SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

WHST.11-12.4Common CoreELAWriting in History, Science and Technical SubjectsGrades 11-12

WHST.11-12.4: Writing for Specialist and General Readers in History and Technical Fields

In plain English: WHST.11-12.4 is the Common Core literacy standard that asks students in grades 11 and 12 to produce clear and coherent writing in history, science and technical subjects, with development, organization and style suited to the task, purpose and audience. Students write for readers who range from specialists to the general public, often about the same facts, and keep every version accurate.

Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects 6-12 · Cluster: Production and Distribution of Writing · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

70-75 min

Overview

Students in grades 11 and 12 write for readers whose knowledge ranges from expert to none, and they often write about the same facts for several of them. This lesson pairs a history context with a technical one. In history, students study a section of a student journal paper that explains why the Manhattan tower of the Brooklyn Bridge stands on sand rather than bedrock, and an audio-tour script that tells walkers on the bridge the same story. In the technical context, they study a storm report written by a water plant operator for the plant superintendent, and then rescue a notice for residents that was written in the operators' shorthand. The bridge facts are real; the water plant and its data are invented and labeled as such.

WHST.11-12.4 asks for the same three choices as in earlier grades, development (what to include and explain), organization (order and signposts) and style (voice, terms and sentence form), suited to the task, purpose and audience. At this level, the lesson stresses judging the reader's expertise, deciding what the reader needs first, keeping claims as strong as the evidence and no stronger, and writing so that a listener, a specialist and a member of the public each find the text clear and coherent.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Analyze a reader's expertise and needs, and state the task, purpose and audience of a history or technical text
  • Develop a text with the facts, definitions and explanations its reader needs, and cut what the reader does not need
  • Organize a text for its reader, for example summary first for a decision-maker or scene first for a listener
  • Choose a style, from technical shorthand to spoken narration, that suits the reader without losing accuracy or overstating evidence
  • Revise a technical draft into a clear, coherent text for general readers

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Producing clear writing suited to task, purpose and audience in grades 9-10 WHST.9-10.4
  • Writing informative texts about historical events and technical processes WHST.9-10.2
  • Reading a bar chart with a labeled scale
  • Knowing that air and water exert pressure that increases with depth

Lesson Procedure

70-75 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "A doctor sets a broken wrist. She writes a note in the patient's medical record, and then she explains the injury to the patient's worried parents. List three things that differ between the note and the explanation, and one thing that must not differ."

    Collect answers. Students usually name terms, length and order; press them for the thing that must not differ: the facts. Name the three choices (development, organization, style) and the three questions behind them (task, purpose, audience). Tell students that in this lesson they will write for readers who are experts, readers who know the period but not the science, listeners who cannot reread a sentence, and residents who want one answer.

  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Show Diagram 1 and explain that a writer begins by placing the reader on a line from specialist to general reader, then asks what that reader already knows and what the reader needs first. Work through the five examples below, then read Model A and Model B. Students mark, in two colors, what the two models share and what only Model A contains.

    • Reader analysis before drafting

      A student is asked to write about the Brooklyn Bridge caissons for a student history journal whose readers are history teachers and students.

      Result: Knows: the Gilded Age, the bridge's fame. Does not know: how a caisson works or why pressure made men sick. Needs: an explanation of the engineering that is exact enough to support an argument about a decision, with each technical term defined once.

    • Development: significance over completeness

      A draft lists every milestone of the foundation work: dates the caissons were launched, the fire in the Brooklyn caisson, the tons of stone laid each month.

      Result: For a paper about one decision, keep only the facts that explain it: how deep each caisson went, what the pressure did to workers, what probes found under the Manhattan caisson. The rest is accurate but is not what this reader needs to follow the argument.

    • Organization: from the known to the new

      A residents' guide to the water plant begins with coagulation chemistry. Residents know only the water that comes out of their tap.

      Result: Begin with what they know (the glass of tap water), then move back through the plant one stage at a time: the tap, the pipes, disinfection, filtration, settling, and the river. Each new stage is linked to one the reader has just met.

    • Style: a knowledgeable stance without jargon

      Draft sentence for the history journal: The pathology was precipitated by rapid decompression of the pressurized workforce.

      Result: Revision: "Workers who left the compressed air too quickly developed what Smith called caisson disease." The revision keeps the precision ("compressed air," "too quickly") and the source, and drops the medical-sounding words that add nothing for a history reader.

