SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

W.9-10.7Common CoreELAWritingGrades 9-10

W.9-10.7: Short and Sustained Research Projects That Solve a Problem

In plain English: W.9-10.7 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 9 and 10 to conduct research projects, both short and more sustained, that answer a question, including one they ask themselves, or solve a problem. Students narrow or broaden the question as the research requires and synthesize several sources into an answer that shows real understanding.

Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards · Cluster: Research to Build and Present Knowledge · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

65 min

Overview

Students follow one research project from its first, oversized question to a written recommendation. Rafael, an invented tenth grader, notices that nobody eats in his school's blacktop courtyard at lunch. He narrows "How can we stop global warming?" to a question he can study, runs a one-day short project with an infrared thermometer, and then spends three weeks reading real sources: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's pages on heat islands, trees and cool pavements, and a 2020 study of reflective street coatings in Los Angeles. When he narrows too far, to a single fix, the librarian pushes him to broaden again. His final section combines the sources, his own measurements and a student survey into one plan.

The lesson treats research as a sequence of decisions: choosing a question, sizing it, reading sources for what they can and cannot show, noticing when sources seem to disagree, and combining them into an answer. Students sort questions by size, build a synthesis grid, launch their own project, and for homework refocus a classmate's project about birds hitting the library windows.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Conduct a short research project that answers one focused question with at least one source and one observation
  • Plan a more sustained research project around a self-generated question or a real problem
  • Narrow a question that is too broad and broaden one that is too narrow, and explain why each change fits the project
  • Synthesize several sources, including their own data, into one explanation, noting where sources agree or seem to disagree
  • Demonstrate understanding of the subject by stating what the sources support and what the research cannot show

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Conducting short research projects that draw on several sources and generate related, focused questions W.8.7
  • Gathering information from print and digital sources and citing it W.8.8
  • Taking notes that separate what a source says from their own comments
  • Averaging a small set of measurements

Lesson Procedure

65-65 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "Name one thing at school or in your neighborhood that bothers you and that you have never found a good answer about. Write it as a question. Could you answer it in one class period? In three weeks? Never?"

    Collect three or four questions and sort them on the board into "one class period," "a few weeks" and "too big to finish." Explain that W.9-10.7 asks students to conduct both kinds of research project: short ones, which answer a small question in a class period or two, and more sustained ones, which take weeks, use several sources and often solve a real problem. The question can be one the student generates, as in this warm-up.

    Introduce the research the lesson follows. Rafael, a tenth grader, starts a three-week project in Ms. Adeyemi's English class. Rafael, his school, his teacher, the librarian Mr. Holt and the facilities manager Ms. Park are invented for this lesson; the sources he reads (the EPA pages and a 2020 study) are real, and his notes on them are written for this page. Read Text 1 aloud. Students write one sentence: which of Rafael's two questions could he answer in three weeks, and why?

    Day 1, September 8. Ms. Adeyemi gave us the assignment: a three-week research project on a question we choose ourselves, ending with a report of 800-1,000 words that uses at least four sources. My first question: How can we stop global warming?

    Ms. Adeyemi read it and wrote in the margin: "Whole libraries try to answer this. What part of it could you actually find out in three weeks?" I thought about what bothers me every day. At lunch, almost nobody sits in the courtyard behind the cafeteria. It is all blacktop, with four metal picnic tables and no shade. Everyone crowds onto the strip of grass by the front lawn or eats inside.

    Day 2, September 9. New question: Why is our lunch courtyard so much hotter than the front lawn, and what could the school do to make it usable in August and September? Ms. Adeyemi approved it. She also gave the class a warm-up first: a one-day project that answers one small factual question by the end of the next class, using at least one source and one observation.

