SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

RST.11-12.3Common CoreELALiteracy in Science and Technical SubjectsGrades 11-12

RST.11-12.3: Following Complex Procedures and Analyzing the Results

In plain English: RST.11-12.3 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 11-12 to follow a complex multistep procedure precisely in experiments, measurements or technical tasks, and to analyze their specific results using the explanations given in the text. It is usually taught in upper-level science and technical courses.

Follow precisely a complex multistep procedure when carrying out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks; analyze the specific results based on explanations in the text.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects 6-12 · Cluster: Key Ideas and Details · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

65-70 min

Overview

Students work with technical texts that have two parts: a procedure to follow and an explanation of what the results should look like and why. They follow each procedure precisely, with its quantities, limits and order, and then analyze specific results, their own or a group's, by matching each pattern in the data to the sentence in the text that explains it. The four texts, written for this page, cover a spring test, a colorimeter calibration, an osmosis experiment with potato tissue and a solar panel test.

The central habit is to move from "the result was strange" to "this specific result matches this explanation in the text, so the procedure tells us to do this." All data are invented for teaching, and every procedure is classroom-safe: no heat, flames or hazardous chemicals.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Follow a complex multistep procedure precisely, including its quantities, units, limits and order of steps
  • Compare specific results with the model the text describes and decide whether they fit
  • Match a pattern in the data to the explanation in the text that accounts for it, and quote that explanation
  • State what the procedure calls for next when a result does not fit, and predict the direction of an error from the text's explanation

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Following complex procedures and their special cases in grades 9-10 RST.9-10.3
  • Citing evidence from science texts, attending to distinctions and gaps RST.11-12.1
  • Plotting data, drawing a best-fit line and reading a slope and an intercept
  • Calculating percent change

Lesson Procedure

65-70 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5-10 minutes

    Students take their own resting pulse with this three-line procedure, then answer the prompt.

    Pulse procedure and explanation (written for this page)
    PartText
    ProcedureSit still for 2 minutes. Press two fingers (not the thumb) lightly on the inside of the wrist below the thumb. Count the beats for 15 seconds and multiply by 4.
    ExplanationA resting pulse for teenagers is usually 60-100 beats per minute. Activity raises the pulse for several minutes. Because the count is multiplied by 4, each beat miscounted changes the result by 4 beats per minute.

    Warm-Up Prompt

    Maya ran up two flights of stairs, sat down and at once counted 27 beats in 15 seconds. What rate does the procedure give, and what does the explanation tell you about that number? Which step did she skip?

    Take answers. The procedure gives 27 × 4 = 108 beats per minute, but the explanation shows why that is not her resting pulse: she skipped the 2 minutes of sitting, and activity "raises the pulse." Point out the two jobs the standard asks for: follow every step precisely, then use the text's own explanation to say what a specific result means.

  2. Direct Instruction20 minutes

    Part 1: Two halves of a technical text. Many procedures contain a procedure (what to do) and an explanation (why the results should look a certain way, and what patterns mean when they do not). Keep this table up for the lesson.

    Analyzing results with the explanation in the text
    Question to askWhere the answer comes fromExample in T1
    What should the results look like?The explanation's model or ruleA straight line; F ÷ x the same for every load (paragraph 6)
    Does this result fit the model?Compare the specific numbers with the predictionIs each point on the line? Did the pointer return to zero?
    If not, which explanation fits the pattern?The "other patterns" the text namesCurve at the end: elastic limit. Offset line: misread zero (paragraphs 6-7)
    What does the text say to do?The procedure step tied to that patternUse the slope, not F ÷ x (paragraphs 5 and 7)

    Part 2: Model the spring test (T1). Read paragraphs 1-5 as a procedure and have students name each quantity and its unit. Then read paragraphs 6 and 7 as the key to the results: each sentence says what a pattern in the data means. Work the three examples, and ask the class after each one which sentence in paragraphs 6-7 explains it. Diagram 1 plots the first two examples.

