D2.His.6.6-8: How Perspectives Shape the Information in Sources
In plain English: D2.His.6.6-8 is the C3 Framework history indicator for grades 6-8 that asks students to analyze how people's perspectives influenced what information is available in the historical sources they created. Students ask who made a source, where they stood, what job or stake they had, and then explain what the source includes and leaves out because of it.
Analyze how people's perspectives influenced what information is available in the historical sources they created.
C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 2: Applying Disciplinary Concepts and Tools · Discipline: History · Perspectives · Official standard
Students analyze how the people who created a set of sources shaped what those sources tell us. The case is the woman suffrage parade in Washington, D.C., on March 3, 1913, the day before a new President was inaugurated. Crowds pressed into the marchers on Pennsylvania Avenue, and the next day the Senate ordered an investigation of the police. Students read the police superintendent's written statement, a marcher's testimony to the Senate subcommittee, and three reports by police officers in charge of different stretches of the route.
For every source, students ask the same questions: who made it, where they were, what their job was, who they were writing for and what they had at stake. Then they explain how those things affected what the source includes and what it leaves out. The sources disagree, and the lesson does not ask students to decide who was honest. It asks them to explain why each source contains the information it does.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Define perspective and identify the creator, position, audience and stake of a primary source
Analyze what information a police report and a marcher's testimony include about the same event, with quoted evidence
Explain how a creator's job and place along the route influenced what each source includes and leaves out
Compare sources that disagree and explain the disagreement with the creators' perspectives, not only with honesty or dishonesty
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Citing specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources RH.6-8.1
Explaining how and why people's perspectives change over time D2.His.5.6-8
Telling a primary source (made at the time by someone involved) from a secondary source (made later by someone studying it)
"A food fight breaks out in the cafeteria. Write down what three people would tell the principal: the lunch monitor on duty, a student who got hit, and a student watching from the far end of the room. What would each one be sure to mention? What might each one leave out?"
Pairs share. On the board, list the reasons the three stories differ: where the person was, what their job was, what they had to gain or lose, and who they were telling. Explain that historians call these parts of a person's perspective: the way a person sees an event, shaped by their experiences, beliefs, job and interests. Today students use the same four reasons on real sources from 1913.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Part 1: Key words. Post these before reading. Suffrage is the right to vote. A procession is a parade or march. A primary source is a document made at the time by someone who took part in or saw an event. Its creator is the person who made it. A hearing is a meeting where lawmakers question witnesses, and testimony is what a witness says there. A superintendent of police is the head of a city's police force, and a precinct is one district of that force, led by a captain. A person's stake is what they could gain or lose from how an event is described. In the police reports, special policemen or specials are extra men hired for the day, and a detail is a group of officers given one job.
Part 2: What happened. On March 3, 1913, the day before a new President was inaugurated, marchers for woman suffrage walked along Pennsylvania Avenue from the Capitol toward the Treasury Building. Huge crowds had come to Washington for the inauguration, and many pushed into the street. (Sylvester's full statement describes guarding the arriving "President elect" that afternoon.) Congress had passed a resolution telling the police to keep the route clear, and on March 4 the Senate directed a subcommittee to investigate "the conduct of the District police" in connection with the parade (title page of the hearings). The subcommittee held hearings in March 1913 and printed all the testimony. Every source today comes from that printed record.
The creators of Sources 1-5 (from the printed hearings, 1913)
Source
Creator
Job or role
Written or spoken
For whom
1
Maj. Richard Sylvester
Superintendent (head) of the police
Written, March 4, 1913
The District Commissioners, who passed it to the Senate
2
Harriet Taylor Upton
Marcher from Warren, Ohio
Spoken testimony, March 1913
The Senate subcommittee
3
Lt. J. A. Duvall
Police officer in charge of one section of the route
Written, March 5, 1913
His boss, Maj. Sylvester
4
Capt. John C. Daley
Police captain in charge of another section
Written, March 5, 1913
His boss, Maj. Sylvester
5
Capt. James E. Mulhall, then Maj. Sylvester and the chairman
Police captain; superintendent; senator leading the hearing
Written March 7; then spoken
Maj. Sylvester; then the subcommittee
Part 3: The four questions. Model them with Source 1, then Source 2: (1) Where was the creator?(2) What was their job?(3) Who was the audience?(4) What was at stake? Then ask: what information does the source include, and what does it leave out? Point out that Source 1 was sent because the Senate asked why the police had not prevented interference with the procession. Sylvester sometimes writes about himself in the third person ("the major and superintendent"); this excerpt mostly uses "I."
