SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

WHST.6-8.10Common CoreELAWriting in History, Science and Technical SubjectsGrades 6-8

WHST.6-8.10: Lab Notebooks, History Quick Writes and Revised Reports, Short and Extended Writing in Two Subjects

In plain English: WHST.6-8.10 is the Common Core literacy standard for grades 6-8 that asks students to write routinely in history, science and technical subjects. They write in short time frames, such as a single sitting or a day or two, and over extended ones that leave time for reflection and revision, for tasks, purposes and readers each subject really uses.

Write routinely over extended time frames (time for reflection and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of discipline-specific tasks, purposes, and audiences.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects 6-12 · Cluster: Range of Writing · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

60-65 min

Overview

WHST.6-8.10 asks middle school students to write routinely, as a regular habit, in history, science and technical subjects. Some of that writing happens in shorter time frames of a single sitting or a day or two, such as a lab notebook entry, an exit ticket or a history quick write. Some of it gets an extended time frame, which the standard defines as "time for reflection and revision." The tasks, purposes and audiences should vary and should be the ones each discipline really uses.

This lesson looks at two subjects side by side through one invented seventh grader, Nico Barreto. In science he keeps a dated lab notebook on radish seeds germinating at three temperatures, writes a claim-evidence-reasoning exit ticket (a short answer in three labeled parts: a claim, the evidence for it and the reasoning that links them), and turns a rushed Draft 1 of his Results and Conclusion into a Draft 2 after his teacher's comments, a written reflection and a day away. In U.S. History he writes a 15-minute quick write on why the Great Chicago Fire of 1871 was so hard to stop, and then revises an exhibit panel for History Night over about a week. Students study what each subject's short writing looks like, trace what reflection and revision changed in each long piece, and plan their own routine. Nico, his school, his teachers, his log and the seed counts are invented for this page; the facts about the 1871 fire are real.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Write a dated lab notebook entry and a claim-evidence-reasoning exit ticket in a single short sitting
  • Write a history quick write that answers its question in the first sentence and supports it with facts from the class reading
  • Explain, with evidence from drafts, comments and a log, what reflection and revision changed in an extended science or history piece
  • Name the habits that make writing fit science or history, such as units and limits in a lab report and dates and evidence in a history panel
  • Plan a routine of short and extended writing in two subjects, with a day away before revision

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Writing routinely over extended and shorter time frames in grade 5 W.5.10
  • Following a multistep lab procedure and recording measurements RST.6-8.3
  • Reading a simple line graph with two labeled axes
  • Knowing that a seed contains a young plant that needs water and warmth to start growing

Lesson Procedure

60-65 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "Think about the last thing you wrote in science and the last thing you wrote in history or social studies. Who was each one for, and how long did you have? Would either one have been better with another week?"

    Take four or five answers and sort them on the board under one sitting or a day or two and extended. Read WHST.6-8.10 aloud. Point out its two kinds of time and the words in its parentheses: an extended time frame gives "time for reflection and revision." Reflection means thinking back on a draft and deciding what it needs; revision means changing the draft because of that thinking. "Discipline-specific" means that science and history each have their own kinds of writing with their own habits.

    Introduce Nico Barreto, an invented seventh grader at the invented Linden Grove Middle School, and his science investigation. Hand out Text 1, the lab handout. Define two terms from it: a seed has germinated when its first root has pushed through the seed coat, its hard outer skin. Ask: which step in the handout tells Nico when and how he must write?

    Question: How does temperature affect how fast radish seeds germinate? A seed has germinated when its first root has pushed through the seed coat, the hard outer skin of the seed.

    Materials for each group: 60 radish seeds, three sandwich bags, three paper towels, a spray bottle of water, a marker, a thermometer.

    1. Fold each paper towel into quarters, spray it until it is damp but not dripping, and place 20 seeds on it.
    2. Slide each towel into a bag and label the bags A, B and C. Leave each bag partly open so air can get in.
    3. Put Bag A in the classroom refrigerator (about 4 °C), Bag B on the back counter (about 21 °C) and Bag C on the seedling heat mat (about 27 °C). Mr. Haskins plugs in the heat mat; it stays warm, not hot.
    4. Every school morning, count the germinated seeds in each bag without opening the towel more than you need to. Spray the towel if it feels dry.
    5. Record every count in your lab notebook the same day. Never erase: draw one line through a mistake and write the correction next to it.