    My one-day question: How much hotter is the courtyard blacktop than the grass at lunchtime? Mr. Holt, the librarian, lent me the science department's infrared thermometer, which reads the temperature of a surface when you point it at the surface.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 1: Rafael's research log, Days 1-2 (Rafael, his school and everyone in his log are invented). Original passage written for this page.
  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Break the standard into its parts, using Rafael's project:

    • Short and more sustained projects. Rafael's one-day project (Text 2) answers one factual question with one observation and one source. His three-week project (Texts 3-7) uses four sources, his own measurements and a survey to solve a problem.
    • A question or a problem, including a self-generated question. Rafael's final question comes from something he noticed, not from a list.
    • Narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate. Diagram 1 shows his question moving from too broad to researchable, then too narrow, then broad enough again.
    • Synthesize multiple sources and demonstrate understanding. His recommendation (Text 7) combines sources into one explanation and one plan, and states what his research cannot show.

    Read Text 2, the short project. Use Diagram 2 to show his readings. Then read Texts 3 and 4, his notes on the first two sources, and work through the examples below. Point out what each note adds: Rafael does not just copy facts; he writes what each source means for his question.

    Field notes, September 10, 12:15 p.m. Sunny, light wind. Air temperature 91°F, from the National Weather Service reading for our town at noon. I took three readings on each surface and averaged them.

    Courtyard blacktop, in full sun: 138°F, 141°F, 141°F. Average: 140°F. Concrete under the cafeteria overhang, in shade: 103°F, 105°F, 104°F. Average: 104°F. Front lawn grass, in sun: 95°F, 97°F, 96°F. Average: 96°F.

    Answer to my one-day question: At 12:15 p.m. on September 10, the courtyard blacktop averaged 140°F, which is 44°F hotter than the grass on the front lawn. One day of readings does not prove that this happens every day, but it fits what the EPA says about dark pavement in the sun (Source A).

    What this raised: The shaded concrete was far cooler than the sunny blacktop, but still warmer than the grass. So is the heat about shade, about the material, or both? That goes into my three-week question.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 2: Rafael's short project, Day 3 field notes and answer (the readings are invented). Original passage written for this page.

    Source A: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Learn About Heat Islands." A heat island is an area, usually a city, that is warmer than the land around it. In the United States, the EPA says, daytime temperatures in urban areas run about 1-7°F higher than in outlying areas, and nighttime temperatures about 2-5°F higher.

    Causes the EPA lists: fewer trees and plants, because hard, dry surfaces such as roofs, sidewalks, roads and parking lots give less shade and moisture; building materials that absorb and give off more of the sun's heat than natural surfaces; tall buildings and narrow streets that block the wind; heat from vehicles, air conditioners and buildings; and calm, clear weather, which makes heat islands worse. On a warm day, the EPA says, ordinary roofing can reach as much as 66°F warmer than the air.

    My note: This page is about whole cities, not one courtyard. I can use its causes to explain our blacktop, but I should not report its city-wide numbers as if they were measured at our school.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 3: Rafael's notes on Source A, the EPA's "Learn About Heat Islands" page (the notes are written for this page; the facts are from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Original passage written for this page.

    Source B: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Using Trees and Vegetation to Reduce Heat Islands" (the version online through 2022, which the Internet Archive has saved; the EPA has since shortened the page) and "Benefits of Trees and Vegetation." Trees and plants cool an area in two ways. They block the sun, and they release water through their leaves, which the EPA calls evapotranspiration.

    That version of the EPA page says that shaded surfaces may be 20-45°F cooler than the peak temperatures of unshaded materials. Evapotranspiration, alone or together with shade, can help lower peak summer temperatures by 2-9°F.

    My note: My shaded concrete was 36°F cooler than the blacktop in the sun, which falls inside the EPA's range, so my Day 3 readings and Source B agree. Grass cools by evapotranspiration, which may explain why the lawn was cooler than the shaded concrete. A young tree takes years to grow a wide crown, though, so a tree planted this fall would not shade the tables next September.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 4: Rafael's notes on Source B, the EPA's pages on trees and vegetation (the notes are written for this page; the facts are from the EPA; the two temperature ranges come from an earlier version of the first page). Original passage written for this page.
    • Narrowing a question that is too broad

      Rafael's first question is "How can we stop global warming?" Ms. Adeyemi asks "What part of it could you actually find out in three weeks?" (Text 1, paragraph 2).

