SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

RL.11-12.9Common CoreELAReading LiteratureGrades 11-12

RL.11-12.9: Comparing Foundational Works of American Literature

In plain English: RL.11-12.9 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 11-12 to know foundational works of American literature from the eighteenth, nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and to compare how two or more texts from the same period treat a similar theme or topic. It is usually taught in an American literature course.

Demonstrate knowledge of eighteenth-, nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century foundational works of American literature, including how two or more texts from the same period treat similar themes or topics.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literature · Cluster: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

60-65 min

Overview

RL.11-12.9 has two parts: students must know foundational American works from the 1700s to the early 1900s, and they must compare how two or more texts from the same period treat a similar theme or topic. This lesson teaches both with two period pairs. The first, Ralph Waldo Emerson's "Self-Reliance" (1841) and Henry David Thoreau's Walden (1854), models the method: place the works in their period, name the shared topic, then compare how each writer treats it. The second pair, the opening of Charlotte Perkins Gilman's "The Yellow Wall-Paper" (1892) and a chapter of Kate Chopin's The Awakening (1899), lets students apply the method on their own to the era of Realism.

All five texts on this page are public domain and quoted exactly from Project Gutenberg transcriptions; [...] marks omitted text. The Whitman excerpt for homework appears in Closure.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Place foundational American works in their literary period and name concerns typical of that period
  • Explain key ideas in excerpts from Emerson, Thoreau, Gilman and Chopin, using quotations
  • Identify the theme or topic that two texts from the same period share
  • Compare how each text treats that topic, including its speaker, form, imagery and tone
  • Write a comparative thesis supported by evidence from both texts

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Citing strong and thorough textual evidence RL.11-12.1
  • Determining themes and how they develop RL.11-12.2
  • Analyzing how an author draws on source material RL.9-10.9
  • Identifying narrator, point of view and tone in prose

Lesson Procedure

60-65 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5-10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "Think of two songs from the same year that are about the same thing, such as leaving home. What makes them alike? What makes them sound completely different?"

    Take a few answers and name the two things students just did: they found a shared topic and compared the treatment (tone, speaker, style). Explain that writers from the same period often share topics because they face the same questions, and that RL.11-12.9 asks students to compare how they answer them.

  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Part 1: What makes a work "foundational." A foundational work is one that later American writers and readers keep returning to: it shaped ideas about the individual, freedom, race or the nation. Walk through the period table below. Students do not need to memorize it; they need to be able to place a work and say what questions its period cared about.

    American literary periods, 1700s to 1920s
    PeriodYears (approx.)Common concernsFoundational works (examples)
    Colonial and Revolutionary1700sFaith, reason, liberty and the new nationJonathan Edwards, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" (1741); Phillis Wheatley, Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral (1773)
    Romanticism and Transcendentalism1820s-1860sThe individual, intuition, nature, nonconformity; also the darker side of human natureWashington Irving, "Rip Van Winkle" (1819); Emerson, "Self-Reliance" (1841); Frederick Douglass, Narrative (1845); Edgar Allan Poe, "The Raven" (1845); Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Scarlet Letter (1850); Thoreau, Walden (1854); Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass (1855)
    Realism and Naturalism1860s-1910sOrdinary lives, regional speech, social forces and limits on freedomMark Twain, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884); Charlotte Perkins Gilman, "The Yellow Wall-Paper" (1892); Stephen Crane, The Red Badge of Courage (1895); Kate Chopin, The Awakening (1899)
    Early Modernism and the Harlem Renaissance1910s-1920sBreaks with tradition, new forms, the city, Black identity and pride in African heritage, the meaning of AmericaRobert Frost, North of Boston (1914); Claude McKay, Harlem Shadows (1922); F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby (1925); Langston Hughes, The Weary Blues (1926)

    Part 2: Model the comparison. Read the Emerson excerpts aloud, then the Thoreau excerpt.

