RI.11-12.3: How Individuals, Ideas and Events Interact and Develop in a Complex Text
In plain English: RI.11-12.3 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 11-12 to analyze a complex set of ideas or sequence of events and explain how specific individuals, ideas or events interact and develop over the course of an informational text. It is usually taught in English 11 and English 12, often with American nonfiction such as memoirs and speeches.
Analyze a complex set of ideas or sequence of events and explain how specific individuals, ideas, or events interact and develop over the course of the text.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Informational Text · Cluster: Key Ideas and Details · Official standard
Students analyze a complex set of ideas and events and explain how specific individuals, ideas and events interact and develop over the course of a text. The lesson reads four excerpts from Frederick Douglass's Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave (1845) in the order they appear. In chapter VI, Mrs. Auld's reading lessons, Mr. Auld's objection and Douglass's new understanding act on one another; in chapter VII, Mrs. Auld changes under the power slavery gives her, and reading brings Douglass both words for his thoughts and a new torment; in chapter X, a fight changes what freedom means to him.
The standard asks for more than cause and effect. Keep students tracking several elements at once and asking what each one does to the others, and whether an element looks different when it returns later in the text. Because the lesson moves forward through one book, students can see ideas from early chapters come back changed.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Identify the individuals, ideas and events in a complex informational text and explain why they must be analyzed together
Explain how a specific individual, idea or event changes another, citing the words that show the interaction
Trace how an individual or an idea develops over the course of a text, including when an earlier element returns with a new meaning
Write an analysis of how individuals, ideas and events interact in a nonfiction narrative, supported by quotations
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Analyzing how an author unfolds a series of ideas or events, including order and connections RI.9-10.3
Citing strong and thorough textual evidence, including where the text leaves matters uncertain RI.11-12.1
Basic background on slavery in the United States before the Civil War
Project the short account. Students answer alone for three minutes, then share.
Warm-Up Prompt
"In ninth grade, a coach told Rosa she was too slow to run varsity. She began running before school every morning. A year later she made the team, and at the season banquet she thanked the coach 'for the best motivation I ever got.'" (1) Name one individual, one idea and one event in this account. (2) How does the coach's idea change what Rosa does? (3) By the banquet, what do the coach's words mean that they did not mean in ninth grade?
Draw the answers as a small web on the board: the coach (individual) states an idea (Rosa is too slow), the idea changes Rosa's behavior (event: morning runs), and the result changes the meaning of the original words, from a put-down to "motivation." Tell students that RI.11-12.3 asks them to do this with a long, demanding text: follow several individuals, ideas and events at once and explain how they act on one another and change over the course of the text.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Part 1: Terms. A complex set of ideas or sequence of events has several elements working at once, so that no one of them can be explained alone. Elements interact when one changes another: a person shapes an event, an event changes a person, an idea moves a person to act, or a person gives an idea new force. They develop when they change over the course of the text: a person hardens or grows, an idea gains or shifts meaning, an event's importance becomes clear only later.
Five kinds of interaction and a question for each
Interaction
Question to ask
An individual shapes an event
What happens because this person acted or spoke?
An event changes an individual
How is this person different after the event?
An idea acts on an individual
What belief, system or pressure changes what this person does?
An individual changes an idea
How does this person use, answer or redefine an idea?
An idea or event returns later
What earlier moment does this recall, and what has changed?
Part 2: Model with Douglass. Frederick Douglass (about 1818-1895) was born into slavery in Maryland, escaped in 1838 and published his Narrative in 1845. In chapter VI he is about eight and has been sent to Baltimore to live with Hugh Auld ("Mr. Auld," called "Master Hugh" in chapter VII) and his wife. Just before this excerpt, Douglass describes Mrs. Auld as the kindest white woman he had met. Gloss an ell (an old cloth measure of about 45 inches, so "give an inch, take an ell" means a small allowance leads to a large demand) and to wit (namely). Read the excerpt with students, then work through the examples and Diagram 1. Each [...] in Mr. Auld's words marks an omitted slur; see the teacher note in Closure.
1But, alas! this kind heart had but a short time to remain such. The fatal poison of irresponsible power was already in her hands, and soon commenced its infernal work. That cheerful eye, under the influence of slavery, soon became red with rage; that voice, made all of sweet accord, changed to one of harsh and horrid discord; and that angelic face gave place to that of a demon.