      Result: He narrows to a problem he can observe and measure: why the lunch courtyard is so hot and what the school could do (paragraph 3). The new question still connects to heat, but it fits the time, the sources and a real place.

    • Running a short project

      The one-day question is "How much hotter is the courtyard blacktop than the grass at lunchtime?" Rafael takes three readings on each of three surfaces and averages them (Text 2, paragraphs 1-2).

      Result: His answer gives the time, the place and the result, then names its own limit: "One day of readings does not prove that this happens every day" (paragraph 3). A short project can be complete and still modest.

    • Letting a short project shape a sustained one

      The shaded concrete was cooler than the sunny blacktop but warmer than the grass. Rafael asks: "is the heat about shade, about the material, or both?" (Text 2, paragraph 4).

      Result: The short project did not just produce a number; it produced the next question. That question sends him to sources about shade (Source B) and about pavement materials (Sources C and D).

    • Using a source within its limits

      Source A gives city-wide numbers. Rafael notes: "I should not report its city-wide numbers as if they were measured at our school" (Text 3, paragraph 3).

      Result: He uses what the source can support, the causes of heat islands, and sets aside what it cannot. Knowing what a source is about is part of demonstrating understanding of the subject.

    • Checking a source against one's own data

      Source B says shaded surfaces may be 20-45°F cooler than unshaded ones. Rafael compares his own readings: the shaded concrete was 36°F cooler (Text 4, paragraph 3).

      Result: His field data and the EPA agree, so each makes the other more convincing. Synthesis starts here: two sources, one of them his own, now support one claim.

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Pairs read Texts 5 and 6. Sources C and D seem to disagree about cool pavement, and on Day 8 Rafael narrows his question to one fix before Mr. Holt pushes him to broaden it again. Pairs fill in the synthesis grid below, one row per source, then answer the two questions after it.

    Source C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Using Cool Pavements to Reduce Heat Islands." Cool pavements are paving materials that reflect more of the sun's energy, let water evaporate, or are otherwise changed to stay cooler than ordinary pavement. The EPA reports that in a pilot study in Arizona, ordinary asphalt reached surface temperatures up to 152°F at midday, while the surface of cool pavements stayed 10-16°F cooler. The EPA also says these technologies are less advanced than other ways of reducing heat islands, and there is no official standard or label for cool paving materials.

    Source D: Ariane Middel and others, "Solar reflective pavements—A policy panacea to heat mitigation?" Environmental Research Letters, 2020. The researchers measured streets in two Los Angeles neighborhoods on July 30, 2019, some coated with a reflective sealant and some not. The coated surfaces were about 4-6°C (about 7-11°F) cooler than regular asphalt. But the coating reflected more sunlight up onto people. At midday, the mean radiant temperature, a measure of the heat a person's body takes in from the sun and nearby surfaces, was about 4°C (about 7°F) higher over the coated pavement. Air temperature barely changed.

    My note: At first C and D seem to disagree. They are measuring different things. C measures the pavement's surface. D also measures the heat reaching a person standing on it, and that person is exactly who I care about.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 5: Rafael's notes on Sources C and D, cool pavements (the notes are written for this page; the facts are from the EPA and a 2020 study). Original passage written for this page.

    Day 8. Source C convinced me. New question: Should our school coat the courtyard with reflective sealant? I started looking only for sources about coatings.

    I showed the question to Mr. Holt. He asked what my project was for. I said, to make the courtyard usable at lunch. He said: "Then look at what Source D says about people. A question about one fix can only come out yes or no. Your problem is a courtyard people won't sit in. Compare the fixes." I reread Source D and saw he was right: a coating alone could make the tables feel hotter at noon.

    Day 9. New question, broader again: Which fix, or mix of fixes, would make the courtyard usable at lunch? I listed four options to compare: a reflective coating, shade sails over the tables, trees along the south edge and replacing part of the blacktop with grass.

