SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

WHST.11-12.8Common CoreELAWriting in History, Science and Technical SubjectsGrades 11-12

WHST.11-12.8: Weighing Sources for Task, Purpose and Audience in Science and History Research

In plain English: WHST.11-12.8 is the Common Core literacy standard that asks students in grades 11 and 12 to gather information for science, history and technical writing from several authoritative print and digital sources with advanced searches. They weigh each source's strengths and limitations for task, purpose and audience, integrate it selectively without plagiarism or over-reliance on one source, and cite it in standard form.

Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the specific task, purpose, and audience; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and over-reliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects 6-12 · Cluster: Research to Build and Present Knowledge · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

75 min

Overview

At grades 11-12, research writing has a reader and a job. A source is not simply good or bad: its strengths and limitations depend on the task (what is being written), the purpose (what it must accomplish) and the audience (who will read it and act on it). In the science context, students follow Rhea, an invented senior, as she researches whether her school district should test classrooms for radon, a radioactive gas from the soil, and writes the evidence section of a memo for a board of five volunteers. Two of her sources are real EPA web pages quoted word for word, one is a real World Health Organization handbook, and three are invented. Her first draft leans on a company blog; her revision spreads the weight across sources and cites them in APA 7 style.

The history context carries the homework: Elias, an invented junior, writes a 200-250 word museum panel on whether Orson Welles's 1938 radio play "The War of the Worlds" really set off a nationwide panic, and must decide which of six sources fit a general audience, while citing them in Chicago style (The Chicago Manual of Style, notes and bibliography). The lesson covers every part of WHST.11-12.8: gathering relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively, assessing the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the task, purpose and audience, integrating information selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism, avoiding over-reliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Plan advanced searches with truncation, file-type and site limits, database filters and leads from a source's own references
  • Assess the strengths and limitations of each source for a specific task, purpose and audience, and explain how the same source can be strong for one task and weak for another
  • Integrate evidence selectively from several sources, translating technical figures for non-specialist readers, without plagiarism
  • Recognize over-reliance on one source in a draft and revise so that no single source carries the argument
  • Cite sources correctly in APA 7 and in Chicago notes and bibliography style

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Gathering authoritative sources with advanced searches and judging their usefulness for a question WHST.9-10.8
  • Conducting research projects that synthesize several sources WHST.9-10.7
  • Quoting, paraphrasing and citing in at least one standard style
  • Reading a simple bar graph and converting between units

Lesson Procedure

75-75 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "A company that installs radon reduction systems posts that 'one in three classrooms in our region is above the safe limit.' You are writing to a school board that must decide whether to spend money on testing. Write one reason the post might be worth reading and two reasons you would not want it to carry your memo."

    Collect answers in two columns, strengths and limitations. Point out that almost every answer depends on who will read the memo and what they must decide. Tell students that today's standard asks exactly that question of every source.

  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Define the terms of the standard. The task is the kind of writing and the decision it supports; the purpose is what the writing must accomplish; the audience is who will read it and act on it. A source's strengths are what it can do well for that task, and its limitations are what it cannot show, whom it may not persuade, or where it may be biased or out of date. Over-reliance means letting one source supply most of the evidence, which passes along that source's blind spots and biases. Advanced searches at this level add truncation (an asterisk that finds every ending of a word stem), file-type limits (filetype:pdf), database filters such as peer-reviewed and date limits, and following a source's own references to earlier work. Read Rhea's assignment and log (Text 1), then work through the examples with Diagram 2.

    The assignment: In Dr. Sethi's Environmental Science 12 class, each student writes a two-page memo for a real decision. I am writing to the board of the Harlan Valley School District, five volunteers: a dentist, a retired bus driver, a farmer, an accountant and a parent of three. In November the board votes on whether to test every ground-floor classroom in the district's nine schools for radon this winter. The board chair asked for "plain language, what it costs, and how sure we can be." Dr. Sethi requires at least five authoritative sources, at least one of them in print, APA 7 citations, and no single source carrying the memo.

    My research question: Should the Harlan Valley School District test its ground-floor classrooms for radon, and what would testing involve?

    Search 1: radon. The results were ads for home test kits, several radon repair companies and a chemistry page about element 86. The ClearAir Radon Solutions blog (Source E) came from this search.

    Search 2: radon schools site:.gov. The first result was the EPA's "Radon in Schools" page (Source A). Its list of related documents included two EPA guides for schools, both from 1994.

    Search 3: radon "lung cancer" deaths site:.gov. This found the EPA's "Health Risk of Radon" page (Source B).

    Search 4: "indoor radon" "reference level" filetype:pdf. The top result was the World Health Organization's handbook on indoor radon (Source C). Mr. Barros, the school librarian, found that the county library also has a printed copy.

    Search 5, in the library's science database, with the peer-reviewed filter and the years 2015-2026: radon AND (school* OR classroom*). Only a few studies came up, and most measured homes or schools in other countries. I wrote down this gap: there is less recent research on U.S. schools than on homes.

