RH.9-10.2Common CoreELALiteracy in History/Social StudiesGrades 9-10
RH.9-10.2: Central Ideas and Summaries of How Events Develop in a Historical Source
In plain English: RH.9-10.2 is the Common Core literacy standard for history that asks students in grades 9-10 to determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source and to write an accurate summary of how key events or ideas develop from the beginning of the text to the end. It is usually taught in U.S. History or World History.
Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary of how key events or ideas develop over the course of the text.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies 6-12 · Cluster: Key Ideas and Details · Official standard
Students determine the central idea of a primary source and write an accurate summary that follows how its key events develop: where the text starts, where the situation turns and where it ends. The lesson separates three things students often blur: the topic of a source (what it is about), its central idea (what the author shows about that topic) and a summary (a short, ordered, opinion-free account of how the events or ideas move from beginning to end).
The sources come from the last days of the Civil War. Students model and practice with Ulysses S. Grant's account of the surrender meeting at Appomattox Court House, from the Personal Memoirs he wrote in 1884-85 and published in 1885-86. For the quiz they read Captain Robert E. Lee's account of how he, and Confederate President Jefferson Davis, learned of the surrender, from the 1904 memoir he wrote about his father. For homework they summarize Grant's account of the night Lincoln was shot. A practice summary written for this page, with deliberate errors, lets students test what "accurate" means.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Distinguish the topic of a historical source from its central idea, and state the central idea in one sentence
Identify the key events in a primary source, their order and the turning points where the situation changes
Write an accurate summary that shows how key events or ideas develop from the beginning of a source to its end
Revise a summary to remove opinions, invented details, errors of order and misstated causes
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Determining the central ideas of a source and summarizing it without prior knowledge or opinions, from grades 6-8 RH.6-8.2
Quoting exact words from a source with quotation marks and a paragraph number RH.9-10.1
Basic background: the Civil War ended in the spring of 1865; Ulysses S. Grant commanded the Union armies and Robert E. Lee commanded the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia
Start with something students summarize every week without thinking about it.
Warm-Up Prompt
"A friend missed Saturday's game and asks what happened. One teammate gives her every play in order. Another says, 'We were down by ten at halftime, switched to a zone defense, and came back to win by two.' Which answer tells her more? What did the second teammate keep, and what did she leave out?"
Collect answers. Name what the second teammate did: she kept the starting situation (down by ten), the turning point (the switch to a zone) and the outcome (a win by two), and she dropped the plays that did not change the story. Tell students that RH.9-10.2 asks for exactly this with a historical source: find its central idea and summarize how the key events or ideas develop, accurately and without opinions.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Part 1: Three terms. Put three definitions on the board and keep them up all period.
Topic, central idea and summary
Term
What it answers
Length
Topic
What is the source about?
A few words: "Grant meets Lee"
Central idea
What does the author show or claim about the topic?
One sentence
Summary
How do the key events or ideas develop from start to end?
A short paragraph, in order, with no opinions
A summary is accurate when every statement in it can be traced to the text, the events stay in the text's order (or the order is stated), causes are stated only when the text gives them, and the summary says whose account it is ("Grant says ..."). It leaves out the reader's opinions and outside facts.
Part 2: Model with Grant. Grant wrote his memoirs about twenty years after the events, and he was one of the two people at the center of them. Read T1 aloud. Students mark each place where the meeting changes direction. Work examples 1, 2 and 4 with T1; example 3 previews T2.
1I was conducted at once to where Sheridan was located with his troops drawn up in line of battle facing the Confederate army near by. They were very much excited, and expressed their view that this was all a ruse employed to enable the Confederates to get away. They said they believed that Johnston was marching up from North Carolina now, and Lee was moving to join him; and they would whip the rebels where they now were in five minutes if I would only let them go in. But I had no doubt about the good faith of Lee, and pretty soon was conducted to where he was. I found him at the house of a Mr. McLean, at Appomattox Court House, with Colonel Marshall, one of his staff officers, awaiting my arrival. The head of his column was occupying a hill, on a portion of which was an apple orchard, beyond a little valley which separated it from that on the crest of which Sheridan's forces were drawn up in line of battle to the south.
[...]
2What General Lee's feelings were I do not know. As he was a man of much dignity, with an impassible face, it was impossible to say whether he felt inwardly glad that the end had finally come, or felt sad over the result, and was too manly to show it. Whatever his feelings, they were entirely concealed from my observation; but my own feelings, which had been quite jubilant on the receipt of his letter, were sad and depressed. I felt like anything rather than rejoicing at the downfall of a foe who had fought so long and valiantly, and had suffered so much for a cause, though that cause was, I believe, one of the worst for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse. I do not question, however, the sincerity of the great mass of those who were opposed to us.
