RI.9-10.9: Analyzing Seminal U.S. Documents and Their Related Themes
In plain English: RI.9-10.9 is the Common Core ELA standard that asks students in grades 9-10 to analyze seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance, such as Washington's Farewell Address or the Gettysburg Address, including how several documents address related themes and concepts. It is usually taught in English 9 or 10, often alongside U.S. History.
Analyze seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance (e.g., Washington's Farewell Address, the Gettysburg Address, Roosevelt's Four Freedoms speech, King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail"), including how they address related themes and concepts.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Informational Text · Cluster: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas · Official standard
Students analyze three seminal U.S. documents that address one theme: the Union and whether a State can override or leave it. Daniel Webster's "Reply to Hayne" (1830) was a Senate speech answering South Carolina's claim that a State could cancel federal laws; Andrew Jackson's proclamation of December 1832 answered South Carolina's attempt to do exactly that; and Abraham Lincoln's First Inaugural Address (1861) spoke to a country from which seven States had already declared themselves separate.
For each document, students ask what occasion it answered, which concepts it defines or repeats and what language makes it memorable. Then they compare: how do the three documents address related concepts such as the source of the government's power, the kind of Union it is and what disunion would mean? A Concept Tracker (Diagram 2) holds the comparison, and a timeline (Diagram 1) places the documents alongside two of the standard's official examples, Washington's Farewell Address and the Gettysburg Address.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Explain what makes a U.S. document seminal, in terms of its historical and its literary significance
Identify the key concepts a seminal document defines, repeats or pictures, citing exact words
Compare how several documents address related themes and concepts, naming both similarities and differences
Explain how a document's occasion and audience shape the way it presents its ideas
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Analyzing two texts that give conflicting information on the same topic RI.8.9
Citing strong and thorough textual evidence RI.9-10.1
Determining an author's purpose and use of rhetoric RI.9-10.6
Basic facts about the Constitution of 1787 and the three branches of government
"The word union can mean a marriage, a workers' group, a school club or a country. Write one sentence about what holds any union together, and one sentence about what might make one of its members want to leave."
List the answers in two columns, "what holds it together" and "why someone leaves." Students usually name shared rules, shared interests and loyalty on one side, and unfair treatment on the other. Tell students they will read three famous American documents written over 31 years, from 1830 to 1861, when States threatened to override or leave the Union. RI.9-10.9 asks them to analyze such seminal documents and how they address related themes and concepts: here, what the Union is, where its power comes from and what breaking it would mean.
Direct Instruction20 minutes
Part 1: What makes a document seminal. A seminal document is one that later writers and readers keep returning to, because it shaped how Americans think about an idea. Its historical significance comes from the moment it answered and what followed; its literary significance comes from language memorable enough to be quoted long after the occasion. The standard's examples show the range: George Washington's Farewell Address (1796), which urged Americans to value the Union above sectional quarrels; Lincoln's Gettysburg Address (1863); Franklin D. Roosevelt's Four Freedoms speech (1941); and Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" (1963). This lesson reads three documents on one theme, the Union, placed on the timeline in Diagram 1.
Three questions to ask of every seminal document
Question
What to look for
Example of a concept it reveals
Occasion
What crisis or event the document answers, and who the audience is
A State claims it can cancel a federal law
Ideas
The key terms and concepts the author defines or repeats
The people, sovereignty, the Union, disunion
Language
Images, repetition, questions, short or long sentences
A flag, an abyss, a question left unanswered
Part 2: The first document. In January 1830, Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina argued in the Senate that a State could judge for itself whether a federal law was constitutional. Daniel Webster of Massachusetts answered him in a speech that lasted two days, January 26-27, 1830, known as the "Reply to Hayne." Read Passage 1 aloud, then model the worked examples.
1This leads us to inquire into the origin of this government and the source of its power. Whose agent is it? Is it the creature of the State legislatures, or the creature of the people? [...] It is, Sir, the people's Constitution, the people's government, made for the people, made by the people, and answerable to the people. The people of the United States have declared that this Constitution shall be the supreme law.
[...]
