D2.Civ.7.6-8: Applying Civic Virtues and Democratic Principles at School and in the Community
In plain English: D2.Civ.7.6-8 is the C3 Framework civics indicator for grades 6-8 that asks students to apply civic virtues and democratic principles in school and community settings. Students practice habits such as honesty, respect and cooperation, and principles such as majority rule with minority rights, equality and the rule of law, in club meetings, classrooms and neighborhood groups.
Apply civic virtues and democratic principles in school and community settings.
C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 2: Applying Disciplinary Concepts and Tools · Discipline: Civics · Participation and Deliberation: Applying Civic Virtues and Democratic Principles · Official standard
Students learn to apply civic virtues and democratic principles in school and community settings, the skill named in D2.Civ.7.6-8. Civic virtues are habits of good character for group life, such as honesty, respect, responsibility, cooperation and open-mindedness. Democratic principles are the basic rules of fair self-government, such as majority rule with minority rights, equality, the rule of law and freedom of expression. Students do not just define these words: they spot them, test them and use them to fix decisions that went wrong.
The sources mix real and invented material. Students read two passages from Henry M. Robert's Robert's Rules of Order Revised (1915), the meeting rulebook many groups still use (Sources 1 and 2), and a passage on teamwork from Arthur W. Dunn's 1920 civics textbook Community Civics and Rural Life (Source 3). They apply those ideas to an invented middle school robotics club meeting (Source 4, the school setting) and the invented minutes of a neighborhood association planning a creek cleanup (Source 5, the community setting). The homework is an invented homeroom vote (Source 6). The activities have students sort actions, run a fair class meeting and repair community decisions.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Define civic virtues and democratic principles and tell the two apart
Identify where people apply, or fail to apply, a civic virtue or a democratic principle in a school or community scenario, citing evidence
Explain how rules such as majority vote, two-thirds votes and keeping debate on the proposal protect both the majority and the minority
Apply civic virtues and democratic principles to improve a decision in a school setting and in a community setting
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Taking part in a class discussion with agreed rules and roles SL.6.1
Citing evidence from a source to support an answer RH.6-8.1
Finding a fraction of a whole number, such as two-thirds of 12 6.RP.A.3
"Your class gets to choose the movie for a reward afternoon. One student shouts out a title, a few friends cheer, and the teacher says, 'Sounds like that's decided.' Was that a fair way to decide? Who might feel left out? What would a fairer way look like?"
List the students' ideas in two columns without labels yet: ideas about how people should act (listen, don't mock anyone, tell the truth) and ideas about how the decision should be made (everyone votes, the votes count the same, the class follows its own rules). Then name the columns. The first column is civic virtues: habits of good character that help people live and decide things together. The second column is democratic principles: basic rules of fair self-government, such as majority rule, equality and the rule of law. D2.Civ.7.6-8 asks students to apply both, which means using them in real situations, at school and in the community (the town or neighborhood around the school, and its groups such as libraries, leagues and associations).
Direct Instruction15-20 minutes
Part 1: The two toolkits. Go through the table. Point out that a virtue is about a person's behavior and a principle is about the rules and process of the whole group. Both are needed: a group can have perfect rules and still fail if members lie or mock each other, and polite members can still make an unfair decision if a few people decide for everyone.
Two kinds of tools for working in a group (the lists are this lesson's working definitions)
Term
What it means
What it looks like in a group
Civic virtue: honesty
Telling the truth, including facts that do not help your side
Admitting a mistake in your own report
Civic virtue: respect
Treating every member as worth hearing, even in disagreement
Disagreeing without insults
Civic virtue: responsibility
Doing your share and keeping your promises to the group
Showing up for the job you signed up for
Civic virtue: cooperation
Working with others toward a shared goal
Splitting a big job so everyone does a part
Civic virtue: open-mindedness
Listening to views different from your own before deciding
Changing your mind when someone gives a good reason
Democratic principle: majority rule with minority rights
The larger number decides, but the smaller number keeps the right to speak and to be treated fairly
Voting after everyone who wants to speak has been heard
Democratic principle: equality
Every member counts the same
One member, one vote
Democratic principle: rule of law
The group follows its own rules, and the rules apply to everyone, leaders included
Following the written rules even when a leader would rather not
Democratic principle: freedom of expression
Members may say what they think, including unpopular views
Recording a minority view in the minutes
Part 2: A rulebook for meetings. In 1876, an army engineer named Henry M. Robert published a short book of rules for running meetings. He had been asked to lead a church meeting and found he did not know how. He revised it in 1915, and later editions of the book are still used by many clubs, school groups and town boards today. Gloss before reading: "assembly" (a group meeting to make decisions), "incompatible" (unable to exist together), "debate" (discussion of a proposal before a vote), "personalities" (personal remarks about members), "rescind" (cancel), "arraign the motives" (accuse someone of having bad reasons) and "measure" (the proposal being discussed).
1The object of Rules of Order is to assist an assembly to accomplish in the best possible manner the work for which it was designed. To do this it is necessary to restrain the individual somewhat, as the right of an individual, in any community, to do what he pleases, is incompatible with the interests of the whole. Where there is no law, but every man does what is right in his own eyes, there is the least of real liberty. Experience has shown the importance of definiteness in the law; and in this country, where customs are so slightly established and the published manuals of parliamentary practice so conflicting, no society should attempt to conduct business without having adopted some work upon the subject as the authority in all cases not covered by its own special rules.
