RL.11-12.10: Reading the Hardest Literature Independently, Stories, Dramas and Poems
In plain English: RL.11-12.10 is the Common Core ELA standard that sets the range and difficulty of literature students in grades 11-12 must read: stories, dramas and poems in the grades 11-CCR (college and career readiness) band. Grade 11 students read it proficiently with scaffolding as needed at the high end; by the end of grade 12, they read at the high end independently.
By the end of grade 11, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, in the grades 11—CCR text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range. By the end of grade 12, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, at the high end of the grades 11—CCR text complexity band independently and proficiently.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literature · Cluster: Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity · Official standard
RL.11-12.10 sets the range and difficulty of the literature students in grades 11-12 must read: stories, dramas and poems in the grades 11-CCR band, the band that ends at college and career readiness. Grade 11 students read these texts proficiently "with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range"; grade 12 students read at the high end "independently and proficiently." At this level students already have sentence-level fixes. What makes the hardest literature hard is usually meaning, not sentences: a narrator whose words undercut his own claims, a scene whose stage directions tell a different story from its dialogue, a poem that jumps without transitions and leans on allusions. This lesson teaches a three-reading protocol for that kind of difficulty and asks students to manage their own scaffolds.
The teacher models the protocol on the opening of Herman Melville's "Bartleby" (1853), a story told by a lawyer who describes himself. Pairs apply it to the opening of Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House (1879) in R. Farquharson Sharp's translation, with one sentence of context. Each student then reads the first 34 lines of T. S. Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" (1915) alone, with a menu of four scaffold cards: they may ask for one, and they must log which one and why. Diagram 2 gives one reader's ratings of the three passages on the qualitative dimensions of Appendix A of the Common Core, for students to test and dispute. The quiz and homework use later passages from all three works.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Apply a three-reading protocol (the literal, the gaps, decide) to complex passages from a story, a drama and a poem
Identify where a literary text says more or less than it states, such as irony, subtext in stage directions, allusion and abrupt shifts, and pose a question at each point
Choose the interpretation that the most details support and name a detail that resists it
Judge which scaffold, if any, a passage requires, use it, and explain the choice, as a step toward reading the high end of the band without support
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Reading literature at the high end of the grades 9-10 band independently RL.9-10.10
Citing strong and thorough evidence, including where the text leaves matters uncertain RL.11-12.1
Using context and reference works to determine the meaning of words L.11-12.4
The terms irony, subtext, allusion, stage direction and dramatic monologue
"Think of the hardest thing you have read for English class, in any year. Was it hard because of the sentences and words, or because you understood every sentence and still did not know what was going on? Write two sentences: the text, and the kind of difficulty."
Sort the answers on the board into two columns, hard to follow and hard to interpret. Point out that by grade 11 the second column matters more: many of the hardest literary texts have easy sentences and difficult meanings. Tell students that RL.11-12.10 expects them to be able, by the end of grade 12, to read the hardest texts of the band with no support at all, and that today they will practice both the reading and the decision about what support they still need.
Direct Instruction15-20 minutes
The three readings. Complex literature rarely gives up its meaning on a first pass, so plan three passes with different questions:
Reading 1, the literal. What happens, who is speaking, to whom, where? Write a one-sentence gist. Use the sentence-level fixes from earlier grades as needed: find the core of a long sentence, try an unfamiliar word in context, restate and check.
Reading 2, the gaps. Mark every place where the text says more or less than it states: irony, a speaker who contradicts himself, a stage direction that tells a different story from the words, an allusion, a sudden jump. At each mark, write a question.
Reading 3, decide. Choose the reading of the passage that the most details support, and name one detail that resists it. A reading that no detail resists has usually ignored something.
Read the opening of "Bartleby" aloud without any introduction; students hear it cold, as they would in a college course. Then think aloud through the worked examples below. Diagram 1 shows all three readings applied to one passage of paragraph 2.
1I am a rather elderly man. The nature of my avocations, for the last thirty years, has brought me into more than ordinary contact with what would seem an interesting and somewhat singular set of men, of whom, as yet, nothing, that I know of, has ever been written—I mean, the law-copyists, or scriveners. I have known very many of them, professionally and privately, and, if I pleased, could relate divers histories, at which good-natured gentlemen might smile, and sentimental souls might weep. But I waive the biographies of all other scriveners, for a few passages in the life of Bartleby, who was a scrivener, the strangest I ever saw, or heard of. While, of other law-copyists, I might write the complete life, of Bartleby nothing of that sort can be done. I believe that no materials exist, for a full and satisfactory biography of this man. It is an irreparable loss to literature. Bartleby was one of those beings of whom nothing is ascertainable, except from the original sources, and, in his case, those are very small. What my own astonished eyes saw of Bartleby, that is all I know of him, except, indeed, one vague report, which will appear in the sequel.
2Ere introducing the scrivener, as he first appeared to me, it is fit I make some mention of myself, my employés, my business, my chambers, and general surroundings; because some such description is indispensable to an adequate understanding of the chief character about to be presented. Imprimis: I am a man who, from his youth upwards, has been filled with a profound conviction that the easiest way of life is the best. Hence, though I belong to a profession proverbially energetic and nervous, even to turbulence, at times, yet nothing of that sort have I ever suffered to invade my peace. I am one of those unambitious lawyers who never addresses a jury, or in any way draws down public applause; but, in the cool tranquillity of a snug retreat, do a snug business among rich men’s bonds, and mortgages, and title-deeds. All who know me, consider me an eminently safe man. The late John Jacob Astor, a personage little given to poetic enthusiasm, had no hesitation in pronouncing my first grand point to be prudence; my next, method. I do not speak it in vanity, but simply record the fact, that I was not unemployed in my profession by the late John Jacob Astor; a name which, I admit, I love to repeat; for it hath a rounded and orbicular sound to it, and rings like unto bullion. I will freely add, that I was not insensible to the late John Jacob Astor’s good opinion.
