D2.Psy.13.9-12: Common Themes in Psychological Science: Ethics, Diversity, Development and Health
In plain English: D2.Psy.13.9-12 is the C3 Framework psychology indicator for grades 9-12 that asks students to explain common themes across psychological science: ethical issues, diversity, developmental issues, and concerns about health and wellbeing. Students learn to spot each theme in any study, from any subfield, and to explain the question it raises about that study.
Explain common themes across the field of psychological science, including ethical issues, diversity, developmental issues, and concerns about health and wellbeing.
C3 Framework for Social Studies (NCSS) · Dimension 2: Applying Disciplinary Concepts and Tools · Discipline: Psychology · Critical Thinking: Themes, Sources, and Evidence · Official standard
D2.Psy.13.9-12 asks students to explain the themes that run through all of psychological science: ethical issues, diversity, developmental issues, and concerns about health and wellbeing. These are not topics in one chapter. They are questions that every subfield must ask of its own research: Is this study right to do, and how are people protected? Whom do the results apply to? Does the answer change with age? How does this connect to health, and could the study affect someone's wellbeing?
Students meet each theme in a real source and then find all four in one study plan. Bernard (1865) shows an early ethics rule and its outdated gap on consent; the Children's Bureau's Infant Care (1922) and a CDC page (2025) show how advice about development changed; Cordelia Nevers (1895) shows a replication with a different group overturning a broad claim; and a current NIMH page shows how psychology treats mental health as part of overall health. An invented, deliberately flawed club study plan lets students practice all four themes at once, on paper only.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Define each of the four common themes and state the question each one asks of a study
Explain an ethical issue, a diversity issue, a developmental issue and a health and wellbeing issue, each with evidence quoted from a source
Identify historical claims in the sources that are outdated and explain what changed
Explain why the four themes count as common themes by showing them in studies from different subfields
Review a study plan for all four themes and propose a better plan, on paper only
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Ethical guidelines for research with human participants, including informed consent D2.Psy.4.9-12
How diversity matters in explaining behavior D2.Psy.7.9-12
Samples, variables and basic research design D2.Psy.1.9-12
"A company tests a new study app on 50 college students and finds that their quiz scores rise. Before you believe that the app will help a 14-year-old, a 70-year-old or a student who is going through a hard month, what questions would you ask?"
Pairs list questions for 3 minutes. Collect them on the board in four unlabeled columns as they come in: one for questions about fairness and permission (Did the students agree? Was anyone pressured?), one for who was studied (Were they all from one college? Did they speak the same language?), one for age (Do teenagers learn the same way?), and one for health (Could the app add stress?). Then label the columns ethical issues, diversity, developmental issues and health and wellbeing. Tell students these four questions come up in every part of psychology, which is why the C3 Framework calls them common themes.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
What a common theme is. Psychology has many subfields: biological, cognitive, developmental, social, clinical, educational and more. A common theme is an issue that comes up in all of them, whatever the topic. A memory researcher, a sports psychologist and a school psychologist all have to ask whether their work is ethical, whom their results apply to, how the answer changes with age, and what the work means for people's health. Each theme gives a question to ask of any study.
The four themes and the question each one asks (summary written for this page)
Is it right to do this study this way, and how are participants protected?
Diversity
Differences in culture, ethnicity, gender, age, language, ability and income, and who is included in a sample
Who was studied, and to whom do the results apply?
Developmental issues
How thought and behavior change, or stay the same, across the lifespan; continuity and stages; nature and nurture over time
Would the answer be the same at a different age or stage of life?
Health and wellbeing
Physical and mental health, stress and coping, prevention, and how research affects participants' wellbeing
How does this connect to health, and could the study itself affect someone's wellbeing?
Ethical issues, then and now. Read Source 1. Claude Bernard, a French physiologist, published this book in 1865; this is the 1927 English translation. He states a rule that sounds modern, about not harming the people in an experiment. Read paragraph 2 closely: one experiment he accepts is missing something every researcher needs today. That part of the source is outdated. Today, U.S. federal rules for most research with human participants (45 CFR 46, the Common Rule) require informed consent, with only narrow exceptions that a review board must approve, and research with minors usually needs a parent's permission and the young person's own agreement (assent).
1First, have we a right to perform experiments and vivisections on man? Physicians make therapeutic experiments daily on their patients, and surgeons perform vivisections daily on their subjects. Experiments, then, may be performed on man, but within what limits? It is our duty and our right to perform an experiment on man whenever it can save his life, cure him or gain him some personal benefit. The principle of medical and surgical morality, therefore, consists in never performing on man an experiment which might be harmful to him to any extent, even though the result might be highly advantageous to science, i.e., to the health of others. But performing experiments and operations exclusively from the point of view of the patient’s own advantage does not prevent their turning out profitably to science. [...]
