D4.2.6-8C3 FrameworkSocial StudiesCommunicating and Taking ActionGrades 6-8
D4.2.6-8: Constructing Explanations with Reasoning, Sequence and Data
In plain English: D4.2.6-8 is the C3 Framework inquiry indicator for grades 6-8 that asks students to construct explanations using reasoning, correct sequence, examples, and details with relevant information and data, while acknowledging the strengths and weaknesses of the explanations. Students explain how or why something happened, in order and with evidence, and say what their sources cannot show.
Construct explanations using reasoning, correct sequence, examples, and details with relevant information and data, while acknowledging the strengths and weaknesses of the explanations.
C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 4: Communicating Conclusions and Taking Informed Action · Communicating and Critiquing Conclusions · Official standard
Students construct an explanation: an answer to a how or why question that shows, step by step, how something happened. A strong explanation uses reasoning (links such as because and so that connect causes to effects), a correct sequence (events in the order they happened), examples, and details with relevant information and data, and it ends by saying honestly where it is strong and where it is weak.
The vehicle is the Blizzard of March 1888, which shut down New York City. Students read five sources written by reporters, the city's weather office and a 1920 encyclopedia, including the experiences of clerks, shop workers, milkmen, newsdealers and letter carriers. The storm is a vehicle for the skill: the same steps work for explaining how a law was passed, why a river flooded or how a factory changed a town.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Construct a written explanation that answers a how or why question with reasoning that links causes to effects
Put events in the correct sequence using clock times, dates and time words from the sources
Support an explanation with relevant examples and with details that include information and data
Acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses of an explanation, including what its sources cannot show
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Constructing arguments from claims and evidence from multiple sources D4.1.6-8
Identifying evidence from multiple sources and its limits D3.3.6-8
Citing specific textual evidence from primary and secondary sources RH.6-8.1
"A friend missed the bus, was late to school and missed a quiz. Explain to a teacher how it happened, in order, in three sentences. Which words in your sentences show that one thing caused the next?"
Collect two or three answers and underline the linking words students used (because, so, then, after that). Introduce the indicator: an explanation answers how or why something happened. It is different from an argument, which takes a position and tries to convince. Today students will explain how one storm stopped New York City in a single day, and then say honestly how good their explanation is.
Direct Instruction20-25 minutes
Part 1: The five parts of an explanation. Write the five parts on the board, with a one-line definition of each:
Reasoning: the links that show how one thing led to another, often signaled by because, so, as a result.
Correct sequence: putting events in the order they really happened, using clock times, dates and time words (first, next, by noon).
Examples: specific cases that show a general point, such as one group of workers who could not do their jobs.
Details with relevant information and data: facts and numbers (data) that bear on the question, each with its source.
Strengths and weaknesses: what the explanation shows well, and what it cannot show because of gaps or limits in its sources.
The question. How did one storm stop New York City in a single day? A blizzard is a fierce, cold wind with blinding snow (Source 5). The storm began on Sunday, March 11, 1888, and raged until March 14 (Source 5). Sources 1-4 were written by New York reporters during the storm and reprinted that year in a book, New York in the Blizzard, compiled by N. A. Jennings. Source 1 calls New York and Brooklyn "the two great cities that the bridge unites": in 1888 they were separate cities, joined by the Brooklyn Bridge.
Source Information: who made each source, when, and how the maker knew (from the sources and the 1888 book)
Source
Who made it
When
How the maker knew
1: The First Day of the Blizzard
A New York newspaper reporter (the book reprints the report without naming the paper or the writer)
During the storm, 1888
Saw the streets that morning
2: Broadway Stores Shut
A New York reporter
During the storm, 1888
Reports from downtown streets and offices
3: Mails and wires
A New York reporter, quoting the telegraph company's wire chief
During the storm, 1888
Mail arrival times (the source does not say who supplied them) and the wire chief's statement
4: The Storm Passing
A New York reporter, reporting the readings of the Signal Service weather office
During the storm, 1888 (the book does not print the date of the evening)
Instruments: a barometer and a wind gauge
5: Blizzard
The Encyclopedia Americana
1920, about thirty years later
Collected records of many storms
Part 2: Read the sources. Pairs read Sources 1-5 and mark each event with its time. Terms: sleet (rain that freezes into ice as it falls), persistency (refusing to give up), inconsiderable (very small), jaded (worn out), depots (railroad stations), larders (food cupboards), horse cars (streetcars pulled by horses), the elevated (trains on tracks raised above the street), mails (bags of letters carried by train), telegraph (messages sent as electric signals along wires on poles), barometer or glass (an instrument that measures air pressure), velocity (speed), probabilities (the 1888 weather office's word for forecasts), Signal Service (the weather office of 1888; Source 4 says its New York office was in the tower of the Equitable Building and its chief office was in Washington).
