animals live?
How many windows does the gym have?
What makes the east stairwell so much louder than the west one between classes?
Why is history important?
Which change would cut the time buses need to leave the school lot after 3:00?
Grades 6-8 Version
Pairs sort the cards and write one reason for each pile
Pairs rewrite one too-broad and one too-narrow question as focused questions about a place or thing at school
Grades 9-12 Version
Pairs sort the cards, then rewrite every unfocused question
For each focused question, pairs decide whether it suits a short or a more sustained project and whether it asks to answer a question or to solve a problem
Discussion Questions
What makes a question too narrow, even when it is specific?
Can a question be focused and still need a sustained project?
Teacher key: card 1, too broad; card 2, too narrow; card 3, focused; card 4, too broad; card 5, too narrow; card 6, focused; card 7, too broad; card 8, focused.
2
Research Sprint: The Loud Stairwell
20 minGroups of 3
Groups run a complete short research project in one sitting. They rotate through four station cards, take notes and write a short answer to the focused question "What makes the east stairwell so much louder than the west one between classes?" All station data are invented.
The Four Station Cards
Station 1, hallway count (invented): between second and third period, 410 students used the east stairwell and 160 used the west stairwell.
Station 2, building notes (invented): the east stairwell has tile walls, concrete steps and a hard ceiling; the west stairwell has a carpeted landing and soft ceiling panels.
Station 3, custodian's note (invented): "The east stairwell door has been propped open since its closer broke in October, so the noise spills into the hallway."
Station 4, fact card: hard, smooth surfaces reflect sound, and soft surfaces absorb some of it, so a room lined with hard surfaces stays louder.
Grades 6-8 Version
At each station, groups answer one guiding question: How many? What is it made of? What changed? Why does that matter?
Groups write a three- to four-sentence answer that uses at least three stations
Groups end with one related, focused question for further research
Grades 9-12 Version
No guiding questions: groups decide what each station contributes
Groups write a short answer that ranks the causes by how well the evidence supports them, and names what the stations cannot show
Groups write two new focused questions that open different avenues, one of them a problem to solve
Discussion Questions
Which station explained the others? Which only described?
Did any group refocus its answer after a later station? What changed its mind?
3
Plan a Sustained Project
15 minIndividuals, then pairs
Each student plans a more sustained research project on one topic from the menu, then a partner reviews the plan for focus and checkpoints.
Topic Menu
How the school could recycle more of the cans thrown away at lunch
Why some classroom plants grow better than others in the same building
How a local street, park or building got its name
What makes the school's busiest entrance crowded, and how to ease it
Grades 6-8 Version
Write a focused question and a two-week plan with one checkpoint each week
List three kinds of sources, for example an interview, an observation count and a fact sheet
Write one question you expect to add after the first week
Grades 9-12 Version
Write a focused question or a problem to solve, and a three- to four-week plan with weekly checkpoints
List at least four kinds of sources, including one the student must find and judge independently
Mark where the inquiry might need to narrow or broaden, and what evidence would trigger the change
Partner Check
Is the question focused: specific, but open enough to need several sources?
Does each week end with something to show?
Is there a planned moment to refocus?
Variation: Research Log Start
Students write the Week 1 entry of a research log for their plan, modeled on the bike-rack log in Independent Practice.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
1 diagrams
Diagram 1: The Research Cycle
A research project moves from a focused question to sources, notes, a synthesized answer and new questions. The dashed arrow returns to the question: in a short project the writer may refocus once, and in a more sustained project the writer narrows or broadens the inquiry several times.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
CCRA.W.7 Homework: Focus, Research and Plan
Directions: Problems 3 and 4 use the invented pond packet (Sources A, B and C) in the lesson plan above. Problems 5 and 6 ask you to plan, not to carry out, a longer project. Keep every question about places, things or events, not about your own life.