1In this connection I have to state that street cars were ordered stopped entering the line of march at 2.30 o'clock p. m. at Fifteenth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW. and at First and B Streets NW., in order to meet the requirements of the joint resolution of Congress, and that Pennsylvania Avenue was roped with cable up to Fifteenth Street NW., both north and south sides, and all streets intersecting with Pennsylvania Avenue were looped by the police, and that the people gathered on the sidewalks were packed closely to the building walls throughout the line of parade, but, notwithstanding this fact, others got beyond the ropes.
2The police force at hand throughout the entire line of march were fully instructed to use every endeavor to keep people back of the lines, and 12 automobiles and the motor patrol wagon, all bearing the insignia of the police department, were employed to assist in maintaining the clearance of the route. [...]
3My captains informed me that in the formations they could afford a clear space for the same and that the only real crowd that massed, giving primary trouble to the police, was when the cable used in front of the New Willard Hotel, at Pennsylvania Avenue and Fourteenth Street NW., broke, giving way and permitting the great crowd assembled there to enter the lines. The overflow on the street probably prevented injury to persons on the sidewalk, which might have resulted in a calamity.
[...]
4[...] The whole passed rapidly and successfully to the end, to the points of dismissal, and observing from Fifteenth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW. to the points of dismissal there was uninterrupted progress and freedom from annoyance. [...]
5Up to the hour of this writing, no complaints of any loss of consequence were reported and no knowledge of any loss of life or limb has come to these headquarters.
[...]
6While referring to this matter, it might be stated that the Metropolitan police force of the District of Columbia has but 724 members, including privates and officers of all grades, that the force was cut down 20 members a year ago, and there was a further reduction of 8 members at this present session of Congress.
7All told, there were 716 men employed along the line of parade, the number of men available consistent with past expenditures for such events.
8The property losses were insignificant, and, as the crowd was in the main composed of women and children, including baby carriages and babies, extraordinary force could not, of course, be used against such public sight-seers. [...]
Major Richard Sylvester, Superintendent of the Metropolitan Police of the District of Columbia, Statement of the Superintendent of Police to the District Commissioners, March 4, 1913 (Source 1) (1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.
1The Chairman. When you reached Pennsylvania Avenue in what condition did you find it?
2Mrs. Upton. As we were marching—may I just tell it as quickly as I can?
3The Chairman. Yes; tell it in your own way.
4Mrs. Upton. [...] As we proceeded toward Peace Monument, down by the Garfield Monument, the crowd began getting a little more dense, but it was like an ordinary procession up to the time we got to the Peace Monument. From that on, as I remember, until we got to Seventh Street, the crowd came closer and closer and closer. We were marching five abreast on Capitol Hill. We dropped off one, then we dropped off another, and we dropped off another until when we got to Seventh Street, there was myself and a small boy who belonged to the Ohio delegation who was carrying a banner with the names of the five Presidents from Ohio on it. He was a splendid little fellow. His mother was in the procession, and I had promised him he could march at the head with me. I was so much afraid that he was going to be hurt that I really paid more attention to him than I did to some other things.
5The Chairman. Why were you afraid he would be hurt?
6Mrs. Upton. Because the crowd gave us no room at all. When I reached Pennsylvania Avenue there was simply room for one small boy and myself, which would make room for two ordinary persons. [...] The only time I felt alarmed about anything was at Seventh Street, because I knew there was always congestion there, and I worried a little bit about that. We had two or three elderly people in our part of the procession, and the thing that I noticed most along the line of march was that the people who were looking at us were largely youngish men, men I should say between 21 and 28, and some women. I saw no baby carriages at all in that procession anywhere.
7The Chairman. You do not mean in the procession; you mean in the crowd?
8Mrs. Upton. I mean watching the procession. There has been some talk about baby carriages. I did not see any. I did not see any policemen. Most of them were absent as I saw it. [...]
Harriet Taylor Upton, questioned by the subcommittee chairman, Senator Wesley L. Jones, Testimony of Harriet Taylor Upton of Warren, Ohio, a marcher near the end of the parade (Source 2) (1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.