How the texts were prepared: Sources 1-4 are typed exactly from the page scans of the 1888 book, and [...] marks every place where words are left out. The misspellings "proabbilities" and "litte" in Source 4 are the book's own. Source 5 is the complete encyclopedia article, in which a long dash printed before a temperature stands for a minus sign (so the dash before 28° means 28 degrees below zero).
1At little after 12 o'clock on Sunday night, or Monday morning, the severe rain that had been pelting down since the moment of the opening of the church doors suddenly changed to a sleet storm that plated the sidewalks with ice. Then began the great storm that is to become for years a household word, a symbol of the worst of weathers and the limit of nature's possibilities under normal conditions.
2At a quarter past 6 o'clock, when the extremely modified sunlight forced its way to earth, the scene in the two great cities that the bridge unites was remarkable beyond any winter sight remembered by the people. The streets were blocked with snowdrifts. [...]
3The wind howled, whistled, banged, roared, and moaned as it rushed along. It fell upon the house sides in fearful gusts, it strained great plate glass windows, rocked the frame houses, pressed against doors so that it was almost dangerous to open them. It was a visible, substantial wind, so freighted was it with snow. It came in whirls, it descended in layers, it shot along in great blocks [...]
4It was Monday morning, when a day of rest from shopping had depleted the larders in every house, and yet there were no milk carts, no butcher wagons, no basket-laden grocer boys, no bakers' carriers. In great districts no attempt was made to deliver the morning papers. The cities were paralyzed.
N. A. Jennings, compiler, reprinting New York newspaper reports, The First Day of the Blizzard, the opening paragraphs (Source 1: a New York newspaper account of Monday, March 12, 1888, reprinted in New York in the Blizzard) (1888). Public domain (published 1888). Source text.
1The persistency with which these men and women struggled toward the usual scene of their daily labors was usually but poorly rewarded. The business done anywhere was inconsiderable, and in many cases the doors were closed altogether and half hidden in drifted snow. As late as 10 o'clock in the down-town streets and avenues clerks and shop girls stood shivering in doorways and hallways, sheltering themselves as well as they could, and anxiously waiting for the arrival of the holder of the keys. Only about half, as a rule, of the force in all the business houses, banks, and offices was on hand by noon, and this number was not added to during the slow-moving hours of the afternoon up to the time that an early closing was generally determined on to give everybody a chance to try and get home.
2In the Equitable Insurance office 93 out of 205 clerks made their appearance, and no officer of higher rank than the assistant cashier was on hand. [...]
[...]
3The milkmen had all succeeded in getting their supplies from the railroad depots before the storm had developed to its full intensity. But in the work of distribution they were caught badly. In many cases it was nearly noon before, with their horses jaded and themselves half frozen, they stopped the service, with most of their customers supplied. With the newsdealers it was much the same. They got their usual stores of papers in due season, but when it came to serving routes the conditions were such that few attempted it. Customers who came after their papers were very welcome to them, but the job of leaving them from door to door was too much for the dealers. They preferred to be " stuck" with whatever unsold papers their luck might determine. The letter carriers made a great struggle to get out the two early deliveries of Sunday stuff, but so many business places were closed, and the work was so difficult, that not much headway was made.
N. A. Jennings, compiler, reprinting New York newspaper reports, Broadway Stores Shut and Snowed Under (Source 2: workers and delivery people on Monday, March 12, 1888, from New York in the Blizzard) (1888). Public domain (published 1888). Source text.
1There were forty out-of-town mails due between 4 o'clock yesterday morning and noon. Of these only four arrived—the Washington, Baltimore, and Philadelphia mail over the Pennsylvania Road at 4:05 A. M., came in the office at 6:30. The Boston mail due at 4:10 A. M. over the New York and New England Road was received at 6:30 o'clock. The Chicago mail, due over the New York Central Road at 6:45, reached the office at five minutes before 1 o'clock. The Boston and Springfield express due at 7:05, arrived at 12:40. At the close of the day's business no other mails had been received, and the exact locations of the trains unknown.
2"There is not a single wire working between New York and the South," said Wire Chief Baldwin of the Western Union Telegraph Company in the afternoon. "As early as 9:30 last night we received news to the effect that sixty poles, bearing some of our most important wires, had fallen in Washington. Shortly after that information we lost Baltimore, then we lost Washington, and then Philadelphia. We have but ten wires to Buffalo, and should have fifty, while to Albany we have not quite ten, and they are working very badly. [...]
3As far as Harlem and a little beyond where our lines run in aerial cables we are all right, but past the point where the wires separate we have no connection. Never before in the history of telegraphy has New York been cut off from communication with the rest of the world. [...]
N. A. Jennings, compiler, reprinting New York newspaper reports, Mails and telegraph wires on March 12, 1888 (Source 3: from New York in the Blizzard) (1888). Public domain (published 1888). Source text.
