SVHS Website Header

My Cart

D2.His.6.6-8C3 FrameworkSocial StudiesHistoryGrades 6-8

D2.His.6.6-8: How Perspectives Shape the Information in Sources

In plain English: D2.His.6.6-8 is the C3 Framework history indicator for grades 6-8 that asks students to analyze how people's perspectives influenced what information is available in the historical sources they created. Students ask who made a source, where they stood, what job or stake they had, and then explain what the source includes and leaves out because of it.

Analyze how people's perspectives influenced what information is available in the historical sources they created.

C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 2: Applying Disciplinary Concepts and Tools · Discipline: History · Perspectives · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

60-70 min

Overview

Students analyze how the people who created a set of sources shaped what those sources tell us. The case is the woman suffrage parade in Washington, D.C., on March 3, 1913, the day before a new President was inaugurated. Crowds pressed into the marchers on Pennsylvania Avenue, and the next day the Senate ordered an investigation of the police. Students read the police superintendent's written statement, a marcher's testimony to the Senate subcommittee, and three reports by police officers in charge of different stretches of the route.

For every source, students ask the same questions: who made it, where they were, what their job was, who they were writing for and what they had at stake. Then they explain how those things affected what the source includes and what it leaves out. The sources disagree, and the lesson does not ask students to decide who was honest. It asks them to explain why each source contains the information it does.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Define perspective and identify the creator, position, audience and stake of a primary source
  • Analyze what information a police report and a marcher's testimony include about the same event, with quoted evidence
  • Explain how a creator's job and place along the route influenced what each source includes and leaves out
  • Compare sources that disagree and explain the disagreement with the creators' perspectives, not only with honesty or dishonesty

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Citing specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources RH.6-8.1
  • Explaining how and why people's perspectives change over time D2.His.5.6-8
  • Telling a primary source (made at the time by someone involved) from a secondary source (made later by someone studying it)

Lesson Procedure

60-70 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5-10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "A food fight breaks out in the cafeteria. Write down what three people would tell the principal: the lunch monitor on duty, a student who got hit, and a student watching from the far end of the room. What would each one be sure to mention? What might each one leave out?"

    Pairs share. On the board, list the reasons the three stories differ: where the person was, what their job was, what they had to gain or lose, and who they were telling. Explain that historians call these parts of a person's perspective: the way a person sees an event, shaped by their experiences, beliefs, job and interests. Today students use the same four reasons on real sources from 1913.

  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Part 1: Key words. Post these before reading. Suffrage is the right to vote. A procession is a parade or march. A primary source is a document made at the time by someone who took part in or saw an event. Its creator is the person who made it. A hearing is a meeting where lawmakers question witnesses, and testimony is what a witness says there. A superintendent of police is the head of a city's police force, and a precinct is one district of that force, led by a captain. A person's stake is what they could gain or lose from how an event is described. In the police reports, special policemen or specials are extra men hired for the day, and a detail is a group of officers given one job.

    Part 2: What happened. On March 3, 1913, the day before a new President was inaugurated, marchers for woman suffrage walked along Pennsylvania Avenue from the Capitol toward the Treasury Building. Huge crowds had come to Washington for the inauguration, and many pushed into the street. (Sylvester's full statement describes guarding the arriving "President elect" that afternoon.) Congress had passed a resolution telling the police to keep the route clear, and on March 4 the Senate directed a subcommittee to investigate "the conduct of the District police" in connection with the parade (title page of the hearings). The subcommittee held hearings in March 1913 and printed all the testimony. Every source today comes from that printed record.