3Some time prior to the period at which this little history begins, my avocations had been largely increased. The good old office, now extinct in the State of New York, of a Master in Chancery, had been conferred upon me. It was not a very arduous office, but very pleasantly remunerative. I seldom lose my temper; much more seldom indulge in dangerous indignation at wrongs and outrages; but, I must be permitted to be rash here, and declare, that I consider the sudden and violent abrogation of the office of Master in Chancery, by the new Constitution, as a —— premature act; inasmuch as I had counted upon a life-lease of the profits, whereas I only received those of a few short years. But this is by the way.
Herman Melville, Bartleby, the narrator introduces himself (1853; this edition 1856). Public domain (published 1856). Source text.
Reading 1: who tells this, and from when?
Paragraph 1: "What my own astonished eyes saw of Bartleby, that is all I know of him, except, indeed, one vague report, which will appear in the sequel." What is the frame of the story?
Result: An elderly lawyer looks back on events that are over and tells only what he saw. He warns that he cannot explain Bartleby ("nothing is ascertainable") and promises "one vague report" at the end. The frame limits the story to one witness's view.
Reading 2: a claim the same paragraph undercuts
Paragraph 3: "I seldom lose my temper; much more seldom indulge in dangerous indignation at wrongs and outrages; but, I must be permitted to be rash here." What gap opens in this sentence?
Result: The calm man loses his temper at once, and the "outrage" is the loss of a well-paid office: he had "counted upon a life-lease of the profits." Melville even prints a blank dash before "premature act," where an oath would go. The wrong that stirs him is a loss of money, a detail to remember when he judges Bartleby.
Reading 2: a knowledge demand
Paragraph 3: "The good old office, now extinct in the State of New York, of a Master in Chancery, had been conferred upon me," and it was abolished "by the new Constitution." What does a reader need to know here?
Result: A Master in Chancery was an officer of a court of equity who took testimony and handled accounts, paid by fees. New York's constitution of 1846 abolished the office, along with the separate Court of Chancery, from July 1847. The narrator lost an easy source of income; a footnote or a quick search is a fair scaffold, and the point survives without it: an easy, profitable post was taken away.
Reading 3: decide, with a resisting detail
Paragraph 2: "All who know me, consider me an eminently safe man." Taking paragraphs 1-3 together, how far should a reader trust this narrator?
Result: Trust his facts and weigh his judgments. He values caution, method and money (Astor praised his "prudence" and "method"; he does "a snug business among rich men's bonds"), so his verdicts on other people may say as much about him as about them. Resisting detail: he admits his own vanity and rashness openly, which a deceptive narrator would hide. The italics on safe can be read both as his pride and as the author's irony.
Teacher tip. Model the resisting detail every time; students at this level often choose a reading and then cite only what agrees with it. Ask the class which of the three readings they would have skipped on their own. Students who skip one often skip reading 2, the one that finds the story.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs get one sentence of context and nothing else: the play opens on Christmas Eve in the Helmers' home in Norway; Torvald Helmer has just been made manager of a bank. Speeches are numbered. Pairs do reading 1 together, then split reading 2: one partner marks the dialogue, the other marks only the stage directions (in italics). They compare, then do reading 3 together.
1Nora. Hide the Christmas Tree carefully, Helen. Be sure the children do not see it till this evening, when it is dressed. (To the PORTER, taking out her purse.) How much?
2Porter. Sixpence.
3Nora. There is a shilling. No, keep the change. (The PORTER thanks her, and goes out. NORA shuts the door. She is laughing to herself, as she takes off her hat and coat. She takes a packet of macaroons from her pocket and eats one or two; then goes cautiously to her husband's door and listens.) Yes, he is in. (Still humming, she goes to the table on the right.)
4Helmer (calls out from his room). Is that my little lark twittering out there?
5Nora (busy opening some of the parcels). Yes, it is!
6Helmer. Is it my little squirrel bustling about?
7Nora. Yes!
8Helmer. When did my squirrel come home?
9Nora. Just now. (Puts the bag of macaroons into her pocket and wipes her mouth.) Come in here, Torvald, and see what I have bought.
10Helmer. Don't disturb me. (A little later, he opens the door and looks into the room, pen in hand.) Bought, did you say? All these things? Has my little spendthrift been wasting money again?
11Nora. Yes, but, Torvald, this year we really can let ourselves go a little. This is the first Christmas that we have not needed to economize.
12Helmer. Still, you know, we can't spend money recklessly.
13Nora. Yes, Torvald, we may be a wee bit more reckless now, mayn't we? Just a tiny wee bit! You are going to have a big salary and earn lots and lots of money.
14Helmer. Yes, after the New Year; but then it will be a whole quarter before the salary is due.
15Nora. Pooh! we can borrow till then.
16Helmer. Nora! (Goes up to her and takes her playfully by the ear.) The same little featherhead! Suppose, now, that I borrowed fifty pounds today, and you spent it all in the Christmas week, and then on New Year's Eve a slate fell on my head and killed me, and--
17Nora (putting her hands over his mouth). Oh! don't say such horrid things.
18Helmer. Still, suppose that happened,--what then?
