RST.9-10.1Common CoreELALiteracy in Science and Technical SubjectsGrades 9-10
RST.9-10.1: Citing Precise Evidence from Science and Technical Texts
In plain English: RST.9-10.1 is the Common Core literacy standard that asks students in grades 9-10 to cite specific textual evidence to support their analysis of science and technical texts, paying close attention to the precise details of explanations and descriptions. It is usually taught in science courses such as Chemistry, Biology or Physical Science, and in English classes that read science writing.
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to the precise details of explanations or descriptions.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects 6-12 · Cluster: Key Ideas and Details · Official standard
Students cite specific evidence from science and technical texts and learn that, in these texts, the evidence that counts is usually a precise detail: the cause in an explanation, the exact location or condition in a description, the quantity or order in a procedure. A quotation that only touches the topic is not enough. Every claim students make must point to the words that explain how or why, or that describe exactly what and where.
The lesson uses Michael Faraday's The Chemical History of a Candle, lectures he gave to young people at the Royal Institution in London in the winter of 1860-61. Students model the analysis on his explanation of the cup of melted wax, practice on his description of a blown-out candle, and answer the quiz on his account of what is inside a flame. Two technical texts written for this page, a lab procedure and a page of an instrument manual, show that the same reading skill applies to the documents students use in a lab.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Cite specific words from a science or technical text to support an analysis, quoting accurately and briefly
Distinguish an explanation (how or why something happens) from a description (what something is like or where it is) and find the precise details each depends on
Identify precise details of cause, condition, location, quantity, sequence and exception, and explain what each contributes
Judge whether a paraphrase or summary keeps the precise details of the original text
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Citing textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts in grades 6-8 RST.6-8.1
Quoting a text accurately with quotation marks and an ellipsis for omitted words
Basic states of matter: solid, liquid and gas, and melting and condensing
Project two lab notes about the same test and ask students which one lets a reader explain what happened.
Warm-Up Prompt
"Note A: The ice melted faster on the metal. Note B: Two 20 g ice cubes were placed at the same time on an aluminum block and on a plastic block of the same size, both at room temperature. The cube on the aluminum was completely melted after 2 minutes 40 seconds; the cube on the plastic still had a solid core after 10 minutes. Which note would you cite to prove that the aluminum carried heat to the ice faster? Underline the three details you would quote."
The data in Note B are invented for this warm-up. Collect answers and list the details students underlined: the equal starting mass (20 g), the same starting time and temperature, the exact times. Point out that Note A makes the same claim but gives nothing to cite. Tell students that RST.9-10.1 asks for exactly this: evidence from the text, and attention to the precise details that make an explanation or description checkable.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Part 1: Explanations, descriptions and precise details. An explanation tells how or why something happens; a description tells what something is like, where it is or how it is arranged. In both, the evidence is usually a small detail: a cause word such as "because" or "so," a condition such as "if," a location, a number or an exception. Use the table to name the kinds of detail students will look for.
Precise details to look for in science and technical texts
Kind of detail
Signal words
What it tells the reader
Cause and effect
because, so, therefore, by the force of
Why something happens: the explanation itself
Condition
if, when, provided, unless
When the explanation holds and when it fails
Location
in the middle, on the outside, at the edge
Where in the object or apparatus something happens
Quantity and measure
numbers, units, at least, to the nearest
How much, how long, how far
Sequence
first, then, as soon as, after
The order a process or procedure follows
Exception
except, only, not
The case the general statement does not cover
Definition or distinction
is, means, the difference between
How the author uses a key term
Part 2: Model with Faraday. Explain the setting: Faraday gave these lectures to a young audience, demonstrating each point with a real candle. Read the excerpt aloud. Then work through the examples, asking after each: which words would you quote, and what kind of detail are they? Use Diagram 1 to locate each detail on a flame, and Diagram 2 with example 4.
