SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

RL.11-12.1Common CoreELAReading LiteratureGrades 11-12

RL.11-12.1: Textual Evidence, Inference and Where a Text Leaves Matters Uncertain

In plain English: RL.11-12.1 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 11-12 to cite strong and thorough textual evidence for what a literary text says explicitly and for inferences drawn from it, and to determine where the text leaves matters uncertain. It adds one demand to the grades 9-10 standard: recognizing deliberate ambiguity and supporting that judgment with evidence.

Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literature · Cluster: Key Ideas and Details · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

60-70 min

Overview

Students sort every claim they make about a text into three kinds: what the text settles (says explicitly), what it suggests (supports an inference) and what it leaves open. The third kind is what this standard adds in grades 11-12: "determining where the text leaves matters uncertain," and supporting that judgment with evidence instead of forcing one answer. The anchor text is Nathaniel Hawthorne's "The Minister's Black Veil" (1836), in which a village minister appears one Sunday with a black veil over his face and never explains it. The tale suits the standard because it is built on a withheld explanation: the narrator reports rumors, questions and doubtful witnesses, and lets the reader weigh them.

Students work through three excerpts in order: the congregation after the first service, the funeral that afternoon, and the scene in which Hooper's betrothed, Elizabeth, asks him to lift the veil. The homework applies the same three questions to Emily Dickinson's "Because I could not stop for Death," as first printed in 1890.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Support a claim about what a text says explicitly with exact, located quotations
  • Support an inference with several details from different parts of a text and explain the reasoning that links them
  • Determine where a text leaves a matter uncertain, and cite the words that open the question and the evidence on each side
  • Distinguish a narrator's statements from reported rumors, questions, ironic remarks and single witnesses

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Citing strong and thorough evidence for explicit meaning and inferences RL.9-10.1
  • Telling a narrator's voice apart from characters' dialogue
  • Recognizing verbal irony, where a speaker says one thing and means another
  • Integrating quotations into their own sentences with paragraph or line numbers

Lesson Procedure

60-70 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5-10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "A classmate starts wearing sunglasses indoors every day and will not say why. List three explanations people might give. For each, what would count as proof? Is there any explanation you could never prove or rule out?"

    Collect explanations and ask which ones rest on evidence and which on gossip. Then ask what a fair observer could honestly say. Guide students to a three-part answer: what we know (the sunglasses), what we might reasonably suspect, and what we cannot tell. Tell students that today's story is built exactly this way, and that the standard asks them to cite evidence for all three parts.

  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Set the scene. Earlier that Sunday, the Reverend Mr. Hooper, a mild and respected minister of about thirty, came to church with a veil of black crape (a thin, crinkled fabric) covering his face above the mouth, and preached on "secret sin." The excerpt begins as the service ends.

    Three kinds of claim.

    • Settled (explicit): the text states it. Cite the exact words.
    • Suggested (inference): the text supports it without stating it. Cite several details and explain how they add up.
    • Left open (uncertain): the text raises a question and deliberately does not answer it, or gives evidence for rival answers. Cite the words that raise the question, the evidence on each side and the gap.

    Watch who is speaking. Hawthorne's narrator often reports what villagers said, asks questions instead of answering them, or says something he does not mean. A character's opinion or a rumor is evidence of what people believed, not of what is true. Short glossary: sagacious (claiming wisdom), vagary (odd whim), wont (in the habit of), settlement (his arrival as the village's minister).

    At the close of the services the people hurried out with indecorous confusion, eager to communicate their pent-up amazement, and conscious of lighter spirits the moment they lost sight of the black veil. Some gathered in little circles, huddled closely together, with their mouths all whispering in the centre; some went homeward alone, wrapped in silent meditation; some talked loudly and profaned the Sabbath-day with ostentatious laughter. A few shook their sagacious heads, intimating that they could penetrate the mystery, while one or two affirmed that there was no mystery at all, but only that Mr. Hooper’s eyes were so weakened by the midnight lamp as to require a shade.