    Search 6: radon "Harlan County" map, then the state geological survey's own site search. This found a county radon map (Source D). Mr. Barros also showed me the county newspaper's archive, where I found a 2025 article about radon tests in the neighboring Bellmont district (Source F).

    Interview: On September 22, 2026, I spoke by phone with Rosa Alvarez, the district's facilities director, about what testing would cost.

    Written for this page (an invented research log), Rhea's assignment and search log (Text 1: written for this page; Rhea, Dr. Sethi, Mr. Barros, the Harlan Valley School District and its board are invented, and so are the search results). Original passage written for this page.
    • Aiming a search at a kind of source

      Search 1, radon, returned test-kit ads, repair companies and a chemistry page (Text 1, paragraph 3).

      Result: Search 2 adds site:.gov to reach government agencies, and Search 3 adds the exact phrase "lung cancer", so each search is built to find one kind of evidence the memo needs: a recommendation for schools, then a health statistic.

    • Gathering print and digital versions

      Rhea found the WHO handbook as a PDF, and Mr. Barros found a printed copy at the county library (paragraph 6).

      Result: The same work can be gathered in both media. Rhea cites the version she read, and the print copy meets Dr. Sethi's print requirement only if she actually uses it. Source F, a printed county newspaper found in an archive, is her other print source.

    • Strengths and limitations for this task

      Source C, the WHO handbook, recommends a reference level of 100 Bq/m³ (Text 3, paragraph 1).

      Result: Strength: an international, health-based standard that is stricter than the EPA's action level, useful if the board asks "how sure can we be?" Limitations for this audience: it was written in 2009 for governments, not schools, and it uses a unit board members do not know, so Rhea must translate it: 100 ÷ 37 ≈ 2.7 pCi/L.

    • A source that fits one purpose but not another

      Source D, the county radon map, reports that 31% of 1,212 home tests were at or above 4 pCi/L (Text 3, paragraph 2).

      Result: For the purpose of deciding whether to test, it is strong: local, from geologists and based on many measurements. For the purpose of deciding whether to repair, it is weak, since it measured homes and says it "cannot predict the radon level in any individual building."

    • An APA reference for an organization's book

      The WHO is both the author and the publisher of Source C.

      Result: World Health Organization. (2009). WHO handbook on indoor radon: A public health perspective. In APA 7, the publisher is left out when it is the same as the author, the title is in italics with sentence-case capitals, and the in-text citation is (World Health Organization, 2009).

    Use Diagram 2 to show that a strength or limitation is always a strength or limitation for something. Ask: if Rhea were writing a lab report on radon decay for Dr. Sethi, which of her sources would gain or lose value?

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Pairs read Sources A-F and the interview notes (Texts 2-4) and fill in the chart below for Rhea's memo. Each strength and each limitation must name the task, the purpose or the audience it depends on. Circulate and push pairs past general labels ("reliable," "biased") to specific ones ("reliable about national risk, silent about our buildings").

    Strengths and limitations for Rhea's memo to the school board (students fill in the empty cells)
    SourcePrint or digital?Strength for this task, purpose and audienceLimitation for this task, purpose and audienceWhat Rhea should use it for, if anything
    A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    Interview

    Source A: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Radon in Schools," web page, last updated August 17, 2026. It says: "The EPA recommends that all schools nationwide be tested for radon." It also says: "A nationwide survey of radon levels in schools estimates that nearly one in five has at least one schoolroom with a short-term radon level above the action level of 4 pCi/L (picocuries per liter)." The page does not give the year of that survey. Other quotations: "EPA estimates that more than 70,000 schoolrooms in use today have high short-term radon levels" and "Testing for radon is simple and relatively inexpensive." The basic elements of testing, as the page lists them: "Test all frequently used rooms on and below the ground level; Conduct tests in the cooler months of the year." Near the top of the page: "After smoking, it is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States causing an estimated twenty one thousand (21,000) lung cancer deaths a year."

    Source B: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Health Risk of Radon," web page, last updated June 24, 2026. It says: "Radon is the number one cause of lung cancer among non-smokers, according to EPA estimates. Overall, radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer. Radon is responsible for about 21,000 lung cancer deaths every year. About 2,900 of these deaths occur among people who have never smoked." The page is written for the general public and says little about schools.

    Written for this page (research notes on two real sources), Rhea's notes on Sources A and B (Text 2: the notes are written for this page; the facts and quotations are from the two real EPA web pages named). Original passage written for this page.

    Source C: World Health Organization, WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective, 2009, available in print and as a free PDF. An international group of experts wrote it for governments setting radon policy. It recommends a national reference level of 100 becquerels per cubic meter (Bq/m³) and, where a country cannot reach that, a level no higher than 300 Bq/m³. It explains that the risk of lung cancer rises with long-term exposure, with no known level below which radon is safe. It is not about U.S. schools, and its unit is not the one the EPA uses: 1 pCi/L equals 37 Bq/m³.

