SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

SL.7.1Common CoreELASpeaking and ListeningGrade 7

SL.7.1: Collaborative Discussions in Grade 7

In plain English: SL.7.1 is the Common Core grade 7 ELA standard that asks students to hold discussions with a partner, in groups and with the teacher, building on others' ideas and stating their own clearly. Seventh graders come prepared with evidence, track progress toward goals and deadlines, ask questions that draw out more detail, steer talk back on topic, and change their views when new information warrants it.

Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 7 topics, texts, and issues, building on others' ideas and expressing their own clearly.

  1. a.Come to discussions prepared, having read or researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas under discussion.
  2. b.Follow rules for collegial discussions, track progress toward specific goals and deadlines, and define individual roles as needed.
  3. c.Pose questions that elicit elaboration and respond to others' questions and comments with relevant observations and ideas that bring the discussion back on topic as needed.
  4. d.Acknowledge new information expressed by others and, when warranted, modify their own views.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Speaking and Listening Standards · Cluster: Comprehension and Collaboration · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

60-65 min

Overview

Seventh graders practice collaborative discussion, the kind of talk where a group works through a question together and each speaker builds on what came before. The text is the ending of O. Henry's short story "A Retrieved Reformation" (first published in 1903). Jimmy Valentine, a safecracker who has gone straight under a new name, must open a locked bank vault to save a child, in front of the detective who has been hunting him. The story ends with a real question for students to argue about: has Jimmy truly changed, and should the detective have let him go?

Students study three short transcripts (written records of who said what) written for this lesson: a teacher-led discussion, a group preparing a debate case, and two partners. The transcripts model the moves SL.7.1 adds in grade 7: tracking progress toward goals and deadlines, asking questions that draw out more detail, bringing a discussion back on topic, and acknowledging new information and changing a view only when the evidence warrants it. Students then use those moves in their own one-on-one, group and teacher-led discussions.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Come to a discussion prepared and refer to marked evidence from the text to probe and reflect on ideas
  • Follow rules for collegial discussions, define roles as needed, and track a group's progress toward a goal and its deadlines
  • Pose questions that elicit elaboration and respond with relevant observations that bring the talk back on topic
  • Acknowledge new information from others and decide, with a reason, whether it warrants changing their own view
  • Build on others' ideas and state their own ideas clearly in one-on-one, group and teacher-led discussions

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Setting specific goals and deadlines and defining roles in a group discussion SL.6.1
  • Paraphrasing a classmate's idea and reviewing the key ideas of a discussion SL.6.1
  • Citing textual evidence to support an analysis of a story RL.6.1

Lesson Procedure

60-65 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5-10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "Think of a time you changed your mind about something because of a fact you learned from another person. What was the fact, and why did it change your mind?"

    Give students three minutes to write, then collect a few answers. Ask one follow-up for each: "Did you change your whole opinion, or just part of it?" Tell the class that SL.7.1 asks them to do exactly this in a discussion: listen for new information and change a view only as far as the evidence goes. Show Diagram 1.

  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Part 1: What grade 7 adds. Walk through Diagram 1 and the table below. Define each key word as it comes up: collegial means respectful and cooperative, the way good teammates act; to elicit elaboration is to draw out more explanation or detail from a speaker; on topic means about the question the group is discussing; new information is a fact or detail another speaker adds that you had not considered; and warranted means justified by good reasons or evidence.

    SL.7.1 moves with sentence starters
    MovePartStarter
    Use your preparationa"The line I marked is in paragraph __ ..."
    Probe an ideaa"Which line makes you think that?"
    Check progressb"It's __. Our goal is __, and we have __."
    Draw out morec"What makes you say that?" "How does that connect to ...?"
    Steer backc"That's interesting, and it connects to our question because ..."
    Build onmain"I'll add to what __ said ..."
    Take in new informationd"I hadn't noticed that. It changes my view about ..."
    Hold a view with a reasond"I hear you, but I still think ... because ..."

    Part 2: The text under study. Students read the two excerpts the night before and mark one line in each. First tell the story up to the letter in your own words: Jimmy Valentine, a skilled safecracker (someone who breaks open safes to steal), gets a pardon (an official release) after ten months in prison and goes straight back to robbing safes. Ben Price, the detective who arrested him before, takes up the trail. In the small town of Elmore, Arkansas, Jimmy falls in love at first sight with Annabel Adams, the banker's daughter, takes the name Ralph D. Spencer and opens a shoe store. A year later he writes to an old partner. Explain a few words: a kit is a set of tools, scores in "old scores" means old wrongs someone might want to settle, and a livery buggy is a rented horse and carriage. The paragraphs are numbered so that speakers can cite them.

