RI.9-10.1: Citing Strong and Thorough Textual Evidence
In plain English: RI.9-10.1 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 9-10 to cite strong and thorough evidence from an informational text to support two kinds of analysis: what the text states outright and what can be inferred from it. Students quote exactly, choose the details that fit a claim best and explain how they support it. It is usually taught in English 9 and English 10.
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Informational Text · Cluster: Key Ideas and Details · Official standard
Students learn to support every statement they make about an informational text with evidence that is strong (it fits the exact claim) and thorough (it covers the whole claim, often with more than one quotation). They practice two kinds of analysis: restating what a text says explicitly, and drawing inferences, conclusions the words support without stating them. Every inference has to be tied to quoted words and a sentence of reasoning.
The lesson uses two works of investigative journalism by women reporters. Students model the skills on the opening of Ida M. Tarbell's The History of the Standard Oil Company (1904), which traces how the oil industry began, then work on their own with Nellie Bly's Ten Days in a Mad-House (1887), her account of posing as a patient to report on how women were examined and committed to a public asylum.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Distinguish what an informational text says explicitly from inferences drawn from it
Quote evidence exactly and give its location by paragraph number
Choose the strongest evidence for a claim and explain why it is stronger than other details
Support an inference thoroughly, with enough quoted evidence to cover every part of the claim
Write an evidence-based paragraph that combines explicit meaning and inference
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Citing the evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of a text RI.8.1
Summarizing a paragraph accurately in their own words
Punctuating a short quotation inside their own sentence
Put a short, everyday text on the board and ask students to separate what it states from what it suggests.
Warm-Up Prompt
"A sign on the cafeteria door reads: 'Lunch today will be served in the gym. Bring your own water bottle.' Write one thing the sign says explicitly and one thing you can infer. Which words in the sign support your inference?"
Collect answers in two columns, Says and Suggests. Students will usually infer that the cafeteria cannot be used today and that there will be no cups or fountain nearby. Ask which words support each inference ("today," "Bring your own"). Point out that an inference still has to rest on quoted words: RI.9-10.1 asks students to do this with every claim about a text.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Part 1: The four terms. Present Diagram 1 and define each term with students.
The language of RI.9-10.1
Term
What it means
A test students can apply
Explicit
Stated outright in the words of the text
Can I point to a sentence that says it?
Inference
A conclusion the words support but do not state
Can I quote the words and explain the step from them to my conclusion?
Strong evidence
The quotation that fits the exact claim most directly
If I removed this quotation, would the claim lose its support?
Thorough evidence
Enough evidence to cover every part of the claim
Does each part of my claim have its own quoted support?
Part 2: Model with Tarbell. Ida Tarbell grew up in the Pennsylvania oil country. From 1902 to 1904 she published a series of articles in McClure's Magazine investigating how John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company came to control the oil business, and the series became this book. It opens not with Rockefeller but with the land and the product. Read the three paragraphs aloud, then think aloud through the worked examples. Use Diagram 1 with paragraph 1.
1One of the busiest corners of the globe at the opening of the year 1872 was a strip of Northwestern Pennsylvania, not over fifty miles long, known the world over as the Oil Regions. Twelve years before this strip of land had been but little better than a wilderness; its chief inhabitants the lumbermen, who every season cut great swaths of primeval pine and hemlock from its hills, and in the spring floated them down the Allegheny River to Pittsburg. The great tides of Western emigration had shunned the spot for years as too rugged and unfriendly for settlement, and yet in twelve years this region avoided by men had been transformed into a bustling trade centre, where towns elbowed each other for place, into which three great trunk railroads had built branches, and every foot of whose soil was fought for by capitalists. It was the discovery and development of a new raw product, petroleum, which had made this change from wilderness to market-place. This product in twelve years had not only peopled a waste place of the earth, it had revolutionised the world’s methods of illumination and added millions upon millions of dollars to the wealth of the United States.
2Petroleum as a curiosity, and indeed in a small way as an article of commerce, was no new thing when its discovery in quantities called the attention of the world to this corner of Northwestern Pennsylvania. The journals of many an early explorer of the valleys of the Allegheny and its tributaries tell of springs and streams the surfaces of which were found covered with a thick oily substance which burned fiercely when ignited and which the Indians believed to have curative properties. As the country was opened, more and more was heard of these oil springs. Certain streams came to be named from the quantities of the substance found on the surface of the water, as “Oil Creek” in Northwestern Pennsylvania, “Old Greasy” or Kanawha in West Virginia. The belief in the substance as a cure-all increased as time went on and in various parts of the country it was regularly skimmed from the surface of the water as cream from a pan, or soaked up by woollen blankets, bottled, and peddled as a medicine for man and beast.
