SVHS Website Header

SVHS Website Header Component

Scroll down or resize the browser to test responsive behavior. Hover over the nav items to open mega menus.

My Cart

RL.8.7Common CoreELAReading LiteratureGrade 8

RL.8.7: Page to Stage and Screen, How Faithful Is the Production?

In plain English: RL.8.7 is the Common Core grade 8 ELA standard that asks students to analyze how closely a filmed or live production of a story or play follows the text or script, and to evaluate the choices its director and actors made. Students line up the script with the production, sort each choice as kept, cut, added or changed, and judge whether it serves the story. It builds on RL.7.7.

Analyze the extent to which a filmed or live production of a story or drama stays faithful to or departs from the text or script, evaluating the choices made by the director or actors.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literature · Cluster: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas · Official standard

01

Lesson Plan

55-70 min

Overview

Students analyze how far a production of a play or story stays faithful to its script and where it departs from it, then evaluate the choices made by the director and the actors. The lesson uses the ending of Lady Gregory's one-act play The Rising of the Moon (1907), in which a police sergeant must decide whether to hand over an escaped rebel, and two imagined productions of that ending written for this page: a stage production and a short film. Because the productions are described in words, every choice can be checked line by line against the script, and no video is needed.

Students then work on their own with a comic scene from Lord Dunsany's The Lost Silk Hat and notes for an imagined film of it. The homework applies the same skill to a story, the opening of Saki's "The Story-Teller," and an imagined film version. The method is the same each time: quote the text, describe the choice, name it (kept, cut, added or changed), and judge what the choice does to the story.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Compare a production's choices with the script or story, quoting the lines each choice comes from
  • Classify a production choice as faithful or as a departure (a cut, an addition or a change)
  • Judge the overall extent to which a production stays faithful to or departs from the text
  • Evaluate a director's or actor's choice by explaining its effect on meaning, character or tone

Prior Knowledge Required

Students should already be comfortable with:

  • Comparing a written story or drama with its filmed or staged version and the techniques of each medium RL.7.7
  • Citing the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis RL.8.1
  • Analyzing how lines of dialogue or incidents reveal a character or provoke a decision RL.8.3
  • Reading a script: telling characters' lines from stage directions

Lesson Procedure

55-70 minutes of class time across 5 phases.

  1. Warm-Up5-10 minutes

    Warm-Up Prompt

    "Think of a story you read and then saw as a movie, a show or a school play. Name one thing the production kept exactly, one thing it cut or added, and one thing you would have done differently if you had been the director."

    Collect a few answers on the board in two columns, "Kept" and "Changed." Students will often complain that a movie "ruined" a book. Ask what exactly was changed, and whether the change hurt the story or simply made it different. RL.8.7 asks for both steps: first find how far a production follows the text, then judge whether its choices work. A change is not automatically a mistake, and following the text is not automatically a success.

  2. Direct Instruction15-20 minutes

    Terms to know:

    • Script: the written text of a play: the characters' words plus the stage directions, the author's notes (usually in italics) about the set, movement and how lines are said.
    • Production: one staging of a play on a stage, or one film of a story or play. The same script can have many productions.
    • Director: the person who decides how the whole production looks and sounds: the set, the lighting, what is cut or added, and how the actors move. Actor: a performer who decides, with the director, how a character speaks and moves.
    • Faithful: a choice that keeps the words, events and meaning of the text. Departure: a choice that moves away from the text. A production can depart in three ways: it can cut something, add something, or change something (a setting, an order, or the way the script says a line is spoken).
    • Interpretation: filling in what the script leaves open, such as how long a pause lasts or where an actor looks. It stays faithful as long as it does not contradict the text.
    • Extent: how far. RL.8.7 asks for the extent to which a production is faithful, so the answer is never just "faithful" or "not faithful" but "faithful in these ways, and it departs in these ways."
    • Evaluate: judge whether a choice works, with a reason: what does the choice do to the story's meaning, a character or the tone (the feeling of the scene, such as tense, sad or comic)?
    • Close-up: a film shot taken very near a face or an object, so it fills the screen. Voice-over: a voice heard on a film's soundtrack while the speaker is not seen speaking.

    Introduce the play. Lady Gregory (1852-1932) was an Irish playwright who helped found the Abbey Theatre in Dublin. The Rising of the Moon was first staged there in 1907, when Ireland was ruled by Britain. Its first stage direction reads: "Scene: Side of a quay in a seaport town. Some posts and chains. A large barrel. Enter three policemen. Moonlight." A Sergeant is guarding the quay (a stone landing place beside the water, pronounced "key") to catch a rebel who has escaped from prison. A ragged ballad-singer (a man who sells printed songs) talks his way into keeping watch with him. They sit back to back on the barrel, and the singer's songs about Granuaile (Grace O'Malley, an Irish sea captain of the 1500s, whose name in old songs stands for Ireland) remind the Sergeant that he sang the same rebel songs as a young man. When a whistle answers the singer's song from a boat below, the Sergeant realizes who the man is. The excerpt begins at that moment.