2Very soon after I went to live with Mr. and Mrs. Auld, she very kindly commenced to teach me the A, B, C. After I had learned this, she assisted me in learning to spell words of three or four letters. Just at this point of my progress, Mr. Auld found out what was going on, and at once forbade Mrs. Auld to instruct me further, telling her, among other things, that it was unlawful, as well as unsafe, to teach a slave to read. To use his own words, further, he said, “If you give [...] an inch, he will take an ell. [...] should know nothing but to obey his master—to do as he is told to do. Learning would spoil the best [...] in the world. Now,” said he, “if you teach that [...] (speaking of myself) how to read, there would be no keeping him. It would forever unfit him to be a slave. He would at once become unmanageable, and of no value to his master. As to himself, it could do him no good, but a great deal of harm. It would make him discontented and unhappy.” These words sank deep into my heart, stirred up sentiments within that lay slumbering, and called into existence an entirely new train of thought. It was a new and special revelation, explaining dark and mysterious things, with which my youthful understanding had struggled, but struggled in vain. I now understood what had been to me a most perplexing difficulty—to wit, the white man’s power to enslave the black man. It was a grand achievement, and I prized it highly. From that moment, I understood the pathway from slavery to freedom. It was just what I wanted, and I got it at a time when I the least expected it. Whilst I was saddened by the thought of losing the aid of my kind mistress, I was gladdened by the invaluable instruction which, by the merest accident, I had gained from my master. Though conscious of the difficulty of learning without a teacher, I set out with high hope, and a fixed purpose, at whatever cost of trouble, to learn how to read. The very decided manner with which he spoke, and strove to impress his wife with the evil consequences of giving me instruction, served to convince me that he was deeply sensible of the truths he was uttering. It gave me the best assurance that I might rely with the utmost confidence on the results which, he said, would flow from teaching me to read. What he most dreaded, that I most desired. What he most loved, that I most hated. That which to him was a great evil, to be carefully shunned, was to me a great good, to be diligently sought; and the argument which he so warmly urged, against my learning to read, only served to inspire me with a desire and determination to learn. In learning to read, I owe almost as much to the bitter opposition of my master, as to the kindly aid of my mistress. I acknowledge the benefit of both.
Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, chapter VI (excerpt: the reading lessons and Mr. Auld's objection; a slur in Mr. Auld's words is omitted) (1845). Public domain (published 1845). Source text.
Naming the complex set
Before analyzing interactions, list the individuals and ideas at work in the chapter VI excerpt. What makes this a complex set rather than a single line of events?
Result: Three individuals (Mrs. Auld, Mr. Auld, Douglass) and at least three ideas (Mrs. Auld's kindness, slavery's "irresponsible power," and learning as "the pathway from slavery to freedom") act on one another at once. The kindness starts the lessons, the power stops them, and the stopping produces the idea. No element can be explained without the others.
An idea acting on an individual
Paragraph 1 comes before the lessons are even described. What does it say acts on Mrs. Auld, and how does Douglass frame the change?
Result: An idea embodied in a system, not a person: "The fatal poison of irresponsible power was already in her hands." Douglass calls it "the influence of slavery" and announces the result first ("this kind heart had but a short time to remain such"), so the reader watches the lessons knowing they will end. The individual is shown as changed by an idea.
An individual shaping an event
Paragraph 2, sentence 3: what does Mr. Auld do, and what reasons does he give?
Result: He ends the lessons: he "at once forbade Mrs. Auld to instruct me further," saying it was "unlawful, as well as unsafe." His quoted argument gives the reasons in his own words: learning would make an enslaved person "unmanageable, and of no value to his master." One person's decision changes the course of events.
An event turning into an idea
How does Mr. Auld's speech change Douglass's thinking? Quote the words that mark the change.
Result: The speech meant to end his learning gives him an insight: "These words sank deep into my heart ... and called into existence an entirely new train of thought." He now understands "the white man's power to enslave the black man," and "From that moment, I understood the pathway from slavery to freedom." The event produces an idea that works against the man who caused it.
Opposed individuals, one outcome
"What he most dreaded, that I most desired." How does Douglass sum up the interaction of the three people by the end of the paragraph?
Result: The two Aulds pushed in opposite directions and produced the same result: "I owe almost as much to the bitter opposition of my master, as to the kindly aid of my mistress. I acknowledge the benefit of both." Kindness gave him the first letters; opposition gave him the reason to keep going. That balance is what "interact" means in RI.11-12.3: the outcome comes from the combination, not from either person alone.
Guided Practice15-20 minutes
The next excerpt opens chapter VII. Douglass returns to Mrs. Auld and explains her change in more detail. Gloss stratagems (clever plans), depravity (moral corruption), chattel (property, the legal status of enslaved people) and precepts (rules). Pairs run Activity 2 with this excerpt and the one from Direct Instruction.
1I lived in Master Hugh’s family about seven years. During this time, I succeeded in learning to read and write. In accomplishing this, I was compelled to resort to various stratagems. I had no regular teacher. My mistress, who had kindly commenced to instruct me, had, in compliance with the advice and direction of her husband, not only ceased to instruct, but had set her face against my being instructed by any one else. It is due, however, to my mistress to say of her, that she did not adopt this course of treatment immediately. She at first lacked the depravity indispensable to shutting me up in mental darkness. It was at least necessary for her to have some training in the exercise of irresponsible power, to make her equal to the task of treating me as though I were a brute.
2My mistress was, as I have said, a kind and tender-hearted woman; and in the simplicity of her soul she commenced, when I first went to live with her, to treat me as she supposed one human being ought to treat another. In entering upon the duties of a slaveholder, she did not seem to perceive that I sustained to her the relation of a mere chattel, and that for her to treat me as a human being was not only wrong, but dangerously so. Slavery proved as injurious to her as it did to me. When I went there, she was a pious, warm, and tender-hearted woman. There was no sorrow or suffering for which she had not a tear. She had bread for the hungry, clothes for the naked, and comfort for every mourner that came within her reach. Slavery soon proved its ability to divest her of these heavenly qualities. Under its influence, the tender heart became stone, and the lamblike disposition gave way to one of tiger-like fierceness. The first step in her downward course was in her ceasing to instruct me. She now commenced to practise her husband’s precepts. She finally became even more violent in her opposition than her husband himself. She was not satisfied with simply doing as well as he had commanded; she seemed anxious to do better. Nothing seemed to make her more angry than to see me with a newspaper. She seemed to think that here lay the danger. I have had her rush at me with a face made all up of fury, and snatch from me a newspaper, in a manner that fully revealed her apprehension. She was an apt woman; and a little experience soon demonstrated, to her satisfaction, that education and slavery were incompatible with each other.
