WHST.9-10.7Common CoreELAWriting in History, Science and Technical SubjectsGrades 9-10
WHST.9-10.7: Short and Sustained Research Projects in History and Science
In plain English: WHST.9-10.7 is the Common Core literacy standard that asks students in grades 9 and 10 to carry out short and longer research projects in history, science and technical classes that answer a question, including one they pose themselves, or solve a problem. Students resize the question as they learn and combine several sources into an answer that shows real understanding.
Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects 6-12 · Cluster: Research to Build and Present Knowledge · Official standard
Students follow two research projects, one in U.S. History and one in Biology, from a question a student asked on their own to a written answer. In history, Tomás, an invented tenth grader, sees a textbook photograph of people climbing a mountain pass under heavy packs during the Klondike Gold Rush of 1897-1898. His one-period short project asks what the Canadian government required each stampeder to bring, and why. It compares an 1897 guidebook, Ernest Ingersoll's Golden Alaska, with the National Park Service's page on the "ton of goods," and it ends with a new question. His three-week project narrows a question that held three projects, broadens it after reading Hamlin Garland's 1899 account of the White Pass trail, and ends with a section that combines all three sources. In science, Wren, an invented biology student, tries to solve a cafeteria problem: fruit flies around the tray return. Her short test finds the bait that catches the most flies, a week of counts near the recycling bins forces her to broaden the question, and a second test of cleaning the places where the flies breed leads to a recommendation.
WHST.9-10.7 asks for both project lengths, a question that can be the student's own, resizing the inquiry when the evidence calls for it, and a synthesis that shows understanding of the subject. The lesson treats each of these as a decision students can see in a research log. The people in both projects and all the fruit fly and tennis-ball data are invented and labeled; the Klondike sources and facts are real.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Turn something they noticed into a self-generated research question, and size it for a short project of one period or a sustained project of several weeks
Narrow a question that holds several projects, and broaden a question when a source shows that the answer is larger than expected
Reconcile sources that give different numbers by checking each source's date, purpose and reasoning
Write synthesis sentences that combine two or more sources, and keep conclusions inside what the sources can support
Use short tests and sources to recommend a solution to a practical problem in a science or technical context
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Conducting short research projects that answer a question, drawing on several sources, in grades 6-8 WHST.6-8.7
Gathering relevant information from print and digital sources WHST.6-8.8
Quoting and paraphrasing sources with a basic citation
"Write down one thing you noticed this week, in any class or outside school, that made you ask why. Then write the question two ways: one you could answer in a single class period, and one that would take three weeks."
Take three or four examples and ask the class which version of each is which. Name the idea: a research question that comes from the student's own noticing is a self-generated question, and WHST.9-10.7 expects students to research questions like these as well as assigned ones. Then introduce Tomás, an invented tenth grader, and read his first research log entry. A stampeder was anyone who joined the rush to the Klondike gold fields in 1897 and 1898. Students mark the sentence where his short-project question comes from.
1Monday, Day 1. Our U.S. History textbook has a photograph from 1898 of a long line of people climbing a snowy mountain pass in single file, each one bent under a heavy pack. The caption says they were on their way to the Klondike gold fields in Canada's Yukon. My first question was: What was the Klondike Gold Rush, and what happened to everyone who went? Mr. Albescu said that question could fill a shelf of books.
2Monday, later. I met with Ms. Duarte, the school librarian. She asked what in the photograph actually made me curious. I said the packs. Why would anyone carry that much up a mountain? She said that was a question I could answer in one class period, and it could be my short project before the three-week project starts.
3Short project question: What did the Canadian government require each stampeder to bring into the Yukon, and why?
4Tuesday, Day 2. Ms. Duarte found me Golden Alaska, a guidebook by Ernest Ingersoll printed in 1897, only months after the first ships carrying Klondike gold reached the United States (Source 1). Its first pages are advertisements: one company runs steamers "between Seattle and Ft. Get There," and another sells shares in a mining company at $1.00 each. I also found the page "Ton of Goods" on the website of Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park, run by the National Park Service (Source 2). Plan for tomorrow: compare what the 1897 guidebook expected with what the park's historians say happened.
SVHS lesson authors, Tomás's Research Log, Days 1-2 (Text 1; Tomás, Mr. Albescu, Ms. Duarte and their school are invented). Original passage written for this page.
Direct Instruction25 minutes
Show Diagram 1. A short project answers one focused question in a class period or two, often with two or three sources. A sustained project runs for weeks, uses more sources and usually changes its question along the way. The standard expects both, and a short project often feeds a sustained one. Read Source 1, the 1897 guidebook, then Tomás's short project.
1Provisions.—There was a report that Canadian mounted police would guard the passes during the latter part of the summer of 1897 and refuse admission to anyone who did not bring a year's provisions with him. This has been estimated as weighing 1,800 pounds. Whether this is true or not, it is certain that no one should go into the Yukon country without taking a large supply of food, and taking it from his starting-point. Whatever is the most condensed and nutritious is the cheapest, and this should be collected with great care. There is well-grounded fear that famine may overtake all the camps there before the opening of navigation in the spring. Newspapers on August 2nd reported agents of the Alaska Commercial Company as saying:
2"We shall refuse to take passengers at all in our next steamer. We could sell every berth at the price we have been asking—$250, as against $120 last spring—but we shall not sell one. We shall fill up with provisions, and I have no doubt the Pacific Coast Company will do the same. We are afraid. Those who are mad to get to the diggings will probably be able to get transportation by chartering tramp steamers, and there is a serious risk that there will not be food enough for them at Juneau or on the Yukon. After the season closes it will be next to impossible to get supplies into the Yukon country, and a large proportion of the gold seekers may starve to death. That would be an ominous beginning for the new camp. Alaska is not like California or Australia or South Africa. It produces nothing. When the supplies from outside are exhausted, famine must follow—to what degree no one can tell."