    Safety: wash your hands after handling seeds. Seeds from a packet are not food. Keep the spray bottle away from the heat mat's cord.

    SVHS lesson authors, Radish Seeds and Temperature, the lab handout (Text 1; Nico Barreto, Linden Grove Middle School, Mr. Haskins and the seed counts are invented). Original passage written for this page.
  2. Direct Instruction15 minutes

    Teach the short writing of each subject through the examples below. Then read Nico's notebook (Text 2). A lab notebook is a dated record written while the work happens, in short single sittings; it is the source the later report is built from. Ask students to find three habits of a good entry (a date and time, counts with the total, observations kept separate from guesses) and the correction on Day 3. Show Diagram 1, which graphs the same counts, and ask on which day Bags B and C were furthest apart.

    • A notebook entry (science, one sitting)

      A 5-minute entry on the morning a student measures a bean plant in a different class investigation.

      Result: Date and time; the measurement with its unit ("plant 1: 6.5 cm"); one observation in plain words ("two new leaves, pale green"); one question ("will the pale leaves darken?"). No opinions, nothing erased, and every number written down the day it was measured.

    • A claim-evidence-reasoning exit ticket (science, one sitting)

      Ten minutes at the end of class, on a different question: does a ball of clay float better when it is shaped like a boat?

      Result: Claim: one sentence that answers the question. Evidence: the measurements that support it ("the flat ball sank; the boat shape held 12 paper clips"). Reasoning: the science idea that links the two (the boat shape pushes aside more water). Three labeled parts, with every number copied from the notebook.

    • A history quick write (history, one sitting)

      Fifteen minutes in class: "Why was the Great Chicago Fire so hard to stop?"

      Result: Plan for one minute: list the causes from the class reading. Write a first sentence that answers the question, one short paragraph per cause or one sentence each, and a last sentence that says which cause mattered most and why. Past tense, dates and places named, no invented facts.

    • Planning an extended piece (either subject)

      A lab report or history panel due in eight school days.

      Result: Day 1: draft from the notebook or the class reading. Days 2-3: get a reader's comment. Day 4: no work (the day away). Day 5: reread and write a short reflection: what the reader needs that the draft does not give. Days 6-7: revise. Day 8: check every number or date against the source and hand in.

    Day 1, Tuesday, 8:05 a.m. (5 minutes). A: 0 of 20. B: 0 of 20. C: 3 of 20. The seeds in all three bags look fatter and darker than yesterday. Question: are the fat ones about to germinate?

    Day 2, Wednesday, 8:02 a.m. (5 minutes). A: 0. B: 5. C: 14. In Bag C the roots are about 1 cm long, and some have white fuzz on them. [Mold?, crossed out with one line] Told Mr. Haskins.

    Day 3, Thursday, 8:04 a.m. (5 minutes). A: 0. B: 13. C: 18. Correction to Day 2: Mr. Haskins says the fuzz is root hairs, tiny hairs that grow out of the root and take in water. Mold would grow on the paper towel too, and this fuzz is only on the roots.

    Day 4, Friday, 8:03 a.m. (5 minutes). A: 0. B: 16. C: 19. The Bag A towel is still damp. Those seeds look the same as on Day 1.

    Day 4 exit ticket, Friday, end of class (10 minutes). Claim: warmer seeds germinate faster. Evidence: on Day 2, Bag C (27 °C) had 14 germinated seeds and Bag B (21 °C) had 5, and Bag A (4 °C) still has none. Reasoning: seeds need warmth to start growing, so the warmest bag started first.

    SVHS lesson authors, Nico's lab notebook, Days 1-4, with his Day 4 exit ticket (Text 2). Original passage written for this page.
  3. Guided Practice15-20 minutes

    Now follow one science piece through an extended time frame. Read Nico's Draft 1 (Text 3), written in 25 minutes on Day 7, and his teacher's comments with Nico's reflection (Text 4). A hypothesis is a testable prediction made before the test. Then read Draft 2 (Text 5), handed in a week after Draft 1.

