RL.7.9: Fiction and History, How Authors Use or Alter the Past
In plain English: RL.7.9 is the Common Core grade 7 ELA standard that asks students to compare and contrast a fictional portrayal of a time, place or character with a historical account of the same period, to understand how authors of fiction use or alter history. Students set a story or poem beside a history and ask what the author kept, changed, added or left out, and why.
Compare and contrast a fictional portrayal of a time, place, or character and a historical account of the same period as a means of understanding how authors of fiction use or alter history.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Literature · Cluster: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas · Official standard
Students compare and contrast a fictional portrayal of a time, place or character with a historical account of the same period, as a way to understand how authors of fiction use or alter history. The lesson pairs John Greenleaf Whittier's poem "Barbara Frietchie" (1863), about an old woman who defies Stonewall Jackson's troops in Frederick, Maryland, with G. F. R. Henderson's history of the same week in September 1862. Students find what the poem keeps from history (the town, the month, the army), what it changes (Jackson himself, the soldiers) and what it adds, and they think about why a poet writing during the war would make those changes.
Students then work on their own with two portrayals of Joan of Arc meeting the Dauphin in 1429: a chapter of Mark Twain's novel, told by an invented eyewitness, and Andrew Lang's short history for young readers. The homework pairs Alfred Tennyson's "The Charge of the Light Brigade" with William Howard Russell's account of the same charge. The method is the same each time: find what the fiction keeps, changes, adds and leaves out, and ask why.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Compare a fictional portrayal of a time, place or character with a historical account of the same period, naming the facts they share
Contrast the two, naming details the fiction changes, adds or leaves out
Explain how and why an author of fiction uses or alters history, citing the author's likely purpose
Support every comparison with quotations and line or paragraph numbers from both texts
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Comparing and contrasting texts in different forms or genres, such as historical novels and poems, on similar topics RL.6.9
Citing several pieces of textual evidence to support an analysis RL.7.1
Analyzing how an author develops the points of view of different characters or narrators RL.7.6
Telling fiction from nonfiction, and a primary source from a secondary one
"Think of a movie, book or show set in a real time in the past, such as the Titanic, the American Revolution or ancient Rome. Name one thing in it you think really happened, one thing you think was made up, and how you could find out which is which."
Collect answers in two columns: "Probably real" and "Probably made up." Then ask how students would check. Answers such as "look it up in a history book" or "read what people who were there wrote" lead to today's work. RL.7.9 asks students to set a work of fiction beside a historical account (a nonfiction report of what happened, based on records and witnesses) of the same period, and to compare and contrast them. The goal is not to catch the author in a mistake. It is to understand how authors of fiction use history, and where and why they change it.
Direct Instruction15-20 minutes
Terms to know:
Fiction: a story or poem the author imagined, even when it uses real people and places. Historical fiction is fiction set in a real time in the past.
Portrayal: the picture an author gives of something: a time (a period, such as the Civil War), a place (a town, a battlefield) or a character (a person, real or invented).
Historical account: nonfiction that reports what happened in the past, based on evidence such as letters, records and witnesses. A good account tells its readers where its information comes from.
Period: the stretch of time a work is about.
Use history: keep real facts, such as dates, places, events and real people. Alter history: change facts, add invented events or people, or leave out parts of what happened.
Purpose: why an author writes: to inform, to entertain, to honor someone, or to persuade readers to feel or believe something.
Introduce the texts. In the American Civil War (1861-1865), the Northern states (the Union) fought the Southern states that had left the country to form the Confederacy. In September 1862, the Confederate general Robert E. Lee led his army north into Maryland, a slave state that had stayed in the Union. One of his generals was Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson. Their troops spent several days in and around the town of Frederick, Maryland. John Greenleaf Whittier (1807-1892), a Northern poet who had worked for years to end slavery, heard a story from that week and turned it into the poem "Barbara Frietchie," published in 1863, while the war was still going on. G. F. R. Henderson (1854-1903), a British army officer, wrote a history of Jackson's life and battles, published in 1898. Henderson's margin note dates the arrival in Frederick to September 7, 1862.
Words to know: spires (the pointed tops of church towers), famished (starving), horde (a large, wild crowd), rebel (here, a Confederate soldier), fourscore years and ten (four times twenty plus ten: ninety years old), slouched hat (a soft hat with a drooping brim), rent (tore), yon (that), bier (the stand for a coffin), delectable (delightful), in lieu of (instead of), vermin (lice and fleas), haversacks (shoulder bags), exemplary (as good as can be), pillage and depredations (stealing and damage), requisitions (things an army takes for its use), cordiality (warm friendliness), gratuitously (for free), charger (a war horse), girth (the strap that holds a saddle on), inaccessibility (being hard to reach). Read the poem aloud first, then Henderson's account.
1Up from the meadows rich with corn Clear in the cool September morn,
The clustered spires of Frederick stand Green-walled by the hills of Maryland.
5Round about them orchards sweep, Apple and peach tree fruited deep,
Fair as the garden of the Lord To the eyes of the famished rebel horde,
On that pleasant morn of the early fall 10When Lee marched over the mountain-wall,--
Over the mountains winding down, Horse and foot, into Frederick town.
Forty flags with their silver stars, Forty flags with their crimson bars,
15Flapped in the morning wind; the sun Of noon looked down, and saw not one.
Up rose old Barbara Frietchie then, Bowed with her fourscore years and ten;
Bravest of all in Frederick town, 20She took up the flag the men hauled down;
In her attic window the staff she set, To show that one heart was loyal yet.
Up the street came the rebel tread, Stonewall Jackson riding ahead.
25Under his slouched hat left and right He glanced; the old flag met his sight.
"Halt!"--the dust-brown ranks stood fast. "Fire!"--out blazed the rifle-blast.
It shivered the window, pane and sash; 30It rent the banner with seam and gash.
Quick, as it fell, from the broken staff Dame Barbara snatched the silken scarf;
She leaned far out on the window-sill, And shook it forth with a royal will.
