WHST.9-10.6Common CoreELAWriting in History, Science and Technical SubjectsGrades 9-10
WHST.9-10.6: Publishing Linked, Interactive History Exhibits and Lab Reports
In plain English: WHST.9-10.6 is the Common Core literacy standard that asks students in grades 9 and 10 to use technology, including the Internet, to produce, publish and update writing in history, science and technical subjects, alone or with others. Students link their writing to sources and definitions and display it in ways print cannot, such as filtered timelines and graphs that change when a reader taps them.
Use technology, including the Internet, to produce, publish, and update individual or shared writing products, taking advantage of technology's capacity to link to other information and to display information flexibly and dynamically.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects 6-12 · Cluster: Production and Distribution of Writing · Official standard
Students follow two pieces of subject-area writing from a draft to a published, linked page and through the updates that come after. In the history context, four invented tenth graders turn a printed paragraph about the Dust Bowl into an entry for their class's online exhibit. Their comment thread in a shared document shows each decision: which facts link to an archive record, which terms open a definition, why the events become a timeline with filters, and what must stay in plain view. After publishing, two problems reported by readers and checkers lead to dated updates. In the science context, two invented biology students publish a lab report on sugar and yeast with a sortable table and a graph that can show every trial. Their teacher and classmates find a misleading axis, a data link that anyone could edit and a table that does not fit on a phone. The lab data are invented and labeled; the history facts are real.
WHST.9-10.6 asks for three uses of technology, producing, publishing and updating, on writing done alone or with others. The grade 9-10 emphasis is what digital writing can do that print cannot: link to other information, such as a source record, a full text or a definition, and display information flexibly and dynamically, so that readers can filter, sort, open and switch views, and so that a display can change when a reader acts or new data arrive. Students judge every feature by what it does for a history or science reader, not by how impressive it looks.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Produce a shared history or science writing product in a shared document, dividing the work and recording decisions in comments
Link each fact, quotation or image to a source record a reader can open, with link text that names the source
Choose flexible and dynamic displays, such as filters, tap-to-open entries, sortable tables and graphs that show values on tap, and explain what each lets a reader do
Keep the main claim and must-know information in plain view, and write alternative text for images
Publish a piece, then update it after feedback with a dated entry in its version history
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Using technology to produce and publish writing that presents the relationships between ideas clearly, in grades 6-8 WHST.6-8.6
Writing informative texts in history and science with headings, graphics and multimedia WHST.6-8.2
Reading a line graph and a data table with means from a lab
Knowing that the Great Depression and the New Deal took place in the 1930s
"A printed poster and a web page both explain the same event in history. Name one thing the web page can do that the poster cannot. Then name one way that same feature could leave a reader with the wrong idea."
Collect answers on the board in two columns, helps and could mislead. Point out that nearly every feature appears in both columns: a link can open a source or a dead page, and a filter can focus a reader or hide half the story. WHST.9-10.6 asks writers to take advantage of what technology can do, which means choosing features for the reader.
Introduce the history task. Ms. Varadi's U.S. History class is building an online exhibit, Hard Times on the Plains, on the school's history website. Read Text 1: her assignment and one team's first draft, a printed paragraph about the Dust Bowl. Ms. Varadi and the team are invented; the facts about the 1930s are real. Students underline every fact in the draft that a reader might want to check and circle every term a ninth grader might not know.
1Assignment from Ms. Varadi, U.S. History 10
2Your team will publish one entry in our class's online exhibit, Hard Times on the Plains, on the school's history website. Your readers are next year's U.S. History students and their families. Every fact must be linked to a source the reader can open. Use at least two features that a printed poster cannot offer, and explain in your team notes why each one helps a reader understand the history. The entry is due in two weeks. After that, your team keeps it up to date for the rest of the semester.
3The team's first draft, written as one printed paragraph
4The Dust Bowl was a disaster on the southern Great Plains in the 1930s. In the 1910s and 1920s, farmers plowed up millions of acres of native grassland to grow wheat, especially when wheat prices were high during World War I. The grass roots had held the soil in place. When a long drought began in the early 1930s, crops died, and strong winds lifted the bare soil into huge dust storms. In May 1934, one storm carried dust all the way to cities on the East Coast. The worst storm came on April 14, 1935, a day people called Black Sunday. Less than two weeks later, on April 27, 1935, the Soil Conservation Act became law. It created the Soil Conservation Service to teach farmers methods such as contour plowing and strip cropping. Many families left the region. Dorothea Lange's 1936 photograph Migrant Mother shows one of these families. The photograph and many other pictures from the 1930s are in the Library of Congress. The law is also online.
SVHS lesson authors, Why the Plains Blew Away, Assignment and Printed Draft (Text 1: Ms. Varadi's brief and the team's first draft; Ms. Varadi, her class and the team are invented, and the facts are real). Original passage written for this page.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Show Diagram 1. A printed paragraph gives every reader the same words in the same order and can only name its sources. A linked entry lets each fact open its source record and each hard term open a definition. A flexible, dynamic display lets the reader choose a view: filter a timeline, open an entry, sort a table, show or hide detail on a graph. Flexibly means the reader can rearrange or choose what to see; dynamically means the display responds, when the reader taps, or when new data arrive. The bottom row of the diagram is the rest of the standard: the piece is produced, published and then updated, with every update logged.