    Day 10. I surveyed 60 students in two lunch periods. 41 of them said heat is the reason they avoid the courtyard. 12 said there are not enough tables, and 7 gave other reasons. I also asked Ms. Park, the district's facilities manager, which options the district has used before. She said the district has put shade sails over seating at two elementary schools, and that planting trees needs a spot where roots will not lift the blacktop.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 6: Rafael's research log, Days 8-10 (the survey results are invented). Original passage written for this page.
    Synthesis grid (pairs fill in the blank cells)
    SourceWhat it says about the courtyard problemAgrees with, or complicates, which other source?How Rafael can use it
    Day 3 field notes
    Source A (EPA, heat islands)
    Source B (EPA, trees)
    Source C (EPA, cool pavements)
    Source D (2020 Los Angeles study)
    Day 10 survey and Ms. Park

    Discuss: (1) Why was narrowing to "Should our school coat the courtyard?" a step backward for this project, when narrowing on Day 2 was a step forward? (2) Which two sources together show that a coating alone is a risky choice for tables where students sit at noon?

  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Read Text 7, Rafael's recommendation. Students mark each sentence that combines two or more sources with an S, and each sentence that states a limit with an L. Then they begin their own project: (1) write a self-generated question about a problem at school or in the community; (2) write a one-day short-project question that would help answer it; (3) list two kinds of sources they will need, including one observation or interview; (4) predict one way the question might need to be narrowed or broadened.

    The quiz uses Texts 1-7 (Warm-Up, Direct Instruction, Guided Practice and this phase); point students back to them when they take it.

    Recommendation: Shade First, Trees for the Long Term

    The courtyard is hot because it is dark pavement with no shade, not only because the weather is hot. On September 10, the blacktop was 140°F in the sun, while concrete a few steps away under the overhang was 104°F (my field notes). The EPA explains the pattern: hard, dry surfaces give "less shade and moisture" and absorb more of the sun's heat (Source A), and shaded surfaces can be 20-45°F cooler than unshaded ones (Source B). Heat matters to students too: 41 of the 60 students I surveyed said it is why they avoid the courtyard.

    A reflective coating looks like the simplest fix, and it does cool the pavement surface (Source C). But the Los Angeles study found that reflective pavement sent more of the sun's heat up onto people, so a person standing on it took in more heat at midday, even though the air was barely cooler (Source D). Since students sit at the tables at noon, a coating by itself could make lunch worse.

    Shade solves both problems at once: it cools the surface and keeps sun off the students. The district already uses shade sails over seating (Ms. Park), so the school could add them over the four tables before next August. Trees along the south edge would add shade and evapotranspiration (Source B), but they take years to grow, and they need a spot where roots will not lift the blacktop. I recommend shade sails now and trees as a long-term plan.

    My research has limits. I measured on one day, at one time. Before the school spends money, someone should measure under the shade sails at an elementary school at noon.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 7: Rafael's recommendation, the final section of his report. Original passage written for this page.
  5. Closure5 minutes

    Exit ticket: (1) Name the moment Rafael broadened his question, and say what would have gone wrong if he had not. (2) Quote one sentence from Text 7 that uses two sources at once. Then hand out the homework texts below: Nadia's research log (Text 8) and her notes on three sources (Text 9). Nadia, her school and the custodian are invented; the two published sources in Text 9 are real, and the notes on them are written for this page.

    Day 1. My first question for the three-week project: Why are birds dying all over the world?

    Why I care: The new library at our school has a wall of glass two stories high that faces a row of oak trees. Twice this month I have found a bird lying under that wall. Mr. Dominguez, our head custodian, keeps a notebook. Since September 1 he has found 11 dead or stunned birds below the library glass and 1 below all the other windows of the school put together.

    Day 2. Ms. Adeyemi says my Day 1 question is too big. My second try: What kind of bird hit the library window on October 3? She says that one is too small for three weeks, because one look in a field guide answers it. I need something in between.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 8: Homework, Nadia's research log, Days 1-2 (Nadia, her school and the custodian are invented). Original passage written for this page.

