WHST.9-10.8Common CoreELAWriting in History, Science and Technical SubjectsGrades 9-10
WHST.9-10.8: Advanced Searches, Useful Sources and Cited Evidence in History and Science Research
In plain English: WHST.9-10.8 is the Common Core literacy standard that asks students in grades 9 and 10 to gather relevant information for history, science and technical research from several authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches. They judge how useful each source is for their research question, integrate information selectively so ideas flow, avoid plagiarism and cite in a standard format.
Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the usefulness of each source in answering the research question; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects 6-12 · Cluster: Research to Build and Present Knowledge · Official standard
Research writing in history and science depends on moves that happen before and during drafting: searching well, deciding which sources actually help, and bringing other writers' words and ideas into a paper without losing the thread or the credit. In the history context, students follow Marisol, an invented tenth grader, as she researches why the Mississippi River flood of 1927 led Congress to abandon the "levees only" policy. They read her search log, five sources of different kinds, a first draft with problems and a revised paragraph with an MLA Works Cited page. The sources are invented for practice, but the facts in them are real.
The science context carries the homework: Theo, an invented student in Earth and Environmental Science, asks whether the Antarctic ozone hole is recovering and whether the Montreal Protocol is the reason. Three of his sources are real (two journal articles and a 2022 international assessment, summarized accurately) and three are invented. The lesson covers every part of WHST.9-10.8: gathering relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively, assessing the usefulness of each source in answering the research question, integrating information selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and following a standard citation format (MLA 9, the ninth edition of the Modern Language Association's style).
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Build advanced searches with exact phrases, OR, the minus sign, site limits, database date ranges and catalog subject searches
Gather relevant information from authoritative print and digital sources and explain what makes each one authoritative
Judge how useful each source is for answering a specific research question, and explain why a source on the right topic can still be of little use
Integrate quotations and paraphrases selectively, with signal phrases and transitions that keep the ideas flowing, and without plagiarism
Cite print and digital sources in MLA 9 style, with in-text citations that match a Works Cited page
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Gathering information from print and digital sources with search terms, and judging credibility and accuracy WHST.6-8.8
Conducting short research projects that answer a question WHST.6-8.7
Quoting and paraphrasing with a basic MLA in-text citation
Citing specific textual evidence from history and science texts
"You type 1927 flood into a search engine and get a flood in Vermont, a list of songs and a river cruise. Your question is about why Congress changed its flood-control policy after 1927. Write down two things you would change about the search, and one kind of source you would look for that a search engine might not show you."
Collect answers on the board in two columns: changes to the words, and other places to look (a library catalog, a newspaper database, a journal database). Keep the list for Direct Instruction. Point out that a search matches words, not questions: the searcher has to turn the question into words a search tool can use.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Define the terms of the standard. An authoritative source is written by someone with expertise on the subject and published by an organization that checks its work, such as a university press, a scholarly journal, a historical society or a government agency. An advanced search uses tools beyond plain keywords: quotation marks for an exact phrase, OR for alternatives, a minus sign to exclude a word, a site: limit for one kind of website, and the filters of a library database or catalog, such as a date range or a subject search. A source is useful when it helps answer the research question itself, which is a higher bar than being about the topic. To integrate information selectively is to bring in only the facts and words that serve the point of a paragraph, with signal phrases ("as the historian Evelyn Marchetti puts it") and transitions that connect them. Plagiarism includes copying words without quotation marks and patchwriting, which keeps a source's sentence and swaps in synonyms. Read Marisol's log (Text 1) aloud, then work through the examples with Diagram 1.
1Assignment from Mr. Adebayo, U.S. History 10: Write one section (600-800 words) of a research paper that answers a question about the 1920s. Use at least four authoritative sources, with at least one print source and at least one digital source, and add a short note explaining why each source you kept helps answer your question. Cite in MLA 9 style and end with a Works Cited page.
2My research question: Why did the Mississippi River flood of 1927 lead Congress to give up the "levees only" policy?
3Search 1, on a general search engine: 1927 flood. The first results were about a flood in Vermont in November 1927, a list of blues songs and a travel page for a river cruise. Only one result was about the Mississippi, and it never mentioned levees.
4Search 2: "1927 Mississippi flood" levees. The results were better, but most of them retold the story of the flood, and one sold framed photographs of it.
5Search 3: "levees only" (1927 OR 1928) "Flood Control Act". Now the results were about the policy itself. The first useful one was an article on Mississippi Valley History Online (Source B).
6Search 4, in the library's historical newspaper database, with the date range set to April 1-30, 1927: Mississippi AND levee AND break. The database found hundreds of articles printed that month. I kept one from the Delta Courier (Source C).
7Search 5, in the library catalog, as a subject search: Flood control -- Mississippi River -- History. Ms. Kowalczyk, the school librarian, showed me that a subject search finds books catalogued under a topic even when their titles use other words. I found The River and the Law (Source A) on the shelf. She also recommended John M. Barry's Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America (1997), a long history of the flood, but every copy was checked out, so I placed a hold.
8Two more pages I opened from Search 1: a fan page about the song "When the Levee Breaks" (Source D) and a blog post about the Vermont flood (Source E).
Written for this page (an invented research log), Marisol's research log, Days 1-2 (Text 1: written for this page; Marisol, Mr. Adebayo, Ms. Kowalczyk and their school are invented, and so are the search results). Original passage written for this page.
Turning a basic search into an advanced one
Search 1, 1927 flood, matched a Vermont flood, song lists and a cruise (Text 1, paragraph 3).