    Words to know: placard (a printed poster, here a wanted notice with a reward), a hundred pounds on my head (a reward of 100 British pounds for catching me), deceived (fooled), comrades (fellow workers, here the other policemen; the Man later uses "comrade" to mean friend), betray (hand over to an enemy), bogwood (old wood dug from a bog and burned as fuel), the small rise up and the big fall down (the poor and powerless take the place of the rich and powerful). Read the script aloud once, with three volunteers, before reading either set of production notes. Tell students that Productions A and B are imagined productions written for this lesson, so that every choice can be checked against the script.

    Sergeant: You are the man I am looking for.

    Man: (Takes off hat and wig. Sergeant seizes them.) I am. There's a hundred pounds on my head. There is a friend of mine below in a boat. He knows a safe place to bring me to.

    Sergeant: (Looking still at hat and wig.) It's a pity! It's a pity. You deceived me. You deceived me well.

    [...]

    (Voice of Policeman X outside:) Here, this is where we left him.

    Sergeant: It's my comrades coming.

    Man: You won't betray me ... the friend of Granuaile. (Slips behind barrel.)

    [...]

    (Sergeant puts hat and wig behind his back.)

    Policeman B: Did any one come this way?

    Sergeant: (After a pause.) No one.

    Policeman B: No one at all?

    Sergeant: No one at all.

    [...]

    Policeman B: Well, we'll leave you the lantern anyhow. (Hands it to him.)

    Sergeant: I don't want it. Bring it with you.

    Policeman B: You might want it. There are clouds coming up and you have the darkness of the night before you yet. I'll leave it over here on the barrel. (Goes to barrel.)

    Sergeant: Bring it with you I tell you. No more talk.

    Policeman B: Well, I thought it might be a comfort to you. I often think when I have it in my hand and can be flashing it about into every dark corner (doing so) that it's the same as being beside the fire at home, and the bits of bogwood blazing up now and again.

    (Flashes it about, now on the barrel, now on Sergeant.)

    Sergeant: (Furious.) Be off the two of you, yourselves and your lantern!

    (They go out. Man comes from behind barrel. He and Sergeant stand looking at one another.)

    Sergeant: What are you waiting for?

    Man: For my hat, of course, and my wig. You wouldn't wish me to get my death of cold?

    (Sergeant gives them.)

    Man: (Going towards steps.) Well, good-night, comrade, and thank you. You did me a good turn to-night, and I'm obliged to you. Maybe I'll be able to do as much for you when the small rise up and the big fall down ... when we all change places at the Rising (waves his hand and disappears) of the Moon.

    Sergeant: (Turning his back to audience and reading placard.) A hundred pounds reward! A hundred pounds! (Turns towards audience.) I wonder, now, am I as great a fool as I think I am?

    Lady Gregory, The Rising of the Moon, the ending (shortened) (1907; this edition 1916). Public domain (published 1916). Source text.

    Director's note. Our stage production follows Lady Gregory's script closely. The set is what her stage directions call for: the side of a quay with posts and chains, one large barrel, and a flight of steps down to the water. A pale blue light stands in for the moon.

    The disguise. When the Man takes off his hat and wig, the actor does it slowly, so the audience sees for the first time that he is a young man with short dark hair. The Sergeant takes them from him and holds them at arm's length, as if they might burn his hands.

    The pause. The script says only that the Sergeant answers "No one" after a pause. Our actor lets five slow seconds pass. He looks at the barrel, then at the two policemen, and only then answers. We want the audience to hold its breath, not knowing which way he will go.

    The lantern. Policeman B flashes the lantern about just as the script says, now on the barrel, now on the Sergeant. We added one moment: the beam stops on the barrel for a full second, right where the Man is hiding, before it moves on. The Sergeant's furious shout comes straight after that beam.

    The last line. As the script directs, the Sergeant turns toward the audience for his final question. Our actor does not play it for a laugh. He asks it slowly, as if he really does not know the answer, and the lights fade on him alone beside the placard.

    Lesson author, Production A: a stage production (imagined director's notes). Original passage written for this page.

    Filmmaker's note. Our twelve-minute film was shot on a real stone harbor at night. A camera can get closer than any theater seat, so we used it to show what the characters hide from one another.

    The disguise. The scene opens on a close-up of the hat and wig in the Sergeant's hands. When the two policemen walk up, the camera moves behind him, and viewers see the wig squeezed in his fist behind his back, where the other men cannot see it.

    The answer. Our Sergeant answers "No one" at once, in a flat voice, without looking at the barrel. The actor felt that a man who has already made up his mind would not stop to think.

    A cut. We cut Policeman B's speech about the lantern reminding him of the fire at home. One shot of the lantern beam sliding across the barrel does the same job in two seconds, and the scene moves faster.

    An addition. The script simply has the Man wave his hand and disappear. We added a shot of a rowboat pulling away across the black water, with the Man looking back at the quay while someone in the boat whistles the tune of his song.

    The ending. We cut the Sergeant's last line. Instead, he tears the placard off the barrel, crumples it and drops it into the harbor, and the film ends on the paper floating away in the dark. We wanted the ending to be clear: the Sergeant has chosen his side.