19Nora. If that were to happen, I don't suppose I should care whether I owed money or not.
20Helmer. Yes, but what about the people who had lent it?
21Nora. They? Who would bother about them? I should not know who they were.
22Helmer. That is like a woman! But seriously, Nora, you know what I think about that. No debt, no borrowing. There can be no freedom or beauty about a home life that depends on borrowing and debt. We two have kept bravely on the straight road so far, and we will go on the same way for the short time longer that there need be any struggle.
Henrik Ibsen, translated by R. Farquharson Sharp, A Doll's House, the opening of Act I (1879; this edition 1923). Public domain (published 1923). Source text.
Reading 1 (speeches 1-10). Teacher note: a wife comes home from Christmas shopping and her husband teases her about spending. Gist: a happy couple at Christmas, a little worried about money.
Reading 2, the stage directions (speeches 3 and 9). Teacher note: Nora eats macaroons from her pocket, "goes cautiously to her husband's door and listens," and later "Puts the bag of macaroons into her pocket and wipes her mouth" before he looks in. The directions show her hiding something small from him, which the dialogue never mentions. Ask: why would a grown woman hide cookies from her husband?
Reading 2, the dialogue (speeches 4-10). Teacher note: "my little lark," "my little squirrel," "my little spendthrift." Ask pairs what the three names have in common and what Helmer's questions ("When did my squirrel come home?") assume about who keeps track of whom.
Reading 3 (speeches 13-22). Teacher note: pairs choose between "a loving, playful marriage" and "a marriage with a secret in it." Supporting details for the second: the hidden macaroons, and her ease with borrowing ("Pooh! we can borrow till then") against his rule "No debt, no borrowing." A detail that resists it: she stops his talk of death ("don't say such horrid things"), which reads as real affection.
Tell pairs to keep their reading 3 and the detail that resists it: the homework asks them to test both against a scene from Act III. Point out that the pairs who read the stage directions and the pairs who read only the dialogue often reach different readings of the same page.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Each student reads the opening of Eliot's poem alone, with no context from the teacher, and does all three readings. The scaffold cards of Activity 3 are on the teacher's desk: a student may take one card, and only after a first full reading, and must write in the scaffold log which card, at which line, and why. Students who take no card write "none" and the line they found hardest. This is the move from grade 11 ("scaffolding as needed") toward grade 12 ("independently"): the student, not the teacher, decides whether support is needed. Questions 11-14 and 19 of the quiz use this passage.
1Let us go then, you and I, When the evening is spread out against the sky Like a patient etherized upon a table; Let us go, through certain half-deserted streets, 5The muttering retreats Of restless nights in one-night cheap hotels And sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells: Streets that follow like a tedious argument Of insidious intent 10To lead you to an overwhelming question ... Oh, do not ask, “What is it?” Let us go and make our visit.
In the room the women come and go Talking of Michelangelo.
15The yellow fog that rubs its back upon the window-panes, The yellow smoke that rubs its muzzle on the window-panes, Licked its tongue into the corners of the evening, Lingered upon the pools that stand in drains, Let fall upon its back the soot that falls from chimneys, 20Slipped by the terrace, made a sudden leap, And seeing that it was a soft October night, Curled once about the house, and fell asleep.
And indeed there will be time For the yellow smoke that slides along the street, 25Rubbing its back upon the window-panes; There will be time, there will be time To prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet; There will be time to murder and create, And time for all the works and days of hands 30That lift and drop a question on your plate; Time for you and time for me, And time yet for a hundred indecisions, And for a hundred visions and revisions, Before the taking of a toast and tea.
T. S. Eliot, The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, lines 1-34 (1915; this edition 1917). Public domain (published 1917). Source text.
Closure10 minutes
Exit ticket: (1) Which reading, 1, 2 or 3, took you longest on the poem, and why? (2) Look at your scaffold log. Would you need the same card on the next poem by Eliot? What would you do instead?
Teacher note on content and language: the scene from A Doll's House ends a marriage, and Helmer's "That is like a woman!" (T2, speech 22) reflects attitudes of the 1870s that the play itself puts on trial; name it as Helmer's view. "Bartleby" ends, beyond these passages, with the scrivener's death in prison; students who read the full story should know that before they begin. The 1923 printing of Ibsen's play repeats one word by mistake ("in in the world") in a speech just before T5; the passages are quoted exactly as printed.
For homework and the quiz: students read the three passages below. In "Bartleby" (T4), the narrator has hired Bartleby as a copyist. In A Doll's House, between Act I and Act III, the audience learns that years earlier, when Helmer was seriously ill, Nora secretly borrowed the money for the stay in Italy that saved his life, and forged her dying father's signature to get the loan. The lender, Krogstad, reveals the forgery in a letter; Helmer turns on Nora in fury, then forgives her the moment a second letter returns the forged bond. T5 follows. T6 is the end of Eliot's poem.
1In answer to my advertisement, a motionless young man one morning stood upon my office threshold, the door being open, for it was summer. I can see that figure now—pallidly neat, pitiably respectable, incurably forlorn! It was Bartleby.
[...]
2Now and then, in the haste of business, it had been my habit to assist in comparing some brief document myself, calling Turkey or Nippers for this purpose. One object I had, in placing Bartleby so handy to me behind the screen, was, to avail myself of his services on such trivial occasions. It was on the third day, I think, of his being with me, and before any necessity had arisen for having his own writing examined, that, being much hurried to complete a small affair I had in hand, I abruptly called to Bartleby. In my haste and natural expectancy of instant compliance, I sat with my head bent over the original on my desk, and my right hand sideways, and somewhat nervously extended with the copy, so that, immediately upon emerging from his retreat, Bartleby might snatch it and proceed to business without the least delay.