    Source D: Northern Plains Geological Survey, Radon Potential of Harlan County, map with notes, 2019, npgs.example/radon-harlan. The survey is a state agency of geologists. The map puts Harlan County in Zone 1, the highest of three zones, where the average indoor level in homes is predicted to be above 4 pCi/L. Its notes report that 31% of 1,212 home test results collected in the county from 2005 to 2018 were at or above 4 pCi/L. The notes add: "This map cannot predict the radon level in any individual building. Only a test can."

    Written for this page (research notes; Source D is invented), Rhea's notes on Sources C and D (Text 3: the notes on Source C are written for this page and its facts are real; Source D, the Northern Plains Geological Survey and its data are invented). Original passage written for this page.

    Source E: "Every School Needs a Radon Fan," a blog post on the website of ClearAir Radon Solutions, a company that installs radon reduction systems, 2024. No author. It says that "one in three classrooms in our region is above the safe limit," gives no source for that number, and says that testing is "a waste of time" unless a system is installed at the same visit. It quotes a price of $4,000 to $6,000 per school and ends with a button: "Book your free inspection."

    Source F: Min-jun Hwang, "Bellmont Schools Find Radon in Six Classrooms," Harlan Valley Courier, printed edition, November 9, 2025, page A3. The Bellmont district tested 48 ground-floor rooms in January 2025 with short-term tests. Six rooms measured above 4 pCi/L, and a second test confirmed all six. The district paid a certified contractor about $5,200 to install reduction systems, and follow-up tests in all six rooms were below 2 pCi/L. The superintendent is quoted: "We would rather know than guess." The article does not say which schools the six rooms were in.

    Interview notes (Rosa Alvarez, facilities director, September 22, 2026): The district has about 210 ground-floor rooms that students or staff use every day. Short-term test kits and lab fees would cost about $20 per room. Her staff could place the kits over two weekends in January.

    Written for this page (invented digital and print sources and an invented interview), Sources E and F, with the facilities director's figures (Text 4: all three are invented for this lesson; the radon science behind them is real). Original passage written for this page.
  4. Independent Practice25 minutes

    Students read Rhea's first draft (Text 5) and label each sentence: over-relies on one source, plagiarism, not needed for the board's decision, missing a unit or translation, or fine. Then they compare it with the revision (Text 6) and Diagram 1 and write three sentences explaining how the revision serves the board better. The quiz also uses these texts.

    [1] Radon is a serious danger, and every school needs a radon fan (ClearAir Radon Solutions, 2024). [2] According to ClearAir Radon Solutions (2024), "one in three classrooms in our region is above the safe limit." [3] After smoking, it is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States causing an estimated twenty one thousand lung cancer deaths a year. [4] Radon was discovered in 1900 by the German physicist Friedrich Ernst Dorn, and it is element 86 on the periodic table. [5] The World Health Organization says the level should be 100 (World Health Organization, 2009). [6] Testing is a waste of time unless a system is installed at the same visit, and each school will cost $4,000 to $6,000 (ClearAir Radon Solutions, 2024). [7] Therefore, the board should hire ClearAir to install systems in all nine schools (ClearAir Radon Solutions, 2024).

    Written for this page (an invented student draft), Rhea's first draft of the memo's evidence section (Text 5: written for this page; sentences are numbered in brackets for discussion). Original passage written for this page.

    Why test. Radon is a radioactive gas that seeps into buildings from the soil. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 2026a) estimates that it causes about 21,000 lung cancer deaths a year in the United States, second only to smoking. Schools are not exempt: a national survey reported by the EPA found that nearly one in five schools had "at least one schoolroom with a short-term radon level above the action level of 4 pCi/L" (EPA, 2026b). Because the EPA page does not date that survey, the figure shows that the problem exists rather than how common it is today.

    Why our district. Harlan County is in the highest of three radon zones, and 31% of the home tests collected there were at or above 4 pCi/L (Northern Plains Geological Survey, 2019). The survey warns that its map "cannot predict the radon level in any individual building" (Northern Plains Geological Survey, 2019), so these figures justify testing, not repairs. Last January, the neighboring Bellmont district tested 48 ground-floor rooms and confirmed high levels in six (Hwang, 2025).

    What testing would involve. The EPA recommends testing every frequently used room on or below the ground floor during the cooler months (EPA, 2026b). For our roughly 210 such rooms, kits and lab fees would cost about $4,200, and staff could place the kits over two weekends in January (R. Alvarez, personal communication, September 22, 2026). If some rooms test high, Bellmont's experience suggests that repairs can be targeted: it spent about $5,200 on six rooms (Hwang, 2025). The World Health Organization (2009) recommends a stricter reference level of 100 Bq/m³, about 2.7 pCi/L, so the board may also want to retest rooms between 2.7 and 4 pCi/L.

    References

    Hwang, M. (2025, November 9). Bellmont schools find radon in six classrooms. Harlan Valley Courier, A3.

    Northern Plains Geological Survey. (2019). Radon potential of Harlan County [Map]. https://npgs.example/radon-harlan

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2026a, June 24). Health risk of radon. https://www.epa.gov/radon/health-risk-radon

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2026b, August 17). Radon in schools. https://www.epa.gov/radon/radon-schools

    World Health Organization. (2009). WHO handbook on indoor radon: A public health perspective.

