RST.6-8.7Common CoreELALiteracy in Science and Technical SubjectsGrades 6-8
RST.6-8.7: Integrating Words with Tables, Graphs and Flowcharts in Science Texts
In plain English: RST.6-8.7 is the Common Core grades 6-8 literacy standard that asks students to integrate numbers and technical facts written in words in a science or technical text with a visual version of the same information, such as a flowchart, diagram, model, graph or table. Students check that the two agree and use each for what it shows best. It is usually taught in middle school science.
Integrate quantitative or technical information expressed in words in a text with a version of that information expressed visually (e.g., in a flowchart, diagram, model, graph, or table).
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects 6-12 · Cluster: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas · Official standard
Students learn to integrate numbers and technical facts written in words with a visual version of the same information: a table, a graph, a flowchart, a diagram or a model. They check that the words and the visual agree, notice what each one shows that the other does not, and use both to answer questions. The main text is John Tyndall's Sound (lectures first published in 1867), which reports the speed of sound in air, gases and liquids both in sentences and in tables, and describes in words how the flash of a gun or of lightning can be used to measure a distance.
The teacher models with Tyndall's table of speeds in warm and cold air and two visuals made from it: a line graph drawn to scale (Diagram 1) and a flowchart (Diagram 2). Pairs chart Dulong's table of gases and add a value that Tyndall gives only in words (Passage 2). Students work alone on Tyndall's description of tuning-forks, which gives its numbers only in words (Passage 3), and on a lightning safety card written for this page, whose table must be read together with its words (Passage 4). The homework uses Wertheim's table of liquids (Passage 5). No one in the lesson handles lightning, gases or chemicals: all the data come from the texts.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Locate a number or fact given in the words of a science text in a table, graph or flowchart of the same information, and the reverse
Build an accurate visual (a table, a bar chart, a line graph or a flowchart) from information given in words, and label its units and conditions
Explain what a visual shows more clearly than the words, and what the words say that the visual leaves out
Use the words and the visual together to answer a question that neither answers alone, and judge whether the two agree
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Interpreting information shown in charts, graphs and diagrams and explaining how it adds to a text RI.4.7
Graphing points on a coordinate grid 5.G.A.2
Multiplying and dividing with multi-digit numbers and decimals 6.NS.B.3
Knowing that sound is a vibration that travels through air, water and solids
Project the note and the graph description below. The garden and its numbers are invented for this warm-up. Give pairs two minutes.
Warm-Up Prompt
A school garden newsletter says: "Our rain gauge collected 2 inches of rain on Monday, twice as much as on Tuesday, and none at all on Wednesday." Under the note is a bar graph with three bars: Monday reaches the 2-inch line, Tuesday reaches the 1-inch line, and Wednesday reaches the half-inch line. Do the words and the graph agree? Which one would you trust, and what would you check?
Take answers. Monday and Tuesday agree (2 inches is twice 1 inch), but Wednesday does not: the words say none, and the graph shows half an inch. A reader who uses only one of them misses the problem. Tell students that RST.6-8.7 asks them to integrate information: to put what the words say together with a visual version of the same information (a table, graph, flowchart, diagram or model), check that they match, and use each for what it shows best.
Direct Instruction15 minutes
Part 1: Words for talking about visuals. Keep this table up for the whole lesson.
Words for integrating text and visuals
Term
What it means
A question to ask
Quantitative information
Information given as numbers and measurements
What was measured, and in what units?
Technical information
Facts about how something works or how a task is done, such as steps, parts or conditions
What are the steps or parts?
Table
Numbers arranged in rows and columns with headings
What do the rows and columns stand for?
Line graph
Points on a grid joined by lines, showing how one quantity changes with another
What does each axis measure, and where does it start?
Bar chart
Bars whose lengths stand for amounts
Does the scale start at zero?
Flowchart
Boxes and arrows showing the steps of a process in order
What comes first, and what goes into each step?
Diagram or model
A drawing or object that shows the parts of something, often to scale
What is the scale?
Integrate
Put the words and the visual together and check that they agree
What does each one add?
Part 2: Model with Passage 1. John Tyndall (1820-1893) was an Irish physicist who gave popular science lectures in London. In Passage 1 he reports the velocity (speed) of sound in air in two ways: in sentences and in a table of measurements made by the French scientist Guillaume Wertheim. Words to know: centigrade (the Celsius scale), 0·5 (the raised dot is a decimal point: 0.5), ” (a ditto mark, meaning the same as the line above), augmentation (increase), trigonometrical observations (measuring a distance with angles), terrestrial (on Earth), thunder-peal (a clap of thunder), place of discharge (where the lightning flashed), apprehended (feared). Show Diagram 1, a line graph of the table drawn to scale, and Diagram 2, a flowchart of the method in paragraph 6.
1The velocity of sound in air, at the freezing temperature, is 1,090 feet a second.