3In this very attitude did I sit when I called to him, rapidly stating what it was I wanted him to do—namely, to examine a small paper with me. Imagine my surprise, nay, my consternation, when, without moving from his privacy, Bartleby, in a singularly mild, firm voice, replied, “I would prefer not to.”
4I sat awhile in perfect silence, rallying my stunned faculties. Immediately it occurred to me that my ears had deceived me, or Bartleby had entirely misunderstood my meaning. I repeated my request in the clearest tone I could assume; but in quite as clear a one came the previous reply, “I would prefer not to.”
5“Prefer not to,” echoed I, rising in high excitement, and crossing the room with a stride. “What do you mean? Are you moon-struck? I want you to help me compare this sheet here—take it,” and I thrust it towards him.
6“I would prefer not to,” said he.
7I looked at him steadfastly. His face was leanly composed; his gray eye dimly calm. Not a wrinkle of agitation rippled him. Had there been the least uneasiness, anger, impatience or impertinence in his manner; in other words, had there been any thing ordinarily human about him, doubtless I should have violently dismissed him from the premises. But as it was, I should have as soon thought of turning my pale plaster-of-paris bust of Cicero out of doors. I stood gazing at him awhile, as he went on with his own writing, and then reseated myself at my desk. This is very strange, thought I. What had one best do? But my business hurried me. I concluded to forget the matter for the present, reserving it for my future leisure. So calling Nippers from the other room, the paper was speedily examined.
Herman Melville, Bartleby, the first refusal (1853; this edition 1856). Public domain (published 1856). Source text.
1Nora (shaking her head). You have never loved me. You have only thought it pleasant to be in love with me.
2Helmer. Nora, what do I hear you saying?
3Nora. It is perfectly true, Torvald. When I was at home with papa, he told me his opinion about everything, and so I had the same opinions; and if I differed from him I concealed the fact, because he would not have liked it. He called me his doll-child, and he played with me just as I used to play with my dolls. And when I came to live with you--
4Helmer. What sort of an expression is that to use about our marriage?
5Nora (undisturbed). I mean that I was simply transferred from papa's hands into yours. You arranged everything according to your own taste, and so I got the same tastes as you--or else I pretended to, I am really not quite sure which--I think sometimes the one and sometimes the other. When I look back on it, it seems to me as if I had been living here like a poor woman--just from hand to mouth. I have existed merely to perform tricks for you, Torvald. But you would have it so. You and papa have committed a great sin against me. It is your fault that I have made nothing of my life.
6Helmer. How unreasonable and how ungrateful you are, Nora! Have you not been happy here?
7Nora. No, I have never been happy. I thought I was, but it has never really been so.
8Helmer. Not--not happy!
9Nora. No, only merry. And you have always been so kind to me. But our home has been nothing but a playroom. I have been your doll-wife, just as at home I was papa's doll-child; and here the children have been my dolls. I thought it great fun when you played with me, just as they thought it great fun when I played with them. That is what our marriage has been, Torvald.
10Helmer. There is some truth in what you say--exaggerated and strained as your view of it is. But for the future it shall be different. Playtime shall be over, and lesson-time shall begin.
11Nora. Whose lessons? Mine, or the children's?
12Helmer. Both yours and the children's, my darling Nora.
13Nora. Alas, Torvald, you are not the man to educate me into being a proper wife for you.
14Helmer. And you can say that!
15Nora. And I--how am I fitted to bring up the children?
16Helmer. Nora!
17Nora. Didn't you say so yourself a little while ago--that you dare not trust me to bring them up?
18Helmer. In a moment of anger! Why do you pay any heed to that?
19Nora. Indeed, you were perfectly right. I am not fit for the task. There is another task I must undertake first. I must try and educate myself--you are not the man to help me in that. I must do that for myself. And that is why I am going to leave you now.
20Helmer (springing up). What do you say?
21Nora. I must stand quite alone, if I am to understand myself and everything about me. It is for that reason that I cannot remain with you any longer.
Henrik Ibsen, translated by R. Farquharson Sharp, A Doll's House, Act III, Nora and Helmer talk (1879; this edition 1923). Public domain (published 1923). Source text.
1No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be; Am an attendant lord, one that will do To swell a progress, start a scene or two, Advise the prince; no doubt, an easy tool, 5Deferential, glad to be of use, Politic, cautious, and meticulous; Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse; At times, indeed, almost ridiculous-- Almost, at times, the Fool.
10I grow old ... I grow old ... I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled.
Shall I part my hair behind? Do I dare to eat a peach? I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach. I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each.
15I do not think that they will sing to me.
I have seen them riding seaward on the waves Combing the white hair of the waves blown back When the wind blows the water white and black. We have lingered in the chambers of the sea 20By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown Till human voices wake us, and we drown.