35"Shoot, if you must, this old gray head, But spare your country's flag," she said.
A shade of sadness, a blush of shame, Over the face of the leader came;
The nobler nature within him stirred 40To life at that woman's deed and word:
"Who touches a hair of yon gray head Dies like a dog; march on!" he said.
All day long through Frederick street Sounded the tread of marching feet;
45All day long that free flag tost Over the heads of the rebel host.
Ever its torn folds rose and fell On the loyal winds that loved it well;
And through the hill-gaps sunset light 50Shone over it a warm good night.
Barbara Frietchie's work is o'er. And the Rebel rides on his raids no more.
Honor to her! and let a tear Fall, for her sake, on Stonewall's bier.
55Over Barbara Frietchie's grave, Flag of freedom and Union wave!
Peace and order and beauty draw Round thy symbol of light and law;
And ever the stars above look down 60On thy stars below in Frederick town.
John Greenleaf Whittier, Barbara Frietchie (1863; this edition 1925). Public domain (published 1925). Source text.
1The next day Frederick was occupied by Jackson, who was once more in advance; [...] But although the army had entered Maryland without the slightest difficulty, the troops were not received with the enthusiasm they had anticipated. The women, indeed, emulating their Virginia sisters, gave a warm welcome to the heroes of so many victories. But the men, whether terrorised by the stern rule of the Federal Government, or mistrusting the power of the Confederates to secure them from further punishment, showed little disposition to join the ranks. It is possible that the appearance of the Southern soldiery was not without effect. Lee’s troops, after five months’ hard marching and hard fighting, were no delectable objects. With torn and brimless hats, strands of rope for belts, and raw-hide moccasins of their own manufacture in lieu of boots; covered with vermin, and carrying their whole kit in Federal haversacks, the ragged scarecrows who swarmed through the streets of Frederick presented a pitiful contrast to the trim battalions which had hitherto held the Potomac. Their conduct indeed was exemplary. They had been warned that pillage and depredations would be severely dealt with, and all requisitions, even of fence-rails, were paid for on the spot. [...] it was soon evident that the western counties of Maryland had small sympathy with the South.
2There were certainly exceptions to the general absence of cordiality. The troops fared well during their sojourn in Frederick. Supplies were plentiful; food and clothing were gratuitously distributed, and Jackson was presented with a fine but unbroken charger. [...] When Jackson first mounted her a band struck up close by, and as she reared the girth broke, throwing her rider to the ground. Fortunately, though stunned and severely bruised, the general was only temporarily disabled, and, if he appeared but little in public during his stay in Frederick, his inaccessibility was not due to broken bones. “Lee, Longstreet, and Jackson, and for a time Jeb Stuart,” writes a staff officer, “had their headquarters near one another in Best’s Grove. Hither in crowds came the good people of Frederick, especially the ladies, as to a fair. General Jackson, still suffering from his hurt, kept to his tent, busying himself with maps and official papers, and declined to see visitors. Once, however, when he had been called to General Lee’s tent, two young girls waylaid him, paralysed him with smiles and questions, and then jumped into their carriage and drove off rapidly, leaving him there, cap in hand, bowing, blushing, speechless. But once safe in his tent, he was seen no more that day.”
G. F. R. Henderson, Stonewall Jackson and the American Civil War, chapter XVIII, the army at Frederick (shortened) (1898). Public domain (published 1898). Source text.
Using history: the time and place
Which parts of the poem's setting does Henderson's account support?
Result: Both put Lee's army in Frederick, Maryland, in September 1862. The poem names "the cool September morn" (line 2), the "clustered spires of Frederick" (line 3) and the day "When Lee marched over the mountain-wall" (line 10). Henderson reports that "the army had entered Maryland" and that "Frederick was occupied by Jackson, who was once more in advance" (paragraph 1), which fits the poem's "Stonewall Jackson riding ahead" (line 24) at the front of the march. Whittier uses real history as the frame: a real town, a real army and a real general. Readers who know the history recognize the setting at once.
Altering history: a real character
Compare the poem's Stonewall Jackson with the Jackson in Henderson's account.
Result: In the poem, Jackson is out in the street in front of everyone: he rides at the head of the troops, glances "left and right" (line 25), orders the troops to halt, and then, ashamed, protects the old woman: "Who touches a hair of yon gray head / Dies like a dog" (lines 41-42). In Henderson's account, Jackson had been thrown from a new horse and was "stunned and severely bruised"; he "appeared but little in public during his stay in Frederick" (paragraph 2). The staff officer Henderson quotes says Jackson "kept to his tent" and "declined to see visitors," and that two girls left him "bowing, blushing, speechless." Whittier keeps Jackson's real name and fame, but gives him a public scene that the account does not report, and a stern, then noble, character quite unlike the shy, injured man in Henderson's pages.
Altering history: a group of people
The poem calls Lee's soldiers "the famished rebel horde" (line 8). Compare and contrast this portrayal with Henderson's.
Result: Alike: both show worn-out soldiers. The poem's "dust-brown ranks" (line 27) match Henderson's "ragged scarecrows" with "torn and brimless hats" and "strands of rope for belts" (paragraph 1). Different: the poem makes them a starving, dangerous "horde" that fires on a woman's window. Henderson says "Their conduct indeed was exemplary," that "all requisitions, even of fence-rails, were paid for on the spot" (paragraph 1), and that "Supplies were plentiful" (paragraph 2). By making the soldiers wilder, the poem makes Barbara Frietchie's courage greater.
Why alter history? The author's purpose
Why might Whittier have told the story this way, and how is Henderson's purpose different?
Result: Whittier wrote in 1863, in the middle of the war, as a Northern poet who opposed slavery. His last lines, "Over Barbara Frietchie's grave, / Flag of freedom and Union wave!" (lines 55-56), show his purpose: to honor loyalty to the Union flag and to move readers. A story with a brave old woman, a famous enemy general and a flag shot through makes that point sharply. Henderson wrote a history decades later to explain Jackson's campaigns, and he names his source ("writes a staff officer"). Henderson has a point of view too: he admired Jackson. But a history is judged by its evidence, and a poem by what it helps readers feel and understand.