    Source 1: Scott R. Loss, Tom Will, Sara S. Loss and Peter P. Marra, "Bird-building collisions in the United States: Estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability," The Condor, 2014. The authors combined data from 23 studies. They estimate that between 365 million and 988 million birds are killed by hitting buildings in the United States each year. Their middle estimate is 599 million. Fewer than 1 percent of the deaths happen at high-rise buildings; almost all happen at homes and at buildings of 11 stories or fewer.

    Source 2: American Bird Conservancy, "Frequently Asked Questions About Birds and Glass." Birds treat reflections as real objects, so glass that reflects trees, sky or shelter can lead them to fly into it. A single decal does not work: to a bird it is simply an obstacle to fly around. Markers work when they cover the glass in a pattern with no spaces more than two inches wide. Markers on the outside surface of the glass work better than markers inside.

    Source 3: Mr. Dominguez's notebook, September 1 to October 15. 11 birds below the library glass, 1 below all other windows. 8 of the 11 were found in the morning, before 9 a.m.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 9: Homework, Nadia's notes on three sources (the notes are written for this page; the facts are from the sources named). Original passage written for this page.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a question-sizing card: "Could one fact answer it? (too narrow) Could whole books not answer it? (too broad) Can I find it out with a few sources in the time I have? (researchable)"
  • Provide the synthesis grid with the Day 3 field notes row filled in as a model
  • Offer sentence frames for synthesis: "Both ___ and ___ show that ___" and "___ seems to disagree with ___, but ___"

For Advanced Students

  • Ask students to find one more real source about shade structures or schoolyard heat and write how it would change or support Rafael's recommendation
  • Have students design the follow-up measurement Rafael proposes in the last paragraph of Text 7: what to measure, where, when and how often
  • Ask students to write the question Rafael might research next year, after the shade sails go up

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Look for questions sized to the project: a short project answers one focused question, and a sustained project has a question that needs several sources to answer. Strong work explains each change to the question (narrowed because it could not be finished, broadened because one source or one fix could only give yes or no). In synthesis, look for sentences that combine sources rather than a list of summaries, for honest handling of sources that seem to disagree, and for claims kept within what each source can support. Students demonstrate understanding when they can explain the cause, weigh the options and state the limits of their own research.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Too Broad, Too Narrow or Researchable? Question Sort

15 minPairs

Pairs sort eight research questions into three piles, then repair every question that is not researchable. The sort practices the move the standard calls narrowing or broadening the inquiry before students size their own questions.

The Eight Question Cards

  • Card 1: Why do people waste food?
  • Card 2: What time does the school cafeteria stop serving breakfast?
  • Card 3: What would it take for our cafeteria to cut the food thrown away at lunch in half?
  • Card 4: How has the internet changed the world?
  • Card 5: How does a two-minute delay between class bells affect how many students arrive late?
  • Card 6: How many bike racks does our school have?
  • Card 7: What makes a city bike lane safe enough that more students ride to school?
  • Card 8: Why is music important?

Sort Key (for the teacher)

Too broad: Cards 1, 4 and 8. Too narrow (one fact or one count answers it): Cards 2 and 6. Researchable for a sustained project: Cards 3, 5 and 7. Accept a well-argued different placement: Card 5 could be a short project if a student only needs one week of attendance data.

Repair Step

For each too-broad card, pairs write a narrower question tied to a place, a group of people or a time. For each too-narrow card, pairs write a broader question that the small fact would help answer, for example Card 6 becomes "Would more students bike to school if the racks were covered?"

Discussion Questions

  • Which card did your pair argue about, and what settled it?
  • Which of your repaired questions could become a one-day short project, and which needs weeks?
  • Look at Rafael's four questions in Diagram 1. Which pile would each one go in?
2

Agree, Add or Complicate: Source Synthesis Stations

20 minGroups of 3-4

Groups rotate through three stations, each with two of Rafael's sources, and write one synthesis sentence at each. The activity turns summaries into synthesis: every sentence must use both sources at the station.

