W.7.10: Quick Writing Across Subjects and a Three-Week Interview Profile
In plain English: W.7.10 is the Common Core grade 7 ELA standard that asks students to write often in two kinds of time: extended projects that leave room for research, reflection and revision, and short pieces finished in one sitting or a day or two. The writing covers many tasks, purposes and audiences in subjects such as math, science and social studies.
Write routinely over extended time frames (time for research, reflection, and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of discipline-specific tasks, purposes, and audiences.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Writing Standards · Cluster: Range of Writing · Official standard
W.7.10 is a range standard: it asks seventh graders to write routinely, which means as a regular habit, in two kinds of time. A shorter time frame is a single sitting or a day or two, such as an exit ticket, a lab conclusion or an email. An extended time frame leaves room for research (finding information), reflection (thinking back on what you learned and what to do next) and revision (changing the draft). The writing is discipline-specific: each school subject, or discipline, has its own kinds of writing and its own expectations for them.
The lesson follows Ari Castellanos, an invented seventh grader, through three weeks. In the same weeks that Ari writes quick pieces for math, science and social studies, he interviews a retired bus driver and turns the interview into a profile for the town library. Students compare what one sitting allows with what three weeks allow, practice short writing at four subject stations, learn to turn closed interview questions into open ones, and audit the range of their own writing. Ari, his teachers, his town and everyone in his writing are invented for this page.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Tell a shorter time frame (a single sitting or a day or two) from an extended one, and choose the right one for a task
Write short, discipline-specific pieces for math, science, social studies and a reader outside school
Plan an extended piece with dated time for research, reflection and revision
Explain how research, a day away from a draft and feedback changed a piece of writing
Reflect on the range of tasks, purposes and audiences in their own writing
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Writing routinely for different tasks, purposes and audiences in grade 6 W.6.10
Writing clearly for a task, purpose and audience W.6.4
Planning and revising with help from peers and adults W.6.5
Short research projects that use several sources W.6.7
"List every piece of writing you did yesterday, in school and out. A math answer counts, and so does a text message. Next to each one, write who read it and how long it took you."
Give students three minutes, then collect examples on the board in a chart with one column per subject (English, math, science, social studies, outside school). Ask: Which pieces took one sitting? Did anyone work on a piece for more than a week? Read W.7.10 aloud and point to its two time frames and its three kinds of range: tasks, purposes and audiences.
Introduce Ari Castellanos, an invented seventh grader, and read Text 1, the assignment his English teacher gave on a Monday. Students underline the task, the audience and the purpose, and circle every checkpoint that gives Ari time for research, reflection or revision.
1Neighborhood Voices: a three-week profile, Ms. Oduya's Grade 7 English class
2Task: Interview one adult who has lived or worked in Fairmont for at least 20 years. Then write a profile of 500-700 words about one part of that person's life here.
3Audience: readers of the local history shelf at the Fairmont Public Library, and the person you interview, who will receive a printed copy of the class booklet.
4Purpose: to inform readers about our town's past through one person's experience, and to honor that person's story.
5Week 1, Monday: choose your person and write 10 interview questions in class. Ask for an interview the same day.
6Week 1, by Friday: hold the interview (30-45 minutes) and type your notes the same day, while you still remember the details.
7Week 2, Tuesday: one research session in the library. Find two facts that give background for your profile, such as a date, a place or an event, and write down where each one came from.
8Week 2, Thursday: Draft 1 is due. Then leave it alone for at least one day.
9Week 3, Monday: writing group. Week 3, Wednesday: send the person you interviewed the exact quotations you plan to use and ask whether you got them right.
10Week 3, Friday: final profile due.
11Every Friday: write a 10-minute journal entry about what you learned that week and what you will do next.
SVHS lesson authors, Neighborhood Voices assignment sheet (Text 1; Ms. Oduya, Fairmont, its library and its middle school are invented for this lesson). Original passage written for this page.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
While the profile is under way, Ari keeps writing in his other classes. Text 2 shows four pieces from Week 1, each written in a single sitting. Diagram 2 shows the moves each kind of writing expects. A math explanation shows its steps; a science conclusion uses claim, evidence and reasoning (a one-sentence answer, the data that support it, and why the data fit); a social studies response answers the question with evidence from a source (a map, a document or a picture the teacher gives) and with context (what the class already knows about the time and place). Writing for a reader outside school starts with its purpose.