    Pairs make a two-column chart, Draft 1 said and Draft 2 says, with one row for each of Mr. Haskins's five comments. In a third column they write which part of the extended time produced the change: the reflection, the day away or the revision. Share out: which change could Nico have made on Day 7 if he had opened his notebook?

    Results: The heat mat seeds grew the fastest. The counter seeds were slower and the fridge seeds didn't do anything. By the end the heat mat had 19 and the counter had 18.

    Conclusion: My hypothesis was right, heat makes seeds grow faster. I think the fridge seeds died. This lab was fun and next time I would use more bags.

    SVHS lesson authors, Results and Conclusion, Draft 1, written in class in 25 minutes on Day 7 (Text 3). Original passage written for this page.

    Mr. Haskins's comments, returned Wednesday of Week 2:

    1. "Grew" or "germinated"? You counted roots through the seed coat. You never measured how tall anything grew.
    2. Your notebook has the day when the counter and heat mat bags were furthest apart. Use it.
    3. "Died": check your Day 7 count for Bag A before you keep this word.
    4. What makes this result less certain? Name at least one limit.
    5. A conclusion is for a reader who wants to know what the data show. Is "fun" data?

    Nico's reflection, written in class the same day (10 minutes):

    I wrote Draft 1 in 25 minutes on Monday, and I wrote what I remembered instead of what my notebook said. When I looked back, Day 2 is the biggest gap: 14 in Bag C and 5 in Bag B. I also forgot that one Bag A seed germinated on Day 7, so the cold seeds were not dead, just slow. My exit ticket from Day 4 was better than my Draft 1. Plan: Thursday, no lab report, so I can read it fresh. Friday, rewrite Results with the Day 2 and Day 7 numbers and write the conclusion with one limit. Monday, hand it in.

    SVHS lesson authors, Comments on Draft 1 and Nico's reflection (Text 4). Original passage written for this page.

    Results: We counted the germinated seeds (seeds with a root through the seed coat) in each bag of 20 on Days 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7. On Day 2, the heat mat bag (about 27 °C) had 14 germinated seeds, the counter bag (about 21 °C) had 5, and the refrigerator bag (about 4 °C) had none. By Day 7 the heat mat and counter bags were close, with 19 and 18, but the refrigerator bag had only 1.

    Conclusion: The data support my hypothesis that warmer temperatures make radish seeds germinate faster, within the range we tested. Warmth mainly changed the speed: by Day 7 the counter bag had almost caught up with the heat mat bag. The cold seeds were not dead, since one germinated on Day 7; they were slower. This result is limited because we tested only one bag of 20 seeds at each temperature, and the temperatures are estimates. Repeating the test with three bags at each temperature would make the result more reliable.

    SVHS lesson authors, Results and Conclusion, Draft 2, handed in on Monday of Week 3 (Text 5). Original passage written for this page.
  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Switch subjects. Students read Nico's history quick write (Text 6), written in one 15-minute sitting, and his History Night panel with its log (Text 7). An exhibit panel is a short sign that explains one idea to visitors at an exhibit, here the school's History Night. Show Diagram 2 so students see both extended pieces side by side.

    On their own, students write two short answers: (1) What did the panel's time frame let Nico do that the quick write could not? Cite the log. (2) What does history writing ask for that the lab report does not, and what do both ask for? The quiz also uses Texts 6 and 7.

    Why was the fire so hard to stop?

    The Great Chicago Fire was hard to stop because almost everything went wrong for the firefighters. First, the watchman who spotted the fire misjudged where it was, so the first fire engines were sent to the wrong place and lost time. Second, the city had only about 185 firefighters and 17 horse-drawn steam engines, far too few for a fire that grew across whole neighborhoods. Third, burning pieces blown ahead of the flames carried the fire across the Chicago River, so the river did not stop it. Last, early on October 9 the fire reached the city's waterworks and burned its roof, and the pumps stopped. After that the water mains went dry, and the hoses had almost no water.

    I think the waterworks was the biggest cause, because without water the firefighters could not fight the fire at all.

    SVHS lesson authors, Why Was the Fire So Hard to Stop?, Nico's 15-minute quick write in U.S. History (Text 6; Ms. Achterberg is invented, and the facts about the 1871 fire are real). Original passage written for this page.