2At all lower temperatures the velocity is less than this, and at all higher temperatures it is greater. The late M. Wertheim has determined the velocity of sound in air of different temperatures, and here are some of his results:
3Temperature of air Velocity of sound 0·5° centigrade 1,089 feet 2·10 ” 1,091 ” 8·5 ” 1,109 ” 12·0 ” 1,113 ” 26·6 ” 1,140 ”
4At a temperature of half a degree above the freezing-point of water the velocity is 1,089 feet a second; at a temperature of 26·6 degrees, it is 1,140 feet a second, or a difference of 51 feet for 26 degrees; that is to say, an augmentation of velocity of nearly two feet for every single degree centigrade.
[...]
5Sounds were started at the same moment from two distant stations, and thus caused to travel from station to station through the self-same air. The distance between the stations was determined by exact trigonometrical observations, and means were devised for measuring with the utmost accuracy the time required by the sound to pass from the one station to the other. This time, expressed in seconds, divided into the distance expressed in feet, gave 1,090 feet per second as the velocity of sound through air at the temperature of 0° centigrade.
6The time required by light to travel over all terrestrial distances is practically zero; and in the experiments just referred to the moment of explosion was marked by the flash of a gun, the time occupied by the sound in passing from station to station being the interval observed between the appearance of the flash and the arrival of the sound. The velocity of sound in air once established, it is plain that we can apply it to the determination of distances. By observing, for example, the interval between the appearance of a flash of lightning and the arrival of the accompanying thunder-peal, we at once determine the distance of the place of discharge. It is only when the interval between the flash and peal is short that danger from lightning is to be apprehended.
John Tyndall, Sound, chapter I, sections 8-9 (Passage 1: sound in cold and warm air, and the flash of a gun; one cut marked [...]) (1867; this edition 1902). Public domain (published 1902). Source text.
Words and a table that seem to disagree
Passage 1, paragraphs 1-3. Tyndall writes that sound moves at 1,090 feet a second at the freezing temperature and that "at all higher temperatures it is greater." Yet the first row of the table gives 1,089 feet at 0·5°, just above freezing. How does a reader fit the words and the table together?
Result: The numbers come from different experiments. The 1,090 is the result of the station experiments in paragraph 5 ("gave 1,090 feet per second"), and the table holds "some of his results," Wertheim's own measurements. A difference of 1 foot a second out of about 1,090 is less than one part in a thousand, smaller than the difference between two careful experiments. Read the words for the general rule (warmer air, faster sound) and the table for each measured value.
Finding the words' summary on a graph
Paragraph 4 sums up the table in words: "a difference of 51 feet for 26 degrees." Where is that summary in Diagram 1, and what does the graph add?
Result: It is the dashed line from the first dot (0·5°, 1,089) to the last dot (26·6°, 1,140). The line rises 1,140 - 1,089 = 51 feet a second across 26·6 - 0·5 = 26·1 degrees, which Tyndall rounds to 26. Since 51 ÷ 26 is about 1.96, he says "nearly two feet for every single degree." The graph adds what the words leave out: the three middle dots do not all sit on the line, so the rise is not perfectly even.
Following a flowchart with a number
On a day near freezing, a student sees a flash and counts 8 seconds before the thunder. Use Diagram 2 with the speed in Passage 1, paragraph 1.
Result: Step 3: 8 × 1,090 = 8,720 feet. Step 4: 8,720 ÷ 5,280 is about 1.65, so the flash was about 1⅔ miles away. The words give the speed (paragraph 1) and the method (paragraph 6: "the interval between the appearance of a flash of lightning and the arrival of the accompanying thunder-peal"); the flowchart puts them in order.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs read Passage 2, from later in the same chapter. Words to know: Dulong (Pierre Louis Dulong, a French scientist), carbonic acid (carbon dioxide), carbonic oxide (carbon monoxide), protoxide of nitrogen (nitrous oxide), olefiant gas (ethylene), inversely proportional (one goes down as the other goes up), density (how much mass is packed into a space), elasticity (how strongly a material springs back when squeezed), MM. (short for "Messieurs," the French for "Misters"). Pairs underline every number in the words, box every number in the table, and draw an arrow between any number that appears in both.
1To complete our knowledge of the transmission of sound through gases, a table is here added from the excellent researches of Dulong, who employed in his experiments a method which shall be subsequently explained:
2VELOCITY OF SOUND IN GASES AT THE TEMPERATURE OF 0° C. Velocity Air 1,092 feet Oxygen 1,040 ” Hydrogen 4,164 ” Carbonic acid 858 ” Carbonic oxide 1,107 ” Protoxide of nitrogen 859 ” Olefiant gas 1,030 ”
3According to theory, the velocities of sound in oxygen and hydrogen are inversely proportional to the square roots of the densities of the two gases. We here find this theoretic deduction verified by experiment. Oxygen being sixteen times heavier than hydrogen, the velocity of sound in the latter gas ought, according to the above law, to be four times its velocity in the former; hence, the velocity in oxygen being 1,040, in hydrogen calculation would make it 4,160. Experiment, we see, makes it 4,164.
4The velocity of sound in liquids may be determined theoretically, as Newton determined its velocity in air; for the density of a liquid is easily determined, and its elasticity can be measured by subjecting it to compression. In the case of water, the calculated and the observed velocities agree so closely as to prove that the changes of temperature produced by a sound-wave in water have no sensible influence upon the velocity. In a series of memorable experiments in the Lake of Geneva, MM. Colladon and Sturm determined the velocity of sound through water, and made it 4,708 feet a second. [...]