Four questions for fiction and history. Model the moves in Diagram 2 for every detail: What did the author keep from history? What did the author change? What did the author add or leave out? Why: what purpose do the changes serve? Give two sentence frames: "Both the poem and the account show ___ (line __; paragraph __)." and "The poem changes ___ to ___, probably because the author wanted readers to ___."
Guided Practice15 minutes
Pairs compare the two texts detail by detail and fill in Diagram 1 with the class. Ask each question before reading the teacher note.
The town. How does each text portray the people of Frederick? Teacher note: in the poem, forty Union flags are pulled down before noon, and Barbara Frietchie raises hers "To show that one heart was loyal yet" (line 22), as if the whole town had given up. Henderson agrees that the army was "not received with the enthusiasm they had anticipated" and that the men "showed little disposition to join the ranks" (paragraph 1). But he also says "The women, indeed," gave "a warm welcome," and that "the good people of Frederick, especially the ladies," came to the camp "as to a fair" (paragraph 2). Both show a town that was not eager to join the South; the poem makes one loyal woman stand alone, and the history shows a town that was divided.
What the history includes and the poem leaves out. Ask students to find two facts in Henderson's account that are not in the poem. Teacher note: possible answers are Jackson's fall from the "fine but unbroken charger" and his bruises, the paying for "fence-rails," and the crowds visiting "Best's Grove." Ask why Whittier would leave them out: a bruised general resting in his tent cannot ride under a window and look up at a flag.
What Whittier said later. Share this with the class: in a note printed with the poem in his collected works, Whittier wrote that he had followed the story as trustworthy sources told it to him, but that it was probably wrong in some details. He added that the real Barbara Frietchie was a loyal Union woman who waved her flag to cheer the Union troops who came after Jackson's, and that another woman in the town may have waved a flag at the Confederates, so that two incidents may have been blended. Ask: if some details are wrong, what is the poem still good for? Teacher note: accept answers that treat it as a portrayal of courage and loyalty during the war, and that say readers should turn to a historical account to learn what happened.
Each pair then writes three sentences: one that names something the poem and the account share, one that names something the poem changes or adds, and one that explains why Whittier might have made that change. Each sentence gives a line number from the poem or a paragraph number from the account.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students now work on their own with a novel and a history of the same moment, from a different time and place. Joan of Arc (about 1412-1431) was a French peasant girl who said that voices from God told her to help Charles, the Dauphin (the title of the heir to the French throne), drive the English armies out of France. Early in 1429 she traveled to the castle of Chinon to meet him. Mark Twain (1835-1910) wrote a novel about her, published in 1896. It is told by an invented old man, the Sieur Louis de Conte, who says he was her childhood friend and her page (a young servant to a noble). Twain pretends to be only the book's translator. Andrew Lang (1844-1912), a Scottish writer who studied the records of Joan's trial, wrote a short history of her life for young readers in 1906. Read the translator's note, then Twain's chapter, then Lang's account.
Words to know: peculiarity (an unusual feature), under oath (sworn to be true in court), Process of Rehabilitation (a later trial that cleared Joan's name), unimpeachable (cannot be doubted), particulars (details), halberds (long spears with an ax blade), flambeaux (flaming torches), canopied (covered with a cloth roof), sceptered (holding a scepter, a king's staff), the Count (the Count of Vendome, a lord who led Joan in), obeisance (a deep bow), De Metz (Jean de Metz, a knight who had brought Joan to court), err (make a mistake), bewilderment (confusion), melodious (musical), liege (lord), impostor (someone pretending to be what they are not).
1The details of the life of Joan of Arc form a biography which is unique among the world’s biographies in one respect: It is the only story of a human life which comes to us under oath, the only one which comes to us from the witness-stand. The official records of the Great Trial of 1431, and of the Process of Rehabilitation of a quarter of a century later, are still preserved in the National Archives of France, and they furnish with remarkable fullness the facts of her life. The history of no other life of that remote time is known with either the certainty or the comprehensiveness that attaches to hers.
2The Sieur Louis de Conte is faithful to her official history in his Personal Recollections, and thus far his trustworthiness is unimpeachable; but his mass of added particulars must depend for credit upon his word alone.
Mark Twain, Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc, the translator's note (1896). Public domain (published 1896). Source text.
1When we entered the great audience-hall, there it all was just as I have already painted it. Here were ranks of guards in shining armor and with polished halberds; two sides of the hall were like flower-gardens for variety of color and the magnificence of the costumes; light streamed upon these masses of color from two hundred and fifty flambeaux. There was a wide free space down the middle of the hall, and at the end of it was a throne royally canopied, and upon it sat a crowned and sceptered figure nobly clothed and blazing with jewels.
[...]
2Joan walked two yards behind the Count, we three walked two yards behind Joan. Our solemn march ended when we were as yet some eight or ten steps from the throne. The Count made a deep obeisance, pronounced Joan’s name, then bowed again and moved to his place among a group of officials near the throne. I was devouring the crowned personage with all my eyes, and my heart almost stood still with awe.
[...]
3She made no obeisance, nor even any slight inclination of her head, but stood looking toward the throne in silence. That was all there was to see at present.
4I glanced up at De Metz, and was shocked at the paleness of his face. I whispered and said:
5“What is it, man, what is it?”
6His answering whisper was so weak I could hardly catch it:
7“They have taken advantage of the hint in her letter to play a trick upon her! She will err, and they will laugh at her. That is not the King that sits there.”
8Then I glanced at Joan. She was still gazing steadfastly toward the throne, and I had the curious fancy that even her shoulders and the back of her head expressed bewilderment. Now she turned her head slowly, and her eye wandered along the lines of standing courtiers till it fell upon a young man who was very quietly dressed; then her face lighted joyously, and she ran and threw herself at his feet, and clasped his knees, exclaiming in that soft melodious voice which was her birthright and was now charged with deep and tender feeling:
9“God of his grace give you long life, O dear and gentle Dauphin!”
