RL.9-10.1: Citing Strong and Thorough Evidence for What a Text Says and Implies
In plain English: RL.9-10.1 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 9-10 to cite strong and thorough textual evidence for two kinds of claims about literature: what the text states directly, and what a reader can infer from it. Strong evidence is exact and on point; thorough evidence draws on several details and explains how they support the claim.
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literature · Cluster: Key Ideas and Details · Official standard
Students learn to tell apart two kinds of claims about a story, what it says explicitly and what a reader infers, and to back each one with evidence that is strong (exact words that bear directly on the claim) and thorough (enough details, from more than one place, each explained). The anchor text is Saki's "The Open Window" (1914), a short story in which a nervous visitor listens to a fifteen-year-old girl's account of a family tragedy. The story suits this standard because its ending changes what the earlier details mean, so students see that an inference is only as good as the evidence behind it, and that new evidence can overturn it.
The story is split into two excerpts. The class reads the opening together and models citation on it; students read the ending on their own and test their inferences against it. The homework applies the same skills to a complete sonnet, Edwin Arlington Robinson's "Reuben Bright" (1897).
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Distinguish a statement the text makes explicitly from an inference a reader draws from it
Support an explicit claim with an exact quotation and a paragraph or line number
Support an inference with several details from different parts of the text and explain the reasoning that links them
Judge whether a quotation is strong or weak evidence for a given claim, and revise a thin answer into a thorough one
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Citing the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis RL.8.1
Putting a quotation in quotation marks and introducing it with their own words
Telling a narrator's words apart from a character's words in dialogue
"A friend walks into class soaking wet, holding an umbrella that has turned inside out, and says, 'Lovely weather.' Write one thing you know for certain and one thing you guess. For the guess, name the clue that made you guess it."
Take three or four answers and sort them on the board under two headings: Stated or seen (she is wet, the umbrella is broken, she said "Lovely weather") and Inferred (she is being sarcastic, it is raining hard). Point out that every good guess on the board came with a clue. Tell students that reading literature works the same way, and that today they will learn to show their clues from the text in quotation marks.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Define four terms before reading:
Explicit: stated directly in the words of the text. You can put your finger on it.
Inference: a conclusion the text supports but does not state. It joins details from the text to what a reader knows about people and the world.
Strong evidence: exact words that bear directly on the claim. A quotation that is only on the same topic is weak.
Thorough evidence: enough evidence to carry the claim, usually two or more details from different places, each followed by an explanation of how it supports the claim.
Read the opening of the story aloud. Stop after paragraph 15 and ask students not to read ahead.
1“My aunt will be down presently, Mr. Nuttel,” said a very self-possessed young lady of fifteen; “in the meantime you must try and put up with me.”
2Framton Nuttel endeavoured to say the correct something which should duly flatter the niece of the moment without unduly discounting the aunt that was to come. Privately he doubted more than ever whether these formal visits on a succession of total strangers would do much towards helping the nerve cure which he was supposed to be undergoing.
3“I know how it will be,” his sister had said when he was preparing to migrate to this rural retreat; “you will bury yourself down there and not speak to a living soul, and your nerves will be worse than ever from moping. I shall just give you letters of introduction to all the people I know there. Some of them, as far as I can remember, were quite nice.”
4Framton wondered whether Mrs. Sappleton, the lady to whom he was presenting one of the letters of introduction, came into the nice division.
5“Do you know many of the people round here?” asked the niece, when she judged that they had had sufficient silent communion.
6“Hardly a soul,” said Framton. “My sister was staying here, at the rectory, you know, some four years ago, and she gave me letters of introduction to some of the people here.”
7He made the last statement in a tone of distinct regret.
8“Then you know practically nothing about my aunt?” pursued the self-possessed young lady.
9“Only her name and address,” admitted the caller. He was wondering whether Mrs. Sappleton was in the married or widowed state. An undefinable something about the room seemed to suggest masculine habitation.
10“Her great tragedy happened just three years ago,” said the child; “that would be since your sister’s time.”
11“Her tragedy?” asked Framton; somehow in this restful country spot tragedies seemed out of place.
12“You may wonder why we keep that window wide open on an October afternoon,” said the niece, indicating a large French window that opened on to a lawn.
13“It is quite warm for the time of the year,” said Framton; “but has that window got anything to do with the tragedy?”