    After a brief interval forth came good Mr. Hooper also, in the rear of his flock. Turning his veiled face from one group to another, he paid due reverence to the hoary heads, saluted the middle-aged with kind dignity as their friend and spiritual guide, greeted the young with mingled authority and love, and laid his hands on the little children’s heads to bless them. Such was always his custom on the Sabbath-day. Strange and bewildered looks repaid him for his courtesy. None, as on former occasions, aspired to the honor of walking by their pastor’s side. Old Squire Saunders—doubtless by an accidental lapse of memory—neglected to invite Mr. Hooper to his table, where the good clergyman had been wont to bless the food almost every Sunday since his settlement. He returned, therefore, to the parsonage, and at the moment of closing the door was observed to look back upon the people, all of whom had their eyes fixed upon the minister. A sad smile gleamed faintly from beneath the black veil and flickered about his mouth, glimmering as he disappeared.

    “How strange,” said a lady, “that a simple black veil, such as any woman might wear on her bonnet, should become such a terrible thing on Mr. Hooper’s face!”

    “Something must surely be amiss with Mr. Hooper’s intellects,” observed her husband, the physician of the village. “But the strangest part of the affair is the effect of this vagary even on a sober-minded man like myself. The black veil, though it covers only our pastor’s face, throws its influence over his whole person and makes him ghost-like from head to foot. Do you not feel it so?”

    “Truly do I,” replied the lady; “and I would not be alone with him for the world. I wonder he is not afraid to be alone with himself.”

    “Men sometimes are so,” said her husband.

    Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Minister's Black Veil (first excerpt: after the Sunday service) (1836; this edition 1889). Public domain (published 1889). Source text.
    • Settled: the text states it

      What does paragraph 2 state about Mr. Hooper's conduct toward his people after the service?

      Result: He greets them as always: he "paid due reverence to the hoary heads" and "laid his hands on the little children's heads to bless them." The next sentence settles the point: "Such was always his custom on the Sabbath-day." What has changed is the veil, not his manners.

    • Suggested: the text supports an inference

      Paragraph 1 says the people were "conscious of lighter spirits the moment they lost sight of the black veil." What can a reader infer?

      Result: The veil weighed on them for the whole service, since relief begins exactly when it is out of sight. The "little circles, huddled closely together" with "mouths all whispering" support this: they need to say out of its presence what they could not say in it.

    • Left open: the text does not decide

      "A few shook their sagacious heads, intimating that they could penetrate the mystery, while one or two affirmed that there was no mystery at all" (paragraph 1). Does the narrator settle what the veil means?

      Result: No. He reports two opposite views and endorses neither. The few only hint ("intimating") that they understand and never say what; the one or two offer a dull practical reason. The meaning of the veil is left open on purpose, and this sentence is the evidence.

    • Strong and thorough

      Claim: the veil unsettles even people who think of themselves as rational. Support it thoroughly from paragraphs 4-5.

      Result: The village physician admits "the effect of this vagary even on a sober-minded man like myself" and asks his wife, "Do you not feel it so?" (paragraph 4). She answers, "I would not be alone with him for the world" (paragraph 5). Two educated witnesses, one who calls himself "sober-minded," both feel a fear they cannot explain.

    Model the sentence. Write on the board: "The text states ___ (paragraph __). It suggests ___, because ___ and ___ (paragraphs __ and __). It leaves open ___: on one side ___; on the other ___; and the text never ___." Students will use this frame through the rest of the lesson.

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Read the second excerpt aloud. Pairs mark it in three colors: settled, suggested and left open. Model these three sentences with the class first, asking pairs to classify each before you confirm:

    The afternoon service was attended with similar circumstances. At its conclusion the bell tolled for the funeral of a young lady. The relatives and friends were assembled in the house and the more distant acquaintances stood about the door, speaking of the good qualities of the deceased, when their talk was interrupted by the appearance of Mr. Hooper, still covered with his black veil. It was now an appropriate emblem. The clergyman stepped into the room where the corpse was laid, and bent over the coffin to take a last farewell of his deceased parishioner. As he stooped the veil hung straight down from his forehead, so that, if her eye-lids had not been closed for ever, the dead maiden might have seen his face. Could Mr. Hooper be fearful of her glance, that he so hastily caught back the black veil? A person who watched the interview between the dead and living scrupled not to affirm that at the instant when the clergyman’s features were disclosed the corpse had slightly shuddered, rustling the shroud and muslin cap, though the countenance retained the composure of death. A superstitious old woman was the only witness of this prodigy.