Read Text 2, the team's comment thread, and Text 3, the entry as published. Students draw an arrow from each comment in Text 2 to the block in Text 3 that it produced. Then work through the five examples.
1Hana: Our readers will open this on the school site, and a lot of them will be on phones. Right now it is one long paragraph. The order of events is the whole story, cause and then effect, so I think the events should become a timeline instead of sentences.
2Desmond: A timeline where each entry is one line, and you tap it to open two or three sentences. Then a reader can see the whole chain from the plowing to the law at a glance and open only what they want.
3Lior: Can we add filter buttons? Weather, Farming, Government, People. If you pick Farming, you only see the plowing and the new methods. That shows that the disaster had human causes and not just bad weather, which is our main point.
4Joaquin: Only if "Show all" is what readers see first. If someone lands on the Weather filter and nothing else, they'll think it was only drought.
5Hana: Links next. The brief says every fact links to a source. For Black Sunday, I found a digitized newspaper front page from April 15, 1935. Should we paste a screenshot of it?
6Desmond: Link to the newspaper page in the archive instead, and say in the link text what it is. A screenshot can't be zoomed or searched, and the archive page gives the paper's name and date, which a history reader needs to judge the source.
7Lior: Same for Migrant Mother. The Library of Congress record has Lange's own caption and the date. Let's show the photo and link it to that record, so a reader can check where it came from.
8Joaquin: And the Soil Conservation Act: link the full text, but put one sentence in our own words right next to the link. Nobody should have to read a law to understand our entry.
9Hana: What about "contour plowing" and "strip cropping"? Next year's ninth graders won't know those terms.
10Desmond: A short definition that opens when you tap the term. It keeps the timeline short for readers who already know the words.
11Ms. Varadi: Good plan. Two cautions. First, anything a reader must know to understand your claim cannot live only behind a tap or a filter, so put your main claim in plain text at the top. Second, every photo needs alternative text, a written description that a screen reader can speak aloud, and the timeline has to make sense with no photos at all.
12Lior: I'll write the alternative text. Joaquin, can you open every link on a phone and a laptop before we publish?
SVHS lesson authors, Comment Thread in the Team's Shared Document (Text 2: Hana, Desmond, Lior, Joaquin and Ms. Varadi are invented). Original passage written for this page.
1[Heading] Why the Plains Blew Away
2[Claim, in plain text at the top] The dust storms of the 1930s were not caused by drought alone. Farming had stripped away the grass that held the soil, and drought and wind did the rest. The government's answer, soil conservation, went after the farming causes.
3[Filter buttons] Show all (selected) | Weather | Farming | Government | People
4[Timeline entry, Farming] 1910s-1920s: Farmers plow up the grassland. Tap to open: Farmers plowed millions of acres of native prairie to plant wheat, especially while prices were high during World War I. The grass roots had held the soil in place. [link: Natural Resources Conservation Service history page on the plowing of the Plains]
5[Timeline entry, Weather] Early 1930s: Drought begins. Tap to open: Years of low rainfall killed the wheat and left plowed fields bare.
6[Timeline entry, Weather] May 1934: Dust reaches the East Coast. Tap to open: One storm carried dust from the Plains to cities as far away as the Atlantic coast.
7[Timeline entry, Weather] April 14, 1935: Black Sunday. Tap to open: One of the worst storms of the decade turned the afternoon dark across the southern Plains. [link: Front page, April 15, 1935, reporting the Black Sunday storm (digitized newspaper archive)]
8[Timeline entry, Government] April 27, 1935: The Soil Conservation Act becomes law. Tap to open: The law created the Soil Conservation Service to teach farmers ways to keep soil in place. [link: Full text of the Soil Conservation Act of 1935] Terms that open a definition when tapped: contour plowing (plowing across a slope along lines of equal height), strip cropping (planting a field in alternating strips of crops and of grass or other cover, so that no wide stretch of soil lies bare).
9[Timeline entry, People] March 1936: Migrant Mother. Tap to open: Dorothea Lange photographed a mother and her children in a camp of pea pickers in Nipomo, California. The photograph shows a family that fled the dust storms. [Photo, with alternative text: "A woman in worn clothes sits in a tent with one hand raised to her chin. Two children lean against her shoulders, and a baby lies in her lap."] [link: Library of Congress catalog record for Migrant Mother, with Lange's caption]
10[Map] The five states hit hardest: Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado and New Mexico. Tap a state to list the timeline entries that mention it.
11[Version history] Version 1, March 3: Published on the school's history website. (Whole team) Version 2, March 9: A reader wrote that the woman in Migrant Mother, Florence Owens Thompson, had moved to California in the 1920s, before the dust storms. The team checked two sources, changed "a family that fled the dust storms" to "a family of migrant farm workers during the Depression," and added a dated correction note at the bottom of the entry. (Lior) Version 3, March 12: The newspaper archive moved its pages to new addresses, so the Black Sunday link opened an error page. Replaced the link and tested it on a phone and a laptop. (Joaquin)
SVHS lesson authors, Why the Plains Blew Away, as Published (Text 3: the team's exhibit entry described block by block, with its version history; the team is invented, and the facts are real). Original passage written for this page.