    Lesson author, Production B: a short film (imagined filmmaker's notes). Original passage written for this page.
    • Faithful: a choice that follows the script

      The script gives one stage direction for the Sergeant's lie: "(After a pause.) No one" (paragraph 9). What does Production A do with it?

      Result: Production A keeps the words and the pause, and makes the pause longer: the actor "lets five slow seconds pass" and looks "at the barrel, then at the two policemen" before answering. This is faithful. The script asks for a pause, and the actor fills it with what the Sergeant is thinking about: the hidden man and his fellow police. Evaluation: a strong choice, because the pause is the moment the Sergeant decides, and the director says the goal is an audience "not knowing which way he will go."

    • Departure: a cut

      Production B cuts Policeman B's speech about the lantern (paragraph 16). What is lost?

      Result: The speech shows that Policeman B is a kind man who thinks of the lantern as "a comfort," like "being beside the fire at home." With it, the Sergeant is lying to a friendly comrade, which makes his choice harder and the scene sadder. The film's reason is speed: "One shot of the lantern beam sliding across the barrel does the same job in two seconds." Evaluation: the beam keeps the danger, but it loses the friendship, so the cut departs from the script's meaning as well as its words.

    • Departure: an addition

      Production B adds a shot of "a rowboat pulling away across the black water." Does the addition fit the script?

      Result: The script never shows the boat, but it tells us about it: "There is a friend of mine below in a boat" (paragraph 2). A stage cannot show open water; a film can. Evaluation: this addition departs from what the script puts on stage but not from its story, because it shows an event the script already describes. It is a small departure that uses the strength of film.

    • Evaluating a large departure: the ending

      The script ends with the Sergeant asking the audience, "I wonder, now, am I as great a fool as I think I am?" (paragraph 24). Production B cuts the line and has him tear up the placard. Evaluate the choice.

      Result: The script ends on a question. The Sergeant has let the man go, yet he still reads "A hundred pounds reward!" and wonders whether he was a fool, so the play leaves him torn between the reward and his old loyalty. The film replaces the question with an answer: he "has chosen his side." Evaluation: the ending is clear and strong on screen, but it departs from the script's meaning, because Lady Gregory leaves the audience to decide. Production A keeps that doubt: its actor asks the line "as if he really does not know the answer."

    Quote it, match it, name it, judge it. Model four moves for every choice (Diagram 2): quote the script; match it to what the production does; name the choice as kept, cut, added or changed; and judge what it does to the meaning, a character or the tone. Give two sentence frames: "The script says ___ (paragraph __), and the production ___, so the choice is ___." and "This choice works / does not work because it ___ the ___ of the scene."

  3. Guided Practice15 minutes

    Pairs compare Productions A and B, choice by choice, and fill in Diagram 1 with the class. Ask each question before revealing the teacher note.

    1. The disguise. The script says "(Sergeant puts hat and wig behind his back.)" (paragraph 7). Is either production unfaithful here? Teacher note: both keep the action. Production A adds an actor's choice when the Sergeant first takes them: he "holds them at arm's length, as if they might burn his hands," which shows he does not want to be caught with them. Production B adds a camera choice, a shot of "the wig squeezed in his fist behind his back." Both additions support the script, because each shows the danger of the secret he is keeping.
    2. The answer. Production A's Sergeant waits five seconds before "No one"; Production B's answers "at once, in a flat voice." Which one departs from the script, and is the departure defensible? Teacher note: B departs, because the script calls for a pause. B's actor has a reason ("a man who has already made up his mind would not stop to think"), but the script's ending suggests the Sergeant has not fully made up his mind: he still wonders whether he is "as great a fool" as he thinks. Accept either judgment if the student uses the script as evidence.
    3. The extent. Count the departures in each production and judge how large each one is. Teacher note: A's only clear addition is small (the beam stops on the barrel), and it serves the script's suspense; its other choices, such as the five-second pause and the quiet last line, fill in what the script leaves open without contradicting it. B departs four times: the quick answer, the cut lantern speech, the added rowboat and the new ending. The rowboat is small; the new ending changes the play's meaning. So A is faithful with one small departure, and B is faithful to the events up to the escape but departs from the play's meaning at the end.

    Each pair then writes three sentences: one about a faithful choice, one about a departure, and one that evaluates a choice, each with a paragraph number from the script and a quotation from the production notes.

  4. Independent Practice15 minutes

    Students now work on their own with a comic scene. Lord Dunsany (1878-1957) was an Irish writer of plays and fantasy stories. The Lost Silk Hat is a one-act comedy whose stage direction sets it on "A fashionable London street." A well-dressed man, the Caller, has left his silk hat (a tall, shiny hat that gentlemen wore) inside a house he cannot go back into, and he asks people passing by to fetch it for him. The first passer-by is a Laborer (a man who does physical work for a living). Read the script first, then the notes for an imagined film of it.