14“Out through that window, three years ago to a day, her husband and her two young brothers went off for their day’s shooting. They never came back. In crossing the moor to their favourite snipe-shooting ground they were all three engulfed in a treacherous piece of bog. It had been that dreadful wet summer, you know, and places that were safe in other years gave way suddenly without warning. Their bodies were never recovered. That was the dreadful part of it.” Here the child’s voice lost its self-possessed note and became falteringly human. “Poor aunt always thinks that they will come back some day, they and the little brown spaniel that was lost with them, and walk in at that window just as they used to do. That is why the window is kept open every evening till it is quite dusk. Poor dear aunt, she has often told me how they went out, her husband with his white waterproof coat over his arm, and Ronnie, her youngest brother, singing ‘Bertie, why do you bound?’ as he always did to tease her, because she said it got on her nerves. Do you know, sometimes on still, quiet evenings like this, I almost get a creepy feeling that they will all walk in through that window—”
15She broke off with a little shudder.
Saki (H. H. Munro), The Open Window (opening) (1914). Public domain (published 1914). Source text.
Explicit: point to the words
What does paragraph 1 state directly about the niece?
Result: She is "a very self-possessed young lady of fifteen," and she is keeping the guest company because her aunt "will be down presently." Each fact is in the words of the text, so a quotation settles it.
Inference: join details
Framton's sister says of her old acquaintances, "Some of them, as far as I can remember, were quite nice" (paragraph 3). What can a reader infer about the people she is sending him to?
Result: She does not know them well, and she is not sure they are all pleasant. "Some" and "as far as I can remember" suggest it; paragraph 4 backs it up, since Framton has to wonder whether Mrs. Sappleton "came into the nice division."
Weak vs. strong evidence
Claim: Framton expects little from these visits. Which is stronger evidence, "'Hardly a soul,' said Framton" (paragraph 6) or "Privately he doubted more than ever whether these formal visits on a succession of total strangers would do much towards helping the nerve cure" (paragraph 2)?
Result: Paragraph 2 is strong: it states his doubt about the visits in so many words. "Hardly a soul" only answers whether he knows people; it is on the topic but does not show what he expects.
From thin to thorough
Thin answer: "Vera's story about the tragedy is believable because she tells it well." Make it thorough, using paragraph 14.
Result: "Vera makes the tragedy believable with exact facts: it happened 'three years ago to a day,' and 'Their bodies were never recovered.' She adds small personal details, such as the husband's 'white waterproof coat' and the song Ronnie sang 'to tease her.' A precise date and ordinary details are what a true memory sounds like."
How to cite. Model the three moves on the board: say it (the claim in your own words), cite it (the exact words in quotation marks, with the paragraph or line number in parentheses), explain it (one sentence on how those words support the claim). Show that a quotation dropped into a paragraph with no lead-in and no explanation leaves the reader to do the work.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs use two highlighter colors: one for what the opening states, one for details that invite an inference. Work through these three sentences together. For each, ask pairs what is stated, what can be inferred, and which words support the inference, before you confirm:
"Framton Nuttel endeavoured to say the correct something which should duly flatter the niece of the moment without unduly discounting the aunt that was to come" (paragraph 2). Teacher note: stated, he tries to say something polite. Inferred, he worries about social rules and about offending anyone; the fussy wording ("duly," "unduly") mirrors his fussiness.
"'You may wonder why we keep that window wide open on an October afternoon,' said the niece" (paragraph 12). Teacher note: stated, the window is open and it is October. Not stated, why it is open. Ask students to notice who raises the subject of the window first, and to keep that detail in mind as they read on.
"'It is quite warm for the time of the year,' said Framton" (paragraph 13). Teacher note: stated, Framton offers a simple reason for the open window. Inferred, he is looking for an ordinary explanation, yet his next question ("has that window got anything to do with the tragedy?") shows he is already drawn into her story.
Then each pair writes one inference about Vera on a sticky note, with two quotations from different paragraphs that support it. Collect the notes and keep them: students will test them against the ending in the next phase.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students read the ending of the story on their own and complete two tasks on the handout: (1) find one detail in the ending that is stated explicitly and one that the reader must infer, each with a quotation; (2) return to their sticky note and decide whether the inference about Vera still holds, needs revising or is overturned, citing the paragraph that decides it. The quiz questions on both excerpts work as a check once students finish.
1“I hope you don’t mind the open window,” said Mrs. Sappleton briskly; “my husband and brothers will be home directly from shooting, and they always come in this way. They’ve been out for snipe in the marshes to-day, so they’ll make a fine mess over my poor carpets. So like you men-folk, isn’t it?”
