SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

RI.7.6Common CoreELAReading Informational TextGrade 7

RI.7.6: Author's Point of View and How an Author Sets a Position Apart

In plain English: RI.7.6 is the Common Core grade 7 ELA standard that asks students to determine an author's point of view or purpose in an informational text. Students then analyze how the author distinguishes his or her position from the positions of others, for example by quoting an opposing claim and answering it. It builds on RI.6.6.

Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how the author distinguishes his or her position from that of others.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Informational Text · Cluster: Craft and Structure · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

55-65 min

Overview

Students learn to determine an author's point of view (what the author thinks or feels about a subject) and purpose (why the author is writing), and then to analyze how the author distinguishes, or sets apart, his or her position from the positions of others. In practice this means noticing where a text reports what other people think, how the author signals that those views are not the author's own, and how the author answers them.

The main text is the last chapter of John Muir's The Yosemite (1912), written while the city of San Francisco was asking the federal government for permission to dam the Hetch Hetchy Valley, a valley inside Yosemite National Park, and turn it into a reservoir. Muir reports what the dam's supporters say and gives his own view in reply, which makes the skill easy to see. The homework adds a passage by Gifford Pinchot, the first chief of the U.S. Forest Service, who defined conservation differently and supported the dam. An invented student letter about a school garden opens the lesson.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • State an author's point of view on an issue in one sentence, supported by a quotation
  • Determine an author's purpose and explain which details reveal it
  • Identify where an author reports another person's or group's position, and the signals that show it is not the author's own
  • Analyze how an author answers an opposing view, for example with facts, experience, an expert who agrees or strong labels
  • Compare how two authors on opposite sides set their positions apart

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Determining an author's point of view or purpose and explaining how it is conveyed RI.6.6
  • Telling a fact from an opinion
  • Recognizing a claim and the reasons that support it RI.6.8
  • Quoting a text accurately with quotation marks and a paragraph number

Lesson Procedure

55-65 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5-10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "Read the letter below. Highlight in one color every sentence that tells what other people think. Highlight in another color every sentence that tells what Priya thinks. Then write her position in one sentence."

    Some students say the old garden behind the gym is a waste of space. They want to pave it and build a second basketball court. I understand why. The one court we have is crowded every lunch, and many students wait the whole period without playing.

    But the garden is not wasted. Last spring, our science classes counted 14 kinds of birds there, and the sixth graders grew enough tomatoes for two class salad days. Others say no one uses the garden. That is only true in winter. From April to June, the garden club meets there every Tuesday and Thursday.

    A new court could go on the empty blacktop by the parking lot, where nothing would be lost. Let's build the court, but not on top of the only green place we have.

    Priya S., grade 7

    Written for this page, Keep the Garden (an invented letter to a school newspaper, for the warm-up and Activity 3). Original passage written for this page.

    Share the highlighting. Students should find two sentences that report other people's views, both marked with a signal: "Some students say" (paragraph 1) and "Others say" (paragraph 2). Everything else is Priya's own view. Her position: the new court should be built on the blacktop, not on the garden. Write point of view, purpose and position on the board, and tell students that RI.7.6 asks two things: what the author thinks, and how the author keeps her view separate from everyone else's. Today's author does this on a much larger stage, in a real fight over a national park.

  2. Direct Instruction15 minutes

    Teach five terms and leave them on the board:

    • Point of view: what the author thinks or feels about the subject. In informational texts, this is the author's opinion or perspective, not first or third person.
    • Purpose: why the author wrote the text, such as to inform, to explain, to persuade or to remember an event.
    • Position: the side an author takes on an issue where people disagree.
    • Opposing view: a position that disagrees with the author's. Authors often report it with signals such as "some say," "they claim" or quotation marks.
    • Rebuttal: the author's answer to an opposing view, which tries to show it is wrong or weaker.

    Introduce the text. John Muir (1838-1914) was a naturalist and writer who helped found the Sierra Club and spent years exploring the Sierra Nevada. Yosemite National Park was created by an act of Congress in 1890. The Hetch Hetchy Valley, about twenty miles from the famous Yosemite Valley, has granite cliffs and waterfalls of its own. In the early 1900s, San Francisco asked to build a dam across the Tuolumne River there to store water and make electricity for the city. Muir fought the plan; this chapter, written as the decision was still being made, is his case. Words to know for Passage 1: rock-bound (closed in by rock), sublime (so grand it fills you with awe), repose (rest), frail and fleeting (weak and short-lived), types of permanence (examples of things that last), communion (close sharing of thoughts and feelings), reservoir (a lake made to store water), grossly (very badly), commercial scheme (a plan to make money), urged (pushed for), comparative cheapness (costing less than other choices), divert (turn to another use) and dedicated (set aside for a purpose).