    Words to know: faultlessly dressed (perfectly dressed), engrosses (fills his mind), to see to the drains (to check the pipes), drawing-room (a formal sitting room), sovereign (a British gold coin worth one pound), rise it (raise it), heir (the person who will inherit a house or money), defrauded (cheated out of what is rightly theirs), I got you there (I caught you out). The Laborer's dropped "h" ("'at" for "hat") shows how he speaks.

    The Caller stands on a doorstep, "faultlessly dressed," but without a hat. At first he shows despair, then a new thought engrosses him.

    Enter the Laborer.

    THE CALLER: Excuse me a moment. Excuse me--but--I'd be greatly obliged to you if--if you could see your way--in fact, you can be of great service to me if--

    THE LABORER: Glad to do what I can, sir.

    CALLER: Well, all I really want you to do is just to ring that bell and go up and say--er--say that you've come to see to the drains, or anything like that, you know, and get hold of my hat for me.

    LABORER: Get hold of your 'at!

    CALLER: Yes. You see, I left my hat behind most unfortunately. It's in the drawing-room (points to window), that room there, half under the long sofa, the far end from the door. And if you could possibly go and get it, why I'd be (The Laborer's expression changes)--Why, what's the matter?

    LABORER (firmly): I don't like this job.

    CALLER: Don't like this job! But my dear fellow, don't be silly, what possible harm--?

    LABORER: Ah-h. That's what I don't know.

    [...]

    CALLER: I only want my hat--Here, I say, please don't go away--here's a sovereign, it will only take you a minute.

    LABORER: What I want to know--

    CALLER: Yes?

    LABORER: --Is what's in that hat?

    CALLER: What's in the hat?

    LABORER: Yes; that's what I want to know.

    CALLER: What's in the hat?

    LABORER: Yes, you aren't going to give me a sovereign--?

    CALLER: I'll give you two sovereigns.

    LABORER: You aren't going to give me a sovereign, and rise it to two sovereigns, for an empty hat?

    CALLER: But I must have my hat. I can't be seen in the streets like this. There's nothing in the hat. What do you think's in the hat?

    LABORER: Ah, I'm not clever enough to say that, but it looks as if the papers was in that hat.

    CALLER: The papers?

    LABORER: Yes, papers proving, if you can get them, that you're the heir to that big house, and some poor innocent will be defrauded.

    CALLER: Look here, the hat's absolutely empty. I must have my hat. If there's anything in it you shall have it yourself as well as the two pounds, only get me my hat.

    [...]

    CALLER: Oh, for heaven's sake--

    LABORER: Ah!

    CALLER: What a hopeless fool you are.

    LABORER: Ah!

    CALLER: Look here.

    LABORER: Ah, I got you there, mister.

    CALLER: Look here, for goodness sake don't go.

    LABORER: Ah! (Exit)

    Lord Dunsany, The Lost Silk Hat, the Caller and the Laborer (shortened) (1914; this edition 1922). Public domain (published 1922). Source text.

    Director's note. Our short film keeps The Lost Silk Hat in the London of Dunsany's own time, just before 1914. We filmed on a street of tall white houses with black railings. The Caller wears a long black coat, gray gloves and a flower in his buttonhole: perfectly dressed, except for his bare head.

    A new opening. The script begins with the Caller already standing on the doorstep. Our film begins one minute earlier, with no words. Through the drawing-room window, viewers watch the Caller and a young woman arguing. He rushes out and slams the front door, and the camera shows his hat left behind on the carpet.

    The Laborer. The actor keeps every dropped "h" that the script spells out, as in "your 'at." He plays the Laborer as a man who is proud of being hard to fool, and he taps the side of his nose each time he says "Ah!"

    The papers. We cut the Laborer's guess that the hat hides papers about the heir to the big house. We felt the scene was long enough without it.

    The hat question. The Caller says "What's in the hat?" twice in a row. The second time, the actor turns and looks straight into the camera, as if asking the viewers whether the Laborer has lost his mind.

    The money. When the Caller offers a sovereign, we show a close-up of the gold coin in his glove, so that viewers who have never seen one know it is real money. When he offers two, the Laborer grins and holds out his hand.

    The music. Quick, light piano music plays under the whole scene, like the music in an old silent comedy, and it stops dead each time the Laborer says "Ah!"

    Lesson author, A film of The Lost Silk Hat (imagined director's notes). Original passage written for this page.

    On the handout, students fill in a three-column chart (What the script says, What the film does, Kept, cut, added or changed?) for every paragraph of the film notes. Then they write two sentences: one that judges the overall extent to which the film is faithful, and one that evaluates the choice they think matters most. The quiz uses this scene and these notes, so do not discuss answers until students have finished the chart.

  5. Closure5-10 minutes

    Exit ticket: (1) In one sentence, explain the difference between saying a production is faithful and saying it is good. (2) Pick one choice from Production A or B and write one sentence that evaluates it, with a paragraph number from the script.