2She rattled on cheerfully about the shooting and the scarcity of birds, and the prospects for duck in the winter. To Framton it was all purely horrible. He made a desperate but only partially successful effort to turn the talk on to a less ghastly topic; he was conscious that his hostess was giving him only a fragment of her attention, and her eyes were constantly straying past him to the open window and the lawn beyond. It was certainly an unfortunate coincidence that he should have paid his visit on this tragic anniversary.
3“The doctors agree in ordering me complete rest, an absence of mental excitement, and avoidance of anything in the nature of violent physical exercise,” announced Framton, who laboured under the tolerably widespread delusion that total strangers and chance acquaintances are hungry for the least detail of one’s ailments and infirmities, their cause and cure. “On the matter of diet they are not so much in agreement,” he continued.
4“No?” said Mrs. Sappleton, in a voice which only replaced a yawn at the last moment. Then she suddenly brightened into alert attention—but not to what Framton was saying.
5“Here they are at last!” she cried. “Just in time for tea, and don’t they look as if they were muddy up to the eyes!”
6Framton shivered slightly and turned towards the niece with a look intended to convey sympathetic comprehension. The child was staring out through the open window with dazed horror in her eyes. In a chill shock of nameless fear Framton swung round in his seat and looked in the same direction.
7In the deepening twilight three figures were walking across the lawn towards the window; they all carried guns under their arms, and one of them was additionally burdened with a white coat hung over his shoulders. A tired brown spaniel kept close at their heels. Noiselessly they neared the house, and then a hoarse young voice chanted out of the dusk: “I said, Bertie, why do you bound?”
8Framton grabbed wildly at his stick and hat; the hall-door, the gravel-drive, and the front gate were dimly-noted stages in his headlong retreat. A cyclist coming along the road had to run into the hedge to avoid an imminent collision.
9“Here we are, my dear,” said the bearer of the white mackintosh, coming in through the window; “fairly muddy, but most of it’s dry. Who was that who bolted out as we came up?”
10“A most extraordinary man, a Mr. Nuttel,” said Mrs. Sappleton; “could only talk about his illnesses, and dashed off without a word of good-bye or apology when you arrived. One would think he had seen a ghost.”
11“I expect it was the spaniel,” said the niece calmly; “he told me he had a horror of dogs. He was once hunted into a cemetery somewhere on the banks of the Ganges by a pack of pariah dogs, and had to spend the night in a newly dug grave with the creatures snarling and grinning and foaming just above him. Enough to make anyone lose their nerve.”
12Romance at short notice was her speciality.
Saki (H. H. Munro), The Open Window (ending) (1914). Public domain (published 1914). Source text.
Closure5 minutes
Exit ticket: (1) In one sentence, explain the difference between citing evidence for an explicit claim and citing evidence for an inference. (2) Write down the sentence from the ending that most changed your reading of the opening, with its paragraph number.
Teacher note on language: in the ending, paragraph 11, Vera's invented tale places Framton "on the banks of the Ganges" among "pariah dogs." This is a British colonial-era image of India as an exotic backdrop, and "pariah" comes from the Tamil name of the Paraiyar, a community long treated as outcaste under the caste system. Keep the words as Saki wrote them, and point out that the story uses them as part of a made-up adventure, not as a description anyone should repeat. The spellings "endeavoured" and "favourite" are British, kept as published.
For homework: students read the sonnet below, which the homework uses.
1Because he was a butcher and thereby Did earn an honest living (and did right), I would not have you think that Reuben Bright Was any more a brute than you or I; 5For when they told him that his wife must die, He stared at them, and shook with grief and fright, And cried like a great baby half that night, And made the women cry to see him cry.
And after she was dead, and he had paid 10The singers and the sexton and the rest, He packed a lot of things that she had made Most mournfully away in an old chest Of hers, and put some chopped-up cedar boughs In with them, and tore down the slaughter-house.
Edwin Arlington Robinson, Reuben Bright (1897; this edition 1905). Public domain (published 1905). Source text.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a sentence frame for citing: "The text states that ___ (paragraph __)." and "This suggests that ___ because ___ (paragraph __)."
