CCRA.W.2: Writing Informative and Explanatory Texts
In plain English: CCRA.W.2 is the Common Core College and Career Readiness anchor standard for writing that asks students to write informative and explanatory texts that examine and convey complex ideas clearly and accurately, by selecting, organizing and analyzing content well. In grades 6-12 it is carried by W.6.2 through W.11-12.2 and WHST.6-8.2 through WHST.11-12.2.
Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
Official note: These broad types of writing include many subgenres. See Appendix A for definitions of key writing types.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Writing · Cluster: Text Types and Purposes Also written as CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.2 · Official standard
CCRA.W.2 is the writing anchor for informative and explanatory texts. Students write to examine a complex idea (work out how it fits together) and to convey it (make it clear and accurate for a reader), and they do both through three choices the standard names: selection (what to include and what to leave out), organization (what order and structure make the idea clear) and analysis (explaining how and why, not only listing facts). This page teaches the anchor as a progression for grades 6-12, from a grade 6 writer who introduces a topic and organizes it by definition or cause and effect, to a grade 11-12 writer whose sections build on each other into a unified whole.
The page uses one technical process all the way through: how a pin tumbler lock, the common front-door lock, knows its key. All four texts are original: research notes, a model explanation, a weak draft written with errors on purpose and a fact sheet on vacuum flasks for homework. Every activity has a grades 6-8 version and a grades 9-12 version. For the full detail of one band, use the grade-level pages listed under Related Standards.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Select the facts that explain a process and leave out details that do not
Organize an explanation so that each section uses ideas the earlier sections have made clear
Explain a complex process accurately with precise, domain-specific vocabulary and defined terms
Analyze why a process works instead of only listing its steps
Write an introduction that previews the explanation and a conclusion that states an implication (grades 9-12: use an analogy and name its limits)
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Taking notes from a source in their own words
Writing a paragraph with a topic sentence and supporting details
Using transition words such as first, then and because
Determining the central idea of an informational text CCRA.R.2
"A front-door key is a strip of metal with a jagged edge. In two sentences, explain how you think the lock can tell the right key from a wrong one. You may guess; we will check your ideas today."
Take four answers and write them on the board without judging them. Most guesses are partly right (the shape of the edge matters) and vague about how. Tell students that turning a vague idea into a clear, accurate explanation is the job of CCRA.W.2, and that they will return to their guesses at the end of class.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Explain the difference between the two purposes in the standard. To examine is to work out how an idea fits together; to convey is to make it clear to a reader who was not there. Then name the three choices a writer makes:
Selection: keep the facts that explain the process; cut true but unhelpful details.
Organization: choose a structure that fits the idea (definition, classification, comparison, cause and effect, process), and use headings and transitions so the reader can follow it.
Analysis: explain how the parts work together and why, instead of listing facts side by side.
"Clearly and accurately" are both required: a clear explanation of a wrong idea fails the standard. Show the progression table so students see how the demands rise from grade 6 to grades 11-12.
Progression of CCRA.W.2 in grades 6-12 (short paraphrases of the grade-level standards)
Grade-level standard
Band
What this band adds
W.6.2
Grade 6
Introduce a topic and organize it with strategies such as definition, classification, comparison and cause and effect; develop it with facts, definitions and details; transitions, precise vocabulary, a formal style and a conclusion
W.7.2
Grade 7
Preview what is to follow; transitions that create cohesion; a conclusion that supports the explanation
W.8.2
Grade 8
Organize ideas into broader categories; well-chosen details; varied transitions
W.9-10.2
Grades 9-10
Complex ideas conveyed clearly and accurately, with important connections and distinctions; sufficient facts and extended definitions; precise language to manage complexity; objective tone; a conclusion that can state implications or significance
W.11-12.2
Grades 11-12
Each new element builds on the one before to form a unified whole; the most significant facts, developed thoroughly; metaphor, simile and analogy used to manage complexity
WHST.6-8.2
Grades 6-8, history, science and technical subjects
Informative texts in the disciplines, including historical events, scientific procedures and technical processes; formal style and objective tone
WHST.9-10.2
Grades 9-10, history, science and technical subjects
Connections and distinctions in discipline content; varied transitions and sentence structures; a style suited to the discipline
WHST.11-12.2
Grades 11-12, history, science and technical subjects
A unified whole built from the most significant facts; techniques such as analogy to manage complex technical ideas
Work through the five examples. They use a separate small topic, how a photoelectric smoke alarm detects smoke, so that the lock texts stay fresh for practice. In this kind of alarm, a small light shines across a dark chamber, and a light sensor sits off to one side, out of the beam.
