W.9-10.7: Short and Sustained Research Projects That Solve a Problem
In plain English: W.9-10.7 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 9 and 10 to conduct research projects, both short and more sustained, that answer a question, including one they ask themselves, or solve a problem. Students narrow or broaden the question as the research requires and synthesize several sources into an answer that shows real understanding.
Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards · Cluster: Research to Build and Present Knowledge · Official standard
Students follow one research project from its first, oversized question to a written recommendation. Rafael, an invented tenth grader, notices that nobody eats in his school's blacktop courtyard at lunch. He narrows "How can we stop global warming?" to a question he can study, runs a one-day short project with an infrared thermometer, and then spends three weeks reading real sources: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's pages on heat islands, trees and cool pavements, and a 2020 study of reflective street coatings in Los Angeles. When he narrows too far, to a single fix, the librarian pushes him to broaden again. His final section combines the sources, his own measurements and a student survey into one plan.
The lesson treats research as a sequence of decisions: choosing a question, sizing it, reading sources for what they can and cannot show, noticing when sources seem to disagree, and combining them into an answer. Students sort questions by size, build a synthesis grid, launch their own project, and for homework refocus a classmate's project about birds hitting the library windows.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Conduct a short research project that answers one focused question with at least one source and one observation
Plan a more sustained research project around a self-generated question or a real problem
Narrow a question that is too broad and broaden one that is too narrow, and explain why each change fits the project
Synthesize several sources, including their own data, into one explanation, noting where sources agree or seem to disagree
Demonstrate understanding of the subject by stating what the sources support and what the research cannot show
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Conducting short research projects that draw on several sources and generate related, focused questions W.8.7
Gathering information from print and digital sources and citing it W.8.8
Taking notes that separate what a source says from their own comments
"Name one thing at school or in your neighborhood that bothers you and that you have never found a good answer about. Write it as a question. Could you answer it in one class period? In three weeks? Never?"
Collect three or four questions and sort them on the board into "one class period," "a few weeks" and "too big to finish." Explain that W.9-10.7 asks students to conduct both kinds of research project: short ones, which answer a small question in a class period or two, and more sustained ones, which take weeks, use several sources and often solve a real problem. The question can be one the student generates, as in this warm-up.
Introduce the research the lesson follows. Rafael, a tenth grader, starts a three-week project in Ms. Adeyemi's English class. Rafael, his school, his teacher, the librarian Mr. Holt and the facilities manager Ms. Park are invented for this lesson; the sources he reads (the EPA pages and a 2020 study) are real, and his notes on them are written for this page. Read Text 1 aloud. Students write one sentence: which of Rafael's two questions could he answer in three weeks, and why?
1Day 1, September 8. Ms. Adeyemi gave us the assignment: a three-week research project on a question we choose ourselves, ending with a report of 800-1,000 words that uses at least four sources. My first question: How can we stop global warming?
2Ms. Adeyemi read it and wrote in the margin: "Whole libraries try to answer this. What part of it could you actually find out in three weeks?" I thought about what bothers me every day. At lunch, almost nobody sits in the courtyard behind the cafeteria. It is all blacktop, with four metal picnic tables and no shade. Everyone crowds onto the strip of grass by the front lawn or eats inside.
3Day 2, September 9. New question: Why is our lunch courtyard so much hotter than the front lawn, and what could the school do to make it usable in August and September? Ms. Adeyemi approved it. She also gave the class a warm-up first: a one-day project that answers one small factual question by the end of the next class, using at least one source and one observation.
4My one-day question: How much hotter is the courtyard blacktop than the grass at lunchtime? Mr. Holt, the librarian, lent me the science department's infrared thermometer, which reads the temperature of a surface when you point it at the surface.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 1: Rafael's research log, Days 1-2 (Rafael, his school and everyone in his log are invented). Original passage written for this page.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Break the standard into its parts, using Rafael's project:
Short and more sustained projects. Rafael's one-day project (Text 2) answers one factual question with one observation and one source. His three-week project (Texts 3-7) uses four sources, his own measurements and a survey to solve a problem.
A question or a problem, including a self-generated question. Rafael's final question comes from something he noticed, not from a list.
Narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate. Diagram 1 shows his question moving from too broad to researchable, then too narrow, then broad enough again.
Synthesize multiple sources and demonstrate understanding. His recommendation (Text 7) combines sources into one explanation and one plan, and states what his research cannot show.
Read Text 2, the short project. Use Diagram 2 to show his readings. Then read Texts 3 and 4, his notes on the first two sources, and work through the examples below. Point out what each note adds: Rafael does not just copy facts; he writes what each source means for his question.
1Field notes, September 10, 12:15 p.m. Sunny, light wind. Air temperature 91°F, from the National Weather Service reading for our town at noon. I took three readings on each surface and averaged them.
