SVHS Website Header

My Cart

CCRA.W.9Common CoreELAAnchor StandardsWritingGrades 6-12

CCRA.W.9: Drawing Evidence from Texts to Support Analysis, Reflection and Research

In plain English: CCRA.W.9 is the Common Core College and Career Readiness anchor standard for writing that asks students to draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection and research: choosing quotations and details that truly back a claim, citing them accurately and explaining how they connect. In grades 6-12 it is carried by W.6.9 through W.11-12.9 and WHST.6-8.9 through WHST.11-12.9.

Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Writing · Cluster: Research to Build and Present Knowledge
Also written as CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.9 · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

60 min

Overview

CCRA.W.9 is the writing anchor that joins reading and writing. Students draw evidence from literary or informational texts and use it for three purposes: analysis (explaining how a text works or what it means), reflection (thinking through an idea a text raises, supported by the text, not by personal stories) and research (using a text as a source to answer a question). In every case the evidence must be relevant to the claim, accurate to the words of the text and explained, not just dropped in.

The lesson uses one public-domain passage, Lafcadio Hearn's retelling of how an old farmer, Hamaguchi Gohei, set fire to his own rice harvest to bring his village up the hill before a tsunami struck. Hearn published it in 1897 in Gleanings in Buddha-Fields, and he presents it as the story of a real man and of a disaster that happened long before he wrote. Two model paragraphs, a weak paragraph and a short fact sheet, all written for this page, let students see strong and weak uses of evidence and practice the research purpose.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Choose evidence from a text that is relevant to a specific claim and explain how it supports the claim
  • Quote accurately, mark omissions with [...] and cite evidence by paragraph number
  • Tell apart evidence that supports a claim, supports only part of it, or does not support it
  • Use a literary or informational text as evidence for analysis, for reflection on an idea and for research, and name a limit of the source

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Citing textual evidence to support what a text says explicitly and what can be inferred from it CCRA.R.1
  • Writing a claim that can be supported or challenged
  • Punctuating a quotation inside a sentence
  • Telling apart a story, a retelling of real events and an informational text

Lesson Procedure

60-60 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "A writer claims: 'The new lunch schedule works better than the old one.' Which would convince you more, 'Everyone likes it' or 'The average wait in the lunch line fell from 15 minutes to 6 minutes'? Explain your choice in one sentence."

    Take three or four answers. Draw out the idea that evidence convinces when it is specific and connected to the claim, and that "everyone says so" is not evidence. Tell students that today they will choose evidence from texts and explain it.

  2. Direct Instruction15 minutes

    Use Diagram 1 to show the move this standard asks for: a claim, the evidence drawn from the text (a quotation, a paraphrase or a specific detail, with its paragraph number) and the explanation that connects the two. The same move serves three purposes. In analysis, the claim is about how the text works. In reflection, the claim is about an idea the text raises. In research, the text is a source that answers part of a question, and the writer also says what the source cannot show.

    Before using any evidence, run three tests: Is it relevant to this claim? Is it enough to carry the claim? Is it accurate, quoted word for word with any cut marked [...] and cited correctly?

    Progression of CCRA.W.9 in grades 6-12 (short paraphrases of the grade-level standards)
    Grade-level standardBandWhat this band adds
    W.6.9Grade 6Draw evidence from texts, applying grade 6 reading standards: for example, compare how texts in different forms or genres approach a similar theme, and tell apart claims supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not
    W.7.9Grade 7Applies grade 7 reading standards, for example: compare a fictional portrayal of a time, place or character with a historical account of the same period; judge whether reasoning is sound and evidence relevant and sufficient
    W.8.9Grade 8Applies grade 8 reading standards, for example: analyze how a modern work of fiction draws on myths, traditional stories or religious works; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced
    W.9-10.9Grades 9-10Applies grades 9-10 reading standards, for example: analyze how an author draws on and transforms source material; judge whether reasoning is valid and identify false statements and fallacious reasoning
    W.11-12.9Grades 11-12Applies grades 11-12 reading standards, for example: show knowledge of foundational works of American literature from the eighteenth to the early twentieth century; evaluate the reasoning and premises in seminal U.S. texts
    WHST.6-8.9Grades 6-8 (history, science, technical)Draw evidence from informational texts to support analysis, reflection and research in history, science and technical subjects
    WHST.9-10.9Grades 9-10 (history, science, technical)The same expectation for informational texts, with the more complex texts of grades 9-10
    WHST.11-12.9Grades 11-12 (history, science, technical)The same expectation for informational texts, with the more complex texts of grades 11-12