2May we make experiments on men condemned to death or vivisect them? Instances have been cited, analogous to the one recalled above, in which men have permitted themselves to perform dangerous operations on condemned criminals, granting them pardon in exchange. Modern ideas of morals condemn such actions; I completely agree with these ideas; [...] A helminthologist had a condemned woman, without her knowledge swallow larvae of intestinal worms, so as to see whether the worms developed in the intestines after her death. Others have made analogous experiments on patients with phthisis doomed to an early death; some men have made experiments on themselves. As experiments of this kind are of great interest to science and can be conclusive only on man, they seem to be wholly permissible when they involve no suffering or harm to the subject of the experiment. [...] So, among the experiments that may be tried on man, those that can only harm are forbidden, those that are innocent are permissible, and those that may do good are obligatory.
Claude Bernard, translated by Henry Copley Greene, Source 1: Claude Bernard on experiments on human beings (1865; 1927 translation) (1865; this edition 1927). Public domain (published 1927). Source text.
Developmental issues, then and now. Source 2 is advice the U.S. Children's Bureau, a federal agency, gave parents in its pamphlet Infant Care. Source 3 is advice from the CDC a century later. Both are about how early experiences shape a child, a developmental issue. Read them side by side.
1A few minutes of gentle play now and then will not harm the normal baby. A young, delicate, or nervous baby needs a great deal of rest and quiet, and however robust the child, much of the play that is commonly indulged in is more or less exciting. It is a great pleasure to hear the baby laugh and crow in apparent delight; but often the means used to produce the laughter, such as tickling, punching, or tossing, make him irritable and restless.
2[...] Rocking the baby, jumping him up and down on her knee, tossing him, shaking his head or carriage disturb him, and make him more and more dependent upon these attentions. But this is not to say that the baby should be left alone too completely. All babies need "mothering," and should have plenty of it. [...]
[...]
3Crying.—Crying should not be classed as a bad habit without some modification, for although a well baby does not cry very much, he has no other means of expressing his needs in the early months of life, and his cry ought to be heeded. But when he cries simply because he has learned from experience that this brings him what he wants, it is one of the worst habits he can learn, and one which takes all the strength of the mother to break. [...] But if, after careful scrutiny of all these conditions, no cause for the crying can be found, the baby probably wants to be taken up, walked with, played with, rocked, or to have a light, or to have some one sit by him—all the result of having learned that crying will get him what he wants, sufficient to make a spoiled, fussy baby, and a household tyrant whose continual demands make a slave of the mother. It is difficult to break up this habit after it has once been formed, but it can be done. After the baby's needs have been fully satisfied he should be put down alone and allowed to cry until he goes to sleep. This may sound cruel, and it is very hard for a young mother to do, but it will usually take only a few nights of this discipline to accomplish the result. [...]
Mrs. Max West (Mary Mills West), U.S. Children's Bureau, Source 2: U.S. Children's Bureau, Infant Care, on play and crying (1922 printing) (1914; this edition 1922). Public domain (published 1922). Source text.
1During this stage, babies form bonds of love and trust with their parents and others shaping their social and emotional development. The way parents cuddle, hold, and play with their baby will set the basis for future interactions with them and others.
[...]
2Talk to your baby. They will find your voice calming.
3Answer when your baby makes sounds by repeating the sounds and adding words. This will help them learn to use language.
4Read to your baby. This will help them develop and understand language and sounds.
[...]
5Praise your baby and give them lots of loving attention.
6Spend time cuddling and holding your baby. This will help them feel cared for and secure.
7Play with your baby when they're alert and relaxed. Watch your baby closely for signs of being tired or fussy so that they can take a break from playing.
[...]
8Take care of yourself physically, mentally, and emotionally.
9Parenting can be hard work! It is easier to enjoy your new baby and be a positive, loving parent when you are feeling good yourself.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Source 3: CDC, Positive Parenting Tips: Infants (0-1 years) (2025). US government work (17 U.S.C. 105). Source text.
Outdated advice, labeled. Source 2's advice about crying and play reflects the habit-training views of its time. It is outdated: the current CDC advice in Source 3 points the other way. Source 2 is printed here as history, not as advice. Notice that the 1922 pamphlet does take a developmental view: it argues that what happens in infancy shapes later behavior. What changed is the evidence and the advice, not the question.
Ethical issues: Source 1
Bernard says an experiment is allowed when it causes "no suffering or harm." His example is a woman who swallowed worm larvae "without her knowledge."
Result: Theme: ethical issues. Bernard's rule protects participants from harm, but he does not ask for their agreement. Today's rule also asks: did the person give informed consent? By that standard the example is unethical, so the page labels this part of Source 1 as outdated.
Developmental issues: Sources 2 and 3
In 1922 the Children's Bureau warned that rocking and play make a baby "more and more dependent upon these attentions." In 2025 the CDC says the way parents "cuddle, hold, and play" with a baby "will set the basis for future interactions."
Result: Theme: developmental issues. Both sources claim that early experience shapes later behavior, but they give opposite advice. Source 2's advice is outdated; the shared question (how do early experiences affect development?) is still a central developmental question.
Diversity: Source 4
Jastrow studied 25 men and 25 women from one Wisconsin class. With the Wellesley women, Nevers found that articles of dress made up 1 word in every 26, compared with 1 in every 11 for Jastrow's women.