    Nico's log for the panel

    Week 1, Thursday, 30 minutes: first draft of the panel, 240 words. The panel space holds 180.

    Week 1, Friday, 10 minutes: conference with Ms. Achterberg. She asked, "A visitor reads your title as a question. Where do you answer it?" My answer was in the last paragraph.

    Week 2, Monday: no work on the panel.

    Week 2, Tuesday, 20 minutes: reread and reflection. A visitor at History Night reads the first lines and walks on, so the answer has to come first. I also wrote "people were dumb to believe it." That is not fair, and it does not explain anything.

    Week 2, Wednesday, 25 minutes: revision. Moved the answer to the top, replaced "dumb" with the reason people believed the story, cut to 180 words.

    Week 2, Thursday, 10 minutes: checked every date against our class reading. I had written October 9 for the start of the fire. It started on the night of October 8.

    The panel as displayed at History Night

    Did a Cow Start the Great Chicago Fire?

    Probably not. The story that Catherine O'Leary's cow kicked over a lantern is one of the best-known stories about the fire, but historians have found no evidence for it.

    The fire did start in or near the O'Learys' barn on DeKoven Street, on the night of October 8, 1871. At the city's inquiry that fall, Mrs. O'Leary swore she had been in bed, and the inquiry found no proof against her. Years later, Michael Ahern, a reporter who covered the fire, claimed that reporters had invented the cow story. In 1997, Chicago's City Council officially cleared Mrs. O'Leary and her cow.

    Why did so many people believe it? The O'Learys were Irish Catholic immigrants, and many Chicagoans at the time were prejudiced against Irish immigrants. A story with someone to blame was easier to accept than a city built of wood in a dry, windy fall.

    When the fire died out early on October 10, about 300 people were dead and about 100,000 were homeless.

    SVHS lesson authors, Did a Cow Start the Great Chicago Fire?, Nico's History Night panel with his revision log (Text 7; the log is invented, and the facts on the panel are real). Original passage written for this page.
  5. Closure5 minutes

    Exit ticket: (1) Write one habit of a lab notebook entry and one habit of a history quick write. (2) Name a piece of science or history writing you have due in the next two weeks and write the day you will take off from it before you revise.

    Teacher note: Text 7 mentions that many Chicagoans in 1871 were prejudiced against Irish immigrants and that this helped the cow story spread. Take a minute to discuss how blaming a group can shape the way an event is remembered, and that historians test such stories against evidence.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a notebook entry frame with four labeled lines (date and time, counts, observation, question) and a claim-evidence-reasoning frame with three labeled boxes
  • For the history quick write, provide the list of causes from the class reading and a sentence starter for the first line: "The fire was hard to stop because..."
  • Pre-fill the dates for the draft and the day away in the extended plan, and let students add the reflection and revision days

For Advanced Students

  • Ask students to rewrite the lab conclusion (Text 5) for the school newsletter, for families, in 80 words, and explain which science habits they kept and which they dropped
  • Have students write a second History Night panel, "Why Did the Fire Burn for More Than a Day?", and keep a log of their own reflection and revision
  • Ask students to design a better seed test with three bags per temperature and write the new handout step that would change

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

In short science writing, look for a date, measurements with their units or totals, observations kept separate from explanations, and corrections made without erasing. In short history writing, look for a first sentence that answers the question, facts from the class reading and no invented details. In the extended pieces, look for a draft, a reader's comment, a written reflection, a gap of at least a day and a revision that changes content, not only spelling. Across both subjects, look for writing on most school days and for more than one purpose and reader.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Five-Minute Notebook Drill

15 minPairs

Pairs watch a short teacher demonstration and write one lab notebook entry each in five minutes, then check each other's entries against the habits from Text 2. It is single-sitting science writing, practiced until it is quick.

Demonstration

The teacher fills two clear cups, one with cold tap water and one with warm tap water (not hot), and adds one drop of food coloring to each at the same moment. Students watch for two minutes. No tasting, and the teacher does all pouring.