1Email, Monday, Week 1 (5 minutes). Dear Mr. Jiménez, Thank you for agreeing to talk with me for my English project about people in Fairmont. Could we meet this Friday at 4:00 at the public library, or would another time be better for you? The interview will take about 40 minutes. I will bring my questions and a notebook. Sincerely, Ari Castellanos, Grade 7, Fairmont Middle School
2Math, Tuesday, exit ticket (8 minutes). Prompt: A jacket costs $72. Is a coupon for 15% off or a coupon for $12 off the better deal? Explain your thinking to a classmate.
3The $12 coupon is the better deal. 15% of $72 is 0.15 × 72 = $10.80, so with the percent coupon the jacket costs $72 - $10.80 = $61.20. With the $12 coupon it costs $72 - $12 = $60.00. Since $60.00 is less than $61.20, the $12 coupon saves $1.20 more. The percent coupon would only win on a jacket that costs more than $80, because 15% of $80 is exactly $12.
4Science, Wednesday, lab conclusion (12 minutes). Question: Which brand of paper towel holds the most water?
5Brand B holds the most water. In our three trials, one sheet of Brand B held an average of 27 mL of water, compared with 18 mL for Brand A and 22 mL for Brand C. Every sheet was the same size and soaked for the same 30 seconds, so the difference comes from the towel, not the test. One limit: we only tested one roll of each brand.
6Social studies, Thursday, short response (15 minutes). Prompt: Why did Timbuktu become a center of trade in the 1300s? Use the map on page 184.
7Timbuktu grew because of where it sat. The map shows it near the Niger River at the southern edge of the Sahara, so goods carried by camel across the desert met goods carried by boat on the river. The arrows on the map show salt coming from the north and gold coming from the south. Our class also learned that when Mansa Musa ruled Mali in the 1300s, the city became known for its mosques and scholars.
SVHS lesson authors, Ari's short writing from Week 1, four single sittings (Text 2; Ari Castellanos, Mr. Jiménez and the lab data are invented). Original passage written for this page.
Math: explain the reasoning, not only the answer
Ari's exit ticket on the $72 jacket (Text 2, paragraphs 2-3).
Result: Ari states the answer in his first sentence, then shows each calculation with dollar signs: 0.15 × 72 = $10.80, and $72 - $10.80 = $61.20 against $72 - $12 = $60.00. His last sentence explains when the answer would change: 15% of $80 is exactly $12, so the percent coupon wins only above $80. A classmate can check every step, which is what a math reader expects.
Science: claim, evidence and reasoning in one sitting
A new prompt, 10 minutes: "Explain to a classmate who was absent why the ice cube on the metal tray melted first." The class data: the cube on the metal tray melted in 7 minutes and the cube on the plastic tray in 24 minutes (invented data; same size cubes, same room).
Result: Claim: the cube on the metal tray melted faster. Evidence: it melted in 7 minutes, compared with 24 minutes on plastic, 17 minutes sooner. Reasoning: both trays started at room temperature, and metal conducts heat into the ice much faster than plastic, so the metal tray keeps feeding the cube heat from the room. Three sentences, one sitting, and a science reader gets every part.
Social studies: answer first, then evidence from the source
Ari's response on Timbuktu (Text 2, paragraphs 6-7).
Result: His first sentence, "Timbuktu grew because of where it sat," answers the question directly. His second sentence does what the prompt asked, using the map: it names the Niger River and the edge of the Sahara and explains why camels and boats met there. A history reader wants the answer and the source together, not a list of facts about the city.
Choosing the time frame
Three tasks arrive on one Monday: a text to a project partner about where to meet at lunch; a 150-word summary of a science article, due Wednesday; and a science fair report on how far paper airplanes of different designs fly, due in four weeks.
Result: The text is a single sitting of a minute or two. The summary is a day or two: read Monday, write Tuesday. The science fair report is extended: it needs trials and research, a break from the draft and revision, so its sessions go on the calendar first.
Show Diagram 2 and ask students which of the four moves they skip most often in their own quick writing. Then point out that Ari's email is writing too: its reader, Mr. Jiménez, is an adult outside school who is giving up his time.
Guided Practice15 minutes
Now follow the extended piece. Read Ari's interview notes (Text 3) and his Friday journal (Text 4). Then show the table of everything Ari wrote in the three weeks, and Diagram 1, which places each session on a calendar. Pairs mark each profile session in the table with Research, Reflection or Revision, and put a star next to the one session that did the most for the final profile. Quiz Question 3 asks for one week's minutes, so leave the totals for the quiz.
1Interview with Walter Jiménez, Friday, Week 1, 4:00-4:40 p.m., Fairmont Public Library. Notes typed at home the same evening.
2Background: born in 1947; grew up on Alder Street; Fairmont High School, class of 1965. Drove the city's Route 4 bus from 1968 to 1999. Route 4 ran about 9 miles from the train depot to the hospital, with 26 stops.