    At the end of a year the situation of Mr. Ralph Spencer was this: he had won the respect of the community, his shoe-store was flourishing, and he and Annabel were engaged to be married in two weeks. Mr. Adams, the typical, plodding, country banker, approved of Spencer. Annabel's pride in him almost equalled her affection. He was as much at home in the family of Mr. Adams and that of Annabel's married sister as if he were already a member.

    One day Jimmy sat down in his room and wrote this letter, which he mailed to the safe address of one of his old friends in St. Louis:

    DEAR OLD PAL:

    I want you to be at Sullivan's place, in Little Rock, next Wednesday night, at nine o'clock. I want you to wind up some little matters for me. And, also, I want to make you a present of my kit of tools. I know you'll be glad to get them--you couldn't duplicate the lot for a thousand dollars. Say, Billy, I've quit the old business--a year ago. I've got a nice store. I'm making an honest living, and I'm going to marry the finest girl on earth two weeks from now. It's the only life, Billy--the straight one. I wouldn't touch a dollar of another man's money now for a million. After I get married I'm going to sell out and go West, where there won't be so much danger of having old scores brought up against me. I tell you, Billy, she's an angel. She believes in me; and I wouldn't do another crooked thing for the whole world. Be sure to be at Sully's, for I must see you. I'll bring along the tools with me.

    Your old friend,

    JIMMY.

    On the Monday night after Jimmy wrote this letter, Ben Price jogged unobtrusively into Elmore in a livery buggy. He lounged about town in his quiet way until he found out what he wanted to know. From the drug-store across the street from Spencer's shoe-store he got a good look at Ralph D. Spencer.

    "Going to marry the banker's daughter are you, Jimmy?" said Ben to himself, softly. "Well, I don't know!"

    O. Henry, A Retrieved Reformation, excerpt 1: the letter (eight consecutive paragraphs), in Roads of Destiny (1903; this edition 1919). Public domain (published 1919). Source text.

    Then summarize the next scene: the morning after Ben Price arrives, Jimmy joins Annabel's family at the bank on his way to Little Rock, carrying his suit-case. Mr. Adams shows everyone the bank's new vault (a strong steel room for money), which has a time-lock (a lock that cannot be opened until a set time). May, who is nine, shuts her five-year-old sister Agatha inside by mistake, and Mr. Adams says there is nobody nearer than Little Rock who can open the door. Ben Price has walked into the bank. Excerpt 2 begins there.

    Agatha's mother, frantic now, beat the door of the vault with her hands. Somebody wildly suggested dynamite. Annabel turned to Jimmy, her large eyes full of anguish, but not yet despairing. To a woman nothing seems quite impossible to the powers of the man she worships.

    "Can't you do something, Ralph--try, won't you?"

    He looked at her with a queer, soft smile on his lips and in his keen eyes.

    "Annabel," he said, "give me that rose you are wearing, will you?"

    Hardly believing that she heard him aright, she unpinned the bud from the bosom of her dress, and placed it in his hand. Jimmy stuffed it into his vest-pocket, threw off his coat and pulled up his shirt-sleeves. With that act Ralph D. Spencer passed away and Jimmy Valentine took his place.

    "Get away from the door, all of you," he commanded, shortly.

    He set his suit-case on the table, and opened it out flat. From that time on he seemed to be unconscious of the presence of any one else. He laid out the shining, queer implements swiftly and orderly, whistling softly to himself as he always did when at work. In a deep silence and immovable, the others watched him as if under a spell.

    In a minute Jimmy's pet drill was biting smoothly into the steel door. In ten minutes--breaking his own burglarious record--he threw back the bolts and opened the door.

    Agatha, almost collapsed, but safe, was gathered into her mother's arms.

    Jimmy Valentine put on his coat, and walked outside the railings towards the front door. As he went he thought he heard a far-away voice that he once knew call "Ralph!" But he never hesitated.

    At the door a big man stood somewhat in his way.

    "Hello, Ben!" said Jimmy, still with his strange smile. "Got around at last, have you? Well, let's go. I don't know that it makes much difference, now."