[...]
3We soon fell into a conversation about old army times. He remarked that he remembered me very well in the old army; and I told him that as a matter of course I remembered him perfectly, but from the difference in our rank and years (there being about sixteen years' difference in our ages), I had thought it very likely that I had not attracted his attention sufficiently to be remembered by him after such a long interval. Our conversation grew so pleasant that I almost forgot the object of our meeting. After the conversation had run on in this style for some time, General Lee called my attention to the object of our meeting, and said that he had asked for this interview for the purpose of getting from me the terms I proposed to give his army. I said that I meant merely that his army should lay down their arms, not to take them up again during the continuance of the war unless duly and properly exchanged. He said that he had so understood my letter.
4Then we gradually fell off again into conversation about matters foreign to the subject which had brought us together. This continued for some little time, when General Lee again interrupted the course of the conversation by suggesting that the terms I proposed to give his army ought to be written out. I called to General Parker, secretary on my staff, for writing materials, and commenced writing out the following terms:
Ulysses S. Grant, Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant, Volume II, chapter LXVII (excerpt: the meeting at McLean's house) (1886). Public domain (published 1886). Source text.
Topic versus central idea (T1)
Topic: Grant meets Lee at the McLean house. That names what T1 is about, not what Grant shows about it.
Result: Central idea: Grant presents a meeting that opens in suspicion and settles into courtesy, with Lee, not Grant, steering the talk toward surrender. The evidence is at both ends: Sheridan's men believed "this was all a ruse" (paragraph 1), and later "General Lee again interrupted the course of the conversation" to ask for written terms (paragraph 4).
Tracking how events develop (T1)
Mark where the text starts, where it shifts and where it ends. Each mark gets a paragraph number.
Result: Start: Union troops want to attack, but Grant "had no doubt about the good faith of Lee" (paragraph 1). Shift: the talk drifts to old army days and becomes "so pleasant that I almost forgot the object of our meeting" (paragraph 3). End: Lee brings the talk back twice, and Grant calls for "writing materials" (paragraph 4). The development runs from distrust, to friendly talk, to business.
A turning point inside the terms (T2, paragraph 1)
"As I wrote on, the thought occurred to me that the officers had their own private horses and effects."
Result: The terms change while Grant writes: officers will keep their side arms, horses and private property, because taking them would be "an unnecessary humiliation." An accurate summary reports this as Grant's own idea; paragraph 2 adds that "No conversation, not one word" about it passed between the two generals.
A model summary of T1 (53 words)
Task: summarize T1 in 60 words or fewer, in the order events happen, with no opinions.
Result: Grant reaches Appomattox Court House, where Sheridan's troops suspect a trick, but he trusts Lee and meets him at Mr. McLean's house. The two generals talk about their old army days until Lee turns the conversation to the surrender terms. Lee then asks that the terms be written out, and Grant begins writing. (The summary keeps the order of T1, names the turning point, and leaves out the apple orchard and Colonel Marshall.)
Show Diagram 1, and point out that the turning points (boxes 3 and 5) are the places where the meeting starts to be about something new.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Read T2 together. Students work in pairs to build an event chain for it (four or five boxes, each with a paragraph number) and then write a three-sentence summary. Stop after paragraph 3 and ask: Did Lee get what he asked for? What do the written terms say?
1When I put my pen to the paper I did not know the first word that I should make use of in writing the terms. I only knew what was in my mind, and I wished to express it clearly, so that there could be no mistaking it. As I wrote on, the thought occurred to me that the officers had their own private horses and effects, which were important to them, but of no value to us; also that it would be an unnecessary humiliation to call upon them to deliver their side arms.
2No conversation, not one word, passed between General Lee and myself, either about private property, side arms, or kindred subjects. He appeared to have no objections to the terms first proposed; or if he had a point to make against them he wished to wait until they were in writing to make it. When he read over that part of the terms about side arms, horses and private property of the officers, he remarked, with some feeling, I thought, that this would have a happy effect upon his army.
3Then, after a little further conversation, General Lee remarked to me again that their army was organized a little differently from the army of the United States (still maintaining by implication that we were two countries); that in their army the cavalrymen and artillerists owned their own horses; and he asked if he was to understand that the men who so owned their horses were to be permitted to retain them. I told him that as the terms were written they would not; that only the officers were permitted to take their private property. He then, after reading over the terms a second time, remarked that that was clear.
