W.11-12.5: Weighing Feedback and Rebuilding a Draft for Its Audience
In plain English: W.11-12.5 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 11 and 12 to develop and strengthen writing by planning, revising, editing, rewriting or trying a new approach, focusing on what is most significant for a specific purpose and audience. Students weigh conflicting feedback, rebuild drafts when needed and edit to the grade 11-12 Language standards.
Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach, focusing on addressing what is most significant for a specific purpose and audience.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards · Cluster: Production and Distribution of Writing · Official standard
This lesson follows a senior's museum wall panel through three drafts. Priya's first draft is accurate, formal and nearly 200 words long, and it opens with the cannery's founder. A curator and a classmate help her see that visitors reading on their feet need one central idea in the first seconds: the cannery ran on the women and teenagers who worked the packing line. Priya tries a new approach built on one worker and one night. It works so well that it creates a new problem, and a second round of feedback brings the other 479 workers back into view. The same session covers grade 11-12 editing: hyphenation, a contested usage choice (who or whom) and syntax varied for effect.
The grade 11-12 emphasis is judgment. Readers give advice that conflicts, and a writer has to weigh it against the purpose and audience instead of following all of it. Students practice that weighing in the activities and on a draft of their own. For homework, they reconcile a teacher's and a parent's opposite requests in a concert program note.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
State the one idea a piece must deliver to a specific audience and judge every draft against it
Weigh conflicting feedback by purpose and audience, and decide to follow, adapt or set aside each comment
Try a new approach when a draft's basic plan cannot serve the reader, and re-plan midway when the purpose shifts
Revise by cutting and compressing so the most significant material gets the most words
Edit to grade 11-12 Language standards, including hyphenation, contested usage and varied syntax
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Revising for what is most significant to a purpose and audience in grades 9-10 W.9-10.5
Adapting writing to task, purpose and audience W.11-12.4
Recognizing active and passive voice
Using semicolons, colons and parallel structure in their own writing (L.9-10.1, L.9-10.2)
"Two people read your draft. One says, 'Add more.' The other says, 'Cut it in half.' Both are trying to help. How do you decide what to do?"
Collect a few answers without judging them, and write the useful questions on the board (Who is the real reader? What is the piece for? Who knows that reader best?). Tell students that W.11-12.5 expects exactly this kind of judgment: a writer strengthens a draft by deciding what is most significant for a specific purpose and audience, and feedback is evidence for that decision, not an order.
Introduce the case. Priya Nair, a high school senior, is interning at the Harlow Bay Historical Society, which is opening an exhibit on the town's old sardine cannery. She has been asked to write the introductory wall panel, the first text visitors see. Priya, her classmate Owen, the town, the cannery, the curator and every fact below are invented for this lesson, although canneries of this kind did operate on the Pacific coast. Read the fact sheet, then Priya's first draft.
Fact sheet: the Harlow Bay cannery exhibit (a fictional town and cannery; all details invented)
Topic
Fact
Cannery
Harlow Bay Packing Company, 1919-1958; salmon at first, sardines by 1925
Workforce
About 480 seasonal workers in 1941, most of them women, many in their teens
Work
Fish packed by hand; paid by the case; shifts of twelve hours or more in heavy seasons
Signal
A steam whistle called workers in whenever the boats arrived, day or night
Featured object
The 1934 time card of Rosa Medeiros, age 15, given by her daughter in 1994
Oral history
Rosa Medeiros, recorded in 1987
Panel limit
150 words, printed large and read standing
Visitors
Families, school groups and tourists; the curator is Ms. Elena Vasquez
1The Harlow Bay Packing Company cannery was established in 1919 by Walter J. Harlow, who had previously operated a lumber mill on the same site. Initially the cannery processed salmon, but by 1925 sardines had become its principal product. The plant was expanded in 1928 and again in 1937, when a second warehouse and a fish-meal plant were constructed.
2At its peak in 1941, the cannery employed approximately 480 workers during the fishing season, the majority of whom were women. Workers were paid by the case rather than by the hour, and shifts could last twelve hours or longer when the catch was large. A steam whistle was used to summon workers to the plant when the boats arrived, which could occur at any hour of the day or night.
3The sardine catch along the Pacific coast declined sharply in the late 1940s, and the company struggled to remain profitable. Canning ended in 1958, and the buildings were sold to the county in 1963. This exhibit, which was assembled from donated objects, photographs, and oral histories collected by the Harlow Bay Historical Society, examines the history of the cannery from its founding to its closure.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 1: Priya's Draft 1 of the introductory wall panel. Original passage written for this page.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Present the standard's two halves. The first half is a toolkit: planning, revising, editing, rewriting and trying a new approach, each used "as needed." The second half is the test every change must pass: does it address what is most significant for this purpose and this audience? At grades 11-12 the hard part is usually not finding problems but choosing among fixes, because readers disagree and a writer cannot follow all of them. Diagram 2 gives students a way to weigh a comment instead of simply obeying it.