John Tyndall, Sound, chapter I, section 13 (Passage 2: Dulong's table of gases, and water; the end of the last paragraph cut, marked [...]) (1867; this edition 1902). Public domain (published 1902). Source text.
Information given only in words
Passage 2. Which facts about hydrogen and water are in the words but not in Dulong's table, and what would a bar chart of the table alone leave out?
Result: Paragraph 3 predicts hydrogen from oxygen: "the velocity in oxygen being 1,040, in hydrogen calculation would make it 4,160," that is, 1,040 × 4. The table's measured 4,164 is only 4 feet a second more. The water value, "4,708 feet a second," appears only in paragraph 4, so a bar chart of the table alone would leave out the fastest speed in the passage. Adding a water bar shows sound in water moving about 4.3 times as fast as in air (4,708 ÷ 1,092).
Debrief: Every row of Dulong's table is at 0° C. Where does the passage say so, and why must a chart of the table say so too? (In the table's title, "AT THE TEMPERATURE OF 0° C." Passage 1 showed that the speed changes with temperature, so a chart without the temperature would be incomplete.) Then start Activities 1-3.
Independent Practice15-20 minutes
Students read Passages 3 and 4 on their own and answer quiz questions 1-20, which also use Diagrams 1 and 2. Passage 3 comes from Tyndall's second lecture and gives its numbers only in words. Words to know: rapidity of vibration or rate of vibration (how fast a sounding object vibrates; paragraph 2 explains how Tyndall counts a vibration), sonorous wave (sound wave), tuning-fork (a two-pronged metal tool that sounds one steady note when struck), foremost (front), condensation (a part of the wave where the air is squeezed together), rarefaction (a part where the air is spread out), excursion (a trip, here one movement), tympanic membrane (the eardrum). Passage 4 is a sample safety card written for this page. Its table is part of the card.
1Having determined the rapidity of vibration, the length of the corresponding sonorous wave is found with the utmost facility. Imagine a tuning-fork vibrating in free air. At the end of a second from the time it commenced its vibrations the foremost wave would have reached a distance of 1,090 feet in air of the freezing temperature. In the air of a room which has a temperature of about 15° C., it would reach a distance of 1,120 in a second. In this distance, therefore, are embraced 384 sonorous waves. Dividing 1,120 by 384, we find the length of each wave to be nearly 3 feet. Determining in this way the rates of vibration of the four tuning-forks now before you, we find them to be 256, 320, 384, and 512; these numbers corresponding to wave-lengths of 4 feet 4 inches, 3 feet 6 inches, 2 feet 11 inches, and 2 feet 2 inches respectively. [...]
2And here it is important to note that by the term vibrations is meant complete ones; and by the term sonorous wave is meant a condensation and its associated rarefaction. By a vibration an excursion to and fro of the vibrating body is to be understood. Every wave generated by such a vibration bends the tympanic membrane once in and once out. These are the definitions of a vibration and of a sonorous wave employed in England and Germany. In France, however, a vibration consists of an excursion of the vibrating body in one direction, whether to or fro. The French vibrations, therefore, are only the halves of ours, and we therefore call them semi-vibrations. In all cases throughout these chapters, when the word vibration is employed without qualification, it refers to complete vibrations.
John Tyndall, Sound, chapter II, section 8 (Passage 3: tuning-forks and the lengths of their waves; two sentences cut, marked [...]) (1867; this edition 1902). Public domain (published 1902). Source text.
1Light from a lightning flash reaches your eyes almost instantly. The thunder from the same flash travels at the speed of sound, which in air at 68 °F (20 °C) is about 1,125 feet per second. Sound moves a little faster in warm air and a little slower in cold air, but the difference is small enough to ignore on this card.
2To estimate how far away the flash was, count the seconds from the flash to the first sound of thunder. Divide the count by 5 to get the distance in miles, or by 3 to get the distance in kilometers. The rule works because sound travels about one mile in 5 seconds and about one kilometer in 3 seconds.
3The table on this card gives the distance for several counts, calculated with 1,125 feet per second and rounded to the nearest tenth of a mile. The last column shows what the divide-by-5 rule gives for the same count. The rule gives a slightly smaller distance than the calculation, so it never makes a storm seem farther away than it is.
4The count tells you where the flash was. It does not tell you whether you are safe. Lightning can strike 10 miles or more from the storm that makes it, which is about as far away as thunder can usually be heard. The rule for this card is simple: when thunder roars, go indoors. If you can hear thunder at all, stop the activity and move everyone into a substantial building or a hard-topped car; a tent, a rain shelter or a small shed is not safe. Wait at least 30 minutes after the last thunder before going back outside.
Written for this page, Lightning Distance Card: Instructions for Coaches and Camp Staff (Passage 4, a sample safety card). Original passage written for this page.