Result: Search 3, "levees only" (1927 OR 1928) "Flood Control Act", names the policy and the law as exact phrases and accepts either year, so the results are about the policy, not just the flood (paragraph 5).
Searching where a search engine cannot
Marisol wants accounts written while the flood was happening, not later retellings.
Result: In the newspaper database she joins three words with AND and sets a date range of April 1-30, 1927 (paragraph 6). The database holds scanned print newspapers that a general search engine does not show, and the date range keeps only articles printed that month.
Judging usefulness, not just topic
Source D, a fan page about the 1929 song "When the Levee Breaks," is about the 1927 flood (Text 4, paragraph 3).
Result: It is on the topic but not useful for this question: it says nothing about levee policy or Congress, and it has no author, date or sources. It could help a different question, such as how musicians remembered the flood.
Integrating selectively
Sentence [5] of the first draft (Text 5) strings together five facts, one of them about a song.
Result: The revision keeps one number, the 145 levee breaks, because it shows the scale of the failure, and saves the Caernarvon dynamiting for its own sentence, where it makes the point that the river needed another outlet (Text 6).
Citing a print book in MLA 9
Marisol paraphrases the levees-only theory from page 142 of Source A.
Result: In-text: (Marchetti 142), the author's last name and the page with no comma between them. Works Cited: Marchetti, Evelyn. The River and the Law: Flood Control in the Mississippi Valley, 1861-1941. Bayou Press, 2016. The book title is in italics because the book is a whole work.
Use Diagram 1 to name each search move and Diagram 2 to show the narrowing path from results to integrated evidence. Stress that the site: limit and the database filters shape what kinds of sources appear, but the searcher still judges each result.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs read Sources A-E (Texts 2-4) and fill in the chart. For each source they note one detail that shows whether it is authoritative, then decide how much of it belongs in a paper that answers Marisol's question. Ask pairs to point to the exact words that support each decision, and to name one source that would become more useful if the question changed.
Usefulness chart for Marisol's question (students fill in the empty cells)
Source
Print or digital?
Who published it, and when?
On the topic?
Helps answer the question? How?
Keep, use for one point, or drop?
A
B
C
D
E
1The River and the Law: Flood Control in the Mississippi Valley, 1861-1941, by Evelyn Marchetti, professor of history. Bayou Press, 2016. From chapter 6, "The Year the River Won."
2[page 142] For more than half a century, the men who managed the lower Mississippi trusted a single tool. An 1861 report by two Army engineers, Andrew Humphreys and Henry Abbot, had argued that levees alone could control the river. The Mississippi River Commission, created by Congress in 1879, came to follow the same idea, which critics called the "levees only" policy. The theory was that levees would squeeze the river into a narrower channel, where faster water would scour the bottom and carry floods safely to the sea. Outlets and spillways, which let some water escape, were rejected as a waste of the river's force.
3[page 143] The flood of 1927 broke that faith. After months of heavy rain across the valley, the river broke through its levees in at least 145 places and covered about 27,000 square miles. On April 21, the levee at Mounds Landing, Mississippi, gave way. Eight days later, to protect New Orleans, officials dynamited the levee at Caernarvon, below the city, and flooded two parishes on purpose. That act admitted what the policy had denied: the river sometimes needed somewhere else to go. The Flood Control Act of 1928 put the federal government in charge of flood control on the lower river and paid for a plan that added floodways and spillways to the levees.
Written for this page (an invented print source), The River and the Law: Flood Control in the Mississippi Valley, 1861-1941, pages 142-143 (Source A: an invented library book, written for this page; Dr. Marchetti and Bayou Press are invented, and the facts are real). Original passage written for this page.
1Mississippi Valley History Online, published by the Lower Mississippi Historical Society. "Levees Only: The Policy the 1927 Flood Ended," by Dr. Samuel Okonjo, historian of the American South. Updated 12 Mar. 2024. Web address: mvhistory.example/levees-only
2In the spring of 1927, the Mississippi River proved that levees alone could not hold it. The water spread across parts of several states and drove hundreds of thousands of people from their homes. At Greenville, Mississippi, thousands of Black refugees were held for weeks on top of the levee, and many were forced to work on it.
3The disaster changed the politics of flood control. Before 1927, states and local levee districts paid a large share of the cost of their levees, with only part of it coming from Washington. After 1927, many members of Congress argued that a river draining much of the country was a national problem. Engineers also saw that a system with no way to release water left every levee at risk.
4The Flood Control Act of 1928, signed by President Calvin Coolidge on May 15, 1928, answered both arguments. It adopted a plan drawn up by the Army's chief engineer, General Edgar Jadwin, that combined stronger levees with floodways and spillways, and the federal government paid most of the cost. The Bonnet Carré Spillway above New Orleans, finished in 1931, was one result.
Written for this page (an invented digital source), Levees Only: The Policy the 1927 Flood Ended (Source B: an invented history website, written for this page; the society and Dr. Okonjo are invented, and the facts are real). Original passage written for this page.
1Source C: "Water Pours Through Mounds Landing Break," Delta Courier, 23 Apr. 1927, page 1. No reporter is named. Marisol found it in the Southern Newspaper Archive, a library database of scanned newspapers.
2From the article: "The water came through the break with a roar that could be heard for miles, and by nightfall the farms below the levee were a lake. Families who had gone to bed on dry land climbed to their rooftops before dawn. Our levee board has done all that levees can do."