    • Style: precision for a specialist

      Draft line for the superintendent: The water got a lot cloudier after the rain, so we added more chemical.

      Result: Revision: "Raw water turbidity rose from 6 NTU to 48 NTU; the alum dose was raised from 18 mg/L to 34 mg/L." A specialist needs the measured quantity, the units and the name of the chemical in order to judge the response.

    The Manhattan tower of the Brooklyn Bridge does not rest on bedrock. Its foundation stops 78.5 feet below high water, on sand and gravel that lie about 30 feet above the rock, because in the spring of 1872 the chief engineer, Washington Roebling, decided that digging deeper would cost more lives than the tower's stability required. That decision makes sense only in light of how the foundations were built and what the work did to the men who built them.

    Each tower was set on a caisson, an enormous timber box with no bottom, sunk into the riverbed. Compressed air pumped into its working chamber held back the water and mud while laborers dug beneath the box's edges, and as they dug, the caisson sank under the weight of the masonry being laid on its roof. The deeper the chamber went, the higher the air pressure had to be to keep the river out. At the Manhattan caisson's final depth, the air was held at roughly 34 pounds per square inch above the pressure of the open air, more than twice the pressure at the surface.

    The cost of that pressure appeared only after the men left it. Workers who returned to the surface too quickly suffered crippling joint pain, paralysis and sometimes death, a condition that the project's physician, Andrew Smith, called caisson disease. It is now known as decompression sickness: under pressure, nitrogen from the air dissolves in the blood and tissues, and when the pressure falls too fast, the gas comes out of solution as bubbles. Between January 25 and May 31, 1872, Smith treated 110 cases, and three workers died. His figures are best read as a minimum, since he could record only the men who came to him.

    Roebling had reason to weigh those numbers heavily. At the Eads Bridge in St. Louis, caisson work had already killed fifteen men. When iron probes showed that the bedrock under the Manhattan caisson lay deeper than expected, Roebling judged the sand above it firm enough to carry the tower and halted the excavation. The disease later left Roebling himself too ill to visit the site, and he directed the rest of the work from home, with his wife, Emily Warren Roebling, carrying his instructions to the engineers. The tower has stood on its sand since the bridge opened on May 24, 1883, a lasting record of a choice between engineering certainty and human cost.

    SVHS lesson authors, Model A (section of a paper for a student history journal): Why the Manhattan Tower Stands on Sand. Original passage written for this page.

    Stop 4: Under the River

    Stop here, near the Manhattan tower, and look down at the water. The stone tower in front of you rests on a foundation that reaches 78 and a half feet below high tide. Men dug that foundation by hand.

    They worked inside a caisson: a giant wooden box, open at the bottom, sunk into the riverbed. Pumps filled it with compressed air to keep the river out. Think of the push you feel in your ears at the bottom of a deep swimming pool. These men worked at about six times that depth.

    The danger came when they climbed back up. Men who left the compressed air too fast were struck by a terrible illness. Their joints ached so badly that some doubled over; some could not walk. Between late January and the end of May 1872, the bridge's doctor treated 110 workers. Three of them died.

    Today we call the illness decompression sickness, or the bends. To limit it, the chief engineer made a hard choice: he stopped digging before the men reached bedrock. So the tower you are looking at stands on sand. And it has stood there, safely, since 1883.

    SVHS lesson authors, Model B (audio-tour script for walkers on the bridge): Stop 4, Under the River (the tour is invented; the facts are real). Original passage written for this page.

    Discuss: What does Model A include that a listener on the bridge could not use, and what does Model B do that a journal reader would find out of place? Both models are accurate. Point out one place where each chooses a different way to state the same fact.

  3. Guided Practice20 minutes

    Turn to the technical context. Explain the key terms first: turbidity is the cloudiness of water caused by suspended particles, measured in nephelometric turbidity units (NTU); a coagulant such as alum is a chemical that makes fine particles clump so that they settle and can be filtered out; the combined filter effluent is the filtered water from all filters together. Federal rules for plants of this type require filtered water turbidity of 0.3 NTU or less in at least 95 percent of the measurements taken each month, and never above 1 NTU. Show Diagram 2, then read Model C.

