SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

W.11-12.2Common CoreELAWritingGrades 11-12

W.11-12.2: Explanatory Writing That Builds a Unified Whole

In plain English: W.11-12.2 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 11 and 12 to write informative and explanatory texts that convey complex ideas clearly and accurately. Students organize so that each new element builds on the last, develop the topic thoroughly with the most significant details, vary transitions and syntax, use precise terms and analogy, and conclude with the topic's significance.

Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.

  1. a.Introduce a topic; organize complex ideas, concepts, and information so that each new element builds on that which precedes it to create a unified whole; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.
  2. b.Develop the topic thoroughly by selecting the most significant and relevant facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience's knowledge of the topic.
  3. c.Use appropriate and varied transitions and syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts.
  4. d.Use precise language, domain-specific vocabulary, and techniques such as metaphor, simile, and analogy to manage the complexity of the topic.
  5. e.Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing.
  6. f.Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic).
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards · Cluster: Text Types and Purposes · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

65-70 min

Overview

Students explain a complex scientific concept in writing, using the chapter in which Charles Darwin explains his most quoted phrase. In Chapter III of On the Origin of Species (1859), Darwin argues that a "struggle for existence" follows from the rate at which living things multiply, and then shows, through a chain that runs from cats to field mice to bumblebees to red clover, that much of the struggle is a matter of dependence rather than fighting. The excerpt is itself a piece of explanatory writing: a principle, numbers that make it concrete, and an extended example that widens the meaning of a term. Students analyze it, study an original model text that explains the same concept for today's readers, and revise a weak draft. They then plan an explanation of Darwin's "great tree" simile, which they write for homework.

The lesson follows the six parts of W.11-12.2, with attention to what the 11-12 band adds: organization in which each new element builds on the one before to form a unified whole (a); thorough development with the most significant details for the audience (b); varied transitions and syntax (c); precise language together with metaphor, simile and analogy used to manage a complex topic (d); a formal, objective style that follows the conventions of science writing (e); and a conclusion that states implications or significance (f).

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Organize an explanation of a complex concept so that each section depends on the one before and the whole text is unified
  • Select the most significant facts, quotations and examples for a stated audience, and justify leaving others out
  • Use an analogy, metaphor or simile to clarify a complex idea, and state where the comparison stops being accurate
  • Vary transitions and sentence structures to link sections and to make the relationships among ideas clear
  • Keep a formal, objective style that follows the conventions of science writing, and end with a conclusion that states the significance of the topic

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Writing an informative text that makes connections and distinctions and uses varied transitions W.9-10.2
  • Interpreting figures of speech in context and analyzing their role in a text L.11-12.5
  • Integrating short quotations into their own sentences with correct punctuation
  • A basic idea of natural selection from a biology course: inherited differences affect which individuals survive and reproduce

Lesson Procedure

65-70 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "Write down the first picture that comes to mind for the phrase 'the struggle for existence.' Then name two living things that could win that struggle without fighting anything."

    Give students three minutes, then list their pictures on one side of the board and their non-fighting winners on the other. Read the first Darwin excerpt aloud while students follow on paper; the paragraphs are numbered in the margin, and the marks [...] show where lines were left out. Ask them to circle each number Darwin gives in paragraphs 1 and 2, and, in paragraph 3, to underline each living thing Darwin names and write beside it what it depends on.

    A struggle for existence inevitably follows from the high rate at which all organic beings tend to increase. Every being, which during its natural lifetime produces several eggs or seeds, must suffer destruction during some period of its life, and during some season or occasional year, otherwise, on the principle of geometrical increase, its numbers would quickly become so inordinately great that no country could support the product. Hence, as more individuals are produced than can possibly survive, there must in every case be a struggle for existence, either one individual with another of the same species, or with the individuals of distinct species, or with the physical conditions of life. It is the doctrine of Malthus applied with manifold force to the whole animal and vegetable kingdoms; for in this case there can be no artificial increase of food, and no prudential restraint from marriage. Although some species may be now increasing, more or less rapidly, in numbers, all cannot do so, for the world would not hold them.