Ernest Ingersoll, Golden Alaska: A Complete Account to Date of the Yukon Valley, from "Outfits, Supplies, etc.," the paragraphs on provisions (Source 1; Text 2) (1897). Public domain (published 1897). Source text.
1Wednesday, Day 3. Short project, one class period.
2What Source 1 said in 1897: Ingersoll reports only "a report" that the Canadian mounted police would refuse to let in "anyone who did not bring a year's provisions with him." He gives an estimate that the food would weigh 1,800 pounds, adds "Whether this is true or not," and warns that "famine may overtake all the camps there before the opening of navigation in the spring." He also quotes agents of a shipping company: "When the supplies from outside are exhausted, famine must follow."
3What Source 2 says: "To prevent mass starvation in the remote and inaccessible Yukon Territory, the Canadian government required every stampeder bring a year's supply of goods before crossing the border." The government counted three pounds of food per day for a whole year, so the food alone weighed at least 1,095 pounds. Clothes and equipment could double the load, which is why it came to be called a "ton of goods." The North-West Mounted Police enforced the amount, and between February and June of 1898 they also collected $174,000 in customs duties on goods bought in the United States.
4The numbers do not match: 1,800 pounds of food in Source 1, at least 1,095 in Source 2. I will use Source 2's number, because it gives the rule behind it, and mention Source 1's figure as an early guess.
5My answer: The Canadian government required each stampeder to bring a year's supply of goods, food plus clothes and equipment, about a ton in all, so that thousands of newcomers would not starve in a territory that supplies could hardly reach.
6A new question: If every stampeder had to move a ton of goods over the mountains, how did they do it?
SVHS lesson authors, Tomás's Short Project, Day 3 (Text 3; the quotations are from Sources 1 and 2). Original passage written for this page.
Read Source 3, Hamlin Garland's account, and Tomás's log for Weeks 2 and 3. Students track each version of the question in the margin. Then show Tomás's synthesis grid and his final section, and work through the examples.
1Thus far the journey had been easy and simple, but immediately after leaving White Pass we entered upon an exceedingly stony road, filled with sharp rock which had been blasted from the railway above us. Upon reaching the end of the wagon road, and entering upon the trail, we came upon the Way of Death. The waters reeked with carrion. The breeze was the breath of carrion, and all nature was made indecent and disgusting by the presence of carcasses. Within the distance of fifteen miles we passed more than two thousand dead horses. It was a cruel land, a land filled with the record of men's merciless greed. Nature herself was cold, majestic, and grand. The trail rough, hard, and rocky. The horses labored hard under their heavy burdens, though the floor they trod was always firm.
[...]
2Down there in the gully, on the sullen drift of snow, the winter trail could still be seen like an unclean ribbon and here, where the shrivelled hides of horses lay thick, wound the summer pathway. Up yonder summit, lock-stepped like a file of convicts, with tongues protruding and breath roaring from their distended throats, thousands of men had climbed with killing burdens on their backs, mad to reach the great inland river and the gold belt. Like the men of the Long Trail, they, too, had no time to find the gold under their feet.
3It was terrible to see how on every slippery ledge the ranks of horses had broken like waves to fall in heaps like rows of seaweed, tumbled, contorted, and grinning. Their dried skins had taken on the color of the soil, so that I sometimes set foot upon them without realizing what they were. Many of them had saddles on and nearly all had lead-ropes. Some of them had even been tied to trees and left to starve.
4In all this could be read the merciless greed and impracticability of these goldseekers. Men who had never driven a horse in their lives, and had no idea what an animal could do, or what he required to eat, loaded their outfits upon some poor patient beast and drove him without feed until, weakened and insecure of foot, he slipped and fell on some one of these cruel ledges of flinty rock.
Hamlin Garland, The Trail of the Goldseekers: A Record of Travel in Prose and Verse, from chapter XXI, "The Rush to Atlin Lake" (Source 3; Text 4; four paragraphs about the summit, a camp and the next morning are left out, marked [...]) (1899; this edition 1906). Public domain (published 1906). Source text.
1Week 2, Monday. Sustained project question, version 1: Why did people join the Klondike Gold Rush, what happened to them on the trail, and did any of them get rich? Mr. Albescu wrote in the margin: "Three projects. Pick one."
2Version 2: What made the trails from Skagway and Dyea so hard for stampeders to cross? I chose these two trails because both of my sources so far describe the trip from the Alaska coast, and because Source 2 says the three-pounds-a-day rule was set for "each person going to Dawson from Skagway or Dyea."
3Week 2, Thursday. Read Source 3, Hamlin Garland's account of his trip over the White Pass trail in 1898, published in 1899. I expected a story about people. Most of it is about horses: "more than two thousand dead horses" in fifteen miles. Garland blames owners who "had never driven a horse in their lives." He also writes that "the winter trail could still be seen," so he crossed after the biggest crowds and is describing what they left behind.
4Version 3: What made the trails from Skagway and Dyea so hard for stampeders and their pack animals to cross? The horses are not a new topic. Many stampeders tried to move their ton of goods with horses, so what happened to the horses is part of the answer.
5Week 3, Tuesday. Synthesis grid finished (below). Ms. Duarte asked what I still cannot answer. I cannot say how many people turned back. None of my three sources counts them, so my final section will not guess a number.
SVHS lesson authors, Tomás's Research Log, Weeks 2-3 (Text 5; the quotations are from Sources 2 and 3). Original passage written for this page.