3Up to the beginning of the 19th century no oil seems to have been obtained except from the surfaces of springs and streams. That it was to be found far below the surface of the earth was discovered independently at various points in Kentucky, West Virginia, Ohio and Pennsylvania by persons drilling for salt-water to be used in manufacturing salt. Not infrequently the water they found was mixed with a dark-green, evil-smelling substance which was recognised as identical with the well-known “rock-oil.” It was necessary to rid the water of this before it could be used for salt, and in many places cisterns were devised in which the brine was allowed to stand until the oil had risen to the surface. It was then run into the streams or on the ground. This practice was soon discovered to be dangerous, so easily did the oil ignite. In several places, particularly in Kentucky, so much oil was obtained with the salt-water that the wells had to be abandoned. Certain of these deserted salt wells were opened years after, when it was found that the troublesome substance which had made them useless was far more valuable than the brine the original drillers sought.
Ida M. Tarbell, The History of the Standard Oil Company, Volume One, chapter one, "The Birth of an Industry" (first three paragraphs) (1904; this edition 1905). Public domain (published 1905). Source text.
Explicit: facts the text states
What does Tarbell state in paragraph 1 about the size of the Oil Regions and how fast they changed?
Result: She states both outright: the region was "a strip of Northwestern Pennsylvania, not over fifty miles long," and "Twelve years before this strip of land had been but little better than a wilderness." Restating them needs no inference.
Inference from a description of methods
Paragraph 2: the oil "was regularly skimmed from the surface of the water as cream from a pan, or soaked up by woollen blankets, bottled, and peddled as a medicine for man and beast."
Result: Tarbell never says the early trade was tiny, but the methods show it: skimming and soaking up with blankets collect oil by hand, a little at a time, and "peddled" suggests selling bottle by bottle. The inference (a small, local trade) rests on those verbs.
Inference from word choice
Paragraph 3 calls the oil in the salt wells a "dark-green, evil-smelling substance" and "the troublesome substance which had made them useless."
Result: The adjectives take the salt makers' point of view: to them the oil was dirty, smelly and in the way. That view is shown through description, not announced, and it sets up the irony of the last sentence, where the same substance turns out "far more valuable than the brine."
Inference from two explicit dates
Paragraph 1 describes the region "at the opening of the year 1872" and says that "Twelve years before" it was nearly a wilderness.
Result: Tarbell does not print the year, but 1872 - 12 = 1860, so the change began around 1860. Combining two explicit details gives an inference the text does not state (Diagram 2).
Thorough support for a two-part claim
Claim: for a long time petroleum was valued for what people believed it could cure, and that belief kept growing.
Result: Each half of the claim needs its own quotation. The belief: the oil was a substance "which the Indians believed to have curative properties" (paragraph 2). Its growth: "The belief in the substance as a cure-all increased as time went on" (paragraph 2). One quotation alone would support only half.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs read the next paragraph of Tarbell's chapter, about Samuel M. Kier, a salt-well owner near Pittsburgh who bottled the oil that came up with his salt water. For each question below, pairs highlight the explicit answer in one color and the words that support an inference in another, then write one answer sentence with a quotation. Use Diagram 2 with question 3.
1Naturally the first use made of the oil obtained in quantities from the salt wells was medicinal. By the middle of the century it was without doubt the great American medicine. “Seneca Oil” seems to have been the earliest name under which petroleum appeared in the East. It was followed by a large output of Kentucky petroleum sold under the name “American Medicinal Oil.” Several hundred thousand bottles of this oil are said to have been put up in Burkesville, Kentucky, and to have been shipped to the East and to Europe. The point at which the business of bottling petroleum for medicine was carried on most systematically and extensively was Pittsburg. Near that town, at Tarentum in Alleghany County, were located salt wells owned and operated in the forties by Samuel M. Kier. The oil which came up with the salt-water was sufficient to be a nuisance, and Mr. Kier sought a way to use it. Believing it had curative qualities he began to bottle it. By 1850 he had worked up this business until “Kier’s Petroleum, or Rock-Oil” was sold all over the United States. The crude petroleum was put up in eight-ounce bottles wrapped in a circular setting forth in good patent-medicine style its virtues as a cure-all, and giving directions about its use. While it was admitted to be chiefly a liniment it was recommended for cholera morbus, liver complaint, bronchitis and consumption, and the dose prescribed was three teaspoonfuls three times a day! Mr. Kier’s circulars are crowded with testimonials of the efficacy of rock-oil, dated anywhere between 1848 and 1853. Although his trade in this oil was so extensive he was not satisfied that petroleum was useful only as a medicine. He was interested in it as a lubricator and a luminant. That petroleum had the qualities of both had been discovered at more than one point before 1850. More than one mill-owner in the districts where petroleum had been found was using it in a crude way for oiling his machines or lighting his works, but though the qualities of both lubricator and luminant were present, the impurities of the natural oil were too great to make its use general. Mr. Kier seems to have been the first man to have attempted to secure an expert opinion as to the possibility of refining it. In 1849 he sent a bottle of oil to a chemist in Philadelphia, who advised him to try distilling it and burning it in a lamp. Mr. Kier followed the advice, and a five-barrel still which he used in the fifties for refining petroleum is still to be seen in Pittsburg. His trade in the oil he produced at his little refinery was not entirely local, for in 1858 we find him agreeing to sell to Joseph Coffin of New York at 62½ cents a gallon 100 barrels of “carbon oil that will burn in the ordinary coal-oil lamp.”