    There is no exception to the rule that every organic being naturally increases at so high a rate, that if not destroyed, the earth would soon be covered by the progeny of a single pair. Even slow-breeding man has doubled in twenty-five years, and at this rate, in a few thousand years, there would literally not be standing room for his progeny. Linnæus has calculated that if an annual plant produced only two seeds—and there is no plant so unproductive as this—and their seedlings next year produced two, and so on, then in twenty years there would be a million plants.

    [...]

    I am tempted to give one more instance showing how plants and animals, most remote in the scale of nature, are bound together by a web of complex relations. [...] I have, also, reason to believe that humble-bees are indispensable to the fertilisation of the heartsease (Viola tricolor), for other bees do not visit this flower. From experiments which I have tried, I have found that the visits of bees, if not indispensable, are at least highly beneficial to the fertilisation of our clovers; but humble-bees alone visit the common red clover (Trifolium pratense), as other bees cannot reach the nectar. Hence I have very little doubt, that if the whole genus of humble-bees became extinct or very rare in England, the heartsease and red clover would become very rare, or wholly disappear. The number of humble-bees in any district depends in a great degree on the number of field-mice, which destroy their combs and nests; and Mr. H. Newman, who has long attended to the habits of humble-bees, believes that “more than two thirds of them are thus destroyed all over England.” Now the number of mice is largely dependent, as every one knows, on the number of cats; and Mr. Newman says, “Near villages and small towns I have found the nests of humble-bees more numerous than elsewhere, which I attribute to the number of cats that destroy the mice.” Hence it is quite credible that the presence of a feline animal in large numbers in a district might determine, through the intervention first of mice and then of bees, the frequency of certain flowers in that district!

    Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, from Chapter III, Struggle for Existence (geometrical increase and the web of relations) (1859). Public domain (published 1859). Source text.
  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Present what the 11-12 standard adds to the 9-10 version. The organization must do more than connect and distinguish ideas: each new element builds on that which precedes it, so that later sections would not make sense without earlier ones (Diagram 1). Development must be thorough, with the most significant details rather than all relevant ones. Writers vary syntax as well as transitions. And part d names metaphor, simile and analogy as tools for managing a complex topic, which means the writer must also know where each comparison stops being accurate. Work through the five examples below, then read the model text.

    • Introducing a complex topic

      Flat opening: Darwin had many important ideas about nature. It names a person but not a concept, and it gives the reader no reason to keep reading.

      Result: Revision: Darwin's phrase "struggle for existence" is widely quoted and often misread, because readers take literally a term he meant as a metaphor.

    • Building each element on the one before

      Two facts presented side by side: A female bullfrog can lay thousands of eggs in a season. A pond's frog population stays about the same from year to year.

      Result: Linked so that the second idea depends on the first: A female bullfrog can lay thousands of eggs in a season, yet the frog population of a pond stays about the same from year to year; it follows that nearly all of those eggs never become breeding adults.

    • Analogy with its limit

      Concept: geometrical increase, the growth of a population that multiplies by the same factor each generation.

      Result: Analogy: geometrical increase works like a savings account with compound interest, where each year's growth is added to the total and the next year's growth is figured on the larger total. Limit: money needs no food or space, while a real population soon runs out of both.

    • Varied syntax

      Three sentences with the same pattern: Seeds fall on crowded ground. Seedlings compete for light. Most seedlings die.

      Result: Revision: When seeds fall on ground that other plants already cover, the seedlings compete for light, and most of them die. The survivors are few.

    • Precise language and the conventions of biology

      Draft sentence: The moths turned dark because they wanted to hide from birds. It gives the moths an intention and treats a population change as a choice.

      Result: Revision: In woods darkened by soot, birds caught pale moths more often than dark ones, so dark moths left more offspring and became more common over many generations.