Table 3. Tomás's synthesis grid (Week 3): which source supports each part of his answer
Part of the answer
Source 1: Ingersoll, 1897
Source 2: park historians
Source 3: Garland, 1899
Why a year of supplies was needed
Fear of famine before spring; food must come from outside
The rule was meant to prevent mass starvation
Not covered
How heavy the load was
Early estimate: 1,800 pounds of food
At least 1,095 pounds of food; about a ton with gear
Horses "under their heavy burdens"
What the trail did to animals
Not covered
Not covered
More than two thousand dead horses in fifteen miles
Inexperience
Not covered
"Few of them had any idea"
Owners who "had never driven a horse"
1The trails from Skagway and Dyea were hard to cross for two connected reasons: what each stampeder had to carry, and what carrying it did to people and animals who had never done such work. The first reason was the load. To prevent mass starvation in the Yukon, the Canadian government required every stampeder to bring a year's supply of goods, counted as at least three pounds of food a day plus clothes and equipment, about a ton in all (Source 2). A guidebook printed in 1897 had already guessed that a year's food alone would weigh 1,800 pounds, and it warned that famine might reach the camps before spring (Source 1). The guidebook's figure was an early estimate, but both sources agree on why the load was needed: the Yukon could not feed thousands of newcomers.
2The second reason was the trail itself. A ton of goods had to go over the pass on people's backs or on animals. Hamlin Garland, who crossed the White Pass trail in 1898, passed "more than two thousand dead horses" in fifteen miles and blamed owners who had "no idea what an animal could do" (Source 3). The park's historians make a similar point about the stampeders themselves: "few of them had any idea what they were getting themselves into" (Source 2).
3Together, the sources show that the rule meant to keep stampeders from starving in the Yukon also made the trail harder to cross, and that inexperience made it deadly for pack animals. My sources describe the hardship, but none of them counts how many people turned back. That number is the next question for this project.
SVHS lesson authors, Why the Coast Trails Were So Hard to Cross, the Final Section of Tomás's Report (Text 6). Original passage written for this page.
Short project: checking a number against the rule behind it
Source 2 says the government counted three pounds of food per day for a year, and that clothes and equipment could double the load. Tomás wants to know whether "a ton of goods" is a fair name for that load.
Result: 3 pounds a day for 365 days is 1,095 pounds of food. Doubled, that is 2,190 pounds, close to a ton (2,000 pounds). The nickname fits the rule, so Tomás can use "about a ton" in his answer and explain where it comes from.
Sustained project: narrowing a question that holds three projects
Version 1 (Text 5, paragraph 1) asks why people joined the rush, what happened on the trail, and whether anyone got rich.
Result: Each part needs its own sources: reasons for leaving home, accounts of the trail, and records of the gold fields. Tomás keeps the part his short project had led to, the trail, and limits it to two trails, which makes version 2 a question three weeks can answer.
Sustained project: broadening when a source changes the picture
Tomás expected Source 3 to describe people. Most of the passage describes dead and abandoned horses.
Result: Version 3 adds "and their pack animals." The added words do not start a new topic: they widen the same question so that the answer can include how the goods were moved and what that cost.
Synthesis: a sentence that needs two sources to be true
Text 6, paragraph 3: "the rule meant to keep stampeders from starving in the Yukon also made the trail harder to cross."
Result: The rule and its purpose come from Source 2; the harder crossing comes from Source 3, where horses labor under heavy burdens and die in the thousands. Neither source says this sentence alone. Synthesis is a claim built from two sources, not two summaries placed side by side.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Move to the science context, where research solves a problem. Wren, an invented biology student, starts from a cafeteria complaint: fruit flies around the tray return and the recycling bins. Read her first log entry and Table 1. Pairs predict which bait will catch the most flies before they look at the numbers.
1Day 1. Since school started in September, small flies have been circling the tray-return window and the two recycling bins in our cafeteria. Mr. Pham, the cafeteria manager, says his staff swats them every lunch and they are back the next day. Dr. Oyelaran, my biology teacher, identified them from my photo as fruit flies and said I could make this my research project. My first question was: How do you get rid of insects? Dr. Oyelaran said that question covers ants, cockroaches, mosquitoes and termites, and asked which insect and which place I actually cared about.
2Narrowed question: Which homemade bait catches the most fruit flies in a trap by the cafeteria's tray return?
3Day 2. Short test, one day. I made 15 identical traps: a plastic cup holding 1/2 cup of bait and a drop of dish soap, covered with plastic wrap poked with ten small holes. Each of five baits went into 3 traps: plain water, sugar water (1 tablespoon of sugar per cup of water), white vinegar, apple cider vinegar, and mashed overripe banana in water. At 2:30 p.m. I set the traps in a row on the shelf beside the tray return, in an order drawn from a hat, and at 2:30 p.m. the next day I counted the flies in every trap. Table 1 shows the mean catch per trap.
SVHS lesson authors, Wren's Research Log, Days 1-2 (Text 7; Wren, Mr. Pham, Dr. Oyelaran and their school are invented, and so are all the data). Original passage written for this page.
Table 1. Mean fruit flies caught per trap in 24 hours (3 traps per bait); invented data
Bait (1/2 cup, with a drop of dish soap)
Mean flies per trap
Plain water
0.7
Sugar water
4.3
White vinegar
6.0
Mashed banana
17.3
Apple cider vinegar
21.7
1Source A: "Fruit Flies Indoors," a page on an invented university extension website (the facts are real). Fruit flies are drawn to the smell of fermenting fruit, including the vinegar and alcohol that fermentation makes. A female can lay about 500 eggs, on overripe fruit or on the moist, sticky film inside drains, mops and containers that held juice or soda. At room temperature an egg can become an adult in about 8 to 10 days. In a trap, a drop of dish soap breaks the surface of the liquid, so flies that land on it sink. Traps catch adult flies but do not remove the places where new flies develop; the most lasting control is to find and clean those breeding sites.