3From this time I was most narrowly watched. If I was in a separate room any considerable length of time, I was sure to be suspected of having a book, and was at once called to give an account of myself. All this, however, was too late. The first step had been taken. Mistress, in teaching me the alphabet, had given me the inch, and no precaution could prevent me from taking the ell.
Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, chapter VII (opening: how Mrs. Auld changed) (1845). Public domain (published 1845). Source text.
Debrief with two questions. What does chapter VII add to the account of Mrs. Auld in chapter VI? Chapter VI tells the change in a few lines; chapter VII slows it down: she "did not adopt this course of treatment immediately" and needed "some training in the exercise of irresponsible power." The individual develops by stages, and the idea acting on her, first named in chapter VI, is named again. How does she end up agreeing with her husband? By her own experience: "a little experience soon demonstrated, to her satisfaction, that education and slavery were incompatible with each other." His idea becomes hers, and she becomes "even more violent in her opposition than her husband himself." Close with paragraph 3, where Douglass takes Mr. Auld's inch-and-ell saying and turns it into a statement of his own victory (Activity 3).
Independent Practice20 minutes
Students read the next excerpt from chapter VII alone and answer quiz questions 1-19 with the passage open; question 20 also uses the Direct Instruction excerpt. Between the Guided Practice excerpt and this one, Douglass describes how he traded bread with white boys in the street for reading lessons. The Columbian Orator was a schoolbook of speeches and dialogues for practicing public speaking. Richard Brinsley Sheridan was an Irish writer and member of the British Parliament; "Catholic emancipation" was the campaign to end laws that barred Catholics in Britain and Ireland from Parliament and public office. Gloss emancipation (release from slavery or legal restriction), abhor (hate), trump (trumpet) and stupidity (here, not knowing or not feeling one's condition). The [...] in paragraph 1 marks two omitted sentences explaining when the dialogue takes place.
1I was now about twelve years old, and the thought of being a slave for life began to bear heavily upon my heart. Just about this time, I got hold of a book entitled “The Columbian Orator.” Every opportunity I got, I used to read this book. Among much of other interesting matter, I found in it a dialogue between a master and his slave. [...] In this dialogue, the whole argument in behalf of slavery was brought forward by the master, all of which was disposed of by the slave. The slave was made to say some very smart as well as impressive things in reply to his master—things which had the desired though unexpected effect; for the conversation resulted in the voluntary emancipation of the slave on the part of the master.
2In the same book, I met with one of Sheridan’s mighty speeches on and in behalf of Catholic emancipation. These were choice documents to me. I read them over and over again with unabated interest. They gave tongue to interesting thoughts of my own soul, which had frequently flashed through my mind, and died away for want of utterance. The moral which I gained from the dialogue was the power of truth over the conscience of even a slaveholder. What I got from Sheridan was a bold denunciation of slavery, and a powerful vindication of human rights. The reading of these documents enabled me to utter my thoughts, and to meet the arguments brought forward to sustain slavery; but while they relieved me of one difficulty, they brought on another even more painful than the one of which I was relieved. The more I read, the more I was led to abhor and detest my enslavers. I could regard them in no other light than a band of successful robbers, who had left their homes, and gone to Africa, and stolen us from our homes, and in a strange land reduced us to slavery. I loathed them as being the meanest as well as the most wicked of men. As I read and contemplated the subject, behold! that very discontentment which Master Hugh had predicted would follow my learning to read had already come, to torment and sting my soul to unutterable anguish. As I writhed under it, I would at times feel that learning to read had been a curse rather than a blessing. It had given me a view of my wretched condition, without the remedy. It opened my eyes to the horrible pit, but to no ladder upon which to get out. In moments of agony, I envied my fellow-slaves for their stupidity. I have often wished myself a beast. I preferred the condition of the meanest reptile to my own. Any thing, no matter what, to get rid of thinking! It was this everlasting thinking of my condition that tormented me. There was no getting rid of it. It was pressed upon me by every object within sight or hearing, animate or inanimate. The silver trump of freedom had roused my soul to eternal wakefulness. Freedom now appeared, to disappear no more forever. It was heard in every sound, and seen in every thing. It was ever present to torment me with a sense of my wretched condition. I saw nothing without seeing it, I heard nothing without hearing it, and felt nothing without feeling it. It looked from every star, it smiled in every calm, breathed in every wind, and moved in every storm.
Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, chapter VII (excerpt: "The Columbian Orator"; two sentences on the dialogue's setting are omitted) (1845). Public domain (published 1845). Source text.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: "Choose one individual and one idea from today's excerpts. In two sentences, explain how the idea changed the individual, or how the individual changed the idea, and quote the words that show it." Read the tickets for students who describe a change without saying what caused it; start the next lesson with two of them.