[...]
2In debate a member must confine himself to the question before the assembly, and avoid personalities. He cannot reflect upon any act of the assembly, unless he intends to conclude his remarks with a motion to rescind such action, or else while debating such a motion. In referring to another member, he should, as much as possible, avoid using his name, rather referring to him as “the member who spoke last,” or in some other way describing him. The officers of the assembly should always be referred to by their official titles. It is not allowable to arraign the motives of a member, but the nature or consequences of a measure may be condemned in strong terms. It is not the man, but the measure, that is the subject of debate.
Henry M. Robert, Robert's Rules of Order Revised, the Preface and section 43, Decorum in Debate (Source 1: why groups need rules, and how members should debate; one cut marked [...]) (1876; this edition 1915). Public domain (published 1915). Source text.
Applying a civic virtue at school (Source 1)
At a school book club meeting, a member says, "Of course Marcus wants the mystery book. He never reads anything hard." How does Robert's rule in paragraph 2 apply, and how could the member say the same point respectfully?
Result: The comment attacks Marcus and guesses at his reasons, which Robert forbids: "It is not allowable to arraign the motives of a member" (paragraph 2). Robert allows strong criticism of the proposal itself: "the nature or consequences of a measure may be condemned in strong terms." A respectful version: "I think the mystery book is too short to give us much to discuss over four meetings." The virtue applied is respect; the point is kept, and only the attack on the person is dropped. As Robert puts it, "It is not the man, but the measure, that is the subject of debate."
Applying a democratic principle at school (Source 1)
What does Robert say every society should do before it conducts business (paragraph 1)? Apply it to a new school chess club.
Result: Robert writes that "no society should attempt to conduct business without having adopted some work upon the subject as the authority in all cases not covered by its own special rules." For the chess club, that means voting at its first meeting on a short set of written rules (how officers are chosen, how a motion passes, who may vote) and naming a rulebook for anything the rules do not cover. Later, when two members disagree about a tournament, the club settles it by rules everyone agreed to in advance, not by whoever argues hardest that day. That is the rule of law in a school setting: the rules come first and bind everyone, officers included.
Part 3: Majority rule and the minority. Read Source 2. Gloss: "motion" (a formal proposal), "quorum" (the smallest number of members who must be present to do business), "general consent" (agreeing without a vote when nobody objects), "by-laws" (a group's written rules), "compromise" (a settlement in which each side gives up something) and "nominations" (naming people for an election).
1Majority Vote. Any legitimate motion not included among those mentioned below as requiring more than a majority vote, requires for its adoption only a majority; that is, more than half of the votes cast, ignoring blanks, at a legal meeting where a quorum is present, unless a larger vote for its adoption is required by the rules of the assembly.
2General Consent or Unanimous Vote. By general, or unanimous, or silent, consent the assembly can do business with little regard for the rules of procedure, as they are made for the protection of the minority, and when there is no minority to protect, there is little use for the restraint of the rules, except such as protect the rights of absent members, or the right to a secret vote. [...]
[...]
3Two-thirds Vote. A two-thirds vote means two-thirds of the votes cast, ignoring blanks which should never be counted. This must not be confused with a vote of two-thirds of the members present, or two-thirds of the members, terms sometimes used in by-laws. To illustrate the difference: Suppose 14 members vote on a question in a meeting of a society where 20 are present out of a total membership of 70, a two-thirds vote would be 10; a two-thirds vote of the members present would be 14; and a vote of two-thirds of the members would be 47.
4There has been established as a compromise between the rights of the individual and the rights of the assembly the principle that a two-thirds vote is required to adopt any motion that suspends or modifies a rule of order previously adopted; or prevents the introduction of a question for consideration; or closes, or limits, or extends the limits of debate; or limits the freedom of nomination or voting; or closes nominations or the polls; or deprives one of membership or office. [...]
Henry M. Robert, Robert's Rules of Order Revised, section 48, Motions requiring more than a Majority Vote (Source 2: majority vote, the minority and the two-thirds vote; three cuts marked [...]) (1876; this edition 1915). Public domain (published 1915). Source text.
Counting a two-thirds vote (Source 2)
Robert's example in paragraph 3: a society has 70 members, 20 are present and 14 vote. Why are there three different answers for "two-thirds," and why do some decisions need two-thirds at all?
Result: Two-thirds of the 14 votes cast is 9 1/3, so 10 votes are needed. Two-thirds of the 20 members present is 13 1/3, so 14 are needed. Two-thirds of all 70 members is 46 2/3, so 47 are needed. A group's rules must say which one they mean. Robert requires two-thirds, not just a majority (more than half), for motions that close or limit debate or limit voting, as "a compromise between the rights of the individual and the rights of the assembly" (paragraph 4). A bare majority cannot silence the minority; the rules, he says, "are made for the protection of the minority" (paragraph 2). Diagram 2 shows the three numbers.