Pre-mark paragraphs 2, 9 and 14 of the opening so students look for evidence in three places before rereading everything
Let students sort statements as stated or inferred before they write any sentences of their own
For Advanced Students
Ask students to find a sentence in the opening that reads one way the first time and another way after the ending, and to explain both readings with evidence
Have students write the strongest possible case for a claim they disagree with, then say which single quotation defeats it
Ask students to find a place where the narrator, not a character, tells the reader something directly, and explain why that evidence carries more weight than a character's words
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Check that every claim is labeled correctly: "the text states" for explicit claims and "this suggests" for inferences. Look for exact quotations with paragraph or line numbers, not paraphrases passed off as quotations. In inferences, look for at least two details and a sentence of reasoning that connects them; a single quotation followed by a restatement is not yet thorough. Watch for students who treat a character's words as facts: what a character says is explicit evidence of what the character said, not proof that it is true.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Stated, Inferred or Contradicted?
15 minPairs
Pairs sort eight statement cards about the opening of "The Open Window" into three piles and write the paragraph number that decides each one. The goal is to make students prove every placement with the words of the text.
The Eight Cards
Vera is fifteen years old.
Framton has come to the country to recover his nerves.
Framton's sister stayed at the rectory about four years ago.
Vera and Framton sit in silence for a while before she asks her first question.
Vera is comfortable leading a conversation with an adult stranger.
Framton does not know whether Mrs. Sappleton is married or widowed.
A man lives in the house.
Framton has met Mrs. Sappleton before.
Procedure
Pairs sort the cards into Stated, Inferred and Contradicted, and write a paragraph number and a short quotation on each card
Two pairs join and compare; any disagreement is settled only by reading the quotation aloud
Answer key for the teacher: Stated, cards 1 (paragraph 1), 2 (paragraph 2), 3 (paragraph 6), 4 (paragraph 5, "sufficient silent communion") and 6 (paragraph 9); Inferred, cards 5 (paragraphs 1, 5 and 8: she is "self-possessed" and asks the questions) and 7 (paragraph 9: the room only "seemed to suggest masculine habitation" to Framton); Contradicted, card 8 (paragraph 9: he knows "Only her name and address")
Discussion Questions
Which card was hardest to place, and which words decided it?
Card 7: whose inference is it, Framton's or the narrator's? How can you tell from the wording?
Card 4 is stated, but in unusual words. How does knowing the meaning of "communion" change your answer?
Modification
For students who need support, place cards 1 and 5 as models, one stated and one inferred, and have pairs sort the other six.
2
Evidence Stations
20 minGroups of 3-4
After the class has read the whole story, four claim posters go up around the room. Groups rotate, add the strongest quotation they can find for each claim, and rate the evidence already on the poster. The goal is to practice choosing strong evidence and building a thorough case together.
The Four Claims
Mrs. Sappleton is a cheerful, practical person.
Framton is used to having other people take care of him.
The sister's plan to help Framton goes badly wrong.
The setting, a quiet country house in October, helps the story seem believable.
Procedure
Each group spends four minutes at a poster, writes one quotation with its excerpt and paragraph number on a sticky note, and adds one sentence explaining how it supports the claim
At the next poster, the group first rates each note already there as Strong or Weak and writes why in a few words, then adds its own
After four rotations, each group returns to its first poster and writes a three-sentence thorough answer using the two strongest notes
Discussion Questions
Which poster collected the weakest evidence at first, and why was it hard to support?
Did any note support a different claim better than the one it was posted under?
Which claim needs evidence from both excerpts to be thorough?
3
Evidence Upgrade
15 minIndividual, then pairs
Students repair a weak paragraph so that it cites strong and thorough evidence. Revising a thin answer shows exactly what each part of a strong answer does.
The Weak Paragraph
"Framton's sister is worried about him. She says a lot of things to him before he leaves. This shows that she cares about him and wants him to be okay."
Procedure
On their own, students mark three problems with the paragraph: no quotation, no paragraph number, and an explanation that only repeats the claim
Students rewrite it with two quotations from paragraph 3 of the opening and a sentence that explains what each shows
Pairs swap and check each other's revision against a checklist: claim, exact quotation, paragraph number, explanation, second piece of evidence
Model revision for the teacher: "Framton's sister worries that he will cut himself off. She predicts that he will 'bury yourself down there and not speak to a living soul,' and that his nerves will be 'worse than ever from moping' (paragraph 3). Her solution, 'letters of introduction to all the people I know there,' shows that she believes company will help him."
Discussion Questions
Which change made the paragraph most convincing?
Is "she cares about him" stated or inferred? What would make the inference stronger?
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: How Strong Is the Evidence?