Ida M. Tarbell, The History of the Standard Oil Company, Volume One, chapter one (fourth paragraph) (1904; this edition 1905). Public domain (published 1905). Source text.
What does Tarbell state about the bottles Kier sold and the illnesses the oil was recommended for? (explicit)
Tarbell writes that several hundred thousand bottles of Kentucky oil "are said to have been put up in Burkesville." What do the words "are said to" tell you about her source, and how much weight can the number carry? (strong evidence)
Find the years Tarbell gives for Kier's business. What can you infer from them about how the use of petroleum was changing? (explicit and inference)
Debrief: push every pair from "Kier sold oil" to a cited, reasoned sentence such as "In 1849 Kier sent oil to a chemist, and by 1858 he was selling 'carbon oil that will burn in the ordinary coal-oil lamp,' which suggests that within ten years he had moved from medicine to lighting." Ask: which of your quotations would you keep if you could keep only one, and why?
Independent Practice15-20 minutes
In 1887 the newspaper the New York World sent the reporter Nellie Bly to pose as a mentally ill woman so that she could report on how patients were examined and treated. She gave the false name Nellie Brown and let people believe she came from Cuba. In this excerpt she is being held in the "insane pavilion" of Bellevue Hospital before being sent to the asylum on Blackwell's Island. Miss Scott is a nurse there, and Mary is a woman who works in the pavilion. Students answer quiz questions 1-20 on their own with the passage open, citing paragraph numbers.
1At 6 o’clock on Sunday morning, Sept. 25, the nurses pulled the covering from my bed. “Come, it’s time for you to get out of bed,” they said, and opened the window and let in the cold breeze. My clothing was then returned to me. After dressing I was shown to a washstand, where all the other patients were trying to rid their faces of all traces of sleep. At 7 o’clock we were given some horrible mess, which Mary told us was chicken broth. The cold, from which we had suffered enough the day previous, was bitter, and when I complained to the nurse she said it was one of the rules of the institution not to turn the heat on until October, and so we would have to endure it, as the steam-pipes had not even been put in order. The night nurses then, arming themselves with scissors, began to play manicure on the patients. They cut my nails to the quick, as they did those of several of the other patients. Shortly after this a handsome young doctor made his appearance and I was conducted into the sitting-room.
2“Who are you?” he asked.
3“Nellie Moreno,” I replied.
4“Then why did you give the name of Brown?” he asked. “What is wrong with you?”
5“Nothing. I did not want to come here, but they brought me. I want to go away. Won’t you let me out?”
6“If I take you out will you stay with me? Won’t you run away from me when you get on the street?”
7“I can’t promise that I will not,” I answered, with a smile and a sigh, for he was handsome.
8He asked me many other questions. Did I ever see faces on the wall? Did I ever hear voices around? I answered him to the best of my ability.
9“Do you ever hear voices at night?” he asked.
10“Yes, there is so much talking I cannot sleep.”
11“I thought so,” he said to himself. Then turning to me, he asked: “What do these voices say?”
12“Well, I do not listen to them always. But sometimes, very often, they talk about Nellie Brown, and then on other subjects that do not interest me half so much,” I answered, truthfully.
13“That will do,” he said to Miss Scott, who was just on the outside.
14“Can I go away?” I asked.
15“Yes,” he said, with a satisfied laugh, “we’ll soon send you away.”
16“It is so very cold here, I want to go out,” I said.
17“That’s true,” he said to Miss Scott. “The cold is almost unbearable in here, and you will have some cases of pneumonia if you are not careful.”
18With this I was led away and another patient was taken in. I sat right outside the door and waited to hear how he would test the sanity of the other patients. With little variation the examination was exactly the same as mine. All the patients were asked if they saw faces on the wall, heard voices, and what they said. I might also add each patient denied any such peculiar freaks of sight and hearing. At 10 o’clock we were given a cup of unsalted beef tea; at noon a bit of cold meat and a potatoe, at 3 o’clock a cup of oatmeal gruel and at 5.30 a cup of tea and a slice of unbuttered bread. We were all cold and hungry.
Nellie Bly, Ten Days in a Mad-House, chapter VII, "The Goal in Sight" (opening) (1887). Public domain (published 1887). Source text.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: "Write one sentence about the Tarbell passage that states something explicit and one that states an inference. Quote the words that support each, and underline the word that carries your inference." Sort the tickets into "inference with support" and "inference without support" to plan the next lesson.