4I then said to him that I thought this would be about the last battle of the war--I sincerely hoped so; and I said further I took it that most of the men in the ranks were small farmers. The whole country had been so raided by the two armies that it was doubtful whether they would be able to put in a crop to carry themselves and their families through the next winter without the aid of the horses they were then riding. The United States did not want them and I would, therefore, instruct the officers I left behind to receive the paroles of his troops to let every man of the Confederate army who claimed to own a horse or mule take the animal to his home. Lee remarked again that this would have a happy effect.
[...]
5General Lee, after all was completed and before taking his leave, remarked that his army was in a very bad condition for want of food, and that they were without forage; that his men had been living for some days on parched corn exclusively, and that he would have to ask me for rations and forage. I told him "certainly," and asked for how many men he wanted rations. His answer was "about twenty-five thousand;" and I authorized him to send his own commissary and quartermaster to Appomattox Station, two or three miles away, where he could have, out of the trains we had stopped, all the provisions wanted. As for forage, we had ourselves depended almost entirely upon the country for that.
Ulysses S. Grant, Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant, Volume II, chapter LXVII (excerpt: writing the terms) (1886). Public domain (published 1886). Source text.
Teacher model for the pair summary: While writing, Grant decides on his own that officers may keep their side arms, horses and private property, and Lee says this will have a happy effect. Lee then asks whether his cavalrymen and artillerists may keep their horses. The written terms do not allow it, but Grant decides to let every man who claims a horse or mule take it home. Before leaving, Lee asks for rations, and Grant supplies them.
Compare the model with two pair summaries under a document camera. Ask which details each pair kept, and use Diagram 2 to sort details into three levels: all details, key events and the central idea.
Practice summary for Activity 2. The passage below was written for this page and contains deliberate errors. Pairs will test it against T1 and T2.
On April 9, 1865, General Ulysses S. Grant met General Robert E. Lee at a house in Appomattox Court House, Virginia. As soon as they sat down, Lee asked for the terms of surrender in writing, and only afterward did the two men talk pleasantly about their years in the old army.
Grant, the greatest general of the war, then wrote out generous terms. Lee handed Grant his sword, and Grant handed it back. Lee demanded that every Confederate soldier be allowed to keep his horse, and Grant had to agree.
Before leaving, Lee asked for food for about fifteen thousand men, and Grant sent rations. The meeting shows that the war ended in a spirit of respect on both sides.
Written for this page (a practice summary, not a published source), Practice Summary: The Meeting at Appomattox (contains deliberate errors for Activity 2). Original passage written for this page.
Independent Practice15-20 minutes
Students read T3 on their own. Its author, Captain Robert E. Lee, was the general's youngest son and a Confederate soldier; he published this memoir in 1904. It tells the same days from the other side, far from the McLean house. Students mark the moments where the author's understanding changes, then take the quiz, which uses T3 together with T1 and T2.
1As I was riding toward Appomattox on the 9th, I met a body of our cavalry with General T. H. Rosser at the head. He told me that General Lee and his army had surrendered, and that this force had made its way out, and was marching back to Lynchburg, expecting thence to reach General Johnston’s army. To say that I was surprised does not express my feelings. I had never heard the word “surrender” mentioned, nor even a suggested, in connection with our general or our army. I could not believe it, and did not until I was positively assured by all my friends who were with Rosser’s column that it was absolutely so. Very sadly I turned back and went to Lynchburg along with them. There I found some wagons from our headquarters which had been sent back, and with them the horses and servants of the staff. These I got together, not believing for an instant that our struggle was over, and, with several officers from our command and others, we made our way to Greensboro, North Carolina. There I found Mr. Davis and his cabinet and representatives of the Confederate departments from Richmond. There was a great diversity of opinion amongst all present as to what we should do. After waiting a couple of days, looking over the situation from every point of view, consulting with my uncle, Commodore S. S. Lee, of the Confederate Navy, and with many others, old friends of my father and staunch adherents of the Southern cause, it was determined to go back to Virginia to get our paroles, go home, and go to work.
2While at Greensboro I went to see President Davis, just before he proceeded on his way further south. He was calm and dignified, and, in his conversation with several officers of rank who were there, seemed to think, and so expressed himself, that our cause was not lost, though sorely stricken, and that we could rally our forces west of the Mississippi and make good our fight. While I was in the room, Mr. Davis received the first official communication from General Lee of his surrender. Colonel John Taylor Woods, his aide-de-camp, had taken me in to see the President, and he and I were standing by him when the despatch from General Lee was brought to him. After reading it, he handed it without comment to us; then, turning away, he silently wept bitter tears. He seemed quite broken at the moment by this tangible evidence of the loss of his army and the misfortune of its general. All of us, respecting his great grief, silently withdrew, leaving him with Colonel Wood. I never saw him again.