    The creators of Sources 1-5 (from the printed hearings, 1913)
    SourceCreatorJob or roleWritten or spokenFor whom
    1Maj. Richard SylvesterSuperintendent (head) of the policeWritten, March 4, 1913The District Commissioners, who passed it to the Senate
    2Harriet Taylor UptonMarcher from Warren, OhioSpoken testimony, March 1913The Senate subcommittee
    3Lt. J. A. DuvallPolice officer in charge of one section of the routeWritten, March 5, 1913His boss, Maj. Sylvester
    4Capt. John C. DaleyPolice captain in charge of another sectionWritten, March 5, 1913His boss, Maj. Sylvester
    5Capt. James E. Mulhall, then Maj. Sylvester and the chairmanPolice captain; superintendent; senator leading the hearingWritten March 7; then spokenMaj. Sylvester; then the subcommittee

    Part 3: The four questions. Model them with Source 1, then Source 2: (1) Where was the creator? (2) What was their job? (3) Who was the audience? (4) What was at stake? Then ask: what information does the source include, and what does it leave out? Point out that Source 1 was sent because the Senate asked why the police had not prevented interference with the procession. Sylvester sometimes writes about himself in the third person ("the major and superintendent"); this excerpt mostly uses "I."

    In this connection I have to state that street cars were ordered stopped entering the line of march at 2.30 o'clock p. m. at Fifteenth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW. and at First and B Streets NW., in order to meet the requirements of the joint resolution of Congress, and that Pennsylvania Avenue was roped with cable up to Fifteenth Street NW., both north and south sides, and all streets intersecting with Pennsylvania Avenue were looped by the police, and that the people gathered on the sidewalks were packed closely to the building walls throughout the line of parade, but, notwithstanding this fact, others got beyond the ropes.

    The police force at hand throughout the entire line of march were fully instructed to use every endeavor to keep people back of the lines, and 12 automobiles and the motor patrol wagon, all bearing the insignia of the police department, were employed to assist in maintaining the clearance of the route. [...]

    My captains informed me that in the formations they could afford a clear space for the same and that the only real crowd that massed, giving primary trouble to the police, was when the cable used in front of the New Willard Hotel, at Pennsylvania Avenue and Fourteenth Street NW., broke, giving way and permitting the great crowd assembled there to enter the lines. The overflow on the street probably prevented injury to persons on the sidewalk, which might have resulted in a calamity.

    [...]

    [...] The whole passed rapidly and successfully to the end, to the points of dismissal, and observing from Fifteenth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW. to the points of dismissal there was uninterrupted progress and freedom from annoyance. [...]

    Up to the hour of this writing, no complaints of any loss of consequence were reported and no knowledge of any loss of life or limb has come to these headquarters.

    [...]

    While referring to this matter, it might be stated that the Metropolitan police force of the District of Columbia has but 724 members, including privates and officers of all grades, that the force was cut down 20 members a year ago, and there was a further reduction of 8 members at this present session of Congress.

    All told, there were 716 men employed along the line of parade, the number of men available consistent with past expenditures for such events.

    The property losses were insignificant, and, as the crowd was in the main composed of women and children, including baby carriages and babies, extraordinary force could not, of course, be used against such public sight-seers. [...]

    Major Richard Sylvester, Superintendent of the Metropolitan Police of the District of Columbia, Statement of the Superintendent of Police to the District Commissioners, March 4, 1913 (Source 1) (1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.

    The Chairman. When you reached Pennsylvania Avenue in what condition did you find it?

    Mrs. Upton. As we were marching—may I just tell it as quickly as I can?

    The Chairman. Yes; tell it in your own way.

    Mrs. Upton. [...] As we proceeded toward Peace Monument, down by the Garfield Monument, the crowd began getting a little more dense, but it was like an ordinary procession up to the time we got to the Peace Monument. From that on, as I remember, until we got to Seventh Street, the crowd came closer and closer and closer. We were marching five abreast on Capitol Hill. We dropped off one, then we dropped off another, and we dropped off another until when we got to Seventh Street, there was myself and a small boy who belonged to the Ohio delegation who was carrying a banner with the names of the five Presidents from Ohio on it. He was a splendid little fellow. His mother was in the procession, and I had promised him he could march at the head with me. I was so much afraid that he was going to be hurt that I really paid more attention to him than I did to some other things.

    The Chairman. Why were you afraid he would be hurt?

    Mrs. Upton. Because the crowd gave us no room at all. When I reached Pennsylvania Avenue there was simply room for one small boy and myself, which would make room for two ordinary persons. [...] The only time I felt alarmed about anything was at Seventh Street, because I knew there was always congestion there, and I worried a little bit about that. We had two or three elderly people in our part of the procession, and the thing that I noticed most along the line of march was that the people who were looking at us were largely youngish men, men I should say between 21 and 28, and some women. I saw no baby carriages at all in that procession anywhere.

