SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

SL.6.1Common CoreELASpeaking and ListeningGrade 6

SL.6.1: Collaborative Discussions in Grade 6

In plain English: SL.6.1 is the Common Core grade 6 ELA standard that asks students to take part in discussions one-on-one, in groups and led by a teacher. Students come prepared and cite evidence, follow discussion rules, set goals, deadlines and roles, ask and answer specific questions with detail, and review key ideas by paraphrasing and reflecting on other points of view.

Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 6 topics, texts, and issues, building on others' ideas and expressing their own clearly.

  1. a.Come to discussions prepared, having read or studied required material; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas under discussion.
  2. b.Follow rules for collegial discussions, set specific goals and deadlines, and define individual roles as needed.
  3. c.Pose and respond to specific questions with elaboration and detail by making comments that contribute to the topic, text, or issue under discussion.
  4. d.Review the key ideas expressed and demonstrate understanding of multiple perspectives through reflection and paraphrasing.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Speaking and Listening Standards · Cluster: Comprehension and Collaboration · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

60-65 min

Overview

Students learn to take part in collaborative discussions one-on-one, in groups and in teacher-led settings, using an excerpt from Hans Andersen's fairy tale "The Emperor's New Clothes" (first published in Danish in 1837). The story is a natural fit: a whole town pretends to see cloth that is not there until a child speaks up, so students have a real question to talk about: why do people stay quiet when something is wrong? A collaborative discussion is one where people think through a question together, and each speaker adds something to what the others said.

Because a discussion cannot be heard on the page, students study three short transcripts (written records of who said what) written for this lesson: a teacher-led discussion, a group planning a poster, and two partners. The transcripts model the moves the standard names: coming prepared and citing the text, following rules and setting goals, deadlines and roles, asking and answering specific questions with detail, and reviewing key ideas by paraphrasing and reflecting. Students then hold their own discussions in all three formats.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Come to a discussion prepared and refer to evidence from the text to probe and reflect on ideas
  • Follow rules for collegial discussions, set a specific goal and deadline, and define roles with a group
  • Pose and respond to specific questions with elaboration and detail
  • Review the key ideas of a discussion and paraphrase and reflect on other points of view
  • Build on others' ideas and express their own clearly in one-on-one, group and teacher-led discussions

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Following agreed-upon rules for discussions and carrying out assigned roles SL.5.1
  • Quoting a text accurately when explaining what it says RL.5.1
  • Marking a sentence in a text and writing a short note about it

Lesson Procedure

60-65 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5-10 minutes

    Students write for three minutes, then tell a partner. Collect four or five answers and write them on the board.

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "Think of a time when you knew something was wrong but stayed quiet, or a time when you spoke up. What made it hard or easy to speak?"

    Keep the stories general; nobody has to name a person. Tell students that today's story is about a whole town that stays quiet, and that they will talk about it in three ways: with the whole class, in a small group and with one partner. SL.6.1 names the skills that make those talks work (Diagram 1).

  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Part 1: What the standard asks. Show Diagram 1 and the table below. SL.6.1 covers three formats (one-on-one, in groups and teacher-led) and four parts. Define each key word as it comes up: collegial means respectful and cooperative, the way teammates treat each other; elaboration means adding details and reasons that explain a point; a perspective is one person's point of view; and to paraphrase is to say someone else's idea again in your own words.

    SL.6.1 discussion moves with sentence stems
    MovePartSentence stem
    Use your preparationa"In paragraph __, I starred ..."
    Probe with evidencea"Can you show us the line that ...?"
    Build on an ideamain"I'll add to what __ said ..."
    Ask a specific questionc"Why does __ do __ in paragraph __?"
    Answer with detailc"I think ... because in paragraph __ ..."
    Ask for morec"Can you say more about ...?"
    Paraphrased"So you're saying that ..."
    Reflectd"I didn't think of that. Now I think ..."
    Review key ideasd"So far we've said ... and ..."

    Part 2: The text under study. Students read the excerpt the night before and star one line. First give the setup in your own words: an Emperor who loves new clothes hires two men who claim to weave cloth that is invisible to anyone who is unfit for his job or very foolish. The Emperor sends his trusted old minister (a high government official) to check on the work. Explain a few old words: swindlers are people who cheat others out of money, stuffs means cloth, a post is a job, a procession is a parade, and chamberlains are officials who serve a ruler. The paragraphs are numbered so that speakers can cite them, and [...] marks places where parts of the story are left out.