Job and audience shape what is included (Source 1, paragraphs 1-2)
Sylvester was answering the question of why the police did not keep the route clear. What does he put first?
Result: He opens with what the police did: street cars were stopped, the Avenue "was roped with cable," side streets "were looped by the police," and the force was "fully instructed to use every endeavor to keep people back of the lines" (paragraphs 1-2). A leader whose department is being questioned is likely to start with the steps it took. The source tells us a lot about plans and orders and much less about what marchers went through.
A creator explains a problem (Source 1, paragraph 3)
Where does Sylvester say the real trouble happened, and how does he describe it?
Result: He says "the only real crowd that massed" was where a cable "broke" in front of the New Willard Hotel at Fourteenth Street, and he adds that the overflow "probably prevented injury to persons on the sidewalk" (paragraph 3). The problem is placed in one spot and tied to an accident with equipment, which fits a writer defending his officers.
A marcher's position (Source 2, paragraph 4)
What does Upton describe, and what does her place in the parade let her see?
Result: Upton was inside the march, so she describes how it felt: the crowd "came closer and closer and closer" until "there was myself and a small boy" left in her row (paragraph 4). Her source is strong on the marchers' experience and limited to the part of the route and the time she passed through.
Two sources on police presence (Sources 1 and 2)
Sylvester describes a police force "fully instructed" along "the entire line of march." What does Upton report about police?
Result: Upton says, "I did not see any policemen. Most of them were absent as I saw it" (Source 2, paragraph 8). The two creators stood in different places and had different jobs: Sylvester reported the plan and orders for the whole route, while Upton reported what she saw from her row. Each source includes what its creator knew best and was most concerned to tell.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs read Source 3, a report from the lieutenant in charge of the first section of the route, and answer four questions. Circulate and ask each pair to point to the words that support each answer.
What part of the route was Duvall responsible for? Quote the words that tell you.
Who asked for this report, and what might Duvall want his boss to know?
List three things Duvall says went well. Which of them describe his own work?
What does the report not tell us about the rest of the route?
1Sir: I have the honor to report that at 12.30 p. m., Monday, the 3d instant, 2 sergeants, 30 privates on foot, and 40 special policemen reported to me for duty at First Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., with which command I was to take charge of Pennsylvania Avenue from the Peace Monument to Four-and-a-half Street NW., and afford the women suffragists protection and insurance against interference while forming for their parade and while the same was passing. I deployed my command uniformly over the territory assigned to me, and with my command, between the hours of 12.30 and 2.30 p. m., preserved good order. At 2.30 p. m., I stopped all westbound street cars, also vehicular traffic, and at 2.55 p. m. had Pennsylvania Avenue between the Peace Monument and Four-and-a-half Street NW. entirely cleared, which condition I preserved until the procession formed and the last end of same had passed by. During the time the procession was passing through my territory there was no disorder, no indecent or vulgar remarks made, and the vast crowd which had assembled showed no disposition to be discourteous to the paraders, but, on the contrary, showed a joyful and friendly disposition. Fully 75 per cent of the spectators consisted of women and children, who quietly dispersed when the parade passed.
Lieutenant J. A. Duvall, Metropolitan Police, Sixth Precinct, Report of Lieutenant J. A. Duvall, Sixth Precinct, to the Superintendent, March 5, 1913 (Source 3) (1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.
Teacher key. 1. "Pennsylvania Avenue from the Peace Monument to Four-and-a-half Street NW." 2. The report is addressed to Maj. Sylvester (see the table), who was gathering reports while the Senate investigated. A lieutenant writing to his commander is likely to show that he followed orders. 3. He "preserved good order," had the Avenue "entirely cleared" at 2.55 p. m. and kept it that way, and says there was "no disorder." The first two describe his own command's work. 4. Nothing about anywhere past Four-and-a-half Street, where other officers were in charge. A source made by a person with one job in one place covers that place.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students work alone on Source 4, the report of the captain in charge of the next section of the route. They answer Quiz Questions 9-13, then write two sentences: "Daley's job was ____, so his report includes ____ but leaves out ____."