2Source B: the label on a fruit fly trap sold in grocery stores (the brand is invented; the ingredients are typical of real traps). "Ingredients: apple cider vinegar, water, soap. Eliminates fruit flies for up to 30 days."
3Source C: my interview with Mr. Pham. Students drop juice boxes and milk cartons into the recycling bins with liquid still in them. The staff empties the bins every afternoon but washes them only on Fridays, and the floor drain under the tray return gets mopped over, not scrubbed. The staff has about 20 minutes after the last lunch for all cleanup. New bins with lids or a pest-control contract need district approval, which takes about a month. His biggest worry is time: "Whatever you recommend has to fit in the cleanup we already do."
4My note: Source A adds something my question left out.
SVHS lesson authors, Wren's Source Notes (Text 8; Source A's website and Source B's brand are invented, and the facts in them are real; the interview is invented). Original passage written for this page.
1Week 2. Traps in real use. Apple cider vinegar had caught the most flies on Day 2, so Mr. Pham let me keep four apple cider vinegar traps by the tray return for all of Week 2. To measure how many flies were around, I hung one yellow sticky card beside the recycling bins every school day of Weeks 1 and 2 and counted the flies on it 24 hours later (Table 2). Week 1, with no traps, averaged 38 flies per card per day. With the traps, Week 2 averaged 31. The traps filled up, but the flies near the bins barely dropped.
2Broadened question: What would cut the number of fruit flies in the cafeteria, not just catch them? Catching flies was the wrong target. Mr. Pham's problem is flies in the cafeteria, and Source A says new flies keep coming from the places where they breed.
3Week 3. Finding the breeding sites. With a hand lens from Dr. Oyelaran's lab I found larvae in the sticky film at the bottom of both recycling bins and in the floor drain under the tray return. Second short test: from Monday of Week 3 the staff rinsed both bins with hot, soapy water every afternoon and scrubbed the drain with a brush on Monday and Thursday, and I took the traps away. The rinse took the staff 8 minutes. Week 3 averaged 15 flies per card per day. In Week 4 we kept the cleaning and put the four traps back: 12 flies per card per day.
4Week 4. Recommendation for Mr. Pham. Rinse both recycling bins with hot, soapy water every afternoon and scrub the floor drain under the tray return twice a week. Keep four apple cider vinegar traps by the tray return, each with 1/2 cup of vinegar, and replace the vinegar every Monday. In my counts, cleaning and traps together cut the flies on the sticky card from 38 a day to 12, while the traps alone reached only 31. Cleaning alone reached 15, so the traps add a smaller extra drop, but the vinegar costs under $2 a week. The rinse fits in the 20-minute cleanup, and nothing needs district approval. Limits: I counted flies with one sticky card, ran each plan for one week in a fixed order while the weather was cooling, and tested one cafeteria in early fall.
SVHS lesson authors, Wren's Research Log, Weeks 2-4, with Her Recommendation (Text 9; invented data). Original passage written for this page.
Table 2. Mean fruit flies on the daily sticky card by the recycling bins (5 school days per week); invented data
Week and plan
Mean flies per card per day
Week 1: usual cleaning, no traps
38
Week 2: usual cleaning, four apple cider vinegar traps
31
Week 3: bins rinsed daily and drain scrubbed, no traps (second test)
15
Week 4: bins rinsed daily and drain scrubbed, four traps
12
Show Diagram 2 and ask: which plan would you have recommended after Day 2, and which after Week 3? Pairs write one sentence for each and name the evidence that changed. Then work through the example.
Solving a problem: weighing two results against the goal
After Week 4, two plans are close. Cleaning alone: 15 flies per card per day. Cleaning plus four traps: 12.
Result: Cleaning did most of the work, from 38 to 15; the traps take off 3 more flies a day. Source C adds the limits: the plan must fit the 20-minute cleanup and need no approval. The rinse takes 8 minutes and the vinegar costs under $2 a week, so the evidence points to both, with the cleaning reported as the main fix and the traps honestly described as a small extra.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students start Activity 3: each one turns the noticing from the Warm-Up, or a question from a current history or science unit, into a research proposal with a short-project question, a sustained question and three planned sources. They trade proposals with a partner, who asks Ms. Duarte's question (what actually made you curious?) and Dr. Oyelaran's question (which part, and where?).
The quiz uses Texts 1-9, Tables 1-3 and the diagrams in Warm-Up, Direct Instruction and Guided Practice; point students back to those phases when they take it.
Closure5 minutes
Exit ticket: (1) Name one moment when Tomás or Wren changed the size of a question, and the evidence that caused it. (2) Write one sentence about the fruit fly problem that needs two sources to be true. Then hand out the homework, Nico's research log about tennis balls in a PE class.
Teacher note on sources: Source 1 is Ernest Ingersoll's Golden Alaska (Rand, McNally, 1897), written while the rush was beginning; its reports about the Canadian police were rumors when it was printed, as Ingersoll himself says. Source 2 is the "Ton of Goods" page of Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park (National Park Service); Tomás's quotations and figures match it. Source 3 is from Hamlin Garland's The Trail of the Goldseekers (first published 1899), describing the White Pass trail in 1898. Garland's language about the stampeders' "greed" is his judgment, and students can treat it as a claim to weigh.
Teacher note on the trap demonstration: the traps use kitchen ingredients. Keep them away from food, seal them and put them in the trash after counting, and set traps in a cafeteria only with the cafeteria manager's permission.
1Nico's research log (Nico, Coach Ibarra and their school are invented; the facts in Nico's source notes are real)
2Day 1. In PE last week, the tennis balls from the outdoor bin barely bounced. Coach Ibarra says they always go "dead" in winter. My first question: Why do balls bounce?