T. S. Eliot, The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, the ending (1915; this edition 1917). Public domain (published 1917). Source text.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Let students keep the scaffold cards for the homework passages as well, but require a first full reading and a written gist before they turn a card over
Give a two-column note sheet for reading 2 in the play: "What they say" and "What the stage directions show"
Read T1 aloud a second time, pausing after each claim the narrator makes about himself, before students mark gaps
For Advanced Students
Have students read the whole of "Bartleby" and decide whether the narrator's judgment of Bartleby changes, citing a resisting detail for their reading
Ask students to translate the Italian epigraph of "Prufrock" with a dictionary or a reliable translation and explain what it adds to lines 1-34
Ask students to read the final scene of A Doll's House in a second translation and compare how the two versions render the word "doll"
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
A strong reading 2 finds gaps a first reading misses and asks a real question about each. A strong reading 3 commits to an interpretation, supports it with several details, and names a detail that resists it, instead of pretending the text is simple. Watch for students who stop after reading 1 because they "understood it," who treat an allusion they do not recognize as a detail they can skip, and who read only the dialogue of a play. For scaffolds, look for honest logs: grade 11 students may still need a card on the hardest passages, and by the end of grade 12 they should be reading comparable passages with none.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
The Trust Ledger
15 minGroups of 3
Groups test six claims the narrator of "Bartleby" makes about himself against his own words in T1. Each claim goes into one of three columns of a ledger: supported, undercut, or not yet testable. The ledger turns the vague sense that a narrator "seems unreliable" into evidence, and it reminds students that an unreliable narrator can still be right about many things.
The Six Claim Cards
"I am a rather elderly man."
"I am a man who, from his youth upwards, has been filled with a profound conviction that the easiest way of life is the best."
"nothing of that sort have I ever suffered to invade my peace."
"I do not speak it in vanity, but simply record the fact"
"I seldom lose my temper"
"What my own astonished eyes saw of Bartleby, that is all I know of him"
Procedure
Groups place each card in a column and write the quotation from T1 that decides it, with its paragraph number
For each undercut claim, they write what the narrator reveals without meaning to
Each group reports one card on which its members disagreed
Answer Key for the Teacher
Supported: card 2 (his "snug business" and his avoidance of juries, paragraph 2). Undercut: card 3 and card 5 (his rash outburst about the lost office, paragraph 3) and card 4 (he admits he loves to repeat Astor's name, paragraph 2). Not yet testable: card 1 (no reason to doubt it, and nothing to test it against) and card 6 (it states a limit, which the rest of the story will test). Accept a reasoned case for card 1 as supported.
Discussion Questions
Which undercut claim matters most for how we will read his account of Bartleby?
Does admitting his faults make the narrator more or less trustworthy?
2
Two Stagings of the First Minute
20 minGroups of 4
Groups stage the first ten speeches of A Doll's House twice, as two different interpretations: once with a carefree Nora and a doting Helmer, once with a Nora who is hiding things from a husband who watches her. Performing both shows students that the stage directions are evidence, and that a play text leaves room for more than one reading.
Procedure
Assign Nora, Helmer, the Porter and a director; the director decides how each stage direction is played
Staging A: every direction is played lightly, for comedy
Staging B: every direction is played as concealment; Nora checks the door before she eats, and she hides the bag fast
The class votes on which staging the words and the directions support better, and each voter must cite one speech number
Discussion Questions
Which stage direction changed most between the two stagings?
Is there a line of dialogue that only works in one of the two stagings?
What would an audience know by the end of speech 10 in each staging?
Modification
For groups who need support, the teacher plays Helmer in both stagings, so the group can focus on how Nora plays the directions.
3
The Scaffold Menu
15 minIndividual, then whole class
Students rate the Prufrock passage on the four qualitative dimensions before and after reading it, compare their ratings with Diagram 2, and decide which one of four scaffold cards, if any, they need. The activity makes the grade 11 to grade 12 shift visible: the reader, not the teacher, judges what support a text requires.
The Four Scaffold Cards
Card A, allusions: Michelangelo was an Italian Renaissance sculptor and painter. Works and Days is the title of a poem about farming and labor by Hesiod, an early Greek poet.
Card B, glossary: etherized, put to sleep with ether before surgery; insidious, harmful in a hidden, gradual way; muzzle, an animal's nose and mouth.
Card C, a reading: the teacher reads lines 1-22 aloud to the student once.
Card D, context: Eliot published the poem in 1915. Many readers take J. Alfred Prufrock, the speaker, to be a middle-aged man on his way to a social gathering, circling a question he may never ask.
Procedure
Before reading: rate the passage 1-3 on each dimension from a quick look
After the three readings: rate it again, then compare with Diagram 2 and circle any rating you disagree with
Log the card you took, if any, the line where you needed it, and whether it helped
Whole class: tally which cards were taken and at which lines
Discussion Questions
Which rating in Diagram 2 do you disagree with, and what line proves your point?
Did the students who took Card A read the poem differently from those who did not?
Variation: No-Card Round
For grade 12 classes late in the year, remove the cards entirely: students read, rate and log what they would have asked for, then check their guesses against the cards afterward.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: Three Readings of One Passage
The three readings applied to the Astor passage in paragraph 2 of "Bartleby" (T1), where the narrator mentions "the late John Jacob Astor" three times. Each reading asks a different question; the third names a detail that resists its own conclusion.
Diagram 2: Where the Difficulty Lives
One reader's ratings of the three lesson-plan passages on the four qualitative dimensions of text complexity in Appendix A of the Common Core. The ratings are judgments, not measurements, and Activity 3 asks students to test them. All three passages rate high on levels of meaning, which is typical of the high end of the grades 11-CCR band.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RL.11-12.10 Homework: Three Readings on Your Own
Directions: Read the three homework passages at the end of the lesson plan (in Closure), with the context note above them: the first refusal in "Bartleby" (T4), the scene from Act III of A Doll's House (T5) and the end of "Prufrock" (T6). Use the three readings without the scaffold cards; if you look anything up, say what and why. Cite the paragraph, speech or line number for every quotation.
