D2.Soc.13.9-12: Characteristics of Groups and How Groups, Individuals and Society Shape One Another
In plain English: D2.Soc.13.9-12 is the C3 Framework sociology indicator for grades 9-12 that asks students to identify characteristics of groups, the effects groups have on individuals and society, and the effects of individuals and societies on groups. Students learn what makes people a group, such as interaction, shared identity, norms, roles and size, and trace influence in both directions with historical sources.
Identify characteristics of groups, as well as the effects groups have on individuals and society, and the effects of individuals and societies on groups.
C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 2: Applying Disciplinary Concepts and Tools · Discipline: Sociology · Social Relationships: Self, Groups, and Socialization · Official standard
D2.Soc.13.9-12 asks students to identify characteristics of groups, the effects groups have on individuals and society, and the effects of individuals and societies on groups. A group, in sociology, is two or more people who interact regularly, share a sense of belonging and expect certain things of one another. Groups have features that can be named and compared: how members interact, the identity they share, their norms, roles and boundaries, and their size. Influence runs in four directions: groups shape their members and the wider society, and individual people and the wider society shape groups.
The lesson uses three historical sources and one invented case. Georg Simmel's 1902 article (Source 1) argues that the number of members changes what a group is, comparing groups of two with groups of three. Edward A. Ross's 1897 article "The Mob Mind" (Source 2) describes how a crowd works on the people in it. A 1925 U.S. Department of Agriculture study of 4-H clubs in one Massachusetts county (Source 3) gives real numbers on who joined, why, and what changed in their families. An invented case about a volunteer trail crew (Source 4) lets students trace all four directions of influence in one group.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Identify the characteristics that make a set of people a group, and tell a group from an aggregate or a category
Explain, with Simmel (1902), how a group's size changes its structure
Describe effects groups have on individuals and on the wider society, using Ross (1897) and the 1925 4-H study
Describe effects that individuals and societies have on groups, citing sources by paragraph
Judge how strongly a source's evidence supports a claim about group effects
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
How social context influences individuals D2.Soc.3.9-12
Social context as the external forces that shape behavior D2.Soc.2.9-12
Reading a data table and computing a percent RH.9-10.7
"Two lab partners and a team of three get the same science project. Predict two ways the team of three might work differently from the pair. Then predict what happens to each if one person drops the class."
List predictions on the board in two columns, pair and trio. Students often notice that a trio can outvote one member and can carry on if one person leaves, while a pair cannot. Tell students that a German sociologist made the same comparison in 1902, and that the size of a group is one of the characteristics they will learn to identify today.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Key terms. A group is two or more people who interact regularly, share a sense of belonging and hold expectations of one another. An aggregate is people who happen to be in the same place at the same time, such as shoppers in one store, and a category is people who share a trait but do not interact, such as everyone born in one year. Norms are a group's shared rules and expectations for behavior; roles are the positions members fill, such as leader or treasurer. A dyad is a group of two and a triad a group of three. The table is a summary written for this page; sociologists use several overlapping lists.
Six characteristics of groups (summary written for this page)
Characteristic
Question to ask
Example from a school orchestra
Interaction
Do the members deal with one another regularly?
Rehearsals three afternoons a week
Shared identity
Do members see themselves as part of a "we"?
Members say "our concert," not "the concert"
Norms
What rules and expectations do members follow?
Arrive tuned; no phones during rehearsal
Roles and structure
What positions exist, and who decides?
Conductor, section leaders, librarian
Boundaries
How does a person get in, and how is membership marked?
An audition; names listed in the program
Size
How many members, and how does the number shape the group?
45 players, so decisions go through section leaders
Influence between groups and the people around them runs in four directions: (1) groups affect individuals, for example by teaching skills or pressing members to conform; (2) groups affect society, for example by spreading new practices; (3) individuals affect groups, by founding, leading, recruiting or leaving; (4) society affects groups, through laws, institutions such as schools, and conditions such as income or housing.
Reading 1. Georg Simmel signed this article from the University of Berlin. Albion W. Small translated this article for the American Journal of Sociology in 1902. Simmel writes in long sentences; read for one question: what changes when a group has two members instead of three? "Antithesis" here means standing face to face with someone, and "superpersonal" means existing above any one person.
1The peculiar conferring of characteristics upon a relationship through the duality of persons concerned in it is exhibited by everyday experiences. For instance, how differently a common lot, an undertaking, an agreement, a shared secret binds each of two sharers, from the case when even only three participate. The specific character of this difference is determined by the fact that the relationship, as a unity composed of its individuals, as a special structure beyond these, has a different bearing upon each of its participants from that of a more complicated structure to each of its members. However it may appear to third parties as an independent, superindividual unity, yet, as a rule, that is not the case for its participants, but each regards himself in antithesis only with the other, but not with a collectivity extending beyond him. The social structure rests immediately upon the one and the other. The departure of each single individual would destroy the whole, so that it does not come to such a superpersonal life of the whole that the individual feels himself independent; whereas, even in the case of an association of only three, if one individual departs, a group may still continue to exist.