    Purpose: to find the spring constant k of a steel spring, in newtons per meter. Materials: a ring stand clamped to the table; a steel spring; a 50 g mass hanger and five 50 g slotted masses; a meter stick clamped upright beside the spring; a small paper pointer taped to the bottom of the spring; safety goggles. Wear goggles throughout: a loaded spring can slip off its hook.

    Zero reading. Hang the spring alone from the clamp. With your eye level with the pointer, read its position on the meter stick to the nearest 0.1 cm. This is the zero position.

    Loading. Hang the empty hanger (50 g) on the spring. When the spring has stopped bouncing, read the pointer again. The extension x is this reading minus the zero position. Add one 50 g mass at a time, up to 300 g in all, and record the extension after each. Do not load the spring beyond 300 g.

    Unloading. Remove the masses one at a time, reading the pointer after each, and finish by removing the hanger. Record whether the pointer returns to the zero position within 0.2 cm.

    Calculation. For each load, the force is F = mg, with m in kilograms and g = 9.8 m/s². Plot F in newtons against x in meters, draw the best-fit straight line and find its slope. The slope is the spring constant k. Do not force the line through the origin.

    What the results mean. While a spring stays within its elastic limit, its extension is proportional to the force on it: doubling the load doubles the extension. The points then fall on a straight line, the ratio F ÷ x is the same for every load, and the pointer returns to its zero position when the load is removed. Past the elastic limit, the coils bend permanently. The extension then grows faster than the force, the last points curve away from the line toward larger extensions, and after unloading the pointer stays lower than its zero position. Readings from a spring stretched past its limit do not give its spring constant.

    Other patterns. If the zero position was misread, every extension is off by the same amount. The points still form a straight line with the correct slope, but the line does not pass through the origin, and F ÷ x changes from load to load; this is why k is found from the slope. Readings taken while the spring is still bouncing scatter the points to both sides of the line instead of bending it.

    Written for this page, Spring Stretch Test: Procedure and Explanation. Original passage written for this page.
    • Following the procedure, then reading the result

      A group follows T1 and records these extensions for loads of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 g: 2.5, 4.9, 7.4, 9.8, 12.3 and 14.7 cm. The pointer returns to within 0.1 cm of zero. What is k, and what does the text say the result shows?

      Result: Paragraph 5: F = mg gives 0.49, 0.98, 1.47, 1.96, 2.45 and 2.94 N; with x in meters, the best-fit line has slope 20.0 N/m and passes within 0.01 N of the origin. Paragraph 6 explains the pattern: the points "fall on a straight line" and the pointer returns to zero, so the spring stayed within its elastic limit and the slope is its spring constant.

    • A result that the explanation rules out

      Another group ignores the 300 g limit in paragraph 3. Their first six extensions match the first group's, but at 350 g and 400 g they read 17.9 cm and 21.6 cm, and after unloading the pointer stays 1.4 cm lower than its zero position.

      Result: With k = 20.0 N/m, the line predicts 17.2 cm and 19.6 cm, so the last two points lie to the side of larger extension, and the gap grows. Paragraph 6 matches every detail: past the elastic limit, the points "curve away from the line toward larger extensions" and the pointer "stays lower than its zero position." The spring is damaged; its later readings "do not give its spring constant," so the spring must be replaced before the next class.

    • Why the procedure uses the slope

      A third group misreads the zero position by 0.6 cm, so every extension is 0.6 cm too large: 3.1, 5.5, 8.0, 10.4, 12.9 and 15.3 cm. One student reports k as the mean of F ÷ x.

      Result: F ÷ x now rises from 15.8 N/m at 50 g to 19.2 N/m at 300 g, as paragraph 7 predicts ("F ÷ x changes from load to load"). The best-fit slope is still 20.0 N/m, and the line crosses the force axis at -0.13 N instead of at the origin. Following paragraph 5, "Do not force the line through the origin," gives the right k; the student's average of F ÷ x does not.