You see, then, in the first instance, that a beautiful cup is formed. As the air comes to the candle it moves upwards by the force of the current which the heat of the candle produces, and it so cools all the sides of the wax, tallow, or fuel, as to keep the edge much cooler than the part within; the part within melts by the flame that runs down the wick as far as it can go before it is extinguished, but the part on the outside does not melt. If I made a current in one direction, my cup would be lop-sided, and the fluid would consequently run over,—for the same force of gravity which holds worlds together holds this fluid in a horizontal position, and if the cup be not horizontal, of course the fluid will run away in guttering. You see, therefore, that the cup is formed by this beautifully regular ascending current of air playing upon all sides, which keeps the exterior of the candle cool. No fuel would serve for a candle which has not the property of giving this cup, except such fuel as the Irish bogwood, where the material itself is like a sponge, and holds its own fuel. You see now why you would have had such a bad result if you were to burn these beautiful candles that I have shewn you, which are irregular, intermittent in their shape, and cannot therefore have that nicely-formed edge to the cup which is the great beauty in a candle. I hope you will now see that the perfection of a process—that is, its utility—is the better point of beauty about it. It is not the best looking thing, but the best acting thing, which is the most advantageous to us.
Michael Faraday, The Chemical History of a Candle, Lecture I (excerpt: the cup of the candle) (1861; this edition 1908). Public domain (published 1908). Source text.
Explanation: cause and effect
Why does a burning candle form a cup that holds its melted fuel?
Result: Faraday gives a chain of causes: the heat of the candle produces an upward current of air, and that air "so cools all the sides of the wax, tallow, or fuel, as to keep the edge much cooler than the part within." The inside melts; "the part on the outside does not melt." The cited words are the cause (the rising air), the effect (a cool edge) and the result (a solid rim around the melt).
Condition: when the explanation fails
What does Faraday say would happen if the air did not rise evenly?
Result: "If I made a current in one direction, my cup would be lop-sided, and the fluid would consequently run over." The precise detail is the condition "in one direction": the cup depends on a "beautifully regular ascending current of air playing upon all sides." A student who writes only "wind ruins candles" has missed the condition.
Exception
Does Faraday claim that every fuel must form a cup?
Result: Almost: "No fuel would serve for a candle which has not the property of giving this cup, except such fuel as the Irish bogwood, where the material itself is like a sponge, and holds its own fuel." An accurate summary keeps the exception and the reason for it (the bogwood holds its own fuel).
From vague to precise evidence
Claim: Faraday cares more about how a candle works than how it looks. Which evidence supports it best?
Result: Weak: "Faraday talks about beautiful candles." Strong: he says the candles that are "irregular, intermittent in their shape" cannot have "that nicely-formed edge to the cup," and concludes, "It is not the best looking thing, but the best acting thing, which is the most advantageous to us." The strong version quotes the reason and the conclusion (Diagram 2 shows the same climb for a different claim).
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs read the second Faraday excerpt, from later in the same lecture. They highlight explanation in one color and description in the other, then complete a three-column chart: question, precise detail quoted, what it explains. Give the questions: What must the vapour be kept from doing? How does Faraday show that the vapour, not the wick, carries the fire back to the candle? Circulate and push for precision: "he lights it" is a start; "he holds 'a lighted taper two or three inches from the wick' and sees 'a train of fire going through the air till it reaches the candle'" is evidence.
There is another condition which you must learn as regards the candle, without which you would not be able fully to understand the philosophy of it, and that is the vaporous condition of the fuel. In order that you may understand that, let me shew you a very pretty, but very common-place experiment. If you blow a candle out cleverly, you will see the vapour rise from it. You have, I know, often smelt the vapour of a blown-out candle—and a very bad smell it is; but if you blow it out cleverly, you will be able to see pretty well the vapour into which this solid matter is transformed. I will blow out one of these candles in such a way as not to disturb the air around it, by the continuing action of my breath; and now, if I hold a lighted taper two or three inches from the wick, you will observe a train of fire going through the air till it reaches the candle. I am obliged to be quick and ready, because, if I allow the vapour time to cool, it becomes condensed into a liquid or solid, or the stream of combustible matter gets disturbed.
Michael Faraday, The Chemical History of a Candle, Lecture I (excerpt: the vapour of a blown-out candle) (1861; this edition 1908). Public domain (published 1908). Source text.
Debrief with one question: Why does Faraday say he is "obliged to be quick and ready"? Students should cite both reasons he gives (the vapour "becomes condensed into a liquid or solid," or "the stream of combustible matter gets disturbed") and notice the word "or": either one ends the demonstration.