Point out the editing note that closes W.11-12.5 in the full Common Core document: editing for conventions should show command of Language standards 1-3 up to grades 11-12. At this level that includes hyphenation conventions (L.11-12.2a), usage that is a matter of convention and sometimes contested (L.11-12.1a and 1b), and syntax varied for effect (L.11-12.3a). Priya meets all three.
Read Text 2 aloud in parts. Ask students to mark each comment as being about significance, style, length or accuracy. Then read Draft 2. Ask: What did Priya keep from Draft 1, what did she drop, and which comment did she not act on yet?
1Ms. Vasquez: Thank you for this, Priya. Everything in it is accurate. Now let me tell you how people actually use this wall. They come through the door, they stop for a few seconds, and they decide whether the room is worth their time. Some read one paragraph. Very few read three.
2Priya: So the panel has to work in one paragraph.
3Ms. Vasquez: It has to work in one sentence. Tell me the one idea the whole room is built around.
4Priya: That the cannery ran on the women on the packing line. Most of the objects came from their families.
5Ms. Vasquez: Then that idea should be the first thing a visitor meets. Right now the first person they meet is Walter Harlow, and he owned a lumber mill.
6Owen: It reads like an encyclopedia entry. "Was established," "were constructed," "was used to summon." Nobody does anything in the first paragraph. Things just get built.
7Priya: I thought a museum panel was supposed to sound formal.
8Ms. Vasquez: Formal, yes. Distant, no. Our visitors include eight-year-olds on school trips and tourists who have never heard of Harlow Bay.
9Owen: What if you start with the whistle? It's the most vivid thing in the draft, and it's buried in the middle of paragraph 2.
10Priya: I could start with the whistle and with Rosa Medeiros. Her time card is in the first case, and she was fifteen in 1934.
11Ms. Vasquez: Try it. And the limit is still 150 words. You're at almost 200, so the founding, the expansions and the closing will have to find another home. Panel 6 covers the closing.
12Owen: One warning, though. If it's all about Rosa, people might think she was the whole story. There were 480 workers.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 2: First response session with the curator and a classmate. Original passage written for this page.
1The whistle could blow at 2 a.m.
2When it did, fifteen year old Rosa Medeiros pulled on her boots and ran six blocks to the Harlow Bay cannery, where the boats were already unloading. Her 1934 time card is in the case to your left. It shows a week of twelve hour shifts. She stood at the packing table and packed sardines by hand. She was paid by the case and not by the hour. She worked until the fish were gone, even if the sun had come up again.
3Rosa was one of the women and teenagers who the company hired each season to work the line. Her family kept the card for sixty years. Her daughter gave it to the Historical Society in 1994, along with a photograph of Rosa at nineteen.
4As you walk through this room, you will hear Rosa's voice in an oral history recorded in 1987, and you will see the tools she used every day on the line.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 3: Priya's Draft 2, a new approach. Original passage written for this page.
Discuss before moving on: Draft 2 is a stronger panel than Draft 1 by almost any measure, yet it has a new problem that Draft 1 did not have. Let students find it in the transcript before they read Text 4.
Guided Practice20 minutes
Read Text 4 and Draft 3 together. Pairs then track each comment in Text 4 through to Draft 3 and label it followed, adapted or set aside. Use Diagram 1 to see how the emphasis shifted across the three drafts, then work through the five examples below as a class.
1Ms. Vasquez: This is a different panel. I read the first line and I want to know what happens. I'd keep that line exactly as it is, on its own.
2Owen: I still have my warning, though. Now it's the Rosa exhibit. A visitor could walk out thinking one girl packed all the sardines. You found a better way in, but the 480 workers disappeared.
3Ms. Vasquez: He's right. Rosa is the way in. She can't be the whole story. What's the sentence that turns her into one of hundreds?
4Priya: Something like "In 1941 the cannery employed 480 people in season, and most of them were women." Right after the time card.
5Ms. Vasquez: Good. Then the paragraph about her family can shrink. The card and the oral history can say that for us. How many words are you at?
6Priya: A hundred sixty-five. So something has to go anyway.
7Owen: Can I be the grammar person? "Fifteen year old" needs hyphens. So does "twelve hour shifts."
8Priya: And "who the company hired" should be "whom," since the company is doing the hiring.
9Ms. Vasquez: For a museum wall, I'd rather you rebuild that sentence than use "whom." A lot of visitors hear it as stiff. "Women and teenagers hired each season" says the same thing and settles the question.
10Owen: Last thing. Paragraph 2 is five short sentences in a row, all built the same way: "She stood," "She was paid," "She worked." It sounds like a list.
11Priya: The short sentences are on purpose. It's supposed to feel like the line.