    The Chairman. You do not mean in the procession; you mean in the crowd?

    Mrs. Upton. I mean watching the procession. There has been some talk about baby carriages. I did not see any. I did not see any policemen. Most of them were absent as I saw it. [...]

    Harriet Taylor Upton, questioned by the subcommittee chairman, Senator Wesley L. Jones, Testimony of Harriet Taylor Upton of Warren, Ohio, a marcher near the end of the parade (Source 2) (1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.
    • Job and audience shape what is included (Source 1, paragraphs 1-2)

      Sylvester was answering the question of why the police did not keep the route clear. What does he put first?

      Result: He opens with what the police did: street cars were stopped, the Avenue "was roped with cable," side streets "were looped by the police," and the force was "fully instructed to use every endeavor to keep people back of the lines" (paragraphs 1-2). A leader whose department is being questioned is likely to start with the steps it took. The source tells us a lot about plans and orders and much less about what marchers went through.

    • A creator explains a problem (Source 1, paragraph 3)

      Where does Sylvester say the real trouble happened, and how does he describe it?

      Result: He says "the only real crowd that massed" was where a cable "broke" in front of the New Willard Hotel at Fourteenth Street, and he adds that the overflow "probably prevented injury to persons on the sidewalk" (paragraph 3). The problem is placed in one spot and tied to an accident with equipment, which fits a writer defending his officers.

    • A marcher's position (Source 2, paragraph 4)

      What does Upton describe, and what does her place in the parade let her see?

      Result: Upton was inside the march, so she describes how it felt: the crowd "came closer and closer and closer" until "there was myself and a small boy" left in her row (paragraph 4). Her source is strong on the marchers' experience and limited to the part of the route and the time she passed through.

    • Two sources on police presence (Sources 1 and 2)

      Sylvester describes a police force "fully instructed" along "the entire line of march." What does Upton report about police?

      Result: Upton says, "I did not see any policemen. Most of them were absent as I saw it" (Source 2, paragraph 8). The two creators stood in different places and had different jobs: Sylvester reported the plan and orders for the whole route, while Upton reported what she saw from her row. Each source includes what its creator knew best and was most concerned to tell.

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Pairs read Source 3, a report from the lieutenant in charge of the first section of the route, and answer four questions. Circulate and ask each pair to point to the words that support each answer.

    1. What part of the route was Duvall responsible for? Quote the words that tell you.
    2. Who asked for this report, and what might Duvall want his boss to know?
    3. List three things Duvall says went well. Which of them describe his own work?
    4. What does the report not tell us about the rest of the route?

    Sir: I have the honor to report that at 12.30 p. m., Monday, the 3d instant, 2 sergeants, 30 privates on foot, and 40 special policemen reported to me for duty at First Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., with which command I was to take charge of Pennsylvania Avenue from the Peace Monument to Four-and-a-half Street NW., and afford the women suffragists protection and insurance against interference while forming for their parade and while the same was passing. I deployed my command uniformly over the territory assigned to me, and with my command, between the hours of 12.30 and 2.30 p. m., preserved good order. At 2.30 p. m., I stopped all westbound street cars, also vehicular traffic, and at 2.55 p. m. had Pennsylvania Avenue between the Peace Monument and Four-and-a-half Street NW. entirely cleared, which condition I preserved until the procession formed and the last end of same had passed by. During the time the procession was passing through my territory there was no disorder, no indecent or vulgar remarks made, and the vast crowd which had assembled showed no disposition to be discourteous to the paraders, but, on the contrary, showed a joyful and friendly disposition. Fully 75 per cent of the spectators consisted of women and children, who quietly dispersed when the parade passed.

    Lieutenant J. A. Duvall, Metropolitan Police, Sixth Precinct, Report of Lieutenant J. A. Duvall, Sixth Precinct, to the Superintendent, March 5, 1913 (Source 3) (1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.