Teacher note on language. Both authors use the words of their time. Tarbell writes "the Indians," and Bly writes "insane," "sanity" and "asylum." The passages are quoted exactly; in discussion, use "Native Americans" (or the name of the nation, where known) and "mental illness."
Homework passage. In this excerpt from the next chapter, Bly has been taken to the asylum on Blackwell's Island. Dr. Kinier is the doctor who examines new patients there, and Miss Grupe is a nurse.
1Mrs. Louise Schanz was taken into the presence of Dr. Kinier, the medical man.
2“Your name?” he asked, loudly. She answered in German, saying she did not speak English nor could she understand it. However, when he said Mrs. Louise Schanz, she said “Yah, yah.” Then he tried other questions, and when he found she could not understand one word of English, he said to Miss Grupe:
3“You are German; speak to her for me.”
4Miss Grupe proved to be one of those people who are ashamed of their nationality, and she refused, saying she could understand but few words of her mother tongue.
5“You know you speak German. Ask this woman what her husband does,” and they both laughed as if they were enjoying a joke.
6“I can’t speak but a few words,” she protested, but at last she managed to ascertain the occupation of Mr. Schanz.
7“Now, what was the use of lying to me?” asked the doctor, with a laugh which dispelled the rudeness.
8“I can’t speak any more,” she said, and she did not.
9Thus was Mrs. Louise Schanz consigned to the asylum without a chance of making herself understood. Can such carelessness be excused, I wonder, when it is so easy to get an interpreter? If the confinement was but for a few days one might question the necessity. But here was a woman taken without her own consent from a free world to an asylum and there given no chance to prove her sanity. Confined most probably for life behind asylum bars, without even being told in her language the why and wherefore. Compare this with a criminal, who is given every chance to prove his innocence. Who would not rather be a murderer and take the chance for life than be declared insane, without hope of escape? Mrs. Schanz begged in German to know where she was, and pleaded for liberty. Her voice broken by sobs, she was led unheard out to us.
Nellie Bly, Ten Days in a Mad-House, chapter VIII, "Inside the Mad-House" (excerpt) (1887). Public domain (published 1887). Source text.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give the sentence frame: "The text states '___' (paragraph __). This suggests ___ because ___."
Read each passage aloud first and gloss older words in the margin (brine, luminant, lubricator, liniment, gruel, ascertain)
Start with explicit questions only; add one inference question once students can quote and locate evidence reliably
For Advanced Students
Find one claim Tarbell states as fact and one she reports only as what others said or believed, and explain why the difference matters for citing her
Read more of Bly's account and trace one inference (for example, about the doctors) across three chapters, adding evidence at each step
Write two answers to the same question, one thin and one thorough, and annotate what makes the second thorough
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong answers quote exact words, give the paragraph, and explain the step from the words to the claim. Watch for three problems: a quotation dropped in with no explanation, an inference stated as if the text said it outright, and "evidence" that is on the same topic but does not support the specific claim. Thorough answers cover every part of a claim; a two-part claim usually needs two quotations.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Said or Suggested?
15 minPairs
Pairs sort eight statements about the Tarbell passage (Direct Instruction) into three piles: Said (the text states it), Suggested (the text supports it as an inference) and Not supported. Every card needs a quotation that justifies its pile.
The 8 Statement Cards
Lumbermen floated logs from the region down the Allegheny River to Pittsburgh.
Three trunk railroads had built branches into the region by 1872.
Before the oil boom, settlers moving west avoided the region.
The oil boom made some investors very rich.
The first salt makers did not know the oil could be sold.
Oil Creek was named for the oil found on its water.
Lumbermen were the first people to find oil in the region.
Petroleum was unknown before it was found in large quantities.
Procedure
Sort the cards, then write the supporting quotation on the back of each one
For every Suggested card, add one sentence of reasoning that connects the words to the statement
For every Not supported card, quote the words that contradict it or explain what is missing
Answer Key
Said: card 1 ("in the spring floated them down the Allegheny River to Pittsburg"), card 2 ("three great trunk railroads had built branches"), card 3 ("The great tides of Western emigration had shunned the spot") and card 6 ("Certain streams came to be named from the quantities of the substance found on the surface of the water, as 'Oil Creek'")
Suggested: card 4 ("every foot of whose soil was fought for by capitalists" and "added millions upon millions of dollars to the wealth of the United States") and card 5 ("It was then run into the streams or on the ground" and "far more valuable than the brine the original drillers sought")
Not supported: card 7 (paragraph 2 says early explorers' journals already told of oil springs) and card 8 (contradicted: "Petroleum as a curiosity ... was no new thing")
Discussion Questions
Cards 2 and 3 are both explicit. Why does the claim "the region changed completely in twelve years" need both of them?