1At 10 o'clock last evening the barometer at the Signal Service office in the tower of the Equitable Building had ceased to fall. It was at 29.64, which was low enough, and it had not begun to rise. But a rise was considered certain to be the next change, and that speedily. The wind gauge record showed that the wind had been very variable. The prevailing direction as well as the direction from which it came strongest was westerly, and the range was only to northwest. The greatest velocity was forty-eight miles an hour, and was recorded about 6 P. M. The fall of snow was sixteen inches. The temperature at 10 o'clock last evening was 11° above having fallen more or less steadily from the 35° recorded twenty-four hours before.
2In the absence of any reports from any stations south of this or from the Chief Signal office in Washington no proabbilities could be furnished. The most help in that direction was from Erie, Pa., and other point West, in the shape of reports of clear weather. This and the fact that at midnight the glass was showing a disposition to rise while the temperature had fallen a litte more, made it safe to say that the storm was passing off to the eastward. The snow-bound city was thus promised a chance for breaking its bonds in the morning.
N. A. Jennings, compiler, reprinting New York newspaper reports, The Storm Passing (Source 4: the Signal Service weather office's readings, as reported in New York in the Blizzard) (1888). Public domain (published 1888). Source text.
1BLIZZARD, a peculiarly fierce and cold wind, accompanied by a very fine, blinding snow which suffocates as well as freezes men and animals exposed to it. The origin of the word is popularly conceded to the United States where there is evidence of its use as early as 1840; recent investigations have shown that it is used in the local dialect of Lancashire, England, where it has been traced back over several centuries and is generally written “bleasard.” It came into general use in American newspapers during the bitterly cold winter of 1880-81, and has been in more or less general use since 1888. Such a storm comes up very suddenly and overtakes the traveler without premonition. The sky becomes darkened, and the snow is driven by a terrible wind which comes with a deafening roar. One of the most severe of these storms recorded in the West was that of January 1888 which extended from Dakota to Texas. The thermometer in some places fell from 74° to —28° F., and in Dakota to —40°. The number of deaths amounted to 235. Children were frozen on their way home from school, and farmers in their fields, and travelers were suffocated by the fine snow. The blizzard which will long be remembered in the Eastern States began 11 March 1888, and raged until the 14th, New York and Philadelphia being the cities most affected. The wind at one time blew at the rate of 46 miles an hour. The streets and roads were blocked, railroad trains snowed up for days, telegraphic communication cut off and many lives were lost. Blizzards are due to a southward flow of a large mass of cold air which is being pushed out from a centre of high barometric pressure. The flow progresses regularly according to the differences of density and pressure on either side of its front line of advance. This regularity of advance has been turned to account by the United States Weather Bureau, which is able to forecast with great accuracy the advance of a blizzard, and thus in almost every case the populations affected are amply forewarned.
The Encyclopedia Americana, Blizzard (Source 5: an encyclopedia explanation written about thirty years later) (1920). Public domain (published 1920). Source text.
Part 3: Model the five parts. Work through the five examples. Each one builds a piece of an explanation from a specific passage and shows the thinking behind it.
Reasoning: linking causes to effects (Source 1, paragraphs 1-2)
Source 1 describes rain, then sleet, then snow and wind. How can a writer turn these descriptions into reasoning?
Result: Connect each step to its effect with a linking word: the rain changed to sleet that "plated the sidewalks with ice" (paragraph 1); then snow came with a fierce wind, so by morning "the streets were blocked with snowdrifts" (paragraph 2). Each because or so must be backed by a source; a link the sources do not show is a guess.
Correct sequence: ordering events by time words (Source 2, paragraphs 1 and 3)
Put these events from Source 2 in order: offices close early; milkmen collect their milk at the depots; clerks wait in doorways; milkmen stop their routes.
Result: Use the time words. The milkmen got their supplies "before the storm had developed to its full intensity" (paragraph 3), so that comes first. Clerks were still waiting "as late as 10 o'clock" (paragraph 1). Milkmen stopped "nearly noon" (paragraph 3). The "early closing" came during "the slow-moving hours of the afternoon" (paragraph 1). The milkmen's event has no clock time, so the writer should say it came early in the morning, not give an exact hour.
Data: checking a number against a claim (Source 2, paragraphs 1-2)
The reporter says "only about half" of office workers came in. Does the Equitable Insurance office's count support that?
Result: 93 out of 205 clerks came in (paragraph 2). 93 ÷ 205 ≈ 0.45, or about 45 percent, which is close to half. So the data supports the claim for that office. A careful explanation reports it as "at one large office, 93 of 205 clerks arrived" rather than turning it into a fact about every office.
Examples: choosing one that fits the point (Source 1, paragraph 4, and Source 2, paragraph 3)
A student wants an example for the point "The storm stopped the food deliveries people needed." Which example fits best?