Result: Theme: diversity. A result from one group of students did not hold in another group of women, so a claim about all women was not supported. Arithmetic: 96 of 2,500 words is 3.84%, about 1 in 26; 1 in 11 is about 9.1%. Both samples are small and come from single colleges, so the page treats them as weak evidence for any claim about men and women in general.
Health and wellbeing: Source 5
NIMH says mental health "is more than the absence of a mental illness" and is "essential to your overall health and quality of life."
Result: Theme: health and wellbeing. Psychology treats mental health as part of health for everyone, not only for people with a diagnosis. Self-care, such as exercise and sleep, is one part of caring for it.
One study, four themes
Invented example: researchers want to know whether a phone-free lunch period changes how much 7th and 11th graders talk with one another.
Result: Ethics: students and parents must agree, and students may opt out. Diversity: include more than one school and report who took part. Development: compare the two grades rather than assuming 12-year-olds and 16-year-olds react the same way. Health: watch for students who feel left out or anxious without their phones. The same four questions fit any study.
Close the segment: Which theme is easiest to forget when a study "works"? Accept any answer with a reason. Many students say diversity, because a result can look true for everyone when it was found in one group.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Read Source 4 together. Nevers, a student in Mary Whiton Calkins's laboratory at Wellesley College, repeated a study by Joseph Jastrow to test his claims about how men and women think. Teacher note: the claims Nevers quotes from Jastrow, such as the claim that "women repeat one another's words more than men," are 19th-century stereotypes. They are printed here so that students can see how evidence challenged them; they are outdated and the page does not endorse them.
1In an article called 'A Study in Mental Statistics,' which appeared in the December, 1891, number of the New Review, Prof. Joseph Jastrow discusses, among other subjects, "The Community of Ideas and Thought-Habits of Men and Women." His data are fifty lists of one hundred disconnected words, twenty-five from the men and twenty-five from the women of his Wisconsin University psychology class. [...]
2For the purpose of testing these results the young women of the experimental psychology class at Wellesley College were asked to write out similar lists of one hundred disconnected words. That the thought-process might be as free as possible, no restriction was made. The students were not even asked, as in the case of Dr. Jastrow's class, to write as rapidly as possible, but this difference in the method cannot possibly be supposed to account for the wide difference in results. The subjects had no knowledge whatever of the purpose of the investigation. [...]
3According to Dr. Jastrow's first generalization, 'women repeat one another's words more than men.' He finds that "female students in their 2,500 words used only 1,123 different words, while their classmates used 1,375 [...] The Wellesley lists tell a different story. Only fifteen lists, that is 1,500 words, have been studied from this point of view, but among the 1,500 are 1,103 different words, only 20 less than those among the 2,500 of the Wisconsin University women, and only 272 less than those among the 2,500 of the Wisconsin University men.
[...]
4The differences between these Wisconsin and Wellesley women's lists are very striking. According to Dr. Jastrow's results, the class to which women contribute most largely is that of 'articles of dress.' Of every 11 words, 1 belongs to this class, and the women have 224 such words as [...] against 129 on the men's list. Our records, on the other hand, swell the numbers of this class to only 96 words, giving it but 1 word in every 26. [...]
[...]
5The conclusions from this study are thus chiefly negative, but not for that reason unimportant. The figures are too few to allow any positive deductions, but their uncompromising contradiction of Dr. Jastrow's results gives a needed warning concerning the dangers of such comparative study of the mental processes of men and women. [...]
Cordelia C. Nevers (study directed by Mary Whiton Calkins), Source 4: Cordelia C. Nevers tests Jastrow's claims about men and women (1895) (1895). Public domain (published 1895). Source text.
Who was studied? Paragraph 1: 25 men and 25 women from one Wisconsin psychology class. Paragraph 2: women from one Wellesley class. Ask: is either group enough to support a claim about all men or all women? (No. Both are small samples from single colleges, and the students differed in training and setting.)
What changed when a different group was studied? Paragraph 4: articles of dress were 1 word in 11 for Jastrow's women but 1 in 26 for the Wellesley women.
Is the comparison in paragraph 3 fair? Jastrow's women used 1,123 different words in 2,500; the Wellesley women used 1,103 in only 1,500. A shorter list has fewer chances to repeat a word, so the counts are not directly comparable. Nevers's point still holds: the Wellesley lists were far from the low variety Jastrow reported, but the evidence is weak in both directions.
What did Nevers conclude? Paragraph 5: her results are "chiefly negative" and "too few to allow any positive deductions"; they warn against broad claims. Ask: which theme does this show? (Diversity: a result found in one group may not hold in another.)
Then work through the same steps for Source 5, the NIMH page, asking which theme it shows and how a researcher could use it. In class, remind students that a trusted adult, a school counselor or a health care provider is the right person to talk to; this lesson never asks students to judge their own or anyone else's mental health.
1Mental health includes emotional, psychological, and social well-being. It is more than the absence of a mental illness—it’s essential to your overall health and quality of life. Self-care can play a role in maintaining your mental health and help support your treatment and recovery if you have a mental illness.
[...]