[...]
10Meantime the young person in the plain clothes was saying to Joan:
11“Ah, you mistake, my child, I am not the King. There he is,” and he pointed to the throne.
[...]
12Joan did not stir from her knees, but still lifted her happy face toward the King, and said:
13“No, gracious liege, you are he, and none other.”
Mark Twain, Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc, Book II, chapter 6, Joan meets the Dauphin (shortened) (1896). Public domain (published 1896). Source text.
1WHEN Joan reached Chinon, she was lodged with a lady who was very kind, and she waited to see the Dauphin. His advisers were not sure that he ought to see the Maid at all; but probably he was curious, and at last she was brought to the castle, and led up the stairs to a great hall, where were many men in splendid dresses. The castle is in ruins now, and the hall has no roof over it, but you can still go in and see the walls, and empty windows, and the great fireplace. A man plainly dressed was in the crowd of magnificent courtiers in silk and gold embroidery. Joan went straight up, and kneeling on one knee, said, “Fair Sir, you are the Dauphin to whom I am come.” But the man pointed to a knight, very richly dressed, and said, “That is the King.”
2“No, fair Sir,” said Joan; “it is to you that I am sent.”
3The Dauphin, for the man was the Dauphin, was surprised at this, for she had never seen him before. He allowed Jean to come to the castle and talk to him, but he was not sure that she was not an impostor, or a silly girl.
4One day, however, she took him aside, into a corner where nobody could hear what they were talking about. When their conversation was ended, the Dauphin looked very grave, and Jeanne looked very glad. She had told him something that made him believe in her.
5What had Joan told to the King? It was known at the time that she had told him something that amazed him, for it is mentioned in a letter written a few weeks later by Alan Chartier, a famous poet. But nobody knew the secret: Joan would never let any one know. When she was a prisoner among the English, the French-priests and lawyers tried to make her speak, but she would not. It was her King’s secret.
Andrew Lang, The Story of Joan of Arc, chapter V, How the Maid Saw the Dauphin (opening) (1906). Public domain (published 1906). Source text.
On the handout, students fill in a four-column chart (Detail, In Twain, In Lang, Kept, changed or added?) with at least six details. Then they write two sentences: one that names something both authors include, and one that explains why Twain might have added a detail Lang does not report. The quiz uses these three texts, so do not discuss answers until students have finished the chart.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: (1) Name one fact Whittier kept from history and one detail he changed or added. (2) In one sentence, explain why reading a historical account can change how you read a poem or story about the same time.
Teacher note on language and content: the texts are kept exactly as published. Whittier calls the Confederate soldiers "rebel" and "the Rebel," the word Northerners used during the war; Henderson, writing later, calls them "Southern soldiery" and "ragged scarecrows." Neither text uses a slur. The Civil War was fought over slavery and the Union; this lesson compares how two writers portray one week of it, and it does not ask students to take the side of either army. The Joan of Arc texts mention her trial, and the homework texts describe a cavalry charge in which many soldiers and horses were killed; neither describes wounds in detail. Russell's word "Muscovite" is an old word for Russian. Tennyson's "six hundred" is a round number: about 670 men rode in the charge, and more than a third of them were killed, wounded or taken prisoner.
Teacher note on the history of the Chinon meeting: Joan's meeting with the Dauphin at Chinon early in 1429 is well recorded. The story that the court tried to fool her with a false king is less certain: at her trial Joan said only that her voice helped her know him among many others, and the fuller story comes from chronicles and from witnesses who spoke about 25 years later. Many historians treat that part as a legend that grew in the telling.
For homework: students read a poem and a historical account of the same battle, printed below. In the Crimean War (1853-1856), Britain and France fought Russia on the Crimean peninsula, on the Black Sea. At the Battle of Balaklava, on October 25, 1854, the British Light Brigade, soldiers on horseback armed with swords and lances, charged a line of Russian cannons after an order that was misunderstood. Many of them were killed or wounded. William Howard Russell (1820-1907) watched the battle and reported it for The Times of London, later turning his reports into a book. Alfred Tennyson (1809-1892), the Poet Laureate (the official poet of Britain), wrote his poem weeks after the battle, from the news reports.
Words to know: league (an old measure of distance, about three miles), dismay'd (filled with alarm), blunder'd (made a bad mistake), volley'd (fired all at once), sabres (curved swords), battery (a group of cannons, and the soldiers who fire them), Cossack (a Russian horse soldier), sunder'd (split apart), Lord Lucan (the commander of all the British cavalry), Lord Cardigan (the commander of the Light Brigade, "the noble Earl"), Captain Nolan (the officer who carried the order), odds (the chances against them), infantry (foot soldiers), cavalry (soldiers on horseback), squadrons in column (groups of horsemen waiting behind to help), continental armies (the armies of Europe), ere (before), flank (side), chaff (husks blown away from grain).
1Half a league, half a league, Half a league onward, All in the valley of Death Rode the six hundred. 5"Forward, the Light Brigade! Charge for the guns," he said: Into the valley of Death Rode the six hundred.
"Forward, the Light Brigade!" 10Was there a man dismay'd? Not tho' the soldier knew Some one had blunder'd: Theirs not to make reply, Theirs not to reason why, 15Theirs but to do and die: Into the valley of Death Rode the six hundred.
Cannon to right of them, Cannon to left of them, 20Cannon in front of them Volley'd and thunder'd; Storm'd at with shot and shell, Boldly they rode and well, Into the jaws of Death, 25Into the mouth of Hell Rode the six hundred,
Flash'd all their sabres bare, Flash'd as they turn'd in air, Sabring the gunners there, 30Charging an army, while All the world wonder'd: Plung'd in the battery-smoke Right thro' the line they broke; Cossack and Russian 35Reel'd from the sabre-stroke Shatter'd and sunder'd. Then they rode back, but not,-- Not the six hundred.
