D4.3.6-8C3 FrameworkSocial StudiesCommunicating and Taking ActionGrades 6-8

D4.3.6-8: Adapting Arguments and Explanations for Audiences Beyond the Classroom

In plain English: D4.3.6-8 is the C3 Framework inquiry indicator for grades 6-8 that asks students to present adaptations of arguments and explanations to audiences and venues outside the classroom, using print, oral and digital technologies. Students keep the core message and evidence accurate while changing length, wording and design to fit each audience.

Present adaptations of arguments and explanations on topics of interest to others to reach audiences and venues outside the classroom using print and oral technologies (e.g., posters, essays, letters, debates, speeches, reports, and maps) and digital technologies (e.g., Internet, social media, and digital documentary).

C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 4: Communicating Conclusions and Taking Informed Action · Communicating and Critiquing Conclusions · Official standard

Start the lesson plan Go to the quiz

Lesson Plan

70-75 min

Overview

Students present adaptations of an argument and an explanation: they keep the same core message and evidence but change its form so that it reaches a particular audience (the people it is for) in a particular venue (the place where they will meet it), using print, oral and digital technologies. A poster in a hallway, a morning announcement and a page on a school website each need different words, lengths and designs.

The vehicle is forest fire prevention. Students start from a 1926 handbook that the U.S. Forest Service wrote with California's state forestry and school offices, and a 2024 National Park Service page on how Indigenous nations, including California nations, have used planned fire to care for the land. The topic is a vehicle: the same adaptation steps work for a water-safety campaign, a history fair exhibit or a report to a town meeting.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

Identify the core argument and the core explanation in a source before adapting them
Adapt an argument and an explanation for a named audience and venue outside the classroom
Choose and use print, oral and digital technologies, matching length, wording and design to each
Keep evidence accurate and fair in every adaptation, including dates, sources and other perspectives

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

Constructing explanations with reasoning, sequence, examples and data D4.2.6-8
Constructing arguments from claims and evidence in multiple sources D4.1.6-8
Producing writing suited to task, purpose and audience WHST.6-8.4

Lesson Procedure

70-75 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

Warm-Up10 minutes
Warm-Up Prompt
"Your class wants every student to bring a water bottle on field trips. How would you say that on a poster in the hallway, in a 20-second announcement, and in a text message to a friend? What would change, and what must stay the same?"
Collect answers. Students usually notice that the poster needs few words and a big headline, the announcement needs repetition because listeners cannot reread, and the text message is short and casual. What stays the same is the core message and any facts. Introduce the indicator: presenting an adaptation means changing the form of an argument (a claim that tries to persuade) or an explanation (an account of how or why something happens) for a new audience and venue, without changing what is true.

Direct Instruction20-25 minutes

Part 1: Three kinds of technology. The indicator names print technologies (posters, essays, letters, reports, maps), oral technologies (speeches, debates, announcements) and digital technologies (websites, social media, digital documentaries). For each adaptation, students answer four questions: Who is the audience? Where will they meet it (the venue)? What one message must they take away? What evidence must travel with it, and how will the source be shown?

Where the work goes: "outside the classroom" in this lesson means school channels the teacher approves, such as the library wall, the morning announcements, the family newsletter or the school website. Digital pieces stay as drafts or mockups (models of how a page or slide will look) unless the school publishes them; students do not post on personal accounts.

Source Information: who made each source, when, and for whom
Source	Who made it	When	First audience
1: Causes of Fires	U.S. Forest Service with California's forestry and school offices	1926	California schoolchildren and teachers
2: Fire Laws, and What You Can Do	The same handbook	1926	California schoolchildren and teachers
3: Indigenous Fire Practices	National Park Service	Updated 2024	Visitors to the Park Service website
4: The Cedar Flat Campaign	SVHS, model adaptations for an invented class	Written for this page	Students using this lesson
5: Four Draft Adaptations	SVHS, invented drafts	Written for this page	Students using this lesson (quiz)

Part 2: Read Sources 1-3. Pairs mark the core argument (what the source wants people to do) and the core explanation (how or why something happens). Terms: inflammable (an older word for flammable, easy to set on fire), litter (fallen needles and leaves), pipe heels (the burning bits left in a tobacco pipe), watershed cover (plants that protect the land a river's water comes from), forage (plants that animals eat), woodsman (a person skilled in living and working in the woods), averted (prevented), suppression (putting fires out), cultural burning (planned fires set by Indigenous nations to care for the land, defined in Source 3, paragraph 2), prescribed burn (a planned, controlled fire), hiatus (a pause), steward (to take care of).

