SVHS Website Header

My Cart

CCRA.SL.1Common CoreELAAnchor StandardsSpeaking and ListeningGrades 6-12

CCRA.SL.1: Preparing for and Taking Part in Collaborative Discussions

In plain English: CCRA.SL.1 is the Common Core College and Career Readiness anchor standard for speaking and listening that asks students to prepare for and take part in many kinds of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others' ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively. In grades 6-12 it is carried by SL.6.1 through SL.11-12.1.

Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others' ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Speaking and Listening · Cluster: Comprehension and Collaboration
Also written as CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.SL.1 · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

55-60 min

Overview

CCRA.SL.1 is the anchor for academic conversation. It asks students to prepare for discussions and collaborations, to participate effectively in many kinds of them (with a partner, in a small group, in a teacher-led seminar) and with partners whose views and backgrounds differ from their own, to build on others' ideas rather than wait for a turn, and to express their own ideas clearly and persuasively. Good discussion is a skill that can be taught and observed, not a personality trait.

This page teaches the anchor as a progression for grades 6-12. In grade 6, students come prepared, follow agreed rules and paraphrase other views; by grades 11-12, they run civil, democratic discussions, probe reasoning and evidence, and synthesize all sides. The lesson uses an invented briefing sheet and a transcript of an invented seventh-grade group deciding what a school garden plot should grow, and an invented eleventh-grade seminar on Francis Bacon's short essay "Of Discourse" (first published in 1597), which is itself advice about conversation. Students read the transcripts as models, then hold and track their own discussions. Every activity has a grades 6-8 version and a grades 9-12 version.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Prepare for a discussion by marking evidence and writing questions tied to specific words in a text or briefing
  • Take part in a partner talk, a small-group decision and a whole-class seminar using agreed goals, roles and rules
  • Build on another speaker's idea by extending, questioning, paraphrasing or qualifying it
  • State their own view clearly, support it with reasons and evidence, and revise or qualify it when new information warrants
  • Evaluate a discussion transcript, naming moves that moved the talk forward and moves that stalled it

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Quoting a text accurately and naming where the words come from CCRA.R.1
  • Telling a claim from the reasons and evidence that support it CCRA.R.8
  • Taking short notes while listening
  • Following class norms for taking turns

Lesson Procedure

55-60 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "Three students are choosing a class field trip. Student A: 'I think we should go to the science museum, because the class just finished the unit on electricity and the museum has a whole floor on it.' Student B: 'The aquarium is better.' Student C: 'Yeah.' What is missing from this conversation? Rewrite Student B's line so that it answers Student A's reason."

    Take two or three rewrites. Student A gave a reason; Student B ignored it and Student C added nothing, so the talk cannot move. A strong rewrite answers the reason: "The electricity floor is a good point, but the aquarium has a lab on water pollution, which is our next unit." Point out the two skills students just used, building on an idea and expressing a view with a reason, and name the other two the anchor adds: preparing beforehand and participating effectively.

  2. Direct Instruction15 minutes

    Terms for the whole period.

    • Collaborative discussion: a conversation in which the speakers work toward a shared goal, such as understanding a text or making a decision, rather than each trying to win.
    • Prepare: read or research the material beforehand and bring marked evidence and questions.
    • Build on: respond to what a speaker just said by extending it, asking about it, paraphrasing it or qualifying it, so the talk moves forward.
    • Qualify: limit a claim to where it is true ("vegetables need daily water in hot weather, not all year").
    • Diverse partners: people whose views, knowledge and experience differ from one's own; the standard expects students to work well with all of them, not only with friends.
    • Range of conversations: one-on-one, small-group and teacher-led discussions, and collaborations such as planning a project together.

    How the anchor grows. Each grade-level standard below has four parts (a-d in the official text): preparation, rules and roles, questions and responses, and responding to other perspectives. The table paraphrases what each band adds.