2I have not allowed myself, Sir, to look beyond the Union, to see what might lie hidden in the dark recess behind. I have not coolly weighed the chances of preserving liberty when the bonds that unite us together shall be broken asunder. I have not accustomed myself to hang over the precipice of disunion, to see whether, with my short sight, I can fathom the depth of the abyss below; nor could I regard him as a safe counsellor in the affairs of this government, whose thoughts should be mainly bent on considering, not how the Union may be best preserved, but how tolerable might be the condition of the people when it should be broken up and destroyed. While the Union lasts, we have high, exciting, gratifying prospects spread out before us, for us and our children. Beyond that I seek not to penetrate the veil. God grant that, in my day, at least, that curtain may not rise! God grant that on my vision never may be opened what lies behind! When my eyes shall be turned to behold for the last time the sun in heaven, may I not see him shining on the broken and dishonored fragments of a once glorious Union; on States dissevered, discordant, belligerent; on a land rent with civil feuds, or drenched, it may be, in fraternal blood! Let their last feeble and lingering glance rather behold the gorgeous ensign of the republic, now known and honored throughout the earth, still full high advanced, its arms and trophies streaming in their original lustre, not a stripe erased or polluted, nor a single star obscured, bearing for its motto, no such miserable interrogatory as "What is all this worth?" nor those other words of delusion and folly, "Liberty first and Union afterwards"; but everywhere, spread all over in characters of living light, blazing on all its ample folds, as they float over the sea and over the land, and in every wind under the whole heavens, that other sentiment, dear to every true American heart,--Liberty and Union, now and for ever, one and inseparable!
Daniel Webster, Second Speech on Foot's Resolution ("The Reply to Hayne"), January 26-27, 1830 (excerpts), as printed in Select Speeches of Daniel Webster, 1817-1845 (1830; this edition 1903). Public domain (published 1903). Source text.
A concept defined by a question
Webster asks of the national government, "Whose agent is it? Is it the creature of the State legislatures, or the creature of the people?" He answers: "It is, Sir, the people's Constitution, the people's government, made for the people, made by the people, and answerable to the people" (paragraph 1).
Result: The concept is popular sovereignty: the people, not the State legislatures, created the government. Webster repeats "people" five times in one sentence, so the answer sounds settled before any proof is given.
Literary significance: repetition and images
Paragraph 2 opens with three sentences that begin "I have not" and warns against those who "hang over the precipice of disunion" to "fathom the depth of the abyss below." Two sentences then begin "God grant."
Result: Repeating the same opening (anaphora) gives the ending the rhythm of a vow. The images turn disunion into a fall from a cliff, so the theme of the Union becomes a matter of feeling as well as of law.
Seminal: later documents return to it
Webster's "made for the people, made by the people, and answerable to the people" (1830) and Lincoln's closing words at Gettysburg (1863), "government of the people, by the people, for the people."
Result: Both treat the people as the source of the government. Lincoln's wording is shorter and more famous, and it echoes Webster's sentence. A seminal document's phrases travel into later documents on the same theme.
Guided Practice15 minutes
In November 1832, a South Carolina convention declared the federal tariff laws of 1828 and 1832 "null and void" in the State. On December 10, 1832, President Andrew Jackson answered with a proclamation. Pairs read Passage 2 and add it to their Concept Tracker (Activity 1). Model the first question with the worked example below.
1The Constitution of the United States, then, forms a government, not a league; and whether it be formed by compact between the States or in any other manner, its character is the same. It is a Government in which all the people are represented, which operates directly on the people individually, not upon the States; they retained all the power they did not grant. But each State, having expressly parted with so many powers as to constitute, jointly with the other States, a single nation, can not, from that period, possess any right to secede, because such secession does not break a league, but destroys the unity of a nation; and any injury to that unity is not only a breach which would result from the contravention of a compact, but it is an offense against the whole Union. To say that any State may at pleasure secede from the Union is to say that the United States are not a nation, because it would be a solecism to contend that any part of a nation might dissolve its connection with the other parts, to their injury or ruin, without committing any offense. Secession, like any other revolutionary act, may be morally justified by the extremity of oppression, but to call it a constitutional right is confounding the meaning of terms, and can only be done through gross error or to deceive those who are willing to assert a right, but would pause before they made a revolution or incur the penalties consequent on a failure.