Captain Robert E. Lee, the general's son, Recollections and Letters of General Robert E. Lee, chapter VIII, "The Surrender" (excerpt: April 1865) (1904). Public domain (published 1904). Source text.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: On an index card, write one sentence that states the central idea of T1 and T2 read together, and one sentence that names the turning point you think matters most, with its paragraph number.
Teacher note on language and point of view: The sources are quoted exactly as published. Grant, the Union commander, reports that his troops wanted to "whip the rebels," and he calls the Confederate cause "one of the worst for which a people ever fought" while saying he does not question the sincerity of those who fought for it. Captain Lee writes as a Confederate officer and a son, almost forty years later, and speaks admiringly of Davis and of "the Southern cause"; his memoir belongs to a period when many Southern writers remembered the Confederacy sympathetically (the "Lost Cause" tradition), and this passage says nothing about slavery, the central issue of secession. T3 does not say who the "servants of the staff" were. Servants with Confederate armies were often enslaved Black men, and elsewhere in the same memoir the word "servants" is used for people held in slavery on the Custis family estates, so these servants may well have been enslaved; the passage alone does not settle it. In T4, the dispatches Grant received were partly wrong: Secretary of State Seward was badly wounded but survived, and no attack on Vice President Johnson was carried out. Grant's view of Johnson is his own judgment, written twenty years later. Tell students that an accurate summary reports each author's framing as the author's ("Grant writes ...", "Lee's son recalls ...") and does not adopt it.
Homework passage. Grant's account of the night of April 14, 1865, used for the homework problems.
1While in Washington I was very busy for a time in preparing the necessary orders for the new state of affairs; communicating with my different commanders of separate departments, bodies of troops, etc. But by the 14th I was pretty well through with this work, so as to be able to visit my children, who were then in Burlington, New Jersey, attending school. Mrs. Grant was with me in Washington at the time, and we were invited by President and Mrs. Lincoln to accompany them to the theatre on the evening of that day. I replied to the President's verbal invitation to the effect, that if we were in the city we would take great pleasure in accompanying them; but that I was very anxious to get away and visit my children, and if I could get through my work during the day I should do so. I did get through and started by the evening train on the 14th, sending Mr. Lincoln word, of course, that I would not be at the theatre.
2At that time the railroad to New York entered Philadelphia on Broad Street; passengers were conveyed in ambulances to the Delaware River, and then ferried to Camden, at which point they took the cars again. When I reached the ferry, on the east side of the City of Philadelphia, I found people awaiting my arrival there; and also dispatches informing me of the assassination of the President and Mr. Seward, and of the probable assassination of the Vice President, Mr. Johnson, and requesting my immediate return.
3It would be impossible for me to describe the feeling that overcame me at the news of these assassinations, more especially the assassination of the President. I knew his goodness of heart, his generosity, his yielding disposition, his desire to have everybody happy, and above all his desire to see all the people of the United States enter again upon the full privileges of citizenship with equality among all. I knew also the feeling that Mr. Johnson had expressed in speeches and conversation against the Southern people, and I feared that his course towards them would be such as to repel, and make them unwilling citizens; and if they became such they would remain so for a long while. I felt that reconstruction had been set back, no telling how far.
4I immediately arranged for getting a train to take me back to Washington City; but Mrs. Grant was with me; it was after midnight and Burlington was but an hour away. Finding that I could accompany her to our house and return about as soon as they would be ready to take me from the Philadelphia station, I went up with her and returned immediately by the same special train. The joy that I had witnessed among the people in the street and in public places in Washington when I left there, had been turned to grief; the city was in reality a city of mourning. I have stated what I believed then the effect of this would be, and my judgment now is that I was right. I believe the South would have been saved from very much of the hardness of feeling that was engendered by Mr. Johnson's course towards them during the first few months of his administration. Be this as it may, Mr. Lincoln's assassination was particularly unfortunate for the entire nation.
Ulysses S. Grant, Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant, Volume II, chapter LXVIII (excerpt: the news from Washington) (1886). Public domain (published 1886). Source text.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a four-box event chain with the paragraph numbers already filled in, so students only write the event in each box
Provide the summary frame: "At the start, ___. Then ___, which changes ___. By the end, ___."