Cannon to right of them, 40Cannon to left of them, Cannon behind them Volley'd and thunder'd; Storm'd at with shot and shell, While horse and hero fell, 45They that had fought so well Came thro' the jaws of Death, Back from the mouth of Hell, All that was left of them, Left of six hundred.
50When can their glory fade? O the wild charge they made! All the world wonder'd. Honor the charge they made! Honor the Light Brigade, 55Noble six hundred!
Alfred Tennyson, The Charge of the Light Brigade (1854; this edition 1925). Public domain (published 1925). Source text.
1When Lord Lucan received the order from Captain Nolan, and had read it, he asked, we are told, "Where are we to advance to?" Captain Nolan pointed with his finger in the direction of the Russians, and according to the statements made after his death, said "There are the enemy, and there are the guns," or words to that effect.
[...]
2Lord Lucan gave the order to Lord Cardigan to advance upon the guns, conceiving that his orders compelled him to do so. The noble Earl saw the fearful odds against him. [...] The only support our light cavalry had was the heavy cavalry at a great distance behind them, the infantry and guns being far in the rear. There were no squadrons in column. There was a plain to charge over, before the enemy's guns could be reached, of a mile and a half in length.
3At ten minutes past eleven our Light Cavalry Brigade advanced. The whole Brigade scarcely made one effective regiment, according to the numbers of continental armies; and yet it was more than we could spare. They swept proudly past, glittering in the morning sun in all the pride and splendour of war. They advanced in two lines, quickened their pace as they closed towards the enemy. At the distance of 1,200 yards the whole line of the enemy belched forth, from thirty iron mouths, a flood of smoke and flame. The flight was marked by instant gaps in our ranks, by dead men and horses, by steeds flying wounded or riderless across the plain. In diminished ranks, with a halo of steel above their heads, and with a cheer which was many a noble fellow's death-cry, they flew into the smoke of the batteries; but ere they were lost from view the plain was strewed with their bodies.
4Through the clouds of smoke we could see their sabres flashing as they rode between the guns, cutting down the gunners as they stood. We saw them riding through, returning, after breaking through a column of Russians, and scattering them like chaff, when the flank fire of the batteries on the hill swept them down. [...] At thirty-five minutes past eleven not a British soldier, except the dead and dying, was left in front of these Muscovite guns. [...]
William Howard Russell, The British Expedition to the Crimea, Book III, chapter II, the charge at Balaklava (shortened) (1858; this edition 1877). Public domain (published 1877). Source text.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a three-column organizer for every detail: In the fiction, In the history, Same or different? Model the first two rows with the class
Read the poem's lines 23-42 aloud as a story in plain words first (the soldiers come, they shoot the flag, she waves it, Jackson stops them), then match each event to Henderson's account
Highlight only three words in Henderson's account that show the soldiers' behavior ("exemplary," "paid," "plentiful") and compare them with "famished rebel horde"
For Advanced Students
Ask them to find the phrase in Henderson's account that shows where his information about Jackson's tent comes from, and explain why a historian names his sources while a poet does not
Have them write a paragraph arguing whether a poem that alters history this much should still be taught in history classes, with evidence from both texts
Ask them to point out one place where Henderson's own admiration for Jackson may shape his account, and compare it with Whittier's view of Jackson
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Check that each answer points to both texts with quotations and line or paragraph numbers, and that it both compares (what the fiction keeps from history) and contrasts (what it changes, adds or leaves out). Strong answers explain why the author of fiction might have used or altered the history, tying the change to a purpose, a mood or a character. Strong answers also remember that when an account does not mention something, it does not prove that it never happened. Weak answers only list differences, or call the fiction "wrong" without asking what it was trying to do.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Matches, Differs or Not There?
15 minPairs
Pairs get 8 cards, each naming a detail from "Barbara Frietchie," and a mat with three columns: Matches the account, Different in the account, and Not in the account. For each card, they find the line of the poem and the words in Henderson's account (if any) that decide where it goes.
The Cards
The army comes into Frederick, a town in Maryland
The army has come over the mountains into Maryland
Jackson's troops lead the way into the town
The soldiers are a starving horde
Jackson rides up the street, looking left and right
Soldiers fire at a flag in an attic window
A woman of ninety snatches up the torn flag and waves it
Jackson blushes with shame and orders the troops to march on
Procedure
Pairs place all 8 cards and write a line number and, where there is one, a paragraph number from Henderson on each
They compare with another pair and settle any card placed differently by rereading both texts
Each pair writes one sentence explaining why Whittier might have made one of the "Different" or "Not in the account" details part of his poem
Answer key for the teacher: Matches: Frederick (lines 3 and 12; paragraph 1), the army entering Maryland (lines 10-11; paragraph 1), Jackson's troops in the lead (line 24; "once more in advance," paragraph 1). Different: the starving horde (line 8; "Supplies were plentiful," paragraph 2), Jackson in the street (lines 24-26; he "appeared but little in public," paragraph 2). Not in the account: the shots at the window (lines 27-30), the old woman and the flag (lines 17-18 and 31-36), Jackson's shame and order (lines 37-42)
Discussion Questions
Does "Not in the account" mean the event never happened? What else would a historian want to check?
Which card changes the portrayal of Jackson most?
Why might a poet keep the real town and the real month while changing the people?
Modification
For students who need support, use two columns, Matches and Does not match, and four cards (Frederick, Jackson's troops in the lead, the starving horde, the shots at the window), with the line number already printed on each card.
2
Ask It Like a Historian
15 minGroups of 3
Groups act as historians checking the poem. They write questions a historian would ask about the Barbara Frietchie story, then look for answers in Henderson's account and in what Whittier said later.
Procedure
Each group writes four questions, for example: Who saw it happen? When was the poem written? Where was Jackson that week? What do other sources say?
They answer each question from the texts, with a paragraph or line number, or write "The texts do not say"
Each group reports its most useful question to the class, and the class votes on which question matters most for judging the poem's history
Discussion Questions
Which question could Henderson's account answer, and which could it not?
