SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

W.11-12.8Common CoreELAWritingGrades 11-12

W.11-12.8: Judging Sources for Task, Purpose and Audience Without Over-Reliance

In plain English: W.11-12.8 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 11 and 12 to gather information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources with advanced searches, weigh each source's strengths and limitations for the task, purpose and audience, and integrate it selectively, avoiding plagiarism and over-reliance on any one source and citing in a standard format.

Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the task, purpose, and audience; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and over-reliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards · Cluster: Research to Build and Present Knowledge · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

65 min

Overview

Students follow one research-based policy brief from the search log to the reference list. Soren, an invented twelfth grader, writes for the staff of an invented state senator about an invented bill that would keep his state on standard time all year. His real sources are a position statement from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, a 2008 Department of Energy report to Congress on extended daylight saving time, and a 2026 Congressional Research Service report on the history and law of daylight saving time. His invented sources are a statewide poll, a business owner's column and a company blog post.

The lesson centers on what separates W.11-12.8 from grade 10: judging each source's strengths and limitations against the task, the purpose and the audience, and avoiding over-reliance on any one source. Students also practice advanced search moves such as filetype:, database limits and citation chaining, and they cite in APA style, including a secondary source. For homework they rebuild a memo to a library board that leans on a single advocacy report.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources using advanced search moves, including filetype:, database limits and citation chaining
  • Assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of a specific task, purpose and audience
  • Integrate selected information into a coherent section that keeps the flow of ideas and draws on several sources, avoiding over-reliance on any one
  • Avoid plagiarism, including uncited borrowed wording and claims attributed to a source that does not make them
  • Cite sources in APA style, including a secondary source and a reference list in correct order

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Using advanced searches and assessing the usefulness of sources for a research question W.9-10.8
  • Conducting sustained research projects that synthesize multiple sources W.11-12.7
  • Evaluating sources in different media to address a question RI.11-12.7
  • Quoting and paraphrasing with in-text citations in one standard format

Lesson Procedure

65-65 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "A state senator's aide has ten minutes to read your research before a vote. A sleep doctor, an energy analyst and a business owner all have evidence. Whose evidence does the aide need, and what would go wrong if your brief quoted only one of them?"

    Collect answers and list on the board what the aide needs: what the bill does legally, its effects, what it costs, who supports or opposes it, and how sure the evidence is. Point out that this list comes from the task, the purpose and the audience, not from the topic. W.11-12.8 asks students to judge each source's strengths and limitations against exactly those three things.

    Introduce the research this lesson follows. Soren, an invented twelfth grader, is writing a policy brief for an invented state senator's staff about an invented bill, Senate Bill 112, which would keep his state on standard time all year. Sources A, B and C are real publications, and his notes quote them accurately; Sources D, E and F are invented. Read Text 1 aloud. Ask: which search found which kind of source, and why did each search need its operators?

    The assignment: In Ms. Castellanos's English 12 class, each student writes a policy brief for a real decision maker. My reader is the staff of State Senator Elena Marsh, who sits on the committee that will hear Senate Bill 112 next month. The bill would exempt our state from daylight saving time, so our clocks would stay on standard time all year. Her aide, Mr. Adair, asked for "two pages, plain language, both sides, and where every number comes from." Ms. Castellanos requires at least five authoritative sources, in print and digital form, cited in APA style (7th edition).

    My research question: What would permanent standard time mean for the people of our state, and what does the evidence say about its costs and benefits?

    Search 1: "permanent standard time" OR "year-round standard time" site:.gov. The OR accepts either phrase, because writers use both. The top results were federal and state government pages, including a Congressional Research Service report written for members of Congress (Source C).

    Search 2: "daylight saving time" energy "report to Congress" filetype:pdf. Limiting the results to PDF files helps because many government reports are published as PDFs. The first result was a 2008 Department of Energy report to Congress (Source B).

    Search 3, in the library database: ("daylight saving time" OR "daylight savings time") AND (sleep OR circadian), limited to peer-reviewed articles published since 2015. This found a position statement from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (Source A).

    Citation chaining: The footnotes of the CRS report led me to a 1976 National Bureau of Standards evaluation of the country's 1974 trial of year-round daylight saving time. I could not find the full text, so I will cite it as quoted in the CRS report.