    Written for this page (a model memo section), Rhea's revised evidence section and reference list (Text 6: written for this page; the quotations are from Sources A and D, and the figures are from Sources B-D, Source F and the interview). Original passage written for this page.

    In the last five minutes, hand out Elias's log, source list and draft panel (Texts 7-9), the history set for the homework. Students underline his audience and his task in Text 7.

    The assignment: The Heartland Broadcasting Museum is opening a small exhibit on radio in the 1930s in October 2026, and Ms. Oyelowo's U.S. History 11 class is writing one panel. My panel answers a question visitors ask every year: did Orson Welles's 1938 radio play "The War of the Worlds" really make the whole country panic? The panel must be 200-250 words, readable by visitors from about age ten to adult, many of whom grew up hearing that millions of people fled from the Martians. The museum's review committee wants a source file with Chicago-style notes and a bibliography, and its rule is that no single source may carry a panel.

    My research question: How did the 1938 "War of the Worlds" broadcast come to be remembered as a nationwide panic, and what does the evidence show about how many listeners were actually frightened?

    Search 1: war of the worlds panic. The results were a page about the 2005 film, a Halloween costume shop, a quiz site and the online exhibit that became Source 1.

    Search 2, in the library catalog: subject War of the worlds (Radio program). This found A. Brad Schwartz's book (Source 2) on the shelf.

    Search 3, in the library's history database: ("War of the Worlds" OR "Martian broadcast") AND (newspaper* OR press) AND 1938. This found a scholarly article (Source 4). Its notes led me to a digitized 1938 newspaper (Source 3).

    Search 4: "War of the Worlds" panic truth. This brought up many pages, including a blog with a secret-experiment theory (Source 5) and a movie database page (Source 6).

    What I still need: a judgment about which sources fit a panel for general visitors, and a draft that does not lean on one book.

    Written for this page (an invented research log), Elias's assignment and search log (Text 7, homework: written for this page; Elias, Ms. Oyelowo, the Heartland Broadcasting Museum and its committee are invented, and so are the search results). Original passage written for this page.

    Source 1: Nora Castellanos, curator, "The Night of the Martians," online exhibit page, Lakeview Radio History Center, updated March 3, 2025, lakeviewradio.example/martians. "The War of the Worlds" aired at 8 p.m. Eastern time on October 30, 1938, on the CBS series The Mercury Theatre on the Air. The 23-year-old Orson Welles directed and narrated it, adapting H. G. Wells's novel as a string of fake news bulletins about Martians landing at Grovers Mill, New Jersey. The program opened with an announcement that it was a drama. That night, the C. E. Hooper ratings company telephoned 5,000 households; 2% said they were listening to the play. Within three weeks, newspapers had printed at least 12,500 articles about the broadcast. Welles apologized at a news conference the next morning. The page gives no notes or sources.

    Source 2: A. Brad Schwartz, Broadcast Hysteria: Orson Welles's War of the Worlds and the Art of Fake News (New York: Hill and Wang, 2015). A real book by a historian who studied the letters that listeners sent to Welles and to the Federal Communications Commission after the broadcast, along with audience surveys from 1938. Schwartz argues that the broadcast briefly frightened or misled a real share of its listeners, but that few of them fled their homes, and that newspapers turned scattered fear into a story of nationwide panic. A 1940 Princeton study had estimated far more frightened listeners; how many people were frightened is still debated.

    Source 3: "Radio Hoax Sends Thousands Fleeing," Kenmore Evening Dispatch, October 31, 1938, page 1, digitized in the Midland Newspaper Archive. No reporter named. It reports that "thousands of terror-stricken families fled their homes" across the country and names no one who fled.

    Source 4: Teresa Lindqvist, "Selling the Scare: Newspapers, Radio, and the 1938 Martian Panic," Midcentury Media Quarterly 29, no. 2 (2019): 44-67. A scholarly journal article. Lindqvist argues that newspapers, which had lost advertising money to radio during the Depression, played up the panic to show that radio could not be trusted with news, and she reprints front pages from October 31, 1938.

    Source 5: "The Broadcast Was a Test," Unseen Archives blog, 2021. No author. It says that "researchers have proven" the broadcast was a secret government experiment to measure public fear. It links to no document or study.

    Source 6: a movie database page about The Night That Panicked America (1975), a television film that dramatizes families fleeing in terror during the broadcast. The page lists the cast and air date.

    Written for this page (source summaries and invented sources), Elias's source list (Text 8, homework: Source 2 and the facts about the broadcast are real; Sources 1 and 3-5, their publishers and their writers are invented; Source 6 describes a real television film). Original passage written for this page.

    Did America Panic?