Four answers to the same claim about the opening of "The Open Window," from no evidence to strong and thorough. The claim and quotations match the third worked example in Direct Instruction.
Diagram 2: Explicit Claim or Inference?
A quick test for any claim about a text. An explicit claim needs the exact words; an inference needs several details and a sentence of reasoning, and it must survive the rest of the text.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RL.9-10.1 Homework: Evidence in "Reuben Bright"
Directions: Read Edwin Arlington Robinson's sonnet "Reuben Bright" at the end of the lesson plan (in Closure). Answer in complete sentences. Put every quotation in quotation marks with its line number; the poem has 14 lines.
Part 1: What the Poem Says Explicitly (Problems 1-2)
What does the speaker state directly about Reuben's work and the kind of living it earned him? Quote the words and give the line numbers.
List the three things Reuben does on the night he learns his wife must die. Quote each one with its line number.
Part 2: What the Poem Implies (Problems 3-4)
The speaker says, "I would not have you think that Reuben Bright / Was any more a brute than you or I" (lines 3-4). What can you infer about what some people assume about butchers? Support your inference with one more detail from the poem and explain your reasoning.
The poem never says why Reuben tears down the slaughter-house (line 14). Make an inference about his reason and support it with at least two details from different lines, explaining how each supports it.
Part 3: Strong and Thorough Evidence (Problems 5-6)
Claim: Reuben loved his wife. Compare two pieces of evidence: "he had paid / The singers and the sexton and the rest" (lines 9-10) and "He packed a lot of things that she had made / Most mournfully away" (lines 11-12). Which is stronger evidence for the claim, and why?
Write a paragraph of 5-7 sentences answering: What does the poem suggest about how grief changes Reuben? Use at least three quotations with line numbers. Label one piece of evidence as explicit and one as the basis for an inference.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Explicit Evidence
Exact quotations that state the answer, with line numbers
Accurate paraphrase, or a quotation without its line number
Inaccurate or missing
Inference
A reasonable conclusion the poem does not state, supported by two or more details
A reasonable conclusion supported by one detail
A guess with no support, or a restatement of the text
Reasoning
Each quotation followed by a sentence explaining how it supports the claim
Explanations that mostly repeat the quotation
No explanation
Judging Evidence
Chooses the stronger quotation and explains what makes it stronger
Chooses correctly without a clear reason
Chooses the weaker quotation or gives no answer
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 2-4, 13 and 16 use the opening of "The Open Window"; questions 5-9, 11, 14-15, 17 and 19 use the ending; questions 10, 12, 18 and 20 use both. Both excerpts are in the lesson plan above (Direct Instruction and Independent Practice). Paragraph numbers restart in each excerpt. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which statement best describes an inference?
Answer: B
An inference is a conclusion drawn from details the text gives, and it is not written out in the text itself. Choice A describes an explicit statement, the other kind of claim the standard names. Choice C confuses an inference with an opinion: an inference must be supported by the text, while an opinion about quality is a judgment. Choice D describes a summary, which reports what happens rather than drawing a conclusion.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In the opening, what reason does Vera give for the moor being dangerous in the year the men were lost?
Answer: C
Vera states the reason: "It had been that dreadful wet summer, you know, and places that were safe in other years gave way suddenly without warning" (paragraph 14). Choice A invents snow; nothing in her account mentions it. Choice B invents fog, which the story never mentions. Choice D borrows dogs from the second tale she invents in the ending (paragraph 11).
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Before she tells her story, Vera asks, "Then you know practically nothing about my aunt?" (paragraph 8), and later adds that the tragedy "would be since your sister's time" (paragraph 10). Which inference do these details best support?
Answer: A
Together the two details show Vera learning that Framton knows only the aunt's "name and address" (paragraph 9) and that his sister left before the supposed tragedy, so no one has told him the facts. The ending confirms that she is inventing the story. Choice B has no support: nothing suggests he is early or that the aunt will be angry. Choice C misreads "since your sister's time" as a question about where the sister lives now. Choice D contradicts the text, which twice calls her "self-possessed" (paragraphs 1 and 8).
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Vera in the opening, why is the window kept open?
Answer: D
Vera says: "Poor aunt always thinks that they will come back some day ... and walk in at that window just as they used to do. That is why the window is kept open" (paragraph 14). Choice A is Framton's guess ("It is quite warm for the time of the year," paragraph 13), not Vera's reason. Choice B invents a detail: no fire or smoke is mentioned. Choice C invents a detail: the spaniel was "lost with them," and no barking is mentioned.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In the ending, Mrs. Sappleton's "eyes were constantly straying past him to the open window and the lawn beyond" (paragraph 2). Framton takes this as a sign of grief. What does the rest of the ending show the reader?