    Last, I set a search engine's date tool to the past month and searched "Senate Bill 112" "standard time" for news about the hearing.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 1: Soren's assignment and search log (Soren, his school, Ms. Castellanos, Senator Marsh, Mr. Adair and Senate Bill 112 are invented; the search results he describes are invented for this lesson). Original passage written for this page.
  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Walk through the four demands of W.11-12.8 with Soren's brief:

    • Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively. Beyond quotation marks and site:, researchers at this level use filetype: to reach reports, OR to cover synonyms, database limits for peer review and date, date tools for recent news, and citation chaining: following a good source's footnotes to the sources behind it.
    • Assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the task, purpose and audience. The same source can be strong for one piece of writing and weak for another. Soren's task is a two-page brief, his purpose is to inform a vote with both sides, and his audience is a busy, nonexpert legislative staff.
    • Integrate information selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and over-reliance on any one source. A brief built on one source repeats that source's purpose and its blind spots.
    • Follow a standard format for citation. This lesson uses APA style (7th edition): author-date in-text citations, page numbers for quotations, and a reference list in alphabetical order. Diagram 2 shows the parts of one reference.

    Read Texts 2 and 3, Soren's notes on the three real sources, then work through the examples below.

    Source A: Muhammad Adeel Rishi and 22 coauthors, "Daylight saving time: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement," Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, October 2020. It says that "the acute transition from standard time to daylight saving time incurs significant public health and safety risks, including increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events, mood disorders, and motor vehicle crashes." It adds that "chronic effects of remaining in daylight saving time year-round have not been well studied," though daylight saving time is less aligned with the body's daily clock. Its position: "these seasonal time changes should be abolished in favor of a fixed, national, year-round standard time."

    Strengths for my brief: The authors are sleep physicians and researchers, the journal is peer-reviewed, and the statement takes a clear side on the exact choice in Senate Bill 112. Limitations: A position statement is written to argue for one policy. It covers health only, with nothing on energy, business or the law. It admits that the long-term effects of year-round daylight saving time are not well studied. Its readers are doctors, so I must explain terms like "circadian" for Mr. Adair.

    Source B: David B. Belzer, Stanton W. Hadley and Shih-Miao Chin, Impact of Extended Daylight Saving Time on National Energy Consumption, a report to Congress from the U.S. Department of Energy, October 2008. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 moved the start of daylight saving time three or four weeks earlier, to the second Sunday in March, and the end one week later, to the first Sunday in November, beginning in 2007, and it asked the Department to measure the effect. The report found total electricity savings of about 1.3 terawatt-hours, which "corresponds to 0.5 percent per each day of Extended Daylight Saving Time, or 0.03 percent of electricity consumption over the year." Total U.S. electricity use in 2007 was 3,900 terawatt-hours. Changes in traffic volume and gasoline use were statistically insignificant.

    Strengths: A federal study, checked by two expert review panels and written for Congress, an audience much like mine. Limitations: It measures a few extra weeks of daylight saving time in 2007, not a switch to permanent standard time, so it only suggests how large or small the energy stakes are. Its data are nearly twenty years old, and it covers energy only.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 2: Soren's notes on Sources A and B (the notes are written for this page; the facts and quotations are from the two sources named). Original passage written for this page.

    Source C: Corrie E. Clark and Lynn J. Cunningham, Daylight Saving Time (DST), Congressional Research Service report R45208, updated July 24, 2026. The Congressional Research Service writes reports for members of Congress and their staffs.

    The law: Federal law lets a state exempt itself from daylight saving time, which is what Senate Bill 112 would do. Hawaii exempted itself in 1967 and Arizona in 1968. Permanent daylight saving time is different: it "could take effect only if Congress were to amend the Uniform Time Act of 1966." The report's summary puts the general rule this way: "the authority to change the DST observance period rests solely with Congress." Exempting a state is the exception the law allows.

    History: During the 1973 oil embargo, Congress put the country on year-round daylight saving time starting January 6, 1974. In October 1974, it required a return to standard time from October 27, 1974, to February 23, 1975. A 1976 National Bureau of Standards evaluation found more traffic deaths of school-age children in the mornings from January to April 1974 than in the same months of 1973, but warned that "this increase cannot be simply interpreted as a 'DST effect,' in view of the many other factors that influence traffic fatalities." That quotation is on page 6 of the report.

    Strengths: Nonpartisan research written for lawmakers, so it matches Mr. Adair's needs almost exactly. It is precise about the law, covers history, energy, safety and health, and footnotes its sources. Limitations: It summarizes other people's research instead of presenting new data. It is national, with nothing specific to our state. And bills on this topic move quickly, so what it says about their status may be out of date by the hearing; I must check the current status before I finish.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 3: Soren's notes on Source C (the notes are written for this page; the facts and quotations are from the report named). Original passage written for this page.
    • Choosing operators for a kind of source

      Soren wants a federal report on energy. Search 2 is "daylight saving time" energy "report to Congress" filetype:pdf (Text 1, paragraph 4).

      Result: "report to Congress" names the genre he wants, and filetype:pdf limits results to PDF files, the format many government reports use. The search describes the source he needs, not just the topic.