    It appears, therefore, that Hetch Hetchy Valley, far from being a plain, common, rock-bound meadow, as many who have not seen it seem to suppose, is a grand landscape garden, one of Nature’s rarest and most precious mountain temples. As in Yosemite, the sublime rocks of its walls seem to glow with life, whether leaning back in repose or standing erect in thoughtful attitudes, giving welcome to storms and calms alike, their brows in the sky, their feet set in the groves and gay flowery meadows, while birds, bees, and butterflies help the river and waterfalls to stir all the air into music—things frail and fleeting and types of permanence meeting here and blending, just as they do in Yosemite, to draw her lovers into close and confiding communion with her.

    Sad to say, this most precious and sublime feature of the Yosemite National Park, one of the greatest of all our natural resources for the uplifting joy and peace and health of the people, is in danger of being dammed and made into a reservoir to help supply San Francisco with water and light, thus flooding it from wall to wall and burying its gardens and groves one or two hundred feet deep. This grossly destructive commercial scheme has long been planned and urged (though water as pure and abundant can be got from outside of the people’s park, in a dozen different places), because of the comparative cheapness of the dam and of the territory which it is sought to divert from the great uses to which it was dedicated in the Act of 1890 establishing the Yosemite National Park.

    John Muir, The Yosemite, chapter 16, "Hetch Hetchy Valley" (Passage 1: a garden, not a meadow) (1912). Public domain (published 1912). Source text.
    • Point of view

      Paragraph 1 calls Hetch Hetchy "a grand landscape garden, one of Nature's rarest and most precious mountain temples." What is Muir's point of view on the valley?

      Result: Muir sees the valley as rare, beautiful and almost holy. The words "rarest," "precious" and "temples" show admiration and reverence (deep respect), not just description. A one-sentence statement: Muir believes Hetch Hetchy is one of nature's rarest treasures and should be treated like a sacred place.

    • How the author marks another view

      In the same sentence Muir writes that the valley is "far from being a plain, common, rock-bound meadow, as many who have not seen it seem to suppose." Whose view is "a plain, common, rock-bound meadow," and how does Muir set his own view apart from it?

      Result: It is the view of other people, the "many" who "seem to suppose" it. The words "far from being" reject that view, and "who have not seen it" hints that those people are judging a place they do not know. Muir, who has seen it, puts his firsthand knowledge against their guess.

    • Purpose

      Paragraph 2 begins "Sad to say" and warns that the valley "is in danger of being dammed and made into a reservoir." What is Muir's purpose in this chapter, and which details show it?

      Result: His purpose is to persuade readers to oppose the dam. "Sad to say" and "in danger" are a warning, and the paragraph names the harm ("flooding it from wall to wall and burying its gardens and groves"). He also offers another answer in parentheses: "water as pure and abundant can be got from outside of the people's park, in a dozen different places." A writer who only wanted to inform would not add that.

    • A second author: answering with a fact

      In the warm-up letter, Priya writes, "Others say no one uses the garden. That is only true in winter." How does she set her position apart here?

      Result: She first reports the other view, marked with the signal "Others say," and then answers it with a fact she can check: "From April to June, the garden club meets there every Tuesday and Thursday." The reader can see both positions and the reason Priya gives for hers.

    Think, mark, answer. Show Diagram 1 and fill in the first row together: what the other side says, how Muir marks it, and what Muir says instead. Then post Diagram 2, the five questions, and walk through them for Passage 1. Give students a sentence frame: "Others believe ___, but the author thinks ___. The author sets this position apart by ___."

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Read Passage 2 aloud. It follows Passage 1 directly. Words to know: civilization (an organized society), made manifest (shown clearly), geranium slip (a cutting from a geranium plant), botanical gardens (gardens where plants are grown for study and display), despoiling (robbing, ruining), gainseekers (people seeking profit), mischief-makers (troublemakers), philanthropy (doing good for others), smug-smiling (smiling in a self-satisfied way), shampiously (a word Muir built from "sham," meaning fake, and "piously," meaning in a religious or dutiful way), panutilization (another made-up word: using everything), enterprising (bold in business), reservation (land set aside), strife (conflict) and shorn (cut short). Muir refers to the Bible's story of Jesus driving the money changers out of the temple in Jerusalem, and to the garden of Eden.