For Activity 2 (Procedure Precision Check). The procedure below was written for this page. It is a safe test with water and no flame.
Purpose: to compare how high colored water rises by capillary action in three wick materials during 10 minutes.
Materials: one strip each of cotton cloth, white paper towel and nylon ribbon, each 1 cm wide and 12 cm long; a 250 mL glass beaker holding 150 mL of tap water tinted with 3 drops of blue food coloring; a pencil; tape; a metric ruler; a timer.
1. With the pencil, draw a line across each strip 2 cm from one end. Use pencil, not ink: ink can run when it gets wet and blur the line.
2. Tape the other end of each strip to the pencil so that the strips hang 2 cm apart. Wind the tops around the pencil until each pencil line will sit exactly at the water surface.
3. Rest the pencil across the rim of the beaker. Check that no strip touches another strip or the glass. A strip that touches the glass can draw water along the wall, so its reading does not count.
4. Start the timer the moment the strips touch the water. At 1, 5 and 10 minutes, measure the height of the blue front above the pencil line to the nearest millimeter. If the front is uneven, record its highest point and write "uneven" beside the reading.
5. Repeat the test twice more with fresh, dry strips. Report the mean of the three trials for each material and time.
Written for this page, Wick Materials Test: Procedure. Original passage written for this page.
Independent Practice15-20 minutes
Students read Faraday's account from Lecture II of what he finds inside the flame and answer quiz questions 1-20 on their own with the passage open. Paragraph numbers are printed beside the text. The "[...]" marks a part of the lecture left out here, in which Faraday repeats his test on a larger scale. The "diagram" and "fig. 7" he mentions are drawings in the book that this page does not reproduce; Diagram 1 is a simple modern sketch.
1Here is a candle: I am about to put the end of this glass tube into the middle of the flame—into that part which old Hooke has represented in the diagram as being rather dark, and which you can see at any time, if you will look at a candle carefully, without blowing it about. We will examine this dark part first.
2Now, I take this bent glass tube, and introduce one end into that part of the flame, and you see at once that something is coming from the flame, out at the other end of the tube; and if I put a flask there, and leave it for a little while, you will see that something from the middle part of the flame is gradually drawn out, and goes through the tube and into that flask, and there behaves very differently from what it does in the open air. It not only escapes from the end of the tube, but falls down to the bottom of the flask like a heavy substance, as indeed it is. We find that this is the wax of the candle made into a vaporous fluid—not a gas. (You must learn the difference between a gas and a vapour: a gas remains permanent, a vapour is something that will condense.)
[...]
3I shall get no vapour from that part which is already burnt. If I raise the tube (fig. 7) to the upper part of the flame, so soon as the vapour has been swept out, what comes away will be no longer combustible: It is already burned. How burned? Why, burned thus:—In the middle of the flame, where the wick is, there is this combustible vapour; on the outside of the flame is the air which we shall find necessary for the burning of the candle; between the two, intense chemical action takes place, whereby the air and the fuel act upon each other, and at the very same time that we obtain light the vapour inside is destroyed. If you examine where the heat of a candle is, you will find it very curiously arranged. Suppose I take this candle, and hold a piece of paper close upon the flame, where is the heat of that flame? Do you not see that it is not in the inside? It is in a ring, exactly in the place where I told you the chemical action was; and even in my irregular mode of making the experiment, if there is not too much disturbance, there will always be a ring. This is a good experiment for you to make at home. Take a strip of paper, have the air in the room quiet, and put the piece of paper right across the middle of the flame (I must not talk while I make the experiment), and you will find that it is burnt in two places, and that it is not burnt, or very little so, in the middle; and when you have tried the experiment once or twice, so as to make it nicely, you will be very interested to see where the heat is, and to find that it is where the air and the fuel come together.
Michael Faraday, The Chemical History of a Candle, Lecture II (excerpt: inside the flame) (1861; this edition 1908). Public domain (published 1908). Source text.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: "Write one claim about the candle that you can support from the passages. Then quote the one precise detail that best supports it, and name the kind of detail (cause, condition, location, quantity, sequence, exception or definition)." Sort the tickets into "quotes the topic" and "quotes the detail" to plan the next lesson.