Selecting content
Four notes: (a) a small light shines across a dark chamber; (b) smoke particles scatter some of that light onto a sensor; (c) the plastic case comes in white or almond; (d) alarms should be tested once a month.
Result: Keep (a) and (b): they explain how detection works. Cut (c), which is true but explains nothing. Note (d) is useful safety advice, but it belongs in a different text, one about using alarms.
Organizing a cause-and-effect chain
Scrambled steps: the alarm sounds; smoke enters the chamber; scattered light reaches the sensor; the particles scatter the light.
Result: Order: smoke enters the chamber, so the particles scatter the light; some scattered light reaches the sensor, and as a result the circuit sounds the alarm. The transitions (so, as a result) show cause and effect, not only sequence.
Precise, domain-specific language
Vague draft: The light thing sees the smoke and then it goes off.
Result: Revision: When smoke particles scatter the beam, some light reaches the light sensor, and the sensor's signal triggers the alarm. Each vague word ("thing," "sees," "it") becomes a named part or action.
Analysis, not only listing
Listing: There is a light. There is a sensor. The sensor is at an angle.
Result: Analysis: The sensor is placed out of the beam's path on purpose, so it receives light only when something in the chamber scatters it. The design turns the presence of smoke into the presence of light.
An analogy and its limit (grades 9-12)
Goal: help a reader picture why smoke makes light reach the sensor.
Result: Analogy: like dust that becomes visible in a sunbeam crossing a dark room, smoke shows up only when it scatters light. Limit: the alarm does not see smoke the way a person does; it measures how much light reaches the sensor.
Hand out the research notes on the pin tumbler lock and read them together. Use Diagram 1 to point to each part as it is named. Tell students that the notes are complete but not selected or organized: some notes are not needed to explain how the lock works.
1Where it is used. The pin tumbler lock is the kind of lock found in many front doors and padlocks that open with a flat key with a jagged edge. Linus Yale Jr. improved and patented versions of it in the 1860s.
2Parts. An outer housing (also called the shell) and, inside it, a cylinder called the plug, which turns when the right key is in it. The keyway is the slot in the plug where the key goes.
3Pin stacks. Holes are drilled through the housing and into the plug, often five or six in a row. Each hole holds a spring at the top, then a driver pin, then a key pin at the bottom that touches the key. Key pins come in different lengths; driver pins are often all the same length.
4Shear line. The thin gap where the outside of the plug meets the inside of the housing. The plug can turn only if nothing crosses this gap.
5Without a key. The springs push the pins down, so each driver pin sits partly in the plug and partly in the housing, blocking the shear line.
6With the right key. Each cut on the key (the pattern of cuts is called the bitting) lifts its key pin to the right height, so the top of every key pin lines up with the shear line. The driver pins rest entirely in the housing, and the plug turns. A cam on the back of the plug pulls the bolt.
7Wrong key. If even one cut is too high or too low, that pin stack crosses the shear line and the plug will not turn.
8Example lock (numbers invented for this lesson). 5 pin stacks; each key pin can be one of 6 lengths.
9Master keys. In some buildings, a small extra pin, called a master pin, sits between the key pin and the driver pin. It creates a second gap in the stack, so two different keys, such as a tenant's key and the building manager's master key, can each line up a gap with the shear line.
10Side notes. Brass is a common material for pins because it resists rust. Keys are often cut on a machine that traces an original key.
SVHS (original research notes), Research notes: How a Pin Tumbler Lock Works (notes written for this page). Original passage written for this page.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Read the model explanation aloud. Students highlight every term the writer defines in one color and every transition or heading in another. Then walk through the steps.
1A front-door lock makes a decision every time someone pushes a key into it: turn, or stay still. The pin tumbler lock, the type found on many front doors and padlocks, makes that decision with a row of small spring-loaded pins. This explanation describes the parts of the lock, how the pins block it, and how the right key, and only the right key, sets them free.