    Teacher key. 1. "Pennsylvania Avenue from the Peace Monument to Four-and-a-half Street NW." 2. The report is addressed to Maj. Sylvester (see the table), who was gathering reports while the Senate investigated. A lieutenant writing to his commander is likely to show that he followed orders. 3. He "preserved good order," had the Avenue "entirely cleared" at 2.55 p. m. and kept it that way, and says there was "no disorder." The first two describe his own command's work. 4. Nothing about anywhere past Four-and-a-half Street, where other officers were in charge. A source made by a person with one job in one place covers that place.

  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Students work alone on Source 4, the report of the captain in charge of the next section of the route. They answer Quiz Questions 9-13, then write two sentences: "Daley's job was ____, so his report includes ____ but leaves out ____."

    Sir: I hereby report that in carrying out General Order No. 15, dated March 1, 1913, making details for March 3, 1913, I was detailed, with 2 sergeants, 26 privates, and 40 specials, to take command of that section of Pennsylvania Avenue NW. between Four-and-a-half and Seventh Streets NW., with instructions to keep that portion of the Avenue clear of all intrusions, as heretofore directed, and insure the marchers every security against embarrassment, which was done. At 2.30 p. m. the Avenue was cleared of all vehicular travel and the intersecting streets (Four-and-a-half and Sixth Streets) were roped off and the pedestrians put behind the ropes. On both sides of Pennsylvania Avenue NW. the people were ordered behind the ropes on the sidewalk, and from Four-and-a-half to Seventh Streets NW. the Avenue was clear. At about 3.30 p. m. the suffragettes' parade arrived at Four-and-a-half Street NW. going west, and during the time the parade was passing over the territory I had charge of they were afforded every protection possible, and there was no obstruction to the line of march until it passed out of my territory. About the time the parade passed out of my territory I noticed that the Avenue was becoming unpassable on account of the large gathering of people from the direction of the Treasury Building. In regard to insulting language toward the marchers, I desire to state that I nor none of my detail heard any indecent language used toward them, nor any ungentlemanly conduct toward the ladies seated on the floats. After the parade passed out of the territory over which I had charge I was ordered to take my detail to the Ellipse and report to Inspector R. B. Boyle, which I did, and was relieved by the said inspector.

    Captain John C. Daley, Metropolitan Police, Ninth Precinct, Report of Captain John C. Daley, Ninth Precinct, to the Superintendent, March 5, 1913 (Source 4) (1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.
  5. Closure5-10 minutes

    Exit ticket. On an index card: "One source about the 1913 parade is ____. Its creator was ____ and was standing ____. Because of that, the source tells us ____ but not ____."

    Teacher notes. The sources use the words of 1913, such as "suffragettes," "the ladies" and "specials" (special policemen hired for the day). Upton's full testimony goes on, just after this excerpt, to mention drunken men in the crowd, and other parts of the hearings describe rough and insulting treatment of marchers. Preview the full hearings before assigning any more of them. Keep the discussion on why each source contains what it does; students do not need to decide who was lying. Source 5, for homework, is a short report and a few lines of the hearing that followed it.

    Sir: Reference to telephone message this date to report what instructions were given on March 3 to protect the parade, etc., I have the honor to report as follows:

    Instructions given to me and transmitted to my men were to use every effort to keep the line of march open and to see that there was no insulting remarks used to those in line. This was accomplished as far as my section was concerned; that is, Second and Pennsylvania Avenue to Garfield Statue. Instructions were to protect the rear of the parade when passed Garfield Statue and flank it. This was done as far as the rear was concerned, but I was unable to flank parade on Pennsylvania Avenue from Four-and-a-half Street to Fifteenth Street NW. on account of the immense crowd in the street. As to attempt to open street, some would have been injured or crushed on account of so many women and children in the crowd.

    [...]

    This goes to show, Mr. Chairman, this gentleman interpreted the orders he received correctly.

    The Chairman. There does not seem to be very much complaint in reference to conditions around Garfield Monument and the Peace Monument up to Four-and-a-half Street.

    Maj. Sylvester. Yes, sir; but what I am endeavoring there to show is that there was a proper understanding of orders. At least, it is so stated here.

    The Chairman. Apparently, from the testimony, the orders were carried out there, but not from Four-and-a-half Street on.