    From the coffin Mr. Hooper passed into the chamber of the mourners, and thence to the head of the staircase, to make the funeral prayer. It was a tender and heart-dissolving prayer, full of sorrow, yet so imbued with celestial hopes that the music of a heavenly harp swept by the fingers of the dead seemed faintly to be heard among the saddest accents of the minister. The people trembled, though they but darkly understood him, when he prayed that they and himself, and all of mortal race, might be ready, as he trusted this young maiden had been, for the dreadful hour that should snatch the veil from their faces. The bearers went heavily forth and the mourners followed, saddening all the street, with the dead before them and Mr. Hooper in his black veil behind.

    “Why do you look back?” said one in the procession to his partner.

    “I had a fancy,” replied she, “that the minister and the maiden’s spirit were walking hand in hand.”

    “And so had I at the same moment,” said the other.

    Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Minister's Black Veil (second excerpt: the funeral) (1836; this edition 1889). Public domain (published 1889). Source text.
    1. "The relatives and friends were assembled in the house and the more distant acquaintances stood about the door, speaking of the good qualities of the deceased" (paragraph 1). Teacher note: settled. The narrator states who was present and what they were doing; nothing here is reported secondhand or hedged.
    2. "It was a tender and heart-dissolving prayer, full of sorrow, yet so imbued with celestial hopes" (paragraph 2). Teacher note: settled as a description, and it supports an inference. The narrator states that the prayer was tender and hopeful, which suggests that Hooper is still the gentle minister of the morning, whatever the veil means.
    3. "The people trembled, though they but darkly understood him" (paragraph 2). Teacher note: settled, the people trembled and understood him only partly. Suggested, the prayer touched a fear they could not put into words; the word "darkly" also echoes the dark veil. Ask pairs which part of the sentence they could prove and which they are reading into it.

    Pairs then classify every remaining sentence of the excerpt on their own, and mark each "left open" sentence with the words that keep it open. Compare two pairs' charts before moving on.

  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Some weeks later, Elizabeth, the woman Hooper is engaged to marry, is the only person in the village who asks him directly about the veil. Students read the third excerpt on their own and complete the three-column chart: at least two sentences in each column, with paragraph numbers. Then they write one paragraph, using the board frame, on the question "What does Elizabeth learn about the veil?" The quiz questions on all three excerpts work as a check once students finish.

    “No,” said she, aloud, and smiling, “there is nothing terrible in this piece of crape, except that it hides a face which I am always glad to look upon. Come, good sir; let the sun shine from behind the cloud. First lay aside your black veil, then tell me why you put it on.”

    Mr. Hooper’s smile glimmered faintly.

    “There is an hour to come,” said he, “when all of us shall cast aside our veils. Take it not amiss, beloved friend, if I wear this piece of crape till then.”

    “Your words are a mystery too,” returned the young lady. “Take away the veil from them, at least.”

    “Elizabeth, I will,” said he, “so far as my vow may suffer me. Know, then, this veil is a type and a symbol, and I am bound to wear it ever, both in light and darkness, in solitude and before the gaze of multitudes, and as with strangers, so with my familiar friends. No mortal eye will see it withdrawn. This dismal shade must separate me from the world; even you, Elizabeth, can never come behind it.”

    “What grievous affliction hath befallen you,” she earnestly inquired, “that you should thus darken your eyes for ever?”

    “If it be a sign of mourning,” replied Mr. Hooper, “I, perhaps, like most other mortals, have sorrows dark enough to be typified by a black veil.”

    “But what if the world will not believe that it is the type of an innocent sorrow?” urged Elizabeth. “Beloved and respected as you are, there may be whispers that you hide your face under the consciousness of secret sin. For the sake of your holy office do away this scandal.”

    The color rose into her cheeks as she intimated the nature of the rumors that were already abroad in the village. But Mr. Hooper’s mildness did not forsake him. He even smiled again—that same sad smile which always appeared like a faint glimmering of light proceeding from the obscurity beneath the veil.