Table for Passage 4: distance to a lightning flash (sample card written for this page)
Seconds from flash to thunder
Distance in feet (1,125 feet per second)
Distance in miles (rounded to 0.1)
Divide-by-5 rule (miles)
5
5,625
1.1
1
10
11,250
2.1
2
15
16,875
3.2
3
20
22,500
4.3
4
30
33,750
6.4
6
45
50,625
9.6
9
Closure5 minutes
Exit ticket: "Name one thing Diagram 1 shows that the words of Passage 1 do not, and one thing the words say that the graph does not show." Sort the tickets into "both named and correct," "only one named" and "confuses the words with the visual."
Teacher note on the science and on safety. Tyndall's numbers are close to modern values. Today the speed of sound in dry air at 0 °C is given as about 331 meters per second (about 1,087 feet per second), and it rises by about 0.6 meters per second (about 2 feet per second) for each degree Celsius, just as paragraph 4 of Passage 1 says. Dulong's gas speeds in Passage 2 are within a few feet a second of modern values for oxygen and hydrogen. Two points need correcting. First, Tyndall's last sentence in Passage 1 (danger only when the interval is short) is not safe advice; Passage 4 gives current guidance, and students should follow it. Second, Passage 2 names carbon monoxide and other gases as data only; no one should handle them. The passages keep the words of the 1902 edition ("velocity," "augments"). Passage 3 leaves out two sentences on the pitch of men's and women's voices, whose figures for women's voices are higher than modern measurements.
Homework passage. Passage 5 comes right after Passage 2 in Tyndall's chapter. Wertheim measured sound in river water from the Seine (the river through Paris) and in water with different salts dissolved in it. Words to know: subsequently (later), comprehend (understand), sulphate, carbonate and nitrate of soda (salts of sodium), chloride of calcium (calcium chloride, a salt used on icy roads), absolute alcohol (pure alcohol), common alcohol (alcohol mixed with some water), spirits of turpentine (an oil from pine trees), sulphuric ether (a liquid once used to put patients to sleep). The liquids are data only; students do not handle them. Wertheim's patterns hold today (warmer water and salty water carry sound faster), but some of his numbers differ from modern ones: modern values for fresh water are about 4,810 feet a second at 15 °C and about 5,090 at 60 °C, so his 60° figure is about 11 percent too high.
1[...] By a mode of experiment which you will subsequently be able to comprehend, the late M. Wertheim determined the velocity through various liquids, and in the following table I have collected his results:
2TRANSMISSION OF SOUND THROUGH LIQUIDS Name of Liquid Temperature Velocity River-water (Seine) 15° C. 4,714 feet ” ” 30 5,013 ” ” ” 60 5,657 ” Sea-water (artificial) 20 4,768 ” Solution of common salt 18 5,132 ” Solution of sulphate of soda 20 5,194 ” Solution of carbonate of soda 22 5,230 ” Solution of nitrate of soda 21 5,477 ” Solution of chloride of calcium 23 6,493 ” Common alcohol 20 4,218 ” Absolute alcohol 23 3,804 ” Spirits of turpentine 24 3,976 ” Sulphuric ether 0 3,801 ”
3We learn from this table that sound travels with different velocities through different liquids; that a salt dissolved in water augments the velocity, and that the salt which produces the greatest augmentation is chloride of calcium. The experiments also teach us that in water, as in air, the velocity augments with the temperature. At a temperature of 15° C., for example, the velocity in Seine water is 4,714 feet, at 30° it is 5,013 feet, and at 60° 5,657 feet a second.
John Tyndall, Sound, chapter I, section 13 (Passage 5: Wertheim's table of liquids; begins partway through a paragraph, marked [...]) (1867; this edition 1902). Public domain (published 1902). Source text.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a two-column organizer, "In the words" and "In the visual," and have students copy each number into one or both columns before answering
Pre-draw the axes and scales for the bar chart in Activity 1 so students only place the bars
Read Passage 4 before Passage 3: its modern English and its table make the idea of matching words and visuals easier to see
For Advanced Students
Make a line graph of the four tuning-forks in Passage 3 and describe the pattern the points make
Redraw Diagram 1 with the vertical axis starting at 0 and write two sentences on what each version helps a reader see
Add a kilometer column to the table for Passage 4 using the divide-by-3 rule and compare it with a calculation using 343 meters per second
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong answers name where each piece of information appears (the words, the visual or both), use the numbers and units correctly, and explain what one form adds to the other. Watch for students who read only the visual or only the words, who read the height of a line on a graph whose axis does not start at zero as if it did, who match the items in a list in the wrong order, or who forget the conditions that go with a number, such as the temperature.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Chart the Gases, Then Add the Water
15 minPairs
Pairs turn Dulong's table in Passage 2 into a bar chart drawn to scale on grid paper, then add the water value that Tyndall gives only in words.
Procedure
Use a scale of 1 grid square = 250 feet per second, starting at 0. Write the scale on the chart.
Draw one bar for each of the 7 gases in the table. Label each bar with its name (modern name in parentheses) and its value.
Add an eighth bar in a different color for water, from paragraph 4.
Title the chart and note the temperature that goes with the gas values.
