RI.6.8: Tracing and Evaluating an Argument and Its Claims
In plain English: RI.6.8 is the Common Core grade 6 ELA standard that asks students to trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text. Students follow how each claim leads to the writer's main point, then sort the claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from the claims that are not. It builds on RI.5.8 and leads to RI.7.8.
Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy · Domain: Reading Standards for Informational Text · Cluster: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas · Official standard
Students learn to trace an argument, which means following it step by step: finding the writer's main claim (the big point the writer wants readers to believe) and the specific claims (the smaller points) that lead to it. Then they evaluate it, which means judging how well it holds up. The key test in grade 6 comes straight from the standard: which claims are supported by reasons and evidence, and which are not? A reason tells why a claim should be believed. Evidence shows it: facts, numbers, examples, observations or the words of an expert.
The teacher models with a famous letter Benjamin Franklin wrote to his daughter in 1784, in which he argues that the bald eagle was a poor choice as a symbol and that the turkey is "a much more respectable Bird" (Passage 1). Pairs trace an invented student letter asking for a bike rack (Passage 2). Students work alone on a speech about dogs that the lawyer George Graham Vest gave to a jury (the citizens who decide a trial) in 1870, printed in a 1925 book (Passage 3), and answer the quiz. The homework uses an invented letter to a town newspaper about Sunday library hours (Passage 4). All four passages are printed in the lesson plan.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Identify the main claim of an argument and the specific claims that lead to it
Trace an argument in order, explaining how each claim connects to the main claim
Distinguish claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not, quoting the text
Evaluate how well an argument is supported and explain what evidence is missing
Prior Knowledge Required
Students should already be comfortable with:
Explaining how an author uses reasons and evidence to support particular points RI.5.8
Citing textual evidence to support an analysis of what a text says RI.6.1
Telling a fact (something that can be checked) from an opinion (what someone thinks or feels)
Using context to work out the meaning of an unfamiliar word
"Your cousin says: 'You should come to my soccer team. We won 9 of our 12 games this season. Our coach is the nicest coach in the whole world. And soccer is the best sport ever invented.' Which of these sentences would help convince your parents? Which would not? Why?"
Take several answers. Students usually notice that "9 of our 12 games" is something a parent could check, while "the nicest coach in the whole world" and "the best sport ever invented" are feelings that nothing in the message backs up. Name the parts: "You should come to my soccer team" is the main claim; the other sentences are specific claims offered to support it; and the number of wins is evidence. Tell students that RI.6.8 asks them to do this with whole texts: follow the claims in order and sort the ones that are backed up from the ones that are not.
Direct Instruction15 minutes
Teach the terms and leave them on the board:
Argument: writing or speech that tries to make readers believe something or do something.
Claim: a statement the writer wants readers to accept. The main claim is the big point; specific claims are the smaller points along the way.
Reason: an explanation of why a claim is true, often after "because" or "so."
Evidence: facts, numbers, examples, observations or an expert's words that show a claim is true.
Supported claim: a claim backed by reasons and evidence. Unsupported claim: a claim the writer simply states, or backs only with feelings or name-calling.
Trace: follow the argument in order, from claim to claim, as you would trace a path on a map. Evaluate: judge how strong the support is.
Signal words: words such as first, because and therefore that show how one claim connects to the next.
Stress one idea: an unsupported claim is not always false. It is a claim the reader has no good reason yet to accept.
Introduce the text. After the American Revolution, officers of the Continental Army (the American army in the war) formed a club called the Society of the Cincinnati. Its members wore a badge shaped like an eagle. In 1784, Benjamin Franklin, who was living in France, read about the new society in newspapers his daughter Sarah Bache had sent him from Philadelphia, and he answered her in a long letter. Passage 1 is the part of the letter about the two birds, printed with Franklin's own spellings and capital letters. Words to know: Dindon (French for turkey), Representative (here, a symbol), perch'd (perched), Fishing-Hawk (the osprey, a bird that dives for fish), diligent (hard-working), in good Case (healthy and well fed), Sharping (cheating), lousy (covered with lice), rank (complete), KingBird (a small, bold bird), emblem (symbol), Chevaliers d'Industrie (French for swindlers, people who live by tricks), withal (also), peculiar to (found only in), Jesuits (Catholic priests, some of whom worked in Canada), Charles the Ninth (a king of France in the 1500s), Grenadier of the British Guards (a British soldier; British soldiers wore red coats) and presume (dare).
1Others object to the Bald Eagle as looking too much like a Dindon, or Turkey. For my own part, I wish the Bald Eagle had not been chosen as the Representative of our Country; he is a Bird of bad moral Character; he does not get his living honestly; you may have seen him perch'd on some dead Tree, near the River where, too lazy to fish for himself, he watches the Labour of the Fishing-Hawk; and, when that diligent Bird has at length taken a Fish, and is bearing it to his Nest for the support of his Mate and young ones, the Bald Eagle pursues him, and takes it from him. With all this Injustice he is never in good Case; but, like those among Men who live by Sharping and Robbing, he is generally poor, and often very lousy. Besides, he is a rank Coward; the little KingBird, not bigger than a Sparrow, attacks him boldly and drives him out of the District. He is therefore by no means a proper emblem for the brave and honest Cincinnati of America, who have driven all the Kingbirds from our Country; though exactly fit for that Order of Knights, which the French call Chevaliers d'Industrie.