    Progression of CCRA.SL.1 in grades 6-12
    Grade-level standardBandWhat this band adds
    SL.6.1Grade 6Come prepared and refer to evidence; follow discussion rules, set goals and deadlines, and define roles; pose and answer specific questions with detail; review key ideas and paraphrase other perspectives
    SL.7.1Grade 7Track progress toward goals; ask questions that draw out elaboration and bring the talk back on topic; acknowledge new information and change one's view when warranted
    SL.8.1Grade 8Add decision-making; pose questions that connect several speakers' ideas; answer with relevant evidence; qualify or justify one's view in light of the evidence
    SL.9-10.1Grades 9-10Come prepared from reading and research; set rules for collegial discussion and decision-making (such as informal consensus or votes); relate the talk to broader themes; bring others in; clarify, verify or challenge ideas; summarize agreement and disagreement
    SL.11-12.1Grades 11-12Promote civil, democratic discussion; ask questions that probe reasoning and evidence; ensure a hearing for a full range of positions; synthesize all sides, resolve contradictions when possible and decide what more research is needed

    Model discussion, grades 6-8. Read the briefing sheet first, as the students in the transcript did. Then read Transcript 1, a discussion among four invented seventh graders. The turns are numbered 1-16. Diagram 1 shows how the four parts of the anchor work together, and Diagram 2 counts the turns in Transcript 1.

    Oakridge Middle School has been offered Plot 7 in the Elm Street Community Garden for next year. The plot is 4 meters by 6 meters and gets about six hours of sun a day. The seventh-grade science classes will care for it, and each class must recommend one of two plans by March 1. Ms. Ruiz, the science teacher, will count the recommendations.

    Plan A is a food garden: tomatoes, green beans, lettuce and squash. The Elm Street Food Pantry has said it will take any fresh vegetables the school brings, every Saturday from June to September. Vegetables need watering every day in hot weather, and most of the harvest comes in July and August, when school is closed. Volunteers would have to sign up for summer watering shifts.

    Plan B is a pollinator garden: native flowers such as coneflower, bee balm and milkweed, which feed bees and butterflies. Once the plants are growing well, they need watering about once a week. They bloom from June to October, so classes could count the insects that visit during the first weeks of school in September.

    The garden club will donate seeds and plants worth $150 for either plan. The garden rules allow one plan per plot.

    SVHS (original briefing; the school, the garden and the plans are invented), Briefing Sheet: What Should Plot 7 Grow?. Original passage written for this page.

    Priya (facilitator): Our goal is to recommend Plan A or Plan B with two reasons, and we have twelve minutes. Jonah is taking notes. Who wants to start?

    Marcus: Plan A, easy. Food is more useful than flowers. Flowers just sit there.

    Elena: Can you say more about "more useful"? Useful to whom?

    Marcus: To people. The briefing says the food pantry will take anything we bring, every Saturday from June to September. That's real food for real families.

    Jonah: I'm writing that down. But the briefing also says vegetables need watering every day in hot weather, and the harvest comes when school is closed. Who's going to do that?

    Marcus: We just make a sign-up sheet. People will do it.

    Elena: I'm adding to Jonah's point. That's every hot day in July and August. If the volunteers missed a week, the tomatoes could die before the pantry ever got them.

    Priya: So Jonah and Elena are saying Plan A could help people the most, but only if the summer watering really happens. Is that right?

    Jonah: Yes, that's what I meant.

    Marcus: Nobody even likes bees anyway. Bees sting people.

    Priya: Let's get back to the two plans. Marcus, does the bee worry change which plan you'd pick, or is it a separate question?

    Marcus: I guess it's separate. I still like the food idea.

    Elena: I'll make the case for Plan B. The flowers only need water about once a week once they're growing, and they bloom until October, so we could count insects in September, when we're actually here. With Plan A, most of the harvest happens while we're away.

    Marcus: Huh. I didn't think about that. We'd never even see the tomatoes. I still think the pantry matters, though. What if we planted mostly flowers and a few beans?

    Priya: The briefing says the rules allow one plan per plot, so a mix probably isn't allowed. We could ask Ms. Ruiz about it. Jonah, can you read back the notes?

    Jonah: For Plan A: food for the pantry all summer. Against Plan A: daily watering when school is closed. For Plan B: weekly watering, and it blooms into October, when we can study it. Question for Ms. Ruiz: is a mix allowed?

    SVHS (original transcript of an invented discussion; the students are invented), Transcript 1: A Small Group Discusses Plot 7 (grade 7). Original passage written for this page.
    • Preparation shows up as evidence: turn 4

      In turn 2, Marcus says food is "more useful" than flowers. What does he add in turn 4?