    [...]

    Life was very gay in the great town where he lived; hosts of strangers came to visit it every day, and among them one day two swindlers. They gave themselves out as weavers, and said that they knew how to weave the most beautiful stuffs imaginable. Not only were the colours and patterns unusually fine, but the clothes that were made of the stuffs had the peculiar quality of becoming invisible to every person who was not fit for the office he held, or if he was impossibly dull.

    [...]

    So the good old minister went into the room where the two swindlers sat working at the empty loom.

    'Heaven preserve us!' thought the old minister, opening his eyes very wide. 'Why, I can't see a thing!' But he took care not to say so.

    Both the swindlers begged him to be good enough to step a little nearer, and asked if he did not think it a good pattern and beautiful colouring. They pointed to the empty loom, and the poor old minister stared as hard as he could, but he could not see anything, for of course there was nothing to see.

    'Good heavens!' thought he, 'is it possible that I am a fool. I have never thought so, and nobody must know it. Am I not fit for my post? It will never do to say that I cannot see the stuffs.'

    'Well, sir, you don't say anything about the stuff,' said the one who was pretending to weave.

    'Oh, it is beautiful! quite charming!' said the old minister, looking through his spectacles; 'this pattern and these colours! I will certainly tell the Emperor that the stuff pleases me very much.'

    [...]

    Then the Emperor walked along in the procession under the gorgeous canopy, and everybody in the streets and at the windows exclaimed, 'How beautiful the Emperor's new clothes are! What a splendid train! And they fit to perfection!' Nobody would let it appear that he could see nothing, for then he would not be fit for his post, or else he was a fool.

    None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.

    'But he has got nothing on,' said a little child.

    'Oh, listen to the innocent,' said its father; and one person whispered to the other what the child had said. 'He has nothing on; a child says he has nothing on!'

    'But he has nothing on!' at last cried all the people.

    The Emperor writhed, for he knew it was true, but he thought 'the procession must go on now,' so held himself stiffer than ever, and the chamberlains held up the invisible train.

    Hans Christian Andersen (the translator is not named in this edition), The Emperor's New Clothes (excerpt), in Stories from Hans Andersen, illustrated by Edmund Dulac. Omitted, marked [...]: the opening description of the Emperor; the Emperor's order for the cloth and his choice of the minister; the swindlers' requests for more silk and gold, a second official's visit, the Emperor's visit and the fitting of the clothes (1837; this edition 1911). Public domain (published 1911). Source text.

    Part 3: A model teacher-led discussion. Read the transcript below aloud, with volunteers taking the parts. It was written for this page. Pause after each worked example below and ask, "Which move from the table did that speaker make?"

    Mr. Brennan: Here is our question. In paragraphs 2 to 7, the old minister cannot see any cloth, but he praises it anyway. Why? Start by reading us the line you starred last night.

    Keisha: I starred paragraph 5: "It will never do to say that I cannot see the stuffs." I think he lies because he's scared. If he says he can't see it, everyone will think he's a fool.

    Mr. Brennan: Who can add to Keisha's idea?

    Tomás: I'll add to it. Keisha said he's scared of looking like a fool, and paragraph 1 tells us there's more to it. The cloth is supposed to be invisible to anyone who "was not fit for the office he held." So if he admits it, he could lose his job, not just look silly.

    Mr. Brennan: So now we have two fears: looking foolish and losing the job. Ben, you had a question in your notes.

    Ben: Yes. Why doesn't the minister just ask the swindlers to show him one thread up close? Wouldn't that settle it?

    Lily: I don't think he dares. He thinks the swindlers can see it.

    Mr. Brennan: Lily, can you say more? What details make him believe that?

    Lily: In paragraph 4 the swindlers act like the cloth is real. They ask "if he did not think it a good pattern and beautiful colouring," and they point to the loom. When somebody acts that sure, you start to doubt yourself.

    Ben: Oh. So he isn't only scared. He really wonders if something is wrong with him. In paragraph 5 he asks himself, "is it possible that I am a fool."

    Mr. Brennan: Let's review before we move on. What key ideas have we heard?