How the texts were prepared: Sources 1 and 2 are typed exactly from the page scans of the 1926 handbook, Source 3 is copied from the Park Service page, and [...] marks every place where words are left out. Source 2 uses "his" for everyone and "man" for people, as writing of 1926 often did, and it describes California's fire laws as they were in 1926.

In California, each year, there are on an average over 2,000 fires, which burn over more than 500,000 acres, and cause damage to timber, brush, watershed cover, forage, and improvements amounting to a million or more dollars. After reading this statement, the first question that will probably come to your mind is: “What causes all these destructive fires?”
Throughout the summer months the forest regions of California are frequently visited by severe thunderstorms. Bolts of lightning from these storms often strike trees, and if the tree happens to be dead or has a dead top, they set fire to the wood, throw sparks into the surrounding inflammable needles and litter, and start forest fires. If the tree is green the lightning runs down along the trunk and sets fire to the dry needles and grass at its base. Lightning storms are known to cause from 500 to 700 fires each year in the State, and doubtless they start many more, of which we have no record and which are put out by the rain.
Lightning fires usually occur in the higher mountains. There is no way by which man can prevent them, and the best that can be done is to have the fire lookouts keep a close watch for them, and then to send a crew of men to put them out before they cover a large area.
[...]
Careless and ignorant acts of man are by far the most serious cause of devastating fires. Of the total number of fires which occur in California each year, 70 per cent are man-caused and could therefore be prevented.
Careless hunters and fishermen, or other visitors traveling through the woods, start many fires by throwing away lighted matches, pipe heels, cigars, or cigarettes. Motorists, likewise, are guilty of throwing smoking material carelessly out of their cars, where it often falls into masses of dry, inflammable pine needles and grass, and flares into a blaze with the first wind that comes up. In the valley regions much grain and pasture land, and even farm buildings, are destroyed by fires set in this manner.
Camp fires carelessly built or left untended often spread over the forest floor or through the dry undergrowth, and in time become forest, brush, or grass fires. In this manner not only valuable timber stands and watershed areas but also many beautiful camping grounds are turned into desolate wastes. Next to smokers, campers are the greatest source of fire danger in our forests.

U.S. Forest Service, with the California State Board of Forestry and the State Department of Public Instruction, Lesson No. 2, Causes of Fires (Source 1: the explanation in a 1926 handbook for California schools) (1926). Public domain (published 1926). Source text.

Some one once said that if we could educate every American to be careful with fire, 95 per cent of our national forestry problem would be solved. But some people are careless with fire even after they have been taught how dangerous it is. So the Government and most of the States have found it necessary to fix severe penalties for failure to handle fire in the way good woodsmen should.
California has a number of laws which prohibit acts of carelessness with fire. One law prohibits leaving camp fires burning without some person in attendance, or allowing a fire to escape from control. Another law prohibits the throwing of lighted matches or tobacco or other inflammable material from an automobile or other moving vehicle. The penalties for breaking these laws may be jail sentences of from 15 days to 6 months, or fines of from $50 to $500, or both. Signs are posted throughout the forested regions of the State, calling attention to the fire laws and requesting cooperation in preventing fires. These signs and others giving valuable information to the public should never be written upon, cut, shot at, or otherwise mutilated, and you can render a public service by helping to protect them.
Fire laws are made to help prevent the fires that could be avoided if all people were as careful as they should be. Lightning will always be the cause of some fires in the forests and fields. Accidents, such as the breaking of electric-power lines, will cause others. But if each one of you will adopt as his motto, “Help prevent fires,” and will do his utmost to follow in the woodman’s footsteps in his use of fire, the losses and damage from all except those caused by nature or accidents will be averted.
[...]
It is the duty of everyone who goes into the forests, whether on business or pleasure, to aid in the suppression of fires, as well as to help prevent them from starting. Furthermore, you should make it a point to influence others by your words and actions, to be very careful in the use of fire at all times. [...]