How does the staff officer's quotation in paragraph 2 help a historian? What makes it more trustworthy than a story heard secondhand?
What would you need to find before deciding the flag story is false?
Variation
One student plays Whittier and one plays Henderson, and the class interviews them. Each answer must be based on the texts, such as "I wrote in 1863, during the war" or "My information about the tent comes from a staff officer."
3
Use It or Alter It
10-15 minIndividual, then pairs
Students write their own short piece of historical fiction set in Frederick in September 1862, using facts from Henderson's account and altering one on purpose, then label every choice.
Model
A model opening: "A boy watched the ragged soldiers pass his father's store, some with rope for belts. One of them counted out coins for a sack of flour." The margin labels read: used, "strands of rope for belts" and "paid for on the spot" (paragraph 1); invented, the boy and the store.
Procedure
Each student writes 6-8 sentences of fiction that use at least two facts from Henderson's account and change or add one detail on purpose
In the margin, they label each fact used, changed or invented, with a paragraph number for the facts they used
Partners trade and check that every label is right and that the change has a clear purpose
Discussion Questions
Why did you choose the detail you changed? What did the change do for your story?
Did any writer change something that would mislead a reader about what really happened? Where is the line?
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: One Week in Frederick, in a Poem and in a History
Five details from "Barbara Frietchie" compared with G. F. R. Henderson's account of the same week in September 1862. Whittier keeps the real town, month and army, changes the portrayal of Jackson, the soldiers and the townspeople, and adds the scene at the window. "Added" means only that this account does not report it.
Diagram 2: Four Questions for Fiction and History
Ask the four questions of every detail. Questions 1-3 are the comparing and contrasting RL.7.9 asks for; question 4 is the reason for it: understanding how and why an author of fiction uses or alters history.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RL.7.9 Homework: The Charge of the Light Brigade, in a Poem and a Report
Directions: Read Tennyson's poem "The Charge of the Light Brigade" and William Howard Russell's account of the charge, both at the end of the lesson plan (in Closure). The poem's lines and the account's paragraphs are numbered. Answer in complete sentences. Put every quotation in quotation marks, give its line or paragraph number, and say whether it comes from the poem or the account.
Part 1: What the Poem Keeps from History (Problems 1-3)
The poem begins "Half a league, half a league, / Half a league onward" (lines 1-2). A league is about three miles. Find the distance the brigade had to charge in Russell's account (paragraph 2). Does Tennyson keep this fact? Explain.
Compare "Cannon to right of them, / Cannon to left of them, / Cannon in front of them" (lines 18-20) with Russell's paragraphs 3 and 4. Quote the words in Russell that show guns in front of the brigade and guns firing from the side.
Russell writes that Lord Lucan asked "Where are we to advance to?" and that the order was followed "conceiving that his orders compelled him to do so" (paragraphs 1-2). Which line of the poem refers to this confusion? What does the poem keep, and what does it leave out?
Part 2: What the Poem Changes, and Why (Problems 4-6)
Russell gives two clock times for the charge (paragraphs 3 and 4). How many minutes passed between the brigade's advance and the moment when no British soldier was left in front of the guns? The poem gives no times or names at all. What does the poem gain by leaving them out, and what does a reader lose?
Russell says Lord Cardigan "saw the fearful odds against him" (paragraph 2). Tennyson writes "Theirs not to reason why, / Theirs but to do and die" (lines 14-15). Contrast the two portrayals of the soldiers' thinking, and explain why Tennyson might have chosen his.
Write a paragraph of 5-7 sentences explaining how Tennyson uses and alters the history of the charge. Include one fact he keeps, one detail he changes, adds or leaves out, and his likely purpose, with a quotation from the poem and one from Russell's account for each point. Use the poem's last stanza (lines 50-55) as evidence of his purpose.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Evidence from Both Texts
Quotes the poem and the account accurately, with line and paragraph numbers
Quotes only one text, or leaves out the numbers
No evidence
Comparing
Names facts the poem keeps from history, matched to the account
Names a shared fact without matching it to the account
No likenesses
Contrasting
Names details the poem changes, adds or leaves out, matched to the account
Names a difference without evidence from the account
No differences
Explaining Use or Alteration
Explains why the poet might have used or altered the history, tied to a purpose
Gives a reason that is vague or not tied to the texts
No explanation
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 2-13 and 16-19 use the three Joan of Arc texts in Independent Practice above: Twain's translator's note, Twain's chapter and Lang's account. Each is numbered from paragraph 1, and each question names the text it cites. Questions 1, 14, 15 and 20 ask about the standard in general. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In RL.7.9, what is a historical account?
Answer: A
A historical account reports what really happened and rests on evidence, such as the trial records Twain's translator's note mentions. Choice B describes historical fiction, the other half of the comparison. Choice C describes a poem like Tennyson's or Whittier's, which is fiction or verse, not an account. Choice D is a timeline, which reports facts but does not give an account of events.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which event appears in both Twain's chapter and Lang's account?
Answer: C
Lang writes that "A man plainly dressed was in the crowd of magnificent courtiers" and Joan "went straight up" to him (Lang, paragraph 1); Twain's Joan finds "a young man who was very quietly dressed" (Twain, paragraph 8). Choice A happens only in Twain (paragraph 7), and choice B only in Lang (paragraph 4). Choice D happens in neither: De Metz fears "they will laugh at her," but Joan does not err.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How does Twain change the trick that Lang describes?
Answer: B
In Lang, the plainly dressed man "pointed to a knight, very richly dressed, and said, 'That is the King'" (Lang, paragraph 1). Twain turns the knight into "a crowned and sceptered figure nobly clothed and blazing with jewels" on "a throne royally canopied" (Twain, paragraph 1). The trick is the same; Twain makes it grander. Choice A misreads both texts, choice C invents a second trick, and choice D reverses who plays the trick.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Twain's narrator says, "I was devouring the crowned personage with all my eyes, and my heart almost stood still with awe." Why does Twain tell the scene through this narrator?