Teacher Key
Bar lengths, to the nearest half square: air 4.5, oxygen 4, hydrogen 16.5, carbonic acid (carbon dioxide) 3.5, carbonic oxide (carbon monoxide) 4.5, protoxide of nitrogen (nitrous oxide) 3.5, olefiant gas (ethylene) 4, water about 19.
The title should say the gases were measured at 0° C; the water value has no temperature in the passage, so it should be labeled "Colladon and Sturm, Lake of Geneva."
The hydrogen bar is about 4 times the oxygen bar (4,164 ÷ 1,040 is about 4.0), which is the "four times" in paragraph 3.
Discussion Questions
Which fact did you find easier to see on your chart than in the table? Which fact is easier to find in the table?
Paragraph 3 says calculation gives 4,160 for hydrogen. Could anyone see the difference between 4,160 and 4,164 on your chart? What does that tell you about when to use a table instead of a chart?
2
Which Visual Tells the Truth?
15 minGroups of 3
Groups compare three draft visuals of Wertheim's air table (Passage 1) made by imaginary students, and decide which ones faithfully show what the words and the table say.
The Three Drafts
Draft A, a table: 0.5 °C, 1,089 ft/s; 2.1 °C, 1,091 ft/s; 8.5 °C, 1,190 ft/s; 12.0 °C, 1,113 ft/s; 26.6 °C, 1,140 ft/s.
Draft B, a line graph: the five temperatures are placed at equal steps along the bottom axis (0.5, 2.1, 8.5, 12.0, 26.6, one step apart each), and the speeds are plotted correctly.
Draft C, a caption: "Sound speeds up by about 2 feet per second for each degree Celsius, from 1,089 feet per second at 0.5 °C to 1,140 at 26.6 °C."
Roles and Procedure
Checker reads each value in a draft aloud; source reader finds it in Passage 1; fixer writes the correction.
For each draft, write "faithful" or "not faithful" and one sentence of evidence.
Teacher Key
Draft A is not faithful: the 8.5 °C row says 1,190, but the table says 1,109 (two digits swapped).
Draft B is not faithful: equal steps for unequal temperature gaps squeeze the long jump from 12.0 to 26.6 into one step, so the graph looks as if the speed rose fastest at the end. Diagram 1 spaces the temperatures to scale.
Draft C is faithful: it matches paragraph 4 and the first and last rows of the table.
Discussion Questions
Draft B has every number right. Why can it still mislead a reader?
What does Draft C leave out that a graph or table would show?
3
Flowchart the Station Experiment
10-15 minIndividual, then pairs
Students turn paragraphs 5 and 6 of Passage 1, which describe how the speed of sound was measured between two stations, into a flowchart. Pairs then compare it with Diagram 2, which uses the speed instead of measuring it.
Procedure
Draw one box for each step the scientists took, in order, with arrows between them.
Write the quantity each step produces (a distance, a time or a speed) beside its box.
With a partner, circle the step where your flowchart and Diagram 2 go in opposite directions.
Sample Answer
1. Measure the distance between the two stations, using angles ("exact trigonometrical observations"): a distance in feet.
2. Fire a gun at each station at the same moment; the flash marks the start ("the moment of explosion was marked by the flash of a gun").
3. At the other station, time the interval from the flash to the arrival of the sound: a time in seconds.
4. Divide the distance by the time ("This time, expressed in seconds, divided into the distance"): a speed.
5. Result: 1,090 feet per second at 0° centigrade.
Opposite direction: the station experiment divides a known distance by a time to get the speed; Diagram 2 multiplies a time by a known speed to get the distance.
Discussion Questions
Why could the scientists treat the flash as the moment the sound started? Which sentence tells you?
Which is easier to follow, the paragraph or your flowchart? Which one tells you more?
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: Wertheim's Table from Passage 1 as a Line Graph, Drawn to Scale
The five rows of Wertheim's table (Passage 1, paragraph 3) plotted at their real temperatures, each labeled with its temperature and speed. The dashed line joins the first and last dots, which is what Tyndall's words in paragraph 4 compare. The vertical axis starts at 1,080 feet per second, not at 0; the zigzag marks the break.
Diagram 2: Tyndall's Flash-and-Sound Method as a Flowchart
A flowchart puts the steps described in words in Passage 1, paragraph 6, in order, and shows where the number from paragraph 1 is used. The flowchart finds a distance; it does not say whether a place is safe from lightning (see Passage 4 and the teacher note in Closure).
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RST.6-8.7 Homework: Wertheim's Table of Liquids
Directions: Read Passage 5 at the end of the lesson plan (in Closure). Its paragraphs are numbered, and paragraph 2 is Wertheim's table. You will need grid paper for Problems 1 and 3. Answer in complete sentences and name the paragraph or the row you use.
Part 1: From the Table to Graphs (Problems 1-3)
Paragraph 3 says that "in water, as in air, the velocity augments with the temperature." Make a line graph of the three Seine river-water rows, with temperature (0 to 60 °C) on the horizontal axis and speed on the vertical axis, drawn to scale. By how many feet a second does the speed change from 15° to 60°?
Paragraph 3 also says that "a salt dissolved in water augments the velocity." Compare the row for the solution of common salt with the river-water rows. The salt solution was measured at a different temperature from all three river-water rows. Explain why the table still supports the claim.