    The W standards keep the same main sentence in every grade. What grows is the reading the evidence serves, because each band applies that grade's reading standards. The WHST standards keep the expectation for informational texts in history, science and technical subjects. Work through the five examples, which use the invented mini-text and mini fact below so that the Hearn passage stays fresh for practice.

    Mini-text (written for this page): Nora checked the barometer twice, then tied the boat a second time. Her brother laughed at her. By midnight the harbor was full of broken masts.

    Mini fact (written for this page): A falling barometer reading often signals that a storm is coming.

    • Analysis: claim, evidence, explanation

      Claim: Nora's caution turns out to be justified. Which evidence carries it?

      Result: Evidence: she "tied the boat a second time," and "By midnight the harbor was full of broken masts." Explanation: the storm that broke other boats proves that her extra knot was a reasonable precaution.

    • Reflection on an idea the text raises

      Reflection claim: the mini-text suggests that preparing for danger can look foolish to others before the danger arrives.

      Result: Evidence: "Her brother laughed at her." Explanation: his laughter comes before the storm; the broken masts afterward reverse who looks foolish. The reflection stays with the text, not with the writer's own life.

    • Research: a story and a fact source together

      Research question: what signs can warn sailors of a storm?

      Result: The mini fact supplies the general rule (a falling barometer often signals a storm); the story only shows a character checking a barometer and never states the reading. A careful researcher cites the fact source for the rule and uses the story at most as an illustration.

    • Quoting accurately, with an omission marked

      A writer wants only part of the first sentence of the mini-text.

      Result: Accurate: Nora "checked the barometer twice [...]." Inaccurate: Nora "checked the barometer two times." Words inside quotation marks must be the author's; a cut is marked [...]; a change of wording is a paraphrase and goes outside quotation marks.

    • Evidence that does not fit the claim

      Claim: Nora is an experienced sailor. Evidence offered: "Her brother laughed at her."

      Result: The quotation is accurate but not relevant: it shows her brother's reaction, not her experience. Better evidence would be her checking the barometer twice, and even that only suggests experience, so the claim should be softened to "careful."

  3. Guided Practice20 minutes

    Read the Hearn passage aloud. Before reading, give four glosses from earlier in Hearn's essay: Hamaguchi is the village's old headman; the people call him Ojiisan, which means Grandfather; as the richest man in the community he is called the Chōja; and Tada is his ten-year-old grandson. Hearn defines a tsunami as an enormous tidal wave caused by an earthquake or by volcanic action under the sea; scientists now avoid the term "tidal wave," because tides do not cause tsunamis. Tell students that the three dots in paragraph 5 are Hearn's own, and that [...] marks words this page has left out.

    [...] And presently an earthquake came. It was not strong enough to frighten anybody; but Hamaguchi, who had felt hundreds of shocks in his time, thought it was queer,--a long, slow, spongy motion. [...]

    As the quaking ceased Hamaguchi's keen old eyes were anxiously turned toward the village. [...] Thus it chanced that Hamaguchi became aware of something unusual in the offing. He rose to his feet, and looked at the sea. It had darkened quite suddenly, and it was acting strangely. It seemed to be moving against the wind. It was running away from the land.

    Within a very little time the whole village had noticed the phenomenon. Apparently no one had felt the previous motion of the ground, but all were evidently astounded by the movement of the water. They were running to the beach, and even beyond the beach, to watch it. No such ebb had been witnessed on that coast within the memory of living man. Things never seen before were making apparition; unfamiliar spaces of ribbed sand and reaches of weed-hung rock were left bare even as Hamaguchi gazed. And none of the people below appeared to guess what that monstrous ebb signified.

    Hamaguchi Gohei himself had never seen such a thing before; but he remembered things told him in his childhood by his father's father, and he knew all the traditions of the coast. He understood what the sea was going to do. [...] He simply called to his grandson:--

    "Tada!--quick,--very quick! ... Light me a torch."