Guided Practice15-20 minutes
A school setting. Source 4 is an invented transcript (a word-for-word written record of what people said) of a middle school robotics club meeting. Read it aloud with students taking the parts. A "grant" is money given for a purpose, and an "amendment" is a change to a motion. As they read, students mark each place where a member or the chair applies a civic virtue or a democratic principle with a check mark, and each place where someone fails to with an X.
1Maya (club president, chairing the meeting): "The meeting will come to order. Thirteen of our 16 members are here. Our only business is last week's motion: to spend the club's $450 grant from the parents' association on a new parts kit, which costs $380. Our club rules say a motion passes with a majority of the votes cast. Who would like to speak?"
2Jordan: "I support the motion. Our old kit is missing gears, and our robot broke down twice last month because the parts are worn out."
3Priya: "I'm against it. I think we should use the grant to enter the regional competition in March. We learn the most by watching how other teams solve problems."
4Sam: "Priya only wants the trip so she can miss a day of school."
5Maya: "Sam, please talk about the plan, not about why a member supports it. Priya, go ahead."
6Priya: "I asked Mr. Okafor, our adviser, to check my numbers. The bus and the entry fee come to $310. Also, the competition is on a Saturday, so nobody misses school."
7Maya: "Is there anyone who hasn't spoken yet?" Leo: "I'm new, so I wasn't sure I should talk. The parts kit helps every member, even people who can't go on a trip."
8Jordan: "We've talked enough. I move that we stop discussion and vote." Maya: "Under our rules, stopping discussion takes a two-thirds vote. All in favor of stopping discussion?" Seven members vote yes and 6 vote no. Maya: "That is not two-thirds, so discussion continues."
9Ana: "What if we don't buy the whole kit? The gears and motors alone cost $140. That plus the trip is exactly $450. I move to amend the motion to buy the gears and motors and pay for the trip."
10After more discussion, the amendment passes, 10 to 3, and the amended motion passes, 11 to 2. Jordan: "I wanted the whole kit, but everyone got heard and the vote was fair. I'll help plan the trip."
SVHS (invented scenario; the school and speakers are invented), Source 4: the Hillcrest Middle School Robotics Club meeting (invented scenario, a transcript written for this page) (2026). Original passage written for this page.
Finding a compromise (Source 4)
How does Ana's amendment in paragraph 9 apply both civic virtues and democratic principles?
Result: Ana has listened to both sides, which is open-mindedness: Jordan needs parts and Priya wants the competition. Her numbers work: $140 for gears and motors plus $310 for the trip is $450, the whole grant. She uses the club's own procedure, a motion to amend, instead of arguing over the chair, which follows the rule of law. The full kit ($380) and the trip ($310) together would cost $690, more than the grant, so the club could not simply do both. A compromise that most members accept, reached by the rules, is how majority rule can still respect the minority.
Pair task: Make a T-chart for Source 4 with the headings "Applied" and "Not applied." Put at least four paragraph numbers in each column you can defend. Then answer: Which one moment would have made the meeting unfair if the chair had handled it differently?
Teacher model for the pair work: Start the "Applied" column with Maya's opening (paragraph 1): she tells members the rule for passing a motion before anyone speaks, so the process is known in advance. Start "Not applied" with any moment students find where a member speaks about another member instead of the plan. Let pairs find the rest; the quiz asks about several of them.
A community setting. Arthur W. Dunn wrote civics textbooks for students around the time of World War I and worked for the U.S. Bureau of Education. Read Source 3 together. Gloss: "dependent upon one another" (needing each other), "disperse" (break up and scatter), "threshing" (separating grain from the stalks), "philanthropic" (helping others, charitable) and "competent leadership is forthcoming" (capable leaders step forward).
1When people have common purposes and are dependent upon one another in accomplishing them, there must be COOPERATION, which is another name for "teamwork." A team of horses that does not pull together can not haul a heavy load. A baseball team, though composed of good players, will seldom win games unless its teamwork is good. A few soldiers may easily disperse a large mob because they have teamwork, while a mob usually does not. This principle of "pulling together," "teamwork," or "cooperation," is of the greatest importance in community life. There can be no real community life without it.
2In the early days there were "barn raisings," when neighbors came together to help one of their number to "raise" his barn; and all the men of a pioneer community contributed their labor in building the community church or schoolhouse. This was a simple form of cooperation. It may be seen now at threshing time, when neighboring farmers combine to thresh the grain of each, the same group of men and the same threshing machine doing the work for all.
[...]
3In cities there are almost innumerable organizations by which groups of people cooperate for one purpose or another. Men in the same line of business or in the same profession organize to promote their common interests. There are boards of trade, chambers of commerce, merchants' and manufacturers' associations. Lawyers have their bar associations, physicians their medical associations. There are associations of teachers, and work men in the various trades have their unions. Besides such business and professional organizations, there are clubs and associations of all sorts for men, for women, and even for children, some of them educational, some social or recreational, some philanthropic, some religious. Where there are so many people interested in the same thing, where it is easy for them to meet together, and where competent leadership is forthcoming, it is quite the usual thing to organize for united action.
Arthur W. Dunn, Community Civics and Rural Life, chapter III, "The Need for Cooperation in Community Life" (Source 3: teamwork in a community; one cut marked [...]) (1920). Public domain (published 1920). Source text.