2Courtyard blacktop, in full sun: 138°F, 141°F, 141°F. Average: 140°F. Concrete under the cafeteria overhang, in shade: 103°F, 105°F, 104°F. Average: 104°F. Front lawn grass, in sun: 95°F, 97°F, 96°F. Average: 96°F.
3Answer to my one-day question: At 12:15 p.m. on September 10, the courtyard blacktop averaged 140°F, which is 44°F hotter than the grass on the front lawn. One day of readings does not prove that this happens every day, but it fits what the EPA says about dark pavement in the sun (Source A).
4What this raised: The shaded concrete was far cooler than the sunny blacktop, but still warmer than the grass. So is the heat about shade, about the material, or both? That goes into my three-week question.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 2: Rafael's short project, Day 3 field notes and answer (the readings are invented). Original passage written for this page.
1Source A: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Learn About Heat Islands." A heat island is an area, usually a city, that is warmer than the land around it. In the United States, the EPA says, daytime temperatures in urban areas run about 1-7°F higher than in outlying areas, and nighttime temperatures about 2-5°F higher.
2Causes the EPA lists: fewer trees and plants, because hard, dry surfaces such as roofs, sidewalks, roads and parking lots give less shade and moisture; building materials that absorb and give off more of the sun's heat than natural surfaces; tall buildings and narrow streets that block the wind; heat from vehicles, air conditioners and buildings; and calm, clear weather, which makes heat islands worse. On a warm day, the EPA says, ordinary roofing can reach as much as 66°F warmer than the air.
3My note: This page is about whole cities, not one courtyard. I can use its causes to explain our blacktop, but I should not report its city-wide numbers as if they were measured at our school.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 3: Rafael's notes on Source A, the EPA's "Learn About Heat Islands" page (the notes are written for this page; the facts are from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Original passage written for this page.
1Source B: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Using Trees and Vegetation to Reduce Heat Islands" (the version online through 2022, which the Internet Archive has saved; the EPA has since shortened the page) and "Benefits of Trees and Vegetation." Trees and plants cool an area in two ways. They block the sun, and they release water through their leaves, which the EPA calls evapotranspiration.
2That version of the EPA page says that shaded surfaces may be 20-45°F cooler than the peak temperatures of unshaded materials. Evapotranspiration, alone or together with shade, can help lower peak summer temperatures by 2-9°F.
3My note: My shaded concrete was 36°F cooler than the blacktop in the sun, which falls inside the EPA's range, so my Day 3 readings and Source B agree. Grass cools by evapotranspiration, which may explain why the lawn was cooler than the shaded concrete. A young tree takes years to grow a wide crown, though, so a tree planted this fall would not shade the tables next September.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 4: Rafael's notes on Source B, the EPA's pages on trees and vegetation (the notes are written for this page; the facts are from the EPA; the two temperature ranges come from an earlier version of the first page). Original passage written for this page.
Narrowing a question that is too broad
Rafael's first question is "How can we stop global warming?" Ms. Adeyemi asks "What part of it could you actually find out in three weeks?" (Text 1, paragraph 2).
Result: He narrows to a problem he can observe and measure: why the lunch courtyard is so hot and what the school could do (paragraph 3). The new question still connects to heat, but it fits the time, the sources and a real place.
Running a short project
The one-day question is "How much hotter is the courtyard blacktop than the grass at lunchtime?" Rafael takes three readings on each of three surfaces and averages them (Text 2, paragraphs 1-2).
Result: His answer gives the time, the place and the result, then names its own limit: "One day of readings does not prove that this happens every day" (paragraph 3). A short project can be complete and still modest.
Letting a short project shape a sustained one
The shaded concrete was cooler than the sunny blacktop but warmer than the grass. Rafael asks: "is the heat about shade, about the material, or both?" (Text 2, paragraph 4).
Result: The short project did not just produce a number; it produced the next question. That question sends him to sources about shade (Source B) and about pavement materials (Sources C and D).
Using a source within its limits
Source A gives city-wide numbers. Rafael notes: "I should not report its city-wide numbers as if they were measured at our school" (Text 3, paragraph 3).
Result: He uses what the source can support, the causes of heat islands, and sets aside what it cannot. Knowing what a source is about is part of demonstrating understanding of the subject.
Checking a source against one's own data
Source B says shaded surfaces may be 20-45°F cooler than unshaded ones. Rafael compares his own readings: the shaded concrete was 36°F cooler (Text 4, paragraph 3).
Result: His field data and the EPA agree, so each makes the other more convincing. Synthesis starts here: two sources, one of them his own, now support one claim.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs read Texts 5 and 6. Sources C and D seem to disagree about cool pavement, and on Day 8 Rafael narrows his question to one fix before Mr. Holt pushes him to broaden it again. Pairs fill in the synthesis grid below, one row per source, then answer the two questions after it.