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Pairs read the colorimeter procedure (T2). First they number the actions in paragraphs 2-5 and underline each rule of order ("from the most dilute to the most concentrated," "rinse ... before each one"). Then they write one sentence for each pattern the explanation names in paragraphs 6 and 7: what it looks like in the data and what causes it. Work the example together, pausing at each reading to ask whether it fits the line. Diagram 2 plots the result.

    Purpose: to find the concentration of blue dye in a sports drink, as a percent of a standard dye solution, from how much red light the drink absorbs. Materials: a colorimeter set to 635 nm (red light); plastic cuvettes; lens tissue; two 10 mL plastic syringes without needles; small cups; distilled water; the standard dye solution, made by the teacher from blue food coloring; the sports drink.

    Dilutions. Make five solutions of 10.0 mL each by mixing the standard solution with distilled water: 2.0 mL of standard with 8.0 mL of water (20%), 4.0 mL with 6.0 mL (40%), 6.0 mL with 4.0 mL (60%), 8.0 mL with 2.0 mL (80%), and 10.0 mL of standard alone (100%). Use one syringe only for the standard and the other only for the water, and stir each cup.

    Calibration. Fill a cuvette three-quarters full with distilled water. Hold it only by its ridged sides, wipe the clear sides with lens tissue and place it in the colorimeter with a clear side facing the arrow. Press CAL. The display should read 0.000. This cuvette is the blank.

    Measuring. Measure the solutions from the most dilute to the most concentrated. Before each one, rinse the cuvette with a small amount of the new solution and pour the rinse away. Fill, wipe and insert the cuvette as in paragraph 3, and record the absorbance.

    The unknown. Measure the sports drink in the same way three times, refilling the cuvette each time, and find the mean absorbance. Plot absorbance against percent concentration for the five standards, draw the best-fit straight line through the origin, and read the drink's concentration from the line.

    What the results mean. For the same dye and the same cuvette, absorbance is proportional to concentration, so the standards should lie on a straight line through the origin. On this colorimeter the relationship holds only up to an absorbance of about 1.0. Above that, so little light passes through the sample that the readings fall below the line, and a concentration read from them is too low. If a sample reads above 1.0, dilute it with an equal volume of distilled water, measure it again and double the concentration you read from the line.

    Other patterns. Fingerprints, scratches or bubbles on the cuvette scatter light, and the colorimeter counts scattered light as absorbed, so a smudged cuvette gives a reading that is too high. A cuvette that was not rinsed with the new solution still holds drops of the previous, more dilute one, so its reading is slightly too low.

    Written for this page, Dye Concentration by Colorimeter: Procedure and Explanation. Original passage written for this page.
    • Analyzing a result with the text's limit

      A pair measures the five standards in T2 and gets 0.192, 0.378, 0.574, 0.826 and 0.951. They re-wipe the 80% cuvette and get 0.764. The sports drink reads 1.30, 1.32 and 1.31; diluted with an equal volume of water, it reads 0.69, 0.70 and 0.70. The best-fit line through the origin has slope 0.0095 per percent.

      Result: The first 80% reading was above the line (the line predicts 0.76), which paragraph 7 explains: a smudge makes a reading "too high." The drink's mean, 1.31, is above 1.0, so paragraph 6 applies: read directly, 1.31 ÷ 0.0095 gives about 138%, which is "too low." Diluted, the mean is 0.697, and 0.697 ÷ 0.0095 = 73.4%; doubled, the drink is about 147% of the standard. The line predicts 1.40 at 147%, so the undiluted reading of 1.31 fell below it, as the text says.

    Debrief: Why does paragraph 4 say to measure from the most dilute to the most concentrated? (With that order, any drops left in an unrinsed cuvette are more dilute than the new solution, so the error is small and its direction is known: paragraph 7 says the reading is "slightly too low.") A text that explains the order of its steps lets a reader predict the effect of breaking it.

  4. Independent Practice20 minutes

    Students read the potato osmosis procedure below and use it, with the invented results in the table, to answer quiz questions 1-20 on their own. They do not carry out the experiment during the quiz.