2The parts. The lock has two main pieces. The outer housing stays fixed in the door, and inside it sits the plug, a cylinder with a slot for the key called the keyway. A row of holes, usually five or six, runs through the housing and down into the plug. Each hole holds a pin stack: a spring at the top, a driver pin below it and a key pin at the bottom, resting in the keyway. The key pins are made in different lengths.
3How the pins block the plug. The plug can turn only at the shear line, the thin gap where the plug meets the housing. With no key in the lock, the springs press every stack down. Each driver pin then sits partly in the housing and partly in the plug, like a bolt slid across the gap, so the plug cannot rotate.
4How the right key opens it. The edge of a key is cut into a pattern of peaks and valleys called the bitting. As the key slides in, it pushes the key pins up. When the key is all the way in, each cut holds its key pin at just the right height: the top of every key pin meets the shear line, and every driver pin sits entirely in the housing. Nothing crosses the gap now, so the plug turns, and a cam on its back pulls the bolt out of the door frame.
5Why a wrong key fails. A different key has at least one cut at a different depth. If a cut is too shallow, it lifts its key pin too far, and the key pin itself crosses the shear line. If a cut is too deep, the key pin sits too low, and its driver pin reaches down across the line. Either way, one pin is enough to block the plug, so every cut on the key matters.
6Why the design works. Because every stack must be right at the same moment, the number of possible keys multiplies with each stack that is added. A lock with more stacks, or more possible pin lengths, has far more possible keys, so a stranger's key is less likely to fit by chance. The design also depends on precision: a key pin made slightly too long can stop even the right key from working.
7In short, a pin tumbler lock turns the jagged edge of a key into a set of heights, and it opens only when every height is right. When a key sticks, one possible cause is a key worn down so that one pin no longer stops exactly at the shear line.
SVHS (original model text), Model explanatory text: How a Pin Tumbler Lock Knows Its Key. Original passage written for this page.
The introduction previews. Ask: "Which sentence in paragraph 1 tells the reader what is coming?" Teacher note: the last sentence lists the parts of the explanation in the order the headings follow.
Terms are defined where they first appear. Ask students to find two terms that are defined in the same sentence that introduces them. Teacher note: "keyway" (paragraph 2) and "bitting" (paragraph 4) are both defined at first use.
A comparison helps a reader picture the idea. Ask: "In paragraph 3, what does the comparison to a bolt slid across a gap help a reader see?" Teacher note: it shows why a pin crossing the gap stops the plug, the way a door bolt holds a door.
Analysis goes beyond the steps. Ask: "Paragraph 6 adds no new step. What does it add?" Teacher note: it explains why the design works and what it depends on, which is analysis.
The conclusion states an implication. Ask: "Does paragraph 7 only repeat the explanation?" Teacher note: its second sentence applies the idea to a sticking key, an implication a reader can use.
Grades 6-8 focus: the introduction, defined terms, headings and transitions. Grades 9-12 focus: how each section builds on the one before, and where the explanation moves from description to analysis.
Independent Practice15 minutes
The weak draft below was written for this page with errors on purpose: it is vague, out of order and in places inaccurate. It is not a model. Students rewrite it using the research notes. Grades 6-8 write one accurate, organized paragraph of 100-150 words that defines at least two terms. Grades 9-12 write two or three paragraphs with headings, including one sentence of analysis that explains why the design works.
1Locks are really cool and everyone uses them. A lock has a big pin inside it that holds it shut. When you put your key in, the pins fall down into the grooves on the key and then the lock opens. The key has to be the right one or it won't work. Also there are springs. The springs make it work better. Some locks have master keys. Locks are made out of metal. That is how a lock works, and it is very interesting.
SVHS (original weak draft), Weak draft for revision: Locks (written for this page, with errors on purpose). Original passage written for this page.
Look for: accurate movement of every part, named parts in place of vague words, a clear order from parts to function, and no filler such as "really cool." The quiz questions on this draft serve as the key; do not hand it out before students write.
Closure5 minutes
Exit ticket: Return to the warm-up guesses on the board. Each student picks one guess and writes one sentence that corrects or sharpens it, using at least one term from today. Look for accurate use of "shear line" and of at least one other term from the notes.