Gloss older words in the margin: ruse, impassible, paroles, side arms, forage, commissary, despatch
For Advanced Students
Read the whole of Grant's chapter LXVII, including the letters he and Lee exchanged, and summarize how the letters change the meeting's purpose
Write two summaries of T1, one that could appear in a Union newspaper and one in a Confederate one, and then explain which words made each inaccurate
Compare T1 with T3 and write a paragraph on how the same day develops differently for an author inside the meeting and one far from it
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong work states the central idea as a claim about the topic, not as the topic itself, and summarizes in the text's order with paragraph numbers for the turning points. Watch for four errors: retelling every detail instead of choosing key events; adding opinions ("the greatest general"); stating a cause the text does not give (Lee "demanded" the horses); and switching the order of events. A good summary also says whose account it is.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Event Strip Sort
20 minGroups of 3-4
Groups receive eight event strips from T1 and T2 in scrambled order. They put the strips in order, choose the two turning points, and turn the chain into a central idea and a summary.
The Eight Strips (teacher copy, in the correct order)
Sheridan's troops think the surrender offer is a trick
Grant meets Lee at Mr. McLean's house
The generals talk about old army days
Lee asks what terms Grant proposes
Lee asks that the terms be written out
Grant adds that officers keep side arms and horses
Grant agrees that men who own horses or mules may take them home
Lee asks for rations for his army
Procedure
Cut the strips apart and shuffle them before handing them out
Put the strips in order and write the text and paragraph number on each one
Choose the two strips after which the meeting is about something new, and star them
Write one sentence stating the central idea, then a summary of four sentences or fewer
Discussion Questions
Which strip could you remove without changing the story? Which one could you not remove?
Strips 6 and 7 both concern horses. Who raised each one, according to T2?
Did any group put strip 5 before strip 3? What words in T1 settle the order?
Variation for a Shorter Class
Give groups strips 2, 4, 6 and 8 only, and have them write a two-sentence summary.
2
Fix the Summary
15-20 minPairs
Pairs test the practice summary T5 (in the Guided Practice phase) against T1 and T2. It contains five deliberate errors. Pairs find them, name the kind of error, and rewrite the summary so that it is accurate.
Procedure
Number the sentences of T5
For each sentence, write accurate, error or not in T1-T2, with the paragraph of T1 or T2 that decides it
Name each error: wrong order, opinion, invented detail, wrong cause or wrong number
Rewrite T5 in 90 words or fewer so that every sentence can be traced to T1 or T2
Answer Key for the Teacher
Wrong order: the pleasant talk about the old army came first; Lee asked for written terms only later (T1, paragraphs 3-4).
Opinion: "the greatest general of the war" is the summary writer's judgment, not Grant's account.
Invented detail: the sword appears nowhere in T1 or T2, so students cannot trace it to the texts. (If students know the famous story, note that later in the same chapter, in a part not printed here, Grant denies that Lee handed over his sword.)
Wrong cause: Lee did not demand anything. He asked, Grant told him the written terms did not allow it, and Grant then decided to let the men take their animals home (T2, paragraphs 3-4).
Wrong number: Lee asked for rations for "about twenty-five thousand" men (T2, paragraph 5).
The date and the state (Virginia) in the first sentence are correct but come from outside T1 and T2 (Grant's letters in the chapter are dated April 9, 1865). The last sentence is a fair central idea, if it is stated as the writer's reading of Grant's account.
Discussion Questions
Which error would be hardest to notice if you had not read T2? Why?
Is "generous terms" an opinion or a fair summary? What would make it fair?
3
Summary Squeeze
15 minIndividual, then pairs
Students summarize T2 three times, each time shorter, to see which details survive. The last version is the central idea.
Procedure
Write a summary of T2 in 60 words or fewer
Cut it to 30 words or fewer without changing the order of events
Cut it to one sentence of 15 words or fewer: this is the central idea
Trade with a partner, who checks each version for accuracy, order and opinion and circles anything not in T2
Discussion Questions
Which event did you keep in all three versions? Why was it impossible to drop?
Did your 15-word version still show development, or only a topic?
Modification for English Learners
Provide a word bank (terms, officers, horses, rations, generous, accept) and allow the 60-word version to be written as a numbered list first.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: How the Meeting Develops in T1 and T2
Six key events from Grant's account, in order, with the text and paragraph for each. The boxes with heavy borders are turning points: after box 3 the meeting is about surrender terms, and after box 5 the terms are more generous than Grant first proposed.
Diagram 2: From Details to a Central Idea
A summary keeps the middle level (key events) and states the top level (the central idea). The bottom level holds true details from T2 that a short summary can leave out.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RH.9-10.2 Homework: Summarizing Grant's Account of April 14, 1865
Directions: Use T4, Grant's account of the night Lincoln was shot, printed in the Closure phase of the lesson plan. Quote exact words where a problem asks for them, and give the paragraph number. Answer Problems 1-5 in 2-5 sentences each; Problem 6 is a paragraph.
Part 1: Key Events in Order (Problems 1-3)
List the key events of T4 in the order they happen, in five short sentences, and give the paragraph number of each.