    Purpose: to estimate the concentration of dissolved substances in potato cells by finding the salt solution in which potato tissue neither gains nor loses water. Materials: potato cylinders about 1 cm across and 4 cm long, cut by the teacher with the skin removed; five cups holding 50 mL each of salt (sodium chloride) solution at 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 mol/L; plastic wrap; paper towels; forceps; a balance that reads to 0.01 g; a timer.

    Before soaking. Blot three cylinders for each cup by rolling each one once across a dry paper towel, without squeezing. Weigh the three together and record the initial mass for that cup.

    Soaking. Put each set of three cylinders into its cup at the same time and cover every cup with plastic wrap. Soak all the cups for the same time, between 45 and 60 minutes.

    After soaking. Remove the cylinders with forceps, blot them exactly as in paragraph 2, weigh each set of three together and record the final mass.

    Calculation. For each cup, find the percent change in mass: (final mass - initial mass) ÷ initial mass × 100. Plot percent change against salt concentration, draw the best-fit straight line and find where it crosses zero percent change. That concentration is your estimate.

    What the results mean. Water moves by osmosis across cell membranes, from the side with less dissolved solute to the side with more. In a solution weaker than the cell contents, the cells take in water and the cylinders gain mass; in a stronger solution, they lose water and mass. Where the line crosses zero, the solution matches the cell contents, and there is no net movement of water. Percent change is used rather than change in grams because the sets do not all start at the same mass.

    Other patterns. Water left on the surface adds mass that never entered the cells, so a set blotted less after soaking than before shows a change that is too high: a gain that is too large or a loss that is too small. Potato skin slows the movement of water, so a cylinder with skin on it changes less than it should. Mass keeps changing for about the first hour, so a set soaked for a shorter time also changes less. An uncovered cup loses water by evaporation, which makes its solution stronger and the loss of mass larger.

    Written for this page, Osmosis in Potato Tissue: Procedure and Explanation. Original passage written for this page.
    Invented results from one group that followed T3 (three cylinders per cup, soaked 50 minutes)
    CupSalt concentration (mol/L)Initial mass (g)Final mass (g)
    A0.010.2411.04
    B0.110.5110.84
    C0.29.879.71
    D0.310.129.51
    E0.410.369.39
  5. Closure5 minutes

    Exit ticket: "Choose one result from today (a curved spring graph, a smudged cuvette or a drink reading above 1.0). Quote the sentence in the text that explains it, and write what the procedure tells you to do next." Sort the tickets into "names the pattern and the cause," "names the cause but not the action" and "describes the result without the text."

    Teacher note on safety and the science. The procedures use no heat, flames or hazardous chemicals: food dye, table salt, potatoes, springs and an LED lamp. Students wear goggles for the spring test, and the teacher cuts the potato cylinders. The science in the texts is simplified in two ways worth discussing afterward. Beer's law holds for dilute solutions, and the 1.0 limit in T2 is a property of a typical school colorimeter, not a universal constant. In the solar panel text, reflection at large angles is one reason outputs fall below the cosine; the panel's design and the lamp's beam shape also play a part.

    Homework passage. The homework uses the solar panel procedure below. A small panel of this size typically gives around 100 mA in full sunlight, and a desk lamp gives only a few percent of full sunlight, so currents of a few milliamperes are expected; the numbers in the homework are invented on that scale.

    Purpose: to measure how the current from a small solar panel changes as the panel is tilted away from a light. Materials: a small solar panel about 6 cm by 8 cm; a digital multimeter set to measure direct current in milliamperes (mA); two connecting leads; an LED desk lamp; a protractor; a ruler; a stack of books. Use an LED lamp: other bulbs can get hot enough to burn skin, and they warm the panel.

    Setup. Darken the room: close the blinds and switch off the room lights. Connect the panel's leads directly to the multimeter. Place the lamp so that its beam points at the center of the panel from 30 cm away, measured along the beam. The tilt angle is the angle between the beam and a line straight out from the face of the panel, so at 0° the panel faces the lamp directly.