1Source C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Using Cool Pavements to Reduce Heat Islands." Cool pavements are paving materials that reflect more of the sun's energy, let water evaporate, or are otherwise changed to stay cooler than ordinary pavement. The EPA reports that in a pilot study in Arizona, ordinary asphalt reached surface temperatures up to 152°F at midday, while the surface of cool pavements stayed 10-16°F cooler. The EPA also says these technologies are less advanced than other ways of reducing heat islands, and there is no official standard or label for cool paving materials.
2Source D: Ariane Middel and others, "Solar reflective pavements—A policy panacea to heat mitigation?" Environmental Research Letters, 2020. The researchers measured streets in two Los Angeles neighborhoods on July 30, 2019, some coated with a reflective sealant and some not. The coated surfaces were about 4-6°C (about 7-11°F) cooler than regular asphalt. But the coating reflected more sunlight up onto people. At midday, the mean radiant temperature, a measure of the heat a person's body takes in from the sun and nearby surfaces, was about 4°C (about 7°F) higher over the coated pavement. Air temperature barely changed.
3My note: At first C and D seem to disagree. They are measuring different things. C measures the pavement's surface. D also measures the heat reaching a person standing on it, and that person is exactly who I care about.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 5: Rafael's notes on Sources C and D, cool pavements (the notes are written for this page; the facts are from the EPA and a 2020 study). Original passage written for this page.
1Day 8. Source C convinced me. New question: Should our school coat the courtyard with reflective sealant? I started looking only for sources about coatings.
2I showed the question to Mr. Holt. He asked what my project was for. I said, to make the courtyard usable at lunch. He said: "Then look at what Source D says about people. A question about one fix can only come out yes or no. Your problem is a courtyard people won't sit in. Compare the fixes." I reread Source D and saw he was right: a coating alone could make the tables feel hotter at noon.
3Day 9. New question, broader again: Which fix, or mix of fixes, would make the courtyard usable at lunch? I listed four options to compare: a reflective coating, shade sails over the tables, trees along the south edge and replacing part of the blacktop with grass.
4Day 10. I surveyed 60 students in two lunch periods. 41 of them said heat is the reason they avoid the courtyard. 12 said there are not enough tables, and 7 gave other reasons. I also asked Ms. Park, the district's facilities manager, which options the district has used before. She said the district has put shade sails over seating at two elementary schools, and that planting trees needs a spot where roots will not lift the blacktop.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 6: Rafael's research log, Days 8-10 (the survey results are invented). Original passage written for this page.
Synthesis grid (pairs fill in the blank cells)
Source
What it says about the courtyard problem
Agrees with, or complicates, which other source?
How Rafael can use it
Day 3 field notes
Source A (EPA, heat islands)
Source B (EPA, trees)
Source C (EPA, cool pavements)
Source D (2020 Los Angeles study)
Day 10 survey and Ms. Park
Discuss: (1) Why was narrowing to "Should our school coat the courtyard?" a step backward for this project, when narrowing on Day 2 was a step forward? (2) Which two sources together show that a coating alone is a risky choice for tables where students sit at noon?
Independent Practice15 minutes
Read Text 7, Rafael's recommendation. Students mark each sentence that combines two or more sources with an S, and each sentence that states a limit with an L. Then they begin their own project: (1) write a self-generated question about a problem at school or in the community; (2) write a one-day short-project question that would help answer it; (3) list two kinds of sources they will need, including one observation or interview; (4) predict one way the question might need to be narrowed or broadened.
The quiz uses Texts 1-7 (Warm-Up, Direct Instruction, Guided Practice and this phase); point students back to them when they take it.
1Recommendation: Shade First, Trees for the Long Term
2The courtyard is hot because it is dark pavement with no shade, not only because the weather is hot. On September 10, the blacktop was 140°F in the sun, while concrete a few steps away under the overhang was 104°F (my field notes). The EPA explains the pattern: hard, dry surfaces give "less shade and moisture" and absorb more of the sun's heat (Source A), and shaded surfaces can be 20-45°F cooler than unshaded ones (Source B). Heat matters to students too: 41 of the 60 students I surveyed said it is why they avoid the courtyard.
3A reflective coating looks like the simplest fix, and it does cool the pavement surface (Source C). But the Los Angeles study found that reflective pavement sent more of the sun's heat up onto people, so a person standing on it took in more heat at midday, even though the air was barely cooler (Source D). Since students sit at the tables at noon, a coating by itself could make lunch worse.
4Shade solves both problems at once: it cools the surface and keeps sun off the students. The district already uses shade sails over seating (Ms. Park), so the school could add them over the four tables before next August. Trees along the south edge would add shade and evapotranspiration (Source B), but they take years to grow, and they need a spot where roots will not lift the blacktop. I recommend shade sails now and trees as a long-term plan.