    Society everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood of every one of its members. Society is a joint-stock company, in which the members agree, for the better securing of his bread to each shareholder, to surrender the liberty and culture of the eater. The virtue in most request is conformity. Self-reliance is its aversion. It loves not realities and creators, but names and customs.

    [...]

    Whoso would be a man, must be a nonconformist. He who would gather immortal palms must not be hindered by the name of goodness, but must explore if it be goodness. Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind. Absolve you to yourself, and you shall have the suffrage of the world.

    [...]

    What I must do is all that concerns me, not what the people think. This rule, equally arduous in actual and in intellectual life, may serve for the whole distinction between greatness and meanness. It is the harder because you will always find those who think they know what is your duty better than you know it. It is easy in the world to live after the world’s opinion; it is easy in solitude to live after our own; but the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude.

    [...]

    The objection to conforming to usages that have become dead to you is that it scatters your force. It loses your time and blurs the impression of your character.

    [...]

    A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day.

    Ralph Waldo Emerson, Self-Reliance (excerpts) (1841). Public domain (published 1841). Source text.

    I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived. I did not wish to live what was not life, living is so dear; nor did I wish to practise resignation, unless it was quite necessary. I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life, to live so sturdily and Spartan-like as to put to rout all that was not life, to cut a broad swath and shave close, to drive life into a corner, and reduce it to its lowest terms, and, if it proved to be mean, why then to get the whole and genuine meanness of it, and publish its meanness to the world; or if it were sublime, to know it by experience, and be able to give a true account of it in my next excursion. For most men, it appears to me, are in a strange uncertainty about it, whether it is of the devil or of God, and have somewhat hastily concluded that it is the chief end of man here to “glorify God and enjoy him forever.”

    Still we live meanly, like ants; though the fable tells us that we were long ago changed into men; like pygmies we fight with cranes; it is error upon error, and clout upon clout, and our best virtue has for its occasion a superfluous and evitable wretchedness. Our life is frittered away by detail. An honest man has hardly need to count more than his ten fingers, or in extreme cases he may add his ten toes, and lump the rest. Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity! I say, let your affairs be as two or three, and not a hundred or a thousand; instead of a million count half a dozen, and keep your accounts on your thumb nail. In the midst of this chopping sea of civilized life, such are the clouds and storms and quicksands and thousand-and-one items to be allowed for, that a man has to live, if he would not founder and go to the bottom and not make his port at all, by dead reckoning, and he must be a great calculator indeed who succeeds. Simplify, simplify.

    Henry David Thoreau, Walden, from "Where I Lived, and What I Lived For" (1854). Public domain (published 1854). Source text.
    • Placing a work in its period

      Emerson's "Self-Reliance" (1841) and Thoreau's Walden (1854). What period are they from, and why does that matter for reading them?

      Result: Both belong to Transcendentalism, part of the American Renaissance of the 1830s-1850s. Thoreau was Emerson's friend, and his cabin at Walden Pond stood on land Emerson owned. Knowing this, a reader expects both to value the individual over institutions, and can ask how each writer does it.

    • Finding the shared topic

      Emerson: "Whoso would be a man, must be a nonconformist." Thoreau: "I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately." What topic do both sentences treat?

      Result: How a person should live: by his own judgment and on purpose, rather than by habit or custom. That is the topic; each writer's treatment of it is what the comparison examines.

    • Comparing the treatment

      Who is speaking, and to whom? Compare "Absolve you to yourself" with "I went to the woods."

      Result: Emerson speaks to "you" in commands and general truths. Thoreau speaks as "I" and reports a choice he made. The same topic arrives as advice in one text and as testimony in the other.

    • Writing a comparative thesis

      Combine the shared topic and the difference in treatment into one claim.

      Result: "Both Emerson and Thoreau urge readers to live by their own judgment, but Emerson makes the case through commands aimed at the reader, while Thoreau makes it through the story of his own attempt to live deliberately."