Answer: D
Twain invented an eyewitness so that readers stand in the hall beside him and share his awe and his fear, which a history cannot give them. Choice A contradicts the translator's note, which says the narrator's "added particulars must depend for credit upon his word alone" (translator's note, paragraph 2). Choice B is wrong because the narrator learns of the trick only when De Metz whispers it (paragraphs 4-7). Choice C confuses the fiction with history: the narrator is Twain's invention.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Lang writes that the Dauphin's advisers were unsure, "but probably he was curious" (Lang, paragraph 1). What does the word probably show about Lang's account?
Answer: D
A historian cannot see inside a person's mind, so Lang marks his guess as a guess. Twain's narrator never hedges: he simply tells what he saw and felt. Choice B is wrong because a hedge shows care with evidence, not invention. Choice C is contradicted by the first sentence, "When Joan reached Chinon." Choice A reads a judgment into a neutral word.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
De Metz grows pale and whispers, "She will err, and they will laugh at her." What does this moment, which is not in Lang's account, add to the scene?
Answer: C
By letting readers hear the trick explained and see a brave knight turn pale (Twain, paragraphs 4-7), Twain makes them worry that Joan will fail, so her choice is a greater relief. Choice A is wrong: Lang explains the Dauphin's belief with the private talk (Lang, paragraph 4), and De Metz's whisper does not. Choice B contradicts his fear and anger at the trick, and choice D invents a detail: he whispers so weakly the narrator "could hardly catch it."
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which statement accurately compares what Joan says and does in the two versions?
Answer: B
Lang's Joan, "kneeling on one knee," says "Fair Sir, you are the Dauphin to whom I am come" (Lang, paragraph 1). Twain's Joan "threw herself at his feet" and says "God of his grace give you long life, O dear and gentle Dauphin!" (Twain, paragraphs 8-9). Choice A is wrong because Twain's Joan "made no obeisance" to the throne (paragraph 3). Choice C ignores the different words, and choice D confuses the Count's introduction with Joan's own speech.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How does the Dauphin first answer Joan in both versions?
Answer: D
In Lang, "the man pointed to a knight ... and said, 'That is the King'" (Lang, paragraph 1); in Twain, he says "I am not the King. There he is," and points to the throne (Twain, paragraph 11). Both authors keep the denial, which is what makes Joan's answer matter. Choice A skips the test. Choice B invents an order, and choice C confuses the first meeting with the private talk that Lang describes later (paragraph 4).
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
According to the translator's note, which parts of the novel should a reader trust least as history?
Answer: B
The note says de Conte "is faithful to her official history," but "his mass of added particulars must depend for credit upon his word alone" (translator's note, paragraph 2). In other words, Twain signals that the main events follow the records and the vivid details are his own. Choices A, C and D all name the parts backed by "The official records of the Great Trial of 1431" (paragraph 1) or by real geography.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which detail appears in Twain's version but not in Lang's account?
Answer: C
Twain's narrator counts "two hundred and fifty flambeaux" (Twain, paragraph 1); Lang gives no such detail. It is one of the narrator's "added particulars." Choices A, B and D appear in both: Lang also has "magnificent courtiers in silk and gold embroidery," "A man plainly dressed" and Joan "kneeling on one knee" (Lang, paragraph 1).
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Lang writes, "The castle is in ruins now, and the hall has no roof over it." What does this sentence show about how his account differs from Twain's chapter?
Answer: B
Lang steps out of 1429 to tell readers what a visitor can still see, as a historian looking back from 1906 might. Twain's narrator writes as if he had stood in the hall that day (Twain, paragraph 2). Choice A describes Twain's method, not Lang's. Choice C invents a disagreement; Twain's excerpt does not name the castle. Choice D contradicts the rest of Lang's account, which treats the meeting as fact.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why might Twain have made the hall so grand, with armor, torches and a jeweled throne?
Answer: A
The more dazzling the fake King, the more striking it is that Joan walks past him to "a young man who was very quietly dressed" (Twain, paragraph 8). Twain alters the history to raise the wonder of the moment. Choice D is wrong because Lang mentions rich clothes, but no armor, torches or throne. Choice B misreads the note, which says added details rest on the narrator's "word alone." Choice C has no support in either text.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What does Lang say about the secret Joan told the Dauphin in private?
Answer: A
Lang writes that "It was known at the time that she had told him something that amazed him," but "nobody knew the secret: Joan would never let any one know" (Lang, paragraph 5). Choice B misreads the poet's letter, which only mentions that she amazed him. Choice C contradicts "she would not," and choice D invents an announcement.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A novel set in the 1850s has an invented girl meet a real inventor at a real world's fair on the right date. What is the author doing with history?
Answer: C
This is a common way authors of fiction use history: they keep a real setting and real people and add invented characters who move through them, as Twain adds a narrator to Joan's story. Choice A is wrong because the fair, the date and the inventor are real. Choice B confuses historical fiction with an account. Choice D is wrong because historical fiction often includes real people.
Question 15 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Why does RL.7.9 ask students to read a historical account alongside historical fiction?
Answer: B
The standard's own words say the comparison is "a means of understanding how authors of fiction use or alter history." Setting the two side by side shows what the author kept, changed or added, and asking why leads to the author's purpose. Choice A treats every change as a failure, and choices C and D describe other goals the standard does not name.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
In 3-4 sentences, compare and contrast the moment when Joan finds the Dauphin in Twain's chapter and in Lang's account. Give one likeness, one difference, and what the difference shows about how Twain used history.