3Source D: "Levee Songs," a fan page on the website BluesVault. No author and no date. It says that the blues song "When the Levee Breaks" was recorded in 1929 by Kansas Joe McCoy and Memphis Minnie, and that its words describe the fear of a levee giving way and the grief of losing a home.
4Source E: "The Flood of '27," a post on Green Mountain Stories, a travel blog about Vermont, 2022. It describes a flood in November 1927 that washed out roads, bridges and rail lines across Vermont and killed dozens of people.
5What Marisol still has to decide: which of these sources, if any, help answer her research question, and how much of each one belongs in her paper.
Written for this page (invented print and digital sources), Three more sources from Marisol's searches (Sources C, D and E: all three are invented for this lesson; the facts about the 1927 floods and the 1929 song are real). Original passage written for this page.
Independent Practice20 minutes
Students read Marisol's first draft (Text 5). For each of its eight sentences they write one label: fine as written, not needed for the point, plagiarism or patchwriting, quotation dropped in without a lead-in, or citation error. Then they compare the draft with her revision (Text 6) and list three changes, naming the part of the standard each change meets. The quiz also uses these texts.
[1] The Mississippi River flood of 1927 was a huge disaster. [2] For more than half a century, the men who managed the lower Mississippi trusted a single tool. [3] The idea was that levees would push the river into a thinner channel, where quicker water would scrape the bottom and carry floods safely to the ocean (Marchetti 142). [4] In November 1927, another flood killed dozens of people in Vermont. [5] The river broke through its levees in at least 145 places, it covered about 27,000 square miles, the levee at Mounds Landing broke on April 21, officials dynamited the levee at Caernarvon, and the song "When the Levee Breaks" came out in 1929. [6] "Our levee board has done all that levees can do." [7] The Flood Control Act of 1928 adopted a plan by General Edgar Jadwin that combined stronger levees with floodways and spillways (mvhistory.example/levees-only). [8] So Congress changed the policy.
Written for this page (an invented student draft), Marisol's first draft of one paragraph (Text 5: written for this page; sentences are numbered in brackets for discussion). Original passage written for this page.
1Before 1927, flood control on the lower Mississippi rested on one idea. Engineers believed that levees, by forcing the river into a narrow channel, would make it cut its own bed deeper and carry high water out to sea, so the builders of the levee system turned down outlets that would let water escape (Marchetti 142). The flood of 1927 showed the flaw in that reasoning. The river broke through its levees in at least 145 places (Marchetti 143), and a newspaper printed two days after the break at Mounds Landing reported that families "who had gone to bed on dry land climbed to their rooftops before dawn" ("Water Pours"). The clearest sign that the policy had failed came when officials, to save New Orleans, blew open the levee at Caernarvon; as the historian Evelyn Marchetti puts it, the dynamiting "admitted what the policy had denied: the river sometimes needed somewhere else to go" (143). Congress drew two lessons from the disaster. Samuel Okonjo explains that many members came to see the river as "a national problem" and that engineers recognized that "a system with no way to release water left every levee at risk." The Flood Control Act of 1928 responded to both by paying for a federal plan that added floodways and spillways to the levees (Okonjo).
2Works Cited
3Marchetti, Evelyn. The River and the Law: Flood Control in the Mississippi Valley, 1861-1941. Bayou Press, 2016.
4Okonjo, Samuel. "Levees Only: The Policy the 1927 Flood Ended." Mississippi Valley History Online, Lower Mississippi Historical Society, 12 Mar. 2024, mvhistory.example/levees-only.
5"Water Pours Through Mounds Landing Break." Delta Courier, 23 Apr. 1927, p. 1. Southern Newspaper Archive, southernnews.example/courier-1927-04-23.
Written for this page (a model paragraph), Marisol's revised paragraph and Works Cited page (Text 6: written for this page; the quotations are from Sources A, B and C). Original passage written for this page.
In the last five minutes, hand out Theo's log and source list (Texts 7-8), the science set for the homework. Students circle his two searches and underline each source's publisher.
1Assignment from Dr. Nakamura, Earth and Environmental Science: Answer a research question about a change in Earth's atmosphere in one paragraph of 150-200 words. Use at least three authoritative sources, print and digital, and explain why each one you use helps answer the question. Cite in MLA 9 style.
2My research question: Is the ozone hole over Antarctica recovering, and is the Montreal Protocol, the 1987 treaty that phased out ozone-destroying chemicals, the reason?
3Search 1: ozone. The results were a city's smog alert page, an online store selling "ozone generators" for cleaning the air, and a page about using ozone to clean swimming pools.
4Search 2: ozone hole getting better. The results mixed news stories from many different years with a sunscreen company's blog. The first result was a 2019 news story saying that year's ozone hole was unusually small.
5Then Mr. Ferris, the school librarian, showed me the library's science database. There I found two journal articles from the journal Nature, which is printed on paper and also published online (Sources 1 and 2). He also pointed me to the full text of an international scientific assessment from 2022 (Source 3).
6What I still need: better searches, a decision about which sources actually answer my two-part question, and help citing a journal article and a report.
Written for this page (an invented research log), Theo's research log (Text 7, homework: written for this page; Theo, Dr. Nakamura, Mr. Ferris and their school are invented, and so are the search results). Original passage written for this page.
1Source 1: Mario J. Molina and F. S. Rowland, "Stratospheric Sink for Chlorofluoromethanes: Chlorine Atom-Catalysed Destruction of Ozone," Nature, volume 249, issue number 5460, 1974, pages 810-812. Summary: The two chemists argued that chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), gases then used in spray cans and refrigerators, do not break down in the lower atmosphere. They drift up into the stratosphere, where ultraviolet light splits them and frees chlorine atoms, and each chlorine atom can destroy many ozone molecules in a chain of reactions. The article was a warning based on laboratory chemistry and calculations, written before any ozone hole had been measured.