1Sir: I hereby report that in carrying out General Order No. 15, dated March 1, 1913, making details for March 3, 1913, I was detailed, with 2 sergeants, 26 privates, and 40 specials, to take command of that section of Pennsylvania Avenue NW. between Four-and-a-half and Seventh Streets NW., with instructions to keep that portion of the Avenue clear of all intrusions, as heretofore directed, and insure the marchers every security against embarrassment, which was done. At 2.30 p. m. the Avenue was cleared of all vehicular travel and the intersecting streets (Four-and-a-half and Sixth Streets) were roped off and the pedestrians put behind the ropes. On both sides of Pennsylvania Avenue NW. the people were ordered behind the ropes on the sidewalk, and from Four-and-a-half to Seventh Streets NW. the Avenue was clear. At about 3.30 p. m. the suffragettes' parade arrived at Four-and-a-half Street NW. going west, and during the time the parade was passing over the territory I had charge of they were afforded every protection possible, and there was no obstruction to the line of march until it passed out of my territory. About the time the parade passed out of my territory I noticed that the Avenue was becoming unpassable on account of the large gathering of people from the direction of the Treasury Building. In regard to insulting language toward the marchers, I desire to state that I nor none of my detail heard any indecent language used toward them, nor any ungentlemanly conduct toward the ladies seated on the floats. After the parade passed out of the territory over which I had charge I was ordered to take my detail to the Ellipse and report to Inspector R. B. Boyle, which I did, and was relieved by the said inspector.
Captain John C. Daley, Metropolitan Police, Ninth Precinct, Report of Captain John C. Daley, Ninth Precinct, to the Superintendent, March 5, 1913 (Source 4) (1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket. On an index card: "One source about the 1913 parade is ____. Its creator was ____ and was standing ____. Because of that, the source tells us ____ but not ____."
Teacher notes. The sources use the words of 1913, such as "suffragettes," "the ladies" and "specials" (special policemen hired for the day). Upton's full testimony goes on, just after this excerpt, to mention drunken men in the crowd, and other parts of the hearings describe rough and insulting treatment of marchers. Preview the full hearings before assigning any more of them. Keep the discussion on why each source contains what it does; students do not need to decide who was lying. Source 5, for homework, is a short report and a few lines of the hearing that followed it.
1Sir: Reference to telephone message this date to report what instructions were given on March 3 to protect the parade, etc., I have the honor to report as follows:
2Instructions given to me and transmitted to my men were to use every effort to keep the line of march open and to see that there was no insulting remarks used to those in line. This was accomplished as far as my section was concerned; that is, Second and Pennsylvania Avenue to Garfield Statue. Instructions were to protect the rear of the parade when passed Garfield Statue and flank it. This was done as far as the rear was concerned, but I was unable to flank parade on Pennsylvania Avenue from Four-and-a-half Street to Fifteenth Street NW. on account of the immense crowd in the street. As to attempt to open street, some would have been injured or crushed on account of so many women and children in the crowd.
[...]
3This goes to show, Mr. Chairman, this gentleman interpreted the orders he received correctly.
4The Chairman. There does not seem to be very much complaint in reference to conditions around Garfield Monument and the Peace Monument up to Four-and-a-half Street.
5Maj. Sylvester. Yes, sir; but what I am endeavoring there to show is that there was a proper understanding of orders. At least, it is so stated here.
6The Chairman. Apparently, from the testimony, the orders were carried out there, but not from Four-and-a-half Street on.
7Maj. Sylvester. Yes.
8The Chairman. I should like to hear some of those reports from Four-and-a-half Street on.
9Maj. Sylvester. This would indicate, however, that he had orders.
10The Chairman. And that he carried them out?
Captain James E. Mulhall; Major Richard Sylvester and the subcommittee chairman, Senator Wesley L. Jones, A report from Captain James E. Mulhall, Fifth Precinct (March 7, 1913), and the exchange that followed in the hearing (Source 5) (1913). Public domain (published 1913). Source text.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a source detective card with the four questions printed and sentence starters ("Because ____ was a ____, the source includes ____")
Read Source 2 aloud first; it is the most story-like, and the police sources make more sense after it
Pre-teach six words: procession, testimony, precinct, superintendent, insignia, obstruction
For Advanced Students
Find a second marcher's testimony in the full printed hearings (archive.org) and compare it with Source 2 using the four questions
Read the reports of the captains for the sections from Seventh Street to the Treasury in the full hearings and add them to the route strip
Write a one-paragraph note to a museum explaining which source it should quote about the crowd, and why it should quote a second one too
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong work names the creator, position, audience and stake of a source, quotes what it includes, and explains a specific thing it leaves out because of the creator's job or place. Watch for answers that call a source "biased" without saying how, that treat one source as simply true and the other as false, or that summarize a source without connecting its content to its creator.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Source Detective Cards
15 minPairs
Each pair fills one detective card for each of Sources 1, 2 and 3. A card has six boxes: creator, where they were, job or role, audience, what the source includes (with one quotation) and what it leaves out. Pairs then circle the box that best explains the "includes" box.