    Hand out the model text. On the first reading, students mark the sentence in paragraph 1 that previews the three steps. On the second, they draw an arrow from the first sentence of each body paragraph back to the idea it depends on, and they bracket every comparison (metaphor, simile or analogy). Point out the conventions of science writing the model follows: the source and date named once, technical terms explained in plain words, processes described as outcomes rather than intentions, and quotations kept short and exact. Close with the conclusion, which states an implication of the concept ("articulating implications or the significance of the topic," in the words of part f) instead of summarizing it.

    The phrase "struggle for existence" calls up pictures of combat: stags locking antlers, wolves fighting over a carcass. Charles Darwin, who placed the phrase at the center of On the Origin of Species in 1859, meant something far broader, and most of what he meant involves no fighting at all. Grasping his meaning takes three steps, each resting on the one before: what Darwin included in the term, why he thought the struggle could never stop, and what the struggle decides.

    A Deliberately Wide Term
    Darwin stretches the term well beyond open conflict, and one of his most famous examples involves no fight at all. In England, he reports, "humble-bees alone visit the common red clover," so the clover's seed crop depends on these bumblebees. The bees depend in turn on the number of field mice, "which destroy their combs and nests," and the mice on the number of local cats. A district with many cats may therefore have more clover. None of these animals fights the clover, yet each one helps to decide whether it leaves seed. To struggle, in Darwin's sense, is to depend on other living things and to succeed or fail at leaving offspring, not only to fight.

    Why the Struggle Never Ends
    Once the term covers survival and reproduction alike, Darwin can claim that the struggle "inevitably follows from the high rate at which all organic beings tend to increase." The reasoning is arithmetic. A population that multiplies in each generation grows geometrically: it doubles, doubles again, and keeps doubling. Darwin borrows an example from the Swedish naturalist Linnaeus, in which an annual plant that left only two seeds each year would have a million descendants within twenty years. No habitat could hold them. The struggle, in other words, is not an occasional crisis but a permanent condition, because "more individuals are produced than can possibly survive."

    What the Struggle Decides
    If most offspring die young, the question becomes which ones survive to reproduce. An analogy helps here. Imagine a lottery in which every seedling holds a ticket and only a few tickets win the chance to flower. A seedling that tolerates shade a little better holds, in effect, a second ticket. In a single season the extra ticket rarely matters; over thousands of generations it tips the outcome again and again, and the trait spreads. This is the step at which the struggle for existence becomes the engine of natural selection.

    Where the Words Can Mislead
    The lottery also shows what the word struggle hides: in a lottery no one fights, and in most of Darwin's cases no one does either. Words such as struggle and battle can suggest that organisms try to change or that nature chooses a winner. Biology writing today avoids that impression. It describes outcomes rather than intentions, and it measures success by the number of offspring an organism leaves, not by its strength.

    Darwin's phrase has lasted for more than a century and a half because it is vivid, but it is useful only when read as he defined it. Understood broadly, the struggle for existence names the fact on which his theory rests: in every generation more living things begin life than can complete it, and small inherited differences decide which of them leave descendants. The same reasoning now guides work far from Darwin's own garden, for example in medicine, where bacteria that survive an antibiotic pass their resistance on to the next generation.

    SVHS lesson authors, Model explanatory text: A Struggle Without Fighting. Original passage written for this page.
  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Pairs complete the table below. For each comparison, they write what it helps a reader understand and what it could lead a reader to believe that is not true. Then the class compares answers for the last column, which has no single right answer.

    Testing the comparisons in Darwin's excerpt and the model text
    ComparisonWhere it appearsTypeWhat it clarifies (students fill in)What it could distort (students fill in)
    "struggle for existence"Darwin, paragraph 1Metaphor
    A lottery with a few winning ticketsModel text, paragraph 4Analogy
    "the engine of natural selection"Model text, paragraph 4Metaphor
    A savings account with compound interestDirect Instruction, example 3Analogy

    Next, pairs read the weak draft below and list its problems under four headings: organization and unity, accuracy and selection, syntax and transitions, and style. They do not rewrite it yet; that happens in Activity 3.