[...]
2But the dictates of a high duty oblige me solemnly to announce that you can not succeed. The laws of the United States must be executed. I have no discretionary power on the subject; my duty is emphatically pronounced in the Constitution. Those who told you that you might peaceably prevent their execution deceived you; they could not have been deceived themselves. They know that a forcible opposition could alone prevent the execution of the laws, and they know that such opposition must be repelled. Their object is disunion. But be not deceived by names. Disunion by armed force is treason. Are you really ready to incur its guilt?
Andrew Jackson, Proclamation, December 10, 1832 (two excerpts), as printed in A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, Volume II (1832; this edition 1897). Public domain (published 1897). Source text.
Defining a concept by contrast
Jackson writes that the Constitution "forms a government, not a league" and that secession "does not break a league, but destroys the unity of a nation" (paragraph 1).
Result: A league is an alliance of independent members, which any member might leave; a government forms one nation. By defining the Union through what it is not, Jackson makes secession an attack on a single body, not a withdrawal from a club.
Guide the pairs with three more questions. (1) Jackson says secession "may be morally justified by the extremity of oppression." What does he call it instead of a constitutional right? (2) Which phrase in paragraph 1 addresses the same concept as Webster's question "Whose agent is it?" (3) Webster's paragraph 2 speaks of feelings and images. What kind of language does Jackson's paragraph 1 use instead? Students should find "revolutionary act," the government that "operates directly on the people individually, not upon the States," and the plain, step-by-step language of definitions ("league," "compact," "solecism").
Independent Practice15-20 minutes
By March 4, 1861, seven Southern States had declared that they had left the Union, and Abraham Lincoln took the oath of office in a divided country. Students read Passage 3, from his First Inaugural Address, and answer the quiz on their own. They also complete the Lincoln column of their Concept Tracker (Diagram 2 shows the Webster and Jackson columns).
1I hold that in contemplation of universal law and of the Constitution the Union of these States is perpetual. Perpetuity is implied, if not expressed, in the fundamental law of all national governments. It is safe to assert that no government proper ever had a provision in its organic law for its own termination. Continue to execute all the express provisions of our National Constitution, and the Union will endure forever, it being impossible to destroy it except by some action not provided for in the instrument itself.
[...]
2Physically speaking, we can not separate. We can not remove our respective sections from each other nor build an impassable wall between them. A husband and wife may be divorced and go out of the presence and beyond the reach of each other, but the different parts of our country can not do this. They can not but remain face to face, and intercourse, either amicable or hostile, must continue between them. Is it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before? Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws? Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends? Suppose you go to war, you can not fight always; and when, after much loss on both sides and no gain on either, you cease fighting, the identical old questions, as to terms of intercourse, are again upon you.
[...]
3I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.
Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861 (three excerpts), as printed in A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, Volume VI (1861; this edition 1897). Public domain (published 1897). Source text.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: "In one sentence, name a concept that two of today's documents share. In a second sentence, explain one difference in how they present it, with a short quotation." Sort the tickets into "names a shared topic" and "explains a difference" to plan the next lesson.
Teacher note on context. The passages are quoted exactly as printed in 1897 and 1903 and contain no slurs; Passage 3 uses "aliens" in its older sense of foreigners. The excerpts leave out what the documents say about slavery, which was bound up with every one of these crises: in 1832 South Carolina's leaders feared that a strong federal government could one day act against slavery, and in 1861 several seceding States named the protection of slavery as a cause. Tell students this before reading, and present the other side fairly: Hayne and John C. Calhoun argued that the Union was a compact among sovereign States, each of which could judge federal laws for itself.
Homework passage. Passage 4 is a sample comparison written for this page by an imagined student. Students evaluate it and then write a stronger one.