Part 1: The End of "Prufrock" (Problems 1-2)
Lines 1-9 of T6 begin "No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be; / Am an attendant lord." Identify the allusion, explain what an "attendant lord" is in a play such as Hamlet, and explain what the comparison says about how Prufrock sees himself. Say whether you needed to look anything up, and what.
Do reading 3 on lines 16-21 of T6, from "I have seen them riding seaward on the waves" to "Till human voices wake us, and we drown." State the reading that the most details support, quote two details for it, and name one detail that resists it.
Part 2: The First Refusal (Problems 3-4)
In T4, paragraph 1, the narrator remembers Bartleby as "pallidly neat, pitiably respectable, incurably forlorn!" Explain what each of the three pairs of words adds, and what "I can see that figure now" suggests about when the narrator is telling the story and what he knows by then.
Trace the narrator's reactions across paragraphs 3-7 of T4 (for example "rising in high excitement" and "Are you moon-struck?") against Bartleby's manner in the same paragraphs. Explain how the scene is built on this contrast, and why the narrator ends it by calling Nippers.
Part 3: The Play and Your Own Reading (Problems 5-6)
Reread speeches 4-10 of T2 (Act I) after reading T5 (Act III). In one paragraph of 5-7 sentences, explain how Nora's words in Act III change the meaning of the Act I opening. Quote at least one speech from each act.
Scaffold report: for the three homework passages, list what you looked up or wished you could look up, and at which line or paragraph. Then write 4-6 sentences on which kind of support you would still need on a new text at this level, and what you will do instead of asking for it by the end of grade 12.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Literal Accuracy
The gist of every passage used is correct, including who speaks and when
One misreading of who speaks or what happens
Several misreadings
Gaps Found
Names irony, subtext, allusion or a shift and explains what it adds
Names a gap without explaining it
Reads only the surface
Interpretation and Resistance
Commits to a reading, supports it, and names a detail that resists it
Supports a reading but ignores resisting details
No interpretation
Evidence and Self-Report
Exact quotations with numbers; an honest, specific scaffold log
Evidence without numbers, or a vague log
No evidence or log
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-5 and 17 use the first refusal in "Bartleby" (T4) and questions 6-10 and 18 use the scene from Act III of A Doll's House (T5), both in Closure with the context note above them. Questions 11-14 and 19 use the opening of "Prufrock" (T3, in Independent Practice). Questions 15-16 need no passage, and question 20 asks about your own reading. Paragraph, speech and line numbers are shown beside each passage. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In T4, paragraph 2, the narrator sits "In my haste and natural expectancy of instant compliance," his hand holding out the copy so that Bartleby "might snatch it." What does this detail reveal before Bartleby speaks?
Answer: B
He calls instant compliance "natural," and he does not even look up: "I sat with my head bent over the original." Obedience is so expected that he has arranged his body for it, which makes the refusal land harder. Choice A misreads "somewhat nervously extended": the nervousness is haste, and nothing suggests he expects a refusal. Choice C invents a test; he is simply "much hurried." Choice D invents an illness.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Paragraph 3: "Imagine my surprise, nay, my consternation, when, without moving from his privacy, Bartleby, in a singularly mild, firm voice, replied." What does "nay" do in this sentence?
Answer: D
"Nay" here means "no, more than that": the narrator replaces "surprise" with "consternation," dismay that leaves him at a loss. Choice A reads "nay" as a plain "no" to the whole phrase. Choice B assigns the word to the wrong speaker; Bartleby's words are in quotation marks. Choice C takes the word as a denial of the event, which the rest of the paragraph describes in detail.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Bartleby answers, "I would prefer not to" (T4, paragraph 3), and he repeats it in paragraphs 4 and 6. Why is this answer so hard for the narrator to deal with?
Answer: A
The words state a preference, not a refusal and not a reason, and they come "in a singularly mild, firm voice." There is nothing rude to punish and no argument to answer. Choice B is wrong because the other clerks are in "the other room" and nothing is insulting. Choice C invents a motive the passage never gives. Choice D misreads the reply as a question; it is a complete answer repeated word for word.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Paragraph 7: "Had there been the least uneasiness, anger, impatience or impertinence in his manner; in other words, had there been any thing ordinarily human about him, doubtless I should have violently dismissed him from the premises." Which restatement is accurate?
Answer: C
The sentence is a condition contrary to fact: "Had there been ... I should have." Bartleby showed none of those feelings, so the narrator did not fire him. His strange calm disarms the narrator. Choice A treats the condition as a fact. Choice B reverses the result of the condition. Choice D takes "ordinarily human" literally; the narrator means Bartleby lacks the usual human reactions, not that he is a ghost.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The narrator adds: "But as it was, I should have as soon thought of turning my pale plaster-of-paris bust of Cicero out of doors." What does the comparison suggest?
Answer: D
The bust is "pale" and made of plaster, and the paragraph has just described Bartleby's "leanly composed" face and "dimly calm" eye. Throwing out a man who acts like a statue would be as pointless as throwing out a statue. Choice A mistakes the point of the comparison: it is about stillness, not value. Choice B ignores that Bartleby barely speaks. Choice C turns a comparison into a plan.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Nora says, "You have never loved me. You have only thought it pleasant to be in love with me" (T5, speech 1). What distinction is she drawing?
Answer: A
She separates love for her from the pleasure Helmer takes in the role of lover: the feeling is about him, not about her. Speeches 3 and 9 make the same point when she says her father and her husband treated her as a doll. Choice B brings in her father, whom she mentions only later and in the same terms. Choice C adds a change over time that she denies ("never"). Choice D invents a distinction the speech does not make.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In speech 5 Nora says, "I was simply transferred from papa's hands into yours." What does the word "transferred" suggest?