Procedure

  • Start a 5-minute timer when the drops go in. Each student writes an entry with four parts: date and time, what was done, what was seen in each cup, and one question
  • Swap notebooks. The partner checks four things: a date and time, both cups described separately, no explanation mixed into the observations, and nothing erased
  • Each student fixes one thing using a single line through the old words

Discussion Questions

  • Which words in your entry are observations, and which are guesses about why?
  • Why write the entry during the demonstration instead of that evening?
  • What would a classmate who missed class need from your entry?
2

Sourcing Rotation

20 minGroups of 3

Groups rotate through four source cards about the start of the Great Chicago Fire and write a six-minute sourcing note on each: who made the source, when, why, and how much it can be trusted on the question "What started the fire?" Each note is one short sitting of history writing.

Source Cards (summaries written for this page)

  • Card A: A Chicago newspaper story printed in the weeks after the fire in October 1871, saying that Mrs. O'Leary's cow kicked over a lantern
  • Card B: Mrs. O'Leary's statement at the city's official inquiry in late 1871, saying that she was in bed when the fire began
  • Card C: A statement by the reporter Michael Ahern, made decades after the fire, saying that reporters made up the cow story
  • Card D: A 1997 resolution of the Chicago City Council clearing Mrs. O'Leary and her cow

Procedure

  • Each group starts at a different card. Set a 6-minute timer for each card
  • The note has four labeled lines: Who made it? When? Why was it made? How far can we trust it about the cause of the fire, and why?
  • After four rounds, groups rank the cards from most to least trustworthy on the cause and write one sentence defending their first choice

Discussion Questions

  • Card B was made by the person the story blamed. Does that make it less useful, more useful, or both?
  • Card C was made decades after the fire. What does that change?
  • Which card would you quote first on a History Night panel, and why?

Modification for Distance Learning

Post each card in its own shared slide. Groups work in breakout rooms with an on-screen timer and type their four-line notes in the speaker notes of each slide.

3

Cold Reread and Revision Plan

20 minIndividual, then pairs

Each student picks one piece of science or history writing from the last two weeks, rereads it cold, writes a reflection and sets dated revision sessions. The activity starts the extended time frame on real work.

Materials

  • One short piece each student wrote at least two days ago in science or history: a lab conclusion, an exit ticket or a short response
  • Texts 3, 4 and 5 as a model of comments, reflection and revision; a blank two-week calendar

Procedure

  • Reread the piece silently once, then answer three questions in writing: What does my reader need that this does not give? Which sentence would a scientist or historian question first? Which number, date or fact should I check against my notebook or reading?
  • Trade with a partner, who adds one comment in the style of Mr. Haskins: a question, not a correction
  • On the calendar, schedule a day away, a revision session and a final check, each with a date and minutes

Discussion Questions

  • What did you notice on the cold reread that you missed when you wrote it?
  • Why is a question from a reader often more useful than a correction?
  • How is revising a lab report different from revising a history panel?

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: Germinated Radish Seeds at Three Temperatures (Invented Data), Drawn to Scale

0 5 10 15 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Days after the seeds were set out (no counts on Days 5 and 6, the weekend) Germinated seeds (of 20) Bag C heat mat (about 27 °C) Bag B counter (about 21 °C) Bag A refrigerator (about 4 °C)
Each line shows one bag of 20 seeds from Nico's notebook (Text 2) and his Day 7 count. The seeds were set out on Monday, Day 0, and counted on Days 1-4 and on Day 7; there were no counts on the weekend, so the lines jump from Day 4 to Day 7. The scale is 60 pixels per day across and 12 pixels per seed up. The counts are invented for this lesson, and they fit what radish seeds usually do: most germinate within a few days at room temperature, faster when warmer, and very slowly in a refrigerator.