    The making of gardens and parks goes on with civilization all over the world, and they increase both in size and number as their value is recognized. Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in, where Nature may heal and cheer and give strength to body and soul alike. This natural beauty-hunger is made manifest in the little window-sill gardens of the poor, though perhaps only a geranium slip in a broken cup, as well as in the carefully tended rose and lily gardens of the rich, the thousands of spacious city parks and botanical gardens, and in our magnificent National parks—the Yellowstone, Yosemite, Sequoia, etc.—Nature’s sublime wonderlands, the admiration and joy of the world. Nevertheless, like anything else worth while, from the very beginning, however well guarded, they have always been subject to attack by despoiling gainseekers and mischief-makers of every degree from Satan to Senators, eagerly trying to make everything immediately and selfishly commercial, with schemes disguised in smug-smiling philanthropy, industriously, shampiously crying, “Conservation, conservation, panutilization,” that man and beast may be fed and the dear Nation made great. Thus long ago a few enterprising merchants utilized the Jerusalem temple as a place of business instead of a place of prayer, changing money, buying and selling cattle and sheep and doves; and earlier still, the first forest reservation, including only one tree, was likewise despoiled. Ever since the establishment of the Yosemite National Park, strife has been going on around its borders and I suppose this will go on as part of the universal battle between right and wrong, however much its boundaries may be shorn, or its wild beauty destroyed.

    John Muir, The Yosemite, chapter 16, "Hetch Hetchy Valley" (Passage 2: beauty as well as bread) (1912). Public domain (published 1912). Source text.

    Pairs answer four questions with the five-question card (Diagram 2). Share the teacher note after pairs have tried:

    1. Which sentence gives Muir's point of view about why parks matter? Teacher note: "Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in, where Nature may heal and cheer and give strength to body and soul alike." He argues that parks meet a need of every person, from the "window-sill gardens of the poor" to the national parks.
    2. What names does Muir give the people on the other side? Teacher note: "despoiling gainseekers and mischief-makers of every degree from Satan to Senators." These are loaded labels, words chosen for their strong feelings. He does not name one real person; he makes the whole group sound greedy and harmful.
    3. What does Muir do with the other side's own word, "Conservation"? Teacher note: he puts "Conservation, conservation, panutilization" in quotation marks, which shows these are their words, not his, and he says they are crying it "shampiously" in "schemes disguised in smug-smiling philanthropy." He suggests that their good-sounding word hides a plan to make money.
    4. How does Muir expect the fight to go on? Teacher note: "I suppose this will go on as part of the universal battle between right and wrong." Muir does not present the dam as a simple difference of opinion. He places himself on the side of right, which leaves no middle ground for the reader.
  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Students read Passages 3 and 4 on their own. Passage 3 follows Passage 2 directly; Passage 4 comes one paragraph later. Words to know: application (a formal request), supervisors (members of the city's governing board), Secretary of the Interior (the member of the President's cabinet in charge of national parks), presumably (it seems likely), aggregation (a collection), practicable (possible to do), sojourn (stay for a while), commission (a group chosen to study a question), cañon (canyon), excursions (trips), submerged (put under water), watershed (the land that drains into a river or lake), outrageous (shocking), incredible (impossible to believe), proponents (people who argue for something), righteous (morally right), devised (planned) and misleading (giving a wrong idea). Mr. Hitchcock, Mr. Garfield and Mr. Fisher were three Secretaries of the Interior.

    The first application to the Government by the San Francisco Supervisors for the commercial use of Lake Eleanor and the Hetch Hetchy Valley was made in 1903, and on December 22nd of that year it was denied by the Secretary of the Interior, Mr. Hitchcock, who truthfully said:

    Presumably the Yosemite National Park was created such by law because within its boundaries, inclusive alike of its beautiful small lakes, like Eleanor, and its majestic wonders, like Hetch Hetchy and Yosemite Valley. It is the aggregation of such natural scenic features that makes the Yosemite Park a wonderland which the Congress of the United States sought by law to reserve for all coming time as nearly as practicable in the condition fashioned by the hand of the Creator—a worthy object of national pride and a source of healthful pleasure and rest for the thousands of people who may annually sojourn there during the heated months.

    In 1907 when Mr. Garfield became Secretary of the Interior the application was renewed and granted; but under his successor, Mr. Fisher, the matter has been referred to a Commission, which as this volume goes to press still has it under consideration.