Paragraph 1 explains why Grant was not at the theatre with the Lincolns. Quote the words that give his reason, and explain in one sentence why this detail belongs in a summary of T4.
Identify the turning point of T4. Quote the words where it happens, and explain what is different after it for Grant and for the people of Washington (paragraph 4).
Part 2: Central Ideas and How They Develop (Problems 4-6)
In paragraph 3, T4 shifts from telling events to explaining what they meant. Quote the sentence that states what Grant felt the assassination did to reconstruction, and explain how the text changes at that point.
Paragraph 4 contains two different times: what Grant "believed then" and his "judgment now," when he wrote the memoirs about twenty years later. Quote the words that show each, and explain how the idea develops from one to the other.
Write an accurate summary of T4 in 100-130 words that shows how the events and Grant's ideas develop from paragraph 1 to paragraph 4. Keep your own opinions out, attribute Grant's judgments to him, and state the central idea in your last sentence.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Key Events and Order
Chooses the key events, keeps T4's order and gives paragraph numbers
Some key events missing or out of order
Retells details at random or lists no events
Central Idea
States a claim about the topic that the whole text supports
States the topic only, or a claim that fits one paragraph
Missing or not supported by T4
Accuracy
Every statement traces to T4; Grant's judgments are attributed to him
One unsupported statement or unattributed judgment
Several invented details, opinions or wrong causes
Development
Shows how the text moves from events to judgment and from "then" to "now"
Mentions the change without explaining it
No sense of development
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-11 and 15-20 use Captain Robert E. Lee's account (T3), printed in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan. Questions 12-14 use Grant's account (T1 in the Direct Instruction phase and T2 in the Guided Practice phase). Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 1 of T3, how does the author first learn that his father's army has surrendered?
Answer: B
Paragraph 1: Rosser "told me that General Lee and his army had surrendered." Choice A moves the official dispatch, which Davis receives in paragraph 2, to the start. Choice C misreads the uncle, whom the author consults later in Greensboro. Choice D invents Union cavalry; the author meets Confederate cavalry.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How does the author's belief develop over paragraph 1 of T3?
Answer: D
The author "could not believe it" until friends assured him "that it was absolutely so," and even then he gathers the horses "not believing for an instant that our struggle was over." Choice A reverses the order of belief and doubt. Choice B skips the disbelief. Choice C ignores his friends' confirmation.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which words from paragraph 1 of T3 mark the end point of the development in that paragraph?
Answer: C
The paragraph moves from news, to disbelief, to travel, to debate, and ends with the decision to go home and work: the point where the author stops acting as if the war continues. Choice A and choice D are middle stages, when he still expects to fight. Choice B describes the debate that comes just before the decision, not its outcome.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 1 of T3, what does "not believing for an instant that our struggle was over" show about that stage of the events?
Answer: A
By this point friends have confirmed the surrender, yet the author gathers horses and heads south to keep going. The phrase separates the two ideas: one army's surrender and the end of the war. Choice B contradicts his friends' confirmation. Choice C belongs to the end of the paragraph. Choice D attributes the words to Davis, who appears only in paragraph 2.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to paragraph 2 of T3, what did President Davis believe before the dispatch arrived?
Answer: C
Davis "seemed to think ... that our cause was not lost, though sorely stricken, and that we could rally our forces west of the Mississippi and make good our fight." Choice A invents a capture. Choice B is the opposite of his view. Choice D is the officers' decision from paragraph 1, not Davis's belief.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 2 of T3, what do the author and the other officers do after Davis reads the dispatch?
Answer: D
"All of us, respecting his great grief, silently withdrew, leaving him with Colonel Wood." This is the last event of the scene, and the author adds "I never saw him again." Choice A turns Davis's own earlier hope into the officers' advice. Choice B invents a reply; Davis hands the dispatch over "without comment." Choice C mixes in the decision from paragraph 1, which the officers made among themselves.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Paragraph 2 of T3 calls the dispatch "tangible evidence" of the loss. Why does this phrase matter to how the events develop?
Answer: A
Before the dispatch, Davis talked of rallying the forces; the dispatch from Lee himself is proof he can hold, and it leaves him "quite broken." Choice B has no support: the author reports no distrust. Choice C reverses the dispatch's content, which announced a surrender. Choice D invents a suspicion the text never mentions.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which statement is the best central idea of T3?
Answer: B
Both paragraphs move the same way: first disbelief or hope, then acceptance, for the author through news and debate, and for Davis through Lee's dispatch. Choice A is too narrow and adds "eager," which the text does not say. Choice C is a judgment the text never makes. Choice D is contradicted: Davis is "quite broken" by the end.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which detail from T3 could a short summary leave out without becoming inaccurate?