    Cedar Fork Water Treatment Plant: Storm Event Report, Night Shift, October 14-15
    To: Plant Superintendent. From: Night-shift operator. (The plant, its staff and all data are invented for this lesson.)

    Summary
    Heavy rain raised raw water turbidity eightfold overnight. After a coagulant dose change and one early filter backwash, combined filter effluent (CFE) turbidity stayed at or below 0.21 NTU, under both the 0.3 NTU and the 1 NTU limits. No treatment limit was exceeded, and no public notice is required.

    Event
    Between 22:00 and 03:00, 2.8 in of rain fell on the watershed. Raw water turbidity at the intake rose from 6 NTU to a peak of 48 NTU at 03:00.

    Actions
    At 23:30, jar tests on the rising raw water indicated an alum dose of 34 mg/L, and the dose was raised from 18 mg/L to 34 mg/L at 23:45. Settled water turbidity peaked at 3.9 NTU at 02:00 and fell to 1.6 NTU by 05:00. Filter 3 reached its head loss limit of 8 ft at 03:40 and was backwashed 14 hours ahead of schedule; Filters 1, 2 and 4 carried the flow in the meantime.

    Results
    CFE turbidity peaked at 0.21 NTU at 04:00 and was back to 0.06 NTU by 07:00. The chlorine residual leaving the plant stayed between 1.2 and 1.4 mg/L throughout.

    Follow-up
    I recommend a raw water turbidity alarm at 25 NTU, which would have prompted jar testing earlier in the storm. At the higher dose, alum stock fell to 11 days of supply; a delivery should be scheduled this week.

    SVHS lesson authors, Model C (technical report for a plant superintendent): Storm Event Report (invented plant and data). Original passage written for this page.
    Two readers of the storm event (students complete the empty cells)
    QuestionPlant superintendentResidents who read the newsletter
    What do they already know?The plant, its limits and its terms
    What do they need first?
    Which facts can be left out?
    Which terms need a definition?None

    Pairs then read the weak draft below, which a new staff member wrote for the utility's newsletter to residents, using Model C as a source. They mark every term a resident would not know, every fact a resident does not need, and the sentence a resident most needs to read. They revise it in Activity 3.

    Storm Update

    On 10/14-10/15 raw turb spiked from 6 to 48 NTU (!!) because of the storm, so night shift bumped alum from 18 to 34 mg/L per jar tests. Settled peaked at 3.9 NTU. F3 hit 8 ft HL and got backwashed early. CFE maxed at 0.21 NTU, which is under the IESWTR 0.3 limit, and Cl2 residual was 1.2-1.4. Also we are low on alum. Honestly the night shift crushed it. Your water was safe the whole time and you don't need to do anything. Questions?

    SVHS lesson authors, Weak draft for revision (notice for residents in the utility's newsletter): Storm Update (invented plant and data). Original passage written for this page.
  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Students read the research notes below on Emily Warren Roebling, who appears at the end of Model A. Each student chooses one of the two homework readers (a history teacher reading a research paper, or tourists reading a walking-tour card) and writes a one-sentence reader analysis and a first sentence for that reader. Pairs exchange first sentences and guess the intended reader; if the partner guesses wrong, the writer revises. Students complete both pieces for homework.

    Note 1. Emily Warren Roebling was born in 1843 and died in 1903.

    Note 2. After caisson disease left Washington Roebling unable to visit the site, she became his main link to the work, and few others saw him during his illness. She carried his instructions to his assistant engineers and reported to him on the progress of the work.

    Note 3. To do this work, she studied engineering subjects, including strength of materials, stress analysis, cable construction and the calculation of catenary curves.

    Note 4. In 1882, Washington Roebling's title of chief engineer was in danger because of his long illness. She met with engineers and politicians to argue that he should keep it, and he did.

    Note 5. Before the official opening in 1883, she was the first person to cross the bridge by carriage, carrying a rooster as a sign of victory.

    Note 6. The bridge opened on May 24, 1883.

    Note 7. Some popular accounts call her the bridge's real chief engineer. Historians disagree about how much of the technical work she did herself.

    Note 8. A plaque on the bridge today honors Emily Warren Roebling, Washington Roebling and his father, John A. Roebling, who designed the bridge and died in 1869, before construction began.

    Note 9. Later in life, she received a law certificate from New York University.