Homework passage. In chapter X, Douglass is about sixteen. His owner has hired him out for the year 1833 to Edward Covey, a farmer known for "breaking" enslaved people, who has beaten him many times over six months. The excerpt opens with the sentence Douglass uses to introduce the episode; the [...] skips his account of collapsing in the field, going to his owner for protection and being sent back, and the start of the fight, in which Covey tries to tie him and a worker named Hughes helps Covey and is kicked away. Bill is another enslaved man, hired out to Covey by his own master.
1I have already intimated that my condition was much worse, during the first six months of my stay at Mr. Covey’s, than in the last six. The circumstances leading to the change in Mr. Covey’s course toward me form an epoch in my humble history. You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was made a man.
2[...] By this time, Bill came. Covey called upon him for assistance. Bill wanted to know what he could do. Covey said, “Take hold of him, take hold of him!” Bill said his master hired him out to work, and not to help to whip me; so he left Covey and myself to fight our own battle out. We were at it for nearly two hours. Covey at length let me go, puffing and blowing at a great rate, saying that if I had not resisted, he would not have whipped me half so much. The truth was, that he had not whipped me at all. I considered him as getting entirely the worst end of the bargain; for he had drawn no blood from me, but I had from him. The whole six months afterwards, that I spent with Mr. Covey, he never laid the weight of his finger upon me in anger. He would occasionally say, he didn’t want to get hold of me again. “No,” thought I, “you need not; for you will come off worse than you did before.”
3This battle with Mr. Covey was the turning-point in my career as a slave. It rekindled the few expiring embers of freedom, and revived within me a sense of my own manhood. It recalled the departed self-confidence, and inspired me again with a determination to be free. The gratification afforded by the triumph was a full compensation for whatever else might follow, even death itself. He only can understand the deep satisfaction which I experienced, who has himself repelled by force the bloody arm of slavery. I felt as I never felt before. It was a glorious resurrection, from the tomb of slavery, to the heaven of freedom. My long-crushed spirit rose, cowardice departed, bold defiance took its place; and I now resolved that, however long I might remain a slave in form, the day had passed forever when I could be a slave in fact. I did not hesitate to let it be known of me, that the white man who expected to succeed in whipping, must also succeed in killing me.
4From this time I was never again what might be called fairly whipped, though I remained a slave four years afterwards. I had several fights, but was never whipped.
5It was for a long time a matter of surprise to me why Mr. Covey did not immediately have me taken by the constable to the whipping-post, and there regularly whipped for the crime of raising my hand against a white man in defence of myself. And the only explanation I can now think of does not entirely satisfy me; but such as it is, I will give it. Mr. Covey enjoyed the most unbounded reputation for being a first-rate overseer and negro-breaker. It was of considerable importance to him. That reputation was at stake; and had he sent me—a boy about sixteen years old—to the public whipping-post, his reputation would have been lost; so, to save his reputation, he suffered me to go unpunished.
Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, chapter X (excerpts: the fight with Mr. Covey and what followed) (1845). Public domain (published 1845). Source text.
Teacher note on language. The Direct Instruction excerpt omits a slur that appears in the original. Douglass quotes Mr. Auld word for word, and in the 1845 text Mr. Auld uses a racial slur four times; Douglass reproduces it to expose how slaveholders spoke and thought. On this page each [...] in paragraph 2 marks one omitted occurrence of the word, and everything else is quoted exactly as printed in 1845. If students read the full chapter, set expectations first: the word is not read aloud or repeated in discussion, and students may say "Mr. Auld's slur" when they cite the passage. Other words reflect the law and language of slavery: "chattel" (property), "brute," and "negro-breaker" (homework passage), a term for a man hired to beat enslaved people into submission. Douglass uses these words to condemn the system, and students should see them as his evidence, not his view.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a partly filled interaction web for the Direct Instruction excerpt, with the arrows drawn and only the quotations missing
Pre-teach the glossed words on cards (irresponsible, depravity, chattel, precepts, emancipation, abhor) and read each excerpt aloud once before students work
Provide frames: "___ (individual or idea) changes ___ when ___. The words ___ show this." and "At first ___ means ___; later it means ___."
For Advanced Students
Read all of chapters VI and VII and add the street boys and the Columbian Orator to the interaction web; decide which element has the widest influence and defend the choice
Compare Douglass's account of Mrs. Auld in the Narrative with his fuller account in My Bondage and My Freedom (1855) and explain how the later version develops her differently
Write a short analysis of how the idea of freedom develops from chapter VI to chapter X, using at least three excerpts on this page
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong work names what acts on what (a person on an event, an idea on a person, an event on an idea) and quotes the words that show it, instead of listing what happened. Look for students who track change: they can say how Mrs. Auld, or the idea of reading, is different at the end of an excerpt than at the start, and why. The strongest answers notice when an earlier element returns and explain what has changed. Watch for answers that treat each event separately, that reduce every interaction to "X caused Y," or that describe a change without the evidence for its cause.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Interaction Web
15 minGroups of 3-4
After Direct Instruction, groups build a web of the chapter VI and chapter VII excerpts on chart paper. Each arrow shows one element acting on another and carries a quotation.