5My research has limits. I measured on one day, at one time. Before the school spends money, someone should measure under the shade sails at an elementary school at noon.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 7: Rafael's recommendation, the final section of his report. Original passage written for this page.
Closure5 minutes
Exit ticket: (1) Name the moment Rafael broadened his question, and say what would have gone wrong if he had not. (2) Quote one sentence from Text 7 that uses two sources at once. Then hand out the homework texts below: Nadia's research log (Text 8) and her notes on three sources (Text 9). Nadia, her school and the custodian are invented; the two published sources in Text 9 are real, and the notes on them are written for this page.
1Day 1. My first question for the three-week project: Why are birds dying all over the world?
2Why I care: The new library at our school has a wall of glass two stories high that faces a row of oak trees. Twice this month I have found a bird lying under that wall. Mr. Dominguez, our head custodian, keeps a notebook. Since September 1 he has found 11 dead or stunned birds below the library glass and 1 below all the other windows of the school put together.
3Day 2. Ms. Adeyemi says my Day 1 question is too big. My second try: What kind of bird hit the library window on October 3? She says that one is too small for three weeks, because one look in a field guide answers it. I need something in between.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 8: Homework, Nadia's research log, Days 1-2 (Nadia, her school and the custodian are invented). Original passage written for this page.
1Source 1: Scott R. Loss, Tom Will, Sara S. Loss and Peter P. Marra, "Bird-building collisions in the United States: Estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability," The Condor, 2014. The authors combined data from 23 studies. They estimate that between 365 million and 988 million birds are killed by hitting buildings in the United States each year. Their middle estimate is 599 million. Fewer than 1 percent of the deaths happen at high-rise buildings; almost all happen at homes and at buildings of 11 stories or fewer.
2Source 2: American Bird Conservancy, "Frequently Asked Questions About Birds and Glass." Birds treat reflections as real objects, so glass that reflects trees, sky or shelter can lead them to fly into it. A single decal does not work: to a bird it is simply an obstacle to fly around. Markers work when they cover the glass in a pattern with no spaces more than two inches wide. Markers on the outside surface of the glass work better than markers inside.
3Source 3: Mr. Dominguez's notebook, September 1 to October 15. 11 birds below the library glass, 1 below all other windows. 8 of the 11 were found in the morning, before 9 a.m.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 9: Homework, Nadia's notes on three sources (the notes are written for this page; the facts are from the sources named). Original passage written for this page.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a question-sizing card: "Could one fact answer it? (too narrow) Could whole books not answer it? (too broad) Can I find it out with a few sources in the time I have? (researchable)"
Provide the synthesis grid with the Day 3 field notes row filled in as a model
Offer sentence frames for synthesis: "Both ___ and ___ show that ___" and "___ seems to disagree with ___, but ___"
For Advanced Students
Ask students to find one more real source about shade structures or schoolyard heat and write how it would change or support Rafael's recommendation
Have students design the follow-up measurement Rafael proposes in the last paragraph of Text 7: what to measure, where, when and how often
Ask students to write the question Rafael might research next year, after the shade sails go up
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Look for questions sized to the project: a short project answers one focused question, and a sustained project has a question that needs several sources to answer. Strong work explains each change to the question (narrowed because it could not be finished, broadened because one source or one fix could only give yes or no). In synthesis, look for sentences that combine sources rather than a list of summaries, for honest handling of sources that seem to disagree, and for claims kept within what each source can support. Students demonstrate understanding when they can explain the cause, weigh the options and state the limits of their own research.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Too Broad, Too Narrow or Researchable? Question Sort
15 minPairs
Pairs sort eight research questions into three piles, then repair every question that is not researchable. The sort practices the move the standard calls narrowing or broadening the inquiry before students size their own questions.
The Eight Question Cards
Card 1: Why do people waste food?
Card 2: What time does the school cafeteria stop serving breakfast?
Card 3: What would it take for our cafeteria to cut the food thrown away at lunch in half?
Card 4: How has the internet changed the world?
Card 5: How does a two-minute delay between class bells affect how many students arrive late?
Card 6: How many bike racks does our school have?
Card 7: What makes a city bike lane safe enough that more students ride to school?
Card 8: Why is music important?
Sort Key (for the teacher)
Too broad: Cards 1, 4 and 8. Too narrow (one fact or one count answers it): Cards 2 and 6. Researchable for a sustained project: Cards 3, 5 and 7. Accept a well-argued different placement: Card 5 could be a short project if a student only needs one week of attendance data.
Repair Step
For each too-broad card, pairs write a narrower question tied to a place, a group of people or a time. For each too-narrow card, pairs write a broader question that the small fact would help answer, for example Card 6 becomes "Would more students bike to school if the racks were covered?"
Discussion Questions
Which card did your pair argue about, and what settled it?
Which of your repaired questions could become a one-day short project, and which needs weeks?