Answer: B
"Transferred" is a word for goods, money or deeds changing hands, and "hands" makes her the object passed between two men. It fits her claim that "You arranged everything according to your own taste." Choice A reads the word as a move of place. Choice C contradicts "simply transferred," which leaves out her own choice. Choice D invents a dowry.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Helmer asks, "Have you not been happy here?" Nora answers, "No, I have never been happy," and then, "No, only merry" (speeches 6-9). What is the difference?
Answer: C
She explains "merry" at once: "our home has been nothing but a playroom," and she thought it "great fun" when he played with her. Merriment is play; happiness would need the seriousness she says their marriage lacked. Choice A reverses the two words. Choice B ties the words to the wrong people. Choice D ignores that she contrasts the words ("No, only merry").
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Helmer promises, "Playtime shall be over, and lesson-time shall begin," and Nora asks, "Whose lessons? Mine, or the children's?" (speeches 10-11). What does her question expose?
Answer: D
Helmer answers "Both yours and the children's," which proves her point: even his reform treats her as a child to be taught, not a partner. She then says, "you are not the man to educate me." Choice A invents a plan. Choice B misses that the question is pointed, not confused. Choice C has no support; her concern in speech 15 is whether she is fit to raise them.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why, according to speeches 19 and 21, is Nora leaving?
Answer: A
She says, "I must try and educate myself," "I must do that for myself," and "I must stand quite alone, if I am to understand myself and everything about me." Choice B takes up his "moment of anger," which she says was "perfectly right." Choice C contradicts speech 3, where she describes life with her father as being his "doll-child." Choice D uses the context note, but the danger has passed with the returned bond, and she gives a different reason.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Lines 1-12 of "Prufrock" (T3) are addressed to a "you": "Let us go then, you and I." Who is "you"?
Answer: B
The poem never names the "you," and a strong reader says so and keeps the possibilities open: the invitation may be to the reader, to a silent companion, or to a part of the speaker himself. Choice A confuses the "you" with the women of lines 13-14, who are "in the room," not walking with him. Choice C takes the simile in line 3 literally. Choice D confuses the subject of the women's talk with a person present.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Lines 2-3: "When the evening is spread out against the sky / Like a patient etherized upon a table." What mood does the simile set for the poem?
Answer: C
A patient "etherized" is unconscious and passive, waiting for something to be done to him; the evening, and the speaker who sees it this way, share that stillness. The simile works against the romantic sunset a reader expects. Choice A treats the image as a plot event. Choice B gives the mood the simile deliberately breaks. Choice D adds an emotion and a situation the lines do not contain.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Lines 13-14, "In the room the women come and go / Talking of Michelangelo," arrive with no transition from line 12. What does the abrupt couplet do?
Answer: A
The couplet cuts from the street to a room, the way thought jumps, and the neat rhyme "go / Michelangelo" gives it a sing-song sound; the poem repeats it later, as a refrain. Choice B ignores the change of place. Choice C is wrong because the women are in the room, not walking with the speaker. Choice D invents a decision; the next stanza describes the fog.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Lines 15-22 describe "The yellow fog that rubs its back upon the window-panes." Which details make the fog behave like a cat, although no cat is named?
Answer: B
Rubbing, licking, curling up to sleep, and in the same stanza "a sudden leap," are all cat behavior, and together they make an implied metaphor that runs through the whole stanza. Choice A picks details that fit fog or smoke as much as an animal. Choice C lists the color and the setting. Choice D names the fog's second name, which is smoke, not an animal.
Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A grade 11 student reading "Prufrock" takes the allusion card and the glossary card. By the end of grade 12, what does RL.11-12.10 expect of the same student on a new poem of similar difficulty?
Answer: B
The standard asks grade 12 students to read "at the high end" of the band "independently and proficiently," so the scaffolds that grade 11 allows "as needed" come off, while the difficulty stays. Choice A keeps the grade 11 support. Choice C lowers the difficulty. Choice D contradicts the standard, which names stories, dramas and poems.
Question 16 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Appendix A of the Common Core describes three measures of text complexity. Which of these is a reader and task consideration?
Answer: D
Reader and task considerations are about the fit between a particular reader, the text and what the reader is asked to do: motivation, knowledge, experience and purpose. Choice A is a quantitative measure. Choices B and C are qualitative dimensions, levels of meaning and knowledge demands, which a teacher judges in the text itself.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
T4, paragraph 7, ends: "This is very strange, thought I. What had one best do? But my business hurried me. I concluded to forget the matter for the present, reserving it for my future leisure." Do readings 2 and 3 on these sentences: what do they show about the narrator, and how does it connect to what he says about himself in T1?
Model answer: Faced with something he cannot explain, the narrator puts it off: business "hurried" him, and he will think about it at his "future leisure." This fits his claim in T1, paragraph 2, that "the easiest way of life is the best": he avoids the conflict instead of settling it. It also fits his habit of letting work come first. A resisting detail: he does ask himself "What had one best do?", so he is troubled, not indifferent. Postponing a problem he cannot understand sets up the rest of the story, in which the problem grows. Rubric: 2 points for a claim about the narrator, a quotation from each passage and a resisting detail or complication; 1 point for a claim with evidence from one passage only; 0 points for summary.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Helmer responds to Nora in T5, speech 10: "There is some truth in what you say--exaggerated and strained as your view of it is. But for the future it shall be different." Explain how this response proves Nora's point even as Helmer tries to answer it.