Teacher note on the 1861 text. Faraday's spelling is British and of its time ("shew" for show, "vapour"), and the quotations keep it exactly. His science also needs two notes. The distinction between a gas and a vapour at the end of paragraph 2 of the quiz passage was common in 1861; today chemists call a vapor the gas form of a substance that is normally a liquid or solid at room temperature, and any gas turns liquid if it is cooled enough. Discuss this after the quiz. Second, Faraday calls the paper experiment "a good experiment for you to make at home." Do not assign it: an open flame and paper belong in a teacher demonstration with fire safety in place, or on video.
Homework passage. The homework uses the page of an instrument manual below, written for this page and modeled on the notes that come with a school electronic balance. Tell students that manuals are technical texts too: every detail is there because leaving it out can spoil a measurement.
1Capacity: 200 g. Readability: 0.01 g. Use between 15 and 30 °C.
2Placement. Set the balance on a firm, level table away from doors, air vents and sunny windows. Turn the two leveling feet until the bubble sits inside the circle of the level indicator. A balance that is not level can give readings that look steady but are slightly wrong.
3Warm-up. Switch the balance on at least 15 minutes before use. Readings taken sooner may drift while the electronics warm up.
4Weighing. Place the empty container at the center of the pan, close the draft shield and press TARE. The display returns to 0.00 g. Add the sample and wait for the stability symbol (a small circle at the left of the display) before you record the reading. The tared container still counts toward the 200 g capacity. If the total load is over capacity, the display shows -OL- and no reading is given.
5Warm or cold samples. Let every sample reach room temperature before weighing. A warm object heats the air around it, and the rising air makes the reading lower than the true mass and unsteady. A cold object does the opposite.
6Calibration. Calibrate the balance after it is moved to a new place and at least once a month. With the pan empty and the display at 0.00 g, hold CAL for 3 seconds until 100 flashes. Place the 100 g calibration mass at the center of the pan with the tweezers provided, and remove it when the display reads End. Use only the calibration mass supplied with the balance.
Written for this page, Electronic Balance, Operating Notes (sample manual excerpt). Original passage written for this page.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give the evidence frame as a sentence starter: "The text says '___.' This is a detail of ___ (cause, condition, location...), and it shows ___."
Read each Faraday passage aloud first, and gloss older words in the margin (shew, taper, guttering, tallow, combustible, condensed)
Number the sentences of T1 and T2 so students can point to a sentence before they quote it
For Advanced Students
Read the omitted part of Lecture II and explain what the flask experiment adds as evidence that the vapour burns
Find one detail in Faraday that a modern chemist would state differently, and write the modern version with a source
Write a two-paragraph explanation of the candle flame for younger students that keeps every precise detail of T3
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong answers quote the precise detail, not the nearest sentence on the topic, and say what the detail explains. Watch for quotations that are too long to show what matters, for summaries that drop a condition or exception ("wind ruins candles," "every fuel needs a cup"), and for claims the text does not make, such as numbers or causes students add from memory. In technical texts, check that students keep quantities and units exactly as written.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Detail Detectives
15 minPairs
Pairs answer six question cards about the two Lecture I excerpts. For each card they find the shortest quotation that answers it and label the kind of detail, using the table from Direct Instruction.
The 6 Cards
What produces the upward current of air around the candle? (T1)
What force keeps the melted fuel level in the cup? (T1)
Why can the irregular, decorative candles not burn well? (T1)
How must Faraday blow the candle out for the vapour demonstration? (T2)
What does the audience see when the taper is brought near? (T2)
Into what two states can the vapour condense if it cools? (T2)
Procedure
For each card, copy the shortest quotation that answers it, in quotation marks
Label the kind of detail: cause, condition, location, quantity, sequence, exception or definition
Trade with another pair and check each other's quotations against the text, word for word
Discussion Questions
Card 1 and card 2 both ask what causes something. Is the cause in each case a thing, a force or a process?
Which card was hardest to answer with a short quotation? What made it hard?
Variation for a Shorter Class
Give each pair three cards, one from T1 and two from T2, and pool the answers on the board.
2
Procedure Precision Check
20 minGroups of 3
Groups read the wick materials procedure (Guided Practice) and find every precise detail that protects the result. Then they compare it with a vague version and decide what the vague version would let go wrong.