Result: Source 1 says there were "no milk carts, no butcher wagons, no basket-laden grocer boys, no bakers' carriers" on a morning when the larders were empty after Sunday (paragraph 4). That example matches the point exactly: food, deliveries, Monday morning. An example about the wind breaking windows is true but shows a different point.
Strengths and weaknesses: how far does the evidence reach? (Source 1, paragraph 4)
Source 1 ends, "The cities were paralyzed." Should an explanation say the whole city stopped?
Result: Strength: a reporter saw the empty streets that morning. Weakness: the same paragraph says papers were not delivered "in great districts," which is not every district, and the reporter could not see every street. An honest sentence: "In the parts of the city the reporters saw, daily life stopped; the sources do not show every neighborhood."
Guided Practice15 minutes
Read Source 6, a model explanation written for this page, aloud. Pairs mark it with five colors, one for each part of an explanation, using the Explanation Builder (Diagram 1). Then discuss:
Which sentences show reasoning? Underline every because and so.
Is the sequence correct? Check each step against Sources 1, 2 and 4.
Which details are examples, and which are data?
Paragraph 4 names two weaknesses. Can you add a third? (Possible answers: the sources were all written by reporters in business areas; no source here comes from the workers themselves; the reports do not count injuries.)
1This model explanation was written for this page by SVHS to show the parts of a strong explanation. It answers the question "How did one storm stop New York City in a single day?" using Sources 1, 2 and 4.
2The storm worked in steps. First, a heavy rain that began on Sunday, March 11, 1888, turned to sleet a little after midnight and coated the sidewalks with ice (Source 1, paragraph 1). Next, snow and a fierce wind arrived together, so that by a quarter past 6 on Monday morning the streets were blocked with snowdrifts (Source 1, paragraph 2). The wind stayed fierce: the weather office's report gives its fastest speed as forty-eight miles an hour (Source 4, paragraph 1).
3Because the streets were blocked, the people who kept the city running could not do their jobs. Milkmen got their milk from the train depots but were caught by the storm on their routes, and newsdealers mostly gave up delivering papers door to door (Source 2, paragraph 3). Clerks and shop workers who set out found locked doors and waited in doorways for whoever held the keys (Source 2, paragraph 1). By noon only about half of the workers had arrived; at one large insurance office, 93 of 205 clerks came in (Source 2, paragraphs 1-2). The city stopped because deliveries, travel and work failed one after another, not because people chose to stay home.
4This explanation is strongest for Monday morning in the business streets, because reporters wrote it down that same day and one office's count of its clerks gives a real number. It is weaker in two ways. The reports come mostly from downtown streets and offices, so they may not show what happened in homes far from downtown. And the count comes from one office, so "about half" for the other offices is the reporter's estimate (Source 2, paragraphs 1-2).
SVHS (sample explanation written for this page), How One Storm Stopped a City (Source 6: an SVHS-written model explanation). Original passage written for this page.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Each student writes a one-paragraph explanation (six to eight sentences) answering a new question: Why could New York not send or receive news and mail on March 12, 1888? Use Source 3, and Sources 1 and 4 if they help. The paragraph must include at least two reasoning links, events in the correct order with at least two time words, one example, two pieces of data with their sources, and a final sentence that names one strength and one weakness of the explanation.
Look-fors for the teacher: every number is tied to a source and paragraph; time words match the source; the final sentence names a real limit of the sources, not a general apology such as "I might be wrong."
Closure10 minutes
Exit ticket: "Write one sentence that tells a reader where your explanation is strongest, and one sentence that tells where it is weakest. Name the source behind each."
Teacher note on the sources: Sources 1-4 come from a book of newspaper reports reprinted in 1888; the book does not name each paper or reporter. The reports use some terms of the time, such as "shop girls" for young women who worked in stores; point this out as period language. The lesson uses the storm only as a vehicle for the explanation skill.
Quiz passage. Questions 12-17 of the quiz use Source 7, three invented student drafts. Each draft is deliberately weak in one way, for students to find and fix.
1These three drafts were invented for this page. Each one answers the question "Why could New York not send or receive news and mail on March 12, 1888?" Each draft is deliberately weak in one way, so that students can find and fix the problem.
2Draft A (Marco): The snow piled up all day Monday, and by Monday night it was so deep that the telegraph poles in Washington began to fall. After that, New York lost its wires to the South. This shows that the snow in New York came first and the broken wires came last.
3Draft B (Priya): Blizzards are very dangerous. In the West in January 1888, 235 people died, and the thermometer in some places fell from 74 degrees to 28 below zero (Source 5). So it makes sense that New York could not send or receive mail in March.
4Draft C (Jordan): The telegraph wires failed, so New York was cut off. The wire chief said there was not a single working wire to the South, and only ten wires to Buffalo instead of fifty (Source 3, paragraph 2). The trains carrying mail were stuck, so only four of forty mails arrived (Source 3, paragraph 1). These facts prove completely why the city was cut off, and no other evidence is needed.