    The most delightful and wonderful camp grounds in the Park are its three great valleys—Yosemite, Hetch Hetchy, and Upper Tuolumne; and they are also the most important places with reference to their positions relative to the other great features—the Merced and Tuolumne Cañons, and the High Sierra peaks and glaciers, etc., at the head of the rivers. The main part of the Tuolumne Valley is a spacious flowery lawn four or five miles long, surrounded by magnificent snowy mountains, slightly separated from other beautiful meadows, which together make a series about twelve miles in length, the highest reaching to the feet of Mount Dana, Mount Gibbs, Mount Lyell and Mount McClure. It is about 8500 feet above the sea, and forms the grand central High Sierra camp ground from which excursions are made to the noble mountains, domes, glaciers, etc.; across the Range to the Mono Lake and volcanoes and down the Tuolumne Cañon to Hetch Hetchy. Should Hetch Hetchy be submerged for a reservoir, as proposed, not only would it be utterly destroyed, but the sublime cañon way to the heart of the High Sierra would be hopelessly blocked and the great camping ground, as the watershed of a city drinking system, virtually would be closed to the public. So far as I have learned, few of all the thousands who have seen the park and seek rest and peace in it are in favor of this outrageous scheme.

    John Muir, The Yosemite, chapter 16, "Hetch Hetchy Valley" (Passage 3: the applications, the Secretary's answer and the camp grounds) (1912). Public domain (published 1912). Source text.

    That any one would try to destroy such a place seems incredible; but sad experience shows that there are people good enough and bad enough for anything. The proponents of the dam scheme bring forward a lot of bad arguments to prove that the only righteous thing to do with the people’s parks is to destroy them bit by bit as they are able. Their arguments are curiously like those of the devil, devised for the destruction of the first garden—so much of the very best Eden fruit going to waste; so much of the best Tuolumne water and Tuolumne scenery going to waste. Few of their statements are even partly true, and all are misleading.

    Thus, Hetch Hetchy, they say, is a “low-lying meadow.” On the contrary, it is a high-lying natural landscape garden, as the photographic illustrations show.

    “It is a common minor feature, like thousands of others.” On the contrary it is a very uncommon feature; after Yosemite, the rarest and in many ways the most important in the National Park.

    John Muir, The Yosemite, chapter 16, "Hetch Hetchy Valley" (Passage 4: "they say" and "On the contrary") (1912). Public domain (published 1912). Source text.

    On the handout, students (1) highlight every place in Passages 3 and 4 where Muir reports what someone else thinks or says; (2) sort each one: an opponent or someone who agrees with Muir; (3) fill in the Passage 4 row of Diagram 1 with one claim Muir answers; (4) write one sentence stating Muir's point of view and one stating his purpose. The quiz uses Passages 3, 4 and 5.

  5. Closure5-10 minutes

    Read Passage 5, the end of the chapter, aloud. Words to know: submerging (putting under water), enhance (improve), sham (fake), forsooth (an old word meaning "indeed" or "in truth"), dismal (gloomy), blot (a stain), basin (the bowl-shaped land that holds a lake), drift (things carried along by water), sepulcher (a tomb), unpollutable (unable to be made dirty), sewerage (sewage, human and animal waste), devotees (devoted followers), ravaging (destroying), commercialism (putting profit first), contempt (scorn) and consecrated (made holy).

    “Damming and submerging it 175 feet deep would enhance its beauty by forming a crystal-clear lake.” Landscape gardens, places of recreation and worship, are never made beautiful by destroying and burying them. The beautiful sham lake, forsooth, should be only an eyesore, a dismal blot on the landscape, like many others to be seen in the Sierra. For, instead of keeping it at the same level all the year, allowing Nature centuries of time to make new shores, it would, of course, be full only a month or two in the spring, when the snow is melting fast; then it would be gradually drained, exposing the slimy sides of the basin and shallower parts of the bottom, with the gathered drift and waste, death and decay of the upper basins, caught here instead of being swept on to decent natural burial along the banks of the river or in the sea. Thus the Hetch Hetchy dam-lake would be only a rough imitation of a natural lake for a few of the spring months, an open sepulcher for the others.

    “Hetch Hetchy water is the purest of all to be found in the Sierra, unpolluted, and forever unpollutable.” On the contrary, excepting that of the Merced below Yosemite, it is less pure than that of most of the other Sierra streams, because of the sewerage of camp grounds draining into it, especially of the Big Tuolumne Meadows camp ground, occupied by hundreds of tourists and mountaineers, with their animals, for months every summer, soon to be followed by thousands from all the world.

    These temple destroyers, devotees of ravaging commercialism, seem to have a perfect contempt for Nature, and, instead of lifting their eyes to the God of the mountains, lift them to the Almighty Dollar.