    Taimatsu, or pine-torches, are kept in many coast dwellings for use on stormy nights, and also for use at certain Shinto festivals. The child kindled a torch at once; and the old man hurried with it to the fields, where hundreds of rice-stacks, representing most of his invested capital, stood awaiting transportation. Approaching those nearest the verge of the slope, he began to apply the torch to them,--hurrying from one to another as quickly as his aged limbs could carry him. The sun-dried stalks caught like tinder; the strengthening sea-breeze blew the blaze landward; and presently, rank behind rank, the stacks burst into flame, sending skyward columns of smoke that met and mingled into one enormous cloudy whirl. Tada, astonished and terrified, ran after his grandfather, crying,--

    "Ojiisan! why? Ojiisan! why?--why?"

    But Hamaguchi did not answer: he had no time to explain; he was thinking only of the four hundred lives in peril. For a while the child stared wildly at the blazing rice; then burst into tears, and ran back to the house, feeling sure that his grandfather had gone mad. Hamaguchi went on firing stack after stack, till he had reached the limit of his field; then he threw down his torch, and waited. The acolyte of the hill-temple, observing the blaze, set the big bell booming; and the people responded to the double appeal. [...]

    [...]

    Through the twilight eastward all looked, and saw at the edge of the dusky horizon a long, lean, dim line like the shadowing of a coast where no coast ever was,--a line that thickened as they gazed, that broadened as a coast-line broadens to the eyes of one approaching it, yet incomparably more quickly. For that long darkness was the returning sea, towering like a cliff, and coursing more swiftly than the kite flies.

    [...]

    "That was why I set fire to the rice."

    He, their Chōja, now stood among them almost as poor as the poorest; for his wealth was gone--but he had saved four hundred lives by the sacrifice. [...]

    Lafcadio Hearn, A Living God (from Gleanings in Buddha-Fields), the tidal-wave narrative, with omissions marked [...] (1897). Public domain (published 1897). Source text.
    1. Find a claim worth proving. Ask: "What is one thing about Hamaguchi or the villagers that a reader could argue about?" List three or four claims on the board, for example "Hamaguchi acts before he can be sure" or "Hearn makes the sea seem alive."
    2. Hunt for evidence. Pairs choose one claim and highlight two pieces of evidence in one color. In a second color, they highlight one detail that seems related but does not support the claim. Teacher note: ask pairs to say why the second detail fails; this is the skill.
    3. Read a model. Grades 6-8 read the first model paragraph below and label its claim, its three pieces of evidence and its explanation. Grades 9-12 read the second model and also label the sentence that names a limit of the source.
    4. Cite and check. Pairs check each quotation in the model against the passage, word for word, and confirm each paragraph number.

    In "A Living God," Lafcadio Hearn shows that Hamaguchi saves the village because he reads warning signs that others miss. The earthquake is "not strong enough to frighten anybody," but Hamaguchi, who "had felt hundreds of shocks in his time," notices that it is "a long, slow, spongy motion" (paragraph 1). When the sea pulls back, the villagers run "to the beach, and even beyond the beach, to watch it" (paragraph 3), toward the place where the danger will strike. Hamaguchi, on the other hand, remembers "the traditions of the coast" and understands "what the sea was going to do" (paragraph 4). This evidence shows that his experience and memory, not luck, let him act in time.

    SVHS (original model paragraph), Model evidence paragraph, grades 6-8 (written for this page). Original passage written for this page.

    Hearn lets the reader know what Hamaguchi knows while the people around him do not, and that gap shows the size of his choice. The narrator reveals early that Hamaguchi "understood what the sea was going to do" (paragraph 4), yet Hamaguchi "did not answer" his grandson's repeated question, because "he had no time to explain" (paragraph 8). Tada's belief that his grandfather "had gone mad" (paragraph 8) is a fair reading of what a child can see, and it makes the act look costly as well as strange: the stacks represent "most of his invested capital" (paragraph 6). The villagers hear his reason only after the wave, in one quiet line, "That was why I set fire to the rice" (paragraph 10), so the explanation comes when the danger has just been shown. One limit matters for any research use: Hearn retells an event from long before he wrote, so the passage is evidence of how he tells the story, not a firsthand record.

