RI.9-10.5: How Sentences, Paragraphs and Sections Develop an Author's Claims
In plain English: RI.9-10.5 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 9-10 to analyze in detail how an author's ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs or larger portions of a text, such as a section or chapter. It is usually taught in English 9 or 10 with essays, speeches and other nonfiction.
Analyze in detail how an author's ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text (e.g., a section or chapter).
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Informational Text · Cluster: Craft and Structure · Official standard
Students analyze in detail how an author's claims are developed and refined at three scales: the sentence, the paragraph and a larger portion of the text, such as a section. Developed means the claim gains support: reasons, examples, a rule, a story, an analogy. Refined means the claim becomes more precise: it is narrowed, qualified, redefined or extended to a new audience. For every sentence or paragraph they discuss, students name what it does to the claim and quote the words that show it.
The text is Thomas Paine's The American Crisis, Number I, written in December 1776 during the American army's retreat across New Jersey. Students model sentence-level analysis on the essay's famous first paragraph, trace how a claim about the Tories (colonists loyal to Britain) shifts across three paragraphs in guided practice, place each passage in the whole essay with a section guide written for this page, and apply the method on their own to the appeal in paragraph 11 (quiz) and the military outlook in paragraph 10 (homework).
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Identify an author's central claim and explain what a particular sentence does to it (states, supports, qualifies, redefines, extends or raises the stakes)
Analyze in detail how a paragraph develops a claim through reasons, rules, examples, anecdotes and analogies, quoting the words that do the work
Explain how a claim is refined from one paragraph to the next, using the author's transitions as evidence
Analyze how a larger portion of a text, such as a section, develops or refines a claim made elsewhere in the text
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Analyzing the role of particular sentences in developing a key concept within one paragraph RI.8.5
Determining a central idea and how it is shaped by specific details RI.9-10.2
Citing strong and thorough textual evidence RI.9-10.1
Basic background on the American Revolution: the Declaration of Independence (July 1776), the British army under General Howe, and Loyalists (Tories)
Write three sentences on the board and ask students to explain what the last one does to the first.
Warm-Up Prompt
"(1) Our team needs more practice. (2) We have lost our last three games in the final five minutes. (3) What we need is not more practice but better conditioning." Sentence 2 adds something to sentence 1, and sentence 3 changes it. What exactly does each one do to the claim?
Collect answers. Students usually see that sentence 2 is evidence and sentence 3 narrows the claim (not practice in general, but one kind of practice). Name the two moves: sentence 2 develops the claim; sentence 3 refines it. Tell students that RI.9-10.5 asks them to analyze exactly these moves in a real text, sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph and section by section.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Part 1: The vocabulary of development. Give students the table below. A sentence or paragraph can do more than one job, and students should always say which words do the job. The margin numbers in each passage count its paragraphs; the Section Guide and Diagram 2 use the essay's own paragraph numbers (1-13).
What a sentence or paragraph can do to a claim
Move
Develops or refines?
Signal words to look for
States the claim
Sets it up
Short, general, often present tense
Gives a reason or rule
Develops
for, because, it is ... that gives
Gives an example, story or eyewitness detail
Develops
once, as I was, a noted one
Offers an analogy
Develops
like, as ... as, just as
Admits a cost or limit (concession)
Refines
yet, though, however, not ... but
Redefines a key word
Refines
is not ... then, that is, in other words
Widens or narrows the audience
Refines
all, every, whoever, only those who
Raises the stakes
Develops
even, only, never
Part 2: Model with paragraph 1. Explain the setting: in December 1776 the Continental Army had been driven out of New York and across New Jersey, and many enlistments ended with the year. Paine, who had marched with the army, wrote this essay; the 1894 editor notes that Washington ordered it read to his soldiers. Read Passage 1 aloud, then work through the examples with Diagram 1.
1THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated. Britain, with an army to enforce her tyranny, has declared that she has a right (not only to TAX) but "to BIND us in ALL CASES WHATSOEVER," and if being bound in that manner, is not slavery, then is there not such a thing as slavery upon earth. Even the expression is impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God.
Thomas Paine, Passage 1: The American Crisis, Number I, paragraph 1 (complete) (1776; this edition 1894). Public domain (published 1894). Source text.
Sentences 1-2: the claim is stated, then sharpened
"THESE are the times that try men's souls." (8 words) is followed by "The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman." (33 words)
Result: Sentence 1 is a general claim about the moment. Sentence 2 refines "try": the trial is a sorting of people into those who shrink and those who stand. The claim changes from "times are hard" to "these hard times will show who is loyal," which gives readers a side to choose.
