W.11-12.2: Explanatory Writing That Builds a Unified Whole
In plain English: W.11-12.2 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 11 and 12 to write informative and explanatory texts that convey complex ideas clearly and accurately. Students organize so that each new element builds on the last, develop the topic thoroughly with the most significant details, vary transitions and syntax, use precise terms and analogy, and conclude with the topic's significance.
Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
a.Introduce a topic; organize complex ideas, concepts, and information so that each new element builds on that which precedes it to create a unified whole; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.
b.Develop the topic thoroughly by selecting the most significant and relevant facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience's knowledge of the topic.
c.Use appropriate and varied transitions and syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts.
d.Use precise language, domain-specific vocabulary, and techniques such as metaphor, simile, and analogy to manage the complexity of the topic.
e.Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing.
f.Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic).
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards · Cluster: Text Types and Purposes · Official standard
Students explain a complex scientific concept in writing, using the chapter in which Charles Darwin explains his most quoted phrase. In Chapter III of On the Origin of Species (1859), Darwin argues that a "struggle for existence" follows from the rate at which living things multiply, and then shows, through a chain that runs from cats to field mice to bumblebees to red clover, that much of the struggle is a matter of dependence rather than fighting. The excerpt is itself a piece of explanatory writing: a principle, numbers that make it concrete, and an extended example that widens the meaning of a term. Students analyze it, study an original model text that explains the same concept for today's readers, and revise a weak draft. They then plan an explanation of Darwin's "great tree" simile, which they write for homework.
The lesson follows the six parts of W.11-12.2, with attention to what the 11-12 band adds: organization in which each new element builds on the one before to form a unified whole (a); thorough development with the most significant details for the audience (b); varied transitions and syntax (c); precise language together with metaphor, simile and analogy used to manage a complex topic (d); a formal, objective style that follows the conventions of science writing (e); and a conclusion that states implications or significance (f).
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Organize an explanation of a complex concept so that each section depends on the one before and the whole text is unified
Select the most significant facts, quotations and examples for a stated audience, and justify leaving others out
Use an analogy, metaphor or simile to clarify a complex idea, and state where the comparison stops being accurate
Vary transitions and sentence structures to link sections and to make the relationships among ideas clear
Keep a formal, objective style that follows the conventions of science writing, and end with a conclusion that states the significance of the topic
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Writing an informative text that makes connections and distinctions and uses varied transitions W.9-10.2
Interpreting figures of speech in context and analyzing their role in a text L.11-12.5
Integrating short quotations into their own sentences with correct punctuation
A basic idea of natural selection from a biology course: inherited differences affect which individuals survive and reproduce
"Write down the first picture that comes to mind for the phrase 'the struggle for existence.' Then name two living things that could win that struggle without fighting anything."
Give students three minutes, then list their pictures on one side of the board and their non-fighting winners on the other. Read the first Darwin excerpt aloud while students follow on paper; the paragraphs are numbered in the margin, and the marks [...] show where lines were left out. Ask them to circle each number Darwin gives in paragraphs 1 and 2, and, in paragraph 3, to underline each living thing Darwin names and write beside it what it depends on.
1A struggle for existence inevitably follows from the high rate at which all organic beings tend to increase. Every being, which during its natural lifetime produces several eggs or seeds, must suffer destruction during some period of its life, and during some season or occasional year, otherwise, on the principle of geometrical increase, its numbers would quickly become so inordinately great that no country could support the product. Hence, as more individuals are produced than can possibly survive, there must in every case be a struggle for existence, either one individual with another of the same species, or with the individuals of distinct species, or with the physical conditions of life. It is the doctrine of Malthus applied with manifold force to the whole animal and vegetable kingdoms; for in this case there can be no artificial increase of food, and no prudential restraint from marriage. Although some species may be now increasing, more or less rapidly, in numbers, all cannot do so, for the world would not hold them.
2There is no exception to the rule that every organic being naturally increases at so high a rate, that if not destroyed, the earth would soon be covered by the progeny of a single pair. Even slow-breeding man has doubled in twenty-five years, and at this rate, in a few thousand years, there would literally not be standing room for his progeny. Linnæus has calculated that if an annual plant produced only two seeds—and there is no plant so unproductive as this—and their seedlings next year produced two, and so on, then in twenty years there would be a million plants.
[...]