2Self-care means taking the time to do things that help you live well and improve both your physical health and mental health. This can help you manage stress, lower your risk of illness, and increase your energy. Even small acts of self-care in your daily life can have a big impact.
[...]
3Get regular exercise. Just 30 minutes of walking every day can boost your mood and improve your health. Small amounts of exercise add up, so don’t be discouraged if you can’t do 30 minutes at one time.
[...]
4Make sleep a priority. Stick to a schedule, and make sure you’re getting enough sleep. Blue light from devices and screens can make it harder to fall asleep, so reduce blue light exposure from your phone or computer before bedtime.
[...]
5Stay connected. Reach out to friends or family members who can provide emotional support and practical help.
6Self-care looks different for everyone, and it is important to find what you need and enjoy. It may take trial and error to discover what works best for you.
[...]
7If you have concerns about your mental health, talk to a primary care provider. They can refer you to a qualified mental health professional, such as a psychologist, psychiatrist, or clinical social worker, who can help you figure out the next steps. [...]
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes of Health, Source 5: National Institute of Mental Health, Caring for Your Mental Health (2026). US government work (17 U.S.C. 105). Source text.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students read Source 6 on their own. It is an invented draft study plan with invented numbers, written for this page so that students can practice finding all four themes in one plan. It is a weak plan on purpose: the sample comes mostly from one class and the closing claim goes far beyond it.
1Invented scenario with invented numbers, written for this page. The psychology club at a high school wants to test whether a 10-minute walk before first period improves students' mood and attention. Here is the club's first draft of its plan.
2Participants. The club has 40 volunteers. Of these, 34 come from one honors biology class taught by the club's adviser; the other 6 are club members. All 40 are 14 or 15 years old.
3Signing up. Students sign up on a sheet at lunch. The plan does not mention parents or guardians, and it does not say whether a student may stop taking part.
4Procedure. On walk days, volunteers walk outside around the track for 10 minutes in any weather. One volunteer has asthma; the plan does not mention it.
5Measures. Each morning, volunteers rate their mood from 1 (very low) to 10 (very good) and complete a timed proofreading sheet that measures attention.
6Sharing results. Each week, the club will post every volunteer's name with their mood ratings on the hallway board "so everyone can see their progress."
7Low ratings. The plan says nothing about what the club will do if a volunteer rates their mood 1 or 2 several days in a row.
8The claim. The club plans to end its report with this sentence: "Morning walks improve mood and attention for all teenagers."
SVHS (invented scenario), Source 6: A psychology club's draft study plan (invented scenario) (2026). Original passage written for this page.
Task: build a four-row table with the headings Theme, Problem in the plan (with paragraph number) and A better plan. Fill one row for each theme. Plans are written on paper only: students do not run the study on anyone. Sources 1-6 are used again in the quiz and homework.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: "Pick a psychology topic you are interested in. Write one question for each of the four themes that a researcher studying that topic should ask." Collect and sort the cards by theme to see which theme the class finds hardest.
Teacher notes. (1) Sources 1, 2 and 4 contain outdated views that are labeled on the page: Bernard's acceptance of an experiment without consent, the 1922 advice on crying and play, and Jastrow's stereotypes about women. Source 1 also mentions experiments on people who had been condemned to death; the page omits Bernard's comments on studying tissues after executions. (2) Source 5 is general health information, not a screening tool. If a student shares that they are struggling, follow your school's procedure and connect them with a counselor or another trusted adult. (3) Source 6 and all of its numbers are invented.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give the four-theme table with the guiding question printed at the top of each column
Pre-highlight one sentence per source that shows its theme, and have students label it E, Di, De or H
Let students complete the Source 6 table with sentence starters such as "The plan does not say ..."
For Advanced Students
Find a sentence in one source that shows two themes at once and explain how they connect
Rewrite the claim in Source 6, paragraph 8 so that it fits the sample, and explain each change
Compare Bernard's harm rule with the idea of informed consent and argue whether a harmless study without consent can ever be justified, with a review board's role in mind
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong answers name the theme and the specific issue ("no parent permission for 14-year-olds," not just "ethics"), quote the source with its paragraph number, and explain the question the theme raises. Watch for students who treat diversity as only race or ethnicity (it also includes age, gender, language, ability and income), who treat developmental issues as only about babies, or who label outdated historical advice as current. Students should also notice when a sample is too small or narrow to support a broad claim.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Theme Lens Sort: Eight Study Cards
15 minGroups of 3-4
Each group gets 8 Study Cards and a sorting mat with four columns: ethical issues, diversity, developmental issues, and health and wellbeing. Each card describes an invented study from a different subfield. Groups place each card under the theme its main problem or question belongs to, with exactly two cards per column, and write on the back the question that theme raises about the study.
The 8 Study Cards (all invented)
Biological: a lab plans to record brain activity while 8-year-olds and 30-year-olds solve the same puzzles, to see whether the same brain areas are used at both ages.
Social: a researcher tells volunteers that a task measures creativity when it really measures whether they go along with a group, and plans to explain the real purpose only to those who ask.