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Pairs fill in a three-column chart (Emerson only / Both / Thoreau only) for the two excerpts. Ask the questions one at a time and confirm each before moving on:

    1. What does each writer want the reader to do? Teacher note: Emerson wants the reader to trust his own mind ("Absolve you to yourself"); Thoreau mostly tells what he wanted for himself ("I wished to live deliberately") and turns to advice only later.
    2. What kind of evidence does each use? Teacher note: Emerson relies on bold general statements and metaphors; Thoreau relies on his own experience and on vivid comparisons (ants, pygmies, a "chopping sea").
    3. What would each say to the other? Teacher note: this is an open question. Accept answers that are grounded in a quotation from each text, and push students to find a real disagreement, not only agreement.

    Each pair writes one sentence for the "Both" column that names the shared topic, and one sentence that names the most important difference. Share two or three and compare them with the thesis in the fourth worked example.

  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Students read the two excerpts below on their own and complete the same three-column chart. Then they write a first-draft comparative thesis. Tell them to start by placing both works in the period table: the story appeared in 1892 and the novel in 1899. The quiz questions on these excerpts work as a check once students finish.

    It is very seldom that mere ordinary people like John and myself secure ancestral halls for the summer.

    A colonial mansion, a hereditary estate, I would say a haunted house, and reach the height of romantic felicity—but that would be asking too much of fate!

    Still I will proudly declare that there is something queer about it.

    Else, why should it be let so cheaply? And why have stood so long untenanted?

    John laughs at me, of course, but one expects that in marriage.

    John is practical in the extreme. He has no patience with faith, an intense horror of superstition, and he scoffs openly at any talk of things not to be felt and seen and put down in figures.

    John is a physician, and perhaps—(I would not say it to a living soul, of course, but this is dead paper and a great relief to my mind)—perhaps that is one reason I do not get well faster.

    You see, he does not believe I am sick!

    And what can one do?

    If a physician of high standing, and one’s own husband, assures friends and relatives that there is really nothing the matter with one but temporary nervous depression—a slight hysterical tendency—what is one to do?

    My brother is also a physician, and also of high standing, and he says the same thing.

    So I take phosphates or phosphites—whichever it is, and tonics, and journeys, and air, and exercise, and am absolutely forbidden to “work” until I am well again.

    Personally, I disagree with their ideas.

    Personally, I believe that congenial work, with excitement and change, would do me good.

    But what is one to do?

    I did write for a while in spite of them; but it does exhaust me a good deal—having to be so sly about it, or else meet with heavy opposition.

    I sometimes fancy that in my condition if I had less opposition and more society and stimulus—but John says the very worst thing I can do is to think about my condition, and I confess it always makes me feel bad.

    So I will let it alone and talk about the house.

    Charlotte Perkins Gilman, The Yellow Wall-Paper (opening) (1892). Public domain (published 1892). Source text.

    Edna Pontellier could not have told why, wishing to go to the beach with Robert, she should in the first place have declined, and in the second place have followed in obedience to one of the two contradictory impulses which impelled her.

    A certain light was beginning to dawn dimly within her,—the light which, showing the way, forbids it.

    At that early period it served but to bewilder her. It moved her to dreams, to thoughtfulness, to the shadowy anguish which had overcome her the midnight when she had abandoned herself to tears.

    In short, Mrs. Pontellier was beginning to realize her position in the universe as a human being, and to recognize her relations as an individual to the world within and about her. This may seem like a ponderous weight of wisdom to descend upon the soul of a young woman of twenty-eight—perhaps more wisdom than the Holy Ghost is usually pleased to vouchsafe to any woman.

    But the beginning of things, of a world especially, is necessarily vague, tangled, chaotic, and exceedingly disturbing. How few of us ever emerge from such beginning! How many souls perish in its tumult!