12Owen: One of them, fine. Five is a drumbeat. Combine some, and save the short one for the end, where it hits.
13Ms. Vasquez: That's the right instinct. Vary them, and let the short sentence land where it counts.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 4: Second response session and editing conference. Original passage written for this page.
1The whistle could blow at 2 a.m.
2When it did, fifteen-year-old Rosa Medeiros pulled on her boots and ran six blocks to the Harlow Bay cannery, where the boats were already unloading. Her 1934 time card, in the case to your left, records a week of twelve-hour shifts. Paid by the case rather than by the hour, she stood at the packing table until the fish were gone. Sometimes the sun came up first.
3Rosa was not unusual. In 1941 the cannery employed 480 people in season. Most were women, many still in their teens, hired each year to work the line. Their families saved the objects in this room: time cards, knives, aprons, photographs.
4As you walk through, you will hear Rosa in an oral history recorded in 1987, and you will see the tools that she and hundreds of other workers used every day.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 5: Priya's Draft 3, the panel as mounted. Original passage written for this page.
Trying a new approach: a new starting point
Draft 1 begins with the founding: "The Harlow Bay Packing Company cannery was established in 1919 by Walter J. Harlow, who had previously operated a lumber mill on the same site."
Result: Draft 2 abandons chronology and begins inside one night: "The whistle could blow at 2 a.m." Priya did not repair the old opening. She chose a different point of entry, a moment and a person, and let the history follow from it.
Planning again, midway: a word budget
After Text 4, Priya must add the workforce, cut to 150 words and keep the opening. She plans by the word: opening line under 10; Rosa's night and her time card about 65; the workforce about 40; the invitation about 30.
Result: The budget comes to about 145 words, under the limit, and it gives the most words to the parts that carry the room's idea. Draft 3 lands at 146 words. Planning is not only a first step; a writer can re-plan whenever the purpose shifts.
Revising: compressing a paragraph into the central idea
Draft 2, paragraph 3: "Her family kept the card for sixty years. Her daughter gave it to the Historical Society in 1994, along with a photograph of Rosa at nineteen."
Result: Draft 3: "Their families saved the objects in this room: time cards, knives, aprons, photographs." Two sentences about one family become one sentence about all the families, which serves the whole room and frees words for the workforce.
Editing: hyphenation conventions (L.11-12.2a)
Draft 2: "fifteen year old Rosa Medeiros" and "a week of twelve hour shifts."
Result: A compound modifier before a noun takes hyphens: "fifteen-year-old Rosa Medeiros," "twelve-hour shifts." After the noun, the same words stay open: "Rosa was fifteen years old," "her shifts lasted twelve hours."
Editing: varying syntax for effect (L.11-12.3a)
Draft 2, paragraph 2, ends with five short sentences in a row, such as "She stood at the packing table and packed sardines by hand. She was paid by the case and not by the hour."
Result: Draft 3: "Paid by the case rather than by the hour, she stood at the packing table until the fish were gone. Sometimes the sun came up first." An opening participial phrase combines two facts, and the one short sentence left, placed last, carries the weight the five could not.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students bring a draft of their own and comments from two readers (a classmate and the teacher, or a classmate and a family member). (1) Write the purpose and audience in one sentence, and the one idea the reader must leave with. (2) List every comment and run each through Diagram 2. (3) Find one pair of comments that pull in different directions and write a short decision note: which you will follow, adapt or set aside, and why, in terms of the reader. (4) Make the change, then make one edit from the grade 11-12 Language standards and name the convention.
The quiz uses Texts 1-5 and the fact sheet (Warm-Up, Direct Instruction and Guided Practice). Point students back to those phases when they take it.
Closure5 minutes
Exit ticket: (1) Name one comment Priya set aside or postponed, and say whether that was the right call. (2) Write the one idea the reader of your own draft must leave with. Then hand out the homework texts below: Theo's first draft of a concert program note on the second movement of Dvořák's Symphony No. 9 (Text 6), and three readers' responses (Text 7). Theo and his readers are invented; the facts about the symphony are historical. The note is written for families at a school orchestra concert, many of whom do not read music.
1Antonín Dvořák (1841-1904) composed his Symphony No. 9 in E minor, Op. 95, "From the New World," in 1893, during his tenure as director of the National Conservatory of Music in New York. The symphony was premiered by the New York Philharmonic at Carnegie Hall on December 16, 1893.
2Tonight we perform the second movement, the Largo, which is in D-flat major and follows a three-part (ABA) design. The movement opens with a slow progression of chords in the brass and woodwinds that modulates to the remote key of D-flat. The principal theme is then stated by the english horn over muted strings. The contrasting middle section moves a little faster and grows darker before the opening theme returns.
3The well known melody was later adapted into the song "Goin' Home" by William Arms Fisher, who Dvořák had taught in New York.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 6: Homework draft, Theo's concert program note (Draft 1). Original passage written for this page.