    Dam Hetch Hetchy! As well dam for water-tanks the people’s cathedrals and churches, for no holier temple has ever been consecrated by the heart of man.

    John Muir, The Yosemite, chapter 16, "Hetch Hetchy Valley" (Passage 5: the lake, the water and the last words) (1912). Public domain (published 1912). Source text.

    Exit ticket: (1) Write Muir's position on the dam in one sentence. (2) Name one way Muir sets his position apart from the dam's supporters in Passage 5, and quote the words that show it.

    Teacher note on the history and the language: Muir wrote this chapter while the decision was still open. In December 1913 Congress passed the Raker Act, which allowed San Francisco to build the dam, and President Woodrow Wilson signed it on December 19, 1913; Muir died a year later. O'Shaughnessy Dam was finished in 1923, and the valley lies under the reservoir today. The reservoir still supplies much of San Francisco's water, which is known for its purity, so students can weigh Muir's prediction in Passage 5 against what happened. Muir uses many religious comparisons (Satan, the devil and Eden, the temple in Jerusalem, cathedrals and churches). They are part of how he frames the dispute; students need to understand them to analyze his point of view, and the lesson does not ask them to share any belief. Muir also describes his opponents in harsh terms. Point out that strong labels are a way of setting a position apart, not proof, and that the other side had reasons too, which the homework lets students read in Pinchot's own words.

    For homework: students read Passage 6, printed below. Gifford Pinchot (1865-1946) led the U.S. Forest Service from 1905 to 1910 and helped make "conservation" a household word. He and Muir had once been friends, but they disagreed about Hetch Hetchy, and Pinchot spoke in favor of the dam when Congress considered it in 1913. This passage, from his 1910 book, explains what he believed conservation means. Words to know: fundamental (basic), misconception (a mistaken idea), husbanding (saving carefully), provision (preparing), welfare (well-being), neglecting (failing to care for or use), vital essence (the most necessary part), descendants (the people who come after us), emphatically (strongly), water-power (electricity or work made from moving water) and navigable waterways (rivers and canals that boats can use).

    The first great fact about conservation is that it stands for development. There has been a fundamental misconception that conservation means nothing but the husbanding of resources for future generations. There could be no more serious mistake. Conservation does mean provision for the future, but it means also and first of all the recognition of the right of the present generation to the fullest necessary use of all the resources with which this country is so abundantly blessed. Conservation demands the welfare of this generation first, and afterward the welfare of the generations to follow.

    The first principle of conservation is development, the use of the natural resources now existing on this continent for the benefit of the people who live here now. There may be just as much waste in neglecting the development and use of certain natural resources as there is in their destruction. We have a limited supply of coal, and only a limited supply. Whether it is to last for a hundred or a hundred and fifty or a thousand years, the coal is limited in amount, unless through geological changes which we shall not live to see, there will never be any more of it than there is now. But coal is in a sense the vital essence of our civilization. If it can be preserved, if the life of the mines can be extended, if by preventing waste there can be more coal left in this country after we of this generation have made every needed use of this source of power, then we shall have deserved well of our descendants.

    Conservation stands emphatically for the development and use of water-power now, without delay. It stands for the immediate construction of navigable waterways under a broad and comprehensive plan as assistants to the railroads. More coal and more iron are required to move a ton of freight by rail than by water, three to one. In every case and in every direction the conservation movement has development for its first principle, and at the very beginning of its work. The development of our natural resources and the fullest use of them for the present generation is the first duty of this generation. So much for development.

    Gifford Pinchot, The Fight for Conservation, chapter IV, "Principles of Conservation" (Passage 6: conservation means development) (1910). Public domain (published 1910). Source text.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give them Passages 3 and 4 with the signal words ("they say," "On the contrary," "who truthfully said") already underlined
  • Let them fill in Diagram 1 with the "Muir says" column already written, so they look only for the other side's words
  • Offer a sentence frame for every answer: "Others think ___. Muir thinks ___. He shows the difference by ___."

For Advanced Students

  • Ask them to list every label Muir gives the dam's supporters across all five passages and rank them from mildest to harshest, then explain what the pattern shows
  • Have them rewrite one paragraph of Passage 4 in a calm, neutral voice and explain what Muir's version gains and loses
  • Ask them to find one place where Muir says something about the other side that the passages do not prove, and explain how a careful reader should treat it

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Check that students can state the author's point of view in their own words and name a purpose with a reason, not just "to persuade." For RI.7.6's second part, strong answers point to the exact words where the author reports the other view (quotation marks, "they say," "many ... seem to suppose") and then explain how the author answers it. Watch for three weak spots: mixing up Muir's words with the words he quotes from others, treating a strong label as if it were evidence, and describing what the other side believes without saying how the author sets his position apart from it.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Whose Words Are These?