Teacher note: the lock texts explain how a lock works so students can practice explanatory writing. They do not teach how to open a lock without its key; keep discussion on the mechanism and on the writing.
For homework: students use the fact sheet below. Its facts were written for this page, and its test data are invented. Its paragraphs are numbered 1-7.
1What it is. A vacuum flask, often called a thermos, is a bottle with two walls, one inside the other. Almost all of the air has been pumped out of the space between the walls, leaving a near vacuum. The Scottish scientist James Dewar designed a vacuum flask in 1892 to keep liquefied gases cold in his laboratory.
2Three ways heat moves. Conduction passes heat through matter by contact, as when a metal spoon warms up in hot soup. Convection carries heat by the movement of a liquid or a gas, as when warm air rises from a heater. Radiation carries heat as infrared light, which can travel through empty space.
3Blocking conduction and convection. Conduction and convection both need matter. The near vacuum between the walls has very little, so very little heat can cross the gap in these two ways.
4Slowing radiation. Radiation can cross a vacuum. To slow it, the wall surfaces that face the gap are often coated with a shiny metal layer, or made of polished steel, which reflects much of the infrared radiation back toward the drink.
5Where heat still escapes. Heat still leaves, slowly. Most of it escapes through the stopper and through the neck, where the inner and outer walls are joined and heat can be conducted from one wall to the other.
6Test results (invented for this lesson). 500 mL of water was poured in at 90 °C. In a vacuum flask with its stopper in, the water was 82 °C after 3 hours and 75 °C after 6 hours. In an open ceramic mug in the same 20 °C room, the same amount of water was 40 °C after 1.5 hours.
7Cold drinks too. The same flask keeps a cold drink cold, because the walls slow heat flowing in just as they slow heat flowing out.
SVHS (original fact sheet), Homework fact sheet: How a Vacuum Flask Keeps a Drink Hot (facts written for this page; test data invented). Original passage written for this page.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a labeled copy of Diagram 1 and a word bank: housing, plug, keyway, pin stack, spring, driver pin, key pin, shear line
Provide a frame: "A pin tumbler lock has ___. Without a key, ___. When the right key goes in, ___, so ___."
Let students rewrite the weak draft one sentence at a time, checking each against a single note
For Advanced Students
Ask students to write a short comparison section that explains the difference between a key pin and a driver pin, and why both are needed
Have students rewrite the model for a younger audience in under 200 words and explain which details they cut and why
Ask students to find a place in the model where an analogy would help and write one, then state where it breaks down
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Check accuracy first: a clear explanation of a wrong idea does not meet the standard. Strong work defines technical terms at first use, follows an order in which each section depends on the ones before, and explains why the process works, not only what happens. Look for selection, too: details that are true but do not explain the process should be gone. In grades 9-12, look for distinctions between similar ideas and an analogy whose limits the writer states.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Card Sort: Select and Organize
15 minPairs
Pairs receive the ten research notes on separate cards, shuffled, and turn them into a plan for an explanation. The sort makes selection and organization visible before anyone writes a sentence.
Grades 6-8 Version
Pairs sort the cards under four headings they are given: The Parts, Locked, Unlocked and Not Needed
They put the cards under each heading in the order a reader needs them, and number them
Each pair writes one sentence explaining why one card belongs under Not Needed
Grades 9-12 Version
Pairs write their own section headings instead of using given ones, with at least one section that analyzes why the design works
They draw an arrow from each section to any earlier section whose terms it depends on; every arrow must point backward
They decide where the master-key note belongs, or whether to cut it, and justify the choice for a reader who wants to know how an ordinary front-door lock works
Discussion Questions
Did two pairs order the same cards differently? Can both orders work?
Why might a writer cut a fact that is true and interesting?
Which card had to come first for the others to make sense?
Modification
For students who need support, pre-sort the Parts cards and have pairs place only the Locked and Unlocked cards.
2
Explain It Three Ways
15 minGroups of 3
Each group explains one idea, the shear line, using three different strategies the grade-level standards name, then judges which strategy helps a new reader most.