Sentences 3-5: a concession becomes a reason
"Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph." Then: "What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value."
Result: Sentence 3 admits the cost ("not easily conquered") and turns it with "yet." Sentence 4 supplies the general rule behind the turn, and sentence 5 applies the rule to "FREEDOM." The claim is developed in three steps: hardship is real, hardship adds value, so freedom is worth the hardship.
Sentences 6-7: a key word is redefined
Britain claims a right "to BIND us in ALL CASES WHATSOEVER," and "if being bound in that manner, is not slavery, then is there not such a thing as slavery upon earth." Then: "Even the expression is impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God."
Result: Sentence 6, the longest (48 words), redefines the quarrel: not a tax dispute ("not only to TAX") but slavery. Sentence 7 raises the stakes again with "Even": the claim is not only unjust but a claim to a power that belongs to God. The paragraph ends further from the first sentence than it began.
The paragraph as a whole
What does paragraph 1 do for the essay?
Result: It moves from a mood ("times that try") to a definition of the conflict (freedom against slavery). Every later section can lean on it: once readers accept that the stakes are freedom, retreating soldiers and neutral neighbors both look different.
A larger portion: Section C (paragraphs 5-6)
Use the Section Guide and Diagram 2. Section C is the longest section (687 words) and is an eyewitness account: "As I was with the troops at Fort Lee."
Result: Section C develops the claim of paragraph 2 that "no great deal is lost yet" with firsthand detail about an orderly retreat, and it gives Paine the standing of a man who was there. A whole section can do one job for the essay's claim, just as a sentence does one job for a paragraph.
Part 3: The whole essay. Hand out the Section Guide and show Diagram 2. Point out that the passages on this page are not in the essay's order: Passage 4 (paragraph 10) comes before Passage 3 (paragraph 11). Ask students to predict, from the guide alone, which section they think carries the essay's main request, and to hold the prediction until the quiz.
Section A (paragraphs 1-3): the test and the stakes. Paine opens with "THESE are the times that try men's souls," argues that a freedom won at a high price is valued more, admits that independence might have been declared earlier, and says God will not abandon a people who tried to avoid war.
Section B (paragraph 4): panics. A panic, Paine says, passes quickly, and it works as one of the "touchstones of sincerity and hypocrisy": it brings hidden Tories into the open.
Section C (paragraphs 5-6): the eyewitness report. Beginning "As I was with the troops at Fort Lee," Paine describes the retreat across New Jersey and praises General Washington's steadiness.
Section D (paragraphs 7-9): the Tories. Printed as Passage 2.
Section E (paragraph 10): the military outlook. Printed as Passage 4.
Section F (paragraph 11): the appeal to those who have "nobly stood." Printed as Passage 3.
Section G (paragraph 12): the offer of mercy. Paine warns that mercy "where conquest is the object, is only a trick of war" and that any state that gave up its arms would be ruined.
Section H (paragraph 13): the way out. Beginning "I thank God, that I fear not," Paine reviews the army's orderly retreat and its new recruits, then sets "perseverance and fortitude" against "cowardice and submission."
Written for this page (a summary of the whole essay, with short quotations from Paine), Section Guide to The American Crisis, Number I (all 13 paragraphs). Original passage written for this page.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs read Passage 2 (paragraphs 7-9), where Paine turns to the Tories, and complete Activity 1. Their question: how does Paine's claim about the Tories change from the first paragraph to the third? Circulate and push for precision: "He talks about Tories" is a topic; "He moves from calling every Tory a coward to reasoning with them, then uses one Tory's words to make a point about every parent" traces development and refinement.
1I shall conclude this paper with some miscellaneous remarks on the state of our affairs; and shall begin with asking the following question, Why is it that the enemy have left the New England provinces, and made these middle ones the seat of war? The answer is easy: New England is not infested with Tories, and we are. I have been tender in raising the cry against these men, and used numberless arguments to show them their danger, but it will not do to sacrifice a world either to their folly or their baseness. The period is now arrived, in which either they or we must change our sentiments, or one or both must fall. And what is a Tory? Good God! what is he? I should not be afraid to go with a hundred Whigs against a thousand Tories, were they to attempt to get into arms. Every Tory is a coward; for servile, slavish, self-interested fear is the foundation of Toryism; and a man under such influence, though he may be cruel, never can be brave.