    Keisha: I said the minister lies because he's afraid of looking foolish. Tomás added that he's also afraid of losing his job. Lily and Ben showed that he starts to doubt himself because the swindlers act so sure.

    Mr. Brennan: That's a clear review. Tomorrow we'll look at the child in paragraph 10 and ask what makes the child different.

    Written for this page (the teacher and students are invented), Transcript 1: A Teacher-Led Discussion. Original passage written for this page.
    • A prepared opening in a teacher-led discussion (paragraphs 1-2)

      Mr. Brennan asks why the minister praises the cloth and adds, "Start by reading us the line you starred last night." Keisha reads paragraph 5 of the story.

      Result: The teacher asks for preparation first, so the first answer comes with evidence: "It will never do to say that I cannot see the stuffs." Keisha then states her own idea clearly in one sentence and gives a reason: he is scared people will think he is a fool.

    • Building on an idea with new evidence (paragraph 4)

      Tomás: "I'll add to it. Keisha said he's scared of looking like a fool, and paragraph 1 tells us there's more to it."

      Result: Tomás names Keisha's idea, then adds a line from paragraph 1 (the cloth is invisible to anyone who "was not fit for the office he held") and a new point: the minister could lose his job. Building on an idea means adding something, not just agreeing.

    • Posing a specific question (paragraphs 5-7)

      Ben: "Why doesn't the minister just ask the swindlers to show him one thread up close? Wouldn't that settle it?"

      Result: Ben's question is specific: it names one character and one action, so classmates know exactly what to answer. Compare a vague question such as "What did you think?" Lily gives a first answer: the minister does not dare, because he thinks the swindlers can see the cloth.

    • Responding with elaboration and detail (paragraphs 8-9)

      Mr. Brennan: "Lily, can you say more? What details make him believe that?"

      Result: Lily elaborates with two details from paragraph 4: the swindlers ask "if he did not think it a good pattern and beautiful colouring," and they point to the loom. Then she explains why the details matter: when somebody acts that sure, you start to doubt yourself.

    • Reflecting and reviewing key ideas (paragraphs 10-12)

      Ben: "Oh. So he isn't only scared." Then Mr. Brennan asks for a review, and Keisha answers.

      Result: Ben reflects: Lily's point changes his idea, and he supports the new idea with "is it possible that I am a fool." Keisha reviews the key ideas and credits each speaker: fear of looking foolish, fear of losing the job, and self-doubt.

    Point out that nobody in this discussion said "I agree" and stopped. Each speaker added a line, a detail or a new idea, and the review at the end showed where the class had got to.

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Groups of four read the group transcript below (written for this page) aloud, one speaker's part each. In it, four sixth graders plan a poster. Groups mark with a highlighter every place where the speakers set a goal, set a deadline, give out a role, or follow or break a class rule. Then show Diagram 2.

    Rosa: Our job is a poster that answers Mr. Brennan's question: "Why do the characters pretend to see the clothes?" What should our goal be?

    Aiden: Three reasons, and each reason needs a line from the story with its paragraph number.

    Kofi: And a deadline. Posters are due at 2:10, so let's have all three reasons picked by 1:55. That leaves fifteen minutes to write.

    June: Okay. Do we need roles? There are four of us and four jobs on the card.

    Rosa: Let's use them. Kofi, you're the timekeeper. June, you write on the poster. I'll check that every line is really in the story, and Aiden presents. And remember our class chart: one person talks at a time, and we disagree with the idea, not the person.

    Aiden: First reason: they're afraid. Paragraph 8 says, "Nobody would let it appear that he could see nothing."

    June: Wait, doesn't that mean the opposite? It sounds like they could see something.

    Rosa: Let me check. The whole sentence is "Nobody would let it appear that he could see nothing, for then he would not be fit for his post, or else he was a fool." So they saw nothing but hid it. Aiden's line works.

    June: My second reason is that people copy each other. In paragraph 11,

    Kofi: Copying? That's silly. They're grown-ups. They should think for themselves.

    Rosa: Kofi, June wasn't finished. One person at a time.

    Kofi: Sorry, June. Go ahead.

    June: In paragraph 11, "one person whispered to the other what the child had said," and soon everybody says it. So people copy the truth the same way they copied the lie.