SVHS (invented scenario written for this page), Three Draft Explanations (Source 7: invented student drafts for the quiz, each deliberately weak). Original passage written for this page.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a timeline strip with the clock times already filled in (midnight, 6:15 a.m., 10 a.m., noon, afternoon), so students only place the events
Assign Sources 1 and 2 first; add Source 3 for the independent practice only
Provide the frame: "First, ___ (Source __). Because ___, ___. For example, ___. The data show ___. This explanation is strong because ___, but it cannot show ___."
For Advanced Students
Compare what the 1920 encyclopedia (Source 5) can add to an explanation with what the reporters saw (Sources 1-4), and explain why an explanation might need both
Write a non-linear version of the model explanation (one that does not start at the beginning): begin with the city at a standstill at noon on Monday, then explain how it got there, keeping every event in its true order
Write a second version of the independent practice paragraph for a reader who knows nothing about 1888, adding the definitions that reader would need
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong explanations answer how or why, not just what; they put events in the order the sources give, with time words; they back each because or so with a source; they use examples that fit the point and data with their sources; and they end with a specific strength and a specific weakness, such as the time the sources stop or the places the reporters did not see. Watch for students who list facts without links, who mix up the order of events, who use numbers from a different storm, or who claim their sources prove everything.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Sequence Strip
15 minPairs
Each pair gets seven event cards taken from Sources 1 and 2 and a long paper strip marked with a time line. Pairs place the cards in order, write the time word or clock time from the source on each card, and draw an arrow labeled so or because between any two cards where the sources show that one event caused the next.
The Seven Cards
Card A: Rain falls from the time the churches open on Sunday.
Card B: Clerks and shop workers wait in doorways for the person with the keys.
Card C: Milkmen collect their milk at the railroad depots.
Card D: The rain turns to sleet and coats the sidewalks with ice.
Card E: Worn-out milkmen stop their routes, with most of their customers supplied.
Card F: Offices decide on an early closing so workers can try to get home.
Card G: The streets are blocked with snowdrifts.
Answer Key for the Teacher
Order: A (Sunday, Source 1, paragraph 1), D (a little after midnight, paragraph 1), C (before the storm reached its full strength, Source 2, paragraph 3), G (by a quarter past 6, Source 1, paragraph 2), B (as late as 10 o'clock, Source 2, paragraph 1), E (nearly noon, Source 2, paragraph 3), F (the afternoon, Source 2, paragraph 1).
Card C has no clock time. Accept it anywhere between D and B if the pair explains its reasoning; the source says only that it came early.
Arrows the sources support: D to G is weather building on weather; G to E and G to B (blocked streets kept deliveries and workers from moving); G to F (Source 2, paragraph 1, gives the reason for the early closing: "to give everybody a chance to try and get home" through the snow).
Discussion
Ask: which card was hardest to place, and why? What does a writer do when a source gives no exact time? (Use the source's own words, such as "early in the morning," instead of inventing a time.)
2
Explanation Builder Stations
20 minGroups of 3
Each group draws one question card and builds an explanation on a blank copy of Diagram 1: the sequence row, the reasoning arrows, one example, two pieces of data or detailed information with their sources, one strength and one weakness. Then the group writes the explanation as one paragraph of five to seven sentences.
Question Cards
Why were the streets nearly impossible to use by Monday morning? (Source 1)
Why did food and newspaper deliveries fail? (Source 1, paragraph 4, and Source 2, paragraph 3)
Why did so many offices close early on Monday? (Source 2, paragraphs 1-2)
Look-fors for the Teacher
Card 1: rain, then sleet, then snow and wind, in that order; wind details from Source 1, paragraph 3. A fair weakness: Source 1 describes what one reporter saw, not the whole city.
Card 2: the empty larders after Sunday make the missing deliveries matter; milkmen and newsdealers are the examples. A fair weakness: the sources say "in many cases" and "few attempted it," not how many.
Card 3: the reason the source gives is to let "everybody" try to get home; the supporting details are that business was "inconsiderable" and only about half the workers came, with the insurance office's count as the data. A fair weakness: one office's count is not a count of every office.
Variation
Groups that finish early rewrite their paragraph as a three-sentence explanation for a younger student, keeping the sequence and one piece of data.
3
Strengths and Weaknesses Gallery
15 minWhole class, moving between posted paragraphs
Groups post their Activity 2 paragraphs. Every student visits two other paragraphs and leaves two sticky notes on each: one that begins "This explanation is strong because..." and one that begins "This explanation cannot show... because the sources...". Then each group reads its notes and adds a final sentence to its own paragraph that acknowledges one strength and one weakness.