3I am tempted to give one more instance showing how plants and animals, most remote in the scale of nature, are bound together by a web of complex relations. [...] I have, also, reason to believe that humble-bees are indispensable to the fertilisation of the heartsease (Viola tricolor), for other bees do not visit this flower. From experiments which I have tried, I have found that the visits of bees, if not indispensable, are at least highly beneficial to the fertilisation of our clovers; but humble-bees alone visit the common red clover (Trifolium pratense), as other bees cannot reach the nectar. Hence I have very little doubt, that if the whole genus of humble-bees became extinct or very rare in England, the heartsease and red clover would become very rare, or wholly disappear. The number of humble-bees in any district depends in a great degree on the number of field-mice, which destroy their combs and nests; and Mr. H. Newman, who has long attended to the habits of humble-bees, believes that “more than two thirds of them are thus destroyed all over England.” Now the number of mice is largely dependent, as every one knows, on the number of cats; and Mr. Newman says, “Near villages and small towns I have found the nests of humble-bees more numerous than elsewhere, which I attribute to the number of cats that destroy the mice.” Hence it is quite credible that the presence of a feline animal in large numbers in a district might determine, through the intervention first of mice and then of bees, the frequency of certain flowers in that district!
Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, from Chapter III, Struggle for Existence (geometrical increase and the web of relations) (1859). Public domain (published 1859). Source text.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Present what the 11-12 standard adds to the 9-10 version. The organization must do more than connect and distinguish ideas: each new element builds on that which precedes it, so that later sections would not make sense without earlier ones (Diagram 1). Development must be thorough, with the most significant details rather than all relevant ones. Writers vary syntax as well as transitions. And part d names metaphor, simile and analogy as tools for managing a complex topic, which means the writer must also know where each comparison stops being accurate. Work through the five examples below, then read the model text.
Introducing a complex topic
Flat opening: Darwin had many important ideas about nature. It names a person but not a concept, and it gives the reader no reason to keep reading.
Result: Revision: Darwin's phrase "struggle for existence" is widely quoted and often misread, because readers take literally a term he meant as a metaphor.
Building each element on the one before
Two facts presented side by side: A female bullfrog can lay thousands of eggs in a season. A pond's frog population stays about the same from year to year.
Result: Linked so that the second idea depends on the first: A female bullfrog can lay thousands of eggs in a season, yet the frog population of a pond stays about the same from year to year; it follows that nearly all of those eggs never become breeding adults.
Analogy with its limit
Concept: geometrical increase, the growth of a population that multiplies by the same factor each generation.
Result: Analogy: geometrical increase works like a savings account with compound interest, where each year's growth is added to the total and the next year's growth is figured on the larger total. Limit: money needs no food or space, while a real population soon runs out of both.
Varied syntax
Three sentences with the same pattern: Seeds fall on crowded ground. Seedlings compete for light. Most seedlings die.
Result: Revision: When seeds fall on ground that other plants already cover, the seedlings compete for light, and most of them die. The survivors are few.
Precise language and the conventions of biology
Draft sentence: The moths turned dark because they wanted to hide from birds. It gives the moths an intention and treats a population change as a choice.
Result: Revision: In woods darkened by soot, birds caught pale moths more often than dark ones, so dark moths left more offspring and became more common over many generations.
Hand out the model text. On the first reading, students mark the sentence in paragraph 1 that previews the three steps. On the second, they draw an arrow from the first sentence of each body paragraph back to the idea it depends on, and they bracket every comparison (metaphor, simile or analogy). Point out the conventions of science writing the model follows: the source and date named once, technical terms explained in plain words, processes described as outcomes rather than intentions, and quotations kept short and exact. Close with the conclusion, which states an implication of the concept ("articulating implications or the significance of the topic," in the words of part f) instead of summarizing it.
1The phrase "struggle for existence" calls up pictures of combat: stags locking antlers, wolves fighting over a carcass. Charles Darwin, who placed the phrase at the center of On the Origin of Species in 1859, meant something far broader, and most of what he meant involves no fighting at all. Grasping his meaning takes three steps, each resting on the one before: what Darwin included in the term, why he thought the struggle could never stop, and what the struggle decides.
2A Deliberately Wide Term Darwin stretches the term well beyond open conflict, and one of his most famous examples involves no fight at all. In England, he reports, "humble-bees alone visit the common red clover," so the clover's seed crop depends on these bumblebees. The bees depend in turn on the number of field mice, "which destroy their combs and nests," and the mice on the number of local cats. A district with many cats may therefore have more clover. None of these animals fights the clover, yet each one helps to decide whether it leaves seed. To struggle, in Darwin's sense, is to depend on other living things and to succeed or fail at leaving offspring, not only to fight.
3Why the Struggle Never Ends Once the term covers survival and reproduction alike, Darwin can claim that the struggle "inevitably follows from the high rate at which all organic beings tend to increase." The reasoning is arithmetic. A population that multiplies in each generation grows geometrically: it doubles, doubles again, and keeps doubling. Darwin borrows an example from the Swedish naturalist Linnaeus, in which an annual plant that left only two seeds each year would have a million descendants within twenty years. No habitat could hold them. The struggle, in other words, is not an occasional crisis but a permanent condition, because "more individuals are produced than can possibly survive."