    • Citation chaining and honest secondary citation

      The CRS report's footnotes lead Soren to a 1976 National Bureau of Standards evaluation, but he cannot find its full text (Text 1, paragraph 6).

      Result: Following footnotes is a strong search move. Because he read only the CRS report's account, he cites the older study "as cited in" the report and lists only the CRS report in his references. Citing the 1976 study directly would claim he read it.

    • Strengths and limitations for this task

      Source A is a peer-reviewed position statement by sleep experts that recommends permanent standard time (Text 2, paragraph 1).

      Result: Strength: expert, peer-reviewed and about the exact choice in the bill. Limitations for a brief meant to show both sides: its purpose is to argue for one policy, it covers health only, and its readers are doctors, so Soren must translate it for Mr. Adair.

    • Seeing indirect evidence

      Source B measured about 0.03 percent of yearly electricity saved when daylight saving time was extended by a few weeks in 2007 (Text 2, paragraph 3).

      Result: The bill would do something different: remove daylight saving time entirely. The report cannot predict that effect, but it shows the energy stakes of shifting clocks have been small. Soren says so in the brief instead of stretching the finding.

    • Matching a source to the audience

      Source C was written by the Congressional Research Service for members of Congress and their staffs (Text 3, paragraph 1).

      Result: Its audience is close to Soren's, so its legal facts are precise and already in plain language. Its limitation is timing: legislative status changes, so he must check it again before the hearing.

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Pairs read Text 4, three more sources Soren found. Then they complete the table below for all six sources. Every cell in the last two columns must name the task, the purpose or the audience.

    Source D: Lakeview University Survey Center, Clock Changes and Time Preferences, a statewide poll of 812 adults taken in August 2026, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points. Results: 44 percent prefer permanent daylight saving time, 31 percent prefer permanent standard time, and 25 percent want to keep changing the clocks.

    My note on D: Strength: the only source that tells the senator what her constituents want. Limitations: A preference is not evidence about health or energy. The poll's question did not explain that the most popular option, permanent daylight saving time, is one our state cannot choose on its own (Source C).

    Source E: Walt Brennan, "Evening Light Keeps Main Street Open," an opinion column in the print edition of the Harborview Gazette, March 8, 2026, page A12. Brennan owns a mini-golf course on the boardwalk. He writes that the bill would "take an hour of summer evening away from every family and every business on the boardwalk."

    My note on E: Strength: it shows a real point of view the senator will hear at the hearing, and it is right that summer sunsets would come an hour earlier by the clock under standard time. Limitations: Brennan has a financial stake, gives no data and speaks for one business, not all of them.

    Source F: A blog post by DreamWell, a company that sells a sleep-tracking app, 2025: "Our users slept an average of 40 minutes less on the Monday after the spring change."

    My note on F: Limitations outweigh strengths. The company sells a product, does not say how many users it measured or how, and says nothing about permanent standard time. I will not use it in the brief.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 4: Three more sources Soren found, with his notes (all three sources and everyone in them are invented for this lesson). Original passage written for this page.
    Strengths and limitations for Soren's brief (pairs fill in the blank cells)
    SourcePrint or digital?Strength for this briefLimitation for this briefUse it for...
    A: sleep medicine statement
    B: DOE report, 2008
    C: CRS report, 2026
    D: statewide poll
    E: Brennan column
    F: sleep-app blog

    Discuss: (1) Source D is invented, unpublished in any journal and about opinions, not facts. Why is it still one of the most important sources for this audience? (2) Which source would become stronger if Soren's task were a persuasive column for the school newspaper instead of a balanced brief?

  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Read Text 5, Soren's first draft of his evidence section, and use Diagram 1 to see how its citations are spread. For each numbered sentence, students decide which problem it has, if any: over-reliance on one source, a claim the cited source does not make, a claim stretched beyond what the source says, uncited borrowed wording, a weak source, or a purpose that does not fit the task. Then they read Text 6, the revision, and Text 7, the reference list, and write down three specific changes Soren made.

    The quiz uses Texts 1-7 (Warm-Up, Direct Instruction, Guided Practice and this phase). Point students back to them when they take it.

    [1] Senate Bill 112 is the right choice, and the senator should vote yes. [2] Daylight saving time is bad for people's health: switching the clocks increases the risk of heart problems, mood disorders and car crashes (Rishi et al., 2020). [3] Staying on daylight saving time all year would also be harmful, because it goes against human biology (Rishi et al., 2020). [4] The sleep experts also say that ending clock changes would save energy (Rishi et al., 2020). [5] Experts agree that standard time is the healthiest choice (Rishi et al., 2020). [6] The authority to change the daylight saving time observance period rests solely with Congress. [7] One company found that people sleep 40 minutes less after the spring change (DreamWell, 2025). [8] For all these reasons, permanent standard time is best (Rishi et al., 2020).