U.S. Forest Service, with the California State Board of Forestry and the State Department of Public Instruction, State and Federal Fire Laws, and What You Can Do (Source 2: the argument in the same 1926 handbook) (1926). Public domain (published 1926). Source text.

For many millennia, fire was integral to many Indigenous peoples’ way of life. Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians used fire to clear areas for crops and travel, to manage the land for specific species of both plants and animals, to hunt game, and for many other important uses. Fire was a tool that promoted ecological diversity and reduced the risk of catastrophic wildfires.
“Cultural burning” refers to the Indigenous practice of “the intentional lighting of smaller, controlled fires to provide a desired cultural service, such as promoting the health of vegetation and animals that provide food, clothing, ceremonial items and more” (Roos, 2021). According to Frank Kanawha Lake, a research ecologist with the USDA Forest Service, and a wildland firefighter of Karuk descent, “[Cultural burning] links back to the tribal philosophy of fire as medicine. When you prescribe it, you’re getting the right dose to maintain the abundance of productivity of all ecosystem services to support the ecology in your culture” (Roos, 2021).
In many areas, cultural burning took a hiatus during the era of fire suppression in the 20th century due to land management agencies’ enforcement of differing practices. However, this has been changing over the past few decades and cultural burning is again becoming an accepted practice for land management in some areas. [...]
[...]
Throughout California, Indigenous nations have used fire for thousands of years as a tool to steward the land, and still do today. When Europeans colonized California, they found a garden of redwoods and other lands. Evidence of this stewardship can still be seen on the trees at Muir Woods. Fire scars tell the story of Indigenous cultural burns set by the first stewards of Muir Woods, the Coast Miwok. Cultural burns passed down through generations have benefited both land and people, by improving soil quality, and spurring growth of certain plant species, creating a healthy and resilient landscape.
[...]
As European colonizers spread across the United States, fire suppression became more common. Without cultural burns, organic matter built up, putting forests at risk of devastating wildfire. [...]
[...]
In 2005, members of the Southern Sierra Miwuk Nation and the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk partnered to conduct a prescribed burn that benefited both ecological and cultural resources in Yosemite Valley. Yosemite firefighters had the opportunity to work with the Native American tribes with knowledge of the area and burning experience that spans thousands of years. The goal of this prescribed fire was to control the non-native and invasive Himalayan blackberry and to encourage growth of traditionally-used plants. The Miwuk used traditional ignition methods for this prescribed burn, which was preceded by a traditional ceremony.

National Park Service, Fire and Aviation Management, Indigenous Fire Practices Shape Our Land (Source 3: the National Park Service today) (2024). US government work (17 U.S.C. 105). Source text.

Part 3: Model the adaptation moves. Work through the five examples. Each one adapts part of a source for one audience, venue and technology.

Print: turning an explanation into a poster (Source 1, paragraphs 1 and 4)
A poster in the school library has to explain the cause of most fires to people walking by. What does the writer keep?
Result: Keep one headline and one number: most fires were started by people, "70 per cent" in 1926 California (paragraph 4). Cut the list of damages (paragraph 1) to one line or move it to small print. A passerby reads for a few seconds, so a poster carries one idea, a picture, and a short source line that gives the year.
Oral: turning an argument into an announcement (Source 2, paragraph 4)
The handbook argues that it is "the duty of everyone" to help prevent fires and to "influence others by your words and actions." How does that become a 30-second announcement?
Result: Speak to listeners directly, use short sentences, and repeat the key line, because listeners cannot reread. End with one action the listener can take, such as staying with a campfire until it is out.
Digital: planning a short slideshow for a website (Sources 1 and 3)
The school website will host a three-slide slideshow. What does digital add, and what must the writer still do?
Result: Digital lets the writer add a chart, links to the full sources and alt text (a short written description of each picture for readers who cannot see it). Each slide still needs a caption (the line of text that goes with a picture) with one fact and its source. A chart of the 1926 numbers must be labeled with the year, so readers do not take it for today's data.
Keeping evidence accurate when shortening (Source 1, paragraph 2)
A student's slide says, "Lightning causes 500 fires a year." Is that a fair short version of Source 1?
Result: No. Source 1 gives a range, "from 500 to 700 fires each year," adds that lightning "doubtless" starts "many more, of which we have no record," and describes California in 1926. A fair short version is "In 1926, lightning started 500 to 700 California fires a year that were recorded." An adaptation may shorten a source but must not change what its numbers mean.
Adding a perspective the old source leaves out (Source 3, paragraphs 3-6)
The 1926 handbook treats every fire in the forest as damage. Should a campaign today say the same?
Result: Source 3 explains that Indigenous nations in California "have used fire for thousands of years as a tool to steward the land," that cultural burning "took a hiatus during the era of fire suppression," and that in 2005 Miwuk and Me-Wuk members partnered with Yosemite to conduct one. A fair adaptation keeps the 1926 argument and gives readers what Source 3 adds, instead of repeating the old idea that every fire is damage.