2Source 2: J. C. Farman, B. G. Gardiner and J. D. Shanklin, "Large Losses of Total Ozone in Antarctica Reveal Seasonal ClOx/NOx Interaction," Nature, volume 315, issue number 6016, 1985, pages 207-210. Summary: Scientists of the British Antarctic Survey reported that ozone measured above their Antarctic stations each spring had fallen sharply since the 1970s, and they linked the losses to chlorine chemistry. The article reported the losses that came to be called the ozone hole.
3Source 3: World Meteorological Organization, Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022, GAW Report No. 278, 2022, online edition hosted by NOAA's Chemical Sciences Laboratory at csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/2022/. Hundreds of scientists wrote and reviewed it. The executive summary says that "the Montreal Protocol continues to be effective at reducing the atmospheric abundance of ODSs" (ozone-depleting substances) and that "the Antarctic ozone hole has generally diminished in size and depth since the year 2000." It adds: "The 2019 ozone hole was the smallest since 2002. In contrast, both 2020 and 2021 had relatively large and long-lasting late-spring ozone holes." It projects that springtime ozone over Antarctica will return "to 1980 values shortly after mid-century (about 2065)."
4Source 4: "Why the Ozone Hole Means You Need SPF 50," a blog post on the website of SunShield, a sunscreen company, 2023. No author. It says that "the ozone layer is disappearing" and links to the company's store.
5Source 5: "Ozone Action Days," a page on the website of the city of Riverton, 2025. It explains that ozone near the ground forms from car exhaust and sunlight, harms the lungs, and is highest on hot summer afternoons.
6Source 6: "Ozone Hole Shrinks to Smallest Size in Years," by Dana Whitfield, Coastal Daily News website, October 2019. It reports that the 2019 ozone hole was unusually small and quotes a scientist who says that warm weather high over Antarctica that year was a major reason.
Written for this page (source summaries and invented sources), Theo's source list (Text 8, homework: Sources 1-3 are real and summarized accurately for this page, with quotations from Source 3; Sources 4-6, their websites and their writers are invented). Original passage written for this page.
Closure10 minutes
Exit ticket: (1) Write one advanced search, with at least two operators, that Marisol could use to learn how the Bonnet Carré Spillway was built. (2) Name one source from today that is on the topic but not useful for Marisol's question, and say what question it could help answer. (3) Explain in one sentence why a citation after copied words does not prevent plagiarism.
Teacher notes: Marisol, Theo, their teachers and librarians, Dr. Marchetti and Bayou Press, Dr. Okonjo and the Lower Mississippi Historical Society, the Delta Courier, the Southern Newspaper Archive, BluesVault, Green Mountain Stories, SunShield, the city of Riverton, Dana Whitfield and the Coastal Daily News are invented; say so when you hand out the texts. Web addresses ending in .example lead nowhere. The facts in the flood sources are real: the 1861 Humphreys and Abbot report, the Mississippi River Commission of 1879, the 145 levee breaks and about 27,000 square miles flooded, the Mounds Landing break on April 21, 1927, the Caernarvon dynamiting on April 29, the forced labor of Black refugees at Greenville, the Flood Control Act of 1928 and the Bonnet Carré Spillway. John M. Barry's Rising Tide (1997) and the 1929 recording of "When the Levee Breaks" are real. Theo's Sources 1-3 are real, and his quotations from Source 3 are word for word from its executive summary. Source B's paragraph on Greenville describes the treatment of Black refugees; give students time to discuss it if they raise it. The Works Cited entries follow MLA 9; the same moves apply in APA or Chicago style.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a search-builder card with one blank for each move: exact phrase, alternatives with OR, a word to exclude, and a site limit
Let students fill in the usefulness chart for Sources E and D first, then A and B, before Source C
Provide signal-phrase frames: "As ... explains, ..." and "According to ..., ..." with a reminder of where the citation goes
For Advanced Students
Have students write a two-sentence usefulness note for Barry's Rising Tide based only on its title, subtitle and date, then list what they would need to check once the book arrives
Ask students to rewrite Marisol's research question so that Source D becomes one of the most useful sources, and explain what else would change
Have students compare Theo's Sources 1 and 3 and explain why a 1974 article cannot answer a question about recovery by itself
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Searches should turn the research question into precise phrases and use at least two advanced tools, and students should explain what each tool does to the results. Usefulness judgments should separate being on the topic from helping answer the exact question, and should name what makes a source authoritative: an expert author, a careful publisher and a date. In paragraphs, every borrowed fact serves the point of the sentence it is in, quotations are introduced by signal phrases, paraphrases change both words and sentence pattern, and every in-text citation matches an MLA 9 Works Cited entry.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Search Lab: Rebuild Eight Searches
15 minPairs
Pairs get eight cards, each with a history or science research question and a weak search. They rebuild each search with at least two advanced tools, predict how the results will change and, if devices are available, test two of their searches. The activity builds the advanced-search part of the standard.