    Readings. Set the panel at 0°, wait 10 seconds and record the current. Repeat at 15°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 75°. Turn the panel about its own center each time; do not move the lamp.

    Final check. Return the panel to 0° and read the current again. If it differs from the first 0° reading by more than 5%, the lamp or the panel has shifted or warmed up: find the cause and repeat the whole series.

    Calculation. Divide each current by the first 0° current to get the relative output. Compare each relative output with the cosine of the tilt angle.

    What the results mean. A tilted panel presents a smaller area to the beam, so it intercepts less of the light, and the current falls in proportion to the cosine of the tilt angle. At 60° the panel should give about half of its 0° current. At large angles, measured outputs usually fall below the cosine, because more of the light is reflected from the panel's glossy surface instead of entering it.

    Other patterns. Light from windows or room lights reaches the panel at every tilt, so it adds a current that does not depend on the angle. It makes the relative outputs at large angles too high, above the cosine. To test for it, cover the lamp: the current should drop to almost zero.

    Written for this page, Solar Panel Output and Tilt Angle: Procedure and Explanation. Original passage written for this page.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a three-column analysis frame: "Specific result (with numbers)," "Sentence in the text that explains it," "What the procedure says to do"
  • Before each text, have students highlight the procedure and the explanation in two colors
  • Provide the best-fit lines already drawn so the analysis, not the graphing, is the focus

For Advanced Students

  • Write an "Other patterns" paragraph for the solar panel text that explains a result it does not yet cover, such as a panel partly in shadow
  • Using Activity 2, card 2, explain how the text's explanation lets you predict an error the text never describes, and design a check for it
  • Compare the analysis sections of two of the texts: which gives the reader more to work with, and why?

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Strong answers follow each procedure step exactly, then name the specific result (with numbers), quote the sentence that explains it and state the action the text calls for. Watch for students who describe a result without explaining it, who explain it with outside knowledge or "human error," who get the direction of an error wrong, or who stop at the diagnosis without saying what the procedure requires next.

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Spring Test Lab

20 minGroups of 3

Groups carry out the spring test (T1) with real springs, plot their own graph and then write an analysis that uses only the explanations in paragraphs 6 and 7. The goal is a result that is both precisely measured and explained by the text.

Procedure

  • Goggles on. Follow paragraphs 2-4 exactly, rotating roles (loader, reader, recorder) at each load
  • The recorder writes each extension with its unit and the pointer check after unloading
  • Plot F in newtons against x in meters on graph paper, draw the best-fit line and find its slope (paragraph 5)

Analysis (write three sentences)

  1. Do your points lie on a straight line? Quote paragraph 6.
  2. Does your line pass through the origin? If not, which sentence in paragraph 7 explains it?
  3. Is your slope a valid spring constant? Give the evidence from your unloading check.

Discussion Questions

  • Compare two groups' values of k for identical springs. Is the difference larger than the scatter paragraph 7 describes?
  • Why does paragraph 3 set a 300 g limit before paragraph 6 explains what happens past the elastic limit?

Variation Without Equipment

Give groups the data from the three examples in Direct Instruction with the conclusions removed, and have them write the analysis.

2

Results Clinic

15 minPairs

Pairs get six result cards from the colorimeter procedure (T2). Each card describes a specific result. For each one, the pair writes the diagnosis (which sentence in paragraphs 6-7, or which step in paragraphs 2-5, explains it) and the fix the procedure calls for.