Applying a civic virtue in a community setting (Source 3)
Dunn describes barn raisings and neighbors sharing one threshing machine (paragraph 2). What would the same virtue look like in a neighborhood or town today?
Result: The virtue is cooperation: neighbors "came together to help one of their number," and at threshing time "the same group of men and the same threshing machine" did "the work for all" (paragraph 2). Each family gives some time and gets help in return. Today the same habit shows up when neighbors share a lawn mower on a schedule, when families take turns driving a carpool to a sports league, or when a library's volunteers split up the jobs for a book sale. Dunn's point in paragraph 1 is that a community needs this habit, not just good individuals.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students read Source 5, the invented minutes (the official written record of a meeting) of a neighborhood association, and then answer the quiz, which uses Sources 1-5. As they read, they highlight civic virtues in one color and democratic principles in another. Gloss: "household" (the people who live in one home), "proposal" (a plan put forward for a vote) and "adjourned" (ended the meeting).
1The Maple Hollow Neighborhood Association met on a Tuesday evening in the community room of the public library. Notice of the meeting was posted on the association's website and on the mailbox board nine days before the meeting. The association's bylaws (its written rules) require at least seven days' notice before any vote. Twenty-two households were represented. Under the bylaws, each household has one vote, whether it owns or rents its home.
2Creek trail cleanup. Ms. Yamamoto proposed holding the cleanup on a Saturday morning in May, from 9 a.m. to noon.
3Mr. Delgado said he works at the bakery every Saturday and that several neighbors who work weekend shifts would also like to help. He asked whether a second shift could be added. Ms. Yamamoto agreed to change her proposal to a Saturday morning shift and a Sunday afternoon shift. The changed proposal passed, 19 to 3.
4Mr. Hale said he opposes holding any cleanup until the broken storm drain that washes trash into the creek is repaired. Several members disagreed with him. The chair said his view would be recorded in the minutes, and it is.
5Treasurer's report. Ms. Okonkwo reported that the cleanup fund has $85. Work gloves cost $3 a pair, and the plan calls for 30 pairs, so the fund is $5 short. She said she wanted members to know before the vote, not after. Mr. Patel offered to bring 5 pairs of his own gloves, so only 25 pairs need to be bought.
6Sign-ups. Twenty-four volunteers signed up: 16 for Saturday and 8 for Sunday. They will work in teams of 4, and each team will clean one section of the trail.
7A member proposed posting, on the mailbox board, the names of households that do not help. Other members said this would embarrass neighbors who cannot help for good reasons, such as illness or work. The proposal failed, 2 to 18.
8The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Minutes taken by the association secretary.
SVHS (invented scenario; the association and people are invented), Source 5: minutes of the Maple Hollow Neighborhood Association (invented scenario written for this page) (2026). Original passage written for this page.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: On an index card, write one civic virtue and one democratic principle. For each, write one sentence describing how you could apply it this week, one at school and one in your community (a team, a library, a place of worship, a neighborhood or a family gathering).
Teacher note on the sources: Sources 1-3 are quoted exactly as printed. Robert (1915) and Dunn (1920) write "he," "man" and "men" for any person, as was usual at the time; point this out and ask students how they would word the rule today. Dunn's examples (soldiers, threshing crews, business associations) come from the years just after World War I; ask students for present-day examples. Robert's rules were written for adult societies; many school clubs use a short version, and the meeting in Source 4 uses the two rules from Sources 1 and 2. Sources 4, 5 and 6 are invented scenarios written for this page; the people and places are not real. The two lists of virtues and principles are working definitions for this lesson, not an official list. Students practice in class and on paper only: the homework asks for a plan, not for contacting any group or official.
Homework passage. Source 6 is a short invented scenario about a homeroom choosing a service project.
1On Monday, Ms. Ruiz told Homeroom 7B that the class would choose one service project for the spring. She wrote three choices on the board: collecting books for the children's room at the county hospital, making cards for the residents of a senior center, or cleaning up the school courtyard. Three of the 28 students in the homeroom were absent that day.
2Before the vote, Diego stood up and said, "Books is the only good choice. Anyone who picks cards is boring." A few students laughed. Ms. Ruiz asked the class to vote right away by raising hands. Books got 12 votes, cards got 9 and the courtyard got 4. Diego called out, "Books wins! The majority chose books."
3After class, Nadia, who had voted for cards, told Ms. Ruiz that she had wanted to explain why the senior center would be a good choice, but there had been no time for discussion. She also said that two of the absent students had told her they wanted the courtyard cleanup.
SVHS (invented scenario; the class and students are invented), Source 6: Homeroom 7B chooses a service project (invented scenario written for this page, for the homework) (2026). Original passage written for this page.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give the table of virtues and principles as a half-page card to keep on the desk during every task
Read Source 4 aloud in parts before students mark it, and give the T-chart with one row filled in
Use the frame: "In paragraph ___, ___ applies / fails to apply the virtue (or principle) of ___ because ___."