Search Cards
1. How did the Tennessee Valley Authority change life in the rural South in the 1930s? Weak search: tva
2. Why did Prohibition fail to stop drinking in Chicago? Weak search: prohibition chicago
3. How did newspapers in 1920 report the vote that ratified the Nineteenth Amendment? Weak search: women vote 1920
4. What did the Dawes Plan of 1924 do for Germany's economy? Weak search: dawes
5. How do wetlands reduce flood damage downstream? Weak search: wetlands floods
6. Does acid rain still harm lakes in the Adirondack Mountains? Weak search: acid rain
7. How do scientists measure the age of groundwater? Weak search: water age
8. Why are coral reefs losing their color when the ocean warms? Weak search: coral white
Procedure
Underline the key ideas in each question and write each one as an exact phrase where the words belong together
Add OR for a common alternative word, a minus sign for a meaning you do not want, or a site: limit, and say where a library tool (catalog subject search, newspaper database with a date range, science database) would work better than a search engine
If devices are available, run the weak and the rebuilt search for two cards and compare the kinds of sources among the first ten results
Teacher key (sample rebuilt searches): 1. "Tennessee Valley Authority" (farmers OR rural) 1930s; 2. Prohibition Chicago "bootlegging" history -recipes; 3. newspaper database, date range August 1920, "Nineteenth Amendment" AND ratified; 4. "Dawes Plan" 1924 Germany reparations; 5. wetlands "flood damage" downstream study site:.edu; 6. "acid rain" Adirondack lakes recovery site:.gov; 7. science database, groundwater AND ("age dating" OR "residence time"); 8. "coral bleaching" "ocean temperature"
Discussion Questions
On card 2, what might the minus sign remove that you actually need? When is excluding a word risky?
Which cards needed a library tool instead of a search engine, and why?
How does a site: limit change the kinds of sources you get without guaranteeing that each one is authoritative?
2
Useful for This Question? Source Card Sort
15 minGroups of 3-4
Groups sort eight source cards for a new science question into three piles: useful, useful for one point, and not useful. Then they change the question and sort again. The activity builds the parts of the standard on gathering authoritative print and digital sources and judging usefulness.
The Question and the Eight Cards (all invented for practice; the facts are real)
Research question: How do scientists know that the Hawaiian Islands formed as the Pacific Plate moved over a hot spot?
1. A university geology department web page, by a named volcanologist, 2022: explains that the islands get older toward the northwest and that the youngest volcanoes are on the Island of Hawaii
2. A travel website's list of the ten best beaches in Hawaii, no author
3. A print textbook, Earth Science Today, 2019: a chapter on plate tectonics with one page on hot spots and a map of the Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain
4. A 1963 journal article by the geophysicist J. Tuzo Wilson that first proposed the hot spot idea for Hawaii (a card gives only its title and summary)
5. A news story from 2018 about the eruption of Kilauea, with photographs of lava reaching homes
6. A jewelry store's page selling "real Hawaiian lava stone" bracelets, which says the stones carry "volcano energy"
7. A science museum's online exhibit, 2021, with a timeline of island ages measured from rock samples
8. A personal blog, no date, claiming that the islands were raised by a giant meteorite strike
Procedure
Each group sorts the cards and writes one reason on each: who made it, what it offers, and whether that helps answer the question
Teacher key: useful, cards 1, 3, 4 and 7 (expert or reviewed sources that explain the evidence, including a print textbook and a digital exhibit); useful for one point, card 5 (shows that the youngest island is still volcanically active, but does not explain the hot spot); not useful, cards 2 (off the question), 6 (a store with an unsupported claim) and 8 (no author, no date and a claim that contradicts the evidence)
New question for the second sort: How did the 2018 Kilauea eruption affect people living nearby? Groups re-sort; card 5 moves to useful, and card 4 drops to not useful
Discussion Questions
Why did card 5 change piles when the question changed, even though the card itself did not change?
Card 4 is from 1963. When is an old source still useful?
Which cards are print and which are digital? Does the medium change how useful a card is?
Modification for Distance Learning
Post the cards on a shared slide with three labeled columns. Each student drags two cards and adds a one-line reason in the speaker notes, and the group settles disagreements in a short call.
3
Integration Workshop: Selective, Flowing and Honest
15 minPairs
Pairs read a short source passage and four student versions of a sentence that uses it. They rank the versions, name the problem in each weak one and write their own. The activity builds the integration, plagiarism and citation parts of the standard.
The Source Passage (invented for practice; the facts are real)
From page 211 of an invented print book, Engineering the Lower River, by Harold Pruitt (Crescent Books, 2012): "The Bonnet Carré Spillway, finished in 1931, was built to do what the old policy forbade. When the river rises dangerously high, crews open its gates, and part of the Mississippi flows sideways into Lake Pontchartrain instead of past New Orleans. It was first opened in the flood of 1937."
Four Student Versions
A. The Bonnet Carré Spillway, finished in 1931, was built to do what the old policy forbade (Pruitt 211).
B. The Bonnet Carré Spillway, completed in 1931, was made to do what the earlier policy prohibited (Pruitt 211).
C. "When the river rises dangerously high, crews open its gates." The spillway was first opened in 1937.
D. The new approach showed up in concrete form in 1931, when the Bonnet Carré Spillway gave the river what Harold Pruitt calls a way to flow "sideways into Lake Pontchartrain instead of past New Orleans" (211).
Procedure
Rank the versions from best to worst and write the problem with each weak one
Teacher key: D is best: it links to the previous idea ("the new approach"), quotes only the vivid phrase, and cites the page with the author named in the sentence. A copies the source's sentence with no quotation marks (plagiarism, even with a citation). B is patchwriting: the same sentence with synonyms swapped. C drops in a quotation with no lead-in and gives no citation for either sentence
Write one more sentence that uses the 1937 fact as a paraphrase and connects it to D
Poster Variation
Pairs make a one-page guide titled "Three Ways to Let a Source Speak," with one example each of a signal-phrase quotation, a partial quotation inside a sentence and a paraphrase, all correctly cited.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: Six Advanced Search Moves, with Examples from the Flood Research
Each move changes what a search returns. Quotation marks and OR shape the words; the minus sign removes a word; a site: limit keeps one kind of website; a database date range and a catalog subject search work only inside library tools, which hold print sources a general search engine does not show.