Make a bar chart of the five salt solutions, drawn to scale, and use it to check which salt "produces the greatest augmentation." Does your chart agree with the words of paragraph 3?
Part 2: What Each Form Adds (Problems 4-6)
Name one thing the table shows that the words of paragraph 3 never mention. Give the rows that show it.
Passage 2 (in Guided Practice) says that Colladon and Sturm measured 4,708 feet a second in the Lake of Geneva, but gives no temperature. Using your graph from Problem 1, estimate the temperature at which Wertheim's river water would carry sound at that speed, and explain what else could explain the difference.
Tyndall gives the three river-water speeds twice, in the table and in the last sentence of paragraph 3. Explain what the table does better, what the sentence does better, and what your graph from Problem 1 shows that neither of them shows as quickly. Then write a one-sentence caption for your graph.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Accurate Visuals
Graphs drawn to scale, with titles, labeled axes, units and the correct values
Values right but scale, labels or units missing
Values wrong or no graph
Words and Visual Together
Checks each claim in the words against the table or graph and says whether they agree
Uses the table or the words, but not both
No comparison
What Each Form Adds
Explains what the table, the words and the graph each show best
Names what one form shows
No explanation
Use of the Text
Names the paragraph or row for every number used
Some numbers without a source
No citations
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-7 use Passage 3 (Tyndall's tuning-forks), and questions 8-13 use Passage 4 (the lightning card) and its table; both are printed in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan, with numbered paragraphs. Questions 6, 7 and 14-20 also use Diagrams 1 and 2 and Passage 1 (in Direct Instruction). Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Passage 3, paragraph 1, gives the rates of vibration of four tuning-forks and the lengths of their waves in words. Which table shows the same pairs correctly?
Answer: B
The rates "256, 320, 384, and 512" correspond to "4 feet 4 inches, 3 feet 6 inches, 2 feet 11 inches, and 2 feet 2 inches respectively," and "respectively" means in the same order. Choice A pairs the two lists in reverse order. Choice C gives the lengths for freezing air (1,090 ÷ each rate, rounded down to whole inches), not for the 15° room air Tyndall uses. Choice D swaps the rates 320 and 384.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student graphs the four forks in Passage 3, with the rate of vibration on the horizontal axis and the wave-length on the vertical axis, both drawn to scale. What will the points look like?
Answer: C
A higher rate gives a shorter wave, so the points fall. The drops are uneven: from 256 to 320 the wave loses 10 inches (52 to 42), but from 384 to 512, a step twice as wide, it loses only 9 inches (35 to 26), so the points level off and make a curve. Choice B ignores the uneven drops. Choice A reverses the pattern. Choice D confuses the speed, which is the same for every fork, with the wave-length.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Tyndall writes that 1,120 divided by 384 gives "nearly 3 feet," and later in paragraph 1 of Passage 3 lists "2 feet 11 inches" for the same fork. How do these two versions fit together?
Answer: A
1,120 ÷ 384 is about 2.92 feet, which is 35 inches, or 2 feet 11 inches: "nearly 3 feet" is the rounded version of the same number. Choice C fails when checked: in freezing air, 1,090 ÷ 384 is about 34 inches, or 2 feet 10 inches. Choice B invents a second fork. Choice D mistakes the rounded value for the exact one.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to paragraph 2 of Passage 3, what does the number 256 mean for the first tuning-fork?
Answer: C
Paragraph 2 says that "by the term vibrations is meant complete ones," an excursion "to and fro," and that this meaning holds throughout the chapters. Choice A is the French count, which Tyndall calls "semi-vibrations." Choice B confuses the rate with the speed (1,120 feet in a second). Choice D changes seconds to minutes.
Question 5 of 20 · Short Answer
Paragraph 2 of Passage 3 says that in France a vibration means a movement "in one direction" only. If a French table listed the fork that Tyndall numbers 256, what number would it show? Explain why a reader must know which definition a table uses.
Model answer: It would show 512, because "The French vibrations, therefore, are only the halves of ours": each of Tyndall's complete vibrations is two French ones, and 2 × 256 = 512. A number in a table means nothing unless the reader knows what was counted, so a table should state its definition or unit in its heading. Without it, a reader could think the French fork sounded a note an octave higher. Rubric: full credit for 512, the quotation or paragraph and the reason; partial credit for 512 with no reason.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Passage 3 says that in a room at about 15° C sound travels 1,120 feet in a second. Use Diagram 1. Where would 15° fall on the graph, and does Tyndall's 1,120 fit Wertheim's measurements?
Answer: A
On the horizontal axis 15 lies between 12·0 and 26·6. Going 3 of those 14·6 degrees along the line between the dots gives about 1,113 + 27 × 3 ÷ 14·6, or about 1,118, close to Tyndall's 1,120. Choice B places 15 on the wrong side of 12. Choice C reads the last dot instead of the right place on the axis. Choice D forgets that a line graph can be read between its dots.
Question 7 of 20 · Short Answer
Passage 3 gives the lengths of four waves but names only one air temperature. Why should a table made from paragraph 1 include the temperature in its title or in a column? Use Diagram 1 in your answer.