3Day 2. Short test in the gym. I took 4 balls from the outdoor bin and kept them for an hour in three places: a cooler with ice packs (about 5 °C), the gym (about 21 °C) and a car parked in the sun (about 35 °C). Then I dropped each ball from 100 inches onto the concrete floor by the loading door and measured the bounce. Mean bounce: 41 inches cold, 49 inches at gym temperature and 53 inches warm.
4Source 1, the Rules of Tennis of the International Tennis Federation: a ball dropped from 100 inches onto a flat, rigid surface such as concrete must bounce more than 53 inches and less than 58 inches.
5Source 2, an invented physics website for students (the facts are real): a tennis ball is a hollow rubber shell filled with air at a pressure higher than the air outside. When the ball is cold, the air inside pushes out with less pressure and the rubber is stiffer, so less energy comes back in the bounce.
6Source 3, an invented sporting-goods blog (the facts are real): pressurized balls slowly lose pressure as air seeps out through the rubber, even when nobody uses them. That is why new balls are sold in pressurized cans.
7Day 3. I checked the outdoor bin. Every ball in it came from cans opened last spring.
SVHS lesson authors, Nico's Research Log (Text 10, homework; Nico, Coach Ibarra and their data are invented, and the facts in the source notes are real). Original passage written for this page.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a question-sizing frame: "I noticed ___. A one-period question is ___. A three-week question is ___."
Provide Table 3 half filled, and have students add one quotation per empty cell from Texts 2-4 or write "not covered"
Find the Chilkoot Pass paragraphs in Golden Alaska (the chapter "From Juneau to the Gold Fields") and decide whether they would change Tomás's version 3 or his final section
Design a test that could show whether the traps still help once the bins are rinsed daily, alternating the two plans over several weeks, and write the sentence the new data would let Wren add
Rewrite Tomás's final section for a visitor sign at a history museum, keeping every claim inside the three sources
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Look for questions that come from something the student noticed and that are sized to the time available: a short project answers one focused question with a few sources, while a sustained question needs several sources and may change. Strong work explains each change to the question and names the evidence that caused it. In synthesis, look for sentences that need two sources to be true, for honest handling of numbers that disagree, and for conclusions that stop where the evidence stops. In problem-solving projects, look for a recommendation that weighs every part of the goal, including practical limits, and states its own limits.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
One Period or Three Weeks? Sizing History and Lab Questions
15 minPairs
Pairs sort eight research questions from history and science classes into four piles and defend each choice. The activity practices sizing a question for a short or a sustained project, and recognizing questions that must be narrowed or broadened first.
Question Cards
1. What was life like in the 1800s?
2. What did the Homestead Act of 1862 promise to settlers?
3. How did railroad routes shape where towns grew in our state between 1870 and 1900?
4. In what year did our town's first railroad station open?
5. How does the color of light affect how fast duckweed grows in our classroom tank?
6. What was the pH of our school's tap water this morning?
7. Why are the tomato seedlings by the window taller than the ones at the back of the room?
8. How does every living thing in the ocean depend on every other one?
Procedure
Pairs place each card in one pile: Too broad, Short project (one period), Sustained project (several weeks) or Too narrow (one fact or one measurement)
For each card, pairs write one reason that names the sources or the time the question needs
Teacher key, one defensible sort: Too broad, cards 1 and 8; Short project, cards 2 and 7; Sustained project, cards 3 and 5; Too narrow, cards 4 and 6
Each pair rewrites one too-broad card and one too-narrow card so that it fits a sustained project
Discussion Questions
Card 7 starts from something a student noticed. What would make it grow into a sustained project?
Card 6 is too narrow alone. How could the same measurement become one data point inside a sustained project?
Is card 2 still a short project if the question becomes "Did the Homestead Act keep its promise?" Why or why not?
2
Catch, Count and Cleanup: A Synthesis Grid for the Cafeteria
15 minGroups of 3
Groups build a synthesis grid for Wren's project from Tables 1 and 2 and Texts 8 and 9, then write sentences that combine sources. The activity practices synthesis in a problem-solving project, where the answer has to satisfy several goals at once.
Grid
Rows: the five baits in Table 1 and the four weekly plans in Table 2
Columns: result (Table 1 or Table 2), why it works or falls short (Source A), what the label claims (Source B), practical limits (Source C)
Write "not covered" in any cell no source fills
Procedure
Each group member fills three rows, then the group checks every cell against the tables
The group writes three sentences, each of which needs two different columns to be true
Teacher key, a strong sentence: "Apple cider vinegar caught the most flies per trap (21.7, against 6.0 for white vinegar), which Source A explains by its fermenting-fruit smell, but four such traps cut the flies near the bins only from 38 to 31 a day"
The group names one empty cell and the source or test that would fill it
Discussion Questions
Apple cider vinegar won the Day 2 test, yet four of its traps barely changed the count near the bins. What does that show about testing only one goal?
Source B's label says its trap "eliminates" fruit flies. Should Wren mention the label in her recommendation, and how?
Which cell in your grid rests on the fewest traps or days, and how would you word a claim that depends on it?
Modification for Distance Learning
Groups build the grid in a shared spreadsheet, with each member color-coding the cells they filled. The teacher comments on one cell per group and asks the group to cite the table or text that supports it.
3
Research Proposal Conference
20 minIndividual, then pairs
Each student drafts a research proposal for a question of their own from a current history, science or technical unit, then holds a short conference with a partner. The activity practices launching a short project inside a sustained one and planning in advance when to narrow or broaden.
Proposal Sheet
What I noticed, in one or two sentences
Short-project question (one period) and the two sources I will try first
Sustained question (three weeks) and three planned sources, at least one of them a primary source, a data set or a test I can run
I will narrow the question if ___; I will broaden it if ___
Procedure
Students draft the sheet alone for 10 minutes
Partners take turns asking two questions: "What actually made you curious?" and "Which part, where and when?"