4What the Struggle Decides If most offspring die young, the question becomes which ones survive to reproduce. An analogy helps here. Imagine a lottery in which every seedling holds a ticket and only a few tickets win the chance to flower. A seedling that tolerates shade a little better holds, in effect, a second ticket. In a single season the extra ticket rarely matters; over thousands of generations it tips the outcome again and again, and the trait spreads. This is the step at which the struggle for existence becomes the engine of natural selection.
5Where the Words Can Mislead The lottery also shows what the word struggle hides: in a lottery no one fights, and in most of Darwin's cases no one does either. Words such as struggle and battle can suggest that organisms try to change or that nature chooses a winner. Biology writing today avoids that impression. It describes outcomes rather than intentions, and it measures success by the number of offspring an organism leaves, not by its strength.
6Darwin's phrase has lasted for more than a century and a half because it is vivid, but it is useful only when read as he defined it. Understood broadly, the struggle for existence names the fact on which his theory rests: in every generation more living things begin life than can complete it, and small inherited differences decide which of them leave descendants. The same reasoning now guides work far from Darwin's own garden, for example in medicine, where bacteria that survive an antibiotic pass their resistance on to the next generation.
SVHS lesson authors, Model explanatory text: A Struggle Without Fighting. Original passage written for this page.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs complete the table below. For each comparison, they write what it helps a reader understand and what it could lead a reader to believe that is not true. Then the class compares answers for the last column, which has no single right answer.
Testing the comparisons in Darwin's excerpt and the model text
Comparison
Where it appears
Type
What it clarifies (students fill in)
What it could distort (students fill in)
"struggle for existence"
Darwin, paragraph 1
Metaphor
A lottery with a few winning tickets
Model text, paragraph 4
Analogy
"the engine of natural selection"
Model text, paragraph 4
Metaphor
A savings account with compound interest
Direct Instruction, example 3
Analogy
Next, pairs read the weak draft below and list its problems under four headings: organization and unity, accuracy and selection, syntax and transitions, and style. They do not rewrite it yet; that happens in Activity 3.
Charles Darwin sailed on a ship called the Beagle and visited the Galapagos Islands, where he saw lots of finches and giant tortoises. Survival of the fittest means the strongest animals win the fight. Animals fight. Plants fight too. They fight for food. They fight for water. Basically everything is trying to kill everything else, which is kind of brutal. Also Darwin says it's like a tree, which makes sense because trees are in nature. So in conclusion, nature is one big battle and only the strong survive.
SVHS lesson authors, Weak draft for revision. Original passage written for this page.
Independent Practice15-20 minutes
Students read the second Darwin excerpt, in which he compares the relationships among species to "a great tree," and plan the explanation they will write for homework. Readers: adults who read a general science magazine, who have heard of evolution but have never read Darwin. Each student (1) underlines every phrase in which Darwin says one part of the tree "may represent" something; (2) chooses the three details they consider most significant for these readers and writes one sentence justifying each choice; and (3) sketches the order of their sections so that each depends on the one before. The two animals Darwin names are the platypus (Ornithorhynchus) and a South American lungfish (Lepidosiren).
1The affinities of all the beings of the same class have sometimes been represented by a great tree. I believe this simile largely speaks the truth. The green and budding twigs may represent existing species; and those produced during each former year may represent the long succession of extinct species. At each period of growth all the growing twigs have tried to branch out on all sides, and to overtop and kill the surrounding twigs and branches, in the same manner as species and groups of species have tried to overmaster other species in the great battle for life. The limbs divided into great branches, and these into lesser and lesser branches, were themselves once, when the tree was small, budding twigs; and this connexion of the former and present buds by ramifying branches may well represent the classification of all extinct and living species in groups subordinate to groups. Of the many twigs which flourished when the tree was a mere bush, only two or three, now grown into great branches, yet survive and bear all the other branches; so with the species which lived during long-past geological periods, very few now have living and modified descendants. From the first growth of the tree, many a limb and branch has decayed and dropped off; and these lost branches of various sizes may represent those whole orders, families, and genera which have now no living representatives, and which are known to us only from having been found in a fossil state. As we here and there see a thin straggling branch springing from a fork low down in a tree, and which by some chance has been favoured and is still alive on its summit, so we occasionally see an animal like the Ornithorhynchus or Lepidosiren, which in some small degree connects by its affinities two large branches of life, and which has apparently been saved from fatal competition by having inhabited a protected station. As buds give rise by growth to fresh buds, and these, if vigorous, branch out and overtop on all sides many a feebler branch, so by generation I believe it has been with the great Tree of Life, which fills with its dead and broken branches the crust of the earth, and covers the surface with its ever branching and beautiful ramifications.
Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, from Chapter IV, Natural Selection (the tree of life) (1859). Public domain (published 1859). Source text.
Closure5 minutes
Exit ticket: (1) Write the question your homework's second section will answer, and explain why it cannot come first. (2) Write one sentence that shows where Darwin's tree simile stops being accurate. (3) Name one implication of the tree simile that your conclusion could state.
Teacher note on the sources: Darwin's words are printed exactly as in the 1859 first edition, including older spellings ("fertilisation," "connexion," "favoured"), "humble-bees" for bumblebees, and his use of "man" for human beings, which was standard at the time. His phrases "tried to branch out" and "tried to overmaster" are figurative; biologists today avoid wording that gives species intentions, and the lesson treats this as one of the limits of his comparisons. Natural selection, the idea these passages lead to, remains a central, well-supported explanation in biology; modern science has added what Darwin could not know, such as how traits are inherited, and has revised some of his details. The lesson teaches how to explain a scientific concept clearly and accurately, as a science text would; students are not asked to state personal beliefs about it. The first excerpt comes from later pages of Chapter III than the excerpt on the RST.11-12.1 page, so the two lessons do not repeat a passage.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Provide a glossary of Darwin's older words before reading: progeny (offspring), inordinately (far beyond normal limits), humble-bees (bumblebees), affinities (relationships), ramifying (branching)
Give students Diagram 1 as a four-box planner with the question each section answers already written in
Offer sentence openers that build on the previous section: "Once ... , ... ." "Because of this, ... ." "This raises a further question: ... ."
For Advanced Students
Ask students to write two versions of the same analogy, one for a general magazine and one for readers of a biology journal, and to explain why the second may not need it at all
Have students find where Darwin's reasoning in paragraph 1 depends on Malthus, research Malthus's argument briefly, and add a short, sourced section that keeps the text unified
Ask students to design an explanatory page that combines headings, a graph and a labeled branching figure, and to justify each format choice in a note to the editor
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Check whether each body section depends on the one before: if two sections could swap places without loss, the organization connects ideas but does not yet build a unified whole. Look for details chosen for significance, with at least one relevant detail deliberately left out. Every comparison should clarify a specific difficulty and be followed, where needed, by its limit. Sentences should vary in structure, with subordinate clauses and colons used to show relationships, not only to add length. Wording should describe outcomes, not intentions ("left more offspring," not "tried to survive"). The conclusion should state an implication or the significance of the topic.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Build the Chain
15 minPairs
Pairs put eight sentence strips from a short explanation into an order in which each sentence builds on the one before, then add the transitions that make the chain visible. The topic, pesticide resistance, uses the same reasoning as Darwin's struggle for existence. The activity builds part a and part c.
Sentence Strips (in scrambled order)
A. Farmers who rotate pesticides that work in different ways can slow this process, because no single pesticide then selects for the same trait generation after generation.
B. A field of crops can hold millions of insects of a single pest species.
C. When a farmer sprays one pesticide season after season, the insects it kills are mostly those without the trait.
D. The practical lesson is that a pesticide's usefulness depends on how it is used, not only on how strong it is.
E. Among so many insects, a few often carry an inherited trait that lets them survive a particular pesticide.
F. After enough generations, most of the pests in the field carry the trait, and the pesticide no longer controls them.
G. The survivors breed, and their offspring inherit the trait.
H. Pesticide resistance is the struggle for existence on a farm: the spray largely determines which insects leave offspring.
Procedure
Pairs order the strips so that each one depends on the one before it, and write in the margin what each strip needs from the previous one
Teacher key: H, B, E, C, G, F, A, D. H introduces the topic; B gives the population, which E needs; E introduces the trait, which C needs; C explains the selection, which G continues; G leads to F, the result; A answers the problem F creates; D states the significance
Pairs add at least four transitions of different kinds (for example, "Among so many," "As a result," "For this reason," "In the end") and combine two strips into one sentence with a subordinate clause
Test: pairs swap any two middle strips and read the paragraph aloud. If it still makes sense, one of those strips does not yet build on the other
Discussion Questions
Which strip could not move at all without breaking the paragraph? Why?
Where does this explanation follow the same steps as Darwin's paragraph 1, and where does it add one?
Is strip D a summary or an implication? How can you tell?
2
Comparison Lab
20 minGroups of 3
Groups test four new comparisons for the struggle for existence, decide which one best manages the complexity of the idea for a given reader, and state each one's limit. The activity builds part d and the attention to audience in part b.