Model answer: The wave-length is the speed divided by the rate ("Dividing 1,120 by 384"), and the speed depends on the temperature. Diagram 1 shows the speed rising as the air warms, and Passage 3 itself gives 1,090 feet in freezing air and 1,120 at about 15° C. The same forks would make slightly shorter waves in freezing air, so a table of wave-lengths is only correct for the temperature it names. Rubric: full credit for linking wave-length to speed and speed to temperature, with Diagram 1; partial credit for saying only that temperature matters.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Passage 4 says the divide-by-5 rule "gives a slightly smaller distance than the calculation." In which row of its table is the gap between the calculated miles and the rule the largest?
Answer: D
The gaps are 1.1 - 1 = 0.1, 3.2 - 3 = 0.2, 6.4 - 6 = 0.4 and 9.6 - 9 = 0.6 miles, so the 45-second row has the largest. The rule is off by the same share of the distance every time, so the gap grows with the count. Choice A has the smallest gap, not the largest. Choices B and C are in between.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A camp counselor counts 45 seconds between a flash and its thunder. The table for Passage 4 gives 9.6 miles. According to the words of the card, what should the counselor do?
Answer: B
Paragraph 4 says "If you can hear thunder at all, stop the activity and move everyone into a substantial building or a hard-topped car." The count "does not tell you whether you are safe." The table gives the distance, but only the words say what the distance means for safety. Choice A uses the table alone. Choice C misreads the 30-minute rule, which starts after the last thunder. Choice D follows the kilometer rule, which changes the unit but not the decision.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which piece of information is in the words of Passage 4 but not in its table?
Answer: C
Only paragraph 4 says that "Lightning can strike 10 miles or more from the storm that makes it." Choices A and B are rows of the table. Choice D is in both: the words (paragraph 3) and the heading of the table's second column.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Passage 4 says to divide the count by 3 to get kilometers. If the card's table had a kilometer column made with that rule, what would it show for a count of 15 seconds?
Answer: B
15 ÷ 3 = 5 kilometers. Choice A divides by 5, which is the rule for miles. Choice C multiplies by 3 instead of dividing. Choice D divides 3 by 15.
Question 12 of 20 · Short Answer
The table for Passage 4 lists 5,625 feet and 1.1 miles for a count of 5 seconds, but the divide-by-5 rule gives 1 mile. Using the words of paragraphs 1-3, show how the card got each number.
Model answer: Paragraph 1 gives the speed, "about 1,125 feet per second," so 5 seconds × 1,125 = 5,625 feet. Dividing by the 5,280 feet in a mile gives about 1.07, which paragraph 3 says is "rounded to the nearest tenth of a mile": 1.1. The rule treats one mile as 5 seconds of sound, which is the same as a speed of 5,280 ÷ 5 = 1,056 feet per second, a little slower than 1,125, so it gives 1 mile. Rubric: full credit for both calculations tied to the words; partial credit for one.
Question 13 of 20 · Short Answer
Write two sentences that put the table's 20-second row into words, the way Tyndall writes about Wertheim's table in Passage 1, paragraph 4.
Model answer: When 20 seconds pass between the flash and the thunder, the flash was about 22,500 feet away, or about 4.3 miles. The divide-by-5 rule gives 4 miles for the same count, a little less than the calculation. Rubric: full credit for every value in the row, with units and the condition (20 seconds); partial credit if a value or unit is missing.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Passage 4, paragraph 1, says the difference between warm and cold air is "small enough to ignore on this card." Suppose the card had used Tyndall's 1,090 feet a second from Passage 1 instead of 1,125. What would its 30-second row show, to the nearest tenth of a mile?
Answer: D
30 × 1,090 = 32,700 feet, and 32,700 ÷ 5,280 is about 6.19, or 6.2 miles, only 0.2 mile less than the card's 6.4, which supports "small enough to ignore." Choice A keeps the card's speed of 1,125. Choice C is the divide-by-5 rule. Choice B divides 1,090 by 5,280 and forgets to multiply by the 30 seconds.
Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Passage 1 gives the speed of sound in air as 1,090 feet a second, and Passage 4 uses 1,125. Which statement best explains how both numbers can be right?
Answer: C
Passage 1 gives 1,090 "at the freezing temperature" and says that "at all higher temperatures it is greater"; Passage 4 gives its speed "in air at 68 °F (20 °C)." Adding nearly two feet a second for each of those 20 degrees gives about 1,129, close to 1,125. Choice A mistakes a difference in temperature for an error. Choice B invents water; Passage 4 is about air. Choice D invents a change with distance that neither passage states.
Question 16 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Passage 4's divide-by-5 rule is a shortcut. Which steps of Diagram 2 does it do in a single step?
Answer: D
Dividing the seconds by 5 turns a count straight into miles, which is the job that step 3 (multiplying by a speed) and step 4 (dividing by 5,280) do together. The reader still has to see the flash and count (steps 1 and 2), so choices A and C are wrong. Choice B leaves out the change from feet to miles.
Question 17 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Diagram 1, the dashed line joins the first and last dots, which is what Tyndall's words in paragraph 4 describe. Which dot lies farthest from the dashed line?