    The voice of the sea is seductive; never ceasing, whispering, clamoring, murmuring, inviting the soul to wander for a spell in abysses of solitude; to lose itself in mazes of inward contemplation.

    The voice of the sea speaks to the soul. The touch of the sea is sensuous, enfolding the body in its soft, close embrace.

    [...]

    Mrs. Pontellier was not a woman given to confidences, a characteristic hitherto contrary to her nature. Even as a child she had lived her own small life all within herself. At a very early period she had apprehended instinctively the dual life—that outward existence which conforms, the inward life which questions.

    Kate Chopin, The Awakening, chapter VI and the start of chapter VII (1899). Public domain (published 1899). Source text.
  5. Closure5 minutes

    Exit ticket: (1) Name the period of one pair and one concern that period shared. (2) Finish the sentence: "The two excerpts share the topic of ___, but they treat it differently because ___."

    Teacher note on historical language: Gilman's narrator repeats the diagnosis of her time, "temporary nervous depression" and "a slight hysterical tendency." "Hysterical" was a medical label often applied to women, and doctors no longer use it. Gilman had been treated with a rest cure herself, and many readers see the story as a response to it. Explain this before students read, so the words are understood as the story's target, not its view. The narrator's illness is often read today as postpartum depression, and some students may know depression from their own or a family member's life: discuss the narrator's situation respectfully, avoid treating mental illness as a joke or as a label for a character, and let students know where they can find support at school. If students read on in The Awakening, preview that the novel ends with Edna's death in the sea.

    For homework: students read the Whitman excerpt below, which the homework uses.

    I celebrate myself, and sing myself,
    And what I assume you shall assume,
    For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you.

    I loafe and invite my soul,
    I lean and loafe at my ease observing a spear of summer grass.

    My tongue, every atom of my blood, form’d from this soil, this air,
    Born here of parents born here from parents the same, and their parents the same,
    I, now thirty-seven years old in perfect health begin,
    Hoping to cease not till death.

    Creeds and schools in abeyance,
    Retiring back a while sufficed at what they are, but never forgotten,
    I harbor for good or bad, I permit to speak at every hazard,
    Nature without check with original energy.

    [...]

    Have you reckon’d a thousand acres much? have you reckon’d the earth much?
    Have you practis’d so long to learn to read?
    Have you felt so proud to get at the meaning of poems?

    Stop this day and night with me and you shall possess the origin of all poems,
    You shall possess the good of the earth and sun, (there are millions of suns left,)
    You shall no longer take things at second or third hand, nor look through the eyes of the dead, nor feed on the spectres in books,
    You shall not look through my eyes either, nor take things from me,
    You shall listen to all sides and filter them from your self.

    Walt Whitman, Song of Myself, sections 1-2 (excerpt) (1855; this edition 1892). Public domain (published 1892). Source text.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Pre-teach five words before reading Emerson: conformity, aversion, nonconformist, integrity, consistency; and two before Gilman: congenial, phosphates
  • Give a comparative thesis frame: "Both ___ and ___ treat ___, but ___ ___, while ___ ___."
  • Read the Gilman excerpt aloud once, and have students mark every sentence where the narrator gives way to John

For Advanced Students

  • Add a third text from the same period (for example, a chapter of Frederick Douglass's Narrative, 1845) and compare how it treats self-reliance
  • Ask whether Emerson's self-reliant individual is possible for Gilman's narrator or for Edna, who live under limits Emerson never names; this is a cross-period extension beyond the standard's same-period comparison
  • Have students research how one of the four texts was first received and whether it was read as "foundational" at the time

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Strong comparisons name a shared topic first and then a real difference in treatment; weak ones list facts about each text in turn and never connect them. Check that students place each pair in the right period and use that period to explain something in the texts, not just as a label. Listen for students who say two texts are "the same" because they share a topic: push them to find the difference in speaker, form, imagery or tone. Every claim about a text should rest on a quotation.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Period Card Sort

15 minGroups of 3-4

Groups sort twelve title cards into four literary periods, then write one question each period seemed to be asking. This builds the background knowledge the standard names before students compare texts.