Answer: A
She has already said the men "will be home directly from shooting" (paragraph 1), and when they appear she cries, "Here they are at last! ... Just in time for tea" (paragraph 5). Her glances are an ordinary wife's lookout. Choice B is Framton's misreading, which the ending overturns. Choice C invents a storm the text never mentions. Choice D takes the cyclist from later in the scene (paragraph 8); he appears only after Framton runs out.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What does Mrs. Sappleton state explicitly about the open window at the start of the ending?
Answer: B
She says: "my husband and brothers will be home directly from shooting, and they always come in this way" (paragraph 1). Choice A repeats Framton's earlier guess about the weather, not her words. Choice C is Vera's invented version of the aunt's feelings, which Mrs. Sappleton never states. Choice D is not in the text; no one says who opened the window.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which quotation from the ending is the strongest evidence that the three men walking across the lawn are alive and not ghosts?
Answer: C
In choice C one of the men walks in, speaks to his wife, jokes about the mud and asks about the man who ran off: ordinary, living behavior that no ghost story needs. Choice A is weak: "figures" in "twilight" could be anything, which is why Framton is frightened. Choice B actually makes them sound ghostly ("Noiselessly," "out of the dusk"), so it works against the claim. Choice D is weak because the spaniel was part of Vera's ghost story too.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
As the men approach, "The child was staring out through the open window with dazed horror in her eyes" (paragraph 6). In light of the whole story, what is the best explanation of her expression?
Answer: D
Moments later she explains Framton's flight "calmly" with a second invented tale (paragraph 11), and the men are plainly alive. A girl who invented the tragedy knows they were never lost, so her "horror" is a performance for Framton. Choice A takes the look at face value, the same mistake Framton makes. Choice B borrows the carpets from her aunt's chatter in paragraph 1. Choice C invents a fear the text never shows.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The last sentence says, "Romance at short notice was her speciality" (paragraph 12). What kind of evidence is this sentence, and what does it show?
Answer: B
No character speaks this line: the narrator tells the reader outright that making up exciting stories ("romance") quickly ("at short notice") is what Vera does best. It turns the reader's inference that she lied into something the text states. Choice A mislabels the narrator as a character. Choice C is wrong because the line comes from the narrator, not Framton, and Framton has already fled; the story never shows him learning the truth. Choice D reads "romance" in its modern sense of love stories instead of its older sense of invented adventure.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Vera tells the family that Framton "told me he had a horror of dogs" (ending, paragraph 11). Which evidence shows most thoroughly that she has made this up too?
Answer: C
Choice C combines two pieces of evidence from different parts of the story: every line Framton speaks to Vera in the opening is about his sister, the aunt or the window, never dogs, and the ending has already shown that her first story was invented, so she has a record of making things up. Choice A attacks Framton's honesty, which is not the question, and his diet has nothing to do with dogs. Choice B uses a real detail but does not show that Vera invented anything. Choice D misreads Mrs. Sappleton's remark, which is about his fright, not about dogs.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In the ending, paragraph 2 says, "It was certainly an unfortunate coincidence that he should have paid his visit on this tragic anniversary." Is this sentence explicit evidence that the day really is the anniversary of a tragedy?
Answer: A
The sentence reports what Framton believes after hearing Vera's story; the narrator is presenting his thoughts, and the arrival of the men proves there was no tragedy. Choice B trusts the word "certainly" without asking whose certainty it is. Choice C is false: Mrs. Sappleton never mentions an anniversary, only that the men "will be home directly." Choice D is wrong because the sentence is a statement, not a question.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student is asked, "Is Vera calm under pressure?" Which answer uses the most thorough evidence?
Answer: C
Choice C gives two quotations from different moments, one from each excerpt, and says why each moment shows calm: the danger of being caught, and a conversation with a stranger. Choice A is a claim with no evidence. Choice B quotes once but gives no explanation; the quotation alone does not show calm. Choice D cites real words but misreads them: the men are not ghosts and Vera does not tell the truth, so the evidence is inaccurate.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence cites evidence from the opening correctly?