Procedure
Write 6 nodes: Douglass, Mrs. Auld, Mr. Auld, slavery's "irresponsible power," learning to read, freedom
Draw an arrow each time one node changes another, and write the quotation on the arrow; aim for 8 arrows across the two excerpts
Star the arrow where an action produces the opposite of what its author intended
Teacher Key
Eight arrows a group can support:
Slavery's "irresponsible power" → Mrs. Auld: "The fatal poison of irresponsible power was already in her hands"
Mrs. Auld → Douglass: "she very kindly commenced to teach me the A, B, C"
Mr. Auld → Mrs. Auld: "at once forbade Mrs. Auld to instruct me further"
Mr. Auld → Douglass: "These words sank deep into my heart"
Douglass → Learning to read: "a fixed purpose, at whatever cost of trouble, to learn how to read"
Learning to read → Freedom: "the pathway from slavery to freedom"
Mr. Auld → Mrs. Auld: "She now commenced to practise her husband's precepts."
Mrs. Auld → Douglass: "From this time I was most narrowly watched."
The starred arrow is Mr. Auld to Douglass: an argument meant to keep Douglass from learning becomes his reason to learn. Accept other arrows that students support with a quotation.
Discussion Questions
Which single arrow, if removed, would change the outcome most? Defend your choice with the text.
The arrows into Mrs. Auld come from two sources, her husband and slavery's power. What does that say about how Douglass explains her change?
2
Tracking Mrs. Auld
15 minPairs
During Guided Practice, pairs chart Mrs. Auld in 5 stages across the chapter VI and chapter VII excerpts, with a quotation for each, and then note what Douglass says is acting on her.
Procedure
Make a five-box timeline and give each stage a short label and a quotation
Under the timeline, copy every phrase Douglass uses to name the force that changes her
Write one sentence on how the chapter VII account differs from the chapter VI account
Teacher Key
Before the lessons: "this kind heart had but a short time to remain such"
Teacher: "she very kindly commenced to teach me the A, B, C"
Hesitating: "she did not adopt this course of treatment immediately"
Obeying her husband: "She now commenced to practise her husband's precepts."
Harsher than her husband: "She finally became even more violent in her opposition than her husband himself."
The force is named three times: "The fatal poison of irresponsible power" and "the influence of slavery" (chapter VI), and "training in the exercise of irresponsible power" (chapter VII). Chapter VII adds a delay ("not ... immediately") and a final stage in which she outdoes her husband.
Discussion Questions
Douglass writes, "Slavery proved as injurious to her as it did to me." Is this sympathy, accusation or both? Use the timeline to decide.
Why might Douglass explain her change as the work of a system rather than as a flaw in her character?
3
The Inch and the Ell
10-15 minPairs, then whole class
Pairs trace two phrases that appear in both the chapter VI and chapter VII excerpts and explain how each one has changed by its second appearance.
Procedure
Find Mr. Auld's saying about the inch and the ell in the chapter VI excerpt (paragraph 2) and Douglass's version in chapter VII (paragraph 3); write down who says each, and what each is meant to do
Find "irresponsible power" in both excerpts and note what it is said to do each time
Write two or three sentences: how does repeating these words let an idea develop?
Teacher Key
Mr. Auld's saying is a warning: a small allowance leads to a large demand, so the lessons must stop. In chapter VII Douglass repeats it as a fact about himself: "Mistress, in teaching me the alphabet, had given me the inch, and no precaution could prevent me from taking the ell." The italics mark the borrowed words. The master's warning has become the slave's boast, and the prediction has come true against the master. "Irresponsible power" first appears as a "fatal poison" already at work, and in chapter VII as something she needed "training" in, so the idea develops from a sudden force into a slow education in cruelty.
Discussion Questions
In chapter VII Douglass applies Mr. Auld's saying to himself and italicizes only "inch" and "ell." Why borrow just those two words, and why speak of "Mistress" rather than Mr. Auld?
Where else might an author let one person's words come back in another person's mouth, and why is that an interaction and not only a repetition?
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
1 diagrams
Diagram 1: How Three People and an Idea Act on One Another in Chapter VI
The interactions in the Direct Instruction excerpt from Douglass's Narrative. Each arrow shows one element acting on another, labeled with words from the passage; the arrow from Mr. Auld to Douglass produces the opposite of what Mr. Auld intended.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RI.11-12.3 Homework: How a Fight Changes Douglass's Idea of Freedom
Directions: Use the chapter X excerpt printed in the Closure phase of the lesson plan; Problems 1, 5 and 6 also use the earlier excerpts. Cite chapter and paragraph numbers and put every quotation in quotation marks. Problems 1-5 need 4-6 sentences each; Problem 6 asks for a short analysis.
Part 1: Individuals and Events (Problems 1-2)
Paragraph 1 ends: "You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was made a man." Explain how this sentence connects the Covey episode to the earlier parts of the Narrative you have read on this page, and what idea it tells the reader to watch for before any event is narrated.
In paragraph 2, Bill refuses to help Covey because "his master hired him out to work, and not to help to whip me." Explain how Bill's decision changes the course of the fight, and what it shows about how individuals other than Covey and Douglass shape the event.
Part 2: Ideas and How They Interact (Problems 3-4)
Paragraph 3 calls the battle "the turning-point in my career as a slave." Trace how the event develops into ideas in this paragraph: name at least three things the battle "rekindled," "revived," "recalled" or "inspired," and explain the difference Douglass draws between being "a slave in form" and "a slave in fact."