    Note 10. A classmate's comment: "The view from the bridge's walkway at sunset is amazing."

    SVHS lesson authors, Homework research notes: Emily Warren Roebling and the Brooklyn Bridge (notes written for this page; the facts are real, and the classmate is invented). Original passage written for this page.
  5. Closure5-10 minutes

    Exit ticket: (1) Name one choice of development that separates Model A from Model B. (2) Name one choice of organization in Model C that suits the superintendent. (3) Write the one sentence from the weak draft (T4) that a resident most needs, rewritten for residents.

    Teacher note on sources: the Brooklyn Bridge facts come from standard references: the caisson depths of 44.5 feet (Brooklyn) and 78.5 feet (Manhattan) below high water, Dr. Andrew Smith's 110 cases and three deaths between January 25 and May 31, 1872, and the opening on May 24, 1883. The pressure figure in Model A is an estimate from the depth of water and should be read as approximate; Smith's 1873 report gives about 36 pounds at the close of the work, and modern accounts often give 35. The fifteen deaths at the Eads Bridge are the figure given in standard accounts of decompression sickness. The water plant and all its data are invented, though the 0.3 NTU and 1 NTU limits are the real federal turbidity standards for conventional filtration plants (40 CFR 141.173).

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a reader-analysis frame: "My reader knows ... , does not know ... , and needs ... first."
  • Provide a glossary card for Model C (turbidity, NTU, coagulant, alum, jar test, head loss, backwash, chlorine residual) before the reading
  • For Activity 3, give students the first sentence of the revised notice and have them write the rest

For Advanced Students

  • Write a version of Model C for the state drinking water inspector, who knows the rules but not this plant, and explain what must be added
  • Rewrite the last paragraph of Model A as the ending of a 90-second radio segment, then compare what each form can and cannot do with evidence
  • Find the one sentence in Model A that states its claim most strongly, and decide whether the evidence in the paragraph fully supports it

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Look first for a reader analysis that is specific: what the reader knows, does not know and needs first. Development should follow from it: specialists get exact values, units and the terms of the field; general readers get definitions, comparisons and only the facts that serve the purpose. Organization should put first what the reader needs first (a summary for a decision-maker, a scene or a direct answer for the public) and signal the structure with headings or clear transitions. Style should fit the form: technical, hedged or spoken as the task requires, with claims no stronger than the evidence. In every version, the facts must stay accurate and the writing must be clear and coherent.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Four Readers, Eight Facts

15 minGroups of 4

Each group member takes one reader card, chooses the facts that reader needs from a shared set of eight, and puts them in the order the reader needs them. The group then compares the four selections. The activity builds development and organization for different audiences.

Reader Cards

  • Reader 1: the plant superintendent, who must decide whether anything must be reported or changed
  • Reader 2: a resident who noticed the storm and wonders whether the tap water is safe
  • Reader 3: the utility's purchasing clerk, who orders chemicals
  • Reader 4: a reporter for the town news website, writing a short story about the storm

Fact Cards (all from Model C)

  • 1. Raw water turbidity rose from 6 NTU to 48 NTU.
  • 2. The alum dose was raised from 18 mg/L to 34 mg/L.
  • 3. Filter 3 was backwashed 14 hours early.
  • 4. Filtered water turbidity peaked at 0.21 NTU, under both limits.
  • 5. No public notice is required.
  • 6. The chlorine residual stayed between 1.2 and 1.4 mg/L.
  • 7. Alum stock fell to 11 days of supply.
  • 8. A turbidity alarm at 25 NTU is recommended.

Procedure

  • Each member selects the facts for his or her reader and puts them in order, writing a one-line reason for the first fact
  • Teacher key, one defensible set: the superintendent needs all eight, starting with 4 and 5; the resident needs 4, in plain words, and a statement that nothing needs to be done; the purchasing clerk needs 2 and 7; the reporter needs 1 and 4, with a plain explanation of each
  • Fact 4 is the only fact that appears in all four selections; the group discusses why
  • Each member writes the first sentence of a text for his or her reader, and the group checks that each sentence would make sense to that reader

Discussion Questions

  • Why does the superintendent's selection include every fact, while the clerk needs only two?
  • Fact 3 matters to the superintendent. Why would it confuse or worry the resident?
  • How would you state fact 1 for the reporter without the unit NTU?
2

From Page to Ear

20 minPairs

Pairs turn paragraph 4 of Model A, the paragraph about Roebling's decision, into a 45-second audio-tour stop at the Manhattan tower, then read it aloud to another pair, who listen without the text. The activity builds organization and style for a listener.