3First week on the job, age 21: "I missed the turn onto Canal Street three times. The riders told me where to go."
4Regular riders: knew many by name. Mrs. Okada rode every weekday for 17 years to the laundry where she worked.
5Hardest part: winter mornings, first run at 5:15 a.m. "But I never once wanted another job."
6The flood (from my extra question, "What night do you remember most?"): 1983, started around 9 at night. Water over Canal Street. The city opened the high school gym as a shelter, and he drove riders there from the Canal Street stops. "I made that trip eleven times that night."
7Best part: "Kids who rode my bus to school later rode it to work, and then their kids rode it."
8To check: When did Route 4 start? What month was the flood? Spelling of Mrs. Okada's name.
9Question I forgot to ask: What happened to the bus he drove?
SVHS lesson authors, Ari's interview notes, typed the evening of the interview (Text 3; Walter Jiménez, Route 4 and the 1983 flood are invented). Original passage written for this page.
1Friday, Week 1 (10 minutes). The interview ran the full 40 minutes, and I only got through seven of my ten questions. The best answer came from a question I had not written down. I asked, "What night do you remember most?" and he told me about the flood. I think my profile should be about the flood night, not his whole career. Next step: find out the exact date of the flood and how many people went to the shelter.
2Friday, Week 2 (10 minutes). At the library, Ms. Brandt, the librarian, showed me the Fairmont Historical Society's timeline. The flood was in April 1983, and about 140 people stayed in the high school gym that night. The timeline also says Route 4 began in 1952. I finished Draft 1 yesterday. It starts with the year he was born and goes in order, and it reads like a list. I am not going to touch it until Monday.
3Friday, Week 3 (10 minutes). On Monday I reread the draft after three days away, and the problem jumped out: the flood, the best part, was buried in paragraph 2 after a lot of dates. My writing group said the same thing, so I moved the flood to the opening. On Wednesday I emailed Mr. Jiménez the quotations I planned to use, and he caught a mistake. I had written that he made the trip "a dozen times," but he made it eleven times, which is also what my notes say. This week I also wrote a lab conclusion and a history response in class, so I did my profile revising at home on Tuesday and Thursday.
SVHS lesson authors, Ari's Friday journal, Weeks 1-3 (Text 4; Ms. Brandt and the Fairmont Historical Society timeline are invented). Original passage written for this page.
Everything Ari wrote in three weeks (invented)
When
Writing
Class
Time frame
Reader
Minutes
Week 1 Mon
Ten interview questions
English (profile)
Part of the extended piece
Ari himself
20
Week 1 Mon
Email asking for an interview
English (profile)
Single sitting
Mr. Jiménez
5
Week 1 Tue
Exit ticket on a coupon problem
Math
Single sitting
A classmate
8
Week 1 Wed
Paper towel lab conclusion
Science
Single sitting
Science teacher
12
Week 1 Thu
Short response on Timbuktu
Social studies
Single sitting
History teacher
15
Week 1 Fri
Interview and typed notes
English (profile)
Part of the extended piece
Ari himself
65
Week 1 Fri
Journal entry
English (profile)
Single sitting
Ari and Ms. Oduya
10
Week 2 Mon
Explanation of a percent problem
Math
Single sitting
Math teacher
10
Week 2 Tue
Library research notes
English (profile)
Part of the extended piece
Ari himself
45
Week 2 Wed
Draft 1, paragraphs 1-3
English (profile)
Part of the extended piece
Ari himself
35
Week 2 Thu
Draft 1, paragraphs 4-5
English (profile)
Part of the extended piece
Ms. Oduya
30
Week 2 Fri
Journal entry (no work on the draft)
English (profile)
Single sitting
Ari and Ms. Oduya
10
Week 3 Mon
Writing group notes
English (profile)
Part of the extended piece
Ari and his group
30
Week 3 Tue
Lab conclusion, in class
Science
Single sitting
Science teacher
15
Week 3 Tue
Revision at home
English (profile)
Part of the extended piece
Ari himself
40
Week 3 Wed
Email with quotations to check
English (profile)
Single sitting
Mr. Jiménez
10
Week 3 Thu
History response, in class
Social studies
Single sitting
History teacher
20
Week 3 Thu
Revision and editing at home
English (profile)
Part of the extended piece
Ari himself
35
Week 3 Fri
Final copy
English (profile)
Part of the extended piece
Library readers and Mr. Jiménez
20
Week 3 Fri
Journal entry
English (profile)
Single sitting
Ari and Ms. Oduya
10
Discuss: The Week 1 interview answered a question Ari had not planned. Where in Text 4 does he decide what the profile will be about? What would have happened to the flood story if the whole profile had been due on the Monday after the interview?