1Daniel Webster, Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln all talk about the Union. Webster gave a speech in the Senate in 1830. He says the Constitution is "the people's Constitution," and he ends with the words "Liberty and Union, now and for ever, one and inseparable!"
2Jackson wrote a proclamation in 1832. Like Webster, Jackson says that the people, not the States, made the Constitution. He also says that "Disunion by armed force is treason."
3Lincoln gave his First Inaugural Address in 1861. He says that "We are not enemies, but friends." All three men loved their country and wanted to keep it together. Their speeches are very important documents in American history, and they show that the Union was important.
Written for this page, Sample Student Comparison (for the homework). Original passage written for this page.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give the Concept Tracker with one cell per row already filled in as a model
Read each passage aloud and gloss older words (agent, league, solecism, secede, organic law, intercourse, aliens) in the margin
Offer the frame: "Both ___ and ___ address the idea of ___. ___ presents it as ___ ("quotation"), while ___ presents it as ___ ("quotation")."
For Advanced Students
Read Hayne's argument in the Senate or John C. Calhoun's writing on nullification and add a column for the compact view to the Concept Tracker
Read Washington's Farewell Address on the Union and explain how Webster or Lincoln builds on it
Trace one phrase from Passage 1 or Passage 3 into a later speech, and explain how the later speaker changes it
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Strong answers name a specific concept (not only the topic "the Union"), quote each document accurately, explain how the language presents the idea and compare at least two documents, naming a similarity and a difference. Watch for summaries that retell each passage in turn, for claims that the documents "all say the same thing," and for claims about a document that its words do not support.
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Concept Tracker
20 minPairs
Pairs build a chart of how each document handles three concepts related to the Union, with a quotation for every cell. The finished Webster and Jackson columns should match Diagram 2; pairs defend any cell that differs.
The Chart
Three rows (kind of Union; what disunion would mean; style of the key lines) and three columns (Passages 1, 2 and 3). Each cell gets a short answer and the exact words that support it.
Procedure
Fill in the Passage 1 column together as a class after the worked examples
Pairs fill in the Passage 2 column during Guided Practice
Each student fills in the Passage 3 column alone during Independent Practice, then compares with a partner
Discussion Questions
Webster uses the word "liberty" in his passage, and Jackson's passage never does. Why might a speech that warns of disunion talk about liberty, while a proclamation that enforces the law does not?
Which of the two documents gives a clearer definition of the Union? Which one is easier to remember? Are those the same document?
Both men answer a claim made by leaders of the same State. How does knowing that change the way you read their words?
Variation for a Shorter Class
Give each pair only one row of the chart and pool the results on the board.
2
Plain English, and What Is Lost
15 minGroups of 3
Groups rewrite one famous sentence in plain modern English and then discuss what the plain version loses. The exercise shows why literary significance is part of what makes a document seminal.
The Sentences
Webster: "Liberty and Union, now and for ever, one and inseparable!"
Webster: "God grant that, in my day, at least, that curtain may not rise!"
Jackson: "The Constitution of the United States, then, forms a government, not a league."
Lincoln: "We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies."
Procedure
Each group takes one sentence and writes a plain version of no more than 15 words that keeps the meaning
Read the original and the plain version aloud, one after the other
List what the plain version kept (the idea) and what it lost (rhythm, image, emphasis, emotion)
Discussion Questions
Which original would you still remember tomorrow? Why?
Did any plain version change the meaning, not only the sound?
What does this suggest about why people still quote these documents?
3
Documents in Conversation
20 minGroups of 4
In each group, three students speak for Webster, Jackson and Lincoln, and the fourth speaks for the South Carolina position of 1830-1832. The group answers the same questions, so students hear how the documents address related concepts.
The Questions
Who created the Union, the people or the States?
May a State cancel a federal law or leave the Union?
What should people who are unhappy with the Union do?
Procedure
The Webster, Jackson and Lincoln speakers may answer only with words quoted from their passage, plus a few joining words
The fourth speaker states the compact view in his or her own words: the States formed the Union by agreement, and each State may judge federal laws for itself
After each question, the group writes one sentence naming where the documents agree and one where they differ
Discussion Questions
Which question was hardest to answer with a speaker's own words? What does that show about what the passage leaves out?