Listener Checklist

  • The stop tells listeners where to look before it tells them anything else
  • Sentences are short enough to be understood in one hearing; no sentence depends on a parenthesis or a semicolon
  • Numbers are few and rounded where exactness does not matter to the listener
  • Every fact is still accurate, and every claim is no stronger than Model A's
  • The stop ends with something the listener can see or remember

Procedure

  • Pairs list the facts in paragraph 4 of Model A and decide which a listener needs
  • Pairs write the stop, about 110-130 words, which is roughly 45 seconds when read aloud at a normal pace
  • One partner reads the stop aloud to another pair while the other partner times it
  • The listening pair retells the stop in two sentences; any fact they miss or get wrong shows a place to revise
  • Pairs revise once and record the final version, if a recorder is available

Discussion Questions

  • Which fact from paragraph 4 did you drop, and why can a listener do without it?
  • What did you have to change in your sentences once you heard them read aloud?
  • Model A says Smith's figures are "best read as a minimum." How, if at all, would you say that on a tour?

Modification for Distance Learning

Pairs record their stop as an audio file and post it to a shared folder. Another pair listens once, without the script, and posts a two-sentence retelling, followed by one suggestion.

3

Notice Rescue

20 minPairs

Pairs rewrite the weak draft (T4) as a clear, coherent notice for residents, 100-140 words, and check every fact against Model C. The activity brings development, organization and style together for a general audience.

Procedure

  • Decide what a resident most needs to know, and where in the notice it belongs
  • Choose at most three facts from Model C that support that message, and state each one in plain words; define turbidity if you use the word
  • Decide what to do with each of these: the filter backwash, the chlorine residual, the alum supply, and the praise for the night shift. Cut, keep or rewrite, and write your reason
  • Add a headline and a last sentence that tells residents where to call with questions (invent a plausible utility phone line and label it invented)
  • Trade with another pair, which highlights any term a resident would not know in one color and any fact that does not match Model C in another

Discussion Questions

  • Model C and your notice report the same night. Which facts appear in both, and how is each stated differently?
  • Why might the line about the alum supply worry residents, even though it is true?
  • Your notice is shorter and simpler than Model C. Is it less accurate? Explain.

Regulator Variation

Pairs write instead the two-sentence entry for the plant's monthly operating report to the state drinking water program. The reader is a regulator who knows the rules but not this plant, so the entry gives the date, the peak raw and filtered turbidity with units, and the comparison with the limits, in the program's formal terms.

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: Placing the Reader Before Writing

Specialist reader General reader or listener State inspector Act. 3 variation knows the rules, not this plant; needs date, peaks, limits formal program terms, values with units Journal readers Model A know the period; need: why the decision was made argued claim, evidence with dates, terms defined once Tour listeners Model B know nothing yet; need: a picture of what is under them short spoken lines, few numbers, a clear ending Residents Revised notice know the tap; need: is it safe, must I do anything? plain words, one message, who to call Upper boxes: what the reader knows and needs. Lower boxes: the choices that follow.
Four texts from this lesson placed on a line from specialist to general reader: the inspector's entry from the Activity 3 variation, Model A, Model B and the revised residents' notice. For each, the upper box names what the reader already knows and needs; the lower box names the development, organization and style that follow. The facts under the texts are the same kind of facts; the choices change with the reader.

Diagram 2: Turbidity Through the Plant During the Storm (invented data)

0.1 1 10 100 Turbidity (NTU, log scale) Raw water peak 48 NTU Settled water peak 3.9 NTU Filtered (CFE) peak 0.21 NTU 1 NTU: never to be exceeded 0.3 NTU: limit for 95% of monthly readings Peak readings during the storm, October 14-15 (invented data)
A figure for readers who can use a log scale, such as the superintendent: each gridline is ten times the one below it, so the 48 NTU raw water and the 0.21 NTU filtered water fit on one chart. The dashed red lines are the real federal turbidity limits for filtered water from plants of this type. For residents, a sentence comparing the filtered water with the limit would serve better than a log-scale chart.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

WHST.11-12.4 Homework: Emily Warren Roebling for Two Readers, and a Plant Visit

Directions: Use the research notes (T5) in Independent Practice for Problems 1-4 and Model C (T3) in Guided Practice for Problem 5. Cite notes as (T5, Note 4). Every fact you use must match the notes or the model.