2But, before the line of irrecoverable separation be drawn between us, let us reason the matter together: Your conduct is an invitation to the enemy, yet not one in a thousand of you has heart enough to join him. Howe is as much deceived by you as the American cause is injured by you. He expects you will all take up arms, and flock to his standard, with muskets on your shoulders. Your opinions are of no use to him, unless you support him personally, for 'tis soldiers, and not Tories, that he wants.
3I once felt all that kind of anger, which a man ought to feel, against the mean principles that are held by the Tories: a noted one, who kept a tavern at Amboy, was standing at his door, with as pretty a child in his hand, about eight or nine years old, as I ever saw, and after speaking his mind as freely as he thought was prudent, finished with this unfatherly expression, "Well! give me peace in my day." Not a man lives on the continent but fully believes that a separation must some time or other finally take place, and a generous parent should have said, "If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace;" and this single reflection, well applied, is sufficient to awaken every man to duty. Not a place upon earth might be so happy as America. Her situation is remote from all the wrangling world, and she has nothing to do but to trade with them. A man can distinguish himself between temper and principle, and I am as confident, as I am that God governs the world, that America will never be happy till she gets clear of foreign dominion. Wars, without ceasing, will break out till that period arrives, and the continent must in the end be conqueror; for though the flame of liberty may sometimes cease to shine, the coal can never expire.
Thomas Paine, Passage 2: The American Crisis, Number I, paragraphs 7-9 (complete) (1776; this edition 1894). Public domain (published 1894). Source text.
Debrief with three questions. (1) In passage paragraph 1, the claim is blunt: "Every Tory is a coward." Which word in passage paragraph 2 signals a change of approach? ("But, before the line of irrecoverable separation be drawn between us, let us reason the matter together.") (2) What does the story of the tavern keeper add that the accusation could not? (A real person, a child, and a sentence readers can picture: "Well! give me peace in my day.") (3) How does Paine's rewrite of the tavern keeper's words ("If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace") turn one man's story into a duty for "every man"? Record the answers on chart paper as a three-step chain: accuse, reason, illustrate and generalize.
Independent Practice15-20 minutes
Students read Passage 3 (paragraph 11) on their own and answer quiz questions 1-14 with the passage and the Section Guide open, then questions 15-20 in writing. Remind them to quote the words that do the work in every answer.
1Quitting this class of men, I turn with the warm ardor of a friend to those who have nobly stood, and are yet determined to stand the matter out: I call not upon a few, but upon all: not on this state or that state, but on every state: up and help us; lay your shoulders to the wheel; better have too much force than too little, when so great an object is at stake. Let it be told to the future world, that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive, that the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet and to repulse it. Say not that thousands are gone, turn out your tens of thousands; throw not the burden of the day upon Providence, but "show your faith by your works," that God may bless you. It matters not where you live, or what rank of life you hold, the evil or the blessing will reach you all. The far and the near, the home counties and the back, the rich and the poor, will suffer or rejoice alike. The heart that feels not now is dead; the blood of his children will curse his cowardice, who shrinks back at a time when a little might have saved the whole, and made them happy. I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death. My own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. Not all the treasures of the world, so far as I believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for I think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am I to suffer it? What signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? If we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other. [...]
Thomas Paine, Passage 3: The American Crisis, Number I, paragraph 11 (the last two sentences are left out) (1776; this edition 1894). Public domain (published 1894). Source text.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: "Choose one sentence from Passage 2. Name the move it makes (use the table from Direct Instruction) and explain in one sentence how it develops or refines Paine's claim about the Tories." Sort the tickets into "names the move only" and "explains the effect on the claim" to plan the next lesson.
Teacher note on language. The essay is quoted exactly as printed. Paine uses "man" and "men" for people in general, and he calls Britain's claim "slavery" at a time when hundreds of thousands of Black men, women and children were enslaved and slavery was legal in every one of the thirteen states. Invite students to discuss that gap. Passage 3 leaves out the last two sentences of paragraph 11, which insult King George III in crude language; the omission is marked [...].
Homework passage. Passage 4 is paragraph 10, which comes just before Passage 3. Here Paine turns from the Tories to the army and to what General Howe's campaign means.