    Teacher note on language and content: the texts are kept exactly as published, including older spellings such as "to-night," the Laborer's dropped "h" and British spellings in Saki's story. The Rising of the Moon is set during the long conflict over British rule in Ireland: the Sergeant is a policeman in the force that kept order for the British government, and the Man is a rebel against it. The play treats both men with sympathy, and it drew complaints from both sides. Lady Gregory's own note in this edition says some "extreme Nationalists" objected before it was staged that it showed the police "in too favourable a light," and a Unionist paper attacked it afterward because the policeman was shown "as a coward and a traitor." The lesson asks students to analyze the production choices, not to take a side in the politics. The cut part of the excerpt includes a hint that the rebel might use force; nothing violent happens on stage. Saki's narrator is openly unkind about the aunt and the children, which is part of the humor and a question in the homework.

    For homework: students read the opening of a short story and notes for an imagined film of it, printed below. Hector Hugh Munro (1870-1916), who wrote as Saki, was a British writer of short, sharp comic stories. In "The Story-Teller," an aunt is traveling by train with three children, and a stranger shares their compartment (a small closed room in a railway carriage). Words to know: sultry (hot and damp), bachelor (an unmarried man), emphatically (very clearly), persistent (refusing to stop), reluctantly (unwillingly), diversion (something that turns attention away), resolute (determined), audible (loud enough to hear), wager (a bet), communication cord (a cord that passengers could pull to stop the train in an emergency), listlessly (without energy), estimation (opinion). "On the Road to Mandalay" is the refrain of "Mandalay," a poem by Rudyard Kipling that was well known in Britain at the time.

    It was a hot afternoon, and the railway carriage was correspondingly sultry, and the next stop was at Templecombe, nearly an hour ahead. The occupants of the carriage were a small girl, and a smaller girl, and a small boy. An aunt belonging to the children occupied one corner seat, and the further corner seat on the opposite side was occupied by a bachelor who was a stranger to their party, but the small girls and the small boy emphatically occupied the compartment. Both the aunt and the children were conversational in a limited, persistent way, reminding one of the attentions of a housefly that refuses to be discouraged. Most of the aunt’s remarks seemed to begin with “Don’t,” and nearly all of the children’s remarks began with “Why?” The bachelor said nothing out loud. “Don’t, Cyril, don’t,” exclaimed the aunt, as the small boy began smacking the cushions of the seat, producing a cloud of dust at each blow.

    “Come and look out of the window,” she added.

    The child moved reluctantly to the window. “Why are those sheep being driven out of that field?” he asked.

    “I expect they are being driven to another field where there is more grass,” said the aunt weakly.

    “But there is lots of grass in that field,” protested the boy; “there’s nothing else but grass there. Aunt, there’s lots of grass in that field.”

    [...]

    The frown on the bachelor’s face was deepening to a scowl. He was a hard, unsympathetic man, the aunt decided in her mind. She was utterly unable to come to any satisfactory decision about the grass in the other field.

    The smaller girl created a diversion by beginning to recite “On the Road to Mandalay.” She only knew the first line, but she put her limited knowledge to the fullest possible use. She repeated the line over and over again in a dreamy but resolute and very audible voice; it seemed to the bachelor as though some one had had a bet with her that she could not repeat the line aloud two thousand times without stopping. Whoever it was who had made the wager was likely to lose his bet.

    “Come over here and listen to a story,” said the aunt, when the bachelor had looked twice at her and once at the communication cord.

    The children moved listlessly towards the aunt’s end of the carriage. Evidently her reputation as a story-teller did not rank high in their estimation.

    Saki (H. H. Munro), The Story-Teller, the opening (shortened) (1914). Public domain (published 1914). Source text.

    Director's note. Our short film moves Saki's story to a crowded commuter train today, on a hot afternoon when the air conditioning has broken down. The characters keep almost all of their words from the story. We added one detail to explain the setting: the aunt's phone has a dead battery, so she has nothing to keep the children busy.

    No narrator. Saki's narrator tells readers that "The bachelor said nothing out loud," and that the aunt "decided in her mind" he was a hard man. Our film has no voice-over. Instead, the camera keeps returning to the bachelor's face, and the actor lets his frown grow a little deeper each time a child asks "Why?"

    The housefly. The story compares the aunt and the children to a housefly "that refuses to be discouraged." A camera cannot film a comparison, so we filmed a real fly bumping against the train window, again and again, while the questions go on.

    The dust. When Cyril smacks the seat cushions, each cloud of dust rises in slow motion through a beam of sunlight from the window.

    The poem. We replaced "On the Road to Mandalay" with the first line of a nursery rhyme, because we thought few viewers today would know Kipling's poem. The smaller girl still repeats her one line over and over in the dreamy but loud voice the story describes.

    A cut. We cut the moment when the bachelor looks at the communication cord. On a modern train the red emergency handle looks too serious, and we did not want viewers to think he might really stop the train.

    The aunt. The actor plays the aunt as a tired, kind woman who is doing her best. When she answers Cyril's questions about the sheep, she speaks gently and patiently, and viewers feel sorry for her.

    Lesson author, A film of The Story-Teller (imagined director's notes). Original passage written for this page.