Card 8 sounds reasonable but is contradicted by the text. How can a statement that "sounds right" still be unsupported?
Variation for a Shorter Class
Give each pair four cards (1, 4, 5 and 8): one stated, two suggested and one contradicted. Pool the answers on the board.
2
Evidence Ladder
20 minGroups of 3-4
Groups receive one claim about the Kier paragraph (Guided Practice) and four evidence strips. They rank the strips from strongest to weakest support for the claim, then write a thorough answer that uses the two strongest.
The Claim and the 4 Evidence Strips
Claim: Tarbell doubts that rock-oil really worked as a cure-all.
"a circular setting forth in good patent-medicine style its virtues as a cure-all"
"the dose prescribed was three teaspoonfuls three times a day!"
"By 1850 he had worked up this business until 'Kier's Petroleum, or Rock-Oil' was sold all over the United States."
"The crude petroleum was put up in eight-ounce bottles"
Procedure
Rank the strips on a ladder drawn on chart paper, strongest at the top
Beside each strip, write one sentence: what does it prove, and what does it not prove?
Write a three-sentence answer to the claim that quotes the top two strips and explains each
Discussion Questions
Strip 3 shows that Kier's oil sold well. Why is it weak support for a claim about Tarbell's doubt, even though it is accurate?
Strips 1 and 2 show doubt in different ways: one through a label ("patent-medicine style"), one through punctuation (the exclamation point). Why does using both make the answer more thorough than using either one?
3
Thin or Thorough?
15 minIndividual, then pairs
Students compare two sample answers, written for this page, to the question "What does Tarbell suggest about Samuel Kier?" They score both with a checklist, then revise the thin answer.
The Two Sample Answers
Answer A: Kier was a businessman. Tarbell says "Mr. Kier's circulars are crowded with testimonials of the efficacy of rock-oil." This shows that he sold a lot of oil.
Answer B: Tarbell suggests that Kier looked further ahead than the medicine trade that made him money. She states that "he was not satisfied that petroleum was useful only as a medicine" and that he "seems to have been the first man to have attempted to secure an expert opinion as to the possibility of refining it." She adds that he used "a five-barrel still" for refining in the fifties, so he acted on the chemist's advice. His dissatisfaction and his refining are stated; the idea that he saw the future of petroleum before others is an inference from them.
Checklist (1 point each)
Makes a specific claim, not only a topic
Quotes the text exactly
Explains how each quotation supports the claim
Uses enough evidence to cover every part of the claim
Procedure
Score both answers alone, then compare scores with a partner and agree on one score for each
Rewrite Answer A so it earns all four points; keep its quotation or replace it with a stronger one
Discussion Questions
Answer A quotes the text. Why does its quotation not prove its claim that Kier sold a lot of oil?
Answer B says which part of its answer is stated and which is inferred. Why does that help a reader trust it?
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: From Quotation to Inference
An analysis moves from the exact words to what they state, then through a step of reasoning to what they suggest. A second quotation that supports the same inference makes the evidence thorough. The example comes from paragraph 1 of the Tarbell passage in Direct Instruction.
Diagram 2: Tarbell's Dates on a Time Line, Drawn to Scale
The dates Tarbell gives in the two passages, placed to scale: Kier's testimonials (1848-1853), his bottle sent to a chemist (1849), his oil sold nationwide (1850), his sale of lamp oil by the barrel (1858), the near-wilderness of "twelve years before" 1872, and the busy region of 1872. The dates are explicit; the conclusion that petroleum changed from a medicine to a fuel in under ten years is an inference.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RI.9-10.1 Homework: Evidence from Nellie Bly's Account of an Admission
Directions: Use the excerpt from chapter VIII of Ten Days in a Mad-House printed in the Closure phase of the lesson plan. Quote exact words and give paragraph numbers for every point. Answer Problems 1-5 in 2-5 sentences each; Problem 6 is a paragraph.
Part 1: What the Text Says Explicitly (Problems 1-2)
How did Dr. Kinier find out that Mrs. Schanz did not understand English? Quote the words in paragraph 2 that state it.
What did Miss Grupe say when the doctor asked her to speak German, and what did she finally find out from Mrs. Schanz? Quote paragraphs 4 and 6.
Part 2: Inferences (Problems 3-4)
Bly writes that the doctor and nurse "both laughed as if they were enjoying a joke" (paragraph 5), and that the doctor spoke "with a laugh which dispelled the rudeness" (paragraph 7). What can you infer about how seriously they took the examination? Explain the step from the words to your inference.
Bly states that Miss Grupe "proved to be one of those people who are ashamed of their nationality" (paragraph 4). Is this a fact Bly observed or an inference she drew? Quote the evidence she gives for it and explain whether that evidence is strong enough.