Look at Rafael's four questions in Diagram 1. Which pile would each one go in?
2
Agree, Add or Complicate: Source Synthesis Stations
20 minGroups of 3-4
Groups rotate through three stations, each with two of Rafael's sources, and write one synthesis sentence at each. The activity turns summaries into synthesis: every sentence must use both sources at the station.
Stations
Station 1: Day 3 field notes (Text 2) and Source B (Text 4)
Station 2: Source C and Source D (Text 5)
Station 3: Source A (Text 3) and the Day 10 survey (Text 6)
Procedure
At each station (6 minutes), decide whether the two sources agree, whether one adds something the other lacks, or whether one complicates the other
Write one sentence that uses both sources and names each, for example "Both ___ and ___ show ___"
Leave the sentence on the station sheet; the next group may improve it but must keep both sources
Last 2 minutes: each group reads the best sentence from the station where it finished
Discussion Questions
At which station did the sources seem to disagree, and how did your sentence handle it?
Which sentence would you move straight into Rafael's report, and where?
How is a synthesis sentence different from two summaries joined by "and"?
Modification for Distance Learning
Post each station as a separate discussion thread with the two texts linked. Groups reply with their sentence, and the next group replies to that post with an improved version, so the thread shows the sentence growing.
3
Launch a Project: Short First, Then Sustained
25 minIndividual, then pairs
Each student starts a research project of their own, following the path Rafael took: a self-generated question, a short project that answers one piece of it, and a plan for the sustained project.
Procedure
5 minutes: write a question about a problem you have noticed at school or in your community, and test its size with a partner using the three piles from Activity 1
10 minutes: carry out a short project on one small piece of it, using one source you can reach now (a website, a school document, a count, a quick interview)
5 minutes: write a two-sentence answer to the short question and one new question it raised
5 minutes: plan the sustained project: your revised question, three sources you will look for (at least one observation or interview), and one sign that would tell you to narrow or broaden
Discussion Questions
What did your short project find that you did not expect?
Did your partner's size test change your question? How?
Which of your planned sources might disagree with another, and what would you do then?
Modification for Classrooms Without Devices
Students use sources in the room or the school: a school handbook, a bell schedule, a count they can take in the hallway, or a short interview with a classmate or staff member. The library can supply a small set of printed articles for groups that need a written source.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: How Rafael Narrowed and Broadened His Question
From left to right, the four versions of Rafael's question in Texts 1 and 6. He narrowed the Day 1 question to one he could research in three weeks, narrowed it again on Day 8 to a single fix, and broadened it on Day 9 into the Day 10 question he answered. The dashed arrow shows the one-day short project that his Day 2 question led to.
Diagram 2: Rafael's Short Project, Surface Temperatures at Lunch
The averages from Text 2, drawn to scale from 0°F. Each bar is the average of three invented readings with an infrared thermometer. The dashed line is the air temperature reported by the National Weather Service at noon. The chart shows that shade and surface type both matter, which became the heart of Rafael's sustained project.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
W.9-10.7 Homework: Refocus and Synthesize Nadia's Bird-Window Project
Directions: Use Texts 8 and 9 in the Closure section of the lesson plan. Nadia is starting the same three-week project as Rafael. Cite the paragraph of Text 8 or the source number in Text 9 for every fact you use, and use only the facts given there.
Part 1: Refocus the Question (Problems 1-2)
Nadia's Day 1 question is too broad and her Day 2 question is too narrow. Explain why each one does not fit a three-week project, then write a new question that fits. Your question must be about a problem Nadia can study at her school.
Write a one-day short-project question that would help answer your Problem 1 question. Name the source or observation that would answer it, and say what Nadia would do with the answer.
Part 2: Synthesize the Sources (Problems 3-4)
For each pair, say whether the sources agree, whether one adds to the other, or whether one complicates the other, and explain in one sentence: (a) Source 1 and Source 3; (b) Source 2 and Nadia's description of the library wall in Text 8, paragraph 2.
Write a paragraph of 120-180 words that answers your Problem 1 question as far as Texts 8 and 9 allow. Use at least three of the four: Source 1, Source 2, Source 3 and Text 8. At least two sentences must each combine two sources.
Part 3: Recommend and Plan (Problems 5-6)
Write a recommendation of 3-5 sentences for the school: what should be done about the library glass, and why? Use Source 2 to explain why one sticker or decal on the glass is not the answer, and state one limit of Nadia's evidence.