Diagram 2: Two Subjects, Two Weeks of Writing

W1 M W1 T W1 W W1 Th W1 F W2 M W2 T W2 W W2 Th W2 F W3 M Notebook entries Science, short E E E E E Exit ticket (CER) Science, short W Lab report Science, extended D R A V H Quick write History, short W History Night panel History, extended D C A R V V E Notebook entry, 5 min W Short piece, one sitting D First draft C Conference R Reread and reflect A Day away V Revise H Hand in
Rows are pieces of writing, and columns are school days from Monday of Week 1 (W1 M) to Monday of Week 3. The short pieces take one sitting each. The two extended pieces, the lab report and the History Night panel, each have a draft, a day away, a reread with reflection and at least one revision, and those steps are spread over about a week.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

WHST.6-8.10 Homework: A Three-Day Notebook, a Quick Write and a Revision

Directions: This homework runs over about a week and a half. Do Part 1 on three mornings in a row (5 minutes each) and the exit ticket on the third day. Do Part 2 in one sitting on any evening. Do Part 3 over the following week, with the date and minutes at the top of each session's work.

Part 1: A Science Notebook (Problems 1-2)

  1. On three mornings in a row, at about the same time, observe the weather outside a window or door. Write a dated 5-minute notebook entry each morning with the time, the air temperature from a thermometer or a weather app (with its unit and where it came from), what the sky looks like, and one question. Do not erase: cross out mistakes with one line.
  2. On the third day, write a 10-minute claim-evidence-reasoning exit ticket that answers: "Were the three mornings warmer or colder than you expected, and what might explain it?" Use only numbers from your entries.

Part 2: A History Quick Write (Problems 3-4)

  1. Timed writing, 15 minutes. Choose an event from the unit you are studying now in social studies or history, and answer: "What was one important cause of this event?" Plan for one minute, answer the question in your first sentence, support it with at least two facts from your class reading, and say where each fact came from.
  2. Right after, write a 5-minute reflection: which fact are you least sure of, and where would you check it? What would a reader who has never studied this event need you to explain?

Part 3: The Extended Piece (Problems 5-6)

  1. Over the next week, turn your Part 1 notebook into a Results and Conclusion like Text 5, with a limit and a next step. Keep a dated log of at least four sessions: a first draft from your notebook, a reader's comment from a family member or classmate, a day with no work on it, and a revision after a written reflection.
  2. Hand in the notebook, both drafts, the log and your reflection, with a paragraph that names two changes between the drafts and says whether the reader's comment, the reflection or the day away led to each.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Notebook HabitsThree dated entries with units, a named source for the temperature, separate observations and questions, and no erasing; the exit ticket uses only notebook numbersEntries missing a part, or the exit ticket uses numbers not in the notebookFewer than two entries
History Quick WriteFinished in 15 minutes; the first sentence answers the question; two facts with their sourcesAnswer comes late or a fact has no sourceNo quick write
Extended ProcessLog shows a draft, a reader's comment, a day away and a revision after reflection; Draft 2 changes content and adds a limitA stage is missing, or changes are only spellingNo second draft
ReflectionNames two changes and ties each to the comment, the reflection or the day awayLists changes without saying what led to themNo reflection

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

The questions use Texts 1-5 and Diagram 1 from the lesson plan, and Nico's history writing (Texts 6 and 7) in Independent Practice. Paragraph numbers refer to the numbered paragraphs of each text. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which pair of assignments would give a student practice in both kinds of time that WHST.6-8.10 names?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Step 2 of the lab handout (Text 1) tells students to leave each bag partly open. What reason does the handout give?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    On Day 3, Nico corrected his Day 2 note about "mold." What does the correction show about lab notebook writing (Text 2)?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which part of the Day 2 entry (Text 2) is an observation rather than a count?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    On Day 2, how many more seeds had germinated in Bag C than in Bag B?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    What percent of Bag B's seeds had germinated by Day 7?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which statement in Draft 1 (Text 3) do Nico's own data contradict?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why did Mr. Haskins question the word "grew" in Draft 1 (Text 4)?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to Nico's reflection (Text 4), what went wrong when he wrote Draft 1?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which words in Draft 2 (Text 5) state a limit of the investigation?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Draft 2 says, "Warmth mainly changed the speed." Which data support that sentence?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In the quick write (Text 6), which cause explains why the firefighters' hoses had almost no water?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    On Thursday of Week 2, Nico checked his panel against the class reading (Text 7). What did he find and fix?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why did Nico replace "people were dumb to believe it" (Text 7)?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The standard defines an extended time frame as "time for reflection and revision." In his reflection on Tuesday of Week 2 (Text 7), what did Nico decide a History Night visitor needs?