Producing a shared product: dividing the work in the shared document
Four writers share one entry. In Text 2 they comment beside the draft instead of rewriting each other's sentences, and the thread ends with two named jobs before publishing.
Result: Lior takes the alternative text, and Joaquin tests every link on two kinds of device. A shared product still needs owners for each task, and the comment thread becomes a record of who decided what, which the version history later continues.
Linking: the archive page instead of a copy
Hana found a digitized newspaper front page about Black Sunday and asks whether to paste a screenshot of it (Text 2, paragraph 5).
Result: Desmond's answer: link to the page in the archive, with link text that says what it is. The published link reads "Front page, April 15, 1935, reporting the Black Sunday storm (digitized newspaper archive)." The reader can zoom, search and see which paper printed it, which a history reader needs to judge a source.
Displaying flexibly: filters without hiding the story
The team adds filter buttons to the timeline. Joaquin warns that a reader who sees only one filter could leave with half the story (Text 2, paragraph 4).
Result: The published entry opens on "Show all (selected)," and each filter only narrows a view the reader has already seen. A flexible display lets readers choose a view, but the writer chooses the first view, and it should be the one that carries the claim.
Linking a long source: a sentence in our own words beside the link
The full text of the Soil Conservation Act is long and legal. Joaquin says nobody should have to read a law to understand the entry (Text 2, paragraph 8).
Result: Text 3 states what the law did in one sentence, "The law created the Soil Conservation Service to teach farmers ways to keep soil in place," and then links the full text. The link is for readers who want to check or go deeper; the sentence is for everyone.
Updating: a correction that readers can see
After publishing, a reader points out that the woman in Migrant Mother had moved to California before the dust storms (Text 3, Version 2).
Result: The team checks two sources, rewrites the caption and adds a dated correction note to the entry. Updating a published piece means changing it where readers will see the change and logging what changed and why, not quietly replacing a sentence.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Move to the science context. Amira and Tobias, two invented biology students, tested how the concentration of sucrose (table sugar) affects fermentation by yeast. Yeast breaks down sugar and releases carbon dioxide gas, so more gas in the same time means faster fermentation. Their class publishes lab reports on a class lab website. Show Table 1, then read Text 4, their report as published, and Text 5, the comments that came in and the updates they made. Diagram 2 shows the graph as it looks after the updates.
Table 1. Gas collected in 15 minutes from 1.0 g of dry yeast in 40 mL of sucrose solution at 35 °C (invented data; three trials each)
Sucrose (%)
Trial 1 (mL)
Trial 2 (mL)
Trial 3 (mL)
Mean (mL)
0
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.7
2.5
9.0
10.5
8.5
9.3
5
15.5
17.0
16.0
16.2
10
21.0
19.5
22.5
21.0
20
16.0
15.0
16.5
15.8
1[Title] How Does Sugar Concentration Affect Gas Production by Yeast?
2[Summary, at the top] Yeast produced the most carbon dioxide in 10% sucrose: a mean of 21.0 mL in 15 minutes. Gas production rose from 0% to 10% sucrose and fell at 20%.
3[Method, in brief] We mixed 1.0 g of dry yeast into 40 mL of sucrose solution at 35 °C and collected the gas by water displacement in an inverted 25 mL graduated cylinder for 15 minutes. We ran three trials at each concentration. [link: Class procedure for the yeast fermentation lab (shared document, view only)]
4[Interactive graph] Mean volume of gas collected (mL) at five sucrose concentrations. Tap or hover over a point to see its value. A button, "Show all trials," adds the three separate trials as small dots.
5[Table, sortable by any column] Sucrose concentration (%) | Trial 1 (mL) | Trial 2 (mL) | Trial 3 (mL) | Mean (mL). The numbers are the same as in Table 1.
6[Term that opens a definition when tapped] fermentation: a process in which yeast breaks down sugar without oxygen, releasing carbon dioxide and ethanol.
7[Discussion] Gas production increased with sugar concentration up to 10%, because the yeast had more sugar to ferment. At 20%, the volume dropped. One possible explanation is that a very concentrated sugar solution draws water out of yeast cells by osmosis, which slows them down. [link: Section on osmosis in our class's online biology textbook] We tested only five concentrations, so the highest rate could lie anywhere between 5% and 20%.
8[Link] Raw data: [link: Our data file (spreadsheet)]
SVHS lesson authors, How Does Sugar Concentration Affect Gas Production by Yeast? (Text 4: Amira and Tobias's online lab report described block by block; the students and their data are invented). Original passage written for this page.
1Dr. Kwan (biology teacher), October 8: The graph's vertical axis starts at 8 mL. The 0% point falls off the bottom, and the rise from 2.5% to 10% looks several times steeper than it is. Start the axis at zero. "Show all trials" is a strong feature, so tell readers in a caption what the spread of the dots shows.