Each writer revises one question after the conference and writes one sentence explaining the change
The teacher collects the sheets and returns each with one suggested source
Discussion Questions
Whose short-project question could be answered today with two sources? What made it so easy to size?
Which "I will broaden it if" sentence named a finding that would really change the answer?
How is a problem-solving project, like Wren's, planned differently from a question-answering project, like Tomás's?
Variation: Science Fair Format
Students in a science course write the proposal as a test plan: the problem, the short test, the measurement, the sources that explain the result, and the practical limits of the person who will use the solution.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: How Tomás's Question Changed During His Research
Tomás's path from a photograph to the final version of his sustained question. The short project answered one focused question in one period and ended with a new one, which became the starting point of the three-week project. Version 1 held three projects and was narrowed; version 3 was broadened when Source 3 showed that pack animals were part of the answer.
Diagram 2: Trap Catches and Sticky-Card Counts in Wren's Project (invented data)
Each bar is drawn to scale from Tables 1 and 2. The bait that caught the most flies in a trap on Day 2 changed the count near the bins far less than cleaning the places where the flies breed. The cleaning weeks came later and used the same sticky-card count.
Directions: Use Nico's research log (Text 10) in Closure. Nico is an invented ninth grader, and his data are invented; the facts in his source notes are real. Cite the log by day or by source number.
Part 1: Refocus the Question (Problems 1-2)
Nico's Day 1 question, "Why do balls bounce?", came from something he noticed in PE. Explain why it is too broad for a project about the PE balls, then write a self-generated question that fits a three-week project. Say whether your change narrows or broadens his question.
Nico's Day 2 test changed only the temperature. Using Day 3, explain why his data cannot yet tell him whether the cold or the age of the balls made them "dead." Then design a one-day short project that could separate the two: what you would compare, what you would keep the same and what you would measure.
Part 2: Synthesize the Sources (Problems 3-4)
Using Source 1, decide which of Nico's three mean bounces (41, 49 and 53 inches) meet the rule for a tennis ball. Show your reasoning, then explain what the result at gym temperature suggests when you add Source 3.
Write a paragraph of 120-160 words that answers the question "Why do the PE balls from the outdoor bin bounce so low in winter?" as far as Text 10 allows. Use Nico's data and at least two of the three sources, and include at least two sentences that each combine two sources.
Part 3: Recommend and Plan (Problems 5-6)
Write a recommendation of 3-5 sentences to Coach Ibarra about the outdoor balls. Base it on the evidence in Text 10 and state one limit of that evidence.
Plan Nico's next two weeks. Name two more sources or tests and what each would add, and describe one result that would make him narrow or broaden his question again.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Sizing the Question
Explains why the first question is too broad; the new question fits three weeks and the PE balls; the change is labeled correctly
New question fits, but the explanation or the label is missing
Question not revised, or still too broad or too narrow
Short Project Design
Explains why temperature and age are mixed together; the test compares balls of different ages at one temperature and measures bounce the same way
Test separates the factors only partly, or the explanation is missing
No test, or a test that changes both factors at once
Synthesis
Applies Source 1 correctly to all three means; the paragraph uses the data and two sources, with two sentences that combine sources, and stays inside the evidence
Some reasoning errors, or sources summarized one after another
Sources and data not used, or claims go beyond them
Recommendation and Plan
Recommendation follows from the evidence and names a limit; the plan adds two sources or tests with clear purposes and a realistic resizing trigger
Recommendation or plan is general
Missing
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
The questions use Tomás's first log entry (Text 1) in Warm-Up; Sources 1 and 3 (Texts 2 and 4), his short project, his later log, Table 3 and his final section (Texts 3, 5 and 6) in Direct Instruction; and Wren's texts (Texts 7-9) and Tables 1 and 2 in Guided Practice. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence of Text 1 best shows that Tomás's short-project question is self-generated, growing out of his own curiosity rather than an assignment list?
Answer: C
C: the short-project question grows directly from what Tomás noticed in the photograph and wondered about (Text 1, paragraph 2). A records the teacher's judgment of the first question's size, not where the question came from. B is the librarian finding a source, and D is a plan for the next day's reading.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does Tomás's short-project question in Text 1 fit one class period better than his first question?
Answer: A
A: "What did the Canadian government require each stampeder to bring into the Yukon, and why?" asks for one rule and its purpose, and Text 3 answers it in one period from two sources. B is false: it cannot be answered yes or no. C is false: the question is still about the Klondike. D confuses length with size; the first question is broader, not shorter in scope.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In a final paper, which sentence reports the load figures in Texts 2 and 3 most accurately?
Answer: D
D keeps each number with its source and its meaning: Ingersoll calls his figure an estimate of the food (Text 2, paragraph 1), and Source 2 gives the rule's minimum for food (Text 3, paragraph 3). A turns an estimate into proof and food into all goods. B assigns Ingersoll's number to the government. C claims an agreement the sources do not show and invents a misprint.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 1 quotes shipping-company agents who say, "Alaska is not like California or Australia or South Africa. It produces nothing" (Text 2, paragraph 2). What should Tomás keep in mind before using this as evidence about the Klondike?
Answer: B
B: the quotation reached Ingersoll through newspapers ("Newspapers on August 2nd reported agents of the Alaska Commercial Company as saying"), and it names Alaska. It can support a claim about the fear of famine in 1897, but Tomás should say who said it and not treat it as a description of the Yukon. A overcorrects: a company's interest is a reason to check a claim, not proof that it is false. C and D give the quotation the wrong source.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Text 1 notes that Golden Alaska opens with advertisements for a steamer line and a mining company. Why does that matter for Tomás's research?
Answer: A
A: companies that sold passage and mining shares gained when more people went north, so a researcher checks the book's claims against other sources, as Tomás does with Source 2. B overcorrects, and Ingersoll's own caution ("Whether this is true or not") shows the book is not simply promotion. C is false: Text 1 dates the book to 1897. D ignores purpose entirely.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why did Tomás limit version 2 of his question to the trails from Skagway and Dyea (Text 5)?