Cognitive: a memory study recruits only English-speaking university students in one city, and the report begins "Human memory works this way."
Health: a study tests whether a six-week sleep-schedule program changes how sleepy and stressed high school students feel during the day.
Developmental: researchers follow the same 200 children from age 3 to age 18 to see whether shyness stays the same or changes as they grow up.
Testing: a reading test written with idioms common in one region is given to students who recently moved from other countries, and their low scores are reported as low reading ability.
Sports: a coach wants to use players' private mood journals in a research report without asking the players.
Clinical: a study compares two ways of teaching stress-management skills and tracks whether students' reported stress and sick days change.
Answer Key
Ethical issues: cards 2 (deception without a full explanation afterward) and 7 (private journals used without permission).
Diversity: cards 3 (one narrow sample, a claim about all humans) and 6 (a test that depends on one region's idioms).
Developmental issues: cards 1 (comparing two ages) and 5 (following the same children over time).
Health and wellbeing: cards 4 (sleep and stress) and 8 (stress management and sick days).
Accept a second theme on the back of any card with a reason: for example, card 1 also raises an ethical issue (8-year-olds need a parent's permission and their own assent), and card 5 raises a diversity issue if all 200 children come from one town.
Debrief Questions
Which cards could fit two columns? Pick one and argue for both.
The cards come from eight different subfields. What does that show about why these are called common themes?
2
Then and Now: Three Source Pairs
15 minPairs
Pairs fill in a Then and Now organizer with three rows: Source 1 with today's informed consent rule (from Direct Instruction), Source 2 with Source 3, and Jastrow's claims with Nevers's results (both in Source 4). Each row has four boxes: the older view (quoted, with paragraph number), the newer view or evidence (quoted), the theme, and what changed.
Model Row (Source 2 and Source 3)
Older view: much play "is more or less exciting," and tickling or tossing can "make him irritable and restless" (Source 2, paragraph 1). Newer view: "Play with your baby when they're alert and relaxed" and watch for signs of being tired (Source 3, paragraph 7). Theme: developmental issues. What changed: both warn against tiring a baby out, but Source 3 treats play as something a baby needs, while Source 2 treats it mostly as a risk to limit.
Discussion
In which row did evidence change the view, and in which did values about people's rights change it? Is it always one or the other?
Why might a reader in 2120 label some of today's advice as outdated? What should that make us careful about?
Variation: Fourth Row
Advanced pairs add a fourth row using Source 5: what view of mental health does NIMH reject when it says mental health "is more than the absence of a mental illness"?
3
Four-Theme Review of a Study Plan
15 minGroups of 3-4
Groups review the club's draft plan in Source 6 with a checklist of four questions, one per theme, and write a revised plan on paper. Groups do not act out a review board; they write a review. No study is carried out.
Checklist
Ethical issues: who agrees to take part, can a student stop, and how is privacy protected?
Diversity: who is in the sample, and does the claim fit the people studied?
Developmental issues: what ages are included, and does the claim go beyond them?
Health and wellbeing: what could go wrong for a participant's health, and what will the club do if a participant seems to be struggling?
Model Revisions for Two Themes
Groups write the diversity and developmental revisions themselves.
Ethics: get parent or guardian permission and each student's own agreement, say that anyone may stop at any time, and report only group averages with code numbers instead of names (paragraphs 3 and 6).
Health and wellbeing: let students walk indoors in bad weather, ask the student with asthma and their family about any limits, and agree in advance that a teacher will privately check in and connect a student with a counselor if low ratings continue (paragraphs 4 and 7).
Sharing
Each group reads its rewritten claim aloud. The class picks the version that best fits the sample and explains why.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
1 diagrams
Diagram 1: Four Questions for Any Study
The four common themes surround any research question from any subfield. Each box gives the question that theme asks. The wording is a summary written for this page.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
Homework: Four Themes Across Psychology
Directions: Part 1 uses Sources 1, 3 and 4. Quote every source you use with its paragraph number. Part 2 asks you to apply the four themes to new cases and to plan a study on paper only: do not run it on anyone.
Part 1: Themes in the Sources (Problems 1-3)
Source 1, paragraph 1 states Bernard's "principle of medical and surgical morality." Quote it, explain in your own words what it protects, and name one thing a researcher today must do that this principle does not require.
Source 3, paragraph 9 says parenting "can be hard work" and that it is easier to be a loving parent "when you are feeling good yourself." Explain how this paragraph connects two themes, developmental issues and health and wellbeing, and give one research question a psychologist could ask that involves both.
In Source 4, paragraph 3, Jastrow's women used 1,123 different words out of 2,500, and his men used 1,375 out of 2,500. What percent of each group's words were different words? Show your work. Then explain why these numbers alone cannot support a claim about all men and all women.
Part 2: Applying the Themes (Problems 4-6)
Invented case: a technology company tests a meditation app on 120 adults aged 25-40 who already meditate, finds that their reported stress drops, and advertises the app as "proven for teens." Name one problem for each of the four themes.