Grades 6-8 Version
Student 1 writes a one-sentence definition of the shear line in their own words
Student 2 writes a cause-and-effect sentence: what happens when a pin crosses it, and what happens when nothing does
Student 3 writes a comparison to an everyday object; the group then combines the three into one short paragraph
Grades 9-12 Version
The group writes an extended definition of the shear line (what it is, what it is not, and why it matters) in three to four sentences
Each student writes a different analogy, and the group states where each one breaks down
The group chooses the strongest analogy for a reader who has never seen inside a lock and explains the choice in one sentence
Discussion Questions
Which strategy made the idea clearest, and for which kind of reader?
Can an analogy make an explanation less accurate? How can a writer prevent that?
3
Write It, Draw It
20 minPairs
Each student turns the smoke-alarm notes from Direct Instruction into a short explanation. A partner then tries to draw the alarm's chamber from the text alone, without seeing the writer's notes. Where the drawing goes wrong, the text needs revising.
Grades 6-8 Version
Write 100-150 words that explain how a photoelectric smoke alarm detects smoke, with one definition and at least two cause-and-effect transitions
Swap texts; the partner draws the light, the sensor and the path of the light, and labels each
Compare the drawing with the writer's intention and revise one sentence that caused a mistake
Grades 9-12 Version
Write 150-200 words with a heading, a defined term, a sentence of analysis that explains why the sensor sits out of the beam, and an analogy with its limit
The partner draws the chamber and writes one question the text did not answer
The writer revises to answer the question without adding details that do not explain detection
Discussion Questions
Which words in your text did your partner misread?
What did you add, and what did you cut, when you revised?
Variation: Lock Version
Pairs who finish early repeat the activity with a short explanation of why a wrong key fails, and the partner draws one pin stack at the moment it blocks the plug.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
1 diagrams
Diagram 1: Inside a Pin Tumbler Lock, Locked and Unlocked
A simplified cross-section with five pin stacks. Left: with no key, the springs push every stack down, so each driver pin crosses the shear line and the plug cannot turn. Right: the cuts of the right key hold each key pin at a height where its top meets the shear line, so no pin crosses it and the plug can turn. A writer explaining the lock can use a diagram like this one, as the grade-level standards allow, but the text must still be clear without it.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
CCRA.W.2 Homework: How a Vacuum Flask Keeps a Drink Hot
Directions: Use the fact sheet "How a Vacuum Flask Keeps a Drink Hot" at the end of the lesson plan (in Closure). Its facts were written for this page, and its test results are invented. Its paragraphs are numbered 1-7. Write in complete sentences and in your own words; when you use a number from the fact sheet, give the paragraph number. For Problem 6, grades 6-8 write 250-350 words; grades 9-12 write 350-500 words and include one analogy and its limit.
Part 1: Selecting and Organizing (Problems 1-2)
Plan an explanation of how a vacuum flask keeps a drink hot. Write a heading for each of three or four sections and list the paragraph numbers each section will use. Name one fact you will leave out and explain why it does not help explain how the flask works.
Write an introduction of two or three sentences that names the topic, hooks the reader without filler and previews your sections in order.
Part 2: Explaining Accurately (Problems 3-4)
Write a paragraph that explains why the near vacuum blocks conduction and convection but not radiation, and how the flask slows radiation. Use the terms conduction, convection, radiation and infrared, and define each the first time you use it.
Use the invented test results (paragraph 6). How many degrees did the water in the flask lose in 6 hours, and how many did the water in the mug lose in 1.5 hours? Find the average loss per hour for each, then write one sentence explaining what the comparison shows and one sentence naming a limit of this test.
Part 3: Writing the Explanation (Problems 5-6)
Write a concluding section of two or three sentences that follows from your explanation and states an implication or the significance of the design, without simply repeating your introduction.