    “If I hide my face for sorrow, there is cause enough,” he merely replied; “and if I cover it for secret sin, what mortal might not do the same?” And with this gentle but unconquerable obstinacy did he resist all her entreaties.

    Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Minister's Black Veil (third excerpt: Elizabeth asks) (1836; this edition 1889). Public domain (published 1889). Source text.
  5. Closure5-10 minutes

    Exit ticket: (1) Name one matter the three excerpts leave uncertain, and quote the words that keep it open. (2) In one sentence, explain why "the text leaves this uncertain" is a claim that needs evidence, not a way to avoid answering.

    Teacher note on language: Hawthorne writes in a deliberately old-fashioned style for a story set in colonial New England: "hath," "wont," "hoary heads" (white-haired elders) and "Sabbath-day" are kept as published. The tale touches on death and a funeral; preview it with any student who has had a recent loss. The Dickinson poem for homework is printed as its first editors published it in 1890, with their title and punctuation; later editions restore Dickinson's own wording and dashes, so students who find another version online should expect differences.

    For homework: students read the poem below, which the homework uses.

    Because I could not stop for Death,
    He kindly stopped for me;
    The carriage held but just ourselves
    And Immortality.

    We slowly drove, he knew no haste,
    And I had put away
    My labor, and my leisure too,
    For his civility.

    We passed the school where children played,
    Their lessons scarcely done;
    We passed the fields of gazing grain,
    We passed the setting sun.

    We paused before a house that seemed
    A swelling of the ground;
    The roof was scarcely visible,
    The cornice but a mound.

    Since then 't is centuries; but each
    Feels shorter than the day
    I first surmised the horses' heads
    Were toward eternity.

    Emily Dickinson, The Chariot ("Because I could not stop for Death") (1890). Public domain (published 1890). Source text.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give the three-column chart with one sentence already placed in each column from the first excerpt
  • Provide a list of signal words to look for: seemed, perhaps, doubtless, if, it was said, a question mark in the narrator's voice
  • Let students answer "Who says so?" for each sentence before they decide whether it is settled

For Advanced Students

  • Ask students to read the complete tale and decide whether the ending settles anything the excerpts leave open, citing the final paragraphs
  • Have students compare the tale with Hawthorne's own footnote to its subtitle, "A Parable," and explain why the footnote explains a different man's veil but not Hooper's
  • Ask students to write a paragraph arguing that one reading of the veil is stronger than another while still stating what the text leaves uncertain

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Check that students label claims correctly: "the text states," "this suggests" and "the text leaves open." Look for the difference between a rumor and a fact: a strong answer says "the villagers believe" rather than "Hooper is mad." When students call something uncertain, check that they quote the words that open the question and give evidence on more than one side; "it is unclear" with no quotation is not yet analysis. Also watch for the opposite error, calling a settled point uncertain: the veil's meaning is open, but where he wears it and how the village reacts are stated.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Rumor Court

20 minGroups of 3-4

Each group puts five explanations of the veil on trial. For each one, the group collects the evidence for and against it from the three excerpts and decides whether the text proves it, supports it, leaves it possible or rules it out. The goal is to separate what the villagers believe from what the text establishes.

The Five Explanation Cards

  • His eyes are weak and need a shade.
  • Something is wrong with his mind.
  • He is mourning a loss.
  • He is hiding a secret sin.
  • The veil is a sign that everyone hides something.

Procedure

  • For each card, the group writes the strongest quotation for it and the strongest quotation against it, with excerpt and paragraph numbers
  • The group gives each card one verdict: Proved, Supported, Possible or Ruled out, and writes one sentence of reasoning
  • Groups post their verdicts; where two groups disagree, each reads its best quotation aloud and the class decides which quotation is stronger
  • Teacher guidance: the first two cards come from villagers whose confidence the narrator undercuts, and each of the last three has some support; push groups to explain the difference between Supported and Proved

Discussion Questions

  • Did any card earn the verdict Proved? What would the text have to say for it to be proved?
  • Which card was hardest to rule out, and why?
  • What does it tell you about the tale that the villagers offer so many explanations and Hooper offers so little?