Guided Practice15 minutes
Read Source 4, the Cedar Flat class's model adaptations, aloud. In pairs, fill one row of the Adaptation Planner (Diagram 1) for each of the three products: audience, venue, technology, core message, evidence kept, how the source is shown. Then discuss:
1. Which product changed the most words, and why was that right for its venue?
2. Find the one fact that appears in all three products. Why did the class keep it everywhere?
3. How does the slideshow include the perspective from Source 3 without dropping the argument about careless fires?
This model was written for this page by SVHS. An invented seventh-grade class in the invented town of Cedar Flat, California, read Sources 1-3 and wrote one core message. Its argument: careful habits with matches, smoking and campfires prevent most forest fires, so everyone should practice them. Its explanation: in the 1920s, a Forest Service handbook reported that 70 per cent of California's fires were started by people (Source 1, paragraph 4), while lightning started 500 to 700 a year (Source 1, paragraph 2). The class also noted that not every fire is careless: some Indigenous nations in California use planned cultural burns to care for the land (Source 3, paragraphs 4 and 6). Then the class adapted the message three ways.
Poster for the school library (print). Headline: MOST FOREST FIRES START WITH PEOPLE. Picture: a campfire ring with a bucket of water beside it. Three lines: Never toss a match. Stay with every campfire. Put it out before you leave. Small print: In 1920s California, about 70 of every 100 forest fires were started by people (U.S. Forest Service handbook, 1926).
Morning announcement (oral, about 40 seconds). "Good morning, Cedar Flat. Here is a question: who starts most forest fires? Lightning? Not usually. In the 1920s, a Forest Service handbook for California schools reported that seven out of ten fires were started by people. Seven out of ten. That means most of them could have been prevented. So if your family goes camping, stay with your campfire and put it out before you leave. Who starts most forest fires? People. Who can prevent them? People."
Slideshow for the school website (digital, three slides). Slide 1 caption: "In the 1920s, California had over 2,000 fires a year, burning more than 500,000 acres." Slide 2, a bar chart, caption: "About 70 per cent of those fires were started by people." Slide 3 caption: "Not all fire is careless. In 2005, members of the Southern Sierra Miwuk Nation and the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk partnered to conduct a prescribed burn in Yosemite Valley." Each slide has alt text describing its picture, and the last screen links to Sources 1 and 3.
SVHS (invented scenario written for this page), The Cedar Flat Campaign (Source 4: SVHS-written model adaptations, an invented scenario). Original passage written for this page.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Each student chooses a new audience and venue from this list: younger students at a school assembly, families reading the school newsletter, or visitors to a school open house. The student adapts the campfire explanation in Source 1, paragraph 6, and the argument in Source 2, paragraph 4, into two products: one print or oral product and one digital product (planned on paper as a mockup). Each product names its audience and venue, keeps at least one fact with its source and year, and stays fair to the perspective in Source 3.
Look-fors for the teacher: the length and wording fit the venue; the 1926 facts are labeled with their year; the source is shown in a way that fits the technology (spoken, printed or linked); no number changes its meaning.
Closure10 minutes
Exit ticket: "Name one thing you changed when you adapted your message, and one thing you refused to change. Why?"
Teacher note on the sources: The 1926 handbook reflects the fire policy of its time, which treated every fire as an enemy; Source 3 shows how the Park Service describes cultural burning today. The lesson asks students to present both fairly and takes no position on any current fire policy.
Quiz passage. Questions 12-19 of the quiz use Source 5, four invented draft adaptations. Each draft is deliberately weak in one way, for students to find and fix.
These four drafts were invented for this page. Students in the same invented Cedar Flat class wrote them for the same campaign. Each draft is deliberately weak in one way, so that students can find and fix the problem.
Ben's poster for the school hallway: "Forest fires are a big problem in California. In the 1920s there were over 2,000 fires a year that burned more than 500,000 acres and caused a million dollars or more of damage to timber, brush, watershed cover, forage and improvements. Lightning caused 500 to 700 of them, but people caused 70 per cent, mostly hunters, fishermen, motorists who threw away matches and cigarettes, and campers who left their fires burning."
Ana's post for the school's website news feed: "95% of forest fires are caused by people!!! Be careful!!!"
Luis's script for the morning announcements: "According to archive dot org slash details slash forest fire preven 79 unit, California had over 2,000 fires a year, burning more than 500,000 acres, causing a million dollars or more of damage, with 500 to 700 started by lightning and 70 per cent man-caused."
Mia's letter to families for the school newsletter: "Dear families, before your next camping trip, please remember the law. In California, leaving a campfire burning without anyone there can mean 15 days to 6 months in jail, or a fine of $50 to $500, or both. Please stay with your fire. Sincerely, Mia."
SVHS (invented scenario written for this page), Four Draft Adaptations (Source 5: invented student drafts for the quiz, each deliberately weak). Original passage written for this page.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