1America did not, nor does not want force; but she wanted a proper application of that force. Wisdom is not the purchase of a day, and it is no wonder that we should err at the first setting off. From an excess of tenderness, we were unwilling to raise an army, and trusted our cause to the temporary defence of a well-meaning militia. A summer's experience has now taught us better; yet with those troops, while they were collected, we were able to set bounds to the progress of the enemy, and, thank God! they are again assembling. I always considered militia as the best troops in the world for a sudden exertion, but they will not do for a long campaign. Howe, it is probable, will make an attempt on this city [Philadelphia]; should he fail on this side the Delaware, he is ruined. If he succeeds, our cause is not ruined. He stakes all on his side against a part on ours; admitting he succeeds, the consequence will be, that armies from both ends of the continent will march to assist their suffering friends in the middle states; for he cannot go everywhere, it is impossible. I consider Howe as the greatest enemy the Tories have; he is bringing a war into their country, which, had it not been for him and partly for themselves, they had been clear of. Should he now be expelled, I wish with all the devotion of a Christian, that the names of Whig and Tory may never more be mentioned; but should the Tories give him encouragement to come, or assistance if he come, I as sincerely wish that our next year's arms may expel them from the continent, and the Congress appropriate their possessions to the relief of those who have suffered in well-doing. A single successful battle next year will settle the whole. America could carry on a two years' war by the confiscation of the property of disaffected persons, and be made happy by their expulsion. Say not that this is revenge, call it rather the soft resentment of a suffering people, who, having no object in view but the good of all, have staked their own all upon a seemingly doubtful event. Yet it is folly to argue against determined hardness; eloquence may strike the ear, and the language of sorrow draw forth the tear of compassion, but nothing can reach the heart that is steeled with prejudice.
Thomas Paine, Passage 4: The American Crisis, Number I, paragraph 10 (complete) (1776; this edition 1894). Public domain (published 1894). Source text.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give the move table as a word bank and a sentence frame: "In the sentence '___,' Paine ___ (move) the claim that ___, which makes it more ___."
Pre-teach older words and names: stands it (holds out), dearness (high price), impious, Tory, Whig, Howe, militia, Providence
For Passage 3, give the sentence breaks in advance (numbered S1-S12) so students can cite by number
For Advanced Students
Read the whole essay and argue which section does the most to develop the claim of paragraph 1, citing at least two other sections for comparison
Compare how Paine develops his claim here with how he develops a claim in one section of Common Sense (1776)
Rewrite paragraph 1 with sentences 3 and 4 swapped, then explain what the change does to the development of the claim
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong answers name a specific move (a concession, a rule, a redefinition, a widened audience), quote the words that make it, and say how the claim is different afterward. Watch for summary in place of analysis ("this sentence talks about soldiers"), for labels with no effect, and for treating every sentence as "support." At the section level, students should explain what a section does for the essay's claim, not only what it is about.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Claim Chain Strips
15 minPairs
Pairs receive the sentences of Passage 2 cut into strips and build a chain that shows how Paine's claim about the Tories changes from the first paragraph to the third.
Materials
One set of strips per pair: the 18 sentences of Passage 2 (8 in paragraph 7, 4 in paragraph 8 and 6 in paragraph 9), each on its own strip, with its paragraph number on the back. Chart paper and markers.
Procedure
Choose one strip from each paragraph that best states Paine's claim about the Tories at that point
Tape the three strips in order and write between them what changed: the claim, the tone or the audience
Find one strip that develops a claim with a story and one that refines a claim with a qualification, and label each with a move from the table
Discussion Questions
Paragraph 7 speaks about the Tories; paragraph 8 speaks to them ("Your conduct is an invitation to the enemy"). What does the change from "they" to "you" do to the claim?
Paine says he felt "all that kind of anger, which a man ought to feel." Does the anecdote that follows prove the Tories are wrong, or does it do something else?
The last sentence of paragraph 9 is about the "flame of liberty" and "the coal." Is it still about the Tories? What larger claim has the paragraph reached?
Variation for a Shorter Class
Give each pair only paragraphs 7 and 9 and ask for one strip from each and one sentence describing the change.
2
Section Relay
20 minGroups of 3-4
Each group becomes expert on one section of the essay, writes the section's job in the argument, and the class lines the sections up to see how the larger portions build the whole.
Setup
Print the full essay from the source link (or project it) and assign Sections A, B, C, E, G and H from the Section Guide, one per group. Sections D and F are Passages 2 and 3, which the whole class reads in the lesson.
Procedure
Read the section and write its job on a sticky note in one sentence: "This section develops (or refines) the claim that ___ by ___"
Quote one sentence that does the most work in the section
Line up the sticky notes on the board in the essay's order, then add D and F as a class
Draw an arrow from any section to an earlier section it depends on, and label the arrow
Discussion Questions
Which sections could trade places without harming the argument, and which could not? Why?