Modification

For students who need support, give each group only three cards and one excerpt per card, and supply one quotation for each card to start from.

2

Hedge Hunt

15 minPairs

Pairs search all three excerpts for the words and devices Hawthorne uses to avoid settling a question, and sort them by type. The goal is to see that uncertainty in a text is built from specific words that can be quoted.

Four Types of Hedge

  • The narrator says something he may not mean (irony)
  • A character's opinion, or a rumor, reported without comment
  • The narrator declines to decide: a question, "seemed," "perhaps," "if"
  • A doubtful or single witness

Procedure

  • Model one example: in the first excerpt, a few villagers are "intimating that they could penetrate the mystery" (paragraph 1); the word "intimating" means they only hint, so this is a claim reported without proof (type 2)
  • Pairs find at least six more hedges, at least one from each excerpt, and write each on the chart with its type
  • For their two best examples, pairs write one sentence each explaining what question the hedge keeps open

Discussion Questions

  • Which type of hedge appears most often in your chart, and what might that say about how the tale is told?
  • Did you find a sentence that looked hedged but actually settles something?
  • How would the tale change if the narrator simply told us why Hooper wears the veil?
3

Fill the Gap, Then Test It

15 minIndividual, then pairs

Students write the scene Hawthorne never wrote, in which Hooper explains the veil, and then test it against the text. The goal is to show that any explanation must fit every detail, and to see what the gap in the tale does.

Procedure

  • On their own, students write a 100-150 word scene in which Hooper explains the veil to Elizabeth
  • Pairs swap scenes and list every detail in the three excerpts that the scene contradicts or cannot account for, with paragraph numbers
  • Each pair writes two sentences: what the invented explanation gains, and what the tale gains by leaving the explanation out

Discussion Questions

  • Did any scene fit every detail? If so, does that make it the right explanation?
  • What happens to the villagers' reactions, and to the reader's, once the veil is explained?

Variation

Instead of writing a scene, students write the explanation as the village gossip would tell it, then test it the same way.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: Settled, Suggested or Left Open?

Three kinds of claim about the first excerpt The text settles it (explicit) "Such was always his custom on the Sabbath-day" (para. 2) Evidence needed: the exact words that state it Worked example 1 The text suggests it (inference) "conscious of lighter spirits the moment they lost sight" (para. 1) Evidence needed: several details and the reasoning that links them Worked example 2 The text leaves it open (uncertain) "one or two affirmed that there was no mystery at all" (para. 1) Evidence needed: the words on each side, and the gap the text leaves Worked example 3
The three kinds of claim the standard names, each with an example from the first excerpt (the worked examples in Direct Instruction) and the evidence it needs.

Diagram 2: Four Moves for Writing About Uncertainty

Writing about a matter the text leaves uncertain 1. Name the open question What does the text refuse to settle? 2. Evidence one way Quote what supports one answer 3. Evidence the other way Quote what supports a rival answer 4. Explain the gap What is withheld, and what the gap does Not "the text is confusing," and not one answer forced on it: a claim about what the text settles, what it suggests and what it holds back.
A paragraph that says a text leaves a matter uncertain still makes a claim, and it needs evidence on each side plus an explanation of what the text holds back.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

RL.11-12.1 Homework: Settled, Suggested and Open in Dickinson

Directions: Read Emily Dickinson's "Because I could not stop for Death" (titled "The Chariot" by its first editors) at the end of the lesson plan (in Closure). Answer in complete sentences. Quote exactly and give line numbers; the poem has 20 lines.

Part 1: What the Poem Settles (Problems 1-2)

  1. What does the speaker state about why she rides in the carriage, who is in it, and what she gave up to go? Quote the words with their line numbers (lines 1-8).
  2. List the three things the carriage passes in the third stanza. Quote each one with its line number.

Part 2: What the Poem Suggests (Problems 3-4)

  1. The carriage pauses "before a house that seemed / A swelling of the ground" (lines 13-14). What does a reader infer this house is? Support your inference with two details from the stanza and explain how each supports it.
  2. Death "kindly stopped" (line 2), "knew no haste" (line 5) and is praised for "his civility" (line 8). What can you infer about the speaker's attitude toward Death? Cite one more detail from the poem that supports or complicates your inference.