In paragraph 5, Douglass explains why Covey did not have him whipped at the public whipping-post. Explain how an idea (Covey's reputation) interacts with an individual and an event here. Then explain why Douglass might include an explanation that he says "does not entirely satisfy me."
Part 3: Development over the Course of the Text (Problems 5-6)
In chapter VI (Direct Instruction), Douglass says he understood "the pathway from slavery to freedom" through learning to read. In chapter X, the turning point is a fight. Explain how these two events interact to develop Douglass's idea of freedom over the course of the text. Is the second event a replacement for the first, or a further stage? Support your answer with quotations from both excerpts.
Write an analysis of 250-350 words: choose one individual (Mr. Auld, Mrs. Auld or Covey) and trace how that individual's actions and Douglass's ideas interact across at least two excerpts on this page. Explain what the individual intends, what actually results, and how the relationship develops over the course of the text.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Interaction
Explains how a specific individual, idea or event changes another, and names both
Names an interaction without explaining how it works
Lists events only
Development
Shows how an individual or idea changes across the text, including what returns and what is new
Notes a change without comparing earlier and later points
No attention to change
Complexity
Keeps several elements in view and explains how they combine
Treats elements one at a time
Reduces the passage to one cause and one effect
Evidence
Exact quotations with chapter and paragraph numbers
Some quotations, or missing locations
No quotations
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
All questions are about the chapter VII excerpt on The Columbian Orator in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan; question 20 also uses the chapter VI excerpt from Direct Instruction. Paragraph numbers refer to the numbered passage. Choose the best answer for questions 1-14, and write short answers for questions 15-20.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which statement best describes the complex set of ideas Douglass develops in this excerpt?
Answer: C
The excerpt holds two effects together: the documents "enabled me to utter my thoughts, and to meet the arguments brought forward to sustain slavery," but "they brought on another [difficulty] even more painful" (paragraph 2). A stretches the moral of one dialogue into a claim about most slaveholders. B reverses the torment the paragraph describes. D takes a feeling he had "in moments of agony" as his conclusion.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How does the thought of being "a slave for life" (paragraph 1) interact with the events that follow?
Answer: A
"The thought of being a slave for life began to bear heavily upon my heart. Just about this time, I got hold of a book": the timing ties the idea to the event, and he reads "Every opportunity I got." B reverses the order: the thought comes before the book. C has no support. D contradicts "I read them over and over again with unabated interest."
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In the dialogue, the slave's replies lead to "the voluntary emancipation of the slave on the part of the master." What idea does Douglass take from this?
Answer: D
Douglass states it: "The moral which I gained from the dialogue was the power of truth over the conscience of even a slaveholder." A brings in force, which the dialogue does not use: the slave wins by "smart as well as impressive things." B reverses the moral. C invents an action the excerpt never mentions.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"They gave tongue to interesting thoughts of my own soul, which had frequently flashed through my mind, and died away for want of utterance." What interaction does this sentence describe?
Answer: B
The thoughts were "of my own soul" and had "frequently flashed through my mind"; what they lacked was "utterance." The texts supply language for ideas already there, which is a two-way interaction between a reader and a text. A misses "my own" and "frequently." C and D invent actions; he calls them "choice documents" and reads them "over and over again."
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"but while they relieved me of one difficulty, they brought on another even more painful than the one of which I was relieved." What does this sentence do in the development of the excerpt?
Answer: B
Up to this sentence, reading has helped him ("enabled me to utter my thoughts"); from here on, the paragraph traces the new difficulty: hatred, torment and the sense of freedom that will not leave him. The sentence is the hinge. A is wrong because no escape is narrated. C confuses "difficulty" with difficulty in reading. D adds a person who does not appear.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How does Douglass's attitude toward his enslavers develop as he keeps reading?
Answer: D
"The more I read, the more I was led to abhor and detest my enslavers," and soon "I loathed them as being the meanest as well as the most wicked of men." The phrase "the more ... the more" marks a development tied to the reading. A reverses it: the hopeful moral does not soften his view of his own enslavers. B ignores "the more." C misreads Sheridan's speech, which was "a bold denunciation of slavery."
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"that very discontentment which Master Hugh had predicted would follow my learning to read had already come." What does this sentence connect?
Answer: A
"Had predicted would follow my learning to read" reaches back to something Master Hugh said before the learning happened, and "had already come" marks it as fulfilled. An individual's words return as an event in Douglass's inner life. B, C and D each invent a rule, a book or a letter that the excerpt never mentions.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"I would at times feel that learning to read had been a curse rather than a blessing." How does this sentence develop the idea of learning to read in the excerpt?
Answer: C
Earlier in the paragraph reading was a gain ("choice documents"); now the same reading can feel like "a curse." "At times" keeps both views alive, so the idea grows more complicated instead of flipping. A ignores the word "curse." B turns a feeling that came "at times" into a permanent decision. D contradicts his clear summary of what he learned from the dialogue and from Sheridan.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"It opened my eyes to the horrible pit, but to no ladder upon which to get out." What does this image add to Douglass's analysis?
Answer: D
The image restates the sentence before it: reading "had given me a view of my wretched condition, without the remedy." Seeing the pit is knowledge; the missing ladder is the missing way out. A and B take the metaphor literally. C reverses "no ladder."