    And then Ben Price acted rather strangely.

    "Guess you're mistaken, Mr. Spencer," he said. "Don't believe I recognize you. Your buggy's waiting for you, ain't it?"

    And Ben Price turned and strolled down the street.

    O. Henry, A Retrieved Reformation, excerpt 2: the ending (the last fifteen paragraphs of the story), in Roads of Destiny (1903; this edition 1919). Public domain (published 1919). Source text.

    Part 3: A model teacher-led discussion. Volunteers read the transcript below aloud. It was written for this page. After each worked example, ask, "Which move from the table did that speaker make, and how can you tell?"

    Ms. Alvarez: Here is today's question: has Jimmy really changed, or is "Ralph Spencer" just one more disguise? Our goal is two pieces of evidence on each side by 10:40. Last night you each marked a line in the letter. Priya, will you start?

    Priya: I marked paragraph 4 of the letter excerpt: "I wouldn't touch a dollar of another man's money now for a million." I think he has changed, and I think the letter proves it.

    Ms. Alvarez: What makes you trust a letter more than something he says out loud?

    Priya: Look at who it's to. Billy is an old partner from his safecracking days. Jimmy doesn't need to impress Billy, so he has no reason to lie. If he were still stealing, he could just say so to Billy.

    Marcus: I'm not sure it proves it. If he quit, why does he still have the tools? In paragraph 7 of the ending, the suit-case full of tools is right there in the bank.

    Diego: Speaking of the tools, could a drill really get through a steel vault door in ten minutes? That seems way too fast to me.

    Hana: That's a fair question, but it's about real vaults, not about whether Jimmy changed. The suit-case does matter for our question, though, because of where it's going. The letter says, "I want to make you a present of my kit of tools," and it ends, "I'll bring along the tools with me." He's taking them to Little Rock to give them away.

    Marcus: Oh, I missed that. I thought the suit-case meant he was planning one more job. If he's bringing the kit to Billy as a present, then carrying it doesn't prove anything bad. I'll drop that part of my point.

    Ms. Alvarez: So the suit-case moved to the other side. Marcus, is there anything you still doubt?

    Marcus: Yes. In the letter he plans to "go West, where there won't be so much danger of having old scores brought up against me." He's hiding his past from Annabel. He changed what he does, but he hasn't told her the truth.

    Jonah: I'll build on that. The story itself says the old Jimmy is still in there. In paragraph 5 of the ending, when he takes off his coat, "Ralph D. Spencer passed away and Jimmy Valentine took his place."

    Ms. Alvarez: Jonah, say more. How does that line fit our question?

    Jonah: He still has the old skills, but now he uses them to save Agatha instead of to steal. So he changed, just not in a way that erases who he was.

    Ms. Alvarez: It's 10:37. Hana, where are we on our goal?

    Hana: For "he changed," we have the line to Billy and giving away the tools. For "not all the way," we have going West to hide his past and the Ralph Spencer line. That's two on each side, three minutes early.

    Ms. Alvarez: Good. Tomorrow we'll use all four to take on a harder question: why does Ben Price let him go?

    Written for this page (the teacher and students are invented), Transcript 1: Has Jimmy Really Changed? (teacher-led). Original passage written for this page.
    • Coming prepared and using the preparation (Transcript 1, paragraphs 1-2)

      Ms. Alvarez asks who will start, and Priya reads the line she marked the night before: "I wouldn't touch a dollar of another man's money now for a million."

      Result: Priya opens with evidence instead of a feeling. She names where the line is (paragraph 4 of the letter excerpt), quotes it exactly, and then states her own view in one clear sentence: he has changed, and the letter proves it.

    • A question that elicits elaboration (Transcript 1, paragraphs 3-4)

      Ms. Alvarez: "What makes you trust a letter more than something he says out loud?"

      Result: The question does not ask Priya to repeat her claim; it asks for the reason behind it. To elicit elaboration means to draw out more explanation. Priya answers with a new idea: Billy is an old partner, so Jimmy has no reason to lie to him.

    • Bringing the discussion back on topic (Transcript 1, paragraphs 6-7)

      Diego asks whether a drill could really get through a steel vault door so fast. Hana answers.

      Result: Hana says the question is fair but belongs to another topic, then connects the suit-case to the class question with a relevant observation from the letter: "I want to make you a present of my kit of tools." The talk returns to whether Jimmy changed without anyone being told to be quiet.