Comparison Cards
1. Simile: the struggle for existence is like a crowded lifeboat with too few seats.
2. Analogy: it works like a job market in which there are always far more applicants than positions.
3. Metaphor: nature is a sieve that lets only some offspring through.
4. Metaphor: nature is a war of all against all.
Procedure
For each card, the group writes one sentence on what it clarifies and one sentence on what it distorts
Teacher key, open to argument: card 1 captures scarcity but suggests that passengers fight for seats; card 2 captures surplus and small advantages but suggests that someone chooses the winners; card 3 captures filtering without fighting but hides reproduction, since a sieve only removes; card 4 captures only literal conflict, the one sense that Darwin's broad definition was written to go beyond
Groups choose the best card for two readers, ninth graders and readers of a biology journal, and explain the choice for each
Each group writes one new comparison of its own, followed by a sentence that begins "The comparison breaks down when ..."
Discussion Questions
Why might an expert reader need fewer comparisons than a general reader?
Can a comparison be accurate and still unhelpful? Give an example.
Darwin's term is itself a metaphor. Why did he keep it instead of using a literal phrase?
Modification for Distance Learning
Post the four cards on a shared board. Each student adds a note to every card, one color for what it clarifies and another for what it distorts, and the group votes on the best card for each reader.
3
Syntax and Style Overhaul
20 minPairs
Pairs rebuild the weak draft from Guided Practice into a unified, accurate paragraph with varied syntax, formal style and a real conclusion. The activity builds parts c, e and f.
Materials
The weak draft, the problem list from Guided Practice, and the first Darwin excerpt for accuracy
Syntax menu: a subordinate clause (because, although, when); a colon that introduces an explanation; a pair of parallel phrases; one short sentence for emphasis after a long one
Style checklist for biology: outcomes rather than intentions; no "basically," "kind of" or exaggeration; terms defined in plain words; the source named once in full
Procedure
Cut the sentences that do not serve an explanation of the struggle for existence, and write in the margin why each one was cut
Correct the definition of "fittest" so that it matches the model text, which measures success "by the number of offspring an organism leaves, not by its strength"
Combine the four "fight" sentences into one or two sentences, using at least two items from the syntax menu
Replace "trying to kill" with wording that describes an outcome
Write a conclusion that states an implication instead of repeating "only the strong survive"
Trade with another pair and label each sentence structure and each transition you find
History of Science Variation
Pairs rewrite their opening for a history of science essay instead. A history essay places Darwin in time, in the past tense (Darwin read Malthus's essay on population in 1838 and saw how it applied to all living things), while a science explanation describes the concept in the present tense. Students explain the difference in one sentence.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: How Each Element Builds on the One Before
The four steps of the model text's explanation (paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 6), arranged as a staircase. Each step answers a question that only makes sense after the step below it: the cause depends on the broad definition, the result depends on the cause, and the significance depends on the result. This is what part a of the standard means by elements that build "to create a unified whole."
Diagram 2: Linnaeus's Two-Seed Plant, Year by Year
A graph drawn to scale of the calculation Darwin cites: one annual plant whose seedlings each leave two seeds a year, with every seed growing into a plant. The number doubles every year, from 1 plant at year 0 to 1,024 at year 10 and 1,048,576 at year 20. The graph shows what the sentence "in twenty years there would be a million plants" cannot: for years the numbers look small, and then they rise almost straight up.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
W.11-12.2 Homework: Explaining Darwin's Tree of Life
Directions: You will write one explanatory text, 500-750 words, step by step. Your readers are adults who read a general science magazine: they have heard of evolution but have never read Darwin. Your topic is Darwin's comparison of the relationships among species to "a great tree" (the second Darwin excerpt, in Independent Practice). Quote short phrases exactly and cite them as (Darwin, tree passage). Keep a formal, objective tone throughout.
Part 1: Introduction, Organization and Selection (Problems 1-2)
Write an introduction of four or five sentences that introduces the topic, states why the comparison is worth understanding, and previews your sections in an order where each depends on the one before. Then write one sentence explaining why your second section could not come first.
From the tree passage, list the three details you consider most significant for your readers and two relevant details you will leave out, with a reason for each choice. Then describe one figure or table you will include and what it will make clear that a paragraph could not.
Part 2: Development and Technique (Problems 3-4)
Draft the section that explains what the parts of the tree stand for. Use at least two exact quotations, and include an extended definition of one idea your readers will not know, such as "groups subordinate to groups."
Write an analogy or simile of your own that clarifies one part of Darwin's tree for your readers. Then write a paragraph that explains one place where Darwin's simile stops being accurate, quoting the words that show it.
Part 3: Cohesion, Style and Conclusion (Problems 5-6)
Draft the full text. Use at least four transitions of different kinds and at least three different sentence structures (for example, a sentence with a subordinate clause, one with a colon, and one short sentence for emphasis). Underline each and label it in the margin.