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"In moments of agony, I envied my fellow-slaves for their stupidity." What does this sentence show about how reading has changed Douglass's relation to other enslaved people?
Answer: B
"Stupidity" here means not knowing their condition, which is what his reading has taken from him; he envies them only "in moments of agony," and in the next sentences he wishes himself "a beast" to "get rid of thinking." The interaction is between knowledge and isolation. A misreads "stupidity" as a judgment of their minds. C and D add plans and warnings that the excerpt does not contain.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
"Freedom now appeared, to disappear no more forever." By the end of the excerpt, how has the idea of freedom developed?
Answer: A
Freedom is "heard in every sound, and seen in every thing" and is "ever present to torment me"; "The silver trump of freedom had roused my soul to eternal wakefulness" shows that it also stirs him. B contradicts "to disappear no more forever." C mistakes an idea for an event; no one frees him here. D contradicts "in every thing."
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does Douglass describe the dialogue's ending, in which the master frees the slave, before he describes his own torment?
Answer: C
Paragraph 1 ends with "the voluntary emancipation of the slave," and paragraph 2 soon arrives at "a view of my wretched condition, without the remedy." Placed together, the book's happy ending and his own lack of one sharpen each other. A has no support. B is not claimed. D contradicts "I read them over and over again."
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which pair of phrases best shows reading working on Douglass in two opposite directions?
Answer: B
B sets the gift against the cost; the second phrase continues "to unutterable anguish," so the echo of "utter" and "unutterable" makes the reversal exact: reading gave him speech and then a pain beyond speech. A names two texts, not two effects. C gives two descriptions of the same eager reading. D gives two things he got from Sheridan, both on the same side.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sequence best describes how the excerpt develops?
Answer: A
A follows the excerpt: "a slave for life" weighs on him, he finds the book, the texts give "tongue" to his thoughts, and the paragraph ends with torment and freedom "in every thing." B invents an escape. C reverses the direction: the book deepens his hatred. D invents a conversation and a teacher.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
The Columbian Orator gives Douglass two texts: the dialogue and Sheridan's speech. Explain how each one interacts with his own ideas. What does each give him, and how do the two together change what he can do?
Model answer: From the dialogue he takes a lesson about people: "the power of truth over the conscience of even a slaveholder," since the slave's replies lead to "voluntary emancipation." From Sheridan he takes a position: "a bold denunciation of slavery, and a powerful vindication of human rights." Both give "tongue to interesting thoughts of my own soul," so the texts meet ideas he already had instead of inventing new ones. Together they let him "utter my thoughts, and to meet the arguments brought forward to sustain slavery": he can now think and argue in words. Rubric: full credit for what each text gives, with a quotation for each, and how together they change what he can do; partial credit for one text explained, or both without quotations.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Trace how the idea of freedom develops across paragraph 2, from "a powerful vindication of human rights" to the last sentence. Identify three stages and quote a few words for each.
Model answer: (1) Freedom as an argument: Sheridan gives "a powerful vindication of human rights," and Douglass can now "meet the arguments" for slavery. (2) Freedom as a painful absence: once he sees his condition "without the remedy," the idea turns against him, and learning feels like "a curse rather than a blessing." (3) Freedom as a constant presence: "The silver trump of freedom had roused my soul to eternal wakefulness"; it is "heard in every sound" and "ever present to torment me." The idea moves from something he reads about, to something he lacks, to something he cannot stop feeling. Rubric: full credit for three stages in order with a quotation for each and a sentence on how the idea changes; partial credit for two stages, or three without quotations.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Douglass says reading "relieved me of one difficulty" but "brought on another even more painful." Explain what each difficulty is, using the text, and how the second grows out of the first.
Model answer: The first difficulty was having thoughts without words: ideas that "died away for want of utterance," and no way to answer "the arguments brought forward to sustain slavery." Reading solves it. The second is what the new clarity shows him: his enslavers are "a band of successful robbers," and his own condition is a "horrible pit" with "no ladder." The second grows out of the first because the same words that let him think clearly also let him see clearly; understanding his situation is what makes it unbearable. Rubric: full credit for identifying both difficulties with quotations and explaining the link between them; partial credit for both difficulties without the link, or one difficulty well explained.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
After the wishes to be "a beast" and "the meanest reptile," the paragraph ends with freedom that "looked from every star, it smiled in every calm, breathed in every wind, and moved in every storm." How do these last sentences change the meaning of the torment described just before them?
Model answer: The wishes to be "a beast" show torment as a wish to stop thinking: "Any thing, no matter what, to get rid of thinking!" The final sentences give the torment a source and a direction. What will not leave him is freedom itself, which "now appeared, to disappear no more forever." The verbs "smiled" and "breathed" make freedom alive and even attractive, not only painful, so the torment becomes the pressure of a goal he cannot forget. The paragraph ends pointing toward freedom, not toward despair. Rubric: full credit for contrasting the wish to stop thinking with the image of freedom everywhere, with quotations, and explaining how the ending changes the torment's meaning; partial credit for describing the ending without the change.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
In one paragraph of 6-8 sentences, analyze how individuals, ideas and events interact and develop in this excerpt. Discuss at least one individual, one idea and one event, and explain how at least one of them changes.