    Kofi: Okay, that changes my mind. Copying works both ways. It's 1:52, by the way.

    Aiden: For the third reason, what about the Emperor? In paragraph 13 he knows the truth, but he thinks "the procession must go on now."

    Rosa: So he's too proud to stop. That's three reasons with three lines, and it's 1:54. June, you can start writing.

    Written for this page (the students are invented), Transcript 2: A Group Plans a Poster. Original passage written for this page.

    Debrief with three questions. (1) What goal and deadline did the group set in paragraphs 1-3? Three reasons, each with a line and a paragraph number, picked by 1:55, so that there are fifteen minutes to write before 2:10. (2) Which class rule was broken, and how did the group handle it? In paragraph 10 Kofi cuts June off before she finishes. Rosa reminds him of the rule, he apologizes, and June finishes her point in paragraph 13. (3) Did the roles help? Rosa's job as line checker settles June's worry about the quotation in paragraph 8, and Kofi, the timekeeper, calls out the time.

  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Students read the transcript of a one-on-one talk between two partners, Grace and Omar (written for this page), about the end of the story. They answer quiz questions 1-10 on their own with the transcript and the story open, then questions 11-20, which ask them to use the standard in new situations and to write their own discussion moves.

    Grace: I'll start. Last night I read the ending twice and wrote down what the father says in paragraph 11: "Oh, listen to the innocent." I think "innocent" there means the child doesn't know the rules the grown-ups follow. So here's my question: was the child brave, or did the child just not know any better?

    Omar: I think the child was brave. Everyone else was cheering. It's hard to say something different from a whole crowd.

    Grace: Can you give me an example from the story that shows it was hard?

    Omar: Sure. In paragraph 8, everybody "in the streets and at the windows" is saying how beautiful the clothes are. Then in paragraph 10 the child is the only one who says the truth out loud, and it's a little child, smaller than everyone there.

    Grace: So you're saying the child spoke up even though the whole crowd said the opposite. I see that. But I still think the child didn't know it was risky. The grown-ups were scared of looking unfit for their jobs. A little child doesn't have a job to lose.

    Omar: Hmm, that's a good point. Paragraph 8 also says the grown-ups stayed quiet because "then he would not be fit for his post, or else he was a fool." A child has no post.

    Grace: Right. What do you think about the father? Is he on the child's side?

    Omar: I think so. He says "listen," so he wants people to pay attention. Right after that, "one person whispered to the other what the child had said."

    Grace: That makes me think of something. Maybe the child didn't have to be brave, but the father did. He's a grown-up with a post to lose, and he still told people to listen.

    Omar: I didn't think of that. He's the first grown-up to say the child is worth hearing. So maybe the brave one is the father, and the child is the honest one.

    Grace: Let me review what we have. You think the child was brave because the whole crowd was cheering. I think the child had nothing to lose. And now we both think the father took a real risk.

    Omar: That's fair. I still think it's hard for any kid to talk in front of a crowd, though. Let's bring both ideas to the class discussion tomorrow.

    Written for this page (the students are invented), Transcript 3: Two Partners Talk. Original passage written for this page.
  5. Closure5 minutes

    Exit ticket: "Write one move from today's table that you will use in your next discussion, and the exact words you will say." Sort the tickets by part (a-d) to plan partners for Activity 1.

    Teacher note on the text. The excerpt comes from a 1911 English edition and keeps its British spellings ("colours," "colouring") and older words exactly as printed. The story ends with the Emperor walking in the parade with no clothes on; the excerpt says only that "he has nothing on," and most sixth graders know the tale. Keep the talk on why the characters stay quiet, not on the joke.

    Homework. Tonight students prepare for and hold a short one-on-one discussion about the story, then plan for a group discussion. Show them the homework directions and the rubric before they leave.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give each student the sentence-stem table on a card and ask them to use two specific stems in the discussion
  • Let students rehearse their starred line and one sentence about it with a partner before the group talks
  • Pre-teach the old words (swindlers, stuffs, post, procession, chamberlains, writhed) with a small picture or example for each

For Advanced Students

  • Lead the group in Activity 2 as the line checker and plan two follow-up questions in advance
  • Read the whole story in the 1911 edition and bring one omitted paragraph that supports or changes a classmate's idea
  • Track one discussion with a turn timeline like Diagram 2 and write three sentences about who spoke and who was left out