Write the full explanatory text with your headings, your introduction from Problem 2, your paragraph from Problem 3, at least one use of the test data and your conclusion from Problem 5. Use transitions that link the sections and keep a formal style.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Selection
Every fact helps explain how the flask works; unneeded details are cut
Mostly relevant facts, with one unneeded detail or one key fact missing
Facts copied in order with no selection
Organization
Headings, a preview and transitions; each section builds on the one before
Clear sections but weak transitions or preview
No clear structure
Accuracy and Analysis
Correct science, terms defined, and the text explains why the design works
Mostly correct, but explains what without why
Contains a science error that misleads the reader
Language and Conclusion
Precise vocabulary, formal style, and a conclusion that states an implication
Some vague words, or a conclusion that only repeats
Informal or vague throughout, or no conclusion
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-5, 9, 14, 15 and 18 use the model explanation, questions 6, 11, 17, 19 and 20 use the research notes, and questions 7 and 8 use the weak draft "Locks"; all three texts are in the lesson plan above. Questions 10, 12, 13 and 16 stand alone. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to paragraph 2 of the model explanation, what is the order of the parts in each pin stack, from top to bottom?
Answer: B
Paragraph 2 says each stack holds "a spring at the top, a driver pin below it and a key pin at the bottom, resting in the keyway." Choice A turns the stack upside down. Choice C moves the spring into the middle, but the spring sits at the top and presses the whole stack down. Choice D swaps the two pins, which would put the driver pin against the key; the key pin is the one that touches the key.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to paragraph 4 of the model, what does the cam on the back of the plug do?
Answer: D
Paragraph 4 ends: "the plug turns, and a cam on its back pulls the bolt out of the door frame." The cam is the last link in the chain, connecting the turning plug to the bolt. Choice A gives the springs' job to the cam. Choice C gives the key's job to the cam: the cuts of the key line up the pins. Choice B describes something the text never mentions.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to the model, what happens when one cut on a wrong key is too deep?
Answer: A
Paragraph 5 says that with a cut too deep, "the key pin sits too low, and its driver pin reaches down across the line." Choice B describes a cut that is too shallow, the opposite case in the same paragraph. Choices C and D describe events the text never mentions.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The model's sections move from the parts of the lock, to how the pins block it, to how the right key opens it, to why a wrong key fails. Why is this order effective?
Answer: C
The section on the right key depends on "shear line," "key pin" and "driver pin," which earlier sections have already explained, so a reader never meets a term before it is clear. Choice A is wrong because the shear line is defined in paragraph 3, not at the end. Choice B is wrong because the model describes one kind of lock and never compares older and newer ones. Choice D is wrong because the model leaves out the lock's history altogether.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 5 of the model, what does the transition "Either way" do?
Answer: A
"Either way" follows the too-shallow case and the too-deep case and shows that both end in the same result: one pin "is enough to block the plug." Choice D misreads the phrase as doubt; the writer is certain that both cases fail. Choice B is wrong because the model never discusses master keys, and choice C names a comparison the paragraph does not make.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The research notes describe an example lock with 5 pin stacks, where each key pin can be one of 6 lengths. In theory, how many different keys could this design allow?
Answer: C
Each of the 5 stacks can take any of 6 lengths, independently, so the count multiplies: 6 × 6 × 6 × 6 × 6 = 65 = 7,776. Real key systems rule out some combinations, so this is a theoretical maximum. Choice A multiplies 5 by 6 instead of multiplying 6 by itself five times. Choice B adds the numbers. Choice D computes 56, swapping the number of stacks and the number of lengths.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence in the weak draft "Locks" states something inaccurate about how the lock works?
Answer: B
The key does not let the pins fall; it pushes the key pins up until each top meets the shear line, as the notes say: each cut "lifts its key pin to the right height." Choice C is accurate but vague, since it does not say why a wrong key fails. Choices A and D are true facts that explain nothing about how the lock opens, a selection problem rather than an accuracy problem.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which revision of the weak draft's sentence "The springs make it work better" is the most precise and accurate?
Answer: D
Choice D names what the springs push, in which direction and with what result, using the terms "pin stack," "driver pins" and "plug." Choices A and B keep the vague verb "work" and add no information. Choice C names the pins but ends with the vague "how it all works" instead of stating the effect.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What do the bold headings in the model, such as "Why a wrong key fails," do for a reader?
Answer: A
Each heading names the question its section answers, which supports the organization the introduction previews. Choice B confuses an explanatory text with an argument; the model takes no position. Choice C is wrong because each section depends on the ones before it. Choice D is wrong because the headings name topics, not sources; the model never marks which ideas came from the notes.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student is explaining how a hot-air balloon rises. Which detail is least relevant to that explanation?