      Result: Marcus adds a detail from the briefing: the pantry "will take anything we bring, every Saturday from June to September." His opinion becomes a reason others can test. Preparation is not only reading beforehand; it is bringing the reading into the talk when a claim needs support.

    • Building on an idea: turn 7

      Jonah raises the summer watering problem in turn 5. How does Elena's turn 7 build on it rather than repeat it?

      Result: She names her move ("I'm adding to Jonah's point") and extends it with a consequence: "If the volunteers missed a week, the tomatoes could die before the pantry ever got them." Jonah raised a question; Elena shows why it matters for the decision.

    • A weak move and a repair: turns 10-11

      Marcus says, "Nobody even likes bees anyway. Bees sting people." Why is this weak, and what does Priya do?

      Result: It is a sweeping claim ("nobody") with no support, and it pulls the talk away from the two plans. Priya does not scold him. She redirects with a question that lets him connect the worry to the decision or set it aside: "does the bee worry change which plan you'd pick, or is it a separate question?" A facilitator's question can repair a weak move.

    • Changing a view with new information: turn 14 (grades 7-8)

      After Elena's case for Plan B, what does Marcus do with his view?

      Result: He acknowledges the new point ("I didn't think about that. We'd never even see the tomatoes."), keeps what he still believes ("I still think the pantry matters") and proposes a new option. That is the grade 7 and 8 move: acknowledge new information and, when warranted, modify or qualify a view.

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    A seminar, grades 9-12. Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was an English lawyer, statesman and philosopher. His short essay "Of Discourse" gives advice about conversation. The excerpt below comes from an 1884 American edition, which keeps Bacon's older English: questioneth means "questions," ere means "before," poser means "an examiner," and a galliard was a lively dance. The 1884 editor glosses "to give the occasion" as "to start the subject." All students read the essay; grades 6-8 work with the four sentences the teacher marks (the one on giving the occasion, the one on questions, the one on leaving others their turns and the one on discretion), and grades 9-12 read it all. Then pairs read Transcript 2, an invented eleventh-grade seminar on the essay, with the turns numbered 1-14.

    Some in their discourse desire rather commendation of wit, in being able to hold all arguments, than of judgment, in discerning what is true; as if it were a praise to know what might be said and not what should be thought. Some have certain commonplaces and themes, wherein they are good, and want variety; which kind of poverty is for the most part tedious, and, when it is once perceived, ridiculous. The honorablest part of talk is to give the occasion, and again to moderate and pass to somewhat else; for then a man leads the dance. It is good in discourse, and speech of conversation, to vary and intermingle speech of the present occasion with arguments, tales with reasons, asking of questions with telling of opinions, and jest with earnest; for it is a dull thing to tire, and, as we say now, to jade any thing too far. As for jest, there be certain things which ought to be privileged from it; namely, religion, matters of state, great persons, any man’s present business of importance, and any case that deserveth pity; yet there be some that think their wits have been asleep, except they dart out somewhat that is piquant, and to the quick; that is a vein which would be bridled:—

    [...]

    And, generally, men ought to find the difference between saltness and bitterness. Certainly, he that hath a satirical vein, as he maketh others afraid of his wit, so he had need be afraid of others’ memory. He that questioneth much, shall learn much, and content much, but especially if he apply his questions to the skill of the persons whom he asketh: for he shall give them occasion to please themselves in speaking, and himself shall continually gather knowledge; but let his questions not be troublesome, for that is fit for a poser. And let him be sure to leave other men their turns to speak; nay, if there be any that would reign and take up all the time, let him find means to take them off, and to bring others on, as musicians used to do with those that dance too long galliards. If you dissemble sometimes your knowledge of that you are thought to know, you shall be thought, another time, to know that you know not. Speech of a man’s self ought to be seldom, and well chosen. I knew one was wont to say in scorn, “He must needs be a wise man, he speaks so much of himself;” and there is but one case wherein a man may commend himself with good grace, and that is in commending virtue in another, especially if it be such a virtue whereunto himself pretendeth. Speech of touch towards others should be sparingly used; for discourse ought to be as a field, without coming home to any man. [...] Discretion of speech is more than eloquence; and to speak agreeably to him with whom we deal, is more than to speak in good words, or in good order. A good continued speech, without a good speech of interlocution, shows slowness; and a good reply, or second speech, without a good settled speech, showeth shallowness and weakness. As we see in beasts, that those that are weakest in the course, are yet nimblest in the turn; as it is betwixt the greyhound and the hare. To use too many circumstances, ere one come to the matter, is wearisome; to use none at all, is blunt.