Plan, on paper only, a better version of Jastrow's study of word lists. Describe your sample, how you would get consent, how you would protect privacy, and one way to check whether age or training matters. Name the theme each choice addresses.
Choose two subfields of psychology (for example, cognitive and social). For each, describe an invented study in one sentence and show how the same two themes come up in both. Then explain in 3-4 sentences why the C3 Framework calls these themes "common themes across the field."
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Themes
Each theme is named and tied to a specific issue in the case or source
Themes named but one issue vague or misplaced
Themes missing or confused
Evidence
Quotations with source and paragraph numbers support each claim about a source
Quotations without paragraph numbers, or one claim unsupported
No quotations
Outdated views and limits
Labels outdated claims as outdated and notes the limits of small or narrow samples
Mentions limits without explaining them
Treats historical claims or weak samples as settled
Study plan
Plan protects participants, describes its sample and fits its claim to the people studied, on paper only
Plan addresses some of these
No plan, or a plan that would harm or deceive participants
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Sources 1, 2 and 3 are printed in Direct Instruction, Sources 4 and 5 in Guided Practice, and Source 6 in Independent Practice. Source 1 is used in Questions 1-3 and 15; Source 2 in Questions 4, 5 and 16; Source 3 in Questions 5 and 16; Source 4 in Questions 7-9, 17 and 20; Source 5 in Questions 10 and 11; and Source 6 in Questions 12, 13 and 18. Questions 6, 14 and 19 are new invented cases. Questions 1-14 are multiple choice; 15-20 are short answer.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 1, paragraph 1, what does Bernard's "principle of medical and surgical morality" forbid?
Answer: B
Bernard writes that the principle "consists in never performing on man an experiment which might be harmful to him to any extent, even though the result might be highly advantageous to science." D describes today's informed consent rule, which Bernard does not state. A reverses his point: science's benefit does not justify harm. C is wrong: he says physicians make therapeutic experiments daily.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 1, paragraph 2, which experiments does Bernard call obligatory?
Answer: D
He sorts experiments into three kinds: "those that can only harm are forbidden, those that are innocent are permissible, and those that may do good are obligatory." A is the permissible kind and B the forbidden kind, a misreading of the three-part list. C describes experiments he finds of interest, not the obligatory kind.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A researcher today plans a harmless memory test with high school students but does not tell the students or their parents that they are in a study, and asks no review board. How do Bernard's rule in Source 1 and today's informed consent rule judge this plan?
Answer: A
Bernard's test is harm: he calls experiments "wholly permissible when they involve no suffering or harm" (paragraph 2). Today's rule (45 CFR 46) also requires informed consent and, for minors, a parent's permission, unless a review board approves a narrow exception, so a secret study that no board has reviewed is not allowed. B ignores consent; C ignores that Bernard allows harmless experiments; D reverses the two rules.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 2, paragraph 3, why does the baby cry when no cause can be found?
Answer: C
The pamphlet says the crying is "all the result of having learned that crying will get him what he wants." A and B are the kinds of causes the paragraph says to rule out first ("after careful scrutiny of all these conditions"), so choosing them misreads the case it describes. D is not in the source. This habit view is outdated (see Source 3).
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which paragraph of Source 3 gives advice that most directly reverses Source 2's advice not to take up a baby who cries without a clear cause?
Answer: C
Source 3, paragraph 6 says: "Spend time cuddling and holding your baby. This will help them feel cared for and secure." Source 2 warned that taking up the baby leads to "a spoiled, fussy baby." A and B are about language, and D is about the parent's own health; none of them is about picking up or holding the baby.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Invented case: researchers measure the reaction times of the same group of adults at ages 25, 45 and 65 to see how much they change. Which theme does this study raise most directly?
Answer: A
Following the same people across ages asks how behavior changes or stays the same over the lifespan, a developmental issue. D is the likely error: diversity is about differences between people or groups, but here the comparison is the same people over time. B and C may come up but are not what the design is built to answer.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 4, paragraph 3, the Wellesley women's lists contained 1,500 words, and 1,103 of them were different words. What percent of the 1,500 words were different words?
Answer: D
1,103 / 1,500 = 0.7353, about 73.5%. A divides by 2,500, the size of Jastrow's lists, instead of 1,500. B is the share of words that were repeats, (1,500 - 1,103) / 1,500. C divides 1,103 by the Wisconsin women's 1,123, which compares two counts rather than finding a percent of the list.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which difference in method between the two studies does Nevers admit in Source 4, paragraph 2?
Answer: B
She writes that the Wellesley students "were not even asked, as in the case of Dr. Jastrow's class, to write as rapidly as possible." C reverses the source, which says they "had no knowledge whatever of the purpose." A is wrong: each list had one hundred words. D is not in the source, and the Wellesley class was women only.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Nevers says the difference in method "cannot possibly be supposed to account for the wide difference in results" (Source 4, paragraph 2). How should a careful reader treat this sentence?
Answer: A
Nevers gives no data showing that writing speed does not matter, so the sentence is her assumption; a study that varied only the speed instruction could test it. B overstates it: she reports no comparison of fast and slow writing. C has no support in the source. D overreacts: an untested assumption is a limit to note, not a reason to discard the other evidence.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 5, paragraph 1, mental health includes which kinds of well-being?