    Everyone knows the story: on October 30, 1938, a radio play about a Martian invasion sent millions of Americans running into the streets. It is not true.1 Only a small share of radio listeners were tuned in to the play.2 Almost nobody who heard it was fooled.3 Newspapers made up the panic because they hated radio.4 So the panic never happened at all.5

    Notes

    1. Schwartz, Broadcast Hysteria.

    2. Schwartz, Broadcast Hysteria.

    3. Schwartz, Broadcast Hysteria.

    4. Schwartz, Broadcast Hysteria.

    5. Schwartz, Broadcast Hysteria.

    Written for this page (an invented student draft), Elias's first draft of the panel and its notes (Text 9, homework: written for this page). Original passage written for this page.
  5. Closure10 minutes

    Exit ticket: (1) Name one of Rhea's sources that would be stronger for a lab report on radon than for the board memo, and explain why. (2) Write one search, with truncation or a file-type limit, that could find current radon testing rules for schools in your state. (3) In one sentence, explain what over-reliance on a single source can hide from a reader.

    Teacher notes: Rhea, Elias, their teachers, Mr. Barros, Rosa Alvarez, the Harlan Valley and Bellmont districts, Min-jun Hwang and the Harlan Valley Courier, the Northern Plains Geological Survey, ClearAir Radon Solutions, the Heartland Broadcasting Museum, the Lakeview Radio History Center and Nora Castellanos, the Kenmore Evening Dispatch, the Midland Newspaper Archive, Teresa Lindqvist and the Midcentury Media Quarterly, the Unseen Archives blog, and Martin Okafor and Northlake Press (the model citations) are invented; say so when you hand out the texts. Web addresses ending in .example lead nowhere. Sources A and B are real EPA pages, and every quotation from them in Text 2 is word for word; Source C is the real WHO handbook (2009), and its reference levels are as stated. A. Brad Schwartz's Broadcast Hysteria (Hill and Wang, 2015) and the television film The Night That Panicked America (ABC, 1975) are real. The facts about the broadcast in Source 1 are real, including the opening announcement, the Hooper telephone survey of 5,000 households (2% listening to the play), the at least 12,500 newspaper articles within three weeks and Welles's apology the next morning; the 1940 Princeton study in Source 2 is Hadley Cantril's The Invasion from Mars. Historians still disagree about how many listeners were frightened, so accept panels that say "far fewer than the newspapers claimed" and push back on panels that say "no one was frightened," which is what Elias's draft wrongly claims. Source 4's argument that newspapers exaggerated the panic to discredit radio is a real line of scholarship, here given to an invented author. Source 5's secret-experiment claim is invented for the lesson; treat it as an example of an unsupported claim, not a theory to debate. Rhea's references follow APA 7; the Chicago notes Elias must write, and the model in the homework directions, follow the notes and bibliography system of the 17th edition (the 18th edition, 2024, allows the place of publication to be left out).

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a two-column card for each source: "Strong for ... because ..." and "Limited for ... because ...", with the board's three requests (plain language, cost, certainty) printed at the top
  • Let students fill in the Guided Practice chart for Sources E and F first, then A and D, before B, C and the interview
  • Provide APA frames for a web page, a newspaper article and a personal communication, with blanks for each element

For Advanced Students

  • Have students find their own state's radon program page with an advanced search, judge its strengths and limitations for Rhea's memo, and write its APA reference
  • Ask students to rewrite Rhea's evidence section for a different audience, a one-page notice for families, and explain which sources gain or lose weight
  • Have students list the kinds of evidence Rhea's Search 5 showed to be missing and explain how she should acknowledge the gap to the board

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Strength and limitation judgments should name the task, purpose or audience they depend on, and students should be able to show a source moving from strong to weak when the task changes. Searches should be built for a kind of evidence, using at least two advanced tools. In revisions, no source supplies most of the evidence, technical figures are translated for the reader, quotations are short and introduced, paraphrases change words and structure, and every citation matches an APA 7 reference or a Chicago note and bibliography entry.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Search Plan Studio

15 minPairs

Pairs get six research tasks from science and history classes. For each one they write a search plan: the kind of source the task needs, where to search, and one search string that uses at least two advanced tools. The activity builds the advanced-search and gathering parts of the standard.

Search Tasks

  • 1. A letter to the city council on whether street trees lower summer temperatures on the blocks around a school
  • 2. A lab report discussion comparing your measured speed of sound with published values
  • 3. A history paper on how women's organizations argued for the repeal of Prohibition, using sources from 1929-1933
  • 4. A museum label on the Erie Canal's effect on the price of shipping grain
  • 5. A memo to the athletic director on whether artificial turf fields cause more injuries than grass
  • 6. A history paper on how the 1930s Civilian Conservation Corps changed state parks

Procedure

  • For each task, name the kind of source it needs most (peer-reviewed study, government data, primary source from a period, museum or archive) and where to look (search engine, library catalog, article database, newspaper archive)
  • Write one search string using at least two tools: exact phrase, OR, minus sign, truncation (*), site:, filetype:, or a database date or peer-reviewed filter
  • Add one follow-up move: checking the reference list of the best result for earlier sources, or a subject term the database attaches to it
  • Teacher key (samples): 1. "street trees" (temperature OR cooling) study site:.edu; 2. article database, "speed of sound" air temperature measure*; 3. newspaper archive, dates 1929-1933, (Prohibition OR repeal) AND women*; 4. "Erie Canal" freight (rates OR costs) grain; 5. article database, peer-reviewed, 2015-2026, ("artificial turf" OR "synthetic turf") AND (grass OR "natural turf") AND injur*; 6. catalog subject search, Civilian Conservation Corps, then "Civilian Conservation Corps" "state park*" site:.gov

Discussion Questions

  • Which tasks needed a library tool that a general search engine cannot replace?
  • When could truncation bring in too many unrelated words? Try injur* and park*.
  • How did the task (a letter, a lab report, a label) change the kind of source you searched for?
2

Task Swap: Rating Sources for Three Readers

15 minGroups of 3-4

Groups rate six source cards for three different tasks on the same science question, then explain every rating that changes from one task to the next. The activity builds the strengths-and-limitations part of the standard for task, purpose and audience.