1Dr. Kim (orchestra director): The history is right, and I want it kept. Our program notes are how students learn to write about music, so name the key and the form.
2Mrs. Okonkwo (parent volunteer who edits the program): I'll be honest: I don't know what "modulates to the remote key" means, and most families in that auditorium won't either. They read this in the two minutes before the lights go down. Tell them what to listen for.
3Hannah (plays the English horn solo): Start with the sound. The first thing the audience hears is those low chords, and then me, alone, over the quiet strings. If they know that's coming, they'll listen for it.
4Dr. Kim: I don't object to that, as long as the note stays accurate. Just don't call it a folk song or a spiritual. Dvořák wrote that melody himself; the words came later.
5Mrs. Okonkwo: The limit is 150 words, and it has to fit on half a page of the program.
6Theo: So I have two readers who want different things, and 150 words to give them both.
SVHS lesson authors, Text 7: Homework feedback, three readers respond to Theo's note. Original passage written for this page.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a comment log with three columns (comment, what it is about, decision) and fill in the first row from Text 2
Have students highlight Draft 1 in two colors, one for facts that serve the room's central idea and one for facts that belong on another panel, before reading Draft 2
Provide a short list of hyphenation patterns (number plus unit before a noun, -ly adverbs without hyphens) for the editing work
For Advanced Students
Ask students to write Panel 6, the closing panel, from the facts Priya cut, and explain how its purpose differs from the introduction's
Have students consult a usage guide on "who" and "whom" and write a paragraph arguing for or against Ms. Vasquez's choice
Ask students to write a 60-word version of Draft 3 for a large-print label and defend each cut against the curator's goal
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong work names the one idea a piece must deliver and measures each change against it. When students discuss feedback, look for decisions with reasons (followed, adapted, set aside) rather than a list of fixes, and for awareness that a comment can be right and still be postponed. In revisions, look for real structural change: a new opening, compressed material, content moved to another place. In editing, students should apply hyphenation conventions correctly and explain a usage choice in terms of convention and audience, not only as a rule. Watch for students who polish sentences in a draft whose plan is not working.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Conflicting Feedback Council
20 minGroups of 4
One student writes and three play readers who want different things from the same short text. The writer has to produce one revision and defend it. The activity makes the central skill of W.11-12.5 visible: deciding what is most significant when not every reader can be satisfied.
The Draft (invented)
This mural was painted in 2025 by the artist Lena Ortiz with the help of 40 students from Eastside High School. It was funded by a grant from the Riverside Arts Council. The wall belongs to the old Eastside Ice Company building, built in 1911. The mural shows the river, the ice company's workers and the families who live in the neighborhood today.
Task: a plaque of 50 words or fewer, read by people walking past on the sidewalk.
Reader Cards
Card 1, the artist: "Say what the mural means. The river connects the neighborhood's past and present."
Card 2, the arts council: "Our grant must be credited in the first sentence."
Card 3, the neighborhood association: "Tell people the building's history. Most neighbors have never heard of the ice company."
Procedure
Each reader presents a card's request in one minute, in role
The writer asks each reader one question, then drafts the plaque alone (6 minutes)
The writer reads the plaque aloud and explains which request was followed, which was adapted and which was set aside
Readers respond in role, then the group rotates roles for a second round if time allows
Discussion Questions
Which request was hardest to set aside, and what argument settled it?
Did any writer find one sentence that satisfied two readers at once?
How did the sidewalk reader, who was not in the room, shape the decisions?
Modification for Distance Learning
Post the draft and the three cards in a shared document. Readers leave their requests as comments, and the writer resolves each comment with a one-sentence reply stating the decision.
2
Same Material, New Reader
20 minPairs
Priya cut most of Draft 1, but those facts were not wrong; they were aimed at the wrong reader. Pairs rebuild the same material for a reader who needs it. The activity shows that significance depends on purpose and audience, not on the facts alone.
The New Task
The Historical Society's website needs an "About the Collection" note of about 150 words for researchers and family historians who want to know what the archive holds and what period it covers.
Procedure
Pairs reverse-outline Draft 1: one label per sentence, such as "founding," "expansion," "pay" or "closing"
Pairs mark which labels a researcher needs and which a wall-panel visitor needs, and note any that both need
Pairs write the website note, reusing Draft 1's facts but choosing a structure for the new reader
Pairs swap notes with another pair and check that every fact matches the fact sheet
Discussion Questions
Which sentence that Priya cut became one of your most important?
Did Draft 1's style bother you as much once the reader was a researcher? Why or why not?
What would a researcher miss if the website used the wall panel's text?
Timeline Variation
Pairs present the same facts as a six-entry timeline for the exhibit's back wall, and explain why a timeline suits that position in the room but not the entrance.