    Maj. Sylvester. Yes.

    The Chairman. I should like to hear some of those reports from Four-and-a-half Street on.

    Maj. Sylvester. This would indicate, however, that he had orders.

    The Chairman. And that he carried them out?

    Captain James E. Mulhall; Major Richard Sylvester and the subcommittee chairman, Senator Wesley L. Jones, A report from Captain James E. Mulhall, Fifth Precinct (March 7, 1913), and the exchange that followed in the hearing (Source 5) (1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a source detective card with the four questions printed and sentence starters ("Because ____ was a ____, the source includes ____")
  • Read Source 2 aloud first; it is the most story-like, and the police sources make more sense after it
  • Pre-teach six words: procession, testimony, precinct, superintendent, insignia, obstruction

For Advanced Students

  • Find a second marcher's testimony in the full printed hearings (archive.org) and compare it with Source 2 using the four questions
  • Read the reports of the captains for the sections from Seventh Street to the Treasury in the full hearings and add them to the route strip
  • Write a one-paragraph note to a museum explaining which source it should quote about the crowd, and why it should quote a second one too

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Strong work names the creator, position, audience and stake of a source, quotes what it includes, and explains a specific thing it leaves out because of the creator's job or place. Watch for answers that call a source "biased" without saying how, that treat one source as simply true and the other as false, or that summarize a source without connecting its content to its creator.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Source Detective Cards

15 minPairs

Each pair fills one detective card for each of Sources 1, 2 and 3. A card has six boxes: creator, where they were, job or role, audience, what the source includes (with one quotation) and what it leaves out. Pairs then circle the box that best explains the "includes" box.

Answer Key for the Teacher

  • Source 1: Sylvester, head of the police, who moved between the route and the station for the President-elect; written for the District Commissioners and the Senate. Includes orders, equipment and numbers ("12 automobiles," "724 members"). Leaves out what marchers saw. Best explained by his job and audience.
  • Source 2: Upton, a marcher, inside the procession; speaking to senators. Includes the crowd pressing in and her fear for the boy. Leaves out the police plans and other parts of the route. Best explained by where she was.
  • Source 3: Duvall, a lieutenant at the first section; writing to Sylvester. Includes his men, times and good order. Leaves out everything past Four-and-a-half Street. Best explained by his job and place.
2

Map the March: Who Saw Which Stretch?

15 minPairs

Each pair gets a paper strip of the route like Diagram 1, with the police sections already marked. Pairs add sticky notes for Upton (Source 2) and for the cable that broke (Source 1), each with a short quotation. Then they answer: which sources describe the same stretch, and where does the record have only one kind of voice?

Answer Key for the Teacher

  • Upton: from the Peace Monument to Seventh Street, where "the crowd came closer and closer and closer" (Source 2, paragraph 4), with the worst point "at Seventh Street" (paragraph 6). Her note covers both Duvall's and Daley's sections.
  • Cable: at Fourteenth Street, in front of the New Willard Hotel (Source 1, paragraph 3).
  • Only one kind of voice: in these five sources, the stretch from Seventh Street to Fourteenth Street is described only in general terms (Source 1 and Source 5). The full hearings include more witnesses for it.
3

Missing Voices

10 minGroups of 3-4

Groups list people who were on Pennsylvania Avenue on March 3, 1913, but have no source on this page. For each one, they write a question that person could answer and a sentence predicting what their source might include or leave out, based on where they stood and what they wanted.

Possible Answers

  • A spectator on the sidewalk: what the crowd was doing and why people pushed forward.
  • A marcher near the front of the parade: whether the route was clear earlier in the afternoon.
  • A special policeman hired for the day: what orders he was given.
  • A newspaper reporter: what a reporter chose to describe for readers.

Push groups to connect each prediction to the person's place and stake, not to whether the person was "good" or "bad."