Part 1: Focusing Questions (Problems 1-2)
Label each question too broad, too narrow or focused, and rewrite the two that are not focused: (a) "What is the ocean?" (b) "How tall is the school flagpole?" (c) "Why do the hallway's motion-sensor lights switch off while people are still walking under them?"
Start from the focused question "Why does the school's front entrance get crowded at 8:10?" Write three related, focused questions that open different avenues: one about data, one about causes and one about a solution.
Part 2: A Short Project (Problems 3-4)
Using all three pond sources, write a short report of 120-180 words that answers a new focused question: "What could the school change before next summer to keep the pond from turning so green?" Connect the sources to each other, and end with one thing the sources cannot show.
The pond log shows the water level falling all summer. Using Sources A and B, explain in three or four sentences how the falling water level could connect to the growth of algae.
Part 3: A More Sustained Project (Problems 5-6)
Plan a three-week project on one topic from Activity 3's menu. Write the focused question, a goal for each week, at least three kinds of sources and one checkpoint where you expect to refocus, narrow or broaden.
In four or five sentences, explain what a more sustained project on the Hillcrest pond could add that the one-period project could not (for example, new data, testing or more sources), and write the focused question you would use for it.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Focused Questions
Questions are specific and open enough to need several sources
Questions are close, but one is too broad or too narrow
Questions are unfocused or missing
Use of Sources
Draws on several sources and connects them to each other
Uses several sources but reports them one at a time
Uses one source or none
Understanding of the Subject
Explains how the facts fit together and names what the sources cannot show
Some explanation, but mostly lists facts
Copies or lists facts with no explanation
Project Planning
Realistic plan with checkpoints and a planned moment to refocus
Plan lacks checkpoints or a refocus point
No workable plan
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 4-11, 14, 16 and 20 use the invented pond packet, the model short report and the weak report; questions 12, 13, 18 and 19 use the invented bike-rack log. All texts are in the lesson plan above. Choose the best answer, or write a short response, then check the explanation.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which research question is focused enough for a short research project?
Answer: B
Choice B names one place, one pattern and a comparison that a few sources (a sign-up sheet, a count, an interview) could explain. Choice A is too broad for a short project. Choice C is too narrow: one look answers it. Choice D asks for an opinion, not something research can settle.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which question is too narrow to make a research project?
Answer: D
A single record answers choice D, so nothing is left to investigate or understand. Choices A and C are focused questions about a cause. Choice B is a focused problem-solving question of the kind grades 9-12 add.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which assignment describes a more sustained research project?
Answer: A
Choice A runs for weeks, uses a self-chosen question and sources the student finds, and keeps a log: the features of a sustained project. Choice B is a short project. Choice C is a summary of one source, not research on a question. Choice D is a single lookup.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to the pond log, by how many degrees did the water warm between June 15 and August 1?
Answer: D
The water was 19 °C on June 15 and 27 °C on August 1, and 27 - 19 = 8. Choice A uses July 15 (25 - 19). Choice B uses August 15 (28 - 19). Choice C gives the August 1 reading instead of the change.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The water level fell from the marker to 26 cm below it between June 15 and August 15, a span of 61 days. About how much did it fall per day?
Answer: A
26 cm divided by 61 days is about 0.43 cm per day, a few millimeters, which fits slow summer evaporation. Choice B divides the days by the centimeters (61 / 26). Choice C is the drop per month, about 26 / 2. Choice D is the total drop, not the daily rate.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which source best answers the sub-question "Has anyone added chemicals to the pond?"
Answer: C
The interview notes say the groundskeeper "has not added any chemicals to the pond." Source A measures the water, the algae and the water level, but says nothing about chemicals. Source B gives general facts about algae, not about this pond. The weak report is not a source.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which source tells you the time of day and the spot where each measurement was taken?
Answer: A
Source A, the pond log, says "Each reading was taken at 10 a.m. at the north end of the pond." Source B gives general facts about algae and no measurements. Source C gives the date of the interview, not where or when the measurements were made. Choice D overlooks the opening note of the pond log.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence best demonstrates understanding of the pond subject rather than listing facts?