Where did the Webster, Jackson and Lincoln speakers agree completely?
Did hearing the compact view make any of the three arguments seem stronger or weaker?
Modification for Remote Classes
Run the conversation in a shared document with four colored columns, one per speaker, and have each group post its agreement and difference sentences.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: Timeline of Seminal Documents on the Union
The three passages on this page (blue) and two of the standard's official examples (gray), placed to scale on a timeline from 1780 to 1870. Webster's speech and Jackson's proclamation came two years apart, during the nullification crisis; Lincoln spoke 31 years after Webster, when States had already declared secession. The Gettysburg Address came two years after Lincoln's First Inaugural.
Diagram 2: Concept Tracker for the Three Passages
The class Concept Tracker after Guided Practice. Each cell quotes or describes how one document handles a concept related to the theme of the Union. The Webster and Jackson columns are filled in; students complete the Lincoln column on their own.
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RI.9-10.9 Homework: Three Documents, One Theme
Directions: Use Passages 1-3 in the lesson plan and Passage 4 (a sample student comparison) in the Closure phase. Paragraphs are numbered. Quote exact words for every point. Answer Problems 1-5 in 3-5 sentences each; Problem 6 is a paragraph.
Part 1: Across the Documents (Problems 1-3)
Webster rejects two mottos for the flag: "What is all this worth?" and "Liberty first and Union afterwards" (Passage 1, paragraph 2). Explain what the second motto means, why Webster calls it "delusion and folly," and how his final words answer it.
Webster (Passage 1, paragraph 2) and Jackson (Passage 2, paragraph 2) both describe the people who would lead others toward disunion. How does each one characterize those leaders? Quote each, and explain what the difference shows about each document's purpose and about the way each treats the concept of disunion.
Choose one of the three passages. Explain the crisis it answered and who its audience was, then show how knowing the occasion changes the way you read one sentence from it.
Part 2: Evaluating a Comparison (Problems 4-6)
What is the main claim of Passage 4? Explain why it is too general to guide an analysis, and rewrite it as a claim about a related concept in two of the documents.
Passage 4 says, "Like Webster, Jackson says that the people, not the States, made the Constitution." Check this claim against Passage 2, paragraph 1. Is it supported? Quote the words that decide the question and correct the sentence.
Write a paragraph (150-200 words) that analyzes how two of the three documents address the permanence of the Union. Unlike Passage 4, analyze and do not only summarize: quote each document at least once, name one similarity and one difference, and explain what each author's choice of words shows.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Evidence
Exact quotations from the right passage and paragraph
Quotations that are vague, loose or from the wrong place
No quotations
Concepts
Names a specific concept (source of power, permanence, disunion) and traces it across documents
Names a general topic such as "the Union" without a concept
No concept
Analysis
Explains how word choice, images or structure present the concept
Describes what the document says without explaining how
Summary only
Accuracy
Every claim about a document is supported by its text
One claim is unsupported or overstated
Several claims misread the documents
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-10, 15 and 17 are about Passage 3 (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address) in the Independent Practice phase of the lesson plan. Questions 13 and 14 are about Passage 2 (Jackson), and the others compare Passage 3 with Passage 1 (Webster) or Passage 2, both in earlier phases. Paragraphs are numbered. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything so you or your students can try again.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 1 of Passage 3, on what grounds does Lincoln say the Union is perpetual?
Answer: A
Lincoln holds that "in contemplation of universal law and of the Constitution the Union of these States is perpetual." Choice B invents a vote that the paragraph never mentions. Choice C mistakes a document Lincoln cites in a part of the address that this excerpt leaves out. Choice D is wrong because paragraph 1 gives no role to the President's or Congress's wishes.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which reason in paragraph 1 of Passage 3 supports Lincoln's claim that "Perpetuity is implied"?