Plan Nadia's next week. Name two more sources she should look for and what each would add, and describe one finding that would make her narrow or broaden her question again.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Refocusing the question
Both questions' problems explained; new question fits three weeks and Nadia's school; short-project question answerable in a day
New question workable but one explanation missing, or short question too big
No new question, or the new question repeats Day 1 or Day 2
Synthesis
Paragraph combines sources in at least two sentences, cites each fact and handles scale (national vs. school) correctly
Sources cited but mostly summarized one at a time
One source only, or facts not from Texts 8-9
Understanding of the subject
Recommendation explains why reflections cause collisions and why spacing matters; one real limit stated
Recommendation reasonable but reasons thin or no limit
Recommendation not supported by the sources
Planning the sustained project
Two useful new sources, each with its purpose, and a clear narrow-or-broaden trigger
Sources named without purposes, or trigger vague
No plan
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
The questions use Texts 1-7 in the lesson plan: Rafael's log (Warm-Up), his short project and source notes (Direct Instruction), Sources C and D and his later log (Guided Practice) and his recommendation (Independent Practice). Paragraph numbers match the numbers beside each text. Questions 13, 14, 15 and 19 use new situations. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Text 1, paragraph 2, why does Ms. Adeyemi push back on Rafael's first question, "How can we stop global warming?"
Answer: B
She writes "Whole libraries try to answer this. What part of it could you actually find out in three weeks?" The problem is size: the question is too broad for the project. A is false; Rafael later reads three EPA pages (Texts 3-5). C misreads the log: Rafael wrote the question himself, and the assignment asks for "a question we choose ourselves" (paragraph 1). D contradicts the standard, which includes research that will "solve a problem."
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What is the source of Rafael's Day 2 question?
Answer: D
Rafael writes "I thought about what bothers me every day. At lunch, almost nobody sits in the courtyard behind the cafeteria" (Text 1, paragraph 2). That makes it a self-generated question, grounded in his own observation. A invents a topic list. B confuses the question with Mr. Holt's help in paragraph 4, which comes after the question. C reverses the order: he reads Source A after he has his question.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which feature makes Rafael's Day 3 project a short research project rather than a sustained one?
Answer: A
Ms. Adeyemi's warm-up asks for "a one-day project that answers one small factual question by the end of the next class, using at least one source and one observation" (Text 1, paragraph 3), and Text 2 does exactly that. B invents a rule about equipment. C reverses the two projects: the recommendation (Text 7) belongs to the sustained project. D is false: Text 2, paragraph 3, cites Source A.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Using the averages in Text 2, how many degrees hotter was the courtyard blacktop than the air temperature at noon?
Answer: C
The blacktop averaged (138 + 141 + 141) / 3 = 140°F, and the air was 91°F, so 140 - 91 = 49°F. A is the blacktop minus the shaded concrete (140 - 104). B is the blacktop minus the grass (140 - 96), the comparison Rafael reports. D is the shaded concrete minus the grass (104 - 96). Each wrong option compares a different pair of numbers from the notes.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Text 2, paragraph 3, why does Rafael write that "One day of readings does not prove that this happens every day"?
Answer: B
A short project can be complete and still modest. Rafael reports what he measured and says what it cannot show; he then notes that his result "fits what the EPA says about dark pavement in the sun." A invents doubt about the tool; his three blacktop readings agree closely (138, 141, 141). C invents a rule. D is false: no source says that, and Source B supports his readings (Text 4, paragraph 3).
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Text 3, paragraph 3, what does Rafael decide about Source A's numbers for whole cities?
Answer: D
He writes: "I can use its causes to explain our blacktop, but I should not report its city-wide numbers as if they were measured at our school." Using a source for what it can support is part of demonstrating understanding. A is exactly what he rules out. B goes too far: he keeps the source for its causes and quotes it in Text 7. C invents a swap he never makes.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source B (Text 4), what are the two ways trees and plants cool an area?
Answer: A
Text 4, paragraph 1: "They block the sun, and they release water through their leaves, which the EPA calls evapotranspiration." B describes reflective pavement (Source D) and the wind-blocking buildings in Source A, not trees. C invents a heat-storage process that is not in the notes. D confuses trees with two of the causes of heat islands listed in Source A (heat from vehicles, tall buildings).
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Text 5, paragraph 3, how does Rafael explain the apparent disagreement between Source C and Source D?
Answer: C
Rafael writes: "They are measuring different things. C measures the pavement's surface. D also measures the heat reaching a person standing on it." Both findings can be true at once, which is how he synthesizes them. A dismisses a source without reason, the opposite of what he does. B misreads Source C, which is about "Using Cool Pavements." D invents a detail that is not in the notes.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
On Day 8 Rafael narrows his question to "Should our school coat the courtyard with reflective sealant?" Why does Mr. Holt push him to broaden it again (Text 6, paragraph 2)?
Answer: B
Mr. Holt says: "A question about one fix can only come out yes or no. Your problem is a courtyard people won't sit in. Compare the fixes." Narrowing to one solution cut the project off from the problem it was meant to solve. A invents an approval rule. C invents a ban. D invents a rule about sources; Rafael adds a survey and an interview on Day 10.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Rafael's Day 10 survey (Text 6, paragraph 4), about what percent of the students surveyed said heat is the reason they avoid the courtyard?