Independent Practice15 minutes
Read the opening of Ari's Draft 1 (Text 5) and the final profile (Text 6). Each student finds three differences and writes, for each one, which part of the extended time made it possible: the interview notes, the library research, the day away, the writing group or the quotation check. Then students write a five-minute reflection in their own journals: "What could Ari do in three weeks that he could not do in the 15-minute Timbuktu response?"
The quiz uses Texts 1-6 and the table in Guided Practice. Paragraph numbers match the numbers beside each text.
1Walter Jiménez was born in 1947. He grew up in Fairmont and went to Fairmont High School. In 1968 he got a job driving the Route 4 bus for the city. He drove it for 31 years until he retired in 1999.
2Mr. Jiménez said driving a bus was a good job. He knew a lot of the riders. He liked his job. One thing that happened was a big flood in 1983. He drove people to the high school "a dozen times that night."
SVHS lesson authors, Profile Draft 1, the first two of its five paragraphs, written in Week 2 (Text 5). Original passage written for this page.
1At about nine o'clock on an April night in 1983, water was pouring over Canal Street, and Walter Jiménez was driving the Route 4 bus straight toward it. Riders were waiting at the Canal Street stops with bags and blankets. He picked them up and drove them up the hill to the Fairmont High School gym, which the city had opened as a shelter. "I made that trip eleven times that night," he said. About 140 people spent that night in the gym, according to the Fairmont Historical Society's timeline.
2Mr. Jiménez drove Route 4 for 31 years, from 1968 until he retired in 1999. He was 21 when he started, and his first week did not go smoothly. "I missed the turn onto Canal Street three times," he said, laughing. "The riders told me where to go."
3What he remembers most fondly is not the bus itself but the people on it. "Kids who rode my bus to school later rode it to work," he said, "and then their kids rode it." For 31 years, many Fairmont mornings started on his route.
SVHS lesson authors, Final profile, the first two paragraphs and the last one, handed in at the end of Week 3 (Text 6). Original passage written for this page.
Closure5 minutes
Exit ticket: (1) Name one piece of writing you will do this week in a single sitting, its class and its reader. (2) Name one piece that deserves an extended time frame, and write the day of your first research session for it.
Teacher notes: (1) Everyone and everything in Texts 1-6 is invented, including Fairmont, Route 4, the 1983 flood and the paper towel data; the Timbuktu facts in Text 2 are real. (2) Before an interview assignment like Text 1, send families a short note and let students choose a family member, a neighbor or a school staff member, so that no student has to approach a stranger. (3) Routine writing does not all need a grade. Many teachers read journals and quick-writes for completion and give full feedback on the extended piece.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give sentence frames for each subject: "The answer is ___ because ___." (math); "My claim is ___. The data show ___. This means ___ because ___." (science); "___ happened because ___. The source shows ___." (social studies)
Shorten the station quick-writes in Activity 1 to three sentences and let students say their answer aloud to a partner before writing
Give a blank three-week calendar with the research, day-away and revision boxes already drawn in
For Advanced Students
Write the Timbuktu response a second time for a different reader, a fourth grader, and explain two changes the new audience required
Add a sixth column to the Guided Practice table: the purpose of each piece (inform, explain, persuade, request, thank, reflect)
Draft three follow-up questions Ari could ask Mr. Jiménez about what happened to his bus, and explain which one would add the most to the profile
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
In the short pieces, look for the moves of each subject: a math answer with its steps and units, a science claim backed by data and reasoning, a social studies answer that uses the source it was given, and a message that states its purpose for its reader. In the extended work, look for dated research, a real break from the draft and a revision that changes more than words: a new opening, a corrected fact or an exact quotation. Reflections should name what changed and why, not only that the writer "worked hard."
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Four-Station Quick-Write Rotation
25 minGroups of 4, then individual writing
Groups rotate through four stations, one per subject, with 5 minutes at each. At every station each student writes one complete short piece in a single sitting, using the moves in Diagram 2. The last 5 minutes are for sharing.
Station Cards
Station 1, Math: A bowling alley charges $8 per game, or $30 for a card good for 4 games. Write to a friend who plans to bowl 4 games: which choice is cheaper per game, and by how much?
Station 2, Science: Two identical cans of water sat in the sun for 30 minutes, one wrapped in black paper and one in white paper. Both started at 20 °C. The black can ended at 31 °C and the white can at 26 °C (invented data). Explain the result to a classmate who was absent.