Answer: B
Lincoln argues that "no government proper ever had a provision in its organic law for its own termination," so a lasting Union is built into the idea of a government. Choice A reverses his claim. Choice C invents a time limit. Choice D is a claim about age that the paragraph does not make.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 1 of Passage 3, the phrase "organic law" most nearly means
Answer: C
Lincoln uses "organic law" alongside "the fundamental law of all national governments" and "our National Constitution," so it means a government's founding law. Choice A takes "organic" in its modern farming sense. Choice B confuses the national law with a State law. Choice D contradicts the written "express provisions" Lincoln names.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Paragraph 2 of Passage 3 begins "Physically speaking, we can not separate." How does this argument differ from the one in paragraph 1?
Answer: D
Paragraph 1 argues from law ("universal law," "the Constitution"); paragraph 2 argues that the sections "can not remove" themselves from each other and must "remain face to face." Choice A is wrong because the paragraph cites no scripture. Choice B misses the change from legal to practical reasoning. Choice C reverses Lincoln's question whether trade and "intercourse" could be "more advantageous" after separation.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What point does Lincoln make by comparing the sections of the country to a husband and wife?
Answer: A
A couple "may be divorced and go out of the presence and beyond the reach of each other, but the different parts of our country can not do this." The comparison works by contrast. Choice B draws the opposite lesson from the comparison. Choice C and choice D add ideas the paragraph never states.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What do the two questions "Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws?" and "Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends?" suggest?
Answer: C
The questions expect the answer "no": as separate nations ("aliens," meaning foreigners) the sections would have to rely on treaties, which are harder to make and enforce than laws. Choice A turns a rhetorical question into advice. Choice B overstates the word "faithfully." Choice D misreads the comparison as a proposal.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which feature of language do the same two questions use?
Answer: A
Both questions have the same shape and trade the same pairs of words (aliens and friends, treaties and laws), so the contrast carries the argument. Choice B is not in the passage. Choice C is wrong because no one is quoted in paragraph 2. Choice D is wrong because paragraph 2 gives no dates or numbers.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What is Lincoln's point in the last sentence of paragraph 2 of Passage 3 ("Suppose you go to war...")?
Answer: D
After "much loss on both sides and no gain on either," Lincoln says, "the identical old questions, as to terms of intercourse, are again upon you." Choice A predicts a result the sentence does not give. Choice B is the opposite of his point. Choice C ignores "you cease fighting."
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 3 of Passage 3, the "mystic chords of memory" stretch "from every battlefield and patriot grave." Which shared memory is Lincoln calling on?
Answer: B
Lincoln spoke in March 1861, before any battle between North and South, so "battlefield and patriot grave" point to the Revolution and earlier wars that Americans from every State remembered together. Choice A is wrong because the war had not begun. Choice C turns a memory the whole country shares into Lincoln's private one. Choice D reads the musical word "chords" literally.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How does the closing sentence of Passage 3 turn the Union's bonds into an extended metaphor?
Answer: C
The bonds are "mystic chords" that "will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched" by "the better angels of our nature," so the Union is pictured as music waiting to be played. Choice A is not in the sentence. Choice B recalls Lincoln's "house divided" speech of 1858, not this sentence. Choice D belongs to Webster's paragraph 2.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Jackson ends Passage 2 with "Are you really ready to incur its guilt?" Lincoln ends Passage 3 with "the better angels of our nature." How do the two endings differ?
Answer: B
Jackson has just said that "Disunion by armed force is treason," so his question warns; Lincoln calls his hearers "not enemies, but friends" and trusts the "bonds of affection." Choice A reverses the two. Choice C is wrong for Lincoln, whose passage threatens no one. Choice D is not in either passage.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 2 of Passage 1, Webster says he has "not allowed myself, Sir, to look beyond the Union" and prays that what lies behind may never be opened to his vision. How does Lincoln's paragraph 2 in Passage 3 treat the prospect of separation differently?
Answer: B
Webster will not look: "Beyond that I seek not to penetrate the veil." Lincoln does look. He asks whether intercourse could be "more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before" and follows a war to its end, when "the identical old questions, as to terms of intercourse, are again upon you." Choice A gives Webster's image of the abyss, which Lincoln's paragraph does not use. Choice C describes Webster's approach, not Lincoln's. Choice D contradicts Lincoln's warning of "much loss on both sides and no gain on either."