    Francis Bacon, Of Discourse (excerpt: the Latin quotation and one anecdote are left out) (1597; this edition 1884). Public domain (published 1884). Source text.

    Mr. Abernathy: Our question comes from near the end of the essay: "Discretion of speech is more than eloquence." Do you agree? Point us to the words you marked while you prepared.

    Dev: I agree. Bacon's first sentence criticizes people who want "commendation of wit, in being able to hold all arguments" more than "judgment, in discerning what is true." That's eloquence without discretion. You can argue any side, but you aren't trying to find out what is true.

    Lucia: I want to push on that. Is being able to argue every side really a fault? In debate we're assigned sides, and it makes you understand the other view.

    Dev: Fair. But Bacon's word is "desire." He's criticizing people who want to be praised for it. Debate is practice, so I don't think he's talking about that.

    Theo: Yeah, I agree with Dev. Showing off is bad. Also, Bacon is really old, so a lot of this doesn't apply anymore.

    Lucia: Which part doesn't apply? Can you point to a line?

    Theo: I mean the language, mostly. Galliards and all that.

    Sam: The galliard line is my favorite, actually. He says if someone "would reign and take up all the time," you should "find means to take them off, and to bring others on," the way musicians do with dancers who dance too long. That's what a facilitator does now. So the words are old, but the idea isn't.

    Mr. Abernathy: Hana, you marked the sentence about questions. How does it connect to what Sam just said?

    Hana: Bacon says, "He that questioneth much, shall learn much," especially if he asks people about their own skill, but "let his questions not be troublesome." So asking a quiet person a question is one way of bringing them on, as long as it doesn't feel like a test. I'd call that discretion too: knowing what to ask, and whom.

    Lucia: That changes my answer a little. I came in thinking eloquence matters more, because a well-built speech persuades people. But if discretion includes knowing when to ask and when to stop, then I'd say discretion matters more in a conversation and eloquence matters more in a speech.

    Dev: That's close to Bacon's own point at the end: "A good continued speech, without a good speech of interlocution, shows slowness." Interlocution means the back-and-forth. He wants both.

    Mr. Abernathy: Where are we, then? Someone sum up what we agree on and what we don't.

    Sam: We agree that discretion matters most in conversation. We don't agree yet on whether being able to argue every side is a fault. Lucia sees it as useful practice, and Dev thinks Bacon means showing off. To settle it, we'd need to know how people argued in Bacon's time, and none of us looked that up.

    SVHS (original transcript of an invented seminar; the teacher and students are invented), Transcript 2: A Seminar on "Of Discourse" (grade 11). Original passage written for this page.
    1. Opening the seminar: turns 1-2. Ask: "How does Mr. Abernathy's opening make preparation count?" Teacher note: he asks for "the words you marked while you prepared," so students must arrive with evidence. Dev answers with two quotations from Bacon's first sentence and then says what they mean for the question.
    2. Challenge and response: turns 3-4. Ask: "Is Lucia being rude when she says 'I want to push on that'?" Teacher note: no. She challenges the idea, not Dev, and gives a reason from experience with debate. Dev concedes part of it ("Fair") and answers with a closer reading of one word. A challenge followed by a reasoned reply is what the grades 9-10 standard calls clarifying, verifying or challenging ideas.
    3. Back to the text: turn 12. Ask: "What does Dev add in turn 12?" Teacher note: he ties the point under discussion to a sentence near the end of the essay and defines the hard word interlocution (the back-and-forth of conversation), so the group's idea is now tied to Bacon's own words.
    4. Hold the rest for the quiz. Students analyze the other turns of both transcripts on their own in the quiz, so stop after turn 12 here.
  4. Independent Practice15-20 minutes

    Students hold their own discussion in groups of four, using Activity 1 (the fishbowl and talk tracker) or Activity 3 (the decision meeting). Grades 6-8 discuss the Plot 7 question from the briefing sheet; grades 9-12 discuss Mr. Abernathy's question about "Of Discourse," or a new one from the essay. Before talking, each student writes one piece of evidence and one question on an index card (Activity 2 gives the card format). Groups set a goal and a time limit, choose a facilitator and a note-taker, and end with a two-sentence summary of what they agree on and what they don't.