The Question, the Tasks and the Six Cards (all invented for practice)

Question: Is well water in Fox Creek Township safe to drink after the spring flood? Tasks: (1) a memo to the township council deciding whether to pay for free well tests; (2) a chemistry lab report comparing students' nitrate readings with a safety standard; (3) a flyer for residents with private wells.

  • 1. A state health department fact sheet on testing wells after floods, 2024, in plain language, with the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter
  • 2. A peer-reviewed article, 2019, on bacteria in private wells after floods in another state, with detailed statistics
  • 3. A well-drilling company's web page advertising "flood-proof" wells, no date
  • 4. A county newspaper article, 2025, interviewing three township families whose wells tested positive for bacteria
  • 5. A university extension bulletin, 2021, giving step-by-step instructions for disinfecting a well
  • 6. A college chemistry textbook, 2016, explaining how nitrate test strips and meters work

Procedure

  • For each task, rate every card strong, limited or unsuitable, and write one reason that names the task, purpose or audience
  • Circle every card whose rating changes across the three tasks, and explain why
  • Teacher key (sample reasoning): card 1 is strong for all three but limited for the lab report, which needs the method as well as the limit; card 2 is strong for the council memo's evidence but limited for the flyer, since its statistics and its other state do not speak to residents directly; card 3 is unsuitable for every task (a seller's claims); card 4 is strong for the council memo and flyer as local, human evidence but limited as proof of how common contamination is; card 5 is strongest for the flyer; card 6 is strongest for the lab report and unsuitable for the flyer

Discussion Questions

  • Which card changed ratings the most, and what does that show about judging sources?
  • Why is the newspaper article strong evidence that a problem exists but weak evidence of how widespread it is?
  • Which two cards together would keep the council memo from relying on any one source?

Modification for Distance Learning

Post the cards and a three-column rating grid in a shared document. Each student rates the cards for one task, then the group compares the three columns in a short call.

3

Spread the Weight: Revising an Over-Reliant Paragraph

15 minPairs

Pairs revise a history paragraph that draws all of its evidence from one book, using three short extra sources, so that no source carries the paragraph and the ideas still flow. The activity builds the integration, over-reliance, plagiarism and citation parts of the standard.

The Paragraph and the Extra Sources (all invented for practice; the facts are real)

Paragraph: "Prohibition ended because Americans changed their minds.1 By 1929 many voters thought the law had made crime worse.2 The Great Depression made the tax money from legal alcohol look attractive.3 Women who had once supported Prohibition organized against it.4 The Twenty-first Amendment was ratified on December 5, 1933.5" Notes 1-5 all cite the same book: Dana Merritt, Dry Years (Lakeshore Press, 2015).

  • Extra source 1: a 1932 newspaper editorial, printed and now digitized, calling for repeal to raise tax revenue for relief
  • Extra source 2: a historical society web page, 2020, on Pauline Sabin, who founded the Women's Organization for National Prohibition Reform in 1929
  • Extra source 3: the National Archives' transcription of the Twenty-first Amendment

Procedure

  • Mark each claim in the paragraph with the kind of source that would support it best: a primary source from the period, a scholarly secondary source or an official record
  • Rewrite the paragraph so that at least three different sources appear, with a transition or signal phrase linking each piece of evidence to the one before
  • Write the new notes in Chicago style, using a shortened note for any second citation of the same source
  • Teacher key: note 3 is better supported by extra source 1, a voice from 1932; note 4 by extra source 2; note 5 by extra source 3; notes 1 and 2 stay with Merritt, and the rewrite should present "changed their minds" as Merritt's interpretation, not as a fact

Poster Variation

Pairs draw a before-and-after bar graph of citations per source for their paragraph, like Diagram 1, and add one sentence explaining what the reader gains from the second version.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: Citations per Source in Rhea's First Draft and Revision

First draft (Text 5) Revision (Text 6) ClearAir (E) 4 0 EPA (A, B) 0 3 WHO (C) 1 1 Geological Survey (D) 0 2 Hwang (F) 0 2 Interview 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 citations
Each bar counts the in-text citations of one source. The first draft cites the ClearAir company blog four times and one other source once, so a seller's claims carry the section. The revision cites no one source more than three times, spreads its evidence across five sources and an interview, and drops the blog.