[...]
2This peculiar intimacy appears most simply in the contrast between it and combinations of three. In such a case each individual element operates as a court of appeal between the two others, and exhibits the double function of such an organ. It operates both in combining and separating. Where three elements, A, B, C, constitute a community, there is added to the immediate relationship which exists, for example, between A and B, the immediate relationship which they gain by their common relation to C. This is unquestionably a sociological enrichment, apart from the bond by the straight and shortest line; each pair of elements are now joined by a broken line. Points upon which the pair could find no immediate contact are put in reciprocal relationship by the third element, which offers to each another side, and joins these, nevertheless, in the unity of its personality. Separations which the parties could not of themselves reconcile are accommodated by the third, or by their being included in a comprehensive whole. On the other hand, the direct union is not merely strengthened by the indirect, but it may also be destroyed. There is no relationship so complete between three that each individual may not, under certain circumstances, be regarded by the other two as an intruder, even if it is only to the extent of sharing in certain moods, which can develop their concentration and timid tenderness only with undisturbed glance from eye to eye. It may also be observed how extraordinarily rare and difficult it is for three people, even in the case of a visit to a museum or in the presence of a landscape, to come into a really united state of feeling, which, however, may occur with relative ease between two.
Georg Simmel, translated by Albion W. Small, Source 1: Simmel on groups of two and groups of three (1902) (1902). Public domain (published 1902). Source text.
Reading 2. Edward A. Ross, named in the magazine as "Prof. Edward A. Ross," wrote this article for Popular Science Monthly in July 1897. By "mob" he means any crowd whose members come to share one mood, not only a violent one. Suggestion means an idea or feeling that one person picks up from others without reasoning about it, and inhibitive power means the ability to hold oneself back. In paragraph 3, "primitive impulse" means the first impulse, not anything about so-called primitive peoples.
1The inhibitive power which measures our ability to go our own way undisturbed grows with the variety and number of suggestions that reach us. This may be because conflicting suggestions block each other off. The power of independent choice seems to develop best when the clash of suggestions reduces to a minimum the ascendency of the outer world over the individual. This is why age, travel, and contact with affairs build up character. But when numerous identical suggestions beset one, one's power of resistance is gradually undermined. As many taps of a hammer fracture the bowlder, so the onset of multitudinous suggestion breaks the strongest will. Men who can readily throw off the thousand suggestions of everyday life will be quite swept away by the reiteration of a single idea from all sides. As a mighty organ compels even benches and windows to vibrate in unison with it, so the crowd dominated by a single mood emits a volume of suggestion that gives an emotional pitch and tone to every individual in it.
2Besides the volume of suggestion possible in a crowd, there is usually a condition of excitement or expectancy. Frequently, too, there is a pressure on the body which prevents voluntary movement while conveying promptly to each all those electrifying swayings and tremors that express the emotions of the mass. The mere physical contact in the excited crowd, therefore, provides certain conditions of suggestibility.
3A cross-section of the mob sometimes shows a concentric structure. There is in the center a leader from whom suggestions proceed. These, caught up by those near by and most dominated by his personality, are transmitted to the next circle with an added force. Thus the suggestion passes outward from zone to zone of the crowd, at each stage gathering volume and hence power to master the rest. That, therefore, which started at the center as fascination becomes sheer mental intimidation at the rim. This symmetrical type of mob has led some to look in every case for the leader who controls the mass by his personality or prestige. But the quest for a nucleus, while it makes the study of mobs more mysterious and sensational, certainly does not make it more scientific. Rarely does the primitive impulse proceed from one man. Usually the first orientation of minds is brought about by some object, spectacle, or event. This original phase, the moment it is observed by the members of the crowd, gives rise to three results: (1) By mere contagion the feeling extends to others till there is complete unanimity; (2) each feels more intensely the moment he perceives that the rest share his feeling; (3) the perceived unison calls forth a sympathy that makes the next agreement easier, and so paves the way for the mental unity of the crowd.
Edward A. Ross, Source 2: Ross on how a crowd works on the people in it (1897) (1897). Public domain (published 1897). Source text.
Size as a characteristic: Source 1, paragraph 1
Use Simmel to explain why two friends who run a small dog-walking business together depend on each other more than three friends would.
Result: Simmel writes that in a group of two "The departure of each single individual would destroy the whole," while "in the case of an association of only three, if one individual departs, a group may still continue to exist." If one of the two friends quits, the business as a partnership ends; with three, the other two can carry on. Size is a characteristic of the group, not of any one member.
A group's effect on individuals: Source 2, paragraph 1
Explain Ross's account of why a person in a crowd is harder to keep independent than the same person alone.