2Mateo (classmate), October 9: Your data file link opens the spreadsheet in edit mode. I could have changed your numbers without meaning to.
3Reader comment, October 10: On my phone, the table is cut off after the Trial 2 column, so I can't see the means.
4Version history
5Version 1, October 7: Published on the class lab website. (Amira and Tobias)
6Version 2, October 9: The vertical axis now starts at 0 mL. Added a caption under the graph: "Small dots show the three trials. At 20%, all three trials are lower than every trial at 10%, so the drop is not caused by one unusual trial." (Amira)
7Version 3, October 9: Changed the data file link to view only, and opened it from a classmate's account to test it. (Tobias)
8Version 4, October 11: On narrow screens, the table now shows only the Sucrose and Mean columns, with a "Show trials" button that opens the other three. (Tobias)
SVHS lesson authors, Comments on the Published Lab Report, with Its Version History (Text 5: Dr. Kwan, Mateo, the reader, Amira and Tobias are invented). Original passage written for this page.
Feature audit for the lab report (pairs fill in the empty columns)
Feature in Text 4
What it lets the reader do
Problem found after publishing (if any)
Update that fixed it
Summary at the top
Link to the class procedure
Interactive graph
Sortable table
Link to the data file
Pairs complete the audit, then begin Activity 3. Discuss: which feature in Text 4 needed no update at all, and what does that say about testing a page before it goes live?
Independent Practice15 minutes
Each student takes a piece of writing from a current history, science or technical class, such as a paragraph, a lab conclusion or a set of instructions, and plans its online version. (1) List three things in it that should link somewhere, with link text for each that names the destination. (2) Choose one flexible or dynamic display and write two sentences on what the reader can do with it. (3) Mark one piece of information that must stay in plain view, and say why. (4) Write alternative text for one image or graph. A student without a current piece uses the team's printed draft in Text 1 and plans a version different from Text 3.
The quiz uses Texts 1-5 and Table 1 (Warm-Up, Direct Instruction and Guided Practice); point students back to those phases when they take it.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: (1) Name one link or display in Text 3 or Text 4 and the reader it helps most. (2) Name one update in either version history and the kind of problem it fixed. Then hand out the homework: Hana's printed draft of a new exhibit entry, and the message Ms. Varadi sends a week after it goes live.
Teacher note on sources: the Dust Bowl facts are standard in U.S. History textbooks and in the histories published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The correction in Version 2 is real history: Florence Owens Thompson, the woman in Dorothea Lange's Migrant Mother, was born in Indian Territory, in what is now Oklahoma, and moved to California in the 1920s, before the dust storms, so the photograph is often mislabeled as a picture of Dust Bowl migrants. The Library of Congress catalog record carries Lange's own caption. The exhibit, its links and its readers are invented.
Safety note for teachers who run the yeast lab: prepare the 35 °C water bath yourself, wear splash goggles when filling and inverting the graduated cylinders, and wipe up spills, since sugar solution makes floors slippery. Do not let students taste any solution.
1Planting a Wall of Trees (Hana's printed draft of a new exhibit entry)
2In 1934, President Franklin D. Roosevelt announced a plan to plant long belts of trees across the Great Plains to slow the wind and hold the soil. The U.S. Forest Service ran the work, known at first as the Shelterbelt Project and later as the Prairie States Forestry Project. Planting began in 1935 and continued until 1942. Workers, many of them hired through New Deal work programs, planted about 220 million trees in windbreaks on farms from North Dakota to Texas. Farmers agreed to protect and care for the trees on their land. Some people at the time doubted that trees could grow on the dry Plains. A windbreak slows the wind for some distance downwind of the trees, which keeps soil from blowing and protects crops. Some of the windbreaks still stand today. There is a Forest Service history of the project online, and there are photographs of the plantings in the Library of Congress. A map of where the belts were planted would also help.
3Message from Ms. Varadi, one week after the entry is published
4Two things came in about your entry. The Library of Congress link opens a page of search results with hundreds of photographs instead of the planting photographs you describe. And a reader asked what "New Deal work programs" means.
SVHS lesson authors, Planting a Wall of Trees, Printed Draft and a Message After Publishing (Text 6, homework: Hana and Ms. Varadi are invented, and the facts are real). Original passage written for this page.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a three-column organizer, Link it, Layer it, Keep it in view, with one example from Text 3 already filled in for each column
Provide link-text frames: "[What it is], [date], from [where it is kept]"
In Guided Practice, assign only the first three rows of the feature audit, then add the rest
For Advanced Students
Design a second view of the Dust Bowl timeline for a different reader, a visitor to a historic site, and explain which links and filters change
Write the caption Amira and Tobias would need if they added a sixth concentration, 15%, to the graph, and explain what the new point could show
Draft a short style guide for the class exhibit: rules for link text, alternative text, default views and update notes
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Look for students who treat each link and display as a writing choice made for a reader: link text that names the source, links to records rather than copies, definitions that open for readers who need them, and filters or toggles that start from a view carrying the claim. The main claim and must-know information should stay in plain view, and images and graphs should have alternative text or captions. In shared products, the comment thread and version history should show who did what. Updates should be dated, visible to readers and explained, and graphs should represent the data honestly, with values checkable in a table.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Link It, Layer It or Keep It in View?