Diagram 2: Task, Purpose and Audience as Three Lenses on Every Source

Task What is being written? Form and length Decision it supports Kinds of evidence it needs Purpose What must it do? Inform, persuade or both Level of certainty needed Cost, risk or history? Audience Who will read it? What readers already know Units and terms they use What earns their trust Strength or limitation? It depends on all three.
The same source can be a strength for one piece of writing and a limitation for another. Before keeping a source, a researcher asks what is being written, what it must do and who will read it; the answers decide how much weight the source can bear and how it must be explained.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

WHST.11-12.8 Homework: Did the 1938 "War of the Worlds" Broadcast Cause a Nationwide Panic?

Directions: Use Elias's log, source list and draft (Texts 7-9) in Independent Practice. You are helping Elias finish his museum panel. Answer the six problems in complete sentences, and use Chicago style (notes and bibliography) for every citation.

Model Chicago citations for a book Elias read but did not use (the book and its publisher are invented). Follow the same pattern for your own notes and bibliography.
Full note (first citation): 1. Martin Okafor, Voices in the Air: American Radio, 1920-1945 (Madison, WI: Northlake Press, 2017), 212.
Shortened note (later citations): 4. Okafor, Voices in the Air, 215.
Bibliography entry: Okafor, Martin. Voices in the Air: American Radio, 1920-1945. Madison, WI: Northlake Press, 2017.
Notes put the author's first name first and use commas, with the publication facts in parentheses and the page at the end; the bibliography puts the surname first, uses periods between parts and is listed alphabetically.

Part 1: Searching and Gathering (Problems 1-2)

  1. Elias's Search 4, "War of the Worlds" panic truth, brought up a secret-experiment blog and a movie database page. Write two better searches or search moves for his question, each using at least two advanced tools or a library database, and name the kind of source each is designed to find.
  2. Sort Sources 1-6 into print, digital or both, and explain which of them could give Elias evidence from 1938 itself of how the story of a nationwide panic was spread.

Part 2: Strengths and Limitations (Problems 3-4)

  1. Make a table of Sources 1-6 with one strength and one limitation of each for Elias's task (a 200-250 word panel), purpose (correcting a popular story fairly) and audience (visitors from about age ten to adult). Name the lens (task, purpose or audience) behind each judgment.
  2. Elias's draft (Text 9) cites Source 2 in all five notes. Explain two ways this over-reliance misleads visitors, using what Text 8 says about Source 2 and about the other sources.

Part 3: Integrating and Citing (Problems 5-6)

  1. Rewrite Elias's panel in 200-250 words for its audience. Use at least three sources, with note numbers, present Schwartz's conclusion as one historian's argument, explain why the panic story spread, and keep only information a visitor needs. Use no copied words without quotation marks.
  2. Write the Chicago notes for your panel, using full notes for first citations and shortened notes after that, and a bibliography entry for Sources 1 and 2.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Searching and GatheringTwo searches built for kinds of sources, with advanced tools explained; sources sorted by mediumSearches improved but not tied to kinds of sources, or one source sorted wronglyNo revised searches
Strengths and LimitationsEvery judgment names the task, purpose or audience; the over-reliance on Source 2 explained with two effectsJudgments general ("reliable," "biased"), or one effect of over-relianceSources judged without reasons
Selective, Balanced IntegrationPanel fits the audience and length, uses three or more sources, frames Schwartz as one argument, and has no copied wordsPanel too long or too technical, or leans on one source in placesCopied words, or one source carries the panel
Chicago CitationFull and shortened notes and bibliography entries correctly formed and matchedMinor errors in order, punctuation or italicsCitations missing

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 3 and 9 are new research problems. The others use Rhea's log (Text 1) in Direct Instruction, her notes and sources (Texts 2-4) in Guided Practice, and her draft and revision (Texts 5-6) in Independent Practice. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Rhea wants a database search that finds measure, measured, measurement and measuring in one step. Which search term does that?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Search 4 (Text 1, paragraph 6), why does filetype:pdf help Rhea find a source like the WHO handbook?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A student is writing a memo to a school nurse on whether classroom air purifiers reduce absences, and wants recent research, not product pages. Which search plan fits that task best?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Rhea notes that Source A, updated in August 2026, lists related EPA guides for schools from 1994 (Text 1, paragraph 4). What limitation does this suggest for her memo, and what should she do?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which statement best describes a strength of Source A for Rhea's task, purpose and audience?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Source B reports that radon causes "about 21,000 lung cancer deaths every year" (Text 2, paragraph 2). What is its main limitation for Rhea's memo?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why should Source E not carry any part of Rhea's memo, even though it is about radon in schools (Text 4, paragraph 1)?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    For a board of volunteers deciding whether to test, which is the best description of Source F (Text 4, paragraph 2)?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which plan would best help a student avoid over-reliance on one source in a history paper about why Prohibition ended?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Sentence [3] of Rhea's draft (Text 5) is plagiarism. Why?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why is cutting sentence [4] of the draft (Text 5), about the discovery of radon in 1900, a sound choice for this memo?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Text 6, Rhea cites the two EPA pages as (EPA, 2026a) and (EPA, 2026b). Why the letters?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Rhea cites her interview as (R. Alvarez, personal communication, September 22, 2026), but Rosa Alvarez does not appear in the reference list (Text 6). Is that correct in APA 7?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A print journal article, "Radon in Rural Schools," by Grace T. Ellison and Omar Farouk, appeared in Journal of School Health Studies, volume 12, issue 3, pages 45-58, in 2022 (the article and journal are invented). Which APA 7 reference is correct?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Text 6 is divided into three parts that begin "Why test," "Why our district" and "What testing would involve." How does this choice serve the task and audience?