    • Acknowledging new information and modifying a view (Transcript 1, paragraphs 8-10)

      Marcus: "Oh, I missed that. I thought the suit-case meant he was planning one more job."

      Result: Marcus names the new information, explains why it changes one part of his point, and drops that part. He does not give up his whole view: he keeps his doubt and supports it with a different line, the plan to "go West." Changing a view when warranted means changing only as much as the evidence requires.

    • Tracking progress toward a goal and a deadline (Transcript 1, paragraphs 14-15)

      Ms. Alvarez: "It's 10:37. Hana, where are we on our goal?"

      Result: The goal from paragraph 1 was two pieces of evidence on each side by 10:40. Hana counts what the class has against that goal, two for each side, and reports that they finished three minutes early. Tracking progress means checking the goal during the talk, not only setting it at the start.

    Point out that the class ended with more doubt than it started with, and that is a good result. Marcus changed part of his view and kept the rest, and Hana's progress check shows the goal was met on time.

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Groups of four read Transcript 2 aloud, one part each. In it, four seventh graders prepare their side of a class debate. Groups mark every place where a speaker sets or checks a goal or deadline, gives out a role, follows a rule, steers the talk back, or changes a view because of new information. Then show Diagram 2.

    Elena: Our side in Friday's debate is "Yes, Ben Price was right to let Jimmy go." Ms. Alvarez gave us 25 minutes, starting now at 10:05, so we finish at 10:30. What's our goal?

    Tariq: The task card says an opening statement with three reasons, and each reason needs a line from the story.

    Elena: Then let's set checkpoints: all three reasons picked by 10:15, the statement written by 10:25, and five minutes to practice. Do we need roles?

    Mei: Yes, or we'll all talk at once. I'll keep time and call the checkpoints. Sam, you're the evidence checker, so every line has to pass you. Tariq writes. Elena, you give the statement on Friday.

    Sam: Fine. And our rule from the class chart: one voice at a time, and if you disagree, give a reason. First reason: Jimmy had already quit. The letter says, "I've quit the old business--a year ago."

    Tariq: Good. I'll write that down as reason one.

    Mei: Wait. Ben Price never reads that letter. Jimmy mailed it to Billy in St. Louis. If our reasons are about Ben's choice, they have to be things Ben could know.

    Sam: Hmm. You're right, Ben never saw the letter. Then I'd change the reason: Ben saw for himself what Jimmy gave up. When Jimmy opens his tools, "Ralph D. Spencer passed away and Jimmy Valentine took his place," and Ben is standing right there.

    Elena: What else did Ben see? Can you point to it?

    Sam: Paragraph 12 of the ending. Jimmy walks right up to him and says, "Well, let's go." He doesn't run. That can be reason two.

    Tariq: This reminds me of that movie where the cop chases the thief for years and then they become friends. Did anyone see it? The ending was so good.

    Elena: Maybe later, but we're on Ben. And actually your point fits: Ben has chased Jimmy for a long time, so letting him go is a big change for Ben, too. We could say that in the statement.

    Mei: Checkpoint. It's 10:14, and we have two reasons. We need a third in one minute, or we fall behind.

    Tariq: Third reason: Ben already knew Jimmy was living an honest life. The letter excerpt says he "had won the respect of the community" and his shoe-store was "flourishing," and Ben "lounged about town in his quiet way until he found out what he wanted to know."

    Sam: Those words are all in paragraphs 1 and 7 of the letter excerpt. It passes.

    Mei: 10:15, three reasons, right on time. Tariq, you have ten minutes to write the statement. I'll call 10:25.

    Written for this page (the students are invented), Transcript 2: A Group Prepares a Debate Case. Original passage written for this page.

    Debrief with three questions. (1) How does the group track its progress? Elena sets checkpoints in paragraph 3 (reasons by 10:15, statement by 10:25, practice until 10:30), and Mei, the timekeeper, checks them in paragraph 13 ("It's 10:14, and we have two reasons") and paragraph 16 ("three reasons, right on time"). (2) What new information changes the first reason, and was the change warranted? In paragraph 7 Mei points out that Ben never read the letter. Sam agrees and replaces the reason with something Ben saw himself. The change was warranted, because a reason for Ben's choice has to be something Ben knew. (3) How is Tariq's movie comment handled? Elena sets it aside for later and finds the part that is relevant: Ben's long chase makes his choice stand out. The talk is back on topic in one turn.