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Strong sixth-grade discussion shows preparation (students cite a paragraph without being asked), listening (they paraphrase or name the last speaker's idea before adding their own), and detail (answers include a reason and a line from the text). Watch for three weak patterns: "I agree" with nothing added, questions so vague that nobody knows how to answer, and groups where one student does all the talking. In written items, look for correct paragraph numbers, exact quotations and moves that are labeled correctly: paraphrasing restates another person's idea, reflecting says how your own idea changed or held, and reviewing sums up the key ideas of the whole talk.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Question and Detail Partners

15 minPairs (one-on-one)

Partners take turns asking one specific question and answering it with detail and evidence. The partner who asked must paraphrase the answer before responding.

Procedure

  • Each student brings one starred line from the story and writes one specific question about it on a question-stem strip ("Why does __ do __ in paragraph __?")
  • Partner A asks the question. Partner B answers in three pieces: an idea, a detail or reason, and a line from the story with its paragraph number
  • Partner A paraphrases the answer ("So you're saying ..."), then agrees, adds to it or gives a different view
  • Switch roles and repeat. Finish with one sentence each: "My idea changed or stayed the same because ..."

Discussion Questions

  • Which question got the longer answer: one about a single line, or one that asked about the whole story?
  • When your partner paraphrased you, did they get your idea right? What did you do if they did not?

Variation for Online Classes

Pairs meet in breakout rooms and type their final sentences into the class chat.

2

Poster Group with Role Cards

20 minGroups of 4

Groups follow the class discussion rules, set their own goal and deadline, and hand out roles before they start, then make a poster that answers a question about the story.

Set Up (4 minutes)

  • Read the two class rules on the chart aloud: one person talks at a time, and disagree with the idea, not the person
  • Write a specific goal on the planning card (for example, "two reasons, each with a line and a paragraph number") and a deadline as a clock time
  • Hand out the four role cards as needed: timekeeper, writer, line checker, presenter

Discuss and Make (13 minutes)

Question for the poster: "Is the child in paragraph 10 the hero of the story, or is someone else?" Each member gives one idea with a line from the story. The line checker finds each line in the text before the writer puts it on the poster.

Share (3 minutes)

The presenter reads the poster to the class and says whether the group met its deadline. The teacher collects the planning cards.

Discussion Questions

  • Did your group follow both class rules? If a rule was broken, what did someone say to get back on track?
  • Which role did your group need most for this task? Was any role not needed?
3

Talk-Ticket Circle

15 minWhole class (teacher-led)

The teacher leads a whole-class circle. Every student has two talk tickets and spends one each time they speak, so everyone speaks and nobody takes over.

Procedure

  • The teacher asks: "Why does the Emperor keep walking in paragraph 13, even after everyone knows the truth?"
  • To spend a ticket, a student must first paraphrase or name the last speaker's idea, then add a detail, a line from the story or a new question
  • The teacher asks follow-ups such as "Can you say more?" or "Which line shows that?" and invites students who still have two tickets
  • After about 10 minutes, one student reviews the key ideas out loud, and every student writes one sentence of reflection on the back of a ticket

Discussion Questions

  • How did having to paraphrase first change what people said?
  • Did the review at the end include every key idea? What was left out?

Modification for Large Classes

Run two circles at once, with a student leader in the second circle using the teacher's list of follow-up questions.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: The Four Parts of SL.6.1

SL.6.1: four parts of one good discussion (a) Come prepared Read or study the text Mark lines to cite Use them to probe ideas (b) Set up the group Follow the class rules Set a goal and a deadline Give out roles as needed (c) Ask and answer Ask specific questions Answer with detail and evidence (d) Look back Review the key ideas Paraphrase other views Reflect on your own In every format (one-on-one, in groups, teacher-led): build on others' ideas and say your own ideas clearly
Parts a-d of the standard follow one discussion from start to finish: come prepared, set up the group, ask and answer questions, and look back. The skills in the bottom box apply in all three formats.