    Afterward, each student writes three sentences: one naming a turn in which someone built on their idea or they built on someone else's, one naming a view that changed (theirs or another speaker's) and why, and one naming what the group would need to know to go further.

  5. Closure5 minutes

    Exit ticket: Write one sentence that builds on something a classmate said today. Start with their idea in your own words, then add a reason, a question or a limit.

    Teacher notes. All three transcripts and the briefing sheet are invented for this page, and so are the students, the teachers and the town; they are models, not records of real classes. Some turns are weak on purpose and are named as weak on this page: Marcus's turns 2, 6 and 10 in Transcript 1 and Theo's turns 5 and 7 in Transcript 2. Bacon's essay is quoted word for word from the 1884 edition, with two marked cuts: a one-line Latin quotation and a short anecdote about two noblemen. Bacon writes of "men" and "a man," as writers of his time did; his advice applies to every speaker.

    For homework: students read Transcript 3 below, an invented planning meeting among three partners. The turns are numbered 1-12.

    Ava: Okay, the history fair is in three weeks. We need a topic for our display.

    Kofi: The covered bridge on Mill Road. The historical society has a box of photos of it from before the 1927 flood.

    Ren: Or the old train station.

    Ava: The bridge is better. Let's do the bridge.

    Ren: Wait, why is it better? I said the station because the public library has the station's old ticket books, so we'd have real records with dates and numbers in them.

    Kofi: That's a good point. Records would make our display more than pictures. But the photos show what the bridge looked like, and at a fair people look at pictures first. What if we found both kinds of sources for one topic? Does the library have anything about the bridge?

    Ren: I could check. If the library has records on the bridge too, I'd pick the bridge.

    Ava: Fine. So who does what?

    Kofi: I'll ask the historical society if we can scan the photos.

    Ava: And I'll make the board.

    Ren: And I'll go to the library. When do we meet again?

    Ava: Whenever. We'll figure it out.

    SVHS (original transcript of an invented planning meeting; the students and the town are invented), Transcript 3: Three Partners Plan a History Fair Display. Original passage written for this page.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a set of sentence starters on a card: "I want to add to ___'s point...", "Can you say more about ___?", "So you are saying ___. Is that right?", "I see it differently because ___."
  • Let students rehearse their first contribution with a partner before the group discussion begins
  • Pre-mark two sentences in the briefing or the essay and let students bring those as their evidence

For Advanced Students

  • Ask students to facilitate a group and, afterward, write a paragraph on one moment where they brought another speaker in and how
  • Have students find a second sentence in "Of Discourse" that seems to contradict the question's claim and bring it to the seminar
  • Ask students to write the ground rules a group of five would need for a discussion that must end in a decision, with a fallback if consensus fails

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Strong participants arrive with marked evidence and questions, refer to specific words when they speak, and respond to the speaker before them: they extend, ask, paraphrase or qualify. Their own claims come with reasons, and they say when and why their view has changed. Watch for students who speak often but never build on anyone, students who agree without adding anything, and groups that never set a goal or end without a summary. In written work, look for turn numbers and quotations that actually show the move the student names.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Fishbowl with a Talk Tracker

20 minWhole class: an inner circle of 4-5 and an outer circle

An inner circle holds a discussion while the outer circle tracks it. Then the circles switch. Tracking someone else's talk makes the moves of the standard visible before students try them.

The Talk Tracker

Each outer-circle student watches one inner-circle speaker and tallies four moves: E (refers to evidence from the reading), Q (asks a real question), B (builds on the previous speaker) and S (sums up or paraphrases). They also copy down one sentence that moved the talk forward.