Answer Key for the Teacher
Source 1: Sylvester, head of the police, who moved between the route and the station for the President-elect; written for the District Commissioners and the Senate. Includes orders, equipment and numbers ("12 automobiles," "724 members"). Leaves out what marchers saw. Best explained by his job and audience.
Source 2: Upton, a marcher, inside the procession; speaking to senators. Includes the crowd pressing in and her fear for the boy. Leaves out the police plans and other parts of the route. Best explained by where she was.
Source 3: Duvall, a lieutenant at the first section; writing to Sylvester. Includes his men, times and good order. Leaves out everything past Four-and-a-half Street. Best explained by his job and place.
2
Map the March: Who Saw Which Stretch?
15 minPairs
Each pair gets a paper strip of the route like Diagram 1, with the police sections already marked. Pairs add sticky notes for Upton (Source 2) and for the cable that broke (Source 1), each with a short quotation. Then they answer: which sources describe the same stretch, and where does the record have only one kind of voice?
Answer Key for the Teacher
Upton: from the Peace Monument to Seventh Street, where "the crowd came closer and closer and closer" (Source 2, paragraph 4), with the worst point "at Seventh Street" (paragraph 6). Her note covers both Duvall's and Daley's sections.
Cable: at Fourteenth Street, in front of the New Willard Hotel (Source 1, paragraph 3).
Only one kind of voice: in these five sources, the stretch from Seventh Street to Fourteenth Street is described only in general terms (Source 1 and Source 5). The full hearings include more witnesses for it.
3
Missing Voices
10 minGroups of 3-4
Groups list people who were on Pennsylvania Avenue on March 3, 1913, but have no source on this page. For each one, they write a question that person could answer and a sentence predicting what their source might include or leave out, based on where they stood and what they wanted.
Possible Answers
A spectator on the sidewalk: what the crowd was doing and why people pushed forward.
A marcher near the front of the parade: whether the route was clear earlier in the afternoon.
A special policeman hired for the day: what orders he was given.
A newspaper reporter: what a reporter chose to describe for readers.
Push groups to connect each prediction to the person's place and stake, not to whether the person was "good" or "bad."
Variation for Advanced Groups
Give groups the list of witnesses printed at the front of the hearings and ask them to choose two more witnesses to read, explaining what new perspective each would add.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
1 diagrams
Diagram 1: Who Was Responsible for Which Stretch of the Route
The shaded boxes show the two police sections described in Sources 3 and 4: the Peace Monument (at First Street) to Four-and-a-half Street, and Four-and-a-half Street to Seventh Street. The red dot marks where Sylvester says a cable broke, at Fourteenth Street. Marchers walked west, from the Capitol toward the Treasury. Places come from the sources. The strip is not drawn to scale: places are spaced by street number, so distances are only approximate.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
D2.His.6.6-8 Homework: What the Superintendent Chose to Read
Directions: Use Source 5 (printed in the Closure phase) for Part 1 and Sources 1-5 for Part 2. In Source 5, paragraphs 1-2 are a captain's written report, and paragraphs 3-10 are what was said in the hearing after Maj. Sylvester read it and part of another report aloud. To flank a parade (paragraph 2) means to walk or ride alongside it to protect it. Quote the sources with paragraph numbers.
Part 1: Reading Source 5 (Problems 1-3)
In paragraph 2, what two instructions does Captain Mulhall say he and his men were given? Quote them. Which part of the route does he say was "accomplished"?
In paragraph 2, what does Mulhall say he was "unable" to do, and why? Quote his reason. How is his report different from Source 4 in what it admits?