15 minPairs

Each pair gets eight quotation strips from Passages 1 and 2 and the warm-up letter. Pairs sort them into two piles: the author's own position, and another group's position as the author reports it. Then they circle the words on each strip that helped them decide.

The Eight Strips

  1. "as many who have not seen it seem to suppose" (Passage 1)
  2. "a grand landscape garden, one of Nature's rarest and most precious mountain temples" (Passage 1)
  3. "because of the comparative cheapness of the dam" (Passage 1)
  4. "Everybody needs beauty as well as bread" (Passage 2)
  5. "Conservation, conservation, panutilization" (Passage 2)
  6. "that man and beast may be fed and the dear Nation made great" (Passage 2)
  7. "Some students say the old garden behind the gym is a waste of space." (letter)
  8. "Let's build the court, but not on top of the only green place we have." (letter)

Procedure

  • Pairs read each strip in its sentence in the passage before sorting it
  • They circle the signal: a phrase such as "seem to suppose" or "Some students say," quotation marks, or a word that shows the author's attitude
  • Answer key for the teacher: the author's own position, strips 2, 4 and 8; another group's position or reasons as the author reports them, strips 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7. Strips 3 and 6 are the hardest: they give the other side's reasons in Muir's words. In strip 6, "the dear Nation" is sarcastic, so the wording is Muir's even though the reason belongs to his opponents

Discussion Questions

  • Which strips could you sort only by going back to the passage? Why?
  • How can an author report someone else's reason and still show that he disagrees with it?
  • Which signal was the clearest, and which was the easiest to miss?

Modification

For students who need support, start with strips 7 and 8 from the letter, where the signals are plain, before moving to Muir.

2

Say It Three Ways

15 minGroups of 3-4

Groups rewrite one sentence from Passage 1 three times: as Muir wrote it, in neutral words, and as a supporter of the dam might say it. Comparing the three versions shows how word choice keeps Muir's position separate from the other side's.

The Sentence

"This grossly destructive commercial scheme has long been planned and urged (though water as pure and abundant can be got from outside of the people's park, in a dozen different places), because of the comparative cheapness of the dam and of the territory." (Passage 1, paragraph 2)

Procedure

  • Groups underline every word in Muir's sentence that shows his attitude
  • They write a neutral version that keeps the facts and drops the attitude
  • They write a version a dam supporter in San Francisco might say, using only reasons named in Passages 1 and 2
  • Model answers for the teacher: neutral, "The plan to build a dam has been proposed for years, partly because it would cost less than other water sources." Supporter, "Our city has worked for years on a plan that would bring water and light to San Francisco at a fair cost." Muir's version adds "grossly destructive" and "commercial scheme," and the words in parentheses give his answer inside the sentence itself

Discussion Questions

  • Which facts stayed the same in all three versions?
  • Which version would a reader who has not decided trust most? Why?
  • Muir puts his answer in parentheses. What does that placement do?
3

Answer the Letter

10-15 minPairs

Pairs write a short reply to Priya's letter from the warm-up, from a student who wants the second court on the garden site. The reply must report Priya's position fairly, mark it clearly as hers, and then answer it.

Requirements

  • Four to six sentences
  • At least one signal that shows a view is Priya's (for example, "Priya writes that ...")
  • At least one answer that uses a reason or a fact, not only a strong word
  • No insults: the reply must be one that Priya could read without feeling mocked

Procedure

  • Pairs draft the reply, then trade with another pair
  • The other pair highlights, in two colors, the reply's report of Priya's view and the writer's own view
  • Model answer for the teacher: "Priya writes that the garden is not wasted because the garden club uses it in spring. That is true, but the club meets two days a week for three months, while the court would be used every lunch all year. The blacktop by the parking lot is also where buses turn around, so it is not really empty. We could move the garden beds to the courtyard and build the court behind the gym." (The bus detail is invented for the model)

Variation

For a harder version, pairs write the reply in Muir's style, with strong labels, and then rewrite it fairly. They explain which version would persuade more readers and why.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: Two Positions Side by Side

Two positions side by side: how Muir sets his apart The other side says How Muir marks it Muir says Passage 1 a plain, common, rock-bound meadow as many who have not seen it seem to suppose a grand landscape garden Passage 2 Conservation, conservation, panutilization quotation marks and "shampiously crying" Everybody needs beauty as well as bread Passage 4 ? ? ? Fill in the Passage 4 row during Independent Practice: one claim Muir answers.
A three-column chart for reading Muir: what the other side says, the words Muir uses to mark it as theirs, and Muir's own position. The first two rows are filled in during Direct Instruction and Guided Practice; students fill in the Passage 4 row on their own.