Answer: C
NIMH writes: "Mental health includes emotional, psychological, and social well-being." A, B and D each swap in kinds of well-being the paragraph does not list (physical, financial, spiritual or academic) and drop at least one that it does. The point for this theme is that mental health is part of everyone's overall health.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Source 5, paragraph 7, what should a person with concerns about their mental health do first?
Answer: B
NIMH says: "If you have concerns about your mental health, talk to a primary care provider," who can refer the person to a mental health professional. C misreads the self-care tips as a replacement for help; the source presents them as one part of caring for mental health. A and D are not in the source. For students, a trusted adult or school counselor is also a good first person to talk to.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Source 6, paragraph 2, what percent of the 40 volunteers come from the one honors biology class?
Answer: D
34 / 40 = 0.85, or 85%. A reads the count 34 as a percent. B is the share of the other 6 volunteers, 6 / 40 = 15%. C reads the count 6 as a percent. With 85% from one class, the sample is narrow: a diversity problem.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which rewrite of the claim in Source 6, paragraph 8 best fits the club's sample?
Answer: A
A limits the claim to the people studied (40 volunteers aged 14 or 15) and to what was measured. B and C still generalize to groups the club did not sample, the same leap as the original claim. D makes a claim about students older than 15, an age group the club did not study at all, a developmental leap. (The result in A is a model sentence; the club has not yet run its study.)
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Invented case: a psychologist studies whether a daily 20-minute walk lowers stress and blood pressure in office workers. Which theme does this research question address most directly?
Answer: C
Stress and blood pressure are health outcomes, so the question itself is about health and wellbeing. A, B and D would still matter in planning (consent, who is sampled, workers' ages), which is the error of picking a theme every study has rather than the one this question is about.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Source 1, paragraph 1 says that acting "exclusively from the point of view of the patient's own advantage does not prevent their turning out profitably to science." Explain what this sentence means and how it shows an ethical issue that every area of psychology faces.
Model answer: Bernard means that a doctor can put the patient's own good first and still learn things that help science: experience with each patient makes the next treatment better. This shows a common ethical issue: the interests of the person being studied can pull against the goal of gaining knowledge for others. Bernard settles it in favor of the person ("never performing on man an experiment which might be harmful to him"), which is still the starting point today, although today's rules add informed consent. Any subfield, from memory research to clinical work, has to balance what the participant risks with what science gains. Rubric: 2 = explains the sentence and names the balance between the participant and science, with a quotation; 1 = one of these; 0 = neither.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Source 2, paragraph 3 begins by saying that a young baby's cry "ought to be heeded." Explain how this fits with the rest of the paragraph's advice, why the paragraph is labeled outdated, and which theme it shows. Quote Source 3.
Model answer: The pamphlet accepts that a young baby cries to show his needs, so a cry with a cause should be answered. But it treats crying without a clear cause as a learned bad habit and tells mothers to let the baby "cry until he goes to sleep." That habit-training view is outdated: the CDC now advises parents to "Spend time cuddling and holding your baby" because it helps babies "feel cared for and secure" (Source 3, paragraph 6). The theme is developmental issues: both sources ask how early experiences shape later behavior, but they answer differently. Rubric: 2 = explains both parts of the advice, labels it outdated with a Source 3 quotation, and names the developmental theme; 1 = two of these; 0 = fewer.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Nevers studied only women. Explain why her study can still challenge Jastrow's claims about women, what it cannot tell us about men, and which theme this shows. Name one weakness of her sample.
Model answer: Jastrow claimed that women in general show certain word habits, but his data came from 25 women in one Wisconsin class (Source 4, paragraph 1). Nevers found very different patterns in another group of women (for example, dress words fell to "1 word in every 26"), so the claim did not hold beyond his sample. Her study cannot test anything about men, because no men were in it. This shows the theme of diversity: results from one group may not apply to others, so a sample must be described and claims limited to it. Weakness: her comparison used only 15 lists for one count (paragraph 3) and all came from one college class, so it is weak evidence too, as she admits ("The figures are too few," paragraph 5). Rubric: 2 = all four parts with evidence; 1 = two or three parts; 0 = fewer.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Name one problem in Source 6 for the theme of diversity and one for developmental issues, each with a paragraph number, and propose a fix for each.
Model answer: Diversity: 34 of the 40 volunteers come from one honors biology class (paragraph 2), so the sample may differ from other students in interests, schedules or grades. Fix: recruit from several classes and describe the sample in the report. Developmental issues: all volunteers are 14 or 15 (paragraph 2), but the claim is about "all teenagers" (paragraph 8). Fix: include students from every grade and compare age groups, or limit the claim to 14- and 15-year-olds. Rubric: 2 = both problems with paragraph numbers and workable fixes; 1 = one problem and fix; 0 = neither.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Invented case: a researcher wants to study whether high school students who use a mood-tracking app for a month feel less stressed. Explain how the themes of ethical issues and health and wellbeing both apply, and say what the researcher should plan in case a participant reports feeling very low.