Answer: D
Who escorted the author into the room is true but does not change the events. Choices A, B and C are key events: the news that starts the development, the decision that ends paragraph 1, and the reaction that ends paragraph 2. Dropping any of them would leave a gap in how the events develop.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In what order does the author travel in T3?
Answer: A
He is "riding toward Appomattox," turns back and goes "to Lynchburg," and then "we made our way to Greensboro, North Carolina." Choice B swaps the last two places. Choice C puts Lynchburg first. Choice D starts in Greensboro and adds Richmond, which is not a stop in T3.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence is an accurate summary statement about paragraph 2 of T3?
Answer: C
Paragraph 2: "he handed it without comment to us; then, turning away, he silently wept bitter tears." Choice A invents a purpose and a command role; the author traveled with officers, not at the head of Rosser's force. Choice B turns Davis's hope ("seemed to think") into an order. Choice D contradicts paragraph 1's "great diversity of opinion."
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 2 of T1, how do Grant's own feelings develop?
Answer: B
Grant writes that his feelings, "which had been quite jubilant on the receipt of his letter, were sad and depressed." Choice A reverses the order. Choice C confuses Grant with Sheridan's troops, who suspected a ruse in paragraph 1. Choice D applies to Lee, whose feelings "were entirely concealed," not to Grant, who states his.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to paragraph 4 of T2, why does Grant let Confederate soldiers take their horses and mules home?
Answer: C
Grant says "most of the men in the ranks were small farmers" who might not be able "to put in a crop" without their horses. Choice A invents a refusal: T2 describes a question, not a demand. Choice B has no support in T2. Choice D is contradicted by paragraph 3: "as the terms were written they would not."
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
T1 and T3 describe the same days from two sides. Which statement about how the two texts develop is accurate?
Answer: D
T1 ends as Grant "commenced writing out the following terms," and T3's paragraph 1 ends with the decision to "go home, and go to work." Choice A fits neither ending. Choice B misdescribes both: T1 never turns to anger, and T3 moves from disbelief and hope toward acceptance and grief, not from grief to hope. Choice C is wrong for T3: the author was on the road and in Greensboro, far from the meeting.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Write one sentence that states the central idea of T3. Then quote the detail from paragraph 2 that best supports it.
Model answer: For the author and for Jefferson Davis, the surrender became real only in stages: first as news the author could not believe, then as a decision to go home, and finally as Lee's official dispatch. The best support from paragraph 2 is that Davis "seemed quite broken at the moment by this tangible evidence of the loss of his army," which shows the last stage. Rubric: full credit for a claim about how the surrender became real (not just the topic "the surrender") and an exact quotation from paragraph 2 that supports it; partial credit for a topic-only sentence or a quotation that does not fit.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Summarize T3 in 60-80 words. Keep the events in order and show how both the author and Davis change.
Model answer (68 words): On his way toward Appomattox, the author hears from General Rosser that Lee has surrendered. He cannot believe it until friends confirm it, and even then he thinks the fight will go on, so he travels through Lynchburg to Greensboro. There, after days of discussion, the officers decide to go home for paroles. Davis still hopes to fight on until Lee's official dispatch arrives, and then he weeps. Rubric: full credit for 60-80 words, the correct order (Rosser, disbelief, Lynchburg, Greensboro, decision, dispatch), both changes, and no opinions; partial credit for a correct summary that misses one change or runs out of order.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Trace how Davis's outlook develops in paragraph 2 of T3. Quote one phrase from early in the paragraph and one from late in it, and name the event that comes between them.
Model answer: Early in the paragraph Davis thinks "that our cause was not lost, though sorely stricken," and that the South could "make good our fight." Then he receives "the first official communication from General Lee of his surrender." Late in the paragraph he "silently wept bitter tears" and seemed "quite broken." His outlook moves from hope to grief, and the dispatch is what changes it. Rubric: full credit for two exact quotations in the right order and the dispatch named as the event between them; partial credit for one quotation or no event.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Name two details from T3 that you would leave out of a summary, and explain why leaving them out does not make the summary inaccurate.
Model answer: I would leave out that the author consulted "my uncle, Commodore S. S. Lee, of the Confederate Navy" and that the wagons came with "the horses and servants of the staff." Both are true, but neither changes the direction of the events: the news, the disbelief, the decision to go home and Davis's grief happen the same way without them. A summary is accurate when what it does say is true and in order; it does not have to say everything. Rubric: full credit for two minor details from T3 and a reason based on whether they change the development; partial credit for one detail, or for choosing a key event.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
T3 was published in 1904. How many years after April 1865 is that? Explain why an accurate summary should say "the author recalls" or "Lee's son writes" instead of stating his feelings as plain fact.