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 1 of Passage 2, Jackson says it would be "a solecism" to claim that any part of a nation could leave it "without committing any offense." What does "solecism" mean here?
Answer: A
Jackson argues that saying a State may secede "is to say that the United States are not a nation": the claim undoes its own terms, like calling something a nation whose parts can leave it at will. Choice B and choice C confuse the word with the legal matters in the paragraph. Choice D mistakes "solecism" for "soliloquy."
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Paragraph 2 of Passage 2 includes "Their object is disunion. But be not deceived by names. Disunion by armed force is treason." What is the effect of these sentences?
Answer: D
Three short sentences of four to six words each move from a charge ("Their object is disunion") to a warning to a verdict, and the italicized treason names the act, leaving no room for doubt. Choice A is the opposite of the sentence length. Choice B describes the question that follows, not these statements. Choice C is wrong because there are no images of nature here.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Complete the Passage 3 column of Diagram 2. For each row (kind of Union, what disunion would mean, style of the key lines), give a short answer and a quotation from Passage 3.
Model answer: Kind of Union: a perpetual Union, "the Union will endure forever." What disunion would mean: a separation that cannot really happen, since the sections "can not but remain face to face," and a war that ends with "the identical old questions" unsettled. Style: it moves from legal reasoning ("organic law") to plain questions ("Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws?") to a musical image ("mystic chords of memory"). Rubric: full credit for all three rows, each with an accurate quotation; partial credit for two rows.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Both Webster (Passage 1, paragraph 2) and Lincoln (Passage 3, paragraph 3) close with an image. Explain one way Lincoln's approach to the theme of the Union differs from Webster's, quoting both.
Model answer: Webster looks at what disunion would destroy: he fears seeing "the broken and dishonored fragments of a once glorious Union" and a land "drenched, it may be, in fraternal blood," and he answers with the flag's motto. Lincoln looks at what still unites the country: "We are not enemies, but friends," and "The mystic chords of memory" will "swell the chorus of the Union." Webster warns through fear; Lincoln appeals through memory and affection, speaking to people who had already begun to leave. Rubric: full credit for a clear difference with a quotation from each; partial credit for one passage only.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Explain why Passage 3 is a document of historical significance. Use the date of the address and one sentence from the passage.
Model answer: Lincoln gave the address on March 4, 1861, after seven States had declared that they had left the Union and a few weeks before the war began. In it the new President stated the government's position: "the Union of these States is perpetual," so the secession declarations had no legal force in his view. The address set out the constitutional ground on which the national government would act in the war that followed. Rubric: full credit for the occasion, a quoted sentence and an explanation of its consequence; partial credit for the occasion or the sentence alone.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
Which passage do you think was most persuasive to its first audience? Name the audience each speaker addressed and support your choice with evidence.
Model answer: Webster spoke to the Senate and a crowded gallery, Jackson addressed the people of South Carolina, and Lincoln spoke to the whole nation, including the States that had declared secession. Lincoln's passage may have been the most persuasive to those who were still undecided, because it avoids threats and offers friendship: "We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies." Jackson's warning ("Are you really ready to incur its guilt?") may have convinced waverers but angered his opponents. Rubric: full credit for naming each audience and supporting a choice with at least one quotation; partial credit for a choice without the audiences or without evidence. Other well-supported choices earn full credit.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Jackson writes, "The laws of the United States must be executed" (Passage 2, paragraph 2). Lincoln writes, "Continue to execute all the express provisions of our National Constitution" (Passage 3, paragraph 1). Compare how each presents the duty to carry out the law and what that duty means for the Union.
Model answer: Jackson presents carrying out the laws as a personal duty he cannot escape: "I have no discretionary power on the subject; my duty is emphatically pronounced in the Constitution." He ties that duty to force, since opposition "must be repelled." Lincoln presents carrying out the Constitution as the thing that keeps the Union alive: if it continues, "the Union will endure forever," and the Union can be destroyed only "by some action not provided for in the instrument itself." Jackson's sentences warn opponents what the government will do to them; Lincoln states a calm general rule that makes the Union's survival depend on ordinary law. Rubric: full credit for each author's view of the duty with a quotation and a stated difference; partial credit for one author.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Write a thesis statement for an essay on how Passages 1, 2 and 3 address the theme of the Union. Then give one short quotation from each passage that you would use.