Rules for the Notes
Name a specific part of the explanation (a link, an example, a number), not the handwriting or the length.
Every weakness must point to a limit of the sources, such as a time they stop, a place they do not cover, or a number that is an estimate.
Every strength must say why a reader can trust that part, such as who saw it or how it was measured.
Discussion
Ask: does admitting a weakness make an explanation less convincing or more? Students usually find that a specific, honest limit makes the rest of the explanation easier to trust.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
1 diagrams
Diagram 1: The Explanation Builder
The five parts of an explanation, filled in from the model explanation (Source 6). The top row is the sequence, left to right in time, and each arrow is a reasoning link ("so"). The middle row holds the examples and the data, each with its source; the bottom row holds the strengths (green) and weaknesses (red). Students copy the blank frame for their own explanations.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
D4.2.6-8 Homework: How Did the Weather Change, and Could Anyone Forecast It?
Directions: Use Sources 1, 4 and 5 (printed in the Direct Instruction section). The question for this homework is "How did the weather change during the storm, and how well could people in 1888 forecast it?" Cite the source and paragraph for every piece of evidence. You are scored on how you build and check your explanation.
Part 1: Data and Sequence (Problems 1-3)
Data: Source 4, paragraph 1, gives two temperatures. By how many degrees did the temperature fall, and over how many hours? Write one sentence that uses this data in an explanation of how the weather changed.
Sequence: Source 4 describes "10 o'clock last evening," but the book does not print the date. Use the 35° reading "twenty-four hours before" and the weather described in Source 1, paragraph 1, to decide which evening is most likely. Say how sure you can be, and why.
Reasoning: in Source 4, paragraph 2, the weather office decided it was "safe to say that the storm was passing." List the pieces of evidence it used, and join them into one or two sentences with because or so.
Part 2: Strengths, Weaknesses and Your Explanation (Problems 4-6)
Strengths and weaknesses: Source 5 says the Weather Bureau can now warn people "in almost every case." Source 4 says "no proabbilities could be furnished." Explain why these two statements do not contradict each other, and what this tells you about using Source 5 as evidence about 1888.
Source 5 explains what causes blizzards in general, and Source 4 gives one evening's readings in New York. Explain how a writer could use both in one explanation. Which one is the general rule, and which one is the specific case?
Write a paragraph of five to seven sentences that answers the homework question. Include at least two time words, two reasoning links, one piece of data with its source, and a final sentence naming one strength and one weakness of your explanation.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Reasoning and sequence
Events in the order the sources give, joined by links each backed by a source
Order or links partly correct, or some links unsupported
A list of facts with no order or links
Examples, information and data
Relevant examples and data, each with source and paragraph
Evidence present but partly off the question or uncited
Missing or wrong evidence
Strengths and weaknesses
Names a specific strength and a specific limit of the sources
Names only one, or only a general limit
None
Clarity
A reader who has not seen the sources could follow the explanation
Mostly clear, with gaps a reader must fill
Hard to follow
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-11 and 18-20 use Sources 1-5 (in the Direct Instruction section). Questions 12-17 use Source 7, three invented student drafts (in the Closure section). For each multiple-choice question, choose the best answer. For short-answer questions, write three to six sentences.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 3, paragraph 1, says forty out-of-town mails were due that morning. What fraction of them arrived?
Answer: C
Only four of the forty mails arrived, and 4 ÷ 40 = 1/10. One-fourth comes from dividing 10 by 40, using the ten wires to Buffalo from the next paragraph instead of the four mails; one-fortieth counts only one mail.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 3, paragraph 1, the Chicago mail was due at 6:45 and reached the office at "five minutes before 1 o'clock." How long after its due time did it reach the office?
Answer: B
Five minutes before 1 o'clock is 12:55, and 6:45 to 12:55 is 6 hours and 10 minutes. 5 hours and 35 minutes is the Boston and Springfield express (7:05 to 12:40); 5 hours and 20 minutes comes from reading the arrival as 12:05.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to the wire chief in Source 3, paragraph 2, in what order did Western Union lose its connections?
Answer: D
He says that after the news about the poles, "we lost Baltimore, then we lost Washington, and then Philadelphia." Starting with Washington mixes up the news of poles falling there with the order the connections were lost; Buffalo and Albany still had a few wires.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The wire chief says, "We have but ten wires to Buffalo, and should have fifty" (Source 3, paragraph 2). What percent of the usual wires to Buffalo were working?
Answer: B
Ten out of fifty is 10 ÷ 50 = 0.2, or 20 percent. 10 percent treats the 10 wires as a percent without dividing; 50 percent uses the fifty as if it were the answer.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The wire chief claims New York had been "cut off from communication with the rest of the world" (Source 3, paragraph 3). Which detail from Source 3 gives the best reason for that claim?