Write a concluding section that follows from your explanation and states an implication or the significance of the tree comparison for your readers. Then revise one body paragraph for formal style and the conventions of science writing, and list three changes you made.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Unified Organization
Topic introduced with its significance; each section depends on the one before; formatting or a graphic that aids comprehension
Sections connected but could be reordered without loss
No clear organization
Thorough Development
Most significant details chosen and justified; exact, cited quotations; an extended definition suited to the readers
Details relevant but not the most significant, or development thin in one section
Few details from the source
Syntax, Transitions and Technique
Varied transitions and sentence structures that show relationships; an analogy or simile that clarifies, with its limit stated
Some variety; comparison present but its limit missing
Repetitive structure; no technique
Style and Conclusion
Formal, objective tone; outcomes rather than intentions; conclusion states an implication
Some lapses in tone or discipline conventions; conclusion summarizes
Informal throughout or no conclusion
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
The questions use the first Darwin excerpt, the model text, the weak draft and Diagram 2 from the lesson plan, and the tree passage in Independent Practice. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student's assignment is to explain what Darwin meant by "struggle for existence." Which thesis statement fits an informative/explanatory text?
Answer: B
B states what the text will explain and says it accurately, as Darwin's chain of dependence, in which cats may affect clover "through the intervention first of mice and then of bees" (paragraph 3), requires. A takes a debatable position, which makes it an argument. C begins a personal narrative. D is praise that no explanation could support with the passage.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How does paragraph 1 of the model text introduce its topic?
Answer: C
The model opens with images of "combat," corrects them ("most of what he meant involves no fighting at all"), and previews the steps that follow, so the reader knows what misreading the text will fix and in what order. A overstates: the book is named but not summarized. B reverses the order: natural selection appears only in paragraph 4. D confuses the introduction with paragraph 2, where the examples are discussed.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does the model place the lottery analogy (paragraph 4) after the section on why the struggle never ends (paragraph 3)?
Answer: A
Paragraph 4 begins "If most offspring die young," which is the result of paragraph 3; the lottery then explains which of the many offspring survive. Without paragraph 3, a reader would not know why there are too few "winning tickets." B invents a rule. C is false: paragraph 3 quotes Darwin twice. D confuses order with importance; paragraph 4 is "the step at which" the struggle becomes natural selection.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence, added to the end of paragraph 3 of the model text, would most weaken the unity of the explanation?
Answer: D
The naming system is accurate, and Linnaeus is mentioned in the paragraph, but the fact has nothing to do with why the struggle never ends, so it breaks the chain in which each element builds on the one before. A, B and C each extend the reasoning of paragraph 3: A strengthens the claim, B checks the arithmetic, and C widens the example to animals, as Darwin's "all organic beings" does.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A writer wants to show readers the chain of dependence in paragraph 3 of the first Darwin excerpt, which runs from cats to field mice to humble-bees to red clover. Which format would aid comprehension most?
Answer: B
The point is a sequence of causes, each passing its effect to the next, and a flow diagram shows every link and its direction at a glance, ending in "the frequency of certain flowers in that district." A is a useful graphic for a different point, geometrical increase. C decorates the page but shows only the last link. D shows only one link, and a literal kill, so it would strengthen the combat reading the explanation is meant to correct.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A writer wants to point out that Darwin's cat-to-clover chain in paragraph 3 of the first excerpt is a reasoned inference rather than something he measured. Which quotation is most significant for that point?
Answer: C
C states the conclusion of the chain and marks it as an inference with "quite credible" and "might," so it supports the point directly. A states one link as a fact without a hedge, so it does not show that the chain is inferred. B reports an observation from Darwin's own experiments with bees. D is Mr. Newman's field observation, one piece of evidence for the chain, not its hedged conclusion.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A writer wants to show readers that geometrical increase applies even to living things that breed slowly. Which detail from the first Darwin excerpt is most significant for that point?
Answer: A
The point is about slow breeders, and Darwin's own example is "Even slow-breeding man has doubled in twenty-five years" (paragraph 2), so it is the most significant detail for this point. B, C and D come from paragraph 3, where they show how living things depend on one another, not how fast they increase.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The readers of an explanation are biology students who already know what natural selection is. How should the writer adjust the explanation of the struggle for existence?
Answer: B
Development should suit "the audience's knowledge of the topic": these readers know natural selection, so the most useful space goes to what they may not know, the breadth of Darwin's term. A repeats what they know. C removes the evidence an explanation needs. D would suit general readers, not biology students.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 3 of the model text, what does the sentence "The struggle, in other words, is not an occasional crisis but a permanent condition" do?
Answer: D
"In other words" signals a restatement, and the "not an occasional crisis but a permanent condition" contrast turns the numbers into a general idea, an example of syntax used to clarify a relationship. A is wrong: no new example follows. B misreads the transition; nothing is conceded. C misplaces it: the conclusion is paragraph 6.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which revision varies the syntax to show how these ideas relate? Rabbits breed quickly. Foxes eat rabbits. The rabbit population stays about the same.