In paragraphs 3-10, Sylvester says what he is "endeavoring there to show," and the chairman asks for other reports. Explain how each man's job shapes what he wants from the reports.
Part 2: Connecting the Sources (Problems 4-6)
Mulhall says opening the street was risky because of "so many women and children in the crowd" (paragraph 2). Compare this with how the crowd is described in Source 2. Give one reason based on perspective for the difference.
Sylvester chose which reports to read to the senators. Explain how that choice could affect what information the Senate had. What kind of report would you ask him to read next?
Write a paragraph of 6-8 sentences answering this question: Why do the police sources and the marcher's testimony give different information about the same parade? Use at least three of Sources 1-5.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Creator
Names the creator's job, place and audience for each source used
Names the creator without job, place or audience
Creator not identified
Evidence
Exact quotations with source and paragraph numbers
Paraphrase or quotation without a citation
No evidence
Includes and leaves out
Explains something the source includes and something it leaves out, and links both to the creator
Lists contents without linking them to the creator
Not addressed
Fairness
Explains differences with perspective rather than calling a source simply true or false
Calls a source biased with one reason
Calls a source true or false with no reason
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 2-5 use Source 1 and Questions 6-8 use Source 2 (both in the Direct Instruction phase). Questions 9-13 use Source 4 (Independent Practice), and Question 13 also uses Source 3 (Guided Practice). Questions 1, 14 and 15-20 ask you to connect the sources. Choose the best answer, or write a short answer with quotations.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A historian says that a source's information was influenced by its creator's perspective. What does that mean?
Answer: C
A perspective is the way a person sees an event, shaped by experiences, job and interests, so it affects what a creator notices, includes and leaves out. Choice A is a common mistake: a source shaped by perspective can still contain accurate facts, as the police reports' times and numbers do. Choice D describes a secondary source, not perspective.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 1, paragraph 1, what does Sylvester say happened even though people on the sidewalks "were packed closely to the building walls"?
Answer: B
He writes, "but, notwithstanding this fact, others got beyond the ropes" (paragraph 1). Choice A reverses his statement that street cars "were ordered stopped"; choice D confuses the time the cars were stopped with the police leaving.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 1, paragraph 5, says no complaints "of any loss of consequence were reported." What kind of information does this sentence leave out?
Answer: D
The sentence counts only serious losses reported to "these headquarters," so it says nothing about what marchers went through in the crowd. Choice A is wrong because the sentence does address loss "of life or limb"; B and C are in the source, in paragraphs 3 and 7.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why might Sylvester include the facts in Source 1, paragraph 6, about the size of the police force?
Answer: A
He writes that the force "has but 724 members" and was "cut down 20 members a year ago" with "a further reduction of 8 members" (paragraph 6). A leader whose department is being investigated has a reason to point out that it was short of officers. Choice D misreads the numbers as injuries; none of the other choices is in the text.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 1, paragraph 8, why does Sylvester say "extraordinary force could not, of course, be used"?
Answer: C
He says "the crowd was in the main composed of women and children, including baby carriages and babies" (paragraph 8). Choice D contradicts paragraph 2, where 12 automobiles were used; A and B are not in the source.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Upton says she "really paid more attention to him than I did to some other things" (Source 2, paragraph 4). Why does this matter to a historian?
Answer: B
Upton tells the senators that her attention was on keeping the boy safe, so she may have missed things around her. A careful reader notes this limit. Choice A contradicts her account of marching; C is not a claim she makes.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 2, paragraph 6, which detail shows Upton was thinking about the safety of the people marching with her?
Answer: D
Right after saying she "worried a little bit," she mentions "two or three elderly people in our part of the procession" (paragraph 6), people who could be hurt in a crush. Choices B and C describe the watchers, not her group, and A comes from the banner in paragraph 4.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Upton says, "There has been some talk about baby carriages. I did not see any" (Source 2, paragraph 8). Which source on this page contains the claim she seems to be answering?
Answer: A
Sylvester's statement says the crowd included "baby carriages and babies" (Source 1, paragraph 8). Choice B is close, since Duvall says many spectators were "women and children," but he does not mention baby carriages.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 4, about when did the parade reach Four-and-a-half Street?
Answer: D
Daley writes, "At about 3.30 p. m. the suffragettes' parade arrived at Four-and-a-half Street NW." Choice B is when his men cleared vehicles from the Avenue; A and C are times from Duvall's report (Source 3).