Differentiation Strategies

For Struggling Students

  • Give a four-box card to use for every choice: What does the script say? What does the production do? Kept, cut, added or changed? What does it change about the story?
  • Before the film notes, have them highlight every stage direction in the script in one color and every line a production changes in another
  • Let them act out paragraphs 7-11 of the Rising of the Moon excerpt with a partner, once with a pause and once without, before they write about the two productions

For Advanced Students

  • Ask them to write director's notes for a third production of the Rising of the Moon ending that departs from the script at least twice, and to defend both departures in a paragraph
  • Have them argue in a paragraph whether a departure can ever be more faithful to a play's meaning than a choice that keeps every word, using the ending of Production B as their test case
  • Ask them to compare the Man's last speech, "when the small rise up and the big fall down," with Production B's added boat, and explain what the film shows and what it leaves out

Assessment Guidance

What to Look For

Check that each answer quotes or points to the script or story, describes exactly what the production does, names the kind of choice (kept, cut, added or changed) and then judges it with a reason tied to meaning, character or tone. Strong answers judge the extent: they weigh small departures against large ones instead of calling a whole production "faithful" or "unfaithful." Weak answers list differences without judging them, or judge a choice only by personal taste ("it was boring").

02

Classroom Activities

3 Activities

1

Kept, Cut, Added or Changed?

15 minPairs

Pairs get 8 cards, each describing a choice from a third imagined production of the Rising of the Moon ending, and a mat with four columns: Kept, Cut, Added and Changed. For each card, they find the paragraph of the script it comes from, write the number on the card and place it in a column.

The Cards

  • The Man slips behind the barrel to hide
  • The Man hides inside the barrel and pulls its lid shut
  • The Sergeant pushes the hat and wig into his coat pocket instead of holding them behind his back
  • Policeman X's line "Here, this is where we left him" is not spoken; the policemen simply walk in
  • The Man shakes the Sergeant's hand before he says "good-night, comrade"
  • The Sergeant hands back the hat and wig without a word
  • Policeman B points out the clouds, and a rumble of thunder follows his words
  • The Sergeant says his last line and then walks off the stage, leaving the placard behind

Procedure

  • Pairs place all 8 cards and write a paragraph number from the script on each one
  • They compare with another pair and settle any card placed differently by rereading the script
  • Each pair picks one card they think helps the play and one they think hurts it, and writes one sentence of evaluation for each
  • Answer key for the teacher: Kept: slips behind the barrel (paragraph 6), hands back the hat and wig without a word (paragraph 22). Cut: Policeman X's line (paragraph 4). Added: the handshake (paragraph 23), the thunder (paragraph 14), walking off the stage (paragraph 24; the script ends with him facing the audience). Changed: hiding inside the barrel (paragraph 6), the coat pocket (paragraph 7)

Discussion Questions

  • Which card changes the meaning of the scene most, and which changes it least?
  • Hiding inside the barrel is a change of only a few inches. Why might it still matter to the scene with the lantern?
  • Is the handshake faithful to the Man's words "good-night, comrade, and thank you" even though the script never asks for it?

Modification

For students who need support, use two columns, Kept and Not kept, and four cards (behind the barrel, inside the barrel, the hat and wig handed back, the thunder), with the paragraph number already printed on each card.

2

Direct It Two Ways

15 minGroups of 3

Groups become the director and actors. They stage paragraphs 7-11 of the Rising of the Moon excerpt (the lie to Policeman B) twice, with two different sets of choices, and the class evaluates which version serves the script better.

Roles and Setup

  • One student plays the Sergeant, one plays Policeman B, and one is the director, who also reads the stage directions aloud
  • A chair or a crate stands in for the barrel; a folded sheet of paper stands in for the hat and wig

Procedure

  • Version 1: follow the script exactly, including "(After a pause.)" The director decides how long the pause lasts and where the Sergeant looks
  • Version 2: the director makes one departure: cut the pause, add a movement, or have the Sergeant say "No one at all" in a new way (laughing, angry or whispering)
  • The group performs both versions for another group, which writes one sentence on what the departure changed and one sentence judging whether it works

Discussion Questions

  • Which version made the audience believe the Sergeant's lie, and which made them doubt it?
  • Did the director's departure change the Sergeant's character, or only the tone of the moment?
  • What did you have to decide as actors that the script does not tell you?

Variation

Stage paragraph 24, the Sergeant's last line, twice instead: once as a joke at his own expense and once as a real, worried question. The audience judges which delivery fits "A hundred pounds reward!" and the rest of the scene better.

3

Critic's Corner

10-15 minIndividual, then pairs

Students write a short review of one of the two productions, as a theater or film critic would, then trade with a partner who checks it against a four-point checklist.

Model

A model review sentence about a different moment, the Man's exit: "Production A says nothing about the exit, so it keeps the script's quick wave and disappearance, and the escape stays a surprise; Production B shows the rowboat, which makes the escape real but gives the audience nothing left to imagine." The sentence names the choice, points to the script and judges the effect.

Procedure

  • Each student picks Production A or B and writes a review of 5-6 sentences: one sentence on the overall extent to which it is faithful, two choices that are described and named, and a judgment of each with a paragraph number from the script
  • Partners trade and check four points: script quoted, choice named, effect explained, extent judged
  • Writers revise one sentence based on the check

Discussion Questions

  • Did any two reviewers judge the same choice differently? What evidence did each use?
  • Can a review praise a production that departs from the script? What would it need to show?