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 5: Soren's first draft of the brief's evidence section (written for this page; sentences are numbered in brackets for discussion). Original passage written for this page.

    What the bill would do. Federal law allows a state to exempt itself from daylight saving time, as Hawaii did in 1967 and Arizona in 1968, but no state can adopt permanent daylight saving time unless Congress amends the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (Clark & Cunningham, 2026). Senate Bill 112 therefore chooses between the two options our state actually has: keep changing the clocks or stay on standard time all year.

    Health. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine reports that the spring change to daylight saving time brings short-term risks, including higher risks of heart problems, mood disorders and vehicle crashes, and it recommends "a fixed, national, year-round standard time" (Rishi et al., 2020, p. 1781). The statement argues for one policy, and it acknowledges that the long-term effects of year-round daylight saving time "have not been well studied" (Rishi et al., 2020, p. 1781).

    Energy and safety. The energy stakes appear small. When daylight saving time was extended by several weeks starting in 2007, the Department of Energy measured savings of about 0.03% of the nation's yearly electricity use (Belzer et al., 2008), although that study did not test permanent standard time. The safety evidence is older and mixed. During the 1974 trial of year-round daylight saving time, morning traffic deaths of school-age children rose compared with 1973, but federal reviewers warned that the increase "cannot be simply interpreted as a 'DST effect'" (National Bureau of Standards, 1976, as cited in Clark & Cunningham, 2026, p. 6).

    What residents want. In an August 2026 poll of 812 adults, 44% preferred permanent daylight saving time, 31% permanent standard time, and 25% the current system (Lakeview University Survey Center, 2026). The most popular choice is the one our state cannot make alone. At least one boardwalk business owner opposes the bill, arguing that it would "take an hour of summer evening away from every family and every business on the boardwalk" (Brennan, 2026, p. A12).

    Bottom line. The health evidence favors Senate Bill 112, the energy effect is likely small either way, and public opinion leans toward an option that only Congress can provide.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 6: Soren's revised evidence section (written for this page; the quotations are from Sources A, C and E). Original passage written for this page.

    References

    Belzer, D. B., Hadley, S. W., & Chin, S.-M. (2008). Impact of extended daylight saving time on national energy consumption: Report to Congress, Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 110. U.S. Department of Energy. https://doi.org/10.2172/949762

    Brennan, W. (2026, March 8). Evening light keeps Main Street open. Harborview Gazette, A12.

    Clark, C. E., & Cunningham, L. J. (2026). Daylight saving time (DST) (CRS Report No. R45208). Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45208

    Lakeview University Survey Center. (2026). Clock changes and time preferences: A statewide survey of 812 adults. Lakeview University.

    Rishi, M. A., Ahmed, O., Barrantes Perez, J. H., Berneking, M., Dombrowsky, J., Flynn-Evans, E. E., Santiago, V., Sullivan, S. S., Upender, R., Yuen, K., Abbasi-Feinberg, F., Aurora, R. N., Carden, K. A., Kirsch, D. B., Kristo, D. A., Malhotra, R. K., Martin, J. L., Olson, E. J., Ramar, K., . . . Gurubhagavatula, I. (2020). Daylight saving time: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 16(10), 1781–1784. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8780

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 7: Soren's reference list, APA style (written for this page; Sources D and E are invented, so their entries are models only). Original passage written for this page.
  5. Closure5 minutes

    Exit ticket: (1) For your own research project, name your task, purpose and audience in one sentence each. (2) Name the source you are most tempted to rely on, and one question it cannot answer for your audience.

    Hand out the homework texts below: Farah's assignment and first draft (Text 8) and her source list (Text 9). Farah, the library, its board and all six sources are invented for practice.

    Teacher note: Senate Bill 112, Senator Marsh and the poll are invented, but the federal rules described in Source C are real. Legislation on daylight saving time changes often, so if students research the topic themselves, have them check a bill's current status on the legislature's own site before citing it.

    The assignment: Farah is writing a one-page memo for the board of the Cedar Bluff Public Library, which votes in November on whether to stop charging overdue fines on children's and teen materials. The five board members are volunteers: a retired banker, a middle school teacher, a pastor, a small-business owner and a parent of two. The board chair asked for "a recommendation, what it would cost, and the evidence on both sides." Her teacher requires APA style.

    Farah's research question: Would ending youth overdue fines help or hurt the Cedar Bluff Public Library and the families it serves?