3
Usage Court
15 minPairs
Pairs rule on eight usage questions with a dictionary or usage guide at hand (L.11-12.1b). Some have a settled answer in edited American English; others are contested, and the writer chooses by audience. The activity prepares students for choices like Priya's "who" and "whom."
The Eight Cases
Case 1: "The data is clear" or "The data are clear"
Case 2: "a ten minute break" or "a ten-minute break"
Case 3: "Whom did the company hire?" on a museum wall
Case 4: "to carefully record" or "to record carefully"
Case 5: "The cannery closed it's doors" or "The cannery closed its doors"
Case 6: "a newly-painted wall" or "a newly painted wall"
Case 7: "What was the building used for?" or "For what was the building used?"
Case 8: "None of the workers was paid" or "None of the workers were paid"
Procedure
Pairs sort each case as "settled convention" or "contested: choose by audience" and cite the reference they used
For each contested case, pairs pick the form they would use on a museum wall and in a research paper, and give a reason
Pairs compare rulings with another pair and resolve any disagreements with the reference
Ruling Key (for the teacher)
Settled: Cases 2, 5 and 6 (a hyphenated compound modifier before a noun; "its" as the possessive; no hyphen after an -ly adverb). Contested: Cases 1, 3, 4, 7 and 8, where usage guides accept both forms or disagree, and the choice depends on the audience and the level of formality.
Discussion Questions
Which contested case did your pair decide differently for the wall and for the paper?
Why might a usage be acceptable in one decade and questioned in another?
When is rebuilding a sentence better than choosing either form?
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: How the Emphasis Shifted Across Three Drafts
Each bar is one draft, divided by what its sentences are about and drawn to scale by word count (195, 165 and 146 words); the numbers inside the bars are words. The lesson authors classified each sentence by its main subject. Company history fills half of Draft 1 and disappears from Draft 2, Rosa appears only in Drafts 2 and 3, and the workforce as a whole returns in Draft 3. The dashed line, visible between the bars, marks the 150-word limit.
Diagram 2: Weighing a Reader's Comment
A decision path for feedback. The first question comes from the standard itself: does the comment serve what is most significant for this purpose and audience? A comment that fails that test is not necessarily wrong; it may belong in another piece. When two useful comments conflict, the writer looks for a single change that answers both before choosing between them.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
W.11-12.5 Homework: Two Readers, One Program Note
Directions: Use Texts 6 and 7 in the Closure section of the lesson plan. Theo's school orchestra will play the Largo from Dvořák's Symphony No. 9 at its spring concert, and his program note must fit a 150-word limit. Most of the audience are families who do not read music, but the orchestra director wants the note to teach something about music too. Use only the facts in Text 6 and Text 7, and do not add any claim about the music you cannot support from them.
Part 1: Plan (Problems 1-2)
Write a plan for the note: its purpose, its main audience, and the one thing that audience should listen for. Then quote Dr. Kim's request and Mrs. Okonkwo's request (Text 7, paragraphs 1 and 2) and explain in 2-3 sentences whether one change could answer both.
Reverse-outline Draft 1: give each sentence a label (history, technical description or listening guide). Name the label that serves the main audience least well, and say what you will do with those sentences.
Part 2: Rewrite and Check (Problems 3-4)
Write Draft 2 (130-150 words) with a new approach: organize it around what the audience will hear, in the order they will hear it, as Hannah suggests (Text 7, paragraph 3), or around another plan you justify. Keep at least one technical term and explain it in plain words.
Make an accuracy table for Draft 2: list each factual claim and the sentence in Text 6 or Text 7 that supports it. Revise any claim that goes beyond the texts, and check Dr. Kim's warning in paragraph 4.
Part 3: Edit and Reflect (Problems 5-6)
Draft 1 has three convention problems: a hyphenation error, a capitalization error and a who/whom choice. Find each one, correct it, and name the convention. For the who/whom sentence, decide whether to use "whom" or rebuild the sentence for this audience, and explain. Then edit your Draft 2 into Draft 3.
Write a memo to Dr. Kim (150-200 words) explaining how Draft 3 answers his request and Mrs. Okonkwo's, which request you adapted, and why that choice serves the concert audience.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Weighing feedback
Both readers' requests quoted and weighed against a clear purpose and audience
Requests named but weighed without reference to the audience
One reader ignored, or no decision made
New approach
Draft 2 is rebuilt around a justified plan and fits 130-150 words
Draft 2 reorders Draft 1 without a new plan, or misses the length
Draft 2 repeats Draft 1 with word changes
Accuracy
Every claim traced to Text 6 or 7; nothing unsupported
One unsupported or unchecked claim
Several unsupported claims, or the melody called a folk song
Editing
All three problems fixed and the conventions named; the who/whom choice argued
Two problems fixed, or fixes made without naming conventions
Problems not found
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
The questions use the fact sheet and Texts 1-5 in the lesson plan: Priya's three drafts and the two response sessions (Warm-Up, Direct Instruction and Guided Practice). Paragraph numbers match the numbers beside each text. Questions 7, 9 and 18 use new practice sentences. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Text 2, paragraph 3, Ms. Vasquez tells Priya, "It has to work in one sentence." What does she mean?