Section C is the longest section (Diagram 2). Does length tell you how important a section is to the claim?
Which section would you cut if the essay had to be half as long, and what would the claim lose?
3
Claim Ladder
15 minIndividual, then pairs
Students write Paine's claim as one sentence at three points in the essay and compare the versions to see how the claim has been refined.
Procedure
After Passage 1, write Paine's claim in one sentence of your own
After Passage 2, rewrite the claim so it includes what paragraphs 7-9 added
After the Section Guide entry for Section H, write the final version
With a partner, circle the words that changed between versions and label each change: narrowed, widened, qualified or raised the stakes
Discussion Questions
Which version of your claim is the most precise? What did Paine write that made it possible?
Did any rung of your ladder go down (lose precision)? What does that tell you about the section in between?
Modification for English Learners
Give a starter for each rung: "Paine claims that ___ because ___."
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: How the Sentences of Paragraph 1 Build the Claim
Each bar is one sentence of Passage 1, drawn to scale by word count (8, 33, 24, 19, 29, 48 and 15 words). The dark bars mark the shortest sentence, which states the claim, and the longest, which redefines it. The right column names what each sentence does.
Diagram 2: The Whole Essay by Section
The 13 paragraphs of The American Crisis, Number I grouped into the eight sections of the Section Guide, drawn to scale by word count. Dark sections are printed on this page as Passages 2-4; Passage 1 is paragraph 1, in Section A.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RI.9-10.5 Homework: How Paragraph 10 Develops Paine's Claim
Directions: Use Passage 4 (paragraph 10) in the Closure phase of the lesson plan and the Section Guide. Quote exact words for every point. Answer Problems 1-5 in 3-5 sentences each; Problem 6 is a paragraph.
Part 1: Particular Sentences (Problems 1-2)
The paragraph opens: "America did not, nor does not want force; but she wanted a proper application of that force." (In 1776, "want" could mean "lack.") What distinction does this sentence set up, and how do the next three sentences develop it?
"I always considered militia as the best troops in the world for a sudden exertion, but they will not do for a long campaign." Explain how this sentence refines what Paine said about the militia two sentences earlier. Which word does the refining?
Part 2: The Paragraph (Problems 3-4)
Reread the sentences about Howe's attempt on Philadelphia, from "Howe, it is probable" through "it is impossible." How does Paine turn a threat into a reason for hope? Name the move and quote the sentence that makes it.
Near the end, Paine proposes that the property of Tories who help Howe be confiscated, then writes: "Say not that this is revenge, call it rather the soft resentment of a suffering people." What move is this (use the table from the lesson), and how does it refine his proposal? Is it convincing to you?
Part 3: Larger Portions (Problems 5-6)
Using the Section Guide, explain how paragraph 10 connects Section D (the Tories) to Section F (the appeal in Passage 3). Quote one sentence from paragraph 10 that looks back and one that prepares for what comes next.
Write a paragraph (150-200 words) that analyzes how one idea from paragraph 1 is developed or refined in paragraph 10. You might trace the value of hard experience ("What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly") or Paine's view of Britain's power. Quote both paragraphs and explain how the idea is different by paragraph 10.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Claim
States Paine's claim precisely at the point discussed
States the topic rather than the claim
Claim missing or inaccurate
Moves and Evidence
Names the move each sentence makes and quotes the exact words
Quotes without naming the move, or names it without quoting
No quotation and no move
Development and Refinement
Explains how the claim is different after the sentence, paragraph or section
Describes the sentence but not its effect on the claim
Summary only
Larger Portions
Connects paragraph 10 to other sections with quoted evidence from each
Makes the connection with evidence from one side only
No connection to other sections
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
All questions are about Passage 3 (paragraph 11 of the essay) in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan; questions 12-14 and 19 also use Passage 1 and the Section Guide in Direct Instruction. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which words state the main request of Passage 3?
Answer: B
The first sentence ends in two commands, "up and help us; lay your shoulders to the wheel," and every later sentence gives a reason to obey them. Choice A imagines how the request will be remembered; it does not make the request. Choice C introduces the reasoning at the end, not the request. Choice D praises a kind of person, which supports the request but does not state it.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"I call not upon a few, but upon all: not on this state or that state, but on every state." How does this part of the first sentence refine Paine's appeal?