Grades 6-8 Version

  • The inner circle discusses the Plot 7 question for 7 minutes, using the briefing sheet
  • The teacher gives the facilitator three prepared questions to use if the talk stalls
  • Trackers share one tally and one sentence with the speaker they watched, starting with something that worked

Grades 9-12 Version

  • The inner circle discusses a seminar question from "Of Discourse" for 8 minutes with no prepared prompts
  • Trackers also note any moment when a speaker challenged an idea and whether the reply gave a reason
  • The class compares the trackers' notes and decides which single turn changed the direction of the discussion

Discussion Questions

  • Which move was the hardest to find on the tracker, and what would it have sounded like?
  • Did more turns make a speaker more helpful to the group? What did the trackers' notes show?
  • What did the facilitator do that a tracker could see?
2

Prepare-to-Talk Cards

15 minIndividual, then pairs

Students prepare three index cards before a discussion, then test them in a one-on-one conversation with a partner. Preparation becomes something a teacher can see and check.

The Three Cards

  1. Evidence card: a quotation or fact, copied exactly, with where it comes from
  2. Question card: a question the group could disagree about, tied to the evidence
  3. Position card: one sentence stating a view, with the reason behind it

Grades 6-8 Version

  • Students make the cards from the briefing sheet, using frames such as "The briefing says ___, so ___."
  • Partners trade cards. Each partner asks one question about the other's position card, and the owner answers it
  • Each student revises one card after the conversation

Grades 9-12 Version

  • Students make the cards from "Of Discourse"; the question card must be one that the essay alone cannot settle
  • Partners trade position cards and each writes the strongest objection to the other's view
  • Each student adds a fourth card: the research they would do to answer the objection

Discussion Questions

  • Which of your cards did your partner's question change, and how?
  • What is the difference between a question with one right answer and a question a group can discuss?
  • How could a facilitator use the position cards to bring a quiet speaker in?
3

The Decision Meeting

20 minGroups of 4, mixed by the teacher

Groups must reach one decision, with roles, a time limit and a decision rule agreed before they start. The teacher mixes the groups so that students work with partners they do not usually choose.

Roles

  • Facilitator: states the goal, keeps the talk on it, brings in anyone who has not spoken
  • Note-taker: records reasons for and against each option
  • Timekeeper: gives a warning with 3 minutes left
  • Summarizer: reads back the agreement and disagreement at the end

Grades 6-8 Version

  • The decision: which plan should the class recommend for Plot 7? Each member must give at least one reason from the briefing
  • Decision rule: talk for 10 minutes, then vote; the vote is recorded with the reasons on each side
  • Each student writes one sentence on whether their view changed and what changed it

Grades 9-12 Version

  • The decision: which of three questions should next week's seminar on "Of Discourse" use? The teacher writes the three on the board, for example "Is Bacon right that jokes about some subjects should be off-limits?", "Can someone who speaks well be a poor conversationalist?" and "What does Bacon mean by 'discretion'?"
  • Decision rule: try for consensus first; if it fails at 12 minutes, take a vote and record the minority view
  • The summarizer's report must name the strongest reason against the chosen question

Discussion Questions

  • Did your group reach consensus or vote? What did the decision rule change about how people talked?
  • Which role was hardest to play well, and why?
  • What did the minority view add to the final decision?

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: The Four Parts of CCRA.SL.1

CCRA.SL.1: four parts that work together in every discussion 1. Prepare Read or research first; mark evidence; write real questions 2. Participate Agree on a goal, roles and rules; take turns; bring others in 3. Build on ideas Extend, ask about, paraphrase or qualify what was just said 4. Express your view State it clearly with reasons; revise it when evidence warrants Each discussion ends with a summary that shows what to prepare for the next one.
The anchor's four requirements as one cycle: prepare, participate, build on others' ideas and express your own. A strong discussion moves through all four, and its closing summary shows what to prepare next. Drawn for this page.

Diagram 2: Who Talked in Transcript 1?

Transcript 1: number of turns per speaker (16 turns in all) Priya 4 turns: 1, 8, 11, 15 Marcus 6 turns: 2, 4, 6, 10, 12, 14 Elena 3 turns: 3, 7, 13 Jonah 3 turns: 5, 9, 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Number of turns
Turns per speaker in the invented Plot 7 discussion, counted from the transcript, with the turn numbers. Marcus took the most turns. A count shows how often each person spoke, not how much each turn helped: read it together with the transcript.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

CCRA.SL.1 Homework: Evaluating a Planning Meeting

Directions: Read Transcript 3, "Three Partners Plan a History Fair Display," at the end of the lesson plan (in Closure). The students, the town and the meeting are invented. Cite turns by number (1-12) and quote exact words where a problem asks for evidence. Answer in complete sentences.