Diagram 2: Turn Timeline of the Poster Group

Who spoke when: the poster group (16 turns) Turn (paragraph) number Rosa 5 Aiden 3 Kofi 4 June 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1:52 1:54 turn 10: Kofi cuts June off Number after each name = turns taken. Goal: three reasons picked by 1:55.
Each dot is one turn in the group transcript in Guided Practice, placed in the row of the speaker who took it. Rosa takes 5 turns, Kofi and June 4 each, and Aiden 3. The red dot marks turn 10, where Kofi cuts June off and breaks the one-person-at-a-time rule. The group picks its three reasons at 1:54, one minute before its 1:55 deadline.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

SL.6.1 Homework: Prepare, Talk and Plan

Directions: Use the story excerpt in the Direct Instruction phase of the lesson plan. In Part 2 you hold a 10-minute one-on-one discussion with a classmate (in person, by phone or online) or with an adult at home; take notes during it or right after. Write in complete sentences and give paragraph numbers whenever you refer to the story.

Part 1: Prepare (Problems 1-2)

  1. Reread the excerpt and star two lines that help explain why the characters say nothing about the missing cloth. Copy each line exactly with its paragraph number, then write one sentence for each saying what it shows.
  2. Write three specific questions about the story for your discussion partner. Each question should name a character or a paragraph (for example, "Why does ... in paragraph ...?"), and none should have a yes-or-no answer.

Part 2: Talk (Problems 3-4)

  1. Hold your 10-minute one-on-one discussion and start it with one of your questions from Problem 2. Write down your opening words. Then describe one moment when you said your own idea clearly and one moment when you built on your partner's idea.
  2. Write down one question your partner asked you and the answer you gave. Then add to that answer: write two more sentences with a detail and a line from the story that you could have used to explain it better.

Part 3: Look Back and Plan (Problems 5-6)

  1. Review your discussion in three or four sentences: paraphrase your partner's main idea in your own words, list the key ideas you both expressed, and say whether your own idea changed, and why.
  2. Next class, your group of four will make a poster about the story. Write a plan: the two class rules you will follow and one thing you will say if someone breaks one, a specific goal, a deadline as a clock time, and a role for each member.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
PreparationTwo exact lines with correct paragraph numbers and three specific, open questionsLines or questions present, but not exact, not numbered or only yes-or-noNo lines or questions
Discussion RecordOpening words, a clear own-idea moment, a build-on moment, and a detailed added answer with a lineMoments described in general terms, or the added answer has no lineNo discussion recorded
Review and ReflectionAccurate paraphrase, key ideas from both partners and a reason the view changed or stayedParaphrase or key ideas missing, or no reason givenMissing or a retelling of the story
Group PlanTwo rules with a plan for a broken rule, a specific goal, a clock-time deadline and a role for each memberMost parts present but some vagueNo plan

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 1-10 are about Transcript 3, the one-on-one talk between Grace and Omar in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan, and the story excerpt it discusses (Direct Instruction). Questions 11-20 ask you to use the standard in new situations. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 1 of the partners' transcript, how does Grace show that she came to the discussion prepared?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which description fits the question Grace asks at the end of paragraph 1?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 4, Omar answers Grace's request for an example. What makes his answer detailed?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 5, Grace says, "So you're saying the child spoke up even though the whole crowd said the opposite." What is she doing?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which sentence from paragraph 5 states Grace's own idea most clearly?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why does Grace ask, "Can you give me an example from the story that shows it was hard?" (paragraph 3)?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 6, Omar quotes paragraph 8 of the story. What does the quotation do in the discussion?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 9, Grace says, "That makes me think of something." How does she build on Omar's answer about the father?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    What in paragraph 10 shows that Omar understands a point of view different from his first one?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    What does Grace do in paragraph 11 of the partners' transcript?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A group's class chart has two rules: "One person talks at a time" and "Disagree with the idea, not the person." Dev disagrees with Ana's reason. Which comment follows both rules?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which statement sets a specific goal and a deadline for a group?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A group of three has 15 minutes to find one line from the story for each of three reasons and read the lines to the class. Which set of roles fits this task best?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In a teacher-led discussion, the teacher asks, "How do the people in the crowd change after the child speaks?" Which answer responds with the most elaboration and detail?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write one specific question about paragraphs 2-7 of the story that you could ask a partner. Name the paragraph your question comes from, and explain in one sentence why it cannot be answered with just yes or no.