Result: Ross says independent choice grows when "conflicting suggestions block each other off," but "when numerous identical suggestions beset one, one's power of resistance is gradually undermined." A crowd sends one message from all sides at once, so it "gives an emotional pitch and tone to every individual in it." The effect comes from the crowd, not from any one member.
How a crowd's mood forms: Source 2, paragraph 3
Ross lists three results once members of a crowd notice the same thing. Put them in your own words.
Result: (1) The feeling spreads "By mere contagion" until all share it; (2) each person feels it more strongly on seeing that the others share it; (3) the shared feeling makes the next agreement easier. Each step is an effect of the group on its members, and each step makes the group more united.
Counting relationships (page illustration of Simmel's point)
How many pairs of members are there in a group of 2, of 3 and of 6? Use pairs = n(n - 1)/2.
Result: 2 members: 2 x 1 / 2 = 1 pair. 3 members: 3 x 2 / 2 = 3 pairs. 6 members: 6 x 5 / 2 = 15 pairs. Adding one member to a pair triples the relationships, which is one way to see Simmel's claim that the third member changes the group's form. The formula is this page's illustration; Simmel does not give it.
Close the segment: Simmel and Ross both make claims about all groups or all crowds. What kind of evidence does each give? Students should notice that both rely on reasoning, everyday experience and comparisons (Ross's organ that makes windows vibrate, his hammer that breaks a boulder) rather than on counts or measurements. Source 3, later in the lesson, is different: it reports numbers.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Read Source 4 together. It is an invented case with invented numbers, written for this page.
1Invented case with invented numbers, written for this page. In the spring of 2021, a retired park ranger in the invented town of Linden Falls pinned a notice to the library bulletin board asking for help clearing fallen trees from the Ridge Loop, a 16-mile trail in the hills above town. Nine people came to the first Saturday work day. By the end of the summer they were calling themselves the Ridge Loop Trail Crew.
2By 2024 the crew had 24 members. On work days everyone wears an orange vest and signs in on a clipboard at the trailhead. Two rules, written by the founder, are read aloud before every work day: no one works alone, and no one runs a saw without a partner watching. Experienced members train newcomers, one member looks after the tool shed, another plans the work-day calendar, and the founder runs a monthly meeting where members vote on which section to repair next. Anyone may join, but a person counts as a member only after three work days.
3In an end-of-season questionnaire in 2024, which 18 of the 24 members returned, 14 wrote that they had made at least one new friend on the crew and 11 wrote that they now spend more time outdoors than before they joined. Several added that they now pick up litter on any trail they walk, even when no one is watching.
4The crew changed the town as well. Between 2021 and 2024 it cleared or repaired 11 of the Ridge Loop's 16 miles. The town's parks office began listing the work days on the town calendar, and in 2023 two nearby high schools began sending student volunteers on the first Saturday of each month.
5In 2025, two changes reached the crew at almost the same time. In March, the town council, pointing to insurance costs, passed a rule that every volunteer who uses power tools on town land must first complete a four-hour safety course. In May, the founder moved away to be closer to family, and no one agreed to take over the monthly meeting. By December the crew had 15 members.
6Asked about the drop, one member who stayed said: "Some people left because of the course, I think, and some because the meetings stopped. We never asked them which."
SVHS (invented scenario), Source 4: The Ridge Loop Trail Crew (invented case with invented data) (2026). Original passage written for this page.
Characteristics (paragraph 2). Find one detail for each of the six characteristics in the table. (Interaction: Saturday work days. Shared identity: the crew's name and the orange vests. Norms: no one works alone, no saw without a partner watching. Roles: trainers, tool-shed keeper, calendar planner, the founder who runs meetings. Boundaries: membership after three work days. Size: 24 members by 2024.)
Growth (paragraphs 1-2). The crew grew from 9 to 24 members. Find the increase and the percent increase. (24 - 9 = 15 more members; 15 / 9 is about 1.67, an increase of about 167 percent.)
Effects on members (paragraph 3). What share of the questionnaires report a new friend, and what share of all 24 members returned one? (14 / 18 is about 78 percent; 18 / 24 = 75 percent.) Note the weakness on the page: the 6 members who did not answer may differ from those who did, and the answers are the members' own reports, so the case shows what members say the group did for them, not a measured change.
Who made the group? Paragraph 1 names one person who started the crew. Is the crew's growth only the founder's doing? Hold the question for Activity 2.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students read Source 3 on their own. It is a 1925 report by the U.S. Department of Agriculture on 4-H clubs, which the report also calls boys' and girls' clubs, in Middlesex County, Massachusetts. Its cover names the sponsor as "Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Home Economics, United States Department of Agriculture and State Agricultural Colleges Cooperating": a federal and state program, not a private club. A practice in the report means a new or improved farm or home method, such as canning fruits and vegetables or bread-making (the report's own examples). The study covered a rural cross section of several towns and one school section of the city of Malden. One caution belongs on every reading: this is one county in one spring, and the people who collected the data were officers of the program being studied.