    SVHS (original model paragraph), Model evidence paragraph, grades 9-12 (written for this page). Original passage written for this page.
  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    The paragraph below was written for this page with weaknesses on purpose. It is not a model. Students list its problems with evidence, then rewrite it with one clear claim and two pieces of cited evidence, each followed by an explanation. Grades 9-12 add a sentence that says what the passage cannot show.

    Hamaguchi is a very rich man who does not care about his rice. "The sun-dried stalks caught like tinder." This shows he is rich. Also the villagers were not smart because they went to the beach. "Ojiisan! why? Ojiisan! why?--why?" In conclusion, Hamaguchi is a hero because he saved everyone and the text proves it in many places.

    SVHS (original weak paragraph), Weak paragraph for revision (written for this page, with weaknesses on purpose). Original passage written for this page.

    For the research purpose, students also read this short fact sheet, written for this page. It summarizes general coastal safety advice and is not a quotation from any agency. The quiz and homework use it together with the Hearn passage.

    A tsunami is a series of large waves, usually caused by an earthquake under or near the sea. Official warnings matter, but a tsunami can reach a nearby coast before any warning is sent, so people who live on coasts are taught to recognize natural signs.

    Three natural signs are often taught. The first is an earthquake that is strong or that lasts a long time. Shaking does not have to be violent to count: a long earthquake is a warning sign too. The second is the sea drawing back suddenly and much farther than usual, uncovering sand, rocks or reefs. The third is a loud roar from the ocean.

    If you notice any of these signs near a coast, move at once to high ground or inland. Do not go to the shore to look. Because a tsunami is a series of waves and the first wave may not be the largest, stay away from the shore until officials say it is safe.

    SVHS (original fact sheet), Fact sheet: Natural Warning Signs of a Tsunami (written for this page; it summarizes general coastal safety advice). Original passage written for this page.
  5. Closure5 minutes

    Exit ticket: Write one claim about the Hearn passage and one quotation that supports it, cited by paragraph number. Then write one sentence explaining the connection. Look for evidence that is relevant and quoted word for word.

    Teacher note on the source: The title page of the 1897 edition describes Hearn as a lecturer on English literature at the Imperial University of Japan. His essay is titled "A Living God" because, he writes, Hamaguchi was one of the people honored while still alive by having a temple built for his spirit. The passage mentions Shinto festivals and the hill-temple, which Hearn identifies earlier, in a sentence cut from paragraph 4, as the Buddhist temple; these are cultural facts of the village. Hearn presents the story as true. It is based on a real event, the tsunami that followed the 1854 Ansei-Nankai earthquake, but Hearn wrote more than forty years later and changes some details, so students should treat it as his account, not as a verified record. Words such as "mad" (paragraph 8) are used in the older sense of "out of his mind," as Tada believes.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a three-column organizer (claim, evidence with paragraph number, "this shows ... because ...") with the first row filled in from the mini-text
  • Point students to paragraphs 2, 3 and 6 for the evidence hunt, so that the search area is smaller
  • Provide sentence frames for citing: "In paragraph __, Hearn writes, '__.' This shows __ because __."

For Advanced Students

  • Ask students to find the single sentence in the passage that carries the most evidence for two different claims, and to write both claims
  • Have students write a research note that uses the fact sheet for a general rule and the passage only as an illustration, then explain why that order matters
  • Ask students to write a counterclaim to the second model paragraph and support it with evidence the model did not use

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Check that each claim is specific and that every piece of evidence is relevant to it, quoted word for word (with any cut marked [...]) and cited by paragraph. Strong work explains how the evidence supports the claim instead of letting a quotation stand alone. Look for students who can say when evidence supports only part of a claim. In grades 9-12, look for writers who weigh which evidence is strongest and who name what a source cannot show when they use it for research.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

One Passage, Three Purposes

15 minPairs

Pairs use the Hearn passage for three different writing purposes, one card at a time, and see how the purpose changes which evidence they choose.

The Three Purpose Cards

  • Analysis card: How does Hearn make the sea seem strange and threatening before the wave appears?
  • Reflection card: What does the passage suggest about acting on knowledge before you can explain it to others?
  • Research card: A researcher is studying how knowledge of natural dangers was passed from one generation to the next. What can paragraph 4 offer, and what would the researcher still need to check in other sources?