The Vague Version
Give groups this version, written for this page: "Hang three strips of different materials in colored water and see which one the water climbs fastest. Measure a few times and write down the results."
Procedure
In the original procedure, underline every quantity, unit, location and condition
For each of five underlined details, write one sentence: what would go wrong in the results if this detail were missing?
Find the two places where the procedure explains its own reason (the ink and the glass wall), and quote them
Rewrite the vague version in three sentences that keep the five details your group judged most important
Discussion Questions
Why does the procedure give a reason for some steps and not for others? Which unexplained step would you most want explained?
The procedure asks for the "highest point" of an uneven front. How could two groups get different numbers if this detail were left out?
Variation: Run the Test
With the optional materials, groups carry out the procedure exactly as written and report their means. The test uses only water and food coloring; wipe up spills so the floor is not slippery. Groups then list any step they had to interpret, which shows where the procedure is not yet precise enough.
3
Paraphrase Court
15 minGroups of 4
Groups judge five one-sentence paraphrases of Faraday's Lecture I excerpts. For each, they rule accurate, too vague or inaccurate, and support the ruling with a precise quotation.
The 5 Statements
"The flame melts the whole top of the candle."
"Any moving air around a candle spoils its cup."
"A blown-out candle gives off a vapour that can be lit a few inches away from the wick."
"Faraday says that only wax can be used to make a candle."
"Faraday thinks the way a candle works matters more than the way it looks."
Procedure
Each member argues one ruling for one statement; the group decides
Write the ruling and the quotation that decides it on the statement strip
For every statement ruled too vague or inaccurate, write a corrected paraphrase that keeps the precise detail
Discussion Questions
Statement 2 is close to the text but not the same. Which single phrase in T1 decides it?
Statements 3 and 5 can both be supported. Which one needs the more precise quotation, and why?
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: The Candle Flame in Faraday's Details
A simple sketch, not to scale, of a steady candle with each label taken from Faraday's explanation of the cup in Lecture I (T1): the ascending current of air, the melted fuel held level in the cup and the edge kept cooler than the part within. The wick label summarizes a later part of the same lecture. Dashed arrows show the ascending current of air. Students can add their own labels from the quiz passage after the quiz.
Diagram 2: From the Topic to the Precise Detail
Three levels of evidence for the claim "the cup holds the melted fuel because its edge stays solid." Only level 3 quotes the detail that explains why, which is what RST.9-10.1 asks students to find.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RST.9-10.1 Homework: Precise Details in an Instrument Manual
Directions: Use the electronic balance operating notes printed in the Closure phase of the lesson plan (paragraphs are numbered). Quote the exact words, with the paragraph number, for every point you make. Answer Problems 1-5 in 2-5 sentences each; Problem 6 is a paragraph.
Part 1: Find the Precise Details (Problems 1-2)
Paragraph 2 gives three things to avoid or check when you place the balance. Quote each one. For which of them does the manual give a reason, and what is the reason?
Dev switches the balance on at 9:05 and starts weighing at 9:12, and the readings creep upward while he watches. Quote the detail that explains this, and state the earliest time he should have started weighing.
Part 2: Apply the Details (Problems 3-4)
Priya tares a beaker with a mass of 96.40 g and then pours in 110 g of water. What will the display show? Quote the two details that let you predict it, and show the arithmetic.
A crucible taken from a drying oven reads 24.87 g, and the reading rises slowly while it sits on the pan. Using paragraph 5, explain why. Is the crucible's true mass more or less than 24.87 g? Quote the words that tell you.
Part 3: Explain and Connect (Problems 5-6)
A classmate summarizes paragraph 6 as "Calibrate the balance once a month by putting a weight on it." List three precise details the summary leaves out, quoting each, and explain which omission could spoil a calibration and how.