Part 3: Strong and Thorough Evidence (Problems 5-6)
In paragraph 9, Bly asks, "Can such carelessness be excused, I wonder, when it is so easy to get an interpreter?" Choose the two quotations from paragraphs 2-8 that most strongly show "carelessness," and explain why each is stronger than another detail you could have chosen.
Write a paragraph (150-200 words) answering this question: according to Bly, was Mrs. Schanz treated fairly? Use at least three quotations with paragraph numbers. Include at least one explicit detail and at least one inference, and label which is which.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Accurate Quotation
Exact words with paragraph numbers for every point
Some quotations inexact or unlocated
No quotations, or quotations not from the passage
Explicit Meaning
Restates what the text says accurately and precisely
Restates it with minor errors
Misreads what the text says
Inference and Reasoning
Inferences follow from the quoted words, and the reasoning is stated
Inferences plausible but the reasoning is thin
Inferences unsupported or stated as fact
Strong and Thorough Support
Chooses the best evidence and covers every part of each claim
Relevant evidence that covers only part of a claim
Evidence off the point or missing
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
All questions are about the excerpt from Nellie Bly's Ten Days in a Mad-House in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan. Paragraph numbers refer to the numbers shown beside that passage. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to paragraph 1, why was the heat not turned on in the pavilion?
Answer: B
The nurse "said it was one of the rules of the institution not to turn the heat on until October" (paragraph 1). Choice A misreads the pipes: the text says only that they "had not even been put in order," not that patients damaged them. Choice C invents a medical reason that the passage never gives. Choice D names a cause the passage never mentions.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to paragraphs 8 and 18, what did the doctor ask the patients?
Answer: D
Paragraph 18 states it explicitly: "All the patients were asked if they saw faces on the wall, heard voices, and what they said," and paragraph 8 lists the same questions for Bly. Choice A describes questions the doctor never asks in this excerpt. Choice B invents a reading test. Choice C comes from a later examination by a different doctor, after this excerpt ends.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Bly answers "there is so much talking I cannot sleep" (paragraph 10) and later says she answered "truthfully" (paragraph 12). What can the reader infer?
Answer: A
The word "truthfully" tells the reader that her answer was literally true: people around her do talk, some of them "about Nellie Brown," the name everyone is discussing. The doctor, though, asks what the voices "say," as if they were imaginary. Choice B ignores "truthfully." Choice C invents a memory test the doctor never mentions. Choice D is contradicted: she answers every question "to the best of my ability."
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"'I thought so,' he said to himself" (paragraph 11). What does this sentence suggest about the doctor?
Answer: C
"I thought so" means the answer matches what he already expected, and he says it "to himself," before asking what the voices say. Choice A is the opposite of "I thought so." Choice B is contradicted by his reply, which responds directly to her answer. Choice D has no support: nothing in the passage shows that the doctor suspects who Bly really is.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Bly asks, "Can I go away?" and the doctor answers "with a satisfied laugh, 'we'll soon send you away'" (paragraphs 14-15). What is the best inference about his answer?
Answer: B
Bly asks to go home; the doctor, who has just ended the examination, means she will be sent away to the asylum, and his "satisfied laugh" shows he is pleased to have decided. The same words carry two meanings. Choice A takes "send you away" in Bly's sense and ignores the laugh. Choice C conflicts with "satisfied." Choice D invents doubt; "soon" shows he has already decided.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which quotation is explicit evidence that the doctor himself recognized that the conditions in the pavilion could harm the patients?
Answer: D
In paragraph 17 the doctor says outright that the cold is "almost unbearable" and that it could cause "pneumonia." Choices A, B and C are all things he says during the examination; they show how he questioned Bly, not what he thought about the conditions. Choosing one of them confuses a quotation from the right person with evidence for the right claim.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which of these statements does paragraph 18 state explicitly?
Answer: A
Bly writes, "I might also add each patient denied any such peculiar freaks of sight and hearing." Choice B goes beyond the paragraph, which does not say what happened to the other patients that day. Choice C is not stated; Bly reports their answers, not her judgment of them. Choice D is not in the paragraph: Miss Scott does not speak at all.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
At the end of paragraph 18, Bly lists every meal from 10 o'clock to 5.30. What does this list most strongly suggest?
Answer: C
The list is explicit: "a cup of unsalted beef tea," "a bit of cold meat and a potatoe," "a cup of oatmeal gruel," "a slice of unbuttered bread." The small portions ("a cup," "a bit," "a slice") and the words "unsalted" and "unbuttered" suggest a thin diet, and the next sentence confirms the effect: "We were all cold and hungry." Choice A reverses that sentence. Choices B and D add details the passage never gives.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which statement is an inference a reader can draw, rather than something Bly states directly in the excerpt?
Answer: D
Bly never says what the meal looked or tasted like, but she calls it "some horrible mess, which Mary told us was chicken broth" (paragraph 1): she knows its name only because Mary told her, which suggests she could not recognize it. Choice A is stated outright ("They cut my nails to the quick"). Choice B is stated in paragraph 18. Choice C is stated in paragraph 1, where the doctor appears and Bly is "conducted into the sitting-room."