The Twelve Cards

  • Phillis Wheatley, Poems on Various Subjects (1773)
  • Jonathan Edwards, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" (1741)
  • Washington Irving, "Rip Van Winkle" (1819)
  • Frederick Douglass, Narrative (1845)
  • Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Scarlet Letter (1850)
  • Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass (1855)
  • Mark Twain, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884)
  • Charlotte Perkins Gilman, "The Yellow Wall-Paper" (1892)
  • Kate Chopin, The Awakening (1899)
  • Robert Frost, North of Boston (1914)
  • F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby (1925)
  • Langston Hughes, The Weary Blues (1926)

Procedure

  • Groups sort the cards by date first, then check their piles against the period table in the lesson plan
  • For each period, the group writes one question the works in that pile seem to ask (for example, "What does freedom mean for one person?")
  • Groups post their questions and read the other groups' questions for the same period

Discussion Questions

  • Which card was hardest to place? Why?
  • Which questions show up in more than one period?
2

Double-Entry Comparison Chart

20 minPairs

Pairs build an evidence chart for Emerson and Thoreau, matching a quotation from one text with a quotation from the other that treats the same idea. The chart becomes the raw material for a comparative paragraph.

Setup

  • Chart with four rows and three columns: Emerson quotation, Thoreau quotation, "Same idea or different?"
  • One row is filled in as a model: "Whoso would be a man, must be a nonconformist" beside "I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately" (same topic, different treatment: command vs. personal account)

Procedure

  • Pairs fill in three more rows with quotations not used in class discussion
  • For each row they write one sentence explaining the match
  • Pairs star the row that shows the biggest difference and share it

Discussion Questions

  • Did you find any place where the two writers disagree, not only differ in style?
  • Which writer would be easier to follow in daily life? Use a quotation.

Modification

For students who need support, provide six quotations on slips (three from each text) and have pairs match them instead of finding their own.

3

Comparative Paragraph Workshop

20 minIndividual, then pairs

Students turn the thesis from the fourth worked example, or their own, into a full comparative paragraph about Emerson and Thoreau, then peer-review it with a checklist.

Paragraph Plan

  • Sentence 1: thesis naming the shared topic and the difference
  • Sentences 2-3: Emerson, with one quotation and an explanation
  • Sentences 4-5: Thoreau, with one quotation and an explanation
  • Sentence 6: what the comparison shows about the period

Peer Checklist

  • Does the thesis name both a similarity and a difference?
  • Is every quotation exact and followed by an explanation?
  • Does the last sentence connect both texts to their period?

Discussion Questions

  • Is it easier to write about how the texts are alike or how they differ? Why?
  • What did the period add to your paragraph that the texts alone did not?

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: Emerson and Thoreau, Same Topic and Different Treatment

Emerson (1841) and Thoreau (1854) on how to live Emerson only Speaks to "you" in commands and maxims Builds the case from general truths about "society" Tells no story of his own Both Live by your own judgment, not custom Life should be lived on purpose The individual counts more than institutions Thoreau only Speaks as "I" and tells his own story Builds the case from vivid comparisons: ants, pygmies, a "chopping sea" Same period, same topic, different treatment: that is the comparison RL.11-12.9 asks for.
A three-column chart of the modeled pair. The middle column holds the shared topic; the outer columns hold the differences a comparative thesis builds on.