Part 3: What the Poem Leaves Open (Problems 5-6)

  1. Name one matter the poem leaves uncertain, such as where the ride ends or how the speaker feels now. Quote the words that leave it open, and explain why they do not settle it.
  2. Write a paragraph of 6-8 sentences answering: What does the speaker know, what does she only guess, and what does the poem refuse to settle? Use at least three quotations with line numbers, and label each one settled, suggested or left open.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Settled EvidenceExact quotations that state the answer, with line numbersAccurate paraphrase, or a quotation without its line numberInaccurate or missing
InferenceA conclusion the poem supports but does not state, backed by two or more details with reasoningA reasonable conclusion backed by one detailA guess, or a restatement of the text
UncertaintyNames what is left open, quotes the words that keep it open and explains why they doNames an open question without quoting the words that keep it openCalls a settled point uncertain, or forces one answer
Labeling and CitationEvery quotation labeled correctly and cited exactlyOne mislabeled or misquoted itemSeveral errors, or no labels

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 2-4 and 16 use the first excerpt of "The Minister's Black Veil" (Direct Instruction), questions 5-10 and 18 the second (Guided Practice), and questions 11-15, 17 and 19 the third (Independent Practice); question 20 uses all three. Paragraph numbers restart in each excerpt. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    RL.11-12.1 asks students to determine "where the text leaves matters uncertain." What does that require?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In the first excerpt, what does paragraph 2 say Mr. Hooper did at the moment of closing the parsonage door?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    "Old Squire Saunders, doubtless by an accidental lapse of memory, neglected to invite Mr. Hooper to his table" (first excerpt, paragraph 2; the original sets the middle phrase off with dashes). What does the word "doubtless" most likely signal?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The lady says, "I wonder he is not afraid to be alone with himself," and her husband answers, "Men sometimes are so" (first excerpt, paragraphs 5-6). What does the husband's reply suggest, and what does it leave open?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    "A person who watched the interview between the dead and living scrupled not to affirm that ... the corpse had slightly shuddered" (second excerpt, paragraph 1). What does "scrupled not to affirm" mean here?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The same paragraph ends, "A superstitious old woman was the only witness of this prodigy." How does this sentence affect the claim that the corpse shuddered?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    "Could Mr. Hooper be fearful of her glance, that he so hastily caught back the black veil?" (second excerpt, paragraph 1). What does the narrator do in this sentence?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    At the funeral the narrator says of the veil, "It was now an appropriate emblem" (second excerpt, paragraph 1). Why "now"?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In his funeral prayer, Hooper prays that all "might be ready ... for the dreadful hour that should snatch the veil from their faces" (second excerpt, paragraph 2). What does "the dreadful hour" most likely refer to?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which of these does the second excerpt present as fact, not as a question, a report or a fancy?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In the third excerpt, what does Mr. Hooper state explicitly about how he will wear the veil?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Hooper answers Elizabeth: "If I hide my face for sorrow, there is cause enough ... and if I cover it for secret sin, what mortal might not do the same?" (third excerpt, paragraph 10). What does this answer leave uncertain?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Elizabeth warns, "there may be whispers that you hide your face under the consciousness of secret sin. For the sake of your holy office do away this scandal" (third excerpt, paragraph 8). Which inference about Elizabeth is best supported?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    "Know, then, this veil is a type and a symbol" (third excerpt, paragraph 5). What does Hooper state here, and what does he hold back?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which quotation from the third excerpt is the strongest evidence for the claim that wearing the veil costs Hooper something he values?

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A lady says it is strange "that a simple black veil, such as any woman might wear on her bonnet, should become such a terrible thing on Mr. Hooper's face!" (first excerpt, paragraph 3). What does her remark suggest about the veil's power?