Write a paragraph (150-200 words) about moving air. Faraday (T1) and the balance manual both explain how moving air affects a result. Cite at least two precise details from each text, and explain one way the effect of rising air is the same in both and one way it differs.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Accurate Quotation
Quotes the exact words with the paragraph number
Quotes loosely or without a paragraph number
No quotation
Precise Detail
Chooses the detail (number, condition, reason) that answers the question
Chooses a sentence on the topic that does not contain the key detail
Evidence unrelated to the question
Explanation and Application
Explains what the detail shows and applies it correctly, including the arithmetic in Problems 2-3
Applies the detail with an error or without explanation
No application
Comparison Paragraph
Two precise details from each text, one similarity and one difference explained
Details from only one text, or a comparison without explanation
Summary only
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
All questions are about Faraday's Lecture II passage in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan (paragraphs are numbered). Quote the passage in your short answers. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to paragraph 1, where does Faraday put the end of the glass tube?
Answer: B
Paragraph 1: Faraday puts it "into the middle of the flame," into "that part which old Hooke has represented in the diagram as being rather dark." Choice A confuses the middle with the top; Faraday raises the tube to the upper part only later, in paragraph 3. Choice C mixes this lecture with the cup in Lecture I. Choice D describes where the air is (paragraph 3), not where the tube goes.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What does the substance drawn through the tube do when it reaches the flask?
Answer: C
Paragraph 2: it "falls down to the bottom of the flask like a heavy substance, as indeed it is." Choice A is what we might expect from something that comes out of a flame, which is the point of Faraday's surprise: it "behaves very differently from what it does in the open air." Choice B is not in the passage; nothing burns in the flask here. Choice D adds a result the passage never describes.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What does Faraday say the substance in the flask is?
Answer: D
"We find that this is the wax of the candle made into a vaporous fluid," and Faraday adds that it is "not a gas." Choice A contradicts "not a gas." Choice B confuses the vapour with soot, which the passage does not mention. Choice C brings in water, which Faraday discusses later in the lectures but not here.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which detail in paragraph 2 tells how long the flask must stay at the end of the tube before the substance collects?
Answer: A
"If I put a flask there, and leave it for a little while, you will see that something from the middle part of the flame is gradually drawn out." Choice B describes the first thing seen at the end of the tube, before any flask is used. Choice C comments on how heavy the substance is, not on time. Choice D is from paragraph 3 and describes raising the tube.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What comes out of the tube when Faraday raises it to the upper part of the flame, once the vapour has been swept out?
Answer: B
"What comes away will be no longer combustible: It is already burned." Choice A reverses the point of the first sentence, "I shall get no vapour from that part which is already burnt." Choice C confuses the upper flame with the cup. Choice D misreads where the air is: it is "on the outside of the flame," and the tube is inside it.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to paragraph 3, where does the "intense chemical action" take place?
Answer: A
"In the middle of the flame, where the wick is, there is this combustible vapour; on the outside of the flame is the air ...; between the two, intense chemical action takes place." The key detail is the location word "between." Choice B puts it in the middle, where the unburned vapour is. Choice C confuses the demonstration with the flame. Choice D puts it below the flame, which the passage never mentions.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which phrase tells when the vapour inside the flame is destroyed?
Answer: C
"Whereby the air and the fuel act upon each other, and at the very same time that we obtain light the vapour inside is destroyed." Choice A describes moving the tube, a step in the demonstration. Choice B is a condition for the paper experiment. Choice D is about practicing the experiment.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Where does Faraday say the heat of the flame is?
Answer: D
"Do you not see that it is not in the inside? It is in a ring, exactly in the place where I told you the chemical action was." Choice B is the reverse of the italicized "not," which is Faraday's own emphasis. Choices A and C are not in the passage.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In the paper experiment, how is the strip of paper burnt?
Answer: B
"You will find that it is burnt in two places, and that it is not burnt, or very little so, in the middle." The two burnt places are where the ring crosses the paper. Choice A is the result someone would expect if the middle were hottest, the idea Faraday is correcting. Choice C ignores the pattern. Choice D invents a detail about holding the paper.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Faraday writes that the paper "is not burnt, or very little so, in the middle." What do the words "or very little so" add?
Answer: A
The phrase qualifies "not burnt": the middle may darken a little, so a reader who sees slight scorching has not disproved the ring. Choice B overreads it; Faraday is certain the paper is "burnt in two places." Choice C reverses the meaning. Choice D misreads "very little" as an amount of paper.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 3, what does "this" refer to in "there is this combustible vapour"?