    Charles Darwin sailed on a ship called the Beagle and visited the Galapagos Islands, where he saw lots of finches and giant tortoises. Survival of the fittest means the strongest animals win the fight. Animals fight. Plants fight too. They fight for food. They fight for water. Basically everything is trying to kill everything else, which is kind of brutal. Also Darwin says it's like a tree, which makes sense because trees are in nature. So in conclusion, nature is one big battle and only the strong survive.

    SVHS lesson authors, Weak draft for revision. Original passage written for this page.
  4. Independent Practice15-20 minutes

    Students read the second Darwin excerpt, in which he compares the relationships among species to "a great tree," and plan the explanation they will write for homework. Readers: adults who read a general science magazine, who have heard of evolution but have never read Darwin. Each student (1) underlines every phrase in which Darwin says one part of the tree "may represent" something; (2) chooses the three details they consider most significant for these readers and writes one sentence justifying each choice; and (3) sketches the order of their sections so that each depends on the one before. The two animals Darwin names are the platypus (Ornithorhynchus) and a South American lungfish (Lepidosiren).

    The affinities of all the beings of the same class have sometimes been represented by a great tree. I believe this simile largely speaks the truth. The green and budding twigs may represent existing species; and those produced during each former year may represent the long succession of extinct species. At each period of growth all the growing twigs have tried to branch out on all sides, and to overtop and kill the surrounding twigs and branches, in the same manner as species and groups of species have tried to overmaster other species in the great battle for life. The limbs divided into great branches, and these into lesser and lesser branches, were themselves once, when the tree was small, budding twigs; and this connexion of the former and present buds by ramifying branches may well represent the classification of all extinct and living species in groups subordinate to groups. Of the many twigs which flourished when the tree was a mere bush, only two or three, now grown into great branches, yet survive and bear all the other branches; so with the species which lived during long-past geological periods, very few now have living and modified descendants. From the first growth of the tree, many a limb and branch has decayed and dropped off; and these lost branches of various sizes may represent those whole orders, families, and genera which have now no living representatives, and which are known to us only from having been found in a fossil state. As we here and there see a thin straggling branch springing from a fork low down in a tree, and which by some chance has been favoured and is still alive on its summit, so we occasionally see an animal like the Ornithorhynchus or Lepidosiren, which in some small degree connects by its affinities two large branches of life, and which has apparently been saved from fatal competition by having inhabited a protected station. As buds give rise by growth to fresh buds, and these, if vigorous, branch out and overtop on all sides many a feebler branch, so by generation I believe it has been with the great Tree of Life, which fills with its dead and broken branches the crust of the earth, and covers the surface with its ever branching and beautiful ramifications.

    Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, from Chapter IV, Natural Selection (the tree of life) (1859). Public domain (published 1859). Source text.
  5. Closure5 minutes

    Exit ticket: (1) Write the question your homework's second section will answer, and explain why it cannot come first. (2) Write one sentence that shows where Darwin's tree simile stops being accurate. (3) Name one implication of the tree simile that your conclusion could state.

    Teacher note on the sources: Darwin's words are printed exactly as in the 1859 first edition, including older spellings ("fertilisation," "connexion," "favoured"), "humble-bees" for bumblebees, and his use of "man" for human beings, which was standard at the time. His phrases "tried to branch out" and "tried to overmaster" are figurative; biologists today avoid wording that gives species intentions, and the lesson treats this as one of the limits of his comparisons. Natural selection, the idea these passages lead to, remains a central, well-supported explanation in biology; modern science has added what Darwin could not know, such as how traits are inherited, and has revised some of his details. The lesson teaches how to explain a scientific concept clearly and accurately, as a science text would; students are not asked to state personal beliefs about it. The first excerpt comes from later pages of Chapter III than the excerpt on the RST.11-12.1 page, so the two lessons do not repeat a passage.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Provide a glossary of Darwin's older words before reading: progeny (offspring), inordinately (far beyond normal limits), humble-bees (bumblebees), affinities (relationships), ramifying (branching)
  • Give students Diagram 1 as a four-box planner with the question each section answers already written in
  • Offer sentence openers that build on the previous section: "Once ... , ... ." "Because of this, ... ." "This raises a further question: ... ."