Answer: A
Ms. Vasquez has just described how visitors use the wall: "Some read one paragraph. Very few read three" (paragraph 1). If most visitors read little, the idea the room is built around has to arrive first. B takes the words too literally. C and D describe formatting and sentence length, which she does not discuss here.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Owen says of Draft 1, "Nobody does anything in the first paragraph. Things just get built." Which feature of the draft is he pointing to?
Answer: C
Owen quotes the verbs: "'Was established,' 'were constructed,' 'was used to summon'" (Text 2, paragraph 6). In the passive voice the actors disappear, and in a room about workers, the people doing the work should be visible. A may be true of Draft 1, but it is not what this comment targets. B reverses the problem: Draft 1 is formal and distant, not informal. D is false; Ms. Vasquez calls the draft accurate and no one finds spelling errors.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does Ms. Vasquez object that "the first person they meet is Walter Harlow"?
Answer: B
Priya has just named the room's idea, "the women on the packing line," and Ms. Vasquez answers that "that idea should be the first thing a visitor meets" (Text 2, paragraphs 4-5). A founder who "owned a lumber mill" leads away from it. A contradicts her first comment, "Everything in it is accurate." C overgeneralizes from one panel. D is not her advice; she later says the founding needs "another home" (paragraph 11).
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Ms. Vasquez tells Priya the panel should be "Formal, yes. Distant, no." Which sentence best fits that description?
Answer: B
The Draft 3 sentence is standard, precise English, but it speaks to the visitor ("your left"), points to a real object and puts a person at the center. A and D are formal but distant: passive verbs and no one the reader can see. C is close to the reader but not formal: "awesome" and "cool" are slang, and the exclamation oversells.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
At the end of Text 2, Owen warns, "If it's all about Rosa, people might think she was the whole story." Which sentence in Draft 3 answers that warning most directly?
Answer: D
The sentence places Rosa among hundreds of workers, which is exactly the scale Owen says is missing: "There were 480 workers" (Text 2, paragraph 12). A is the opening hook, and B and C are both about Rosa alone, so they deepen the focus Owen is worried about instead of widening it.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Text 2, why does Ms. Vasquez mention "eight-year-olds on school trips and tourists who have never heard of Harlow Bay"?
Answer: A
She mentions these visitors right after "Formal, yes. Distant, no" (paragraph 8): the panel stays formal but must reach readers who know nothing about the town. B invents a second panel. C contradicts her praise for accuracy. D contradicts "Formal, yes."
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence follows hyphenation conventions?
Answer: C
"Six-day" is a compound modifier before the noun "week," so it takes a hyphen, and "newly restored" takes none, because an adverb ending in -ly is not hyphenated to the word it modifies (L.11-12.2a). A wrongly hyphenates the -ly adverb. B leaves "six day" open before the noun. D hyphenates the wrong pair of words and also hyphenates the -ly adverb.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Text 4, Ms. Vasquez asks Priya to rebuild the sentence rather than write "whom." Which statement best describes the usage question?
Answer: D
In "who the company hired," the pronoun is the object of "hired," so formal edited English calls for "whom," and Priya is right. But usage is a matter of convention and sometimes contested (L.11-12.1a), and Ms. Vasquez judges that many visitors hear "whom" as stiff, so she rebuilds the sentence: "Women and teenagers hired each season." A is false; she never calls "whom" wrong. B reverses the grammar: because the company is the subject, the pronoun is the object. C is wrong because she chooses a correct alternative, not an error.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which revision of these sentences varies the syntax most effectively for a wall panel? The boats came in at night. The whistle blew. The workers woke up. The workers ran to the plant.
Answer: D
D combines three facts in one complex sentence and saves a short sentence for the end, where it lands with force (L.11-12.3a). A strings independent clauses together with commas alone, a series of comma splices. B is grammatical but repeats "and" so often that every clause gets the same weight. C cuts the sentences into fragments and loses who did what.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Ms. Vasquez says the founding, the expansions and the closing "will have to find another home." Why is cutting them from this panel the right choice?
Answer: A
The facts are sound ("Everything in it is accurate," Text 2, paragraph 1), but the introductory panel has 150 words for the one idea visitors must meet first, and "Panel 6 covers the closing" (paragraph 11). The material moves; it is not lost. B contradicts the curator. C overgeneralizes: dates belong elsewhere in the exhibit. D gives a reason about the writer's time, not the reader's needs.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Text 4, Ms. Vasquez would keep "The whistle could blow at 2 a.m." "exactly as it is, on its own." Why does a one-line opening paragraph suit this panel?