Variation for Advanced Groups

Give groups the list of witnesses printed at the front of the hearings and ask them to choose two more witnesses to read, explaining what new perspective each would add.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

1 diagrams

Diagram 1: Who Was Responsible for Which Stretch of the Route

The Parade Route on Pennsylvania Avenue, March 3, 1913 Source 3: Duvall Sixth Precinct Source 4: Daley Ninth Precinct 1st St 4½ St 7th St 14th St 15th St Capitol and Peace Monument Treasury Building cable broke (Source 1) parade moved west Spacing follows street numbers, so distances are approximate.
The shaded boxes show the two police sections described in Sources 3 and 4: the Peace Monument (at First Street) to Four-and-a-half Street, and Four-and-a-half Street to Seventh Street. The red dot marks where Sylvester says a cable broke, at Fourteenth Street. Marchers walked west, from the Capitol toward the Treasury. Places come from the sources. The strip is not drawn to scale: places are spaced by street number, so distances are only approximate.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

D2.His.6.6-8 Homework: What the Superintendent Chose to Read

Directions: Use Source 5 (printed in the Closure phase) for Part 1 and Sources 1-5 for Part 2. In Source 5, paragraphs 1-2 are a captain's written report, and paragraphs 3-10 are what was said in the hearing after Maj. Sylvester read it and part of another report aloud. To flank a parade (paragraph 2) means to walk or ride alongside it to protect it. Quote the sources with paragraph numbers.

Part 1: Reading Source 5 (Problems 1-3)

  1. In paragraph 2, what two instructions does Captain Mulhall say he and his men were given? Quote them. Which part of the route does he say was "accomplished"?
  2. In paragraph 2, what does Mulhall say he was "unable" to do, and why? Quote his reason. How is his report different from Source 4 in what it admits?
  3. In paragraphs 3-10, Sylvester says what he is "endeavoring there to show," and the chairman asks for other reports. Explain how each man's job shapes what he wants from the reports.

Part 2: Connecting the Sources (Problems 4-6)

  1. Mulhall says opening the street was risky because of "so many women and children in the crowd" (paragraph 2). Compare this with how the crowd is described in Source 2. Give one reason based on perspective for the difference.
  2. Sylvester chose which reports to read to the senators. Explain how that choice could affect what information the Senate had. What kind of report would you ask him to read next?
  3. Write a paragraph of 6-8 sentences answering this question: Why do the police sources and the marcher's testimony give different information about the same parade? Use at least three of Sources 1-5.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
CreatorNames the creator's job, place and audience for each source usedNames the creator without job, place or audienceCreator not identified
EvidenceExact quotations with source and paragraph numbersParaphrase or quotation without a citationNo evidence
Includes and leaves outExplains something the source includes and something it leaves out, and links both to the creatorLists contents without linking them to the creatorNot addressed
FairnessExplains differences with perspective rather than calling a source simply true or falseCalls a source biased with one reasonCalls a source true or false with no reason

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 2-5 use Source 1 and Questions 6-8 use Source 2 (both in the Direct Instruction phase). Questions 9-13 use Source 4 (Independent Practice), and Question 13 also uses Source 3 (Guided Practice). Questions 1, 14 and 15-20 ask you to connect the sources. Choose the best answer, or write a short answer with quotations.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A historian says that a source's information was influenced by its creator's perspective. What does that mean?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Source 1, paragraph 1, what does Sylvester say happened even though people on the sidewalks "were packed closely to the building walls"?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Source 1, paragraph 5, says no complaints "of any loss of consequence were reported." What kind of information does this sentence leave out?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why might Sylvester include the facts in Source 1, paragraph 6, about the size of the police force?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Source 1, paragraph 8, why does Sylvester say "extraordinary force could not, of course, be used"?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Upton says she "really paid more attention to him than I did to some other things" (Source 2, paragraph 4). Why does this matter to a historian?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Source 2, paragraph 6, which detail shows Upton was thinking about the safety of the people marching with her?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Upton says, "There has been some talk about baby carriages. I did not see any" (Source 2, paragraph 8). Which source on this page contains the claim she seems to be answering?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to Source 4, about when did the parade reach Four-and-a-half Street?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Daley says his orders to keep the Avenue clear were carried out, "which was done." Who was the audience for his report, and how might that shape it?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Where does Daley say the people came from who made the Avenue "unpassable" after the parade left his section?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why might Daley include a sentence about "insulting language toward the marchers"?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Sources 3 and 4 were both written on March 5 by officers to their commander. What information do both leave out?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which question would best explain why Sources 1, 3 and 4 say more about orders and plans than about what marchers went through?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer

    Duvall (Source 3) describes the spectators as mostly women and children. Upton (Source 2) describes them differently. Quote both, then explain how each creator's position could lead to a different description.