Answer: C
"This" points back to the vapour described in paragraph 2, "the wax of the candle made into a vaporous fluid," and it is located "in the middle of the flame, where the wick is." Choice A borrows the blown-out candle from Lecture I (Guided Practice), which is not in this passage. Choice B confuses the fuel with the air. Choice D reverses the point: that matter is "no longer combustible."
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Whose drawing does Faraday rely on in paragraph 1 to point out the dark part of the flame?
Answer: D
"That part which old Hooke has represented in the diagram as being rather dark." Robert Hooke was a seventeenth-century English scientist. Choices A, B and C are not supported: the passage names no other drawing, and photographs are not mentioned.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What is the purpose of the sentence in parentheses at the end of paragraph 2?
Answer: B
Faraday has just called the substance "a vaporous fluid" and "not a gas," and the parenthesis explains the difference so the claim can be understood: "You must learn the difference between a gas and a vapour." Choice A is wrong because no source is named there. Choice C is not in this passage. Choice D confuses the definition with the apparatus.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
The substance "falls down to the bottom of the flask like a heavy substance, as indeed it is." What do the words "as indeed it is" tell the reader?
Answer: A
"Like a heavy substance" could mean it only looks heavy; "as indeed it is" confirms that it is. The comparison that makes sense in the flask is with the air it sinks through. Choice B compares it with the wrong thing. Choice C adds a measurement the passage never mentions. Choice D reverses the phrase.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Trace the path of the substance from the flame to the flask. Cite at least two precise details from paragraph 2.
Model answer: The tube starts in the dark middle of the flame (paragraph 1), and at once "something is coming from the flame, out at the other end of the tube." When a flask is put there, the substance "is gradually drawn out, and goes through the tube and into that flask," where it "falls down to the bottom of the flask like a heavy substance." Rubric: full credit for the correct order (middle of the flame, tube, flask, bottom of the flask) with two accurate quotations; partial credit for the correct path with one quotation or a paraphrase only.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Faraday calls the substance in the flask "a vaporous fluid" and says it is "not a gas." Using his own definition in paragraph 2, predict what would happen to the substance if the flask were set aside to cool, and quote the words that support your prediction.
Model answer: It would condense back into wax, first liquid and then solid, on the bottom and walls of the flask. Faraday's definition is that "a gas remains permanent, a vapour is something that will condense," and he identifies the substance as "the wax of the candle made into a vaporous fluid." Rubric: full credit for the prediction (it condenses) with the definition quoted; partial credit for the prediction without the quotation. A prediction that it stays a gas misses the distinction.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Faraday asks, "How burned?" In your own words, explain his answer, citing the three parts of the flame he names in paragraph 3.
Model answer: The combustible vapour is "in the middle of the flame, where the wick is"; the air is "on the outside of the flame"; and "between the two, intense chemical action takes place, whereby the air and the fuel act upon each other." "Burned" means the vapour has reacted with the air in that region, which is why what comes from the top of the flame is "no longer combustible." Rubric: full credit for all three locations cited and "burned" explained as the reaction of fuel with air; partial credit for two locations or an explanation without quotations.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
A classmate writes: "Faraday shows that you can collect wax vapour from any part of the flame." Correct the claim with precise details from paragraphs 1-3.
Model answer: The vapour comes only from the middle. Faraday puts the tube "into the middle of the flame," into "that part which old Hooke has represented in the diagram as being rather dark," and says "I shall get no vapour from that part which is already burnt": from the upper part, "what comes away will be no longer combustible." A corrected claim: wax vapour can be drawn from the dark middle of the flame, but not from the upper part, where it has already burned. Rubric: full credit for a correction that names the middle and cites both paragraph 1 and paragraph 3; partial credit for a correction with one citation.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Paragraph 3 moves from an explanation of how the flame burns to a description of an experiment with paper. Explain how the result of the experiment supports the explanation. Cite one detail from each.
Model answer: The explanation says the chemical action takes place "between" the vapour in the middle and the air outside, and the experiment shows where the heat is: the paper "is burnt in two places" and hardly at all "in the middle." A strip laid across a hollow ring of heat would be burnt exactly where it crosses the ring twice, so the result matches the explanation that the heat is "where the air and the fuel come together." Rubric: full credit for one quotation from the explanation, one from the experiment and the link (two burnt places = the ring); partial credit for the two quotations without the link.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Faraday gives conditions for the paper experiment to show its result clearly. Quote two of them, and explain why each matters, using what paragraph 3 says about where the heat is.