Answer: B
Choice B introduces the quotation in the writer's own words, quotes exactly, gives the paragraph number and explains what the words show. Choice A uses Saki's words without quotation marks or a location, which passes them off as the student's own. Choice C drops a quotation in with no claim and no explanation. Choice D puts quotation marks around words that are not in the text, which is a misquotation.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Mrs. Sappleton says of Framton, "One would think he had seen a ghost" (ending, paragraph 10). What does the reader understand that she does not?
Answer: D
The reader heard Vera's story and saw Framton's "chill shock of nameless fear" (paragraph 6), so the reader knows he thought the men were dead. Mrs. Sappleton means her remark as a figure of speech; it is accidentally true. Choice A exaggerates his "nerve cure" into fainting, which never happens. Choice B is contradicted by the men walking in. Choice C accepts Vera's second invented story as fact.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
In the ending, the narrator says Framton "laboured under the tolerably widespread delusion that total strangers and chance acquaintances are hungry for the least detail of one's ailments and infirmities" (paragraph 3). What can you infer about how the narrator views Framton? Support your answer with this quotation and one more detail from either excerpt.
Model answer: The narrator finds Framton a little ridiculous. Calling his belief a "delusion" and saying strangers are not "hungry" for details of his "ailments" pokes fun at him for talking about his health to people who do not care. His hostess's summary of the visit supports this: she calls him a man who "could only talk about his illnesses" (ending, paragraph 10), which shows how his favorite subject looks to other people. Rubric: 2 points for a reasonable inference about the narrator's attitude supported by the quotation and a second accurate detail, with reasoning; 1 point for the inference with only one piece of evidence; 0 points for a paraphrase with no inference.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
In the opening, as Vera tells the tragedy, "the child's voice lost its self-possessed note and became falteringly human" (paragraph 14). Explain what a first-time reader would infer from this detail, and how the ending changes that inference. Cite the ending.
Model answer: On a first reading, the faltering voice suggests real grief: the calm girl is moved by her family's loss, which makes the story more believable. After the ending, the same detail supports a different inference: Vera is performing. The men she called dead walk in alive (ending, paragraph 9), and she tells her second tale "calmly" (ending, paragraph 11), so the break in her voice was part of the act. Rubric: 2 points for both inferences with a quotation from the ending that overturns the first; 1 point for one inference only, or both without evidence from the ending; 0 points otherwise.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Name one thing the story states explicitly about what Framton sees just before he runs away, and one thing the reader must infer about why Vera tells her stories. Cite evidence for each.
Model answer: Explicit: the story states what Framton sees before he runs: "three figures were walking across the lawn towards the window" with guns, a white coat and a "tired brown spaniel" (ending, paragraph 7), which matches Vera's description of the lost men. Inferred: Vera's motive is never stated, but she seems to enjoy fooling adults for her own amusement. She tells her second story "calmly" (ending, paragraph 11), and she tells both tales to listeners who have no way to check them, which suggests a game she plays for fun rather than a reason like revenge. Rubric: 2 points for one explicit detail and one labeled inference, each with an accurate quotation; 1 point if one is missing or mislabeled; 0 points otherwise.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Write a claim about why Framton believes Vera's story so easily, and support it with two pieces of evidence from different excerpts.
Model answer: Framton believes Vera because his nerves and his ignorance of the family leave him no way to test her story. He knows "Only her name and address" (opening, paragraph 9), so he cannot check the facts. And he is already on edge: his hostess's cheerful talk of shooting strikes him as "purely horrible" (ending, paragraph 2), and when the men appear he feels "a chill shock of nameless fear" (ending, paragraph 6). Rubric: 2 points for a clear claim and two accurate quotations from different excerpts, each explained; 1 point for one piece of evidence or no explanation; 0 points for no claim or no evidence.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
A student claims, "Mrs. Sappleton is cruel to her guest," and cites her answer to his talk about his health, "'No?' said Mrs. Sappleton, in a voice which only replaced a yawn at the last moment" (ending, paragraph 4). Is this strong evidence for the claim? Explain, and say what the quotation does support.
Model answer: It is weak evidence for cruelty. The quotation shows that she is bored by his account of his diet and nearly yawns, but she hides the yawn, which is polite, not cruel. It does support a smaller claim: she is not interested in his illnesses and is paying attention elsewhere, as the next sentence shows ("but not to what Framton was saying"). Rubric: 2 points for judging the evidence weak for cruelty, explaining why, and naming a claim it does support; 1 point for judging it weak without a clear reason; 0 points for accepting it as strong evidence of cruelty.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
In the opening, Vera describes the husband "with his white waterproof coat over his arm" and Ronnie "singing 'Bertie, why do you bound?'" (paragraph 14). In the ending, the men return carrying "a white coat" and a voice sings "I said, Bertie, why do you bound?" (paragraph 7). What can you infer from this match about how Vera builds her story? Cite both excerpts.