Give the Adaptation Planner with the audience and venue already filled in for each product
Start with the poster only: one headline, one picture idea and one fact with its source
Provide the frame: "My audience is ___. They will see this in ___. The one thing they must remember is ___. My evidence is ___ (source, year)."

For Advanced Students

Plan a storyboard (a frame-by-frame plan) of six frames for a two-minute digital documentary, a short video that explains real events, that uses both the 1926 handbook and the Park Service page, with narration and captions
Write a short debate opening for each side of the question "Should a fire-safety campaign mention planned burns?" using only evidence on this page
Adapt the same message for a reader who speaks another language at home, and explain which words you simplified and why

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Strong adaptations name their audience and venue; change length, wording and design to fit the technology; keep the core argument or explanation the same; carry at least one fact with its source and year in a form that fits the medium; and stay fair to the perspective in Source 3. Watch for posters with paragraphs of text, announcements that read like essays, digital posts that drop the source or change a number's meaning, and 1926 laws or figures presented as today's.

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

Same Message, Three Venues

20 minGroups of 3

Each group adapts one argument, the duty to prevent fires and to "influence others" (Source 2, paragraph 4), and one explanation, how campfires become forest fires (Source 1, paragraph 6). Each member takes one technology: a print poster for the school library, an oral announcement of about 30 seconds, or a digital mockup of two website slides with captions and alt text. Members then compare their products against the Adaptation Planner (Diagram 1).

Checklist for Each Product

Names its audience and venue at the top.
Keeps the core argument and the core explanation.
Carries at least one fact with its source and year.
Fits its technology: few words for print, repetition for oral, captions and alt text for digital.

Look-fors for the Teacher

Campfire explanation: fires "carelessly built or left untended" spread over the forest floor or dry undergrowth and become forest, brush or grass fires (Source 1, paragraph 6).
Argument: everyone who goes into the forest should help prevent fires and influence others (Source 2, paragraph 4).
Accept any product that keeps both and fits its technology; push groups whose three products read the same.

Discussion

Ask: which technology made it hardest to keep the source? Students often find that the oral version needs the source said in a few plain words.

Accuracy Check

15 minPairs

Pairs get six short statements that an invented student wrote for a campaign. For each, they mark it accurate or not accurate by checking Sources 1-3, cite the paragraph, and rewrite any inaccurate statement so that it is true and still short enough for a poster.

The Six Statements

In 1926, people started about 7 of every 10 California fires.
Lightning never starts forest fires.
In the 1920s, California fires burned more than 500,000 acres a year.
Indigenous nations in California have used planned burns for thousands of years.
Every lightning fire can be prevented if people are careful.
Indigenous peoples used fire only to clear land for crops.