Answer: D
41 of 60 students named heat: 41 / 60 = 0.683, or about 68 percent. A uses the count, 41, as if it were a percent. B is the share who said there are not enough tables (12 / 60 = 20 percent). C takes that count, 12, as a percent. The survey is invented for this lesson.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence from Text 7 does the most to synthesize sources, rather than report one source?
Answer: A
Sentence A draws a conclusion that needs two sources together: Source C shows a coating cools the pavement, Source D shows it sends more heat onto people, and Rafael's own knowledge of the lunch schedule puts students at the tables at noon. B reports only his field notes. C reports only his survey. D states a limit of one source, his own readings.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does Rafael recommend shade sails first and trees only as a long-term plan (Text 7, paragraph 4)?
Answer: C
Rafael writes that trees "take years to grow, and they need a spot where roots will not lift the blacktop," while "The district already uses shade sails over seating (Ms. Park)." His recommendation combines Source B, his note in Text 4 and Ms. Park's interview. A reverses Source B, which says trees cool. B distorts Ms. Park: she only says trees need the right spot. D misreads the survey, which asked why students avoid the courtyard, not which fix they want.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student's question for a three-week project is: "In what year was our town's public library built?" What is the best advice?
Answer: B
One source answers the question, so it is too narrow for three weeks; it could be a short project. A broader question, such as how the library has changed what it offers as the town has grown, would use the date as one piece of evidence. A mistakes easy for suitable. C gets the direction wrong: the question is too small, not too big. D is false; almost any subject can hold a sustained question.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student is frustrated by late school buses. Which question fits a sustained research project that tries to solve the problem?
Answer: D
Option D is tied to one problem in one place, and answering it needs several sources: arrival records, the district's routes, interviews with drivers or staff, and perhaps what other districts have tried. A is too broad for one student's project. B is too narrow: one record answers it, though it could be a short project that feeds D. C is a single fact and is not about the problem at all.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
A student's one-day project counts drinks at two water fountains during one lunch period and finds the second-floor fountain used far more than the first-floor one. Write a question this finding could raise for a sustained project, name one source it would send the student to, and explain how this matches what Rafael's short project did (Text 2).
Model answer: New question: "Why do students use the second-floor fountain more, and what change would make the first-floor one used as much?" It would send the student to a source such as the facilities office's records of which fountains have bottle fillers or cold water, or a short survey of students. This matches Rafael's project: his readings answered the one-day question but also raised a new one, "is the heat about shade, about the material, or both?" (Text 2, paragraph 4), which sent him to sources on shade and on pavement. Rubric line: 2 points for a new question that grows out of the finding, a fitting source and a link to Text 2, paragraph 4; 1 point for two of the three. Accept any question the count could raise.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Write one sentence that synthesizes Source D (Text 5) and Rafael's Day 10 survey (Text 6). Name both sources in your sentence.
Model answer: "Because 41 of the 60 students in Rafael's Day 10 survey said heat is why they avoid the courtyard, the Los Angeles study's finding that reflective pavement raised the heat reaching a person by about 4°C at midday (Source D) means a coating alone would work against the very problem the school needs to solve." Rubric line: 2 points for one sentence that uses a fact from each source and draws a single conclusion; 1 point for two facts joined without a conclusion, or one source unnamed.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Identify one place where Rafael narrowed his inquiry and one place where he broadened it. For each, cite the text and explain why the change was appropriate.
Model answer: He narrowed on Day 2, from "How can we stop global warming?" to a question about his lunch courtyard (Text 1, paragraph 3), because the first question could not be answered in three weeks. He broadened on Day 9, from whether to coat the courtyard to "Which fix, or mix of fixes, would make the courtyard usable at lunch?" (Text 6, paragraph 3), because a question about one fix could only come out yes or no and Source D showed a coating alone might make the tables hotter. Rubric line: 2 points for both moves with citations and reasons; 1 point for both moves without reasons, or one move fully explained.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Rafael ends his report by saying his research has limits (Text 7, paragraph 5). Name one limit and describe the evidence that would address it.
Model answer: He measured on one day, at one time, so his readings may not describe every lunch in August and September. Readings taken at the same time on several days, in different weather, would address it; so would his own proposal to measure under shade sails at an elementary school at noon, which would show whether sails cool the tables as much as the overhang did. Rubric line: 2 points for a real limit and matching evidence; 1 point for a limit with vague or unrelated evidence.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
A classmate wants to research "Why is social media bad?" Rewrite the question so that it fits a three-week research project, and explain the change in one or two sentences.