Station 3, Social studies: Fact card: silk was made only in China for many centuries; it was light and easy to pack; buyers in Rome paid high prices for it. Explain why traders carried silk thousands of miles along the Silk Road.
Station 4, Outside school: Write a note of about 60 words to a school custodian, cafeteria worker or bus driver, thanking that person for one specific thing.
Procedure
Start the timer at each station. Write the station number and the minute you finished at the top of your piece
Before you write, underline the reader named on the card
When the timer sounds, stop, even mid-sentence, and move on; a single sitting has an end
In the last 5 minutes, each student reads one piece aloud, and the group names which Diagram 2 moves it used
Answer Notes (for the teacher)
Station 1: the card costs $30 ÷ 4 = $7.50 per game, 50 cents less than $8, so it saves $2 over 4 games. Station 2: the black can warmed 11 °C and the white can 6 °C; dark surfaces absorb more of the sunlight that falls on them. Station 3: a strong answer uses all three facts from the card and adds a reason of its own, for example that a light, costly good gave traders a large profit for each load. Station 4: look for a specific detail and a clear thank-you in the first two sentences.
Modification for Distance Learning
Post the four cards as slides and run the timer on screen. Students write in a shared document with one heading per station, then paste their best piece into the chat for the sharing round.
2
Interview Question Ladder
20 minPairs
Research for a profile starts with good questions. Pairs turn closed questions (ones that can be answered yes, no or with one word) into open ones, add a follow-up question, then interview each other for four minutes and take notes the way Ari did.
The Six Question Cards
Card 1: Did you like school when you were my age?
Card 2: Was your first job hard?
Card 3: Has our town changed?
Card 4: Do you remember any big storms?
Card 5: Did you have a favorite place to go on weekends?
Card 6: Are you proud of your work?
Procedure
For each card, write an open version that starts with What, How, Why or Tell me about
Under each open question, write one follow-up that asks for a story or an example
Partners interview each other for 4 minutes each on the topic "a time you learned something the hard way." The listener writes one exact quotation in quotation marks and one fact to check later
Each student writes a three-sentence reflection: what the best answer was, which question produced it, and what to ask next time
Sample Rewrites (for the teacher)
Card 1: "What was a school day like when you were in seventh grade?" Follow-up: "What is one day you still remember?" Card 3: "How has Main Street changed since you moved here?" Follow-up: "What is gone that you miss?" Card 6: "What part of your work are you proudest of, and why?" A good follow-up asks for one moment, not a summary.
Discussion Questions
Which open question got the longest answer? Which got the best story?
Why does a writer type interview notes the same day, as Text 1 asks?
What fact from your partner's interview would you need to check before publishing it?
3
Portfolio Range Audit
20 minIndividual, then groups of 3
Students gather six to eight pieces of their own writing from the past month, from every class, and sort them on a range grid. The audit shows which time frames, subjects and readers they already write for and which are missing.
The Range Grid
Draw a grid with three rows (single sitting; a day or two; extended) and five columns (English, math, science, social studies, outside school). Write the title of each piece in the right cell, with its reader in parentheses.
Procedure
Sort every piece onto the grid. Count the pieces in each row
Circle every empty cell. Choose one empty cell to fill in the next two weeks
For the extended row, write the research, reflection and revision steps the piece had, or should have had
In groups of three, each student shares one goal and one date for starting it
Discussion Questions
Which row of your grid is fullest? Why might that be?
Which reader outside school could you write for this month?
Look at your extended piece. Which step, research, reflection or revision, got the least time?
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: Ari's Three Weeks, One Extended Piece and the Short Writing Around It
Each column is one school day. The top row shows the sessions on the profile, with minutes underneath; the day marked A is the planned day away from Draft 1. The middle row shows the single-sitting pieces Ari wrote for other classes, and the bottom row his Friday journal entries. All data are invented.
Diagram 2: The Moves of Short Writing in Four Subjects
Discipline-specific writing: each subject expects its own moves, even in a quick piece. Read each column from top to bottom. Science uses claim, evidence and reasoning; social studies pairs evidence from a source with context.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
W.7.10 Homework: Three Quick Pieces and a Mini-Profile
Directions: This homework runs over one week in short sessions. Do Part 1 tonight, timing each piece. Do Part 2 over the next four to six days and keep a log with the date and minutes of each session. Do Part 3 at the end of the week.
Part 1: Single Sittings in Three Subjects (Problems 1-3)
Math, 10 minutes: At a school fundraiser, a small bag of popcorn costs $2.50 and a large bag, which holds twice as much, costs $4.00. Write a short explanation for a parent: which size is the better value, and why? Show your calculation with dollar signs.