Answer: C
The color of the envelope is true but explains nothing about rising, so a writer selecting content would cut it. Choices A, B and D are each a link in the cause-and-effect chain: heating makes the air inside less dense, and the surrounding denser air pushes the balloon up.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to the research notes, what does a master pin do?
Answer: B
Paragraph 9 of the notes says a master pin "creates a second gap in the stack, so two different keys ... can each line up a gap with the shear line." Choice A reverses the purpose, since the tenant's key still works. Choice C misplaces the pin, which sits between the key pin and the driver pin. Choice D names an effect the notes never mention.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student's explanation of how expansion joints work on a bridge needs a concluding sentence. Which one states the significance instead of only repeating?
Answer: D
Choice D tells the reader why the design matters: it connects the explanation to a consequence. Choice A restates a definition, choice B is filler that adds nothing, and choice C is a general statement that could end almost any text about bridges.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence keeps a formal style and an objective tone?
Answer: A
Choice A states the process in neutral, precise words. Choice B uses informal words ("honestly," "super"). Choice C addresses the reader and tells them how to feel. Choice D adds a personal judgment ("the coolest part") that has no place in an explanatory text.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A writer compares the pin stacks to "a row of gates that must all be open at the same time." What does this analogy capture, and where does it fall short?
Answer: B
Like the gates, every stack has to be right at the same moment, or the plug stays blocked. But a gate is simply open or shut, while a pin must stop at one exact height; lifting a key pin too far blocks the plug too. Stating that limit keeps the analogy accurate. Choice A names features the analogy has nothing to do with, and choices C and D misread what it is about.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
In two or three sentences, explain to a reader who has never seen inside a lock what happens when someone pushes in a key with one cut that is too shallow. Use the terms key pin, driver pin and shear line.
Model answer: "A shallow cut is too high, so it lifts its key pin too far. The top of that key pin rises past the shear line, the gap between the plug and the housing, and pushes into the housing along with the driver pin above it. Because a pin now crosses the gap, the plug cannot turn, even if every other cut is right." Rubric: 2 points for an accurate explanation that uses all three terms correctly and states why the plug is blocked; 1 point for an accurate explanation missing a term or the cause; 0 points if the direction of the pins is wrong.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
The four sentences below explain how a rim brake stops a bicycle wheel, but they are out of order. Write them in a logical order, and add one transition word or phrase that shows cause and effect. (a) Friction between the pads and the rim slows the wheel. (b) The rider squeezes the brake lever. (c) The cable pulls the brake arms together, pressing the pads against the rim. (d) Squeezing the lever pulls a cable that runs to the brake.
Model answer: b, d, c, a. "The rider squeezes the brake lever. Squeezing the lever pulls a cable that runs to the brake. The cable pulls the brake arms together, pressing the pads against the rim. As a result, friction between the pads and the rim slows the wheel." Rubric: 2 points for the order b, d, c, a with a fitting cause-and-effect transition (as a result, so, therefore); 1 point for the correct order without a transition, or one swapped pair with a fitting transition.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Rewrite this sentence from the weak draft so that it is accurate and precise: "A lock has a big pin inside it that holds it shut." Use the research notes.
Model answer: "A pin tumbler lock has a row of five or six pin stacks, and when no key is in the lock, the driver pin in each stack crosses the shear line and holds the plug in place." Rubric: 2 points for replacing "a big pin" with the row of pin stacks and naming what blocks the plug; 1 point for one of the two; 0 points if a single pin is still described.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
The model ends with an implication about a sticking key. Write a different concluding sentence for the model that states another implication or the significance of the design.
Model answer: "Because one wrong height is enough to keep the plug still, a lock maker can make a lock harder to open by chance with a simple change: adding another pin stack or another possible pin length." Rubric: 2 points for a conclusion that follows from the explanation and states a new implication or significance; 1 point for a conclusion that follows but mainly repeats; 0 points for filler.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Which two of the ten research notes would you leave out of an explanation of how an ordinary front-door lock opens, and why? Then name one note that must stay, and explain why the explanation would fail without it.