Answer: C
C: Tomás says both sources so far describe the trip from the Alaska coast and that Source 2 set the rule for "each person going to Dawson from Skagway or Dyea" (Text 5, paragraph 2). A is wrong: the note says only "Pick one." B is wrong: Source 1 comes from a book that describes several routes, and Tomás never claims these were the only ones. D is wrong: Tomás had not read Source 3 yet, and it describes only the White Pass trail.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How does Tomás know that Garland crossed the White Pass trail after the biggest crowds had passed?
Answer: D
D: Garland sees the old winter trail on the snow and the traces the crowds left, so he is describing the trail after the rush (Text 4, paragraph 2; Text 5, paragraph 3). A and C describe details the passage does not contain, and B confuses the publication year, 1899, with the trip, and gives the fact the wrong source.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which new finding would be the best reason for Tomás to broaden version 3 of his question again?
Answer: B
B: hired packers are another way the ton of goods crossed the pass, so the finding changes the answer to the same question, the reason Tomás gave for adding pack animals. A and C would start new topics, and D adds no new information about how the trail was crossed.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does Tomás end his final section (Text 6) by saying that none of his sources counts how many people turned back?
Answer: C
C: the three sources support claims about the load, the trail and inexperience, but none gives a number, so Tomás keeps his conclusion inside the evidence and names the next question (Text 6, paragraph 3; Text 5, paragraph 5). A misreads a stated limit as failure, B invents a requirement, and D turns missing evidence into a claim.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Dr. Oyelaran said Wren's first question "covers ants, cockroaches, mosquitoes and termites" (Text 7). What did Wren's narrowed question add?
Answer: A
A: "Which homemade bait catches the most fruit flies in a trap by the cafeteria's tray return?" names the insect, the method and the place from Mr. Pham's problem. B is a hypothesis, not part of the question. C appears nowhere in the question, and D comes later, in the interview.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Using Table 1, about how many times as many flies did an apple cider vinegar trap catch as a white vinegar trap?
Answer: C
C: 21.7 / 6.0 is about 3.6. A gives the difference, 21.7 - 6.0 = 15.7, as if it were a ratio. B inverts the ratio (6.0 / 21.7 is about 0.28). D compares apple cider vinegar with mashed banana instead of white vinegar (21.7 / 17.3 is about 1.3).
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why did Wren broaden her question in Week 2 (Text 9)?
Answer: B
B: Mr. Pham's staff swats the flies and "they are back the next day" (Text 7, paragraph 1), and with four traps the sticky card still averaged 31 flies a day against 38 with none (Text 9, paragraph 1). A is false: the catches run from 0.7 to 21.7. C invents a request. D misreads Source B, which lists apple cider vinegar.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which two sources in Text 8 agree with each other, and on what?
Answer: C
C: Source A says fruit flies are drawn to the smell of fermenting fruit, including vinegar, and Source B's trap uses apple cider vinegar as its bait. A is Source B's claim, and Source A contradicts it: traps "do not remove the places where new flies develop." B misstates Source C, where new bins need district approval, and Source B says nothing about bins. D mistakes Mr. Pham's description of the current schedule for advice; Source A says to clean the breeding sites.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Wren recommends four apple cider vinegar traps with 1/2 cup of vinegar each, refilled every Monday (Text 9). A 32-ounce bottle of vinegar holds 4 cups. How many weeks does one bottle last?
Answer: B
B: 4 traps x 1/2 cup = 2 cups a week, and 4 cups / 2 cups a week = 2 weeks. A uses 1/2 cup for all four traps together (4 / 1/2 = 8). C uses 1 cup per trap, 4 cups a week. D counts only two traps, 1 cup a week. The small amount helps explain why cost is not a real limit for this part of the plan.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Explain how Tomás's short project (Text 3) set up his sustained project. Quote the last sentence of Text 3 and the version of his question in Text 5 that grew out of it, and explain the link.
Model answer: Text 3 ends, "If every stampeder had to move a ton of goods over the mountains, how did they do it?" The short project answered what the rule required, and that answer raised a new problem, moving the load. Version 2 in Text 5 turns the problem into a question for three weeks: "What made the trails from Skagway and Dyea so hard for stampeders to cross?" The short project gave the sustained one its focus, the crossing, and a fact to build on, the ton of goods. Rubric line: full credit quotes both sentences accurately and explains that the short project's answer created the sustained question.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Write one new synthesis sentence about the Klondike trails that needs two of Tomás's sources to be true. Do not reuse a sentence from Text 6. Then name what each source contributes.
Model answer: "Ingersoll advised stampeders in 1897 to take food that was 'the most condensed and nutritious' (Source 1), yet the rule the park describes still meant at least 1,095 pounds of food per person (Source 2), so even careful packers faced a huge load." Source 1 contributes the 1897 advice, and Source 2 contributes the rule's minimum. Neither source alone says that careful packing could not make the load small. Rubric line: full credit for a sentence whose claim depends on both sources, accurate quotations or paraphrases, and a correct account of each source's part.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Wren's cleaning test in Week 3 (Text 9) was a second short project inside her sustained one. What question did it answer, which source led her to it, and why did she need to run the test instead of simply following the source's advice?
Model answer: It answered, "Does rinsing the recycling bins daily and scrubbing the drain cut the flies near the bins?" Source A led to it: "the most lasting control is to find and clean those breeding sites" (Text 8, paragraph 1). Source A is general advice: it does not say which sites matter in this cafeteria, whether a daily rinse is enough, or whether the work fits in the staff's 20 minutes. Only a test in the cafeteria itself could show that. The result, 15 flies per card a day against 38 with no traps and 31 with traps alone, showed that cleaning did far more than trapping, and the rinse took only 8 minutes. Rubric line: full credit states the question, cites Source A, explains why a general source cannot replace a test in the real setting and uses the results.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Wren's recommendation lists three limits (Text 9, paragraph 4). Choose one, explain how it could change the recommendation, and describe a sustained next step that would test it.