Science, 10 minutes: A class planted bean seeds in six cups (invented data). Three cups sat in a warm room (24 °C) and sprouted after 4, 5 and 6 days. Three sat in a cool room (15 °C) and sprouted after 8, 9 and 10 days. Write a conclusion with a claim, evidence (use the averages) and reasoning, and name one limit of the test.
Outside school, 10 minutes: Write an email or note to an adult who helped you this month, such as a coach, a relative or a librarian. State your purpose in the first sentence, give one specific detail and close politely.
Part 2: An Extended Mini-Profile (Problems 4-5)
Research: Choose a family member, a neighbor or a school staff member to interview for 15-20 minutes about one memory of a place. Write eight open questions and two follow-ups first. Take notes during the interview, type or rewrite them the same day, and list one fact you will check and how.
Over the next four to six days, write a mini-profile of 250-350 words for that person and one other reader of your choice. Check your fact, write a draft, leave at least one full day with no work on it, and then revise: try a new opening and check every quotation against your notes. Hand in the notes, both drafts and your dated log with minutes.
Part 3: Reflect on Your Range (Problem 6)
Write a reflection of 120-180 words. List every piece of writing you did this week in any class, with its time frame and reader. Then compare one Part 1 piece with your mini-profile: what could you do with several days that you could not do in 10 minutes? Quote one sentence from each draft of the mini-profile to show a change.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Short pieces fit their subject
Each Part 1 piece uses its subject's moves (math steps, claim-evidence-reasoning, a clear purpose) and is finished in its time
One piece is missing a move or is unfinished
Pieces are missing or ignore the subject
Extended process
Notes, a checked fact, a draft, a day away and a revision, all shown in a dated log
One step is missing or undated
Only a final copy
Audience
Each piece is written for its named reader, inside or outside school
The reader is named but the writing does not change for them
No reader in mind
Reflection
Names specific changes, quotes both drafts and explains what the time made possible
General reflection or only one quotation
No reflection
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
The questions use Texts 1-6 in the lesson plan: the assignment sheet (Warm-Up), Ari's short writing (Direct Instruction), his interview notes, journal and the table of his writing (Guided Practice), and his Draft 1 and final profile (Independent Practice). Paragraph numbers match the numbers beside each text. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which checkpoint in Text 1 is built for reflection?
Answer: C
Text 1 asks for a Friday journal "about what you learned that week and what you will do next," which is thinking back and planning ahead: reflection. A is research, because the interview gathers information. B is feedback that leads to revision. D is the deadline, not a step that gives time to think.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Text 1, who will read the finished profiles?
Answer: A
Text 1 names two audiences: "readers of the local history shelf at the Fairmont Public Library, and the person you interview." B confuses the people who help with the draft with its audience. C names places Ari used for research, not readers. D appears nowhere in the assignment.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Use the table in Guided Practice. How many minutes did Ari spend on the profile project in Week 2, counting his journal entry?
Answer: D
The Week 2 profile rows are 45 (research) + 35 + 30 (Draft 1) + 10 (journal) = 120 minutes. A, 110, leaves out the journal, which Text 1 makes part of the project. B, 130, also adds the 10-minute math explanation, which belongs to another class. C, 145, is the Week 3 total.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence in Ari's paper towel conclusion (Text 2, paragraph 5) is the reasoning?
Answer: B
Reasoning explains why the evidence supports the claim. B does that: because the test was the same for every sheet, the towel must explain the difference. A is the claim. C is the evidence, the measured averages. D is a limit, which tells how far to trust the result but does not connect the data to the claim.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Ari's Timbuktu response (Text 2, paragraph 7), which sentence uses context from beyond the map?
Answer: D
D brings in what the class learned earlier, Mansa Musa's rule, which the map cannot show. A is the answer to the question. B and C both report what Ari read on the map, so they are evidence from the source, not outside context.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Ari's email to Mr. Jiménez (Text 2, paragraph 1) says, "The interview will take about 40 minutes." Why does this sentence fit its reader?
Answer: B
Mr. Jiménez is an adult outside school doing Ari a favor, so the length of the meeting is exactly what he needs to decide. A invents a grading rule that is not in the texts. C overgeneralizes; many emails need no time at all. D misreads the sentence: the school project is mentioned in the first sentence, not in this one.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which of these is on the "To check" list in Ari's interview notes (Text 3)?
Answer: B
Text 3 lists "Spelling of Mrs. Okada's name" to check, along with when Route 4 started and the month of the flood. A, C and D are facts Mr. Jiménez gave directly (about 9 miles, eleven trips, born in 1947), and Ari does not list them to check.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to Ari's Week 1 journal entry (Text 4, paragraph 1), what made him decide to write about the flood?