Diagram 2: A Method for Comparing Texts from the Same Period

Four steps for comparing two texts from one period 1. Place Which period? What did it care about? 2. Topic What subject do both texts treat? 3. Treatment Speaker, form, imagery, tone, evidence 4. Claim Thesis: shared topic plus a real difference Step 1 is the knowledge half of the standard; steps 2-4 are the comparison half.
Students use the same four steps with the Gilman and Chopin excerpts in Independent Practice and with Whitman in the homework.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

RL.11-12.9 Homework: Whitman in Conversation with Emerson and Thoreau

Directions: The poem later titled "Song of Myself" first appeared, untitled, in the 1855 Leaves of Grass, in the same period as "Self-Reliance" and Walden. Read the excerpt at the end of the lesson plan (in Closure; from the 1891-92 edition), then answer in complete sentences. Quote exactly.

Part 1: Know the Work (Problems 1-2)

  1. Explain in your own words what Whitman means by "You shall no longer take things at second or third hand, nor look through the eyes of the dead, nor feed on the spectres in books."
  2. Using the period table, identify two features of the excerpt that connect it to Transcendentalism. Quote a line for each.

Part 2: Compare the Treatment (Problems 3-4)

  1. Whitman writes, "I loafe and invite my soul, / I lean and loafe at my ease observing a spear of summer grass." Thoreau writes, "Our life is frittered away by detail." How do the two writers treat the topic of busyness and attention? Name one similarity and one difference.
  2. Whitman ends, "You shall not look through my eyes either, nor take things from me." Compare this stance toward the reader with the way Emerson addresses the reader in "Self-Reliance."

Part 3: Write the Comparison (Problems 5-6)

  1. Write a one-sentence comparative thesis about how Whitman and Thoreau treat the question of how a person should gain knowledge.
  2. Write a paragraph of 150-200 words comparing how Whitman ("Creeds and schools in abeyance") and Emerson ("Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind") treat the authority of tradition. Use two exact quotations from each text.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Knowledge of the Work and PeriodAccurate paraphrase and two period features, each with a quotationOne feature, or a paraphrase with an errorInaccurate or missing
ComparisonNames a shared topic and a real difference in treatmentSimilarities only, or differences onlyDiscusses one text at a time with no comparison
Thesis and ParagraphClear thesis; paragraph of 150-200 words with an explanation after every quotationThesis vague or explanations thinNo thesis
EvidenceExact quotations with line or paragraph numbersQuotations without locations, or one misquotationNo textual evidence

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 1-6, 16 and 18 use the Emerson and Thoreau excerpts; questions 7-14, 17, 19 and 20 use the Gilman and Chopin excerpts; question 15 asks about pairing. All texts are in the lesson plan above. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In "Self-Reliance," Emerson writes that "Society is a joint-stock company, in which the members agree, for the better securing of his bread to each shareholder, to surrender the liberty and culture of the eater." What does the metaphor claim?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Emerson writes, "It is easy in the world to live after the world's opinion." Which sentence from Walden treats the same topic, living by conclusions other people have reached?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." What is Emerson arguing in this part of the excerpt?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Thoreau says that if life "proved to be mean," he would "publish its meanness to the world; or if it were sublime, to know it by experience." What does this show about his approach compared with Emerson's in these excerpts?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Short Answer

    Emerson writes that "the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude." Thoreau went to live alone in the woods. Does Thoreau's choice fit Emerson's statement, or complicate it? Use one quotation from each text.

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Thoreau writes, "Our life is frittered away by detail." Which sentence from the Emerson excerpt makes a related point about what conformity costs a person?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which topic do Gilman's "The Yellow Wall-Paper" and Chopin's The Awakening share in these excerpts?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Gilman's narrator writes, "John laughs at me, of course, but one expects that in marriage." What does this sentence reveal?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why does Gilman's narrator call her journal "dead paper" and "a great relief to my mind"?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    How do the two excerpts differ in who tells the story?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Short Answer

    "Personally, I disagree with their ideas. / Personally, I believe that congenial work, with excitement and change, would do me good. / But what is one to do?" Explain how the repeated word "Personally" and the final question show the narrator's conflict.