    Farah's first draft of her evidence paragraph: Fines keep kids away from libraries. The Freedom to Read Alliance calls fines "a tax on the families who can least afford it" (Freedom to Read Alliance, 2024). The Alliance says libraries that end fines see more children come back (Freedom to Read Alliance, 2024), and it says books still come back on time (Freedom to Read Alliance, 2024). According to the Alliance, fines bring in very little money (Freedom to Read Alliance, 2024). A 2018 study proved that fines drive away low-income families (Ng, 2018). The board should end fines.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 8: Homework, Farah's assignment and first draft (Farah, the Cedar Bluff Public Library and its board are invented). Original passage written for this page.

    Source 1: Freedom to Read Alliance, Fine Free for Kids: Results from 40 Libraries, a 2024 report posted on the group's website. The Alliance is a national advocacy group that campaigns to end library fines, funded by donors who support that goal. It reports that 34 of the 40 libraries saw children's card use rise after they ended youth fines, and it calls fines "a tax on the families who can least afford it." It does not compare these libraries with libraries that kept fines. It cites a 2018 study by the economist Paul Ng, which Farah could not find.

    Source 2: Cedar Bluff Public Library, 2025 Annual Budget, printed in the board packet. Youth overdue fines brought in $3,150 of the library's $2.4 million budget. Staff estimate that they spend about 260 hours a year handling youth fines.

    Source 3: Ingrid Solberg, "Overdue: What Happened When Three Midwestern Libraries Dropped Youth Fines," Library Quarterly Review, a peer-reviewed journal, 2023, volume 41, issue 2, pages 88-104. In the first year without fines, on-time returns fell from 91 percent to 88 percent, the number of items never returned did not change, and new children's library cards rose by 12 to 19 percent.

    Source 4: Pat Holloway, "Library Director: Fines Teach Responsibility," Cedar Bluff Courier, print edition, June 3, 2019, page B2. The director it quotes retired in 2022.

    Source 5: Minutes of the September 2026 board meeting. A parent said her son stopped going to the library after he owed $14.

    Source 6: "Fines Are Obsolete: Automate Renewals Instead," a 2025 blog post by ShelfSmart, a company that sells library software.

    SVHS lesson authors, Text 9: Homework, Farah's source list (all six sources and everyone in them are invented for practice). Original passage written for this page.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a three-column card: "My task is ___ / My purpose is ___ / My audience needs ___," and have students test each source against one column at a time
  • Fill in the Source A row of the Guided Practice table as a model
  • Offer frames for balanced integration: "While ___ finds ___, ___ adds that ___" and "___ argues ___, but ___ notes a limit: ___"

For Advanced Students

  • Check the current status of daylight saving time bills on the legislature's own website and write a one-sentence update for Soren's brief with a correct citation
  • Rewrite Text 6 for a different task and audience, such as a science explainer for ninth graders, and explain which sources gain or lose strength
  • Convert Text 7 to MLA style and list every difference between the two formats

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Strong work names the task, purpose and audience before judging any source, and every judgment of a source's strength or limitation refers to one of them. Searches show deliberate choices: synonyms joined with OR, filetype: or database limits used to reach a kind of source, citation chaining, and a date check for fast-changing facts. In writing, look for claims matched to the source that actually makes them, no single source carrying the whole argument, limits of evidence stated openly, smooth signal phrases, and APA citations, including secondary citations, that match an alphabetized reference list.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

One Source, Three Tasks

20 minGroups of 3

Groups judge the same six source cards for three different writing tasks on one question: should our city ban gas-powered leaf blowers? The activity shows that a source's strengths and limitations depend on the task, purpose and audience.

The Three Tasks

  • Task 1: A two-page memo to the city council before a vote (purpose: inform a decision; audience: council members and their staff)
  • Task 2: An explainer for a seventh-grade science newsletter (purpose: explain how small engines pollute; audience: 12- and 13-year-olds)
  • Task 3: An opinion column for the school newspaper (purpose: persuade; audience: classmates and families)

The Six Source Cards (all invented for practice)

  • Card 1: A state air-quality agency fact sheet on pollution from small gas engines, 2025
  • Card 2: A statement from a landscaping business association opposing the ban
  • Card 3: A peer-reviewed study measuring leaf-blower noise near homes
  • Card 4: A petition with 900 residents' signatures supporting the ban
  • Card 5: An equipment store's web page comparing battery and gas blowers
  • Card 6: The city budget office's estimate of the cost of rebates for battery blowers

Procedure

  • Each group member takes one task and writes one strength and one limitation for each card, in terms of that task
  • The group compares: circle every card whose strength or limitation changed from one task to another
  • For each task, choose the three cards you would use and say what the three together still cannot show

Sample Judgments (for the teacher)

Card 6 is essential for Task 1 (council members must weigh cost) and nearly useless for Task 2. Card 1 is strong for all three tasks but needs translation for seventh graders. Card 2 is a limitation-heavy source for Task 3 unless the column addresses the opposing view, where it becomes useful. Accept any judgment that names the task, the purpose or the audience.