Answer: C
C uses a subordinate clause of contrast ("Although") and one of cause ("because") to show that predation offsets rapid breeding. A only joins the sentences with "and," which adds without relating. B adds "So" but keeps three sentences of the same pattern. D changes punctuation only; the semicolons do not show which idea causes which.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Choose the transition that best clarifies the relationship: In every generation more offspring are produced than can survive; ____, small inherited differences decide which individuals leave descendants.
Answer: A
The second clause follows from the first: because there is a surplus, differences decide who survives, so a cause-and-effect transition such as "consequently" fits. "For instance" would introduce an example, "nevertheless" a contrast with an expected result, and "meanwhile" something happening at the same time; none of these is the relationship.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 3 of the first Darwin excerpt, Darwin says that plants and animals "are bound together by a web of complex relations." What does the web metaphor help a reader understand?
Answer: B
A web is a set of connected strands, and Darwin follows one path through it: cats may affect clover "through the intervention first of mice and then of bees," species that are "most remote in the scale of nature." B names the feature of a web that the metaphor uses. A reads the metaphor literally. C borrows the wrong feature of a web, its use as a trap, which the passage never suggests. D ignores the bees, which help the clover set seed rather than eat it.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In the tree passage, Darwin writes, "I believe this simile largely speaks the truth." What does the word "largely" signal?
Answer: D
"Largely" limits the claim: the tree is true to the pattern of relationships, but a careful reader should expect places where it fails. A reads "largely" as a statement about size. B ignores the qualifier. C contradicts the passage, which says the affinities "have sometimes been represented by a great tree," so the image was used before Darwin.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence best follows the conventions of biology writing?
Answer: A
A describes an outcome (who escaped, who left offspring) and how a trait became common, with no intention given to the animals or to nature. B gives the lizards a goal, as if individuals could change their legs by trying. C personifies nature as a chooser. D uses judgmental language that breaks an objective tone.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Write an extended definition of natural selection for readers of a general magazine, three or four sentences long. Connect it to Darwin's struggle for existence, quote the first Darwin excerpt once, and include one thing natural selection is not.
Model answer: "Natural selection is the process by which inherited traits that help living things survive and reproduce in a particular environment become more common over generations. It depends on the struggle for existence: because, as Darwin writes, 'more individuals are produced than can possibly survive' (paragraph 1), small inherited differences decide which individuals leave offspring. It is not a change an individual makes during its life, and it involves no choice by nature or by the organism." Rubric line: 2 points for a definition that names the class (a process), how it works, its link to the struggle, an exact, cited quotation and a non-example; 1 point if one part is missing.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Explain how paragraph 2 of the first Darwin excerpt builds on paragraph 1. Quote each paragraph once.
Model answer: Paragraph 1 states a principle: a struggle "inevitably follows from the high rate at which all organic beings tend to increase," because without destruction a population would grow until "no country could support the product." Paragraph 2 then extends the principle to every case, "There is no exception to the rule," and makes it concrete with Linnaeus's calculation for a plant that leaves only two seeds. The calculation depends on paragraph 1: on its own it is a curious number, but read after the principle it shows that even the least productive organism would overrun its habitat, so the struggle must be universal. Rubric line: 2 points for showing that the second paragraph depends on the first, with an exact quotation from each; 1 point for describing the two paragraphs without showing the dependence.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Revise this sentence from the weak draft so that it keeps a formal style and an objective tone and is accurate to Darwin's meaning: "Basically everything is trying to kill everything else, which is kind of brutal."
Model answer: "In Darwin's broad sense, living things compete for limited resources and depend on one another, but most of this competition involves no direct conflict." Rubric line: 2 points for removing the informal words ("Basically," "kind of brutal"), replacing "trying to kill" with an accurate description of an outcome or relationship, and keeping a neutral tone; 1 point if the tone is formal but the idea is still inaccurate.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
The weak draft ends, "So in conclusion, nature is one big battle and only the strong survive." Write a new concluding statement of two or three sentences that follows from an accurate explanation of the struggle for existence and states its significance in your own words, without repeating the model text's conclusion.
Model answer: "The struggle for existence, as Darwin defined it, is less a battle than a constant surplus: far more organisms begin life than the world can support. Because this surplus never ends, even small inherited advantages can spread over many generations, which is why Darwin placed the idea at the foundation of his theory." Rubric line: 2 points for a conclusion that corrects the "battle" reading, follows from the explanation, and states an implication or significance; 1 point if it is accurate but only summarizes.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Combine these sentences from the weak draft into one or two sentences with varied structure, and correct the idea so that it matches Darwin's broad sense: "Animals fight. Plants fight too. They fight for food. They fight for water."