Answer Key for the Teacher

1: accurate (Source 1, paragraph 4: "70 per cent are man-caused").
2: not accurate; lightning caused "from 500 to 700 fires each year" (Source 1, paragraph 2).
3: accurate (Source 1, paragraph 1: "over more than 500,000 acres").
4: accurate (Source 3, paragraph 4).
5: not accurate; "There is no way by which man can prevent them" (Source 1, paragraph 3).
6: not accurate; they also used fire for travel, to manage the land for specific plants and animals, to hunt game, "and for many other important uses" (Source 3, paragraph 1).

Variation

Pairs that finish early turn statements 2, 5 and 6 into true captions of no more than twelve words each.

Audience Test

15 minWhole class

Students present their Independent Practice products. For each one, the class plays the named audience: for a poster, they get five seconds to look and then say what they remember; for an announcement, they hear it once and repeat the key line; for a digital mockup, they read the captions and say what the alt text tells them. The presenter then revises one part.

Feedback Rules

Say what the audience remembered, not whether you liked it.
Name one change that would help this audience in this venue.
Check one fact against its source before the product leaves the classroom.

Sharing Outside the Classroom

The teacher chooses which revised products go to approved school channels (library wall, announcements, newsletter, school website). Students do not post products on personal social media accounts.

Diagrams & Visual Aids

1 diagrams

Diagram 1: The Adaptation Planner

The top box holds what stays the same in every adaptation: the core argument and explanation, with their evidence. The three boxes below show what changes for each technology, filled in from the Cedar Flat model (Source 4). Students copy the blank planner for their own products.

Homework Assignment

~30 min

D4.3.6-8 Homework: Adapting the Park Service Explanation

Directions: Use Source 3 (the National Park Service page) and Source 2 (the 1926 fire laws argument), both printed in the Direct Instruction section. You will adapt them for new audiences and venues outside the classroom. Products stay on paper as drafts or mockups. Cite the source and paragraph for every fact you use.

Part 1: Print and Oral (Problems 1-3)

A state park near an invented town wants a small sign for its visitor center. Write a label of no more than 30 words that adapts the explanation in Source 3, paragraph 4. Then name the audience and the venue, and say what you cut and why.
Write a 30-second podcast opening for families that explains what cultural burning is (Source 3, paragraph 2). Use one short quotation from Frank Kanawha Lake, say who he is in a few plain words, and repeat your key line once.
Adapt the argument in Source 2, paragraph 4, into a two-line notice for a campground bulletin board. Keep the idea of influencing others, and add one fact from Source 1 with its year.

Part 2: Digital and Accuracy (Problems 4-6)

Plan a three-picture web gallery about the 2005 burn in Yosemite Valley (Source 3, paragraph 6). For each picture, write a caption of one sentence and alt text of one sentence. The captions must name the nations involved and the goal of the burn.
Accuracy: Source 3, paragraph 5, says that without cultural burns, "organic matter built up." Explain this idea for a reader your age in two sentences, and say which word or words you had to define to keep it accurate.
Compare your visitor-center label (Problem 1) and your web gallery (Problem 4). What changed between them, what stayed the same, and why?

Rubric

Criterion	Full Credit (2 pts)	Partial Credit (1 pt)	No Credit (0 pts)
Fit to audience and venue	Length, wording and design fit the named audience and venue	Mostly fits, with one mismatch	Does not fit, or no audience named
Argument and explanation kept	The core argument or explanation is clear and unchanged in meaning	Partly kept, or blurred	Lost or changed
Accurate evidence and source	Facts keep their meaning and carry their source and year in a form that fits the medium	Facts accurate but a source or year missing	Facts changed or wrong
Technology	Uses the features of print, oral or digital well (headline, repetition, captions and alt text)	Uses some features	Ignores the technology