Discussion Questions

  • Which card changed the most across the three tasks, and why?
  • Card 4 is not authoritative about pollution. For which task is it still strong, and what makes it strong there?
  • Which task would tempt a writer to rely on one source, and which source would it be?
2

Search Strategy Relay

20 minTeams of 4

Teams build and test a full search strategy for a new question: Do red-light cameras reduce crashes at city intersections? Each member owns one search move, then the team combines the results.

The Four Roles

  • Role 1: List key phrases and synonyms (for example red-light camera, automated enforcement, intersection crashes, angle crashes) and write a search-engine query that joins synonyms with OR and uses quotation marks
  • Role 2: Write a query that reaches a kind of source, using site: or filetype:, such as government reports in PDF form
  • Role 3: Write a library database query with AND and OR, and choose limits for peer review and publication date
  • Role 4: Take the best source the team finds and follow its references or footnotes to two more sources (citation chaining)

Procedure

  • Each role has 8 minutes to write and run its search and to log the top five results by who made them
  • The team then chooses its four strongest sources and writes one strength and one limitation for each, for a memo to a city transportation committee
  • Finally, the team names one fact that could change soon and the search move it would use to check it

Sample Queries (for the teacher)

Role 1: "red-light cameras" OR "automated enforcement" crashes intersections. Role 2: "red-light camera" evaluation site:.gov filetype:pdf. Role 3: ("red-light camera*" OR "automated enforcement") AND (crash* OR collision*), peer-reviewed, last ten years. The asterisk is a truncation symbol that many library databases accept for word endings; check the database's help page. Accept any strategy whose operators fit the question.

Discussion Questions

  • Which role found the most authoritative sources? Which found the most relevant?
  • Did citation chaining turn up a source none of the searches found?
  • Which of your sources might disagree, and would that be a strength or a limitation for the memo?

Modification for Classrooms Without Devices

Give each team a printed packet of twelve invented results for each role's search and a one-page source with a short reference list. Teams choose results, judge them and practice citation chaining on paper.

3

Rebalance the Paragraph

20 minPairs

Pairs repair an over-reliant paragraph from the leaf-blower memo in Activity 1. They map every claim to a source, find the claims one source cannot carry, and rebuild the paragraph from the six source cards with APA in-text citations.

The Over-Reliant Paragraph (invented for practice)

Gas leaf blowers are a serious problem for our city. According to the air-quality agency, their engines release more pollution than many people expect (State Air Quality Board, 2025). The agency also says residents are tired of the noise (State Air Quality Board, 2025), and it says a ban would cost the city very little (State Air Quality Board, 2025). Landscapers will adjust easily (State Air Quality Board, 2025). The council should pass the ban.

Procedure

  • Highlight each claim and write which card, if any, could truly support it
  • Mark each claim the agency fact sheet cannot support (noise, cost, landscapers' views)
  • Rewrite the paragraph in 120-160 words with at least four of the six cards, no card cited more than twice, one signal phrase per source, and one sentence that states a limit of the evidence
  • Trade with another pair and count citations per source, as in Diagram 1

Discussion Questions

  • Which claim was borrowed from one source's authority but belonged to a different source?
  • How did adding the landscapers' statement (Card 2) change the flow and the credibility of the paragraph?
  • Does avoiding over-reliance mean citing every source equally? Why or why not?

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: Over-Reliance in Numbers, First Draft and Revision

Citations of each source: first draft (Text 5) and revision (Text 6) First draft Revision A (Rishi) 5 2 B (Belzer) 0 1 C (Clark) 0 2 D (poll) 0 1 E (Brennan) 0 1 F (DreamWell) 1 0 First draft: 5 of its 6 citations go to Source A; the sixth goes to Source F, which Soren later dropped. Revision: no source is cited more than twice. Each bar unit is one citation.
Each bar counts the citations of one source in Soren's evidence section. The left column counts Soren's first draft (Text 5), and the right column his revision (Text 6). Source C's two citations in the revision include the secondary citation of the 1976 study.