Stations

  • Station 1: Day 3 field notes (Text 2) and Source B (Text 4)
  • Station 2: Source C and Source D (Text 5)
  • Station 3: Source A (Text 3) and the Day 10 survey (Text 6)

Procedure

  • At each station (6 minutes), decide whether the two sources agree, whether one adds something the other lacks, or whether one complicates the other
  • Write one sentence that uses both sources and names each, for example "Both ___ and ___ show ___"
  • Leave the sentence on the station sheet; the next group may improve it but must keep both sources
  • Last 2 minutes: each group reads the best sentence from the station where it finished

Discussion Questions

  • At which station did the sources seem to disagree, and how did your sentence handle it?
  • Which sentence would you move straight into Rafael's report, and where?
  • How is a synthesis sentence different from two summaries joined by "and"?

Modification for Distance Learning

Post each station as a separate discussion thread with the two texts linked. Groups reply with their sentence, and the next group replies to that post with an improved version, so the thread shows the sentence growing.

3

Launch a Project: Short First, Then Sustained

25 minIndividual, then pairs

Each student starts a research project of their own, following the path Rafael took: a self-generated question, a short project that answers one piece of it, and a plan for the sustained project.

Procedure

  • 5 minutes: write a question about a problem you have noticed at school or in your community, and test its size with a partner using the three piles from Activity 1
  • 10 minutes: carry out a short project on one small piece of it, using one source you can reach now (a website, a school document, a count, a quick interview)
  • 5 minutes: write a two-sentence answer to the short question and one new question it raised
  • 5 minutes: plan the sustained project: your revised question, three sources you will look for (at least one observation or interview), and one sign that would tell you to narrow or broaden

Discussion Questions

  • What did your short project find that you did not expect?
  • Did your partner's size test change your question? How?
  • Which of your planned sources might disagree with another, and what would you do then?

Modification for Classrooms Without Devices

Students use sources in the room or the school: a school handbook, a bell schedule, a count they can take in the hallway, or a short interview with a classmate or staff member. The library can supply a small set of printed articles for groups that need a written source.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: How Rafael Narrowed and Broadened His Question

Rafael's research question, from Day 1 to Day 10 Day 1 How can we stop global warming? Too broad Day 2 Why is our courtyard hotter than the lawn, and what could the school do? Researchable Day 8 Should our school coat the courtyard with reflective sealant? Too narrow Day 10 Which fix, or mix of fixes, would make the courtyard usable at lunch? Final question Day 3: one-day short project How much hotter is blacktop than grass? Darker boxes: questions that fit the project. Dashed arrow: the short project that Day 2 started.
From left to right, the four versions of Rafael's question in Texts 1 and 6. He narrowed the Day 1 question to one he could research in three weeks, narrowed it again on Day 8 to a single fix, and broadened it on Day 9 into the Day 10 question he answered. The dashed arrow shows the one-day short project that his Day 2 question led to.

Diagram 2: Rafael's Short Project, Surface Temperatures at Lunch

Average surface temperature, Day 3 at 12:15 p.m. (invented readings) 0°F 40°F 80°F 120°F 160°F 96°F 104°F 140°F Front lawn grass, sun Concrete under overhang, shade Courtyard blacktop, sun Air, 91°F
The averages from Text 2, drawn to scale from 0°F. Each bar is the average of three invented readings with an infrared thermometer. The dashed line is the air temperature reported by the National Weather Service at noon. The chart shows that shade and surface type both matter, which became the heart of Rafael's sustained project.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

W.9-10.7 Homework: Refocus and Synthesize Nadia's Bird-Window Project

Directions: Use Texts 8 and 9 in the Closure section of the lesson plan. Nadia is starting the same three-week project as Rafael. Cite the paragraph of Text 8 or the source number in Text 9 for every fact you use, and use only the facts given there.