Part 1: Reading the Conversation (Problems 1-2)

  1. In which turn does a speaker first ask another speaker for a reason? Quote the question, and explain how the conversation changes in the turns after it.
  2. Explain how Kofi's turn 6 builds on Ren's idea instead of simply rejecting it or giving in. Quote two phrases from turn 6 that show the build.

Part 2: Expressing and Preparing (Problems 3-4)

  1. Ava's turn 4 states a view with no reason. Rewrite it so that it is clear and persuasive, using at least one detail from turn 2 or turn 6. Then explain in one sentence what your version does that the original does not.
  2. Before their next meeting, what should each partner prepare? For Kofi, Ren and Ava, name one specific thing and explain how it would help the group decide on its topic.

Part 3: Making the Collaboration Work (Problems 5-6)

  1. The meeting ends with "Whenever. We'll figure it out." Write the goal, a deadline and a next meeting time that the group could have agreed on, using what the transcript says about the fair, and explain why each one matters. Grades 9-12: also write a decision rule for what the group will do if the library has no records about the bridge.
  2. Write a paragraph evaluating the meeting as a collaboration: name two things the partners did well and one thing they should change, each with a turn number.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Evidence from the TranscriptEvery answer names the right turn and quotes the exact words that show the moveTurns named but quotations missing or loosely matchedNo turn numbers or quotations
Building on IdeasExplains precisely how a turn extends, questions or qualifies an earlier oneSays a turn builds on another without showing howConfuses building on with agreeing or repeating
Clear, Persuasive ExpressionRewritten turn states a view, gives a specific reason from the transcript and responds to the other speakersView and reason present, but the reason is vague or ignores the othersRewrite still gives no reason
Planning the CollaborationGoal, deadline, roles or next steps are specific, fit the transcript and are explainedPlan is present but vague or partly unexplainedPlan missing or unrelated to the meeting

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 2-8, 15 and 19 use the Plot 7 briefing sheet and Transcript 1 (Direct Instruction). Questions 9-14 and 16-20 use "Of Discourse" and Transcript 2 (Guided Practice); question 18 compares the two transcripts. Question 1 stands on its own. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In CCRA.SL.1, what does it mean to build on another speaker's idea?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    What does Priya do in turn 1 of Transcript 1 that helps the group participate effectively?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In turn 3, Elena asks, "Can you say more about 'more useful'? Useful to whom?" What does her question do?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which detail in Jonah's turn 5 shows that he prepared by reading the briefing?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In turn 8, Priya says, "So Jonah and Elena are saying Plan A could help people the most, but only if the summer watering really happens. Is that right?" Which discussion move is this?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why is Elena's turn 13 more persuasive than Marcus's turn 2?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In turn 15, how does Priya use the briefing?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Priya sets the group's goal in turn 1. Which part of that goal has the group NOT yet met by turn 16?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why is Theo's turn 5 in Transcript 2 a weak contribution to the seminar?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    How does Sam's turn 8 respond to Theo's claim that a lot of the essay "doesn't apply anymore"?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In turn 11, how does Lucia change her view?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    What does Sam's summary in turn 14 say the group would need in order to settle its disagreement?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Bacon writes, "let him be sure to leave other men their turns to speak." Which move in Transcript 2 follows this advice most directly?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Bacon writes, "To use too many circumstances, ere one come to the matter, is wearisome; to use none at all, is blunt." What does this advise a speaker in a discussion?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer

    In Transcript 1, Marcus says in turn 2, "Food is more useful than flowers." Write a reply of one or two sentences that builds on his idea instead of simply agreeing or disagreeing, then explain what makes it a build.

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    Rewrite Theo's turn 5 in Transcript 2 so that it expresses a view clearly and persuasively. Use a line from "Of Discourse" in your rewrite.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    To prepare for a seminar on "Of Discourse," write two questions you would bring. Tie each one to a specific sentence in the essay, and explain why it would help the group discuss rather than simply answer.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    Compare Jonah's notes in Transcript 1 (turn 16) with Sam's summary in Transcript 2 (turn 14). What does Sam's summary do that Jonah's notes do not?