2I am, on this account, not displeas'd that the Figure is not known as a Bald Eagle, but looks more like a Turk'y. For in Truth, the Turk'y is in comparison a much more respectable Bird, and withal a true original Native of America. Eagles have been found in all Countries, but the Turk'y was peculiar to ours; the first of the Species seen in Europe being brought to France by the Jesuits from Canada, and serv'd up at the Wedding Table of Charles the Ninth. He is, [...] a Bird of Courage, and would not hesitate to attack a Grenadier of the British Guards, who should presume to invade his FarmYard with a red Coat on.
Benjamin Franklin, in the edition of Albert Henry Smyth, Letter to Mrs. Sarah Bache, January 26, 1784 (Passage 1: the paragraphs on the bald eagle and the turkey; one phrase left out and marked [...]) (1784; this edition 1906). Public domain (published 1906). Source text.
Trace: find the main claim
Franklin writes, "I wish the Bald Eagle had not been chosen as the Representative of our Country" (paragraph 1) and later that "the Turk'y is in comparison a much more respectable Bird" (paragraph 2). What is his main claim, and how are his specific claims arranged?
Result: Main claim: the bald eagle is a poor symbol for the country, and the turkey is a more respectable bird. The specific claims come in two groups. Paragraph 1 lists what is wrong with the eagle: it is dishonest, poor and lousy, and a coward. Paragraph 1 ends with a small conclusion, "He is therefore by no means a proper emblem," where "therefore" signals that the claims before it are meant to lead there. Paragraph 2 lists what is right about the turkey. Tracing means following that order.
A claim supported by evidence
Franklin claims the eagle "does not get his living honestly." What does he give to back this up?
Result: He gives an observation readers can check: the eagle "watches the Labour of the Fishing-Hawk" and, when the hawk has caught a fish, "the Bald Eagle pursues him, and takes it from him." That is evidence, a specific behavior, and he even invites readers to check it: "you may have seen him." Bald eagles really do chase ospreys and steal their fish. The claim is supported. (Calling this "bad moral Character" is still Franklin's judgment: a bird is not dishonest the way a person is.)
A claim with no support
Franklin adds that the eagle "is generally poor, and often very lousy" (paragraph 1). Is this claim supported?
Result: No. Franklin gives no reason and no evidence: no example, no observation, nothing a reader could check. He only compares the eagle to "those among Men who live by Sharping and Robbing," which makes readers dislike the bird without showing that the claim is true. It is an unsupported claim.
Evaluate: does the evidence prove the claim?
Franklin claims the eagle "is a rank Coward," because "the little KingBird, not bigger than a Sparrow, attacks him boldly and drives him out of the District" (paragraph 1). How strong is this support?
Result: Franklin does give evidence, a behavior people can watch: small kingbirds do chase eagles away. But the evidence does not quite prove the claim. An eagle that flies off from a pestering little bird may simply not think it worth a fight; that is not the same as cowardice. The claim has evidence, but the link between the evidence and the word "Coward" is weak. Evaluating means asking not only "Is there evidence?" but "Does it show what the writer says it shows?"
Find it, check it, judge it. Show Diagram 1 and model the routine with the examples: (1) copy the claim in the writer's words; (2) look for a reason (why?) and for evidence (what shows it?); (3) decide: supported, partly supported, or not supported, and say why. Stress that a claim can have evidence and still be weak if the evidence does not show what the writer says. Give students a frame: "The writer claims ___. The support is ___ (a reason / evidence / nothing). This claim is supported / partly supported / not supported because ___."
Guided Practice15 minutes
Read Passage 2 aloud: a letter from a sixth grader to her principal, invented for this page. Students copy the claim checker in Diagram 2. In pairs, they highlight each claim in one color and its support in the other, then run every claim through the three questions. Pairs answer the three questions below, then share. Teacher notes:
1Dear Ms. Okafor: I am a sixth grader at Birch Street Middle School, and I am writing to ask you to put a bike rack by the front doors before spring break.
2First, more students would ride to school if they had a safe place to lock their bikes. I gave a survey to three sixth-grade homerooms, and 31 of the 74 students said they would ride at least twice a week if we had a rack. Right now, on a normal day, only 6 bikes are chained to the fence by the parking lot.
3Second, a rack would not cost much. The hardware store on Main Street sells a steel rack that holds 10 bikes for $389. Our parent group told me it still has $1,200 to spend this year.