Model answer: He says to "have the air in the room quiet" and to put the paper "right across the middle of the flame," and he warns that the ring shows "if there is not too much disturbance." The heat is in a thin ring; moving air bends the flame and smears the ring, and paper held off-center crosses the ring unevenly, so the two burnt places would not show clearly. Rubric: full credit for two quoted conditions and an explanation tied to the ring; partial credit for conditions without explanation.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RST.9-10.1 mean?
RST.9-10.1 asks students to back up their analysis of science and technical texts with specific evidence from the text, and to pay attention to the precise details of explanations and descriptions. "RST" means Reading Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects, and "9-10" is the grade band. In practice, students quote the detail that shows how, why, where or how much, not just a sentence on the topic.
How is RST.9-10.1 different from RST.11-12.1?
RST.9-10.1 centers on the precise details of explanations or descriptions. RST.11-12.1 keeps the citing of evidence but asks students to attend to important distinctions the author makes and to any gaps or inconsistencies in the account. The 9-10 reader asks "exactly what does the text say?"; the 11-12 reader also asks "what does the text leave out or contradict?"
Is RST.9-10.1 taught in science class or English class?
Both. The literacy standards for science and technical subjects were written so that science teachers share responsibility for reading, using the texts of their own subject: lab procedures, textbook explanations, articles and manuals. Many schools also use science writing in English 9 and 10.
What counts as a "precise detail" in a science text?
A precise detail is the small piece of text that an explanation or description depends on: a cause ("by the force of the current"), a condition ("if I made a current in one direction"), a location ("the part within"), a quantity with its unit, a step in a sequence, or an exception ("except such fuel as the Irish bogwood"). If a summary drops it, the summary becomes inaccurate or unclear.
What is the difference between an explanation and a description?
An explanation tells how or why something happens; a description tells what something is like or where its parts are. Faraday explains why a candle forms a cup (the rising air cools the edge) and describes what his audience sees when a lighted taper is held near a candle that has just been blown out. Students look for cause words in explanations and for location, size and order words in descriptions.
Why use a text from 1861 to teach science reading?
Faraday's lectures were written for young listeners, describe every demonstration step by step, and are in the public domain, so a lesson can quote them in full. Older science texts also teach a useful habit: checking each claim against what we know now. The teacher note in Closure lists the two places where this text needs a modern comment.
Is everything Faraday says still accurate?
His observations hold up: the cup of melted fuel, the rising current of air and the vapour of a blown-out candle are real and still used in teaching. One of his definitions reflects its time, and the teacher note in Closure gives the modern version. Students should cite what the text says and note where science has moved on.
How long should a quotation be?
As short as it can be while still containing the precise detail. A whole paragraph hides the evidence; a single word can lose its meaning. Teach students to quote the phrase and use an ellipsis for words they skip, as in "so cools all the sides of the wax ... as to keep the edge much cooler."
How is RST.9-10.1 assessed?
Tests ask students to choose the quotation that best supports a statement, to answer a question with evidence from a science passage, or to judge whether a summary is accurate. Constructed responses are usually scored on whether the evidence is relevant and specific and whether the student explains it. The quiz on this page uses all three formats.
What are common mistakes with RST.9-10.1?
Common mistakes are quoting a sentence on the topic instead of the sentence with the detail, dropping a condition or exception when paraphrasing, adding facts from memory as if the text said them, and changing numbers or units. A useful check: can someone who reads only your quotation see why it proves your point?
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to RST.9-10.1: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RST.6-8.1Prerequisite
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts
Lesson coming soon
Alongside
RST.9-10.3Parallel
Follow a complex multistep procedure precisely, attending to special cases or exceptions
Lesson coming soon
RH.9-10.1Parallel
Cite specific evidence from primary and secondary sources, noting date and origin
Lesson coming soon
WHST.9-10.9Parallel
Draw evidence from informational texts to support analysis, reflection and research
Lesson coming soon
After this lesson
RST.11-12.1Next step
Cite evidence from science texts, attending to distinctions, gaps and inconsistencies