Part 1: Reader Analysis and Selection (Problems 1-2)

  1. You will write (a) a paragraph for a research paper on how the Brooklyn Bridge was finished after Washington Roebling fell ill, read by a history teacher who knows the period well, and (b) a 100-130 word card for a walking tour of Brooklyn, read by tourists. For each, write a reader analysis: what the reader knows, does not know and needs first.
  2. For each piece, list the notes you will use, in the order you will use them, and the notes you will leave out, with a reason for each. Explain how you will handle Note 7 in each piece so that neither overstates what historians know.

Part 2: Two Pieces (Problems 3-4)

  1. Write the research paragraph, 150-200 words, with a claim about Emily Warren Roebling's role, evidence from the notes with citations, and a knowledgeable, measured stance.
  2. Write the walking-tour card, 100-130 words, with a title. Open with something tourists can picture, keep sentences short, and keep every fact accurate.

Part 3: A New Technical Reader and Reflection (Problems 5-6)

  1. A ninth-grade environmental science class will tour the Cedar Fork plant. Using Model C, write a 120-160 word explanation, for them, of how the plant kept the tap water clear during the storm. Define turbidity and coagulant, keep the order of the treatment steps, and leave out what the students do not need.
  2. Choose two of your three pieces. Name one difference in development, one in organization and one in style between them, and explain each by the reader. Then quote one sentence you revised for clarity or concision, before and after.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Reader AnalysisSpecific analysis of what each reader knows and needs, and choices in each piece follow from itAnalysis given but general, or not reflected in the writingMissing
DevelopmentFacts selected for each purpose; the disputed claim handled with a measured stance; terms defined where the reader needs themSome needed facts or definitions missing, or some irrelevant notes keptFacts inaccurate or overstated
OrganizationEach piece puts first what its reader needs first, and its order is easy to followOrder partly suited to the readerNo clear order
Style and ClarityStyle fits each form (research paper, tour card, class explanation); every sentence is clear and conciseSome lapses in style or clarityStyle unsuited to the readers, or writing hard to follow

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

The questions use Models A and B (T1 and T2) in Direct Instruction, Model C (T3) and the weak draft (T4) in Guided Practice, and the homework notes (T5) in Independent Practice. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which statement best describes the purpose and audience of Model A (T1)?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Model A (T1) says that Smith's figures "are best read as a minimum, since he could record only the men who came to him." Why does the writer add this sentence for a history-journal reader?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why does Model A (T1) mention the Eads Bridge in St. Louis in paragraph 4?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Model A (T1) gives the pressure as "roughly 34 pounds per square inch above the pressure of the open air." Model B (T2) instead compares it with the bottom of a deep swimming pool. Why does each choice suit its audience?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which feature of Model B (T2) is chosen for listeners rather than readers?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A student wants to add one sentence to paragraph 3 of Model A (T1). Which sentence keeps the section's knowledgeable, measured stance?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Model C (T3) begins with a Summary before the Event, Actions and Results. Why does this organization suit the plant superintendent?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Model C (T3) uses terms such as "CFE," "jar tests" and "head loss" without defining them. Why is this appropriate?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which sentence in Model C (T3) most directly lets the superintendent judge whether the plant met the federal turbidity limits?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The weak draft (T4) is meant for residents. Which problem with its organization matters most for that audience?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which revision of the weak draft's (T4) sentence Honestly the night shift crushed it. best suits a notice for residents?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A resident asks, "What is turbidity?" Which definition best suits the notice?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which version of this sentence is clearest and most concise for the superintendent? It is my recommendation that at some point consideration be given to the possibility of installing an alarm for raw water turbidity at the 25 NTU level.

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which sentence has an unclear reference that a revision should fix? The sentences come from a draft paragraph about the Manhattan caisson.

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer

    Rewrite this sentence from Model C (T3) for residents in the utility's newsletter, and explain two changes you made: "After a coagulant dose change and one early filter backwash, combined filter effluent (CFE) turbidity stayed at or below 0.21 NTU, under both the 0.3 NTU and the 1 NTU limits."