  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Students read Transcript 3, a one-on-one talk between partners Leila and Owen (written for this page) about the rose and about Ben Price. With the transcript and both excerpts open, they answer quiz questions 1-10 on their own, then questions 11-20, which ask them to use the standard in new situations and to write their own discussion moves.

    Leila: We have eight minutes and two questions, so let's give the rose four minutes. I reread paragraphs 3 to 5 of the ending last night. Jimmy asks Annabel for her rose right before he opens his suit-case. Why do you think he wants it?

    Owen: I think it's for good luck. He's about to do something hard, so he wants something of hers with him.

    Leila: Could be. What in the story makes you think it's about luck?

    Owen: He has "a queer, soft smile" in paragraph 3. He looks calm, like he knows he'll need a little luck and she's giving it to him.

    Leila: Here's something I noticed, though. Right after he puts the rose in his pocket, the story says, "With that act Ralph D. Spencer passed away and Jimmy Valentine took his place." Passed away is what people say when someone dies.

    Owen: Oh. So Ralph Spencer is kind of dying right there. That changes how I see the rose. It's not for luck. It's a goodbye present, something to keep from Annabel, because he thinks he'll lose her once everybody sees what he can do.

    Leila: That's how I read it. And paragraph 12 fits: he tells Ben, "I don't know that it makes much difference, now."

    Owen: My little sister once locked me in the garage by accident. I yelled for like twenty minutes before my dad came home.

    Leila: That sounds scary, and it's actually why the scene works. In paragraph 1, Agatha's mother is so "frantic" that she beats on the vault door with her hands. Everyone is panicking, and that makes Jimmy's calm stand out. It's been four minutes, so let's move to Ben. Why does he let Jimmy go?

    Owen: Maybe Ben is just tired of chasing him. Arresting people means a lot of paperwork.

    Leila: I hear you, but I don't think that fits. Ben came all the way to Elmore to find Jimmy. Someone who is tired of a case wouldn't travel that far. I think Ben lets him go because he just watched Jimmy save a child and give up his secret to do it.

    Owen: Okay, the trip to Elmore is a good point, so I'll drop the paperwork idea. But I think there's more. Ben calls him "Mr. Spencer" in paragraph 14. He uses the new name, so he's telling Jimmy that Ralph Spencer is who he is now.

    Leila: I didn't notice the name. So you're saying Ben lets the new man go free, not the old burglar. I'll add that to my answer.

    Owen: We have one minute left. Let's each write one sentence for the class.

    Written for this page (the students are invented), Transcript 3: Partners Talk About the Rose and Ben Price. Original passage written for this page.
  5. Closure5 minutes

    Exit ticket: "Write down one piece of new information you heard today from a classmate or a transcript. Did it change your view of Jimmy or Ben? Say why it was or was not enough to change it." Use the tickets to pair students with different views for Activity 1.

    Teacher note on the text. The excerpts come from a 1919 printing of Roads of Destiny (1909) and keep O. Henry's spelling, punctuation and dated words exactly, including "ain't," the double hyphens that stand for dashes and the invented word "burglarious." Paragraph 1 of the ending includes the dated generalization "To a woman nothing seems quite impossible to the powers of the man she worships"; name it as the narrator's old-fashioned view of women and invite students to question it. The story asks readers to sympathize with a former burglar, and Ben Price's choice is meant for debate, not as a model of how police should act.

    Homework. Tonight students research a question about the story, hold a one-on-one discussion at home or by phone, and plan their group's debate. Go over the directions and rubric before they leave.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give students the starter table on a card and ask them to try two specific moves, one of them "Draw out more"
  • Let students mark and rehearse one line from each excerpt with a partner before the group discussion
  • Pre-teach the story words (pardon, safecracker, vault, time-lock, kit, livery buggy) with a quick sketch or example for each

For Advanced Students

  • Serve as timekeeper in Activity 2 and write the group's progress on the checkpoint card at each check
  • Read the whole story and bring one detail from outside the excerpts that could count as new information for a classmate's view
  • After Activity 3, write a short paragraph on which new-information card changed the most views and why it was persuasive

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Strong seventh-grade discussion shows preparation (students cite a paragraph without being prompted), follow-up (questions such as "What makes you say that?" that get a longer, more specific answer), and steering (a speaker connects a side comment back to the question instead of ignoring it or shutting it down). Watch for groups that set a deadline and never check it, for speakers who say "good point" and change nothing, and for students who drop their whole view the moment someone disagrees. In written items, look for exact quotations with paragraph numbers, a correct label for each move, and a reason whenever a student says a view should or should not change.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Follow-Up Question Interviews

15 minPairs (one-on-one)

Partners with different views of Ben Price's choice interview each other. The goal is to get the longest, most specific answer possible by asking follow-up questions that elicit elaboration.