For Advanced Students
Rewrite Robert's paragraph 2 of Source 1 as five rules for a middle school club, in today's words, keeping every idea
Decide whether the Maple Hollow association (Source 5) should have used a two-thirds vote for any of its decisions, and defend the answer with Source 2
Compare Dunn's idea of teamwork (Source 3) with the way a sports team you know makes decisions
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong work names a specific virtue or principle, points to the exact action in the source (with a paragraph number), and explains why that action applies it or fails to. Strong answers also propose a concrete fix that keeps the group's goal. Watch for four errors: calling every good behavior "democracy" without separating virtues (how a person acts) from principles (how the group decides); treating "majority" as "the most votes" even when no option has more than half; thinking that following the rules means the minority must stay silent; and judging a decision by whether one likes the result rather than by how it was made.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Virtue or Principle? Card Sort
15 minPairs
Pairs get 10 action cards. For each card they decide whether it mainly shows a civic virtue (how a person acts) or a democratic principle (how the group decides), name which one, and mark the setting: S for school or C for community.
The 10 Cards
At a club meeting, a member who disagrees waits for the chair to call on her before she speaks.
The school's honor code applies to every student, including the team captains.
A public library's teen advisory board counts every member's vote the same, whether the member is in grade 6 or grade 8.
A volunteer at a food pantry admits she miscounted the cans and corrects her report.
Before voting on a new lunch-line rule, the class hears from students who bring lunch from home and students who buy lunch.
A youth baseball league applies its age-limit rule to the coach's own son, just as it does to every other player.
A youth soccer league lets parents who dislike a schedule change speak at its board meeting.
After losing a vote on the theme for the class mural, a student helps paint the winning design.
A school club's rules require a two-thirds vote to end discussion, so a small majority cannot silence everyone else.
Neighbors take turns shoveling the sidewalk in front of an elderly neighbor's house.
Answer Key for the Teacher
Civic virtues: card 1 (respect, S), card 4 (honesty, C), card 5 (open-mindedness, S), card 10 (responsibility and cooperation, C)
Democratic principles: card 2 (rule of law, S), card 3 (equality, C), card 6 (rule of law, C), card 7 (freedom of expression, C), card 9 (majority rule with minority rights, S)
Both: card 8 shows the virtue of cooperation and the principle of majority rule, accepted by the losing side (S)
Five cards are set at school (1, 2, 5, 8, 9) and five in the community (3, 4, 6, 7, 10).
Procedure
Read each card aloud and ask: is this about one person's behavior, or about the group's rules and process?
Place the card in the Virtue pile, the Principle pile or a "Both" pile, and write the name on a sticky note
Mark S or C on each card
Compare with another pair and settle any disagreement by pointing to the table from Direct Instruction
Discussion Questions
Which card could go in more than one pile? Why?
Choose one school card. What would the same virtue or principle look like in a community group?
Variation for a Shorter Class
Use cards 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 9 only: two virtues, three principles and the "Both" card.
2
Run a Fair Class Meeting
20 minWhole class
The class holds a short meeting on an invented question: "Should our class celebration at the end of the unit be a game afternoon or a talent show?" Students use two rules from Robert: speak about the proposal, not the person (Source 1, paragraph 2), and stopping discussion takes a two-thirds vote of the votes cast (Source 2). Four students get secret role cards that test the rules.
Roles
Chair: calls on speakers in turn, keeps a list so no one speaks twice before everyone who wants to has spoken once, and states each vote
Secretary: writes the minutes: each motion, each vote count and any minority view a member asks to have recorded
Timekeeper: gives each speaker 1 minute
Secret role cards (4): "You interrupt once." "You have an important fact (the talent show needs the stage, which is free only on Fridays) but you wait to be asked." "You move to stop discussion after only two speakers." "You make one comment about a classmate instead of the plan, then accept the chair's correction."
Procedure
The chair states the motion and the two rules
Discussion: the chair calls on speakers and asks, before any vote, "Is there anyone who hasn't spoken yet?"
When the motion to stop discussion comes, the class votes on it; the secretary computes two-thirds of the votes cast and the chair announces whether discussion continues
The class votes on the main motion by secret ballot, and the secretary reads the minutes aloud
Debrief Questions
Which secret role did you spot? How did the chair or the group handle it?
Would a different result have happened if the member with the fact had never been asked?
Members who lost the vote: did the process feel fair? What made it fair or unfair?
Modification for English Learners
Post the sentence starters "I move that ___," "I agree with the proposal because ___" and "I disagree with the proposal because ___," and let students practice one aloud with a partner before the meeting.
3
Community Fix-It
15 minGroups of 4
Each group gets 4 problem cards describing invented community groups where a decision went wrong. For each card, the group names the missing civic virtue or democratic principle and rewrites what should have happened in 2-3 sentences.
The 4 Problem Cards
The leader of a park volunteer group moves the spring planting day to a weekday by herself, although the group's rules say members vote on the date.
At a library meeting about new hours for the teen room, one adult keeps interrupting the teenagers who came to speak.
A volunteer coach tells the youth basketball league board that 20 families signed up for a new carpool, although only 12 did, because he wants the board to approve it.
A community garden gives the sunniest plots to the organizer's friends without a drawing or a sign-up list.
Answer Key for the Teacher
Card 1: rule of law (the leader broke the group's own rule); fix: call a meeting or a vote on the date
Card 2: respect, and the principle that every member's voice counts equally; fix: the chair keeps a speakers' list and asks the adult to wait his turn
Card 3: honesty; fix: report the real number, 12, so the board decides with true facts
Card 4: equality (fair treatment for all); fix: a public sign-up list or a drawing for plots
Procedure
Each member reads one card aloud
The group agrees on the missing virtue or principle and writes it on the card
The group writes the fix and checks that it still reaches the group's goal
Discussion Questions
Which card was a problem with a person's behavior, and which was a problem with the group's process?