Model answer: "I would leave out the Side notes (paragraph 10), because the metal of the pins and the way keys are copied do not explain how the lock opens, and the Master keys note (paragraph 9), because an ordinary front-door lock does not need one. The Shear line note (paragraph 4) must stay: without it, a reader cannot understand why a pin crossing the gap stops the plug." Rubric: 2 points for two reasonable cuts with reasons and one essential note with a reason; 1 point for cuts or an essential note without reasons. Other choices, such as cutting the history in paragraph 1, earn full credit when justified.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Use the master-key note (paragraph 9 of the research notes) to explain, in two or three sentences, why a master-keyed lock may open for more keys than its owner intends. Suppose every one of the 5 stacks in the example lock has a master pin.
Model answer: "A master pin gives a stack two gaps, so two different heights work at that position instead of one. If all 5 stacks have master pins, a key can use either height at each position, so in theory 25 = 32 combinations of heights would open the lock, not only the tenant's key and the master key. Each added gap is another way for a key to line up." Rubric: 2 points for explaining that each master pin adds a second working height and that the choices multiply across stacks, with the count of 32; 1 point for the idea without the multiplication.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does CCRA.W.2 mean?
It means students should be able to write texts that inform or explain: they examine a complex idea and convey it clearly and accurately to a reader. The standard names how: by selecting the right content, organizing it well and analyzing it, which means explaining how and why, not only listing facts.
What is the difference between CCRA.W.2 and W.8.2?
CCRA.W.2 is the broad anchor; W.8.2 is the grade 8 standard that carries it. W.8.2 spells out the grade 8 expectations, such as organizing ideas into broader categories, choosing well-chosen details and using varied transitions. The progression table on this page shows what each grade band adds, up to the unified whole and the analogies of grades 11-12.
What is the difference between informative and explanatory writing?
They overlap, and the standard treats them together. Informative writing mainly tells a reader what something is or what happened; explanatory writing tells how or why something works or happens. An explanation of how a lock works is explanatory, and the description of its parts inside it is informative.
How is explanatory writing different from argument writing?
An explanatory text does not take a position for a reader to accept; it helps the reader understand. An argument (CCRA.W.1) states a claim that someone could dispute and supports it. An explanation can still include analysis, such as why a design works, but the analysis serves understanding, not persuasion.
What does "analysis of content" mean in CCRA.W.2?
It means explaining how the parts of a topic connect and why, instead of placing facts side by side. "The sensor sits out of the beam" is a fact; "the sensor sits out of the beam so that it receives light only when smoke scatters it" is analysis, because it explains the purpose of the design.
How do students decide what to leave out?
By testing each fact against the purpose of the text: does it help the reader understand the idea being explained? True and interesting facts that do not serve the purpose can be cut, or saved for a different text. Activity 1 on this page practices this with a card sort.
Does CCRA.W.2 apply in science, history and technical classes?
Yes. In grades 6-12 it is also carried by WHST.6-8.2, WHST.9-10.2 and WHST.11-12.2, which include narrating historical events, describing scientific procedures and explaining technical processes. A lab report's procedure section and an explanation of the causes of an event are both CCRA.W.2 writing.
Can students use headings and diagrams in CCRA.W.2 writing?
Yes. The grade-level standards name formatting such as headings, graphics such as charts and tables, and multimedia when they help a reader. The text should still make sense on its own; a diagram supports the explanation rather than replacing it.
What are common mistakes in explanatory writing?
A common mistake is a list of facts with no explanation of how they connect. Others include using technical terms before defining them, vague words such as "thing" and "stuff," filler openings and closings, and confident statements that are not accurate. Reading a draft aloud to someone who does not know the topic exposes many of these problems.
How is CCRA.W.2 assessed?
Usually through a written explanation scored with a rubric, often after students read a set of sources. Rubrics generally look at focus, organization, development with evidence, language and conventions; check your state's test guide for its own criteria. In class, short tasks such as ordering steps, defining a term or writing a conclusion assess parts of the skill, as this page's quiz does.
07
Related Standards
11 standards
These are the grade-level standards that carry anchor CCRA.W.2 in grades 6-12, plus closely related anchors.
Grades 6-8
W.6.2Grade-band standard
Write informative texts that examine a topic through relevant, organized content