Model answer: "Animals and plants alike compete for what they need, such as food, water and light; yet, as Darwin explains, most of this competition is not a fight at all but a matter of dependence and of leaving offspring." Rubric line: 2 points for combining the four sentences with at least two different structures (here a list after "such as" and a contrast introduced by "yet"), and for correcting "fight" to Darwin's broader meaning; 1 point if the sentences are combined but the idea is unchanged.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Darwin says the struggle follows "on the principle of geometrical increase." Write an analogy that explains geometrical increase to a general reader, using a comparison that does not appear in this lesson, and state one way the analogy breaks down.
Model answer: "Geometrical increase works like a rumor in which everyone who hears it passes it to two new people the next day: after the first day three people know, but before the end of the third week more than a million do. The analogy breaks down because a rumor needs no food or space, while every new plant or animal needs both, which is exactly why the real population cannot keep growing." Rubric line: 2 points for an accurate analogy of repeated multiplication, not steady addition, and a real limit tied to the concept; 1 point if the analogy is accurate but the limit is missing or vague.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does W.11-12.2 mean?
W.11-12.2 means that students in grades 11 and 12 can write informative and explanatory texts that examine and convey complex ideas, concepts and information clearly and accurately, through the effective selection, organization and analysis of content.
The six parts ask for organization that builds a unified whole (a), thorough development with the most significant details (b), varied transitions and syntax (c), precise language and techniques such as metaphor, simile and analogy (d), a formal, objective style that fits the discipline (e), and a conclusion that states implications or significance (f).
How is W.11-12.2 different from W.9-10.2?
The 11-12 standard raises the level of control in almost every part.
In grades 9-10, students organize to make connections and distinctions and use well-chosen, sufficient details. In grades 11-12, each element must build on the one before it, development must be thorough and limited to the most significant details, syntax must vary along with transitions, and part d adds metaphor, simile and analogy as tools for managing a complex topic.
What does "each new element builds on that which precedes it" look like in a real essay?
It means that later sections depend on earlier ones, so the order cannot be changed without loss.
A quick test: swap two body paragraphs and reread. If the text still works, the paragraphs are parallel topics, not a chain. In Activity 1, for example, the sentence about survivors breeding makes sense only after the sentence about the spray killing the insects without the trait.
Why does an informative writing standard mention metaphor, simile and analogy?
Because comparisons are one of the best ways to make an unfamiliar, complex idea understandable, and good science writers use them constantly.
The standard says these techniques serve "to manage the complexity of the topic," not to decorate the prose. That purpose also brings a duty: the writer should know, and often tell the reader, where the comparison stops being accurate.
How do students decide which facts are "the most significant"?
A fact is most significant when the explanation would be weaker for the intended reader without it.
Students can rank their details by asking which ones a reader needs to follow the next step, which make an abstract idea concrete, and which the reader already knows. Being able to name a relevant detail they chose to leave out, and say why, is good evidence of selection.
What counts as varied syntax in an explanatory essay?
Varied syntax means using different sentence structures on purpose, so that the form of a sentence shows how its ideas relate.
Examples include a subordinate clause for cause or contrast ("Although most seeds never sprout, ..."), a colon that introduces an explanation, parallel phrases for items of equal weight, and a short sentence for emphasis after a long one. Variety for its own sake, without a relationship to show, does not help.
What are the conventions of science writing that students should follow?
Science writing states what happens precisely and objectively, and it avoids giving intentions to organisms or to nature.
It uses the present tense for general processes, defines technical terms, names sources and dates, and hedges claims the evidence does not fully support. In biology in particular, writers say that a trait "became more common" rather than that a species "tried" to change.
How is W.11-12.2 usually assessed?
W.11-12.2 is usually assessed with a source-based explanatory essay scored on a rubric for organization, development, language and conventions.
Many state tests and college placement tasks include writing of this kind. Your state's released items and scoring guides show how organization, use of sources and style are weighted.
Why use On the Origin of Species in an English class?
Darwin's chapter on the struggle for existence is a classic piece of explanatory writing: he states a principle, makes it concrete with numbers, and widens the meaning of a difficult term through an extended example.
The text is in the public domain, it uses both a metaphor and a simile, and Darwin comments on how far his simile holds, and it connects English with biology, where students explain the same concept. The lesson asks students to explain Darwin's ideas accurately, not to state personal beliefs about them.
How can parents support explanatory writing at this level?
Ask your student to explain a complex idea from any class to you in five minutes, and then ask what comparison would help you understand it.
Follow up with "Where does that comparison stop working?" and "What did you need to tell me first?" Those two questions practice the analogy with its limit and the step-by-step organization that W.11-12.2 asks for.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to W.11-12.2: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
W.9-10.2Prerequisite
Write informative texts that make connections and distinctions with varied transitions