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Daley says his orders to keep the Avenue clear were carried out, "which was done." Who was the audience for his report, and how might that shape it?
Answer: B
The report is addressed to "Richard Sylvester, Major and Superintendent," who was gathering reports during the investigation (see the creators table). A captain writing to his commander has a reason to show that his orders were followed. Nothing in the report is addressed to the marchers, a newspaper or the President-elect.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Where does Daley say the people came from who made the Avenue "unpassable" after the parade left his section?
Answer: C
He writes that the Avenue "was becoming unpassable on account of the large gathering of people from the direction of the Treasury Building." Choice B mixes up the roped-off "Sixth Streets" with the crowd; choice A is the opposite end of the route.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why might Daley include a sentence about "insulting language toward the marchers"?
Answer: A
He writes, "In regard to insulting language toward the marchers, I desire to state that I nor none of my detail heard any indecent language." A report like this answers the question its creator was asked or the complaint he expected. Choice B reverses his statement that no one heard such language.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Sources 3 and 4 were both written on March 5 by officers to their commander. What information do both leave out?
Answer: D
Both reports describe orders, men, times and streets, things an officer reports to a commander, and neither gives the marchers' experience. Choices A, B and C are all in both reports, for example "2.30 p. m." and "2 sergeants."
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which question would best explain why Sources 1, 3 and 4 say more about orders and plans than about what marchers went through?
Answer: A
The creators were police officers asked to explain the police work, so their jobs and audience shaped what they included. Counting words or numbers (B and C) describes the sources without explaining them, and D is true but explains nothing about their content.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Duvall (Source 3) describes the spectators as mostly women and children. Upton (Source 2) describes them differently. Quote both, then explain how each creator's position could lead to a different description.
Model answer: Duvall says "Fully 75 per cent of the spectators consisted of women and children" (Source 3). Upton says the watchers "were largely youngish men" (Source 2, paragraph 6). Duvall saw only his own section, the first stretch of the route, and he was writing to his commander about his own work. Upton was inside the march and was squeezed by the people closest to her, so she noticed who was pressing in. Rubric: 1 point per quotation (2), 3 points for linking each description to a position or stake.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Daley says there was "no obstruction to the line of march" in his section, from Four-and-a-half to Seventh Street (Source 4). Upton describes the same stretch in Source 2. Compare the two, and give two reasons based on perspective why they differ.
Model answer: Upton says that from the Peace Monument "until we got to Seventh Street, the crowd came closer and closer and closer" (Source 2, paragraph 4), the opposite of Daley's account. Reason 1: Daley was the officer responsible for that stretch and was writing to his commander, so he had a stake in reporting that it was clear. Reason 2: they saw the stretch from different places and at different moments; Daley reports on his whole section as its commander, while Upton was inside one row near the end of a long parade, about the time Daley himself says the Avenue "was becoming unpassable." Rubric: 2 points for the comparison with quotations, 1 point for each reason (4 points).
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Duvall had 2 sergeants, 30 privates and 40 special policemen. Daley had 2 sergeants, 26 privates and 40 specials. How many men did each have? Why would officers put these numbers in reports to their commander?
Model answer: Duvall: 2 + 30 + 40 = 72 men. Daley: 2 + 26 + 40 = 68 men. Officers report numbers because their commander needs to know how the force was used, and because the numbers show the officer had a plan and followed it. The numbers tell us about the police side of the day, not about the marchers. Rubric: 1 point for each total, 2 points for the explanation.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Sylvester says "the only real crowd that massed" was where the cable broke near Fourteenth Street (Source 1, paragraph 3). Explain how Daley's report (Source 4) could support this claim and how Upton's testimony (Source 2) challenges it.
Model answer: Daley supports it in part: he says the Avenue became "unpassable" after the parade left his section, because of a crowd coming from farther up the Avenue, toward Fourteenth Street. Upton challenges it: she says the crowd pressed in long before that, from the Peace Monument to Seventh Street, where "the crowd gave us no room at all" (paragraph 6). Sylvester had a reason to place the trouble in one spot caused by an accident. Rubric: 2 points for the support, 2 points for the challenge, 1 point for linking to Sylvester's perspective.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Upton's testimony was spoken in answer to the chairman's questions. Using paragraphs 1, 5 and 7 of Source 2, explain how the questions could shape what information is in her source.