Model answer: Helmer grants "some truth" but at once judges her view "exaggerated and strained," so he is still the one who decides what is true in the marriage. He then announces the future himself ("it shall be different"), deciding the change without asking her what it should be. Nora has just said that he "arranged everything according to your own taste"; his reply arranges her reform the same way. The irony is that his promise to change repeats the pattern she describes. Rubric: 2 points for explaining the irony with quotations from speech 10 and one other speech; 1 point for noticing that he still controls the terms without evidence; 0 points otherwise.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
In lines 23-34 of "Prufrock," the word "time" appears again and again: "There will be time, there will be time." Do reading 2 and reading 3: what does the repetition suggest about the speaker, and what detail in the lines supports your reading?
Model answer: The repetition sounds like reassurance, but it works as delay: the speaker keeps telling himself there is time instead of acting. The lines make room for "a hundred indecisions" and "a hundred visions and revisions," all "Before the taking of a toast and tea," so large plans shrink to a tea party. Even "time to murder and create" sits beside the trivial, which suggests he talks of great acts and does small ones. A resisting detail: the lines could also be read as calm confidence, since nothing yet forces him to hurry; but "indecisions" makes procrastination the better reading. Rubric: 2 points for a clear reading, two quoted details and attention to the repetition; 1 point for a reading with one detail; 0 points otherwise.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Look at your scaffold log from Independent Practice and your work on the quiz. Which passage of this lesson would you still need support to read, and what kind? Name the line or paragraph, the qualitative dimension (levels of meaning, structure, language or knowledge demands), and one thing you could do yourself instead of taking the support.
Model answer: I still needed support on "Prufrock," lines 13-14 and 29. The difficulty was knowledge demands: I did not know who Michelangelo was in enough detail, or that "works and days" names an old poem, so I took Card A. Next time I could do what the card did myself: when a name or phrase seems to point somewhere, look it up after my first full reading, not before, and then check whether it changes my reading 3. On "Bartleby" I needed no card; reading 2 was enough. Rubric: 2 points for a specific place, a correctly named dimension and a realistic plan for independence; 1 point if one is missing; 0 points for a general statement.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RL.11-12.10 mean?
It means students in grades 11-12 must be able to read and understand stories, dramas and poems at the level of the grades 11-CCR band, the band that ends at college and career readiness. It names no single analytic skill; it sets how hard the literature is and how much support students may still need: some at the high end in grade 11, none at the high end by the end of grade 12.
What does "11-CCR" mean in RL.11-12.10?
It means the complexity band from grade 11 to college and career readiness (CCR). It is the last band in the Common Core: a student who reads its hardest texts independently by the end of grade 12 is reading at the level the standards set for entry to college and careers.
How is RL.11-12.10 different from RL.9-10.10?
The band is higher, and the endpoint is the band's top. RL.9-10.10 ends with independent reading at the high end of the grades 9-10 band; RL.11-12.10 ends with independent reading at the high end of the grades 11-CCR band. In practice the difficulty shifts from sentences toward meaning: irony, subtext, allusion and form, which is why this lesson uses a three-reading protocol instead of sentence-level moves.
How is RL.11-12.10 assessed?
Mostly through the texts on other assessments. Tests rarely label a question "standard 10"; they give passages in the band and ask about evidence, theme, word choice and structure, which a student can answer only after reading the passage well. In class, a teacher can assess it directly with a new passage read without support, checking the three readings, the student's questions and an honest scaffold log.
What counts as the "high end" of the band?
The most demanding texts in the band, usually because of their qualitative dimensions: layered meaning, unusual structure, dense or old language, and heavy knowledge demands. Appendix A of the Common Core leaves the judgment to readers using quantitative measures, qualitative dimensions and reader and task considerations together. Modernist poetry such as "Prufrock" and ironic narration such as "Bartleby" are strong candidates.
Should grade 12 students ever get scaffolds?
On new texts of the band's hardest kind, the goal by the end of grade 12 is none. Earlier in the year, and in grade 11, scaffolds "as needed" are part of the standard. The move to independence works best when students choose and log their own support, as in this lesson's scaffold menu, so that the decision becomes theirs before the support disappears.
Why teach RL.11-12.10 with Melville, Ibsen and Eliot?
Each is hard in a different way that college reading demands: a narrator whose words undercut his claims, a play whose stage directions carry a secret, and a poem built of jumps and allusions. All three are in the public domain, so the passages can be printed in full on the page. The protocol works the same way on contemporary novels, plays and poems your anthology licenses.
Is it cheating to look things up while reading?
No. Looking up an allusion or a historical term is what skilled readers do, and a student who knows when to do it is reading independently. What matters is the order: read the passage through first, then look up what the meaning depends on, then reread. Looking up a summary of the whole work instead of reading it is different, because it replaces the reading.
How can parents support a senior reading difficult literature?
Ask what the text says on the surface and then what it might mean underneath, and ask for one line that supports each answer. Encourage your teenager to reread short, hard passages instead of racing ahead, and to write a question in the margin wherever something feels off. Those questions are often where the meaning is.
How does RL.11-12.10 connect to other standards?
It follows RL.9-10.10 and sets the reading level every other reading standard for grades 11-12 assumes, from citing evidence where the text leaves matters uncertain (RL.11-12.1) to analyzing structure and word choice. RI.11-12.10 sets the same expectation for literary nonfiction, and writing about literature (W.11-12.9) depends on it.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to RL.11-12.10: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RL.9-10.10Prerequisite
Read literature at the high end of the grades 9-10 band independently