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    From the third excerpt, paragraphs 1 and 4, what can you infer about Elizabeth's relationship with Hooper and her way of dealing with the veil? Cite at least two details and explain the reasoning.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    After the funeral, one mourner asks another, "Why do you look back?" and learns they both had "a fancy ... that the minister and the maiden's spirit were walking hand in hand" (second excerpt, paragraphs 3-5). What does the text settle here, and what does it leave uncertain? Is the agreement of two mourners strong evidence?

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    In the third excerpt, Hooper's "smile glimmered faintly" (paragraph 2), and later he smiled "that same sad smile which always appeared like a faint glimmering of light proceeding from the obscurity beneath the veil" (paragraph 9). What can a reader infer from the smile, and what does it leave uncertain?

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    The narrator calls the minister "good Mr. Hooper" (first excerpt, paragraph 2). Using evidence from at least two excerpts, write a paragraph on whether the text settles that Hooper is good. Include evidence on both sides and say what, if anything, the text leaves uncertain.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does RL.11-12.1 mean?

It means students in grades 11-12 must support their reading of a literary text with strong and thorough evidence, and must also recognize where the text deliberately leaves a question open. The standard names three kinds of claim: what the text "says explicitly," "inferences drawn from the text," and "where the text leaves matters uncertain." Each one needs evidence.

What does "where the text leaves matters uncertain" mean?

It means places where a text raises a question and chooses not to answer it, or gives evidence for rival answers without deciding. In "The Minister's Black Veil," the reason for the veil is never given; villagers guess, the narrator asks questions, and Hooper refuses to explain. A strong reader identifies the open question and quotes the words that keep it open.

How is RL.11-12.1 different from RL.9-10.1?

The two standards are word for word the same until RL.11-12.1 adds "including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain." In grades 9-10, students cite evidence for what a text states and implies. In grades 11-12, they must also judge when the evidence does not settle a question and say so, with quotations, instead of forcing one answer.

Isn't saying "the text is uncertain" just a way to avoid answering?

No: done well, it is a claim that needs more evidence, not less. A student must name exactly what is left open, quote the words that open it, and give the evidence on each side. "It's unclear" with no quotation avoids the question; "the villagers offer rival explanations and the narrator endorses none" answers it.

How do you cite evidence for something a text does not say?

Quote the words that raise the question and the words that stop short of answering it. Useful signals are questions in the narrator's voice (earlier in the tale he asks whether Hooper is hiding his face from God as he prays, and never answers), hedges such as "seemed" or "perhaps," and claims reported without proof. The absence itself can be stated: "the narrator never says what the veil covers."

Is ambiguity the same as confusing writing?

No. Confusing writing leaves the reader unsure what is happening; deliberate ambiguity makes the events clear and leaves their meaning open. In Hawthorne's tale, where Hooper goes, what he says and how people react are all stated plainly. Only the reason for the veil is withheld, and the narrator draws attention to that gap again and again.

Does Hawthorne ever explain the veil?

Not inside the tale. On his deathbed Hooper declares that he sees a black veil on every face around him, which widens the veil's meaning to everyone without naming his own reason, and he is buried still veiled. In a footnote to the subtitle "A Parable," Hawthorne mentions a real minister, Joseph Moody of York, Maine, who hid his face after accidentally killing a friend, and adds that in Moody's case the veil meant something different.

Can outside information settle what a text leaves uncertain?

It can inform a reading, but it cannot change what the text itself settles. Knowing that the tale is set in colonial New England, where the minister was at the center of village life, helps explain why one man's veil troubles a whole village. But a biography, a study guide or another reader's interpretation does not make an open question closed; the claim about uncertainty is a claim about the words on the page.

How is RL.11-12.1 usually assessed?

Tests often pair a question about meaning with a follow-up asking which quotation best supports the answer, and some ask which statement a passage leaves unresolved. In essays, it is assessed whenever students must support an interpretation and address evidence that points another way. The quiz on this page mixes both kinds of question.

What texts work well for teaching RL.11-12.1?

Texts that are clear about events but withhold a key explanation. Besides Hawthorne's tale, good choices include Dickinson's poems, Henry James's The Turn of the Screw, Frost's "The Road Not Taken" and many short stories with open endings. Short works are best at first, because students can check every relevant sentence before deciding that a question is truly left open.