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    Omar ends by saying, "I still think it's hard for any kid to talk in front of a crowd" (paragraph 12 of the partners' transcript). Write a two- or three-sentence reply that builds on his idea, gives a detail from the story, and states your own idea clearly.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    Paraphrase Grace's first view and Omar's first view in one sentence each, using your own words. Then write one sentence of reflection: which view is closer to yours now, and why?

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    In a teacher-led discussion about the Emperor, three students said: Jada: "He cares more about looking good than about his people." Marco: "He is scared, like the minister, of being called unfit." Wen: "He keeps walking at the end because stopping would be even more embarrassing." The teacher asks you to review the key ideas. Write two or three sentences.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Your group of four has 20 minutes to make a poster that answers, "What lesson does the story teach?" Write a plan with two class rules you will follow, a specific goal, a deadline as a clock time, and a role for each member. Explain in a phrase why each role is needed.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write the first two or three sentences you would say to start a one-on-one discussion about the minister's words "Oh, it is beautiful! quite charming!" (paragraph 7). Your opening should show what you read or studied and end with a question for your partner.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does SL.6.1 mean?

SL.6.1 means that sixth graders take part in discussions with a partner, in small groups and with the whole class led by a teacher, and make them work. "SL" stands for Speaking and Listening. Students come prepared and cite evidence, follow discussion rules and set goals, deadlines and roles, ask and answer specific questions with detail, and at the end review the key ideas and paraphrase and reflect on other views.

How is SL.6.1 different from SL.5.1?

SL.6.1 asks for more planning and more detail. In grade 5, students follow agreed-upon rules and carry out assigned roles; in grade 6, they also set specific goals and deadlines and define roles themselves. Grade 6 adds "with elaboration and detail" to asking and answering questions, asks students to use evidence to "probe and reflect on ideas," and replaces drawing conclusions with showing understanding of multiple perspectives through reflection and paraphrasing.

What changes in SL.7.1?

In grade 7, students track progress toward their goals and deadlines instead of only setting them. They pose questions that draw out more elaboration, bring the discussion back on topic when needed, and acknowledge new information from others and, when warranted, change their own views. The skills practiced in this lesson, especially paraphrasing and reflecting, prepare students for that step.

How do you grade a sixth-grade discussion fairly?

Grade specific moves you can see or hear, not the amount of talk. A short checklist works well: cited a paragraph, built on an idea, asked a specific question, answered with detail, paraphrased someone, reviewed or reflected. Record a few students per discussion rather than everyone at once, and let written items like the homework and quiz count for students who find speaking in a group hard.

What does "collegial" mean in SL.6.1?

"Collegial" means respectful and cooperative, the way teammates or coworkers treat each other. Rules for collegial discussions are rules such as "one person talks at a time" and "disagree with the idea, not the person." In grade 6, students follow rules like these; the standard does not ask them to write the rules, though many teachers let classes help.

My child is shy. How can they meet this standard?

Shy students can meet it with preparation and structure. Starting with one partner is easier than a whole class, and a written question or starred line gives them something ready to say. Talk tickets, like the ones in Activity 3, make sure every student gets a turn without anyone taking over. Paraphrasing is also a good first move, because it starts from someone else's idea.

How do you teach paraphrasing to sixth graders?

Give them a stem and a check. The stem is "So you're saying that ...," and the check is asking the first speaker, "Did I get it right?" Practice with short, clear statements first, and point out that a paraphrase uses new words but keeps the same idea. In Activity 1, partners must paraphrase each answer before responding.

Why does this lesson use written transcripts instead of video?

A transcript lets students stop, reread and cite exactly who said what, which is hard to do with a recording. Students can point to "paragraph 5" of a discussion the same way they point to a paragraph of a story. After studying the models, students hold their own spoken discussions in Activities 1-3 and the homework.

Can SL.6.1 be taught in an online class?

Yes. Breakout rooms work for one-on-one and group discussions, and a video call with raised hands works for teacher-led talk. Set the same rules, goals and roles as in person, ask students to use the chat to post their starred line, and have each group share its review or final sentences in the class chat.

What is the difference between elaboration and just talking more?

Elaboration adds something that explains the point: a reason, a detail or a line from the text. Talking longer without those does not count. In the model teacher-led discussion, Lily elaborates when asked by quoting the swindlers' words in paragraph 4 and explaining why those words would make the minister doubt himself.