Which fix would be hardest to carry out in real life? Why?
Modification for Advanced Students
Groups write a fifth card about a school setting with the same missing virtue or principle as one of the community cards, and trade it with another group.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: Civic Virtues and Democratic Principles in Two Settings
D2.Civ.7.6-8 asks students to apply both civic virtues (how each person acts) and democratic principles (how the group decides), at school and in the community. Each box gives one example from this lesson; students add more during the card sort.
Diagram 2: What "Two-Thirds" Means Depends on the Base
Robert's example in Source 2, paragraph 3, drawn to scale: two-thirds of the 14 votes cast is 10 votes, two-thirds of the 20 members present is 14, and two-thirds of all 70 members is 47. Robert requires a two-thirds vote to close debate so that a bare majority cannot silence the minority.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
D2.Civ.7.6-8 Homework: Fixing a Homeroom Vote
Directions: Problems 1-4 use Source 6, the invented scenario about Homeroom 7B, printed in the Closure phase of the lesson plan. Problems 5 and 6 ask you to apply the lesson to a setting you know. Answer in 2-5 sentences, and cite the paragraph numbers of any source you use. Problem 5 is a plan on paper only: do not contact any group or official.
Part 1: What Went Wrong (Problems 1-3)
Diego says, "The majority chose books" (paragraph 2). Was he right? Show the numbers, and explain the difference between a majority and the most votes.
Name one civic virtue that was missing before the vote (paragraph 2). Use Source 1, paragraph 2 to explain what Diego should have done instead, and rewrite his comment so it follows Robert's rule.
Nadia raises two concerns (paragraph 3). For each, name the democratic principle at stake and suggest one fair fix that Ms. Ruiz's class could use.
Part 2: Apply It (Problems 4-6)
The class decides to hold a second vote, a runoff (a new vote between the top two choices), after a 10-minute discussion. In the runoff, the 4 students who chose the courtyard split: 1 votes for books and 3 vote for cards; everyone else votes as before. Who wins, and is it a majority of the 25 voters? Explain why a runoff can be fairer than the first vote.
Choose a community group you know (for example, a sports league, a library, a youth group or a neighborhood). Describe one decision it might make, and explain how it could apply one civic virtue and one democratic principle while making it.
Write four rules for meetings of a club at your school. Tie each rule to a civic virtue or a democratic principle, and support at least one rule with a quotation from Source 1 or Source 2.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Names the Virtue or Principle
Names the right virtue or principle and explains it
Names it without explaining it
Names none, or the wrong one
Evidence
Cites the exact action with paragraph numbers
Refers to the source without a paragraph number
No reference to a source
Application
Gives a concrete fix or plan that keeps the group's goal
Gives a vague fix ("be nicer")
No fix or plan
Numbers
Counts votes correctly and uses "majority" correctly
One counting error
Calls the most votes a majority without checking
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-3 use Robert's rules on debate (Source 1), Questions 4-5 use Robert's rules on voting (Source 2), Questions 6-7 use Dunn (Source 3), Questions 8-12 and 18 use the robotics club meeting (Source 4), Questions 13-16 use the neighborhood minutes (Source 5), and Questions 17 and 19 use more than one source. Question 20 asks about your own school. All passages are printed in the lesson plan. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 1, paragraph 1, Robert writes, "Where there is no law, but every man does what is right in his own eyes, there is the least of real liberty." What does he mean?
Answer: B
Robert argues that rules "restrain the individual somewhat" but protect "the interests of the whole": without them, no one can count on being heard, so there is "the least of real liberty." Choice A reverses his argument. Choice C gives one person the power the rules are meant to share. Choice D describes the very situation he warns against, "every man does what is right in his own eyes."
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Robert says a member "must confine himself to the question before the assembly" (Source 1, paragraph 2). At a school club meeting about choosing a fundraiser, which comment breaks this rule?
Answer: D
The question before the club is the fundraiser, and the T-shirts are a different subject, so the comment in Choice D does not "confine" itself to the question. Choices A, B and C all discuss the fundraiser (when, which one, how many volunteers), so they are in order. Choice B compares two plans strongly, which Robert allows: a measure "may be condemned in strong terms."
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Under the rule in Source 1, paragraph 2, which comment at a school club meeting is in order?
Answer: C
Choice C criticizes the plan and refers to the speaker as "the member who spoke last," exactly as Robert suggests. Choice A arraigns a member's motives, which "is not allowable." Choices B and D attack people, not the measure.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A club has 30 members. At a meeting, 24 are present and 21 vote on a motion to end discussion. Using Robert's meaning of a two-thirds vote in Source 2, paragraph 3, how many yes votes does the motion need?
Answer: B
Robert says "A two-thirds vote means two-thirds of the votes cast." Two-thirds of 21 is exactly 14. Choice C, 16, is two-thirds of the 24 members present. Choice D, 20, is two-thirds of all 30 members, rounded up. Choice A, 11, is a simple majority of 21, which is not enough to end discussion.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 2, paragraph 2, when can a group act by "general consent," without following its usual voting steps?