Model answer: The chairman decides what Upton talks about. He asks about the "condition" of the Avenue (paragraph 1), why she was afraid for the boy (paragraph 5), and whether she means the procession or the crowd (paragraph 7). Her answers follow his topics, so the testimony includes what the senators wanted to know, such as the crowd and the police, and may leave out other parts of her day. Rubric: 2 points for using the questions as evidence, 2 points for explaining the effect, 1 point for quotations.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
In 4-5 sentences, explain how the creators' perspectives influenced what information is available in Sources 1-4. Use at least three sources.
Model answer: The police sources were written by men whose work was being investigated, so they include orders, equipment, numbers and times, such as "12 automobiles" (Source 1) and "2.55 p. m." (Source 3). Each officer also describes only his own section. Upton marched inside the crowd and spoke to senators, so her source includes how close the crowd came and her fear for a boy (Source 2). Because the creators had different jobs and places, the record holds many facts about police plans and fewer firsthand descriptions of the march. Rubric: 1 point per source correctly linked to its creator (3), 2 points for a clear overall explanation.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does D2.His.6.6-8 mean?
D2.His.6.6-8 asks middle school students to analyze how people's perspectives influenced what information is in the historical sources they created. It is a history indicator in Dimension 2 of the C3 Framework, in the group on perspectives. In practice, students ask who made a source, where they were and what they wanted, then explain what the source includes and leaves out.
What is the difference between perspective and bias?
Perspective is the way a person sees an event; bias is usually a word for an unfair slant. Everyone who creates a source has a perspective, because they stood somewhere and had a job or interest. Calling a source "biased" ends the conversation; this indicator asks students to explain exactly how a perspective shaped the information, which is more useful.
Why use the 1913 suffrage parade to teach D2.His.6.6-8?
The event has several kinds of sources made by people with very different jobs and places. The Senate printed police reports and witness testimony side by side, so students can compare a police superintendent, officers in charge of different blocks and a marcher describing the same afternoon. The language is plain enough for grades 6-8.
Are the police reports useless because the officers had a stake?
No, they are useful for different information. The reports give exact times, numbers and orders that no marcher could know, such as when each section was cleared. Their limit is that each officer describes his own work and his own section. Historians use sources like these together, noting what each one can and cannot tell them.
How is D2.His.6.6-8 different from D2.His.6.9-12?
The 6-8 indicator is about the people who made primary sources; the 9-12 indicator is about people who write history. In grades 9-12, students analyze how historians' own perspectives shaped the histories they produced, a step beyond the participants' sources used here.
What are the four questions students use with each source?
Where was the creator, what was their job, who was the audience, and what was at stake? Students answer the four questions, then say what the source includes and what it leaves out, and connect the two. The warm-up practices the same questions with a made-up cafeteria scene.
How can I adapt this lesson for 11- to 14-year-olds?
Start with the most story-like source and keep the passages short. Source 2 reads like a story, so it is a good first read before the police reports. Pre-teach words like precinct and testimony, use the route strip so students can see who stood where, and let students answer with sentence starters at first.
Where can students read more of the sources?
The full hearings are online. They were printed by the Government Printing Office in 1913 as Suffrage Parade: Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on the District of Columbia, United States Senate, and a scanned copy is on archive.org. They include many more witnesses, including other marchers and police officers. Preview them first, since some testimony describes rough treatment of marchers.
How is D2.His.6.6-8 assessed in this lesson?
The quiz and homework ask students to tie the contents of a source to its creator. Multiple-choice items check close reading of each source, and the short answers ask students to compare sources that disagree and explain the difference with the creators' jobs, places and audiences. The rubric rewards fairness: explaining a difference without simply calling one side false.
What should students study after D2.His.6.6-8?
A good next step is D2.His.10.6-8, detecting limitations in the historical record. Once students see that each creator covered only part of an event, they can ask what the whole record is missing. Later, D2.His.6.9-12 turns the same question toward historians and the histories they write.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to D2.His.6.6-8: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RH.6-8.1Prerequisite
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources
Standard text: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History (Silver Spring, MD: NCSS, 2013). NCSS was not involved in the production of this lesson and does not endorse it.