The 6 Result Cards

  1. The 60% standard reads 0.648, above the line through the other four points; there is a thumbprint on a clear side
  2. A pair measured the standards from 100% down to 20% and did not rinse the cuvette between them
  3. A second sports drink reads 1.46, 1.48 and 1.47
  4. During the 40% reading, a bubble is stuck to the inside of the cuvette
  5. A pair drew their line through only the 80% and 100% points and read the drink from it
  6. A pair used one syringe for both the standard and the water, without rinsing it

Teacher Key

  • Card 1: paragraph 7, fingerprints make a reading "too high"; wipe with lens tissue, hold by the ridged sides and measure again
  • Card 2: two steps in paragraph 4 were broken (the order and the rinse). The explanation in paragraph 7 lets you predict the effect: the drops left behind are now more concentrated than the new solution, so each reading is slightly too high, the reverse of the case the text describes. Repeat in the right order
  • Card 3: paragraph 6, the mean (1.47) is above 1.0, so the reading is unreliable and too low; dilute with an equal volume of water, measure again and double the concentration
  • Card 4: paragraph 7, bubbles scatter light and make the reading too high; tap the cuvette or refill it and measure again
  • Card 5: paragraph 5 calls for the best-fit line through the origin for all five standards; redraw it
  • Card 6: paragraph 2 says to use one syringe "only for the standard and the other only for the water"; dye left in the syringe tints the water, so each dilution is stronger than its label. Make the dilutions again

Discussion Questions

  • Cards 1 and 4 have the same diagnosis. What in the text tells you they cause the same kind of error?
  • For card 2 the text does not state the answer. How did the explanation in paragraph 7 let you work it out?
3

Claim Check

15 minGroups of 4

Groups read the results and five claims from an invented student lab report on the spring test (T1), then label each claim supported by the text, contradicted by the text or not addressed by the text, citing a paragraph for each label.

The Student's Results

Loads of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 g gave extensions of 2.9, 5.4, 7.8, 10.4, 12.9 and 15.3 cm. After unloading, the pointer returned to within 0.1 cm of the zero position.

The 5 Claims

  1. "F ÷ x rises from 16.9 N/m at 50 g to 19.2 N/m at 300 g, so the spring gets stiffer as it stretches."
  2. "Our best-fit line does not pass through the origin, which suggests we misread the zero position."
  3. "The slope of our best-fit line gives k = 19.7 N/m."
  4. "The pointer returned to zero, so we stayed within the elastic limit."
  5. "The spring would have snapped at 350 g."

Teacher Key

  • Claim 1: contradicted. The ratios are right, but paragraph 7 explains the pattern: with a misread zero, "F ÷ x changes from load to load" while the slope stays correct
  • Claim 2: supported. Paragraph 7: the line "does not pass through the origin" when the zero position was misread (the line crosses the force axis at about -0.08 N)
  • Claim 3: supported. Paragraph 5 makes the slope the spring constant; the best-fit slope is 19.7 N/m
  • Claim 4: supported. Paragraph 6: within the elastic limit "the pointer returns to its zero position," and paragraph 4 sets the test at 0.2 cm
  • Claim 5: not addressed. The text sets a 300 g limit and describes permanent bending past the elastic limit; it never says the spring would break

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: Reading the Spring Graph with the Text's Explanation

Spring test (T1): force against extension 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 0 1 2 3 4 Extension x (cm) Force F (N) Loads of 50-300 g lie on a straight line: slope = k, about 20.0 N/m (paragraph 5) Open points, 350 g and 400 g: past the elastic limit, curving to larger x (paragraph 6)
The invented data from the first two worked examples, drawn to scale. Filled points (50-300 g) lie on the best-fit line, whose slope is the spring constant (T1, paragraph 5). The open red points (350 g and 400 g, beyond the 300 g limit in paragraph 3) curve away toward larger extensions, the pattern paragraph 6 explains as the elastic limit.

Diagram 2: A Colorimeter Calibration Line and Its Limit

Colorimeter calibration (T2): absorbance against concentration 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 Concentration (% of standard) Absorbance Upper limit of the straight line, about 1.0 (paragraph 6) 80%, smudged: too high undiluted drink: below the line diluted drink: on the line
The invented calibration from the Guided Practice example, drawn to scale. The five standards lie on a line through the origin (T2, paragraph 6). The smudged 80% reading sits above the line (paragraph 7), and the undiluted drink, above the 1.0 limit, falls below it (paragraph 6); after dilution, the drink's reading lies on the line.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

RST.11-12.3 Homework: Solar Panel Output and Tilt

Directions: Use the solar panel procedure printed at the end of the Closure phase of the lesson plan (paragraphs are numbered). The data in the problems are invented. Show your calculations, and for every analysis quote the sentence in the text that explains the result, with its paragraph number.