Answer: A
Robert says the rules "are made for the protection of the minority, and when there is no minority to protect, there is little use for the restraint of the rules." If no one objects, there is no minority. Choice B gives the chair a power the passage never gives. Choice C confuses general consent with a quorum, which paragraph 1 says must be present. Choice D mixes it up with the two-thirds vote in paragraphs 3-4.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 3, paragraph 1, why does Dunn mention that "A few soldiers may easily disperse a large mob"?
Answer: B
Dunn's point is that a small group with "teamwork" beats a larger group without it, "while a mob usually does not" have teamwork. Choices A and D turn an illustration into a claim he does not make. Choice C reads a warning into the sentence that is not there.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 3, paragraph 3, what makes it "quite the usual thing to organize for united action" in cities?
Answer: D
Dunn names three conditions: "so many people interested in the same thing," it is "easy for them to meet together," and "competent leadership is forthcoming." Choice A is not in the text. Choice B ignores the clubs "for men, for women, and even for children." Choice C contradicts his whole chapter, which is about people being "dependent upon one another."
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 4, paragraph 4, Sam says, "Priya only wants the trip so she can miss a day of school." Which rule from Source 1 does Sam break?
Answer: D
Sam accuses Priya of having a bad reason instead of discussing the plan, which is arraigning her motives. Maya's reply in paragraph 5 ("talk about the plan, not about why a member supports it") applies the rule. Choices A, B and C are real rules from paragraph 2, but Sam's comment is not about officers' titles, an earlier act of the club or being called to order.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 4, paragraph 7, Maya asks, "Is there anyone who hasn't spoken yet?" Which democratic principle does her question apply?
Answer: C
Maya makes sure a quiet member gets the same chance to speak as the others, and Leo adds a point no one had made. That is equality, shown in Choice C. Choice A misreads the moment: no vote is taken. Choices B and D name real principles that do not fit this question.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 4, paragraph 8, the vote to stop discussion is 7 yes and 6 no. Why does discussion continue?
Answer: B
Thirteen members voted, and two-thirds of 13 is 8 2/3, so 9 yes votes were needed; 7 is a majority but not two-thirds. Choice A is wrong because 7 to 6 is not a tie. Choice C uses the wrong rule: the club counts two-thirds of the votes cast, not a share of all 16 members. Choice D has no support: Maya never votes in the transcript.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Priya says, "I asked Mr. Okafor, our adviser, to check my numbers" (Source 4, paragraph 6). Which civic virtue does this show most clearly?
Answer: C
Checking her figures with an adult before sharing them is about giving the group true information, which is honesty. Choice A is wrong because she disagrees with Jordan. Choice B misreads the order: Sam spoke about her, not before her by her choice. Choice D is wrong because she speaks in paragraph 3.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
At the end of Source 4, Jordan says, "I wanted the whole kit, but everyone got heard and the vote was fair. I'll help plan the trip." What does his response show?
Answer: D
Jordan lost on the full kit but accepts the result because the process was fair, and he offers to help: majority rule plus the virtue of cooperation, as in Choice D. Choice A ignores his reason ("the vote was fair"). Choice B is wrong: Jordan is not the chair, and no vote is overruled. Choice C is the opposite of what he says.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 5, paragraph 3, Mr. Delgado works on Saturdays, and the proposal is changed to add a Sunday shift. Which pair best describes what the association applied?
Answer: A
Members listened to a view they had not considered (open-mindedness) and changed the plan so that neighbors with weekend jobs could take part. Choice D is incomplete: the vote happened only after the plan was changed to include them. Choices B and C name ideas that the paragraph does not show.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Ms. Okonkwo reports that the cleanup fund has $85, that 30 pairs of gloves at $3 a pair are needed, and that she wanted members to know "before the vote, not after" (Source 5, paragraph 5). What does her report show?
Answer: C
Thirty pairs at $3 cost $90, and $90 - $85 = $5 short. Reporting the shortfall before the vote, when it can still affect the decision, is honesty. Choice A reverses the subtraction. Choice B subtracts from $100 instead of $90. Choice D ignores the $5 difference.
Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The Maple Hollow bylaws require seven days' notice before any vote, and the meeting was announced nine days ahead (Source 5, paragraph 1). Which democratic principle is the association following?
Answer: B
The association follows its own written rules, which apply to every vote: that is the rule of law. Nine days is more than the seven the bylaws require. Choices A and C are democratic principles, but neither is about following the group's rules on notice. Choice D has nothing to do with the minutes.
Question 16 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 5, paragraph 7, why did the members vote down the proposal to post the names of households that do not help?
Answer: A
The minutes say "this would embarrass neighbors who cannot help for good reasons, such as illness or work," which is the virtue of respect. Choice B contradicts paragraph 1, where the meeting notice was posted on the mailbox board. Choices C and D are not in the minutes; Mr. Hale opposed the cleanup in paragraph 4.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Name one civic virtue or democratic principle that appears in BOTH the school meeting (Source 4) and the neighborhood meeting (Source 5). Give one piece of evidence from each, with paragraph numbers.