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Bacon advises a speaker to "apply his questions to the skill of the persons whom he asketh." Suppose one member of the Plot 7 group has worked in a vegetable garden and another has never grown anything. Write one question for each partner that follows Bacon's advice, and explain your choices.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Grades 9-12: Write an opening statement of four or five sentences for a seminar on Bacon's claim that "Discretion of speech is more than eloquence." State your position, cite one sentence from the essay and end with a question for the group.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does CCRA.SL.1 mean?

It means students should be able to prepare for and take part in many kinds of discussions and collaborations, working with partners of all kinds, building on what others say and expressing their own ideas clearly and persuasively. A student meeting it arrives with evidence and questions, responds to the speaker before them instead of waiting for a turn, gives reasons for a view and changes or qualifies that view when the evidence warrants.

How does CCRA.SL.1 change from grade 6 to grade 12?

The same four habits grow more demanding. Grade 6 students come prepared, follow agreed rules, answer questions with detail and paraphrase other views. Grades 7 and 8 add tracking goals, drawing out elaboration, connecting several speakers' ideas and qualifying a view. Grades 9-10 add setting the group's own rules and relating talk to broader themes; grades 11-12 add probing reasoning, ensuring a hearing for a full range of positions and synthesizing all sides. The progression table in Direct Instruction lists each grade-level standard.

What does "diverse partners" mean in CCRA.SL.1?

It means people whose views, knowledge and experience differ from the student's own. The standard expects students to discuss and collaborate well with anyone in the class, not only with friends who already agree. Teachers can support this by mixing groups, assigning roles and setting rules that give every member a turn, as in Activity 3.

What counts as preparing for a discussion?

Preparing means reading or researching the material and bringing something to use: a marked quotation, a fact with its source, a real question and a first position with a reason. The Prepare-to-Talk Cards in Activity 2 make this visible. Preparation shows during the talk when a student points to specific words, as the students in the seminar transcript do.

What is the difference between agreeing and building on an idea?

Agreeing accepts an idea; building on it adds something. A student builds on an idea by extending it with a reason or consequence, asking a question about it, paraphrasing it to check understanding or limiting it to where it holds. "I agree" alone does not move a discussion forward, which is why Student C's "Yeah" in the warm-up leaves the talk stuck.

How do teachers assess CCRA.SL.1 if speaking is hard to grade?

Teachers usually combine observation with written evidence. A talk tracker (Activity 1) records specific moves, a rubric scores preparation, building on and expressing ideas, and a short written reflection after the discussion shows what each student noticed. Students can also evaluate a transcript, as in the homework and quiz on this page, which tests whether they recognize effective moves.

How can a quiet student meet CCRA.SL.1?

A quiet student meets it the same way as anyone else: by preparing, contributing and responding to others, though the routes in can vary. Prepared cards, rehearsing a first point with a partner, the role of note-taker or summarizer, and a facilitator who invites the student in all help. The standard asks for effective participation, not for the most talking.

Is CCRA.SL.1 the same as debate?

No. A debate is a contest in which each side tries to win; a collaborative discussion is shared work toward understanding or a decision. Debate skills such as stating claims and answering objections help, and the seminar in Transcript 2 discusses them, but CCRA.SL.1 also asks students to build on others' ideas, bring others in and change their minds when the evidence warrants.

How does CCRA.SL.1 connect to other ELA standards?

It draws on reading and feeds writing and presenting. Referring to evidence uses the close reading of CCRA.R.1; judging a speaker's reasons connects to CCRA.SL.3; presenting findings to a group is CCRA.SL.4; and discussion before writing often strengthens the arguments students write for CCRA.W.1.

Why does a CCRA.SL.1 lesson use an essay from the 1590s?

Because Bacon's "Of Discourse" is short advice about conversation, so students practice discussion on a text whose subject is discussion. Its sentences about questions, turn-taking and getting to the point give the class criteria to test against their own talk. The older English is glossed in Guided Practice, and grades 6-8 work with four marked sentences.