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Chopin writes that "A certain light was beginning to dawn dimly within her," and calls it "the light which, showing the way, forbids it." What does this paradox suggest?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Chopin says Edna had always known "the dual life," which she describes as "that outward existence which conforms, the inward life which questions." What does she mean?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write a one-sentence comparative thesis about how Gilman and Chopin treat a married woman's awakening to her own mind. Then give one quotation from each excerpt that supports it.

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A student plans to pair Walden with The Awakening as "two texts from the same period." What is the problem with this pairing for RL.11-12.9?

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which feature of the "Self-Reliance" excerpt is most typical of Transcendentalism?

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    "The voice of the sea is seductive; never ceasing, whispering, clamoring, murmuring, inviting the soul to wander for a spell in abysses of solitude; to lose itself in mazes of inward contemplation." What does the sea stand for in this passage, and what warning do the words "abysses" and "lose itself" carry?

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    "Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity! I say, let your affairs be as two or three, and not a hundred or a thousand; instead of a million count half a dozen, and keep your accounts on your thumb nail." What is Thoreau recommending?

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    In Gilman's excerpt, who holds authority over the narrator, and how do you know? In Chopin's excerpt, where does the pressure on Edna come from? Use one quotation from each.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which sentence best describes a difference in tone between the two excerpts?

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does RL.11-12.9 mean?

It means students in grades 11-12 must know foundational American literature from the 1700s to the early 1900s and be able to compare how two or more works from the same period treat a similar theme or topic. Knowing titles is not enough: students show knowledge by reading the works, placing them in their period and comparing them with evidence.

Which works count as "foundational" American literature for RL.11-12.9?

The standard does not give a list, so schools choose. Works that later writers keep responding to are the usual choices: for example Emerson, Thoreau, Douglass, Hawthorne, Poe, Whitman and Dickinson in the nineteenth century, Wheatley in the eighteenth, Gilman and Chopin at the turn of the century, and Frost, Fitzgerald and the Harlem Renaissance poets in the early twentieth. Many of these are in the public domain, so full texts are free.

What counts as "the same period"?

A shared literary era, such as Transcendentalism in the 1840s-1850s or Realism in the 1890s. Texts a few years apart that answer the same questions of their time work well, and knowing the period helps explain why they share a topic.

How is RL.11-12.9 different from RL.9-10.9?

RL.9-10.9 asks how an author draws on and transforms source material, such as a later writer using Shakespeare. RL.11-12.9 focuses on American literature and asks students to compare works from the same period, with knowledge of the period itself as part of the standard.

Do students have to read whole books to meet this standard?

No. The standard asks for knowledge of foundational works and comparison of how texts treat a topic, and short complete poems or well-chosen excerpts can do both. Whole works give richer knowledge, so many courses combine one longer work with several shorter paired texts.

Can a poem be compared with an essay or a novel?

Yes. The standard says "texts," not a genre. Emerson's essay and Thoreau's memoir are a classic pair, and a poem can be paired with a story. Differences in form are often the most interesting part of the comparison, because form shapes how each writer treats the topic.

What is a comparative thesis?

It is a one-sentence claim that names what two texts share and how they differ in treating it: "Both A and B ___, but A ___, while B ___." A thesis that lists only similarities is too thin to argue; one that lists only differences often loses the shared topic that makes the comparison meaningful.

How is RL.11-12.9 usually assessed?

Usually through paired passages: students answer questions about each text and then about how the two treat a common topic, often ending with a written comparison. Timed essays that ask students to compare two works from a period are also common in American literature courses.

How should teachers handle historical terms in older texts?

Name them before reading. Gilman's narrator repeats the label "hysterical," a diagnosis doctors once applied to many women and no longer use, and other older texts use words that are offensive now. A short note on when and how a word was used lets students read the work as history without repeating the language casually.

How does RL.11-12.9 connect to writing standards?

W.11-12.9 asks students to draw evidence from literary texts in their writing, and it quotes this standard as its example for literature. A comparative paragraph or essay about two works from the same period meets both standards at once.