Answer: B
The line gains about 1.95 feet a second per degree, so at 8·5° it is at about 1,089 + 8 × 1.95, or 1,104.6, and the dot is at 1,109, about 4.4 above the line. The 2·1° dot is about 1.1 below the line and the 12·0° dot about 1.5 above it. Choice D names the two dots the line passes through, which are on it.
Question 18 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Diagram 1's vertical axis starts at 1,080 feet per second, not at 0. What should a reader keep in mind?
Answer: A
Because the axis starts at 1,080, the last dot is drawn about 7 times as high above the bottom edge as the first (60 against 9 feet a second above 1,080), even though the speed changed only from 1,089 to 1,140, about 4.7 percent. Choice B reads heights from the bottom edge as if it were 0. Choice C mistakes where the scale starts for a law of nature; Passage 1 says the speed is lower at lower temperatures. Choice D is too strong: a broken axis is fine when it is marked, as the zigzag does.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
A classmate reads Diagram 1 and says: "From 12·0° to 26·6°, sound gains 27 feet a second, so it gains about 27 feet for every degree." Using the graph and the words of Passage 1, paragraph 4, explain the mistake and give a better figure per degree for that part of the graph.
Model answer: The 27 feet (1,140 - 1,113) is gained over the whole stretch from 12·0° to 26·6°, which is 14·6 degrees, not over one degree. Dividing, 27 ÷ 14·6 is about 1.8 feet a second per degree. That matches Tyndall's words, "nearly two feet for every single degree centigrade." Rubric: full credit for naming the 14·6-degree gap, a figure near 1.8 and the link to paragraph 4; partial credit for the figure without the link.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
On a freezing day, a hiker sees a flash and counts 6 seconds before the thunder. Use Diagram 2 and the words of Passage 1 to estimate the distance in feet and in miles, and name the passage sentence that supplies the speed.
Model answer: Step 3: 6 × 1,090 = 6,540 feet, using "The velocity of sound in air, at the freezing temperature, is 1,090 feet a second" (paragraph 1). Step 4: 6,540 ÷ 5,280 is about 1.24, so the flash was about 1¼ miles away. Because the hiker can hear the thunder, Passage 4 says to get to shelter. Rubric: full credit for both distances and the sentence; partial credit for one distance with the sentence.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RST.6-8.7 mean?
RST.6-8.7 asks students in grades 6-8 to integrate numbers and technical facts written in words in a science or technical text with a visual version of the same information, such as a flowchart, diagram, model, graph or table. Students check that the words and the visual agree, see what each one adds, and use both to answer questions.
What kinds of visuals count for RST.6-8.7?
Any visual that presents the same information as the words: the standard names flowcharts, diagrams, models, graphs and tables as examples. This lesson uses tables printed in Tyndall's text, a line graph, a bar chart, two flowcharts and a to-scale drawing on grid paper.
Do students have to make visuals, or only read them?
Both help, and the standard's key word is integrate. Students read visuals made by others, and they also build their own from words, which is one of the surest ways to find what a text leaves out or states loosely.
How is RST.6-8.7 different from RST.9-10.7?
RST.9-10.7 asks students to translate information in both directions, from words into a visual and from a visual or equation back into words. RST.6-8.7 asks students to integrate the two: to connect the words and the visual and use them together.
Why use John Tyndall's Sound for this standard?
Tyndall gives the same measurements both in sentences and in tables, sometimes with small differences, so students have to connect the two. His topic, the speed of sound, is part of middle school science, and his 1902 edition is in the public domain.
Are Tyndall's numbers still accurate?
Mostly yes. His speed in air at freezing, 1,090 feet a second, is within a few feet of the modern value of about 1,087, and his rule of about two feet a second more for each degree Celsius matches modern measurements. Some of Wertheim's numbers for liquids are off by up to about 11 percent, and his advice about when lightning is dangerous is outdated; the teacher notes in Closure give the details.
What should students do when the words and a visual disagree?
Find out why before choosing one. The numbers may come from different experiments, one may be rounded, a visual may have a scale that does not start at zero, or one may simply contain an error. Students should say which source they trust and why.
Is the flash-to-thunder count a safe way to decide whether to stay outside?
No. The count estimates how far away the lightning was; it is not a safety test. Passage 4, a sample card written for this page, gives current safety guidance, and the teacher note in Closure explains why Tyndall's 1867 advice should not be followed.
How is RST.6-8.7 assessed on this page?
The quiz and homework ask students to match words to the right table or graph, read a graph between its points, find information that appears in only one form, build graphs to scale and explain what each form adds. Short answers are scored for accurate numbers with units and for naming where each number comes from.
How does this connect to math and science classes?
Building the graphs uses the coordinate-grid and scale skills of grades 5-6 math, and the content links to middle school science work on waves. In high school, RST.9-10.7 extends the skill to translating between words, visuals and equations.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to RST.6-8.7: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RI.4.7Prerequisite
Interpret information presented visually or quantitatively and explain how it adds to a text
Lesson coming soon
Alongside
RH.6-8.7Parallel
Integrate visual information such as charts and maps with other information in texts