1The data were collected by Federal and State administrative and supervisory officers during May, 1925. Calls were made at all farm and village homes in the rural area selected and information obtained from adults, club members and young people of club age, but not in club work. In the urban area only club members or their parents were interviewed. Where the members of the family involved were not at home, the data were obtained from the other members of the family. [...]
[...]
2The data indicate, however, the active support given the work by all the county extension agents. The State club leaders have made contacts with nearly one out of every four homes with boys and girls of club age. The importance of local leaders in junior extension work as conducted in Middlesex County is brought out by the fact that the number of families reporting contacts with local leaders equaled 91.5 per cent of the families with boys and girls of club age and 37.7 per cent of all families.
[...]
3Club work seems to exert considerably greater influence on changes in practices on the farms and in the homes where club members live than elsewhere. (Table 11.) Fifty-one per cent of the families having boys and girls in club work reported changes in practices as compared with 3 per cent of the families without club members.
[...]
4Condition of Home Occupancy. - Of the 856 families interviewed, 669 or 78.2 per cent reported that they owned their homes, while 21.8 per cent reported that they rented (Table 14). Home ownership seems to exert a distinct influence on club membership and on the adoption of improved practices in the area studied. Thirty per cent of the owners had boys and girls in club work, whereas 20 per cent of the tenants had boys and girls in club work. Eighteen per cent of the families who owned their homes were influenced to adopt practices, whereas only 10 per cent of the tenant families were so influenced.
[...]
5The part played by different agencies in influencing boys and girls to take up club work has been a matter of much conjecture among club leaders. Table 21 is especially interesting in this connection. It shows in an outstanding way the support given the work by the school system in Middlesex County, 45.9 per cent of all club members being interested through the school to take up the work. An additional 17.2 per cent were influenced to take up the work as the result of direct contact with extension agents. That 11.6 per cent were influenced by other club members is significant from the standpoint of what club members can be encouraged to do in helping to expand their own organization. It is also significant from the standpoint of adolescent psychology.
M. C. Wilson, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Cooperative Extension Work, with Gertrude L. Warren and George L. Farley, Source 3: A federal study of 4-H clubs in Middlesex County, Massachusetts (1925) (1925). Public domain (published 1925). Source text.
Selected figures from the 1925 report, Tables 11 and 14 (856 families interviewed)
Families
Number
Percent with boys and girls in club work
Percent reporting changed practices
With boys and girls in club work
237
-
51
Without boys and girls in club work
619
-
3
Owners of their homes
669
30
18
Renters ("tenants")
187
20
10
Reasons for becoming club members, 1925 report, Table 21, totals (569 reasons from 551 members; 18 urban members gave two reasons)
Influenced to take up club work through
Number of members
School
253
Extension agents
95
Other club members
64
Local leaders
60
Meetings and exhibits
52
Miscellaneous
16
Parents
7
No reason given
22
Task: make a four-row chart headed Direction of influence, Evidence from Source 3 (with paragraph or table), and How strong is this evidence? Fill one row each for group to individual, group to society, individual to group and society to group. Leave a row blank if Source 3 gives no evidence for it, and say so.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: "Name two characteristics of a group. Then give one example of a group affecting a person and one example of society affecting a group, each from a different source."
Teacher notes. (1) Simmel and Ross write "he" and "himself" for all people, as was usual in their time, and Source 3 calls renters "tenants." (2) Ross's 1897 article is used here only for its account of suggestion in crowds. His later books, such as The Old World in the New (1914), contain views on immigrant groups that this page does not share; check before assigning other Ross readings. (3) Ross and Simmel reason from examples, not measured data; treat their claims as hypotheses to test. (4) Source 3 compares families with and without club members, but families that chose to join may already have differed, and the data were gathered by officers of the program. Its numbers show patterns, not proof that clubs caused the changes. (5) Source 4 is invented, and so are its numbers. (6) The page uses "4-H" for the clubs; the 1925 report uses both "4-H club work" and "boys' and girls' club work."
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give the six-characteristic table with a blank column and have students fill in one detail from Source 4 for each row before reading Simmel
Pre-mark the sentence in each paragraph of Sources 1 and 2 that states the main claim, and provide a short glossary (antithesis, superpersonal, suggestion, inhibitive)
Provide a sentence frame for the four directions: "In Source ___, paragraph ___, the ___ affects the ___ because ___."
For Advanced Students
Read the rest of Simmel's article in the source file and summarize one more claim he makes about large groups compared with small ones
Compare Ross's paragraph 3 with paragraph 1 of Source 3: who is the "leader at the center" in the 4-H data, and does the evidence support Ross's doubt that one person usually starts things?