4Third, riding to school is good exercise. Our health textbook says that children and teens need about 60 minutes of physical activity every day. My ride takes 15 minutes each way, so biking would give me half of that before the first bell.
5Also, everyone knows that kids who ride bikes are happier and get better grades. Bikes are much cooler than cars, anyway.
6Finally, the street in front of our school is perfectly safe, so nobody would ever get hurt. Please say yes to a bike rack. Sincerely, Maya R., Grade 6
Written for this page, Make Room for Bikes (Passage 2: an invented letter to a principal written for this page; the student, the school and the survey are invented). Original passage written for this page.
Trace it. What is the main claim, and what are the specific claims, in order? Teacher note: main claim, "put a bike rack by the front doors before spring break" (paragraph 1). The signal words "First," "Second," "Third," "Also" and "Finally" mark five specific claims: more students would ride (paragraph 2), a rack would not cost much (paragraph 3), riding is good exercise (paragraph 4), bike riders are happier and get better grades (paragraph 5), and the street is perfectly safe (paragraph 6).
Sort it. Which claims are supported by reasons and evidence, and which are not? Teacher note: paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 give evidence: a survey ("31 of the 74 students"), a price and a budget ("$389" and "$1,200"), and a health guideline plus the writer's ride time. Paragraphs 5 and 6 give none. "Everyone knows" is not evidence, and "perfectly safe, so nobody would ever get hurt" is stated with nothing to back it up.
Judge it. Is even the supported part strong? Teacher note: look closely at the numbers. The rack "holds 10 bikes," but 31 students said they would ride, so the writer's own evidence suggests one rack may not be enough. The survey also covered only three homerooms, and "would ride" is a promise, not a count. Strong readers see that evidence can support a claim and still leave questions. For the principal, the unsupported safety claim may matter most of all.
Independent Practice15 minutes
Students read Passage 3 on their own and fill in a fresh claim checker before they answer the quiz. In 1870, a Missouri farmer went to court against his neighbor after his hunting dog, Old Drum, was shot. A young lawyer named George Graham Vest spoke to the jury (the group of citizens who decide a trial) for the dog's owner. Vest later served as a United States senator. The speech is printed inside a short, unsigned account of the trial in a 1925 book of dog stories. Words to know: testimony (what witnesses say in court), address (a speech), reared (raised), traitors to their faith (people who break a promise of loyalty), reputation (what others think of a person), ill-considered (not thought through), prone to (likely to), malice (the wish to hurt someone), prosperity (having money and success), pauper (a very poor person), outcast (someone pushed away by others), plaintiff (the person who brings a case to court) and verdict (the jury's decision).
1Young Vest took no interest in the testimony and made no notes, but at the close of the case arose, and in a soft voice made the following address:
2"Gentlemen of the Jury:
3"The best friend a man has in the world may turn against him, and become his enemy. His son or daughter that he has reared with loving care may prove ungrateful. Those who are nearest and dearest to us, those whom we trust with our happiness and our good name, may become traitors to their faith. The money that a man has, he may lose. It flies away from him, perhaps when he needs it most. A man's reputation may be sacrificed in a moment of ill-considered action. The people who are prone to fall on their knees to do us honor when success is with us may be the first to throw the stone of malice when failure settles its cloud upon our heads.
4"The one absolutely unselfish friend that man can have in this selfish world, the one that never deserts him, the one that never proves ungrateful or treacherous, is his dog. A man's dog stands by him in prosperity and in poverty, in health and in sickness. He will sleep on the cold ground, where the wintry winds blow and the snow drives fiercely, if only he may be near his master's side. He will kiss the hand that has no food to offer; he will lick the wounds and sores that come in encounter with the roughness of the world. He guards the sleep of his pauper master as if he were a prince. When all other friends desert, he remains. When riches take wings, and reputation falls to pieces, he is as constant in his love as the sun in its journey through the heavens.
5"If fortune drives the master forth an outcast in the world, friendless and homeless, the faithful dog asks no higher privilege than that of accompanying him, to guard him against danger, to fight against his enemies. And when the last scene of all comes, and death takes his master in its embrace and his body is laid away in the cold ground, no matter if all other friends pursue their way, there by the grave-side will the noble dog be found, his head between his paws, his eyes sad, but open in alert watchfulness, faithful and true even in death."
6When he concluded his remarks, there were but few dry eyes in the audience. The case was submitted without further argument, and the jury promptly returned a verdict for the plaintiff.
George Graham Vest, in an unsigned account printed by the book's editors, Dwight Everett Watkins and Charles H. Raymond, A Tribute to the Dog (Passage 3: the speech inside the editors' account of the trial, from the account's third paragraph to the end) (1925; this edition 1927). Public domain (published 1925). Source text.
Closure5-10 minutes
Exit ticket: (1) Write one claim of your own about your school that is supported by a reason and evidence, and one that is not. (2) Finish the sentence: "A claim can have evidence and still be weak when ___."