15 minPairs
Pairs sort eight pieces of information from history and science pages into three piles and defend each choice by naming the reader. The activity practices deciding when to link out, when to layer information behind a tap, filter or toggle, and when to keep it in plain view.
Information Cards
1. The main claim of a history exhibit entry
2. The full text of a 1930s federal law
3. A one-sentence definition of "windbreak"
4. The original caption and date of an archive photograph
5. The separate trials behind each mean on a lab graph
6. The safety warning in a lab procedure
7. A 20-minute recorded interview with a farmer who lived through the dust storms
8. A year-by-year count of dust storms in one county, 1932-1940
Procedure
Pairs place each card in one pile: Link it (send the reader to another page), Layer it (tap to open, filter, toggle or sort on the same page) or Keep it in view
For each card, pairs write one reason that names the reader
Teacher key, one defensible sort: Keep it in view, cards 1 and 6; Link it, cards 2, 4 and 7; Layer it, cards 3, 5 and 8
Pairs compare with another pair and settle one disagreement by naming a specific reader, such as a student on a phone or a teacher checking sources
Discussion Questions
Card 8 could be a sortable table on the page or a link to a spreadsheet. What would decide it?
Why should a safety warning never sit behind a tap, even if it makes the page longer?
Card 4 goes in the link pile, but the photograph itself is on the page. What does the link add that the photo does not?
2
Shared Timeline Build
20 minGroups of 4
Groups produce and publish a short linked timeline in a shared document on a topic from their current history or science unit. The activity practices producing a shared product, linking each fact to a source and building a display readers can filter and open.
Roles
Two entry writers: each writes two timeline entries of one line plus two or three sentences that open when tapped
Source checker: finds a source record for every fact and writes the link text
Access checker: writes alternative text for any image and tests the page on a phone and a laptop
Procedure
Write a one- or two-sentence claim in plain text at the top before any entries
Give each entry one filter tag, and decide which view readers see first
Leave decisions as comments beside the draft, not as edits to someone else's sentences
Publish to the class web page, or share the document as view only, and write Version 1 in a version history with the date and names
Discussion Questions
Which entry was hardest to link to a source you trusted, and what did you do?
Does your timeline make sense with every entry closed? What does a reader who opens nothing learn?
Modification for Classrooms Without Devices
Groups build the timeline on index cards taped to chart paper: the one-line entry on the front, the opened text on the back, and a sticky note with the source details for each link. Colored dots stand in for filter tags, and a clipboard sheet serves as the version history.
3
Update Round
15 minPairs
Pairs receive three messages about a published lab report and make, test and log an update for each. The activity practices updating a published science product and using the version history so returning readers can see what changed.
Message Cards
Card A, from a reader: "Your procedure link now asks me to sign in, so I can't open it."
Card B, from the teacher: "Readers can't tell from the report what temperature the water bath was. Put it where they will see it before the graph."
Card C, from a classmate: "The alternative text for your graph just says 'graph.' A reader who can't see it learns nothing."
Procedure
Decide what to change for each card and where on the page the change goes
Make the change in a copy of Text 4, then test it the way a reader would meet it: open the link while signed out, read the page top to bottom, or read the alternative text aloud without looking at the graph
Write one version history line per card: version number, date, what changed and who changed it
Teacher key: Card A, reset the sharing setting so anyone with the link can view, then test from a signed-out browser; Card B, add the temperature to the method or the summary; Card C, rewrite the alternative text to state the pattern, for example "Line graph: mean gas volume rises from 0.7 mL at 0% sucrose to 21.0 mL at 10%, then falls to 15.8 mL at 20%"
Discussion Questions
Which card needed a test that only another person or another device could do?
Card B does not report an error. Is it still an update the version history should record?
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: What a Linked, Flexible Page Adds to a Printed Paragraph
The top row shows the grade 9-10 emphasis of WHST.9-10.6: a printed paragraph gives every reader the same fixed text, a linked entry opens sources and definitions, and a flexible, dynamic display lets the reader choose and change the view. The bottom row shows the uses of technology the standard names for every grade band: produce, publish and update, with a dashed arrow for each update that is logged and republished.
Diagram 2: Yeast Gas Production at Five Sucrose Concentrations, as Shown After the Updates (invented data)
Each large dot is the mean of three trials from Table 1, and the small dots beside it are the trials that the "Show all trials" button displays. The horizontal axis is drawn to scale, so the gap between 10% and 20% is four times the gap between 0% and 2.5%.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
WHST.9-10.6 Homework: Publishing and Updating the Shelterbelt Entry
Directions: Use Hana's printed draft and Ms. Varadi's message (Text 6 in Closure). Hana's entry will join the Dust Bowl entry (Text 3) in the class's online exhibit, Hard Times on the Plains, for the same readers: next year's U.S. History students and their families. Describe links and displays in brackets, the way Text 3 does, for example [link: ...] or [Tap to open: ...].