Diagram 2: Five Questions for Point of View and Position

Five questions for point of view, purpose and position 1 What is the topic or issue? the subject the author writes about 2 What does the author think about it? point of view: the author's opinion or attitude 3 Why is the author writing? purpose: to inform, explain, persuade or remember 4 Who sees it differently, and how is their view shown? quotation marks, "some say," "they claim," a label 5 How does the author answer the other view? facts, experience, an expert, strong words, "but"
Five questions to ask of any informational text where people disagree. The first three find the author's point of view and purpose; the last two find how the author sets that position apart from others.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

RI.7.6 Homework: Pinchot's Side of the Argument

Directions: Read Passage 6 at the end of the lesson plan (in Closure). Cite it by paragraph number, for example (Passage 6, paragraph 2), and cite Muir's chapter by passage and paragraph. Answer in complete sentences, and put every quotation in quotation marks.

Part 1: Pinchot's Point of View (Problems 1-3)

  1. What is Pinchot's point of view about what conservation means? Quote the sentence in paragraph 1 where he states it most directly, and restate it in your own words.
  2. Pinchot writes, "There has been a fundamental misconception that conservation means nothing but the husbanding of resources for future generations. There could be no more serious mistake." Whose view is he setting his position apart from? Which words show how he feels about that view?
  3. What is Pinchot's purpose in Passage 6? Support your answer with two details, one of them from paragraph 3.

Part 2: Two Authors, Two Positions (Problems 4-6)

  1. In Passage 2, Muir puts the words "Conservation, conservation, panutilization" in the mouths of the people he opposes. Using Passage 6, explain what conservation means to Pinchot, and how that meaning differs from Muir's point of view on what parks are for.
  2. Pinchot sets his position apart by correcting what he calls a "misconception." Choose one method Muir uses in Passage 4 or 5 to set his position apart. Explain how each author's method works, and say which one you think would be more convincing to a reader who has not decided. Quote each author once.
  3. Write a paragraph of 6-8 sentences answering: How do Muir and Pinchot each set their positions apart from the other side? State each author's point of view and purpose, and give at least two quotations from each. You do not have to choose a side, but you may say which author's methods are fairer.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Point of View and PurposeStates the author's view and purpose accurately in the student's own wordsStates one of the two, or states them only by copying the textWrong or missing
Others' PositionIdentifies the view the author sets himself apart from and the words that mark itNames the other view without the words that mark itConfuses the author's view with the other view
How It Is Set ApartExplains the method (quoting and answering, correcting, labels, facts) and how it worksNames a method without explaining itNo method named
EvidenceExact quotations with passage and paragraph numbersQuotations without locationsNo quotation

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 1-3 are about point of view and purpose in general. Questions 4-8 use Passage 3 and questions 9-13 use Passage 4 (Independent Practice). Questions 14-18 use Passage 5 (Closure). Questions 19 and 20 use more than one passage, and question 20 also uses the warm-up letter. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which sentence states a point of view rather than a fact?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    An article reads, "Some parents believe homework should be banned. However, a short reading assignment each night helps students build habits." What does the word However do?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A 1910 pamphlet lists the train times from San Francisco to Yosemite, the price of a ticket and the hotels near the park. What is its main purpose?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Passage 3, why does Muir quote Secretary Hitchcock's 1903 decision at length?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Muir introduces the quotation by saying that Hitchcock "truthfully said" it (Passage 3, paragraph 1). What does the word truthfully show?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Short Answer

    In Passage 3, paragraph 4, what does Muir predict would happen if Hetch Hetchy were "submerged for a reservoir"? Explain how this prediction supports his position.