Teacher note on the texts. Passage 1 is printed as Franklin wrote it, with his capital letters and old spellings ("perch'd," "Turk'y," "FarmYard"). He wrote it as a private, partly joking letter to his daughter about a club badge, not as a formal proposal for a national bird; the bald eagle had already been placed on the Great Seal of the United States in 1782. His comparison of the eagle to "those among Men who live by Sharping and Robbing" is name-calling, which is part of what students evaluate. Passage 3 uses "man" and "his" for all people, as writers of its time often did. The speech was not recorded word for word at the trial; like other printed versions, this one was written down afterward, and versions differ slightly. Its last paragraph speaks of a master's death and burial, so prepare students who have recently lost a pet or a family member. Passages 2 and 4 and all their people, places and numbers are invented for this page.
For homework: students read Passage 4, an invented letter to the editor of a town newspaper, printed below. Words to know: editor (the person who chooses what a newspaper prints), sign-in sheets (lists that visitors write their names on), average (the total shared out equally, here visitors per Saturday), council (the group of people elected to run a town) and director (the person in charge).
1To the Editor: The Maple Falls Public Library should open on Sunday afternoons, from 1 to 5 p.m. I am in sixth grade, and I think Sunday hours would help the whole town.
2People already want more weekend time at the library. The library's sign-in sheets show that 1,236 people visited on the four Saturdays in October. That is an average of 309 visitors each Saturday, more than on any weekday.
3Sunday hours would not cost the town much. At the September council meeting, the library director said that paying two staff members for four extra hours would cost about $180 a week.
4Libraries are the most important buildings in any town, and people who read are always kinder than people who do not.
5Sunday hours would also help students do better in school. My older brother says he would have passed his science test last spring if the library had been open the Sunday before.
6Other towns have tried it. When the Cedar Grove library began opening on Sundays last year, its head librarian reported that Sunday became its second-busiest day of the week.
7Please, council members, do not let our library sit dark on the one afternoon when many families are free. Signed, Jordan P., Maple Falls
Written for this page, Open the Library on Sundays (Passage 4: an invented letter to the editor written for this page; the writer, the towns and all numbers are invented). Original passage written for this page.
Differentiation Strategies
For Struggling Students
Give a copy of Passage 1 with the claims already underlined, so students only decide what support each one has
Allow a three-color code while reading: one color for the main claim, one for specific claims and one for evidence
Pair Diagram 2 with sentence starters: "The writer says ___. The writer shows it by ___."
For Advanced Students
Ask them to rewrite one unsupported claim from Passage 2 so that it is supported, and to name where they would find the evidence
Have them look for a claim in Passage 1 that is supported but still unfair, and explain the difference
Ask them to find an advertisement or a letter to the editor, trace its argument and share which claims are backed up
Assessment Guidance
What to Look For
Check that students name the main claim in their own words, list the specific claims in the order the writer gives them, and quote the words they judge. A strong answer says what kind of support a claim has (a reason, evidence, or nothing), decides whether that support really shows the claim is true, and names the evidence that is missing. A common weak answer calls a claim "unsupported" simply because the student disagrees with it; ask "What does the writer give you to go on?" Another is to call any number or quotation strong evidence; ask "Does this show what the writer says it shows?"
02
Classroom Activities
3 Activities
1
Claim Sort
15 minPairs
Each pair gets 10 claim cards, written for this activity, from an argument that the school should start a recycling program. All names and numbers on the cards are invented. Pairs sort the cards into three piles: Supported (a reason and evidence), Reason only and Not supported.
The 10 Cards
Recycling would cut our trash. The custodian says about 3 of the 9 bags we fill each day are paper and bottles.
Recycling is the right thing to do.
Bins would cost the school nothing. The city's website says it gives free blue bins to every public school.
We should recycle because paper that is thrown away is wasted.
Everyone in the school wants to recycle.
Students would use the bins. When Mr. Lee's class kept a bin for two weeks, it was full every afternoon.
A recycling club would be fun because students like working together.
Recycling is the best idea anyone has ever had.
Cans could earn money for the school. The scrap center on Oak Street pays 5 cents for each can.
Recycling matters because it teaches us to take care of the earth.
Procedure
Pairs sort the cards and write, on the back of each card, the word or number that decided their choice (8 minutes)
Two pairs compare piles and must agree on any card they sorted differently (5 minutes)
Answer key for the teacher: Supported, cards 1, 3, 6 and 9; Reason only, cards 4, 7 and 10; Not supported, cards 2, 5 and 8
Discussion Questions
Card 7 gives a reason. What evidence would move it to the Supported pile?
Card 5 sounds like a fact. Why is it still not supported?
Modification
For students who need support, give only cards 1, 2, 4 and 5 and sort the first card together.
2
Follow the Claim Trail
15 minGroups of 3-4
Each group gets 8 strips cut from a short argument, written for this activity: "Our school should plant a row of trees along the playground fence." The strips are shuffled. The group rebuilds the argument on chart paper as a trail, with the main claim at the top and each piece of support taped under the claim it backs up.