Model answer: "How does using a phone during homework time affect how long ninth graders at our school take to finish their assignments?" The original question is too broad and assumes its answer; the new one names a group, a behavior and an effect that surveys, time logs and published sources can address. Rubric line: 2 points for a narrower, neutral question tied to a group or place, with a reason; 1 point for a narrower question that is still one-sided or has no explanation. Accept any focused question on a comparable scale.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
How does Text 7 show that Rafael understands the subject he investigated, not just that he found sources? Give two pieces of evidence from the text.
Model answer: First, he explains a cause, not just a fact: the courtyard is hot "because it is dark pavement with no shade, not only because the weather is hot" (paragraph 2). Second, he weighs options against the problem, rejecting a coating alone because students "sit at the tables at noon" and Source D shows reflected heat reaches people (paragraph 3). He also states the limits of his own evidence (paragraph 5). Rubric line: 2 points for two specific pieces of evidence tied to understanding (cause, weighing options, limits); 1 point for one.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does W.9-10.7 mean?
W.9-10.7 means that students in grades 9 and 10 carry out research projects, both short ones and longer ones, to answer a question or solve a problem, and the question can be one they came up with themselves.
Along the way they narrow or broaden the question when it turns out too big or too small, and they combine several sources into an answer that shows they understand the subject, not just that they found facts.
What is the difference between a short and a more sustained research project in W.9-10.7?
A short project answers one focused question in a class period or a few days; a sustained project takes weeks and uses several sources to answer a larger question or solve a problem.
The standard asks for both. Short projects build the habit of finding and checking information quickly, and they often feed a sustained project, as Rafael's one-day temperature readings did in this lesson.
What does "narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate" mean?
It means changing the size of the research question when the work reveals it is too big or too small to answer well.
Narrow a question that whole books could not answer by tying it to a place, a group or a time. Broaden a question that one fact answers, or one that tests only a single solution, into a question that needs several sources. "When appropriate" matters: the change should come from what the research reveals, not happen automatically.
How is synthesizing sources different from summarizing them?
Summarizing reports what each source says one at a time; synthesizing combines sources into a single explanation or answer.
A synthesis sentence usually needs two sources to be true: "Both the school's readings and the EPA show..." or "The EPA says cool pavement is cooler, but the Los Angeles study shows it can send more heat onto people." When sources seem to disagree, synthesis explains why, for example because they measure different things.
Why does W.9-10.7 mention a self-generated question?
Because the standard wants students to learn to ask research questions, not only to answer assigned ones.
A self-generated question usually starts from something the student has noticed or cares about. It still has to be sized and refined, as Rafael's first question about global warming shows, but ownership tends to make the research more careful and the sources better chosen.
How is W.9-10.7 different from W.8.7 and W.11-12.7?
W.8.7 asks for short research projects that draw on several sources and generate related, focused questions; W.9-10.7 adds more sustained projects, solving a problem, narrowing or broadening the inquiry and synthesizing sources.
W.11-12.7 uses the same words as W.9-10.7. The difference comes from what surrounds it: harder texts and sources, and companion standards such as W.11-12.8, which asks students to assess each source's strengths and limitations, where W.9-10.8 asks them to assess its usefulness.
How does W.9-10.7 relate to W.9-10.8?
W.9-10.7 is about conducting the research project as a whole; W.9-10.8 is about gathering sources, judging how useful each one is and citing it properly.
The two are usually taught together. In this lesson, Rafael's note that Source A describes whole cities, not his courtyard, is a W.9-10.8 judgment that serves his W.9-10.7 project.
Can students use their own observations, surveys or interviews as sources?
Yes. The standard asks for multiple sources, and first-hand data such as measurements, surveys and interviews count, as long as the student reports how they were collected.
Students should also state the limits of their own data: one day of readings, or a survey of two lunch periods, is a small sample. Combining such data with published sources makes both stronger.
How long should a W.9-10.7 research project be?
The standard does not set a length; it asks for both short and more sustained projects.
A common pattern is a few short projects of one or two class periods across the year and one or two sustained projects of several weeks that end in a written report or presentation. What matters is that the question fits the time and the sources available.
How is W.9-10.7 assessed?
It is usually assessed in class, through both the research process and the final product, because a timed test cannot show a project that lasts weeks.
Useful evidence includes a research log that shows how the question changed and why, notes that separate source facts from the student's comments, and a final piece in which sentences combine sources. Some state tests include a research task with a small set of sources; check your state's assessment materials.
07
Related Standards
6 standards
These standards connect to W.9-10.7: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
W.8.7Prerequisite
Conduct short research projects drawing on several sources and generating focused questions
Lesson coming soon
Alongside
W.9-10.8Parallel
Gather information from multiple sources, assess usefulness and integrate it with citations
Lesson coming soon
RST.9-10.9Parallel
Compare findings in a text with other sources, including one's own experiments
Lesson coming soon
SL.9-10.4Parallel
Present information, findings and evidence clearly, concisely and logically