Grades 6-8 Version

  • Each card names the paragraphs to search: paragraphs 2-3 for analysis, paragraphs 4-8 for reflection, paragraph 4 for research
  • Pairs fill a three-column chart for each card: quotation, paragraph number, what it shows
  • Pairs write one claim sentence for each card

Grades 9-12 Version

  • No paragraph hints: pairs search the whole passage
  • For each card, pairs choose their strongest piece of evidence and a second choice, then write one sentence on why the first is stronger
  • On the research card, pairs add a sentence naming a limit of the source, for example that Hearn retells events from long before he wrote

Discussion Questions

  • Did any quotation work for more than one card? Did its job change?
  • Which card was hardest to support with evidence, and why?
  • How is a reflection claim different from a personal opinion?

Modification

For students who need support, work the analysis card together as a class first, then let pairs complete the other two.

2

Does It Fit? Claim and Evidence Card Sort

15 minGroups of 3

Groups sort eight cards, each pairing a claim with a quotation from the passage, into three piles: supports, supports only part and does not support.

The Eight Cards

  1. Claim: Hamaguchi is old and not strong, but he pushes himself. Evidence: "hurrying from one to another as quickly as his aged limbs could carry him" (paragraph 6)
  2. Claim: Tada is frightened and angry with his grandfather. Evidence: "Tada, astonished and terrified, ran after his grandfather" (paragraph 6)
  3. Claim: Hamaguchi burns only a few stacks, as a small signal. Evidence: "Hamaguchi went on firing stack after stack, till he had reached the limit of his field" (paragraph 8)
  4. Claim: A torch was easy to find in a coastal home. Evidence: "are kept in many coast dwellings for use on stormy nights" (paragraph 6)
  5. Claim: Hamaguchi is wealthy and old. Evidence: "Hamaguchi's keen old eyes were anxiously turned toward the village" (paragraph 2)
  6. Claim: The villagers were celebrating when the sea pulled back. Evidence: "He rose to his feet, and looked at the sea." (paragraph 2)
  7. Claim: Tada stays at his grandfather's side until the people arrive. Evidence: "then burst into tears, and ran back to the house" (paragraph 8)
  8. Claim: Hamaguchi explains his plan to Tada before lighting the fire. Evidence: "He simply called to his grandson:--" (paragraph 4)

Grades 6-8 Version

  • Groups sort the cards, then check each quotation against the passage and its paragraph number
  • For each card that does not fully support its claim, groups write the part of the claim that is missing evidence

Grades 9-12 Version

  • Groups sort the cards, then repair every card that does not fully support its claim, either by finding better evidence or by rewriting the claim to fit the evidence
  • Groups decide which repair is more honest in each case: changing the evidence or changing the claim

Discussion Questions

  • Which cards quote the passage accurately but still fail? What does that show about accuracy and relevance?
  • When a quotation contradicts a claim, should the writer drop the claim or look for other evidence?

Teacher key: card 1, supports; card 2, supports only part (frightened, yes; the passage shows no anger); card 3, does not support (he burns stack after stack, to the edge of his field); card 4, supports; card 5, supports only part (old, yes; this sentence says nothing about wealth); card 6, does not support (the sentence is about Hamaguchi, not the villagers); card 7, does not support (he runs back to the house); card 8, does not support (he calls Tada, and paragraph 8 shows he gives no explanation).

3

Evidence Repair Shop

15 minIndividuals, then pairs

Students revise the weak paragraph from Independent Practice into a paragraph whose evidence is relevant, accurate, cited and explained, then trade with a partner who checks each quotation against the passage.

Grades 6-8 Version

  • Choose one of the weak paragraph's claims and make it specific
  • Replace the dropped quotations with two quotations that fit, each with a paragraph number
  • Use the frame "This shows ... because ..." after each quotation

Grades 9-12 Version

  • Write a new claim that a reader could disagree with
  • Blend at least two short quotations into your own sentences, using [...] for any cut, and cite each by paragraph
  • End with a sentence that names what the passage cannot show about the real event

Partner Check

  • Is every quotation word for word?
  • Is every paragraph number right?
  • Does each quotation support the claim it is attached to, or only part of it?