Diagram 2: The Parts of an APA Reference and Its In-Text Citations

An APA reference and the in-text citations that point to it Clark, C. E., & Cunningham, L. J. Authors (2026). Date Daylight saving time (DST) (CRS Report No. R45208). Title in italics, report number Congressional Research Service. Publisher https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45208 Link Parenthetical: (Clark & Cunningham, 2026) Narrative: Clark and Cunningham (2026) explain that ... Secondary: (National Bureau of Standards, 1976, as cited in Clark & Cunningham, 2026, p. 6)
The reference for Source C in Text 7, broken into its APA elements: authors with initials and an ampersand before the last one, the year in parentheses, the report title in italics and sentence case with the report number, the publisher and the link. The three in-text forms below all point to this one entry, including the secondary citation for a study Soren found only in the report.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

W.11-12.8 Homework: Rebuild Farah's Memo to the Library Board

Directions: Use Texts 8 and 9 in the Closure section of the lesson plan. Farah's sources are invented for practice, so use only the facts given in Text 9. Name the task, purpose or audience in every judgment you make about a source.

Part 1: Strengths and Limitations (Problems 1-2)

  1. For each of Farah's six sources, write one strength and one limitation for her memo, in terms of its task, purpose or audience. At least two of your limitations must be about purpose (why the source was made) and one about date.
  2. The board members include a retired banker and a parent of two. Which source would matter most to each of them, and why? Then name the one source the board as a whole most needs, and explain.

Part 2: Over-Reliance and Searching (Problems 3-4)

  1. Farah's draft (Text 8, paragraph 3) cites the Freedom to Read Alliance four times. For each of those four claims, say whether another source in Text 9 supports it better, contradicts it or adds a limit. Then explain what is wrong with the draft's citation of the 2018 study, and how Farah should cite it if she uses it.
  2. Write three advanced searches Farah could use to find more authoritative sources: one with filetype: or site:, one for a library database with AND, OR and at least one limit, and one citation-chaining step starting from Source 3. For each, say what kind of source you expect it to find.

Part 3: Integrate and Cite (Problems 5-6)

  1. Rewrite Farah's evidence paragraph in 150-200 words. Use at least four sources, cite no source more than twice, state at least one limit of the evidence, and use APA in-text citations with signal phrases.
  2. Write the APA reference list for the sources in your Problem 5 paragraph, in alphabetical order. Then explain in two or three sentences why your paragraph now fits the board's request for "the evidence on both sides" better than Farah's draft.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Strengths and limitationsEvery judgment names the task, purpose or audience; purpose and date limits identified; board members' needs distinguishedJudgments reasonable but some are general ("reliable," "biased") without reference to the memoJudgments missing or unsupported
Over-reliance and plagiarismEach Alliance claim tested against other sources; the unread 2018 study identified and cited as a secondary source or droppedOver-reliance identified but claims not tested, or the secondary-source problem missedOver-reliance not identified
Advanced searchingThree searches fit the question, operators and limits used correctly, citation chaining described with a concrete next stepSearches improve on keywords but one move is missing or misusedPlain keyword searches only
Integration and APA citationParagraph flows with signal phrases, draws on four or more sources, states a limit; in-text citations and references follow APA and matchSeveral sources used but strung together, or minor APA errorsOne source carries the paragraph, or citations missing or in another format

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

The questions use Texts 1-7 in the lesson plan: Soren's search log (Warm-Up), his notes on Sources A-C (Direct Instruction), Sources D-F (Guided Practice), and his first draft, revision and reference list (Independent Practice). Paragraph numbers match the numbers beside each text. Questions 4, 14 and 19 use new situations. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Search 2 (Text 1, paragraph 4), what does filetype:pdf do?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Search 1, "permanent standard time" OR "year-round standard time" site:.gov, why does Soren join the two phrases with OR?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Soren used citation chaining to find the 1976 evaluation (Text 1, paragraph 6). Which next step would also be citation chaining?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A student is writing about a city parking rule that the council changed last week. Which search move best guards against using an outdated source?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which is a limitation of Source A for Soren's brief, according to his notes in Text 2?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to Text 2, what makes Source A especially strong for this particular brief?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why can Source B not show how much energy Senate Bill 112 would save or cost?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Soren is tempted to write "Extended daylight saving time cut electricity use by 0.5 percent." Using Text 2, why would that mislead Mr. Adair, and what is the yearly figure?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why does Soren consider Source C a close match for his audience (Text 3)?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why does the date on Source C, "updated July 24, 2026," matter for Soren's brief?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Another student reads, on page 5 of the CRS report (Source C), a finding from a 1975 Department of Transportation report to Congress. She cannot get the 1975 report itself. Which APA in-text citation should she use?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to Soren's notes in Text 4, what is the main limitation of Source D, the poll, for this brief?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Using Diagram 1 and Text 5, what best describes the over-reliance in Soren's first draft?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A web page by Tomas Ruiz, "Why the fall clock change is easier than the spring one," was posted on November 2, 2025, by the Coastal Sleep Institute at www.coastalsleep.org/fall-change. Which APA reference is correct? (The author and institute are invented.)

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer

    Choose Source D, E or F from Text 4. Name one strength and one limitation it has for Soren's brief, and tie each one to the task, the purpose or the audience.