For Advanced Students

  • Ask students to write two versions of the same analogy, one for a general magazine and one for readers of a biology journal, and to explain why the second may not need it at all
  • Have students find where Darwin's reasoning in paragraph 1 depends on Malthus, research Malthus's argument briefly, and add a short, sourced section that keeps the text unified
  • Ask students to design an explanatory page that combines headings, a graph and a labeled branching figure, and to justify each format choice in a note to the editor

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Check whether each body section depends on the one before: if two sections could swap places without loss, the organization connects ideas but does not yet build a unified whole. Look for details chosen for significance, with at least one relevant detail deliberately left out. Every comparison should clarify a specific difficulty and be followed, where needed, by its limit. Sentences should vary in structure, with subordinate clauses and colons used to show relationships, not only to add length. Wording should describe outcomes, not intentions ("left more offspring," not "tried to survive"). The conclusion should state an implication or the significance of the topic.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Build the Chain

15 minPairs

Pairs put eight sentence strips from a short explanation into an order in which each sentence builds on the one before, then add the transitions that make the chain visible. The topic, pesticide resistance, uses the same reasoning as Darwin's struggle for existence. The activity builds part a and part c.

Sentence Strips (in scrambled order)

  • A. Farmers who rotate pesticides that work in different ways can slow this process, because no single pesticide then selects for the same trait generation after generation.
  • B. A field of crops can hold millions of insects of a single pest species.
  • C. When a farmer sprays one pesticide season after season, the insects it kills are mostly those without the trait.
  • D. The practical lesson is that a pesticide's usefulness depends on how it is used, not only on how strong it is.
  • E. Among so many insects, a few often carry an inherited trait that lets them survive a particular pesticide.
  • F. After enough generations, most of the pests in the field carry the trait, and the pesticide no longer controls them.
  • G. The survivors breed, and their offspring inherit the trait.
  • H. Pesticide resistance is the struggle for existence on a farm: the spray largely determines which insects leave offspring.

Procedure

  • Pairs order the strips so that each one depends on the one before it, and write in the margin what each strip needs from the previous one
  • Teacher key: H, B, E, C, G, F, A, D. H introduces the topic; B gives the population, which E needs; E introduces the trait, which C needs; C explains the selection, which G continues; G leads to F, the result; A answers the problem F creates; D states the significance
  • Pairs add at least four transitions of different kinds (for example, "Among so many," "As a result," "For this reason," "In the end") and combine two strips into one sentence with a subordinate clause
  • Test: pairs swap any two middle strips and read the paragraph aloud. If it still makes sense, one of those strips does not yet build on the other

Discussion Questions

  • Which strip could not move at all without breaking the paragraph? Why?
  • Where does this explanation follow the same steps as Darwin's paragraph 1, and where does it add one?
  • Is strip D a summary or an implication? How can you tell?
2

Comparison Lab

20 minGroups of 3

Groups test four new comparisons for the struggle for existence, decide which one best manages the complexity of the idea for a given reader, and state each one's limit. The activity builds part d and the attention to audience in part b.

Comparison Cards

  • 1. Simile: the struggle for existence is like a crowded lifeboat with too few seats.
  • 2. Analogy: it works like a job market in which there are always far more applicants than positions.
  • 3. Metaphor: nature is a sieve that lets only some offspring through.
  • 4. Metaphor: nature is a war of all against all.

Procedure

  • For each card, the group writes one sentence on what it clarifies and one sentence on what it distorts
  • Teacher key, open to argument: card 1 captures scarcity but suggests that passengers fight for seats; card 2 captures surplus and small advantages but suggests that someone chooses the winners; card 3 captures filtering without fighting but hides reproduction, since a sieve only removes; card 4 captures only literal conflict, the one sense that Darwin's broad definition was written to go beyond
  • Groups choose the best card for two readers, ninth graders and readers of a biology journal, and explain the choice for each
  • Each group writes one new comparison of its own, followed by a sentence that begins "The comparison breaks down when ..."