The 8 Strips
Our school should plant a row of trees along the playground fence.
Trees would keep the playground cooler.
On a sunny afternoon in September, our class held a thermometer 1 meter above the blacktop. It read 31 °C in the sun and 27 °C in the shade of the one oak tree. (invented data)
Trees would give birds a place to nest.
That is because many birds build their nests in branches.
Trees are the most beautiful plants in the world.
The city parks department gives young trees to schools for free each spring. (invented)
Planting trees would not cost much.
Procedure
Groups find the main claim first and tape it at the top (strip 1)
They tape each specific claim under it (strips 2, 4, 6 and 8) and put the support under the claim it belongs to: strip 3 under strip 2, strip 5 under strip 4 and strip 7 under strip 8
Groups circle in red any claim with nothing under it, and label each support "reason" or "evidence"
Discussion Questions
Which claim has a reason but no evidence? What could the class observe to add evidence?
Strip 3 is a measurement from one afternoon. How could the class make that evidence stronger?
3
Thumbs Test
10 minWhole class
The teacher reads six invented claims like those in advertisements and posters. Students show a thumb up (supported by reasons and evidence), a thumb sideways (a reason only) or a thumb down (not supported). Before the answer is shown, one student from each group explains the vote.
The Six Claims
"Sparkle toothpaste is the best toothpaste on Earth!"
"Come to the fall fair, because the money raised will pay for new library books."
"Last year, the fall fair raised $2,400, and the library bought 160 new books with it."
"Everybody who is anybody plays Star Racer."
"Wear a helmet, because it protects your head if you fall."
"In the town's count, 18 of the 20 bike crashes that sent riders to the hospital involved riders without helmets."
Procedure
Answer key for the teacher: thumbs down for 1 and 4; sideways for 2 and 5; up for 3 and 6
After each vote, ask: "What would the writer need to add to earn a thumb up?"
Point out that claims 2 and 3, and claims 5 and 6, make the same case; the second of each pair adds evidence
Variation
For a harder version, students bring in a real advertisement or poster, read its claims aloud and lead the vote.
03
Diagrams & Visual Aids
2 diagrams
Diagram 1: Tracing Three of Franklin's Claims
The main claim of Passage 1 at the top and three of the specific claims from paragraph 1 below it, each with the support Franklin gives and a judgment: supported, not supported, or evidence that may not prove the claim. It matches worked examples 2-4.
Diagram 2: Claim Checker
A three-question test for any claim. Students copy it in Guided Practice and run each claim in Passage 2 through it: Is there a reason? Is there evidence? Does the evidence really show the claim is true?
04
Homework Assignment
~30 min
RI.6.8 Homework: Sunday Hours at the Library
Directions: Read Passage 4 at the end of the lesson plan (in Closure). Cite it by paragraph, for example (Passage 4, paragraph 2). For every judgment, quote the words you are judging and explain your thinking. Answer Problems 1-5 in 3-5 sentences each; you may use the claim checker from Diagram 2.
Part 1: Trace the Argument (Problems 1-2)
Trace the argument in Passage 4. Write the main claim in your own words. Then list the specific claims in paragraphs 2-6 in order, and explain in one sentence each how the claim connects to the main claim.
The last paragraph asks the council members not to "let our library sit dark on the one afternoon when many families are free." Is this a new claim, a reason, evidence or a restatement of the main claim (the main claim said again in other words)? Explain how it fits the argument you traced in Problem 1.
Part 2: Supported or Not? (Problems 3-4)
Paragraphs 2 and 3 each make a claim and then support it. For each paragraph, quote the claim, name the evidence and say where the evidence comes from. Then explain which of the two you find more convincing, and why.
Paragraph 4 makes two claims. Quote each one and decide whether it is supported by reasons and evidence. Then explain why the word "always" makes the second claim very hard to support.
Part 3: Evaluate (Problems 5-6)
In paragraph 5, the writer supports the claim that Sunday hours would help students with one person's opinion: "My older brother says he would have passed his science test." Is this enough evidence for a claim about all students? Explain, and describe one piece of evidence that would support the claim better.
Write a paragraph of 6-8 sentences evaluating the whole argument in Passage 4. Which claims are well supported, and which are not? Judge at least three claims, quote the text, and end with the one change that would make the letter most convincing to the town council.
Rubric
Criterion
Full Credit (2 pts)
Partial Credit (1 pt)
No Credit (0 pts)
Tracing
States the main claim accurately and lists the specific claims in order, showing how each connects
Main claim correct, but claims missing or out of order
Main claim missing or wrong
Supported or Not
Sorts each claim correctly and names its reason or evidence
Sorts most claims correctly, or names the support vaguely
Claims not sorted, or sorted by agreement only
Evaluation
Judges whether the evidence really shows the claim and names what is missing
Judges without explaining, or names missing evidence only
No judgment
Quotations and Accuracy
Quotes the passage with paragraph numbers; no misreadings
Some quotations missing, or one misreading
No quotations, or several misreadings
05
Quiz: 20 Questions
Interactive, with answers
Instructions
Questions 1-3 are about arguments in general. Questions 4-7 and 15 use Passage 1 (Direct Instruction), and questions 8-14 and 16-18 use Passage 3 (Independent Practice). Question 19 uses Passages 1 and 3, and question 20 uses Passage 3. Your score updates as you answer, and Reset quiz clears everything.