03

Diagrams & Visual Aids

2 diagrams

Diagram 1: One Scene, Two Productions

The ending of The Rising of the Moon: script and two productions Moment in the script Production A (stage) Production B (film) Hat and wig hidden behind his back (par. 7) KEPT Kept; he holds them at arm's length at first KEPT Kept, in a close-up of the wig in his fist “No one,” after a pause (par. 9) KEPT Five slow seconds before he answers CHANGED Answers at once, in a flat voice Policeman B's lantern speech (par. 14-16) ADDED Speech kept; the beam stops on the barrel CUT One shot of the beam instead The Man waves and disappears (par. 23) KEPT Not mentioned: the script's exit stands ADDED A rowboat on the water, a whistled tune Last line, spoken to the audience (par. 24) KEPT Asked slowly, as a real question CUT Placard torn up and dropped in the harbor faithful (the text is kept; details may be filled in) departure (cut, added or changed)
Five moments from the ending of The Rising of the Moon (paragraph numbers from the excerpt) and what each imagined production does with them. Production A keeps every moment and adds one small beat; Production B keeps the disguise, changes the answer, cuts the lantern speech, adds the rowboat and replaces the last line.

Diagram 2: Four Moves for Judging a Production Choice

Judging one production choice in four moves 1. Quote it What does the script or story say? Give the paragraph. 2. Match it What does the production do at that moment? 3. Name it Kept, cut, added or changed? 4. Judge it What does it do to meaning, character or tone? Does it serve the story? Then weigh every choice together: the extent Faithful in words, events and meaning Small departures that keep the meaning Departures that change the meaning
Use the four moves for every choice. Step 3 sorts the choice; step 4 is the evaluation RL.8.7 asks for. A production's overall extent of faithfulness comes from weighing all its choices together, large departures more than small ones.

04

Homework Assignment

~30 min

RL.8.7 Homework: The Story-Teller on Film

Directions: Read the opening of Saki's story "The Story-Teller" and the notes for an imagined film of it, both at the end of the lesson plan (in Closure). The paragraphs of both are numbered. Answer in complete sentences. Put every quotation in quotation marks and give its paragraph number, and say whether it comes from the story or the film notes.

Part 1: Faithful or a Departure? (Problems 1-3)

  1. The story says the bachelor "said nothing out loud," and the film shows his frown growing deeper instead (film notes, paragraph 2). Quote the sentence in story paragraph 6 that the frown comes from. Is the film's choice faithful to the story, a departure, or both? Explain.
  2. Compare two of the film's choices: the fly at the window (film notes, paragraph 3) and the dust in slow motion (film notes, paragraph 4). Quote the words in story paragraph 1 that each choice comes from. Which choice turns the words of the story into a picture more directly, and why?
  3. The film replaces "On the Road to Mandalay" with a nursery rhyme (film notes, paragraph 5). Using story paragraph 7, explain what the change keeps from the story and what it loses.

Part 2: Evaluating the Director's and Actors' Choices (Problems 4-6)

  1. The actor plays the aunt as "a tired, kind woman who is doing her best" (film notes, paragraph 7). Quote two places in the story (paragraphs 4 and 9) that show how Saki's narrator sees her. Evaluate the actor's choice: what does it change about the tone of the scene?
  2. The film cuts the moment when the bachelor looks "twice at her and once at the communication cord" (story paragraph 8). Explain what this moment shows about the bachelor, and evaluate the director's reason for cutting it.
  3. Write a paragraph of 5-7 sentences judging the extent to which the film stays faithful to or departs from the opening of the story. Discuss at least three choices, including the new setting (film notes, paragraph 1), and evaluate one choice you think works and one you think does not, with a quotation from the story for each.

Rubric

CriterionFull Credit (2 pts)Partial Credit (1 pt)No Credit (0 pts)
Evidence from the StoryQuotes the story accurately, with paragraph numbersRefers to the story without quoting it or without paragraph numbersNo evidence from the story
Describing the ChoiceStates exactly what the film does and names it as kept, cut, added or changedDescribes the choice but does not name it, or names it wronglyRetells the story instead
Evaluating the ChoiceJudges the choice with a reason tied to meaning, character or toneGives a judgment with a vague or personal reason onlyNo judgment
Judging the ExtentWeighs small and large departures to reach an overall judgmentGives an overall judgment without weighing the choicesNo overall judgment

05

Quiz: 20 Questions

Interactive, with answers

Instructions

Questions 2-13 and 16-18 use the scene from The Lost Silk Hat and the notes for the imagined film of it, in Independent Practice above; paragraph numbers refer to the script unless a question names the film notes. Questions 1, 14, 15, 19 and 20 ask about the standard in general. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.

Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

  1. Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    In RL.8.7, what does it mean to say that a production stays faithful to its script?

  2. Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which choice in the film of The Lost Silk Hat is most faithful to the script?

  3. Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    How does the film's new opening depart from the script?

  4. Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    What does the new opening change for viewers of the film?