Answer: B
Choice B connects data from the log, a fact from the interview and an explanation from the fact sheet into one cause-and-effect statement. Choice A reports two sources side by side without linking them. Choice C copies a fact sheet sentence. Choice D is an opinion with no evidence.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The weak report says, "Hillcrest Middle School was built in 1998 and has about 600 students." What is the problem with this sentence?
Answer: A
None of the three sources gives these facts, and the school's age and size do not help explain the green pond. Choice B is wrong because the words come from no source to quote. Choice C is wrong: the report never returns to it. Choice D is wrong: the log says nothing about the school.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Overall, why does the weak report fail to demonstrate understanding of the subject?
Answer: B
The report strings together separate facts and ends with "algae is very interesting," so it never explains why the pond turns green. Choice A is not the main problem: the model report is short too. Choice C is wrong: using several sources is what the standard asks. Choice D is wrong: a quotation can be useful when it is explained.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student begins the pond project expecting the cause to be warm weather, then reads in the interview that the pump broke on July 10. What is the best research move?
Answer: C
Refocusing the inquiry when a source changes the picture is exactly what the grade-level standards expect, starting in grade 6. Choice A throws away relevant evidence. Choice B treats refocusing as failure. Choice D jumps to a question that is too broad and no longer about the pond.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In the bike-rack log, where does the student broaden the project, and why?
Answer: D
In Week 3 the student adds a second question about the route after riders mention the crossing. Choice A is where the student narrows, not broadens. Choice B is where the student collects data. Choice C is where the student narrows again for the final paper.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Week 2 of the bike-rack log, about how many more bikes did the Oak Street rack hold than the Maple Street rack, on average, over the five days?
Answer: B
Oak Street averaged 85 / 5 = 17 bikes and Maple Street 18 / 5 = 3.6, so the difference is 17 - 3.6 = 13.4. Choice A is the Maple Street average. Choice C is the Oak Street average. Choice D is the difference of the five-day totals (85 - 18) without dividing by 5.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
After the pond project, which new question is related and focused, and opens a different avenue of research?
Answer: C
Choice C stays with the pond but opens a new avenue, a comparison with earlier years, that the three sources cannot answer. Choice A is too broad. Choice B is already answered by the interview notes (July 10). Choice D is the original question, not a new one.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Rewrite this question so that it is focused enough for a short research project at school: "How does the internet work?"
Model answer: "Why does the school Wi-Fi slow down in the library at lunch but not during first period?" Rubric: 2 points for a question that names a specific place, time or pattern and needs several sources to answer; 1 point for a question that is narrower but still too broad, or one that a single lookup answers; 0 points otherwise.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
The club notes in Source A say the algae cover "was estimated by eye from the footbridge, so the percentages are rough." In two or three sentences, explain what a report can and cannot claim from the algae-cover numbers.
Model answer: "The club estimated the algae cover by eye from the footbridge, so the percentages are rough, and a report should not treat 15% or 40% as exact or compare small differences between readings. The numbers can still support the general claim that the cover grew a great deal over the summer, from none in mid-June to most of the surface by mid-August, because a change that large shows up even in rough estimates." Rubric: 2 points for naming the limit from the club notes and a claim the numbers can still support; 1 point for only one of the two; 0 points otherwise.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Name one difference between a short research project and a more sustained one, and give an example of each on the pond topic.
Model answer: "A short project answers one focused question with a few sources in a class period or two, for example explaining from the three sources why the pond turns green. A sustained project runs for weeks and refines its question, for example a month-long project that compares the Hillcrest pond with two other ponds in town, adds new observations and interviews more people." Rubric: 2 points for a correct difference and a fitting example of each; 1 point for a difference with only one example; 0 points otherwise.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
After the bike-rack project, write two related, focused questions that open different avenues of research. Do not repeat the questions in the log.