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    Sentence 3 of Text 5 stretches what Source A says about year-round daylight saving time. Using the quotations in Text 2, explain what Source A actually says, rewrite the sentence accurately with an APA in-text citation, and explain in one sentence why the original is a citation problem.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    Give two ways Text 6 avoids over-reliance on one source while keeping the ideas flowing. Quote a phrase from Text 6 for each.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    Sentence 6 of Text 5 has no citation. Using Text 3, identify where its wording comes from and explain the two problems with the sentence. Then rewrite it for the brief as a marked quotation with a signal phrase and an APA in-text citation. The quoted words are on the report's Summary page, which has no page number.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    A classmate writes a persuasive column for the school newspaper arguing that permanent standard time would help teenagers' sleep. Which two of Soren's sources would be strongest for that task, purpose and audience, and which limitation of Source A matters less there than it did in Soren's brief?

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Mr. Adair says, "Just tell us what the sleep doctors say." Explain why a brief that relied only on Source A would fail Soren's task. Use two specific limitations from Texts 2 and 3.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does W.11-12.8 mean?

W.11-12.8 means that students in grades 11 and 12 gather information from several authoritative print and digital sources with skilled searching, judge each source's strengths and limitations for the specific writing task, purpose and audience, and weave the information into their writing without plagiarism, without leaning too hard on any one source, and with correct citations.

It is the source-handling part of research writing at the end of high school.

How is W.11-12.8 different from W.9-10.8?

W.9-10.8 asks students to assess each source's usefulness in answering the research question; W.11-12.8 asks them to assess its strengths and limitations in terms of the task, purpose and audience, and adds avoiding over-reliance on any one source.

In practice, a grade 10 student asks "Does this source help answer my question?" A grade 12 student also asks "What can this source do for this particular piece of writing and these readers, and what can't it do?"

What does "in terms of the task, purpose, and audience" mean for judging a source?

It means a source is judged against the writing it will serve, not in the abstract.

The task is the kind of writing (a policy brief, a lab report, an op-ed), the purpose is what it must accomplish (inform a vote, persuade, explain), and the audience is who will read it and what they need. A statewide poll is weak evidence about health but essential for a legislator who must know what voters want.

What counts as over-reliance on one source?

Over-reliance means one source carries claims it cannot support alone, so the writing inherits that source's purpose, scope and blind spots.

A useful check is to count citations per source, as Diagram 1 does, and then ask whether each claim is cited to the source best placed to support it. Avoiding over-reliance does not mean citing every source equally; a central source can appear often if other sources carry the claims it does not cover.

What advanced search skills should students use for W.11-12.8?

Beyond quotation marks, the minus sign and site:, students should use OR for synonyms, filetype: to reach reports, database limits for peer review and date, date tools for recent events, and citation chaining.

Citation chaining means following a strong source's footnotes or references to the sources behind it. Operators work in most search engines, but details vary, so students should check the help page of the engine or database they use.

How do you cite a source you found quoted in another source?

In APA style, name the original work and the source you actually read, for example (National Bureau of Standards, 1976, as cited in Clark & Cunningham, 2026, p. 6), and list only the source you read in the reference list.

MLA uses a similar approach with "qtd. in." Either way, the goal is honesty: citing the original directly would claim you read it. Whenever possible, find and read the original.

Does W.11-12.8 require APA or MLA style?

No. The standard asks for "a standard format for citation" and does not name one.

English classes often use MLA, and social science and science courses often use APA. This lesson uses APA (7th edition) so that students meet a second format before college. What matters is consistent use of one format, with in-text citations that match the reference list.

Is attributing a claim to the wrong source a form of plagiarism?

It is a citation error that misrepresents sources, and many schools treat it under the same academic honesty rules as plagiarism.

If a writer credits a sleep expert with an energy finding, readers are misled about where the evidence comes from and how strong it is. Checking that each cited source really makes the claim beside it is part of avoiding plagiarism and part of integrating sources accurately.

Can unpublished sources like polls and interviews count as authoritative?

A poll, interview or public record can be authoritative for what it measures, even if it is not published in a journal.

A well-run statewide poll is authoritative about what residents prefer, not about health effects. Students should report how such a source was gathered, such as the sample size and margin of error for a poll, and use it only for the claims it can support.

How can teachers assess W.11-12.8?

Look at the whole research process: the search log, the source notes and the final cited writing.

Strong evidence includes searches with purposeful operators and citation chaining, notes that state each source's strengths and limitations for the actual task and audience, writing in which several sources share the work and limits are stated openly, and a reference list that matches the in-text citations. Short checks, such as fixing an over-reliant paragraph or a secondary citation, test single skills quickly.