  5. Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The film's actor keeps the Laborer's dropped "h." Why is this choice faithful to the script?

  6. Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The actor taps the side of his nose each time he says "Ah!", a gesture that means "I know what you are up to." The script does not ask for it. Which line from the script best supports this choice?

  7. Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which words from the script are lost when the film cuts the Laborer's guess about the papers?

  8. Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which judgment of the cut papers guess is best supported by the script?

  9. Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The script prints "in" in italics in "What's in the hat?" What does this tell the actors?

  10. Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The second time the Caller says "What's in the hat?", the actor looks straight into the camera. Which statement best describes this choice?

  11. Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    When the Caller offers two sovereigns, the film's Laborer grins and holds out his hand. How does this acting choice compare with the script?

  12. Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    Which is the best evaluation of the close-up of the gold coin?

  13. Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    The piano music "stops dead each time the Laborer says 'Ah!'" What does this choice do?

  14. Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A director moves a play to the present day but keeps every line of the script. Which statement about the production is most accurate?

  15. Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice

    A stage production of a ghost story turns off every light during the ghost's first appearance. Which sentence is the strongest evaluation of this choice?

  16. Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer

    In 3-4 sentences, judge the extent to which the film of The Lost Silk Hat stays faithful to the script. Weigh at least one small departure against one large one, with a paragraph number from the script for each.

  17. Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer

    Choose one acting choice in the film (the nose tap, the look into the camera, or the grin at two sovereigns). In 2-3 sentences, evaluate it with a quotation from the script.

  18. Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer

    Write 2-3 sentences of director's notes for a stage production of paragraphs 26-33 of The Lost Silk Hat that stays faithful to the script but adds one piece of stage business (an action the script does not ask for). Then explain in one sentence why your addition fits the script.

  19. Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer

    Explain in 2-3 sentences how a production can keep every word of a script and still depart from it. Give an example that is not already described in the film notes.

  20. Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer

    In 2-3 sentences, explain why RL.8.7 asks students to evaluate a production's choices instead of only listing how it differs from the script.

0 of 20 answered · 0 correct

06

Frequently Asked Questions

10 Questions

What does RL.8.7 mean?

It means eighth graders compare a filmed or live production of a story or play with its text and judge how closely the production follows it. Then they evaluate the choices the director and actors made. Students do not stop at listing differences: they explain what each choice does to the story and whether it works.

How is RL.8.7 different from RL.7.7?

RL.7.7 asks how each medium works; RL.8.7 asks how faithful the production is and whether its choices are good ones. In grade 7, students compare a text with its filmed or staged version and analyze techniques such as lighting, sound and camera angles. In grade 8 they measure how far the production stays with the text and judge the director's and actors' decisions.

Do students have to watch a movie for RL.8.7?

No. Students can work from written descriptions of productions, such as director's notes, reviews or a shot list, and from scenes they stage themselves in class. This lesson uses imagined productions described in words, so every choice can be checked against the script. If a school has a licensed recording of a production, the same questions apply to it.

Is a faithful production always a better production?

Not always. A choice that follows the script can still be dull, and a departure can serve the story well, such as a film shot that shows an event the script only mentions. That is why the standard asks for two steps: first judge how faithful the production is, then evaluate whether each choice works.

What counts as a departure from the text?

A departure is any choice that cuts, adds or changes something in the text. Cuts remove lines or events; additions put in new actions, shots, music or scenes; changes alter the setting, the order of events or the way the script says a line is spoken. Filling in what the script leaves open, such as how long a pause lasts, is interpretation, and it stays faithful as long as it does not contradict the text.

What is the difference between a director's choice and an actor's choice?

The director makes choices about the whole production, and actors make choices about their own characters. The set, lighting, music, camera shots and cuts are usually the director's. How a line is said, a pause, a gesture or a facial expression is usually worked out by the actor with the director. RL.8.7 asks students to evaluate both kinds.

How do you evaluate a director's choice in a paragraph?

Use four moves: quote the text, describe what the production does, name the choice (kept, cut, added or changed), and judge its effect on the meaning, a character or the tone. For example: "The script says the Sergeant answers only after a pause, and Production A stretches the pause to five seconds, which makes his choice the most tense moment of the play."

Which plays and stories work well for teaching RL.8.7?

Short scenes with clear stage directions and one big decision work well. This lesson uses Lady Gregory's The Rising of the Moon, Lord Dunsany's comedy The Lost Silk Hat and Saki's story "The Story-Teller," all old enough to be in the public domain. Many teachers also use a class novel or play that has a film version the school can show.

How is RL.8.7 assessed?

It is usually assessed with written responses, since the evaluation needs a reason and evidence. Students may be given a script and a description or clip of a production and asked to explain one faithful choice and one departure, then judge them. Short multiple-choice items can check whether students can tell kept, cut, added and changed choices apart.

Can a story that is not a play be used for RL.8.7?

Yes. The standard names "a story or drama," so a short story and its film version count. With a story, students also look at what the narrator tells readers that a film must show in some other way, such as a character's thoughts, which is what this lesson's homework on "The Story-Teller" asks.