Model answer: One limit is that each plan ran for one week in a fixed order while the weather was cooling. Insects slow down in cooler weather, so some of the drop in Weeks 3 and 4 might have happened anyway, and the cleaning might deserve less credit than the counts suggest. A sustained next step: over six weeks, alternate weeks of daily cleaning with weeks of the usual cleaning, and count flies on two or three sticky cards each day, so that the weather affects both plans alike. Rubric line: full credit names a real limit from the text, explains a specific way it could change the answer and proposes a test that addresses it over time.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Write a self-generated research question based on something you have noticed at school, then write two versions of it: one for a short project of one class period and one for a sustained project of three weeks. Explain what makes each version the right size.
Model answer: I noticed that the hallway by the gym smells like chlorine in the afternoon. Short project: "Why does a pool smell like chlorine, and is the smell from chlorine itself?" Two sources, such as a public health page and a chemistry reference, could answer that in one period. Sustained project: "What causes the chlorine smell near our pool in the afternoons, and what could the school change to reduce it?" That needs sources, observations at different times and an interview with the pool manager over several weeks. Rubric line: full credit for a question that clearly comes from the student's own noticing, two versions that differ in scope, and reasons tied to sources and time.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
The standard says students research "to answer a question ... or solve a problem." Which of these does Wren's project do? Support your answer with one sentence from Text 7 and one from Text 9.
Model answer: Wren's project solves a problem. Text 7 names the problem: "Mr. Pham, the cafeteria manager, says his staff swats them every lunch and they are back the next day." Text 9 ends with a solution for the person who has the problem: "Rinse both recycling bins with hot, soapy water every afternoon and scrub the floor drain under the tray return twice a week." Along the way she answers questions, such as which bait catches the most flies, but the project is judged by whether its recommendation works for Mr. Pham. Rubric line: full credit makes a clear choice, quotes one accurate sentence from each text and explains how the questions serve the problem.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does WHST.9-10.7 mean?
WHST.9-10.7 means that students in grades 9 and 10 carry out research projects in history, science and technical classes, both short ones and longer ones, to answer a question or solve a problem.
Students may research their own questions, change the size of the question as they learn, and combine several sources into an answer that shows they understand the subject, not just the sources.
What is the difference between WHST.9-10.7 and W.9-10.7?
The wording is the same, but W.9-10.7 belongs to English class, while WHST.9-10.7 applies the same research skills in history, science and technical subjects.
In practice, WHST research often uses primary sources such as an 1897 guidebook, data from a lab or a test, and sources written for specialists, and it is judged by a history or science teacher who is reading for accurate content.
How long is a "short" research project, and how long is a "more sustained" one?
The standard gives no fixed length; a short project usually answers one focused question in a class period or two, and a sustained project runs over several weeks.
What matters is the size of the question. In this lesson, a one-period project asks what one rule required and why, and a three-week project asks what made two trails so hard to cross, which needs more sources and changes along the way.
What is a self-generated research question?
It is a question the student asks on their own, usually from something they noticed, rather than one chosen from a teacher's list.
Self-generated questions often start too broad or too vague. Asking "What actually made you curious?" and "Which part, where and when?" helps a student turn the first version into one a project can answer.
How do students know when to narrow or broaden a research question?
They narrow a question when it holds several projects or cannot be answered with the time and sources available, and they broaden it when a source shows that the answer is larger than the question allows.
A useful test for broadening: does the new material change the answer to the same question? If it does, widen the question. If it only adds an interesting side topic, leave it out.
What does "synthesize multiple sources" look like in history or science writing?
Synthesis means making claims that combine sources, so that the reader learns something no single source says alone.
A summary reports Source 1, then Source 2. A synthesis sentence might say that a rule described by one source made the trail described by another harder to cross. A synthesis grid, with the parts of the answer as rows and the sources as columns, helps students see where sources agree, add to each other or leave gaps.
Does a lab test or a survey count as a research source under WHST.9-10.7?
Yes: a student's own measurements, tests, surveys and interviews can be sources, as long as the method is described and the limits are stated.
In this lesson, Wren combines her own trap counts and sticky-card counts with an extension page, a product label and an interview. Her recommendation names its limits, such as one sticky card and plans tested in a fixed order.
What should students do when two sources give different numbers?
They should report the difference openly and explain it by checking each source's date, purpose and reasoning, instead of quietly choosing one.
Useful questions: When was each source written, and how close was the writer to the events? Does the source explain how it got the number, or only state it? Is one number an estimate and the other a count or a rule? A careful writer can then say which figure the paper relies on and why, and still mention the other.
How is WHST.9-10.7 different from WHST.11-12.7?
The two standards have the same wording, so the difference lies in the complexity of the questions, the sources and the synthesis expected in each grade band.
In grades 9 and 10, students often combine a few sources and resolve simple discrepancies. In grades 11 and 12, projects often run longer, use more primary sources and weigh sources that interpret the same events in conflicting ways.
How can parents help with a WHST.9-10.7 research project at home?
Parents can help most by asking questions rather than supplying answers: what made you curious, what does this source say, and how do you know?
Asking a student to explain one change to the research question, or one place where two sources disagree, builds the thinking the standard asks for. Checking that the project keeps a research log also helps teachers see the process.
07
Related Standards
6 standards
These standards connect to WHST.9-10.7: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
WHST.6-8.7Prerequisite
Conduct short research projects in history and science, drawing on several sources