Answer: B
Ms. Vasquez gives the reason: "I read the first line and I want to know what happens" (paragraph 1). A single short line, set apart, works for the visitor who stops for only a few seconds. A is not her reason, and other sentences in Draft 2 are also error-free. C invents a rule. D is wrong because Draft 2 has no founding facts left to separate.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The Historical Society asks Priya for a 40-word sidewalk sign that should bring passersby inside. Which plan best fits the new purpose?
Answer: C
A sign has one job: to make a passerby step inside. The whistle line is the strongest hook Priya has, one sentence carries the room's idea, and an invitation states the action. A brings back the opening that failed on the wall. B gives information without a reason to enter. D cannot fit in 40 words and repeats the focus Owen warned about.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which comment in Text 2 is mainly about what is most significant for the purpose, rather than about style or length?
Answer: B
Ms. Vasquez's question (paragraph 3) asks Priya to name the central idea that every choice in the panel should serve, which is the focus the standard names. A is about style (the tone of an encyclopedia). C is about length. D is Priya's belief about tone, which Ms. Vasquez then qualifies.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Draft 2 ends with "the tools she used every day on the line." Draft 3 ends with "the tools that she and hundreds of other workers used every day." Why is the change an improvement?
Answer: C
The new ending repeats, in the last words a visitor reads, the point Priya added for Owen: Rosa was one of hundreds of workers. A is wrong because the Draft 2 sentence has no hyphenation error. B is false: Draft 3 is 146 words. D is false: Draft 3 still mentions the oral history, "recorded in 1987."
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Draft 1 is accurate and formal. Using two quotations from Text 2, explain why Priya's readers treated it as a problem of purpose and audience rather than of correctness.
Model answer: Ms. Vasquez begins by saying "Everything in it is accurate" (paragraph 1), so correctness is not in question. The problem is fit: visitors "stop for a few seconds" and "Very few read three" paragraphs (paragraph 1), yet Draft 1 saves its most vivid detail, the whistle, for the middle and opens with a founder. Owen adds that "Nobody does anything in the first paragraph" (paragraph 6), so the people the room is about are hidden. A correct text can still fail its readers, and the fix is to rethink what they meet first. Rubric line: 2 points for two accurate quotations and an explanation that separates accuracy from fit to audience and purpose; 1 point for one quotation or an explanation that stays general.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Rewrite this Draft 1 sentence in the active voice for the panel's visitors: "A steam whistle was used to summon workers to the plant when the boats arrived, which could occur at any hour of the day or night." Then explain two improvements your version makes.
Model answer: "Whenever the boats came in, day or night, a steam whistle called the workers to the plant." First, the whistle now acts ("called"), and the workers are the ones called, so the people stay visible and the sentence is shorter. Second, the original "which could occur" has no clear noun to point to (it seems to mean the boats' arrival); moving "day or night" next to "the boats came in" removes the vague "which." "Called" also replaces the formal "summon" for readers of all ages. Rubric line: 2 points for a correct active-voice sentence and two improvements explained; 1 point for a correct rewrite with one improvement or none.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Write a caption of 25 words or fewer for Rosa's time card in its case, using only facts from Drafts 2 and 3. Then explain one choice you made for visitors reading it at the case.
Model answer: "Time card, 1934. Rosa Medeiros, fifteen, packed sardines, paid by the case. This card records a week of twelve-hour shifts. Donated by her daughter, 1994." (25 words.) I put the object and the year first because a visitor at the case is looking at the card and wants to know what it is before whose it is. The facts come from Draft 2 ("Her daughter gave it to the Historical Society in 1994") and Draft 3 ("records a week of twelve-hour shifts"). Rubric line: 2 points for an accurate caption within 25 words and a choice explained in terms of the visitor at the case; 1 point if the caption runs long or the explanation ignores the reader.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Edit this practice paragraph and name the convention behind each correction: The cannerys' steam whistle could be heard two miles away. Workers who the foreman trusted were given the best paying stations. A long time employee remembered running to the plant in her nightgown.
Model answer: "The cannery's steam whistle could be heard two miles away. Workers whom the foreman trusted were given the best-paying stations. A longtime employee remembered running to the plant in her nightgown." (1) "Cannery's": one cannery, so the possessive apostrophe goes before the s (punctuation, L.11-12.2). (2) "Whom": the pronoun is the object of "trusted" in formal edited English; rebuilding the sentence ("Workers the foreman trusted") is also acceptable, since this usage is contested (L.11-12.1a). (3) "Best-paying": a compound modifier before a noun is hyphenated (L.11-12.2a). (4) "Longtime": the adjective is spelled as one word (L.11-12.2b). Rubric line: 2 points for all four problems fixed with conventions named; 1 point for three problems fixed or fixes without conventions.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
The Historical Society decides that Draft 3 will also be read aloud as the first stop of an audio tour. Explain two changes Priya should make for listeners, and why each one serves them.