Answer: C
The "not ... but" pattern appears twice, and each time it replaces a smaller group ("a few," "this state or that state") with a larger one ("all," "every state"). The appeal is refined by widening. Choice A reverses the move: the appeal reaches beyond the army. Choice B reads doubt into a sentence that shows none. Choice D invents content; no state is named.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"Let it be told to the future world, that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive, that the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet and to repulse it." What does this sentence add to the appeal?
Answer: A
"Let it be told to the future world" asks readers to imagine the story that will be told about them, so it develops the appeal with the motive of lasting honor. Choice B treats a hope as a report: the sentence describes what Paine wants to be told, not what has happened. Choice C misreads "the city and the country ... came forth" together as a disagreement. Choice D invents a claim about the war's end.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How do the two sentences "It matters not where you live, or what rank of life you hold, the evil or the blessing will reach you all" and "The far and the near, the home counties and the back, the rich and the poor, will suffer or rejoice alike" develop the appeal?
Answer: D
The first sentence states the idea in general terms ("where you live," "rank of life"); the second gives three pairs of opposites ("far and the near," "home counties and the back," "rich and the poor"), so readers can find themselves in the list. Choice B misses that the wording changes from general to specific. Choice A adds a subject the passage does not mention. Choice C invents a source; the sentences are Paine's own claim.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What role does "The heart that feels not now is dead; the blood of his children will curse his cowardice, who shrinks back at a time when a little might have saved the whole, and made them happy" play in the passage?
Answer: B
The sentence describes what happens to the one "who shrinks back": his own children will "curse his cowardice." It develops the appeal from the negative side. Choice A reverses its target; the sentence is aimed at those who have not acted. Choice C ignores "cowardice" and "dead," which condemn holding back. Choice D adds a topic that is not in the passage.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The next two sentences begin "I love the man that can smile in trouble" and "'Tis the business of little minds to shrink." How do they relate to the sentence about "The heart that feels not now"?
Answer: C
After the portrait of the man "who shrinks back," Paine gives its opposite: a man who can "gather strength from distress" and "will pursue his principles unto death." The pair gives readers a model to follow as well as one to avoid. Choice A misreads "little minds," which is a rebuke. Choice B misses the change from warning to praise. Choice D ignores that "trouble" and "distress" refer to the crisis.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"My own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light." What does this sentence do in the structure of the passage?
Answer: D
Up to this point the passage appeals to honor, shared danger and shame. This sentence announces "reasoning," and the next three sentences are an argument by analogy. It works as a hinge between two kinds of support. Choice A is wrong because the argument comes after it. Choice B reverses "straight and clear." Choice C confuses it with the second sentence.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Paine writes that nothing "could have induced me to support an offensive war, for I think it murder," before he describes the thief. How does this clause refine his claim?
Answer: A
The clause is a concession that limits the claim: he supports only a war of defense. The analogy that follows (a thief who "breaks into my house") then shows that this war fits that limit. Choice B stops reading at the concession and misses the "but" that follows. Choice C confuses his word "murder," used for offensive war, with a charge against Britain. Choice D reverses the move: the clause narrows.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"What signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them?" What does this question do to the thief analogy?
Answer: C
The question sets pairs side by side ("a king or a common man," "an individual villain, or an army of them") and implies that none of the differences matter. Without it, a reader could say a king is not a thief; with it, the analogy covers George III and his army. Choice A reads doubt into a question whose answer Paine thinks is obvious. Choice B misses that the question denies any difference. Choice D takes the analogy literally.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What is the role of the last sentence of the excerpt: "If we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other"?
Answer: B
"We shall find no difference" answers the question before it, and "punish in the one case and pardon in the other" states the conclusion: resisting a king is as just as resisting a burglar. Choice A mistakes the conclusion for an objection. Choice C reverses "punish" and "pardon." Choice D confuses it with the earlier portrait of the man who can "smile in trouble."
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which description best fits the order of Passage 3 as a whole?
Answer: D
The passage opens with a call ("up and help us"), gives reasons based on honor and shared danger, contrasts the one "who shrinks back" with the one who can "smile in trouble," and ends with the thief analogy. Choice A fits Section C of the essay, the eyewitness report, not this passage. Choice B describes the start of Passage 2. Choice C invents a plan and a budget.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Passage 3 the thief sets out to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his will. Which earlier sentence does this echo, and what does the echo do to the claim?