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 1-11 and 20 use Sources 1-3 (in the Direct Instruction section). Questions 12-19 use Source 5, four invented draft adaptations (in the Closure section). For each multiple-choice question, choose the best answer. For short-answer questions, write three to six sentences or the product the question asks for.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 1 says California had "over 2,000 fires" a year and that 70 per cent were man-caused (paragraphs 1 and 4). About how many of 2,000 fires is 70 per cent?
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Lightning started "from 500 to 700 fires each year" (Source 1, paragraph 2). If there were 2,000 fires a year, what share of them is that?
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student shortens Source 1, paragraph 6, for a poster: "Campers are the greatest fire danger in our forests." Is this an accurate short version?
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Your class wants to reach families who check the school website on their phones. Which technology fits this audience and venue?
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 2, paragraph 3, gives the motto "Help prevent fires." Why would this motto work well in an oral announcement?
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which line from the sources would make the best headline for a poster about preventing fires?
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Frank Kanawha Lake says cultural burning "links back to the tribal philosophy of fire as medicine" (Source 3, paragraph 2). Which version keeps his meaning for younger students?
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 3, paragraph 3, says cultural burning "took a hiatus during the era of fire suppression." Which short version keeps the meaning?
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A website slide shows a bar chart of 1926 California fire causes. Which alt text is best?
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence for a campaign presents both the 1926 argument and the Park Service perspective fairly?
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which source would be the strongest to cite in an adaptation about how California's Indigenous nations use fire today?
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Read Ben's poster in Source 5, paragraph 2. What is its main problem as a poster?
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Read Ana's post in Source 5, paragraph 3. What is its main problem?
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Read Luis's announcement in Source 5, paragraph 4. Why will listeners have trouble with it?
Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Read Mia's letter in Source 5, paragraph 5. What is its main problem?
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Rewrite Ben's draft (Source 5, paragraph 2) so that it works as a hallway poster. Include a source line with the year.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Rewrite Luis's announcement (Source 5, paragraph 4) so that it works for listeners in about 30 seconds. Keep at least one fact and its source.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Rewrite Ana's post (Source 5, paragraph 3) to fix its main problem for the school website. Add a source with its year, and write one sentence of alt text for a picture you would post with it.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Rewrite Mia's letter (Source 5, paragraph 5) to fix its main problem while keeping her argument.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
A school open house will have a table about forest fires. Choose one technology (print, oral or digital) to present the explanation in Source 3, paragraph 4, to visiting families. Describe your product and explain two choices you made to fit the audience and to keep the explanation accurate.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does D4.3.6-8 mean?

D4.3.6-8 asks students in grades 6-8 to present adaptations of arguments and explanations on topics of interest to others, reaching audiences and venues outside the classroom with print and oral technologies (such as posters, letters and speeches) and digital technologies (such as websites and digital documentaries).

What is an adaptation in D4.3.6-8?

An adaptation keeps the same core message and evidence but changes the form so that it fits a new audience and venue. A report can become a poster, an announcement or a web page; what changes is length, wording, design and how the source is shown, not what is true.

Do students have to post on social media to meet this indicator?

No. The indicator names social media as one example of digital technology, but students can meet it with a website slideshow, a mockup or a storyboard shared through channels the school approves. This lesson keeps digital products as drafts unless the school publishes them.

What counts as a venue outside the classroom?

Any place where people beyond the class meet the work: a library wall, morning announcements, a family newsletter, an open house or the school website. The audience should be real or clearly named, so students can fit the product to it.

Why does this lesson use forest fire prevention?

It is a vehicle for the skill. Fire safety is a topic of interest to families and communities, and the sources include both an argument (prevent careless fires) and an explanation (how fires start), plus a modern perspective from the National Park Service that a fair adaptation must include.

How do students keep an adaptation accurate when they shorten it?

They keep each number's meaning, its place and its year, and they name the source in a form the medium allows: small print on a poster, a few spoken words in an announcement, a link on a website. A saying or estimate must not become a count.

Why include the Park Service page about Indigenous fire practices?

Because the 1926 handbook treats every fire as damage, while Source 3 explains that Indigenous nations in California have used fire for thousands of years as a tool to steward the land, including through cultural burning. Presenting perspectives fairly means a campaign about careless fires should not suggest that all fire is the same.

How is D4.3.6-8 assessed?

With products and short answers scored on fit to audience and venue, a kept argument and explanation, accurate evidence with its source, and good use of the technology. The rubric on this page uses those four criteria.

How does D4.3.6-8 connect to the Common Core literacy standards?

It works with WHST.6-8.6, using technology to produce and publish writing, and SL.8.5, integrating multimedia and visual displays into presentations. Both are about choosing the form that helps an audience understand.

What comes after D4.3.6-8?

D4.3.9-12 asks high school students to adapt arguments and explanations that feature evocative ideas and perspectives on issues and topics, for a range of audiences and venues outside the classroom.