Diagram 2: From Search Results to Evidence Worth Citing
Each level is a question the researcher asks, and fewer sources pass each one. A source can be relevant without being authoritative, and authoritative without being useful for this particular question. Even a useful source is integrated selectively: only the parts that support a point in the paper go in.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
WHST.9-10.8 Homework: Is the Ozone Hole Recovering?
Directions: Use Theo's research log and source list (Texts 7-8) in Independent Practice. You are helping Theo finish his Earth and Environmental Science research. Answer the six problems in complete sentences, and use MLA 9 for every citation.
Part 1: Searching and Gathering (Problems 1-2)
Theo's searches ozone and ozone hole getting better returned smog alerts, air-cleaning machines and a sunscreen blog. Write two advanced searches for his question, each with at least two different tools from Diagram 1, and explain what each tool will change in the results.
Sort Sources 1-6 into print, digital or both, and name the three that are most authoritative. For each of those three, give one detail from Text 8 that shows its authority.
Part 2: Judging Usefulness (Problems 3-4)
Theo's question has two parts: is the ozone hole recovering, and is the Montreal Protocol the reason? Make a table that shows which of Sources 1-6 help with each part, and explain why Source 1, an authoritative article, cannot answer the first part.
Theo plans to write, "The ozone hole is fixed, because the 2019 hole was the smallest ever." Using Sources 3 and 6, explain two things wrong with this sentence, then rewrite it so that it is accurate.
Part 3: Integrating and Citing (Problems 5-6)
Write Theo's paragraph of 150-200 words answering his question. Use at least three sources, including one short quotation introduced with a signal phrase and one paraphrase, each with an MLA in-text citation. Keep only information that answers the question, and use no copied words without quotation marks.
Write MLA 9 Works Cited entries for Sources 1 and 3, then explain in one or two sentences why Theo's paragraph should not cite Source 5 at all.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Advanced Searches and Gathering
Two searches with at least two tools each, explained correctly; sources sorted by medium, with authority shown by details
Searches improved but use one tool, or the authority details are thin
No advanced searches
Usefulness
Each source matched to the part of the question it answers; the 2019 claim corrected with Sources 3 and 6
Usefulness judged by topic only, or one problem in the claim missed
Sources judged without reasons
Selective, Honest Integration
Only information that answers the question; quotation introduced; paraphrase in new words and sentence pattern
Some extra information, or a paraphrase close to the source
Copied words presented as the writer's own
MLA Citation
In-text citations match correct Works Cited entries for a journal article and a report
Minor errors in order, punctuation or italics
Citations missing
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-3 are new search problems. The others use Marisol's log (Text 1) in Direct Instruction, Sources A-E (Texts 2-4) in Guided Practice, and her draft and revision (Texts 5-6) and Theo's source list (Text 8) in Independent Practice. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student researching the radio boom of the 1920s finds that some writers call it the "radio craze" and others the "radio boom." Which search will find pages that use either phrase?
Answer: B
B keeps each phrase together with quotation marks and joins the two with OR, so a page with either phrase counts. A has no quotation marks or OR, so it looks for all four words anywhere on a page. C treats both phrases as one four-word phrase that almost no page contains. D uses a minus sign, which throws out every page that says "radio boom" instead of accepting it.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student researching how Hoover Dam was built keeps getting pages about vacuum cleaners made by the Hoover company. Which change fixes the search hoover construction?
Answer: A
A turns the name into an exact phrase and uses the minus sign to drop pages that mention vacuums. B adds vacuum pages with OR instead of removing them. C limits the search to commercial sites, where the vacuum company's pages are. D searches for a phrase no history page uses and adds the unwanted word.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student wants U.S. government pages about the history of the Tennessee Valley Authority. Which search does that most directly?
Answer: B
B keeps the agency's name together as a phrase and uses site:.gov, which returns only pages from U.S. government websites. A adds the word "government," which matches any page that uses it. C removes every page that contains "history" and treats .gov as an ordinary word. D uses OR to accept any page with any one of the three words, including pages about other valleys.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student wants to read how newspapers reported the stock market crash of October 1929 while it was happening. Which setting in a library newspaper database helps most?
Answer: D
A date range keeps only articles printed in those weeks, so the results are reports written as the crash unfolded. A ranks articles by popularity, which says nothing about when they were printed. B throws out the very articles the student needs. C is far too broad and ignores dates.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Mr. Adebayo requires at least one print source and at least one digital source (Text 1, paragraph 1). Which pair of Marisol's sources meets that requirement most clearly?
Answer: D
Source A is a book Marisol took off the library shelf (Text 1, paragraph 7), and Source B is an article on a website. A, B and C each pair two digital sources. Source C, a printed newspaper that she read as a scan in a database, could count as either, but the clearest pair is A and B.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source E (Text 4, paragraph 4) came up in Marisol's first search. Why should she leave it out of her paper?
Answer: D
Source E describes a November 1927 flood in Vermont; it matched the words "1927 flood" but not Marisol's question about the Mississippi and levee policy. A overstates a rule: some blogs by experts are useful. B confuses the date of a secondary source with the date of the events. C misreads the source, which is not about the Mississippi flood at all.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How can Source C, the 1927 newspaper article (Text 4, paragraphs 1-2), best serve Marisol's research question?