Procedure

  • Each partner writes one sentence answering "Should Ben Price have let Jimmy go?" and marks one line from either excerpt that supports it
  • Partner A reads the sentence. Partner B may not argue yet, only ask up to three follow-ups from the question strips ("What makes you say that?" "Which line shows it?" "What would change your mind?")
  • After 4 minutes, switch. The timekeeper in each pair says the time out loud at the switch
  • Finish by each writing one sentence: "One new thing I learned from my partner is ..., and it does or does not change my view because ..."

Discussion Questions

  • Which follow-up question got the longest answer from your partner? Why do you think it worked?
  • Did your partner's answers give you new information, or only their opinion? How can you tell the difference?

Variation for Online Classes

Pairs work in breakout rooms, and each partner types the final sentence into a shared document.

2

Debate Prep with Checkpoint Cards

20 minGroups of 4

Groups prepare one side of the class debate on Ben Price's choice. Each group plans its goal and checkpoints on a card, gives out roles as needed, and records its progress at every checkpoint, the way the group in Transcript 2 does.

Plan (3 minutes)

  • Read the class rules aloud: one voice at a time, and give a reason when you disagree
  • Write the goal on the checkpoint card (three reasons, each with a line and a paragraph number) and two checkpoint times: reasons picked, then the statement written
  • Give out the role cards the task needs: timekeeper, evidence checker, writer, speaker

Work and Check (14 minutes)

Groups argue "Yes, Ben was right" or "No, Ben should have arrested Jimmy," as the teacher assigns. At each checkpoint the timekeeper asks, "Where are we?" and the writer records the time and the number of reasons finished. If the group is behind, it decides out loud what to change, such as dropping the weakest reason or shortening practice.

Share (3 minutes)

The speaker reads the opening statement. The timekeeper reports whether each checkpoint was met and what the group changed if it was not.

Discussion Questions

  • At your first checkpoint, were you on time, ahead or behind? What did you do about it?
  • Did anyone bring new information that changed one of your reasons? Was the change warranted?
3

New-Information Fishbowl

15 minWhole class (teacher-led)

The teacher leads a whole-class discussion on "Has Jimmy really changed?" Six students sit in an inner circle and talk; the rest watch from the outer circle, and everyone holds a view card from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely). The teacher adds new-information cards one at a time.

Procedure

  • Everyone raises a view card. Inner-circle students explain their number with one line from either excerpt
  • The teacher reads a new-information card, for example the fact that Jimmy is carrying the tools to Little Rock to give them away, or that he plans to "go West" to escape "old scores"
  • Anyone who changes a number must say what changed it; anyone who keeps a number must say why the new information is not enough
  • When a comment drifts from the question, the teacher raises a hand and a student in the inner circle steers back with a relevant observation. Swap the circles after three cards

Discussion Questions

  • Which card moved the most view cards? Why was it stronger than the others?
  • Is keeping your number ever the right choice after new information? Give an example from today.

Modification for Large Classes

Run two fishbowls at once, with a student leader reading the cards in the second one.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: The Four Parts of SL.7.1

SL.7.1: what a grade 7 discussion adds (a) Prepare Read or research first Bring a marked line Use it to probe ideas (b) Organize Follow the class rules Track goals and deadlines Give roles as needed (c) Question Ask for elaboration Answer with relevant ideas Steer back on topic (d) Update Acknowledge new facts Weigh them with the text Change views if warranted New information sends you back to the text: check it, then prepare your next point Three formats, same moves One-on-one a partner In groups three to five Teacher-led the whole class In every format: build on others' ideas and state your own clearly
The four parts of the standard follow one discussion: prepare, organize, question and update. The dashed arrow shows that new information sends a speaker back to the text before the next point. The bottom box lists the three formats named in the main standard.