Design on paper a comparison that could test whether 4-H membership changed family practices, naming a comparison group and one way to measure practices before and after
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong answers name specific characteristics of a group (interaction, shared identity, norms, roles and structure, boundaries, size) rather than saying only that a group is "people together," keep the four directions of influence distinct, and support each claim with a source and paragraph number. Watch for students who call an aggregate (people at one bus stop) a group, who credit every change in a group to its leader, or who read the 1925 percentages as proof that clubs caused the changes. Full-credit work on Source 3 notes at least one limit of the evidence, such as self-selection of club families or data collected by the program's own officers.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Group, Aggregate or Category? A Ten-Card Sort
15 minGroups of 3-4
Each group gets 10 cards, each naming a set of people. Groups sort the cards into three piles, group, aggregate and category, using the definitions from Direct Instruction. For every card in the group pile, they name two of the six characteristics it clearly has.
The 10 Cards
Passengers riding in one subway car at 8 a.m.
Everyone whose last name begins with M
A family that eats dinner together most nights
The five members of a high school's student court
Fans standing in line outside a movie premiere
All U.S. residents aged 65 and older
An online chess club whose regular members play every Tuesday
Drivers stopped at the same red light
People with type O blood
A small town's volunteer fire company
Answer Key
Groups: 3, 4, 7 and 10 (regular interaction, shared identity, norms and roles; for example, the student court has set roles and rules for hearings, and the fire company has a chief, training rules and a station). Aggregates: 1, 5 and 8 (same place, same time, little or no lasting interaction). Categories: 2, 6 and 9 (a shared trait, no interaction). That is 4 + 3 + 3 = 10 cards.
Discussion
Could an aggregate become a group? Ask what would have to change for card 5 to become a group (repeated meetings, a name, rules about who belongs). Ross's crowd in Source 2 sits between the piles: it forms for a moment, then disappears.
2
Four Arrows: Who Made the Trail Crew, and What Did It Make?
20 minPairs, then groups of 4
Pairs reread Source 4, paragraphs 1-4, and fill a four-arrow organizer: group to individual, group to society, individual to group, society to group. For each arrow they quote one detail from Source 4 and link it to Source 1 or Source 2. Then pairs join to settle the question left open in Guided Practice: was the crew's growth only the founder's doing?
Step 1: The Organizer (10 min)
Four boxes, each with three lines: the detail from Source 4 (with paragraph number), which direction of influence it shows, and one sentence connecting it to Simmel or Ross. Paragraph 5 is not part of this activity.
Step 2: Settle the Question (10 min)
Groups of four list everything in paragraphs 1-4 that helped the crew grow, then sort the list into what one person did and what other people or institutions did. Each group writes a two-sentence answer.
Answer Key
Group to individual: new friendships, more time outdoors and picking up litter even when no one is watching (paragraph 3), which fits Ross's point that a group gives "tone to every individual in it" (Source 2, paragraph 1), here slowly rather than in a moment. Group to society: 11 of 16 miles repaired, and work days on the town calendar (paragraph 4). Individual to group: the founder's notice, the founder's two rules and the monthly meeting the founder ran (paragraphs 1-2). Society to group: the library bulletin board that carried the notice (paragraph 1) and the two high schools that send volunteers (paragraph 4); the school volunteers can also be read as the crew affecting the schools. A strong answer to Step 2: the founder started the crew and set its first norms, but its growth also depended on the library, the parks office and the schools, so the case does not support crediting one person alone.
3
What Changed the Group? Six Case Cards
15 minGroups of 3
Each group reads six short invented cases. For each card, students decide whether the change came from one individual or from society (a law, an institution or a wider condition), name the characteristic of the group it changed, and predict one further effect.
The Six Cards (invented cases)
A robotics team's new captain starts posting the build schedule a week ahead, and more members come to build nights.
The city closes its community center on Sundays, so a Sunday chess club must move to Saturdays and loses members who work that day.
The state athletic association changes its rules so that ninth graders may run on varsity teams, and a cross-country team's roster grows.
The founder of a teen book club leaves for college, and the remaining members start rotating the discussion-leader job.
The town library begins lending musical instruments, and a community jazz band gains several beginners.
One member of a neighborhood garden group persuades the others to stop using weed killer, and the group adds a written rule.
Answer Key
Individual: cards 1, 4 and 6 (a captain, a departing founder, one persuasive member). Society: cards 2, 3 and 5 (a city decision, a statewide rule, a library program). Characteristics changed: interaction (1, 2), size (2, 3, 5), boundaries (3), roles (4) and norms (6). Predictions vary; a strong one follows from the change, for example that a band with beginners may slow its rehearsals or add a training role.
Variation
Have each group write a seventh card that shows one change coming from society and a second change, in the same group, coming from one individual, then trade cards with another group.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: How Group Size Multiplies Relationships
Each line is one relationship between two members. A dyad has 1, a triad 3 and a group of five 10. Simmel's point (Source 1) is that the third member does more than add a line: the third changes how the other two relate. The pair count is this page's illustration, not Simmel's.