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Bly writes that the night nurses, "arming themselves with scissors, began to play manicure on the patients" (paragraph 1). What do the words "arming" and "play" suggest?
Answer: B
"Arming" is the language of fighting, and "play manicure" suggests the nurses were only pretending to groom the patients. The next sentence supports the inference: "They cut my nails to the quick." Choice A ignores the tone of the verbs. Choice C has no support. Choice D takes "arming" literally and adds a threat the text never mentions.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which quotation is the strongest evidence for the claim "the examinations were routine rather than careful"?
Answer: A
The claim is about all the examinations, and only choice A describes them all: "exactly the same" for every patient. Choice B describes the doctor, not the examination. Choice C describes Bly's answers, not the doctor's method. Choice D shows that patients followed one another, which fits the claim but is weaker, because a careful examination could also be followed by another one.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Bly writes, "The cold, from which we had suffered enough the day previous, was bitter" (paragraph 1). What can the reader infer from this sentence?
Answer: C
The words "we had suffered enough the day previous" show that the patients, Bly among them, were already in the pavilion and already cold the day before, so the problem was not new. Choice A overlooks "the day previous." Choice B is contradicted by "we," which places Bly there the day before. Choice D mistakes one detail (the nurses "opened the window") for the whole cause; the cold had begun a day before that window was opened.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which quotation is the strongest explicit evidence that Bly was not the only patient treated roughly by the night nurses?
Answer: B
Right after "They cut my nails to the quick," Bly adds "as they did those of several of the other patients," which states directly that others were treated the same way. Choice A describes only Bly's own nails. Choice C describes the nurses getting ready and names no patient. Choice D is about Bly alone ("my bed").
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which pair of quotations gives the most thorough support for the claim "the patients were cold from morning until evening"?
Answer: D
The claim has two parts, morning and evening, and choice D covers both: the cold breeze let in at 6 o'clock (paragraph 1) and "We were all cold and hungry," which comes right after the last meal at 5.30 (paragraph 18). Choice A covers the right times but never mentions cold. Choice B describes the doctor. Choice C mentions "night" but is about voices, not temperature. Picking quotations that share a word or a time with the claim, but not its point, makes evidence thin.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
In paragraph 4 the doctor asks, "Then why did you give the name of Brown?" What does this question tell the reader explicitly, and what can you infer from it about what the doctor already knew?
Model answer: The question states outright that Bly had given the name "Brown" at some earlier point, and that she has just given a different name, "Nellie Moreno" (paragraph 3). From it we can infer that the doctor had been told about her before the examination, from records or from the staff, because he knows the earlier name without asking. Rubric: full credit for the explicit point (she gave the name Brown before) with a quotation, and a supported inference about the doctor's prior knowledge; partial credit for only one of the two.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Bly tells the doctor, "Nothing. I did not want to come here, but they brought me" (paragraph 5). Using what the introduction to the excerpt (Independent Practice) tells you about why Bly was in the pavilion, explain why the reader should not take this statement at face value, and what it shows about how Bly is behaving in front of the doctor.
Model answer: Bly came to the pavilion on purpose, sent by her newspaper, so "I did not want to come here" is not a true account of how she arrived. It is part of the role she is playing: a confused patient who insists "Nothing" is wrong and begs, "Won't you let me out?" The inference is that her words to the doctor are a performance, and the reader must separate what Bly says in the scene from what Bly the reporter tells us. Rubric: full credit for using the background (she came on assignment), quoting paragraph 5 and explaining that the statement is part of her act; partial credit for noting it is untrue without explaining why she says it.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Read the first three sentences of paragraph 1 again. What can you infer happened to the patients' clothing at night? Quote the words that support your inference and explain your reasoning.
Model answer: The patients' clothes seem to have been taken away for the night. Bly writes, "My clothing was then returned to me," and something can only be "returned" if it was taken. The detail "the nurses pulled the covering from my bed" also shows that the nurses controlled even the patients' bedding. The text never says the clothes were taken; the word "returned" is the evidence for the inference. Rubric: full credit for the inference, the quotation and an explanation of why "returned" supports it; partial credit for the inference with a quotation but no reasoning.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
For each statement, write Explicit or Inference, and quote the words from paragraph 1 that support it: (a) The patients washed at a shared washstand. (b) The patients were woken on a fixed schedule whether or not they had slept. (c) Bly complained to a nurse about the cold.
Model answer: (a) Explicit: "I was shown to a washstand, where all the other patients were trying to rid their faces of all traces of sleep." (b) Inference: the time is exact ("At 6 o'clock"), and the nurses announce "it's time for you to get out of bed," which suggests a set routine, not attention to each patient. (c) Explicit: "when I complained to the nurse." Rubric: 1 point for each correct label with a fitting quotation (3 points), and 1 more point for the reasoning behind the inference in (b).