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which sentence fits a history panel better than a lab report?

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write Nico's Day 7 notebook entry. Use the Day 7 counts from Draft 2 (Text 5), add one observation and one question, and follow the notebook habits from Texts 1 and 2.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    Using Text 2, explain to a sixth grader who missed the lab, in two or three sentences, why the white fuzz on the Bag C roots was not mold.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Nico's first draft of the panel had 240 words, and the panel space holds 180 (Text 7). What fraction and what percent of his words did he have to cut? Show your work, and name one kind of sentence a writer can cut first from a museum panel.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Mr. Haskins assigns a new lab report due in 6 school days, and on Day 3 you have a test in another class that will take all your study time. Using Nico's two extended pieces as models, write a plan that gives each day one job, keeps a day away before rereading, and ends with a check of every number against the notebook.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does WHST.6-8.10 mean?

WHST.6-8.10 means that students in grades 6-8 write often in history, science and technical classes, both in short time frames and in extended ones, for many different tasks, purposes and readers.

Short writing takes a single sitting or a day or two, such as a lab notebook entry, an exit ticket or a history quick write. Extended writing gives time for reflection and revision, such as a lab report or a history panel that goes through a draft, a reader's comment, a day away and a revision.

How is WHST.6-8.10 different from W.8.10?

The wording is almost the same, but WHST.6-8.10 is for history, science and technical subjects, and its extended time frame names "reflection and revision" without the word "research."

W.8.10, the grade 8 English standard, adds "research" to the extended time frame. Research writing in history and science is covered by WHST.6-8.7 and WHST.6-8.8, so WHST.6-8.10 keeps the focus on the habit of writing often and revising after reflection.

Who teaches WHST.6-8.10, the English teacher or the science and history teachers?

WHST.6-8.10 is meant for science, history and technical teachers, working in their own classes.

The Common Core literacy standards for grades 6-12 describe what students should do with writing in those subjects, so the lab notebook, the history quick write and the revised lab report belong to those classes. English teachers can help by using the same words for time frames, reflection and revision.

What counts as short writing in science?

In science, short writing is anything written in one sitting or a day or two, such as a notebook entry, an exit ticket, a prediction before a lab or an answer to an analysis question.

A good notebook entry is dated, written while the work happens, and keeps measurements, observations and questions apart. Its first reader is the scientist who wrote it, who will build a report from it later.

What counts as short writing in history?

In history, short writing includes quick writes, sourcing notes on a document, short responses to a question and captions for images or maps.

A good quick write answers its question in the first sentence, uses facts from the reading, and says which cause or piece of evidence matters most. It should never add facts the writer is not sure of.

Is revising the same as fixing spelling?

No, revising means changing what a piece says or how it is organized; fixing spelling is editing.

In the lesson, Nico's revision replaced a wrong word, added the key numbers and a limit, and moved an answer to the top of a panel. A proofread at the end is still worth doing, but it does not replace revision.

Why does WHST.6-8.10 ask for a day away before revising?

The standard asks for time for reflection, and a day or more away is a simple way to get it, because writers see problems more clearly when they come back to a draft later.

The standard does not require a specific gap. A day away works well for middle school students, since it is short enough to fit most deadlines and long enough to make the draft feel new.

How is WHST.6-8.10 assessed?

WHST.6-8.10 is usually assessed through a collection of work over time rather than a single test question.

A teacher can look at a lab notebook, a set of history quick writes and one revised piece from each subject, with the drafts and a log. The pattern across that work shows whether a student writes routinely, in both time frames, for different readers and purposes.

Is WHST.6-8.10 for grade 6, 7 or 8?

WHST.6-8.10 covers the whole grades 6-8 band: the same standard applies in grades 6, 7 and 8.

Teachers usually raise expectations across the band. Sixth graders might practice dated entries and one revised piece a term; eighth graders might keep notebooks independently and plan their own reflection and revision sessions.

What comes after WHST.6-8.10 in high school?

In grades 9-10, WHST.9-10.10 keeps the same two time frames for history, science and technical writing.

High school adds longer lab reports, document-based essays and research papers, with more of the scheduling left to the student. Students who arrive with the habit of dated notes, quick answers and revision after reflection are ready for that work.