Diagram 2: The Debate Group's Progress Timeline

The debate group's plan and progress, 10:05 to 10:30 Pick 3 reasons Write statement Practice Plan (set in turn 3) 10:05 10:10 10:15 10:20 10:25 10:30 10:14 2 of 3 reasons 10:15 3 of 3: on time Dashed lines: the group's checkpoints. Dots: Mei's progress checks in turns 13 and 16. Drawn to scale: each tick mark is 5 minutes of the 25 the teacher gave.
A to-scale timeline of Transcript 2 in Guided Practice. The boxes show the group's plan from paragraph 3; the dashed lines mark its two checkpoints, 10:15 and 10:25. The red dot is Mei's check in paragraph 13 (two of three reasons at 10:14), and the green dot is her check in paragraph 16 (three of three at 10:15, on time).

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

SL.7.1 Homework: Research, Discuss and Plan

Directions: Use the two excerpts of "A Retrieved Reformation" in the Direct Instruction phase of the lesson plan. In Part 2 you hold a 10-minute one-on-one discussion with a classmate (in person, by phone or online) or with an adult at home, and take notes during it or right after. Write in complete sentences and give paragraph numbers whenever you refer to the story.

Part 1: Prepare (Problems 1-2)

  1. Research one question the story raises, using a dictionary, an encyclopedia or a site your teacher approves: what is a pardon, and who usually grants one in the United States? Write two sentences about what you found, then copy one line from either excerpt that your research helps explain, with its paragraph number.
  2. Write two open questions about Jimmy or Ben Price for your discussion partner. Under each, write one follow-up question you could ask to draw out more detail if the first answer is short.

Part 2: Discuss (Problems 3-4)

  1. Hold your one-on-one discussion on "Should Ben Price have let Jimmy go?" Write your own view in one clear sentence as you said it, then describe one moment when you built on your partner's idea and what you added.
  2. Write down one piece of new information your partner gave you. Did it change your view? Explain in two or three sentences why the change was warranted, or why the information was not enough to change your mind.

Part 3: Plan and Steer (Problems 5-6)

  1. Your group of four has 20 minutes, from 1:10 to 1:30, to prepare an opening statement for the debate. Write a plan: the class rules you will follow, a specific goal, two checkpoint times with what should be done by each, and a role for each member. Then write what the timekeeper will say at the first checkpoint if the group is behind.
  2. In tomorrow's teacher-led discussion, a classmate starts talking about a detective show on TV. Write the two or three sentences you would say to bring the discussion back to Ben Price's choice with a relevant observation from the story.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
PreparationAccurate research, an exact line with its paragraph number, and two open questions with follow-upsResearch or line present but vague, or follow-ups missingNo research or questions
Discussion RecordA clear own-view sentence and a build-on moment that adds something newView or build-on moment described only in general termsNo discussion recorded
New InformationNames the information and gives a reason the view changed or heldNames the information but gives no reasonMissing
Plan and SteeringRules, a specific goal, two timed checkpoints, roles and a progress statement; a steer-back that links to the storyMost parts present but some vagueNo plan or steer-back

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 1-10 are about Transcript 3, the one-on-one talk between Leila and Owen in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan, and the two story excerpts in Direct Instruction. Questions 11-20 ask you to use the standard in new situations. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 1 of Transcript 3, how does Leila show that she came to the discussion prepared?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 3, Leila asks, "What in the story makes you think it's about luck?" What does this question do?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    What new information does Leila bring in paragraph 5?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    How does Owen respond to Leila's new information in paragraph 6?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 8, Owen tells a story about being locked in the garage. How does Leila respond in paragraph 9?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    How do Leila and Owen track progress toward their goal?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 11, why does Leila keep her own view instead of accepting Owen's paperwork idea?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    How does Owen build on the discussion in paragraph 12?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 13, Leila says, "I didn't notice the name." What is she doing?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which statement best describes how the partners' views change during Transcript 3?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A group's goal is to find four quotations about Ben Price by 1:40. At 1:32 the group has found one. Which comment tracks progress best?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A group of three has 12 minutes to choose one line from each excerpt and explain it to the class. Which set of roles fits the task best?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A group's rules are "One voice at a time" and "Give a reason when you disagree." Ravi disagrees with Nia's first reason. Which comment follows both rules?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In a teacher-led discussion about Ben Price, a student says, "My cousin wants to be a detective when she grows up." Which response brings the discussion back on topic with a relevant observation?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which question would elicit the most elaboration from a classmate who says, "Jimmy was brave"?