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    The utility records a 30-second phone message for callers who ask about the storm. Using Model C (T3), write a four-point outline for the message in the order callers need the points, and give one reason for your first point and one fact from Model C you would leave out.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    Model A (T1) and Model B (T2) both report Smith's 110 cases and three deaths. Explain one difference in development and one difference in style in how they do it, with the reader each choice serves. Cite paragraphs.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    Using Model C (T3), compute the percent of the peak raw water turbidity that was removed before the filtered water left the plant (from 48 NTU to 0.21 NTU). Then write one sentence for the superintendent's monthly summary that reports the result.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write two sentences for Model A (T1) that explain decompression sickness to history-journal readers who are not scientists, using one comparison. Keep the stance knowledgeable and the facts exact.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Model A (T1) will be reprinted in a booklet sold at the bridge's visitor center, for general readers. Name two changes the editor should make and one feature that must not change, and explain each.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does WHST.11-12.4 mean?

WHST.11-12.4 means that students in grades 11 and 12 produce clear and coherent writing in history, science and technical subjects, with development, organization and style suited to the task, purpose and audience.

At this level, the readers range widely, from specialists who expect exact terms and values to members of the public who need plain words and the main point first. Students must judge the reader and adjust every choice while keeping the facts the same.

How is WHST.11-12.4 different from WHST.9-10.4?

The wording of the two standards is the same; the difference is in the complexity of the tasks, texts and readers that grades 11 and 12 handle.

Older students write about more technical content, for specialist readers as well as general ones, and are expected to keep claims matched to the evidence. In grades 11 and 12, the explanatory writing standard, WHST.11-12.2, also asks for a knowledgeable stance, which shapes the style choices this standard covers.

What is the difference between WHST.11-12.4 and W.11-12.4?

The text is the same, but W.11-12.4 belongs to the English class, while WHST.11-12.4 applies to history, science and technical subjects.

In WHST, the tasks and readers come from those fields: research papers, public history, lab and field reports, technical reports and notices. Each field has its own expectations, such as a summary first in a technical report.

What does "audience" mean when the readers are experts?

It means writing for what the expert already knows and needs to decide, which usually allows fewer definitions and demands more exact values.

The superintendent in this lesson knows every term in the storm report, so the report can use abbreviations and units without explaining them. What the expert cannot do without is precision: times, doses, readings and the comparison with the limits.

Can simplifying writing for the public make it inaccurate?

It can, which is why the standard asks for writing that is appropriate to the audience, not simply shorter.

A good general version drops detail but keeps every stated fact true and every claim no stronger than the evidence. For example, the audio tour rounds some figures but still says that three workers died; it does not turn "the doctor treated 110 workers" into "hundreds died."

Why does this lesson use the Brooklyn Bridge and a water treatment plant?

Because WHST.11-12.4 covers history and technical subjects, the lesson practices the same choices in one context of each.

The Brooklyn Bridge shows how a historical explanation is written for a history journal and for listeners on the bridge. The water plant shows how one night's technical data is written for a superintendent and for residents. The bridge facts are real; the plant and its data are invented.

What is a knowledgeable stance in history and technical writing?

A knowledgeable stance is the voice of a writer who understands the subject and its evidence well enough to explain it with confidence and to say where the evidence stops.

Model A shows both sides: it explains decompression sickness exactly, and it warns that the doctor's count of cases is "best read as a minimum."

Does writing for a listener count as writing under this standard?

Yes: a script is writing for a task, a purpose and an audience, and a listener is an audience with special needs.

A listener cannot reread, so a script needs short sentences, few numbers, clear signposts and something to look at or remember. Writing and then hearing a script is a strong way to test whether writing is clear.

How is WHST.11-12.4 usually assessed?

It is usually assessed through students' own writing, often by asking them to write about the same content for two different readers and explain their choices.

Teachers look for a clear reader analysis, facts selected for the purpose, an order suited to the reader, a fitting style and accurate facts in every version. Quiz items like the ones on this page can check whether students recognize these choices in model texts.

How can parents help with this kind of writing?

Ask your student to explain a history or science topic to you, then ask how the explanation would change for the teacher.

Everyday documents also help: compare a product's safety label with its technical manual, or a news report with the scientific study it describes, and talk about what each writer chose for each reader.