Part 1: Follow the Procedure Precisely (Problems 1-2)

  1. List every condition that must be true before the first reading is taken (paragraphs 1-3). For each, quote the words and say which later paragraph explains why it matters.
  2. At 60° the current is small, so Jon moves the lamp to 20 cm from the panel for the 60° and 75° readings. Name the instruction he broke, and use paragraph 6 to explain why his relative outputs at those angles can no longer be compared with the cosine.

Part 2: Analyze the Results (Problems 3-4)

  1. A group records these currents: 0°, 3.60 mA; 15°, 3.46 mA; 30°, 3.10 mA; 45°, 2.52 mA; 60°, 1.72 mA; 75°, 0.80 mA. The final check at 0° reads 3.58 mA. Find the relative output at each angle to three decimal places and compare each with the cosine of the angle. Is the final check within the limit in paragraph 4?
  2. Using your answer to Problem 3, identify the angles at which the relative output is furthest below the cosine. Explain this pattern with the explanation in paragraph 6, quoting it, and state whether the result supports the text's claim about 60°.

Part 3: Diagnose Unusual Results (Problems 5-6)

  1. A second group gets 4.00 mA at 0° and 1.38 mA at 75°. When they cover the lamp, the meter still reads 0.30 mA. Calculate their relative output at 75° and compare it with the cosine. Which pattern in paragraph 7 explains the result, and what should the group change before repeating the series?
  2. A third group's first 0° reading is 3.60 mA and their final check reads 3.36 mA. Write a paragraph (5-7 sentences) that decides whether their series can be used, shows the calculation, names the possible causes the text gives, and explains why a drift like this makes the relative outputs unreliable.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Following the ProcedureEvery step and condition is identified exactly, including distances, angles and the 5% checkOne condition is missing or stated looselySteps are missing or invented
CalculationsRelative outputs, cosines and percent differences are correct to three decimal placesOne or two arithmetic slipsCalculations are missing or wrong
Analysis from the TextEach specific result is explained by the matching sentence in paragraphs 6-7, quoted, with a clear judgmentThe right explanation is named without the specific numbers, or the numbers without the explanationThe analysis uses outside ideas or none
Next StepsStates what the procedure says to do (repeat, remove stray light, restore the setup) and whyStates an action without the reasonNo action, or one the text does not support

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

All questions are about the potato osmosis procedure and the table of invented results in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan (paragraphs are numbered). Cite paragraphs in your short answers. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to paragraph 2, how is each cylinder blotted before it is weighed?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which condition in paragraph 3 must be the same for every cup?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Why does the procedure use percent change instead of change in grams?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Using the results table, what is the percent change in mass for cup A?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In which cups did the results show a net movement of water into the potato cells?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Using the results table, what is the percent change in mass for cup D?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Between which two concentrations does this group's line cross zero percent change?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Cup B changed by +3.14% and cup C by -1.62%. Estimating along a straight line between the two cups, at what concentration is the change zero?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    According to paragraph 6, what does the concentration where the line crosses zero tell you?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A student in this group forgot to blot cup E's cylinders after soaking. How did that affect cup E's result?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Another group left cup D uncovered in a warm, dry room. How does paragraph 7 say this changes cup D's result?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    One cylinder in cup A still had a strip of skin on it. According to paragraph 7, how would that change cup A's result?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A group soaked cup C for only 20 minutes and the other cups for 50 minutes. What is the best judgment about cup C's result?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Short Answer

    Calculate the percent change in mass for cup E. Then describe the pattern across all five cups and explain it with paragraph 6.

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer

    Explain, using the osmosis explanation in paragraph 6, why cup A gained mass and cup E lost mass. Use the words "solute" and "net movement" correctly.