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    Rhea's next step is to find the radon testing rules that apply to schools in her state today. Write two search strings or search moves, each using at least two advanced tools or a library database filter, and name the kind of source each is designed to find and whether it is likely to be print, digital or both.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    Rhea's classmate uses the same sources for a different task: a one-page notice sent home to families, explaining why their children's classrooms will be tested. Name one source that becomes stronger for this task and one that becomes weaker, and explain each in terms of task, purpose or audience.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    A classmate writing to the same board about testing school drinking water for lead cites "AquaPure Filters (2025)," a water-filter company's website, in four of the five sentences of her evidence section. Explain two problems this over-reliance creates for her purpose and audience, and name two kinds of sources she should add.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write the APA 7 reference and the parenthetical in-text citation for this web page: "Radon and Your Child's School," by Lauren Ortiz, published June 3, 2025, on the website of the Midwest Parents Health Network at mphn.example/radon-school (the page and the network are invented).

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Paraphrase this sentence from Source B (Text 2, paragraph 2) for the school board, in plain language, with an APA 7 in-text citation: "About 2,900 of these deaths occur among people who have never smoked." Then explain in one sentence why this fact might matter to this audience.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does WHST.11-12.8 mean?

WHST.11-12.8 means that students in grades 11 and 12 research like professionals in history, science and technical fields: they find strong sources, weigh them for a specific piece of writing and use them honestly.

The standard asks students to gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources with advanced searches, assess each source's strengths and limitations for the task, purpose and audience, integrate information selectively so the ideas flow, avoid plagiarism and over-reliance on any one source, and follow a standard citation format.

What is the difference between WHST.11-12.8 and WHST.9-10.8?

Grades 9-10 ask whether a source is useful for the research question; grades 11-12 ask what its strengths and limitations are for a particular task, purpose and audience.

The 11-12 standard also adds a new demand: avoiding over-reliance on any one source. The other parts, authoritative print and digital sources, advanced searches, selective integration, avoiding plagiarism and standard citation, carry over from grades 9-10.

What do "task, purpose, and audience" mean when judging a source?

They are the three questions that decide how much weight a source can carry in a particular piece of writing.

The task is what is being written (a memo, a lab report, an exhibit panel); the purpose is what it must accomplish (inform a decision, correct a myth, report results); the audience is who reads it and what they know and trust. A technical handbook can be a strength in a lab report and a limitation in a notice to families.

What counts as over-reliance on one source?

Over-reliance means letting one source supply most of the evidence or shape the whole argument.

Counting citations is a quick check, as in Diagram 1, but over-reliance can also hide behind variety: five web pages that repeat one encyclopedia article are one source. The fix is to match each claim with the kind of source best suited to it and to present one writer's interpretation as that writer's.

Is it wrong to cite one excellent source many times?

Not always; a central source may be cited often, but it should not be the only support for the claims that matter most.

A paper on a single document will cite that document throughout. What the standard warns against is resting a conclusion on one source when others could confirm it, qualify it or show another side, since the reader then inherits that source's blind spots.

Which advanced search tools should 11th and 12th graders know?

They should know exact phrases, OR, the minus sign, truncation, site and file-type limits, and the filters of library databases.

Database filters include peer-reviewed, date range and subject terms. Another strong move is following a good source's references to earlier work, and checking which later works cite it. The skill is choosing the tool that reaches the kind of source a task needs.

Can students cite company websites or blogs?

Yes, when the writing is about what the company or blogger claims, but rarely as evidence for facts that others can check.

A seller's page shows what the seller says, which can matter in a paper about marketing. As evidence for a health risk or a historical cause, its financial interest and missing sources are serious limitations, especially for readers who must make a decision.

Which citation style does WHST.11-12.8 require?

The standard asks for "a standard format for citation" and does not name one.

Science and social science classes often use APA 7, history classes often use Chicago notes and bibliography, and English classes often use MLA 9. Students should follow the style their teacher or publication requires and apply it consistently.

How is WHST.11-12.8 assessed?

It is usually assessed through research writing: a paper, report, memo or exhibit with its source list, often with a research log or annotated bibliography.

Teachers look at the sources gathered, the reasoning about each source's strengths and limitations for the task, how evidence is woven into the writing, whether any source dominates, and whether citations are complete and consistent.

How can parents support research writing at home?

Ask your student, "Who is this for, and what do they need to decide?"

That question pushes students to judge sources by their reader instead of by how easy they were to find. When a draft leans on one website, asking "Who else says this?" is a simple way to prompt a check for over-reliance.