Model answer: Thesis: Webster, Jackson and Lincoln all argue that no State can break the Union, but each grounds that claim in a different concept: Webster in the people, Jackson in the nature of a nation, and Lincoln in law and shared memory. Quotations: "the people's Constitution" (Passage 1); "forms a government, not a league" (Passage 2); "The mystic chords of memory" (Passage 3). Rubric: full credit for an arguable thesis that names a shared theme and a difference, with an accurate quotation from each passage; partial credit for a thesis that only lists topics.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RI.9-10.9 mean?
RI.9-10.9 asks students to analyze seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance, including how they address related themes and concepts. "RI" means Reading Informational Text and "9-10" is the grade band. In practice, students read founding speeches, proclamations and letters closely and compare how several of them treat the same big idea.
What counts as a seminal U.S. document for RI.9-10.9?
A document that shaped how Americans think about an idea and that later writers keep quoting. The standard's examples are Washington's Farewell Address, the Gettysburg Address, Franklin D. Roosevelt's Four Freedoms speech and Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail." Presidential addresses and proclamations, famous Senate speeches and court opinions can all qualify.
Do students have to read the four documents named in the standard?
No. They are introduced with "e.g.," so they are examples, not a required list. This page uses three other seminal documents on one theme and places two of the examples on its timeline. King's letter is still under copyright, so teachers who pair it with this lesson should use a licensed copy.
What are "related themes and concepts" in RI.9-10.9?
They are the ideas that several documents share or argue about. Here the theme is the Union, and the related concepts include where the government's power comes from, whether the Union can be broken and what disunion would mean. Students compare how each document defines, repeats or pictures those concepts.
How is RI.9-10.9 different from RI.11-12.9?
RI.11-12.9 is narrower and deeper: it names required founding documents (the Declaration of Independence, the Preamble, the Bill of Rights and Lincoln's Second Inaugural) and asks students to analyze their themes, purposes and rhetorical features. RI.9-10.9 lets teachers choose the documents and stresses how they address related themes and concepts.
How is RI.9-10.9 different from RH.9-10.9?
RH.9-10.9 belongs to the history literacy standards and asks students to compare how primary and secondary sources treat the same topic. RI.9-10.9 is an English standard: it focuses on seminal documents and pays attention to their literary significance, such as memorable images and phrasing, as well as their ideas.
Why teach the nullification and secession crises in English class?
Because the documents from those crises are both arguments and literature. Webster's closing lines and Lincoln's "better angels of our nature" are quoted for their language, while Jackson's proclamation shows how plain legal prose makes a case. Reading them together lets students see one theme handled in three styles, which is the heart of the standard.
How can students handle the old-fashioned language in these speeches?
Read the passages aloud, gloss a few words in the margin (league, solecism, organic law, aliens in the sense of foreigners) and let students paraphrase one sentence at a time. Activity 2 turns this into analysis: students write plain versions and then discuss what the originals do that the plain versions cannot.
How is RI.9-10.9 assessed?
Assessments often pair two excerpts on a shared topic and ask students to identify a common concept, explain how each text presents it and support the answer with quotations. Written responses are judged on accurate evidence and on explaining how the language presents the idea, not only on summary.
How does RI.9-10.9 connect to U.S. History?
The same documents appear in U.S. History courses, where students study the causes of the Civil War and the debate over states' rights. The English class adds close reading of the language. A history teacher and an English teacher can share this lesson: one explains the crises, and the other shows how the documents argue.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to RI.9-10.9: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RI.8.9Prerequisite
Analyze two texts that give conflicting information on the same topic
Lesson coming soon
Alongside
RI.9-10.6Parallel
Determine an author's point of view or purpose and how rhetoric advances it