Answer: A
Paragraph 1 quotes Britain's claim of a right "to BIND us in ALL CASES WHATSOEVER" and calls it slavery. Paragraph 11 puts the same words in the mouth of a housebreaker, so an abstract claim of power becomes a personal attack that any reader would resist. The echo refines the opening claim into an argument for self-defense. Choice B misreads the tavern keeper, whom Paine criticizes. Choice C mismatches the phrases. Choice D quotes paragraph 10, which does not contain the words.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Passage 3 opens with "Quitting this class of men, I turn with the warm ardor of a friend to those who have nobly stood." Using the Section Guide, what does this opening show about how Paine builds the essay?
Answer: C
"Quitting this class of men" looks back to the Tories, who are the subject of paragraphs 7-10, and "I turn ... to those who have nobly stood" names the new audience. One sentence both ends a section and begins the next. Choice A confuses it with Section C. Choice B is wrong because Sections G and H follow. Choice D misses the word "Quitting."
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to the Section Guide, the essay ends with Section H, which sets "perseverance and fortitude" against "cowardice and submission." Which earlier sentence of the essay does this ending most directly develop?
Answer: B
Paragraph 1 divides people into those who "shrink" and those who stand; Section H returns to the same choice in new words, now tied to the outcome for the whole country. The ending develops the opening claim into a choice between two futures. Choice A is about the value of freedom, not the reader's choice between two ways of acting. Choice C is addressed to the Tories. Choice D is a military prediction from paragraph 10.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Explain how the first two sentences of Passage 3 develop Paine's appeal. Quote at least two phrases and name the move each one makes.
Model answer: The first sentence makes the request ("up and help us; lay your shoulders to the wheel") and widens its audience with "not on this state or that state, but on every state," so no one is left out. The second sentence develops the request with a motive: "Let it be told to the future world" asks readers to imagine the honor of being remembered as the people who "came forth to meet and to repulse" the danger "in the depth of winter." The first sentence says what to do; the second says why it will matter. Rubric: full credit for two quoted phrases with a correctly named move for each and an explanation of how the appeal grows; partial credit for one.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Paine writes "Say not that thousands are gone, turn out your tens of thousands." What objection is he answering, and how does the sentence refine his appeal?
Model answer: He answers the objection that the army has already lost too many men ("thousands are gone"), perhaps through the retreat and the end of enlistments. Instead of denying the loss, he turns it into a larger demand: "tens of thousands." The sentence refines the appeal by answering a reason for despair with a bigger goal, and the next clause ("throw not the burden of the day upon Providence") refines it again: readers cannot wait for God to act for them. Rubric: full credit for naming the objection, quoting the reply and explaining how the appeal becomes larger or more demanding; partial credit for naming the objection only.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Analyze how the thief analogy (from "Not all the treasures of the world" to "pardon in the other") develops and refines Paine's claim that Americans should fight. Refer to at least three sentences.
Model answer: The first sentence concedes a limit, that he would never support "an offensive war, for I think it murder," and then describes a thief who "breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property" and tries to "bind me in all cases whatsoever." This narrows the claim: the war is justified because it is defense. The second sentence, a question, removes the special status of a king: it does not matter "whether he who does it is a king or a common man." The third draws the conclusion that there is no "just cause" to "punish in the one case and pardon in the other." By the end the claim is more precise: fighting Britain is not rebellion for gain but the same self-defense anyone would use against a burglar. Rubric: full credit for three sentences, each with its move (concession, analogy, question, conclusion) and a statement of how the claim has changed; partial credit for describing the analogy without the refinement.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Why might Paine place the appeals to honor and shame before the "line of reasoning" instead of after it? Explain the effect of this order on readers in December 1776.
Model answer: Readers who had watched the army retreat were discouraged, so Paine first gives them reasons to feel something: the honor of being remembered ("Let it be told to the future world"), the shared danger ("the evil or the blessing will reach you all") and the shame of the one "who shrinks back." Once they are moved, he gives them reasoning that makes the feeling look justified: the war is like defending your house against a thief. Ending on "punish in the one case and pardon in the other" leaves readers with an argument they can repeat, not only a mood. The order builds the claim from the heart to the head. Rubric: full credit for describing the order accurately with quotations and explaining its effect on the 1776 audience; partial credit for describing the order without the effect.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Using the Section Guide, explain how Section F (Passage 3) prepares for Section G, where Paine warns that Howe's offer of mercy "is only a trick of war." Quote Passage 3.