Multiple choice: pick an option to check it. Short answer: write your answer, then reveal the model answer.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In an argument, what is the main claim?
Answer: B
Choice B is the definition: the main claim is the writer's big point, and the specific claims lead to it. Choice A confuses a claim with evidence; a surprising fact is support, not the point. Choice C mistakes position for purpose: many writers state the main claim first, but not all do. Choice D also names evidence, an expert's words, not the claim.
Question 2 of 20 · Multiple Choice
A student writes, "Our town needs a crosswalk on Elm Street." Which sentence is evidence for this claim?
Answer: C
Choice C is evidence: a number from a named source that a reader could check. Choice A is another claim with nothing behind it. Choice B is the writer's feeling, not proof. Choice D sounds like a fact, but "everybody I know" and "always" cannot be checked, so it gives no real support.
Question 3 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Read: "We should keep the gym open after school. It gives students a safe place to play, and it is the most fun place in the world." How is the bold claim supported?
Answer: D
Choice D is right: "It gives students a safe place to play" is a reason for keeping the gym open, but the writer gives no fact, number or example to show the gym is safe. Choices A and B describe evidence that is not there: the sentence has no number and quotes no one. Choice C treats the claim as a fact, but whether the gym is safe is exactly what a reader would want shown.
Question 4 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In Passage 1, paragraph 2, Franklin writes that "the first of the Species seen in Europe being brought to France by the Jesuits from Canada." How does he support this claim?
Answer: A
Choice A is right: Franklin names no source, date or witness; he simply states it. A careful reader would check it, and it turns out to be wrong: the Spanish brought turkeys to Europe from Mexico in the early 1500s. Choice B invents a quotation that is not in the passage. Choice C confuses this claim with the fishing-hawk claim in paragraph 1, where Franklin does point to something readers can see. Choice D names details the passage never gives.
Question 5 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Passage 1 begins, "Others object to the Bald Eagle as looking too much like a Dindon, or Turkey." Whose claim is this?
Answer: B
Choice B is right: "Others object" tells the reader that this is what other people say. Franklin's own view starts with "For my own part." Tracing an argument means keeping track of who claims what. Choice A mistakes a reported claim for the writer's claim. Choices C and D name people who appear in or behind the letter, but the sentence does not say that either of them made this objection.
Question 6 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Franklin writes, "Eagles have been found in all Countries, but the Turk'y was peculiar to ours" (Passage 1, paragraph 2). Which claim does this sentence support?
Answer: C
Choice C is right: the sentence gives the reason the turkey is a true native: other countries have eagles, but only America had the turkey. (That part is accurate: wild turkeys come only from North America.) Choices A and D are claims about the eagle in paragraph 1, which have their own support. Choice B is a different claim, which comes later and has no support of its own.
Question 7 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Franklin ends Passage 1 by saying the turkey "would not hesitate to attack a Grenadier of the British Guards, who should presume to invade his FarmYard with a red Coat on." What is the best evaluation of this claim?
Answer: D
Choice D is right: Franklin offers no example or observation, and the picture of a turkey charging a soldier is meant to make his daughter smile. Choice A invents an event that the passage does not describe. Choice B links two claims that Franklin never connects; being native says nothing about courage. Choice C mixes up one true detail, the red coats, with the claim itself, which is about the turkey's courage.
Question 8 of 20 · Multiple Choice
What is the main claim of the speech in Passage 3?
Answer: C
Choice C is right: paragraph 4 names "The one absolutely unselfish friend that man can have in this selfish world" as "his dog," and paragraphs 4 and 5 build on that point. Choice A turns "may prove ungrateful" into "are sure to," which the speech never says. Choice B reverses the speech: paragraph 3 says money "flies away from him." Choice D goes far beyond the speech, which is about one case.
Question 9 of 20 · Multiple Choice
How does paragraph 3 of Passage 3 fit into Vest's argument?
Answer: A
Choice A is right: friends, children, money, reputation and flatterers all "may" fail a man, which prepares for paragraph 4, where the dog "never deserts him." Tracing shows the order: first what fails, then what does not. Choice B names evidence the speech never gives; Vest does not mention the facts of the case. Choice C reverses the structure. Choice D mistakes general examples for facts about the owner.
Question 10 of 20 · Multiple Choice
In paragraph 4, Vest says a dog "will sleep on the cold ground, where the wintry winds blow," "will kiss the hand that has no food to offer" and "guards the sleep of his pauper master as if he were a prince." What kind of support are these sentences?