Part 1: Plan the Links and Displays (Problems 1-2)
List at least four facts or sources in Text 6 that should link to another page. For each, write link text that says what the reader will find there, and name the kind of source it should open (for example an archive record or a government history).
Choose two displays that a printed page cannot offer, such as a timeline, a map a reader can tap, a definition that opens or a before-and-after photo pair. For each, explain in two sentences what the reader can do with it and how it helps them understand the shelterbelt project. Then name one piece of information that must stay in plain view, and why.
Part 2: Produce and Publish (Problems 3-4)
Write the published version of the entry, described block by block like Text 3, in 150-250 words. Include a claim in plain text at the top, the links from Problem 1, the displays from Problem 2 and alternative text for one photograph of a planting.
Trade entries with a partner in a shared document. Leave two comments on your partner's entry, one about a link and one about a display. Then answer the two comments you receive, saying what you changed or why you left it as it is.
Part 3: Update After Publishing (Problems 5-6)
Ms. Varadi's message in Text 6 arrives one week after your entry goes live. Make an update for each of the two issues she reports, and write a version history line for each with the version number, the date, what changed and who changed it.
In 80-120 words, compare one of your updates with Version 2 or Version 3 of the Dust Bowl entry (Text 3). Say what kind of problem each update fixed and how a dated version history helps a reader who returns to the exhibit.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Links to Other Information
Four or more links to fitting sources, each with link text that names what the reader will find
Links present but vague ("click here") or aimed at the wrong kind of source
No links planned
Flexible and Dynamic Display
Two displays print cannot offer, each explained by what the reader can do; must-know information kept in view
Displays named but not explained, or the claim hidden behind a tap
No displays, or displays that hide the claim
Producing and Publishing
Block-by-block entry with a plain-text claim, accurate facts from Text 6 and useful alternative text; two peer comments given and answered
Entry incomplete, alternative text too vague, or peer comments not answered
Entry missing
Updating
Both issues fixed, each with a complete version history line; comparison names the kind of problem and the reader's gain
One issue fixed, or lines incomplete; comparison general
No updates
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
The questions use the assignment and printed draft (Text 1) in Warm-Up, the comment thread and published entry (Texts 2 and 3) in Direct Instruction, and Table 1, the lab report (Text 4) and its comments and version history (Text 5) in Guided Practice. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which requirement in Ms. Varadi's assignment (Text 1) most directly asks the team to use technology's capacity to link to other information?
Answer: C
C: "Every fact must be linked to a source the reader can open" (Text 1, paragraph 2) is a rule about links. A names the audience, B asks for display features in general, and D is a rule about updating, which the standard names separately from linking.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does Hana propose turning the draft's events into a timeline (Text 2, paragraph 1)?
Answer: B
B: Hana says, "The order of events is the whole story, cause and then effect." A timeline displays that order at a glance. A treats the choice as a matter of space, C invents a requirement (the brief asks only for two features print cannot offer), and D describes a feature no one proposes.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Lior (Text 2, paragraph 3), what would the Farming filter help readers see?
Answer: A
A: Lior says the filter "shows that the disaster had human causes and not just bad weather, which is our main point." A filter is flexible display in the service of the claim. B and D describe information the filter does not sort by, and C describes the Government entry, which the Farming filter hides; Lior says nothing about how quickly the government acted.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does Lior want the Migrant Mother photograph linked to its Library of Congress record (Text 2, paragraph 7)?
Answer: D
D: the record "has Lange's own caption and the date," so "a reader can check where it came from." A is false, since the team writes alternative text for the embedded photo (Text 3). B names a benefit no one mentions, and C invents a rule: the team does show the photo.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How does the team handle "contour plowing" and "strip cropping" in the published entry (Texts 2 and 3)?
Answer: A
A: Desmond suggests "a short definition that opens when you tap the term" (Text 2, paragraph 10), and Text 3 lists the terms that "open a definition when tapped." B confuses the definitions with the link to the law, C removes content the entry needs, and D describes a print solution the team does not use.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which of Ms. Varadi's cautions (Text 2, paragraph 11) does the first content block of the published entry (Text 3) follow?
Answer: B
B: Text 3 opens with "[Claim, in plain text at the top]," which follows her first caution that must-know information cannot "live only behind a tap or a filter." A and D are her second caution, followed later in the entry, and C is Lior's request to Joaquin, not something the first block shows.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What led to Version 3 of the Dust Bowl entry (Text 3)?
Answer: C
C: "The newspaper archive moved its pages to new addresses, so the Black Sunday link opened an error page." Joaquin replaced the link and tested it. A describes Version 2, B invents a request (the map is already in Version 1), and D invents an error: the date is April 14, 1935, in every version.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A reader who uses a screen reader reaches the Migrant Mother entry in Text 3. Which part of the entry tells that reader what the photograph shows?
Answer: D
D: the alternative text, "A woman in worn clothes sits in a tent with one hand raised to her chin...," describes the image in words a screen reader can speak, as Ms. Varadi required (Text 2, paragraph 11). A names where the record is kept, B sorts entries, and C gives only the date and title.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which feature of the lab report (Text 4) displays information dynamically, changing what the reader sees when the reader acts?