Discussion Questions

  • Why might an expert reader need fewer comparisons than a general reader?
  • Can a comparison be accurate and still unhelpful? Give an example.
  • Darwin's term is itself a metaphor. Why did he keep it instead of using a literal phrase?

Modification for Distance Learning

Post the four cards on a shared board. Each student adds a note to every card, one color for what it clarifies and another for what it distorts, and the group votes on the best card for each reader.

3

Syntax and Style Overhaul

20 minPairs

Pairs rebuild the weak draft from Guided Practice into a unified, accurate paragraph with varied syntax, formal style and a real conclusion. The activity builds parts c, e and f.

Materials

  • The weak draft, the problem list from Guided Practice, and the first Darwin excerpt for accuracy
  • Syntax menu: a subordinate clause (because, although, when); a colon that introduces an explanation; a pair of parallel phrases; one short sentence for emphasis after a long one
  • Style checklist for biology: outcomes rather than intentions; no "basically," "kind of" or exaggeration; terms defined in plain words; the source named once in full

Procedure

  • Cut the sentences that do not serve an explanation of the struggle for existence, and write in the margin why each one was cut
  • Correct the definition of "fittest" so that it matches the model text, which measures success "by the number of offspring an organism leaves, not by its strength"
  • Combine the four "fight" sentences into one or two sentences, using at least two items from the syntax menu
  • Replace "trying to kill" with wording that describes an outcome
  • Write a conclusion that states an implication instead of repeating "only the strong survive"
  • Trade with another pair and label each sentence structure and each transition you find

History of Science Variation

Pairs rewrite their opening for a history of science essay instead. A history essay places Darwin in time, in the past tense (Darwin read Malthus's essay on population in 1838 and saw how it applied to all living things), while a science explanation describes the concept in the present tense. Students explain the difference in one sentence.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: How Each Element Builds on the One Before

1 Define What the term includes 2 Explain the cause Why the struggle never stops 3 Show the result Which offspring survive to breed 4 Significance Why the idea still matters makes possible leads to explains Each element rests on the one before it; remove a step and the ones above it fall
The four steps of the model text's explanation (paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 6), arranged as a staircase. Each step answers a question that only makes sense after the step below it: the cause depends on the broad definition, the result depends on the cause, and the significance depends on the result. This is what part a of the standard means by elements that build "to create a unified whole."

Diagram 2: Linnaeus's Two-Seed Plant, Year by Year

0 200k 400k 600k 800k 1M 1.2M 0 5 10 15 20 Year 10: 1,024 Year 15: 32,768 Year 20: 1,048,576 Years after the first plant Number of plants (each plant leaves two seeds, and every seed grows)
A graph drawn to scale of the calculation Darwin cites: one annual plant whose seedlings each leave two seeds a year, with every seed growing into a plant. The number doubles every year, from 1 plant at year 0 to 1,024 at year 10 and 1,048,576 at year 20. The graph shows what the sentence "in twenty years there would be a million plants" cannot: for years the numbers look small, and then they rise almost straight up.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

W.11-12.2 Homework: Explaining Darwin's Tree of Life

Directions: You will write one explanatory text, 500-750 words, step by step. Your readers are adults who read a general science magazine: they have heard of evolution but have never read Darwin. Your topic is Darwin's comparison of the relationships among species to "a great tree" (the second Darwin excerpt, in Independent Practice). Quote short phrases exactly and cite them as (Darwin, tree passage). Keep a formal, objective tone throughout.

Part 1: Introduction, Organization and Selection (Problems 1-2)

  1. Write an introduction of four or five sentences that introduces the topic, states why the comparison is worth understanding, and previews your sections in an order where each depends on the one before. Then write one sentence explaining why your second section could not come first.
  2. From the tree passage, list the three details you consider most significant for your readers and two relevant details you will leave out, with a reason for each choice. Then describe one figure or table you will include and what it will make clear that a paragraph could not.