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Before a discussion, Mateo looked up "time-lock" and learned that such a lock will not open until a set time. Which opening uses his research to probe an idea?

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    A classmate says, "Jimmy is still a criminal, because he broke open the vault with burglar's tools." Write two or three sentences in reply that acknowledge the point, state your own view clearly, and support it with a line from either excerpt and its paragraph number.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    You think Ben Price lets Jimmy go only because he feels sorry for Annabel. A classmate points out that, in excerpt 1, Ben watched Jimmy in town and said to himself, "Well, I don't know!" Is this new information enough to change your view? Write two or three sentences that acknowledge it and explain your decision.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Your group of four has 25 minutes, from 9:35 to 10:00, to make a poster answering, "What is the turning point of the story?" Write a plan with two class rules, a specific goal, two checkpoint times and what should be done by each, and a role for each member. Then write what the timekeeper should say at the first checkpoint if the group is behind.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write one open question about Jimmy's letter (excerpt 1) that you could ask a partner, and one follow-up question that would draw out more detail if the answer is short. Then write one sentence you would say if your partner started talking about something unrelated to the story.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does SL.7.1 mean?

SL.7.1 means that seventh graders take part in discussions with a partner, in groups and with the whole class, and make them productive. "SL" stands for Speaking and Listening. Students come prepared with evidence, follow discussion rules while tracking progress toward goals and deadlines, ask questions that draw out more detail and keep the talk on topic, and acknowledge new information, changing their views when it is warranted.

How is SL.7.1 different from SL.6.1?

Grade 7 moves from setting goals to managing them and from reviewing ideas to updating them. In grade 6, students set goals and deadlines; in grade 7, they track progress toward them. Grade 7 also asks for questions that elicit elaboration and for responses that bring the discussion back on topic, and it replaces grade 6's reviewing and paraphrasing with acknowledging new information and, when warranted, modifying their own views. Part a also changes from "read or studied required material" to "read or researched material under study."

What does "when warranted" mean in SL.7.1?

It means a student should change a view only when there is a good reason to. New information from a classmate, especially evidence from the text, may justify a change; a guess, a louder voice or simple disagreement does not. In the group transcript on this page, Sam replaces his first reason after Mei points out that Ben never read Jimmy's letter, because her point is a fact from the story.

What does tracking progress toward goals and deadlines look like in a discussion?

It looks like a check during the work, not just a plan at the start. A timekeeper names the time, compares what the group has done with the goal, and suggests a change if the group is behind: "It's 10:14, and we have two of three reasons." Checkpoint cards, like the ones in Activity 2, make those checks routine.

How do you bring a discussion back on topic without being rude?

Find the part of the side comment that connects to the question, and use it to steer. A starter such as "That's interesting, and it connects to our question because ..." keeps the speaker included. In the group transcript, Elena turns a comment about a movie into a point about Ben Price's long chase.

Why use "A Retrieved Reformation" for a discussion lesson?

The story is short, readable for seventh graders, and ends on a choice that people really disagree about: a detective lets a former safecracker go free. Its details also shift the way new information does in a real discussion; a reader who notices that Jimmy is carrying his tools to give them away may see the suit-case differently. The story was published in 1903 and is in the public domain.

How do you grade a seventh-grade discussion fairly?

Grade observable moves instead of how much each student talks. A short checklist works: cited a paragraph, asked a follow-up question, steered back on topic, checked progress, acknowledged new information, and gave a reason for keeping or changing a view. Observe a few students in each discussion, and count written work like the homework and quiz for students who find speaking in a group hard.

My child hates changing their mind in an argument. Is that a problem for this standard?

Not necessarily, since the standard asks students to change their views only when warranted. What it does require is acknowledging new information: saying out loud what the other person added and explaining why it does or does not change their view. Practicing the starter "I hear you, but I still think ... because ..." at home helps.

Can SL.7.1 be taught in an online class?

Yes. Use breakout rooms for pairs and groups and the main room for teacher-led talk. Post the checkpoint times in the chat so the timekeeper can report progress, and let students hold up view cards on camera or type a number from 1 to 5 in the chat when new information comes up.

What comes after SL.7.1?

SL.8.1 comes next. In grade 8, students pose questions that connect the ideas of several speakers, respond with relevant evidence, and, when warranted, qualify or justify their own views in light of the evidence presented. The habit practiced here, naming new information and giving a reason for your response to it, leads directly to that step.