Answer: B
Choice B is right: each sentence describes what a dog "will" do in general. They are reasons many listeners would accept from their own experience, but no particular dog, event or fact is named, so they are weak evidence. Choices A and C describe kinds of evidence the speech does not contain. Choice D is wrong because paragraph 1 says Vest "took no interest in the testimony," and the speech never refers to it.
Question 11 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Vest calls the dog "The one absolutely unselfish friend" and "the one that never deserts him" (paragraph 4). Why do the words "absolutely" and "never" make this claim hard to support?
Answer: C
Choice C is right: "never" means no dog, ever, and one dog that ran away would disprove it. Claims with words like always, never, everyone and absolutely need very strong evidence. Choice A invents a scientist. Choice B confuses the words with hard vocabulary; both words are still common. Choice D is wrong because the sentence is a statement, not a question.
Question 12 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Which sentence, if Vest had added it to paragraph 4, would be evidence for his claim that a dog "stands by him in prosperity and in poverty"?
Answer: D
Choice D is right: it gives a specific example, one family and one dog, that shows the claim in action. Choice A is another unsupported claim, praise with nothing behind it. Choices B and C tell listeners they must already agree; that is pressure, not evidence, because neither sentence shows anything that a listener could check.
Question 13 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Paragraph 1 of Passage 3 says, "Young Vest took no interest in the testimony and made no notes." Who makes this claim, and how is it supported?
Answer: B
Choice B is right: the words come from the unsigned account that the book prints around the speech, not from the speech itself, and the account names no witness or record. It is an interesting claim, but unsupported, and the book was printed more than fifty years after the trial. Choice A is wrong because the sentence is outside the speech and says he "made no notes." Choices C and D name people who do not speak in the passage.
Question 14 of 20 · Multiple Choice
Paragraph 6 says "there were but few dry eyes in the audience" and "the jury promptly returned a verdict for the plaintiff." What does this show about Vest's claims?
Answer: A
Choice A is right: tears and a quick verdict show that the speech was persuasive; they do not add evidence for any claim about dogs. A claim can win people over and still be unsupported. Choice B mistakes agreement for proof. Choice C draws a conclusion the paragraph does not support. Choice D invents a fact about the jury.
Question 15 of 20 · Short Answer
Choose one claim from Passage 1 that is supported by evidence and one that is not. Do not use the three claims shown in Diagram 1. Quote each claim, and explain your choice.
Model answer: Supported: "the Turk'y is [...] a true original Native of America" (paragraph 2). Franklin supports it with a reason that can be checked: "Eagles have been found in all Countries, but the Turk'y was peculiar to ours." Not supported: the turkey "would not hesitate to attack a Grenadier of the British Guards" (paragraph 2). He gives no example or observation, only a funny picture. (The claim about the Jesuits bringing turkeys from Canada is also a good choice for "not supported.") Rubric: 2 points for one correctly sorted claim of each kind, each quoted and explained; 1 point for one of them; 0 points otherwise.
Question 16 of 20 · Short Answer
Trace the argument of Vest's speech (Passage 3, paragraphs 3-5) in three or four steps, in order. Then state what Vest wants the jury to decide, even though he never says it directly.
Model answer: Step 1 (paragraph 3): friends, children, money and reputation "may" all fail a man. Step 2 (paragraph 4): the dog is different: "The one absolutely unselfish friend that man can have in this selfish world [...] is his dog." Step 3 (paragraph 4): examples of the dog's loyalty in hard times, such as sleeping "on the cold ground" to be near his master. Step 4 (paragraph 5): the dog stays faithful even at the master's grave. Vest never says it, but he wants the jury to decide that killing a dog destroys something truly valuable, so they should rule for the dog's owner. Rubric: 2 points for at least three steps in the right order, with quotations, and a reasonable statement of what he wants the jury to decide; 1 point for steps without the conclusion, or the conclusion without steps; 0 points otherwise.
Question 17 of 20 · Short Answer
Vest's speech is about a trial over a dog that was shot, but the speech never mentions who shot the dog, why, or what the dog was worth. Evaluate his argument: is it supported by reasons and evidence? Quote the passage.
Model answer: The argument is supported by reasons but not by evidence about the case. Vest gives reasons many people accept, such as the contrast between friends who "may become traitors to their faith" and a dog that "never deserts him" (paragraphs 3-4). But he offers no facts about this dog or this killing, and the account even says he "took no interest in the testimony" (paragraph 1). The speech works on the jury's feelings; it does not prove anything about what happened. Rubric: 2 points for a clear judgment that separates the reasons from the missing evidence, with two quotations; 1 point for a judgment with one quotation or no explanation; 0 points otherwise.
Question 18 of 20 · Short Answer
In paragraph 5, Vest says that at the master's grave "will the noble dog be found, his head between his paws, his eyes sad." Is this claim supported? Explain, and name one kind of evidence that could support it.