Model answer: 1904 - 1865 = 39 years. The feelings in T3, such as "To say that I was surprised does not express my feelings," are the author's memory, written down 39 years later by a Confederate officer about his own father's army. A summary that says "Lee's son recalls that he could not believe the news" stays accurate about whose account it is; a summary that says "everyone in the South refused to believe it" turns one man's memory into a general fact. Rubric: full credit for 39 years and a reason tied to memory or point of view; partial credit for the number only.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
A student wrote: "Rosser's cavalry escaped from Appomattox, so the author bravely led them to Greensboro, where everyone agreed to keep fighting until Davis finally gave up." Name three inaccuracies, then rewrite the sentence so that it is accurate.
Model answer: (1) "Bravely" is the student's opinion, not the text. (2) The author did not lead anyone: he "went to Lynchburg along with them," and he reached Greensboro "with several officers from our command and others." (3) Not everyone agreed: there was "a great diversity of opinion," and the group decided to go home. (4) The text never says Davis gave up; it says he wept. Rewrite: After Rosser's cavalry left Appomattox, the author went with them to Lynchburg and then traveled with other officers to Greensboro, where, after days of discussion, they decided to go home. Rubric: full credit for three inaccuracies with evidence and an accurate rewrite; partial credit for two.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RH.9-10.2 mean?
RH.9-10.2 asks students in grades 9-10 to find the central ideas or information in a primary or secondary history source and to write an accurate summary of how the key events or ideas develop over the course of it. "RH" stands for Reading in History/Social Studies. In practice, students state what the author shows about the topic and summarize the source's movement from beginning to end.
How is RH.9-10.2 different from RH.11-12.2?
Both ask for central ideas and an accurate summary. RH.9-10.2 stresses how key events or ideas develop over the course of the text, so the summary follows the source's order and turning points. RH.11-12.2 asks for a summary that makes clear the relationships among the key details and ideas, such as cause and effect or problem and solution, which usually suits more complex arguments.
What is the difference between a topic and a central idea?
A topic names what a source is about; a central idea says what the author shows or claims about it. "The surrender at Appomattox" is a topic. "Grant presents a meeting that opens in suspicion and settles into courtesy" is a central idea, because it can be supported or challenged with evidence from the text.
What makes a summary accurate in a history class?
A summary is accurate when every statement can be traced to the source. It keeps the source's order, states causes only when the source gives them, uses the source's numbers and names, and attributes judgments to the author ("Grant says"). It adds no opinions and no outside facts, and it leaves out minor details rather than changing them.
How long should a summary of a primary source be?
There is no fixed length, but a summary is much shorter than the source. For a passage of 400-600 words, 60-130 words is a workable range for class. Activity 3 on this page has students cut the same summary to 60, then 30, then 15 words, which shows which events carry the development.
Should a summary include my opinion of the source?
No. A summary reports what the source says; an opinion or evaluation belongs in a separate sentence or a separate task. Words like "bravely," "greatest" or "sadly" are signs that an opinion has slipped in, unless they are the author's own words and are attributed to the author.
How is a summary different from a retelling?
A retelling repeats events in order and keeps most of the details; a summary keeps only the key events and shows how they connect. The test is whether a detail changes the direction of the text. In Grant's account, the apple orchard can be dropped, but Lee's request for written terms cannot.
Why use Grant's account of Appomattox for RH.9-10.2?
It is a short, clear primary source in which the situation visibly changes: from distrust, to friendly talk, to terms that grow more generous as Grant writes them. Its turning points are easy to find and cite, and Captain Lee's account of the same days from the Confederate side lets students summarize a second source whose development runs differently. Both are in the public domain, so the page can quote them.
Which class teaches RH.9-10.2?
RH.9-10.2 is a literacy standard for history and social studies, so it is usually taught in U.S. History or World History in grades 9-10, often alongside English classes that teach RI.9-10.2. It fits any unit that uses documents, and summarizing a source is a common first step in document-based essays.
How do I help students who copy sentences instead of summarizing?
Limit the words and change the form. Have students build an event chain first, with one short phrase per box and no full sentences, then write the summary from the chain with the source turned face down. Checking the summary against the source afterward catches both copying and errors.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to RH.9-10.2: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RH.6-8.2Prerequisite
Find a source's central ideas and summarize it apart from prior knowledge or opinions
Lesson coming soon
Alongside
RH.9-10.3Parallel
Analyze a series of events and decide whether earlier events caused later ones
Lesson coming soon
RI.9-10.2Parallel
Analyze how a central idea develops over a text and write an objective summary