Model answer: Vera builds her lie out of true details. She knows the men really will come home through the window with the coat and the song, because that is what they always do, so she places those details in her story in advance. When the real men appear with "a white coat hung over his shoulders" (ending, paragraph 7) and sing the same line, the true details seem to prove her ghost story. The inference is that her lie works because it is made mostly of facts. Rubric: 2 points for the inference with accurate quotations from both excerpts and an explanation of why true details make the lie convincing; 1 point for noticing the match without explaining it; 0 points otherwise.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RL.9-10.1 mean?
It means students in grades 9-10 must support what they say about a literary text with evidence from it. The standard covers two kinds of claims: what the text "says explicitly" and "inferences drawn from the text." For both, the evidence must be "strong and thorough": exact words that bear directly on the claim, enough of them to carry it, each explained.
What is the difference between explicit and inferred meaning?
Explicit meaning is stated in the words of the text; inferred meaning is a conclusion the words support without stating it. "Vera is fifteen" is explicit in "The Open Window." A claim about why Vera tells her story is an inference, because the story never says. Students cite exact words for both, but an inference also needs a sentence of reasoning that links the details to the conclusion.
What makes textual evidence "strong and thorough"?
Strong evidence bears directly on the claim; thorough evidence is enough of it, drawn from more than one place and explained. A quotation that is only on the same topic is weak. One strong quotation may be enough for a simple explicit claim, but an inference usually needs two or more details, and a thorough answer also checks that nothing elsewhere in the text contradicts it.
How is RL.9-10.1 different from RL.8.1?
RL.8.1 asks students to cite "the textual evidence that most strongly supports" an analysis, so the focus is on choosing the best evidence. RL.9-10.1 asks for evidence that is "strong and thorough," which adds quantity and range: several pieces, from across the text, with the reasoning spelled out. Grades 9-10 texts are also longer and more complex.
How is RL.9-10.1 different from RL.11-12.1?
The wording is the same except for one addition: RL.11-12.1 adds "including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain." In grades 11-12, students must also recognize where a text deliberately refuses to settle a question, and cite evidence for that uncertainty instead of forcing one answer.
How many quotations should a student use?
There is no fixed number; use enough to carry the claim, with each one explained. A simple explicit claim may need one exact quotation. An inference or a claim about a whole story usually needs two or three details from different places. Piling up quotations without explaining them does not make an answer thorough.
Should students quote or paraphrase?
Quote when the exact words matter, and paraphrase when only the event matters. Words like "self-possessed" or "sufficient silent communion" carry the meaning, so they should be quoted exactly. A plot event can be paraphrased with a paragraph number. Words in quotation marks must match the text exactly; anything else is a misquotation.
How should students cite paragraph or line numbers?
Put the number in parentheses after the quotation: (paragraph 14) for prose, (lines 3-4) for poetry, with a slash between lines of poetry inside the quotation. When a lesson uses two excerpts whose numbering restarts, name the excerpt too, for example (ending, paragraph 7). The goal is that a reader can find the words in seconds.
How is RL.9-10.1 usually assessed?
Tests often pair a question about meaning with a second question asking which quotation best supports the answer, and constructed responses ask students to make a claim and support it with evidence. Classroom essays assess it in every paragraph that quotes a text. Practicing both kinds of item, like the quiz on this page, prepares students for either.
Is an inference just a guess?
No: an inference is a conclusion the text supports, and a guess is not tied to evidence. If a student cannot point to the details that led to a conclusion, it is a guess. A good inference can still turn out to be wrong when later evidence contradicts it, as readers of "The Open Window" discover, so strong readers test their inferences against the whole text.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to RL.9-10.1: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RL.8.1Prerequisite
Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of a text
Lesson coming soon
Alongside
RI.9-10.1Parallel
Cite strong and thorough evidence for what an informational text says and implies
Lesson coming soon
RL.9-10.3Parallel
Analyze how complex characters develop, interact and advance the plot or theme
Lesson coming soon
W.9-10.9Parallel
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis
Lesson coming soon
After this lesson
RL.11-12.1Next step
Cite strong and thorough evidence, including where the text leaves matters uncertain