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    Daley says there was "no obstruction to the line of march" in his section, from Four-and-a-half to Seventh Street (Source 4). Upton describes the same stretch in Source 2. Compare the two, and give two reasons based on perspective why they differ.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    Duvall had 2 sergeants, 30 privates and 40 special policemen. Daley had 2 sergeants, 26 privates and 40 specials. How many men did each have? Why would officers put these numbers in reports to their commander?

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    Sylvester says "the only real crowd that massed" was where the cable broke near Fourteenth Street (Source 1, paragraph 3). Explain how Daley's report (Source 4) could support this claim and how Upton's testimony (Source 2) challenges it.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Upton's testimony was spoken in answer to the chairman's questions. Using paragraphs 1, 5 and 7 of Source 2, explain how the questions could shape what information is in her source.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    In 4-5 sentences, explain how the creators' perspectives influenced what information is available in Sources 1-4. Use at least three sources.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does D2.His.6.6-8 mean?

D2.His.6.6-8 asks middle school students to analyze how people's perspectives influenced what information is in the historical sources they created. It is a history indicator in Dimension 2 of the C3 Framework, in the group on perspectives. In practice, students ask who made a source, where they were and what they wanted, then explain what the source includes and leaves out.

What is the difference between perspective and bias?

Perspective is the way a person sees an event; bias is usually a word for an unfair slant. Everyone who creates a source has a perspective, because they stood somewhere and had a job or interest. Calling a source "biased" ends the conversation; this indicator asks students to explain exactly how a perspective shaped the information, which is more useful.

Why use the 1913 suffrage parade to teach D2.His.6.6-8?

The event has several kinds of sources made by people with very different jobs and places. The Senate printed police reports and witness testimony side by side, so students can compare a police superintendent, officers in charge of different blocks and a marcher describing the same afternoon. The language is plain enough for grades 6-8.

Are the police reports useless because the officers had a stake?

No, they are useful for different information. The reports give exact times, numbers and orders that no marcher could know, such as when each section was cleared. Their limit is that each officer describes his own work and his own section. Historians use sources like these together, noting what each one can and cannot tell them.

How is D2.His.6.6-8 different from D2.His.6.9-12?

The 6-8 indicator is about the people who made primary sources; the 9-12 indicator is about people who write history. In grades 9-12, students analyze how historians' own perspectives shaped the histories they produced, a step beyond the participants' sources used here.

What are the four questions students use with each source?

Where was the creator, what was their job, who was the audience, and what was at stake? Students answer the four questions, then say what the source includes and what it leaves out, and connect the two. The warm-up practices the same questions with a made-up cafeteria scene.

How can I adapt this lesson for 11- to 14-year-olds?

Start with the most story-like source and keep the passages short. Source 2 reads like a story, so it is a good first read before the police reports. Pre-teach words like precinct and testimony, use the route strip so students can see who stood where, and let students answer with sentence starters at first.

Where can students read more of the sources?

The full hearings are online. They were printed by the Government Printing Office in 1913 as Suffrage Parade: Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on the District of Columbia, United States Senate, and a scanned copy is on archive.org. They include many more witnesses, including other marchers and police officers. Preview them first, since some testimony describes rough treatment of marchers.

How is D2.His.6.6-8 assessed in this lesson?

The quiz and homework ask students to tie the contents of a source to its creator. Multiple-choice items check close reading of each source, and the short answers ask students to compare sources that disagree and explain the difference with the creators' jobs, places and audiences. The rubric rewards fairness: explaining a difference without simply calling one side false.

What should students study after D2.His.6.6-8?

A good next step is D2.His.10.6-8, detecting limitations in the historical record. Once students see that each creator covered only part of an event, they can ask what the whole record is missing. Later, D2.His.6.9-12 turns the same question toward historians and the histories they write.