Variation: Two-Source Paragraph

Students write a research paragraph that answers a question with the fact sheet as the main source and one quotation from the Hearn passage as an illustration, citing both.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

1 diagrams

Diagram 1: Claim, Evidence, Explanation and the Three Tests

Drawing evidence from a text Claim what you will show Evidence quote, paraphrase, detail Explanation how it supports the claim Three tests for every piece of evidence Relevant? about this claim Enough? carries the whole claim Accurate? word for word, [...], cited Purposes: analysis (how the text works), reflection (an idea it raises), research (what the source shows, and what it cannot)
The core move of CCRA.W.9: a claim, evidence drawn from the text and an explanation that connects them. Every piece of evidence passes three tests before it is used. The same move serves analysis, reflection and research; in research, the writer also says what the source cannot show.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

CCRA.W.9 Homework: Evidence for Analysis, Research and Reflection

Directions: Use the Hearn passage "A Living God" and the fact sheet "Natural Warning Signs of a Tsunami," both in the lesson plan above. Quote word for word, mark any cut with [...], and cite the Hearn passage by paragraph number and the fact sheet by its title. Do not reuse any quotation from the two model paragraphs on this page.

Part 1: Evidence for Analysis (Problems 1-3)

  1. Write a claim about one quality of Hamaguchi's character, such as decisiveness, courage or selflessness. Support it with two quotations from two different paragraphs, and write one sentence of explanation after each.
  2. Paragraph 9 describes the returning sea. Choose two words or phrases from it and explain, in three or four sentences, how they show the size and speed of the danger.
  3. Paraphrase paragraph 3 in two or three sentences of your own words. Then quote one phrase from it that you could not paraphrase without losing something, and explain what would be lost.

Part 2: Evidence for Research and Reflection (Problems 4-6)

  1. The fact sheet says that a tsunami is a series of waves and that the first wave may not be the largest. Does this excerpt give any evidence on that point? Explain how you checked, and how you would find out what Hearn's full essay says (the "Source text" link under the passage opens the full public-domain book).
  2. Write a research paragraph of five to seven sentences that answers the question "How can people near a coast recognize that a tsunami may be coming?" Use the fact sheet as your main source and the Hearn passage as an illustration, cite both, and include one sentence on a limit of using Hearn's story as evidence.
  3. Write a reflection paragraph of six to eight sentences on this question: what does the passage suggest about the difference between seeing something and understanding it? Support your reflection with evidence from at least two paragraphs. Keep the reflection about the text, not about your own life.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
ClaimSpecific and arguable, and fits the purpose (analysis, research or reflection)Present but general or only loosely tied to the purposeMissing, or a summary instead of a claim
Relevant EvidenceEach piece of evidence supports the claim it is attached toSome evidence supports only part of the claimEvidence unrelated to the claim, or none
Accuracy and CitationQuotations word for word, cuts marked [...], every source cited correctlyOne or two quotation or citation errorsMisquoted, uncited or invented evidence
ExplanationExplains how each piece of evidence supports the claim; names a limit of the source in researchSome explanation, but at least one quotation is left to speak for itselfQuotations dropped in with no explanation

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 7, 8, 9 and 16 refer to the weak paragraph, questions 12 and 18 also use the fact sheet "Natural Warning Signs of a Tsunami," and all other questions use the Hearn passage "A Living God." All texts are in the lesson plan above. Choose the best answer, or write a short response, then check the explanation.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A student claims, "Hamaguchi noticed the earthquake when other people did not." Which quotation from the Hearn passage best supports this claim?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which detail in paragraph 2 best shows that the sea was behaving in a way the weather could not explain?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A student claims, "The ebb uncovered parts of the coast that were normally underwater." Which quotation is the strongest evidence?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 5, Hamaguchi says, "Tada!--quick,--very quick! ... Light me a torch." What do the repetition and the breaks in this line best show?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 8, what is the "double appeal" that the people respond to?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which quotation best supports the claim that Hamaguchi set the fire to save people, not to destroy the rice?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The weak paragraph ends, "the text proves it in many places." What is the main problem with this sentence as evidence?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The weak paragraph quotes "The sun-dried stalks caught like tinder" and says, "This shows he is rich." What is wrong with this use of evidence?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The weak paragraph says the villagers "were not smart because they went to the beach." Which quotation best shows that this judgment is unfair?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which sentence integrates a quotation from the passage correctly, with an accurate citation?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A student wants to shorten this sentence from paragraph 6: "The sun-dried stalks caught like tinder; the strengthening sea-breeze blew the blaze landward; and presently, rank behind rank, the stacks burst into flame." Which version is quoted correctly?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The fact sheet says that one natural sign of a tsunami is the sea drawing back suddenly and much farther than usual. Which detail from the Hearn passage matches this sign?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which is the best reason to use "A Living God" with care as evidence in a research paper about tsunami safety?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which claim can NOT be supported with evidence from the passage?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer

    Why might fire work better than another kind of warning in this situation? Write a claim and support it with one quotation from paragraph 6, cited by paragraph number.

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    Rewrite the weak paragraph's final claim, "Hamaguchi is a hero," as a more specific claim. Add one quotation with a paragraph number and one sentence of explanation.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    Paraphrase this sentence from paragraph 2 in your own words: "Thus it chanced that Hamaguchi became aware of something unusual in the offing." Then explain in one sentence when a writer should paraphrase instead of quote.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write one research sentence that combines one fact from the fact sheet with one quotation from the Hearn passage, citing both sources.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Reflection: in two or three sentences, explain what the passage suggests about what a community owes to one person's sacrifice. Support your reflection with one piece of evidence from paragraph 10 or 11.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write one focused research question that the Hearn passage raises but cannot answer, and name one kind of source that could help answer it.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does CCRA.W.9 mean?

It means students should be able to pull evidence out of what they read and use it in their writing. The evidence (quotations, paraphrases and specific details) must support a claim, whether the writing is analysis of a text, reflection on an idea the text raises, or research that uses the text as a source.

How is CCRA.W.9 different from CCRA.R.1?

CCRA.R.1 is the reading side: citing evidence to support what a text says and what can be inferred from it. CCRA.W.9 is the writing side: building that evidence into an essay, a research paper or a reflection, quoted accurately, cited and explained.

What counts as evidence from a text?

Exact quotations, accurate paraphrases, specific details and, in informational texts, data or facts. What does not count: a general statement that "the text proves it," or a quotation that is accurate but unrelated to the claim.

What does "reflection" mean in this standard? Do students write about themselves?

No, not necessarily. Here reflection means thinking through an idea a text raises, such as what a story suggests about courage, and supporting that thinking with evidence from the text. This page keeps every reflection task about the text, so no student has to share personal experiences.

How many quotations should a paragraph have?

There is no fixed number. A useful guide is enough evidence to carry the claim and no more than the writer can explain. Two well-chosen quotations with explanations usually do more than four dropped in a row.

How do students show that they left words out of a quotation?

They mark the cut with an ellipsis, as in [...] on this page or the three spaced dots that many style guides use. The cut must not change the author's meaning, and any words the writer changes go outside the quotation marks as a paraphrase.

How does CCRA.W.9 change from grade 6 to grade 12?

The main sentence stays the same, but each grade applies its own reading standards. In the official examples, grade 6 compares texts in different genres and separates supported from unsupported claims; grades 9-10 analyze how authors transform source material and spot fallacious reasoning; grades 11-12 work with foundational American literature and seminal U.S. texts. The WHST standards apply the skill to informational texts in history, science and technical subjects.

Can a story be used as evidence in a research paper?

Yes, with care. A story or retelling can show what people knew, believed or remembered, and it can illustrate a point. For facts, a researcher should rely on sources built to report them and say what the story cannot show.

Is CCRA.W.9 on standardized tests?

The anchor itself is not tested, but the grade-level standards that carry it are reflected in many state English tests, which often ask students to write a response supported with evidence from one or more passages. Practicing claim, evidence and explanation prepares students for those tasks.

What is a common mistake with text evidence?

A frequent one is the "dropped quotation": a quotation set in a paragraph with no lead-in and no explanation, so the reader must guess why it is there. Another is evidence that is accurate but supports only part of the claim.