Answer: B
B: pressing "Show all trials" changes the graph in front of the reader by adding the small dots. A and D are fixed text that every reader sees the same way, and C links to other information, a different capacity in the standard.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A reader sorts the table in Text 4 by the Mean column, from largest to smallest. Using Table 1, which concentration appears second?
Answer: C
C: the means from largest to smallest are 21.0 mL (10%), 16.2 mL (5%), 15.8 mL (20%), 9.3 mL (2.5%) and 0.7 mL (0%), so 5% is second. A, 10%, is the first row, not the second. D, 20%, is third: its mean is only 0.4 mL below the 5% mean, an easy difference to misread. B, 2.5%, is the second row of the table before sorting, when the rows are in concentration order.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What problem does Dr. Kwan find with the graph as first published (Text 5)?
Answer: A
A: Dr. Kwan writes that the axis "starts at 8 mL," so "the 0% point falls off the bottom, and the rise from 2.5% to 10% looks several times steeper than it is." B reverses the design (the trials appear only when the button is pressed), and C and D describe problems she never mentions.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which update in Text 5 responds to Mateo's comment?
Answer: D
D: Mateo reports that the data link "opens the spreadsheet in edit mode," and Version 3 "changed the data file link to view only." A answers Dr. Kwan, B answers the reader on a phone, and C is the first publication, which came before any comments.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How does Version 4 (Text 5) solve the phone reader's problem without removing any data?
Answer: B
B: on narrow screens the table "shows only the Sucrose and Mean columns, with a 'Show trials' button that opens the other three." The reader sees the means first and can still open every trial, which is flexible display. A removes data, C sends the reader away from the report, and D moves the problem without fixing it.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A classmate suggests linking every noun in the Discussion of Text 4, including "yeast," "sugar," "gas" and "volume," to a definition. What is the best response?
Answer: C
C: Text 4 links the osmosis section and defines "fermentation," terms the explanation depends on. Links to everyday words bury the useful ones. A treats more links as better, B throws away a capacity the standard asks students to use, and D uses a rule that has nothing to do with the reader.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Choose one fact from the team's printed draft (Text 1) and show how the published entry (Text 3) links it to other information. Quote both, and explain what the link lets a history reader do that the printed sentence could not.
Model answer: Text 1 says, "In the 1910s and 1920s, farmers plowed up millions of acres of native grassland to grow wheat." In Text 3, the Farming entry keeps that fact and adds "[link: Natural Resources Conservation Service history page on the plowing of the Plains]." The printed sentence asks the reader to trust the team. The link lets the reader open a government history, see who wrote it, and read more about how the plowing happened, which is how a history reader checks a claim about causes. Rubric line: 2 points for an accurate quotation from each text and an explanation of what the reader can now do; 1 point if a quotation is missing or the explanation only says the link "adds information."
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Dr. Kwan calls "Show all trials" a strong feature (Text 5). Using Table 1, explain in two or three sentences what a reader learns from the trial dots at 10% sucrose that the mean alone does not show.
Model answer: The mean at 10% is 21.0 mL, but the three trials were 21.0, 19.5 and 22.5 mL, a spread of 3.0 mL. The dots show how much the trials varied, so a reader can judge how precise the mean is. They also show that even the lowest trial at 10% (19.5 mL) was higher than the highest trial at 20% (16.5 mL). Rubric line: 2 points for accurate trial values and a statement about variation or reliability; 1 point for accurate values without an explanation, or an explanation without values.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Amira and Tobias state their main result in a summary at the top of the report (Text 4), even though the graph shows the same pattern. Explain two reasons this helps readers, and connect one of them to Ms. Varadi's first caution in Text 2.
Model answer: First, a graph shows values only when a reader taps or hovers, and a reader on a phone or using a screen reader may never do that; the summary gives everyone the result, "Yeast produced the most carbon dioxide in 10% sucrose." This follows Ms. Varadi's caution that anything a reader must know "cannot live only behind a tap or a filter." Second, the summary tells readers what to look for before they reach the graph, so the interactive display confirms a claim instead of making the reader find it. Rubric line: 2 points for two distinct reasons, one linked to the caution with a quotation; 1 point for one reason, or two without the link to Text 2.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
On October 14, Dr. Kwan posts: "Room 12 ran the same lab at 15% sucrose and got a mean of 18.5 mL." (Room 12 and its result are invented.) Should Amira and Tobias add this to their report? If so, explain how, using the capacities of the published page, and write the version history line.
Model answer: Yes, but as another group's result, not as a sixth row of their own table, because they did not collect it and cannot vouch for its trials. They could add a sentence to the Discussion, "Another class found a mean of 18.5 mL at 15% sucrose, which suggests the drop begins somewhere above 10%," and link it to Room 12's published data. On the graph, the point could appear in a different color, labeled as Room 12's result. Version history: "Version 5, October 14: Added Room 12's 15% result to the Discussion with a link to their data, and marked it on the graph in a different color. (Amira)" Rubric line: 2 points for an update that keeps the other class's result separate and credited, uses a link or display feature, and includes a complete version line; 1 point if the update merges the data as their own or the version line is missing.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Ms. Varadi says the timeline "has to make sense with no photos at all" (Text 2). Rewrite the opened text of the Black Sunday entry in Text 3 so that it adds one detail from Text 1 and still makes sense with no link and no photo. Then explain in one sentence what the link adds for readers who do open it.