Answer: A
Ari writes that the best answer "came from a question I had not written down" and that the flood story followed. B is not in Text 1. C happened in Week 2, after the decision. D reverses the text: Ari got through only seven of his ten questions.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why did Ari do no work on his draft on Friday of Week 2 (Text 4, paragraph 2)?
Answer: C
Text 1 says to leave Draft 1 alone "for at least one day," and Ari writes, "I am not going to touch it until Monday." On Monday the break paid off: "the problem jumped out." A confuses this with the Week 3 email. B contradicts his own judgment that the draft "reads like a list." D invents a reason that no text gives.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which facts in the final profile (Text 6) came from Ari's library research rather than from the interview?
Answer: D
Ari's Week 2 journal says the historical society's timeline gave him the month, April, and the number, about 140 people, and the final profile names that source. A, B and C all come from Mr. Jiménez himself, as the interview notes in Text 3 show.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Draft 1 (Text 5) quotes Mr. Jiménez as saying "a dozen times that night." Which step in Text 1 caught the error?
Answer: A
In Week 3, Ari "emailed Mr. Jiménez the quotations I planned to use, and he caught a mistake" (Text 4, paragraph 3). B gave him the date and the number of people, not the quotation. C helped him move the flood to the opening. D came before the draft was written.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does the final profile open with the flood instead of the year Mr. Jiménez was born?
Answer: C
Ari writes that after three days away "the problem jumped out" and "My writing group said the same thing, so I moved the flood to the opening" (Text 4, paragraph 3). A is false: 1983 falls in the middle of his 31 years. B is not in Text 1. D overgeneralizes about an audience the texts never describe that way.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Mr. Jiménez started driving Route 4 in 1968 (Text 3). The timeline says Route 4 began in 1952 (Text 4). How many years had the route been running when he started?
Answer: B
1968 - 1952 = 16 years. A, 21, is his age when he started (1968 - 1947). C, 31, is how long he drove the route (1999 - 1968). D, 47, subtracts 1952 from 1999, the year he retired, not the year he started.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which task most needs an extended time frame?
Answer: C
A report built on a survey needs research (writing and giving the survey), time to think about the results and a revised draft for an important reader: all three parts of an extended time frame. A, B and D are single-sitting tasks with one quick answer each.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Write a two- or three-sentence math explanation for a classmate: Which is the better buy, 3 notebooks for $4.50 or 5 notebooks for $7.00? Show your steps.
Model answer: The 5-notebook pack is the better buy. $4.50 ÷ 3 = $1.50 per notebook, and $7.00 ÷ 5 = $1.40 per notebook. Since $1.40 is less than $1.50, each notebook in the 5-pack costs 10 cents less. Rubric line: 2 points for the right answer stated first with both unit prices shown; 1 point for the right answer with only one calculation or no comparison; 0 for an answer with no steps.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Draft 1 says, "He liked his job" (Text 5, paragraph 2). Rewrite the sentence so that it shows instead of tells, using a quotation from Ari's notes (Text 3) that the final profile does not use.
Model answer: Even the 5:15 a.m. winter runs did not change his mind: "But I never once wanted another job," he said. Rubric line: 2 points for an exact quotation from Text 3 that is not in Text 6, introduced and punctuated correctly; 1 point for a quotation from Text 3 that the final profile already uses, or a paraphrase; 0 if the sentence still only tells.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
W.7.10 names three things an extended time frame leaves room for. Name all three and give one example of each from Ari's three weeks, with a text citation.
Model answer: Research: the library session, where the timeline showed that "The flood was in April 1983" (Text 4, paragraph 2). Reflection: the Friday journal, where Ari decided "my profile should be about the flood night" (Text 4, paragraph 1). Revision: moving the flood to the opening after the writing group (Text 4, paragraph 3; compare Text 5 and Text 6, paragraph 1). Rubric line: 2 points for all three with a correct example and citation; 1 point for two; 0 for one or none.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
In one sitting, write a science conclusion with a claim, evidence and reasoning from these invented data: a sugar cube stirred in warm water (40 °C) dissolved in 45 seconds, and one stirred in cold water (5 °C) took 3 minutes 10 seconds.
Model answer: Sugar dissolves faster in warm water than in cold water. The cube in 40 °C water dissolved in 45 seconds, while the cube in 5 °C water took 190 seconds, more than four times as long. Warm water particles move faster, so they pull sugar off the cube and carry it away more quickly. Rubric line: 2 points for a claim, both times with units and reasoning that explains the difference; 1 point if one part is missing; 0 if the data are not used.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Plan a two-week schedule for a new extended task: a 400-word profile of a local business for your school newspaper. Give at least one dated session each for research, reflection and revision, and say what you will do in each.