Answer: A
His reason is that beyond Harlem, "past the point where the wires separate we have no connection" (paragraph 3). The fallen poles in Washington explain only the lost lines to the South, and the two answers about mails are about trains, not about communication by wire.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence uses reasoning to link a cause to its effect?
Answer: B
The word so joins a cause (blocked streets) to an effect (no milk deliveries). The other sentences are descriptions or data: they are useful details, but on their own they do not explain how one thing led to another.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why is Source 4 a strong source for the wind speed and the snowfall?
Answer: A
The readings come from "the wind gauge record" and the barometer at the Signal Service office (Source 4, paragraph 1), so they were measured, not guessed. Being written thirty years later describes Source 5, which is a weakness for details about 1888; the wire chief and the workers are in Sources 3 and 2.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 5 says, "Blizzards are due to a southward flow of a large mass of cold air." What kind of detail is this sentence?
Answer: C
The sentence explains what causes blizzards in general, which is useful for the why part of an explanation. It is not an eyewitness account (Source 5 was written in 1920), it gives no count for New York, and it does not describe any one day.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 4 gives the greatest wind speed as forty-eight miles an hour; Source 5 says the wind "at one time blew at the rate of 46 miles an hour." What should a careful explanation do?
Answer: D
Reporting both numbers with their sources is honest about a small disagreement, and Source 4 is closer to the measurement. Choosing 46 because a source is newer ignores how each source knew; averaging hides the sources; leaving the wind out throws away relevant data.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student's point is "The storm stopped the delivery of letters inside the city." Which example from the sources fits this point best?
Answer: A
Source 2, paragraph 3, says the letter carriers "made a great struggle" with the early deliveries, "but ... not much headway was made." That example matches the point. The clerks and the windows are true details about other effects of the storm, and the barometer reading is weather data, not an example of deliveries.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 3, paragraph 1, ends with the mails "at the close of the day's business." What is one weakness of using Source 3 to explain the whole storm?
Answer: B
Source 3 stops at the close of business on Monday, so it cannot show how long the mails and wires stayed down. It does give clock times for each mail, it was reported in New York, and it does not repeat Source 5.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Read Draft A in Source 7, paragraph 2. What is its main problem?
Answer: A
Draft A says the snow in New York came first and the broken wires came last, but the dates and times in the sources do not allow that order. It does use time words ("all day Monday," "by Monday night," "After that"), but they put the events in an order the sources contradict; it uses no numbers from another storm; and it names no weakness at all.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Read Draft B in Source 7, paragraph 3. What is its main problem?
Answer: C
Draft B's numbers are real (Source 5), but they describe a January 1888 storm in the West, so they are not relevant to why New York lost its news and mail in March. It does cite a source, it has no sequence to get wrong, and it names no weaknesses.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Read Draft C in Source 7, paragraph 4. Which part of a strong explanation does it leave out?
Answer: D
Draft C has good evidence, reasoning ("so") and data, but it ends by saying its facts "prove completely" why the city was cut off. The indicator asks writers to acknowledge strengths and weaknesses; Draft C does neither.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Rewrite Draft A (Source 7, paragraph 2) to fix its main problem. Use at least two time words and cite Sources 1 and 3.
Model answer: The trouble with the wires started before the snow in New York. By 9:30 on Sunday night, news came that sixty telegraph poles had fallen in Washington, and soon after, the wires to the South went dead (Source 3, paragraph 2). Only a little after midnight did the rain in New York turn to sleet, and by morning the streets were blocked with snow (Source 1, paragraphs 1-2). So the storm cut the wires to the South first, and then buried the city. Rubric: full credit for putting the wire failures before the New York snow, with two time words and both citations; partial credit for a correct order with only one citation.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Rewrite the last sentence of Draft C (Source 7, paragraph 4) as two sentences, so that the draft does everything the indicator asks.
Model answer: This explanation is strong because its numbers were reported that same day: the clock times of the mails and the statement of the telegraph company's own wire chief (Source 3). It is weaker because Source 3 does not say why the mail trains were late, and the wire chief's numbers are his own report, which no other source on this page checks. Rubric: full credit for replacing the claim of complete proof with a specific strength tied to how the source knew and a specific limit of the sources; partial credit for one of the two, or for general statements such as "I could be wrong."
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Fix the main problem in Draft B (Source 7, paragraph 3) using two pieces of evidence from Source 3. Explain why each one works better.
Model answer: Only four of the forty out-of-town mails arrived that morning (Source 3, paragraph 1), which is relevant because it measures how badly mail stopped reaching New York. Western Union had only ten of its usual fifty wires to Buffalo (Source 3, paragraph 2), which is relevant because it shows how much of the telegraph connection to Buffalo was cut. Rubric: full credit for two pieces of New York data from March 12 with sources and a reason for each; partial credit for relevant data without explanations.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Source 1, paragraph 3, describes the wind. Turn one of its details into two sentences of reasoning that explain why going outside was hard. Use because or so.