Model answer: "How many students who live within two miles of school ride bikes, and how many could?" (data) and "What did a nearby school do when it added covered bike parking?" (solutions from another place). Rubric: 2 points for two focused questions, related to the project, that open different avenues; 1 point if one question is unfocused or repeats the log; 0 points otherwise.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Read the "What I now understand" section of the bike-rack log. In two or three sentences, explain how it shows understanding of the subject rather than a list of findings.
Model answer: "It explains why riders choose a rack, keeping bikes dry rather than distance, and it weighs the causes, calling the crossing a second, smaller factor. Those judgments rest on the survey, where 21 of 30 riders named the overhang and only 6 named distance." Rubric: 2 points for noting that the section explains and weighs causes, with evidence from the log; 1 point for a general answer without evidence; 0 points otherwise.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
The model short report ends with a new question about testing the water for phosphorus. Explain why ending with a further question is part of demonstrating understanding, and say whether that question suits a short or a more sustained project.
Model answer: "A writer who understands a subject knows where the evidence stops, and a good further question points exactly there: the club never measured nutrients. Testing before and after fertilizing would take weeks of repeated measurements, so it suits a more sustained project." Rubric: 2 points for linking the question to a limit of the evidence and correctly choosing a sustained project with a reason; 1 point for one of the two; 0 points otherwise.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does CCRA.W.7 mean?
It means students should be able to carry out research projects of two lengths, short and more sustained, each built on a focused question, and come out of them understanding the subject. The product shows that understanding: the writer explains how the facts fit together instead of listing them.
What is the difference between a short and a sustained research project?
A short project answers one focused question with a few sources in a class period or two. A more sustained project runs for weeks, often starts from a question the student chooses, uses sources the student finds and judges, and refines the question along the way.
What makes a research question "focused"?
A focused question is specific enough to answer and open enough to need several sources. "What is weather?" is too broad, "Did it rain on Tuesday?" is too narrow, and "Why does the north field stay muddy for days after rain?" is focused.
Is CCRA.W.7 only for high school?
No. This page covers grades 6-12, and the expectations build across them. Grade 6 adds refocusing the inquiry, grades 7-8 add generating new focused questions, and grades 9-12 add sustained projects, solving problems, and narrowing or broadening the inquiry.
What does it mean to "demonstrate understanding of the subject"?
It means the writer can explain the subject, not just report what sources say. Signs of understanding include connecting sources to each other, explaining causes, weighing which evidence is strongest and naming what the sources cannot show.
How is CCRA.W.7 different from CCRA.W.8?
CCRA.W.7 is about the project: the question, the process and the understanding. CCRA.W.8 is about the sources inside it: gathering information, judging credibility and accuracy, and using sources without plagiarism. Real projects use both.
Is it a problem if a student changes the research question partway through?
No; the grade-level standards expect it. Grade 6 calls it refocusing the inquiry, and grades 9-12 call it narrowing or broadening. A research log helps students record why the question changed.
How many sources does a short research project need?
The standards say "several sources" for grades 6-8 and "multiple sources" for grades 9-12, without a number. Three sources of different kinds, such as data, an explanation and an interview, are often enough for a short project.
How can teachers fit sustained research into a crowded schedule?
One workable approach is to run one sustained project per semester alongside regular units, with short weekly checkpoints, and use short projects of one or two periods inside other units. A research log keeps the long project moving between checkpoints.
Can CCRA.W.7 projects be done in science or history classes?
Yes. The WHST standards (WHST.6-8.7, WHST.9-10.7 and WHST.11-12.7) carry the same expectations into history, science and technical subjects, where research often includes data the students collect themselves.
07
Related Standards
11 standards
These are the grade-level standards that carry anchor CCRA.W.7 in grades 6-12, plus closely related anchors.
Grades 6-8
W.6.7Grade-band standard
Short research projects using several sources, refocusing when needed