Part 2: Development and Technique (Problems 3-4)

  1. Draft the section that explains what the parts of the tree stand for. Use at least two exact quotations, and include an extended definition of one idea your readers will not know, such as "groups subordinate to groups."
  2. Write an analogy or simile of your own that clarifies one part of Darwin's tree for your readers. Then write a paragraph that explains one place where Darwin's simile stops being accurate, quoting the words that show it.

Part 3: Cohesion, Style and Conclusion (Problems 5-6)

  1. Draft the full text. Use at least four transitions of different kinds and at least three different sentence structures (for example, a sentence with a subordinate clause, one with a colon, and one short sentence for emphasis). Underline each and label it in the margin.
  2. Write a concluding section that follows from your explanation and states an implication or the significance of the tree comparison for your readers. Then revise one body paragraph for formal style and the conventions of science writing, and list three changes you made.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Unified OrganizationTopic introduced with its significance; each section depends on the one before; formatting or a graphic that aids comprehensionSections connected but could be reordered without lossNo clear organization
Thorough DevelopmentMost significant details chosen and justified; exact, cited quotations; an extended definition suited to the readersDetails relevant but not the most significant, or development thin in one sectionFew details from the source
Syntax, Transitions and TechniqueVaried transitions and sentence structures that show relationships; an analogy or simile that clarifies, with its limit statedSome variety; comparison present but its limit missingRepetitive structure; no technique
Style and ConclusionFormal, objective tone; outcomes rather than intentions; conclusion states an implicationSome lapses in tone or discipline conventions; conclusion summarizesInformal throughout or no conclusion

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

The questions use the first Darwin excerpt, the model text, the weak draft and Diagram 2 from the lesson plan, and the tree passage in Independent Practice. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A student's assignment is to explain what Darwin meant by "struggle for existence." Which thesis statement fits an informative/explanatory text?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    How does paragraph 1 of the model text introduce its topic?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why does the model place the lottery analogy (paragraph 4) after the section on why the struggle never ends (paragraph 3)?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which sentence, added to the end of paragraph 3 of the model text, would most weaken the unity of the explanation?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A writer wants to show readers the chain of dependence in paragraph 3 of the first Darwin excerpt, which runs from cats to field mice to humble-bees to red clover. Which format would aid comprehension most?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A writer wants to point out that Darwin's cat-to-clover chain in paragraph 3 of the first excerpt is a reasoned inference rather than something he measured. Which quotation is most significant for that point?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A writer wants to show readers that geometrical increase applies even to living things that breed slowly. Which detail from the first Darwin excerpt is most significant for that point?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The readers of an explanation are biology students who already know what natural selection is. How should the writer adjust the explanation of the struggle for existence?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 3 of the model text, what does the sentence "The struggle, in other words, is not an occasional crisis but a permanent condition" do?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which revision varies the syntax to show how these ideas relate? Rabbits breed quickly. Foxes eat rabbits. The rabbit population stays about the same.

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Choose the transition that best clarifies the relationship: In every generation more offspring are produced than can survive; ____, small inherited differences decide which individuals leave descendants.

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In paragraph 3 of the first Darwin excerpt, Darwin says that plants and animals "are bound together by a web of complex relations." What does the web metaphor help a reader understand?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In the tree passage, Darwin writes, "I believe this simile largely speaks the truth." What does the word "largely" signal?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which sentence best follows the conventions of biology writing?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write an extended definition of natural selection for readers of a general magazine, three or four sentences long. Connect it to Darwin's struggle for existence, quote the first Darwin excerpt once, and include one thing natural selection is not.

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    Explain how paragraph 2 of the first Darwin excerpt builds on paragraph 1. Quote each paragraph once.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    Revise this sentence from the weak draft so that it keeps a formal style and an objective tone and is accurate to Darwin's meaning: "Basically everything is trying to kill everything else, which is kind of brutal."

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    The weak draft ends, "So in conclusion, nature is one big battle and only the strong survive." Write a new concluding statement of two or three sentences that follows from an accurate explanation of the struggle for existence and states its significance in your own words, without repeating the model text's conclusion.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Combine these sentences from the weak draft into one or two sentences with varied structure, and correct the idea so that it matches Darwin's broad sense: "Animals fight. Plants fight too. They fight for food. They fight for water."