Diagram 2: Club Membership, Home Ownership and Changed Practices, 1925
Drawn to scale from Source 3, paragraphs 3 and 4 (Tables 11 and 14 of the report). Dark bars: families with club members or owners; light bars: the comparison families. One county, data gathered by the program's own officers in May 1925: a pattern to explain, not proof that the clubs caused the changes.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
Homework: Groups, Members and the World Around Them
Directions: Sources 1 and 2 are printed in Direct Instruction, Source 4 in Guided Practice, and Source 3 with its two data tables in Independent Practice. Quote every source you use with its paragraph number. Problem 5 asks you to plan on paper only: do not survey or interview anyone.
Part 1: Reading the Sources (Problems 1-3)
In Source 1, paragraph 2, Simmel says the third member of a triad "operates both in combining and separating." Explain each half of that claim with a quotation, then show both halves in an invented example of three students sharing a project.
Use the Table 21 figures printed with Source 3. The table lists 569 reasons but only 551 members. Explain why the percent of members influenced in each way should be computed out of 551, not 569. Then compute, to one decimal place, the percent of the 551 members who were influenced through meetings and exhibits and through parents. Say which direction of influence each of those two rows shows, and explain your choice.
Simmel writes that in a dyad each member "regards himself in antithesis only with the other, but not with a collectivity extending beyond him" (Source 1, paragraph 1). Explain what he means. Then describe an invented group of about 20 people whose members do feel part of a collectivity, naming two of the six characteristics that show it.
Part 2: Using the Concepts (Problems 4-6)
Make a three-column chart for these invented sets of people: the audience at one evening concert, every alto singer in the state, and a 30-voice community choir that rehearses weekly. Label each as a group, an aggregate or a category, and justify each label with at least two characteristics from the lesson's table.
On paper only, plan a better study than Source 3 of whether 4-H membership changes family practices. Name a comparison group, say what you would measure before and after a family joins, and say who should collect the data and why.
Write a paragraph that argues for or against this claim: "Groups shape individuals more than individuals shape groups." Use evidence from at least two of Sources 1-4, and answer one point the other side would make.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Characteristics
Names specific characteristics of groups and uses them to tell groups from aggregates and categories
Characteristics named but loosely applied
Characteristics missing or confused
Directions of influence
Keeps the four directions distinct and gives a correct example of each one used
One direction confused with another
Directions not distinguished
Evidence
Quotations carry source and paragraph numbers; Problem 2 is computed correctly with work shown
One claim unsupported or one computing error
No evidence, or several errors
Reasoning
Problem 5 is a workable plan on paper; Problem 6 weighs evidence and answers the other side
Plan or argument incomplete
Plan or argument missing
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Sources 1 and 2 are printed in Direct Instruction, Source 4 in Guided Practice, and Source 3 and its two tables in Independent Practice. Source 1 is used in Questions 1-4 and 15; Source 2 in Questions 5-7, 16 and 19; Source 3 in Questions 8-11, 17 and 19; and Source 4 in Questions 14, 15 and 18. Questions 12, 13 and 20 use new invented examples. Questions 1-14 are multiple choice; 15-20 are short answer.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 1, paragraph 2, what role does Simmel say each member of a group of three can play for the other two?
Answer: A
Simmel writes that "each individual element operates as a court of appeal between the two others." B leaves out half his point: the third can separate the pair, but he says it operates "both in combining and separating." C and D are not in the passage.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 1, paragraph 2, the indirect tie through a third member can strengthen the direct union of the other two. What else does Simmel say it can do to that union?
Answer: B
"the direct union is not merely strengthened by the indirect, but it may also be destroyed." A repeats the strengthening half of the sentence instead of the second effect the question asks for. C and D are not in the passage.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does Simmel mention a visit to a museum in Source 1, paragraph 2?
Answer: C
Simmel says it is "extraordinarily rare and difficult" for three people, "even in the case of a visit to a museum," to reach "a really united state of feeling," which "may occur with relative ease between two." D reverses the comparison. A and B are claims Simmel does not make.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 1, paragraph 1, which examples does Simmel give of things that bind each of two sharers differently from when three take part?
Answer: D
Simmel writes: "how differently a common lot, an undertaking, an agreement, a shared secret binds each of two sharers, from the case when even only three participate." B takes its examples from paragraph 2, where Simmel discusses how hard it is for three people to share one feeling. A and C are not his examples in this passage.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 2, paragraph 1, what does Ross say builds up a person's power to go his or her own way?
Answer: B
Ross writes: "This is why age, travel, and contact with affairs build up character," because varied, conflicting suggestions block each other off. A is the opposite: "the reiteration of a single idea from all sides" sweeps people away. C belongs to paragraph 2, where physical contact raises suggestibility.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Besides the sheer volume of suggestion, which two conditions in a crowd does Ross say add to suggestibility in Source 2, paragraph 2?