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Passage 3 ends, "So far as I have learned, few of all the thousands who have seen the park and seek rest and peace in it are in favor of this outrageous scheme." What does the phrase So far as I have learned do?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Passage 3, paragraph 3, reports that the 1907 application was "renewed and granted" and that a Commission "still has it under consideration." Why might Muir include this plain history in a persuasive chapter?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Passage 4 opens, "That any one would try to destroy such a place seems incredible; but sad experience shows that there are people good enough and bad enough for anything." What does this sentence do before Muir answers the other side's arguments?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Muir says his opponents' arguments are "curiously like those of the devil, devised for the destruction of the first garden" (Passage 4, paragraph 1). What is the effect of this comparison?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Passage 4 each follow the same pattern: a claim from the dam's supporters, then "On the contrary." What does this pattern let Muir do?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Muir answers the claim that Hetch Hetchy is a "low-lying meadow" by saying it is "a high-lying natural landscape garden, as the photographic illustrations show." What kind of support does he offer?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Short Answer

    Muir writes, "Few of their statements are even partly true, and all are misleading" (Passage 4, paragraph 1). Is this a fair way to set his position apart from the dam's supporters? Explain, using Passage 4.

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In Passage 5, paragraph 1, the dam's supporters claim a reservoir "would enhance its beauty by forming a crystal-clear lake." What is Muir's main answer?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Muir calls the reservoir "The beautiful sham lake, forsooth." What tone do these words give his answer to the other side?

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    How does Muir answer the claim that "Hetch Hetchy water is the purest of all to be found in the Sierra" (Passage 5, paragraph 2)?

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Muir calls the dam's supporters "These temple destroyers" (Passage 5, paragraph 3). How does this label connect to Passage 1?

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    The chapter ends, "Dam Hetch Hetchy! As well dam for water-tanks the people's cathedrals and churches, for no holier temple has ever been consecrated by the heart of man." Explain the comparison and how it sums up Muir's point of view.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Muir's purpose in this chapter is to persuade readers to oppose the dam. Give three different ways he sets his position apart from that of the dam's supporters, each with a quotation from a different passage, and explain how each one serves that purpose.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Priya (warm-up letter) and Muir both argue against a plan to build over a green place. Compare how each one treats the other side's position. Use one quotation from each.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does RI.7.6 mean?

It means seventh graders work out what an author thinks about a subject, or why the author wrote, and then analyze how the author keeps that position separate from other people's positions. Students look for where a text reports another view and how the author answers it.

How is RI.7.6 different from RI.6.6 and RI.8.6?

RI.6.6 asks students to determine the point of view or purpose and explain how it is conveyed. RI.7.6 adds other people's positions: how the author distinguishes his or her own from theirs. RI.8.6 goes further, asking how the author acknowledges and responds to conflicting evidence or viewpoints.

What is the difference between point of view and purpose?

Point of view is what the author thinks; purpose is why the author writes. Muir's point of view is that Hetch Hetchy is a sacred, rare place; his purpose is to persuade readers to oppose the dam. A text can have a clear point of view and a purpose to inform, as a fair news report sometimes does.

Is point of view in RI.7.6 the same as first person and third person?

No. In informational texts, point of view means the author's opinion or perspective on the subject. First person and third person describe who is telling a story, which is part of the reading literature standards. A third-person science article can still have a strong point of view.

How can students tell when an author is reporting someone else's view?

They look for signals: quotation marks, phrases such as "some say," "they claim" or "many believe," a named person or group, and contrast words such as "but," "however" and "on the contrary" that come right after. Diagram 2 turns these into questions students can ask of any text.

Why use the Hetch Hetchy debate for RI.7.6?

Because both sides wrote about it in their own words. Muir reports his opponents' claims and replies to them, which makes the skill easy to see, and Gifford Pinchot's writing lets students read the other side directly. The debate also connects to science and history courses on conservation and water.

What happened to Hetch Hetchy after Muir wrote this?

The dam was approved. Congress passed the Raker Act, which President Woodrow Wilson signed on December 19, 1913, O'Shaughnessy Dam was finished in 1923, and the valley is a reservoir today that supplies much of San Francisco's water. Some groups still argue that the reservoir should be drained and the valley restored.

How is RI.7.6 usually assessed?

Usually with questions that ask for the author's point of view or purpose, and with questions about a specific sentence: whose view it reports, or how the author answers it. Wrong options often confuse the author's words with the words the author quotes. Written responses ask students to explain the author's method with evidence.

Should students decide whether Muir or Pinchot was right?

They may, but it is not the goal of RI.7.6. The standard asks students to analyze how each author presents his position. Judging whether the reasoning and evidence hold up is the work of RI.7.8, and writing their own argument that answers an opposing claim is W.7.1.

Isn't Muir unfair to the other side?

Students often think so, and it is worth discussing. Strong words and comparisons are one way to set a position apart, but they are not the same as evidence. The quiz asks students to judge one of his statements for themselves, using the passage.