Model answer: First, "in the case to your left" works on a wall but may confuse a listener who is not standing at the panel, so the recording should say where the time card is in a way that works from the tour's first stop, or save the direction for the stop at the case. Second, listeners cannot see the colon list "time cards, knives, aprons, photographs," so Priya might slow it down ("their time cards, their knives, their aprons") so each item registers. She should keep "The whistle could blow at 2 a.m." as the first thing heard, since it works just as well aloud. Rubric line: 2 points for two changes that each follow from a listener's needs, with a quotation from Draft 3; 1 point for one change or changes without reasons.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Draft 1 and Draft 3 both mention the whistle. Compare how each draft uses it, and explain what the difference shows about deciding what is most significant for this audience.
Model answer: In Draft 1 the whistle is one fact among many, in the passive voice, in the middle of paragraph 2: "A steam whistle was used to summon workers to the plant when the boats arrived." In Draft 3 it is the whole first paragraph: "The whistle could blow at 2 a.m." The fact did not change; its position and weight did. Priya decided that the detail best able to pull a standing visitor into the room should come first and stand alone. What is most significant depends on the reader, not on how important a fact seemed to the writer. Rubric line: 2 points for quotations from both drafts and an explanation that connects position and emphasis to the audience; 1 point for a comparison without the connection to the audience.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does W.11-12.5 mean?
W.11-12.5 means that students in grades 11 and 12 strengthen their writing by planning, revising, editing, rewriting or trying a new approach, and that they judge every change by what is most significant for a specific purpose and audience.
At this level the standard is mostly about judgment: deciding which problems matter, which advice to take and when a draft needs to be rebuilt rather than repaired.
Is W.11-12.5 different from W.9-10.5?
The main wording is the same; the difference is in the editing note and in the difficulty of the writing situations.
In the full Common Core document, the note after W.11-12.5 ties editing to the grade 11-12 Language standards, such as hyphenation conventions and contested usage, while W.9-10.5 points to the grade 9-10 ones. Teachers usually raise the challenge too: mixed audiences, conflicting feedback and strict limits, as in this lesson.
What should a writer do when two readers give opposite advice?
Go back to the purpose and the audience, and let them decide.
First look for one change that answers both readers; Theo's homework note can explain a technical term in plain words, which satisfies a director and a parent at once. If no single change works, follow the advice that serves the real audience, and say why. A comment that loses may still be right for a different piece.
What counts as "trying a new approach" in grades 11-12?
It means changing the plan of the piece, not only its sentences: a new point of entry, a new structure or a new genre.
Priya's move from a chronological history to a panel that opens on one night is an example. A new approach is worth the time when the old plan cannot deliver the one idea the reader needs.
Which Language standards does editing cover in grades 11-12?
The editing note points to Language standards 1-3 for grades 11-12.
They include understanding that usage is a matter of convention and can be contested (L.11-12.1a), resolving such questions with references (L.11-12.1b), observing hyphenation conventions and spelling correctly (L.11-12.2a and 2b), and varying syntax for effect (L.11-12.3a). Students also keep using the earlier rules, such as semicolons and parallel structure.
Is "whom" still required in formal writing?
In formal edited English, "whom" is still the standard object form, but its use is one of the best-known contested usages.
Some writers rebuild a sentence instead of choosing either form. Usage guides such as those named in L.11-12.1b discuss the question; students should know the rule and choose deliberately.
How do I teach students to cut without losing what matters?
Have them name the one idea the reader must leave with, then give each part of the draft a word budget.
Material that does not serve that idea is not deleted from the world; it moves to another place, such as a later section, an appendix or a different document. Reverse outlines and bar diagrams of word counts, like Diagram 1, make the choices visible.
How is W.11-12.5 assessed?
It is usually assessed in class, through a series of drafts with the writer's reasons for each change.
A timed test shows only a final product, so many teachers collect a portfolio: drafts, the feedback received, a decision note on which comments were followed, and a final reflection. Check your state's materials to see whether its writing assessments include a revision task.
Does W.11-12.5 apply to college application essays?
Yes: it applies to any writing students produce, including personal essays for applications.
Those essays are a clear case of writing for a specific reader with a strict limit, which makes planning, feedback and cutting essential. The same process in this lesson (one central idea, weighed feedback, a new approach when needed) applies directly.
How can parents support revision at home?
Read the draft as its real reader would, and say what you remember after one reading.
What a reader remembers is a good test of what the draft makes most significant. If your advice conflicts with the teacher's, talk with your student about who the audience is instead of insisting on either version.
07
Related Standards
6 standards
These standards connect to W.11-12.5: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
W.9-10.5Prerequisite
Plan, revise, edit and rewrite for what matters most to purpose and audience, grades 9-10