Part 1: Refocus the Question (Problems 1-2)

  1. Nadia's Day 1 question is too broad and her Day 2 question is too narrow. Explain why each one does not fit a three-week project, then write a new question that fits. Your question must be about a problem Nadia can study at her school.
  2. Write a one-day short-project question that would help answer your Problem 1 question. Name the source or observation that would answer it, and say what Nadia would do with the answer.

Part 2: Synthesize the Sources (Problems 3-4)

  1. For each pair, say whether the sources agree, whether one adds to the other, or whether one complicates the other, and explain in one sentence: (a) Source 1 and Source 3; (b) Source 2 and Nadia's description of the library wall in Text 8, paragraph 2.
  2. Write a paragraph of 120-180 words that answers your Problem 1 question as far as Texts 8 and 9 allow. Use at least three of the four: Source 1, Source 2, Source 3 and Text 8. At least two sentences must each combine two sources.

Part 3: Recommend and Plan (Problems 5-6)

  1. Write a recommendation of 3-5 sentences for the school: what should be done about the library glass, and why? Use Source 2 to explain why one sticker or decal on the glass is not the answer, and state one limit of Nadia's evidence.
  2. Plan Nadia's next week. Name two more sources she should look for and what each would add, and describe one finding that would make her narrow or broaden her question again.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Refocusing the questionBoth questions' problems explained; new question fits three weeks and Nadia's school; short-project question answerable in a dayNew question workable but one explanation missing, or short question too bigNo new question, or the new question repeats Day 1 or Day 2
SynthesisParagraph combines sources in at least two sentences, cites each fact and handles scale (national vs. school) correctlySources cited but mostly summarized one at a timeOne source only, or facts not from Texts 8-9
Understanding of the subjectRecommendation explains why reflections cause collisions and why spacing matters; one real limit statedRecommendation reasonable but reasons thin or no limitRecommendation not supported by the sources
Planning the sustained projectTwo useful new sources, each with its purpose, and a clear narrow-or-broaden triggerSources named without purposes, or trigger vagueNo plan

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

The questions use Texts 1-7 in the lesson plan: Rafael's log (Warm-Up), his short project and source notes (Direct Instruction), Sources C and D and his later log (Guided Practice) and his recommendation (Independent Practice). Paragraph numbers match the numbers beside each text. Questions 13, 14, 15 and 19 use new situations. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Text 1, paragraph 2, why does Ms. Adeyemi push back on Rafael's first question, "How can we stop global warming?"

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    What is the source of Rafael's Day 2 question?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which feature makes Rafael's Day 3 project a short research project rather than a sustained one?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Using the averages in Text 2, how many degrees hotter was the courtyard blacktop than the air temperature at noon?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Text 2, paragraph 3, why does Rafael write that "One day of readings does not prove that this happens every day"?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Text 3, paragraph 3, what does Rafael decide about Source A's numbers for whole cities?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to Source B (Text 4), what are the two ways trees and plants cool an area?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Text 5, paragraph 3, how does Rafael explain the apparent disagreement between Source C and Source D?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    On Day 8 Rafael narrows his question to "Should our school coat the courtyard with reflective sealant?" Why does Mr. Holt push him to broaden it again (Text 6, paragraph 2)?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Rafael's Day 10 survey (Text 6, paragraph 4), about what percent of the students surveyed said heat is the reason they avoid the courtyard?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which sentence from Text 7 does the most to synthesize sources, rather than report one source?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why does Rafael recommend shade sails first and trees only as a long-term plan (Text 7, paragraph 4)?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A student's question for a three-week project is: "In what year was our town's public library built?" What is the best advice?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A student is frustrated by late school buses. Which question fits a sustained research project that tries to solve the problem?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer

    A student's one-day project counts drinks at two water fountains during one lunch period and finds the second-floor fountain used far more than the first-floor one. Write a question this finding could raise for a sustained project, name one source it would send the student to, and explain how this matches what Rafael's short project did (Text 2).