Answer: B
The article was printed during the flood, and its last sentence, "Our levee board has done all that levees can do," shows that even a local paper saw the limits of levees. It says nothing about Congress, so A asks too much of it. C reverses the meaning of the sentence, which defends the levee board. D rejects a source by its type instead of asking what it can show.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What makes Source A (Text 2) both authoritative and useful for Marisol's question?
Answer: C
Source A is by a professor of history and published as a book, and it explains both the theory behind the policy (page 142) and what the flood showed about it (page 143), which is exactly what the question asks. A judges by length. B is false: Source B (2024) is newer. D describes Source C, not Source A.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Sentence [2] of Marisol's first draft (Text 5) is plagiarism. Why?
Answer: A
Sentence [2] is Source A's sentence "For more than half a century, the men who managed the lower Mississippi trusted a single tool," presented as Marisol's own words. B is wrong because it states a fact from Source A, not an opinion. C names a style choice, not a problem. D is wrong because the sentence has no quotation marks, so it is not presented as a quotation at all.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Sentence [3] of the draft (Text 5) has a citation, (Marchetti 142). Why is it still a problem?
Answer: B
Source A says levees would "squeeze the river into a narrower channel, where faster water would scour the bottom and carry floods safely to the sea"; sentence [3] keeps that pattern and changes "squeeze," "narrower," "faster," "scour" and "sea." A citation credits the idea, but the wording is still borrowed. A invents a rule: MLA in-text citations give author and page. C is wrong because the theory is on page 142. D is wrong because the idea needs a source.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Marisol's draft ends with sentence [8], "So Congress changed the policy" (Text 5). How does the end of her revision (Text 6) improve on it?
Answer: C
Text 6 says "Congress drew two lessons from the disaster" and supports each lesson with a quotation from Okonjo, then ties the Flood Control Act to both, so the ending explains the change instead of just announcing it. A is wrong because Congress is still there. B is wrong because Source E is not used at all. D is wrong because the paragraph opens with the policy, not with Congress.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Marisol adds a date from "Timeline of the 1927 Flood," an unsigned page on the website of the Delta Heritage Museum, which also publishes the site (the page and museum are invented). Which MLA 9 in-text citation is correct?
Answer: B
When a work has no author and the organization that made it is also its publisher, MLA 9 begins the Works Cited entry with the title, so the in-text citation is a shortened title in quotation marks. A would be correct only if the museum were listed as the author, which MLA avoids when author and publisher are the same. C adds a year, as APA does, and leaves out the quotation marks. D uses a web address, which belongs only at the end of the Works Cited entry.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A web article, "Building the Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway," by Rosa Delgado, was posted on 4 June 2023 on the website River Engineering History, published by the Midwest Rivers Archive, at riverhistory.example/floodway. Which Works Cited entry follows MLA 9? (The article and website are invented.)
Answer: A
A puts the author last name first, the article title in quotation marks, the website in italics, then the publisher, the date in day-month-year order and the location. B puts the first name first, italicizes an article title and drops the publisher and location. C is APA style. D starts with the title although the author is known, italicizes the publisher in place of the website and leaves the website title without italics.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Text 6, what does the sentence "The flood of 1927 showed the flaw in that reasoning" do for the paragraph?
Answer: C
The sentence points back to the theory just explained ("that reasoning") and forward to the evidence that follows, so the facts read as one argument instead of a list; that is how selective integration keeps the flow of ideas. A is wrong because the 145 breaks are cited in the next sentence. B is wrong because the sentence quotes no one. D is wrong because it states Marisol's own point, not a new fact.
Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Theo's Source 2 (Text 8, paragraph 2) has three authors. Which MLA 9 Works Cited entry is correct?
Answer: A
MLA 9 lists the first author and "et al." when a source has three or more authors, puts the article title in quotation marks and the journal in italics, and gives volume, issue, year and pages. B lists all three names, italicizes the article title and drops the volume and pages. C is APA style. D starts with the title although the authors are known.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Marisol wants to learn more about the Greenville levee camp in 1927. Write two advanced searches: one for a general search engine and one for the library's newspaper database. Use at least two different tools across the two searches, and explain what each tool does.
Model answer: "Search engine: "Greenville" levee camp 1927 (refugees OR evacuees) site:.edu. The quotation marks and OR shape the words, and site:.edu keeps university pages, such as archives and history departments. Newspaper database: Greenville AND levee AND camp, with the date range set to April-June 1927, so that only reports printed during the camp's first weeks appear." Rubric line: 2 points for two workable searches using at least two different tools, each explained correctly; 1 point for searches that improve on plain keywords but are not explained, or for an explanation that misstates what a tool does.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Suppose Marisol's question were instead How did people living in the Mississippi Delta experience the 1927 flood? Which two of Sources A-E would become more useful, and why? Name one source that would become less useful.
Model answer: "Source C would become more useful, because it was printed during the flood and describes families climbing onto their rooftops. Source D would also become more useful, because a 1929 blues song shows how people remembered the flood, though Marisol would still need a more authoritative source to confirm the song's details. Source A would become less useful, since its pages 142-143 are about engineering and law, not daily life." (Source B's Greenville paragraph is also an acceptable choice for "more useful.") Rubric line: 2 points for two sources that fit the new question with reasons from the texts and one source that fits it less well; 1 point for sources named without reasons, or only one correct choice.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Sentence [6] of Marisol's draft (Text 5) is a quotation dropped into the paragraph with no lead-in and no citation. Rewrite it as one sentence that introduces the quotation with a signal phrase, connects it to the idea that levees had limits, and cites it correctly in MLA 9.