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Bly calls the doctor "handsome" twice (paragraphs 1 and 7), and she answers his question "with a smile and a sigh, for he was handsome." What can you infer this detail adds to her account of the examination? Support your answer with evidence.
Model answer: The detail suggests that the examination felt more like a social conversation than a medical test. The doctor asks, "If I take you out will you stay with me? Won't you run away from me when you get on the street?", which sounds like teasing, and Bly answers "with a smile and a sigh." By pointing out his looks, Bly hints that his charm had nothing to do with skill, so the reader questions his judgment even more when he decides her case in a few questions. Rubric: full credit for a clear inference about the effect of the detail, at least two quotations and reasoning; partial credit for a plausible inference with one quotation.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Write a paragraph (100-150 words) that answers: how does Bly lead readers to judge the doctor without ever stating her judgment? Use at least three quotations with paragraph numbers, and include both an explicit detail and an inference.
Model answer: Bly never writes that the doctor was careless; she lets his own words make the case. Explicitly, his third question is "What is wrong with you?" (paragraph 4), asked before he has examined her at all, which suggests he assumed something was wrong from the start. After only a few questions he ends the examination with "That will do" (paragraph 13), and then "another patient was taken in" (paragraph 18), so the reader infers how little time each case received. By quoting him exactly and adding almost no comment, Bly makes the reader draw the conclusion she wants: the doctor decided quickly and on very little evidence. Rubric: 2 points for a clear claim about Bly's method, 2 for three accurate quotations with paragraph numbers, 2 for reasoning that separates what the text states from what it suggests.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RI.9-10.1 mean?
RI.9-10.1 means that students in grades 9 and 10 must back up everything they say about an informational text with quoted evidence. That includes both what the text says outright and what it only suggests. "RI" stands for Reading Informational Text, "9-10" is the grade band, and "1" is the first standard in the strand, the evidence skill the other reading standards rely on.
What is the difference between explicit evidence and an inference?
Explicit meaning is stated in the words; an inference is a conclusion the words support without stating it. Tarbell states that the Oil Regions were "not over fifty miles long"; that is explicit. She never states that the region was crowded and competitive, but "towns elbowed each other for place" implies it. Both kinds of claim need quoted evidence; an inference also needs a sentence of reasoning.
What makes textual evidence "strong and thorough" in RI.9-10.1?
Strong evidence fits the exact claim, and thorough evidence covers all of it. A quotation on the right topic can still be weak if it does not prove the specific point. A claim with two parts, such as "the region grew fast and drew competing investors," needs support for both parts, which usually means two quotations.
How is RI.9-10.1 different from RI.8.1 and RI.11-12.1?
The grade 8 standard asks for the evidence that "most strongly supports" an analysis; grades 9-10 ask for evidence that is "strong and thorough," so students must cover a claim fully, not only pick the best single quotation. RI.11-12.1 keeps the same wording and adds one demand: "determining where the text leaves matters uncertain."
How many quotations should a student use?
Enough to cover every part of the claim, and no more than the claim needs. For a one-part claim, one well-chosen quotation with an explanation is often enough. For a paragraph-length answer, two or three quotations are typical. A string of quotations with no explanation is not thorough; it leaves the reasoning to the reader.
How should students cite evidence from a passage?
Quote the exact words in quotation marks and give the location, such as a paragraph or page number. Short quotations work best inside the student's own sentence. Paraphrase is fine for background, but when the claim depends on specific words ("elbowed," "fought"), those words should be quoted.
What are common mistakes students make with textual evidence?
A common mistake is dropping in a quotation without explaining how it supports the claim. Others are stating an inference as if the text said it outright, choosing a quotation that is on the topic but not on the point, and changing the author's words when quoting. Activities 1 and 3 in this lesson target these errors.
How is RI.9-10.1 tested?
It is usually tested through questions that ask for both an answer and its evidence. Many state tests use two-part items in which Part A asks for an inference and Part B asks which quotation best supports it. Written responses are also scored partly on whether the evidence is accurate, relevant and explained.
Why does this lesson use Ida Tarbell and Nellie Bly?
Both were investigative reporters, and their writing is dense with concrete detail, which makes it good practice for separating what is stated from what is suggested. Both also reveal attitudes through word choice rather than announcing them, so students have to infer. Both texts are in the public domain.
How can parents help a student practice RI.9-10.1 at home?
Ask "How do you know?" and "Where does it say that?" when your student talks about a news article, a manual or a school reading. Ask them to point to the exact sentence, then to say whether the text stated the idea or they figured it out. That habit is the core of the standard.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to RI.9-10.1: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RI.8.1Prerequisite
Cite the evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of an informational text
Lesson coming soon
Alongside
RL.9-10.1Parallel
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of literature