Answer: C
Ross names "a condition of excitement or expectancy" and "pressure on the body": "The mere physical contact in the excited crowd" provides conditions of suggestibility. A reverses both conditions. B and D are not in the passage.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Ross's "concentric" crowd (Source 2, paragraph 3), what happens to a suggestion as it passes from the center to the rim?
Answer: A
The suggestion passes "from zone to zone of the crowd, at each stage gathering volume and hence power to master the rest," so that fascination at the center "becomes sheer mental intimidation at the rim." B reverses the direction of change. C and D are not in the passage.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which feature of the method in Source 3, paragraph 1, makes it hardest to compare club work in the rural area with club work in the city of Malden?
Answer: C
"In the urban area only club members or their parents were interviewed," so the city sample has no families outside club work to compare with, while the rural sample does. A is a strength of the rural sample. D is a real limit, but it applies in both areas, so it does not weaken the rural-urban comparison in particular.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Table 11 of the 1925 report lists 237 families with boys and girls in club work among the 856 families interviewed. About what percent of all the families is that?
Answer: A
237 / 856 is about 0.277, or about 28 percent. B divides by the 619 families without club members instead of by all 856 (237 / 619 is about 0.38). C is the percent of club families that reported changed practices, a different figure. D is the share of families without club members (619 / 856).
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Source 3, paragraph 4 and the table report that 20 percent of the 187 renting families had boys and girls in club work. About how many renting families is that?
Answer: B
0.20 x 187 = 37.4, so about 37 families. A reads the percent as a count. C is half of 187, as if the rate were 50 percent. D is the number of renting families without club members (187 - 37 = 150).
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 3, paragraph 5, the report says the 11.6 percent figure for members influenced by other club members is significant. What does the report say it shows club members can be encouraged to do?
Answer: C
The figure "is significant from the standpoint of what club members can be encouraged to do in helping to expand their own organization": individual members recruiting is one way individuals shape a group. A describes the clubs' effect on homes in paragraph 3, not this figure. B and D are not in the passage.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which of these is a group, rather than an aggregate or a category?
Answer: D
The neighbors interact regularly and share a purpose, so they have the characteristics of a group. A and C are aggregates: people in the same place at the same time who do not keep interacting. B is a category: people who share a trait but do not interact.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A study group grows from 4 members to 8. Using pairs = n(n - 1)/2, how many pairs of members does the larger group have?
Answer: B
8 x 7 / 2 = 28 pairs (the group of 4 had 4 x 3 / 2 = 6). A doubles the 6 pairs, as if pairs grew at the same rate as members. C is 8 x 7 without dividing by 2, which counts every pair twice. D is 8 x 8, which also pairs each member with himself or herself.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 4, paragraph 5, which change is an effect of society on the Ridge Loop Trail Crew?
Answer: B
A town council rule is a decision of the wider society's government that the crew must follow. A is an individual affecting the group. C is the group affecting individuals (paragraph 3), and D is the group affecting society (paragraph 4).
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Use Source 1, paragraph 1 to explain why the Ridge Loop Trail Crew (Source 4) could go on after its founder left, and then explain why it still lost members.
Model answer: Simmel says that in a dyad "The departure of each single individual would destroy the whole," but "even in the case of an association of only three, if one individual departs, a group may still continue to exist." The crew had 24 members, so it did not depend on the founder the way a pair depends on each partner. But the founder held a role, running the monthly meeting, and "no one agreed to take over the monthly meeting" (paragraph 5). A group survives a departure only if someone fills the roles the person held. Rubric: one accurate quotation from Simmel; the size point applied to the crew; the lost role identified as one reason for the decline.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Invented situation: at a school pep rally, a student who never starts chants joins the whole gym in one. Use Source 2, paragraph 1 to explain why the same student would probably not start the chant alone at home.
Model answer: Ross says independence grows when "conflicting suggestions block each other off," as they do in everyday life, where the student hears many different ideas. In the gym, "numerous identical suggestions beset one": hundreds of students shouting the same words are "the reiteration of a single idea from all sides," and "one's power of resistance is gradually undermined." At home there is no crowd sending one message from every side, so nothing overrides the student's usual restraint. The chant is the group's effect on the individual. Rubric: two accurate quotations from paragraph 1; the contrast between varied and identical suggestions explained; the effect identified as group to individual.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Source 3, paragraph 4 says home ownership "seems to exert a distinct influence on club membership." Give the evidence, then offer one other explanation for the difference and say what data would help decide between the two.
Model answer: 30 percent of owners had boys and girls in club work, against 20 percent of renters, and 18 percent of owners adopted practices, against 10 percent of renters. Another explanation: owners may have lived in the area longer, or owned farms where club projects such as gardens and poultry were easier, so length of residence or farm size, not ownership itself, may explain the gap. Data that would help: club membership for owners and renters with the same length of residence or the same kind of home. Rubric: both comparisons stated correctly; a plausible alternative explanation; data that would separate the two explanations.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
In Source 4, membership fell from 24 to 15 in 2025. Find the percent decrease, and explain why the case cannot tell us which of the two changes in paragraph 5 caused the drop.