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    Another group reports that their line crosses zero at 0.31 mol/L. You find that they did not blot cup D after soaking. Explain how that mistake could move their crossing point, using paragraph 7.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    Set X starts at 6.20 g and gains 0.40 g. Set Y starts at 12.40 g and gains 0.62 g. A student says set Y responded more strongly. Evaluate the claim with a calculation and paragraph 6.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    Why must the cylinders be blotted in the same way before and after soaking? Answer with paragraphs 2, 4 and 7.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    To save time, a classmate plans to weigh all fifteen cylinders together before soaking and then weigh each cup's three cylinders separately after soaking. Will this plan let them follow paragraph 5? Explain.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    Suppose the experiment is repeated with sweet potato, whose cells hold more dissolved sugar than ordinary potato cells. Predict where the line would cross zero, and justify the prediction with paragraph 6.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does RST.11-12.3 mean?

RST.11-12.3 asks students in grades 11-12 to follow a complex multistep procedure precisely, in an experiment, a measurement or a technical task, and then to analyze their specific results using the explanations the text itself gives. "RST" is the set of Reading Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects. The second half is what sets the 11-12 standard apart: students must say what their own numbers mean according to the text.

How is RST.11-12.3 different from RST.9-10.3?

RST.9-10.3 ends with special cases and exceptions; RST.11-12.3 adds analysis of results. Both ask students to follow a complex procedure precisely. The 9-10 standard focuses on applying the special cases the text defines. The 11-12 standard asks students to "analyze the specific results based on explanations in the text": to judge whether a result fits the model the text describes and, if not, which of the text's explanations accounts for it.

What does "analyze the specific results based on explanations in the text" look like?

Students compare their actual numbers with what the text says should happen, then use the text's own reasons to explain any difference. On this page, a curved spring graph is explained by the elastic limit in the text, and a colorimeter reading above 1.0 by the limit of the straight-line relationship. Good analysis names the specific result, quotes the explanation and says what the procedure calls for next.

Is RST.11-12.3 taught in science class or English class?

Usually in upper-level science and technical courses such as Chemistry, Physics, Biology or engineering classes, where students follow written procedures. The literacy standards give science and technical teachers a share of the responsibility for reading. English 11 and 12 can also use technical manuals and lab texts to teach it.

Can students practice RST.11-12.3 without doing the experiment?

Yes. Students can analyze invented or recorded results against a procedure's explanation, as the quiz and homework on this page do. Doing the procedure (Activity 1) adds something reading alone cannot: students find out how easily a step is done loosely, and they analyze results they measured themselves.

What makes a procedure "complex" at grades 11-12?

A complex procedure has many dependent steps, precise quantities and units, conditions on order or timing, calculations and an explanation that ties results to a model. The texts on this page each combine several of these: a load limit and a unit conversion in the spring test, an order of measurement and a dilution rule in the colorimeter procedure, and a calculation from a graph in the osmosis lab.

What are common mistakes when students analyze results?

Students often describe the result without explaining it ("cup E lost mass"), explain it with outside knowledge instead of the text, or blame "human error" without saying which error and in which direction. Another frequent slip is ignoring what the text says to do next, such as diluting a sample or replacing a damaged spring.

How does RST.11-12.3 connect to NGSS practices?

It supports the practices of planning and carrying out investigations and of analyzing and interpreting data. Students follow a procedure accurately and then interpret their data with a model, which is the same move scientists make when a result does not fit. It is a reading standard, so the explanations come from the text rather than from new science content.

How do you grade an analysis of results?

Look for three things: the specific result with its numbers, the sentence in the text that explains it (quoted and cited), and the judgment or action that follows. The rubric in the homework uses these criteria. An analysis that is correct science but not based on the text meets the science goal but not this standard.

Does RST.11-12.3 help with college and career readiness?

Yes. College labs, technical training and many jobs require following written procedures and troubleshooting results with a manual. The standard names both skills, following steps precisely and interpreting what the results mean, which are the skills a technician uses when a reading looks wrong.