Model answer: "Even at the time, some people saw that levees could not do the job alone: two days after the Mounds Landing break, the Delta Courier admitted that the local levee board "has done all that levees can do" ("Water Pours")." Rubric line: 2 points for a signal phrase that names the source or its date, a link to the paragraph's point, the quoted words unchanged inside quotation marks and a short-title citation, since the article has no author; 1 point if one of these is missing.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Write the MLA 9 Works Cited entry for this print magazine article: "Sandbags and Steamboats," by Lena Hart, in the magazine American River History, spring 2020, pages 34-39. (The article and magazine are invented for practice.)
Answer: Hart, Lena. "Sandbags and Steamboats." American River History, Spring 2020, pp. 34-39. Rubric line: 2 points for the elements in order (author, article title in quotation marks, magazine in italics, date, pages with "pp.") and MLA punctuation, with the season capitalized; 1 point for the right order with one or two format errors.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
A classmate using Source B (Text 3, paragraph 4) wants to show that the 1928 law ended the levees-only policy. She writes: "The Flood Control Act of 1928 was signed by President Calvin Coolidge on May 15, 1928, and it adopted a plan drawn up by the Army's chief engineer, General Edgar Jadwin, and it combined stronger levees with floodways and spillways, and the federal government paid most of the cost." Rewrite it as one sentence in your own words that keeps only what supports her point, with an MLA in-text citation, and name one detail you cut and why.
Model answer: "The 1928 law broke with the levees-only approach by adding floodways and spillways, which let high water leave the river, and by making the federal government pay most of the bill (Okonjo)." Cut: the signing date and Jadwin's name, which are accurate but do not show the policy changing. Rubric line: 2 points for a sentence that keeps the floodways and spillways (the break with levees only), uses new wording and sentence structure instead of the source's, and cites (Okonjo), plus a reason for a cut; 1 point for a shorter sentence that still copies phrases from the source or lacks the citation.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does WHST.9-10.8 mean?
WHST.9-10.8 means that students in grades 9 and 10 can find, choose and use sources honestly when they write research in history, science and technical classes.
The standard has six connected demands: gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, use advanced searches effectively, assess how useful each source is for the research question, integrate information selectively so the ideas flow, avoid plagiarism, and follow a standard format for citation.
How is WHST.9-10.8 different from W.9-10.8?
The wording is the same; the classes and the sources are different.
W.9-10.8 belongs to the English standards, while WHST.9-10.8 asks for the same research skills in history, science and technical subjects, where sources include historical newspapers, government reports, scholarly books and journal articles. Many schools teach the moves in English and expect them again in content-area papers and lab reports.
What makes a source "authoritative"?
An authoritative source is written by someone with real expertise and published by an organization that checks its work.
Signs include a named author with credentials in the field, a publisher such as a university press, a scholarly journal, a historical society or a government agency, a clear date and evidence that a reader can trace. In history, a primary source such as a 1927 newspaper can be authoritative about what people reported at the time without being authoritative about causes.
What counts as an advanced search?
An advanced search uses tools beyond typing keywords into a search box.
On search engines those tools include quotation marks for exact phrases, OR for alternatives, the minus sign to exclude a word, and site: to limit results to one kind of website. In library tools they include subject searches in the catalog, date ranges and field limits in databases, and the subject terms that databases attach to each article.
What is the difference between a relevant source and a useful source?
A relevant source is about the topic; a useful source helps answer the specific research question.
A page about a blues song from the 1927 flood is relevant to the flood but not useful for a question about why Congress changed flood policy. Usefulness depends on the question, so the same source can move from useless to essential when the question changes.
What does it mean to integrate information "selectively"?
It means bringing in only the facts and words that support the point being made, not everything the research turned up.
Selective writers choose the one number that makes the point, quote only the phrase that matters, introduce quotations with signal phrases and connect each piece of evidence to the one before it. The result reads as an argument instead of a list of facts from different sources.
Is it plagiarism if I change some of the words and add a citation?
Yes, if the sentence still follows the source's structure and wording.
Keeping a source's sentence and swapping in synonyms is called patchwriting, and a citation does not fix it, because the citation credits the idea but the wording is still borrowed. A real paraphrase restates the idea in new words and a new sentence pattern; exact wording goes in quotation marks.
Which citation style does WHST.9-10.8 require?
The standard asks for "a standard format for citation" and does not name one.
History classes often use MLA or Chicago style, and science classes often use APA. Whichever style a teacher assigns, students should follow it consistently, with in-text citations that match a Works Cited or References list.
How does WHST.9-10.8 change in grades 11-12?
WHST.11-12.8 replaces "usefulness" with judging each source's strengths and limitations for the task, purpose and audience.
It also adds a demand to avoid overreliance on any one source. In grades 9-10, the focus is on whether each source helps answer the research question and on integrating it smoothly and honestly.
How can parents help with a research paper at home?
Ask your student two questions: "What exactly is your question?" and "How does this source help answer it?"
A precise question makes searches better, and the second question keeps students from padding a paper with sources that are only on the topic. It also helps to ask where an exact phrase came from whenever a sentence sounds unlike your student's own writing.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to WHST.9-10.8: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
WHST.6-8.8Prerequisite
Gather print and digital sources, judge credibility and accuracy, quote or paraphrase and cite