Model answer: Freedom of expression for the minority appears in both. In Source 4, paragraph 8, the motion to stop discussion fails because 7 of 13 votes is not two-thirds, so members who still wanted to speak could go on; in Source 5, paragraph 4, the chair records Mr. Hale's opposing view in the minutes although several members disagreed. (Other good answers: open-mindedness, Source 4, paragraph 7 and Source 5, paragraph 3; honesty, Source 4, paragraph 6 and Source 5, paragraph 5.) Rubric: full credit for one correctly named virtue or principle with accurate evidence from both sources; partial credit for evidence from only one source.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Rewrite Sam's comment in Source 4, paragraph 4 so that it follows Robert's rule in Source 1, paragraph 2 and still argues against the trip.
Model answer: "I'm against spending the grant on the trip. Only a few members can go, but every member uses the parts kit, so the kit helps more people." The new comment criticizes the measure, "the nature or consequences of a measure may be condemned in strong terms," and says nothing about Priya's reasons. Rubric: full credit for a comment that argues against the trip on its merits and makes no claim about any member's motives; partial credit if it drops the attack but makes no argument.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Source 5, paragraph 6 says 24 volunteers will work in teams of 4, with each team cleaning one section of the trail. How many teams will there be, and how does this plan show the kind of cooperation Dunn describes in Source 3?
Model answer: 24 / 4 = 6 teams: 4 on Saturday (16 volunteers) and 2 on Sunday (8 volunteers). Like the neighbors at threshing time in Source 3, paragraph 2, each person does one part of a job that no one could do alone, and the work is organized so it gets done; Dunn calls this "pulling together" (paragraph 1). Rubric: full credit for 6 teams and a link to a specific idea in Source 3; partial credit for the number or the link alone.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Choose one democratic principle from this lesson. Describe a decision at your own school where it could be applied, and explain what applying it would look like.
Model answer: Equality could be applied when a grade chooses the theme of its spring dance. Every student, not only the planning committee, would get one ballot, and the committee would collect ideas from all homerooms before making the list of choices, so each student's preference counts the same. Rubric: full credit for a correctly named principle, a realistic school decision and a concrete description of how the principle shapes the process; partial credit if the description is vague.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does D2.Civ.7.6-8 mean?
D2.Civ.7.6-8 asks students in grades 6-8 to apply civic virtues and democratic principles in school and community settings. Students use habits such as honesty and respect, and principles such as majority rule and the rule of law, when they make decisions with others, and they judge whether a group decision was made fairly.
What are civic virtues?
Civic virtues are habits of character that help people live and decide things together, such as honesty, respect, responsibility, cooperation and open-mindedness. They describe how each person acts in a group. The C3 Framework does not give one official list, so teachers often use a short working list like the one in this lesson.
What is the difference between a civic virtue and a democratic principle?
A civic virtue is about a person's behavior; a democratic principle is about the group's rules and process. Telling the truth about a budget is a virtue (honesty); giving every member one vote is a principle (equality). Many good decisions need both.
Is D2.Civ.7.6-8 taught in civics or in history class?
It is a civics indicator, usually taught in a grade 7 or grade 8 civics or social studies course, but it fits any class that holds meetings or group projects. Student government, clubs and service projects are natural places to practice it.
Why use Robert's Rules of Order with middle school students?
Because it is a real rulebook that many clubs, school boards and town councils still use, and its core ideas are short and clear: debate the proposal, not the person, and protect the minority's right to be heard. Students do not need the whole book; two or three rules are enough to run a fair class meeting.
What is the difference between a majority and a plurality?
A majority is more than half of the votes cast; a plurality is simply the most votes. If 30 people vote 13, 10 and 7, the choice with 13 has a plurality but not a majority, because 13 is less than half of 30. Groups that want a majority winner can hold a runoff between the top two choices.
How can students apply democratic principles in the community without getting involved in politics?
By working with everyday community groups: a library teen board, a sports league, a neighborhood cleanup, a food pantry or a youth group. These groups make decisions, keep minutes and vote, so students can practice fair procedures on questions that have nothing to do with parties or elections.
How is D2.Civ.7.6-8 assessed?
Usually with scenarios and performance tasks rather than vocabulary tests. Students read an account of a meeting or decision, name the virtue or principle that was applied or missing, cite the evidence and propose a fix. Teachers can also observe a class meeting with a simple checklist.
What comes after D2.Civ.7.6-8 in high school?
D2.Civ.7.9-12 asks high school students to apply civic virtues and democratic principles when working with others, in more demanding settings such as group deliberations and juries. Related grades 6-8 indicators are D2.Civ.9.6-8, on comparing how different groups deliberate, and D2.Civ.10.6-8, on how personal interests and civic virtues shape the way people address problems.
Does applying democratic principles mean the majority always gets its way?
No: majority rule works together with minority rights. The majority decides, but the minority keeps the right to speak, to be treated fairly and to try to change minds later. That is why Robert requires a two-thirds vote to cut off debate, and why a group can record a minority view in its minutes.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to D2.Civ.7.6-8: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
SL.6.1Prerequisite
Engage in collaborative discussions with diverse partners on grade 6 topics
Standard text: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History (Silver Spring, MD: NCSS, 2013). NCSS was not involved in the production of this lesson and does not endorse it.