Model answer: The wind "strained great plate glass windows" and "rocked the frame houses" (Source 1, paragraph 3), so even buildings were being pushed by it. Because the wind was "so freighted ... with snow," a person walking into it faced snow as well as wind; this helps explain why clerks sheltered in doorways (Source 2, paragraph 1). Rubric: full credit for a quoted detail, a reasoning word and an effect the detail really supports; partial credit for a detail and an effect with no clear link.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Explain one strength and one weakness of Source 4 and one strength and one weakness of Source 5 as evidence about the storm in New York in 1888.
Model answer: Source 4's strength is that its numbers are readings from a barometer and a wind gauge, taken while the storm was happening; its weakness is that it gives the readings for one evening without printing the date, and its hopeful forecast was only a prediction. Source 5's strength is that it says why blizzards form and gives the storm's full dates, March 11 to 14; its weakness is that it was written in 1920 and gives only a few general details about New York. Rubric: full credit for a specific strength and weakness for each source; partial credit for one source only.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
The Chicago and Boston mails reached the office hours late (Source 3, paragraph 1). Write a short explanation (four to six sentences) of why. Then add a sentence about a weakness: what does Source 3 not tell you?
Model answer: First, the storm reached New York in the night, when rain turned to sleet and then to snow and fierce wind (Source 1, paragraph 1). By the morning the streets were blocked (Source 1, paragraph 2), and the mail trains were running hours behind: the Chicago mail came in hours after its due time, and most mails did not arrive at all (Source 3, paragraph 1). At the close of business, "the exact locations of the trains" were still "unknown" (Source 3, paragraph 1), so the post office could not even say when the rest would come. Weakness: Source 3 never says why the trains were late; snow on the tracks is a likely reason, but these sources do not show it directly. Rubric: full credit for a correct sequence, a reasoning link, data with a source, and a specific weakness; partial credit if the weakness is missing or the cause is stated as certain.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does D4.2.6-8 mean?
D4.2.6-8 asks students in grades 6-8 to construct explanations that use reasoning, correct sequence, examples, and details with relevant information and data, and to acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses of their explanations. In plain terms: explain how or why something happened, in order, with evidence, and be honest about what the evidence cannot show.
What is the difference between an explanation and an argument in D4.2.6-8?
An explanation answers how or why something happened; an argument takes a position and tries to convince a reader. D4.1.6-8 covers arguments, and D4.2.6-8 covers explanations. The two often use the same evidence, but an explanation is judged by whether its steps and links are right, not by whether the reader agrees.
Why does this lesson use the Blizzard of 1888?
It is a vehicle for the skill. The storm has a clear sequence, sources written while it happened, measured data, and gaps that students can name honestly. The same five parts work for explaining a law, a migration, a flood or a factory closing.
What counts as reasoning in a middle school explanation?
Reasoning is the set of links that show how one thing led to another, usually signaled by words such as because, so, as a result and which meant that. Each link must be backed by a source; a link no source shows is a guess and should be labeled as one.
How do students show correct sequence when a source gives no exact time?
They use the source's own time words. In this lesson, Source 2 says the milkmen collected their milk "before the storm had developed to its full intensity," with no clock time, so a careful writer says "early in the morning" rather than inventing an hour.
What is the difference between an example and data?
An example is a specific case that shows a general point, such as the milkmen caught on their routes. Data are numbers, such as the count of clerks at one office or a wind speed. Strong explanations use both, and every number carries its source.
What does acknowledging weaknesses look like for 11- to 14-year-olds?
A specific sentence about the limits of the sources: when they stop, which places they do not cover, which numbers are estimates, or which links they do not show. A general apology such as "I might be wrong" does not meet the indicator.
How is D4.2.6-8 assessed?
With writing and source questions scored on the five parts, not on recall of storm facts. The rubric on this page gives points for reasoning and sequence, for relevant examples and data, for specific strengths and weaknesses, and for clarity.
How does D4.2.6-8 connect to the Common Core literacy standards?
It works alongside RH.6-8.3, identifying the key steps in a text's description of a process, and WHST.6-8.4, producing clear and coherent writing suited to its task and purpose. Students who explain a sequence well are practicing both.
What comes after D4.2.6-8?
D4.3.6-8 asks students to adapt their arguments and explanations for audiences outside the classroom, and D4.2.9-12 raises the bar to sound reasoning, linear or non-linear sequence, and judging an explanation by its purpose, such as cause and effect or a technical process.
07
Related Standards
6 standards
These standards connect to D4.2.6-8: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
D3.3.6-8Prerequisite
Identify evidence from multiple sources to support claims, noting its limitations
Standard text: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History (Silver Spring, MD: NCSS, 2013). NCSS was not involved in the production of this lesson and does not endorse it.