Model answer: The excerpt begins with an idea pressing on an individual: "the thought of being a slave for life" weighs on the twelve-year-old Douglass just as an event, finding The Columbian Orator, gives him something to answer it with. The book's dialogue, in which a slave's arguments win "voluntary emancipation," gives him the idea of "the power of truth over the conscience of even a slaveholder," and Sheridan gives words to thoughts "of my own soul." These texts change Douglass himself: he can "utter my thoughts" and "meet the arguments" for slavery. The same change sets off a second development, his growing hatred of his enslavers, marked by "The more I read, the more." A third individual enters through memory: Master Hugh's prediction of "discontentment" returns, fulfilled. By the end, freedom has developed from an argument in a book to a presence "in every thing" that he can neither reach nor forget. Rubric: full credit for an individual, an idea and an event, a clear account of how they act on one another, at least one development traced with quotations, and no plain retelling; partial credit if one element is missing or the paragraph mostly summarizes.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Reread Mr. Auld's words in the Direct Instruction excerpt, especially "It would make him discontented and unhappy." Explain how this prediction interacts with the events of this excerpt. Was Mr. Auld right? How does Douglass's account turn the prediction into support for a different conclusion?
Model answer: Mr. Auld predicted that reading would make Douglass "discontented and unhappy" and "forever unfit him to be a slave." In this excerpt the first part comes true word for word: "that very discontentment which Master Hugh had predicted ... had already come." So Mr. Auld was right about the effect. But he treated discontent as harm ("it could do him no good, but a great deal of harm"), while Douglass shows it as the start of freedom: the torment is caused by freedom that "appeared, to disappear no more forever." The same prediction, fulfilled, becomes evidence that slavery depends on keeping people from knowledge, which is the "pathway from slavery to freedom" Douglass saw in chapter VI. Rubric: full credit for quoting the prediction and its fulfillment, judging whether Mr. Auld was right, and explaining how Douglass reverses its meaning; partial credit for the connection without the reversal.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RI.11-12.3 mean?
RI.11-12.3 asks students to analyze a complex set of ideas or sequence of events in an informational text and explain how specific individuals, ideas or events interact and develop over the course of the text. In plain terms: follow several people, ideas and events at once, show how they change one another, and show how they change as the text goes on. "RI" means Reading Informational Text, and "11-12" is the grade band.
What makes a set of ideas or events "complex"?
A set is complex when its elements depend on one another, so that none can be explained alone. A memoir in which a person, a law and a belief all shape each other is complex; a list of steps in a recipe is not. Complexity also comes from time: an idea introduced early may return later with a different meaning.
What does it mean for individuals, ideas or events to "interact"?
It means one changes another. A person's decision can cause an event, an event can change a person, an idea can push a person to act, and a person can take an idea and give it new force. Students show an interaction by naming both elements, saying what one does to the other, and quoting the words that show it.
How is RI.11-12.3 different from RI.9-10.3?
RI.9-10.3 asks how an author unfolds a series of ideas or events: the order of the points, how they are introduced and developed, and the connections between them. RI.11-12.3 raises the demand to a complex set and to interaction: how specific individuals, ideas or events act on one another and develop across the whole text. The 9-10 standard is mostly about the author's sequence; the 11-12 standard is about the web of influences inside it.
How is RI.11-12.3 different from RI.11-12.2?
RI.11-12.2 is about two or more central ideas and how they interact and build on one another, plus an objective summary. RI.11-12.3 includes individuals and events as well as ideas, and asks how all of them interact and develop. A lesson on RI.11-12.3 might follow a person's change, while a lesson on RI.11-12.2 stays with the text's main claims.
Does "over the course of the text" mean students must read the whole book?
No, but they must read enough to see change. Excerpts taken in order from the same work, like the chapters on this page, let students see an early element return later. With a single short text, students trace development from its opening to its end.
Why teach RI.11-12.3 with Frederick Douglass's Narrative?
Douglass's Narrative (1845) is a foundational American text in which individuals, ideas and events visibly shape one another: a slaveholder's objection to reading becomes the young Douglass's reason to read, and the power slavery gives a kind woman changes her. The chapters are short and can be read in order, and many American literature courses already include the book.
How should teachers handle the offensive language in the Narrative?
Prepare students before reading. In the original, Douglass quotes a slaveholder's slur word for word to expose him. This page omits the slur and marks each cut with [...], keeping every other word as Douglass published it; if students read the full text, the word should not be read aloud or repeated in discussion. Explain the historical terms students will meet, such as "chattel," and discuss why a formerly enslaved author would reproduce his oppressors' language. Tell families in advance if your school expects it.
How is RI.11-12.3 usually tested?
Reading tests often ask how one person, idea or event affects another, how a person or idea changes across a passage, or why an author returns to an earlier detail. Written tasks ask for an analysis of how elements of a text interact, supported by evidence. On the digital SAT, questions about how ideas in a passage relate appear in the Reading and Writing section's Information and Ideas and Craft and Structure domains.
What mistakes do students make with RI.11-12.3?
Students often summarize the events in order and call it analysis, or treat each element separately. Another frequent problem is reducing every interaction to one cause and one effect, or describing a change without the evidence for what caused it. A useful fix is to ask for two quotations per claim: one showing the element before the interaction and one after it.
07
Related Standards
6 standards
These standards connect to RI.11-12.3: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RI.9-10.3Prerequisite
Analyze how an author unfolds a series of ideas or events and connects them