Model answer: In both versions Joan passes over a richly dressed decoy and kneels before a plainly dressed young man, who denies that he is the King: Lang's Joan says "Fair Sir, you are the Dauphin to whom I am come" (Lang, paragraph 1), and Twain's says "O dear and gentle Dauphin!" (Twain, paragraph 9). The difference is in how much we see and feel: Twain adds a jeweled figure on a throne, "two hundred and fifty flambeaux" and De Metz's frightened whisper. Twain keeps the event the history reports but surrounds it with invented details and emotions, so the reader lives through it. Rubric: 2 points for an accurate likeness and difference, each with evidence from both texts, and an explanation of Twain's use of history; 1 point for a likeness or difference without evidence or without the explanation; 0 points otherwise.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Choose one detail Twain adds that Lang does not report (the jeweled figure on the throne, the torches, or De Metz's whisper). In 2-3 sentences, explain what the detail does for the reader, with a quotation.
Model answer: De Metz's whisper, "She will err, and they will laugh at her" (Twain, paragraph 7), lets the reader know about the trick before Joan acts. Because a brave knight is "shocked" and pale, the reader fears for Joan, and her joyful choice of the right man feels like a small miracle. Rubric: 2 points for a detail that is truly only in Twain, an accurate quotation and a clear effect on the reader; 1 point for a detail and an effect without a quotation, or a quotation without an effect; 0 points otherwise.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
The translator's note says de Conte "is faithful to her official history" but that his "added particulars must depend for credit upon his word alone." In 2-3 sentences, explain what this means, with one example of each from Twain's chapter.
Model answer: It means the main events follow the records of Joan's life, but the vivid details come only from the narrator, who is Twain's invention. Joan choosing the plainly dressed Dauphin over the man he points to follows the recorded story, which the historian Lang reports too (Lang, paragraphs 1-2). The "two hundred and fifty flambeaux" and De Metz's whisper are added particulars that no historian can check. Rubric: 2 points for an accurate explanation with one example of each; 1 point for the explanation or the examples only; 0 points otherwise.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Is Twain's chapter less true than Lang's account? In 3-4 sentences, argue your answer with evidence from both texts.
Model answer: As a report of what happened, Twain's chapter is less reliable, because its narrator and many details are invented, while Lang is careful even to say the Dauphin was "probably" curious (Lang, paragraph 1). But Twain does not pretend otherwise: his translator's note warns that the added details rest on the narrator's "word alone." And his chapter may give a truer feeling of the moment, the awe of a crowded hall and the fear that Joan would fail. So Lang's account is the better guide to the facts, and Twain's novel helps readers imagine how the facts felt. Rubric: 2 points for a clear position supported by evidence from both texts that separates factual accuracy from other kinds of truth; 1 point for a position with evidence from only one text; 0 points otherwise.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
In 2-3 sentences, explain why RL.7.9 asks students to compare fiction with history "as a means of understanding how authors of fiction use or alter history," instead of only checking the fiction for mistakes.
Model answer: Authors of fiction often change history on purpose, to build suspense, to honor someone or to make a message clearer. Comparing the two texts shows exactly what the author kept and what he changed, and asking why reveals the author's purpose and helps readers enjoy the fiction without mistaking it for a record. Rubric: 2 points for the idea that changes can be purposeful and that comparison reveals the author's choices; 1 point for a partly correct idea; 0 points otherwise.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RL.7.9 mean?
It means seventh graders compare and contrast a work of fiction about a real time, place or person with a historical account of the same period. They look for what the author kept from history, what he or she changed, added or left out, and why. The goal is to understand how authors of fiction use or alter history, not just to spot errors.
What counts as a historical account for RL.7.9?
Any nonfiction report of the same period counts, as long as it is based on evidence. It can be a history book, a newspaper report written at the time, a letter or diary, or an encyclopedia entry. This lesson uses a biography of Stonewall Jackson, a short history of Joan of Arc and a war reporter's account of a battle.
Does the fictional work have to be a novel?
No. The standard says "a fictional portrayal," so a novel, a short story, a play or a narrative poem all work. Poems such as "Barbara Frietchie" and "The Charge of the Light Brigade" are good choices, because they are short and tell a story about a real event.
Is historical fiction lying?
No, because readers know it is fiction. Authors of historical fiction invent characters, conversations and feelings to bring a period to life, and sometimes they change facts on purpose. The problem comes only when a reader mistakes the fiction for a record. Comparing it with a historical account helps readers tell the two apart.
Why do authors of fiction change history?
Usually to serve the story or its purpose. An author may simplify events to keep the story moving, invent a character to give readers someone to follow, make a real person braver or crueler to sharpen a conflict, or change details to honor a cause. Some changes also come from the author's sources: Whittier later wrote that the story he heard was probably wrong in some details.
How is RL.7.9 different from RL.8.9?
RL.7.9 compares fiction with history; RL.8.9 compares modern fiction with myths, traditional stories and religious works. In grade 7, the second text is a historical account of the same period. In grade 8, students analyze how a modern story draws on old themes, patterns of events or character types and makes them new.
Can a historical account have a point of view too?
Yes. A historian chooses what to include and how to describe it, and may admire or dislike the people he or she writes about. Henderson, for example, admired Stonewall Jackson. That is why good accounts name their sources, as Henderson does when he quotes a staff officer, so readers can judge the evidence.
What if the historical account does not mention something in the story?
Then the account does not settle the question by itself. An account leaves many things out, so silence is not proof that an event never happened. Students should say "the account does not mention it" rather than "it is false," and look at other sources before deciding.
Which texts work well for teaching RL.7.9?
Short fiction or narrative poems about well-documented events work well, paired with a readable account of the same moment. This lesson uses Whittier's "Barbara Frietchie," Mark Twain's novel about Joan of Arc and Tennyson's "The Charge of the Light Brigade," with histories by G. F. R. Henderson, Andrew Lang and William Howard Russell, all in the public domain. Many teachers also pair a class historical novel with a chapter from a history textbook.
How is RL.7.9 assessed?
It is usually assessed with a story or poem and a short historical passage about the same event. Students may be asked what the fiction keeps from the history, what it changes, and why the author might have changed it, with evidence from both texts. Multiple-choice items can check whether students can match details across the two texts.
07
Related Standards
6 standards
These standards connect to RL.7.9: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RL.6.9Prerequisite
Compare texts in different forms or genres on similar themes and topics