Model answer: Ethical issues: participants are minors, so the researcher needs a parent's permission and each student's own agreement, must let anyone stop at any time, and must keep mood entries private. Health and wellbeing: the outcome, stress, is about wellbeing, and tracking mood could itself help or upset a student. Plan: before the study starts, decide that a trained adult will check in privately with any student who reports feeling very low and connect them with a school counselor or other support, and tell participants about this in advance. The researcher does not diagnose anyone. Rubric: 2 = both themes explained and a support plan that avoids diagnosis; 1 = one theme or no plan; 0 = neither.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Explain why ethical issues, diversity, developmental issues, and health and wellbeing are called common themes across the field of psychological science. Use two sources from this page that come from different areas of psychology or medicine.
Model answer: They are common themes because they come up in every area of psychology, whatever the topic. For example, Source 1 is about medical experiments, yet it raises an ethical question every psychologist faces: how to protect the people studied. Source 4 is about word association, a cognitive topic, yet it raises a diversity question: Jastrow's results from one class did not hold for the Wellesley women. The same four questions (Is it ethical? Who was studied? Does age matter? What about health?) can be asked of any study. Rubric: 2 = defines common themes and shows them in two sources from different areas; 1 = one source or no definition; 0 = neither.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does D2.Psy.13.9-12 mean?
D2.Psy.13.9-12 asks high school students to explain the themes that run through all of psychological science: ethical issues, diversity, developmental issues, and concerns about health and wellbeing. It is an indicator in the C3 Framework's psychology companion (Appendix B), in the group on critical thinking about themes, sources and evidence. Students should be able to find each theme in a study from any subfield and explain the question it raises.
What counts as a common theme in psychology?
A common theme is an issue that every area of psychology has to deal with, whatever its topic. A memory researcher, a sports psychologist and a school psychologist all have to ask whether their work is ethical, whom their results apply to, whether age changes the answer, and what the work means for health. That is different from a topic, such as memory or emotion, which belongs mainly to one area.
Why does a D2.Psy.13.9-12 lesson use sources from 1865, 1895 and 1922?
Old sources show that the themes are not new and how thinking about them changed. Bernard already had a rule against harming subjects but no rule about consent; the 1922 Infant Care pamphlet already asked how early experience shapes children but gave advice that is now outdated; and Nevers already showed that a result from one group may not hold in another. The page labels each outdated view as outdated.
Is diversity in psychology only about race and ethnicity?
No. Diversity also includes culture, gender, age, language, ability, income and other ways people differ. In research, the key question is who was in the sample and whether the results apply to people who were not. Nevers's study in Source 4 is about gender, and the club's plan in Source 6 is mostly about a narrow sample from one class.
Are developmental issues only about babies and children?
No. Developmental psychology covers the whole lifespan, from infancy to old age. A developmental issue arises whenever a result might change with age or life stage, or when researchers ask whether a trait stays stable or changes over time. That is why a study of 14-year-olds cannot simply be applied to all teenagers or to adults.
How should I handle the mental health part of this lesson safely?
Keep it general and never ask students to judge their own or anyone else's mental health. Source 5 is general information from NIMH, not a screening tool. If a student shares that they are struggling, follow your school's procedure and connect them with a counselor or another trusted adult. The page gives only general pointers to help.
Do students carry out a study in this lesson?
No. Students review an invented study plan and write a better plan on paper only. No one collects data from classmates or anyone else. If a teacher later wants students to run a real class study, the school's own rules for research with students apply.
How does D2.Psy.13.9-12 connect to D2.Psy.4.9-12 and D2.Psy.7.9-12?
D2.Psy.4.9-12 is about following ethical guidelines in research, and D2.Psy.7.9-12 is about why diversity matters in explaining behavior. D2.Psy.13.9-12 pulls those ideas together with development and health and asks students to see all four as questions that cut across the whole field. It is a good lesson to teach after those two indicators.
What is a common mistake students make with these themes?
A common mistake is naming the theme without the specific issue, for example writing "ethics" instead of "the plan has no parent permission for 14-year-olds." Another is treating historical advice as current. Ask students to point to the exact sentence, give its paragraph number, and say whether the view is still accepted.
Is the advice in the 1922 Infant Care pamphlet still followed?
Not the advice printed on this page. Its warnings against play and its advice to let a baby cry until he sleeps reflect the habit-training views of the 1920s. The CDC's current tips for parents of infants (Source 3) tell parents to talk to, read to, cuddle and play with their babies. The page prints the 1922 text only as a historical source.
07
Related Standards
6 standards
These standards connect to D2.Psy.13.9-12: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
D2.Psy.4.9-12Prerequisite
Follow ethical guidelines for research with human and nonhuman participants
Recognize how knowledge in psychology is interconnected
Lesson coming soon
D2.Psy.22.9-12Extends to
Use psychological knowledge to promote healthy lifestyle choices
Lesson coming soon
Standard text: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History (Silver Spring, MD: NCSS, 2013). NCSS was not involved in the production of this lesson and does not endorse it.