Model answer: "On April 14, 1935, one of the worst storms of the decade turned the afternoon dark across the southern Plains. People called it Black Sunday, and less than two weeks later the Soil Conservation Act became law." The rewrite adds the timing from Text 1, so a reader who opens nothing still sees the link between the storm and the law. The link to the April 15 front page lets a reader see how a newspaper reported the storm the next day, which is primary evidence the entry itself cannot give. Rubric line: 2 points for an accurate rewrite with a detail from Text 1 that stands on its own and a sentence on what the link adds; 1 point if the rewrite depends on the link or photo, or the explanation is missing.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Choose a piece of writing from one of your history, science or technical classes. Describe one link and one flexible or dynamic display you would add if you published it online, and explain how each helps its reader. Then name one test you would run before publishing.
Model answer (one of many): A lab conclusion on how light color affects plant growth. Link: "[link: Our class procedure for the plant growth lab (view only)]," so a reader can check how the plants were measured without the conclusion repeating the method. Display: a line graph of plant height over 14 days with buttons for each light color, so a reader can compare two colors at a time instead of reading five crowded lines. Test: open the procedure link from a signed-out browser to make sure anyone can view it. Rubric line: 2 points for a link with clear link text, a display that print cannot offer, a reason for each tied to the reader and a realistic test; 1 point if one of the three is missing or the reasons do not name the reader.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does WHST.9-10.6 mean?
WHST.9-10.6 means that students in grades 9 and 10 use technology, including the Internet, to produce, publish and update writing in history, science and technical subjects, alone or with others.
The grade 9-10 version adds a focus on what digital writing can do that print cannot: link to other information, such as a source record or a definition, and display information flexibly and dynamically, for example with a filtered timeline, a sortable table or a graph that shows every trial when a reader taps a button.
What is the difference between WHST.9-10.6 and W.9-10.6?
The wording is the same, but W.9-10.6 is taught in English class, while WHST.9-10.6 applies to writing in history, science and technical subjects.
In practice, WHST.9-10.6 links point to the kinds of sources those disciplines rely on, such as archive records, laws, data files and lab procedures, and its displays show evidence: timelines of causes and effects, maps, data tables and graphs.
What does "display information flexibly and dynamically" mean?
Flexibly means the reader can choose or rearrange what to see; dynamically means the display changes in response, when the reader acts or when new data arrive.
Filter buttons on a timeline, entries that open when tapped and a table that sorts by any column are flexible. A graph that adds individual trials when a button is pressed, or a chart that updates as new results are entered, is dynamic. Either kind still needs a first view that carries the writer's main point.
What should a link in a history or science report point to?
A link should point to the most direct source a reader could use to check or extend the writing, such as an archive's record of a document or photograph, the full text of a law, a data file or a lab procedure.
Link text should say what the reader will find, for example "Full text of the Soil Conservation Act of 1935," not "click here." A link supports the writing; it does not replace a sentence that explains the point in the writer's own words.
Do students need to build a website to meet WHST.9-10.6?
No: a shared document with comments and a version history, a class blog or a class web page is enough.
The standard is about writing choices, such as what to link, what to display and how to update, not about code. Classes with few devices can plan links and displays on paper first, as in this lesson's homework, and publish one group product together.
How is WHST.9-10.6 different from WHST.11-12.6?
WHST.9-10.6 emphasizes linking and flexible, dynamic display, while WHST.11-12.6 emphasizes updating writing in response to ongoing feedback, including new arguments or information.
Both bands produce, publish and update. In grades 11-12, the harder task is judging a stream of feedback after publication and deciding which comments change the piece, and which change its claim.
Does a link count as a citation?
No: a link helps a reader reach a source, but the writing should still name the source, its creator and its date in words.
Links break when archives move or rename their pages. If the link text or a source list names the source, a reader can still find it. Many history and science teachers ask for both a link and a standard citation.
How can teachers grade a shared digital product fairly?
Grade the product as a whole for the group, and use the comment thread and version history to see each student's contributions.
Assigning named roles, such as entry writer, source checker and access checker, makes contributions visible. A short individual reflection in which each student explains one link or display choice they made also gives an individual grade.
What should students check before they publish an online history or lab report?
Students should open every link, read the page on a phone as well as a laptop, and read it once with every tap-to-open section closed.
The closed reading shows whether the main claim is in plain view. Students should also check that every image has alternative text, that graphs show the data honestly, and that shared files open for readers outside the class.
How can families help with WHST.9-10.6 at home?
Ask your student to show you something they published for a class and to open two of its links with you.
Ask what each link is for and whether the page still makes sense without clicking anything. If a link is broken or a page is hard to read on a phone, that is a real update the student can make and record.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to WHST.9-10.6: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
WHST.6-8.6Prerequisite
Use technology to produce and publish writing that presents relationships between ideas