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Darwin says the struggle follows "on the principle of geometrical increase." Write an analogy that explains geometrical increase to a general reader, using a comparison that does not appear in this lesson, and state one way the analogy breaks down.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does W.11-12.2 mean?

W.11-12.2 means that students in grades 11 and 12 can write informative and explanatory texts that examine and convey complex ideas, concepts and information clearly and accurately, through the effective selection, organization and analysis of content.

The six parts ask for organization that builds a unified whole (a), thorough development with the most significant details (b), varied transitions and syntax (c), precise language and techniques such as metaphor, simile and analogy (d), a formal, objective style that fits the discipline (e), and a conclusion that states implications or significance (f).

How is W.11-12.2 different from W.9-10.2?

The 11-12 standard raises the level of control in almost every part.

In grades 9-10, students organize to make connections and distinctions and use well-chosen, sufficient details. In grades 11-12, each element must build on the one before it, development must be thorough and limited to the most significant details, syntax must vary along with transitions, and part d adds metaphor, simile and analogy as tools for managing a complex topic.

What does "each new element builds on that which precedes it" look like in a real essay?

It means that later sections depend on earlier ones, so the order cannot be changed without loss.

A quick test: swap two body paragraphs and reread. If the text still works, the paragraphs are parallel topics, not a chain. In Activity 1, for example, the sentence about survivors breeding makes sense only after the sentence about the spray killing the insects without the trait.

Why does an informative writing standard mention metaphor, simile and analogy?

Because comparisons are one of the best ways to make an unfamiliar, complex idea understandable, and good science writers use them constantly.

The standard says these techniques serve "to manage the complexity of the topic," not to decorate the prose. That purpose also brings a duty: the writer should know, and often tell the reader, where the comparison stops being accurate.

How do students decide which facts are "the most significant"?

A fact is most significant when the explanation would be weaker for the intended reader without it.

Students can rank their details by asking which ones a reader needs to follow the next step, which make an abstract idea concrete, and which the reader already knows. Being able to name a relevant detail they chose to leave out, and say why, is good evidence of selection.

What counts as varied syntax in an explanatory essay?

Varied syntax means using different sentence structures on purpose, so that the form of a sentence shows how its ideas relate.

Examples include a subordinate clause for cause or contrast ("Although most seeds never sprout, ..."), a colon that introduces an explanation, parallel phrases for items of equal weight, and a short sentence for emphasis after a long one. Variety for its own sake, without a relationship to show, does not help.

What are the conventions of science writing that students should follow?

Science writing states what happens precisely and objectively, and it avoids giving intentions to organisms or to nature.

It uses the present tense for general processes, defines technical terms, names sources and dates, and hedges claims the evidence does not fully support. In biology in particular, writers say that a trait "became more common" rather than that a species "tried" to change.

How is W.11-12.2 usually assessed?

W.11-12.2 is usually assessed with a source-based explanatory essay scored on a rubric for organization, development, language and conventions.

Many state tests and college placement tasks include writing of this kind. Your state's released items and scoring guides show how organization, use of sources and style are weighted.

Why use On the Origin of Species in an English class?

Darwin's chapter on the struggle for existence is a classic piece of explanatory writing: he states a principle, makes it concrete with numbers, and widens the meaning of a difficult term through an extended example.

The text is in the public domain, it uses both a metaphor and a simile, and Darwin comments on how far his simile holds, and it connects English with biology, where students explain the same concept. The lesson asks students to explain Darwin's ideas accurately, not to state personal beliefs about them.

How can parents support explanatory writing at this level?

Ask your student to explain a complex idea from any class to you in five minutes, and then ask what comparison would help you understand it.

Follow up with "Where does that comparison stop working?" and "What did you need to tell me first?" Those two questions practice the analogy with its limit and the step-by-step organization that W.11-12.2 asks for.