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write one sentence that synthesizes Source D (Text 5) and Rafael's Day 10 survey (Text 6). Name both sources in your sentence.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    Identify one place where Rafael narrowed his inquiry and one place where he broadened it. For each, cite the text and explain why the change was appropriate.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    Rafael ends his report by saying his research has limits (Text 7, paragraph 5). Name one limit and describe the evidence that would address it.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    A classmate wants to research "Why is social media bad?" Rewrite the question so that it fits a three-week research project, and explain the change in one or two sentences.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    How does Text 7 show that Rafael understands the subject he investigated, not just that he found sources? Give two pieces of evidence from the text.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does W.9-10.7 mean?

W.9-10.7 means that students in grades 9 and 10 carry out research projects, both short ones and longer ones, to answer a question or solve a problem, and the question can be one they came up with themselves.

Along the way they narrow or broaden the question when it turns out too big or too small, and they combine several sources into an answer that shows they understand the subject, not just that they found facts.

What is the difference between a short and a more sustained research project in W.9-10.7?

A short project answers one focused question in a class period or a few days; a sustained project takes weeks and uses several sources to answer a larger question or solve a problem.

The standard asks for both. Short projects build the habit of finding and checking information quickly, and they often feed a sustained project, as Rafael's one-day temperature readings did in this lesson.

What does "narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate" mean?

It means changing the size of the research question when the work reveals it is too big or too small to answer well.

Narrow a question that whole books could not answer by tying it to a place, a group or a time. Broaden a question that one fact answers, or one that tests only a single solution, into a question that needs several sources. "When appropriate" matters: the change should come from what the research reveals, not happen automatically.

How is synthesizing sources different from summarizing them?

Summarizing reports what each source says one at a time; synthesizing combines sources into a single explanation or answer.

A synthesis sentence usually needs two sources to be true: "Both the school's readings and the EPA show..." or "The EPA says cool pavement is cooler, but the Los Angeles study shows it can send more heat onto people." When sources seem to disagree, synthesis explains why, for example because they measure different things.

Why does W.9-10.7 mention a self-generated question?

Because the standard wants students to learn to ask research questions, not only to answer assigned ones.

A self-generated question usually starts from something the student has noticed or cares about. It still has to be sized and refined, as Rafael's first question about global warming shows, but ownership tends to make the research more careful and the sources better chosen.

How is W.9-10.7 different from W.8.7 and W.11-12.7?

W.8.7 asks for short research projects that draw on several sources and generate related, focused questions; W.9-10.7 adds more sustained projects, solving a problem, narrowing or broadening the inquiry and synthesizing sources.

W.11-12.7 uses the same words as W.9-10.7. The difference comes from what surrounds it: harder texts and sources, and companion standards such as W.11-12.8, which asks students to assess each source's strengths and limitations, where W.9-10.8 asks them to assess its usefulness.

How does W.9-10.7 relate to W.9-10.8?

W.9-10.7 is about conducting the research project as a whole; W.9-10.8 is about gathering sources, judging how useful each one is and citing it properly.

The two are usually taught together. In this lesson, Rafael's note that Source A describes whole cities, not his courtyard, is a W.9-10.8 judgment that serves his W.9-10.7 project.

Can students use their own observations, surveys or interviews as sources?

Yes. The standard asks for multiple sources, and first-hand data such as measurements, surveys and interviews count, as long as the student reports how they were collected.

Students should also state the limits of their own data: one day of readings, or a survey of two lunch periods, is a small sample. Combining such data with published sources makes both stronger.

How long should a W.9-10.7 research project be?

The standard does not set a length; it asks for both short and more sustained projects.

A common pattern is a few short projects of one or two class periods across the year and one or two sustained projects of several weeks that end in a written report or presentation. What matters is that the question fits the time and the sources available.

How is W.9-10.7 assessed?

It is usually assessed in class, through both the research process and the final product, because a timed test cannot show a project that lasts weeks.

Useful evidence includes a research log that shows how the question changed and why, notes that separate source facts from the student's comments, and a final piece in which sentences combine sources. Some state tests include a research task with a small set of sources; check your state's assessment materials.