Model answer: 24 - 15 = 9 members left; 9 / 24 = 0.375, a decrease of 37.5 percent. Two changes came "at almost the same time": the safety-course rule in March and the founder's move in May. Members who left were never asked why ("We never asked them which," paragraph 6), so the effect of the rule cannot be separated from the effect of the founder's leaving. Asking each departing member, or comparing with a crew that faced only the rule, could separate them. Rubric: correct computation with work; both changes named; the missing evidence identified.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Ross doubts that a crowd's first impulse usually comes from one leader (Source 2, paragraph 3). Do the 1925 4-H figures (Source 3, paragraph 2 and Table 21) suggest that individuals mattered in building those clubs? Use numbers.
Model answer: Yes, but alongside institutions. Families reporting contact with local leaders "equaled 91.5 per cent of the families with boys and girls of club age" (paragraph 2), and in Table 21, 60 of 551 members (about 10.9 percent) joined through local leaders and 64 (about 11.6 percent) through other members. Still, the school brought in 253 members, far more than any individuals did. So, as Ross would expect, no single leader explains the clubs: many individuals and an institution worked together. Ross wrote about crowds, which form in minutes, so the comparison is loose. Rubric: at least two numbers used correctly; individuals weighed against the school; a limit of the comparison noted.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Invented situation: a neighborhood running club meets every Thursday, has a coach, a T-shirt with its name and a rule that no runner is left behind on the route. Identify three characteristics of the club as a group, and give one effect the club could have on its members and one effect a town decision could have on the club.
Model answer: Interaction: the weekly Thursday runs. Shared identity: the named T-shirt. Norms: no runner is left behind. (Roles, the coach, also counts.) Effect on members: a runner who would quit alone keeps going because the group waits for everyone. Effect of a town decision: if the town closes the park path for repairs, the club must change its route or meeting time, and some members may stop coming. Rubric: three correctly labeled characteristics with details; one group-to-individual effect; one society-to-group effect.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does D2.Soc.13.9-12 mean?
D2.Soc.13.9-12 asks high school students to identify the characteristics of groups, the effects groups have on individuals and on society, and the effects individuals and societies have on groups. It belongs to the sociology companion to the C3 Framework (Appendix C), in the cluster on social relationships: self, groups and socialization.
What are the characteristics of a group in sociology?
A group is two or more people who interact regularly, share a sense of belonging and hold expectations of one another. Lists vary, but most include interaction, shared identity, norms, roles and structure, boundaries of membership, and size. This page uses those six as a working summary.
What is the difference between a group, an aggregate and a category?
Only a group interacts over time. An aggregate is people in the same place at the same time, such as passengers on one train, and a category is people who share a trait but do not interact, such as everyone with the same birthday. Activity 1 practices the difference.
Why does a group's size matter?
Size changes how the group works. Simmel argued in 1902 that a group of two ends if either member leaves, while a group of three can survive a departure and the third member changes how the other two relate. Larger groups usually need more formal roles and rules to hold together.
How do groups affect individuals?
Groups teach skills and norms, offer friendship and identity, and press members to conform. Ross's 1897 article describes the quick version in a crowd, where many identical suggestions weaken a person's ability to hold back; long-lasting groups do it more slowly, through habits and rules.
Can one person really change a group?
Yes, but rarely alone. Founders, leaders, recruiters and members who leave all change groups, yet the same group is also shaped by institutions and conditions around it. Activity 2 asks students to weigh one founder's role against the library, parks office and schools in an invented case.
Is the 1925 4-H study good evidence that clubs changed families?
It is useful evidence of a pattern, not proof of a cause. The families with club members reported far more changed practices, but families that joined may have differed from the start, the study covered one county, and the people collecting the data worked for the program. Homework Problem 5 asks students to plan a stronger study on paper.
How is D2.Soc.13.9-12 different from D2.Soc.14.9-12?
D2.Soc.13.9-12 is about groups in general: what they are and how influence runs between groups, individuals and society. D2.Soc.14.9-12 narrows the focus to in-groups and out-groups and how membership affects life chances and shapes a society's norms and values.
Do students survey or observe real groups in this lesson?
No. All research tasks are planned on paper. Students work with historical sources and invented cases, and no task asks them to report on their own groups, friends or families.
Which courses teach D2.Soc.13.9-12?
It is usually taught in a high school sociology elective, in the unit on groups and socialization, and it fits psychology and civics units on group behavior, such as social psychology or civic associations.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to D2.Soc.13.9-12: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
D2.Soc.3.9-12Prerequisite
Identify how social context influences individuals
Standard text: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History (Silver Spring, MD: NCSS, 2013). NCSS was not involved in the production of this lesson and does not endorse it.