Model answer: It is not supported in the speech. Vest describes a moving picture, but he does not name any real dog that stayed at a grave, so the listener has only his word for it. Evidence could be a true, checkable example, such as a newspaper report of a dog that stayed by its owner's grave, or the words of people who saw it. Rubric: 2 points for a correct judgment with a reason and a sensible kind of evidence; 1 point for the judgment or the evidence only; 0 points otherwise.
Question 19 of 20 · Short Answer
Compare Passage 1 and Passage 3. Which writer supports more of his claims with evidence that a reader could check? Give one example from each passage.
Model answer: Franklin supports more claims with checkable evidence. His claim that the eagle takes fish from the fishing hawk points to a behavior readers "may have seen" (Passage 1, paragraph 1), and he backs up the turkey's being native with a comparison of countries (paragraph 2). Vest describes what dogs do in general, such as "He will kiss the hand that has no food to offer" (Passage 3, paragraph 4), but never gives a particular dog or event. Both writers also make claims with no support at all. Rubric: 2 points for a clear choice supported by one accurate example from each passage; 1 point for a choice with one example; 0 points otherwise.
Question 20 of 20 · Short Answer
Rewrite Vest's claim "The one absolutely unselfish friend that man can have in this selfish world [...] is his dog" as a claim that could be supported. Then write one sentence of evidence that would support your new claim.
Model answer: New claim: "Many dogs stay loyal to their owners even when times are hard." Evidence: "When a family in our town lost their house in a fire, their dog stayed with them in the shelter every night." The new claim drops "absolutely" and "the one," so a few good examples can support it; the original claim is about every dog and every person. Rubric: 2 points for a narrower claim that can be supported and a specific piece of evidence that fits it; 1 point for only one of the two; 0 points otherwise.
0 of 20 answered · 0 correct
06
Frequently Asked Questions
10 Questions
What does RI.6.8 mean?
It means sixth graders follow an argument step by step and judge how well it is backed up. The standard asks students to "trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text," and to tell apart the claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from the claims that are not.
What is the difference between a claim, a reason and evidence?
A claim is what the writer wants you to accept; a reason says why; evidence shows it. In "Our class needs a second pencil sharpener (claim) because students wait in line to use the only one (reason); on Monday we counted 9 students waiting at once (evidence)," each part does a different job. Many claims have a reason but no evidence, and some have neither.
How is RI.6.8 different from RI.5.8?
RI.6.8 adds judging. In RI.5.8, students explain how an author uses reasons and evidence and which reasons support which points. In RI.6.8, students also trace the whole argument, evaluate it, and pick out the claims that have no support at all.
What comes after RI.6.8 in grades 7 and 8?
The same skill with sharper tests. RI.7.8 asks students to judge whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims. RI.8.8 adds recognizing when irrelevant evidence is introduced. Work on supported and unsupported claims in grade 6 prepares for both.
If a claim is not supported, does that mean it is false?
No. An unsupported claim may be true or false; the writer has simply not given the reader a reason to believe it. In Passage 2, the street in front of the school may really be safe, but the writer gives the principal nothing to show it. Students should judge the support, not their own opinion of the claim.
Is a fact the same as evidence?
Not always. A fact becomes evidence only when it shows that a particular claim is true. A true fact that has nothing to do with the claim does not support it, and a fact can be real but still too small to prove a big claim, as when one person's experience is used to speak for everyone.
What does it mean to trace an argument?
It means following the argument in order. Students find the main claim, then list the specific claims in the order the writer gives them, and notice how signal words such as "first," "because" and "therefore" connect them. A traced argument can be drawn as a map with the main claim at the top.
Did Benjamin Franklin really want the turkey to be the national bird?
Not exactly. In a private 1784 letter to his daughter about the badge of the Society of the Cincinnati, a club of Revolutionary War officers, he wrote that he wished the bald eagle had not been chosen to represent the country, and he praised the turkey, partly as a joke. He never formally proposed the turkey as a national symbol, and the bald eagle had already been placed on the Great Seal of the United States in 1782.
How can parents practice RI.6.8 at home?
Use advertisements, reviews and letters to the editor. Ask your child: "What does this want us to believe? What does it give us to go on? Which claims have nothing behind them?" Commercials are good practice, because they often mix one checkable fact with several big claims.
How is RI.6.8 assessed?
Usually with questions about a short argument. A multiple-choice item may ask which sentence supports a given claim, or which claim is not supported by reasons and evidence. A short written answer may ask students to trace the argument or to evaluate one claim, quoting the text. Tests vary by state, so check your state's released practice items.
07
Related Standards
5 standards
These standards connect to RI.6.8: prerequisites to review first, parallel standards at the same level, and next steps that build on it.
Before this lesson
RI.5.8Prerequisite
Explain how an author uses reasons and evidence to support particular points
Lesson coming soon
Alongside
SL.6.3Parallel
Delineate a speaker's argument and claims, telling supported from unsupported ones