Model answer: Monday, Week 1: write questions and email the owner for an interview (research). Thursday, Week 1: interview and type notes the same day (research). Friday, Week 1: journal on the best detail and the focus (reflection). Tuesday, Week 2: Draft 1. Wednesday, Week 2: no work on it. Thursday, Week 2: reread and revise the opening, and send the owner the quotations to check (revision). Friday, Week 2: final copy to the newspaper editor. Rubric line: 2 points for dated sessions covering research, reflection and revision, with a break before revising; 1 point if one is missing or undated; 0 for a list with no dates.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Reflection: In two or three sentences, compare what Ari could do in his 15-minute Timbuktu response with what he could do in the three-week profile. Quote one phrase from Text 2 or Text 4.
Model answer: In 15 minutes Ari could only use what the map and his class notes already gave him, such as "salt coming from the north and gold coming from the south" (Text 2, paragraph 7). In three weeks he could find new facts, step away and change his whole approach; after a break, he writes, "the problem jumped out" (Text 4, paragraph 3). Short writing shows what you know right now, and extended writing lets you find out more and rethink it. Rubric line: 2 points for a specific comparison with an accurate quotation; 1 point for a general comparison or no quotation; 0 if only one kind of writing is described.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does W.7.10 mean?
W.7.10 means that seventh graders write as a regular habit, both in short time frames and over longer projects, for many kinds of tasks, purposes and readers.
A short time frame is a single sitting or a day or two, such as an exit ticket or a lab conclusion. An extended time frame leaves time for research, reflection and revision, such as a profile or report built over several weeks.
What does "discipline-specific" mean in W.7.10?
It means the writing belongs to a particular school subject and follows that subject's expectations.
A math explanation shows its steps and units, a science conclusion gives a claim, evidence and reasoning, and a social studies response uses a source and its historical context. W.7.10 asks students to practice all of these, not only essays for English class.
What counts as a shorter time frame in W.7.10?
The standard defines it in its own parentheses: a single sitting or a day or two.
That covers a five-minute quick-write, a timed response in class, a homework paragraph and a short piece drafted one day and finished the next. What makes it short is that there is no time to research, step away and revise in depth.
Is W.7.10 the same as W.6.10 and W.8.10?
Yes, the wording is the same in grades 6, 7 and 8.
The difference is in the writing students do. In grade 7, the other writing standards ask for more: arguments that acknowledge alternate or opposing claims (W.7.1) and research that generates additional focused questions (W.7.7), for example. W.7.10 asks students to do that grade-level writing regularly and in both time frames.
How is W.7.10 assessed?
Usually through a body of work rather than one test question.
Teachers look at a portfolio or writing folder over a grading period: Are there short pieces from several subjects? Is there at least one extended piece with notes, drafts and revisions? On-demand writing in class and on state writing tasks gives evidence of the shorter time frame.
How often should seventh graders write?
The standard says "routinely," which means regularly, not only when a big project is due.
Many teachers build in short writing several times a week, such as warm-ups, exit tickets and journals, and run one or two extended pieces at a time. The goal is a steady habit across subjects, not a set number of pages.
How long should an extended writing project take in grade 7?
Long enough to include real research, a break from the draft and revision; for many seventh-grade projects that is two to four weeks.
What matters is the steps, not the calendar. A project assigned three weeks ahead but written the night before is really a short piece. Dated checkpoints, like those on Ari's assignment sheet, keep the extended work moving.
How does W.7.10 connect to writing in science and social studies?
It asks for writing in every discipline, and it pairs with WHST.6-8.10, the grades 6-8 standard for writing in history, science and technical subjects.
WHST.6-8.10 uses almost the same words, with extended time for reflection and revision. A lab conclusion or a history response written in class counts toward both standards when it follows the subject's expectations.
Do teachers have to grade every piece of routine writing?
No. W.7.10 is about writing often, and much routine writing can be checked quickly or read for completion.
A common approach is to read quick-writes and journals briefly, give full feedback on one piece at a time and ask students to choose their best short pieces for a portfolio. The reflection in this lesson's homework gives students practice in judging their own range.
How can parents help with W.7.10 at home?
Give your child real reasons to write: thank-you notes, emails to relatives, a list or plan for a family event, or answers to a grandparent's questions.
For long school projects, ask to see the calendar and help protect the day away from the draft. Being interviewed for a school profile, as in this lesson's homework, is another way to help.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to W.7.10: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
W.6.10Prerequisite
Write routinely over extended and shorter time frames in grade 6