Model answer: Passage 3 ends by arguing that there is no reason to "pardon" a king who acts like a thief, so readers are ready to hear that they should not accept pardon or "mercy" from his general either. The thief who wants to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" does not become safe by offering mercy. Section G then refines this into a practical warning: giving up your arms in exchange for mercy would ruin every state. Section F gives the principle; Section G applies it to Howe's offer. Rubric: full credit for a link between the end of Passage 3 and Section G, supported by a quotation, and an explanation of how the claim is carried forward; partial credit for a link with no quotation.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Choose one sentence in Passage 3 that you think does the most to develop Paine's claim. Explain what move it makes and what the passage would lose without it.
Model answer (one possible answer): "What signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man ...?" makes the most difference. Without it, the thief analogy would describe an ordinary crime, and a loyal reader could reply that a king is not a burglar. The question removes that reply by listing the differences (king or common man, countryman or not, one villain or an army) and treating each as meaningless, so the conclusion that follows ("no difference") applies to Britain. Without it, the passage would end with an analogy that readers could refuse. Rubric: accept any sentence defended with a correctly named move, a quotation and a clear account of what would be lost; full credit requires the account of what would be lost; partial credit for naming the move only.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RI.9-10.5 mean?
RI.9-10.5 asks students to analyze in detail how an author's ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs or larger portions of a text, such as a section or chapter. "RI" means Reading Informational Text and "9-10" is the grade band. In practice, students explain what a specific part of a text does to the author's claim and quote the words that do it.
What is the difference between "developed" and "refined" in RI.9-10.5?
A claim is developed when it gains support and refined when it becomes more precise. Reasons, examples, stories and analogies develop a claim. Concessions, qualifications, new definitions and a widened or narrowed audience refine it. In paragraph 1 of The American Crisis, the rule "it is dearness only that gives every thing its value" develops the claim, and the redefinition of Britain's claim as "slavery" refines it.
How is RI.9-10.5 different from RI.11-12.5?
RI.9-10.5 asks students to analyze how parts of a text develop and refine claims. RI.11-12.5 asks them to analyze and also evaluate the structure of an exposition or argument, including whether it makes the points clear, convincing and engaging. In grades 9-10 the question is "what does this part do?"; in grades 11-12 it adds "does the structure work, and how well?"
What counts as a "larger portion" of a text?
A larger portion is any stretch longer than a paragraph that does one job for the whole: a section, a chapter, or a group of paragraphs on one subject. The standard names a section or chapter as examples. In this lesson the Section Guide divides Paine's 13 paragraphs into eight sections, and students explain what a section, such as the eyewitness report in paragraphs 5-6, does for the essay's claim.
How is RI.9-10.5 different from RI.9-10.3?
RI.9-10.3 is about how an author unfolds a series of ideas or events and the connections between them; RI.9-10.5 zooms in on how particular parts develop and refine a claim. The two work well together: RI.9-10.3 asks for the order and links, and RI.9-10.5 asks what a given sentence or section contributes.
How do I keep students from just labeling sentences?
Require three things in every answer: the move, the quoted words and the change in the claim. A label alone ("this is a concession") earns partial credit. The Claim Ladder activity helps, because students must rewrite the claim after each part and circle what changed.
Why teach RI.9-10.5 with Thomas Paine's The American Crisis?
Paine wrote to change what readers would do in a specific month, so almost every sentence has a visible job. The essay is short (13 paragraphs), divides clearly into sections, and is in the public domain, so the page can quote it exactly. Its famous opening also gives students a sentence they may already know, which they can now analyze instead of only recognize.
Is RI.9-10.5 only for arguments?
No. The standard says "ideas or claims," so it applies to explanations, reports, biographies and science writing as well as arguments. In an informational article, students might analyze how a definition in one paragraph is refined by an example in the next, or how a section on causes prepares for a section on effects.
How is RI.9-10.5 usually assessed?
It is usually assessed with questions about the role of a specific sentence or paragraph, such as "How does paragraph 3 develop the author's claim?" or "Which sentence best refines the idea in the opening?", and with short written analyses. The quiz on this page uses both kinds, plus questions that connect a passage to the rest of the essay.
How does RI.9-10.5 connect to student writing?
Students who can see how a writer develops and refines a claim can plan their own arguments the same way. W.9-10.1 asks students to develop claims and use words and clauses that link the major sections of a text. After this lesson, students can outline an essay by writing the job of each paragraph, then check their drafts with the same move table.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to RI.9-10.5: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RI.8.5Prerequisite
Analyze a paragraph's structure and how sentences develop and refine a key concept
Lesson coming soon
Alongside
RI.9-10.3Parallel
Analyze how an author unfolds a series of ideas, including their order and connections